Thank you Richard Cotten. Often one hears the cry from the
controlled media that America is becoming increasingly
"polarized," the implication being that we are losing
our national unity and national will, and are increasingly
becoming split up into feuding interest groups.
I hate to break it to the conventional commentators, but
America lost its national unity and its national will a long time
ago. When Americans had a clearly defined national culture and
racial identity, both of them European by the way, then it could
be said that we had national unity, and that we shared enough
values in common for there to be such a thing as a national will.
I agree that those are desirable things, and no one who is old
enough to remember what it was like 30 years ago would disagree
with me when I say that those were far happier times for America.
What anti-American forces have done to this country is break
down our sense of ethnic and cultural identity, break down our
race-based sense of national unity, and force upon us a spurious
unity based on an enforced belief in an ethic of
"diversity" and "multiculturalism." It is the
breakdown of this spurious unity that Establishment Liberal and
Conservative commentators decry when they wail about our
increasingly "polarized" society.
Never mind that any halfway intelligent 9-year-old could have
told you that trying to convert America into a multicultural,
multilingual, multiracial stew wasn't going to work, that it
would just result in the splitting of our society into dozens or
hundreds of incompatible and squabbling interest groups. And never
mind the fact that this gigantic Liberal Social Experiment was
imposed upon us by both Republicans and Democrats and that
American people were never given a choice in the matter. Never
mind the fact that this social experiment is hurting everyone,
including those racial minorities that it is supposed to benefit,
by wiping out thousands of generations of racial and cultural
heritage and replacing them with a throwaway Pepsi-Cola consumer culture
that guarantees the genetic death of any race or group that
adopts it. Never mind all that.
Let's just focus on this so-called "polarization." I
say it's a good thing. Positions are being delineated, lines are
being drawn, choices are being made. The false unity enforced by
the Establishment is breaking down, in all areas of our society.
In politics, the phony middle ground occupied by such faceless
servants of the system as George Bush and Bill Clinton is
shrinking, and voices that represent real alternatives are
starting to be heard. All to the good, I say, when the forces
that hate America and American values and traditions are forced
to display their true colors. And all to the good when decent
Americans stand up for all that is right in the most honest and
forthright manner possible, instead of trying to be
"reasonable" and "inoffensive." If homosexuality
is evil, let's say so. If racial mixing goes against nature and
against our most deeply held values, let's say so. And if the
Bill Clinton team really thinks that sodomy is a moral right, and that
world government should replace American freedom, then let them
say so openly! The only alternative to such "polarization"
is a continuation of the deception by which America's enemies
have ruled us since 1933.
A listener recently sent me a copy of an article from the El
Cajon Daily Californian by John Leo. It seems Mr. Leo attended
the biennial art show at the Whitney Museum of American Art in
New York City. Polarization was dramatically evident there.
"When you pay your $6 to see the big ... art show at New
York's Whitney Museum ... the fellow at the cash register gives
you a little attendance pin to wear. Mine said: 'I can't imagine
ever wanting to be white.' In a flash, you know you've stumbled
into yet another politically correct art show meant to frighten the
white folks (and, of course, the male folks and the straight
folks).
"... 'Whiteness is a signifier of power,' the catalog
explains, and wearing the button lets whites 'absolve themselves
of some of the privileges of cultural imperialism.'"
In the women's section, one work of "art" is a piece
of plastic imitation vomit, just like the ones sold in novelty
stores except much larger. Another piece of "art" by
Sue Williams consists of just the words "The art world can
suck my proverbial -----." (If I told you what that blank
stood for, this program couldn't be aired.) According to the
catalog, this artistic statement "wrenches painting away
from its white male domain." Another grotesque work shows
casts of a disembodied larynx and tongue, made out of lipstick. We
are informed that this represents "the silencing of women
through specifically gendered material," whatever that
means.
