Profiling the
Opposing Forces Commander
and His Kosher Handlers
First posted 23 May 2009
Most recently
updated, reedited 8 July 2012
In
the military intelligence world, it is extremely important to create
a realistic behavioral model of ones adversary as a necessary first
step towards making successful predictions. The
most basic version of profiling is called “the intelligence preparation
of the battle field.”Here, the intelligence officer maintains
a detailed overview of the enemy situation, friendly situation, terrain,
and other essential tactical factors. But
this is only the tip of the proverbial ice berg.Invariably, one also requires extensive “deep background”
on an enemy, to include such “soft topics” as history, culture,
personality profiles, and tactical and strategic doctrines.All these things, whether directly or indirectly, influence an
enemy’s behavior. In
the Info War during the Bush administration we faced two primary enemies.
To use cattle ranch parlance: “Circle B” and “Circle
Z.” We also faced a much deeper organizational enemy, such as
the "Rings within Rings" strategy described by G. Edward Griffin
(described later in this chapter) and more nebuluous enemies with deep
ethnic, religious, cultural, and other sociological roots that have
been "position-building" for centuries. First,
at the center of “Circle Bush” is a demented, alcoholic,
sadistic, draft-dodging clown masquerading as President of the United
States named George W. Bush. Continually leaning over his shoulder and
whispering in his ear what to think and say are two gentile confederates:
Bush’s totally
unscrupulous “boy genius” political advisor Karl Rove
and his arguably even more diabolical Vice President Dick Cheney.Many different news reports claim that Rove and Cheney
actually ran the White House, not Bush.
Secondly,
heavily overlapping “Circle Bush” like a Venn Diagram
is the vastly more powerful and dangerous “Circle Zionist,”
comprising the utterly treasonous and deceitful Zionist neo-con power
elite in control of major national media, key branches of the Federal
government, and fiercely loyal to Greater Israel at the expense of
whatever was left of the U.S. Constitution and legitimate American
national interests. An
excellent book that provides deep background on these characters is
The High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper.
Later in this series I cite The New Jerusalem,The New Babylon and other workds by Michael
Collins Piper, that explain important deep sociological, cultural,
religious, and historical background. The
moment I say this, I can almost hear a whining, sarcastic, impatient
voice in the background “Here we go again, blame it all on the
Jews!” Well,
no, we don’t blame everything on the Jews.The Jewish influence is both a cause and effect.While it is true that the Zionist power elite creates enormous
mischief in its own right, an alien group like this never would have
risen to the top of American society were it not for so many things
that had already gone wrong on so many different social, political,
cultural and religious levels involving non-Jews.We will try to address those issues as
well. One
of my biggest problems in writing this book is that both Captain May
and I make many assertions that are a few leaps ahead of what most
Americans are exposed to either in their federally-funded schools
or controlled national media.This creates what Psychological Operations
(PSYOPS) specialists call the “incredible truth” problem
(or conversely what psychologists also call “cognitive dissonance”),
where people often find it hard to believe ideas that have been clouded
with disinformation or lie too far beyond what they are routinely
told –even when these ideas are completely true. For
example, Americans are routinely told that they have the best, mostly
highly evolved political system on the planet. Presenting
evidence that George W. Bush is a man of bad character raises all
kinds of deeper questions about what has gone so terribly wrong with
the American political system –and who really controls it from
behind the scenes-- that a latter day Caligula or Nero can rise to
the top.In fact, in his
interviews, Captain May asserts that the political situation in America
has deteriorated to the point that bad character has almost become
a prerequisite for high office. I
agree with him that “must be blackmailable” has almost
become a de facto job description for high office, particularly when
the public remains lulled into complacency by controlled national
media.However, making this point requires not
one, but an entire sequence of “dissonance reduction”
or “deprogramming” steps before the public will fully
subscribe to our viewpoint. To
provide full explanations, not only must we provide convincing evidence
regarding Bush’s bad character, but we must also explain (a)
why it suits the political objectives of the power elite behind the
scenes to support someone like Bush (b) how the power elite is able
to corrupt an honest democratic process through such tools as vote-buying,
physical threats, control of national media, and vote fraud (c) how
all of this reflects well-documented historical trends and confirmed
sociological patterns (d) why “counter predators” in American
society are so weak that they permit all of this to happen in the
first place and (e) why Bush and the shadow power elite are so evil
that they consciously try to “manage” the American public
with false flag events, displaying a level of callousness reminiscent
of the Morlocks who control Eloi flower children in H.G. Well’s
The
Time Machine. I
cannot cover (a) to (e) in this chapter alone, although I will touch
upon these areas through the remainder of this book.For now we need to focus on George W. Bush.He serves as a useful intellectual “rabbit hole”
(as in what led Alice to a strange
whole new world in Alice in Wonderland)
that in turn leads to the other areas. As
we deal with “rabbit hole” George Bush and follow on topics,
I may need to request that the reader patiently show a “willing
suspension of disbelief” until we connect enough dots to prove
our case in a thoroughly coherent way. Obviously
the Bush/Zionist power elite problem did not emerge over night.In fact, this power elite has been furiously at work furthering
its agenda in America ever since the beginning of the 20th century,
if not earlier.While its power base has grown, the effective
influence of the old WASP power elite has been in corresponding decline.
Through their growing infiltration of national media, finance, academia,
and government, the Zionists have even created disinformational roadblocks
to jam out truthful interpretations of the aforementioned areas (a)
to (e). The
fact that direct talk about Zionist power may seem so incredible to
most Americans actually helps to prove rather than disprove their
influence, especially once one understands the real nature of this
power, as we will discuss towards the end of this chapter. Back
to Bush.We can start by analyzing the character
of George W. Bush himself, and then address members of his immediate
family and their ancestors. Capt May provided
the following analysis in this 4 August 2003 letter to an individual
named Dr. Pesikoff:
August 4, letter to Dr. Pesikoff
Certified letter of authority
Dear Dr. Pesikoff,
Thanks for suggesting the practical business of the notes
and recollections you have regarding my case. In the event of
my death, kindly release my entire file to anyone who is interested.
To give credit where it’s due, your skepticism about
the president helped me take a good, long look at his personality.
I think the following observations about George W. Bush deserve note:
1.The Bush Dynasty rests on his shoulders.
2.He has a grudge against Saddam Hussein, who tried to assassinate
his father.
3.He thinks he’s Shakespeare’s Henry V, making up
for an ill-spent youth with a bellicose reign; but he’s acting
like Richard III, who ruthlessly disposed of anyone impeding his power.
4.He thinks he’s George Washington, saving his country;
but he’s acting like George III by tyrannizing it.
5.He thought he’d be called another George Patton for charging
into Iraq
; but now fears that he’ll be called another George Custer.
6.He is, like me, a dry alcoholic who has found something to
keep him focused. With me it’s tae kwon do and writing.
With him it’s power plays and politics.
