Is the U.S. Government Protecting or
Threatening Our Rights?

"Hi! We're the U.S. Government.
We are here to help you!"

Left: Rather than allow Texas police handle Branch Davidian dissidents in a common sense, local Texas way, the ATF and FBI stormed in with U.S. military vehicles and succeeded in burning 74 men, women, and children alive in 1993.

Right: U.S. Government officials sanction torture and sadistic humiliation at Abu Ghraib following the 2003 invasion to allegedly help "bring democracy to Iraq." According to numerous reports, Israeli advisors coached Americans on brutal Israeli interrogation methods and ways to turn Iraq into another West Bank, and Americans all too eagerly listened. Adding to the unnecessary antagonism, Americans routinely use massive troop attacks and air strikes in situations that would ordinarily require only a few fluent interpreters and some skillful local police. Adding another surreal twist, our spendthrift government has built four gigantic, obviously "permanent" super bases complete with Burger Kings, first-run movie theaters, and swimming pools in a land where the overall population has turned against us and hardly a convoy can make it from Kuwait to Baghdad without taking small arms fire.

Articles about prisoners held at Guantanamo without evidence along with the Abu Ghraib files and torture photographs, should raise questions about why American officials feel that they need to descend into barbarism, when Americans in earlier periods in American history were able to endure extreme stresses and maintain their republican idealism.

Not OK, Oklahoma

Similarly, the U.S. Government has failed to explain explosives found inside the Murrah Government building in Oklahoma City after the 1995 bombing (please see 4 min online video "Oklahoma City Bombing: Startling Evidence Proves Cover Up"), or the fact that the ANFO bomb carried inside Timothy McVeigh's truck (parked away from the Murrah building) held insufficient explosive power to shear away over a third of the building.

William Jasper's New American article "Proof of Bombs and Cover-Up" cites the report by Brigadier General Benton K. Partin (USAF, Retired). According to this explosives expert. "Using the official estimate of 4,800 pounds of ANFO would yield a maximum pressure of explosion of about one-half million pounds per square inch at detonation. But by the time the blast wave traveled through the air to the nearest of the building’s columns, it would have dropped off to about 375 pounds of pressure per square inch, and by the time it reached the nearest column in the second row of columns it would have been down to 27 to 38 psi. The compressive yield strength of concrete is around 3,500 pounds per square inch, far above anything exerted by the truck bomb blast on the building’s structure."

Unfortunately the inability of the public to hold the government accountable for its lies and omissions has only egged it on to even greater outrages.

THE DAMNED
American style

Contrary to the official government story, there is overwhelming evidence that something smaller and more weaponized than a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon on 9-11. Sample sources include the outstanding web site pentagonresearch.com, the documentary Loose Change, and the book Synthetic Terror: Made in the USA by Webster Tarpley.

How could a Boeing 757 punch through three rows of buildings and make a nice round exit hole? Look at the aerial photo of three rings of the Pentagon that got penetrated. Those are big, reinforced buildings. Normally the fusilage of a 757 will crumple like a Volkswagon in a head-on collision. Looks more like a uranium penetrator to me! Also, pentagonresearch.com claims that the FBI is hiding 85 videos. Why? The only video that has been released shows a microsecond flash of something indistinguishable that zooms into the Pentagon before we see a big explosion.

Col Donn de Grand Pre, author of The Rattler's Revenge and the Viper's Venom, held a conference of pilots that was reported in 2003. The conference determined that the planes which struck the world trade center towers must have been remotely piloted to perform with their level of precision.

According to other sources, American Air Force pilots were not scrambled to intercept airlines outside their normal flight patterns according to normal procedures. Quite a few other routine defense procedures were also mysteriously breached that day. Lastly, it appears that the explosion took out financial accountants and files in the Pentagon pertaining to the investigation of 2.3 trillion dollars missing in a Pentagon audit under the watch of Zionist Pentagon Comptroller Dov Zakheim. Bill Christison, a former senior CIA official, thinks the attack was motivated as a cover-up of this scandal.

All the evidence points toward an inside job, suggesting that some rogue element of the CIA or U.S. military, probably in league with a foreign power such as Israel, attacked the command center of the U.S. military to justify war for Israel and oil in the Middle East. In other words, American defense assets were probably used to attack a major American defense establishment. Col Donn de Grand Pre has called it a Neo-con coup de etat, and I agree with him.

In stepping back to weigh the ultimate meaning of all this, I cannot help but think of the darkly surrealistic film The Damned (1969) by Italian director Lucino Visconti.

Visconti spared almost no decadent motif (real or imagined) to try to demonize 1930's German society. He not only seized upon such themes as male transvestitism and homosexuality (which, incidentally, the Clinton Administration tried to introduce into the U.S. military in the early 1990's), but he also dramatized a scene taken from the famous "Night of the Long Knives" where Hitler purged leaders of his S.A. with his S.S. Obviously healthy classical liberal societies do not see death feuds within their own military establishments.

