The Censorious Race
American Dissident Voices broadcast
April 24, 2004
Kevin Alfred Strom
Today, the first day this broadcast is on the air, April 24,
2004, there will be an important historical revisionist
conference in Sacramento, California. Quite a few National
Alliance members will be there and participating. A tremendous
last-minute effort has been made to save the conference -- which
was almost cancelled, in fact had been cancelled before the
rescue effort began, due to Jewish censorship.
conference will run from 2:00pm to 9:30pm on Saturday, and some
participants plan private activities on the next day, Sunday. The
conference is being sponsored by the Institute for Historical
Review, whose director, Mark Weber, has been a guest many times
on this program. You may reach the IHR at email@example.com or by
telephone at 949-631- 1490.
There's an interesting story behind the conference. It was -- and
is -- a gathering of revisionist historians and free speech
advocates from around the world with an interest in correcting
the historical record from Zionist/Jewish distortions and
propaganda, and with an additional interest in studying the
pathologies and dangers of Jewish power today.
The original organizer of the conference felt compelled to
abruptly cancel the conference just five days before it was to
begin -- because the hall which had been rented, Sacramento's
German-American Turn Verein, succumbed to Jewish pressure and
reneged on their contract with the revisionists. It seems that
the hall owners had 'heard from' Jewish pressure groups, members
of which had registered for the conference under false names in
order to get the venue information. But local activists and
revisionists took a 'never say die' and 'can-do' attitude to the
fight against censorship -- and refused to give up. A
reconstituted conference was immediately organized.
Though the original organizer refused to use his list of
conference ticket holders to spread the word, the IHR,
Stormfront, National Vanguard, the National Alliance,
attorney Edgar Steele, and the Freedomsite all worked to get the
word out quickly and a good turnout is expected.
The Institute for Historical Review picked up the ball and
scheduled a meeting which included many of the original speakers
at the Turn Verein event -- and they didn't make the mistake of
publicizing the venue many days before the meeting. Now it may
seem strange to you that a public conference discussing -- of all
things -- mainly historical issues has to conceal its location
until the last minute. But that's the way it is when you
challenge the Jewish establishment. You can hold openly racialist
conferences scheduled months in advance -- and don't get me
wrong, I'm glad that you can -- without anything near the danger
of heavy pressure being brought on the hall as you have when you
question the central myths that prop up Jewish power. Most
non-Whites are racialist themselves, and their opposition to
White racialism is spotty at best and weak in general, except
when whipped to a fever pitch by Jewish media, money, and
organization. But when you directly challenge the architects of
multiracialism and Zionism, as this conference -- and revisionist
conferences before it -- did, you get a very focused and very
determined Jewish opposition, totally dedicated to censoring you,
shutting you up, and closing you down by any means necessary,
fair or foul.
Now, the exact natures of the threats made by Jews to get the
Turn Verein to abrogate its contract are not known -- but the
story put out by the hall, that they 'didn't know' that their
clients were White people who occasionally doubted that what Jews
say is always true, must be false. The hall was openly rented in
the name of a European-American cultural group
conference was openly announced to the Turn Verein -- and the
world, for that matter -- as a revisionist event. So the Turn
Verein's recent claim that the conference 'misrepresented itself'
must be a cover story for the real pressure tactics that cannot
be named in fear of further reprisals. Jewish pressure is often
economic -- if the Turn Verein depends on business from the
general public to stay afloat, they might be very vulnerable to
negative stories in the Jewish media, a sudden 'food poisoning'
story on page one, or the like. And one Jewish group, the JDL --
which happily admits it was involved in the pressure campaign --
has been directly linked to terror bombings. In fact, the recent
former leader of the JDL, Irv Rubin, was awaiting trial for
planning a series of bomb attacks when he allegedly committed
suicide before being able to testify about others involved in the
plot. Rubin's successor crowed about his part in threatening the
Turn Verein to back out of their agreement:
"...We had been diligently working behind the scenes to
facilitate just such an event [that is, the cancellation]. Today
has been a very good day for the Jewish Community of
Sacramento... and for the Jewish Defense League who can add
another battle star to our banner."