Donald Moffet's "Oh Baby, Sheet With ..." (Well,
again I can't even read the last word of the title without getting
thrown off the air) consists only of a sheet with a hole in it.
This object was missing from the show when Leo attended, however,
because someone had touched the nearby work "Chocolate Gnaw,"
a giant piece of brown lard by Janine Antoni, and had then wiped
his or her hands on the "Oh, Baby..." sheet, apparently
not realizing that it was a work of art. The giant piece of brown
lard, in case you can't guess, "critiques a patriarchal
community where eating is transgressive," according to the catalog.
I am not making this up.
Leo concludes with his estimate of what the viewer of the show
was supposed to have learned: "In two numbing hours at this
organized shambles, I learned that the world is neatly divided
into good and bad. [The Good are] women, non-whites, homosexuals,
transvestites, gang members, glory holes, people with AIDS, [and]
gays in the military. [The Bad are] America, straight white
males, family, religion, hierarchies, lipstick, ... and penises not
attached to gay men.
"This is one more grim, whining, monocultural show, with
all the voices singing the same old song, 'Hey, hey, ho, ho,
Western Culture's Gotta Go,' (lyrics by Stanford University and
Jesse Jackson). In a phrase used at all these shows, it's about
replacing the center (mainstream America and its values) with the margin
(the race and gender ideologues and their allies).
"The Whitney catalog makes this clear [when they say]
'Marginality, in effect, has become the norm while the center is
increasingly undefinable and perhaps irrelevant.' In other words,
it's about a cultural war to destabilize and break the
mainstream."
I agree, it is a cultural war. And the moneyed forces that are
destroying this country are enlisting many, though not all, of
our young artists and students into this war against us. Older
Americans might find it hard to believe, but shows such as the
one I just mentioned are the norm in the "art" world,
and a similar Politically Correct dictatorship exists on
virtually every high school and college campus as well. But I
also say it is good for our enemies to be so open about their
agenda. It just might startle a few White Americans into
awakening from their TV-induced slumber.
Let me give you another example of polarization. This is an
article sent in by a listener, from the Associated Press as
printed in the New Orleans Times-Picayune of last September. The
article is entitled "Forum on Crime, Genetics, on Hold After
Criticism."
"[Dateline] Baltimore -- A conference exploring possible
links between genetics and crime was postponed (indefinitely) ...
because federal money was withheld amid sharp criticism from
Black leaders.
"The decision by the National Institutes of Health to
freeze $78,000 earmarked for the meeting at the University of
Maryland College Park amounts to an assault on academic freedom,
university officials said.
"'The crux of the conference was to look at research now
being done that either attempts to link genetics to crime or is
being construed as having that effect,' said organizer David
Wasserman, a legal scholar at the university's Institute for
Philosophy and Public Policy. 'The last thing in the world that
the conference wants to do is promote that crime and genetics are
linked.'
"Because some of this research is going on, it is
appropriate to debate the implications, but we have to make clear
that we are not saying that NIH validates the notion that there
is a link between genetics and crime.' (he said)
"[But according to Jim Williams, director of public
relations for the National Association for the Advancement of
Colored People,] 'We know that from the calls we have received
that there was quite a bit of concern about the direction of the
conference and I think that concern was justified.'
"Research that was to have been discussed included the
inheritability of behavioral characteristics, the neural biology
of behavior, and genetic markers for various behavior, Wasserman
said.
"'To sweep these issues under the rug because they offend
people is an absolute tragedy that run counter to the concept of
what a university is and does,' university spokesman Gary
Stephenson said."
Let me ask this question: Just what are the NAACP afraid of?
If there is no link between genetics and criminal behavior, then
the research that was to be discussed at the conference would
have confirmed that, and the NAACP's belief that "white
racism" and other environmental factors are the real causes
of high Black crime rates would be vindicated. Obviously, they
are afraid that the research would show that there IS a link
between genetics and crime, and they'd do anything to stop the
truth from getting out. Now it is certainly regrettable that
minority pressure groups have such a lockhold on our universities
that they can squelch even the discussion of certain
"forbidden" issues, but one must admit that the
strong-arm tactics of the anti-American forces in preventing
debate should show even the most deluded Liberal the real nature
of the forces with which he has mistakenly allied himself.
