RESOLVING OPPOSING
POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC
IDEOLOGIES
by William B. Fox
Last updated 13 Oct 2010
Mutualism vs. Parasitism
Section
Two
Parasitism
|
Environmental
(leftist) |
Genetic
(rightist) |
"Y"
axis
Central-
ization
(more
top down)
|
"x" axis
Environmental
Centralized
|
Genetic
Centralized |
Environmental
Decentralized |
Genetic
Decentralization |
(Third dimensional
"z" axis entailing "mutualism" vs. "parasitism"
not drawn, see discussion below)
|
Decen-
tralized
(more
bottom
up) |
The diagram
includes a "z" axis sloping backwards as in a perspective
drawing to create a cube effect, entailing the "altruist/symbiotist"
vs "predator/parasite" (or "mutualism" vs.
"parasitism" for short) duality of sociobiology.
A recapitulation of my definition of "mutualism
vs. parasitism" from the Introduction
section:
I
have derived the "z" axis third dimension from the
altruist/symbiotist vs. predator/parasite duality in sociobiology.
For the sake of convenience, I call this the "mutualism"
vs. "parasitism" duality.
"Mutualism" is a scientific term usually applied to
animal and plant populations who live in close association and
benefit each other, so obviously when we try to apply it to
human affairs with popular terminology we are unlikely to find
exact language. I think that it is roughly similar to our concept
of a human "producer." However, there are many ways
that humans can benefit each other, whether it involves exchanging
things of real value with each other in an open and fair way,
or by unselfishly defending and nurturing each other, or by
remaining respectful of each other's lives, property, and other
interests. It implies a style of leadership where the powerful
and less powerful can growth together, rather than the powerful
monopolizing and squeezing out their competition or abusing
their subordinates. Therefore I can also relate the "mutualism"
concept to many different popular terms, such as "altruist,"
"open," "honest," "unselfish,"
"benefactor," "brotherhood," "balance
of power," "limited powers," "guaranteed
rights," "principled," "self-restrained,"
"republican," "patriot," "martyr,"
"hero," "chivalry," "sportsmanship,"
"honor," "protector," "shared genetic
interests," "supporting genetic fitness," and
"eugenic." (If the latter three terms seem strange
to the reader, I cover them in more detail in my environmental
vs. genetics discussion).
The word "parasitism" usually applies to animal and
plant populations who live in close association where one species
lives as the expense of the other. I think that a good approximation
in human affairs is the term "criminal." Other words
that have varying levels of similarity or association include
"selfish," "deceptive," "enemy,"
"thievery," "untrustworthy," "exploitive,"
"greedy," "unscrupulous," "lawbreaker,"
"sponger," "deadbeat," "wise-guy,"
"corrupt," "traitor," "tyrant,"
"working against your interests,""unrestrained,"
"totalitarian,""monopolist" (implying viciously
selfish and destructive competition),"dysgenic," and
"undermining genetic interests and genetic fitness."
Speaking of genetics, this concept should not be confused with
a child who lives at the expense of his parents. The child offers
the chance of long term genetic survival to his parents, whereas
the parasite undermines the long term genetic interests of its
host and may even drive it into extinction.
The Anatomy of Parasitism
Parasitism can be a very successful
evolutionary strategy in certain niches. For example, I have
read that in certain tropical rain forest jungles, parasites
comprise approximately half the animal species. Probably not
a bad estimate for featherless bipeds in parts of New York
City, Los Angeles, or Washington, D.C. as well.
The really chilling part
Science can tell us how things work, but it cannot tell us
"why" we should feel motivated to do certain things.
In other words, why we should go on living. Why we should
have children. Why we should respect individual rights as
opposed to promoting mindless conformity. Why we should produce
rather than steal. Or why we should risk our lives to maintain
representative government rather than yield to ruthless gangsterism.
The "answers" to the "why"-related questions
are ultimately in our genes. They are the result of distinctive
evolutionary processes. This is why it is so dangerous to
admit alien peoples into our society who might superficially
mimic republican and chivalrous free enterprise values, but
deep down inside instinctively feel very differently than
white people. Most Asian and African peoples have a long evolutionary
history of being easily terrorized into collectivist despotism.
I do not see any of the traditional Anglo-Saxon revulsion
towards torture in the behavior of Mexican-American Alberto
R. Gonzales who has masqueraded as Attorney General under
George Bush during the Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo affairs.
Nor do I see it in Dr. Alan Dershowitz, the Jewish disgrace
for a Harvard Law School professor who has tried to condition
the public towards becoming more accepting of torture under
certain circumstances. This includes Israel's so-called "war
on terror" where torture of Palestinians is a routine
occurrence.
All of this should be a warning sign.
More chilling yet, there is no scientific reason why people
who prefer honest debate and respect private property rights
should prevail over people who prefer torture, secretive assassination,
and theft as methods to prevail over political rivals. Under
certain circumstances, both approaches can be very effective
roads to ultimate power in a society. Therefore a programmable
robot operating on pure logic that selects a course of action
based upon the probabilistic expected value of possible courses
of action would be perfectly capable of pursuing either modus
operandi.
For example, during the Bolshevik Revolution, the communists
were very effective at mass-murdering people at a faster rate
than their political opposition could organize against them.
For over seventy years these evil communists prevailed, at
the cost of tens of millions of lives.
According to Nesta Webster in The French Revolution,
during the Reign of Terror in France a group of a few thousand
utterly ruthless Jacobins headquartered in Paris held a nation
of about 27 million people by the throat. She also notes that
all the "fire and enthusiasm" was on the side of
the revolutionaries, and the ancien regime was amazingly
slow to react towards these evil people.
A Reign of Terror could easily happen in America, following
both an economic collapse and staged incidents used to justify
martial law. An evil group could start killing Americans by
the millions, much like the Jewish communist NKVD men who
murdered hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians by systematically
rounding them up and putting bullets in the back of their
heads at secret police stations, and then disposing of their
bodies like cordwood. This is not to mention over six million
people genocided in Stalin's deliberate terror famine of the
early 1930's, or the tens of millions of other Russians genocided
at other times.
If a Reign of Terror takes place in America, part of the "secret
weapon" of the perpetrators will be the fact that they
are so evil that the average American will not comprehend
what is going on until his head is already in a noose or in
the path of a bullet. We are already being conditioned to
accept more curtailment of our civil liberties and police
state monitoring through the so-called "Patriot"
Act and National ID system I describe in the Critical
Issues section.
We saw a Reign of Terror once before in American history when
William Tecumseh Sherman's army waged a scorched
earth campaign in northern Georgia and South Carolina.
We have already seen fellow Americans engage in mass suicide
under the leadership of the Rev
Jim Jones in Guyana.
Again, there is no scientific reason why extremely self-destructive
people cannot rise to power in America and take us all down
with them. In fact, they might even take down all of humanity
across the globe.
In the final analysis, the only real defense that exists for
honest and productive people in American society is to circle
the wagons with like-minded people against the criminal-parasite
attacks that are coming. They also need to educate fellow
Americans about parasites threat as quickly as possible.
Criminality as a genetic phenomenon
In my environmental
vs. genetics discussion, I provide strong evidence that
there is a genetic basis to criminality in humans. This should
not be too surprising, since criminal behavior tends to have
a degree of rogue malevolence, extreme duplicity, and "viral
persistency" that shocks the normal sensibilities of
a law-making community. Otherwise, offensive behavior is normally
excused with an alibi such as an "accident," "oversight,"
"failure to communicate," "immaturity"
or "making a mistake" that can corrected with some
learning and a little bit of re-training.
It is bad enough when criminality exists on an individual
level, but it becomes particularly dangerous when it can coalesce
and perpetuate itself on the level of a crime family, a ruling
class, or on a broader tribal level. If it persists long enough
within an in-bred human gene pool, it can become heavily imprinted
on a group biological level much like the Samurai face on
the Heike Crab (described in my environmental
vs genetics section). Later in this article I provide
a good case study example of an inbred criminal tribe that
used religion as a cover when I discuss the Thugs of India.
I will also address Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology.
An excellent article "Race
and the Psychopathic Personality" appeared in the
July 2002 American Renaissance. It reinforces the
concept covered in my environmental vs. genetics section about
how criminal traits exist within a bell-shaped distribution
curve, much like any other trait with a genetic component.
When a population group is heavily skewed towards criminality,
it suffers a double whammy. It has a relatively large number
of full blown criminals on one end of the curve working their
mischief, and a relatively low number of honest people at
the other end of the scale to keep them in check. Furthermore,
it has a huge number of people in the center of the population
group who subtly aid and abet the active criminals, although
they themselves are not particularly criminal.
I selected the term "parasitism" because I wanted
to capture a broader concept than the sense of "destructive
competition" that we get with the word "predation."
Certainly human predators cause an enormous amount of damage.
However, their methods tend to be out in the open. They generally
much easier to understand than human criminals.
As part of the "parasite" concept, I want to address
the concept that criminals can evolve within a society to
be inherently destructive to not only others, but also in
the long run towards themselves and their own people. In addition,
criminals can be superficially very charming and helpful.
This enables them to easily blend into the very population
that they ultimately work to destroy.
Getting our arms around criminality
Admittedly there are many forms of criminality
practiced on many levels of society by different groups and
individuals. For the purpose of macro-social analysis, I wish
to focus on ultra-high level criminality that destroys nations
and undermines racial, ethnic, social, economic, and political
integrity on a massive scale. However, this form of criminality
is typically the most subtle and difficult form of criminality
to diagnose.
It is helpful to analyze high-level criminality from a variety
of perspectives. The following are three approaches that can
help us to start thinking about the problem.
Examine positive role models, then extrapolate
the exact opposites. This is similar to the Secret Service
approach where one must first know what a real dollar bill looks
like before you can identify counterfeit versions. We need to first
define what we consider productive behavior on a broad political,
economic, and personal level, then identify the mirror image opposites.
We should also note the types of traits, magnitude, persistency,
and degree of social organization involved with both productive
behaviors and their opposites. I have already defined my concept
of productive behavior related to business and government in the
mutualism section of this article.
Examine definitive criminal role models and identify common
characteristics. One can find quite a lot of information
on high-level crime in America on the Internet under such topic
searches as Mafia,
Meyer Lansky,
Lucky Luciano,
Julius
and Ethel Rosenberg, Hollywood
Ten, Jonathan
Pollard, 1980's
S & L Scandal, and the $1.4
billion securities industry settlement of 2003. Perhaps one
of the best case studies is Final Judgment: The Missing
Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy by Michael
Collins Piper that helps to pull together not only criminal organizations
such as Meyer Lansky's mafia, but also criminal-at-risk organizations
such as the CIA or criminal aiding and abetting organizations such
as national media that maintained the cover up.
Extrapolate from parasite animal models in nature.
The natural sciences contribute important concepts to help us understand
the evolution of organized human criminality. Many fields such as
game theory, ecology, and sociobiology help us understand the evolutionary
payoffs under certain paradigms for the development of criminal
traits.
Examining mirror image opposites
The following is an example of a way we might first
identify "producer" behaviors for business in a left hand
column, and then come up with mirror image opposite "parasite"
behaviors for a corresponding right hand column.
Productive Business
..................................................
|
..... |
Parasite Business
..................................................
|
Creates highly competitive products of real value with a
trend of increasing quality at ever decreasing prices |
|
Foists things on people things of dubious or negative value,
while separating them from as much of their money as possible |
Maximizes rewards to talented, honest, working people, while
disincentivizing laziness and incompetence |
|
Cheats talented and hardworking people, shifts as much wealth
to lazy, incompetent, and unethical people as possible |
Creates a work environment that enhances innovation and
effective problem solving. Builds a sense of pride, trust,
and teamwork |
|
Subjects people to an environment that dehumanizes them,
burns them out, violates promises, and destroys their cohesion
and sense of self-worth |
Maintains transparency to shareholders and capital markets
to reward prudent investment and improve capital market efficiency.
Encourages transmission of honest economic signals to foster
rational entrepreneurial calculation and maximize efficient
economic adjustment. |
|
Routinely lies to shareholders and public with fraudulent
accounting statements. Routinely transmits false economic
signals that create massive capital market distortions, massive
economic wastage, and completely undermines rational entrepreneurial
calculation. |
Reinvests in plant, equipment, and technology to improve
productivity and operations. Builds up retained earnings to
provide a cushion for contingencies. Practices conservative
accounting. |
|
Converts corporate assets into obscene salaries/loot for
insiders. Converts plant and equipment into speculative financial
assets. Chokes company with debt. Destroys quality of earnings.
|
Trims corporate structure to optimize efficiency and incentives.
Increases accountability and rewards innovation. |
|
Builds massive corporate bureaucracy to hide responsibility.
Rewards deadwood. Provides secure revenue streams to incompetent
cronies. |
Respects property rights necessary to incentivize rational
entrepreneurial calculation |
..... |
Steals patents, leaks trade secrets, dilutes shareholder
value |
Increases flow of honest information to management to improve
flexibility and problem-solving |
|
Stifles flow of information with compartmentalization. Routinely
engages in deception and obfuscation. |
Creates super-ordinate goals that give value
to broader society, supports family life, enhances productive
charities, increases domestic manufacturing and other technological
infrastructure |
|
Runs sweat shop environment that undermines chances of having
a successful family life. Pollutes environment. Runs down
domestic infrastructure. Puts aliens and enemies first. |
I do not mean to imply that all businesses
which show many of the traits listed to the right are necessarily
"parasitic," or are run by bad people. Many of these
practices may result from expedience or incompetence rather
than malevolence. Quite often business leaders are overwhelmed
by unexpected competition and other factors that put them in
over their head. They may start cutting corners as a last ditch
effort to avoid bankruptcy.
On the other hand, if one looks at the full pattern of a manager's
career, and sees that under a variety of conditions he tends
to move things from the left column to the right column, then
we might rightly suspect that there may be some real criminal
tendencies involved.
Next, let us consider a producer vs. parasite profile for government.
Productive Government
..................................................
|
..... |
Parasite Government
..................................................
|
Protects lives, property, and human rights |
|
Maliciously destroys lives and property, undermines civil
liberties |
Renders socially useful services in proportion to the
taxes it collects. Eliminates waste. |
|
Grows bureaucracy and waste while raising taxes regardless
of services rendered to taxpayers |
Increases government accountability and transparency,
protects whistle-blowers. Demystifies its processes and
makes itself open to grass roots input. |
|
Ruthlessly suppresses any criticism or any challenges
to power. Creates a sense of religious awe about itself
to stifle objective criticism. Launches ideological crusades
without concrete justifications. This is typically done
as a smokescreen to hide corruption and special privileges
for crony groups. |
Demonstrates consistent principles and inspires admiration
both at home and abroad |
|
Practices extreme double standards and inspires hatred
and loathing at home and around the world |
Serves the interests of honest, competent, hard-working,
loyal people in society, to include their vital cultural
and genetic interests |
|
Serves a few narrow corrupt and disloyal interests at
expense of everyone else. Undermines the cultural and racial
coherence of core population. |
Policies favor strong domestic economic development and
job creation, to include the steady strengthening of the
technological and manufacturing base. |
|
Runs down domestic manufacturing base while empowering
potential enemies |
Maintains stable, trustworthy environment that honors
contracts, encourages mutually beneficial trade relations |
|
Foments international distrust through unnecessary aggressive
wars, deception, barbaric practices such as torture, use
of DU Weapons of Mass Destruction on helpless civilians,
etc. |
Maintains the value of currency, honors commitments to
retirees, eliminates unnecessary cash drains on taxpayer |
|
Debauches the currency, cripples or bankrupts country
with debt |
Protects productive capabilities of the private sector
or at least leaves it alone |
... |
Squeezes out the private sector |
Lastly, I think that it is also important to try to examine
mirror image opposites on a citizenship level. Having already
discussed republican strategies and "republican virtue"
in my mutualism section, we might consider for the right column
the kinds of behaviors that would fall in a "parasite"
or "enemy alien" category.
Productive
Citizen
("republican virtue")
..................................................
|
..... |
Parasite
"Citizen"
(de facto "enemy alien")
..............................................
|
Provides value for value received. Economic activity provides
net benefit for not only self and but society as a whole |
|
Monopolizes economic and political power for self, steals
opportunities and resources from others while giving relatively
little in return, leaving the overall society poorer |
Supports rational behavior required for technological progress
|
|
Encourages irrational, superstitious, or greedy behavior
|
Resists enemies |
|
Aids enemies who seek to ruthlessly exploit or maliciously
destroy society |
Activities can survive honest disclosure and
rational explanation and maintain standing in community. Promotes
honesty and full material disclosure with others. |
|
When honestly disclosed or fully explained, their activities
consistently earn them universal contempt and hatred. They
feel they must habitually engage in deception to survive. |
Capable of self-restrained, far-sighted, socially conscious
behavior |
|
Characterized by extreme pettiness that always places selfish
interests above broader long term interests of society |
Rewards and incentivizes productive people |
|
Cheats productive people and consistently shifts resources
to nonproductive people |
Supports motherhood, family, and other institutions required
for long term genetic, cultural, and ethnic survival |
|
Thwarts motherhood, disrupts and destroys family, undermines
genetic interests, fosters dysgenic decay, turns basic moral
values of society on their head. Promotes homosexuality over
heterosexuality. |
Honors agreements, creates a stable framework for incubation
of entrepreneurial enterprises with a real value proposition
|
|
Frequently breaks agreements, regardless of costs to other
parties, in order to create own short term gains. Habitually
strings people along, creates false expectations, and creates
massive wastage and dislocations |
One simple test to try to determine what might constitute "productive
values" on an individual level is to ask the question: "What
if everyone does it?" If the consequence is that the society
will likely remain stable or potentially prosper, then they might
be considered "productive." If, on the other hand, it
is likely that the society will fall into self-destructive chaos
or collapse, then the values might be considered "parasitic."
American
Values Decline (offered by America First Books) identifies
in Chapter Two various common "productive values" shared
by a variety of religions such as Buddhism, Confucianism, Hinduism,
Islamism, Judaism. It also addresses common ethics of major secular
philosophies.
Most of these common values are based on common
sense. They can be derived from thinking through the question "What
if everyone does it?"
To all this I would add as a caveat that not all cultures practice
what they preach, a major charge levied by Ralph Townsend in Ways
That Are Dark: The Truth About China (offered by America
First Books), nor do they necessarily treat others with the same
ethics that they apply within their own tribe, a charge levied by
Dr. David Duke in Jewish Supremacism.
The study of ethics can get complicated when we address various
utilitarian tradeoffs, such as the need to weigh the advantages
of authoritarianism vs. decentralization, long term vs. short term
factors, or self interests vs. group interests. As one example,
the same individual dissident who may be considered selfish, disruptive,
and immature in an Asian society may be considered a heroic innovator
or a freedom fighter against tyranny in Western society. As another
example, while murder is generally considered wrong if done for
petty personal reasons, it may be considered patriotic if applied
to an enemy soldier in time of war. Other examples may include such
ethical dilemma
paradigms as "The Prisoner's Dilemma" and "Tragedy
of the Commons" described in game theory literature. These
scenarios typically pit individual interests against group interests.
The ultimate long term vs. short term utilitarian trade-offs involves
genetics. This looks at how individual and social behavior reshape
a gene pool in either eugenic or dysgenic ways. This is a topic
area addressed by Dr. Raymond Catell in his books Beyondism:
Religion From Science and A New Morality
From Science: Beyondism, and which I have previously
discussed in my environmental
vs genetics section.
Last, but not least, I think it interesting to try to conceptualize
the difference between a productive and a parasite religious/moral
system. In essence, parasite religions degrade the ability of individuals
to function as thinking adults and instead condition them to act
like dependent children and support people who spout mumbo jumbo
rather than perform useful social work. The following is just one
man's opinion (my own) as a hypothetical example:
Productive
Religious/Moral System
..................................................
|
..... |
Parasite
Religious/Moral System
....................................................
|
Consistent with principles outlined in Beyondism:
Religion From Science and A New
Morality from Science by Dr. Raymond Cattell;
is ultimately eugenic. Five hundred years later, population
of practitioners is still vibrant, intelligent, and prosperous,
and not decadent and subsumed by aliens |
|
Has a long term dysgenic decay impact on its practitioners.
Extreme cases involve religious sects that die out because
they completely abstain from sex or commit suicide (eg. Jim
Jones' Guyana Cult, Hale Bopp Cult, suicide cults that want
to bring on Armageddon/Masada Grand Finale, etc) |
Moral precepts pass the test "What if everyone
does it?" Answer: society prospers. |
|
Morality consists of extreme double standards which attempt
to trick the masses into slaving for a select few |
Religion can be reconciled with a scientific
world view. Encourages learning and free inquiry |
|
Encourages fear of new ideas, superstitiousness, blind dogma.
Discourages scientific, analytical thinking. |
Leaves the individual empowered to find God
in his own way. Encourages a responsible, adult approach to
life. |
|
Denies the right of the individual to find God in his own
way, but instead demands costly intermediation of priest class
and dogmas that have no provable basis in fact or logic to
justify their existence, while treating adherents like children
or sheep |
Morality system is intended as a guide for honest
people to live better lives. |
|
Morality system is intended as camouflage to enable crooked
people to better swindle their victims |
Religious emotion draws upon natural, personal,
feelings of sublimity and awe with the cosmos. Religious practices
help motivate individuals to be productive citizens and stable
family men. |
|
Religious emotion centered upon fear and states of altered
consciousness that self-anointed leaders can use to manipulate
religious followers. Religionists feel empowered by malevolent
acts that put fear and terror into others. |
Religion can find new adherents in a calm, reasoning
state of mind |
|
Religion relies heavily on propaganda, fallacious logic,
and brainwashing to recruit adherents |
Religion relies on consistent principles
|
|
Religious principles can be manipulated at will by self-styled
religious leaders to suit their selfish purposes. |
Religion respects the fact that
religious theologies are scientifically un-provable, and avoids
straying too far from this fact with dogmatic additions to
theology. |
....... |
Religion seeks to continually pile on ever more dogma, more
church bureaucracy, more special privileges, and more aggressive
proselytization on top of un-provable assumptions |
In my view, the term "Satanic cult" is synonomous with
a religious group whose practices are focused on the right hand
side of the chart above, with an emphasis on malevolent practices.
In other words, from my own secular viewpoint "Satanic"
essentially means "criminal-parasitic."
The criminal personality
and the "criminal process"
A second perspective to help us understand parasitism involves
looking at individual and group criminal case studies. Starting
with the individualized approach, I think that it is particularly
instructive to examine the concept of the "criminal personality."
American
Values Decline on page 92 cites "Defining Elements
of the Criminal Personality" Source: Samuel Yochelson and
Stanton Samenow, The Criminal Personality Volume II: The Change
Process. New York: Jason Aronson, 1977, Chapter 1.]
Yochelson and Samenow's profile is based upon years of in-depth
research and rehabilitation activity:
____________________________________________________________
Defining Elements of the Criminal
Personality
The restraints of responsible living are
unacceptable and even contemptible. In such a person's reality,
society's values and rules are absurd or unimportant.
Crime does not come to the criminal-to-be, he goes to it
in search of excitement.
In whatever he does, he has to be a unique Number One; to
be like anyone else is to be a failure. Instead of friendship,
he seeks avenues of triumph.
He may work hard to be the best at something he likes, but
then will quit when he tires of it. More often, he expects
to be an overnight success, not through hard work, but by
taking shortcuts.
Throughout life, he is a sprinter, never a long-distance
runner.
Lying is a way of life; lies of omission are more frequent
than lies of commission.
He disregards the right of others to live safely or to expect
promises to be kept, but demands from them the utmost trust,
respect, and consideration. He claims he can live without
depending on others, but demands that others provide whatever
he wants.
He rarely sees anything from another's point of view, and
it doesn't bother him to injure people.
He never develops a realistic concept of family life, an
education, a vocation, or a sense of community.
He blames forces outside of himself for what he does. Others
are always to blame, not he.
Kindness is weakness and people are expendable. They are
valuable only to the extent that they can be controlled
and exploited.
He does not know how to get along with responsible people
on a day-to-day basis; he practices the extremes of total
withdrawal or inappropriate intimacy.
He is fragmented in his thinking, largely ignoring the past
and the long-term future. He may be sincere one day and
completely insincere the next. Whatever he wants to do at
a given moment is "right." He fails to listen
to or take stock of himself. For him, just thinking something
largely makes it so.
Researchers analyze criminality from many
other perspectives that include the study of abnormal behavior
in psychology, game theory in sociobiology, and neurophysiology.
As one example, in "The
Sociobiology of Sociopathy: An Integrated Evolutionary Model"
by the late Dr. Linda Mealey, she noted that:
Sociopaths, who comprise only 3-4% of the male population
and less than 1% of the female population (Strauss & Lahey
1984, Davison and Neale 1994, Robins, Tipp & Przybeck 1991),
are thought to account for approximately 20% of the United States'
prison population (Hare 1993) and between 33% and 80% of the
population of chronic criminal offenders (Mednick, Kirkegaard-Sorensen,
Hutchings, Knop, Rosenberg & Schulsinger 1977, Hare 1980,
Harpending & Sobus 1987). Furthermore, whereas the "typical"
U.S. burglar is estimated to have committed a median five crimes
per year before being apprehended, chronic offenders- those
most likely to be sociopaths- report committing upward of fifty
crimes per annum and sometimes as many as two or three hundred
(Blumstein & Cohen 1987). Collectively, these individuals
are thought to account for over 50% of all crimes in the U.S.
(Loeber 1982; Mednick, Gabrielli & Hutchings 1987, Hare
1993).
Other analysts prefer to use the work "psychopath"
more than the term "sociopath." One example is Laura
Knight Jadczyk, who discussed her concept of the psychopathic
personality in her blog article
"America's
Nervous Breakdown." She endorses the book Political
Ponerology ("Ponerology" means "the
study of evil"), and believes evil is rooted in psychopathology.
In his interview
with Michael Collins Piper on Wednesday, 18 Oct 2006, and
in his subsequent article "Psychopathy & History"
(Jan/Feb 2007 Barnes Review) John de Nugent described
the important neurophysiological research of Dr. Adrain Raine,
who is the author of The Psychopathology of Crime: Criminal
Behavior As a Clinical Disorder. "His color brain scans
show that psychopaths are utterly unlike the other 96% of society.
These brain scans show that when psychopaths are shown horrifying
images that turn others sick to their stomachs, the pleasure centers
of psychopaths are highly activated."
John Nugent mentions other important sources such as Dr. Martha
Stout, author of The Sociopath Next Door (2005) and Dr.
Robert Hare, author of Without Conscience: The Disturbing
World of Psychopaths Among Us. Dr. Hare developed a standard
tool for diagnosing psychopathology called the "Hare
Psychopathic Checklist" which is available online.
John Nugent concludes his Barnes Review article by stating:
One of the most important benefits of understanding
the new finding of the prevalence of psychopaths in society
is this: whereas so-called conspiracy theories tend to appear
to decent people as "of-the-wall," now no more. The
main objection to a conspiracy theory, especially one that posits
the involvement of many evil people, is this "I cannot
imagine anyone doing such a thing. And it could never be a secret."
Wrong: psychopaths are numerous and they do know how to keep
a secret and kill to maintain it.
Perhaps the struggle against the psychopaths
marauding among us will be the ultimate battle for the human
race.
. . . Or perhaps, I might add, the ultimate battles
between human races. According to "Race
and the Psychopathic Personality" (July 2002 American
Renaissance):
In 1994 the American Psychiatric Association
issued a revised Diagnostic Manual listing 11 features of anti-social
personality disorder: (1) inability to sustain consistent work
behavior; (2) failure to conform to social norms with respect
to lawful behavior [this is a euphemism for being a criminal];
(3) irritability and aggressivity, as indicated by frequent
physical fights and assaults; (4) repeated failure to honor
financial obligations; (5) failure to plan ahead or impulsivity;
(6) no regard for truth, as indicated by repeated lying, use
of aliases, or “conning” others; (7) recklessness
regarding one’s own or others’ personal safety,
as indicated by driving while intoxicated or recurrent speeding;
(8) inability to function as a responsible parent; (9) failure
to sustain a monogamous relationship for more than one year;
(10) lacking remorse; (11) the presence of conduct disorder
in childhood.
This is a useful list. Curiously, however,
it fails to include the deficiency of moral sense that is the
core of the condition, although this is implicit in virtually
every feature of the disorder. All of these behaviors are more
prevalent among blacks than among whites, and suggest that blacks
have a higher average tendency towards psychopathic personality.
Questionnaires can be used to measure psychopathic
personality in normal populations. The first to be constructed
was the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI),
which was devised in the 1930s. This instrument consists of
a series of scales for the measurement of a variety of psychiatric
conditions regarded as continuously distributed in the population,
such as hysteria, mania and depression, and includes the Psychopathic
Deviate Scale for the measurement of psychopathic personality.
During the 65 or so years following its publication,
the MMPI has been administered to a great many groups. Mean
scores have been published by different investigators for a
number of samples of blacks, whites, Asian-Americans, Hispanics
and American Indians. All of these studies show a consistent
pattern: Blacks and Indians have the highest psychopathic scores.
Hispanics come next followed by whites. Ethnic Japanese and
Chinese have the lowest scores. The same rank order of racial
groups is found for all the expressions of psychopathic personality
listed by the American Psychiatric Association, and these differences
are found in both children and adults.
The failure of this American
Renaissance
article to mention Jews is not surprising. In Chapter Forty-Four
of The
Judas Goats (carried by America First Books)
Michael Collins Piper discusses the involvement by its editor
Jared Taylor with "Zionist-Friendly Nationalism." While
American Renaissance explicitly discusses most racial
issues, it generally avoids criticism of Jews, Zionism, and Israel.
Also, I am surprised that ethnic Chinese and Japanese are lumped
together at the low end of the range, given the profound character
differences described by Ralph Townsend in Ways
That Are Dark. (Also carried by America First Books)
that I mention in my Preface
to his work.
Thought Experiments
Working backwards
One way to try to get ones arms around descriptions of criminal
traits is to first understand what kinds of behaviors and key
success factors are required for a successful criminal career,
and then work backwards and ask what kind of personality is required
to fit this model. (As an aside, we might consider an evolutionary
perspective that niches in society which support those who manifest
criminal behaviors and enable them to pass on their genes help
to breed and perpetrate criminality).
The modus operandi of a successful bank robber provides a good
hypothetical example for us to try to deduce the mentality from
the required behaviors.
When a bank robber needs money, no one else's rights matter. It
is permissible to shoot tellers, kill policemen, and run over
innocent bystanders in order to steal the life savings of the
elderly. He does not care if his long string of successful bank
robberies happen to inspire other robbers or damage the stability
of the financial system or local economy.
A particularly sophisticated bank robber will buy off policemen,
prosecutors, and politicians who might try to bring him to justice.
He is happy to use blackmail and extortion to control potentially
threatening people if it remains inconvenient to kill them off.
He has a good nose for smelling corruption in other people and
exploiting it where it suits his purposes. He needs to condition
a certain number of people to actively or passively tolerate his
criminality to help form a core support group. This includes people
who help him fence his loot without asking too many questions,
or relatives who do not care to know his whereabouts when he commits
his crimes.
However, when it comes time to enjoy his loot, the bank robber
wants everyone else to be honest and stable. When he walks into
a restaurant to buy a nice meal with his stolen cash, he certainly
does not want the waiter to rob him. When he wants to launder
his money by purchasing and running legitimate businesses, he
does not want the bank that handles his own checks to get robbed.
He wants the cops in his neighborhood to honestly and diligently
discharge their duties that help prevent his daughter from getting
raped and his business property from getting vandalized. When
someone might insinuate that the bank robber is a crook, he wants
to deflect suspicion and threaten accusers with anti-defamation
and libel suits with the same righteous indignance as a law-abiding
person. He also wants district attorneys and politicians to honestly
and diligently protect his own civil rights, particularly when
it comes to the right against self-incrimination and the right
for a fair and speedy trial. He is adamantly against any criminal
behavior that threatens his own interests, yet he knows far more
about many crimes in greater detail than the police because he
plans and executes them himself. He wants to be able to simultaneously
break down and poison society and yet at the same time enjoy the
best things that an honest, stable, and productive society offers.
What kind of personality simultaneously tells lies all the time
and yet righteously demands honesty from others? What kind of
person callously shoots innocent bystanders and cops and yet wants
the utmost consideration for himself — and sleeps well at
night?
Reconciling criminal traits within
honest occupations
Another important perspective necessary to understand criminality
involves taking honest occupations that are loaded with criminal
traits, and figuring out how to distinguish them from criminal
occupations loaded with criminal traits.
A prime example of an "honest" or "patriotic"
occupation that is loaded to the teeth with criminal traits is
spy work. An intelligence agent must perpetually engage in deception
to maintain a "cover." This includes planting false
flags to disguise operations. Since the most valuable intelligence
is typically human intelligence, he needs a good nose for smelling
ways to recruit others to betray their countries without giving
himself away. (An acronym I once heard in a lecture given by an
FBI agent to identify the most common motivations for treason
is SMICE,
or Sex, Money, Ideology, Compromise, and Ego. These motivations
can also
be applied to other types of criminals.)
How do we distinguish spies from criminals? Well, quite frankly
sometimes there is not much of a difference. The behaviors described
in By Way of Deception: The Making and Unmaking of
a Mossad Officer and The Other Side
of Deception by former Mossad Agent Victor Ostrowsky
require some severe mental strain to try to make a distinction
in this area. However, Honorable
Men by former CIA Director William Colby suggests that
making the distinction is possible. "Patriotism" and
obedience to a higher authority or a social purpose higher than
ones own ego comprise at least one crucial distinction.
There are many useful occupations and roles in society that tend
to reward what might be considered "criminal traits"
when taken in isolation. As some examples, most sales organizations
in America want individuals who are shameless about approaching
strangers and are extremely motivated to become a "unique
Number One." The same holds true for people who hold math
and science or Olympic competitions. An infantry officer in time
of war necessarily has to be coldly manipulative in the way he
tactically deploys troops and expends lives. A political dissident
who defies tyranny may have to endure considerable social isolation.
