Starting with first principles and the scientific method
America First Books
Featuring ebooks that find a truer path in uncertain times

Kevin Alfred Strom Archive


The Hollow King

American Dissident Voices broadcast
January 17, 2004
by Kevin Alfred Strom


I've said it before and I'll say it again. 'Martin Luther King, Jr.' was a sexual degenerate, a liar, a plagiarist, a phony reverend, a phony Christian, an imposter, a criminal, a Communist functionary, an enemy of America, a traitor to even his own
people, and a willing pawn in the Jewish establishment's plan to reduce America from a great White nation to a Third World feeding and breeding zone, a province in the Global Plantation of the billionaire Jewish elite. King played on the sentiments and emotions of his White victims, using our gullibility and our hypertrophic sense of fairness and kindness to get the noose around our necks and attempt to kill the one race which exemplifies civility, kindness, empathy, and fairness more than any other. He cynically used our virtues against us -- though he can't get all the credit for the scheme, since his behind-the-scenes handler and speechwriter was Jewish Communist Stanley Levison. Levison and his ilk also represented a very powerful -- in fact, ruling -- faction within the United States government. Besides an attempt to kill our uniquely beautiful and creative race, I think it is quite likely that his handlers eventually decided to kill King, too. King alive, with his increasingly degenerate behavior and with mounting evidence of his Communist and anti-American connections, was becoming an increasing liability to the overall program. But, like John Kennedy, as a dead 'saint' he could cause no embarrassment, and his posthumous halo would act as a force field to ward off critical investigators, while his image and his 'martyrdom' would advance the multiracialist cause more than ever.
 [ ]
It was ten years ago this week that I first launched an exposé on this radio program of that Communist functionary and 'saint' of multiracialism, the man called 'Martin Luther King. Jr.' I was not the first to expose this fraud, liar, and swindler, but at this ten-year juncture it's good to look back and see where we stand on the issue-truth-tellers versus liars, King worshippers versus realists. I'd have to concede that, so far, it's a draw. The battle between the myth-makers and the muckrakers is still on -- stronger than ever, in fact.
[ ]
The supine nature of the politicians who institute holidays and piously invoke the name of this enemy of America and traitor to his own people as some kind of saint or exemplar hasn't changed in ten years, of course. The Jewish-dominated media still determine the election results, so virtually all politicians bow down to whomever the media Jews indicate, and they've still got their blood-soaked fingers pointing at St. Martin the Black. The public schools are still run by the National Education Association and the teachers' colleges are still firmly in the hands of those who push the multiracialist agenda, so our children in public (and usually also in private) schools are still indoctrinated to worship King. As National Vanguard writer Steven Smith recently put it:
As we approach the birthday of Martin Luther King Jr., our nation's schools will use this opportunity to fill White children's minds with pro-diversity and anti-White propaganda. One of the most widely used propaganda tools is a mostly-animated 60 minute video called "My Friend Martin," produced by Jews. It is a certainty that most children enrolled in the United States public school system will be forced to watch this video -- followed by Communist-style 'encounter' sessions, where its messages will be driven home.
In short, the movie is about some 6th graders who travel back in time to visit MLK at various stages of his life. They encourage him to undertake his activist role in society. The most ironic and absurd part of the feature is when the group brings MLK back to the future to save him from his fate. Thus, they remove him from our past and alter history.
In this alternate reality, we see that MLK Middle School has become Robert E. Lee Middle School. We see White students threatening the young MLK and his harmless Black friend. We see a mean old White principal shooing them off school grounds. We see their Hispanic friend, who had been speaking perfect English, now cleaning the school hallway floor and speaking only Spanish (as if this doesn't happen today). The atmosphere of this all-White school is dark, dank, and evil.
Of course, what this video does not show are the other consequences of MLK's activism. This video does not show the non-White gang activity, the drug peddling and usage, and the graffiti-ridden run-down neighborhoods that integration and mass migration have wrought. It does not discuss the new diseases that have been reintroduced to America, such as hepatitis and leprosy. It does not mention the number of White citizens who have lost jobs and scholarships because of 'affirmative action' and racial quotas. It does not discuss the fact that Whites are often denied employment because they do not speak Spanish. It does not discuss how our nation's schools -- among the world's best before MLK's activism -- are now among the worst in the industrialized world, churning out one ignorant generation after another.
It also does not discuss all the money that our government has wasted supporting increasing numbers of illegal immigrants in the form of welfare and free health care. It does not mention the fact that our hospitals are understaffed, that our emergency rooms are flooded with non-Whites, resulting in skyrocketing health care costs and the bankrupting of dozens of hospitals along our southern border. It does not mention the holocaust of crime committed by non-Whites against Whites, and the astronomical costs of housing hundreds of thousands of these dusky aliens in our nation's prisons.
Much of this , of course, can be attributed to the activism of MLK.
Since our children will certainly not hear both sides of the story in our classrooms, it is up to the parents to provide a more realistic and balanced perspective on MLK.
WAKE UP PARENTS! Your children will only get the truth from you - if they get it at all.
[ ]