Actions like the cancelling of the University of Maryland
conference on genetics and crime have a good aspect because they
force people to take sides, many of them who might not ever have
thought about the issue before. The subversive groups that have virtually
ruled this country for decades are becoming drunk with their
power, they imagine that they've got everyone fooled, and because
of that they're starting to go too far.
Despite the fact that we are ruled by our enemies, America is
still a rich country, and most of us are so comfortable that we
can't be bothered with fighting to throw off our velvet chains.
Our situation is going to have to get worse before it can get
better, because only the experience of actual physical suffering
and intense psychological anguish will spur large numbers of
Americans to action. So the faster the Clintonistas accelerate
their program of converting the USA to the USSA, the better the
chances that Americans will still be a majority in this country
when the day of reckoning comes.
There is an old fable that says, "If you want to cook a
frog in boiling water, you can't just catch the frog and throw
him into the pot of boiling water. He'll immediately know what's
happening, jump out of the pot, and you'll have to catch him all
over again. Far better to put a pot of cool water on the stove,
put the frog in it, and ever-so-slowly bring the water to a boil.
The process of change from cool to boiling water occurs so slowly
that the frog doesn't know what's happening to him, and by the
time the water is boiling, it's too late." That's what the
enemies of this country have been doing to us for decades.
Imagine what the reaction would have been if the conspirators had
simply announced in 1945 that we were now living in a Soviet
America and were to become a province of a one-world government.
Their go-slow approach to subversion has been far more successful
than that would have been. But their overconfidence has caused them
to let their "New World Order" world government plans
out of the bag, and the pace of so-called "social
change" has been accelerating.
They've already made the third Monday in January a federal
holiday for a Communist agitator. Let's hope they make DC a state
and call it Mandelastan! Let's hope they make it a felony to
marry someone of your own race and the opposite sex! Let's hope
they screw up the economy so bad that all those stocks and bonds
held by comfortable White people become worthless overnight!
Let's hope that they tear down the Washington monument, and in
its place erect a 500 foot high statue of Martin Luther King
holding aloft a hammer and sickle! Let us hope that the enemies
of America, drunk with their vast power to tax and to regulate
us, will continue to disregard prudence and will go so far and so
fast as they remake America in their twisted homosexual,
multicultural, anti-American image -- so fast that they awaken us
-- so fast that they make even the slowest among us finally
exclaim -- "they're boiling us alive."
A New Outlet for ADV
We are sorry to have to say it, but it is a constant battle to
secure my right to speak freely on the public airwaves. There are
many threats to the continued airing of this program. One is the
so-called "Fairness Doctrine" which is now making its
way through Congress. It is very important for all of you to
understand just what this so-called "Fairness Doctrine"
is all about.
The Doctrine is promoted as a way to ensure that all points of
view on controversial issues of public importance are presented
on radio and television stations. Its actual effect, its intended
effect is the exact opposite -- it will stifle the expression of
all non-Establishment points of view.
Here's how it works: Under the Doctrine, if a station airs a
program dealing with a controversial issue -- say this program,
for example -- any individual or group with an opposing point of
view on that issue would be able to force the station to air its
opposing point of view free of charge. If the Communist Workers
Party or the NAACP don't like what I say on the radio, they would
be able to demand equal time without paying for it. This, of course,
would create a legal and logistical nightmare for radio and television
licensees, with the ultimate effect that they would be unwilling
to air any controversial programs at all, just to avoid all the hassle.