However, whereas Visconti's historically inaccurate S.S. does it's dirty work with Schmeissers (that did not yet exist in 1934), apparently real life rogue elements of our military and/or CIA and their Israeli puppet masters like to do it with remotely piloted aircraft. Furthermore, we have strong evidence from Final Judgment's analysis of the JFK assassination (described again later) that America's answer to Lucino Visconti has also taken place at least once before with the murder of a U.S. President in broad daylight.



Nazi rot and Fed rot: What's the difference? In Lucino Visconti's film The Damned, S.A. men spray pictures of political enemies with submachine gun fire, only to get sprayed themselves the following early morning in an S.S. surprise attack. There is now strong evidence that a rogue element of the U.S. military or CIA attacked Pentagon officials. Was it not already enough that the U.S. military had suffered tremendous self-inflicted damage from aerosolized depleted uranium during the first Gulf War? (covered later).

Defending indispensable
First Amendment rights?

If the U.S. Government ever succeeds in taking away all our rights to freedom of speech, what have we got left? Please see Rev Ted Pike's web site truthtellers.org for updates on the latest threats winding through Congress. A so-called "anti-hate" bill coming up in Jan 2007 with the new Democratic majority Congress looks like a very serious threat to free speech, as I will explain again later.

Consider some highly reputable individuals (certainly not the "Arab terrorist" stereotype, by any means) who have already arrested and even incarcerated.

David Irving (above left), the internationally renown British historian who has written over 30 books, left his Florida home to give a lecture in Austria in November 2005. Austria arrested and sentenced Irving to three years in jail for "illegal speech" that he made sixteen years earlier regarding his historical interpretation of events surrounding German internment of Jews in concentration camps during World War II. After thirteen months in jail, David Irving was finally released in December 2006.

(Above right) The U.S. Government also acquiesced to the deportation of Ernst Zundel (pictured in the orange prison jump suit), first from his home with his U.S. citizen wife in Tennessee to Canada, and then secondly from Canada to imprisonment and trial in Germany. He has also questioned interpretations of historical events that took place over 60 years ago in German camps. On 15 Feb 2007 BBC reported that he was "accused of using `pseudo-scientific' methods to try to rewrite the accepted history of the Nazi Holocaust in 14 pieces of written work and internet publications" and sentenced to five years in jail. BBC also reported that "Germany hopes to make Holocaust denial a crime across the EU as part of a package of laws it wants to introduce during its presidency of the bloc."

Another dissident, Germar Rudolf, was also been deported from America for similar thought crimes and now languishes in solitary confinement in a German prison.

In April 2006, police arrested and handcuffed the patriotic activist Pedro Varella in Spain and confiscated 5,000 of his politically-oriented books. (pictured in the clipping above). As usual, when the New World Order crowd cannot win on facts and logic, they have to send in the goons.

Britain is definitely not as free as America, but still a tad freer than Germany, Austria, and Spain by a recent jury vote. Nick Griffin, chairman of the British National Party, is pictured above in a press conference just before he went on trial in late January 2006 on two charges of inciting racial hatred for making a speech in which he linked Muslim immigrants in Britain to violence. His codefendant Mark Collett faced four counts. Fortunately the jury found them not guilty. If convicted, both defendants could have spent many years in jail.

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts and Congressman Ron Paul have written extensively about the curtailment of American civil liberties under the so-called Patriot Act. According to Dr. Roberts, America now has more prisoners per capita than any other country in the world. Despite all this, thank God for the Bill of Rights or the level of outrages in America would be a quantum level worse, as they already are in Germany, Spain, and Canada.

Harvard in the cross hairs

Speaking of continuing outrages in America, Justin Raimondo's March 31, 2006 article "The Lobby Strikes Back: Harvard study of Israeli lobby's influence costs the academic dean of the Kennedy School his job" outlines suppression in academia. Stephen Walt, former Dean of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government (left), and John Mersheimer, Professor at the University of Chicago co-authored "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" which contains the following passages:

The U.S. national interest should be the primary object of American foreign
policy.   For the past several decades, however, and especially since the Six Day
War in 1967, the centerpiece of U.S. Middle East policy has been its relationship
with Israel.  The combination of unwavering U.S. support for Israel and the
related effort to spread democracy throughout the region has inflamed Arab and
Islamic opinion and jeopardized U.S. security.

This situation has no equal in American political history.  Why has the United
States been willing to set aside its own security in order to advance the interests
of another state?  One might assume that the bond between the two countries is
based on shared strategic interests or compelling moral imperatives.  As we
show below, however, neither of those explanations can account for the
remarkable level of material and diplomatic support that the United States
provides to Israel.

Instead, the overall thrust of U.S. policy in the region is due almost entirely to
U.S. domestic politics, and especially to the activities of the “Israel Lobby.” Other
special interest groups have managed to skew U.S. foreign policy in directions
they favored, but no lobby has managed to divert U.S. foreign policy as far from
what the American national interest would otherwise suggest, while
simultaneously convincing Americans that U.S. and Israeli interests are
essentially identical.