7.He is a born-again Christian who received his power in the
Millennium through his brother’s intervention. It’s
a story worthy of the Old Testament, and a powerful affirmation of
his belief that he is destined to lead us against Islam, which he
may identify as the religion of the Antichrist.
8.What he calls the Global War on Terror is an attempt to enforce
global security through global domination. It is World War Three
in his mind, and he’ll make us mind him in fighting it.
9.If he causes a world war he may view it as a fulfillment of
the Revelation of John in the battle of Armageddon.
Starting with these personal reflections, I have investigated
his character further through his acquaintances and intimates.
I have until now kept their names private, but believe that, given
the frequency of my calls and meetings with them, they are safer revealed
than concealed:
Chase Untermeyer, who was the best man
at my marriage to Mrs. May. Chase worked for the Reagan
and Bush White Houses and is an intimate of the Bush family.
Paul Burka, who edits
Texas Monthly Magazine and believes the Bush Team
is capable of murder. In a conversation in early April, I confided
to him that I believed the “collateral damage” deaths
of Arab journalists covering the Battle of Baghdad were assassination.
“That sounds like Bush” was his reply.
Frank Michel and David Langworthy, both editors for the
Houston Chronicle and associates for over ten years.
Both men have confided to me that then-governor Bush was a bully when
it came to the media, and that his team had bullied them on occasion.
From my conversations with these men I have learned the
following specific character traits about the president:
1.He is the shortest man in his family and is self-conscious
about it.
2.He affects a Texas accent (the only man in his family to do so), and cowboy
manners.
3.He is immature and reaches decisions without much prior consideration.
4.Once he has made up his mind he is headlong and unswerving.
5.He takes opposition to his decisions personally, and retaliates.
I’ll continue to develop these ideas here and there.
I hope you’ll agree with me that the commander in chief has
some interesting issues. Is this the stuff of an interesting
paper?
The manuscript I’ve sent you is intact, minus my
road trip letters, which contain little relevant information.
Eric
Captain
May’s observations in August 2003 proved prescient.Two years later, Doug Thompson would begin his 15 Aug 2005
article “Is Bush Out of Control?” with the following:
Buy
beleaguered, overworked White House
aides enough drinks and they tell a sordid tale of an administration
under siege, beset by bitter staff infighting and led by a man whose
mood swings suggest paranoia bordering
on schizophrenia. They
describe a President whose public persona masks an angry, obscenity-spouting
man who berates staff, unleashes tirades against those who disagree
with him and ends meetings in the Oval Office with “get out of here!” In
fact, George W. Bush’s mood swings
have become so drastic that White House emails often contain “weather
reports” to warn of the President’s demeanor. “Calm
seas” means Bush is calm while “tornado alert” is
a warning that he is pissed at the world. Decreasing
job approval ratings and increased criticism within his own party
drives the President’s paranoia even higher. Bush, in a meeting
with senior advisors, called Senator Majority Leader Bill Frist a “god-damned traitor”
for opposing him on stem-cell research. “There’s
real concern in the West Wing that the President is losing it,”
a high-level aide told me recently. A
year ago, this web site discovered the White
House physician prescribed anti-depressants for Bush. The news
came after revelations that the President’s wide mood swings
led some administration staffers to doubt his sanity. Although
GOP loyalists dismissed the reports
an anti-Bush propaganda, the reports were later confirmed by prominent
GeorgeWashingtonUniversity psychiatrist Dr. Justin Frank in his book Bush
on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President.
Dr. Frank diagnosed the President as a “paranoid megalomaniac”
and “untreated alcoholic” whose “lifelong streak
of sadism, ranging from childhood pranks (using firecrackers to explode
frogs) to insulting journalists, gloating over state executions and
pumping his hand gleefully before the bombing of Baghdad ” showcase Bush’s instabilities. “I
was really very unsettled by him and I started watching everything
he did and reading what he wrote and watching him on videotape. I
felt he was disturbed,” Dr. Frank said. “He fits the profile
of a former drinker whose alcoholism has been arrested but not treated.”
On
the 9 Dec 2007 Jeff and Mike Show, May provided some more evidence
that Bush is a text book sadist who gets titillated by evil:
Capt
May: Bush when he was Governor of Texas put to death the first
woman in 120 years, Karla Faye Tucker. Jeff Lynch: I remember
that, and she found Christ in prison, and she did not ask to be released.
She just said "Let me live," because now she found a purpose
in her life, even behind bars, and he would not grant her any mercy. Capt May: That is the deal,
not that he had to give reprieve. Not that he had to believe her.
But what came out was even more damning, which was that Bush was together
with his buddies chuckling and making jokes, actually mocking Tammy
Faye. He was saying, "Oh, oh, oh, please don't kill me."
This is what he was doing with his buddies when she was being put
to death. [As reported by Paul Begala, CNN]. So, you know, if you
want to call Karla Faye a mad dog, and if you look at her crimes,
it is not hard to make that argument. Man, I am not saying you cannot
shoot a mad dog, and I am not saying that I could not shoot a mad
dog, but if you sit there and laugh and have a good time shooting
a mad dog, then you are a mad dog. Mike Howard: Well, you
are no better than the person who got --to a certain extent you are
no better than the person you are condemning to death. Capt May: That is the point.
It is very interesting you would say that, because what Karla Faye
said --she was a crack 'ho [whore]. And she evidently had a grudge
against ex-boyfriends, drugs were involved --she and one of her homies
went and murdered these people brutally. Jeff. Yes. Capt May: Using a pick
axe. Jeff: Using a pick axe,
right in the head. Capt May: And what she
said was "Every time I hit him with a pick axe, I had an orgasm."
Jeff: Yes, that is pretty
sick. Capt May: However, when
I say Bush gets off on evil, that is what I mean. I mean I think it
is woven into his level all the way to the sexual level. In fact,
if you know anything about the Skull and Bones -- Mike: You know that somewhere
in the Oval Office he has whips and chains, leather hiding somewhere.
I would not be surprised if some homo-erotic-- Capt May: Skull and Bones
has homo-erotic initiation rituals. Jeff: Yes! Mike: Whipping him, maybe?
Capt May: One of the things
that doesn't get talked up is that they all talk about their most
erotic, youthful memories while the others sit around and self-stimulate.
Jeff: Yes, pretty sick.
Capt May: …Until
the conclusion of that act. Now that is reprogramming your wires pretty
deep down, buddy. Mike: (laughter). In fact,
I don't think I am going to sleep well tonight after that.
