The federal hate crimes bill adds homosexuals (and homosexual pedophiles) to the list of groups given unconstitutional protection from so-called “hate crimes.” Headed to the President’s desk, this bill is another giant step to legitimize homosexuality and suppress all moral criticism of this perversion.
At no time in American history has criticism of homosexuality been more desperately needed. The revolution that stripped marital sexuality of its sacredness has leached into the lives of our children. Pro-homosexual sex education, explicit media productions for kids, and even public advocacy for pedophilia are new realities against which it is becoming dangerous to speak. The fetish of male homosexuals for young boys and the vulnerabilities of children in an increasingly sexualized age are not spoken of enough.
In downtown Portland, our city, gay nightclub the Escape is open to all ages. Children even younger than 12 are allowed, as are middle-aged pederasts looking for prey. In the Escape you can see middle-aged, shirtless men dancing with teens and plenty of clientele dressed only in underwear; a pole and three stages are available for explicit performances by visitors of any age. One homosexual teen told The Oregonian she was 15 when she first started frequenting the Escape. The Oregonian reported this fact casually in a story about her life as a “gay teen” in Portland.
Even a brief glance at the culture of homosexual nightclubs gives any thinking person pause about welcoming such sexual deviancy into a legitimate, let alone a federally protected, status! An online guide lists over 200 nightclubs for homosexuals in the United States, more than in Canada, Australia and the UK combined. Such clubs in Portland include Club Portland, a bathhouse open since 1987. Club Portland claims to be the West Coast’s largest; Willamette Week describes the bathhouse industry as “booming” in Portland.
In Club Portland,
you can climb winding stairs to three floors of labyrinthine, blacklit hallways lined with small rooms. Porn runs in a small viewing room with bleacher-style seating. The smoking lounge, on the other hand, features local TV and copies of Details. Individual showers, "gang showers," a blinding steam room and a sauna comprise the clean, well-lit "wet area" on the second floor--a comparatively small piece of the total space, but the bathhouse's epicenter.
Executive producer of the Cascade AIDS Project told WW, “You can walk into a bar and watch hardcore gay porn while you drink your beer," Bruner says. "Across the street there's a business that charges people to come in and have anonymous sex. I'm not saying there aren't similar businesses that cater to straight people. But do they play the same role they play in gay culture? I would say no." To countless traditional Americans, same-gender sex itself is a deviant fetish that should not be allowed, let alone celebrated. The forced legitimization of homosexuality denies this sincerely held and highly justifiable belief, while exalting a sexual preference that is notorious for its seamy and degrading culture. One STD counselor in Portland said some men he interviews report sex with 15 to 20 anonymous partners in the same night. Reporting on the bathhouse in 2003, Willamette Week said that in Multnomah County, “reported infections [of syphilis] among men doubled between 2000 and 2002… Oregon is thought to have the nation's sixth-fastest-growing syphilis rate.”
This STD is passed from promiscuous men to the boys they rape. As if the psychological devastation to young boys were not enough, such infection of youth is a compelling reason the darkest side of homosexuality must be known.
Much of the WW article is spent trying to explain why aggressive safe-sex campaigns and AIDS/STD education (threatening death, blindness and lots of pain) don’t slow the epidemic of reckless, anonymous sex in the homosexual culture. There is no real explanation. The AIDS worker concludes this is “maybe a part of hedonism and recklessness that just doesn't make any sense."
Yes, and maybe the same mysterious perverse behavior and abandon, which characterizes this dark underbelly of homosexual life, should also be examined—since its sordid compulsions drive so many homosexuals toward the most vulnerable of all: children.
Pedophilia in High Places
The Escape nightclub isn’t the only way Portland opens its arms to homosexuals interested in kids. In 2005, current Portland Mayor Sam Adams—a public homosexual—had a romantic relationship with intern Beau Breedlove, who was then 17. Adams claims to have waited until after Breedlove’s 18th birthday to have sex with him; during elections Adams lied about his relationship with the teenager and denied any sexual contact. The truth came out in 2009 after Breedlove went to the press and was paid for his story. Police now refuse to investigate Adams’ actions.
Rev. Louis Sheldon of Traditional Values Coalition summarizes cases of high-profile pederasty in recent US history:
In 1983…Democrat Congressman Gerry Studds [revealed he] had engaged in sodomy with a 17-year-old boy. Studds refused to apologize and was re-elected in 1984 by a 56% margin by his Massachusetts Democrat voters and retired in 1996. When he was being reprimanded in Congress, he turned his back on his colleagues to show his contempt for their reprimand. In 1980, Maryland Republican Bob Bauman was arrested for sodomizing a 16-year-old male prostitute…
In 1989, Massachusetts Democrat Rep. Barney Frank was exposed for permitting homosexual partner Steve Gobie to operate a male prostitution ring out of Frank’s condo in Washington, DC. Frank was reprimanded by the House but won re-election in 1990 by 66% of the vote. He is re-elected every two years by his liberal voters.