He may have to figure out what has gone wrong with the society
with the same cold emotional detachment that a bank robber needs
to figure out how to pull a successful heist. This trait might
also apply to the analytical methods used by scientists. As some
further examples, an entrepreneur who wants to implement a business
plan that brings a break-through invention to market probably
craves excitement. Hollywood actors and actresses affect different
personalities than their "normal" personalities (that
is, if there is such a thing as "normal" in Hollywood).
As a final example, diplomats, brokers, lawyers, negotiators,
and politicians hardly wear their hearts on their sleeves when
they put out feelers, hide their weak cards, and bluff in the
process of trading off concessions in negotiations. However, it
is also true that not all lawyers and politicians are criminals.
Culture and criminality
There are also some interesting cultural complexities. For example,
Nordic societies tend to idolize rugged individualists more than
most societies. Nordic peoples tend to come across as more emotionally
distant compared to most other white Europeans. They value self-restraint,
modestly, and stoicism. An interesting favorite character in Norwegian
fairy tales is the "Ash
Lad," a seemingly impractical misfit who spends time
brooding while poking ashes in the fireplace, but who is ultimately
the one who solves unusual problems that his older brothers are
incapable of handling.
However, before we conclude that Norway, Sweden,
Iceland, Finland, and Denmark are inhabited by anything remotely
suggestive of psychopathic criminals, we need to consider that personal
honor, openness, and trustworthiness have always been vital counterbalancing
Nordic characteristics. So is the stamina to see a touch job through,
as in the Finnish national trait of sissu.
Nordic individualism typically supports libertarianism, and the
Nordic capacity for coldly rational and systematic analysis is typically
applied to science and engineering rather than towards defrauding
people and robbing banks. Last, but not least, Nordics have lived
in completely self-sufficient communities in their quasi-Arctic
indigenous habitats for perhaps hundreds of thousands of years.
They might be parasites on fish, but not on other humans. Most of
their evolutionary history has been more man vs. nature than man
vs. man. They do not define themselves relative to alien peoples.
They do not routinely infiltrate other societies under false pretenses.
Criminality and situational stress factors
A second complicating factor is that parasitic-like exploitation
behavior seems to arise among relatively normal people when they
are subjected to extremely stressful environments such as a war,
and are in competition with groups that have a high level of genetic
and cultural distance. For example, I view Japanese, Spaniards,
and white Americans as fairly normal people under normal circumstances.
Certainly the Bataan Death March, the conquistadors' slave labor
mines in South America, and Abu Ghraib were hardly high points of
humanitarian leadership. However, I would argue that these events
are aberrations for these peoples influenced by such factors as
wartime stress (to include ideological warfare), genetic distance,
and leadership corruption.
A third complicating factor is that fact that
when people with criminal personalities set the tone for a society,
honest people may feel forced to adopt criminal-like attitudes and
tactics out of social pressure to conform or in self-defense. Quite
often we see Hollywood glamorize people with "wise-guy"
personalities, and conversely portray honest people as unsympathetic
and reactionary "squares." As another example, when a
criminal government starts imprisoning political dissidents without
trial, many honest people who are dissidents will start to publicly
lie about their true beliefs and try to lie low in society like
common criminals as a defensive measure.
As a last note, there may some important additional factors to help
define criminality. For example, mental illness and mental instability
seem to contribute towards criminal behavior. While many mentally
ill people are able to avoid committing crimes, certainly mental
instability can increase the probability that they will have more
difficulty constraining antisocial impulses than balanced people.
Aspects of criminality we may not understand
and quite frankly may not really want to "understand"
Elsewhere I discuss how criminality has a
strong genetic component. This implies subtle differences
on the part of the criminal in the part of the character of
his cognition and subjective processing of reality. By definition
criminals gravitate towards harming society, and seem to be
amazing unconcerned about generating fall-out. Many criminals
seem to get satisfaction out of experiencing things that ordinary
people consider to be very shocking and disgusting.
As one example, I recollect watching a PBS
documentary about research on convicted rapists. The researchers
studied the physiological effects on control groups of relatively
normal men compared to the rapists. Electrodes and other monitoring
devices were attached to their bodies to gather a panoply
of physiological response data. Both groups watched videos
of women crying, getting nasty, acting obnoxious, violently
resisting, or showing other signs of severe emotional distress
and resistance while being forced into sex. The convicted
rapists were vastly more likely as a group to really get erotically
turned on by all of this compared to normal men.
I do not think that anyone takes men to a school and teaches
them how a maintain an erection while women are acting really
nasty, obnoxious, belligerent, or pathetic to try to fend
them off. There is a lot more than "culture" or
a "deprived childhood" going on here that involves
the genetic basis of their particular neural wiring. Beyond
a certain point, how can a normal person really "understand"
or be fully capable of relating to what goes through the heads
of pedophiles, necrophiliacs, serial torturers/mass murderers,
or other extremely deviant people?
Efforts by national media to condition us
to sympathize with the behavior of depraved people reflects
more about the perversity and criminality of national
media owners than the criminals they sympathetically portray.
As one example, we have to really wonder about the folks at
Viacom's MTV who came up with the "Shower Rangers"
idea for an episode of Dude, This Sucks
in 2001. Two men dressed up in Boy Scout uniforms bent over
and squirted young girls with diarrhea The late Dr. William
Pierce wrote about it in April, 21, 2001 American Dissident
Voice article "Shocking
Differences." This is more than extreme bad taste
— it is criminal.
Kinkiness can help explain criminal
advantages
Paradoxically, in certain circumstances,
the tendency of criminals to gravitate towards repugnant
behavior can help explain their ability to triumph over
their victims, prosper, and grow their own criminal
community. There are two important reasons for this.
First, being kinky can be good training for learning
how to engage in intrigue. Secondly, being kinky can
provide what game theorists call a "first strike
advantage."
Most people have problems keeping their
mouths shut. An excellent book that dramatizes this
point is The O.S.S. and I
by William J. Morgan. This book is about training and
field operations of the Office of Strategic Services,
the precursor of the CIA, in WWII England.
Promising men were recruited from military
units and ordered to travel by train to an O.S.S. training
center under strict orders not to reveal the purpose
of their trip. Morgan had O.S.S. confederates posing
as fellow recruits ride the trains and engage these
people in small talk. It was amazing to Morgan how many
of these guys spilled the beans. He had to immediately
wash them out and immediately send back to their units
because they simply could not keep their mouths shut
on simple train ride.
Highly deviant or perverted people
such as homosexuals and pedophiles can have an advantage
over ordinary people in that they necessarily lead double
lives and have to learn how to routinely never say what
they really think. To such people, honest behavior,
or standing up and saying what you really believe, means
weakness or a loss of control. You are giving enemies
the rope they need to hang you.
The key is that they have to learn
how to hide their kinkiness until the strategic moment
arrives to use it against their prey. Then they have
a first strike advantage against their victims. Their
victims find it difficult to comprehend what is happening
to them and react in time because the perpetrators hold
an alien mentality.
An excellent example involves the true story about Sam
Comstock described in a chapter of James Michener's
book Rascals
in Paradise. Samuel Comstock was a common crewman
on the early 19th century whaling ship Globe
in the middle of the Pacific ocean who came up with
an incredibly daring self-conceived plan which he successfully
carried out. He suddenly attacked and murdered the Captain
of his ship. Then fast-talking on the spot, he managed
to persuade the crew to support him. He waved off another
whaling ship that had been running parallel to his own
ship in broad daylight without arousing suspicion. Then
he headed for a tropical island. Comstock's secret little
plan was to maroon everybody and then "hang out."
It did not take long "hanging out" on the
Mili Atoll before the other crewman who got conned into
the conspiracy finally figured out that Comstock was
completely nuts. They turned on him and killed him,
and then turned on each other. Two
crewmen survived to tell the tale.
James Michener commented that the biggest
advantage to Comstock's plan is that it was so completely
bizarre and irrational that no one expected anything until
it was on top of them. Apparently Comstock projected enough
force of personality, confidence, and leadership momentum
to keep his mad plan humming along until it literally beached
itself out in nowhere.
Frankly I think that George Bush and his Jewish neo-con handlers
are executing an equally bizarre plan for America with their
wars of aggression and incredibly dangerous brinksmanship
with nuclear weapons. I agree with Paul Craig Roberts's viewpoint
in " A
Final End to History ?" that I quote in my Critical
Issues section.
Kinky and proud
of it
A criminal may not only be a kinky and perverse individual,
but he may also know it, take pride in it, and then
use his weird psychology to exploit others.
Not only is lying a way of life, but I have noticed
in my own dealings with people who appear to have criminal
personalities that they get a strong smug sense of superiority
by feeding people lies and tricking them into swallowing
them. They also get a sense of superiority by being
able to simultaneously keep several mental sets of books,
such as keeping track of the lies they feed others,
and their own sense of truth. Lastly, they seem to be
perpetually comfortable in a world of lies, and view
people who want to tell the truth as "weak"
and foolish people. They feel that when you tell too
much truth, you "lose control." They are actually
uncomfortable in a world with too much truth, and when
faced with such a world, have a tendency to always begin
to spin around them a body guard of lies.
All of this is incomprehensible
to many people until they study evolutionary theory
Criminals parasitically feed off human credulity. Over
and over again I hear people exclaim, "How could
people do such a thing?" The fact that people find
it hard to believe that "someone could do such
a thing" is in fact what gives the criminal is
first strike advantage and allows him to engage in deceptive
cover-ups.
The scientific answer for why "people
can do such a thing" is because there is something about
this behavior that allows its practitioners to pass on their
genes. Complex civilizations can create some very strange
survival niches that breed some very strange behavior. A Barnes
Review advertisement for the book Thug:
Or a Million Murders, which I will address later
in this article, even suggests an interesting theory that
criminality can arise out of multi-racial morasses such as
India where race-mixing hybrization creates new gene combinations
that lack a long term historical track record of self-sufficient
sociobiological stabilization.
We have the presence of criminals in human
societies for the same reason that the Chinese
Mantid has evolved so that the female bites off the head
of the male either during or immediately after sexual intercourse.
The answer is we get this weird behavior because of weird
evolutionary niches that allow the survival of genes that
express this behavior.
Given the right evolutionary environment,
there is no scientific reason why a tribe of deceptive humans
might not evolve that instinctively infiltrates hospitable,
humanitarian societies and then instinctively destroys them
once they gain the upper hand much like the way the Chinese
Mantid female bites the head of the male that inseminates
her. I find Col. Sleeman's book Thug: Or a Million
Murders particularly fascinating because it
documents a hereditary criminal tribe in India that seemed
to be evolving in this direction.
Criminality can be independent
of IQ and social standing
Even though it is a 1950's science fiction
film, I think that The Forbidden Planet
is an important allegory for the way it dramatizes a sharp
conflict between extreme human rationality and technological
advancement on the one hand, and extreme human darkness and
perversity at the same time. I would like to revisit part
of my discussion from Part
Six of my robot series.
Man — the most
dangerous "robot" of all?
It is hard to imagine a better allegory than The Forbidden
Planet to make some very important points that address
this question [about the conflict within man between his rational
side and his instinctive nature, which may be for good or evil
depending on the particular make-up of each individual].
For the uninitiated, this science fiction classic centers on Dr.
Edward Morbius, who is found by an exploratory expedition from
earth on a planet in which he is alone with his daughter Altaira
and their all-purpose robot named Robby. Dr. Morbius came to the
planet with an earlier earth expedition, but every member of that
crew except himself and his daughter perished for mysterious reasons.
While alone with this daughter on the planet, Dr. Morbius was
able to master an extremely advanced technological infrastructure
left over by an extinct race. We find out later that this race
learned how to control extremely powerful forces through forms
of mental wireless communication, and that the malevolent side
of their nature led to fratricidal warfare and their ultimate
suicide. We find out that Dr. Morbius has also harnessed a mind-over-matter
robotic capability. Unfortunately, he too is out of touch with
his subconscious.
While Dr. Morbius sleeps, his subconscious resentment of the invasion
of his secret world unleashes destructive forces, killing members
of the earth expedition. But Dr. Morbius' aggressive "Id"
force is just one part of the instinctive-genetic underpinnings
to his human nature. He also holds affiliative, nurturant, and
procreative instincts (resulting in his daughter, of course) that
also function deep within his subconscious. Overlaying this in
his conscious behavior are his duty-based, contractual, and utilitarian
decision-making capabilities.
Some of Dr. Morbius' basic individualized instinctive traits such
as hunger and satiation might be explained using individualized
Darwinian selective models. Other opposing innate traits such
as altruism and symbiosis on the one hand and aggression and parasitism
on the other require much broader "group" or sociobiological
models. All of these factors tug at each other and create a resultant
vector that put Dr. Morbius in sharp conflict with other humans
on the planet. His internal conflicts become so ferociously leveraged
by advanced technology that they create massive and irreparable
damage.
Dr. Morbius' subconscious was able to launch only a half-hearted
attack on the earth expedition. It ended up killing only a few
crewmen and failed to destroy the space ship. Perhaps his ambivalence
came from recognition of the fact that his daughter needed to
meet up with other humans in order to find a husband. One of the
leaders of the expedition might have provided the best chance
for Dr. Morbius to have quality grandchildren and achieve long
term genetic survival. However, once Dr. Morbius became consciously
aware of his Id monster, he realized that he might be condemned
for the murder of crew members of both the first and second earth
expeditions, and that furthermore he possessed destructive technology
that might be too advanced for humans to handle wisely in their
current stage of evolution. Perhaps out of panic, concern about
technological abuse, a personal death wish, a desire to avoid
living with public shame — or some combination of any of
these or other possible factors, he launched a full blown attack
on himself and ultimately his planet. At the same time, he gave
his daughter and the earth crew adequate time to escape. Like
the Reverend Jim Jones in Guyana, he found himself in a very bad
situation, and ultimately decided to act as his own local governor,
psychiatrist, social worker, judge, jury, and catastrophic self-executioner.
The bigger problem in defining what is "human" and what
is "robotic" is that individual humans can vary greatly
on a biological basis, and in the way in which they resolve conscious
and subconscious forces. They not only vary in terms of their
individual characteristics, but also on a broader genetic level,
to include the tribal and racial level. Some genetic traits relative
to other groups might be considered alien (significantly deviant
from ones gene pool on a tribal level), mutant (deviant on an
individual level), or even parasitic (a term very loosely synonymous
with "criminal").
Many people have within themselves undesirable innate traits that
they do not want to admit to either themselves or society at large.
Their will to live may be so deviant that it might even carry
some type of death wish. Many people have fractured personalities
in which they seek to maximize personal power and pleasure on
a conscious level, yet on a subconscious level they hate themselves
for their deficiencies or deviance. In fact, such people may even
subconsciously feel that there are logical reasons to terminate
themselves from the gene pool.
It is beyond the scope of this article to try to explain possible
evolutionary mechanics behind deviant genes that express alien,
mutant, parasitic, or suicidal traits. But no doubt these dimensions
greatly complicate our ability to define the "human"
side of the human-robot interface, and our ability to define the
heart we want for Tin Man or the courage for Cowardly Lion.
The amount of genetic variation that exists in the real world
should also make us more vigilant regarding humans who wind up
in leadership positions in our society. For starters, we must
learn not to "overly anthropomorphize" people who have
the power to take away our liberty. In fact, there may be people
in high places in our society today with highly fractured personalities.
It is possible that real life people may act similarly to the
fictional Dr. Morbius. They may become cataclysmically destructive
once they fully realize how their fractured innate nature has
had a hand in running down America over the past several decades.
They may seek to divert attention and find ways to tighten their
control in America by covertly fueling internal security problems
and by drawing this country into various external conflicts.
In finding ways to structure a social order that can wisely handle
advanced technology, I would argue for economically and politically
decentralized societies in which people are free to express their
natural tendency to associate with their own kind. It is much
easier for us to observe and judge the character of our neighbors
and people in power if we share a similar "gut" and
"head." It is also much easier for people in power to
feel a sense of shared values and responsibility in smaller and
more homogeneous societies. Lastly, there is a greater chance
that adjacent societies can provide "checks and balances"
and competing models of freedom if they can remain independent
and thereby avoid absorption into an imperial collective.
In contrast, it is much harder to discern fractured and malevolent
personalities if we are forcefully integrated into an imperial
order and are ruled by politicians, central bankers, and media
bosses in far off places with alien backgrounds who are good at
being all things to all people while slyly pursuing agendas that
might be alien or destructive to our interests. These types of
people are the last ones that I would want to empower with arbitrary
control of "infinite numbers of myrmidons -robotic warriors."
Dear Virginia,
that man is a criminal...
I think that most people who have seen The
Forbidden Planet probably leave with the
subliminal impression that while Morbius was certainly
a very unfortunate man caught in tragic circumstances,
he suffered from a disconnection between his conscious
awareness and various subconscious forces that affect
all humans, therefore he could not be all bad. If he
consciously did not know he was doing evil, then how
can we show first degree mens rea
or guilty intent any more than someone who commits murder
as a sleep walker or while suffering some kind of multiple
personality syndrome? Besides, how can a man with so
much going for him, such as his ability to boost his
own IQ into the stratosphere, control the wealth of
a planet, harness extremely powerful forces of the universe,
and even have such a beautiful daughter — be a
criminal? My guess is that most people come
away from The Forbidden Planet
thinking that Morbius had more of a Freudian problem
than a criminal problem.
An important hallmark of the criminal personality
is a fractured personality and fractured moral standards.
A bank robber wants everyone else to be honest and not
steal his money, but he wants to be able to steal other
people's money when it suits his own personal needs.
He also wants to be able to posture as an honest citizen
so that people will accept his money and render him
honest services. We might ask if Dr. Morbius had access
to the same IQ machine that an earth crewman used to
solve the mystery of his id, why he did not use the
machine earlier to solve the mystery on his own? Why
the belle indifference? Or maybe he really
did know all along, and simply feigned naivety when
he was informed by the crewman towards the end of the
move.
The Freudian approach that decouples conscious responsibility
from primeval impulses might in itself involve a criminal
"con." Is it really so hard for us to become
consciously aware of our own animalistic impulses and
then develop intelligent and responsible strategies
for controlling and channeling them? If we cannot take
responsibility for ourselves as adults, then who in
our society should control us — and who ultimately
should control them? The government? Isn't there such
a thing as criminal negligence for people who are incapable
of anticipating how things might go wrong?
Another hallmark of criminal behavior is viciousness.
Almost by definition, criminal behavior tends to be
damaging to other people, yet criminals continue inflicting
it on others without remorse. Once Dr. Morbius understands
that he has controlled a very destructive id monster,
he did even more damage. He initiates the complete destruction
of his planet. He puts his daughter and the earth crew
at some risk, in case they might for some reason become
unable to escape the effective casualty radius of the
exploding planet in time. He denies humans access to
scientific and technological knowledge that was in his
possession. He thinks he knows better than other lesser
humans what is best, and creates a ruthless final monument
to himself with the destruction of a planet.
Unfortunately we evidence of nihilistic destructiveness
in America today. For example, the amazing la belle
indifference of the Bush administration and
his neo-con handlers for the hundreds of tons of aerosolized
depleted uranium with a 4.5 billion year half life dumped
on Iraq, or the damage they have created to America's
image through their use of torture. Similarly, in regard
to Israel, we see a similar characteristic in The
Sampson Option by Seymour Hersh. The state
of Israel thinks the world owes it a living. If Israel
stops receiving all the candy if feels it deserves,
that is, the continued massive foreign aid it expects
from the U.S. and European countries, it is prepared
to use its nuclear
arsenal to blow up and poison as much of planet
earth as possible.
This is almost taken directly out of the script of The
Forbidden Planet.
Case study analysis involving
institutionalized criminal behavior
Once you accept the premise that there are only a very
few functions performed by government that only government
is capable of performing reasonably well, and which
are really useful for the rest of the society, and that
once government expands itself beyond this point it
is usurping and replacing the vitality of vast sectors
of private sector entrepreneurial infrastructure with
dead weight socialism and bureaucracy, then one can
easily perceive big government as consisting of some
percentage of "producer" and some percentage
of "parasite."
As an amusing aside, even a growing parasite can be
smart enough to avoid totally choking off everything
that is healthy. As an example, the late Dr. Murray
Rothbard once told an amusing story about Mao's China
and Hong Kong catalogs.
Historically, socialism means more government control
of wealth distribution. More government in turn means
more bureaucracy. A complete government takeover under
communism means the elimination of any free market pricing
mechanisms.
A big problem with Mao's hardline approach to Marxism-Lenninism
was that since the free market had been abolished, prices
were now set by bureaucrats. Prices were now guided
by internal politics and guess work rather than economic
forces of supply and demand. In this incredibly byzantine
world, no one really knew any more what anything was
supposed to cost.
The Communists hit upon a very "Marxist revisionist"
solution to their pricing problem. They started to send
off for mail order catalogs from Hong Kong, which had
maintained a free market while under British colonial
control. Then they copied Hong Kong catalog prices into
their five year plans.
Communist functionaries started to tell a joke among
themselves that once the international communist revolution
took over the world, they would have to leave Hong Kong
alone so that they would still be able to get the catalogs
to figure out what things are supposed to cost.
Figuring out how little government we can get by with
is obviously tricky. We may require far less government
than we think. Dr. DiLorenzo provides the example of
highway construction in How Capitalism Saved
America. He claims that by 1860 most state
governments outlawed government works programs to build
roads because the private sector had been found to be
vastly more efficient and less corrupt.
We know that in the 19th century, governments in Europe
and North America were able to function amidst major
wars, sharp recessions, and rapid industrial expansion
and still remain under 5-10% of GDP. Therefore, since
today we see that governments in both Europe and North
America comprise about 40-50% of GDP,.we might suspect
that these governments are about 25% "producer"
and at least 75% "parasite."
Some government institutions
are seriously "criminal-at-risk"
If there is one book in America that is
a "must read" in this category, it is Final
Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination
Conspiracy by Michael Collins Piper.
To most people, mafia organizations epitomize institutionalized
criminality. However, libertarians are correct that
since governments killed hundreds of millions of people
in the 20th century, they make all of the world's private
mafias combined pale by comparison.
However, governments and organized crime are not by
any means mutually exclusive. Dr. Murray Rothbard liked
to wryly observe that most governments around the world
are in reality "criminal gangs," and that
taxation is usually nothing more than legalized banditry.
Probably the one area of government where "criminal,"
"mafia," and "government" blur the
most involve espionage organizations such as the CIA,
MI6
(British Secret Intelligence Service), Russian Foreign
Intelligence Service (SVR),
and the Israeli Mossad.
Espionage
operations tend to be inherently parasitic in nature,
just as the combat infantry operations of Army and Marine
Corps units are inherently predatory. Almost by definition,
infiltrating foreign countries under false pretense,
stealing secrets, planting false flags, and sniffing
for weaknesses in foreigners to induce them to betray
their own countries for intelligence information is
hardly a "producer" role. This is one reason
why the government-funded spy world is so inherently
dirty, because its basic modus operandi are strongly
similar to that of the criminal underworld and that
of other genuinely subversive, conspiratorial organizations.
In fact, truth be told, espionage organizations are
essentially state-funded perpetual conspiratorial operations.
Intelligence organizations frequently cooperate with
the underworld, such as the CIA-Mossad drug partnership
in SW Asia's Golden Triangle and Afghanistan (see Prof.
Alfred McCoy’s The
Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug
Trade), or the CIA-Mafia partnership that attemped
to assassinate Fidel Castro.
"Espionage" means theft of state secrets.
Since "conspiracy" means a group of people
who deliberately work together to break laws, espionage
operations are always by definition conspiratorial in
someone else's country, where they are always extremely
illegal.
As
an important qualifier, I would point out that America
requires a strong counterintelligence capability to
defend itself against enemy alien infiltration. In many
ways it "takes a thief to catch a thief."
It also requires overseas capabilities to play this
game.
Let
me also say
that no doubt the CIA has many unsung heroes. I admire
ex-CIA analyst Michael Scheuer's activism to counter
the excesses of the Bush Administration. I am under
the impression from Michael Collins Piper's Final
Judgment and other sources that the late
CIA Director William J. Colby was at root a well-intentioned,
decent, patriotic, and heroic man who made the right
enemies.
There are probably many other examples of honorable,
well-intentioned, patriotic Americans who work for the
CIA. No doubt the CIA can perform many vital missions
for America, and it needs to attract honorable, idealistic
people.
I
also believe, however, that our national media has glamorized
the espionage world with the James Bond, Mission Impossible,
and other spy-related flicks in ways that condition
audiences to think lightly of the extremely nasty underlying
character of espionage operations.
In "criminal-at-risk"
organizations, bad people tend to rise to the top
I do not think it is the case that everyone within a
"criminal-at-risk" organization is genetically
hardwired toward criminality, but rather that these
societies lack checks and balances compared to open
societies. In this environment, it is much easier for
some truly scary, criminal people to rise to the top.
As a former Marine Corps officer, I do not believe
that all Marines are psychotic psychopathic killers,
despite all the bad press about Marine operations that
have gone awry involving innocent Iraqi civilians at
Fallujah, Haditha and elsewhere. I have had a fair amount
of contact with people in other branches of the military
such as the Air Force, Navy, and Army, and to a lessor
extent have known people involved in security-oriented
organizations such as the FBI. I believe that the overwhelming
majority of Americans in all the aforementioned organizations
are basically good, well-intentioned people.
This having been said, I will readily concede that in
a secretive, authoritarian military environment, it
is much harder to challenge and reign in scary people
and prevent them from rising to the top than, say, working
with the local PTA.
Dr. Robert Higgs' April 2006 article: "America
Won, Americans Lost" makes this point regarding
one of Americas supposedly most technically advanced
and sophisticated military organizations:
General Thomas Power, commander in chief
of the Strategic Air Command from 1957 to 1964 and Director
of the Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff from 1960 to 1964,
ranked near the top of the U.S. Armed Forces waging the Cold
War. An ardent warrior, he did not subscribe to the Aristotelian
maxim of moderation in all things. In 1960, while being briefed
on counter-force strategy, he reacted petulantly to the idea
of exercising restraint in the conduct of nuclear war: "Restraint!"
he retorted. "Why are you so concerned with saving their
lives? The whole idea is to kill the bastards. . . . Look. At
the end of the war, if there are two Americans and one Russian,
we win!" Everyone who knew Power seems to have thought
that he was crazy.
Even the man he replaced as SAC commander, General Curtis LeMay,
regarded him as unstable — and everybody knew that LeMay
himself was, as "Dr. Strangelove's" Group Captain
Lionel Mandrake would have put it, "as mad as a bloody
March hare." After LeMay left his command at SAC, he became
Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force in 1957 and Chief of Staff
in 1961. He is most often remembered as a tireless advocate
of an all-out, nuclear first strike on the Soviet Union and
its allies, and as the most likely inspiration for General Buck
Turgidson in "Strangelove." Either Power or LeMay
might have served as a model for the "Strangelove"
character General Jack D. Ripper, whose own nuclear first strike
on the Ruskies came straight out of the LeMay-Power playbook.
Another very troubling dimension regarding General
Curtis LeMay, incidentally, appears in an article " Hanford
Radiation Victim Speaks Out" by June Stark Casey. This
concerns the Hanford Nuclear site in Eastern, Washington, not
that far from where I currently live. Up until the stories broke
out about depleted uranium horrors in Iraq and Afghanistan,
it ranked as the greatest environmental disaster in American
history. She states:
It was on Mother's Day of 1986 that I learned
that I was among the 270,000 Washington State "Downwinder"
residents who were exposed continually and secretly to 1.1 million
curies of radioactive iodine 131 released from the General Electric
operated Hanford Nuclear Reservation in the 1940s and 1950s.
Iodine 131, a known carcinogen, when ingested by cows, forms
heavy concentrations in milk.
In 1945, 550,000 curies of radioactive iodine were released
at Hanford, exposing 150 million Americans to more than 4 billion
picocuries per capita of this lethal radionuclide, an amount
comparable to releases from Chernobyl, the worst nuclear disaster
in history - which resulted in a 200 fold increase in thyroid
cancer in that area. This was followed by two decades of atmospheric
bomb tests recently estimated by the Natural Resources Defense
Council to be equivalent to exploding 40,000 Hiroshima bombs.
Federal and state authorities have declared the Columbia River
near Hanford the most radioactive river in the world. During
the peak years of reactor activity, substantial radiation exposure
was possible merely by standing on the Columbia river shoreline.
Two thirds of U.S. high-level waste from nuclear weapons production
is stored at Hanford. There is more radioactivity at Hanford
than would be released in an entire nuclear war. Clean-up at
Hanford is now expected to cost $100 billion and take 30 years;
parts of Hanford will remain radioactive for thousands of years.
Later she mentions General Curtis LeMay:
According to government documents, radioactive
isotopes were released at Hanford to assess the potential of
radiological warfare and some believe to determine the destruction
and effects on local populations. A secret radiological warfare
experimentation program headed by General Curtis Le May in which
radioactive fission products could be released in an attempt
to poison the water and milk supply was conducted at Hanford
up to 1954. Many Washington residents believe the 1949 experiment
was part of that radiological warfare program. Shockingly, current
environmental laws would allow that same secret experiment to
be conducted today.
I already discussed depleted uranium horrors in my Critical
Issues section. Permit me to add to all that the recent Ben
Klassen article: "The
Evil that Men Do." There is evidence that the military
industrial complex knew about the hazards of depleted uranium
before Gulf War I in 1990-1991. As Leuren Moret points out in
"Depleted
uranium: Dirty bombs, dirty missiles, dirty bullets,"
there is also strong evidence that the military industrial complex
has covered up the horrific evidence following Gulf War I, and
has willfully subjected hundreds of thousands of American servicemen
and innocent Iraqi and Afghanistanian civilians to unspeakable
evil.
When is America going to get some adult leadership in charge of
its military-industrial complex?
There are serious leadership
problems elsewhere that I need to address. The book By
Way of Deception by former Mossad agent Victor Ostrowsky
talks about how the Jewish culture is heavily geared towards the
use of deception. He claims that the Mossad is the most admired
organization in Israel, and in fact runs the country behind the
scenes. Unfortunately behind-the-scenes skullduggery just does
not seem to go away, as anyone knows who has followed the AIPAC
scandal and FBI arrest of Larry Franklin, or Justin Raimondo's
columns about how Jewish neo-cons and the Israel lobby dragged
America into Iraq at www.antiwar.com., or more recently has followed
the Harvard study which complains about suppression of academia
by Jewish organizations.
I do not think
it is the case that all Jews are bad people or that they are all
genetically hard-wired to act as deceptive criminal parasites.
However, I do think that it is clear that Jewish culture is more
heavily geared towards deception than most societies. It also
tends to be a very paranoid culture with a strong "us vs.
them" mentality and a quasi-messianic megalomaniacal will
to power. One very definitely gets a sense of this reading Jewish
Supremacism by Dr. David Duke. As a consequence,
Jewish culture seems to lack many checks and balances found in
more open societies. Under such conditions, it may be much easier
for criminals to rise to the top. Once they are in power, it is
much harder for non-criminal, honest, and responsible Jews to
reign them in.
It is interesting
to compare, for example, the way Jews and Nordics handle dissidents.
It is fairly common for Nordic or Nordic-related societies to
lionize outspoken individualists, such as a Patrick Henry, William
Tell, Copernicus, Galileo, or a Thomas Jefferson. In contrast,
it is more common to see major Jewish organizations condemn outspoken
Jewish dissidents such as Noam Chomsky, Israel Shahak, Mordechai
Vanuunu as "self-hating Jews" or "non-Jewish Jews,"
or "Jewish renegades."
But then again,
honest white Americans today also suffer the embarrassment of
seeing their highest government and military officials out of
control as well. I would refer the reader to the excellent articles
by the libertarian writer Dr. Paul Craig Roberts who frequently
decries America's ruling "Moron from Texas."
The Thugs of India as a "parasite
race" case study
We know from sociobiological theory that if an animal species
finds itself in an ecological niche that rewards parasitic behavior
for long enough, that eventually these traits may become "hardwired"
in the gene pool.
Thug: Or A Million Murders by
Col James L. Sleeman, is a fascinating story. It was written by
the grandson of Sir William Sleeman, the "Thug-hunter"
who rounded up, interrogated, and executed Thugs between 1829
and 1856 in India.
The earliest known accurate record about Thug activity was written
in 1356. It described a thousand Thugs who had been caught in
1290 AD. Oral accounts suggest that the Thugs may have practiced
their evil craft for many centuries previous to this. In any event,
if we assume that Thug activity had achieved full strength by
1290 AD, and the population of India remained fairly stable over
the centuries, the number of possible total victims becomes really
chilling.
Thug math
What is so incredible about the Thugs is that operating in very
small informal groups, and using nothing more than a large handkerchief
as a choke device, they visited a mass murder holocaust on the
people of India whose total death count was right up there with
Stalin, Lenin, and Mao Tse Tung.
Sleeman arrested 4,500 Thugs during his suppression campaign.
(p. 178), "At eight victims to a fully qualified Thug per
working month, assuming that a Thug's active working life was
thirty years, and that the average length of his annual Thuggee
expedition was two months, a little calculation gives a total
per Thug of over 400 victims." (Actually 8 * 2 * 30 = 480
victims, so 400 victims is conservative).
Let us do some additional Thug math. Assume six centuries of activity,
times about four generations of Thugs per century, times 4,500
Thugs per generation, times 400 victims per Thug, gives a possible
total victim estimate within the span of recorded Thug history
of 43,200,000 people, or:
6 centuries * 4 generations/century * 4,500 Thugs/generation *
400 victims/Thug = 43,200,000 victims
No matter how you change any of the underlying assumptions behind
this calculation, one still comes up with some really serious
"parasite" mass murder numbers. On page 177, Col Sleeman
approaches the total calculation from some different sources and
different assumptions, and still comes up with many millions of
victims:
...[the] dependable Indian journal estimated
that the two rivers, Nerbudda and Sutlej, witnessed 10,000 murders
annually. This was a century ago, when Thuggee was being slowly
throttled and when every opportunity existed for ascertaining
the true facts; hence it is quite clear this was considered a
conservative estimate. Now the area defined by this journal represents
less than one-fourth of India, so, as Thuggee extended throughout
that continent, it may safely be assumed that that on this basis
alone forty thousand people fell to the Thug ruhmal every
year, possibly in its heyday fifty thousand would be nearer the
mark. [50,000 a year means five million over a hundred years,
and 30 million victims over six centuries— author]. Staggering
as these awful figures may seem, such is the wealth of human life
in India that this toll would seem a mere flea bite, for wild
animals and snakes still annually account for almost as many.
