Multiracialists are Crazy, Part 3
Verbal tricks are used to obscure the reality of racial differences; learn how to recognize them.
American Dissident Voices broadcast for January 22, 2006
by Kevin Alfred Strom
MULTIRACIALISTS are those who believe it is right and good and
beneficial to force multiple races -- multiple peoples -- to live under
the same government. Multiracialists rule the West today, though a
growing wave of thinkers and activists condemning panmixia and calling
for self-determination and freedom is challenging them. National
Vanguard is an important part of that new wave.
Multiracialists like to use word tricks to deceive the
public. Their leaders tend to be from a group with a very high average
verbal IQ, and that makes them very effective con men. They do two
things with words. They use them to make the truth seem false or absurd
-- or to make falsehoods seem true.
It's easy to do the former. If I told you that "There are those who seriously believe that most people have greater than the average number of legs,"
you'd probably laugh at me. You'd have visions of people with three
legs walking around everywhere. "No sane person could seriously believe
that," you'd say. "Only a nut would believe that 'most people have
greater than the average number of legs' -- that's ridiculous!" But
you'd be wrong. I would have tricked you with words. It is certainly
true that most people have greater than the average number of legs. But
I've expressed it in a way that sounds counterintuitive, making it easy
Analyze the statement carefully. What is meant by
"most people"? That means more than 50 per cent. of human beings. It is
certainly true that more than 50 per cent. of human beings have two
legs. Therefore most people have two legs. And what is the average
number of legs that people have? It's pretty close to two -- but it
isn't exactly two. A minuscule number of people are born with tragic
birth defects which give them more than two legs each. But their
numbers are dwarfed by those who, sadly, have been born without a leg
or legs, or who have lost a leg or legs through accident. So the
average number of legs is some small fraction less than two, say 1.99
legs. Since almost everyone has two legs, it is indubitably true that
"most people have greater than the average number of legs."
If I had put it in forthright language you would not have found the
truth so absurd-sounding. This is the kind of word-trick the
multiracialists play all the time.
They tell us that "haters" and "racists" see significant difference
between the races, which is absurd, they say, because the genetic
structure of human races is so similar. As the pioneering Human Genome
Project had just finished sequencing the human genome in the year 2000,
former President Bill Clinton and other multiracialists rushed to
assure us that any racial differences found would be insignificant --
Clinton's speechwriters even going so far as to insert the subject into
his State of the Union address in January, 2000, saying, "We are all,
regardless of race, 99.9 percent the same."
But that's essentially a word-trick. Even if the genes show a 99.9 per cent. similarity in structure, that does not mean we're 99.9 per cent. the same. As researcher John Entine states:
'We share 98.4 percent of our genes with chimpanzees, 95 percent
with dogs, and 74 percent with microscopic roundworms. Only one
chromosome determines if one is born male or female. There is no
discernible difference in the DNA of a wolf and a Labrador retriever,
yet their inbred behavioral differences are immense. Clearly, what's
meaningful is which genes differ and how they are patterned, not the
percent of genes. A tiny number of genes can translate into huge
Clearly, the multiracialists have conned us with deceptive words. That 0.1 per cent. difference in genetic structure is extremely important
. It makes for gigantic
differences in behavior, in appearance, in intelligence, and in the
capacity to create and maintain a high civilization. It makes what we
would subjectively call a 1,000 per cent. difference in our lives. It
is the difference between Vivaldi and beating on a log. It is the
difference between magnetic resonance imaging and mashed monkey brains.
It is the difference between Ulalume and Umgawa. It is the difference
between a microprocessor and a shrunken head on a stick.
Far more illuminating and useful than raw numbers of genetic
similarity -- which superficially make people appear to be mostly the
same as microscopic roundworms -- is the genetic distance between human
races. Those of you reading this program on the Internet can look at
the following graphic representation of the relative genetic distance
between 42 human population groups. This data is from The History and Geography of Human Genes
by Cavalli-Sforza, Menozzi and Piazza. It shows, in graphical form,
largely what centuries of observation and common sense have been
telling us all along. If you can't access the 'Net right now, next time
you're on line just go to NationalVanguard.org, where you can find this
program by looking at the American Dissident Voices
archives in the left hand column of the page.