So they admit it. In fact, Jewish censorship efforts are coming
more and more out into the open. Even the lemmings are starting
to notice just who it is that thinks they shouldn't see or hear
or read certain points of view. I think that the aggressive
efforts of the ADL and other Jewish groups to censor Mel Gibson's
The Passion was the tipping point on this issue. Their censorship
efforts were slightly successful -- Gibson didn't translate the
most damning phrase from the Jewish high priest into English for
the film's subtitles -- but the end result of it all was that
millions of moviegoers went to the film knowing that there were
certain parts that the Jews had forced out of the film and many
others that they had wanted to censor. They saw The Passion with
a much-heightened sense of the Jewish power structure of 2000
years ago and the even more dangerous Jewish power structure of
today. So the public got two messages -- Jews are censorious, and
Jews can lose. Yes, lose; Gibson stood firm on most of the Jewish
demands, and even their tiny victory in the case of The Passion's
subtitles was really more a case of them shooting themselves in
the foot. This growing awareness of Jewish power -- and the
Jewish agenda -- and Jewish weakness -- bodes well for the future
of our civilization.
Prominent Jewish groups also admit their part in attempting to
shut down Web sites that they don't like. The BBC recently
dutifully republished a screed by the pro-censorship Jewish Simon
Wiesenthal Center with the hilarious title "Internet driving hate
site surge" -- I mean, by definition a 'site,' 'hate' or
otherwise, is on the Internet and can only be on the Internet, so
how could 'the Internet' somehow be driving a 'surge' in any kind
of site? That's like saying 'Presence of roads drives increase in
Volkswagens.' One used to expect at least literacy from the BBC
-- but, then again, maybe the Wiesenthal hacks actually wrote the
headline, too. [ http://tinyurl.com/258td ]
Several of the sites targeted by the Wiesenthal Center were
forced off the server facility which hosted them last week -- at
almost exactly the same time as the release of the Wiesenthal
report. One was martinlutherking.org -- a site devoted to
historical research and study of the man behind the myths.
Another was our own nationalvanguard.org. Another was the largest
pro-White discussion forum in the world -- and one of the largest
discussion forums, bar none -- stormfront.org. And another, whose
high Google rankings angered the Jewish would-be elite, may have
been the one which triggered the latest censor-fest:
Back on March 20th, National Vanguard reporter Jeff Hook
told us that jewwatch.com was in the sites of the censorious
Jews who have punched the word "Jew" into the Google search
engine have finally discovered that the number one result is
www.jewwatch.com. The site is ranked first in relevance of more
than 1.72 million Web pages.
David Krane, communications director for the Web giant, stated
that "Google has no plans to manually alter the results of their
ranking system to knock Jew Watch from its top spot." But now,
after a relentless badgering campaign, he has promised to "alert
Google's engineers to further refine the search algorithm, which
might alter the results for the word."...
When asked how the "hate site" can garner the number one
position, Krane pointed to Google's ranking algorithm that bases
rankings on site relevancy, which is determined by the number of
forwarding links to the site. (Translation: It's very popular.)
Jews have registered www.jewwatch.net to keep it safe from
"haters," while launching frequent 'denial of service' (DOS)
attacks against www.jewwatch.com whereby they overload the site
with requests to make access difficult or impossible.
We continued to cover the story in a report I made on the 8th of
National Alliance member and retired librarian Frank Weltner has
operated 'Jew Watch' -- jewwatch.com -- since 1995 as a watchdog
site and Internet resource for readers and scholars interested in
researching Jewish issues. Through hard work and consistency, the
site has managed to achieve a high ranking on the number one
search engine, Google. In fact, merely entering the word 'Jew'
into the Google search box returns Jew Watch pages as the top two
Google's ranking algorithm, the method used to determine the most
useful and therefore the highest-ranked sites, is not public --
the company fears that should its exact parameters become known,
advertisers would exploit them to gain falsely inflated rankings
for their worthless sites -- but it is believed to analyze the
site's text for content relevant to the site's ostensible
subject, click-throughs from Google itself, and links from other
sites with relevant content on the same subject. By all those
criteria, Jew Watch is the number one site in its specialized
Since Jew Watch archives material from many sources -- Jewish and
non-Jewish -- which express a critical attitude toward the
power-seeking and power-exercising activities of the Jewish
establishment, the site's top ranking at Google has angered
Jewish groups, some of which have attempted to pressure the
search giant to alter its automated ranking criteria to prevent
'anti-Semitic' sites like Jew Watch from receiving a high search
page position. This is something that Google has so far refused
Other Jews are spearheading a plan to spoof the Google algorithm
by providing numerous links from their sites to the Wikipedia
online encyclopedia entry for the word 'Jew' and then submitting
the url of their newly-linked pages to Google, in an effort to
move the Wikipedia page's Google position higher than the Jew
As of this writing, the Wikipedia page is still number three,
after two pages from Jew Watch. It's not really clear just what
these Jewish spoofers would 'win' even if they were successful in
hijacking the top spot: Jew Watch would still be number two, just
as visible -- and, with all the controversy they've created over
it, with a lot more traffic.