For the purpose of arriving at a correct estimate, however, we
will not assume fifty thousand a year, nor yet forty or thirty,
but content ourselves with the number estimated by the Sumachar
Durpan [a native newspaper] as occurring in this
one small area a hundred years ago, namely 10,000. Neither shall
we assume this to be annual toll of three hundred years of killing,
but the most modest estimate of 10,000 Thug victims a year for
a hundred years. In other words, in order to err on the side of
caution and to avoid the least trace of exaggeration, the estimate
of a million murders [pertaining to the title of the book —
author] is based upon one-fourth of the area of the country over
which the Thugs operated, and for one-third of the period only
during which this hideous faith is know to existed. [A million
victims * four times the limited sample area * three times the
limited historical period = 12 million victims — author]
After prolonged research in all the Thuggee records available
to him, the author is convinced that a mere million murders is
very considerably below the true figures, and is unkind to the
memory of the Thugs who glorified in their crimes and boasted
of their murders...
As a satirical aside, I can almost imagine a bunch of idiot modern
liberals reacting to a Thug threat by trying to outlaw or have
legally registered "assault handkerchiefs." The Feds
might even start strip-searching everyone at the airport security
counters — or wait, scratch that — I do not want to
them any ideas!
The Thug modus operandi
Thugs were very clever about winning the confidence of their victims.
They liked to prey on travelers along the roads across India.
Sometimes they would feign injury, or other times act like unpretentious
travelers simply seeking companionship. A group of Thugs would
typically lure each victim to some secluded area off the road,
and proceed to pounce on him and choke him to death. Then they
would bury the victim and proceed to their next kill.
Sleeman's book points out on page 20, "The most astounding
fact about the Thug is that, as a general rule, he was a good
citizen and model husband, devoted to his family, and scrupulously
straight when not on his expeditions, presenting a complexity
of character utterly baffling to a student of psychology. It was,
indeed, essential to the safety of their criminal operations that
they should pass as peaceful citizens. Their opportunities were
great, for communications in India were then both difficult and
dangerous and vast amounts of treasure were carried long distances
by road by disguised treasure-bearers or escorted by armed guards.
A rich merchant and his attendants, for example, would leave Calcutta
for Poona and would, in the normal course of events, remain unheard
of until his return home, perhaps six months later..."
Thugs felt no remorse. On page 5 we discover: "However unscrupulous
and treacherous the Thugs were, one thing at least stands to their
credit, that while they sometimes killed women — though
contrary to their faith — they never maltreated them beforehand.
The taking of human life for the sheer lust of killing was the
Thugs' main object: The plunder, however, pleasant, being a secondary
consideration. That robbery did not form the principle motive
is clear from the fact that they made little effort to ascertain
the wealth of those they put to death, and wretchedly poor men,
their total world wealth less than sixpence, constantly appear
in Thuggee records as having been added to the bag. The Thug,
indeed, regarded his profession much in the same light as the
sportsman: no motive was required for the murders the planned
to commit; their prospective victims were unknown to them; and
it mattered nothing whether they were Hindu or Mohammedan, for
Thugs had in their ranks members of both religions."
What I find really intriguing about the Thugs is that they seem
to fit the criminal personality profile I have already mentioned,
as well as some of the animal models that I will mention later.
They obviously had highly fragmented personalities. Col Sleeman
stated (p. 5), "The Thug was a murderer by hereditary profession,
who sincerely believed that he had a divine right to kill..."
We are challenged to draw a line between the Thug faith in the
goddess Kali as a form of "religiosity" as opposed to
camouflage for malevolent behavior. The Thugs consciously engaged
in extreme forms of deception. Last, but not least, they were
malevolently destructive on their host population in a way that
showed "viral persistency" for well over six centuries.
If the British had not rooted them out, it seems likely that Thuggee
would have continued indefinitely.
Col Sleeman comments (p. 6), "Here was no body of amateur
assassins, driven to crime by force of circumstances, but men
of seeming respectability and high intelligence, often occupying
positions of importance and responsibility in their normal lives,
secretly trained from boyhood to the highest degree of skill in
strangulation." No amount of liberal education would have
likely stopped this phenomenon. Imagine if naive modern liberals
had let a group like this into America to promote "diversity"?
I do not think we can jump the conclusion that all
Thugs were genetically hard-wired towards parasitism like some
of the animal models I will discuss later. However, I think that
their inbred gene pool may have been skewed in the direction of
criminal-rich tendencies. Earlier in the environmental vs. genetics
section I discussed how all traits tend to be distributed in a
bell curve function. If the strongly instinctive criminal side
of the bell curve were, say, on the right side of our hypothetical
bell-shaped curve, I think that the curve was probably titled
and shifted in that direction. However, there were probably quite
a few Thugs who were "slightly predisposed" criminals
in the center. We might also expect to find members of the broader
Thug community, to include wives and children, towards the left
side of the bell curve who were not particularly criminal at all.
However, I think that if the Thug bell-shaped curve were compared
to the bell curve of the general Indian population, similar to
way black and white IQ graphs are compared in the prior section,
I think that we would be able to see a significant difference
in the distributions of innate criminal traits.

Illustration from Thug:
Or A Million Murders by Col James L. Sleeman.
Thugs use a cloth slightly larger than a handkerchief to
wrap into a choke cord for their victim. Their religion
compelled them to avoid drawing blood every time they made
a kill. |
As a parting comment, we should note that
the Thug phenomenon presents a major embarrassment to most
modern liberal and anarcho-libertarian social theory. How
can one possibly create a viable free market economy or democracy
with people who want to choke you to death and bury you for
sport shortly after they accept your goods or accompany you
to the voting booth? How can modern liberal government programs
such as affirmative action, open immigration, or welfare do
anything with such mass murderers except make matters worse?
Have a human with your tortilla? A
look at human physical parasitism
Prior to European contact, human physical parasitism was common
in many societies around the planet. One of the best examples
took place south of the border, down Mexico way.
According to "Aztec
Religion" in Wikipedia, "Human sacrifice was
practiced on a grand scale throughout the Aztec empire. No
human society known to history approached that of the Aztecs
in the quantities of people offered as religious sacrifices:
20,000 a year is a common estimate."
Aztecs periodically waged war with their neighbors with the
intent of rounding up warriors and camp followers for
slaughter as opposed to accomplishing ideological goals.
The Aztecs kept their prisoners of war well fed until their
day of reckoning. Aztec rituals even included stabbing
unborn babies of pregnant women inside their bellies.
There was much more than human religious sacrifice going on
here. Dr. Marvin Harris describes in Cannibals
and Kings: The Origins of Cultures how the Aztecs
ran one of the greatest cannibal empires in history. With
almost assembly-line efficiency, Aztec priests ripped the
hearts out of prisoners one after another and then rolled
them down the steep steps of their pyramids. Then the bodies
were collected and taken to tribal houses to get carved up
for dinner. Harris notes (p. 164):
...Aztec cannibalism was not a perfunctory
tasting of ceremonial tidbits. All edible parts were used in a
manner strictly comparable to the consumption of the flesh of
domesticated animals. The Aztec priests can legitimately be described
as ritual slaughterers in a state-sponsored system geared to the
production and redistribution of substantial amounts of animal
protein in the form of human flesh. Of course, the priests had
other duties, but none had greater practical significance than
their butchery.
Dr. Harris believes that since Mexico in
the pre-contact era lacked alternative sources of high-grade
protein such as domesticated cows, llamas, or pigs, this diet
gave the Aztec warriors a muscle-building advantage over surrounding
tribes. However, because he estimates the population of the
Valley of Mexico at 2 million and the number of prisoners
available for annual human meat distribution at only 15,000,
he believes the flesh could only be distributed in enough
concentration among the Aztec nobility, warriors, and their
retainers to provide an advantage to this relatively small
group. Nevertheless, if this was enough to support their continued
domination, that is all that mattered from an evolutionary
perspective.
If you want to go beyond academic theory
and experience a Hollywood dramatization of mass sociopathic
bloodthirstiness, please watch Mel Gibson's Apocalypto
and read John de Nugent's commentary on the movie "Apolcalypse
of the Psychopaths" at libertyforum.org.
There are many other variables involved in the evolution of
human physical parasitism besides the availability of alternative
protein sources. As an example, National Vanguard's article
"Cannibalism
in the African Congo" reports that cannibalism has
been widespread in areas of Africa where game is plentiful.
I view cannibalism as an evolutionary path opposed to the
mutualist principles stated at the beginning of this article.
Race Differences
in Intelligence: A Global Perspective by Dr. Richard
Lynn (Mankind Quarterly, Spring
1991) lists avoidance of cannibalism as one of twenty one
criteria listed in a study by Baker (1974) for the advancement
of civilization. His twenty one criteria area as follows:
...In the ordinary
circumstances of life in public places, they cover the
greater part of the trunk with clothes.
...They keep the body clean and
take care to dispose of its waste products.
...They do not practice severe
mutilation or deformation of the body,
except for medical reasons.
...They have knowledge of building
in brick or stone, if the necessary
materials are available in their territory.
...Many of them live in towns
or cities, which are linked by roads.
...They cultivate food-plants.
...They domesticate animals and
use some of the larger ones for transport
(or have in the past so used them), if suitable species are
available.
...They have knowledge of the
use of metals, if these are available.
...They use wheels.
...They exchange property by
the use of money.
...They order their society by
a system of laws, which are enforced in such a way that they
ordinarily go about their various concerns in times of peace
without danger of attack or arbitrary arrest.
...They permit accused persons
to defend themselves and to bring witnesses for their defense.
...They do not use torture to
extract information or for punishment.
...They do not practice cannibalism.
...Their religious systems include
ethical elements and are not purely or grossly superstitious.
...They use a script (not simply
a succession of pictures) to communicate ideas.
...There is some facility in
the abstract use of numbers, without consideration of actual
objects (or in other words, at least a start has been made
in mathematics).
...A calendar is in use, accurate
to within a few days in the year.
...Arrangements are made for
the instruction or the young in intellectual subjects.
...There is some appreciation
of the fine arts.
...Knowledge and understanding
are valued as ends in themselves.
This Mankind Quarterly
article notes: "Having set up these criteria, Baker proceeded
to analyze the historical record of the races to ascertain
which have originated civilizations. His conclusion was that
the Caucasoid peoples developed all 21 components of civilization
in four independent locations. These were the Sumerian in
the valley of the Tigris and the Euphrates, the Cretian, the
Indus Valley, and the ancient Egyptian. The Mongoloids also
developed a full civilization in the Sinic civilization in
China. The Amerindians achieved about half of the 21 components
in the Maya society of Guatemala, a little less in the Inca
and Aztec societies, but these peoples never invented a written
script, the wheel (except possibly in children’s toys),
the principle of the arch in their architecture, metal working,
or money for the exchange of goods. The Negroids and the Australian
aborigines achieved virtually none of the criteria of civilization."
We should see some warning signs regarding America today in
this list. For example in regard to:
They do not practice severe mutilation or deformation
of the body, except for medical reasons. We
have seen a rise in ornamental self-mutilation among American
teenagers in the last two decades.
They permit accused persons to defend themselves
and to bring witnesses for their defense. This
has been reduced by the so-called Patriot Act and other infringements
on civil liberties. Later I will discuss the activities of
the Jewish ADL to smear individuals critical of Israel.
They do not use torture to extract information
or for punishment. Tell this to Attorney General
Alberto R. Gonzalez and our "fellow Americans" at
Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo.
They do not practice cannibalism.
See next paragraph.
There is some appreciation of the fine arts.
The whole level of American aesthetic appreciation has been
reduced with primitive rap music and vulgar programming promoted
by America's Jewish-dominated national media.
Obviously in regard to physical parasitism, Americans do not
currently have any overt involvement. However, the anti-abortion
lobby might claim that on a more subtle level, the thirty
million or so white American fetuses that have been aborted
in the last two decades — that have been replaced by
Third World immigrants — reflect a form of human sacrifice
to modern liberal ideals, although they have not actually
involved the actual consumption of human flesh as was the
case in ancient Mexico, or is the case today in certain parts
of China where eating fetuses is considered a delicacy (cf.
"Feces,
Fetuses, Etc." by Dr. William Pierce).
Although Americans are not buying human meat in grocery stores
(or at least not yet, just wait until the economic implosion
and American becomes majority nonwhite), I can recollect in
the last couple of decades at least two tabloid stories with
underlying cannibalism themes that really hit a nerve with
the public about trends in contemporary America. Admittedly,
these sensational stories are purely anecdotal, and probably
do not reflect a statistically significant sampling of social
phenomenon. Nevertheless, they awaken dark fears at the margin
about the permanent, underlying genetic impact of America's
anti-white demographic trends.
According to the National Vanguard's article "Report:
Cannibalism in New Orleans":
Black leader and reparations advocate Randall
Robinson is reporting that "[B]lack hurricane victims in
New Orleans have begun eating corpses to survive."
Like millions of White Americans, Robinson is shocked to find
that one bad rain storm has washed away the lie of multiracial
America, and uncovered deep, incompatible racial differences.
Whether or not Robinson's claim of Black cannibalism in New Orleans
is accurate, or merely the usual overblown 'civil rights' hyperbole
White Americans have had to put up with (and pay for) for generations,
cannibalism is endemic in periods of African social unrest. Many
White liberals are too dishonest to admit this and other facts
of Black behavior to themselves, but are being rapidly re-educated.
Randall Robertson himself later issued a retraction
on a blog:
The claim in the first sentence in
my post was incorrect. I had been told this was happening,
but these claims have turned out to be unsubstantiated. I
therefore retract them — but stand behind everything
else I wrote without reservation.
It is reported that black hurricane victims in New Orleans
have begun eating corpses to survive.
Four days after the storm, thousands of blacks in New Orleans
are dying like dogs. No-one has come to help them.
I am a sixty-four year old African-American. New Orleans marks
the end of the America I strove for.
I am hopeless. I am sad. I am angry against my country for
doing nothing when it mattered...
The second shocker story involved the Brownsville/Matamoros
cult murders of 1989. A key player was Sara Maria Aldrete, who
seemed to fit a popular profile of the assimilated, nice Mexican-American
girl next door who adds so much "diversity" to our
society. I was living in New York City at the time the story
broke, and I specifically remember an "all-[Mexican] American
girl gone bad" theme in local tabloids. According to the
27 July 2006 Wikipedia article on Sara
Aldrete:
Sara Maria Aldrete (born September 6, 1964
in Matamoros, Tamaulipas, Mexico) is a serial killer known
as "La Madrina". She attended high school in Brownsville,
Texas, while still living south of the border, and gained
resident alien status in order to attend Texas Southmost
College. She was known amongst her peers as a good student.
She is 6'1" tall and studied physical education, preparing
to transfer to a university to earn a physical education
teaching certification.
She met Adolfo
Constanzo, a Cuban American fortune-teller and religious
cult leader, and he introduced her to witchcraft and dark
magic. He gave her the nickname "La Madrina",
which is Spanish for godmother, and initiated her into his
cult, which was a conglomeration of Santería,
Aztec
warrior ritual, and Palo
Mayombe, complete with blood sacrifices. Costanzo sexually
assaulted and killed drug dealers and used their body parts
for religious sacrifice ceremonies in an old warehouse near
Matamoros. Many of his victims' body parts were cooked in
a large pot called a nganga. Costanzo made Sara Aldrete
second-in-command of his cult, and directed her to supervise
his followers while he was out shipping marijuana over the
border into America.
In 1989 the killings grew more frequent, and gained attention
when affluent white tourist Mark Kilroy was captured. Costanzo,
Aldrete, and the rest of the cult went on the run. Police
found their hideout on May 6, 1989, and killed several cult
members, including Costanzo, in a shootout. Aldrete was
convicted of criminal association in 1990 and sentenced
to six years in prison. In a second trial, she was convicted
of several of the killings at the cult's headquarters, and
sentenced to an additional 62 years. If Aldrete is ever
released from prison, American authorities plan to prosecute
her for the murder of the American Mark Kilroy.
According to crimelibrary.com,
"A grisly list of cult-related crimes remains unsolved
in Mexico. From prison, Sara Aldrete told reporters, `I don’t
think the religion will end with us, because it has a lot
of people in it. They have found a temple in Monterrey that
isn’t even related to us. It will continue.' Between
1987 and 1989, police in Mexico City recorded 74 unsolved
ritual murders, 14 of them involving infant victims. Constanzo’s
cult is suspected in at least 16 of those cases, all involving
children or teenagers, but authorities lack sufficient evidence
to press charges."
It is quite possible that neither Attorney General Alberto
R. Gonzalez's involvement
with torture nor Sara Aldrete's involvement with ancient
Aztec Warrior Ritual reflect the true sentiments of the overwhelming
majority of Mexican Americans. I have worked with Mexican
Americans in the military and in the civilian work place,
and many of them appear to be competent, hard workers who
strive to be loyal Americans. I did not observe any of them
trying to cut up gringos and cook them in pots. Nor am I suggesting
that U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez is likely to rip
out anyone's heart and roll him down the steps of the Capitol
Building any time soon, although his attacks on our civil
liberties shock my conscience much the same.
But then again, just like the way the "Helter
Skelter" Charles
Manson murders were a form of freaky "blow back"
culminating from the disoriented, deracinated "Acid Rock"
generation of the 1960's promoted by Jewish Hollywood and
other controlled
media, sometimes the extreme whacko stuff contains within
it some important canary-in-the-coal mine warnings about disturbing
underlying demographic and cultural changes in society. Once
the American economy implodes in a bout of hyperinflation,
darkness at the margin can become significant, just like the
Jewish Bolshevik influence that arose admist the social chaos
and devastation in World War I-ravaged Russia.
"Parasitism" is relative
Idaho Attorney Edgar Steele claims that blacks have fifty
times the violent crime rate per capita compared to whites.
They also have over ten times fewer people per capita with
IQ's over 120. (Please see the "Black and White IQ Distributions
Chart" contained in my "environmental
vs. genetics" discussion). In the event of a crisis
leading to social breakdown, they are far more likely to engage
in looting
and public disorder.
If blacks and whites can create a stable social arrangement
where white survival is not threatened, then this can become
a mutualist relationship.
If on the other hand incompetent blacks are elevated to leading
positions and displace talented whites, and furthermore if
their influence undermines the white capacity to practice
white racial nationalist self-determination in order to protect
white genetic interests, then blacks can assume a parasitic
relationship vis a vis whites.
Modern liberals absolutely hate the "separate but equal"
segregated Southern society that existed prior to the so-called
Civil Rights acts of the mid-1960's. However, at least Southern
society was fairly stable and whites did not feel threatened.
Now, whites in general feel their own anxiety climbing towards
the crisis alert level as the odds of Civil War II escalate.
And liberals call this progress.
Whatever you choose to call it, black people can become either
mutualists or parasites, depending on the role they assume
relative to white society.
The same holds true for any other alien group. We segue now
to America's most fateful "minority."
Jewish Criminal Totalitarian Psychopathology
"The Jewish people as a whole
will be its own Messiah. It will attain world domination
by the dissolution of other races...and by the establishment
of a world republic in which everywhere the Jews will exercise
the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the
Children of Israel...will furnish all the leaders without
encountering opposition..." (Karl Marx in a letter
to Baruch Levy, quoted in Review de Paris, June 1, 1928,
p. 574)
'Judaism is not a religion at all.
It’s a license to lie, cheat, steal, rob, exploit,
prostitute, enslave, destroy, torture, murder… as
long as the victim is not Jewish. It’s a mental disease
somewhere in between bipolar disorder and psychopathy. It’s
the membership in a terrorist, satanic cult.' -Andrew
Winkler, Editor/Publisher, ZioPedia -
The most significant group in America in
terms of its toxic shock effect on America's dwindling white
majority is the Jewish elite that controls the central bank,
national
media, and our Congress. (cf. William Fulbright's famous
comment: "Israel controls the U.S. Senate" from
They Dare to Speak Out by former
Congressman Paul Findley). Jewish neo-cons have shanghaied
America into an unnecessary Middle Eastern War. (cf. High
Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper).
According to recent estimates, the Jewish
lobby funds about 75% of the Democratic Party and about
50% of the Republican Party. The Jewish ADL and other pressure
groups intimidate patriotic Americans from effectively protecting
legitimate white genetic interests. (cf. Col Donn de Grand
Pre's books The
Viper's Venom and The Rattler's
Revenge). Please also see the Rev
Ted Pike archive at American First Books that hosts numerous
articles about ADL KGB tactics designed to undermine the First
Amendment and U.S. Constitution.
If after reading patriot literature one still doubts the existance
of Jewish power in America, my advice is take a trip to New
York City, and then secondarily to Los Angeles, and then start
asking around. New York City has the largest Jewish population
in the world outside of Israel, numbering in the millions.
They are there in such critical mass that they openly set
the tone.
In the 20th century New York City dominated America's media,
banking, and commerce. Woody Allen once commented with words
to the effect that 80% of success is often showing up. Among
other key success factors, Jews have definitely physically
occupied America's power centers.
Jews are not parasitic if they do not threaten white survival
and self-determination. Many Jews are productive business
entrepreneurs. Many Jews are highly educated and make tremendous
contributions in their professions. However, once Jews impose
alien values on white society in a way that undermines white
cultural and genetic survival, they can clearly become parasitic.
Not surprisingly, Jewish meddling can generate tremendous
amounts of resentment and hostility in the host population.
Some people buy into the alleged Bismarck
conspiracy theory that the Rothschilds and other elite
Jewish families helped to finance and stir up animosities
that precipitated the utterly ruinous War Between the States.
As examples, they point to Judah
P. Benjamin, who served as Secretary of War for the Confederacy,
and also to Jewish funding of various Abolitionists on the
Northern side. In addition, they claim that the Rothschilds
and other elite Jewish families had already gained control
over the central banks in Britain and France and hence could
provided tempting allies for Southern secessionists. (See
"Why
Banker's Love the Left" by Dr. Henry Makow for further
discussion of this period).
However, for the moment let us consider that even if all this
is all true, gentile Americans still held most of the political
cards and controlled most of the wealth in America. We can't
blame everything on the Jews!
I tend to lay most of the blame for America's ills on the
inability of too many of its gentile leaders to peacefully
resolve America's political crises of the mid-1800's by maintaining
homogeneous northern European-descended populations, and if
necessary, by peacefully spinning off parts of America as
separate countries to preserve decentralization and protect
regional interests. I think that Thomas Jefferson was clear
that this was the preferred alternative to unity at all costs
in his Kentucky Resolutions of 1798. The anti-Federalists
were also clear on this point.
By the mid-Reconstruction era of around 1870, America had
forged a Pact with the Devil. America had decided to become
a united empire at all costs rather than maintain limited
republics. Vast numbers of Americans had decided that mass
murder (640,000 war dead during the War Between the States)
took priority over the States Rights principles of Thomas
Jefferson's Kentucky Resolutions, and that Negro rights took
priority over white rights during the so-called Reconstruction
Era (whites could not vote in many Southern states run by
all-Negro legislatures), and that a "one nation indivisible"
ideal with a highly centralized government is capable of benevolently
guaranteeing "liberty and justice for all" without
wallowing in corruption, where somehow a trend towards centralization
does not yield the historical result that "absolute power
corrupts absolutely."
On a prima facie level, these new principles that most Americans
openly adopted were nothing but trouble waiting to happen.
America's new ideology was now de facto Jacobinism rather
than genuine republicanism. If America did not reverse itself,
the country was already lost. It would simply take another
century and a half for the rot to spread so widely that it
would eventually bring down the whole system.
By the late 1800's millions of Jews immigrated to America
and occupied the most strategically important urban centers.
Soon they came to also occupy the most strategically important
mass media (see The New Jerusalem
by Michael Collins Piper). In 1913, the Rothschild agent Paul
Warburg masterminded the privately owned Federal Reserve Banking
System along with his Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan allies.
Through its steady inflationary policies, the Fed has saddled
Americans with a ruinous form of indirect taxation while financing
the growth of the Orwellian neo-Jacobin Welfare-Warfare Super
State that wages perpetual war for perpetual peace (see Perpetual
War for Perpetual Peace by Gore Vidal, also
same title by revisionist historian Harry Elmer Barnes). Shortly
after Jews played the leading role in creating the Fed Reserve
monster (Edwin Griffin calls it The Creature From
Jekyll Island), Jewish advisors surrounding
Woodrow Wilson orchestrated America's entry into World War
I in return for Britain's Balfour Declaration that promised
Palestine to the Jews. They also navigated Wilson's "hands
off Bolshevism" policy to aid the murderous feeding frenzy
of their co-tribalists on the prostrate Russian people.
By this time, Jews were openly exploiting the running sores
of both American and Russian society . Without question they
took all of America's centralization and demographic fragmentation
problems and made them vastly worse wherever it suited Jewish
interests. At a minimum, they certainly thwarted any real
chance that America could heal and somehow regain genuine
republican forms. But we should not be surprised, because
as I will explain later, Jewish culture is extremely geared
towards cutting corners and "gaming the system."
But going back to the mid-1800's, I think the ultimate blame
lies on errors made by gentile Americans. However, it also
appears obvious to me from the horrible social and political
mess created by the War Between the States that America laid
itself wide open to the Jewish infiltration and takeover that
took place later.
A personal note
I have been around Jews all my life. I have had them as roommates,
professors, bosses, landlords, clients, fellow workers, and
as classmates.
There was certainly no "anti-Semitic" bias in my
background. As a young girl, my mother helped shelter Jews
before she escaped from Norway during World War II when a
member of her group got picked up by the Gestapo. Her father
left Norway when the Nazis initially moved in. As a Norwegian
naval officer he aided the Allied war effort in England. One
of his brothers survived having several merchant ships torpedoed
out from under him in Allied convoys on the Mermansk run.
My paternal grandfather fought against the Nazis as an field
grade officer under Gen George Patton in North Africa. There
is certainly no cultural or "genetic" predisposition
towards anything "Nazi" in my background. My own
political views have generally been biased towards libertarianism.
I think many Jews are very likeable as individuals. In fact,
on an intellectual level I find a number of them to be more
interesting than quite a few fellow gentiles. On a personal
level, many of them can be charming.
However, I am now convinced that Zionist Jews are dangerous
and out of control as an organized, global group. Whenever
they huff and puff, America's community of reform and liberal
Jews seem to always roll over and play dead too easily. As
a former U.S. Marine Corps officer sworn to uphold the Constitution,
watching Jewish neo-cons weed out the CIA, genocide innocent
Lebanese civilians, poison hundreds of thousands of American
military personnel with depleted uranium, run roughshod over
our rights with torture and the so-called "Patriot Act"
and other phony excuses for invasions of our civil liberties
...(and on and on — see my Critical
Issues section), I say it is time to quit passively taking
it in the shorts and stand up for freedom and Western Civilization.
I believe that many leading Zionists are not only criminal,
but are also ultimately suicidal. We have an urgent need to
come to grips with the Jewish character and try to figure
out some kind of sane and humane strategy to deal with it
all before some lunatics in the Israeli government decide
to pull "The
Samson Option" with their hundreds of nukes. They
have already orchestrated events that have led to dirty nuclear
war in the Middle East (see my Critical
Issues sections). With Israeli missiles pointed at European
cities, things can still get much worse.
The punch-line is that Jews cannot seem to prevent their most
evil people from rising to the top. As a group, they seem
to have a very similar problem compared to such secretive
and authoritarian American institutions as the CIA (highly
"criminal-at risk") and the U.S. military (highly
"predator-at-risk"). They lack adequate internal
checks and balances. In the absence of responsible, civilian
adult supervision, bad things start to happen.
The Jewish toxic shock effect, or Jewish criminal totalitarian
psychopathology, has three major elements. I will present
each separately, and then tie them all together in a functional
analysis.
These elements, incidentally, reflect how the Jews as a group
are skewed in their bell-shaped distribution curve. For example,
it is very likely that not all Jews are criminal. However,
their population does seem to be heavily skewed in a criminal
direction relative to other groups.
Let me repeat. I believe that it is possible that most Jews
are not criminal. According to Rev.
Ted Pike, in an interview with Daryl Bradford Smith, perhaps
50% of the Jewish population in America is so assimilated
that they know very little about Jewish culture and religion.
Dr. David Duke provides the following analysis in Jewish
Supremacism (p. 333) on this issue:
Perhaps the best way to describe the Jewish
community is how the distinguished Jewish writer Daniel Elazar
does in Community and Polity: Organizational Dynamics
in American Jewry. [footnote 648]
He proposes a model of concentric circles. The inner circle is
a hard core of about 5 to 8 percent who lead what he calls "fully
Jewish lives." Next are 10 to 12 percent of Jews whom he
calls "participants." They are often employed in "Jewish
civil service," working tirelessly for Jewish causes. Third,
he identifies 25 to 30 percent of Jews whom he calls "contributors
and consumers." These make regular contributions to Jewish
causes and make use of the Jewish community for things such as
weddings, bar mitzvahs and funerals. Elazar calls his last group
the "peripherals and repudiators." They make no contributions
to Jewish causes, but sometimes the inner circles pull them in
to participation or they are peeled off, leaving the Jewish core
at the center and the whole of Jewry more committed than ever.
[footnote 649]
Because of copious publicity of high rates of Jewish intermarriage,
some Gentiles may come to believe that Jews are becoming less
ethnocentric. But in reality the opposite is true. Those Jews
left at the core are even less disposed to assimilate. At the
same time, the out-marrying Jews who are amenable to Gentile values
also serve an important role in causing Gentiles to believe the
Jewish group is more similar to them than it actually is.
While he may believe that many Jews are relatively
assimilated, Rev. Ted Pike is also very clear that he believes
the top Zionist leadership is sick and criminal. He even calls
them "evil Jews." However, Rev. Pike also points
out that many common Jews are often victimized
by their own leaders.
Often the crucial differences in life are at the margin. For
example, virtually all major revolutions and social changes
have been promulgated by a small activist minority. Therefore,
just a little bit of extra criminality within a human population,
despite the fact the majority of people within that population
may not be criminal, can go a long way.
Jewish criminality
Jewish-dominated Hollywood falsely portrays Italian-Americans
as criminal ringleaders in America, when in fact the real
brains have always been Jewish. The same is true in Europe,
where for centuries most of the underworld slang has come
from Yiddish.
Michael Collin's Piper's Final
Judgment gives an excellent overview of
the Meyer Lansky operation in America, which dominated American
organized crime for decades and played a key role in the assassination
of John F. Kennedy. Lansky's crime syndicate was closely tied
to the Mossad, which dominates the global drug trade along
with its partner the CIA. The book Supermob:
How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America's
Hidden Powerbrokers by Gus Russo, also describes
Jewish domination of major organized crime tentacles that
reach throughout America. An excellent companion work is The
Money and the Power: The Making of Las Vegas and Its Hold
on America by Sally Denton and Roger Morris.
This book explains how the Jewish gangsters who founded Vegas
were linked to Jewish mobsters in other American cities, and
how they were able to spread their power tentacles across
America at the highest levels. Denton and Morris also note
how Jewish gangsters have played a key role in the history
of Israel.
Jews have always dominated the vice industries in America,
to include liquor, gambling, and pornography.
See the Jewish
Crime, Jewish Mob page at Jewwatch.com,
the judicial-inc.biz
web pages on Jewish ultra
high level crime, espionage,
and targeted
executions, and also Jewish Supremacism by Dr.
David Duke and The International Jew by Henry Ford
for more details.
Interestingly enough, according to Dr. Kevin McDonald in his
review
of the book Henry Ford and the Jews, "As TIJ
[The International Jew] notes, the Kehillah [central
Jewish community leadership] was organized in response to
the comment by General Bingham, the chief of police of New
York City, that Jews were reponsible for 50% of the crime
in the city."
Jews also have a long track record of dominating high level
organized crime around the world. It is no accident that most
of the underworld slang in major European countries in the
19th century came from Yiddish. In that same century, the
Jewish
Sassoon family ran the opium trade in China, founded Hong
Kong, and used the British army to subjugate the entire country
under the heel of their mega-criminal enterprise. The Sassoons
became one of the richest crime families in the world, and
scion Edward Albert Sassoon intermarried with the British
branch of the Rothschild family and was knighted.
Perhaps it is no accident that Ian Fleming, author of the
James Bond series, cast most of his arch-villains as Jews.
See, for example "Bond's
Semitic Villains" by Robert F. Moss. In the late
1930's and during World War II, Ian Fleming worked for British
intelligence inside the Rockefeller Center office of Sir William
Stephenson, who was profiled in A Man Called Intrepid
as the highest level intelligence operations intermediary
between Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt. Before
Fleming became a novelist, he undoubtedly became intimately
familiar with the "story behind the story" behind
many high level internatonal intrigues. Dr. David Duke commented:
Long after Flemming wrote his popular books
that later became the most successful movie series in history,
life indeed did imitate art in the former Soviet Union when
11 oligarchs (10 of them Jewish according to Jewish-owned
Fortune Magazine) stole 60 percent of the wealth
of the richest resource nation on earth. They did it through,
bribery, extortion, fraud and murder. It was indeed the
biggest criminal theft of all time, and yet the Jewish criminals
such as Gusinsky, Berezovsky, Abramovitch, Khodorkovsky
and others have been defended and protected by powerful
Jewish influence Western nations and in the Jewish-influenced
media. Many others are hiding out with their billions in
Israel . There is even a popular TV program in Israel called
“The Oligarchs” which chronicles the happy adventures
of the Jewish oligarchs in Russia as they go about defrauding
the Russian people. As far as fomenting wars, have not the
Jewish oligarchs of wealth and media around the world fomented
the Iraq War and the clash of civilizations? Have they not
supported the murderous terrorism of Israel against the
Palestinians, the Lebanese and others. Are they not the
ones who are the main protagonists of a proposed war against
Iran which would be catastrophic for the whole world?
Since ancient times, Jews have had a long history as slave
dealers. In early America, Jews dominated the Negro slave
trade. Today, Jews dominate the global white
slave trade. Israel has been a central hub for the exploitation
and resale of Slavic women since the fall of the Soviet Empire.
In July 2001 "a
US State Department report placed Israel in the third
section of its `black list' on countries whose laws don't
meet US criteria for dealing with this crime and threatened
economic sanctions." In Israel, white
sex slaves are only allowed to keep three percent of their
earnings.
