Multiracialists are Crazy, Part 1
The ideas of racial "equality" and multiracialism as a social ethic are obviously crazy -- as well as deadly.
American Dissident Voices broadcast for January 8, 2006
by Kevin Alfred Strom
NOTE: It's one week until National Vanguard's massive literature
outreach on the "Martin Luther King" holiday. Please visit the 'Expose
the Lies' link at the top left at NationalVanguard.org and download our
powerful and effective flyers, print them by the thousands, and get
ready to change the lives of people in your community next weekend.
[ http://nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=7359 ]
CRAZY PEOPLE say some really funny things, if you like absurd
humor. A crazy person may believe that locomotives are actually made
out of marshmallows. Or he may think that the only reason we can't
drink bleach without harmful effects is because we haven't prayed to
the right deity in precisely the right manner. And some lunatics are
quite intelligent in their way, and may be able to produce creative and
internally consistent arguments at some length to justify their
positions, even if their premises are quite nutty. And all that's good
for a laugh.
For example, one Flat Earth believer insisted that
the Earth was two-dimensional and shaped like a plate. And he could
even explain how, on this plate-shaped Earth, people could apparently
travel in a straight line and eventually end up back at their starting
point. "They simply fall off the edge," he said, "and since the Earth
is two-dimensional with no thickness whatsoever, they 'fall' into an
area comprising no space at all and reappear instantly on the opposite side of the plate to resume their straight-line journey back to their starting point."
"But," someone objected, "wouldn't people notice all this 'falling off' and being transported across thousands of miles?"
But the Flat Earther had an answer for that. "No, they wouldn't,"
he continued. "Since the area 'off the edge' of the Earth comprises no
space, it therefore takes no time to traverse it, and the traveller is not even aware of his movement."
All very logical, of course, if you accept the man's premises. Even ingenious. But still completely insane.
We can laugh at our Flat Earther. And we should laugh at the
multiracialist who believes that all human races are "equal," or that
"races do not exist," for his ideas are equally kooky -- and are even
more at variance with observed reality than the Flat Earther's. But
crazy people are funny only at a distance. When they're in the same
room with you, you start getting nervous -- and for good reason. If
they ever get the upper hand over the sane people, then it's really time to worry.
It's all well and good for kooks to spout their theories behind
padded walls or in isolated basements. But when they have the power to
hold your wife and children on the railroad track so they can sample
the delights of the rapidly-approaching marshmallow locomotive, then
they become deadly. When they require us all to drink bleach because
the right gods have been propitiated, then they are homicidal. And when
they decide that "races don't exist" or that "we're all the same" and
then start opening our borders and making social policy and propaganda
to encourage racial mixing, then they are genocidal -- and they must be
Eventually, we'll have to remove all such people from positions of
power. For now, I think that one of the best weapons against them is
laughter -- the demonstration that multiracialist ideas are indeed
quite insane. This will help build the consciousness and confidence of
Whites who have remained rational -- and it will jar some of the good
but miseducated folks who accepted multiracialism back into sanity.
Let's take a look at some of the multiracialists' lunacy.
Much of what passes for writing and education today contains an
implicit assumption that is totally erroneous: the assumption that it
is somehow "immoral" to recognize the reality of the inequality of the
First off, I see no validity whatsoever in any moral system which
condemns free inquiry, rational thought, or recognition of ascertained
facts. And I am going to question such pernicious nonsense wherever it
To our shame, there was once a religio-legal system in place in the
West which imprisoned or killed persons who questioned the existence of
transubstantiation or demons (and many other fantastic delusions too
numerous to list). I have publicly condemned that system, and continue
to do so, and obviously do not want it to return.
But we are returning to it, in a way.