The paper by Dr. Walt and Dr. Mersheimer describes heavy-handed Israel Lobby tactics in such sections as "Think Tanks That Think One Way," "A Strategic Liability," "A Dwindling Moral Case," "The Great Silencer," "The Tail Wagging the Dog," "Demonizing the Palestinians," and "Dreams of Regional Transformation."

On page 22 in "Policing Academia" they comment:

...The Lobby also monitors what professors write and teach. In September 2002, for example, Martin Kramer and Daniel Pipes, two passionately pro-Israel neo-conservatives, establishing a web site (Campus Watch) that posted dossiers on suspect academics and encouraged students to report comments or behavior that might be considered hostile to Israel. This transparent attempt to blacklist and intimidate scholars prompted a harsh reaction and Pipes and Kramer later removed the dossiers, but the web site still invites students to report alleged anti-Israel behavior at U.S. colleges.

See podcast video of Mearsheimer and Walt at 28 Aug 2006 conference.

Former CIA analyst Michael Scheuer describes the Jewish Lobby's harsh response to the Harvard report in his article: "Does Israel Conduct Covert Action in America? You Bet It Does":

In the specific case of the Mearsheimer-Walt paper, prominent pro-Israel Americans have been quick off the mark to limit the damage caused to Israel's interests caused by the paper's candor and truthfulness. From Marvin Kalb to David Gergen to Max Boot to Alan Dershowitz, these folks have brazenly defied reality by insisting there is no "Israeli Lobby" and that Mearsheimer and Walt are dead wrong, poor scholars, paranoid conspiracy peddlers, or reborn Elders of Zion. Eliot Cohen's essay in the Washington Post epitomizes the Israel-Firsters' goal of defaming Mearsheimer and Walt to convince the citizenry that they are crazy and ranting anti-Semites.

But hey — Mearsheimer and Walt have not been handcuffed and thrown in jail, so we are still ahead of Canada, Spain, Britain, and Germany. But before you start feeling too lucky, just remember that if more Americans do not start getting more active about defending their rights, they have the same fate in store as less fortunate Europeans. The Cato Institute has archived an important report "The Constitutional Record of George W. Bush" (see executive summary or PDF file) by Gene Healy and Timothy Lynch that draws the following conclusions:

Unfortunately, far from defending the Constitution, President Bush has repeatedly sought to strip out the limits the document places on federal power. In its official legal briefs and public actions, the Bush administration has advanced a view of federal power that is astonishingly broad, a view that includes

A federal government empowered to regulate core political speech—and restrict it greatly when it counts the most: in the days before a federal election;

A president who cannot be restrained, through validly enacted statutes, from pursuing any tactic he believes to be effective in the war on terror;

A president who has the inherent constitutional authority to designate American citizens suspected of terrorist activity as "enemy combatants," strip them of any constitutional protection, and lock them up without charges for the duration of the war on terror— in other words, perhaps forever; and

A federal government with the power to supervise virtually every aspect of American life, from kindergarten, to marriage, to the grave.

President Bush's constitutional vision is, in short, sharply at odds with the text, history, and structure of our Constitution, which authorizes a government of limited powers.

To show that it really means business about Orwellian monitoring of private citizens, the Bush Administration got the Senate to ratify a scary program called "Real ID."

Steve McNallen provided an interesting perspective on all of this in the June 14th edition of one of his Asatru Folk Assembly publications. Mr. McNallen is the the indigenous Indo-European religious activist who gained national fame in his efforts to help scientists gain custody of the Kennewick Man bones rather than let Indians bury them forever. Mr. McNallen explains:

It's called "Real ID." With no debate and with very little dissent, the United States Senate passed a law mandating what amounts to a national identification card for every citizen. This will be accomplished using the driver's licenses issued by each state. The state will collect your personal information and enter it into a database which will then be networked with the databases of all the other states, creating what is essentially one vast, national pool of information. This system, according to the legislation, must be established by each of the states not later than May, 2008.

Under the Real ID act, citizens of "the land of the free, and the home of the brave" will have to use this card to drive an automobile, get a job, open a bank account, enter a federal building, collect social security payments or take advantage of almost any government service, board a plane…or buy a gun.

What information will be on the card? There are the usual items — your name, age, sex, identification number, and physical address (not a post office box). A digital photograph is required, as well. The Department of Homeland Security has the right to unilaterally add anything else it feels is necessary, ranging from fingerprints or other biometric identifiers to radio frequency identification (RFID) chips. Homeland Security, by the way, is on record as favoring RFID tags; these can serve as tracking devices.

How about firearm ownership? Identification is needed to purchase a gun. No Real ID, no purchase! Furthermore, bills are introduced almost every year in the California legislature to require driver's licenses to buy ammunition. So far, it has failed, but if it ever passes, anyone not carrying the right identification will not be able to buy bullets.