Jews are also leaders in major white collar crime in America.
As an example, see "Enron,
Fastow, and the Looting of America" by Dr. William
Pierce. Major Wall Street swindles have been be led by Jews
such as Ivan Boesky and Mike Milken, whose involvement in
the S&L debacle cost the U.S. taxpayer hundreds of billions
of dollars.
Jews have always produced a disproportionate number of spies
and subversives in America, such as Ethel and Julius Rosenberg,
nine of the Hollywood Ten (six of the ten were dues-paying
members of the Communist Party), Jonathan Pollard, and the
neo-con instigators behind the Larry Franklin-AIPAC spy scandal.
Even the Jewish ADL, a self-styled human rights and Jewish
defense organization, got its fingers caught in the espionage
cookie jar with the Roy Bullock bust in San Francisco. Please
note the Israeli spy
chronology listed at whatreallyhappen.com.
In American and Europe throughout the 1930's, Jews typically
made up over 50% of the membership of communist party organizations,
although they typically made up miniscule portions of the
overall population well below ten times this percentage. Jews
played a key role in financing the Bolshevik revolution, and
a key role in conducting the slaughter of tens of millions
of non-communists. These alleged Jewish atheists systematically
looted and destroyed Christian churches and slaughtered Russian
priests while leaving all synagogues unscathed.
Jews have been major perpetrators of war crimes and terror
atrocities in the Middle East. As some examples, they
were involved in the bombing of the King
David Hotel that killed 92 people in 1946, the assassination
of the Swedish U.N. mediator Count
Folke Bernadotte, the massacre at Deir Yassein, the Lavon
Affair, the machine-gunning of disarmed Egyptian POWs in Sinai,
the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty (21 Americans dead, 92 maimed),
passive-aggressive allowance of the bombing of the Marine
barracks in Beirut in Oct 1983 (according to Victor Ostrovsky
the Mossad knew all about the suicide mission, but deliberately
failed to warn the Marines, who lost 245 men), the Sabra-Shatilla
massacre in Lebanon, the Jewish neo-con led wars of aggression
in Afghanistan and Iraq that have dumped hundreds of tons
of aerosolized depleted uranium in the Middle East (cf. High
Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper),
and the July-August 2006 war of naked
aggression against the civilian
population of Lebanon.
In August 2005, the World
Bank reported that Israel is one of the most corrupt countries
in the West. Business Data Israel (BDI) commented: ""Israel
is considered one of the riskiest places in the Western world,
with an unstable, inefficient regime, low accountability,
a relatively high rate of state
corruption and poor law enforcement." In addition,
according to a 2006 BBC survey, 43%
of the Israeli public feels that some form of torture
should be permissible, the highest percentage of twenty five
leading countries polled across the world. Last but not least,
Uri Avery observes in his article "Lovable
Man?" that the gap between rich and poor in Israel
is one of the widest in the industrialized world (contrary
to northern European societies that have traditionally had
the largest middle classes relative to their overall populations).
Let us pause for a moment and ask if this is what we would
expect from a nation supposedly serving a divine mission from
God to be a light unto the world?
In spirit, if not technical violation of existing laws, Jews
have run roughshod over every 19th century classical liberal
principle upon which America was founded. Let us start with
the pro-white racial nationalism plank. In the immigration
act of 1790 America was explicitly defined as a white country.
Its leaders believed firmly that whites had a right to their
own racial, economic, and political self-determination. In
contrast, Jews spearheaded the 1965 immigration reform act
that opened the floodgates of Third World immigration. Jewish-dominated
national media have consistently orchestrated white guilt
and white self-hatred campaigns.
Let us take the Jeffersonian and Jacksonian plank that vehemently
opposed the creation of a central bank. Rothschild interests,
along with their Rockefeller and Morgan confederates, orchestrated
the creation of the Federal Reserve Banking System in 1913.
The Jewish predisposition towards financial speculation and
manipulation has helped lead America towards massive indebtedness
and loss of core manufacturing industries, as opposed to the
classical liberal focus on internal manufacturing infrastructural
development.
Let us take the classical liberal focus on avoiding aggressive
war and foreign entanglements. Woodrow Wilson was surrounded
by Jewish advisors, who encouraged him to flip flop 180 degrees
after he won re-election in 1916 election on a peace plank.
Suddenly he stated to bang the war drums for World War I intervention.
So did America's Jewish-controlled major newspapers. The Balfour
Declaration, in which the British government promised Palestine
to Zionists (which Britain had not yet conquered from the
Ottoman Empire), was the gift Britain made to American Jews
in return for bringing America into the war on Britain's side.
America's entry into World War I dragged out the war for two
years, cost many millions of additional lives, and so exhausted
Europe that it contributed heavily towards the rise of Bolshevism,
Fascism, Nazism, and World War II. The Jewish recasting of
America into a global hegemon has resulted in an incredible
drain on American lives and treasures.
Finally, let us consider the classical liberal focus on decentralization.
Through their monopolization of national media and control
of Congress, Jews mock early American values that promote
local sovereignty, chivalrous free enterprise competition,
and freedom of speech. Through their resurrection of an archaic
Jewish state, Jews also mock Enlightenment principles that
replaced religious dogma with the individual search for truth
and rationalism. Meanwhile, Jews have the nerve to beat their
chests as leftist champions of all of the aforementioned classical
liberal principles, even though they have torn up every social
contract and implied mutual understanding that once emancipated
them from the ghettos of Eastern Europe.
The Old Testament, Talmud, and Kabala have numerous sections
that absolutely drip with hatred towards gentiles. Sections
of the Talmud refer to gentiles as lowly cattle. Not all Jews
take this seriously, but among the ones that do, this predisposes
them towards being in a state of perpetual war towards gentile
society in much the same manner that hardened criminals are
permanent subversives.
There appear to be some significant sociological differences
in child-rearing practices between Jews and gentiles. An interesting
anecdote was reported by F. Scott Fitzgerald, author of The
Great Gatsby, based on an experience when he
was a scriptwriter in Hollywood in the 1930's. A Jewish kid
is caught lying and cheating in school, and is sent home by
the principle. He wrote in the script that the mother shows
disapproval. His Jewish producers had him rewrite the scene
where the mother coddles the poor dear. Fitzgerald remarked
that if the scene had involved himself and his Irish mother,
she would have whipped the hell out of him.
An important perspective on Jewish criminality was outlined
in the PBS documentary "World War II: The Propaganda
Battle" on PBS, part of the "A Walk Through the
20th Century With Bill Moyers" series. This documentary
featured interviews with Fritz Hippler, creator of the Nazi
documentary The Eternal Jew, as
well as Frank Capra, who created the Why We Fight series.
This PBS documentary showed a famous extract of The
Eternal Jew. It started with an animated map
of the world. It depicted a rat population in central asia.
It noted that rats are a cunning mammalian species that has
evolved to covertly feed off human sloth. The animated map
showed the global rat population spreading out in little colonies
all over the world. First they infested the ancient world,
and then later medieval Europe. Following the advent of the
age of Exploration following the discoveries of Columbus,
little rat colonies followed Europeans to the far corners
of the globe. The animated map then depicted Jewish origins
in western Asia. The documentary noted that Jews live off
the running sores of human civilization. It then showed them
spreading around the world in little colonies following Europeans
in a manner analogous to rats.
This caused Bill Moyers to look up at the camera with a very
painful expression. He asked (with words to the effect), "If
one compares ones fellow man to rats, it does not take a great
genius to figure out what to do with them."
Moyers is absolutely right. These are extremely unpleasant
thoughts. I do not advocate violating the Constitutional rights
of Jews or any other group. I advocate purely legal, peaceful
means.
However, it is true that criminals of all
races can have similarities to rats. Criminals generally operate
in a stealthy manner. They can also be ornery, malicious,
and destructive. According to the book More
Cunning Than Man: A Social History of Rats and
Man by Robert Hendrickson, while it is true
that as individuals rats typically cringe and hide, once they
operate in groups and can find a weak target, they have been
known to attack. As an example, rat packs have been known
to attack and kill unprotected human infants. When given free
rein of an apple warehouse, rats have been known to maliciously
take a small bite out of each apple to ruin as much as possible.
Criminals often operate in an analogous manner, becoming more
dangerous and vicious as they become more organized and powerful
and gain free reign.
One possible explanation of this phenomenon is that criminals
tend to be highly selfish without any strongly held sense
of coherent principles or internal restraint. Therefore, when
they are subjected to close scrutiny or oppressive rule, there
is no limit to how far they will cringe, dissimilate, and
debase themselves in order to please their masters and gratify
simple survival needs. Conversely, when they are in positions
of tremendous power with little external restraint, there
is no limit to the cruel abuses that they are willing to inflict
on others to satisfy their power lusts.
This helps to explain the observation by Tacitus that "When
the state is most corrupt, the rules are most multiplied."
Honest people, conversely, require fewer laws because they
operate under greater internal restraint. In addition, given
that blacks have a higher percentage of sociopaths in their
populations than whites, and that the French Foreign legion
has traditionally had a much higher percentage of desperados
escaping justice than most Western military organizations,
this helps to explain why most black rulers in Africa have
tended to be far more capricious and oppressive on their own
people than the white colonialist governments that they replaced
in the 20th century, and why the Foreign Legion has been notorious
for its brutal discipline.
Getting back to Jews, it is not
that all Jews are like rats, but rather it is those particular
Jews who are criminals
— like criminals of all other races — who remind
people of rodent behavior.
After living in New York City for ten years and dealing with
New York Jews on a daily basis, I am convinced that the Jewish
population has a significantly higher percentage of sociopaths
than the white middle class population. However, I do not
know what that percentage is and can only make a wild guess.
At least 20-30%? I do not know for sure, although it is probably
close to whatever the maximum saturation point a population
can sustain without becoming dysfunctional. Furthermore, the
sustainable saturation level probaly varies with such factors
as economic conditions and the character of the host population.
Jewish sociopathology rates can probably be analyzed with
ecological balance and dynamic game theory interactive models.
However, the more significant issue than determining an accurate
percentage (if such is possible), is the fact that this percentage
seems to be high enough to give the Jewish community very
serious problems in preventing its worst sociopaths from rising
to the top and keeping them in check once they get there.
In the articles that I have archived
for the Reverend Ted Pike, he is not joking around when
he talks about "evil Jewish leaders" who are out
to use every devious means possible to destroy all of our
First Amendment rights, if not what is left of the Constitution.
This is a very real and very serious threat. Michael Collins
Piper is not joking either when he describes their behavior
in books such as Final
Judgment, Judas
Goats, and High
Priests of War. Ditto for Col Donn de Grand Pre in
Viper's
Venom.
Jewish totalitarianism
Anti-Nazi propaganda has left many Americans
with the subliminal impression that because the Nazis were
brutal authoritarians, and because they persecuted the Jews,
that this somehow means that Jews are the exact opposite,
namely humane, libertarian, and innocent. This is is very
fallacious. Often brutal authoritarian intriguers hate each
other more than they are hated by libertarians. As come examples,
authoritarian Nazis fought authoritarian Communists on the
Eastern Front. Communist Chinese waged border skirmishes with
Communist Russians in the 1960's. Communist Vietnamese vanquished
Communist Khymer Rouge mass murderers in Cambodia in the 1970's.
Lastly, Stalinist Communists purged international Trotskyite
Jewish Communists in the 1930's.
The kinds of people who become enemies of the Jews does not
necessarily define who the Jews are as a people. This is particularly
true since the Jews have at one time or another made enemies
of just about every
racial and ethnic group, nationality, and ideological persuasion
on the planet. Jews have severely alienated ideologues ranging
from authoritarians to anarcho-libertarians, and from extreme
leftists to extreme rightists. Perhaps the only thing that
enemies of Jews have had in common throughout history is their
common hatred of Jews who remind them of criminals and subversives.
(See my criminality section above).
Wilmot Robertson points out in the Dispossessed
Majority (p. 193) that everywhere that Jews
have gained the supreme ruling hand, their rule has been cruel
and vicious:
The few instances, at least in recent history,
where bodies of Jews have assumed outright political control —
the Kurt Eisner regime in Bavaria (in late 1919), the short-lived
Spartacus uprising in Berlin (December 1918-January 1919), Bela
Kun's sadistic orgy in Budapest (March-August 1919) — could
hardly be classified as golden ages of statesmanship. Neither
could the Russian Revolution, in which Jews took a commanding
role until the Stalin purges. The Jewish autonomous region of
Birobidzhan in the late Soviet Union's Far East fizzled out almost
before it started. Israel has been in a state of war since its
creation in 1948.
In ancient times, Jews were also brutal. Israeli dissident
Israel Shamir writes in his excellent article "Friends,
True and False":
...Another error the Jews repeat is the
error of mistreating native people. After the Hasmonean
victory over Seleucids, the victory described in the biblical
Books of Maccabees, they took over Palestine. Their first
deed was expulsion of the native population of Caesarea
and its repopulation by Jews. There was a Nakba even then.
In those days, the natives of Palestine had no power plants,
so the Jews had to be satisfied with destroying their temples.
In order to become the Light Unto The Nations, the Jews
had to put the Nations into complete Darkness, and so they
did. A hundred years of Jewish absolute rule (168-68 BC)
were the most horrible times for the country, and the Roman
general Pompey the Great was met as a liberator when he
subdued the Jews and limited their power to Jerusalem and
a few other areas.
Fascism to perfection
The state of Israel today is hardly a model democracy. In
fact, it seems to fit all the criteria outlined in the Mises
Institute seminar on the Economics
of Fascism for the perfect fascist
state, which I will discuss in detail later when I address
its economic policies.
Many of Israel's leaders have openly admired Zeev
(Vladimir) Jabotinsky, a leader of "Revisionist"
Zionism, who in turn openly admired Mussolini's fascism.
Its leaders typically have a Mossad background, which Victor
Ostrowsky (author of By Way of Deception)
claims is the most admired organization in Israel. Not surprisingly,
Israeli leaders prefer to operate in secrecy. They routinely
carry out assassinations. They also routinely engage in back
door international arm-twisting and warmongering through neo-cons
in America (see High
Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper).
Israel also appears to perfectly fit a different definition
of fascism contained in professor Robert Paxton's 2004 book
The
Anatomy of Fascism. In his
article about the highly misleading term "Islamo-Fascism,"
Eric Margolis summarizes Dr. Paxton's ingredients for fascism
as follows:
Paxton defines fascism’s essence, which
he aptly terms its "emotional lava" as: 1. a sense of
overwhelming crisis beyond reach of traditional solutions; 2.
belief one’s group is the victim, justifying any action
without legal or moral limits; 3. need for authority by a natural
leader above the law, relying on the superiority of his instincts;
4. right of the chosen people to dominate others without legal
or moral restraint; 5. fear of foreign "contamination."
Fascism exhalts the state. The Jewish state
is supremely exhalted not only in Israel, but also before
the U.S. Congress by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee
(AIPAC).
The loss of crewman on the U.S.S.
Liberty and the cancerous shortening of the lives of hundreds
of thousands of American military personnel from aerosolized
depleted uranium are all treated like insignificant human
sacrifices on the alter of the ineffably magnificent Zionist
cause.
Fascism promotes massive economic central planning and government
cooption of industry. The Israeli government engages in massive
economic interventionism, including major direct subsidy,
joint ownership of industry, massive welfare payments, and
myriad restrictions on general economic activity. During the
Cold War, socialist
Israel employed about 30% of the population, the highest
percentage outside of Communist countries. Much of the top-down
subsidy comes from American aid. Prior to the Iraqi War, conservative
estimates of American subsidy to Israel was in the hundreds
of billions of dollars. According to an estimate that
appeared in the American Free Press,
the total direct and indirect costs of the Jewish state to
America, to include the full economic impact to America of
the 1970's oil shocks and current Iraq war, are somewhere
over $4 trillion.
Fascism frequently glorifies war and promotes militarism.
Since war-making is typically a monopoly of the state, this
is an ideal way for fascist regimes to flatter themselves
while using militarist authority to suppress civil liberties
and dissent.
The Israeli state is highly militarized and promotes a state
of perpetual siege-like
paranoia among its citizens. It routinely applies horrendous
economic sanctions, if not outright regulatory strangulation,
against West Bank and Gaza-bound enclaves of Palestinians.
Many areas have become de facto Warsaw Ghettos. The Israeli
government also visits aerial bombardment upon innocent
Lebanese civilians and vital infrastructure completely
disconnected from any guerilla activity. The Orwellian "perpetual
war for perpetual peace" environment includes endless
expansionist
visions offered by various political and religious extremists,
hardly denounced vehemently by the Israeli majority.
Fascism frequently involves police state surveillance and
intimidation of the citizenry. Reuven Schossen is a former
Israeli Army Captain who was interviewed
on Aug 3, 2006 by Daryl Bradford Smith. He had this to
say about the current police state climate in Israel (at about
34 minutes into the interview):
Daryl Bradford Smith: ..(After
discussing brutal attitudes by certain Israelis towards Lebanese
civilian victims of Israeli bombings) Do you think that many
of the military are starting to feel that this is a horrible
and wrong approach to Hezbollah and Lebanon and the rest of
it? There must be some people with conscience there. I have
to believe that.
Reuven Schossen: The problem is that the
public is brainwashed. You know the last series of events
began when one soldier was captured in Gaza and two soldiers
were captured in Southern Lebanon. The definition is important.
They were captured. They were soldiers in a military action
that were captured.
Smith: That is right.
Schossen: But when you read
the Israeli media, the newspapers, the radio, the television,
you do not see that they were captured.
Smith: They were "kidnapped."
Schossen: They were "kidnapped."
And these semantics have kidnapped the mind of a whole nation.
Because people are hysterical over there. About the kidnapping
issue. They were not picking flowers at their mother's garden.
Smith: But Reuven, are there
people of conscience who are just plain afraid to say something?
Schossen: You know, living in Israel you
are afraid. If you are living in Israel, you know that your
phones are being listened to. That your Internet is being
watched. And you know, you never know who your friends are.
I had a few surprises after I left there. So people are afraid
to speak out. You know the Israeli security services, the
internal one, I am not speaking about the Mossad, I am speaking
about Shin Beth, are playing with the Israeli population.
You know one of the most amazing pictures of the last day
there was a protest event in Tel Aviv. And you could see the
pictures and you can see people wearing red shirts with communist
signs. I saw that and I could not understand what kind of
communists are those. Since when have you communists marching
with red flags in the streets of Israel. And I want to tell
you something. These were not protestors. These were implanted
by the Shin Beth as a provocation. That was a message to the
Israeli public, that if they go out and protest, they will
be labeled as communists. And in a sense criminals.
Smith: But is not the whole
kibutz system a communist system?
Schossen: The kibbutz was never really communist.
There was only one kibbutz which was openly communist. The
others were kind of socialist.
Smith: That is symantics right there Reuven,
because communism and socialism are not separated by very
much space.
Schossen: It is not exactly semantics. I
touch on that in one of the chapters of my book. The kibbutzim
were a kind of oligarchy. They have very little to do with
socialism. It does not matter, the point is that in 2006 you
cannot find enough communists in Israel, especially the young
ones making a march in the open streets. You see that, and
you understand that this is a machination by the Shin Beth,
the internal security service, to frighten the rest of the
public. It is a subliminal message telling the people, if
you will go out protesting, we will transform you into communists.
We will transform you into criminals. We will ruin your name.
We will ruin your lives. The message maybe to you from outside
is not clear. They say, "How nice to have protesting
people." But to someone living inside that society the
message is very clear and very frightening.
Reuven Schossen has sought political asylum in the United
States. He is trying to publish a book about Israeli police
state repression titled Holygarchy.
At his web site schossen.com, he
writes:
In the place I come from, there is no Constitution.
In the place I come from, different kinds of people have different
rights and responsibilities. Usually, people with many rights
have few responsibilities. Some of the people must serve in the
army on pain of imprisonment; others are exempted. Of those exempted,
some belong to the elite and enjoy unusual benefits; others belong
to minorities with very few rights.
In a recent case, the Supreme Court of my country, sitting down
to its most special meeting of thirteen of our most prominent
judges, decided to forbid marriage between a citizen from one
part of my country with a person from a territory occupied by
my country.
In the place I come from, my religion was decided for me by the
State and is coded into the internal passport required by my government.
Trying to officially change my religion could be a useless lifelong
struggle.
In the place I come from, I can marry a Christian in a church;
but the ceremony will not be recognized by the state and my children
will be bastards and denied many rights because my parents were
Jews. There are no civil ceremonies and one must get married in
the temple belonging to the religion indicated on the internal
passport.
I come from Israel.
Mr. Schossen has demonstrated tremendous
courage and honesty. More telling yet will be the number of
fellow Jews in American who can respect his courage and help
him, because he does need support from both Jews and gentiles
alike.
For more insights into the repressive world of Israel from
an American liberal perspective, one should read online The
Life of An American Jew in Racist, Marxist Israel,
written in 1985 by Jack Bernstein. This is a classic that
helps to reinforce many points made elsewhere in this article.
Religious centralization
Judaism itself is a fundamentally totalitarian religion, as
explicitly noted by Israel Shahak in Jewish History,
Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years.
In his chapter "Orthodoxy and Interpretation" professor
Shahak notes:
The legal system of the Talmud can be described
as totally comprehensive, rigidly authoritarian, and yet
capable of infinite development, without however any change
in its dogmatic base. Every aspect of Jewish life, both
individual and social, is covered, usually in considerable
detail, with sanctions and punishments provided for every
conceivable sin or infringement of the rules. The basic
rules for every problem are stated dogmatically and cannot
be questioned.
In his classic book Stranger
Than Fiction: The History of the Jewish People,
Rabbi Lewis Browne points out that rabbis often built up a
wall of all-encompassing laws to maintain Jewish identity
and continuity at all costs. In various places in medieval
Europe where Jews were initially openly welcomed by gentiles,
the Jews typically segregated themselves first. Then when
they ran into conflict with gentiles through their sharp practices,
they secretly welcomed anti-Semitism because it gave them
an excuse to maintain the wall of ethnic separation, while
at the same time giving them a victimization role that could
be blamed on gentiles rather than upon themselves. In fact,
the Jews have a long history of magnifying their own persecution
and pumping up casualty figures, going back to ancient times.
There are numerous cases where Jews have claimed that more
of them were killed in anti-Semitic programs than the total
number of humans living in the entire host country where they
lived.
All of this stands in sharp opposition to Northern European
traditions of honesty, openness, honor, modesty, and stoicism.
The rub comes when Jews want to enter our society and enjoy
the stability, productivity, and human rights created by the
indigenous innate traits and culture of white people, and
then the next thing we know, elite Jews (who reform Jews cannot
seem to control) want to turn around and receive special privileges,
mix us up racially and ethnically, and call us dumb schmucks
under their breath. They cannot live with us, and they cannot
live without us.
Totalitarianism frequently manifests itself through abusiveness
to dependent people. I vividly remember once watching a PBS
documentary about the necessity of shelters for battered wives
in Israel. Such things are a rarity in northern European societies,
where women's rights are more often taken for granted. Dr.
Duke notes in Jewish Supremacism
(p. 111)
The most prominent of the modern feminists
were Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan and Bella Abzug. Interestingly,
all three came from one of the most sexually repressive
religions on Earth: Judaism. A Hole in the
Sheet by Evelyn Kaye, who grew up in an Orthodox
home, illustrates the demeaning and often degraded position
of women in the Jewish faith and the hatred expressed toward
Gentiles outside of it. She discusses the Bar Mitzvah and
the completely ascendant role of the male and writes the
following:
During the prayers which a Jewish
man recites every morning are a series of blessings, which
include: “Thank you, Lord, for not making me a non-Jew,
for not making me a slave, for not making me a woman.”
In Susan Weidman Schneider’s book Jewish and Female,
Rabbi Laura Geller comments: “Menstrual taboos are
responsible for real damage to Jewish women’s views
of themselves and their bodies. I have met many women
who learned nothing about the Torah except that they could
not touch the Torah because they menstruate.. . . Their
sense of themselves as ‘inferior’ Jews has
already permeated their relationship to tradition and
their own bodies. 237 [footnote for Jewish
Supremacism]
Dr. Duke also observes on page 112 of Jewish
Supremacism:
The Talmud often characterizes women as
unclean, whores, and as deceitful, lower beings. It even
has long passages that justify adult males having sexual
relations with little girls. Women are segregated in the
Orthodox synagogue. Women are almost as reviled as Gentiles.
Note the following Talmudic references, starting with the
prayer to
which Kaye refers:
Blessed be thou. . .who has not
made me a goy. . . who has not made me a woman, and who
has made me an Israelite. . .who has not made me a slave.
Judah Ben Ilai 239
When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it
is nothing, for when the girl is less than this [three years
old], it is as if one puts the finger into the eye, tears
come to the eye,… [footnote] (7) again and again but
eyesight returns, so does virginity come back to the little
girl under three years. (Kethuboth 11b)240
A maiden aged three years and one day may be acquired in
marriage by coition. (Sanhedrin 55b and 69a-69b)241 and
(Yebamoth 57b 58a, 60b)242
Yet, the Jewish high priestesses of women's
liberation have made few inroads in reforming those inequities.
Only the Reform part of Judaism puts women on somewhat of
an equal footing. But Israel is an Orthodox-run Jewish nation,
and nearly all the Reform and Conservative organizations
around the world support Israel wholeheartedly. The question
of ethnic heritage far overshadows any doctrinal debate.
It is ironic that women from the religious culture having
the most demeaning attitude toward women, should focus their
efforts on promoting a sexual revolution among those of
European descent. It seems to me that their time could be
better spent addressing the rank inequities in their own
backyard.
Jewish totalitarian complexities
Most Americans seem to have a visceral sense that "totalitarianism"
means long rows of fanatical soldiers goose-stepping in jackboots
to orders being barked over loudspeakers, as secret police
spies closely watch the reactions of individuals in crowds.
But this is very simplistic.
At the beginning of my "top
down vs. bottom up" article, I have already mentioned
William S. Lind's discussion regarding an interesting anomaly.
Hitler's army actually encouraged forms of insubordination
while engaged in maneuver warfare.
In his book The Roman Republic,
Isaac Asimov talked about how Roman imperialists practiced
the policy, "The looser the hold, the tighter the grip."
The imperialists provided aqueducts, roads, Roman law, and
some quasi-autonomy in return for tribute to Caesar. Many
conquered regions acquiesced to this program.
Similarly, we can see some "loose-tight" characteristics
in at least two areas of Jewish totalitarianism, namely adaptive
mimicry and contractual deal negotiation.
In regard to adaptive mimicry, I have met quite a few Jews
who seem to have photographic memories. As a group, Jews seem
to be very good at quickly learning foreign languages and
superficially adopting foreign customs and culture to blend
in. As an extreme example, I think that former Israeli Prime
Minister Ehud Barak probably earned prestige in Israeli society
for his cleverness when he disguised
himself as an Arab woman to conduct a successful commando
assassination mission in Lebanon. I am also reminded of the
cleverness of the Jewish straight actor Dustin Hoffman when
he successfully plays a woman to get an acting part in the
film Tootsie. In addition, it is
common to find Jews getting involved with political groups
on both sides of every issue, such as both the pro-gun ownership
and anti-gun factions, or pro-immigration and anti-immigration
groups. This, despite the fact that the majority of American
Jews tend to be about one standard deviation to the political
left of white males on most important issues in America. (This
is according to a 1980's article once published in the American
Enterprise magazine). I think that Jews often
take pride in their ability to infiltrate alien groups and
affect views that are very different from their own real views.
Therefore, the fact that there have been some famous Jewish
libertarians such as Ayn Rand, Dr. Ludwig von Mises, and Dr.
Murray Rothbard does not necessarily negate an overall pattern
of Jewish totalitarianism. These libertarians may simply reflect
a small minority of renegades. Indeed, if one looks hard enough
one can find that renegades have existed in all societies,
to include the old Soviet Union and Third Reich. The existence
of certain libertarians may also reflect a combination of
intrigue and adaptive mimicry.
In the cases of Ayn
Rand, Ludwig von Mises, and Dr. Murray Rothbard, I think
that they were probably sincere in their libertarian views.
However, one might argue that they were the renegade exceptions
that help prove the rule. In addition, in their own subtle
ways they too showed their Jewishness. They never staunchly
defended white genetic interests or an American nationalist
industrial policy. Instead they generally favored multi-racialism
and multiculturalism and an internationalist brand of libertarianism
that encouraged open borders and unrestricted free trade.
Dr.
Murray Rothbard, who I admire most of the three, and who
came the closest to defending American Old Right principles,
had a Christian wife of non-Jewish ancestry. He really
was a renegade.
In regard to contractual deal negotiation, obviously people
who are smart enough to understand how to trade off concessions
have the analytical ability to understand encroachments by
authorities. However, intellectually understanding contractual
negotiation and having the emotional drive to demand liberty
are two different things. There are many cases of people who
are intellectually libertarian, but fall into line with a
totalitarian agenda at the drop of a hat because of strong
emotional ties.
A good example of intellectual freedom seekers who remained
emotional slaves are stories about certain Soviet spies who
defected to America during the Cold War. After a few months
in America, many former Soviet agents started experiencing
an extremely powerful urge to go to the Soviet embassy and
turn themselves in. Intellectually, they understood perfectly
well that the Soviet system was evil, barbarous, and totalitarian.
Intellectually, they admired American libertarian institutions
(or what was left of them by the Cold War era). They understood
that upon returning to the Soviet Union, they could be tortured,
shot, or sent to the Gulag for life. However, they also felt
this incredibly powerful emotional attachment to "Mother
Russia." I recollect reading that emotional withdrawal
symptoms became such a problem that the FBI went out of its
way to help create Russian social support groups in America
to reduce the probability of suicides and re-defections.
As a person who leans towards libertarian racial nationalism,
I think it is perfectly healthy for Jews or people of any
race or ethnicity to feel loyalty to their tribal roots. The
issue here is not a strongly felt Jewish loyalty to Jewish
heritage, but rather situations where a strong emotional commitment
causes certain Jews to do nasty things that threaten America
and our Constitutional rights. It is not Jewish racial nationalism
per se that bothers me, but rather the aggressive Zionist
imperialist brand of racial nationalism that is killing people
and destroying American civil liberties.
Regrettably, there are well-funded Jewish totalitarian institutions
firmly implanted here on U.S. soil. One of the most notorious
is called the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). MIT professor
Noam Chomsky, who the ADL labels a Jewish renegade, has noted
its "Stalinist-style
mentality." The ADL claims to be one of America's
leading "human rights" and "Jewish defense"
organizations. In actuality, the American Free
Press has long maintained that this sinister
organization serves as an
unregistered agent of Israel and the Mossad.
The ADL keeps massive
files and dossiers on American dissidents on all ends
of he political spectrum. It got caught in illegal domestic
spying in the notorious Roy
Bullock case. It has been a leader in promoting "hate
crime" legislation, which many American conservatives
view as a back door ruse to condition the public to link political
ideas to "crime." In contrast to all this, the Anglo
Saxon common law punishes only acts, and not speech (with
some extremely narrow exceptions, such as libel or for falsely
yelling "fire!" in a crowded movie theater). The
ultimate objective is to criminalize any public criticism
of Jews in America much as it has already been
criminalized in Canada and throughout Europe.
In addition, the ADL is a leader in promoting legislation
to censure the Internet under the guise of fighting "child
pornography" and "terrorism." Rev. Ted Pike
has been one of many patriotic leaders who has stood up to
fight
this deception.
We have also seen organized Jewish groups come down hard on
the Mearsheimer-Walt Harvard
study for daring to expose the influence of the Jewish
lobby in America today. Jews have also pounced on Holocaustianity
free thinkers such as David
Irving, Ernst Zundel, Gumar Rudolf, and other men of conscience
and free inquiry. I cover this in the Critical
Issues section, also see Best Witness
(offered by America First Books) about an early skirmish in
this longstanding First Amendment Battle.
Last, but not least, we frequently see Jews beat up on fellow
Jews who are dissidents, smearing them as "self-hating
Jews" and "non-Jewish Jews." They include individuals
such as Victor Ostrovsky, Mordechai Venuunu, Noam Chomsky,
professor Stanley Lichter, and professor Israel Shahak.
Offering the Jewish community a
deal it can't refuse
While attending a business club meeting in New York City,
I will never forget once hearing a very successful Jewish
leader with impeccable Ivy League and "assimilated"
credentials talk about being privileged to one day be able
to meet a very special man. He talked about it in such a hushed,
reverent, and cryptic way that I felt it could only mean a
godfather. As a published example of this, the preface of
Indecent
Exposure: A True Story of Hollywood and Wall Street
by David McClintick has a quote by the famous director John
Huston, to the effect that people who lived in Hollywood in
the 1930's were wrong to think that Louis B. Meyer of MGM
was King of the Jungle. Every day Meyer was on the phone long
distance with Nicholas
Schenck of Loews back in New York City, who kept his name
out of the papers, but was the real King of the Jungle. We
also know from Final Judgment about
how America's crime boss Meyer Lansky worked in partnership
with the Israeli government and its Mossad along with part
of the CIA. Their nefarious activities received cover-up services
from America's Jewish dominated national media. In other words,
behind the scenes, Jews operate under a monarchical, oligarchical
godfather
system that makes small potatoes out of the version played
by Marlon Brando in Francis
Ford Coppolla's Godfather film.
Fanatical Zionists have been known to not only arm twist fellow
Jews, but to also kill them. For example, in 1940 the Jewish
Haganah bombed the S.S. Patria in Haifa harbor, killing 247
Jewish refugees. Naeim Giladi, an Arab Jew who has become
a U.S. citizen, has written Ben
Gurion's Scandals: How the Hagannah & Mossad
Eliminated Jews. It talks about how Zionists posing as
Arab terrorists killed Jews in Arab lands to drive them to
Israel.
All of this supports my point that the Jewish community is
often caught in a web of intrigue and conflicting loyalties
that makes it difficult to prevent vicious, depraved, and
tyrannical people from rising to the top.
White social reaction to Jewish totalitarianism
can create additional complications
Jewish totalitarianism often creates enormous complications
for patriotic American gentiles. When first confronted with
nasty, heavy-handed Jewish methods, the immediate patriotic
emotional reaction is often to try to fight fire with fire
and create a focused, authoritarian counter movement. This
is almost reflexive, like trying to swat away a mosquito that
is buzzing in ones ear. Put another way, at first glance,
it seems unlikely that one will break the Jewish chokehold
on America's privately owned central bank, its national media,
and its government by merely passing out lollipops and tootsie
rolls.
