Quotes Without Comment
American Dissident Voices broadcast
March 12, 1994
by Kevin Alfred Strom
There is astounding information available to the dedicated
researcher in our libraries, at least those few that have not yet
engaged in the politically correct frenzy of selling off or
throwing away all books published before 1965. There is even
valuable information available on the major news wire services,
if one has access to them as we do here, or even hidden away on
the back pages of a few newspapers. The problem is that this
information, even when its dissemination is vital to the survival
of our nation, is not brought to the attention of our people
because of the anti-American bias and control of our major news media.
Today I will present to you, without comment, quotations from a
wide variety of sources. Decide for yourself their meaning and
import in this age of increasing repression and thought control.
Decide for yourself if the controlled media have deliberately
First, we have the following report, which was issued by the
Associated Press, but its implications have not been emphasized
by the controlled media:
WASHINGTON (AP) -- World population is growing at the
fastest pace ever and virtually all growth is in the
Third World, according to a survey of released Tuesday by
a research group.
The annual survey by the
Washington-based Population Reference Bureau, said,
"We are at a point where, except for the United
States, population growth is essentially a Third World phenomenon."
The survey predicted world population will reach 5.5
billion by mid-1993, 40 percent of it in China and India.
The bureau said population is growing each year by 90
million, roughly the population of Mexico.
Carl Haub, a demographer who worked on the study, said
that world population will grow to 8.5 billion by the
year 2025, "only if birth rates continue to come
down as expected. If they don't, growth will be even
Haub said that if it were not for the relatively high
U.S. increase, all growth in the world would be in poor
areas. [The US increase is largely due to immigration and
growth among non-Whites. White Americans are failing to
Europe's population is virtually stagnant with a
growth rate of 0.2 percent a year. "This virtually guarantees
population decline by the turn of the century," Haub
States of the former Soviet Union have been growing at
0.6 percent. But there was a wide gap between Russia and
Ukraine, where population is declining, and the Muslim
republics of central Asia, which are growing at more than
The world's fastest growing area is the poorest:
sub-Saharan Africa with a population growth rate of 3
percent a year meaning that population will double in 20
years. Latin America is growing at 1.9 percent.
Asia is growing at a rate of 1.7 percent. But without
China, whose strict and controversial birth control
program is responsible for a sharp drop in growth to 1.2
percent, Asia's rate is 2.1 percent.
Next, we quote writer Peter Brimelow in the Miami Herald:
Just as New York City's government can't stop muggers but does
a great job ticketing young women on Park Avenue for failing to
scoop up after their lapdogs, current U.S. immigration policy in
effect enforces the law only against those who obey it. Annual
legal immigration of some 950,000 - counting 140,000 refugees and
the 100,000 granted political asylum - is overwhelmed by the 2 to
3 million illegal entries into the country every year, which result
in a net annual increase of perhaps 250,000 illegal aliens. (A
cautious estimate - again, no one really knows.) American
liberals, of course, are determinedly, even devoutly, incurious
about this subject. You quickly learn not to raise such matters
with them at all.
The silence of American conservatives has a more complex
cause. To a significant degree, it's due to sheer ignorance. In
the early 1970s, a battle-scarred Goldwater veteran brushed aside
my news from the INS waiting rooms. The U.S., he said, was far
too big for immigration to have any but the most marginal effect. When
later I showed him a news report that the inflow from the former
British West Indies had quintupled during the previous decade, he
was astonished. (These numbers add up. By 1973, over 220,000 West Indians
lived in the New York area alone. And it was just the beginning.
The number of Jamaicans immigrating to the U.S. between 1951 and
1980 amounted to more than a tenth of the island's population. By 1990,
almost another tenth of Jamaica had arrived in the U.S., the
highest proportion from any country in the world.)
Very few people can absorb new realities after the age of 21.
And conservative leaders now in their fifties spent their
formative years in one of the greatest lulls in the history of
American immigration - the result of restrictive quota
legislation designed to favor Northern Europeans in the 1920s, followed
by the Depression and World War II. Amazingly, only about 500,000
legal immigrants entered the U.S. in the whole of the 1930s. (In
those days, there was virtually no illegal immigration.) And only
about a million entered in the 1940s - including World War II
refugees. By contrast, of course, the U.S. accepted over 1.5
million immigrants, counting only legals, in the single year of
The Great Immigration Lull was ended dramatically by the 1965
Immigration Act. Typical of so many Great Society reforms, it was
passed amid much moralizing rhetoric and promptly had exactly the opposite
of its advertised effect.
U.S. immigration policy was not transformed without debate.
There was a debate. It just bore no relationship to what
subsequently happened. In particular, staunch defenders of the
national-origins quota system, like the American Legion, allowed
themselves to be persuaded that the new legislation really enacted
a sort of world-wide quota, no longer skewed toward Northern
Europe-a policy easily caricatured as "racist" in the
era of the civil-rights movement-but still restricting over-all
immigration to the then-current level of around 300,000.