In 1994, the Internet was just starting to become popular, and far more people today get alternative news, opinion, and analysis from the National Alliance and friends of the National Alliance today than did in 1994. It's interesting to see how many places my American Dissident Voices piece on King has been reprinted, and the extent to which it has been and is being discussed in the one medium where free speech still has a foothold. I've gotten emails from several high school and college instructors who used my piece as part of their classroom discussions of King, so there are still a few teachers with enough guts to allow an opposing view to be heard, despite the oppressive atmosphere of Political Correctness which stifles academic freedom most of the time. On the Internet's Usenet discussion forums, of all messages making a direct statement about King since 1994 (there are 8,540 of them as of this writing), about five per cent. of them (421) make reference to my piece on King. When reseraching these messages, I defined a message making a definite statement on King as being one that a) mentioned his name in full, and b) made some direct reference to King beginning with the words "King was." The latter requirement filters out messages that are mere references to the King holiday or mentions of a street name or school name, et cetera. I then divided the messages into two categories -- those that made reference to my full name as author and those which did not. And those which did make such a reference are five per cent. of the total in the discussion forums. That's pretty significant, considering that we're not talking about every National Alliance or National Vanguard piece on King, we're not talking about every critical article on King that may have been influenced by my piece, we're not talking about all the people with a realistic view of King who had something to say about him after reading my article -- we're only talking about one single transcript of one single ten-year-old radio program on King... and five per cent. of all the free discussion on King in the newsgroups makes reference to that one article. Far more than that express doubt about the 'official version' of the MLK story.
[ ]
[ ]
In one of the treacly encomiums that we are forced to endure around this time of year, multiracialist activist R. Jay Allain writes: "King saw the suffering of his people and watched when he told his 6-year old daughter that she couldn't go to the local amusement park because she was not white; he saw 'the depressing clouds of inferiority begin to form in her little mental sky'..."
Whenever two racial groups are forced to live in the same territory, there will be suffering. Nowhere in nature does one biological group treat another group as 'equals,' no matter what rhetoric some humans may spout. It goes against nature; it's not going to happen. And since human inequality is an inescapable fact of nature, there will be superiority and inferiority. That is inevitable and unchangeable. And while I don't believe for a moment that this monster King cared at all for the daughters of even his own race much less any other race, let's just imagine for a moment that he did, that he was sincere. Now there is no such thing as an all-White playground, or an all-White school, or an all-White restaurant, or an all-White theatre. For all practical purposes, that is forbidden by law. So St. Martin the Red has triumphed. He got his way. I ask, what was the cost? In multiracialist America, there may be no more all-White playgrounds, but there are all-Black and all-Mestizo playgrounds in areas where White people no longer feel safe, no longer are willing to send their children. And in many of these areas even non-Whites fear to send their children for fear of the animalistic criminals that inhabit them. So Martin Luther King's twisted dream has triumphed. And it is a nightmare, not a dream.
King and his employers manipulated our willingness to believe, our empathy, our concern for the weak and the downtrodden, our yearning for justice. All of these qualities within us are a part of our genetic inheritance, are a part of our nature, and we couldn't eliminate them even if we wanted to, and so we must regard them as good and as a given. Our altruism developed within us over many millennia while we lived only among our own kind. That is the key -- among our own kind. We must reserve our altruism for our own kind and for preserving the environment
necessary for the life of our own kind. Within the limits it was meant to serve, it can perform miracles. Extended to those who want to destroy us, it is suicidal.
King made emotional and naive Whites snivel and shed tears for the little Black girl who couldn't go to the playground or the amusement park. And now we have whole cities -- the once-great prides of our civilization -- where White people have been evicted and excluded on pain of maiming or death, where Whites are murdered and robbed and raped every day. How many White children are killed or crippled -- how many White children are never born because their mother or father was a victim of this insane policy of retreat from the nation -- from the world --
that once was ours? Now is the time for the shedding of tears.
King claimed that he saw 'the depressing clouds of inferiority begin to form in her little mental sky' -- those White children who were killed or who were never born have no mental sky, no future, nothing. Now is the time for the shedding of tears, shedding of tears for the death of something beautiful, something irreplaceable, something sacred. The losses have been great. But it is not too late to save our race. After we repent for the sins we have committed against our own children, we must cease the shedding of tears and do what is right to ensure that White children will still be being born 10,000 years from now.
[ ]
In 2004, we're ten years closer to the day in 2037, when a federal judge's order to keep the FBI files on 'Martin Luther King, Jr.' sealed will expire. On that day everyone expects -- especially the King insiders who pushed to have the files sealed in the first place -- that all of what I've said about King's Jewish Communist handlers and his perverted and promiscuous race-mixing sex escapades will be confirmed, in spades. The Jews are probably betting that by 2037, it won't matter a bit if the files are unsealed. They're won't be enough of a White community left, they hope, to do or say anything against their tyranny by that time. Their myth about King will have served its purpose by then, Whites will be utterly dispossessed, powerless, and well on their way to extinction by then, they hope. They reason, probably correctly, that, if their racial mixing program is successful, that the mulatto "Americans" of the future won't have the inclination or the reasoning ability to draw the correct conclusions from the FBI files on King even if they cared about them, which is itself doubtful. If the level of corruption and dishonesty in America continues to increase apace until 2037, it's also doubtful that there will be anything left in those files and that what is "released" will be anything but brazen forgeries designed to serve someone's political or career agenda of the moment.
Well, it's your responsibility and my responsibility to make sure that those hopes and dreams of the Jewish billionaire media elite are frustrated and that you and your children and your children's children will be around to see the files and the full truth unsealed. If we really do our job well, it will happen long before 2037, because a new kind of judge in a new kind of America will rightly decide that the truth should come out as soon as possible. The nightmare will be over. I plan to be there. How about you?