Another effect, also intended by the framers of the so-called
"Fairness Doctrine," would be to put the final decision
of what individuals and groups are given free time to air their views
into the hands of the Federal courts. We much prefer the present
situation, where honorable Americans are still free to purchase time
on independent stations. If someone opposes our views, then, by God,
let them purchase time just like we do! Today, by purchasing
expensive airtime with funds donated by our listeners, we are at
least able to add our ounce or two of truth to counterbalance the
10,000 tons of lies on the other side of the scale. But that is
exactly the situation that the enemies of freedom want to put an
end to. America's enemies already control 99.9% of what is
broadcast on the AM, FM, and TV dials. They don't need to and
don't want to purchase time to debate us. They want to use this
law to intimidate stations into cancelling us. Americans need to
say, "Thanks, but NO THANKS" to their Congressman, and
urge them to reject the misnamed "Fairness Doctrine."
Another form of intimidation practiced by America's enemies is
economic intimidation. It is often used to try to get American
Dissident Voices thrown off the air. Here's how it usually works:
agents of the criminal foreign spy agency, the Anti-Defamation
League of B'nai B'rith or ADL for short, either openly in their official
capacity, or covertly, depending upon the strength and reputation
of the ADL in the town where the station is located; approach the
radio station or some of its major advertisers. Pressure is
applied, by threats of advertising boycotts or cancellation of
lucrative contracts, or unfavorable publicity is threatened, backed up
with proof of ADL influence in the newsroom. Sometimes well-known
politicians who are ADL properties are brought in if the initial
pressure fails to produce the desired effect. Sometimes, economic intimidation
comes from local leftist or minority activists, too. In either
case, the result is a stifling of freedom of speech.
Unfortunately, economic intimidation sometimes works, and it is
with regret that I must announce that the two stations owned by
the Positive Radio Group, with whom we have had an excellent
relationship for over a year, have cancelled this program.
October 2nd will be the last day that American Dissident
Voices will be carried on WKGM, Virginia Beach, Virginia; and on
WNOW, Charlotte, North Carolina. Listeners to those two stations
should get out paper and pencil and write the following
information down. To replace WKGM and WNOW, we have signed on
with 50,000-Watt station WLAC-1510 in Nashville, Tennessee. We'll
start on WLAC on October 16th. WLAC covers the Charlotte and
Virginia Beach areas as well as all of the Southeastern US, the
Gulf Coast states, and the Midwest east of the Mississippi River. Beginning
October 16th, and every Saturday thereafter, we'll be on WLAC,
1510 on your AM dial, at 11:30 p.m. Eastern Time, 10:30 p.m. Central Time.
That's every Saturday, 11:30 p.m. Eastern Time, at 1510 on your
AM dial. Drop us a line and let us know how it's coming in. We'll
give you the address in a few moments.
Ladies and gentlemen, there is no better way to educate
yourself, or open the eyes of your friends and family, than with
the brilliant speech by Professor Revilo P. Oliver entitled What
We Owe Our Parasites. What We Owe Our Parasites is an amazing
speech, quite possibly the finest patriotic speech ever committed
to cassette tape. Dr. Oliver was for 32 years Professor of the
Classics at the University of Illinois, and has been a patriotic leader
since 1954. He is not only an outstanding scholar, but is also
one of greatest living stylists in the English language. With
brilliant wit and humor, and an inspiring sweep of history, Dr.
Oliver will explain to you the subversion of our nation and what
it is about us that has made us such willing dupes of our
enemies. There is no speech which can remotely compare in sheer
intellectual impact to Dr. Oliver's What We Owe Our Parasites. It
is now available to every listener who contributes $12 or more to
keep this program on the air as our Radio Offer Number 7. To
receive this brilliant speech by a master of the orator's art,
just send the largest gift you can afford today, a minimum of
$12, to National Vanguard Books, Department R, PO Box 90,
Hillsboro WV 24946 USA, and remember to ask for Radio Offer
Number 7.
Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom telling you to
keep on thinking free.
at
the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781