Bush
ignored a plea to spare the life of Karla Faye Tucker by both the
Pope and World Council of Churches.Wayne Madsen provided further insight into
the vicious side of Bush’s personality in “Bush’s
`Christian’ Blood Cult: Concerns Raised by Vatican : ”
Bush's
blood lust has been extended across the globe. He has given the CIA
authority to assassinate those deemed a threat to U.S. national interests. Bush has
virtually suspended Executive Orders 11905 (Gerald Ford), 12306 (Jimmy
Carter), and 12333 (Ronald Reagan) which prohibit the assassination
of foreign leaders. Bush's determination to kill Saddam Hussein, his
family, and his top leaders with precision-guided missiles and tactical
nuclear weapon-like Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) bombs is yet
another indication of Bush's disregard for his Republican and Democratic
predecessors. It now appears that in his zeal to kill Hussein, innocent
civilian patrons of a Baghdad restaurant were killed by one of Bush's
precision Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs). Like it or not, Saddam
Hussein was recognized by over 100 nations as the leader of Iraq -- a member state of the United
Nations. Hussein, like North Korea' Kim Jong Il, Syria's Bashir Assad,
and Iran's Mohammed Khatami, are covered by Executive Order 12333,
which the Bush mouthpieces claim is still in effect. Bush's "Christian"
blood cult sees no other option than death for those who become his
enemies. This doctrine is found no place in Christian theology.
Regarding
evidence that Bush is a sexual pervert, James Guckert, aka Jeff Gannon,
a $200/hour gay male prostitute, was
able to get near George W. Bush nearly every day for 2 years. Something
perverse seems to also involve other members of his family. Consider
for example the allegations connected to theFranklin Cover-up Scandal where call-boys
were taken on a midnight tour of the White House during the administration
of George W. Bush’s father, George H. W. Bush Speaking
of the Bush family, in “American Caligula”May 28, 2004thepeoplesvoice.org,
author Raymond Ponzini observed:
Lt.
Cmdr. Al Martin, US Navy, (Ret) said, "You have to look at the
entire Bush Family in this context - as if the family ran a corporation
called “Frauds-R-Us,” George Jr.’s specialty was
insurance and security fraud, Jeb’s specialty was oil and gas
fraud, Neil’s specialty was real estate fraud, Prescott’s
specialty was banking fraud, and George Sr.’s specialty? All
of the above." Christopher Hitchens, Washington Editor for Harpers and columnist for The Nation said, “George Bush, he’s bad on drugs, he’s sick mentally and physically, if he was a
dog he’d be shot. He’s a scumbag.
That’s why he won’t be re-elected.
He’s not morally,
physically or mentally fit to be President.”
Before
the Vietnam "War", the Golden Triangle was run by French
Intelligence and Corsican mobsters. After the French bailed out
and America moved in, the triangle was run by U.S. intelligence,
with aid from Sicilian mobsters. This narcotics network is well
documented in The
Politics of Heroin in S. E. Asia by Alfred McCoy, The
Great Heroin Coup by Henrik Kruger and Double-Cross
by Sam and Chuck Giancana. Vice-President
George Bush, as Chairman of President Reagan's cabinet-level working
group and as Director of the National Narcotics Interdiction System,
was the highest U. S. governmental official involved in the "war
on drugs". Frances
Mullen, Jr., former head of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), called
Bush's efforts "an intellectual fraud" and "a liability
rather than an asset". Soon after these statements, Mullen
resigned and the resultant General Accounting Office (GAO) report
was buried. In
July, 1985, the suppressed GAO paper reported that there were "no
benefits from the National Narcotics Border Interdiction System,
directed by George Bush. In fact, the overall effect was to encourage
supply...." Monika
Jensen-Stevenson, a 60 Minutes producer, quit her job after the
CBS news program refused to air the story she had uncovered relating
to the covert drug trade. Her book, Kiss
The Boys Goodbye, details how our intelligence community
used the apparatus of the POW/MIA governmental agencies as a cover
for the trafficking of opiates from the Golden Triangle.
This
is an important precedent, given that this work shows how the son
ran a fake war on terror, in which federal agencies such as the Department
of Homeland Security and FBI do more to set up "Al Qaeda"
terror acts than defend America against them. The drug theme also
persists, given that Afghanistan went from having very little opium
production under the Taliban to becoming a major world producer after
George Bush's invasion in 2001. Last, but not least, the aforementioned
quote that talks about only "French Intelligence and Corsican
mobsters" being in control of the Golden Triangle is inaccurate.
Many sources, such as Final
Judgment, explain how both French Intelligence and the Corsican
mafia were heavily infiltrated and influenced by the Mossad. Other
sources identify Mossad as being the key player alongside the CIA,
which it largely controls, in both the Golden Triangle and more recently
during the George W. Bush administration in Afghanistan. Having
now established that George W. Bush has both serious personal problems
and sordid family roots, the next big question is how all of this
impacted on his performance as President of the United States . For
starters, America is supposed to have a republican government that is specifically
designed to prevent dictatorship –something that Bush has openly
courted in both word and deed. This
point is worth emphasizing.For
example, the book The End of Kings: A History of Republicans
and Republicans by William Everdell explains the historical pattern
where republican governments have usually always been instituted first
and foremost as an attempt to solve the problem of tyranny, rather
than as a tool to achieve any universal suffrage or wealth redistribution
goals of “social democracy.”These leftist things usually come later
in the historical life cycles of republics. A
tyrant can become a terrible parasite on a society, literally destroying
it from within through such means as fomenting ill-advised wars, raising
ruinous levels of taxation, and conducting murderous purges of honest
and productive people. A
republican government, which I interpret as nothing more than an effort
to institute rational elements of the scientific method to government,
is supposed to achieve enough transparency, accountability, and group
input to prevent irrational and irresponsible excesses by any single
individual. As
the famous libertarian historian Lord Acton observed, “Power
corrupts, and power corrupts absolutely.”Any one entrusted with sole power, by whatever name he is called,be it “dictator,” “king,” “unitary
executive,” “emperor,” “monarch,” “commissar,”
or whatever, is at high risk of abusing it and ultimately turning
into a tyrant. People
with a dictatorial mentality become particularly dangerous when they
feel that their power base is threatened and feel justified to try
to preserve it at all costs, to include though the use of murderous covert operations.In Russian history alone, Ivan the Terrible, Lenin, Trotsky,
and Stalin are good examples. This
is all pretty basic stuff that most Americans –the “counter
predators” in our society-- should have been taught in High
School civics classes if they have not been able to figure it out
for themselves. Unfortunately,
most Americans do not seem to be either adequately taught or self-informed
in this area.According to “Americans
Test Low in Civic Literacy” by Michael Caprio.1,700 out of 2,500 randomly selected Americans flunked the
ISI civics test. According to other news reports about this same test,
even seniors at elite universities such as Harvard did poorly. Now
back to “predator” George W. Bush.He openly flirted with dictatorship in his rhetoric on many
occasions with surprisingly little reaction from a dumbed-down public
–or controlled national media.Worse yet, this menacing language was backed
by highly constrictive legislation, the use of torture, a greatly
enhanced the surveillance state, and war criminal aggression abroad. Bush
frequently flipped off subordinates
and once screamed "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,
it’s just a goddamned piece of paper!” He also stated,
“I’m the President and I’ll
do whatever I goddamned please..." At
wikiquote for
Bush online one can find the following:
1998
·“You don't get everything
you want. A dictatorship would be a lot easier. “
·“I told all four
[congressional leaders] that I felt like this election happened for
a reason; that it pointed out — the delay in the outcome should
make it clear to all of us — that we can come together to heal
whatever wounds may exist, whatever residuals there may be. And I
really look forward to the opportunity. I hope they've got my sense
of optimism about the possible, and enthusiasm about the job. I told
all four that there are going to be some times where we don't agree
with each other, but that's okay. If this were a dictatorship, it
would be a heck of a lot easier... [Bush laughs out loud, audience
laughs out loud] ...just so long as I'm the dictator [more
laughter].”