One of the most famous examples of authoritarian reaction
was George
Lincoln Rockwell, a former U.S Navy flier who founded
the American Nazi Party in 1959. He claimed in his book White
Power that he was really trying to promote an
"authoritarian republic" rather than blind "Fuhrerism."
He felt that one needed to use very bold confrontative tactics
to deal with Jewish power. If nothing else, the Nazis might
shake things up, expand the political frame of reference,
and maybe gain some elbow room for traditional American conservatives
who Rockwell felt had become too squeamish. Rockwell was angered
that many conservatives rarely dared to explicitly identify
Jews as their enemies in public, often using cutesy terms
such as "the eskimos" and "the you know who"
even in their private political meetings. According to some
sources, before he was assassinated in 1967, Rockwell had
started to shift away from the storm troop confrontative approach.
As another famous example, the late Dr. William Pierce claimed
in his article "The
Radicalizing of an American" in Best
of Attack: Revolutionary Voice of the National Alliance
(p. 124-125) that he started out as a libertarian while growing
up as a teenager and later as a physics professor at Oregon
State University. Then after he got disgusted with the social
changes fomented by Jews in America during the early 1960's,
he got involved with George Lincoln Rockwell and became publisher
of National Socialist World. By
the early 1970's he started to distance himself from Nazi
tactics, although in editorials such as "The
Measure of Greatness" that appeared in the March-April
1989 National Vanguard magazine
he did not exactly engage in Hitler-bashing either. He instructed
members of his National Alliance in a 1980's membership manual
that they could honestly tell the public that they were not
a "Nazi" movement. Later in an American
Dissident Voices broadcast he referred to the use of Nazi
props as a "cheap right wing trick" that tried to
use authoritarianism as a method to build cohesion among whites
to match Jewish cohesion, circumventing the more tedious process
of building shared values and educating fellow citizens on
a grass roots level. While the use of Nazi props might fetch
instant publicity in the controlled media, Pierce said that
such tactics typically attracted flakey right wing "hobbyists"
and "thrill-seekers" rather than people with a deep
long term commitment and sorely needed skills.
Last, but not least, in My Awakening,
on pages 488-489, Dr.
David Duke claims that as a teenager he was influenced
by George Lincoln Rockwell's extremist approach. The story
of young David is a classic example of an immature reaction
to the complex sociological threat created by Jews, specifically
as it regarded Duke's desire to protest a Jewish revolutionary
named William Kunstler who proselytized near his home in the
New Orleans area. According to Dr. Duke:
Kunstler had been the main lawyer for the
`Chicago 7' defendants, who were charged with rioting at the 1968
Democratic National Convention. He had also been involved with
hundreds of Black legal actions, trying to force destruction of
White schools and neighborhoods. One of the things that really
disturbed me about Kunstler was that the media seldom mentioned
his Communist activism and beliefs. Instead, they presented him
as an "activist," or "civil rights lawyer,"
never as the Communist Revolutionary that he was. I wanted to
do something to call attention to his Communist pedigree.
I heard about his scheduled appearance at Tulane University, only
a day before the event. My good friends Ray Leahart and Louis
McWilliams asked me if I wanted to do anything, and I thought
about it quickly and proposed that we picket him. We three made
up one large sign reading KUNSTLER IS A COMMUNIST JEW.
To add to the drama and prevent the press from ignoring it, I
decided to try the Rockwell tactic and use a swastika armband
to demonstrate against the Communist traitor...
...My father was furious when he found out what I had done. Me
made me promise I would not join the Nazi Party, and I never did.
Of course, that single rash act of picketing Kunstler came back
to haunt me many years hence, for it gave my enemies another chance
to attack me by association, rather than confront the ideas and
issues themselves. At the same time, I felt relieved that I had
acted publicly, I had crossed my Rubicon and I felt there was
no going back from my chosen path.
A big problem with any authoritarian approach
is that it immediately alienates Nordic America. I have already
described in my environmental
vs. genetic discussion how Nordics have longstanding libertarian
traditions, more so than any other people on the planet.
Unfortunately Nordics have been in steady decline as a percentage
of America's population since the Civil War. Most of them
still do not have their act together or know anything about
their indigenous Indo-European culture or identity. They are
easily manipulable. It still works like a charm for Jews to
trot out blond-haired, blue-eyed Nordics-for-hire and have
them bewail those supposedly nasty, authoritarian, bigoted,
racist American nationalists who don't say nice things about
all those totally wonderful poor, persecuted, innocent, downtrodden
Jews. In their own way, particularly among Christian Zionist
Nordics, Nordic Americans can become bigger enemies of white
right wingers than the Jews themselves.
Dr. Duke often talks about how national media frequently tag
him with the label "former Klansman," as if he was
born with "KKK" on his birth certificate. The national
media is much less likely to mention that he has been out
of the Klan nearly three decades, and has served as elected
public official in the Louisiana legislature. An important
point Dr. Duke likes to make for would-be pro-white activists
is that Jewish-controlled Hollywood has created many toxic
and distorted images of right wingers, and that this can create
self-defeating, self-fulfilling prophecies. For example, Hollywood
often shows racially conscious whites skirking around as if
they have done something illegal when in fact it is perfectly
legal, normal, and healthy to be concerned about white survival.
Meanwhile, Hollywood makes aggressive pro-Zionist activists
such as Mel Mermelstein in Mike Piper's Best
Witness (carried by America First Books) appear very
noble. White Americans need to turn off their TV sets when
it comes to all the "Hollywood Nazi," "Hollywood
Klansmen," and other toxic "Hollywood Right Winger"
stereotypes being fed them and simply be themselves and act
like the normal, decent citizens that they are. The real sickies
are the Jewish moguls who run Hollywood who continually pump
out misleading images.
An important purpose behind this discussion of Jewish totalitarianism
is to clear up American right wing codespeak about an amorphous
group of internationalists who work tirelessly through myriad
front organizations to create a one world despotic government.
What they usually mean, in plainer English, is an international
network of extremely powerful Jewish plutocrats who possess
a powerful instinctive tendancy towards centrism, criminal
deception, and monopolization. These paranoid Jewish criminals
feel that they must ultimately create a global police state
to prevent honest citizens from thinking for themselves, organizing,
rebelling, and ultimately overthrowing Jewish supremacism.
These low cunning supremacists routinely infiltrate legitimate
nationalist groups with agents who pose as phony free speech
liberals in order to find exploitable vulnerabilities and
determine ways to play off one group against another. They
also play the same game by infiltrating leftist groups.
E.D. Butler summed it up well in his article "Censored
History" when he stated, "The frightful results
to date of the policies of these international power fanatics
are nothing compared with what now threatens mankind. It is
no use suggesting that they can be appealed to, pointing out
that their policies of centralising power run so contrary
to reality, that the end result must be the complete collapse
of what remains of Civilisation and their own destruction."
Jewish psychopathology
On the street level, we have all heard the term
"neurotic New Yorker" which usually means "Jewish."
Having lived in New York City for ten years, which has the
largest Jewish population in the world outside of Israel,
it was not uncommon for me to hear gentiles comment about
their need to periodically leave New York City to mentally
"detox." It is not uncommon to hear them refer to
Jews as being a very "unnatural" people, overly
adapted to the very "unnatural" multi-racial, multi-cultural
environment of a densely populated urban environment. Lastly,
it is interesting that Israel has
more psychiatrists per capita than any other nation in
the world.
Perhaps the one word that summarizes best what gentiles find
distasteful in Jews is the word "psychopath." Go
to any college textbook on abnormal psychology, look up the
chapter on "psychopathic" and "sociopathic"
personality disorders, and entire Jewish culture and Talmudic
approach to religion appear to fit to a "T" all
the clinical symptoms.
Whereas the aforementioned late Dr. Linda S. Mealey estimated
that gentically-based hard core psychopaths make up about
4% of a white population, my guess is that the Jewish percentage
is somewhere between five to ten times higher within the inbred
Jewish gene pool.
As an example, when psychopaths are in subordinate positions,
they are infamous for being superficially very charming, often
obsequious, and masterful at telling people what they want
to hear. Conversely, once psychopaths are in a superior position,
they are also infamous for being totally ungrateful for any
favors done to them and being particularly cruel, duplicitous,
and exploitive. This is the kind of clinical description you
will find in a college text book that is probably written
by a psychologist or psychiatrist having no thought of Jews
in mind, yet just replace the term "psychopath"
or "sociopath" with "Jew" and you instantly
replicated the bulk of most so-called "anti-semitic"
literature.
I could go on for pages trying to describe Jewish "unnaturalness,"
"toxicity," and "psychopathic nature,"
but perhaps the following might serve as an adequate introductory
overview.
Apocalyptic megalomania: This is
a central topic of Israel Shahak's classic work and currently
comprises the most dangerous Jewish delusional disorder. Israel
has over four hundred atomic bombs and missiles, if anything
should go wrong, many Israeli leaders think they have some
kind of divine right to exercise a "Samson Option"
and pull the whole world down with them. Closely related to
this insanity is Israel's "mad
dog" policy advocated by Phineas Lavon and other
Jewish leaders.
The Talmud, which Jews prize over the Old Testament, is a
virtual megalomania manual. As some examples: "Only Jews
are human. [Gentiles] are animals." (Baba Mezia 114a-
114b.). Also, "Even the best of the [Gentiles] should
be killed. (Babylonian Talmud); and finally "If a heathen
[Gentile] hits a Jew, the Gentile must be killed. Hitting
a Jew is hitting God." (Sanhedrin 58b.)
An important component of Jewish delusional megalomania is
Jewish messianism. In his book Stranger than Fiction:
A History of the Jewish People, Rabbi Lewis
Browne noted that a major recurrent theme of Jewish history
has been the way in which over and over again some self-styled
Rabbi has come up with a New Revelation, gained a large Jewish
cult following, and then has ultimately come to a bad end
for himself and his followers.
Unfortunately the bad end can also become bad news for gentiles
who get sucked into the messiah game. Rev. Ted Pike has discussed
on Daryl Bradford Smith's show the mentality of certain Zionist
groups sects where the end justifies the means. Hence, it
is OK to do evil, because when the Messiah finally comes,
he will somehow rectify all the evil that has been done in
preparation for his coming.
Obviously this approach flunks scientific reasoning 101, because
there are no control measures or differentiations between
independent and dependent variables. What if it turns out
that Jews who do evil in perpetuity never see a messiah? How
do we tell the difference between a true "Chosen of God"
and some group that simply wants to do perpetual evil for
its own sake?
Back in the late 1980's-early 1990's time frame, I recall
seeing a documentary film about Israel that began with a rock
concert in Israel. A lead guitarist started banging out a
steady barrage of low base notes. Then in studied intervals
between the notes, he started wailing into the microphone,
"Messiah is not coming...messiah is not coming...messiah
is not coming...messiah is not coming...(then the base notes
stopped, with a pregnant pause)....he is not even going to
telephone!!!" The crowd of young Israeli rock fans went
wild with laughter and applause.
Part of the "joke" behind all this is the fact that
well over half of all Jews are atheists (in Jewish
Supremacism, Dr. Duke quotes an Israeli poll
that puts the figure as high as 85%), and most of Israel's
leading Zionist politicians have been secular, yet somehow
they cannot shake their egotistical fanaticism. They realize
that much of the Old Testament collapses before modern archeology
and rational Biblical criticism, yet they threaten to nuke
major capitols of the world for questioning their legitimacy.
In my environmental
vs. genetics discussion, I describe how most of Israel's
religious justification for its existence may in fact be based
upon myth, deception, self-delusion, or some combination of
all these things:.
The Biblical stories suggesting glorious and self-sufficient
kingdoms in Palestine, a servile tenure in Egypt, and
various bucolic and pastoral settings are so contrary
to [the pattern of secular historical accounts], to include
even the psychological pattern of the Babylonian Talmud,
that one might wonder if much of the Old Testament was
deliberately created as disinformation. The Israeli dissident
writer Uri Avnery wrote in "Israel's
Provocations: The Method in the Madness" that:
. . .most Israeli archaeologists have always been the
loyal foot-soldiers of the official propaganda. Since
the emergence of modern Zionism, they have been engaged
in a desperate endeavor to "find" archaeological
evidence for the historical truth of the stories of
the Old Testament. Until now, they have gone empty-handed:
there exists no archaeological proof for the exodus
from Egypt, the conquest of Canaan, and the kingdoms
of Saul, David, and Solomon. But in their eagerness
to prove the unprovable (because in the opinion of the
vast majority of archaeologists and historians outside
Israel – and also some in Israel – the Old
Testament stories are but sacred myths), the archaeologists
have destroyed many strata of other periods.
Even the site of the Dome of the Rock Mosque that many
Zionists would like to level in order to make way for
the Third Temple is subject to doubt. Unfortunately the
Dome of Rock happens to be the third holiest shrine in
Islam, and destroying it to make way for more Zionist
real estate development is likely to spill even more rivers
of blood in the Middle East —
and cost ever more American treasure to support their
schemes.
John Tiffany wrote The Myth of the Wailing
Wall for the March/April
2006 issue of the Barnes Review:
Neither the Dome of the Rock near the center of the
Haram esh-Sharif in Jerusalem, nor the Al Aqsa Mosque
occupying the southern side of the Haram (nor any area
within the four walls of that haram, or sanctuary) was,
in reality, the true spot in Jerusalem where the historic
temples of ancient Israel were located. Biblical and
literary accounts dogmatically place the site of all
the temples over the Gihon Spring just north of the
ancient City of David (Zion) and on the southeastern
ridge of Jerusalem. All the present antagonists fighting
in Jerusalem over the "temple site" (who are
out to turn their bombs and guns into plowshares) are
warring over (and for) the wrong place.
Dr. Issa Khalaf's article "Rationality
and Israeli violence" (17-23 Aug 2006 Al-Ahram) provides
an excellent analysis of the extreme contradictions manifested
by Jewish psychopathology. He notes:
Israel is an ethnic state, with an ethno-religious-
nationalist-messianic ideology, based on group identity, not individual
rights, whose institutionalised preference is for Jewish superiority,
disallowing the possibility of equality for a systematically and
sophisticatedly excluded and discriminated against Arab minority.
This is far from the system of majority rule based on the principle
of moral individual equality, protected through minority rights,
rule of law, and civil rights generally found in Western democracies.
This supremacism comes at a tremendous psychological
price. Dr. Khalaf quotes Israeli commentator Haim Hanegbi
from his Ari
Shavit interview, in Haaretz,
28 August, 2003:
I am not a psychologist, but I think that everyone
who lives with the contradictions of Zionism condemns himself
to protracted madness. It's impossible to live like this. It's
impossible to live with such a tremendous wrong. It's impossible
to live with such conflicting moral criteria. When I see not only
the settlements and the occupation and the suppression, but now
also the insane wall that the Israelis are trying to hide behind,
I have to conclude that there is something very deep here in our
attitude to the indigenous people of this land that drives us
out of our minds.
High rate of insanity:
In the late 1800's, European psychotherapists noted
that Jews have a higher incidence rate of insanity compared
to gentiles, ranging from two
to six times the local population. The Jewish
Encyclopedia article "Nervous Diseases"
notes
that:
The Jews are more subject to diseases of the
nervous system than the other races and peoples among which they
dwell. Hysteria and neurasthenia appear to be most frequent. Some
physicians of large experience among Jews have even gone so far
as to state that most of them are neurasthenic and hysterical...he
following causes are usually assigned for the nervousness of the
Jews: (1) The fact that they are town-dwellers, and that diseases
of this kind are most frequently observed in the populations of
the modern large urban centers. (2) The peculiar occupations of
the Jews: neurasthenia is seen most often among the commercial
classes, bankers, and speculators. This view is not sustained
by the fact that neurasthenia and hysteria are met with in the
poorer classes of Jews, in laborers and artisans, just as often
as in the richer classes. (3) Consanguineous marriages are also
blamed by many physicians; but the modern view that such marriages,
when contracted between healthy individuals, are not at all detrimental
to the health of the offspring contradicts this theory...
The comment in the Jewish Encyclopedia
about being town dwellers is very significant. Significantly,
throughout recorded history Jews have mostly functioned as
an urban minority. In Isaac Asimov's Bible,
Asimov claims that the real center of gravity in the ancient
world for Jews was Babylonia and not Palestine. Jews have
never really functioned as a balanced, self-sufficient ecosystem
on a sociobiological level, but rather as dependent sub-componant
at odds with a host. To put it differently in layman's parlance,
Jews have always been the ultimate "cosmopolitans,"
"city slickers," "hustlers," "promoters,"
"wheeler-dealers," and "confidence artists."
They have also always been the world's leading "professional
minority."
High rate of traumatic stress
disorder: Another interesting indication of
a different Jewish nervous system can be seen in military
affairs. In all of America's wars, Jews have generally been
dramatically under represented in
proportion to their percentage within the overall American
population (3%) in regard to both their level of U.S. military
participation and combat casualties. (In contrast, Jews can
be as much as ten times over represented in American professional
occupations such as lawyers, doctors, professors, investment
advisors). According to "Israelis: Neither Tough Nor
Brave" (National Vanguard,
Dec 1982), one reason why Israel is so trigger happy with
massive American-supplied firepower from jets and artillery
is because its soldiers have little toughness for close combat.
In bloody American military campaigns, battle fatigue may
account for as much as 10 percent of all casualties suffered.
"For the Israeli soldiers who participated in the invasion
of Lebanon [in 1982], a relatively brief and easy excursion
in which the Jew were exposed to little direct fire, as indicated
by the extraordinary low number of Jewish combat deaths, battle
fatigue accounted for 23 per cent of all casualties."
This is not to mention how Israel shocked the world in the
summer of 2006 with its massive destruction of Lebanese infrastructure
and innocent civilian lives.
High level of homosexuality: With
the usual Talmudic cleverness and duplicity, Jews simultaneously
condemn homosexuality, rationalize
it, sanction
it, and promote it. Behind closed doors, Jews appear to
have a much higher rate of homosexuality than the general
white population. In The
Life of An American Jew in Racist, Marxist Israel
(available online), Jack Bernstein talks about how Israeli
society is over-supplied with homosexuals. I got the same
feeling when I lived in New York City for ten years.
Bear in mind that homosexuality is more than simply a "life-style."
Read "Fag
Facts" (PDF file) published by the Family
Research Institute about how homosexuality has very serious
implications in terms of such factors as mental health, life
span, promiscuity, hygiene, and recruitiment of minors.
According
to Reverend Ted Pike, Judaism, more than any other religion,
has rejected moral judgments against homosexuality and supports
the gay agenda. Pike reports
that:
Reform Judaism, representing 39 percent of American religious
Jews, is now in total endorsement of sodomy. It says:
We hold that homosexuality is no longer {an abomination};
it is not a mental illness or social deviancy; it is not
a perversion of the natural order. Homosexuality is not
a choice or a preference; it is not something that one
decides to do or abstain from doing. It is, like, heterosexuality,
the way one is. As such it makes no sense on religious
or moral grounds to differentiate between people on the
basis of sexual orientation.
Rabbi Eric Yoffie, president of the Union For Reformed
Judaism, concurs:
For the first time in history, a major rabbinical
body has affirmed the Jewish validity of committed, same-gender
relationships. 1
Conservative rabbis, who lead 33 percent of religious
Jews, announce they will soon ordain gay rabbis and encourage
homosexuality for Jewish men and women who are so inclined.
2
Orthodox Judaism, 21 percent of American religious Jews,
has not yet outwardly endorsed homosexuality. In fact, it
officially forbids homosexual relations between adults.
But in the Talmud, the highest religious, ethical and
legal authority for Orthodox Jews, we find a very different,
shocking reality: little boys under the age of nine (delectable
objects of homosexual lust) are repeatedly described as
incapable of “throwing guilt” on the adult who
rapes them!
Orthodox gay Jewish groups thrive,
American gay porno stars such as Michael Lucas entertain
Israeli troops with live sex shows in Israel, and famous
Jews such as the late Allen
Ginsberg have been disproportionately
represented in radical gay organizations such as the North
American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) and other gay groups.
This helps to explain why Jewish-dominated national media
have pushed for acceptance of homosexuality across America
so hard in recent decades.
Two examples of national media promotion include the notorious
lesbian Ellen
Degeneres, whose openly pro-gay influence has been magnified
by such Jewish controlled media outlets such as CBS, HBO,
and Time. Please also note the movie
Brokeback Mountain, created by Jewish
producers, that tries to bend the American cowboy masculinity
icon towards homosexuality. Idaho attorney Edgar Steele has
had some choice
words about the damage this has done. It is the fact that
this is part of a continual, systematic national media propaganda
pattern that makes many American conservatives so livid.
I am reminded of the following passage from Tom Wolfe's The
Bonfire of the Vanities (p. 106):
. . ."Jimmy,"
Andriutti said to Caughey, "did you know that Jewish
guys — Larry, I don't want you to take this personally
— did you know that Jewish guys, even if they're real
stand-up guys, all have one faggot gene? That's a well-known
fact. They can't stand going out in the rain without an
umbrella or they have all this modern sh** in their apartment
or they don't like to go hunting or they're for the f**king
nuclear freeze and affirmative action or they wear jogging
shoes to work or some god***n thing. You know?"
. . ."Gee," said
[Larry] Kramer, "I don't know why you thought I'd take
it personally."
. . . "Come on, Larry,"
said Andriutti, "tell the truth. Deep down, don't you
wish you were Italian or Irish?"
. . ."Yeah," said
Kramer, "that way I wouldn't know what the f**k was
going on in this f**king place."
Barnes Review writer John de Nugent informed
this author that according to the Jewess Xaviera Hollander,
"The Happy Hooker," a significant proportion of
Jewish men by age 50 have acquired a homosexual lover.
I do not mean to suggest that all male Jews are homosexuals
or un-masculine, but rather that the Jewish community appears
to have a significantly higher percentage of homosexuals than
white gentile communities. The problem is
significant enough that it must
be addressed in any honest discussion about Jews and about
how American values have become so messed up.
To be sure, there are certainly masculine Jewish people around,
such as various screen personas played by Jews such as William
Shatner, Kirk Douglas, James Caan, Paul Newman, and Sir Lawrence
Olivier. From first hand experience, I have observed some
Jewish leaders with masculine personalities in both the military
and civilian worlds.
However, even here there can be some interesting little twists
which make one wonder about what the real underlying feelings
are. As an example, in a PBS interview, the Jewish actor Sir
Lawrence Oliver talked about how he once shocked a British
audience with his "vulgarity" and his emphasis on
"technique" when one moment he played a very hard-edged
Hamlet in live theater, and then in a play that immediately
followed, he convincingly played an effeminate puff-head aristocrat.
When one reads real histories about the Jews,
one is often struck about how Jews repeatedly get off with
a mere slap on the wrist or mere expulsion after commiting
extremely damaging high-level crimes that would ordinarily
get most gentiles hung in a heartbeat from the lamp posts.
I think that a high level of homosexuality and adaptive mimicry
acting traits within Jewry are important factors to help explain
this anomoly. Most gentiles tend to think of their enemies
as being openly bold, defiant, and aggressive personalities.
German Nazis and American Indian savages are good historical
examples. From my own experience as a real estate broker in
New York City, I have known many Jews who are brilliant people,
but who nevertheless like to play effeminate games such as
pretend that they are poor in math or are not "mechanical"
when in fact they are like human computers. When one is acting
as a mediator in an urban setting between different peoples
from varied ethnic backgrounds and all walks of life, one
can begin to appreciate how it might help to be a bit oily
and effeminant to patiently keep cool and pragmatically make
deals rather than risk blowing deals by affecting a harder
masculine edge that is more likely to alienate people.
Oiliness also helps people slither out of tight spots. Jews
can be extremely deceitful and vicious, yet they are so good
at appearing mild-mannered and meek that one almost feels
like one is trying to hit a girl by taking reprisals against
them. For starters, there is no ethnic group in America that
celebrates and whines about a long history of persecution
like the Jews. Mike Piper calls this "The
Cult of Death." Repeatedly mulling and kvetching
over their long history of persecution while making big profits
off what Norman Finkelstein calls the "Holocaust
Industry" reflects both a cynical and an effeminate
approach to life.
Jewish effeminacy reminds me of the self-protective pherome
that the Death's Head moth squirts on itself when it invades
bee hives. I discuss this later in the parasite animal models
section.
Perhaps Dr. David Duke sums it all up best on page 221 of
Jewish Supremacism:
A Palestinian I met in college related to me one of the most
descriptive remarks I have ever heard concerning the Palestinian
conflict. He told me that "The Jew always cries in pain
as he strikes you!"
A high rate of incest and child
molestation Herve Ryssen, French author of The
Mirror of Judaism, The Jewish Fanatic, the Jewish Mafia, The
Psychoanalysis of Judaism, and the online article "The
Psychopathology of Judaism," has gathered evidence
that the rate of child molestation and incest is much higher
among Jews than surrounding white populations.
Kiddie sex and other forms of exploitation
are condoned by the Talmud, as noted
by the following passages:
"When a man finds that evil appetites
are taking hold of his sense, let him repair to some place
where he is unknown, let him dress himself in black and
follow the impulses of his heart." (Mo'ed Katan,
17a). The meaning of this is made more clear in these
other extracts from 'The Talmud': "A gentile girl
who is three years old can be violated" (Aboda Shara
37a). "Inasmuch as a non-Jewish child at three years
and a day is suitable for copulation, her raper is only
unclean until the evening, when he is clean again after
taking a dip in the water." (Choschen Ha'mischpat).
"A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired
in marriage by coition." (Sanhedrin 55b). "When
a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is
nothing, for when the girl is less than three years old
it is as if one puts the finger into the eye - tears come
to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back
to the little girl under three years. When a small boy
has intercourse with a grown-up woman he makes her as
'a girl who is injured by a pieces of wood'." (Kethuboth
11b). "The seed [child] of a Christian is of no more
value than that of a beast." (Kethuboth 3b). 'The
Talmud' is not only a source of justification for Jewish
gangsters and child rapists, it is also the source which
justifies - indeed, INSISTS upon - the suppression of
information which might reflect discredit on Jewry or
any individual Jew. "If a Jew has raped a non-Jewish
girl, and another who saw it is called as a witness, that
Jew must, without compunction, swear falsely." (Jore
Deah) "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator
everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he
has denounced." (Schulchan Aruch, Choschem Hamischpath,
338). "A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat and perjure
himself; but he must take care that he is not found out,
so that Israel may not suffer." (Schulchan Aruch,
Jore Deah). "A Jew may lie and perjure to condemn
a Christian. The name of God is not profaned when lying
to Christians." (Baba Kama, 113a, 113b). "Jews
must always try to deceive Christians." (Zohar I,
160a)
In his 1 July 2009 article "Pirates
of the Mediterranean," Dr. Paul Craig Roberts notes:
There is a great deal of evidence (see
Jonathan Cook's excellent
piece on this site yesterday) that Israel is a child
abuser. “God’s Chosen People” routinely
abuses captured Palestinian children. The Israelis also
abuse Palestinian children by shooting them down in the
streets.
Don’t take my word for it. The Geneva-based
Defense for Children International says, according to Time
Magazine, that “the ill-treatment and torture
of Palestinian child prisoners appears to be widespread,
systematic and institutionalized, suggesting complicity
at all levels of the political and military chain of command.”
According to Time Magazine, “Often,
children suffer lasting traumas from jail. Says Saleh Nazzal
from the Palestinian Ministry of Prisoner Affairs, ‘When
soldiers burst into a house and drag away a child, he loses
his feeling of being protected by his family. He comes back
from prison alienated from his family, his friends. They
don’t like going back to school or even leaving the
house. They start wetting their beds.’ Says Mona Zaghrout,
a YMCA counselor who helps kids returning from prison: ‘They
come out of prison thinking and acting like they are men.
Their childhood is gone.’ And they often turn to another
father figure--the armed militant groups fighting the Israeli
occupation.’”
A high level of "miscellaneous
other" perversion: The article "The
Essence of Judaism" in Best of Attack! and
National Vanguard Tabloid explains that:
The Talmud, the most authoritative and influential
source for Jewish law, is replete with sexual considerations of
a nature repellent to Westerners. As Rabbi Adin Steinsalz, a contemporary
Talmudic scholar admits, "After you have learned the right
passages in the Talmud, you have learned about every perversion,
in the greatest detail."
The Talmud regards bestiality as no bar to matrimony. In the section
of the Talmud entitled Yabmuth (59a), a woman who has copulated
with a dog is pronounced fit for marriage to a Jewish priest.
(A dog-priest, perhaps?). Children three years and one day old
are considered suitable for intercourse. (Yabmuth 57a) "Is
there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen?
Unnatural intercourse is permitted to a Jew." (Sanhedrin
58b). And so it goes, throughout the gigantic work of which Jewish
law claim, "Yahweh himself studies the Talmud standing, he
has such respect for that book." (Mechillah).
Ironically, while America's controlled media
currently encourages Americans to hate Muslims, nowhere in
Islam do you find anything as hateful towards Jesus as the
Talmud, which states: "Balaam [Jesus] is raised from
the dead and being punished in boiling hot semen. Those who
mock the words of the Jewish sages and sin against Israel
are boiled in hot excrement." (57a Gittin).
Earlier I have mentioned "The
Shower Rangers," by Dr. William Pierce, who described
how top Jews at Viacom thought it was funny to squirt young
gentile girls with diarrhea as a surprise comedy act. I also
mentioned his article "Fetuses,
Feces, etc." that describes a seemingly pathological
Jewish preoccupation with scatological material.
On his Thursday, 14 Feb 2008 Republic Broadcasting Network
Radio Show,
Michael Collins Piper responded to call-in listeners who talked
about the unusual scatological obsession of Jews. One listener
gave as an example a routine by Jewish comedian Howard Stern
where he was being sprayed by what the audience was supposed
to imagine was excrement hitting a fan.
Michael Collins Piper:
(at 39 min, 40 sec) When we get letters like that at American
Free Press (hate mail from Jews), almost invariably
they are totally anonymous. And they are usually filled
with the most obscene language, talking about bathroom functions.
And you know Mark Glenn [author of No
Beauty in the Beast, proprietor of www.crescentandcross.com]
and I have talked about this. This is something we have
noticed. When we get angry emails from, shall we say, followers
of the Talmud, these emails are almost invariably loaded
with that kind of language. In fact, you know, on more than
one occasion I have even had them even say things to me
like "Mikey Piper, where is your diaper." And
you know, the last time I heard that was in first grade.
You know, this is the kind of mind set, the kind of thinking
that comes out of the Talmudic point of view.
Caller ("Jim from Texas"):
It is all scatological, so to speak.
MCP: Oh, absolutely. Absolutely.
In fact, in my entire experience, I can only think out of
probably maybe a hundred letters over the years that I have
received from people of the Jewish persuasion critical of
my work, I can only think of four that were written by people
who sounded like they were sensible human beings. Occasionally
I get emails from a gentleman named Henry who sends some
interesting information in to me by email. He is a listener
to this program. I would count Henry among that group. There
was a young man from Michigan, as I recall. And then there
was an elderly retired dentist living out in Phoenix. But
that three, those three right there that is the three that
come to mind immediately. Whereas I would say 96 to 97%
of the others have always been vile and vulgar -- I could
not read them on the air because the Federal Communications
Commission would come down on me. But it is very, very interesting.
Morbid desire to subvert gentile sexual mores:
Sex
Plague, by Dr. Lasha Darkmoon, The Occidental
Observer, 6 Oct 2010, quotes the Jewish head guru of
psychiatric pseudo-science Sigmund Freud: “Sexual morality
is contemptible. I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life….If
only Americans knew, we are bringing
them the plague!" She comments:
As many as 260 new porn sites go online daily,
more than ten sites an hour.
Since Jews are known to dominate the porn
industry and comprise only 2% of America’s population,
it is reasonable to suppose that most of the new sites being
started up every hour are being started up by Jews.
It is even more alarming to note how sex is
now deployed by many American Jews as a weapon against Christianity
with its socially cohesive and family-friendly values.
Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein’s infamous
words — “The only reason that Jews are in
pornography is that we think that Christ sucks”—surely
tell us all we need to know about the bitter hatred felt by
so many Jews for the Western countries that have harboured
them and given them hospitality for so long.
Fractured personalities:
Jewish Freudian psychotherapy puts enormous emphasis on integrating
fractured levels of personality, which helps to confirm my
observation that Jews as a group tend to have vastly more
fractured personalities than the general white population.
An important element of Jewish fracturing is the fact that
"normal," "honest," "mainstream,"
"righteous," and "assimilated" Jews will
typically front for and support corrupt Jews out of a sense
Jewish tribal loyalty. For example, in By Way
of Deception, Victor Ostrovsky talks about how
under the sayonim program the Mossad can recruit the assistance
of Jews virtually anywhere in the world. As another example,
after Ivan Boesky was convicted as a stock swindler, he was
welcomed with open arms back into synagogues.
It is common to see fracturing on an ideological level. As
some examples, the monopoly capitalist Jacob Schiff supported
Bolshevist Leon Trotsky not only when he came to live in New
York City in 1916, but also when Trosky returned to Russia
to form the Red Army and butcher millions of Christians. Dr.
Armand Hammer, former head of Occidental Petroleum, shifted
back and forth between having been an active "friend
of Lenin" to calling himself a "friend" of
various U.S. presidents. Also, Michael Collins Piper observes
in High
Priests of War how many current "neo-conservatives"
reinvented themselves who formerly had Trotskyite backgrounds.
Jews are famous for opportunistically shifting back and forth
between whatever ideologies happen to serve their purposes
at the moment.
Now that the ruinous effects of open borders and massive Third
World immigration are beginning to become much more obvious
to most white Americans, we are beginning to see increasing
numbers of Jews jump ship and start to posture as if they
have been "pro-white" all along, when in fact Jews
led the immigration law changes in the mid-1960's that created
the demographic disaster. They have also funded and directed
most of the extreme leftist organizations that have suppressed
the white immune response system against alien invasion, while
simultaneously funding fanatical Zionists in Palestine that
insist on maintaining Jewish racial purity (for some specifics,
see Dr. William L. Pierce's article "The
Nature of the Beast.")