We of the West are now veering toward the establishment of the
doctrine of "equality," racial and other varieties as well, as a kind
of secular religion. The "hate crime" laws which are now being imposed
by the elites' hired legislators (with the acquiescence of the boobs)
are part and parcel of the new faith: Like most priesthoods, the prime
movers of the "equality" hoax have a yen to punish, imprison, or kill
those who question their profitable racket. In some countries, like
Canada and Germany, they already have that power. (The same thing
applies to belief in "the Holocaust," another faltering styrofoam prop
of the current establishment.)
[ http://nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=7156 ]
A precursor to the legal persecution of those perceptive enough to
realize that neither individuals nor races are or should be "equal" is
the promotion (only begun in the last few decades, by the way) of the
idea that such "evil" thoughts constitute "racism" and that "racism" is
an awful awful bad thing -- mustn't do or Daddy spank. Slowly the idea
is being added that not only is "racism" veddy veddy bad, but it is
also somehow illegal.
Preposterous? Well, demons, witches, and transubstantiation are
preposterous, too, but hundreds of thousands have been killed by
"well-meaning" folks fired up for blood by an utterly false and insane
belief system. I don't want it to happen again.
So, I must speak out.
There is no evidence whatsoever that the human races are equal in
intelligence or in many other characteristics, and in fact it would be
a bizarre anomaly of Nature if they were. After many thousands of years
of divergent evolution in vastly different environments, it would be
astounding if we found the human races to be "equal" in physical
structure or mental conformation. The whole concept of the evolution of
life by branching and speciation depends on the ever-flowering inequality of races or subspecies. This applies to every form of life and, frankly, it's not quite sane to believe it doesn't apply to human beings.
There should be no moral opprobrium attached to the stating of this obvious fact.
I once had a multiracialist "explain" to me the consistent failure
of Blacks and Mestizos to achieve at a level comparable to Whites. He
said: "The ONLY reason they could possibly fail is if they are
discriminated against." So, in his mind, "equality" of the races is a
given, an almost divine law of the universe. The only reason we don't
have racial equality in the real world -- the only reason -- is
"discrimination" by Whites. He then went on to demonize
"discrimination," as if it were a Satanic thing practiced by Whites for
the sole purpose of preventing his perfect heaven of "equality" from
coming into being.
Racial "discrimination" merely means choosing between races for
some purpose. For example, when the founding fathers of America
instituted the Naturalization Act of 1790 (in effect until treasonously
abrogated in 1952), which explicitly stated that only members of the
European race could become citizens of the United States, they were
certainly choosing in that sense. They were trying to ensure
the practical fulfillment of what had been stated in the Constitution:
that this new nation was for their "sacred posterity" -- that is, the
actual lineal descendants of the European men and women making up this
nation. They chose not to give the new nation, purchased at the cost of so much blood and toil, to others.
If you are an American basketball coach engaged in a bidding war to
award "scholarships" to some of the lengthier African tribesmen, you
too are engaged in racial "discrimination," though of the crassest
Discrimination merely means choosing between alternatives. The
expression "discriminating shoppers," meaning intelligent shoppers who
care about quality, survives in American English as a reminder of the
original meaning before the insanity really got started.
Racial "segregation" -- which multiracialists condemn as even more
terrible than discrimination -- is, of course, the state of affairs
which obtained between the races for millennia before the advent of
Marxism and its offshoot and related universalist doctrines. Absent
laws forcing their association, the vast majority of the members of all
human races segregate themselves quite naturally. An examination of
high school lunchrooms -- or metro area neighborhoods -- in "racially
diverse" areas will easily confirm this.
Before the racial "equality" nuttiness came on the scene, people
organized their societies that way naturally without even thinking
about it. Even today, Whites who are as "liberal" as you can get
without actually being off your rocker still make housing purchase
decisions in a manner absolutely indistinguishable from members of
It's unconscious. It's biological. And it really has nothing to do with "hate" -- and everything to do with divergent evolution.
If you are not free to discriminate, you are not free to choose.
If you may only discriminate when an authority says your choice is
based on what the authority says is "relevant," then you are a slave to
I prefer the principles of the founders of my nation, the United
States of America, which give me the freedom to choose and to decide
for myself what is relevant and what is not.