oOnline
NewsHour interview, Washington
, DC , (December 18, 2000)' during his first trip to Washington as President-elect. The last sentence
is also included in Fahrenheit 9/11
2001
·“Dealing with Congress
is a matter of give and take. The president doesn't get everything
he wants, the Congress doesn't get everything they want. But we're
finding good common ground. A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot
easier, there's no question about it.”
·“It's not a dictatorship
in Washington , but I tried to make it one in that instance.”
oDescribing his executive
order making faith-based groups eligible for federal subsidies, New Orleans , Louisiana , January
15, 2004
In his 9 Dec 2007 Jeff and Mike show interview, Capt. May commented:
Capt May: ….King George Bush, who calls
himself, by the way, the "unitary executive." Which is
--you have heard of the theory of the unitary executive --the neo-con
theory. Jeff: Yes. Capt May: Unitary executive is just in Latin what
in Greek would be "monarch." Mike: Uh-huh. Capt May: Unitary is just "sole ruler."
Sole commander. So the Bush --let's say the post-911 theory of U.S.
government has become dictatorial. Mike: Exactly. Capt May: By its own definition. By its own terms.
Jeff: As he says, [feigning a mock Texas accent]
"I'm the decider [guy]." (laughter) Capt May: That is probably as close to dictatorship
as it could come in speech. Actually, that is false. Because we
all remember the expression from December 2000 one month before
assuming office when Bush once told Congress during his visit there,
"Dictatorship would be a hell of a lot easier as long as I
could be the dictator." Jeff: Yes, that is not a joking matter for a President
to say. Capt May: Well you know there are these categories
of information, and as an Internet writer. You know I write for
the Lone Star Iconoclast. I live off of them, they are
my stock and trade. They are the little repeated, but often important
phrases like the decider comment. Or when Bush said dictatorship
would be better. Bush said that in 1999 when he was still Texas
governor. So these kinds of statements give a great amount of information
to the public, but the public never hears them. Jeff: No. Capt May: Because they are sanitized out by the
media. Mike: Of course. Capt May: The mainstream media is not there to
inform-- Jeff: No Capt May: --But to misinform and disinform. Jeff: Yes Mike: It is the language version of money laundering.
In
his Cracking Satan’s Code interview, Capt. May explained the
relationship of Bush to Zionist neo-cons, and how their behavior reflects
longstanding war plans for Greater Israel:
Capt
May: Well, remember this war [in Iraq ] started with "Shock and Awe." "Shock
and Awe" was the propaganda phrase we used to describe how we
were going to scare the Moslems into peeing their pants and giving
up, remember? Hughes: Yes. Capt May: There is nothing
more shocking and awful than nukes. And I am not saying anything about
what they want to do that they didn't say in a document they issued
in 2000: The Project for a New American Century, which you know was
made up of the neo-cons. And the neo-cons are nothing but a cute phrase
used to describe the Jewish hardliners who are part of daddy Bush's,
George Herbert Walker Bush's cabinet in the Iraq
war. The ones who want to go all the way through and fight everybody.
Karen AnnHughes: And I
want to point out something right here. Those particular people, that
you just mentioned, during Hitler's regime, were very instrumental
in killing Jews throughout Europe . And they are without mercy. They will do it again.
[Editor’s Note: Ms. Hughes is probably referring to the Transfer
Agreement negotiated in 1933 between Zionists and Nazis.These Zionist leaders—similar to
neo-cons today—cold-bloodedly selected Zionist zealots to emigrate
from Germany to Israel , whereas less enthusiastic
Jews were left behind to a highly uncertain fate. Also, see Chapter
34: "Saving Dr. Toben, Handling Real Nazis, and Countering the
Holocaustianity Intellectual Blackjack," where Capt.
May questions major elements of the Holocaust story peddled by controlled
national media to the American public]. Capt May: Yes, this particular
group when we talk about the Jews, we need to understand that there
are three basic categories that I think of. One is what I call the
self-hating Jews. And that means the Jews who really are going to
say everything that I am about to say, but the other Jews say that
they hate themselves. That they are lying about the Jews. They represent
about 10% of the Jews. Then there is probably, oh, 60-70% of the Jews
who are kind of the way towards Zionists that the Irish people are
towards the IRA. They are not in on it, but they are not going to
mess with it, and in their heart of hearts they are kind of for it.
And then there is the hard edge, the 25% that is Zionist. And those
are the criminal conspiracy. Hughes: Right. Capt May: And they are
cabalistic. They use the Jewish technique of the Cabala. Something
that they learned when they were in the Babylonian Exile, by the way,
from the Babylonians which involved encrypting, encoding, numerology.
It is a mystic and occult science or art. Very much parallel to Illuminatism,
Free Masonry, and whatnot. Hughes: Exactly. Capt May: We are talking
about all these codes and numbers, and everything we are talking about
comes straight out of these two gangs. The Cabalistic Zionists, and
the Illuminatist power elite, which calls itself Christian, but is
really anti-Christian. So the Zionist Jews who are part of George
Herbert Walker Bush's cabinet, and who wanted to go into a big war
in the Middle East in 1991 and 1992, were the ones who gathered around
Bush, gathered up all the media, finance, political influence of worldwide
Zionism and brought George W. Bush to the Presidency. In 2000, they
had published a document. This being one year before 9-11. In September
2000 they had published a document called The Project for a New American
Century: Restructuring America's Defenses. By the way, "Restructuring
America's Defenses" was also a code. "Restructuring America 's Defenses" or "R.A.D."
It was intended to be a RADical restructuring of America
's defenses. Just a little joke they put on the front page of it.
In that book they said the correct move in the world today was to
take over the Middle East to get the oil and take care of Israel's
territorial enemies and that it would be a great thing to do but in
order to do it we would have to have a new Pearl Harbor. That is where
you have heard the phrase "A New Pearl Harbor." Hughes: Yes. Capt May: The new Pearl
Harbor was called for by the people who brought Bush to
power one year before 9-11 and six months before Bush took the oath
of office. When Bush came to office, the war plan was already agreed
upon, and it was A Project for a New American Century: Restructuring
America's Defenses. It was only about an eighty page long document.