All of this is bad enough. But there is more: Marketers are already salivating over the possibilities opened by Real ID. Consider this quote from David Raab, President of Client X Client, a consulting and software firm —

"Companies will adopt the national ID as a convenient, reliable customer identifier. This will coincidentally make their data more salable because it will be easier to link with customer information from other sources. The value of such ID-enhanced data will in fact be high enough to justify offering incentives to consumers to provide it where using the national ID is not mandatory. This value will also encourage companies to design systems so customer data is easy to extract. The legal obligation to respond to any government requests will further encourage such designs….Continuous surveillance is already a fact of life and will only expand. Commercial access to surveillance data will soon follow."

Raab's article (Marketing in a Data-Rich World, http://www.dmreview.com/article_sub.cfm?articleId=1033585 ) envisions a total information matrix which destroys forever our notions of privacy and endangers our political freedom. But Raab doesn't care — there's money to be made!

Christian groups have led the fight against Real ID, seeing it as the "mark of the beast" described in Revelation. Unfortunately, the bill has already passed and is even now being implemented across the country. There is, however, still the possibility that it can be repealed. One effort, at http://www.nonationalid.com, asks visitors to take a pledge stating they will not vote for any politician who will not support the repeal of the Real ID Act. (I signed it.)

I am glad to see any group, whatever its religious belief, fighting tyranny but I think it is a mistake to let the public think that only Christians care about these issues. As the noose tightens, Asatruar need to be able to attract to us men and women who love freedom and who are ready to take a stand in its defense.

We must remember that the very concept of freedom exists in Western civilization because of our ancestors. Free will and personal responsibility are implicit in the Germanic concept of orlog, in which people have a role in "making their own fate." Anglo-Saxon Common Law reflects these same values. Similarly, political freedom was important enough to our ancestors that they structured their tribes into components comparable to the executive, judicial, and legislative branches of government enshrined in the United States Constitution. (And the Constitution may have its faults…but it's a darned sight better than what we have now!)

We're all about freedom. Asatruar need to be aware of threats to this part of our heritage, and we need to be a beacon to others. And above all, we need to take a stand for liberty whenever it is endangered by runaway government or by the intrusive greed of private industry.

As another Orwellian iniative, in September 2006 the Bush Administration pushed the Military Commissions Act of 2006 through both houses of Congress. Justin Raimondo observed that its definition of an "unlawful combatant" is particularly troubling: :

It doesn't say "alien" or "terrorist," although it specifically includes members of the Taliban and al-Qaeda. It says "person" – any person, including American citizens. Bruce Ackerman, professor of law at Yale and author of Before the Next Attack: Preserving Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism, puts it:

"Buried in the complex Senate compromise on detainee treatment is a real shocker, reaching far beyond the legal struggles about foreign terrorist suspects in the Guantanamo Bay fortress. The compromise legislation, which is racing toward the White House, authorizes the president to seize American citizens as enemy combatants, even if they have never left the United States. And once thrown into military prison, they cannot expect a trial by their peers or any other of the normal protections of the Bill of Rights."

Congress has now granted the president the powers of a dictator. The rest of the story of our slide into absolutism is merely a matter of filling in the details.

The additional punch line behind all of this is that when a government — and the special interests who control it behind the scenes — get so paranoid and corrupt that they have to violate every last nook and cranny of our privacy, then what we have is a society that is doomed to ultimately collapse much like the old Soviet Union. It has become too secretive, fearful, invasive, and bureaucratic to have the adaptability and innovativeness that characterizes a leading edge industrial economy. It will alienate the kinds of free-thinking, honest people it needs most for productive leadership. Many of them will either leave the country or engage in various forms of passive or active resistance.

If Federal supremacists ever succeed in their campaign to get the public to accept the National ID as a way of life, then you better believe that special interests will try to use personal data as leverage to monitor and bully people who do not share their views on such issues as abortion, prayer, taxes, Internet censorship, massive illegal Third World immigration, accepting political correctness interpretations of history taught to our school children, and fighting overseas wars for Israel.

We have too much abuse already with illicit use of Internal Revenue Service income tax returns, "affirmative action" compliance statistics, so-called "hate crime incidents," and other tracking data gathered by the government. We also see numerous other examples of dangerous infringements with the increasing militarization of our police departments, the renewed efforts to expand use of military tribunals, the creation of detention camps, the requirement for foreign travel permission, the U.S. Presidential usurpation of state government control over National Guard Units, and violations of the Posse Comitatus Act and over 750 other laws. The National ID is a continuation of a trend that has been going on for decades to condition the public to accept ever more government surveillance, intervention, and brutal force. It is just that the totalitarian odor behind all of this is becoming much more obvious now. Justin Raimondo calls the Bush Administration "the biggest expansion of government power since 27 B.C."

The worst damage the Orwellian bureaucrats can do to you is often subtle and sneaky and does not leave finger prints. Bureaucratic compliance officers can "busy you" and make you die the death of a thousand little knife cuts. They start wasting your time making you cross every "t" and dot every "i" of their mountains of regulations, which are usually selectively enforced to favor their political allies. By running you through spurious investigations, while forcing you to expend considerable time preparing your defense, they can damage your reputation through "guilt by association" even though you have done nothing wrong. They can "busy" you so much that it becomes very hard to run a competitive small business or pay the bills to raise a family. Meanwhile, Federal supremacists collect their steady government paychecks. They even get internal brownie points for being "tough" about enforcing "regulations," even if their efforts are unfairly applied and are just plain mean, stupid, and self-serving.

