The War of Terror
It's not a war on terror, but of terror exchanged for terror on both sides, neither of which is our side.
ILLUSTRATION: Special police are sent to Grand Central Station
in New York City. Even SWAT teams on every streetcorner will not
suffice to protect us now; a fundamental rethinking of our society's
assumptions about nationhood and race is required.
American Dissident Voices broadcast
July 10, 2005
by Kevin Alfred Strom
WAR. IT'S HERE. I have been accused of overusing the metaphor of
war, as in what I said last week, "There's a war being waged against
White people." As in the many times I've said there's a war being waged
against Western civilization. But I don't think it's fair to accuse me
of overdoing the metaphor, no matter how many times I've used it, for
the simple reason that it's not a metaphor. It's a fact.
Three days before I recorded this broadcast, that fact was proved
once again by the horrific terror bombings of the London transportation
system. More than 700 people, most of them totally innocent White
people, were wounded -- and we still don't know how many were killed,
since not all the bodies have been removed or reassembled yet, but it
may be between 50 and 100.
When I woke up on September 11th, 2001, my first thought was that
it was William Pierce's birthday. I didn't know that in just a few
moments America would be attacked and thousands killed because of our
pro-Israel Middle Eastern policies. Something that William Pierce
warned us about. "Stay out of tall buildings," he had said. And just a
few days ago, on Thursday, July 7th, I had a parallel, though I am sure
entirely coincidental experience.
Early that morning, I
recalled that it was Revilo Oliver's birthday. But my first telephone
call on Thursday was a shocker. It was from National Vanguard editor
David Mullenax, who told me of the sickening carnage in London. Again,
the kind of destruction that both Pierce and Oliver said was coming
unless we got the Zionist tick off our jugular. A little over a year
ago, the same thing happened in Madrid, where even more innocent White
people were killed.
What is the overwhelming message of these events, especially the latter two, which occurred after uncounted billions of dollars and thousands of lives had been spent on
implementing a National Security state and prosecuting an alleged War
on Terror? The overwhelming message is this: The government can't protect us.
The war Israel and the neocons have brought to the Middle East is
coming to our shores, and nothing that Bush or Blair or any of the
tin-pot potentates can do will stop it.
In London it was backpack-size bombs and (possibly) timers -- all
made from common materials. Tomorrow it may be suitcase nukes. In any
case, when your opponent's army lives and breeds in your own territory
by the millions, and when he is even willing to kill himself to inflict
death and destruction on you, death and destruction are going to be inflicted. Count on it.
Our immigration policy and insane 'we're all the same' racial
belief system ensures that an Islamist army exists within our borders.
And our equally insane and apparently endless war for Israel in the
Middle East ensures that we are creating thousands upon thousands of
potential Osama bin Ladens every day among the Muslims. Some of them --
many of them -- will enlist and are enlisting in the war against us.
Some of them may be strapping on bombs in Los Angeles, New York,
Washington, or Peoria as I speak. Short of imprisoning our whole
population in protective custody or giving up almost all of our
cherished freedoms, they cannot all be stopped. As Rex Stout once said
in more elegant words than mine, if a committed and resourceful foe is
absolutely determined to kill you, you are going to be killed.
Even Tony Blair essentially threw up his hands and admitted as much
when he said yesterday "If people are actually prepared to go on to a
Tube or a bus and blow up wholly innocent people ... you can have all
the surveillance in the world and you couldn't stop that happening."
One rather odd theory being floated by the authorities, by the way, to
partially justify their total lack of preparedness for and prevention
of this attack, is that White Muslims from the Balkans -- what they
call "clean skins" -- were recruited to carry out the attacks.
Britain's Independent on Sunday quotes unnamed "intelligence
sources" for this rank speculation, which not only has no basis in the
evidence, but is contraindicated by their simultaneous guess that the
terrorists might have been "mercenaries" (in which case -- they failed
to mention -- they need not have been Muslims). This contradictory sort
of guessing gets the imprimatur of the major media for reasons which I
will leave to your imagination.