* * *

The philosopher Savitri Devi called it 'enthralling.' Dr. William Pierce called it "a survival manual for the White race." Revilo Oliver of the University of Illinois, one of the leading classicists of the last century, called it "unique... a veritable encyclopaedia of everything that is directly pertinent to our race's position in the world today."
The book is William Gayley Simpson's Which Way Western Man?, which was unavailable for years and which has just been republished in a new edition by National Vanguard Books.
William Simpson began his career as a graduate, summa cum laude, of a major theological seminary, and became a Franciscan brother working among the poor and disenfranchised in an attempt to make a better world. Simpson saw the magnitude of the problems he and his comrades were trying to solve, and realized that the ameliorative work in which they were engaged would never solve the problems they were tackling, and could at best only slow down the steady decline of our civilization and of human quality generally.
He read the great philosophers, particularly Nietzsche, and from the 1920s to 1980 kept a written record of his quest for truth and for the meaning of life, which he found in the never-ending quest to increase human excellence and quality. Which Way Western Man? is the result of that quest, and it is one of the most important books of the last 100 years.
Published in 1980, the first edition sold out within a few years and was not reprinted, as the author was working, throughout the 80s and until his death in the 1990s, on a series of revisions and additions which reflected new knowledge and the mature final insights of the author. At last, the monumental job of revision has been completed and the second edition of Which Way Western Man? is now available.
Which Way Western Man? is more than just a work of history, philosophy, and science, although it is all of that -- it is also the story of a life, the life of an unusually sensitive and compassionate man, a man who could understand the mission of St. Francis as well as that of Nietzsche -- a man who could see our position in the universe and relate it to the ordinary reader in a way that no other writer has ever done. I recommend Which Way Western Man? with my highest commendation. It is a life-changing book.
Which Way Western Man? is available as item number 407 from National Vanguard Books. This huge, encyclopedic work of 1070 pages is $39.95 plus $3 shipping and handling in the U.S., $5 elsewhere in the world. That's item 407 for $39.95 plus $3 in the U.S., $5 world, to National Vanguard Books, Box 330, Hillsboro WV 24946 USA. Or you can order online by clicking on the book's image at
Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: "Freedom is not free; free men are not equal, and equal men are not free."


For the latest contact, donation, and other update information regarding Kevin Alfred Strom, please visit his web page at Please also visit, and Prices, addresses, and availability information pertaining to materials cited in his works are subject to change.

Please also visit the America First Institute donation page.




Flag carried by the 3rd Maryland Regiment at the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781

© America First Books
America First Books offers many viewpoints that are not necessarily its own in order to provide additional perspectives.