Pizza Racism and Other Servings
by Kevin Alfred Strom
Free Speech, September 1996
Volume II, Number 9
hen the enemies of our people first began to promote racial integration
and non-White immigration three decades and more ago they told us that
what they were proposing was just "fairness" and "equal opportunity."
They insisted that our society would not change substantially, that we
would just be "sharing" it with a few long-suffering, disadvantaged
victims of discrimination.
When patriots protested that the real purpose of the "integration"
program was not fairness but racemixing and the genetic destruction of
the White race we were viciously attacked as "haters" and "extremists."
While in private the enemies of our people approved of and desired
nothing more than "integration" at the DNA level, in public they
pooh-poohed the possibility that "civil rights" laws or Third World
immigration would have such an effect.
Now it is painfully evident that the "racist extremists" were absolutely
right. Now racial mixing is being actively and disgustingly promoted in
every avenue possible. It is being promoted by the Jews and the
corporate billionaires on the electromagnetic waves of television and
radio. It is being printed onto millions of miles of photographic
emulsions. It is being engraved in the ones and zeroes of digital disks
and diskettes. It is being printed on forest upon forest's worth of
newsprint and magazine paper.
It is also abundantly clear that the "racist extremists" were absolutely
right when they said our society would be profoundly changed by Third
World immigration and by the "integration" program. Our great cities
should have progressed triumphantly into the 21st century: Instead they
are now regressing to the level of the jungle.
A recent wire service article from Britain shows that America is not
alone in suffering the slow suicide of multiracialism. Let me share with
you some excerpts from this report, entitled "Portraits of a Love with
No Colour Bar"
BRITAIN - Four out of ten young black men who are married or in steady
relationships live with white women, according to Government figures.
The first full national census study of ethnic minorities in Britain
also shows that 40 per cent of black children are in single parent
This is a striking contrast to the 15 per cent of white children and ten
percent of Asian youngsters in the same situation. The single-parent
family is so much a part of Caribbean tradition, says the report, that
more than a quarter of Britain's black population lives in one.
The figures -- which come from detailed analysis of the 1991 census, in
which race was a question for the first time show a widening of the
ethnic mix, with increasing numbers of white women taking black husbands
The women, many middle-class and well educated, are giving birth to a
new generation of mixed-race children.
Researchers estimate that by the early 1990s out of a total ethnic
population of 350,000 children aged under four, 70,000 were of mixed
race. The 40 per cent of men of Caribbean origin who have chosen white
partners are aged 16 to 34. Around 20 per cent of black Caribbean women
in the same age group are married or in steady relationships with white
. . . In the Caribbean, there is a tradition of couples having children
without being legally married. According to the report, they either live
together or are joined in a regular sexual partnership known as a
'visiting union.' There is an emphasis on the mother-child bond and a
lack of emphasis on the conjugal one.
Of course the "Caribbean tradition" the writer talks about is really
nothing of the kind. It's an African tradition. It's so persistent, this
absent-father syndrome, among those of African ancestry that it exists
to some degree wherever Blacks are found.
The absent-father syndrome is a problem for the Africans. It should not
be a problem for us. It has become a problem because we are stupid
enough to subsidize it and because the behavior of Whites is negatively
affected by social integration with Blacks. The real problem, however,
in every White country, not just Britain, is the nuclear warfare taking
place. I'm not talking about the fission or fusion of hydrogen atoms.
I'm talking about something far more deadly -- far more dangerous. I'm
talking about the death of our race by warfare taking place at the level
of the cellular nucleus. I'm talking about the warfare against our race
by the union of our genetic material with those of other races, a
process which can never be undone and which means death for us far more
surely than does warfare by hydrogen bomb.
* * *
After the recent bombing in Atlanta, Georgia, the controlled media were
very quick to air footage of bomb-making plans supposedly available on
the Internet. I think I can be forgiven for suspecting that they had the
tapes already cued up and ready to roll. They are champing at the bit in
their zeal to scare the boobs into supporting censorship of the 'Net.
They show us bomb plans on the 'Net but do not show us bomb plans
available in thousands of libraries and from the Government Printing
Our opponents have also created a false link between so-called "racism"
and pornography by constantly pairing them in their shrill calls for
governmental controls on electronic speech.