Chutzpah is a very prized trait in Jewish culture.
It is also an excellent example of hypocritical fracturing.
Dr. Alan Dershowitz has written a book titled Chutzpah
that encourages his fellow tribalists to be proud of it and
just let it all hang out. Even Larry Wilde's Official
Jewish Jokebook has plenty of chutzpah jokes.
Here is an example of a cute
chutzpah joke I found on the Internet:
Bubby on the Bus
An old Jewish bubby climbs onto a crowded
bus. Standing front of a seated young man she clutches her
chest and says, "Oi! If you knew what I had, you'd get
up and give me your seat." The man looks at the old woman,
and feeling sympathy, gives up his seat. The woman sitting
beside the bubby takes out a fan and starts to fan herself.
Grasping her chest, the bubby turns and says, "If you
knew what I have, you would give me that fan." The woman
gives her the fan. Fifteen minutes later the woman gets up
and says to the bus driver, "Stop, I want to get off
here." The driver driver says, "Sorry, lady, but
the bus stop is at the next corner. I can't stop in the middle
of the block." Again, the old woman clutches her chest
and says, "If you knew what I have, you would let me
out right here." Worried, the bus driver pulls over and
lets her out. As she's climbing down the stairs, he asks,
"Ma'am, what is it, exactly, that you have?"
She smiles sweetly at him. "Chutzpah," she says.
This is the kind of chutzpah that makes many
gentiles who like to hang out with Jews smile and laugh and
view them as bunch of lovable old rogues. However, for the
purposes of this article I want to cover the brand of chutzpah
that ultimately creates major national security threats.
In the bad forms of chutzpah, a person tells a nervy lie,
and then goes "one extra" in brazenness by righteously
attacking the victim of the lie with another lie. I have known
Jews who are so good at creating a fantasy world for themselves
so that they virtually believe their own lies while "on
stage." Great method acting, even to the point of self-delusion.
In fact, it is so smooth, so slick, so
spontaneous, and so natural for so many of them
that I consider it a kind of a quasi-instinctive, semi-conscious,
delusional disorder.
As two examples, watch these
chilling videos, Exhibits 1 and 2, that show Israeli spokespersons
withstand grilling about Israeli mass murder of innocent Lebanese
civilians by British journalists. These Israelis have the
same smooth relentless insectoid robotic efficiency as the
human-killing supercomputer HAL in 2001 a Space
Odyssey. Also, watch
video where WTC landlord Larry Silverstein casually talks
about the decision to "pull" World Trade Center
7, even though obviously it must have taken days to lay in
controlled demolitions —
what did he know in advance of 9-11?
Mystery buildings have a long history in New York City. Back
in the late 1800's insurance companies in New York came up
with the term "Jewish lightning" to characterize
Jewish businessmen who secretly set fire to their failing
businesses to collect the insurance money. Chutzpah
involved going "one extra" with this "con"
by righteously and indignantly threatening to sue the insurance
company for dereliction and screaming "anti-Semitism"
if it did not settle quickly and fully.
In regard to Larry Silverstein and WTC 7, an anonymous reader
at prison planet reported
that, "In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties
won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild
on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties' estimated investment
in WTC 7 was $386 million. This building's collapse alone
resulted in a profit of about $500 million."
As another example, noted by Israeli peace activist Israel
Shamir in his article "Friends
True and False," during the July 2006 invasion of
Lebanon, the Israelis deliberately targeted and killed four
U.N. peacekeeper observers as part of their war of naked aggression
against the people of Lebanon. Then Israeli Prime Minister
Ehud Olmert had the chutzpah to ask United Nations
Secretary-General Kofi Annan to
apologize!
Laird Wilcox's Crying
Wolf: Hate Crime Hoaxes In America (also listed as
link in my site map section) has documented innumerable hoaxes
staged by Jews, such as fake attacks on Jewish cemeteries
with spray-painted swastikas, combined with the chutzpah
to make an indignant national media shows over alleged wrongs.
Incidentally, in the Tawana
Brawley affair in 1987, some nationally prominent blacks
tried to play the same
game as many unscrupulous Jews but were just were not
as smart and smooth. Everything blew up in their faces.
One needs to understand how chutzpah has helped certain Jews
get rich since ancient times. As one example, in medieval
Europe, Jewish goldsmiths would issue warehouse receipts for
gold and silver coins and jewelry kept with them on deposit.
Knowing that not everyone came to collect their valuables
all at once, they created fake warehouse receipts and then
loaned them out, in essence counterfeiting money. This sleazy
practice, considered utterly crooked in all other industries
(such as in the grain and personal effects storage industries)
has become the basis of the fractional reserve banking system
in America today, as explained in the excellent Mises Institute
video about Money, Banking,
and the Federal Reserve.
This can create a whole new interpretation of someone like
the Jewish money lender Shylock in William Shakespeare's classic
play The Merchant of Venice. In
a climatic trial scene, Shylock unmercifully whips out his
knife to cut a pound of flesh out of Antony, the Merchant
of Venice, for defaulting on his loans after his ships sank
in storms. Fortunately Portia, the heroine of Shakespeare's
play, prevents Shylock from "collecting" through
her impassioned speech before a judge.
Imagine if the loans that Shylock had made to Antony were
based on nonexistent assets. Imagine that Shylock feels he
must protect his counterfeiting racket at all costs, therefore
he goes ahead and mock-righteously cuts out his pound of flesh,
with blood gushing on the floor and Antony screaming out in
pain. Now that would be chutzpah.
We can see how Shylock might feel incentivized to act cruelly
righteous even if he is loaning out unsecured paper, for fear
that to do otherwise would undermine confidence in his crooked
loan system. Then his other borrowers might default and he
would be left impoverished. Worse yet, leveraged fractional
reserve systems can create major business recessions and even
depressions once a wave of defaults causes them to rapidly
implode. In fact, Dr. Murray Rothbard claims in his work The
Great Depression that an imploding fractional
reserve system was a major cause behind one of America's worst
economic catastrophes. Nevertheless, regardless of any possible
social justifications, to most white people the kind of fractured
behavior that would be involved in cutting up Antony would
be so unspeakably low that it would almost define "criminal
evil."
Can't happen in real life? Take a look at Larry Silverstein,
who was involved in the decision to "pull" World
Trade Center Seven, and collected billions in insurance money
while beating his chests about how America should go fight
Israel's enemies in the Middle East. Meanwhile, he has not
appeared before a grand jury to help explain the strong evidence
of controlled demolitions that brought down his buildings.
Nor has he explained the sightings of strange work crews that
entered his buildings weeks before the collapse. Don't "we
the people" have the right to demand further legal investigation
of someone like Silverstein, or are we just merely cattle?
There are lots of pounds of flesh that have been lost among
the few thousand Americans who died in 9-11, not to mention
servicemen killed in Iraq, or hundreds of thousands of American
military and Iraqi civilians destroyed by aerosolized depleted
uranium. And don't forget those 500,000 Iraqi children who
America's Jewish Secretary of State Madelyn Albright under
President Clinton thought were an "acceptable loss"
as a consequence of America's twelve year blockade of Iraq
in her interview with Greta Van Susteren.
As another important real world example, there is strong evidence
that the Rothschilds and other elite Jewish families used
considerable chutzpah to make gigantic loans to embattled
countries during the Napoleonic Wars based on nonexistent
assets, and ultimately parlayed the unsecured loans into wealth
for themselves while paying off politicians so that they would
not caught and punished. They even gained control of central
banks.
We know for fact that the Israel Lobby has shown the chutzpah
to recycle U.S. aid money to Israel to further buy off and
further corrupt U.S. Congressmen. See Stealth
PACs by Richard H. Curtiss and They
Dare to Speak Out by former Congressman Paul
Findley. Jews such as Ben Bernanke who run the Federal Reserve
show an incredible amount of chutzpah by telling us that he
may be able to ease interest rates in the mid single digit
area because inflation is subsiding, when everyone sees real
commodity prices escalating at double digit rates, and the
Fed had the nerve to stop reporting the money supply growth
(M3) in March 2006. It also takes a lot of chutzpah for the
highly artificial state of Israel to maneuver the U.S. into
invading Middle Eastern countries (see High
Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper) when there
is considerable evidence that the 9-11 "terrorism"
was an inside job, and furthermore, that America is effectively
bankrupt and without an adequate industrial base.
Extreme projection: This is the
case where the person who lives in a glass house likes to
throw stones at other glass houses, on the theory that the
best defense is a good offense. As some examples, Jewish Bolsheviks
murdered tens of millions of Russians, yet Jews incessantly
whine about Jewish deaths in German internment camps that
were more than ten times fewer. In fact, they have grossly
inflated casualty numbers and have exaggerated circumstances
and have even shamelessly created a whole Holocaust industry
to thoroughly exploit white guilt. (See Best Witness
by Michael Collins Piper carried by America First Books, and
The Holocaust Industry by Jewish
writer Norm Finklestein).
While the whole Holocaust thing has certainly provided untold
billions in reparations money for Israel from Germany, and
tremendous sympathy money from America and other Western countries,
on another level it has backfired by giving many Jews a very
militant "Jewish crap doesn't stink" attitude that
alienates many gentiles. I certainly saw a lot of this while
I lived in New York City.
As another example, consider that many Jews are the biggest
racists on the planet. They insist on maintaining bloodlines
documented by genealogies going back over a fifteen hundred
years (such as the Cohen priestly class and the kohanim
class). Nevertheless they condemn any form of racial consciousness
among whites as bigotry. Jews condemn any criticism of themselves
as "anti-Semitic" and "Nazi," yet do not
hesitate to publicly defame and hurt the employment of white
patriots who try to stand up to them.
A healthy society does not need Big Brother surveillance,
even when it comes under severe stress. The Bush administration
and its Jewish supremacist handlers who are trying to put
the rest of America under increasing surveillance and take
away our civil liberties are simply projecting their own criminality
on to others. They are not telling us how we
deserve to be treated, but rather how they
deserve to be treated.
Mike Rivero, webmaster of Whatreallyhappened.com,
posted on 23 Nov 2006 an excellent summary of ultra high-stakes
Jewish projection regarding the Israeli campaign to drag America
into striking Iran.
(Watch former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu try
to whip up anti-Iranian hate in his TV
interview with Glenn Beck archived on YouTube). Rivero
responded to a neo-con piece "Bomb
Iran" that appeared in the 19 Nov 2006 Los
Angeles Times. Written by Joshua Muravchik,
a resident scholar at the Zionist-highjacked American Enterprise
Institute, this LA Times OpEd piece
exhorts America to make a pre-emptive strike to avoid a possible
future Iranian nuclear threat. Rivero responded:
What nuclear threat?
Is Iran a threat to the United States?
No, it isn't. Our parents paid trillions of dollars to create
the ultimate nuclear deterrent force, consisting of land-based
nuclear missiles, submarine-launched nuclear missiles, and
nuclear-armed bombers, all able to strike anywhere on the
Earth.
In contrast, Iran has no nuclear weapons.
Nobody has found any proof Iran is making nuclear weapons
(although one could hardly blame them for doing so after
seeing the US invade the non-nuclear armed Iraq).
What is Iran doing that Mr. Muravchik
finds so upsetting?
Iran is building a power station. Yep,
that's it. Iran is building a power station. You know, to
make electricity with?
Nobody in the US cares about Iran's power
station. After all, the United States and Iran have both
signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which allows
signers to build and fuel nuclear power plants. And that
is what Iran is doing, along with allowing all the inspections
the treaty requires, and complying with relevant UN resolutions.
Israel, on the other hand, has not signed
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, does not allow inspections,
has at least 400 nuclear weapons, and when it cannot have
UN resolutions vetoed by the US, will ignore them.
The problem here isn't Iran. The problem
is that Israel, having routinely ignored the UN, conducted
a secret weapons program, avoided signing nuclear control
treaties, lied at every turn, cannot admit to itself that
other nations can behave with honor. So, Israel has to deal
with its own sense of guilt by convincing itself that every
other nation behaves exactly the way that Israel behaves.
It is okay for Israel to have a secret weapons plant under
the Dimona reactor because (in Israel's imagination) Iraq
had nuclear weapons plants under their reactor (it didn't
as it turns out), Iran has nuclear weapons plants under
their reactor (it doesn't, according to inspectors), etc.
etc. etc. Another manifestation of this avoidance of guilt
by transference is the idea that it is okay for Israel to
treat the Palestinans the way it does because the rest of
the world treats Jews that same exact way. It is okay for
Israel's spies to blackmail the US Government into attacking
Israel's enemies because otherwise those other governments
would blackmail the US into attacking Israel.
On and on it goes with Israel's crimes
justified by a paranoid delusion operating on a national
scale. Israel; acts as it does because it is terrified of
other nations acting exactly the same way, not realizing
that Israel alone is behaving like a spoiled child in the
region, and that everyone else would be happy to get on
with their lives and their business if it weren't for the
fear Israel itself creates.
Imagine you live in a neighborhood where
everyone is working and living together, but in this shack
in the middle of town of a raving paranoid, armed to the
teeth, pointing his guns out the window at every passer
by, even taking pot-shots at some of them, daring them to
shoot back so that he can screech, "See? See? They DP hate
me!" before opening up on a schoolyard with an AK-47.
Is an intervention needed?
You betcha!
Racial instability, genetic distance,
unique inbred temperamental traits: Many scientists
believe that race mixing can add to mental instability. One
reason is that for periods of hundreds of thousands of years,
different races have evolved a particular mix of temperamental
traits that achieve evolutionary balance for a particular
physical environment. Race-mixing can produce unpredictable
combinations of discordant mental traits. As one example,
I once heard a Mexican intellectual on talk radio describe
how most Mexicans are genetically some mixture of white and
Indian, and a lot of them feel like they are two different
kinds of people mixed together. One interpretation of Middle
Eastern monotheism, incidentally, is a need for race-mixed
people to have a single deity focus upon to help pull themselves
together psychologically.
Jews have absorbed genes from many different peoples, while
at the same time preserving a core genetic type that can typically
be traced through the maternal line. As some examples of outside
absorption, in The Dispossessed Majority,
(p. 31), Wilmot Robertson cites A. E. Mourant, author of The
Genetics of the Jews, who found that Jews as
a whole show an admixture of 5-10 percent Negro genes. Conversely,
one can find some Jews in America who have blond hair and
blue eyes similar to Jewish film stars Kirk Douglas and Goldie
Hawn.
In Chapter
25 "Jewish Evolutionary Strategy and Claims of Jewish
Superiority" of his book My Awakening,
Dr. David Duke observes that:
One researcher summed up the overall genetic
differences by saying that there was probably at least three
times more genetic difference between an average Jew in France
and his Gentile Frenchman neighbor than between an average
French Jew and a Jew living in Russia or the Middle East.
…the same group who chronically preach to us that there
are no great differences between Blacks and Whites, boldly
assert that the Jewish people are genetically homogenous!
As part of the wide genetic distance argument, Jews have
many genetically-transmitted diseases such as Tay-Sachs and
Picts that are uniquely Jewish.
On page 455 of My Awakening, Dr.
Duke resolves the mystery regarding how Jews can externally
appear similar to their gentile hosts (note
this study of Jewish faces), yet internally maintain a
high level of genetic distance:
Fritz Lenz suggested back in the 1930s that Jewish resemblance
to the European populations did not mean that their genes were
similar. He suggested that their similar external resemblance
could have emerged from the natural selection of genes within
the Jewish gene pool. These genes could simply be a small cluster
of genes that lay dormant in the Jewish pool or that were introduced
by limited genetic mixture with Gentiles, and which then were
selectively favored by the social environment. Genes that caused
a greater corporeal resemblance to that of the Gentile host
could have favorable results in acceptance, wealth, and social
advancement and thus on reproductive success.
By a somewhat similar process, distinct species of butterflies,
not closely related, come to resemble one another without narrowing
their genetic distance. Only a small set of genes influencing
appearance within the Jewish population could thus be favored,
causing a greater similarity of appearance to the Gentile population
while not narrowing their overall genetic alienation from their
host population. Over many generations the external resemblance
to Gentiles could increase while the parts of the brain that
affect behavioral tendencies and abilities could be unaffected.
The April 2009 blog comment "Are
Jewish and White Interests Compatible?" provides
the follow genetic distance chart and provides some important
links:
"First off, people might question why
I consider jews a separate group from the rest of the white
race. This is why: “http://www.white-history.com/refuting_rm/2.html”
and “http://scienceblogs.com/gnxp/2009/01/how_ashkenazi_jewish_are_you.php”

"...take a look at the scatter plots.
As you can see jews form an island of genetic diversity
completely separate from whites. They act as a sort of bridge
between the middle east and Europe, neither one nor the
other. Why should they be considered white? They don’t
overlap with any standard European country — France,
the USA, Italy, Germany, Britain, Russia, etc. They have
nothing to do with our genes. This doesn’t mean they
are bad people, Japanese have even less genetic relatedness
to the white genome, but I certainly respect them. However,
it does mean they are not one of us, which should put people
into a heightened sense of awareness and risk when dealing
with them."
 The
following are some sample articles that explain the Neanderthal
background of Jews. For a complete list of articles, please visit
the Table
of Contents of the May/June 2010 special issue of The
Barnes Review.
PARTING
THOUGHTS: THE ETERNAL CONFLICT by George
Kadar, "...The 20th century in the Western world
can be rightfully called the "Century of the Neanderthal"
and it is up to us to stop this process."
The ethnic-genetic distance concept:
Throughout
history people have tended to practice the axiom that as ethnic-genetic
distance decreases, the chances for altruistic and mutualistic
behavior tends to increase. Conversely, as ethnic-genetic distance
increases, the chances of predatory or parasitic behavior also
tends to increase, all other things being held equal. See the
article "Zoological
Subspecies in Man" by Dr. Raymond Hall which explains
how this behavior is not only common among homo sapiens, but
virtually all mammalian species. Therefore, this behavior is
the instinctive result of evolutionary forces common throughout
nature.
While
Jews are famous for being extremely tribalistic among their
own kind, they tend to encourage the exact oppositive behavior
among gentiles. In fact, Jews tend to encourage unnatural relationships
among gentiles both in terms of unnatural divisions and unnatural
alliances. The encourage unnatural divisions by supporting feminism,
which encourages animosity between men and women, and Marxist
class warfare, which stirs up unnecessary strife between people
of shared race, ethnicity and nationality. Jews also like to
promote unnatural alliances by encouraging interracial marriage,
multi-racial immigration, miscegenation, and homosexuality.
Once
Jews are allowed to thoroughly work their influence on a gentile
society, it's social fabric is typically severely ruptured on
all levels. Its overall level of social and economic efficiency
tends to decline to Third World levels. This seems to be the
story of America in the last few decades.
The
following are some key articles on the ethnic-genetic interest
concept:.
Jewish
Ethnic-Genetic Distance From Whites
 Interestingly
enough, even Jewish-controlled sources like the New York Times
host articles that explain Jewish genetic similarities among
each other, and distance from gentiles, such as " Studies
Show Jews’ Genetic Similarity" by Nicholas Wade,
NYT, June 9, 2010:
The
shared genetic elements suggest that members of any Jewish
community are related to one another as closely as are fourth
or fifth cousins in a large population, which is about 10
times higher than the relationship between two people chosen
at random off the streets of New York City, Dr. Atzmon said.
 Ashkenazic
and Sephardic Jews have roughly 30 percent European ancestry,
with most of the rest from the Middle East, the two surveys
find. The two communities seem very similar to each other
genetically, which is unexpected because they have been separated
for so long.
 In
Chapter 14: "Jewish Evolutionary Strategy and Claims of
Jewish Superiority" of his book Jewish Suprmacism,
Dr. David Duke provides insight into how Jews reflect enormous
genetic distance from white gentile populations. Jews are able
to compensate for these differences to some extent by engaging
in varioius forms of behavioral and superficial genetic adaptive
mimickry:
...The
first thing I found was information on the set of genetically
borne diseases that occur almost exclusively in the Jewish
community, such as Tay-Sachs disease. Their presence certainly
indicated a genetic variance specific to the Jewish population
and illustrated a genetic difference from the Gentiles. Soon
I found scientific papers dealing precisely with the issues
I sought. [footnote 628, 629]
Genetic
researchers Sachs and Bat-Miriam discovered amazing similarity
between the Jewish populations of nine countries of North
Africa, the Middle East, and Central Europe. Conversely, they
found sharp differences between Jews and non-Jews from those
same countries. [footnote 630]
In
studying blood group data, Mourant, Kopec, and Doma-
niewska-Sobczak wrote in a book called The Genetics of the
Jews that it may be said that, in general, blood group data…support
the relative homogeneity of the main historical Jewish communities.
[footnote 631]
Now,
here we have mainstream Jewish anthropologists and geneticists
-- the same groups who chronically preach to us that there
are no great differences between Blacks and Whites -- boldly
assert that the Jewish people are genetically distinctive
and relatively homogenous! They argue that some differences
exist between the Ashkenazim and the Sephardim (the main ethnic
division among Jews), but that essentially Jews are a single
people with a limited genetic resemblance to the European
populations among whom they dwell. [foonote
632]
•
In blood group data, two major studies, one in 1977
by Bonné- Tamir, Ashbel, and Kenett and one
by Karlin, Kenett, and Bonné-Tamir in 1979,
found when using fourteen polymorphic loci, no significant
difference in Jewish populations from Iraq, Libya,
Germany, or Poland. They estimated that the genetic
distance between Gentiles and Jews living in the same
area is three to five times
[Top of page] 330 [hapter
title] JEWISH EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY
greater than
for Jews living in the different nations studied.
In the 1977 study, the researchers state “not
much admixture has taken place between Ashkenazi Jews
and their Gentile neighbors during the last 700 years
or so.” [footnote 633,
634]
•
Mille and Kobyliansky discovered in studies of dermatologlyphic
data that Ashkenazim (Eastern European Jews) are much
more similar to Sephardim (Middle-Eastern and European
Jews) than they are to the non-Jewish Eastern Europeans.
[footnote 635]
•
Kobyliansky and Livshits in using cluster analysis
on 25 mor phological characteristics, estimated that
Jews in Russia were six times more distant from Russians
than Russians were from Germans. They also found the
Jews to be completely separate from the twenty-four
other ethnic groups studied in Russia, Germany, and
Poland. [footnote 636]
•
Another study compared modern Jews and those of 3,000-year-old
Jewish skeletons discovered in the Middle East. Sofaer,
Smith, and Kaye studied dental morphology from Morocco,
Kurdish Iraq, and Eastern European countries. They
found more likeness between the widely scattered Jewish
populations than for the Gentile groups living near
them. The ancient Jewish skeletal group turned out
to be far more similar to the three Jewish populations
than for every non-Jewish group studied except for
one, an Arab Druse group from the 11th century. [footnote
637]
 One
researcher summed up the overall genetic differences
by say ing that there was probably at least three times
more genetic difference between an average Jew in France
and his Gentile Frenchman neighbor than between an average
French Jew and a Jew living in Russia or the Middle
East.
 The
Jewish studies amazed me. I would not have guessed that
Jews were that genetically different from all Europeans.
I knew a few Jews who were indistinguishable from the
potpourri of other European-Americans. From their appearance,
it seemed impossible that there was three times more
genetic difference from us than from Jews in remote
regions of the world. But, the research proved that
a wide genetic difference existed between Jew and European.
I wondered why they did not seem that dramatically different
in their appearance.
 Fritz
Lenz suggested back in the 1930s that Jewish resemblance
to the European populations did not mean that their
genes were similar.638 He suggested that their similar
external resemblance could have emerged from the natural
selection of genes within the Jewish gene pool. These
genes could simply be a small cluster of genes that
lay dormant in the Jewish pool or that were introduced
by limited genetic mixture with Gentiles, and which
then were selectively favored by the social environment.
Genes that caused a greater corporeal resemblance to
that of the Gentile host could have favorable results
in acceptance, accumulation of wealth, as well as social
advancement ó leading to reproductive success.
[Book title] JEWISH
SUPREMACISM [top of page] 331
 By
a somewhat similar process, distinct species of butterflies
not closely related, come to resemble one another without
narrowing their genetic distance. A very small set of
genes influencing appearance within the Jewish population
could thus be favored, causing a greater similarity
of appearance to the Gentile population while not narrowing
their overall genetic alienation from their host population.
Over many generations, the external resemblance to Gentiles
could increase while the parts of the brain that affect
behavioral tendencies and abilities could be unaffected.
 According
to evolutionary genetics, it is possible that Jews have
come to more resemble their hosts in their external
appearance while at the same time becoming even more
distant in their mental and behavioral characteristics.
Whatever the questions of physical appearance, there
seemed little doubt that Jews are indeed very different
from Europeans and that they had maintained that genetic
difference for a very long time.
 I
also ran across a number of popular sources arguing
that high Jewish-Gentile intermarriage rates would end
their genetic distinctiveness from European Gentiles.
As in so many other matters dealing with the Jews, there
is a wealth of information on the issue, an underlying
reality that is very different from popular perceptions.
Jews = Hybridized Neanderthals
= Troll Relatives?
Interestingly
enough, quite a few sources on the Internet explain how it
is very likely that Troll mythology among northern European
peoples evolved from pockets of Neanderthal peoples that were
later overtaken by immigrations of Nordic and Celtic peoples.
Hence, the recent attacks on Iceland via Zionists such as
the Rothschild-controlled City of London, George Soros, and
Goldman Sach might be viewed as a "Troll attack"
on a Nordic nation.
According
to the web page "Troll"
at the web site "Fantasy
Your Guide On The Web."
...In
the genre of paleofiction, the distinguished Swedish-speaking
Finnish paleontologist Björn Kurtént has entertained
the theory (e.g. in Dance
of the Tiger) that trolls are a distant memory
of an encounter with Neanderthals by our Cro-Magnon ancestors
some 40,000 years ago during their migration into northern
Europe. Spanish paleoanthropologist Juan Luis Arsuaga provides
evidence for these types of encounters in his book, The
Neanderthal's Necklace. The theory that Neanderthals
and Cro-Magnons occupied the same area of Europe at the
same time in history has been theorized based on fossil
evidence. Other researchers believe that they just refer
to neighboring tribes. The problem with this theory is that
neither Neanderthals or Cro-Magnons existed in this part
of Europe during the ice-age. Most of Scandinavia was covered
by a large glacier and the area was not occupied until much
later.
 My
response to the "problem with this theory" cited
by this author above is that Ice sheets have advanced and
retreated multiple times over the last 50,000 years. There
could be pockets of Neanderthal tribes that survived even
into the historic era throughout northern Europe, just as
there are tiny pockets of somewhat blond-haired and blue-eyed
peoples who have survived in various places in Central Asia
in places like Afghanistan (for example in Nuristan)
and Iran even though the original populations have been repeatedly
overrun and colonized by alien poeples. Lastly, people can
import mythologies with their migrations from other geographic
areas. For example, the Jan/Feb
2007 Barnes Review carried an article "The
Baltic Origins of Homer’s Epics" which argued that
"Here is compelling evidence that the events of Homer's
Iliad and Odyssey took place in the Baltic and not the Mediterranean.
Reveals how a climate change forced the migration of a people
and their myth to ancient Greece and identifies the true geographic
sites of Troy and Ithaca in the Baltic Sea and Calypso’s
Isle in the North Atlantic Ocean—following Homer’s
own geographic descriptions."'
English
summaries 3/2000
 Signs
of Neanderthal man unearthed in Finland by Juha Valste and
Antti Halkka
 Pages
4-11
 For
a long time, the oldest known signs of people in Finland
post-dated the latest Ice Age, making them less than 10,000
years old. Now, at Susiluola, in Kristiinankaupunki, western
Finland, stone implements and signs of fire have been discovered
which are around 120,000 years old. These indicate that
people have existed here during the Eem interglacial warmer
period between two ice ages. All the human forms as old
as these in Central and southern Europe have been Neanderthals.
 Tales
have long been told about Susiluola (it’s name - for
some obscure reason - means "wolf cave" in Finnish).
The old folk were convinced that Susiluola had been inhabited
by mankind sometime during the Stone Age. Recently, a curious
local inhabitant was given permission to excavate the cave.
The National Board of Antiquities had no money to fund this
operation, no available staff, and in fact little interest
in the project.
 Digging
deeply into the cave floor deposits, amateur geologists
soon unearthed blackened stones and roughly made stone implements.
They immediately abandoned their project, gracefully making
way for a thorough professional scientific examination of
the cave strata. Thus far, the site has yielded approximately
30 stone implements and over a hundred fragments produced
during their shaping. There are no rock types in the area
from which it would be an easy job to manufacture weapons
and tools. Some of the artefacts have been carved from red
shale.
 There
are many layers in the deposits on the cave floor, some
of which constitute original floor surfaces, whereas others
have been built up from stones and earth transported there
by either water or ice. Pollen and spores from trees and
other kinds of plants have been found in the strata associated
with human occupation. These sub-fossils tell us that the
climate 120,000 years ago was rather warm, in other words
similar to what it is today.
 Susiluola
represents the first Neanderthal dwelling site that has
even been found in Fennoscandia.
 Not
unnaturally, it has caused a sensation among anthropologists
and geologists in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark.
 The
Wikipedia article on " Trolls"
(as of May 2010) has the following interesting comment:
 Many
of the fairytale and folklore descriptions of "Trolls"
are similar to characteristics of Neanderthal people.
Neanderthal people overlapped with us (Homo Sapiens)
for 30,000 to 50,000 years.
At
his web
site about his book The Iceman Inheritance,
Jewish author Michael Bradley makes the following observations
about how Neanderthal genes may have shaped the Jewish
character:
...And
maybe some Neanderthal emotional and behavioral traits
persisted among the Ashkenazim along with the physical
ones.
Their
“chosen people” pretension is a typical
Neanderthal in-group obsession that is actually a genetic
racist predisposition against all other humans. It is
a genetically determined “us against them”
mentality. Their higher level of known Neanderthal aggression
against outsiders is responsible for their disproportional
social influence wherever they have settled in the West.
Their
men’s feelings of sexual inadequacy are a Neanderthal
genetic legacy reflected in much more frequent confusion
of sexual orientation than occurs among males of other
Caucasian ethnic groups and other races. It has been
the subject of too-numerous Jewish-authored books and
screenplays, and Woody Allen’s work (and private
life) is a very well known example of this Jewish predicament.
This
genetic Neanderthal psychosexual maladaptation has also
bequeathed to Jews a tendency toward emotional instability
and hysteria when they feel nervous or threatened...
which is all the time when they are not in absolute
control. And they are arrogant, but uneasy, even then.
An ethnic symptom of this emotional instability is the
Jewish tendency toward hypochondria. Even they cannot
(yet) control death.
This
unfortunate combination of high aggression combined
with a tendency toward hysteria and emotional instability
has proved to be a dangerous and tragic situation over
the course of Western history. Their aggression encourages
continual Jewish attempts to control societies, while
the emotional instability makes it difficult for most
Jews to distinguish reasonably between justified social
criticism by their non-Jewish neighbors and attacks.
Insensitive
even to objective concerns about inordinate Jewish influence
in societies, and reacting with hysterical aggression
to any such supposed “attack” on their behavior
and pleas from non-Jews to limit it, Jews have always
provoked violence against themselves. And then they,
with much emotional satisfaction, feel victimized and
attribute the situation to innate “anti-Semitism”
among their neighbors.
This
tragic cycle happened most recently in Nazi Germany,
of course, but it had happened previously in almost
all European countries. This historical pattern is the
social result of Neanderthal genetic traits of high
aggression and emotional instability caused by Ice Age
psychosexual maladaptation. All this is very clear to
me now.
The Meaning of "Ethnic
Genetic Distance" In Regard to Jewish Influence on
America
People tend to recreate the environment
around them to reflect their own characteristics (please
refer to my environmental
vs. genetic discussion). As a partially race-mixed
people, with a high level of genetic distance towards
their hosts, perhaps we should not be surprised that everywhere
Jews have gone in history they have tried to racially
mix up their host populations. They tend to do this regardless
of whether or not the hosts want to get mixed up or not.
In the long run, this behavior is irrational, because
no host population likes to undergo an attack on its genetic
interests and risk being reduced to a minority.
Ironically, I believe that most white Americans only really
care about very basic things like holding down a decent
job and supporting a family. As a "melting pot"
society, the overwhelming majority of Americans could
care less if Jews dominate Hollywood, national media,
Wall Street or whatever. In fact, quite a few Americans
admire Jewish business acumen and are happy to partner
up with them.
The formula to maintain American society on perpetual
prosperity autopilot was really simple. Just keep America
the way it was up until the mid-1960's at about 90% white.
Keep government somewhere below 30% or even 20% of GDP
(actually the lower the better — 5% would not be
low enough for me) so it does not squeeze out the productive
private sector too much. Avoid disastrous foreign entanglements.
Basically follow the 19th century classical liberal agenda.
It is really simple!
Within such an environment, America could prosper and
pretty much run itself indefinitely. Jews would always
be fairly free to do their own thing. To be sure, there
will always be plenty of people around who do not like
Jews, and say bad things about them, but no neo-Nazi or
anti-Semitic movement would have likely become influential
enough to directly threaten Jewish interests. As long
as most American families can make a decent living, live
in nice neighborhoods, and look forward to a prosperous
future, the American Nazi Party could march through every
American neighborhood six million times and most whites
would probably remain apathetic.
But apparently operating by this very simple formula was
just too easy for Jewish leaders. They just could not
leave well enough alone, or quit while they were ahead.
Nor could they ever adopt a really protective or appreciative
attitude towards white working class Americans. They had
to attack vital white genetic interests by opening the
floodgates of Third World immigration in the mid-1960's.
They had to keep pushing multi-racialism, multi-culturalism,
radical feminism, homosexuality, collective white guilt
over the "Holocaust," the JFK assassination
and assault on the U.S.S. Liberty cover-ups, and on and
on and on. They also had to keep growing the spendthrift,
warmongering, neo-Jacobin welfare warfare super state
in support of Israel and get Americans killed overseas.
So now everything has been pushed way too far and is unraveling.
Some crazy elite Jews had it in the bag, and they blew
it. Almost on par with the self-destructive nuttiness
of the Reverend Jim Jones and his suicide cult in Guyana.