Why are politicians allowed to get away with this behavior? Is some kind of “pedophile lobby” advocating behind the scenes? It certainly appears so! The American Psychiatric Association (APA)—the most influential psychiatric organization, instructing psychiatrists and trainees worldwide—shows the power of this unseen force.
In 1994, the APA drastically modified its criteria for diagnosing pedophilia as a mental illness in the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR). The earlier version, DSM-III-R, stated that simply acting on sexual desire for children was adequate to diagnose pedophilia. In the current version, the APA changed its criteria so a child-molester is considered to have a psychiatric disorder only if his pedophilic actions “caused clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of functioning.” Simply having sex with children no longer makes someone a pedophile, as long as it doesn’t cause the adult “significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of function.”
In 1998, the APA review publication Psychological Bulletin published an article by three university academics agreeing that some children find sexual experiences with adults “positive.” The article also said boys respond more positively than girls to sexual encounters with adults. It concludes that man-boy “consensual” sexual relationships were often not harmful and sometimes even positive for victims. The authors cite Alfred Kinsey's 1948 work, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, as a guide for their “child-abuse disguised as science” study. (Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 22)
In the December 2002 issue of Archives of Sexual Behavior, psychiatrist Charles Moser of San Francisco's Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality and other experts argued to completely remove pedophilia from the DSM. Some writers in the issue said there is little or no proof that sex with adults harms children. Moser concludes, “Any sexual interest can be healthy and life-enhancing.” (Complete text and commentary - Pedophilia: Concepts and Controversy, Archives of Sexual Behavior, vol. 31, no. 6, December 2002, pp. 465-510.)
The December 2002 Archives of Sexual Behavior quotes an article from an earlier issue by Robert Bauserman (Psychology Dept University of Michigan).
“The diversity of sexual behavior in a cross-cultural perspective is amazing to those who assume that their own society’s moral standards are somehow the law of nature. Yet it is a fact that almost every sort of sexual activity…has been considered normal in some society at some time…Man-boy relationships are no exception to this rule of diversity…Although they are roundly condemned by many segments of Western society as inherently abusive and exploitive, there have been (and still are) many societies that do not share this viewpoint.” (Bauserman, Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 1997 issue)
Bauserman thus implies that, since this behavior is viewed as acceptable in other cultures, we should legitimize it in ours.
Sexualizing our Kids
Alfred Kinsey hugely affected the APA’s stance on pedophilia as well as sex theory throughout the western world by saying children are innately sexual and have orgasms from birth and that homosexuality and sodomy are normal. Pedophilia advocates, piggy-backing on Kinsey, say kids should be allowed to express their nature with whomever they choose. Apparently, the Anti-Defamation League and other so-called “civil rights” groups agree about children’s innate sexuality, since they press for sex discussions and education (including pro-homosexual dogma, winningly packaged) for children as young as eight months! (See, Pedophiles the Hate Bill Protects, Part One ) It is now illegal for parents to opt their children out of homosexual education lectures in grade school in California.
In the past, sex education in public schools centered on pubertal changes and gender differences. Today the focus has shifted to sexual behavior including homosexuality. Such teaching sexualizes children. What if we forced children to learn about sexual fetishes, such as bondage? Forced education about homosexuality is no different. It also confuses children at a vulnerable time, exposing them to the suggestion that they may be homosexual, leading them toward “gay” support groups where activist adults “affirm” their deviance.
Dr. Judith Reisman summarizes:
As a matter of fact, our children are told that they’re animals, sexual from birth. They’re told that they can engage in sexual conduct with one another, gender undifferentiated, while some “professors” and teachers indicate sex with adults is legitimate. The product of such fraudulent, pedophile-biased sex education is seen in the American Psychiatric Association claim that pedophiles are not necessarily troubled unless they feel badly about their lust for children.
It is still officially unacceptable to advocate for pederasty or pedophilia. You may find it difficult to believe a “pedophile lobby” could ever gain clout in Washington. But at one time, homosexuality was also illegal in the states. In Connecticut in 1650, adultery could be punished by the death penalty. Judges could order unmarried people who had sex to be whipped. Today, adultery and premarital sex are common themes of popular entertainment; homosexual contact is also now a regular image. This is how sexual mores can be manipulated. Would our great-great-great-grandparents have ever anticipated Ellen, RuPaul, Gossip Girl, or that film couples would be expected to jump into bed on their first date, in every movie?
In her article, “Making Bi/Homosexual Youth,” Reisman reports “A recent "teen poll" conducted by the establishment girls magazine Seventeen claimed that seventeen percent of teens polled in 1991, versus fifty-four percent polled in 1999, accept homosexuality as appropriate.”