As you can see from the graph, the European peoples are almost
alone in a corner by themselves, close to some closely related
Caucasian ethnicities, with the North Asians and South Asians and
Africans in distinct and separate clusters in widely separated parts of
the graph. Science has validated what the racialists have been saying
all along. This is what CBS, ABC, and Bill Clinton don't
want you to see.
Also interesting about the graph of relative genetic distance is
the fact the center, what one would consider the nominally "average"
part of the graph, is nearly empty, while the periphery or edge area of
the graph is relatively full -- making the genetic distance graph look
something like a graph of the expanding universe. The picture painted
is not one of panmixia, but of races evolving away from each other,
away from the average or center, becoming more
diverse in the true sense of the word, more different
This, too, is in accord with both common-sense observation and the laws
of evolution, which posit racial divergence and separation as one of
the very engines of Life itself.
Another multiracialist word-trick is this argument -- the multiracialists tell us repeatedly that: "Differences within
races are greater than the differences between
races, therefore race is a useless concept." Sometimes they use that
argument referring to genetic difference, sometimes in reference to
other racial differences. But the line is always essentially the same
-- "Differences within
races are greater than the differences between
races, therefore race means nothing."
Like the line about legs I spoke about before, this is
superficially persuasive -- until you apply some critical reasoning.
It's a word-trick.
Let's look at it critically. First let's look at a chart of one
racial characteristic, White intelligence versus Black intelligence, as
shown in the following chart, which you can download and view at
NationalVanguard.org. What you see is the bell curve distribution of
Black intelligence superimposed on the bell curve for White
intelligence. The White curve is, on average, more than 15 points
higher than the Black, and there is a considerable area of overlap.
The bell curves describing the distribution of IQ (and also other
characteristics) within each race do overlap. And it is true, as the
multiracialists say, that the distance from one extreme to the other on
each curve is often greater than the average distance between the
So, since the bell curve describing White IQ goes from, say 50 on
the extreme low end, to say 150 on the extreme high end; and since the
Black IQ curve is only 15 or 20 points below the White curve on
average; it is therefore true to say that the maximum difference
possible between White IQs (100 points) is much
greater than the average difference between Blacks and Whites (15 points).
But that statement is quite deceptive, unless you at the same time relate that living in a Black society -- which would have a tiny fraction
of the geniuses, and many times more borderline morons
-- is vastly different from living in a White society.
The same statement (that the range
of all differences is greater than the average
differences between the groups being compared) can be said of most racial differences, or even species differences.
The range in blossom color and shape among all roses may be greater
than the average differences in the same characters between roses and
violets. But that does not mean that roses are violets.
The range of physical characteristics among all men is far greater
than the average physical differences between men and women -- but that
does not mean that men are women, or that sex does not exist.
The range in size and shape among office buildings is far greater
than the average differences between office buildings and houses -- but
that does not mean that we cannot distinguish between houses and office
buildings or that they are the same thing.
Can you see how you've been tricked for years -- how you've been deceived?