Multiracialists often claim that racial realists like us want to
persecute and dominate other races. As far as persecution and
domination are concerned, I'm absolutely against them. They implicitly assume a multiracial society.
Wherever two or more races are required to live under the same
government, there is always racial conflict, and claims and
counter-claims of domination or "unfairness."
Once every race has its independence and freedom, and its own
territory, such things will be as rare as racial conflict is in Iceland
or Japan today. The maxim of self-determination, which I talked about
last week, eliminates and makes impossible persecution
and domination of one people by another to the same extent that it
facilitates racial separation. It's in the forced multiracialist states
-- which sadly includes most of the White world these days -- where
racial conflicts erupt. The multiracialist belief is the precise
opposite of the truth.
[ http://nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=7361 ]
Multiracialists condemn the former American laws which, until quite
recently, prevented marriage between members of different races. Laws
forbidding racial intermarriage were, as Jefferson stated, an
unfortunate necessity because of the proximity of the races -- unless
one was willing, as the Founding Fathers and most Americans throughout
history were not, to accept the genocide, by mixing, of one's own race.
Jefferson, along with many other founders and also Abraham Lincoln,
thought that the best answer was racial separation on a continental
scale: that is, repatriation of Africans to the land of their
ancestors, or, in the interest of economy, their transportation to the
island of Santo Domingo in the Caribbean.
Multiracialists reject the rational and humane vision of the
Founders. They dream of racial mixing as an ideal -- they dream of
racial mixing like some people dream of the Second Coming or winning
the Publisher's Clearinghouse sweepstakes. They dream of racial mixing
as if it will usher in a new, ideal world of good and virtue. They are
dangerous, crazy people. One actually told me once: "When we have mixed
our gene pools enough, probably 10 or 20 generations from now, we will
all be pretty close to the same color. End of the race issue.
Interbreeding between races improves genetic vigor and dilutes
race-specific defects... I am doing my part, as often as is practical."
I am glad that such multiracialists forthrightly admit that they
want the genocide and extinction of our race -- most of their ilk are
not so honest.
But I am afraid that their dream of the one happy mixed race of the future is a hopeless fantasy.
Wherever racial mixing has occurred on a large scale, the result
has not been one harmonious mixed race, but exactly the opposite. New
racial combinations come into being, with multiple layers of
stratification, and a tremendous increase in racial conflict. (Spike
Lee's School Daze dealt with this process of race-formation and stratification among Mulattos and Blacks.)
India, which has now spun off into four separate nations, with at
least another two about to be born in blood, is a good example; as is
Brazil, where they are now shooting unwanted Mulatto children like mad
dogs in the streets, with the apparent approval of many in all social
classes, who are now so degraded that they only wish to see life go on
with a minimum of trouble.
Those are not futures I would wish on my children. The only way to
prevent them is to preserve the European racial character of our
Multiracialists like to claim that since many racial traits have no
hard-edged geographic boundaries, that therefore "race does not exist."
I am sure that few would assert, because the Earth's atmosphere
possesses no hard-edged boundary with the emptiness of interplanetary
space, that the atmosphere does not exist or that it is identical to a
The boundaries between pre-man and man were also not hard-edged
when we were diverging from our pre-human ancestors. That racial
division led to a very significant speciation indeed.
There is also an infinite series of gradations between Lake Itasca,
the Mississippi River, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Atlantic Ocean. I
think we shall have to agree, though, that it is not wicked to regard
the Atlantic Ocean as different in many most significant ways from Lake
Itasca. And there are special rooms for people who seriously believe
that these gradations somehow prove that the Mississippi River doesn't
And, further, there is a very long series of gradations of life
forms between pond scum and the Queen of England, and the precise
divisions we make between all of these life forms are to some degree
"social" and arbitrary. But they are also useful; they describe real
hereditary distinctions of structure and behavior; and they have
greatly increased our understanding of the Life processes which allowed
something not too dissimilar from pond scum to eventually become the
Queen of England.