[ http://tinyurl.com/8peaj ]
And those who are charged with protecting us, the time-servers, a
few real heroes, and the well-meaning (along with the alien moles and
intelligence operatives who are surely interspersed among them), form a
pretty inept coalition -- if London is any indication.
Not only was the attack carried out with apparent impunity, but in
its aftermath the authorities could not -- until after a considerable
interval -- even determine when the bombings took place. On the
day after the attacks, establishment newspapers were still publishing a
timeline which stated that the subway blasts were almost half an hour
apart from the first to the last, beginning at 8:51AM, and ending at
9:17AM, 26 minutes later. (The bus explosion, they say, happened at
[ http://tinyurl.com/czfdz ]
But later reports state that the subway explosions came "within
seconds" of one another, indicating that timers may have been used.
Which is correct? I don't know. But I do know that a system that can't
even accurately tell me what happened in the recent past doesn't
exactly inspire faith that it can protect me in the future.
[ http://tinyurl.com/9wmyc ]
The neocons and Jewish supremacists are already using this event to
gain maximum political capital, just as they did with 9/11. For
example, Fox News' neocon talking head Brian Kilmeade stated live on
the air that this attack brought the focus back where it belongs --
away from the environment and back to winning the "war on terror":
"...at the G8 summit, where their topic Number 1 -- believe it or
not -- was global warming, the second was African aid. And that was the
first time since 9-11 when they should know, and they do know now, that
terrorism should be Number 1. But it's important for them all to be
together. I think that works to our advantage, in the Western
world's advantage, for people to experience something like this
together, just 500 miles from where the attacks have happened." (emphasis ours)
[ http://tinyurl.com/bzdld ]
And Israel's finance minister Benjamin Netanyahu had the gall to
use the attacks to beat the war drums some more against Iran -- along
with already-destabilized Syria, the next country on the warmonger's
hit list. At a meeting in London which was slightly delayed by the
bombings, the Israeli finance minister spoke to his real and imagined
servants and inferiors. I quote from wire service reports:
'With London's subway tunnels still smoldering from Thursday's
explosions, Israel's finance minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, used his
address at a London conference to warn the West that Iran's continued
progress toward nuclear weapons could one day provide radical Islamic
groups with "a nuclear umbrella" to cover their terrorist acts.
Netanyahu said the West must do more to oppose Tehran's growing
nuclear threat... "The Iranian regime supports terror, both
ideologically and operationally," he said. "I think the regime will go
as fast as it can to develop nuclear weapons, regardless of who leads
'Netanyahu called for cancellation of planned shipments of Russian
nuclear equipment and nuclear fuel to Iran's Bushehr plant, still under
'"This is not an Israel problem -- this is a world problem that
concerns everybody, including Russia," he said. "There has to be a
common solution here: first to prevent the transfer of nuclear
technology or fuel, secondly to punish regimes that deviate from this
and, thirdly, to put pressure on the Iranian regime, in all avenues
possible, to stop this program."
'When asked if a military response would be required to prevent
Iran from developing nuclear weapons, Netanyahu answered, "I don't
know. I am not aware of any plans, but that doesn't mean they don't
exist, for example in America."
'Noting Libya's decision to shut down its own nuclear program after
the U.S. attacked Iraq, the finance minister said, "The deterrent
effect has worked on some, but so far has not worked on others," he
'Netanyahu added that "...concerted action was required to rein in Iran."'
[ http://tinyurl.com/dwa9c ]
[ http://tinyurl.com/aeabv ]
If that's not a veiled threat to use their client state, America,
to attack Iran if Russia and Iran don't do as they're told, I don't
know what is.