That document calls for everything within the power of modern weaponry
and science to be brought to bear to fight this Third World War, which
was predicated upon having what is called in Latin a causus belli, a reason for war. A new Pearl Harbor . They executed the new Pearl
Harbor on 9-11 and everything they promised to do in a
Project for a New American Century: Restructuring America's Defenses
document, they are going to do. The same way that people after World
War II said, "My God, how could we have been so stupid, Hitler
said everything he was going to do in Mein Kampf." Well, the neo-cons, the
people who brought in the Bush boys, said everything they were going
to do in a Project for a New American Century. It is just that the
media hasn't covered it. In that document they say, "We're going
to go nuclear." They say, "We're going to have cyber warfare."
They say --now this is how chilling and cold-hearted these rascals
are-- "That we should fully explore the options of biological
warfare, especially since biological warfare can target genotypes."
Hughes: Oh yes, they have
got that down pat now. Capt May: They are going
to exterminate the Arabs. Hughes: Yes. Capt May: Look, everything
they say was done to them in World War II is what they are going to
do. That is the oldest hustle of all hustles. You know, if you tell
somebody, "You are a murderer" and somebody tried to kill
you, that is the best way to get them to drop their guard so that
you can stab them in the back, isn't it? Hughes: Oh gee. Oh my gosh.
Significantly,
just as George W. Bush has openly talked about dictatorship, his Zionist
neo-con handlers have openly espoused a totalitarian philosophy known
as “Straussianism.”Capt
May addressed this in his interview with Dr. Kevin Barrett:
Capt
May: You know Dr. Barrett, this whole discipline that we are talking
about, this whole cryptanalysis is the actual word, from the Greek
"crypto" meaning "secret" and "analysis"
meaning "to discover" and "to investigate." This
discovery or investigation into hidden things, hidden numbers, this
"cryptanalysis," in Ghost Troop we commonly refer to it
as the embedded code. Because the code is embedded all over the place.
It is particularly in newspaper articles, in day groups, you will
find it all over. And that is, by the way, one of the Straussian,
neo-con idiosyncrasies is that they love to be like a bunch of bullies.
They love to know that there is a joke at your expense but you don't
know it. Dr. Barrett: Well that
is right. That actually is a very important part of the Straussian
philosophy about a secret elite that knows what the general public
doesn't know. Capt May: They get it. Dr. Barrett. That is right.
That is very basic --they go back to Plato and the stories of Socrates,
and they claim that actually there was this hidden wisdom that Plato
and Socrates taught to their most gifted, or shall we say their most
psychopathic students, and those students were taught that in fact
that the ordinary teaching that all of us get from reading Plato and
Socrates is false. Capt May: The hoi polloi.
The many. Dr. Barrett: Right, that
is just for the masses. And the true teachings is that there is no
such thing as good in the world, there is no God, there is no transcendent,
and only the really hard, hard core people like themselves, the arch-Machiavellian
neo-con types are strong enough to face the unpleasant reality. And
thus those people have not only the right, but the duty to assume
complete power over everybody else, and to rule through lies, murder,
-- whatever it takes. Because there is no rule [of law]. Capt May: Well if you have
known Straussians, you will know that they will even talk about Machiavelli's
twenty four books. And the first twelve books --they will break them
down into numeric codes themselves. Part of the reason for that is
that Leo Strauss himself, the father of the Straussian movement, was
a Hungarian Jew and a Kabbalistic student. Strauss brought those principles
of Kabbalah to political philosophy. Dr. Barrett: That seems
like a bad parody of mysticism. Numerology and mysticism, there is
a long and fairly honorable tradition among this sort of thing among
people who are trying to get close to God, but here it seems like
they are trying to go in the other direction. Capt May: Well, he writes
his classic philosophy and the, what --"Philosophy and Political
Persecution," no --Persecution
and the Art of Writing, in which he says basically you have to
lay it between the lines or the many will gang up and kill you. You
can't really tell them the truth. So the whole secrecy motif is inherent
even in the proto-neo-cons. The Straussians are all behind it. And
let us talk about some of the numerics that --when I said that this
would be embedded code, the reason I told you it was kind of a Straussian
joke, it was the same way that, remember I said earlier that they
had been telling us it is a global war since day one. So that one
day we will not be able to bitch when they say, "By the way,
global war meant World War, dummy, didn't you know that?" Dr. Barrett: Well a lot
of them are actually calling it World War III, and some are calling
it World War IV. Capt May: Yes, and in the
same way this is the embedded code that we are talking about, but
with the advent of the Iraq War, what did they tell you the media
was going to be? Embedded media. Dr. Barrett: Right. Capt May: In other words
the media was not only going to be embedded in the military, it was
also going to be compromised. You know, there is a lot of eroticism
and cruelty --you are going to embed media, that means media is in
bed with government, so there was that part of it, and there is the
idea that media is embedded with code…
The
Straussian mindset has been an important factor in the ruthless way
America has conducted its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan .This includes the use of “Shock and
Awe.”The Arab Mind by Raphael Patai, is another example of a work by a
neo-con that tries to provide justification for this ruthlessness.Patai, incidentally, is a Hungarian-Israeli-American
academic. According
to Pankay Mishra in his review “In
search of monsters to destroy” (Guardian.co.uk 4 Oct 2008);
…The Arab Mind, originally published in
1973, was the bible of neocon commentators in Washington and New York
cheerleading the Bush administration's audacious venture: what Condoleezza
Rice in the new book by Bob Woodward, The
War Within: A Secret White House History 2006-2008 (Simon &
Schuster), describes as shifting the "epicentre of American power"
from Europe, where it had rested since the second world war, to the
Middle East. Widely read in the US military, The Arab
Mind later inspired the modus operandi of the jailers of Abu Ghraib.
More
surprisingly, respectable intellectuals, journalists and academics
echoed its generalisations. Among these people was the historian Bernard
Lewis, who assured Dick Cheney, one of his most devoted readers, that
"in that part of the world, nothing matters more than resolute
will and force". The New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman …exhorted the US
to act "just a little bit crazy", since "the more frightened
our enemies are today, the fewer we will have to fight tomorrow".
Accordingly, Richard Armitage, assistant secretary of state and a
relative moderate among the Bush administration's hawks, told Pakistani
diplomats that the US would bomb their country "back to the stone
age" if it did not withdraw its support for the Taliban. …Could
smashing up Iran
or invading Pakistan become the face-saving formula for the exponents of "shock
and awe"? Certainly, they see US force impressing the Persian
and the Pakistani mind as it apparently has the Arab mind. And such
is the crazy logic of a wounded militarism that, notwithstanding its
battered economy, the US may soon be embattled on many
more fronts in what is already its most damaging war.