But when those who support multiculturalism talk violently or wave
weapons and bomb-making books around the controlled media keep their
silence and smile approvingly. Consider this report we received from the
Aryan News Agency:
The music group Rage Against The Machine has a new album out called Evil Empire, which is number one on the music charts.
There was recently a report about them on MTV. They interviewed two
members of the band who appear to be mulattos. To let the audience know
the "political ideals" of the band one had a baseball cap with the word
"commie" on the front.
They have extreme ...[leftist] political messages in their music. I
noticed the album cover for Evil Empire has a young,
blue-eyed White boy on it in a super-hero-like costume [showing the
audience they are aiming for]. Inside the album they have a list of
"suggested reading," which, according to MTV, includes books about the
Black Panthers, Mumia Abu-Jamal, guerrilla warfare, and [an infamous
bomb-making manual] called The Anarchist Cookbook.
They said they hope to attract people to their political beliefs with
Where are the media and critics who call for the banning of White Power
groups and albums due to their content? Do we see any calls for
boycotts of record stores that sell this album? No! Instead, this
group is promoted on television and radio and they are considered
thought-provoking young intellectuals. The double-standard that exists
in our society is overwhelmingly against anything White and will promote
anything that is anti-White.
Indeed. And I must mention another gross instance of media hypocrisy.
When Nichols and McVeigh were arrested for allegedly setting off the
bomb at the Federal Building in Oklahoma City it was almost supernatural
how the media spin doctors went into action blaming the bombing on
"racists," despite the fact that one of the suspected pair was married
to a non-White and must be presumed to be an anti-racist. They made much
of the fact that Timothy McVeigh, like hundreds of thousands of other
people around the world, had read the novel The Turner Diaries. But did these same controlled media tell you that the suspected
Unabomber read, studied, underlined sections of, and made copious notes
in the margins of another book? Did these same controlled media tell you
that this other book was found among the few possessions in the suspect
eco-terrorist's remote cabin hideout? Was this book on their list of the
other books which were found there? Did they call for suppression of
this book and others like it in print or on the Internet? No, of course
not. What was this "inspiring" work, so influential in Theodore
Kaczynski's thinking? It is entitled Earth in the Balance, and it was written by a man named Al Gore, Jr., who just happens
to be vice president of the United States.
* * *
Let us look, for a moment, at terrorism from a different perspective. A
very large percentage of the terrorism in the United States is not the
result of domestic issues. For years the FBI listed the Jewish Defense
League and its allies as the greatest domestic terrorists, though the
Jewish-dominated media never told you that. And no one could possibly be
unaware of the terrorist threat from radical Arab groups outraged at
America's support for Israeli murder and conquest.
My question is this: Why are we allowing these Middle Easterners, these
non-Americans and non-Whites, to bring their quarrels and wars and
killings and bombings over here? While I understand the anger felt by
Arabs at the Jewish theft of their land and slaughtering of their
people, and while I say that all American support for the Israeli state
should be ended immediately, I think we should insist that these Middle
Easterners fight their wars on their own turf. The multiracialists
brought them here, and they are responsible for the deaths of innocent
American men, women, and children. If they are so fond of "diversity"
and the death it brings, let them go too.
But we have foolishly allowed aliens to rule over us, to own our media
and dominate our government. I often point out the destructive effects
of Jewish power in the United States, but letting any alien group have
power over our people is a sin that cannot be forgiven.
Recently a group in Congress led by Republican Senator Alan Simpson
managed to shift the balance of power just enough so that it looked as
though a cut in legal immigration quotas might pass. As Simpson put it:
Polls clearly show that some 70 per cent. of Americans favor reductions
in both illegal and legal immigration. Two-thirds of our immigration is
legal, so trying to reduce illegal immigration alone is not sufficient.
The Knight-Ridder News service reports that:
Currently, the U.S. issues an unlimited [!] number of visas for the
foreign-born spouses, parents and minor children of its citizens, about
250,000 a year.
An additional 226,000 visas are available for the adult children,
brothers and sisters of citizens, and for the spouses and minor children
of legal permanent residents who do not yet have citizen status.