Today, it is astonishing to read the categorical assurances
given by supporters of the 1965 Immigration Act. "What the
bill will not do," summarized Immigration Subcommittee
chairman Senator Edward Kennedy: First, our cities will not be
flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed
bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the
same...Secondly, the ethnic mix will not be upset...Contrary to the
charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America
with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most
populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia...
Every one of these assurances has proved false.
Next we hear the words of Sir Francis Galton, from his -
Hereditary Talent and Character (1865)
Our human civilized stock is far more weakly through
congenital imperfection that that of any other species of
animals, whether wild or domestic. If the twentieth part of the
cost and pains were spent in measures for the improvement of the
human race that is spent on the improvement of the breed of horse and
cattle, what a galaxy of genius might we not create.
The scientist Charles Darwin said in his -
The Descent of Man (1871)
We now know, through the admirable labors of Mr. Galton, that
genius tends to be inherited.
Darwin's colleague, Alfred Russell Wallace, stated in 1872:
In one of my latest conversations with Darwin, he expressed
himself very gloomily on the future of humanity, on the ground
that in our modern civilization natural selection had no play,
and the fittest did not survive.
The great writer and author of Brave New World, Aldous Huxley,
wrote in his Brave New World Revisited in 1958:
In this second half of the twentieth century we do nothing
systematic about our breeding; but in our random and unregulated
way we are not only overpopulating our planet, we are also, it
would seem, making sure that these greater numbers shall be of
biologically poorer quality.
From the pen of Dr. Alexander Graham Bell, best known for his
invention of the telephone and his founding of the National
Geographic Society, we read in his 1898 article in -
The Journal Of Heredity:
At the present time considerable alarm has been expressed at
the apparently growing disinclination of American women to bear
children, and a cry has been raised against what people call race
From the New York Times of February 11, 1986, we read from an
article entitled - "HALF OF U.S. COUPLES CAN'T HAVE
Nearly half of all [white] couples of childbearing age in the
United States are physically unable to have children, as
Americans increasingly choose sterilization to limit their new
families, according to Government statistics.
Next, we quote from President Abraham Lincoln in one of the
famous Lincoln-Douglas debates:
"I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in
favor of bringing about in any way the social and political
equality of the white and black races - that I am not, nor ever
have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of
qualifying them to hold office, nor to inter-marry with white people;
and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical
difference between the white and black races which I believe will
forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social
and political equality."
Next from his Notes for Speeches, September 1859, Collected
Works, Vol 3, p 399, we read the words of Abraham Lincoln:
Negro equality! Fudge! How long, in the government of a God
great enough to make and maintain the Universe, shall there
continue knaves to vend, and fools to gulp, so low a piece of
demagoguism as this?
From Abraham Lincoln's Address on Colonization to a Deputation
of Negroes in Washington , D.C. on August 14, 1862 (Collected
Works, Vol. V, p. 371) we read the following:
- See our present condition -- the country engaged in war!
-- our White men cutting one another's throats ... and
then consider what we know to be truth.
But for your
race among us there could not be war, although many men
engaged on either side do not care for you one way or the
other ... It is better for us both, therefore, to be
You and we are different races. We have between us a
broader difference than exists between almost any other
two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not
discuss, but this physical difference is a great
disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very
greatly, many of them by living among us, while ours
suffers from your presence. In a word, we suffer on each
side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason at least
why we should be separated.
Our next quote without comment is from Thomas Jefferson's
autobiography, first published by his grandson, Thomas Jefferson
Randolph in 1829 and again published by special Act of Congress
in 1853. I quote from page 51, dated January 6, 1821:
"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate
than that these people [the Blacks] are to be free; nor is it
less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the
same government. Nature, habit, opinion have drawn indelible
lines of distinction between them. It is still in our power to
direct the process of emancipation and deportation, peaceably,
and in such slow degree, as that the evil will wear off insensibly, and
their place be ...filled up by free White laborers. If, on the
contrary, it is left to force itself on, human nature must
shudder at the prospect held up."
Our next item is from Black Nationalist leader Malcolm X, who
"Give us some land of our own and let us go for
And now this revealing quote from a leading operative of the
New World Order and former director of the UN's World Health
Organization, a Mr. Brock Chisholm, as printed in USA Magazine for August 12th, 1955:
"What people everywhere must do is practice birth control
and miscegenation in order to create one race in one world under
Next we hear from Reverend George E. Simons, who as the
Superintendent of the Methodist Episcopal Church in Petrograd
from 1907 to 1918 was an eyewitness to the Bolshevik Revolution.
He testified before the United States Senate and his statement
can be found in Volume III of United States Senate Document No.