It is also true that chemical waste dumps blend to some extent with
ground water, and that without extensive tests you cannot be sure that
your well water is absolutely pure. But that is no excuse for
pouring in a quart of dioxin, or for claiming that dioxin is "the same"
as water. That's essentially what the multiracialists are doing to our
Everyone who acknowledges the evolutionary process acknowledges
that races exist. (It's only when we come to the ever-so-sensitive
topic of human races that religious and political delusions make some avert their eyes from reality.)
Race-formation is the very engine of evolution itself. Without it, Life as we know it would be impossible.
Due to mutations and the actions of natural selection on existing
variations, new types develop. When these varieties become
significantly distinct, we call them races or subspecies. When they
become even more distinct, diverging to the point where interbreeding
is the exception rather than the rule, or even becomes impossible, then
we call them a new species.
Since all mammals had a common ancestor (now extinct), and there are now many species of mammal, therefore all existing mammal species must have gone through a race-divergence process, evolving into many different subspecies and eventually new species.
Note that we are applying hard-edged concepts (species, subspecies) upon what is really a continuous process, that of divergence and speciation.
This divergence has certainly happened to the human races, and
indeed it would be a biological wonder approaching the fantastic if it
The really interesting question isn't where we hang the precise
labels of race and species. The question of greatest significance is:
Will we, through our social policies and our popular
mythologies, allow this branching process to continue; or will we
attempt to terminate it?
Speciation is a gradual process which could not happen without race-formation. It borders on the absurd to deny this.
Race-formation occurs even in beings not possessing a
consciousness, such as plants, and in fact took place for many
millennia before the development of consciousness in any form.
Astoundingly, all of this happened despite the fact that the
big-brained multiracialists weren't provided with a definition of race
that suited them.
To claim that we must precisely or genetically define races before
we acknowledge their existence is equivalent to claiming that Amazonian
tribesmen may not distinguish between food and offal because they
haven't studied the chemical structures thereof.
Actually, it's even more ridiculous than that: it is equivalent to
claiming, because the tribesmen can't make the requisite molecular
diagrams, that there actually is no difference between the waste
products of a chicken and its eggs.
So multiracialism is an absurd and dangerous body of ideas, bound to be ultimately fatal to any people that totally embraces it.
The Jewish supremacists who dominate our media have promoted
multiracialism 24 hours a day for two generations at least. Yet,
clearly, from their opposition to Jewish intermarriage and their
support of the racial-nationalist-supremacist state of Israel, we can
see that they clearly do not believe in it themselves. So why do they
promote it for us? That, like a talent for haggling over the
price of a carpet in a dusty marketplace or for getting the rubes to
think the pea is definitely under the third shell, may also be
ultimately genetic. Their culture is one of infiltrating and altering
other cultures wherein they choose to live. What they promote for us is based on what they want us to do which they at some level believe is best for them.
Remember that fact as we continue our discussion of the lunacies of multiracialism next week on American Dissident Voices.
* * * * * *
We need your support. You can join or donate by writing to our
postal address below, or you can also donate through Paypal by sending
We can have a clean, orderly, progressive, safe, and incomparably richer and more beautiful nation if it becomes a proud White nation again.
To do that we must begin by restoring White community and White
racial consciousness among our people. We at National Vanguard are
doing that by building world-beating new media for Whites and by
getting out on the street and meeting our neighbors and showing them
what we're all about.
We're going to help our people. We're going to educate our people.
We're going to come up with creative ways to awaken our people. We're
going to create publications that will be like nothing ever seen before
in the cause of White awakening. We're going to do what it takes.
Be a part of what we're doing. Join National Vanguard today. For
further information on National Vanguard, write to Post Office Box
5145, Charlottesville VA 22905, or visit http://www.nationalvanguard.org/ and click on the "join" link at the top of the page. We appreciate your support.
Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the
words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not
equal; and equal men are not free.