So
far in this chapter we have talked about George W. Bush as a demented
psychopath, and how his Zionist neo-con handlers seem to have similar
mental characteristics.They are also bent towards secret society
maneuverings and totalitarianism.Notice also how the word “criminal” keeps popping
up in these interviews as well. Let’s
pause for a moment and review some key words such as “psychopathic,”
“secret societies,” “totalitarianism,” “criminality,”
and “Zionist neo-cons.” Certainly
a next logical question is whether or not all these things relate
to each other?Furthermore,
how do these horrible things rise to the top in our society? At
my web site www.americafirstbooks.com I wrestle
with the issues in some detail by exploring scientific dualities in
my article series “Reconciling Opposing Economic and Political
Ideologies.” This can be accessed from “Resolving Ideologies”
option on the home page tool bar. As
one example, we can try to approach this question by looking at the
“centralized vs. decentralized” debate in management science.This is essentially a libertarian mode of analysis. Without
question, the major trend in American history has been from a relatively
decentralized society to one reflecting a high degree of imperial
centralization.As an example, Dr. Murray Rothbard observes
in Conceived in Liberty
that in the late colonial period, most Americans had almost no government
by European standards.Everything
was handled on a local level.Up until the War Between the States, total government remained
below about 5% -10% of GDP. Once
local power is shattered, power tends to gravitate towards the center.This is certainly what began to happen after states’
rights were shattered by the Federal victory.Today, total government in American consumes about 50% of GDP
and reaches into all areas of Americans’ lives. If
one accepts the premise by libertarian authors such as Harry Browne,
author of the classic Why Government Doesn’t Work, that
government is inherently bureaucratic, and is usually inferior when
it comes to producing useful things compared to the private sector,
it becomes easy to see how once government grows beyond a certain
size, it tends to become more of a parasite than a producer.Beyond a certain point, increasing centralization tends to
create a fertile environment where intriguers tend to thrive at the
expense of honest producers. We
can also try to approach this question utilizing the environmental
vs. genetics debate in psychology. On
the genetic side of the equation, we can look at how the white population
was overwhelmingly White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) in the early
1800’s. WASPs are mostly a Nordic or Nordic-Celtic people from
Northern Europe with strong traditions of rugged individualism, a
relatively large middle class of armed and self-sufficient free farmers
(and fishermen and craftsmen), and various forms of parliamentary
government going back to prehistoric times.They take pride in their craftsmanship and ability to produce
real and useful things.They traditionally have a strong year-round work ethic and
tend to be more far-sighted and self-disciplined in their operations
than other groups.Their innate temperamental traits
have been sculptured by a long evolutionary history in a frost zone
environment, with strong themes of technological adaptation and man
vs. nature conflict. They also put considerable emphasis on open,
honorable, and chivalrous behavior. Flash
forward to mid 20th century America, and we see WASP’s
largely displaced in high finance and national media by Jews, who
have very different cultural, social, and innate temperamental characteristics.Among other things, Jews are much more adapted to the Asiatic-despotic
social model, where the leaders typically utilize covert gangster
tactics and trickery to rise to the top of a pyramidal social structure.Jews are predisposed towards achieving
quick gain through intrigue, financial speculation, and transactional
businesses as opposed to going through the more laborious route of
engineering and manufacturing real and useful things.They tend to be more collectivistic than individualistic, as
witnessed by their historic enthusiasm for “Kibbutz”-style
communes and other communist experiments. I
call this the "gorilla-gangster" social model. It is a common
practice in nature for the strongest gorilla to grab everything for
himself, to include monopolizing female gorillas into harems, while
driving less advantaged males to the periphery. Although less likely
to pass on their genes, the weaker males still serve a collective
tribal purpose of acting as sentries against predators and adding
numbers or "throw weight" to the herd.
"The
Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will
attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by
the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and
by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will
everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In
this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all
the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments
of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall
without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then
be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property
and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus
will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said
that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all
the property of the whole world in their hands."
— Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, 'La Revue de Paris', p.574, published June 1, 1928
The
human analog of the "gorilla-gangster" social model is called
"Oligarchical
Collectivism." Having evolved in pyramidal, Asiatic
societies such as ancient Babylon, or as professional minorities who
run authoritarian organized crime systems, Jews have imprinted in
their DNA a tropism towards creating pyramidal power structures, where
they stand at the top as the ruthless overlords, with race-mixed masses
at their feet. They tried to overhaul Russian society in this fashion
during the Bolshevik Revolution, and this is the trend promoted by
the Zionist oligarchy on America today:
The Jewish Oligarchical Collectivist-Asiatic Despotic
Social Model taken from George Orwell's 1984
Oligarchical collectivism as it is
practiced today by America's Zionist overlords
America:
Freedom to Fascism - Director's Authorized Version, by Aaron
Russo. Caption:
"The Film Determined to find the law that requires American
citizens to pay income tax, producer Aaron Russo ("The Rose,"
"Trading Places") set out on a journey to find the evidence.
This film which is neither left, nor right-wing is a startling examination
of government. It exposes the systematic erosion of civil liberties
in America since 1913 when the Federal Reserve system was fraudulently
created. Through interviews with U.S. Congressmen, a former IRS
Commissioner, former IRS and FBI agents and tax attorneys and authors,
Russo connects the dots between money creation, federal income tax,
and the national identity card which becomes law in May 2008. This
ID card will use Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chips which
are essentially homing devices used to track people. This film shows
in great detail and undeniable facts that America is moving headlong
into a fascist police state. Wake up! ------ Dear Lovers of Liberty,
the struggle is just beginning! Get ready... Are you aware by May
of 2008 the law will require you to carry a national identification
card? Are you aware that there are plans being developed to have
all Americans embedded with a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)
computer chip under their skin so they can be tracked wherever they
go? Are you aware the Supreme Court has ruled that the government
has no authority to impose a direct unapportioned tax on the labor
of the American people, and the 16th Amendment does not give the
government that power?"
"For
the first time ever, the secret agenda of the planet’s ruthless
Super-class is exposed in stark detail. This documentary film chronicles
how men of power and influence have worked in stealth for centuries
to establish an oppressive world government. Learn
how this global oligarchy controls the populace through drug trafficking,
money laundering, staged terror attacks, media propaganda and debt. The
criminal controllers have successfully dominated the globe and are
now in the final phase of consolidating power. Invisible
Empire is a damning indictment of the globalists through their own
words and documents. Worldwide
tyranny isn’t coming, it’s here. This
isn’t conspiracy theory, it’s conspiracy fact. The New
World Order is out in the open— all documented in stunning living
color. Unelected
bureaucrats are establishing regional unions under one superstate.
Witness
their plan for a global tax and a cashless surveillance society in
which every man, woman and child is micro-chipped at birth."