Secret, Inbred Rancor
In The Dispossessed Majority, Wilmot Robertson
noted: (page 199)
The Jewish nervous system bears the
load of many obsessions, a principal obsession being
an implacable, almost innate hostility to the peoples
who at different times have sheltered or persecuted
them, enriched or impoverished them, deified or satanized
them. The Jewish fascination for political, economic,
and social experiments may not, as often supposed, be
proof of a noble, unselfish desire to save mankind by
a coteries of professional Messiahs, but evidence of
a deeply rooted, semi-conscious, semi-coordinated vendetta
-- Francis Bacon called it a "secret inbred rancour"
-- against all things non-Jewish and, in the final countdown,
possibly all things Jewish as well.
Israeli dissident Israel Shamir described
an interesting manisfestation of this rancor in his article
"The
Bloody Passovers of Dr. Toaff." While this Jewish
ritual murder of gentiles may have been conducted by only
a small minority of extremists, this definitely reflects
a cold-blooded "kill for sport" mentality towards
members of out-groups reminiscent of the Thugs of India.
Note also how the Thugs of India also
had an amazing ability to posture as respectable members
of local communities when they were not out moonlighting
in their grisly sport.
Another interesting example is provided by the Jewish
writer Dr. Henry Makow in the article "Incest
Survivor." According to Dr. Makow: "On May
1, 1989, a `nice Jewish girl', age 29, appeared on the
Oprah Show and said her family was part of a Satanic cult
that dates back to the 1700's. Although they appear to
be upstanding citizens --lawyers, doctors, police officers
etc. -- they engage in Satanic ritual human sacrifice,
incest and cannibalism, often in synagogues. They drink
blood and eat babies. She is describing the Illuminati
which originated in the Frankist Movement in the Eighteenth
century. Jacob Frank, born Jacob Leibowitz (1726-1791)
led a major Satanic heresy that shook the Jewish world.
They believed that the Messiah would return if the world
went over to evil completely, so they encouraged all sexual
licence and Satanic Evil as the ultimate Good. Financed
by the Frankist Rothschild banking syndicate, they subverted
all religions and national elites by assuming every religious
and political hue. They took over Freemasonry and are
now in the final stage of establishing their world government
a.k.a `globalization.' "
While I lived in New York City, I once came in contact
with a highly educated, "self-hating Jew" who
told me that what turned him off the most about his own
people is that there is a tendency for complete psychopaths
to rise to the top for whom there is absolutely no
limit to their ruthlessness and sadistic urges. He
cited the Bolshevik revolution, mostly funded and led
by Jews, as the clearest example. In a similar vein, John
de Nugent, who translated portions of Alexander Solzhenitsyn's
last major work Together
For Two Hundred Years for the Barnes Review,
told this author that Solzhenitsyn's history of Jewish-run
police state Red Terror is so evil and depressing that
even hardened right wingers find it very hard to make
it through his translation in one sitting. As an example,
Stalin and his Jewish conferates cut rations at certain
work camps because inmates were not dying off at a fast
enough rate. They also enjoyed randomly "disappearing"
completely innocent, apolitical, honest, altruistic members
of local communities just to keep everyone else in a state
of complete fear and uncertainty.
In July 2009 the FBI arrested a ring of rabbis in New
Jersey involved in a major
organ-harvesting and money laundering operation. The
Swedish newspaper Aftenbladet ran the story "They
Plunder Our Sons for their Organs" about how
Israeli soldiers act as bodysnatchers in the West Bank.
Jews are also leaders
in child pornography rings. All of this certainly
shows a high degree of cruelty towards gentiles, in line
with what Voltaire
once said of the Jews:
. "They are, all of them, born
with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the
Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I
would not be in the least bit surprised if these people
would not some day become deadly to the human race."--Voltaire
as quoted in A.Gould, What Did They Think of The
Jews?, Jason Aronson Inc., New Jersey, (1991),
p. 90. Gould cites: "Voltaire, Lettres de Memmius
a Ciceron, 1771, in The French Enlightenment,
p.300"
Jewish "misanthropy" or hatred
of mankind has been observed by many different peoples
around the globe for ages. The web page "The
Universality of Anti-Semitism" published by the
Jewish Tribal Review provides important quotes from many
famous observers:
"The Jews," J. O. Hertzler
writes, "... have been a supernation rather than
members of a nation. More than any other people, certainly
up to the time of the emancipation, they were innocent
and irresponsible toward the national traditions and
aspirations of the people among whom they lived"
(Hertzler, 76).
"Hatred for the Jews," Abram
Leon writes, "does not date solely from the birth
of Christianity. Seneca treated the Jews as a criminal
race. Juvenal believed that the Jews only existed to
cause evil for other peoples. Quintilian said that Jews
were a curse for other people" (Leon, 71).
In 59 BC the Roman statesman Cicero
criticized Jewish "clannishness" and "influence
in the assemblies." In the second century AD Celsus,
one of Rome's great medical writers, wrote that Jews
"pride themselves in possessing superior wisdom
and disdain for the company of other men." Philostratus,
an ancient Greek author, believed that Jews "have
long since risen against humanity itself. They are men
who have devised a misanthropic life, who share neither
food nor drink with others." (Cf. Shakespeare's
Merchant of Venice, I, iii.) The great Roman historian
Tacitus (A.D. 56-120) declared that "the Jews are
extremely loyal toward one another, and are always ready
to show compassion [for their fellow Jews], but toward
other people they feel only hate and enmity" (Morais,
46). Centuries later Voltaire's criticism of Jews, in
his Essai sur le Moeurs, repeated many of the same charges:
"The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable
hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters;
always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being
enjoyed by others, always barbarous -- cringing in misfortune
and insolent in prosperity." Ironically, as Jacob
Katz observes, "Voltaire did more than any other
single man to shape the rationalist trend that moved
European society toward improving the status of the
Jew" (Katz, 34). Still historically remembered
(according to the Encyclopedia Britannica, 1994) "as
a crusader against tyranny and bigotry," Voltaire
turned repeatedly and angrily against Jews who he believed
to epitomize such "tyranny and bigotry." Jews,
he complained, "are ... the greatest scoundrels
who have ever sullied the face of the globe ... They
are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their
hearts, just as the Bretons and Germans are born with
blond hair. I would not in the least be surprised if
these people would not some day become deadly to the
human race ... You [Jews] have surpassed all nations
in impertinent fables, in bad conduct, and in barbarism.
You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny"
(Gould, 91).
On another occasion Voltaire charged
that "the Jew does not belong to any place except
that place which he makes money; would he not just as
easily betray the King on behalf of the Emperor as he
would the Emperor for the King?" (Katz, 44). Thirty
of 118 of Voltaire's essays in his Dictionary of Philosophy
address Jews, usually disparagingly. Voltaire calls
Jews "our masters and our enemies ... whom we detest
... the most abominable people in the world." With
the coming of the Enlightenment, as David Sorkin notes,
"Jews were roundly condemned for "their ritualistic
religion, national character or economic situation which,
separately or together, prevented them from being moral.
Enlightenment thinkers almost without exception subscribed
to this image of Jewish inferiority" (Sorkin, 85).
"The ghetto," Enlightenment
intellectuals argued, "had produced an essentially
unacceptable culture. Jews were utter strangers to Europe.
Social isolation had created traits in need of drastic
transformation: Jews harbored within them hatred of
the Christian nurtured by centuries of Talmudic and
rabbinic indoctrination, they were religious fanatics,
parasitic in their economics and dishonest in their
dealings" (Aschheim, 6). "Know that wherever
there is money," said Montesquieu in his Persian
Letters, "there is the Jew" (Krefetz, 45)...
...Jewish author William Korey notes
the same mystifying omnipresence of anti-Jewish animus
among disparate peoples in interviews (at a Harvard
archive) with 329 refugees from the Soviet Union in
the early 1950s: "A detailed examination of the
background information of those who registered hostile
attitudes to Jews reveals that they were of various
age, national, educational, and status groups, and that
they left the USSR at different periods" (Korey,
11).
The top six "anti-Semitic"
assertions by this diverse group of people included
assertions that (1) Jews occupy a privileged and favored
position in Soviet society. 2) Jews are business-
and money-minded. 3) Jews are clannish and help each
other. 4) Jews are aggressive and 'pushy.' 5) Jews
are sly, calculating, and manipulative, and know how
to 'use a situation.' 6) Jews are deceitful, dishonest,
unprincipled, insolent, and impudent (Korey, 5).
A high rate of schizophrenia.
At his web
site, journalist John de Nugent provides
an intriguing theory by Dr. Arnold A. Hutschnecker, a
New York psychiatrist, that schizophrenia may have a viral
transmission factor, and that Jews may be unusually susceptible
carriers. According to schizophrenia.com, the concept
of viral transmission is plausible:
Recent epidemiologic studies indicate
that infectious agents may contribute to some cases
of schizophrenia. In animals, infections with Toxoplasma
gondii can alter behavior and neurotransmitter function.
In humans, acute infection with the cat virus "T.
gondii" can produce psychotic symptoms similar
to those displayed by persons with schizophrenia. Two
other studies found that exposure to cats in childhood
was a risk factor for the development of schizophrenia.
As
a caveat, even if Dr. Hutschnecker's theory has some validity,
this still does not necessarily imply that being around
Jews will significantly increase the odds that one will
become schizophrenic. Many diseases require a combination
of factors to get infected, to include a genetic predisposition,
various situational stress factors, and a reduced immune
system. As an example, while it is true that leprosy (Hansen's
Disease) is contagious, only a small percentage of
people with adquate sleep, nutrition, exercise, personal
hygiene, manageable emotional stress, and a lack of history
of leprosy in their families (or within their racial or
ethnic group --for example pre-contact native Hawaiians
were unusually susceptible to leprosy compared to most
whites) will ever contract leprosy even when surrounded
by lepers for extended periods. As a personal example,
I spent the equivalent of a couple of weeks in contact
with lepers in the early 1980's at Hawaii's Kaluapapa
leper colony, and over ten years surrounded by Jews in
New York City, Los Angeles, and elsewhere, but I do not
have either leprosy or schizophrenia. (One leper at Kalaupapa
even told me about cases where normal people have been
married to lepers while living at the leper colony and
never contracted the disease despite sharing the same
household and having continuous intimate sexual contact.
According to Wikpedia "It is estimated that due to
genetic factors, only 5% of the population is susceptible
to leprosy...The incubation period for the bacteria can
last anywhere from two to ten years"). Also, the
rise in schizophenia in the U.S. population may be due
to other factors besides possible viral transmission from
Jews. For example, according to schizophrenia.com, the
increased
use of street drugs has been strongly linked to a
rise in schizophrenia rates. All of this having been said,
I nevertheless believe from personal observation and written
sources that Jews have a significantly higher rate of
schizoprhrenia compared to the general population, even
if we do not fully understand the cause of this phenomenon.
Furthermore, Jewish-controlled
national media have indirectly encouraged schizophrenia
by popularizing the counter-culture use of street drugs
and also forms of multiracialism and multiculturalism
that alienate whites from traditional American convervative
values, thereby dramatically increasing situational stress
factors. Therefore, the correlation between an increased
Jewish presence in the U.S. population and higher rates
of schizophrenia can be attributed to other Jewish influences
besides the possibility of a physical virus carried by
Jews:
Evidence
that Jews are carriers of schizophrenia is disclosed
in a paper prepared for the American Journal of
Psychiatry by Dr. Arnold A. Hutschnecker, the New
York psychiatrist, who once treated President Nixon.
JdN:
He treated Nixon for decades.
In
a study entitled "Mental Illness: The Jewish Disease"
Dr. Hutschnecker said that although all Jews are not
mentally ill, mental illness is highly [physically]
contagious and Jews are the principal sources of infection.
Dr.
Hutschnecker stated that every Jew is born with the
seeds of schizophrenia and it is this fact that accounts
for the world-wide persecution of Jews.
"The
world would be more compassionate toward the Jews if
it was generally realized that Jews are not responsible
for their condition." Dr. Hutschnecker said. "Schizophrenia
is the fact that creates in Jews a compulsive desire
for persecution."
Dr.
Hutschnecker pointed out that mental illness peculiar
to Jews is manifested by their inability to differentiate
between right and wrong. He said that, although Jewish
canonical law recognizes the virtues of patience, humility
and integrity, Jews are aggressive, vindictive
and dishonest.
"While
Jews attack non-Jewish Americans for racism, Israel
is the most racist country in the world," Dr. Hutschnecker
said.
Jews,
according to Dr. Hutschnecker, display their mental
illness through their paranoia. He explained that the
paranoiac not only imagines that he is being persecuted
but deliberately creates situations which will
make persecution a reality.
Dr.
Hutschnecker said that all a person need do to see Jewish
paranoia in action is to ride on the New York subway.
Nine times out of ten, he said, the one who pushes you
out of the way will be a Jew.
"The
Jew hopes you will retaliate in kind and when you do
he can tell himself you are anti-Semitic."
During
World War II, Dr. Hutschnecker said, Jewish leaders
in England and the United States knew about the terrible
massacre of the Jews by the Nazis. But, he stated, when
State Department officials wanted to speak out against
the massacre, they were silenced by organized Jewry.
Organized Jewry, he said, wanted the massacre to continue
in order to arouse the world's sympathy.
Dr.
Hutschnecker likened the Jewish need to be persecuted
to the kind of insanity where the afflicted person mutilates
himself. He said that those who mutilate themselves
do so because they want sympathy for themselves. But,
he added, such persons reveal their insanity by disfiguring
themselves in such a way as to arouse revulsion rather
than sympathy.
Dr.
Hutschnecker noted that the incidence of mental illness
has increased in the United States in direct proportion
to the increase in the Jewish population.
"The
great Jewish migration to the United States began at
the end of the nineteenth century," Dr. Hutschnecker
said. "In 1900 there were 1,058,135 Jews in the
United States; in 1970 there were 5,868,555; an increase
of 454.8%. In 1900 there were 62,112 persons confined
in public mental hospitals in the United States; in
1970 there were 339,027, in increase of 445.7%. In the
same period the U.S. population rose from 76,212,368
to 203,211,926, an increase of 166.6%. Prior to the
influx of Jews from Europe the United States was a mentally
healthy nation. But this is no longer true."
Dr.
Hutschnecker substantiated his claim that the United
States was no longer a mentally healthy nation by quoting
Dr. David Rosenthal, chief of the laboratory of psychology
at the National Institute of Mental Health, who recently
estimated that more than 60,000,000 people in the United
States suffer from some form of "schizophrenic
spectrum disorder." Noting that Dr. Rosenthal is
Jewish, Dr. Hutschnecker said that Jews seem to take
a perverse pride in the spread of mental illness.
Dr.
Hutschnecker said that the word "schizophrenia"
was given to mental disease by dr. Eugen Blueler, a
Swiss psychiatrist, in 1911. Prior to that time it had
been known as "dementia praecox," the name
used by its discoverer, Dr. Emil Kraepelin. Later, according
to Dr. Hutschnecker, the same disease was given the
name "neurosis" by Dr. Sigmund Freud.
"The
symptoms of schizophrenia were recognized almost simultaneously
by Bleuler, Kraepelin and Freud at a time when Jews
were moving into the affluent middle class," Dr.
Hutschnecker said. "Previously they had been ignored
as a social and racial entity by the physicians of that
era. They became clinically important when they began
to intermingle with non-Jews."
Dr.
Hutschnecker said that research by Dr. Jacques S. Gottlieb
of Wayne State University indicates that schizophrenia
is caused by deformity in the alpha-two-globulin protein,
which in schizophrenics is corkscrew-shaped. The deformed
protein is apparently caused by a virus which, Dr. Hutschnecker
believes, Jews transmit to non-Jews with whom they come
in contact. He said that because those descended from
Western European peoples have not built up an immunity
to the virus they are particularly vulnerable to the
disease.
"There
is no doubt in my mind," Dr. Hutschnecker said,
"that Jews have infected the American people with
schizophrenia. Jews are carriers of the disease and
it will reach epidemic proportions unless science develops
a vaccine to counteract it."
SOURCE:
Psychiatric News, published by the American
Psychiatric Association. Date of publication: Oct. 25,
1972.
In
his classic work The
Biological Jew, American populist author Eustace
Mullins describes how Jews tend to lead much more sedentary
lives than host populations, and this in turn contributes
towards not only high rates of overall physical degeneration,
but also mental illness that afflicts about one third
the population:
As
a result of their parasitic mode of life, the Jewish
communities have developed sedentary habits, which in
turn have led to certain diseases, directly attributable
to this sedentary life, and which have been known for
their high incidence among the Jews. Thus diabetes is
referred to in many medical dictionaries as "the
Jewish disease."
Diabetes
occurs principally because the sedentary and parasitic
life prevents Jews from burning up the excess blood
sugars which they ingest in their diet, and which are
intended for use in direct forms of energy. This causes
a surfeit of sugar in the system, which becomes the
disease of diabetes. Also, generations of sedentary
persons cause malfunctions or the gradual weakening
of the pancreas and other organs which are responsible
for controlling the level of blood sugar. Thus, diabetes
becomes a hereditary disease among generations of sedentary
people.
The
Jewish community has developed a number of degenerative
types of disease, such as blood disorders, cancers of
various kinds, and other forms of physical degeneration,
which are directly attributable to their mode of parasitic
existence, and to the physical degeneracy which it produces.
As they cohabit with the gentile community, and as their
sedentary mode of life becomes more widely practiced,
these degenerative diseases begin to appear throughout
the host community.
In
one of the most important physical correlations between
the Jewish community and the known types of parasitic
organism in the plant and animal kingdoms, [Geoffrey]
LaPage, [author of Parasitic Animals] says:
"Among other organs which are
often reduced or lost when parasitic life is adopted
is the nervous system. It may be reduced as a whole
or the reduction may affect chiefly the eyes and other
organs. Organs of special sense are best developed
in active animals which feed upon other animals and
need to defend themselves against their enemies. They
are not required by parasitic animals which live a
relatively sheltered existence on or inside the bodies
of their hosts amid a relative abundance of food."
The
effect of a parasitic mode of existence upon the nervous
system, which can be observed in many types of parasites,
are especially noteworthy in the Jew. The degeneration
of the nervous system into a state of severe mental
illness in an average of thirty percent of all Jews
has long been supposed by sociologists to be due to
the physical interbreeding in the Jewish community,
but the high incidence of mental illness in Jews whose
families have intermarried with gentiles is the same
rate as those who have remained within the Jewish community.
This points to a strictly biological origin of this
degeneracy of the nervous system, and bears out Professor
LaPage’s contention that the leading of a parasitic
mode of existence inevitably leads to a reduction or
a degeneracy of the nervous system.
A functional
analysis of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology
There are some important keys to understanding
the evolution of Jewish social behavior:
a) According to our most reliable historical
records, since ancient times Jews always been a highly urbanized,
clever people living in mostly multiracial, cosmopolitan environments
spread out in colonies around the known world. In fact, contrary
to Hollywood movies, there is strong evidence that the main
force behind the spread of early Christianity in the Roman
Empire were not poor gentiles hiding out in caves and getting
fed to lions, but wealthy urban Jews who used their financial
power to promote a universalistic religion that cleverly deifies
their tribal history at the expense gentile tribal histories,
while slapping their own wrists a little bit with the story
of the unjust condemnation of Jesus by the Sanhedrin to avoid
making their promotion too obvious.
b ) Jews have always been heavily involved in various forms
of trade, brokerage and mediation, requiring the ability to
psychologically manipulate and play off opposing groups. They
have also been used as ferocious tax collectors. Their whole
evolutionary history has been man vs. man rather than man
vs. nature.
c ) Jews have always sought to preserve their racial, tribal,
and ethnic cohesion at all costs,
even at the expense of completely demonizing all non-Jews
in their "religious" writings. Extremist Jews take
literally Talmudic passages that approve of deceiving gentiles,
treating them like cattle, and of even killing off the best
goyim. This can ultimately mean that there are no moral and
ethical limitations regarding how they treat non-Jews.
d ) Jewish "survival of the fittest" has always
meant "survival of the richest" — at
all costs.
e ) Jewish culture and religion is more heavily geared towards
intrigue and covert operations than any other people on the
planet. Jews celebrate Esther, Abraham, Spanish Morano Jews,
and many others who operated under false pretenses to infiltrate
and gain major influence within alien cultures. Jewish culture
heavily values secrecy and the use of disinformation.
One can mentally "reverse engineer"
what the Jews are all about. Simply take a) to e) above
as your constraints, and then try to mentally conceptualize
what the resultant racial-ethnic group would have to look
like to evolve under such constraints.
First a few good words for
certain Jews
In discussing Jews it is very important to acknowledge
their core strengths. I think that many American white
patriots make the mistake of focusing so heavily on Jewish
negatives that they fail to describe how the Jewish positives
interact with the negatives to create a coherent system.
From my dealings with Jews from all walks of life in New
York, sometimes I almost wondered if being born Jewish
automatically puts a two year MBA program on their birth
certificates, combined with a two year program in intelligence
operations training.
Jews tend to have tremendous "entrepreneurial infrastructure."
There is nothing wrong with this, in fact, I admire entrepreneurship.
When I lived in New York City, I spent considerable time
attending meetings of venture capital associations in
which Jews were leaders in sourcing and evaluating business
plans. This is a great strength in the Jewish community
that I genuinely respect.
Part of this comes from the tremendous premium Jews have
traditionally placed on education, which is also admirable.
Another important part comes from the fact that successful
Jews typically bend over backwards to provide mentorship
and jobs for up and coming Jews. They are also much more
likely to bring each other the best deals, provide capital,
supply inside industry knowledge, and lend other forms
of assistance necessary to be successful. The Jewish community
has a staggering number of Jewish mutual benefit associations,
so that if something goes terrible wrong with some Jews
on one place of the planet, Jews are quickly informed
and prepared to help each other right away.
One reason why Jews help each other so much is they maintain
a vision of themselves as a people. This is an important
aspect of the popular sovereignty concept that can apply
to all peoples that I address in greater detail in my
discussion of libertarian racial nationalism in my "American
History Reinterpreted" series. In essence, Jews practice
economic nationalism on an informal, non-state level.
Up to a point, I think that this is also admirable.
Where Jews cross the line in terms of the classical liberal
agenda is when they engage in massive deception and other
forms of high-end thievery (deception is theft of truth).
Jews are uniquely equipped to engage in perpetual forms
of soft 4th
generation warfare in the midst of relatively peaceful
and unassuming gentile host communities. It has been this
extreme multi-functionality that has caused many observers
in history, such as Benjamin Franklin in his famous
prophecy, to characterize Jews as "a state within
a state."
I have mentioned previously that people tend to re-create
the social environment around them in a way that mirrors
their own characteristics. As America becomes more multi-racial
underneath the strong-arm prodding and surveillance of
its neo-Jacobin government, this puts more pressure on
white separatist groups to simultaneously become both
more racially conscious, while also finding better covert
means to employ militant methods. In essence, they become
more like the Jews in order to adapt to the multi-racial,
multi-cultural environment of the neo-Jacobin welfare-warfare
super state largely created by Jews. Similarly, the rise
of Hezbollah and Hamas among Arabs in many ways mirrors
the complex social threat created by Jews. Their capabilities
range from guerilla warfare to running social service
institutions, heading political parties, and maintaining
Islamic religious establishments.
Despite all of this, most materially successful gentile
business leaders in America today still think of themselves
as individualists. They cannot wait to get rich and cash
out, retire, and play golf. They could care less about
mentoring to the next generation of fellow whites or providing
start up capital, contacts, deals, and job leads. Most
of them have subconsciously absorbed sharp "get-ahead"
Jewish values without at the same time having a sense
of social responsibility for their own people. And then
to add insult to injury, they piously espouse libertarian
philosophy that everyone has to learn how to be a "tough
cowboy" and let the "free market" magically
sort everything out as they offshore jobs to secure short
term profits for themselves while neglecting the long
term forms of investment in America required to sustain
jobs and prosperity.
Deracinated American gentile business leaders are in many
ways worse than the worst things that can said about the
Jews, because they are driven by selfishness and egotism,
without any compensating sense of loyalty to their own
people.
Down South they used to call these kinds of deracinated
people "Scalawag white trash." Given the degraded
moral level of American society today, it seems like all
a person has to do is make over $500,000 a year and call
himself a CEO, and somehow this makes him automatically
respectable. However, this will probably change once we
experience ultra-hyperinflation, the middle class gets
wiped out, and we start having the "who lost America"
public trials over the national debt and sabotage of domestic
industry, perhaps reminiscent of various episodes of the
French Revolution.
Another business advantage Jews tend to enjoy is they
more likely to promote themselves into the deal stream
as early as possible in their business careers. Exposure
to deal-making helps them understand how the various parts
of markets and businesses come together. It also helps
them view the world in contractual terms. They learn how
to negotiate harder bargains for themselves.
Some examples of occupations that tend to provide early
deal stream exposure are many forms of brokerage such
as business brokerage and real estate brokerage, corporate
law, start-up business entrepreneurship, and serving as
a bank officer in a workout department.
The book Winning
Through Intimidation by Robert J. Ringer provides
a good overview of the Jewish approach to deal negotiation,
which necessarily involves carefully withholding and manipulating
information and appearances on both sides of a negotiation
in order to carve out a strong position for oneself as
the mediator and conversely avoid getting squeezed out
by buyers and sellers.
In fairness to Jews, the possibility of getting unfairly
squeezed out in deal negotiation is a very serious problem
in real world business negotiations. It can be a very
cold and cruel world even when trying to deal with supposedly
self-styled "fair and ethical" gentiles. It
is often very hard work to find enough deals to put into
a pipeline, and then successfully negotiate enough of
those deals through to completion, to make a decent living.
Acting as a mediator to a negotiation involves sizing
up deal parameters for both sides of the negotiation,
and then shrewdly trading off concessions for both sides
while navigating them towards making a deal. It also usually
means bargaining people down hard who give up concessions
too easily. Often the big money comes from taking advantage
of people who are poor negotiators, who are often dismissed
as being "unfit" or as "dumb schmucks"
for their lack of homework invested towards understanding
their real negotiation position or their lack of nerve
in standing up for themselves.
This mentality colors the Jewish approach to life. For
example, when Jews convince white gentiles that they should
be anti-racist, and promote black, Asian, Jewish, and
Mexican racial interests before their own, they are simply
extracting an ideological concession from whites. This
has nothing to do with justice, logical consistency, or
racial truth. From the Jewish viewpoint, if gentiles have
to struggle long and hard just to get back to square one
in terms of re-establishing their white racial identity,
this concession gives them a greater zone of security
than if gentiles are able to work from having a solid
racial identity towards challenging Jewish supremacy in
various areas of banking, media, and commerce. In the
Jewish view, if whites are such dumb schmucks that they
willingly give up their racial identity and heritage,
then they get what they deserve.
It is all about extracting and trading off concessions.
The whole world is a non-stop haggling process. Everything
outside the Jewish people is a conditional commodity subject
to manipulation — to include political and religious
ideologies. Everything is transactional.
From this vantage point, objective truth is not always
relevant. In fact, truth itself is simply one more controllable
commodity, to be dissected, offered, withheld, transacted,
or distorted at will.
The Western concept of the Faustian search for truth as
an end in itself is alien to the Jewish haggling, transactional,
commodity-trading spirit.
In The Dispossessed Majority,
Wilmot Robertson provides a footnote on page 195 that
really hits the nail on the head:
According to James Yaffe, Jews have more
interest in sex than non-Jews, less interest in athletics,
less faith in an afterlife, a lower birthrate, take many more
expensive vacations, live longer, spend more time in psychoanalysis,
and are much more likely to be hippies. In Hollywood, Jews
get more divorces, commit more adultery, and drink less than
their non-Jewish neighbors. Jews use Jewish doctors 95 percent
of the time; Jewish lawyers 87 percent of the time. Although
they sometimes try to force themselves into non-Jewish country
clubs, they are very exclusive about their own. One, the Hillcrest
in Los Angeles, has the highest initiation fee ($22,000) of
any golf club in the U.S. and bans non-Jews except for a few
show business figures who are admitted as "honorary Jews."
Jews, continues Yaffe, are noted for their "fear, obsequiousness,
isolationism and belligerence" —
a psychological chasm between Jew and non-Jew that may never
be bridged. Traditionally dogmatic themselves, they demand
rationalism in others. For the Jew "the intellect can't
be just a tool...it has to be a weapon too. He doesn't use
it simply to discover what the world is like or to create
something beautiful, or to communicate his ideas. He must
use it to beat down his competitors, to prove his superiority.
For him the controversy is inseparable from the intellectual
activity. Watch him at a party; note the vicious delight with
which he backs lesser intellects into a corner. He's implacable;
neither social decorum nor human compassion can soften his
attack. If you want to observe this trait at a safer distance,
read what he writes to the letters-to-the-editor pages. In
all Jewish publications, from Commentary down to
the most obscure Yiddish weekly, these pages bathe the reader
in vitriol. Like his father, the garment manufacturer, the
Jewish intellectual doesn't trade easy." The
American Jews, pp. 38, 65, 68, 234-35, 268-69,
292-93.
In fact, Jews are often so focused on
the deal-making and trading approach to life that they
even go to the extremes of manufacturing deal situations
where they can routinely play off one group against another
while controlling communication between them and manipulating
appearances. The book By Way of Deception
by Victor Ostrowsky provides an extreme example, where
the Mossad was simultaneously selling weapons and support
services to the government of Sri Lanka and an opposing
rebel group. They are also making money training both
groups on Israeli military bases. One day a scheduler
screwed up the physical training schedule when both groups
happen to be training on the same base. Both groups happened
to jog towards each other with a fence between them on
an athletic field. The Israeli instructors were terrified
with the thought that the two groups might recognize each
other, but fortunately for the Israelis they passed each
other without an incident.
Jews, if anything, they are too
deal oriented. They are too oriented towards shuffling
assets and financial manipulation rather than tinkering
with improving the quality of real goods and services.
Furthermore, American Jews are too opportunistic in looking
for deals anywhere around the world, rather than supporting
America's national interests. As an extreme example, Israel
did not support America's national interest when it sold
Jonathan Pollard's secrets to the Soviet Union, or America's
nuclear technology to Red China, as documented in Final
Judgment.
Gentiles tend to be more content with starting out as
lower level functionaries. It is more common for gentiles
to get deal-making exposure only after they have worked
their way up to higher levels of management in mid to
late career. However, for someone like a Henry Ford or
Thomas Edison (or more recently a Steve Jobs or George
Lucas) who learns his industry from the ground up, shop
floor knowledge can be a great strength in the long run.
There is an interesting bitter irony here, because the
Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution are
both very contractual in nature, whereas the Talmud is
very duty-based. As Jews have usurped ever more power
in America, and have grown the neo-Jacobin Welfare-Warfare
Super state (Federal Government) in support of Israel,
they have helped to squeeze increasing percentages of
gentiles into political correctness, walking-on-egg shells,
flunky roles. In contrast, elite Jews have become ever
more aggressive at applying high level arm-twisting deal
pressure on Congress and other American institutions.
In addition to their superlative entrepreneurial infrastructure,
another glaring feature of Jewish culture is the extent
to which it has deeply embedded within itself all the
functional elements one would ordinarily find within an
intelligence operations manual.
As some examples, in the Old Testament, Abraham uses his
wife to infiltrate the court the Pharaoh under false pretenses.
Jacob (renamed Israel) uses treachery to steal the birthright
of his brother Esau. The Jewish holiday of Purim is based
on the biblical book of Esther, which Isaac Asimov calls
a work of fiction in Asimov's Bible.
A Jew named Mordechai acts as a case officer to infiltrate
Esther under false pretenses into the court of a Persian
king and later uses intrigue to foil an anti-semitic plot.
Lastly, the Jewish holiday of Yom Kipper features the
Kol Nidre ceremony where Jews renounce all their vows
to everyone except fellow Jews.
In my own frequent business dealings with Jews in New
York City, it is very common to see them operate under
assumed "Anglo" names for both themselves and
their businesses. It is very common to see them sprinkle
few lies here and there in their conversations and then
take a smug, quiet pleasure if they think they have got
you to swallow the lies without knowing it. This seems
to give them a better sense of control. It is not uncommon
for Jews to be "crypto" and deny their Jewishness,
to include pretending to be WASP extreme rightists. Lastly,
more than any other group, one hears Jews express anxiety
whenever one is "talking too much" and "getting
too much information out there." They have this very
paranoid sense that they always have to tightly control,
filter, and twist information or else bad things will
happen to them.
Intelligence operations concepts such as "front organizations,"
"double agent," dissimilation, "limited
hang out" (telling part of the truth to pre-empt
the competition from presenting the full truth), and PSYOPS
(Psychological Operations or propaganda) almost seem like
a normal part of everyday life. In fact, a Jew who does
not show a proclivity towards immediately grasping intrigue
is looked down upon by fellow Jews as a "dumb schmuck."
Living in New York City amidst the Jews, one almost gets
the feeling that one is weird if one is not
doing something covert beneath the surface. If one tries
to be a straight up person, and is not dismissed right
away as a dumb schmuck for being this way, the attitude
is often, "Hey, that can be
a convincing approach, use honesty
too!"
I think Victor Ostrowsky hit the nail on the head in By
Way of Deception when he pointed out that
the Mossad is the most admired organization in Israel.
Although it only has about two thousand full time employees,
its real strength comes from being able to draw upon the
active support of almost any Jew any where in the world.
This includes providing instant escort services, safe
houses, money laundering, and other high-powered services
that would be almost unheard of for the civilian side
of most other racial and ethnic groups.
More than any other people that I have ever encountered,
the Jewish people impress me as being like a CIA in search
of a country. I have often thought about a futuristic
scenario where the U.S. economy implodes, America falls
into civil war, and eventually gets militarily carved
up by foreign countries. (We are already being taken over
on an economic level through massive foreign purchases
of U.S. companies due to our chronic balance of trade
deficits and soaring indebtedness). Imagine if CIA members
decide to survive independently forever as an inbred,
multi-national, espionage organization that continues
to survive economically off its business fronts and organized
crime connections. Imagine that it is willing to shamelessly
use anything, to include concocted religious literature,
to provide cover and group cohesion for long term group
survival.
Come back in five hundred or a thousand years, and whatever
descendents of the CIA are still functioning as in inbred,
perpetual covert operations group, will probably closely
parallel what the Jews are today.