The Jewish efforts at pressuring and 'link bombing' Google (the
latter is something which Google disapproves of, by the way) have
generated quite a bit of press, with stories on ZDNet, the Los
Angeles Times, the Jerusalem Post, the Charleston (South
Carolina) Post and Courier, and many others.
The Post and Courier quoted National Alliance member Frank
Weltner, who created and operates the site from his home in St.
'Site operator Frank Weltner, a retired librarian who lives in
St. Louis, defended the site Monday in a telephone interview.
"They (the Jews) own the media; they own the banks," Weltner
said. "This is a democracy, and in a democracy, minorities should
not rule. But Jews don't feel that way; they feel that they
should rule this country, and I object to that. I want my country
'...Google's operators have said they are in no way against Jews
but can't remove Jew Watch from its search engine. "The way that
Google decides to rank and order Web pages is done completely
automatically, using (computer) software," corporate spokesman
David Krane said Monday. "This ranking criterion is essentially
representative of popular opinion on the Internet." Even when
people don't like the results, Google operators never interfere
with the computer program, said Krane, who identified himself as
a Jew who will be observing Passover. "That's the promise that
Google has made to its users for more than six years," Krane
said. "We guarantee an objective, tamper-free search
The Jerusalem Post piece describes one Jew's "call to arms" over
Jew Watch and openly admits Jewish efforts to remove the site:
What is a Jew? Those hoping to find out from a Google search are
in for an unpleasant surprise. The first of 1.75 million entries
that appear when you type "Jew" into the search engine is an
This discovery by a New York real-estate developer, among others,
has sparked a cyberspace showdown, and a bid to alter the
situation by a small band of Internet experts.
While surfing the Web from his New York home, real-estate
investor Steven Weinstock was shocked to find Jew Watch...
"At first I felt surprised, and then those feelings turned to
shock," he said.
What upset him most is not that hatemongers might be publishing
such lies, but that any person looking to find out about Judaism
would be offered choices such as the "Jewish Controlled Press,"
"Jewish World Conspiracies," "Jewish Media Lies," and "Jewish
Banking and Financial Manipulations." Under one of the
categories, titled "Revisionists - 6,000,000 Jews DID NOT DIE,"
there are dozens of links to articles dedicated to Holocaust
..Jew Watch's description of itself is bland: "Archive of essays,
articles, and on-line books about a perceived international
Jewish conspiracy: Keeping a Close Watch on Jewish Communities &
Organizations Worldwide." ...Perversely, the site also has links
to Jewish community and civil rights organizations such as B'nai
B'rith, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Simon
Wiesenthal Center, but lists them as "Jewish Hate Groups."
"If it means hating extremists, racists, and anti-Semites, then
this title is well deserved," said Dr. Efraim Zuroff, director of
the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Jerusalem. "Not to fight against
these groups increases their potential to poison the minds of
Weinstock has been working to get rid of the site. Last Saturday,
he launched his own Web site, called Remove Jew Watch, containing
a petition which received more than 3,000 signatures in its first
48 hours - 1,500 on Monday alone. He also wrote an e-mail to
Google, demanding that it remove the site.
There is an inherent danger when a hate site masquerades as an
academic resource, said Brian Marcus of the civil-rights division
of the Anti-Defamation League.