The fear of all of this alone intimidates many citizens from protesting at a time when the need to exercise their Constitutional rights is most urgent. In a corrupt police state, rules and regulations become snares to trap political adversaries, not guidelines for honest citizens. The ancient Roman writer Tacitus summed it up well when he said, "When the state is most corrupt, then laws are most multiplied." It happened within the rotting Roman Empire, and it is happening again today within the American Establishment's New World Order.

In considering all of this, we also need to keep in mind the extreme likelihood that the official government story behind 9-11 and hence the "necessity" for the big Homeland Security apparatus are all based upon massive fraud to begin with.

The Reverend Ted Pike is a leading activist in America to monitor the never-ending efforts by the ADL and other sinister organizations to censor the Internet. America First Books has created a special section for his articles and special alerts. Currently, Rev Pike is encouraging citizens to aggressively contact their Congressmen and raise consciousness among their fellow citizens to prevent Congress from approving some very ominious "hate crime" legislation that has been submitted in 2007. If this evil legislation goes through, it could mean the same end of free speech in America, just like what we have already seen in Canada and many European countries. Conversely, if we can keep a free Internet and maintain our freedoms, we can keep the bad guys desperate.

More than 200 participants represented 21 nations from five continents at the World Depleted Uranium Weapons Conference held 16-19 October 2003. (See some sample gruesome photos here, here, and here if you can stomach it. Please also note the LIFE Magazine photo essay "The Tiny Victims of Desert Storm").

"If they had killed us once, it would not be so bad. But what the Americans have brought upon us is not only depriving us but our future generations of our basic god given human right, the right to live. They will be killing us for generations to come." (An Afghan Victim of US-UK bombing)

“Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.” - Henry Kissinger, quoted in “Kiss the Boys Goodbye: How the United States Betrayed Its Own POW’s in Vietnam”

Civilized concern for its own military and the innocent? The US expended about 300 tons of Depleted Uranium (DU) on Iraq in 1991, and five times as much beginning in 2003 with Gulf War II. Researchers have discovered that radioactivity levels from destroyed Iraqi tanks are 2,500 times higher than normal. (Tests by the Seattle Post-Intelligencer have found 1,500 times higher levels). The rate of birth defects in Basra in southern Iraq increased over sevenfold since the first Gulf War, and Down's Syndrome has increased over fivefold. Dr. Marion Fulk, former scientist with the Livermore, CA National Lab, said that between 31% to 100% of the warhead mass of DU gets "aerosolized" upon impact, depending upon the size of the warhead. Aerosolized sub-micron particles then get breathed by soldiers and civilians alike.

Dr. Alexandra C. Miller released a report for the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute in Bethesda, MA indicating that DU's chemical instability causes one million times as much genetic damage as would be expected from the radiation effect alone. Unlike larger radioactive sources, the sub micron-sized DU particles pass through skin, lungs, and stomach into the blood stream, spread throughout the body and through the blood-brain barrier, and penetrate inside the nuclei of cells. Dr. Katsuma Yagasaki notes that the particles are not only inherently carcinogenic and radioactive, but also have a terrible 4.5 billion year half-life persistency. According to Dr. Chris Busby, unlike larger uranium particles, sub-micron DU absorbs "between 400 and 1200 times more radiation from natural background than the equivalent volume of tissue (depending on the photon energy). The energy borrowed is re-emitted as short range photoelectrons which have high ionizing [DNA-destructive] power." In other words, the particles act as ultra-magnitude step-up transformers that convert natural radiation into harmful radiation once inside cells of the human body, in addition to emitting their own radiation virtually forever. Researchers claim that it also damages cells as a heavy metal independently of its radioactive properties.

More than 500,000 "Gulf War era" veterans are currently receiving disability compensation for a variety of symptoms linked to "Gulf War Syndrome" that many experts trace to DU. According to one source, "In a group of 251 soldiers from a study group in Mississippi who had all had normal babies before the Gulf War, 67 percent of their post-war babies were born with severe birth defects."

From a Darwinian viewpoint, passing on uncorrupted genes to future generations is a vital requirement of a higher evolutionary process. The War Between the States terminated over 640,000 gene carriers. Quite a few of the dead did not have any children. It is quite possible that America's involvement in Middle Eastern conflicts starting with Gulf War I will wind up inflicting more genetic damage on America — in a silent and insidious way — than the bloodiest war in American history.

Cancer rates are already going up all over the world, as microscopic particles of depleted uranium are being carried by the winds and oceans everywhere on the planet. According to Dr. Doug Rokke, Israelis used American-supplied DU in Lebanon in their 2006 invasion. Thanks "W."

"Alien" Is On
the Loose As Well

 

"Men fight because there is nothing more horrible than cultural and national obliteration."