62, 66th Congress, First Session:
Out of 388 members of the new Russian government, only 16
happened to be Russians. One was an American Black. All the rest,
371, were Jews. Of these 371 Jewish Bolshevik leaders, no less
than 265 of them were from the Lower East Side of New York City.
From the Jewish World of February 9, 1883 we read:
"The great ideal of Judaism is that the whole world shall
be imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a universal
brotherhood of nations - a greater Judaism in fact - all the
separate races and religions shall disappear."
In The American Hebrew of September 10, 1920 we read:
"The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of
Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning,
whose goal is to create a new order in the world. What was
performed in so excellent a way in Russia ... shall also, through
the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over
In the American Bulletin of May 15, 1935, Rabbi Stephen S.
"Some call it Marxism - I call it Judaism."
From the book The Nineteenth Century and After, published in
London in November 1923, page 695, author Henry Pearson tells us:
The Bolsheviki have employed every form of cruelty it is
possible to devise, and gloat over the sufferings of their
victims. The movement is run almost exclusively by Jews. Nearly
every commissar is a Jew, and nearly all of them speak English,
most of them with an American accent."
Jewish author Dr. Lewis Harap, in the magazine Jewish Life for
June 1951, page 20, reveals:
On May 29, 1950... in the Chicago Tribune ...three prominent
American Jews, Felix Frankfurter, Henry Morgenthau Jr., and
Herbert H. Lehman ...were called the secret government of the
United States and were linked with world communism.... The
article was written by Walter Trohan, the Tribune's top Washington
In an interview with a New York Times reporter on Christmas,
1921, the great industrialist and patriot Henry Ford stated as
"It was the Jews themselves who convinced me of the
direct relationship between the international Jew and war. In
fact, they went out of their way to convince me. On the peace
ship were two very prominent Jews. We had not been at sea 200
miles before they began telling me of the power of the Jewish
race, of how they controlled the world through their control of
gold, and that the Jew and no one but the Jew could end the war.
I was reluctant to believe it but they went into detail to
convince me of the means by which the Jews controlled the war,
how they had the money, how they had cornered all the basic materials
needed to fight the war and all that, and they talked so long and
so well that they convinced me. They said, and they believed,
that the Jews started the war, that they would continue it as
long as they wished, and that until the Jew stopped the war it
could not be stopped. I was so disgusted I would have liked to
turn the ship back."
Jewish international banker James Paul Warburg in a speech
before the United States Senate on February 17, 1950, said:
We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The
only question is whether World Government will be achieved by
conquest or consent.
In a letter written in the last century to Karl Marx,
reprinted in La Revue de Paris for June 1, 1928, Jewish writer
Baruch Levy stated -- and note carefully the phraseology
The Jewish people as a whole will be its own messiah. It will
attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the
abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the
establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will
everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New
World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders
without encountering opposition.
On October 13th, 1939 the following broadcast was made by the
great aviator and patriot Charles Lindbergh, a part of his effort
to prevent the horrible slaughter of World War II. In this case I
have an actual recording of which I present a small excerpt:
Our bond with Europe is a bond of race, and not of political
ideology. It is the European race we must preserve: political
progress will follow. Racial strength is vital -- politics a
luxury. If the White race is ever seriously threatened, it may
then be time for us to take our part in its protection: to fight
side by side with English, French, and Germans -- but not with
one against the other for our mutual destruction. Let us not dissipate
our strength, or help Europe to dissipate hers in these wars of
politics and possession.
With those words of Charles Lindbergh I bring to a close my
collection of Quotes Without Comment.
Ladies and gentlemen, dear listeners, we have been lied to and
distracted and misled and duped, many of us for our entire lives.
The true history of our nation and the world has been witheld
from us, and we and our children and grandchildren are being
manipulated to accept a predatory and destructive World Government, the
so-called "New World Order" that Bill Clinton and
George Bush are so fond of talking about. The people behind the
New World Order hate America. They hate every free nation, for
free nations are an obstacle to world power. They are the ones
who are taking our children and filling their brains with lies in the
public schools. They are the ones who are sponsoring the invasion
of our nation by the impoverished masses of the Third World. They
are the killers of an entire generation of our people in the
If we do not oppose them to the greatest extent that we are able, we shall have proved ourselves unfit to survive in the real world.
The latest, just-printed edition of our patriotic magazine,
National Vanguard, contains the most revealing article ever
written on the history of these subverters of our Republic. Every
American - and every man or woman who cares about the future of
our civilization - should read this precedent-setting article
written by National Alliance Chairman Dr. William Pierce. It also
contains very important information on the current drive to disarm
and silence all Americans, and much much more - information you
cannot get from any other source. You can receive a copy of this
magazine for a gift of $4 or more to keep this program on the air
as our Radio Offer Number 24. Just send $4 or more, as much as
you can afford, to the address our announcers will give in a
moment, and remember to ask for Radio Offer Number 24. With your
help, I'll see you next week on American Dissident Voices.