It looks like Netanyahu is a bit of a loose cannon, saying all
those things in English to a meeting in London, right after Sharon said
that the attacks should not be directly compared with Israel's
situation in the Middle East -- at least in any English-language
statements -- since that might make it look too much like Israel was
taking advantage of the London attacks. But Sharon's government didn't
mind making political and diplomatic capital out of the deaths of White
people to the Hebrew-language media
. Again, from press reports:
'After the attacks, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon ordered his
government not to make any remarks equating the blasts with the
situation in Israel. "It is not our incident, and there is no need to
talk [about it] beyond expressing shock," a source in Sharon's office
'After the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, Israel tried to link the tragedy to the Palestinian resistance.
'On Thursday, Shalom and Israeli Finance Minister Binyamin Netanhayu made similar remarks, but only to the Hebrew-language media.... [emphasis ours]
The source in Sharon's office said that the Prime Minister's
decision not to give interviews to foreign media was taken after
reports that the Israeli embassy in London received a pre-attack
warning minutes before the first explosion.
The official warned of the "danger that this kind of report can bring to Israel."'
[ http://tinyurl.com/7buo4 ]
Indeed. That kind of report could be very dangerous to Israel,
especially in the aftermath of incontrovertible evidence that Israelis
and other Jews in New York City were warned shortly before the 9/11
attacks -- especially considering that we now know that Israeli
intelligence was tangled up to the hilt with the Muslim cells involved
in 9/11, and knew practically their every move.
And what of this warning to Netanyahu? Were Israeli officials warned of the London bomb attacks before
they occurred? Or is this just a product of wild-eyed conspiracy theorists in the blogosphere?
Let's look at the evidence. No less than the Associated Press -- in
the person of a writer with a Jewish-sounding surname, Amy Teibel --
stated that "British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes
before Thursday's explosions that they had received warnings of
possible terror attacks in the city, a senior Israeli official said.
Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had planned to attend an
economic conference in a hotel over the subway stop where one of the
blasts occurred, and the warning prompted him to stay in his hotel room
instead, government officials said." And the story went on to say that
"Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at
the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible
attacks, the official said."
Now no one disputes the fact that Netanyahu did not go to the
conference hotel as planned. He stayed put. But the Israelis are now
denying -- at first, they were not -- that such a warning was ever
received. They claim that what made Netanyahu change his plans was word
received a few minutes after
the bombings, not before.
The story is curious on several counts. For one thing, I don't
believe that the Jewish supremacists would have anything to gain by
fabricating and then denying the story themselves. In fact, they'd have
a lot to lose, since quite a few people would give credence to the
story, no matter how frantic the later denials. So I believe that AP's
source did see or hear evidence that such a call was made.
But was it made by Scotland Yard as alleged? Giving the most
credence that I can to the story, based on the fact that the controlled
media are very unlikely to purposely make something up out of whole
cloth that hurts Israel, I still have a problem with the idea of a
Scotland Yard official calling one person -- and one person only -- and
that person being Israel's finance minister -- to warn of a terror
attack to come in the next few minutes. As venal and corrupt as our
Western politicians and government officials are, I believe that there
are still too many honest men in the bureaucracy who, if they knew
anything about it, would not permit that to happen.
If British police officials at Scotland Yard possessed such
knowledge, even if the knowledge was restricted to a few men in one
section, it is hard to imagine these men warning Benjamin Netanyahu --
warning anyone at the hotel below which one bomb was detonated -- not
warning anyone in charge of the London subways and bus lines -- not
warning anyone in the media so that instructions could be broadcast to the public -- and, most of all, not
warning members of their own families so they could escape death --
family members who later would tell the tale of how they, too, were
warned and lives were thereby saved.
No, I don't think that Scotland Yard or its bureaucracy per se
possessed foreknowledge of the blasts. But someone at
Scotland Yard may have indeed made such a warning call. Someone whose
primary loyalty is not to Britain or the British people. Someone for
whom secrecy is essential and almost reflexive. Someone who, unlike
most of Scotland Yard, has direct ties to an intelligence service with
excellent al-Qaeda connections and intercepts. Someone who may actually
be working for that intelligence service while nominally on the British
payroll. Someone who weighs British and American deaths in an ice-cold
cost/benefit calculus of what will most benefit his own
who are neither British or American. Someone who, breaking protocol in
the urgency of the moment, was accidentally overheard because the usual
secure communications would have taken too long. If you can think of a better explanation for the call and the leak of the call, I welcome your correspondence.