In addition, 140,000 visas are available to employers who seek to hire
foreign workers, and 55,000 visas are available through a lottery.
Simpson proposed to cut each of these categories and to cap family
reunification visas at 480,000, a proposal that would have reduced legal
immigration by a third over the next three years....
Mr. Simpson's proposal is a very modest proposal indeed, and hardly
sufficient to solve our out-of-control immigration problem. But another
Republican, Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan, was determined that
immigration quotas not be reduced. With procedural nods from Republican
nabobs like Bob Dole, he initiated moves that killed the quota
reductions. Leftist pro-immigration groups were ecstatic, and the
controlled media began to heap praise on Abraham for his "compassion,"
for his support, for what he himself called "open borders and ethnic
diversity." Abraham further stated:
I felt it was important for the party to be out front on this side of
the issue rather than to be seen as a nativist party that was hostile to
people who came from diverse ethnic backgrounds.
The libertarian Cato Institute, another supporter of unlimited Third
World immigration, also gave credit where credit was due. Their
spokesman Stuart Anderson said:
If Spencer Abraham hadn't been elected to the U.S. Senate, we would have
seen cuts to legal immigration this year. . .
Frank Sharry, the executive director of the pro-immigration "National
Immigration Forum," stated:
For some of us, it was the first time we'd ever met with a Republican
senator. And I remember thinking I didn't know what to expect. It was
like 'This guy's speaking to me.' It's affected my entire view of the
Isn't it wonderful, friends? Now the multiracialists will have two
parties to choose from, while White Americans have none. It seems
terrible from a conservative point of view -- there is no representation
for traditional White Americans at all in the current establishment. But
for those who know that the current establishment is an utterly rotten
occupation regime, it is actually a positive development. It bodes well
for the awakening of our people and their ultimate abandonment of the
sellout political gangs called Democrats and Republicans.
I almost forgot to mention that the "heroic" Spencer Abraham is an Arab
of Lebanese descent, and he has just given us an object lesson in what
happens when you are stupid enough to think that the race of your
leaders does not matter.
* * *
LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ -- The Lawrenceville School Board declared last month
that henceforth a new holiday would be added to their schedule. It was
to be called "Million Man March Day," but disappointed school board
members canceled it when they discovered that the march was not an
annual event, according to school board president Lincoln Green. Had the
march been annual as they had hoped, the holiday would have taken the
place of Veteran's Day, which had been eliminated from the schedule.
* * *
Have you heard of the latest burning issue in San Francisco's Black
community? It's "Pizza Racism."
The following is from an ANA wire report:
SAN FRANCISCO -- Domino's "30 minutes or it's free policy" could grow
you a beard in San Francisco's urban housing projects.
Plagued by robberies and even murders, pizza shops and other delivery
businesses from FedEx to florists stay out of the projects. Willie
Kennedy, San Francisco's former city supervisor, who lives in the tough
Bayview/Hunter's Point district, calls it "racism." She was quoted as
saying that the reason for no pizza delivery in the projects 'can only
be because we are black people.'
Apparently trying to stay alive is now racism.
Kennedy stated, 'This neighborhood has been ostracized. They think every
African-American is a criminal.' Before retiring in May, Kennedy pushed
through an ordinance requiring businesses that make deliveries to make
deliveries to all neighborhoods. Businesses responded by stopping
delivery services altogether.
Dorothy Erlich, executive director of the ACLU of Northern California,
calls the law an important 'commitment to civil rights.'
The California Restaurant Association protested the law, saying it
violates federal occupational health and safety laws, which make it
illegal to force workers into hazardous situations. The restaurateurs
also warn that workers' compensation premiums would increase
Supporters countered by saying that the fines imposed were a fair way to
stop racism and that Blacks needed the law to allow them to sue
recalcitrant businesses. They also stated that the law is a model for
The Board of Supervisors has now softened the measure by allowing
delivery services to refuse to go to certain homes if they have a 'good
faith' belief that so doing would be 'an unreasonable risk of harm.'
In Kennedy's absence, the addendum passed unanimously.
Just imagine a multi-million dollar lawsuit for failure to deliver a
pizza to a Negro in the projects! It's coming. Stranger things will
happened. America, you have truly gone insane.