— William Robertson Boggs in "Why Nations Fight"
January 1991 issue of American Renaissance

Becoming a minority is never fun. Throughout history, groups that suffer steady population losses and become forcefully reduced to a minority status typically complain of oppression and even genocide. Certainly any population group that fails to resist its own dispossession cannot possibly be a healthy one. Yet this is exactly what is happening to the white population inside the U.S., even though the reasons are psycho-political. They do not even involve toxic military agents such as the previously mentioned depleted uranium, although the end results a hundred years from now may be very similar.

Mexican-American demonstrators

We are seeing "minority" (actually now the "new majority" in border states such as California, Arizona, and New Mexico as well as in America's ten largest cities) relations take a new turn where militant nonwhite and often illegal immigrants proclaim that white Americans have no right to secure borders. In fact, many of them claim that white Americans should no longer enjoy ordinary citizenship rights within their own U.S. states. Ominously, a growing minority of demonstrators inside America hoist the Mexican flag over the U.S. flag, espouse a breakaway nation, and even advocate booting whites out of North American territory.

Just remember if you are white and have to eventually retreat to a place like Britain, France, Poland, Scandinavia, or Germany (if they will take you ahead of nonwhite immigrants), do not try to speak too loudly about what happened to you in America so that you do not wind up standing before a jury like Nick Griffin or get thrown in jail like David Irving.

The arrogant and nasty people who are trying to run our lives and ruin our sense of indigenous identity and culture don't like it when we rattle our chains too loudly.

Quite a few Americans still react to the graphs depicted above with pride. To them it shows America's progress in achieving greater "diversity."

In his article "Subjective Reasons Are Sufficient," American Renaissance editor Jared Taylor observed:

We (white Americans) are the only race that officially and deliberately ignore the call of racial kinship. No other race welcomes strangers into its homelands and then grants them racial preferences over the children of natives. No other race subsidizes racially alien under classes and then blames itself for the fecklessness, incompetence and violence of these under classes. No other race measures virtue by how many advantages it can offer to people as biologically unlike itself as possible, or by how loudly and persistently it can heap scorn on its own history, traditions, and ancestors. Members of no other race routinely adopt children of other races.

"The Anatomy of Ethnic Conflict" by Thomas Jackson in the June 2002 American Renaissance showed a chart created by Professor Tatu Vanhanen at the University of Helsinki, Finland, that most people intuitively understand:

This chart shows an interesting relationship. As societies become increasingly diverse on a racial and ethnic level, they tend to become increasingly unstable and strife-ridden.

If white Americans want to be able to provide humanitarian aid to other peoples around the world, and project the image of a morally upright and stable society, how will it help them to become a strife torn, economically diminished minority in what was once the prosperous land of their forefathers? Given these concerns, why do national media keep pushing the "benefits" of unlimited growth and ever more racial "diversity"?

Stuck on stupidity, neurosis, cowardice,
or what?

Perhaps you have heard the old saying, "If you want to know who holds ultimate power in a country, find out who everyone is afraid to criticize?"

Actually the outrages I discuss below are both a cause and an effect, both the symptoms and part of an underlying disease. Certainly a breakdown in trust throughout American society is an important underlying theme, or else America could produce leaders who prevent rather than thrive on corruption. And certainly grotesque breaches in trust go back to at least the War of Southern Independence, when the U.S. Government violated any sense of loyalty to the spirit of checks and balances in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, Constitution, and Articles of Confederation by brutally crushing any last vestige of truly effective States' Rights. It also obscenely violated any spirit of loyalty to America's founding Anglo-Saxon racial and common law traditions by stripping white Southerners of their rights and placing their legislatures in the hands of uneducated blacks during the so-called Reconstruction Era. (I will discuss these issues further in my history reconsidered section, still under development).

All this having been said, what I am about to describe is a bell-weather of the corruption of traditional American values. These kinds of things could never keep happening in a healthy American society.

This is not a barber shop quartet. Regarding the group in the upper left, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz ran the caption in March 2005: “President Katzav presented three surviving members of the ‘Lavon affair’ with certificates of appreciation at a Jerusalem ceremony Wednesday.”

Just one catch. The "appreciated" activities were designed to destroy American property, with a high probability of killing Americans as well.

Never heard of the Lavon Affair? It was organized by former Israeli Defense minister Pinhas Lavon as a false flag operation, in which Israeli agents disguised as Egyptians attacked American and British facilities in Cairo in 1954 in an effort to sour U.S.-Egyptian relations. Israel apologized for the treachery, but embarrassments continued. For example, Gen. Moshe Dayan, pictured in the upper right photo speaking with Pinhas Lavon, was Defense Minister when Israel deliberately attacked the U.S.S. Liberty (pictured below). Former Prime Minister Golda Meir, in the lower picture to the left of Lavon, authorized a Mossad hit team that gunned down an innocent Moroccan in July 1973 in Lillehammer, Norway, of all places. According to former Mossad agent Victor Ostrowsky in By Way of Deception: The Making of a Mossad Officer, it is de rigueur for Israeli Prime Ministers to routinely sign off on assassination lists. Then came the Jonathan Pollard case, which entailed one of the greatest compromises of American classified material in American history. Israel not only stole major secrets from America, but likely turned around and sold them to the Soviet Union.