The Jewish war we are fighting in the Middle East has now been
brought home, with 9/11, with Madrid, and with this week's day of blood
in London. Some may say it is unfair for me to call it a Jewish war,
but I assure you I am not exaggerating. It is Jewish on every front.
Jewish media moguls and change agents were the driving force behind
the change in our immigration laws -- in Britain, the United States,
and all over the White world -- which has allowed a flood of potential
terrorists and criminals free access to our nations, our
infrastructure, and our people. The same Jewish supremacists are behind
the massive psychological warfare campaign against White people, which
has disarmed us in the face of this invasion and made too many of us
afraid to speak out or made us believe that it is somehow "wrong" to
oppose this invasion, this ethnic cleansing of Whites from our
The Jewish-led neocons were and are the architects of the Middle
East War which they are now drooling to extend to Iran, at the cost of
how many more lives we do not know and they do not care.
And Jewish intelligence operatives were up to their ears in 9/11
intel and used their cold cost/benefit analysis to come to the
conclusion that letting it happen was the best thing for the Jews,
since it pushed us
into war against their
they have been deeply involved in the instigation of terror and other
attacks on America, including the Lavon affair and the USS Liberty,
they have been known to "run" Islamist terror cells themselves (such as
the Achille Lauro
hijackers), and their traces are quite evident in the anthrax attacks as well.
So what should we do? Re-up and support Bush and his illegal
immigration amnesty and the war he's running for his Zionist bosses?
No, that's just what our people's enemies want us to do. That will just
guarantee that this war will be brought home to our shores more and
more. So should we run amok and engage in attacks on non-White
immigrants? No, the Jewish supremacists would love that. It would give
them a chance to demonize all opposition to them as "hate" and pass new
laws so eventually they can put anyone who writes a book or article
critical of multiracialism or Zionism in jail as a "hate criminal."
Should we publish unprofessional materials attacking Jews and other
non-Whites, using crude terms and calling for violence from readers?
No, again, that's just what the Jewish supremacists want. When you do
things like that, you're just destroying any credibility that good
people have spent a lifetime building up for our cause and our sensible
biological worldview. You're confirming every stereotype that the media
have put out about us in the minds of your readers. You're just putting
yourself and anyone who is unfortunate enough to be associated with you
into the box the Jewish supremacists have made for us. And that box is
There is a better way. That way is the way of National Vanguard.
Founded by a physics professor, Dr. William L. Pierce, with a deep love
for his people -- and carried on today by businessmen, engineers,
artists, students, parents, and people from every walk of life who know
how to get things done -- National Vanguard is committed to bring high
intelligence, razor-sharp competence, and deep commitment to the cause
of awakening the White people of North America and the world to our
great danger -- and our even greater destiny.
We need a government which is not manipulated and controlled by
Jews or any other people not our own. We need a government which is
answerable to us alone, and which defines our people the same way
Nature does -- biologically, racially
. We need media which belong to us, not to hostile aliens with their own agenda. And most of all, we need the sense of community
that only real kinship and shared goals, traditions, and origins can bring. We need space for our own kind to live.
We're building those media right now. We're creating that sense of
community every day. And we are determined to do so responsibly and
honestly and better than pro-White outreach has ever been done before.
We're working for the day when we and our precious children will live
free once again. I hope you'll join your efforts to ours.
Join National Vanguard today. For further information on National
Vanguard, write to Post Office Box 5145, Charlottesville VA 22905, or
and click on the "join" link
at the top of the page. We appreciate your support.
Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the
words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not
equal; and equal men are not free.