Unless bold Americans speak the whole truth about homosexuality—and the hate crime laws giving it judicial protection and absolute cultural legitimacy—the next generations will be raised in the national equivalent of a gay bathhouse. Already, sexual depravities stream incessantly from TV and cinema screens, computer desktops, and every second song on the radio. The sacred, divinely given joys of sexuality have been stolen from youth taught to use each others’ bodies, male or female, for fleeting and corrupt self-gratification. Our children, from their youngest ages, are vulnerable to lies in the schools and predators on the streets (and in political office)!
Already our nation is very dark. If we do not speak up now, the next light we see may be the fire from heaven coming down on our Sodom.
Harmony Grant is a writer for National Prayer Network. To greater understand the illogic behind hate laws, read her article “Top Eleven Reasons You Should Fight Hate Laws.” At www.truthtellers.org you can also find two 10-minute videos which powerfully explain the most recent hate crime bills.
Watch the dynamic 10-minute educational videos, "Stop the Pedophile-Protecting Hate Bill!, at www.truthtellers.org which explains how the hate bill, S. 909, ends freedom. Also at www.truthtellers.org, watch our gripping 82-minute documentary "Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians."
Call all members of the Senate and demand hearings on S. 909, 1-877-851-6437 toll free and 1-202-225-3121. Call repeatedly (every other day), especially call the 19 members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. The names are available on the Action Page at www.truthtellers.org. Tell the Senator: "Please hold hearings on the pedophile-protecting hate bill S. 909. If the Senator votes for this bill, or allows its sponsors to sneak it through the Senate as a rider to a bill, my friends and I will never forgive or forget."
Let the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians: http://www.adl.org/99hatecrime/intro.asp.
TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this topic. Call (503) 631-3808.
NATIONAL PRAYER NETWORK,
P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015
America First Books Editor's Note
For those new to this controversy, please check the latest articles in our Rev Ted Pike and Harmony Grant archive to see where protests should be directed to be the most effective. Sometimes the "action" is in the House, and other times it is in the Senate or in the Executive Office. Sometimes it involves arresting a bill before it gets through a committee, or it at other times it may have already slipped through and now faces either a floor vote or the possibility of getting snuck through as a rider to another bill. Also, please link
to the following articles:
Fox News Rips "Pedophile-Protecting" Hate Bill:
...[Fox News anchor Megyn] Kelly interviewed Rep. Steve King, who attempted to amend the hate bill in Judiciary last week to explicitly exclude pedophiles. King reported how Rep. Alcee Hastings, a pro-hate bill Democrat, proudly claimed practitioners of 547 paraphilias listed by the American Psychiatric Association can "live without fear" once the hate bill is passed.
Ms. Kelly also expressed indignation that, while the Democrats acted to protect pedophiles, they rejected Republican efforts to obtain similar special protection for war veterans. Especially in times of unpopular wars, these are common victims of "hate crimes," spit upon or attacked because of who they are -- military defenders of America's freedom...
Alert to Congress Regarding Hate Bills and the False Flag Attack Threat by America First Books publisher William B. Fox. Two-thirds down the web page please find the essay "The Hate Crime Law Concept: It is all very sinister for at least nine major reasons."
Also, earlier on this same page I comment:
Although Rev Ted Pike is completely independent from Captain May and myself in terms of his political and religious views, the threats we address all stem from the same corrupt power elite. I mention in my concluding remarks below that this elite “would mobilize us into domestic tyranny and foreign wars, while distracting us from economic depression and the groups that brought it about.”
This is the real problem, not the lack of more “hate crime” laws. If anything, we need even more freedom of speech to speak truth to power, sort out our problems, and develop peaceful strategies to handle high level malefactors. This is why we urgently need for members of Congress to not only take a principled stand and stop all hate crime legislative initiatives, but to also roll back all the existing hate crime laws currently on the books.
Hate crime laws actually pose a major national security threat. They condition Americans to feel that certain types of thought are inherently immoral or illegal, even if they do not result in any form of violence or infringement on the rights of others.
In our articles related to false flag attacks, Capt. Eric H. May and I have discussed strong evidence that Mossad-CIA was behind 9-11, the mere "thought" of which would some day be outlawed once hate crime oversight bureaucracies become firmly implanted in America. We can expect government hate crime overwatch entities to experience the usual cancerous growth and abuse of power that libertarian writer and Presidential candidate Harry Browne described in his classic book Why Government Doesn't Work.
Please find out more about the hate crime issue in the Rev Ted Pike archive.
Please discover important alternative religious
and secular viewpoints on
freedom of speech issues
at America First Books:
a) The Rev Ted Pike archive
b) The Religious Crisis page
These web pages address not only conservative Christian and Christian Zionist viewpoints, but also secular, anarcho-libertarian, atheist, pagan (paricularly Asatru/Odinist),
and "miscellaneous other" perspectives.