More recently, Larry Franklin was arrested by the FBI in an AIPAC-related spy ring case. Furthermore, Israel has received massive increases in aid during America's invasion and occupation of Iraq, and uses American power to apply "reductionism" against its enemies in the region.

Michael Collins Piper's book The High Priests of War and the Harvard University report by Dr. John Mearsheimer and Dr. Stephen Walt both document the central role of the Israel lobby in dragging America into its ongoing Middle Eastern wars.

Incidentally, America's Jewish elite has been the primary leader of America's liberal minority coalition which has promoted massive Third World immigration into this country. The Jewish ADL was a prime mover behind the Immigration Law change in 1965 that opened the flood gates.

"Our crowd," which consists off Jewish-run media, central banks, and investment banks, not only played a key role in the socially re-engineering of America in the 20th century, but also promoted massive financial re-engineering solutions to America's economic problems as well. This stands in stark contrast to the traditional focus upon quality product engineering and manufacturing process development that characterized 19th century WASP-run America. One can find more background on the cultural-racial nature of this change in The Dispossessed Majority by Wilmot Robertson.

Many Americans, myself included, think it would be very nice if we could live in a simpler, more naive world in which the Israelis are always the good guys. A world where Moshe Dayan remains nothing less than a great hero, and where we feel nothing but fondness for someone like Golda Meir. However, truth be told, thinking that way gets tougher and tougher when Jewish/Israeli policies compromise America's national security, undermine America's moral leadership in the world, and quite frankly, hit us in our genes as well.

Above: The U.S.S. Liberty when it finally met up with another American ship the day after the deliberate Israeli attempt to sink it and kill everyone on board.

In 1967 Israel flew numerous reconnaissance flights over the U.S.S. Liberty while the ship was in international waters off Israel in broad daylight. It was flying a large American flag. Israeli fighters shot up the ship with rockets and blanketed it with napalm in repeated strafing runs. Israeli torpedo boats closed in and fired three torpedoes at the ship. Two missed, but one torpedo put a big hole in the side of the ship and almost sank it. Israelis also machine-gunned life rafts thrown overboard. Luckily, an improvised S.O.S. signal sent out by the Liberty finally caused them to break off the attack. Overall, the Israelis succeed in killing thirty four Americans and wounding 174.

Dwight Porter, the former U.S. American Ambassador to Lebanon, claims his office received intercepts of Israeli war plane communications that prove the attack was deliberate. In addition, in the original story told by Major Seth Mintz to journalists Rowland Evans and Robert Novak, Israeli Defense Force personnel in the war room that ordered the attack knew it was an American ship.

By some estimates, Israel has cost America over $4 trillion since inception, to include not only direct aid, but also indirect costs such as the oil shocks related to the Yom Kipper War in 1973.

We seem to have gone well beyond the "neurotic New Yorker" stage.

It is fair to say that no other people on this planet has ever been more generous towards both the Jewish people and the state of Israel than Americans. When all that help boomerangs into an attack on a U.S. ship on the high seas, it really does begin to feel like some kind of dark, sinister Freudian psychoanalytical phenomenon out of The Forbidden Planet.

Oh yes, there was another Id monster strike that I have not mentioned yet, that still remains largely undisclosed to America's collective conscious.

Have you ever heard about Michael Collins Piper's underground bestseller Final Judgment: This Missing in the John F. Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy? This landmark book provides overwhelming evidence that Israel, the Mossad, the CIA, and Jewish-controlled mobsters collaborated to assassinate President John F. Kennedy in November 1963.

There were no doubt many motives behind the assassination, however, one in particular sticks out. Israeli scientists were working with Red Chinese scientists on a joint program to help each other get the atomic bomb. John F. Kennedy opposed nuclear weapon development for both countries and paid with his life.

This is just one more tragedy that added the phrase "Magic Bullet," to "Fertilizer Super-Bomb," "Pancake Effect," "Plausible Denial," and other strange terms of a sick, declining society.

But it is not over yet. Far from it.

Our "Id Monster"
is closing in on us

Forbidden Planet Id Monster breaks through

American society is breaking down. Massive economic and demographic forces are dramatically changing this country forever. No amount of establishment spin-doctoring or attention deflection over real, imagined, or contrived crises — either at home or abroad — can stop powerful forces closing in on us.

What can we do to help ourselves in our personal lives and on a community level?

On a national level, what have Americans hidden from themselves deep within their psyche? What strengths and virtues have we neglected? What evils have we embraced? Are there whole dimensions of reality that we have ignored to our peril? Could there be a social equivalent to Freud's individualized "Id" concept? (I think I have some answers. See my discussion in my "Resolving Opposing Ideologies" section).