In
their ruthless scrambles to become top gorillas, Jews tend to be
very opportunistic, manipulative, and chameleon-like.They will opportunistically support any –I repeat ANY-- political, economic, or religious ideology --be it capitalism,
communism, pro-gun ownership, anti-gun ownership, anarcho-libertarianism,
fascism, neo-conservatism, New Age Hippie Counterculture, Christian
Zionism, Straussianism, environmentalism, or Trotskyitism –if
it serves their immediate tactical advantage.In fact, Jewish organizations typically
help fund and infiltrate both sides of political controversies so
that no matter who wins, they can establish some control and influence.Jews tend to deal in ideologies no differently
from the way Jewish rag peddlers and pawn shop owners like to swap
around rags and junk. It
is an interesting paradox that the most effective Zionists leaders
like David Ben Gurion and Golda Meier have tended to be atheists.For these Jews, political ideologies and religious theologies
are simply mental play toys to be used on other peoples to accomplish
tactical objectives rather than something to really believe in oneself.
This
reminds me of the joke I once heard when I lived in New York City for ten
years and was surrounded by Jews.Here it is: Whenever you get two Jews together, you get three
opinions. One
of the favorite ideological playtoys and diversionary tactics of
Jews in America is to promote phony forms of "Libertarianism"
that helps keep WASPs and other groups too fragmented and individualized
to stand up to them. Please see my "Libertarianism
vs. Nationalism" web page where I delve into important
details of this issue. In my "Iceland
Gets `ENRONed,' Then Goes for `1776'" I provide
a country analysis about how Mossad-CIA, the Russian Mafia, Goldman
Sachs, the City of London, and other Jewish entities were able to
exploit phony forms of libertarianism to infiltrate and ruin a Nordic
country. A
very important point I emphasize at this point in my discussion
is that while it may be possible to feel overawed and even intimidated
with various forms of Jewish power, and perhaps even suffer forms
of "Stockhold Syndrome," (see Chapter
37 where I discuss "predictive programing," "Stockhold
Syndrome," "limited hangout," and other techniques
that help a population incrementally learn how to "love Big
Brother" over time), in the final analysis the gorilla-gangster
social model cannot win --or at least as long as free societies
exist outside of Jewish global domination. The gorilla-gangster
social model is ultimately a parasitic, paranoid, stratified, control
freak society that squeezes out innovation and entrepreneurship.
Such societies tend to stagnate and fall by the wayside relative
to innovative societies over time. Worse yet, the worst psychopaths
tend to rise to the top, who enjoy such sadistic measures as "soft
kill" false flag pandemics, and other "UN
Agenda 21"-type global depopulation schemes.
(Please read "Sustainable
Development, Agenda 21, and Prince Charles" by
activist researcher Joan Veon and related articles listed by Dr.
Eric Karlstrom at his web site "9/11
New World Order"). In the final analysis,
everyone, including members of the military and police who initially
think they are "on the inside" become targets of the top
power clique. (For example, witness the Stalinist purges of the
late 1930's, where even high level "insiders" suddenly
found themselves shot in the back of the head or in the GULAG as
"outsiders."). As soon as the top "gorilla gangster"
power elite is through using white Americans who serve as police
and military to subdue the general population under a ruthless
martial law scenario, they would probably be happy to replace
them with millions of soldiers imported from China and elsewhere
in Asia. Under tyranny, no one is safe. Over
the long run, economically successful, technologically advanced
societies tend to have certain "loose-tight," characteristics.
This includes a high degree of politically decentralization and
chivalrous behavioral characteristics at the grass roots that protect
private property and other entrepreneurial incentives. (For an excellent
discussion of "loose-tight" management practices, please
see the landmark work In
Search of Excellence by Thomas J. Peters and Robert H.
Waterman. On
a sociogical level, it is worth noting that Nordic peoples have
been historically almost the mirror image opposite of Jews in terms
of "gorilla gangsterism," preferring instead societies
that guarantee individual rights. In my "Iceland
Gets `ENRONed,' Then Goes for `1776'", I described
how Iceland has been one of the most naturally libertarian and productive
societies in human history on a per capita basis. It is unfortunate
in this regard that the Nordic percentage of the U.S. white population
has dropped from over 60% to less than 20% over the last 150 years,
as noted in my Libertarianism
vs. Nationalism web page, but things can still
go from bad to even worse if nothing is done to arrest the continual
push by Jews and their allies towards ever greater Asiatic despotism
and racial destruction of Nordics and other whites in America. Admittedly,
it can be very tempting to want to join up with Jewish gorilla-gangsters
in the short run, since the rewards can be so great. As one example,
we learn in Stealth
Pacs: How Israel's American Lobby Seeks to Control U.S. Middle East
Policy by Richard Curtiss and They
Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby
by fomer Congressman Paul Findley that U.S. elected officials who
decide to play ball with Jews discover that Jews are very clever
about taking part of the billions that the U.S. taxpayer gives to
Israel and slipping it under the table to them as a generous kickbacks
to give even more aid to Israel and Jewish causes. As another example,
in his 31 Aug 2010 3rd hour interview with Alex Jones, Joel Skousen
described how one of the pleasures of working for Mossad-CIA is
that certain employees can get beautiful women delivered to their
hotel rooms, who have been "paid for by the Company" [the
"Company" is the nickname of "The CIA"]. What
is not so pleasurable is coming to the realization that Mossad-CIA's
activities are fundamentally parasitic to society over the long
run. Alex Jones describes how Mossad-CIA's global drug trade has
converted Mexico into a failed narco-state that has now brought
untold misery to millions of people. Another good example involves
episode 117
of The Corbett Report about the total outrage of black
community leaders in Los Angeles after they discovered that Mossad-CIA
was pushing crack-cocaine on them, following the strange "suicide"
(according to a corrupt coroner) of journalist Gary Webb who somehow
succeeded in shooting himself twice in the head according to the
usual "official report." We
have to avoid Stockholm Syndrome and not let our greed glands get
the best of us when confronted with gorilla-gangster predators.
It helps to realize that Jews are not invincible, in fact one can
make a case that is is only because of some unusual quirks of American
history and peculiarities in the structure of American society that
Jews have been able to get away with what they have for so long.
(regarding "structural" issues, please see my discussion
in Chapter
6 about the "Imperial, Orwellian, Zionist-Dominated, Neo-Jacobin,
Multi-Racial, Multi-Cultural, Welfare-Warfare, Global Super State
that Wages Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace"). Sooner or a
later their corrupt machinations will collapse. It has in fact happened
many times before in European history, and eventually historical
cycles will catch up with Jewish malefactors in America as well.
As an example, in his May/June 2010 Barnes Review article
Revenge
of the Neanderthal, Willis Carto explains the horrible
Jewish track record for arousing host populations to turn on them:
A partial list of all the areas from which the Jews have been
banished, sometimes on numerous occasions, over the last 998 years
is lengthy. The list includes Mainz (four times), France (four
times), Upper Bavaria (twice), England, Saxony, Hungary (twice),
Belgium, Slovakia (twice), Austria, Lyon, Cologne, Netherlands,
Brandenburg (twice), Warsaw, Spain, Italy (twice), Lithuania,
Portugal, Naples (three times), Navarre, Nuremburg, Prussia, Genoa,
Prague, Bavaria, the Papal States, Hamburg, Vienna, Moravia, Bohemia
and Moscow. (A chart of these states/municipalities with the year
of expulsion is found at left.)