In social style, Jews seem
to compare to Nordics like the way Chinese compare to
Japanese
The book Ways
That Are Dark by Ralph Townsend (carried
by America First Books) makes an analogy which
I think has a striking application to the Jews relative
to the Nordic founders of America.
According to Townsend, when Americans first make contact
with Chinese and Japanese (such as when he served in the
American consulate in Shanghai in the early 1930's) Americans
initially overwhelmingly favor the Chinese over the Japanese.
The Chinese are more friendly, talkative, and garrulous.
In contrast, the Japanese come across as more quiet, taciturn,
and reserved. However, after Americans have acquired some
experience dealing with both groups for a couple years,
a funny starts to happen. Americans start to overwhelming
favor the Japanese over the Chinese.
The reason, he explained, is that the Japanese are much
more likely to keep their word and form stable relationships.
On the other hand, dissimilation is so widespread in Chinese
culture that the Chinese have no word for "lie"
that carries the same moral repugnance as in Western societies.
While living in New York City, I had an interesting comparative
ethno-racial experience in one evening that made me feel
like I had been put through a two hundred year American
history time machine.
First I attended a Mensa meeting in the early afternoon
where most of the attendees happened to be Jews. They
were from all walks of life. The purpose was purely social
and informal. No specific agenda. The conversations quickly
got on current events, with a slant towards intrigue and
paranoid threats towards Jews. The Jews were verbally
aggressive, often witty and funny. Sometimes they are
really very good at gearing down and relating to people,
schmoozing with them on their emotional and intellectual
level. Sometimes they are also rude, pedestrian, and "in
your face." They are usually talkative and sometimes
contentious, in fact, there is a joke in New York that
whenever you get two Jews together, you get three opinions.
I could get on a topic involving intrigue and have no
problems finding someone to talk to for endless hours.
When the meeting was over, I walked a few Mid-town Manhattan
blocks over to group that functioned as an informal Norwegian
social club with no specific agenda. There were people
there from all walks of life, to include Norwegian nationals
working in America, Norwegian Americans who have lived
in America all their lives, and even a couple of Jews
who did business with Norwegian exporters — but
they remained in the background and did not set the tone
of the meeting.
What really struck me about this meeting is that compared
to the earlier meeting with Jews, I felt like I was at
the Queen of England's Tea Party. An Icelander was not
kidding when he referred to his fellow Nordics as "an
aristocratic people with egalitarian tendencies."
People were much more reserved, much more attuned to protocols
and politeness. Just like Townsend's analogy regarding
the reserved behavior of the Japanese. And the people
were not trying to be reserved and aloof. This
is just the way they naturally are. Just like the British.
That reminds me of a World War II joke where a Norwegian
and English pilot are sipping scotch at a RAF bar when
they suddenly the sound of an incoming buzz bomb. The
English pilot dives under a table as the whole building
shakes with the explosion. After the smoke clears, the
English officer gets off the floor and brushes himself
off. He notices the Norwegian officer still standing at
the bar, calmly sipping his scotch. Not to be one-upped,
the English officer blurts out, "I say, old boy,
too scared to move?"
Speaking of ethnic anecdotes, I once read in the Jewish
Press an amusing story titled "Too
Much Yeast." It said that some Jews do not like to
go to Israel on vacation, because at the hotels they find
that Jewish attendants are pushy and rude in ways that
get on their nerves. This article, obviously written by
a Jew, suggested that the Jewish presence in a host population
should be kept below a certain percentage, such as, say,
3%, or else Jewish behavior becomes too visible and obnoxious,
just like adding too much yeast to flour in making bread.
I have mentioned elsewhere in this series that the Nordic
peoples include not only the Scandinavians, but also the
English, Scottish, Dutch, northern Germans, northern French,
parts of Ireland, and pockets elsewhere in Europe. Up
until the 1840's, America was overwhelmingly White Anglo-Saxon
Protestant-Nordic. The Norway Times
likes to run articles such as "George Washington
Was One of Us!" drawing attention to the fact his
ancestors came from the York area, heavily settled by
Norwegian Vikings. Although Thomas Jefferson was part
Celtic, he was to a large extent another "Mr. Nordic
America" just like George Washington. In many ways
Jefferson exuded the "Athenian" or "Cavalier"
side of the Nordic character, whereas George Washington
was more on the "Spartan" or "Puritan"
side. When one travels to Virginia and drops by Monticello
or Mount
Vernon, one easily can sense the "aristocratic"
side of the Icelander's description of the "aristocratic
people with egalitarian tendencies."
The Nordic and Celtic peoples have a lot of interesting
anomalies and paradoxes to their own indigenous racial
character much like the Jews. In regard to their traits
such as prizing individualism, honor, and chivalry they
are extremely different, if not almost the exact opposite.
I clearly believe that their traits are much more conducive
towards the mutualist behavior I described at the beginning
of this article. Not surprisingly, since they are the
ones who invented chivalrous free enterprise competition
and republican government, they seem to be the best at
maintaining it.
Many Jewish people are nice enough as individuals, but
the fundamental problem with their world, which is so
geared towards money, secrecy, and intrigue is that very
sick people can flourish and rise to the top. On his talk
show, Daryl Bradford Smith and Rev Ted Pike talked
about how when you look under the hood at Zionist leaders,
you see "a terrible sickness."
In contrast, the evolutionary history of northern European
societies has been more man vs. nature, much more decentralized
and libertarian, and with a strong technological flavor.
It was always possible in northern European society to
become highly successful without the emphasis on the relentless
intrigue and money manipulation. In addition, out on the
farm and in the fishing villages in places like Norway,
Poland, Scotland, Britain, Ireland, or Germany, the perverts,
sickies, and criminals tend to stand out like a sore thumb,
whereas they tend to blend in much better in the big cities
where they can even find certain synagogues that might
welcome them and their ill-gotten riches with open arms.
Lastly, in making my analogy, I do not mean to imply that
the Chinese and the Jews are exactly alike any more than
Nordics are exactly like the Japanese. For starters, Chinese
have historically tended to keep to themselves rather
than infiltrate societies under false pretenses. The Japanese
are relatively more authoritarian and collectivistic than
Nordics.
The Jewish aggression question
While it is true that when it comes to business the Jews
are pretty smart, it is also important to note that they
are not that smart. They are
not all geniuses, as even IQ tests prove.
I do not believe that Jews have enough innate talent to
accumulate the level of wealth and power they wield in
America today base purely on smarts and honest hard work
alone. In fact, there is very strong historical evidence,
to include confessions by Jews themselves, that they have
received the critical "push" they need to achieve
dominance from nefarious sources. For example, elite families
such as the Rothschilds used their underworld ties and
dishonest practices to crack European central banks, and
ultimately create the U.S. central bank. Once they got
their hands on the ability virtually print money for themselves,
they cleverly spread it among their fellow tribesmen to
launder it into businesses around the country. This terrible
power of the purse, created by fraud rather than the kind
of innovative hard work shown by a Ford or Edison, has
given the Jews massive financial "air superiority"
over every other racial and ethnic group in America. It
has enabled them to grab the U.S. government by the hairs
of it head. However, from a purely moral perspective,
it has no more legitimacy than pirate treasure.
The short term payoffs of Jewish
homosexuality for intelligence operations
The word "perversion" comes from Latin which
means "turning away." Kevin Strom gave an excellent
talk titled "Perversion
of the Sacred" which explains why homosexuality
involves "turning away" from true romantic,
heterosexual love and procreation.
Homosexuality entails a perversion of normal heterosexual
intercourse. It deflects people from having children and
assuming the responsibilities of raising a family. If
too many people engage in it, their own tribal group will
die out on a biological level. Aggressive homosexuals
are obviously not particularly bothered by the smell of
a situation where they are promoting something that encourages
the genetic death of their own tribe or race. That same
set of nostrils is probably not offended at the perversity
of the intelligence operations game as well. In fact,
it may thrive on the stench.
For people involved in intelligence operations, I believe
that it probably helps to have a fractured personality
and also to be a bit bisexual or gay.
Traditionally, homosexuals are used to living double lives.
While it is true that homosexuality is partly genetic
(Bailey
and Pillard (1991) claim it is about 50% genetic),
and furthermore many homosexuals cannot help themselves
about the way they feel, it is also true that a significant
proportion of homosexuals are secretly at war with the
mores of the overall society. They become practiced at
keeping a poker face as they bluff their way amidst the
general population, which constitutes a potential enemy.
In addition, an effeminate approach to life by gay men
helps them attune themselves to indirect methods for handling
problems rather than bold, open solutions.
This is perfect mental training for spooks. CIA agents
habitually lie about who they are. An interesting component
of intelligence operations training detailed in books
like By Way of Deception and
The O.S.S. and I are situational
tests where trainees have to quickly think on their feet
to develop alibis, cover stories, and new aliases.
Also, the espionage world involves recruiting and co-opting
people through blackmail, intimidation, and bribes. It
probably helps to engage in homosexual sex with potential
sources of human intelligence and take hidden photos as
one means to compromise and coopt them. If nothing else,
a person who already lives in a psychological underworld
as his homosexual way of life finds it much easier to
pull others down to that level through blackmail and extortion.
The short term payoffs of Jewish
criminality for intelligence operations
Criminality and espionage operations can be mutually reinforcing.
The following are some examples of how they are interrelated.
On pages 154-155 of Final
Judgment, Michael Collins Piper quotes Professor
Alfred McCoy (The Politics of Heroin: CIA
Complicity in the Global Drug Trade, p.
14), who summarized the links of the CIA and organized
crime around the world:
Since prohibition of narcotics in
the 1920s, alliances between drug brokers and intelligence
agencies have protected the global narcotics traffic.
Given the frequency of such alliances, there seems a
natural attraction between intelligence agencies and
criminal syndicates . . Both are practitioners of what
one retired CIA operative has called the 'clandestine
arts'—the basic skill of operating outside the
normal channels of civil society. Among all the institutions
of modern society, intelligence agencies and criminal
syndicates alone maintain large organizations capable
of carrying out covert operations without fear of detection.
As suggested in this quotation, successful
criminals typically deal in secrecy and learn how to evade
state authorities. This can include adopting disguises
and stealing the identities of other people. Since police
detectives typically trace motives to catch criminals,
successful criminals often find patsies to deflect suspicion
and take the fall for them. Lastly, criminals often need
to create legitimate organizations to fence stolen goods
and launder money.
Similarly, spies often rely on cover stories and false
identity documents. Well-funded players also create front
organizations to leak disinformation into media, create
"limited hang out" stories, and smear truth
tellers. Andreas Von Bulow, former Head of the Parliamentary
Commission of the German Secret Service, stated, "95%
of the work of intelligence agencies around the world
is deception and disinformation." (p. 8, New
World Order Exposed by Victor Thorn).
An interesting book that outlined Soviet agents of influence
techniques is Dezinformatsia:
Active Measures in Soviet Strategies by Richard Shultz.
Michael Collins Piper's Final Judgment
has some excellent coverage of American national media
cover-ups of the JFK assassination. Victor Ostrowsky's
By Way of Deception describes
the Mossad's permanent disinformation office that routinely
devises false flags and other cover stories for all major
operations.
Even the U.S. military frequently embraces deception.
I recollect during a field grade staff planning course
once hearing about some academic study that determined
that whenever a decoy operation is combined with a military
offensive plan, all other things being held equal, the
odds of success improve by at least 60%.
Successful criminals often learn how to covertly network
with other criminals. For example, it is much easier to
commit a crime such as murder by having a surrogate commit
the crime who does not have a traceable personal motive.
Because they must deal in secrecy and carefully control
their operations, the leadership structure of criminal
organizations is typically highly authoritarian and oligarchical.
Similarly, intelligence operatives routinely use drop
points to make it difficult to trace contact between spies
and their case officers. State-sponsored espionage operations
are typically directed in a highly authoritarian manner,
with special attention paid to controlling and compartmentalizing
the flow of information.
Relating all of this back to
Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology
As mentioned, an important root of anti-Semitism
is the way in which a tinge of duplicity, criminality,
and perversion frequently sours Jewish behavior. Given
their secretive style, it is almost impossible for them
to keep criminality at bay and prevent their worst people
from rising to the top.
Complicating the picture even further is the fact that
governments around the world spend untold hundreds of
billions of dollars for intelligence operations services.
There is a strong international market for covert skills.
In addition, there have been numerous cases in history
where governments get into serious trouble and they need
people to cleverly manipulate their currencies or collect
taxes in time of war. Not long after they have excoriated
the Jews, many governments have invited them back to do
their dirty work for them.
I am reminded to the song by Cher "Gypsies,
Tramps & Thieves," where towns people would
righteously condemn gypsies, but then "...every night
all the men would come around and lay their money down."
Stalin liked to use Jews to run communist tyrannies in
Eastern Europe, because he knew that he could count on
them be coldly manipulative, vicious, and thorough. In
the Middle Ages, various kingdoms throughout Europe used
Jews for tax collectors, because the rulers knew they
could count on the Jews to be more relentless and coldly
manipulative with numbers and verbiage than Christians.
As a further example, Edward I expelled
Jews from England in 1290. Then in the mid 17th century,
Oliver Cromwell allowed Jews back into England. He had
drawn on the lending services of Jews in the Netherlands
to help finance the Parliamentary side of the English
Civil War. As a Puritan, he suffered from a delusion that
Jews are some kind of holy people of the Old Testament.
According to one source, Jews helped finance both sides
of the English Civil War in hopes that at least one of
their bets would pay off. Then after they re-entered England
with the blessing of Oliver Cromwell, they discovered
that many Royalist and Cavalier aristocrats who had been
Cromwell's enemies were totally impoverished. They offered
capital in return for opportunities to intermarry and
ultimately gain titles of nobility in order to deeply
embed themselves within England's ruling elite. This gave
them a social base from which they could later help create
and control England's central bank, which in turn gave
them an important base to later spring over to America
and create America's central bank.
An unvirtuous circle
Perhaps by now the reader begins to sense how all the
different parts of the Jewish character can reinforce
each other on a broader sociological level. We might see
how it helps the street slick urban mediator and punk
opportunist from the ghetto to have a slightly fractured
personality to keep multiple mental sets of books in order
to function as a professional minority for over two thousand
years. (I discuss the fractured liberal minority coalition
politics game in some detail in my environmental
vs. genetics discussion). We might see how these traits
reinforce being a bit gay, devious, or inclined to operate
as mafiosa with an innate talent for exploiting morally
ambiguous business niches in society. This in turn reinforces
a superior intelligence operations capability, which in
turn reinforces an opportunistic, transactional, monopolistic,
and covert business operations style that can quickly
access enough wealth to buy off key people in host populations.
Using a biological analogy, this viral capability to penetrate
the nucleus of the host cell is important to keep the
game going both on a high political level and also on
a broad sociological basis. I could go on in much greater
detail, but hopefully now the reader can get a better
intuitive feel for how the various jig saw pieces of Jewish
criminal totalitarian psychopathology logically tie together.
The fundamental problem for America is that Jews have
become very adapted to living on the edges of toxic race-mixed,
urban environments they have thrived in over the last
2,500 years. Unfortunately, that success has come at a
terrible price. The toxicity that they have survived has
also become imprinted within their culture and gene pool.
They have a tendency to act as a reverse template. That
is, spread "edge characteristics" and toxicity
wherever they go, even where it does not previously exist.
One reason why the so-called "Jewish problem"
is so difficult to deal with is that in the short run,
the intelligence operations game can be extremely effective
for seizing control of the wealth and other strategic
bases of a society. Paradoxically, in the long run, these
methods generate cynicism, corruption, and paranoia that
can ultimately degrade the innovativeness, productivity,
and cohesion of the targeted society. Nevertheless, Jews
tend to continually play the intelligence operations game
with robotic efficiency and persistency until something
powerful enough finally puts them in check, as if while
striving to gain the whole world, they could care less
that they have already lost their own soul.
Jews remind me of the old story about how one can supposedly
catch a monkey with an old-fashioned glass milk bottle
chained to a tree. Simply put a banana inside the glass
bottle, and wait for a monkey to reach inside and grab
it. The problem for the monkey is that the narrow neck
of the glass bottle prevents him from pulling out the
banana while he is holding it. Many monkeys are supposedly
so greedy that they refuse to let go of the banana even
as a human walks up to them. And that is how they get
caught and get thrown into cages.
Similarly, because the intelligence operations approach
to life can be so extremely effective in the short run
as a short-cut to wealth and power, Jews just cannot give
it up despite all the long term negative repercussions
on the back end. As a quasi-racial group, they are addicted
to intrigue. Everything, and I mean everything
— to include political ideology, morality, and religion
— is just a schmiel or "put on"
that can be manipulated at will to gain a tactical advantage.
Incidentally, the United States Government itself has
a problem similar to the Jews in terms of the untold hundreds
of billions of dollars it invests in covert CIA operations
in Third World countries, despite all the negative blow-back
its meddling often generates. See Confessions
of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins to better
understand how this also serves the short term interests
of major "American" money center banks as well
as professional political families such as the Bush's
who are experts at gaming the governmental system (for
example, see George
Bush: The Unauthorized Biography
by Webster Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin).
Another reason why the "Jewish problem" is so
messy is that there is in fact a genetic as well as a
cultural component behind their behavior. The intelligence
operations game has been going on for so long that the
mental traits which support it have become firmly embedded
in their gene pool. This is why many Jews feel so totally
paranoid about dealing with it. They are afraid that if
the cat comes out of the bag regarding genetic realities,
they will get thrown back into concentration camps. Genetic
problems are much harder to accommodate than cultural
problems. Ironically, the more they stonewall, the more
they build social pressures against humane and compassionate
options that involve negotiated power sharing as opposed
to open, embittered, unconditional ethno-racial warfare.
The genetic component is important for another reason
besides explaining extreme Jewish defensive paranoia.
It implies that much of Jewish behavior that undermines
white America is a semi-conscious tropism.
In other words, it comprises an instinctive, subconscious
tendency. Like Dr. Morbius when he arouses the Id monster
in his sleep, Jews are not always consciously aware of
the nature and impact of their toxic behavior on gentiles.
They are forever writing books about anti-Semitism (to
include the Jewish writers who dominate Wikipedia.org
entries on related topics), and they always seem to cover
everything in great detail except the most important and
obvious problems. They act convinced that all anti-Semities
are simply inadequate white trash people dripping with
envy towards the Jews on account of allegedly well-earned
Jewish success.
Dealing with the Jews can be like dealing with someone
you may like as a person, but they have terrible drinking
problem. The alcoholic hates you when stop him from chugging
the booze, but hates you even more if you don't intervene
to prevent him from drinking himself to death.
I am reminded of Steven Spielberg's excellent film A
Soldier's Story, where the real villain
in a mystery involving a murdered black sergeant is not
a suspected white redneck, but a self-hating black. While
living in New York City, I discovered that some of the
biggest anti-Semites in America are the Jews themselves.
The attitude of many Jews that they must hide their modus
operandi from the prying eyes of gentiles is in itself
an anti-semitic admission that they feel they have negative
characteristics that cannot survive the spotlight of truth.
Screaming "Anti-Semite!" at honest critics of
Jews is itself an anti-Semitic expression of paranoid
Jewish self-loathing. After all, how many whites go around
accusing nonwhites of "ugly anti-gentilism"?
We smile at the idea, because the idea of white people
aggressively ferreting out "anti-gentilism"
with "hate crime" initiatives sounds paranoid,
Orwellian, vicious, and even childish. Why be so defensive
if one has nothing to hide? Despite all of this, whites
tolerate this exact same obnoxious behavior on the part
of well-funded Jewish groups such as AIPAC with close
ties to Congressmen, the Southern Poverty Law Center with
its conduits to leftist extremists, and the ADL with its
sinister connections to American law enforcement personnel.
And of course, as Wilmot Robertson points out in The
Dispossessed Majority, Jews who pose as
America's biggest anti-racists are in fact the biggest
racists of all. For example, Jews who demand open borders
and promote white race-mixing in America simultaneously
support extreme Jewish racial exclusivity in Israel. To
add another layer of irony, the Arabs who populate Middle
Eastern countries are actually more semitic than the Ashkenazi
Jews who run Israel. Yet these Ashkenazis savagely persecute
the Arabs. Therefore the nastiest anti-semites in the
world are in fact Jews.
This is the way it often works with Jews — everything
frequently has a crooked, ironic, or hypocritical twist.
Even my own use of the term "intelligence operations"
carries with it ironies, caveats and reservations. "Intelligence
operations" carries with it a connotation of formalized,
rationally-directed, conscious operations management.
That conceptualization carries within it my own bias towards
trying to reconstruct the world in rationalistic, technological
terms, consistent with my own racial-ethnic background.
The term "intelligence operations" can also
reflect a militarized worldview, and frankly I do have
a military background as well. But since the Jewish people
are a distinctive biological
as well as cultural phenomenon, whose nervous systems
and emotionality reflect evolutionary
logic rather operations management logic, I am guilty
of projection if I try to push the intelligence operations
analogy too far.
How do you "quantify" a nagging Jewish mother?
How do define the "logic structure" of a street
slick, "hipsy pipsy lots of pep!" sales approach,
or a mousy-voiced effete double-talker like the former
Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, or a Yiddish-accented gangster
who slits a detective's nose with a switchblade in the
film noire Chinatown,
or a brash little squirt like Pee
Wee Herman? The possible characterizations are multi-faceted
and nearly endless, but suffice to say, it is hard to
capture a sociological phenemonon in an organizational
diagram or "order of battle" schemata. (Incidentally,
last time I checked, an "Is he or isn't he?"
Jewish web site is tracking 75%
votes that Pee Wee Herman is Jewish).
Many Jews hate us when we publicly expose their modus
operandi, but they hate us even more when we stand around
like a bunch of little wide-eyed, naive, Little
Annie Fannies and do nothing to stop them from fouling
the social environment and ultimately destroying themselves.
Gentiles who do nothing but suck up to Jews are not real
friends, as Israel Shamir points out in "Friends
True and False."
Last but not least, gentiles must not openly identify
the deceptive behavior of Jews, but they should also define
their own standards of honor in order to avoid becoming
subconsciously infected with Jewish criminal values. Furthermore,
they have to realize that in the long run, appeasing Jewish
sickness and criminality only makes the problem worse.
While it is true that increasing levels of power can corrupt
any racial or ethnic group, I think that Jews are more
that way than any other group because their culture is
so heavily geared towards opportunistic exploitation and
adversarial use of deception. Because they define themselves
in terms of their hosts, they are less self-restrained
once a host fails to restrain them. They almost remind
me of mobile tank warfare tactics where reserve echalons
immediate vector in to exploit and expand breaches in
the enemy line the minute they develop.
Like the character played by Gary Cooper in the movie
High Noon, whites must understand that in
the long run, there is no place to run or hide. As the
Jewish writer Dr. Henry Makow put it in the title of his
article, "We're
All Anti-Semites Now," we become "anti-Semities"
whenever we do anything that Jews don't like,
to include standing up to Jewish criminality.
You have to figure out a way to take
a stand. Whenever they breach our lines, you have to send
in the mobile reserves fast. Don't let them flak-suppress
you with their barrages of "anti-Semite!" accusations
and their eternal whining about their "victimhood."
Using a different analogy, whites who fail to resist can
become like individuals who get hypothermia in a very
cold environment. At some point a person stops shivering
and instead begins to feel pleasantly warm all over. This
means the core temperature of the brain has dropped into
the death zone. The person with that glazed look in his
eyes who feels warm all over must recognize this as a
terrible danger sign and must immediately find real warmth
and get his core temperature back up. If he fails to do
so, he may have less than an hour to live.
Similarly, when all anti-Semites have been driven underground,
that is, when gentiles openly embrace Jewish "wise
guy" values, Jewish criminals become totally respectable,
and when all criticism towards Jews is totally suppressed,
this is a terrible social danger sign much like hypothermia
for individuals. The Pied Piper has been dunked in the
lake, and the rodents rule the town. Loki
has broken his bindings and is mustering the monsters
of Ragnarok.
The 20th century was essentially the Jewish century for
America, in which Jewish values and priorities set the
tone for our country. Through the negligence of gentile
leadership, our society has become deeply infected with
standards that promote hype and immediate gratification
rather than substance. Americans feel very complacent
and comfortable as all the deteriorative factors outlined
in my Critical
Issues section are literally screaming "Red Alert!"
America has become a high fraud, high greed, high self-deception
society headed towards major economic collapse and major
social dislocation.
Thomas Jefferson and convicted Jewish stock swindler Mike
Milken do not mix any better than Thor and Loki. An approach
to life that stresses scientific honesty, decentralization,
and interpersonal chivalry on the one hand, and an approach
to life that emphasizes intrigue and vicious monopolization
on the other hand, have severe problems coexisting side
by side. One will eventually squeeze the other out, or
be forced to fight the other for its very existence.
I believe unequivocally that the Thomas Jefferson approach
must gain the upper hand. In fact, it is non-negotiable.
I do not see how any American who has pledged to protect
and defend the Constitution can feel otherwise.
This then, is my own personal understanding of the complexities
of the so-called "Jewish problem" here in America
that is the topic of many titles carried by America First
Books.
Parasite animal models
Various animal species employ very sophisticated
parasitic modus operandi. Obviously most humans are not
"hardwired" towards criminality or "parasitism."
However, humans often mimic animals in many ways. As a
very simple example, a human wearing body armor into battle
imitates the genetically "hardwired" shell characteristics
of a crustacean or the bony forehead of a rhinoceros.
Looking at species which have become completely "hardwired"
towards parasitism can give us some important clues about
traits to look for in sizing up human criminal groups,
even if most forms of human criminality involve componants
of learning.
One interesting example involves the Death's Head Moth.
It routinely invades bee hives and sucks out the honey.
This is an amazing feat, given that the moth is several
times larger than the average bee, and furthermore given
that bees normally converge on any invader and sting it
to death. However, this moth has evolved to give off a
scent that make the bees think that it is another bee.
Due to some evolutionary quirk, bees are very poor at
judging an alien by size, but are extremely good at judging
it by smell. Hence, as long as the moth can continue to
secrete this special hormone, it can merrily suck honey
out of the combs as dozens of wiggling, busy bees are
literally scrunched up around the moth inside the hive.
Unfortunately for the moth his supply of scent is limited.
He must make sure not to become so absorbed in sucking
honey that he fails to leave the hive before his scent
is used up. If he tarries too long, the bees suddenly
recognize an invader in their midst, and immediately turn
into the moth and sting him to death.
In his classic work The
Biological Jew, author Eustace Mullins refers
to the work Parasitic Animals by Geoffrey LaPage
(Cambridge University Press, 1951):
LaPage points out that every animal,
whatever its mode of life, is gradually altered by the
slow processes of evolution. He says that the parasite,
far from being an exception to this rule, actually exemplifies
it.
It develops teeth with which to
rasp the tissues of the host, sucking apparatuses
to suck its juices, coagulants to hold onto the host
body. The remarkable cunning with which some kinds
of bloodsucking bats stalk their victims and steal
their blood must also be reckoned among the modifications
which their temporarily parasitic habits have produced.
Species of Desmodus attack cattle, horses and other
animals, including man and poultry, when they are
asleep at night. They watch their victims carefully,
and, when they are asleep, they walk or sidle up to
them and scoop out a piece of flesh so delicately
that the sleeping animal often is not aware of the
bite until the bleeding is discovered in the morning."
Another fascinating parasite example
involves the South American fire ant described in "An
Amazing Parallel" taken from Best of
Attack! Revolutionary of the National Alliance.
The article refers to an 11 June 1965 Time
Magazine article titled "Subversion
Among the Ants" about a tiny, but troublesome fire
ant native to South America that was making inroads into
the southern U.S.
According to the report, scientists noted
that in South America the fire ants were much less a problem
for farmers than in the United States. Some unknown malady
seemed to have robbed them of their natural fierceness, aggressiveness,
and industriousness; in other words, the fire-ant "civilization"
in South America had become terminally decadent.
When the scientists investigated further they traced the source
of the fire-ant decadence to a social parasite — "another
species of ants that live without concealment in the fortresses
of the fierce fire ants and, by some mysterious influence,
make their hosts support them in idle luxury."
And what is this "mysterious influence," this fire-ant
liberalism, which blunts their xenophobic instinct and makes
them tolerate the alien parasites in their midst? The scientists
don't know, but they say it is transmitted from the parasites
to the hard-working fire ants by a fluttering of the parasites'
antennae, "apparently conveying a compelling message
that makes the worker feed the parasites..."
Shades of Jewish television! So the ant-parasites do it with
antennae too! But the message the media masters convey to
us through out TV antennae compels us to do far more than
feed their bloodsucking tribe. It robs us of memory of the
past and concern for the future. It perverts all healthy instincts.
It turns racial pride into racial guilt. It undermines racial
solidarity and gives us in its place self-hatred. It makes
us abandon our own natural interests and serve instead the
interests of alien parasites and all the racial dregs of the
globe.
Well, from the source, you probably guessed
in advance it would take a swipe at America's controlled national
media. Again, I do not believe that all Jews are bad people.
In fact, in many ways good Jews are also being victimized by
criminals at the top. And no doubt many American Indians and
Iraqis can level complaints about American cultural domination
that are not dissimilar to white complaints about Jewish supremacists.
By the same token I see no reason to take the spotlight off
the controlled media, particularly when it has served as a cheerleader
and/or apologist rather than as a watchdog regarding American
aggression in the Middle East and other extremely dangerous
trends I mention in my Critical
Issues section.
The slogan "silence is consent" that Jewish activists
use regarding gentile acquiescence towards Nazi abuse of Jews
also works the other way around in regard to gentile acquiescence
to Zionist aggression towards Palestinians and Lebanese and
their destruction of traditional American values.
I think that all of us, Jews and gentiles alike, have a public
duty to work much harder at the grass roots level to reign in
our criminal leaders and crazy people.
Summary comments
While it is easy to spot low level crime, such
as petty theft and murder, it is much harder for citizens to
identify high level criminal activity. This is especially true
in situations where criminals control national media, and can
spin doctor crooked policies to make them appear honorable.
Accurately identifying high level criminality often requires
pattern recognition skills. A person may need to look at such
variables as the degree to which the criminal behavior undermines
mutualist principles, the social stresses required to produce
the destructive behavior, and the viral persistency the criminal
behavior in the face of efforts to correct it.
The degree to which society lets its guard down against high
level criminal infiltration is usually referred to as decadence.
It is usually inversely related to the degree of high level
criminal infestation in a society. Often this infestation does
not take place over night, but rather builds up progressively
over time. I think that we can create a phase progression spectrum
model similar to the cultural conflict model addressed in the
prior environmental
vs. genetic section.
a) Soft "pre-parasitism:"
weakness, negligence, ineptitude (implies
naivety, ignorance, laziness)
b) Acute decadence, social destructiveness
shows conscious motives, persistency
c) Chronic, institutionalized decadence (implies
infestation)
d) Cancerous, institutionalized decadence,
possibly including inbred malevolence
e) Hard "parasitism." Inbred, permanent
pattern of consistent destructiveness to hosts,
as exemplified by the Thugs.
In his book Why Civilizations
Self-Destruct, Dr. Pendell claims that civilizations
tend to collapse when the ratio of nonproductive people
becomes too large relative to productive people, that
the society sags under the weight of massive incompetence.
While I believe that Dr. Pendell identified a valid long
term genetic explanation for permanent decline, I think
that his analysis fails to include an important short
term variable that greatly accelerates social decadence.
I call this variable "virally persistent parasitism."
It denotes dark forces that operate like an "enemy
within" that consciously, deliberately, systematically,
and consistently block all major efforts used by men of
goodwill in a society to rationally sort out and resolve
a society's social problems and put it back on a mutualist
course.
In this article I explain why I believe 19th century classical
liberal principles were based on sound mutualist principles.
Unfortunately, America's ruling elites have been cynically
running roughshod over the classical liberal principles
upon which America was founded ever since 1861. Their
criminal infestation has only accelerated as we move closer
to our present era. In addition to suffering from the
disease of progressive Federal centralization (the less
polite term is "tyranny"), which was primarily
initiated under the Abraham
Lincoln dictatorship, we have also been cursed with
increasingly virulent strains of Jewish criminal totalitarian
psychopathology.
By the mid-19th century, America had such a large European
population, and such a vast infrastructure of universities,
manufacturing, and free enterprise businesses, that it
had over a century of "ruin" left in it despite
the increasingly criminal nature of its top leadership.
For over a century, scientific, technological, and economic
progress was able to continue along a strong upward path
while most American institutions remained on "cruise
control" despite the rotting social and political
order at the highest levels. However, we can see from
the economic data cited in my Critical
Issues section , that America was beginning to show
serious signs of slippage in its international competitiveness
by the early 1970's. At that time, real wages for the
average American worker began to stagnate.
I believe that America's problems run extremely deep.
It may seem formidable to address them, but making no
effort is even worse, because it risks a continued slide
towards oblivion. A wide variety of approaches on many
different levels of society will be required for positive
action. This may ultimately require some radical solutions,
entailing not only decentralization of government, but
also the political restructuring of America into separate
countries. In the best case scenario, the necessary changes
can be accomplished in a fairly rational and peaceful
manner.
The broad mass of citizenry will not only need to better
educate itself regarding the real causes of America's
decadence, but its business and political elites will
have to show greater loyalty towards ordinary citizens.
They will need to show greater courage and unity in combating
parasitic elitist enemies who have done tremendous damage
from the top down. This will ultimately require developing
greater ethnic, racial, and cultural ties to promote loyalty
in addition to achieving greater intellectual clarity
about America's real enemies. I have already addressed
the importance of genetic interests towards preserving
loyalty in my environmental
vs. genetic section, and will revisit this as well
as ethnic and cultural factors in the libertarian racial
nationalist (genetic bottom up) section of my American
history discussion, where I focus upon the popular sovereignty
concept.
Back to Part One:.........
Overview
Back to Part
Two: ..........Centralization
vs. Decentralization
Back
to Part Three: ....Environmental
vs. Genetic
Additional References
2010-04-10 Zionism
Unmasked: The Dark Face Of Jewish Nationalism
by Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Studies
at the U.S. Army War College. See also interesting commentary
by Dr. Sabrosky in "Israel
Did 9-11" - U.S. Military Expert Supports Bollyn
Thesis."
|