"One of our major concerns is that children unable to discern
what is true will stumble onto these hate sites," he said. "There
have been many cases where children unknowingly turn in school
reports that contain anti-Semitic and racist remarks."
Stopping hate sites has been difficult, said Zuroff....
What's really interesting about the Jerusalem Post story is the
admission by Zuroff that the Jewish goal is censorship of their
critics, and the assumption that Jewish groups can decide what is
and what is not an "academic resource" based on its position
regarding Jews. The article continues:
...Daniel Sieradski, editor of the Jew School, a site devoted to
Jewish fringe culture, decided to take matters into his own
hands. Using a method called Google bombing, which exploits a
quirk in Google's algorithms, he hoped to raise another site to
the No. 1 rank.
"I decided to issue a call to arms on my Web site," Sieradski
said. "Within a week, my proposal caught the attention of other
Jewish bloggers [keepers of Web-based diaries] in the US, Canada,
Sieradski's efforts paid off. The Wikipedia encyclopedia listing
for "Jew," which just a week ago held no rank on Google, rose to
the fourth-highest entry. But Sieradski is still not satisfied.
"Our work is not yet done," he said....
Indeed -- their work was not yet done. Jew Watch,
nationalvanguard.org, martinlutherking.org, stormfront.org, and
several other sites immediately began to be attacked by hackers
in what are called Denial of Service (DOS) and Synflood attacks,
which are attempts by cyber-terrorists to send so many thousands
of false requests for pages to the sites every second that the
site's servers are so overloaded that the ordinary reader cannot
access the site at all, effectively shutting it down. And the
intense cyber-attacks were coupled with behind-the-scenes
pressure on the server facility -- the ironically-named
'Everyone's Internet' ( ev1servers.net ), formerly Rackshack --
which hosted the sites. 'Everyone's Internet' had hosted the
servers for these and other racialist and Jew-critical sites for
some time, and well knew that the content of the sites was
clearly legal and did not violate the 'Terms of Service' of the
company in any way. Yet within a few days of the publicity
surrounding Jew Watch and our coverage of that story, and the
launch of the cyber-attacks on the sites, came a terse statement
from 'Everyone's Internet' that all of the sites mentioned were
in violation of their 'Terms of Service' -- accompanied by a
statement that 'Everyone's Internet' did not have to explain how
the sites were supposedly in violation. On that basis they
demaded that the sites be removed or they would shut them down.
Clearly -- as in the case of the Turn Verein cancellation -- a
cover-up of Jewish censorship efforts was being made.
Proof of this came in the email from 'Everyone's Internet'
itself: one of the sites that they demanded be removed and
claimed had violated their 'Terms of Service' was
whitehistory.com. Here's the twist: whitehistory.com was a url
that had never been developed and had no content whatsoever.
And so nationalvanguard.org and the other sites have been forced
to find new servers and were down for a couple of days. Some of
the sites, including jewwatch.com are still in transition and are
temporarily off line.
The name 'Jew Watch' contains an important concept. Jewish
groups, working with corrupt politicians, have already made
publishing certain opinions on history and politics illegal in
many nations. They work feverishly to shut down anyone who
exposes their agenda and reveals their crimes, and harm those who
will not back down. Groups that would take away our freedom of
speech should be watched, and watched very closely indeed.
The Wiesenthal censors sent out a few hundred copies of their
'report' on 'hate sites' on the Internet as a CD-ROM to police
departments, governments, and other censorship-friendly groups.
While their CD-ROM gathers dust or is used as a coffee coaster at
police departments too overwhelmed with non-White crime to pay
too much attention to it, the National Alliance and its Web sites
have more than a third of a million readers every month and
growing. The Jews have failed to shut down the latest revisionist
meeting, they have failed to shut down nationalvanguard.org and I
believe they will fail to shut down jewwatch.com, and their
disinformation efforts have failed to stop the latest and best
National Alliance Leadership Conference which was held last
weekend. They may have more wealth than we do, and wealth can buy
a lot of things, but we are armed with the most powerful weapons
of all -- righteousness and truth. And we are growing in
influence, capabilities, and confidence. Our race deserves to
live in freedom, and no trickster, thug, or con man can stop us
from achieving that goal. We are going to win.