There are many issues that we must explore, to include many issues we feel like we do not want to explore, as America gets pushed to the brink.

We have been lied to by our government and its federally-funded schools. We have been lied to by controlled national media. Time for some deeper and painfully truthful self-examination.

DOES AMERICA
STILL HAVE A "DESTINY?"

Times have really changed since MGM released its mega-budget epic How The West Was Won in 1962. The winner of three Academy Awards, and featuring an all-star cast, it quickly became the third largest grossing picture in MGM history up until that time.

The movie used the literary technique of dramatizing the progress of three generations of a pioneer family across 19th century America. The concept for the movie started when Bing Crosby perceived it in a 1959 Life Magazine series about the winning of the West. He purchased the rights and released a record album with songs from that era.

The film culminated with aerial scenes of early 1960's freeways and skyscrapers. The narrator, Spencer Tracy, commented that although "They are all gone now" the sacrifices and vision of American pioneers helped create a great nation.

Without question, this movie was consciously designed as a paean to American Manifest Destiny. It certainly left a subliminal suggestion that perhaps there could be even better things ahead for what had been proudly hailed as the land of the free and home of the brave.

One online film critic even went so far as to quip that How the West Was Won was "America's answer to Leni Riefenstahl." However, I take strong exception to this comparison. All the events which have unfolded since the 1960's have clearly demonstrated that America's real answer to Riefenstahl by America's real ruling elite was not How The West Was Won, but the movie Exodus. Released only two years earlier, Exodus starred Paul Newman and greatly glorified and romanticized Zionism.

The analogy with Reifenstahl is much better with a movie like Exodus. According to former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky, Israel is essentially run top-down by his former spy organization. It is highly secretive, duplicitous, gangsterish and cutthroat in its operations. Israel is also very socialistic. The government controls most of the major industries as well as media. It continuously inflates the currency to support massive social welfare programs for Jews. The exclusively Jewish state also practices routine assassination, police state torture, and apartheid policies against Palestinians and other gentiles. This is ultimately done in the name of Jewish racial purity. These activitities make anything done by American Klansmen look triffling by comparison. In fact, the Zionist state is also very bellicose, forever stirring up wars in the Middle East and elsewhere.

Hence, this Jewish brand of national socialism is a much more fitting counterpart to all the evils commonly attributed to Hitler's authoritarian brand of national socialism that was glorified by Reifenstahl than anything to do with pioneer America. In contrast, our pioneer ancestors were very libertarian in their political values and put a high emphasis on truthfulness, individual responsibility, and personal honor.

Today we always hear deceitful and bellicose banter from our Israel-first neo-con leadership in Washington, D.C. and national media in the place of honest analyses regarding America's real problems. Dr. Paul Craig Roberts felt prompted to write his very disturbing June 12, 2006 article: "A Final End to History? Bush's Armageddon Wish." Among other things, he observed:

Nuking Iran is an essential part of the attack plan. The US lacks the necessary conventional military force to invade and occupy Iran, but the use of nuclear weapons against Iran has a wider purpose. The neocons are determined not to have any more embarrassments, such as the Iraqi insurgency. By nuking Iran they intend to send a wider message that the US will use every means at its disposal to ensure its hegemony. The neocons believe that the use of nukes will convince Arabs and the wider world that there is no recourse to accepting America's will.

The neoconservatives could not care less about public opinion. Neocons are contemptuous of the American people. Leo Strauss taught neocons that it was their duty to deceive the clueless American people in order to implement their agenda of global domination. The neocons believe that they have a perfect right, even the obligation, to manipulate the public through propaganda and black ops in order to create acceptance and support for their wars of aggression.

The neocons are the epitome of evil, and they have succumbed to hubris. Like Hitler when he attacked the Soviet Union, neocons believe that their manipulative skills and use of military power will carry the day for their agenda. Hitler's hubris doomed Germany to destruction. What price will America pay for neocon hubris?

Is this what American history was all for? To finally culminate in massive global radiation poisoning? For white Americans to commit racial suicide as the country turns into a bankrupt Third World slum? To waste all of our last treasure and moral authority fighting for crony oil company concessions, Zionist monopoly power, and discredited interpretations of dogmatic Jewish fairy tales in the sands of the Middle East — while perfecting a police state on home soil?

Or were we meant to ultimately carry the torch of Western science and Western Civilization to the stars?

The articles "Resolving Opposing Ideologies" and "History Reinterpreted" along with many of our ebook offerings will hopefully help you get a deeper sense regarding what is out of balance in America today and how we got into our current mess. We try to offer ideas about where we can start re-balancing to begin to solve many of our problems.

Rather than parrot the propaganda of Jewish, Federal, and New World Order supremacists, hopefully America First Books can continue to uncover suppressed truths, address real problems, and offer real inspiration.

"...when the republican virtue fails, slavery ensues."
Thomas Paine, Common Sense, 1776

"There is not a truth existing which I fear,
or would wish unknown to the whole world"
Thomas Jefferson to Henry Lee, 1826. ME 16:179