Look again at the IQ graph. As writer Alpin MacLaren put it recently:
'Note that the absolute number of Blacks who have an IQ above the
average IQ of Whites is minuscule. If you looked at the dark portion of
the graph as if it were a mountain, which represents the entire Black
population, you would climb all the way up one side, go over the top,
and come nearly all the way down the other side before you finally
reached the small section that is of above average intelligence. When
you get up to the part of the graph showing the IQ level of 120, which
is the average IQ of doctors, you see that the number of Blacks who
have that IQ is extremely small. And remember, this graph is adjusted
to show the Black and White populations as being equal in size -- so
you can see that the absolute number of those Blacks with an IQ of 120
or above is vanishingly small. If you compare the graphs you
will see that the percentage of Whites who are over the 120 level, is
about the same as the percentage of Blacks over the 100 level. At every
point above the point of average intelligence for Whites (100), you can
see that the Whites far outnumber the Blacks, both absolutely and
relative to their percentage of total population. It is important that
we understand this as we continue. For a randomly chosen group of
Blacks, 75% to 80% of them will have below average intelligence. Half
of them will have an IQ that is below 80!' (emphasis added)
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=7372 ]
As I said, this has a profound effect on the kind of society each group will build. When you have a tiny fraction
of the geniuses, and many times more borderline morons
compared to White society, your society will be far more dysfunctional,
far less able to cope with environmental and social problems, far less
competent in defending itself, far more violent, far more criminal, far
more diseased, and far more cruel and dictatorial than the all-White
society to which you are comparing it. Tiny genetic differences, and
small percentage differences in average intelligence, make for gigantic
differences in the way people live -- and die.
Denying the obvious is a favorite recreation of cranks like
flat-Earthers and multiracialists, and the "there is no difference
between the races" lunacy fully qualifies for a room, if not an entire
storey, in Kook Manor.
Not too many years ago, the "equality" votaries were claiming that
not only were the races genetically different, but they were different
enough so that interracial crossings invariably produced what is called
"hybrid vigor." Now they claim that the "hybrids" weren't hybrids at
all since "race does not exist" and, in their own words, "the genetic
differences between individuals are greater than those between
The fact that their successive positions are absolutely
contradictory does not even embarrass them. Perhaps, like some
religious zealots, they do not even notice the paradox and, even if
they did, would dismiss it since reason and logic are irrelevant when
one is fighting for "moral good," as many of the "equality" believers
sincerely (though stupidly) believe themselves to be doing.
species, plant and animal, that exists or has ever
existed on this planet has evolved through racial variation. Therefore
it is abundantly evident that races exist. Every case of speciation
necessarily begins with very small
variations, some barely
noticeable, which eventually become more numerous and/or pronounced
with the passage of many generations, until a new race is produced.
Over time, racial differences increase and a new species may be born.
Without such racial variation, speciation and therefore evolution
itself could never have happened.
This certainly applies to us humans, who are no more exempt from
the natural laws of evolution, which necessarily include
race-formation, than we are from the natural laws which guarantee that
a fall from 10,000 feet onto hard rock will occur at a certain velocity
and will certainly be fatal. These laws of racial divergence and
speciation would be true even if humans did not exist and no one had
ever bothered to ponder where the subspecies boundaries lie (a
necessarily arbitrary point on what is really a continuum). These laws
of racial divergence and speciation would be true even if no one had
ever thought of the concept or the words "race" and "subspecies."
We White men and women are one of Nature's races. We are a unique
people. If we do not heed the maxim of self-determination -- if we do
not throw off the mental shackles imposed on us by those who created
the word-tricks of the multiracialists -- if we do not make our own
survival our highest priority as individuals and as a society -- we
shall surely perish from the Earth.
We need your support. You can join or donate by writing to our
postal address below, or you can also donate through Paypal by sending
We can have a clean, orderly, progressive, safe, and incomparably richer and more beautiful nation if it becomes a proud White nation again.
To do that we must begin by restoring White community and White
racial consciousness among our people. We at National Vanguard are
doing that by building world-beating new media for Whites and by
getting out on the street and meeting our neighbors and showing them
what we're all about.
We're going to help our people. We're going to educate our people.
We're going to come up with creative ways to awaken our people. We're
going to create publications that will be like nothing ever seen before
in the cause of White awakening. We're going to do what it takes.
Be a part of what we're doing. Join National Vanguard today. For
further information on National Vanguard, write to Post Office Box
5145, Charlottesville VA 22905, or visit http://www.nationalvanguard.org/ and click on the "join" link at the top of the page. We appreciate your support.
Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the
words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not
equal; and equal men are not free.