Partial List of Cities/States
that
have expelled Jews
-- 1012-1933
Country
Year
Country
Year
Country
Year
Mainz
1012
Upper Bavaria
1442
Naples
1533
France
1182
Netherlands
1444
Italy
1540
Upper Bavaria
1276
Brandenburg
1446
Naples
1541
England
1290
Mainz
1462
Prague
1541
France
1306
Mainz
1483
Genoa
1550
France
1322
Warsaw
1483
Bavaria
1551
Saxony
1349
Spain
1492
Prague
1557
Hungary
1360
Italy
1492
Papal States
1569
Belgium
1370
Lithuania
1495
Hungary
1582
Slovakia
1380
Portugal
1496
Hamburg
1649
France
1394
Naples
1496
Vienna
1669
Austria
1420
Navarre
1498
Slovakia
1744
Lyons
1420
Nuremburg
1498
Moravia
1744
Cologne
1424
Brandenburg
1510
Bohemia
1744
Mainz
1438
Prussia
1510
Moscow
1891
Augsburg
1438
Genoa
1515
Germany
1933
The
reader might wonder, "What is wrong with these people. Why
don't they ever learn?" We
must note how much of Jewish behavior is a genetically-based tropism
that they will continue to act out, even it it causes them to overreach
themselves and manifest self-destructive "Scorpion
and the Frog" tendencies. Having been through
business school and received military intelligence operations training,
I am amazed at how the average Jew on the street, with no formal
education at all in any of these areas, nevertheless tends to have
amazing intuitive feel for all these things.More than any other ethnic culture, Jewish society is heavily
geared towards business and intrigue.They are almost like a CIA in search of
a country, which helps to explain why Israelis admire the Mossad
more than any other organization in their country. Another
thing really struck me about the Jews is that they are the ultimate
“city slickers” of mankind.Throughout all recorded history, they have
always been a more highly urbanized people than most other groups.They have always particularly thrived in
decadent multi-racial, multi-cultural cosmopolitan settings.Contrary to the pastoral image created
in the Bible, the real center of gravity of ancient Jews was Babylonia
for over 1,500 years. In fact, this has been such a major part of
their past that one suspects that it has become reverse imprinted
in their DNA through a Darwinian process.Whenever Jews rise in power, they tend to instinctively recreate
the social environment around them in ways that fit their unique
characteristics, which means recreating “Babylonia,”
multiculturalism, and multiracialism whether it is good for the
host population or not. In
fact, speaking of DNA, in Jewish Supremacism by Dr. David Duke, he
cites genetic studies that claim that Jews as a group are twice
as genetically distant from the average white person as any white
ethnic group is from any other white group (for example twice the
ethnic-genetic distance compared to the distance between Irish and
Russians or between Scots and Greeks). In
order to better fasten themselves on to the American host population,
Jews have had as collaborators in big cities many millions of Catholics
and peoples from authoritarian, peasant societies of southern and
eastern Europe who came in waves of immigration following the mid-18th
century.These collaborators often envy and resent
many of the aloof personality characteristics and attitudes of superiority
of WASPs. (WASPs tend
to be emotionally distant and highly judgmental with each other,
so nothing personal). Jews
have also had as collaborators tens of millions of intellectually-challenged
Christian Zionist Protestants suffering from the delusion that Jews
are some kind of specially favored people of God exempt from criticism
--rather than a race of utterly manipulative, psychopathic, deceitful,
and shameless predators who resort to anything –to include telling lies
about God – if it creates for them a tactical advantage. All
of these things have had a huge impact on the character of America
’s political and economic institutions –mostly for the
worse. Lastly,
we can apply the mutualism vs. parasitism paradigm one finds in
the field of sociobiology, where “parasitism” is roughly
comparable to the term “criminal.” Parasitism
can be a very successful evolutionary strategy in certain tropical
biomes, where as many as 50% of the animals species are parasites
on the other species. Regarding
humans, parasitism became an increasingly rewarding way of life
in 20th century America as the country became a more
urbanized, multi-racial, and multi-cultural. Whereas Americans in the early 1800’s
typically retained strong Old World ethnic and cultural ties (for
example the descendants of Puritans often retained ties to eastern
England and the descendants of Scots-Irish could remember their
clan origins in Scotland), the “melting pot” produced
increasingly fragmented and disoriented whites who became increasingly
inept, disunited, and powerless in regard to keeping a highly tribalistic,
goal-oriented, and crafty people like the Jews in check. Furthermore,
whereas in most states of early America
only literate land-owning white males could vote, following the
War Against Southern Independence, the average ability of voters
to comprehend the unique danger posed by the Zionist cabal began
to deteriorate with the new mania for universal suffrage. For example,
both women and former Negro slaves became enfranchised in the late
19th century.According to political science studies,
women as a group vote about one standard deviation to the ideological
left of men. In accordance with the Right Wing 101 principle
that groups tend to reorient the environment around them to suit
their unique characteristics, when women as a group grow in political
power, government tends to become “wetter,” more nanny-like,
and more expensive (higher taxes are required to fund bleeding heart
socialistic programs).In
regard to full-blooded blacks, most “culture fair” IQ
tests show them about one standard deviation below whites.This is not a particularly auspicious start in dealing with
a very clever, subtle, and duplicitous people like the Zionists.
As
usual, as “counter predators” within the electorate
weaken, predators at the top multiply and grow more dangerous. In
my discussion of parasitism in my “mutualism vs. parasitism”
article at my web site, I tie together the aforementioned terms
such as “psychopaths,” “secret societies,”
“totalitarianism,” “criminality,” and “Zionist
neo-cons.”Please
see my extended discussion of Jewish criminal
totalitarian psychopathology on my web site. Among other things,
I provideevidence that Jews have a much higher rate
of genetically-based psychopathy and homosexuality within their
gene pool compared to whites, and explain why this might offer a
survival advantage given their peculiar evolutionary strategy. The
following is an extract where I focus on the topic of Jewish criminality:
Jewish-dominated
Hollywood falsely portrays Italian-Americans
as criminal ringleaders in America , when in fact the real brains
have always been Jewish. The same is true in Europe
, where for centuries most of the underworld slang has come from
Yiddish. Michael
Collin's Piper's Final Judgment
gives an excellent overview of the Meyer Lansky operation in America , which dominated American
organized crime for decades and played a key role in the assassination
of John F. Kennedy. Lansky's crime syndicate was closely tied to
the Mossad, which dominates the global drug trade along with its
partner the CIA. The book Supermob: How Sidney Korshak
and His Criminal Associates Became America's Hidden Powerbrokers
by Gus Russo, also describes Jewish domination of major organized
crime tentacles that reach throughout America. An excellent companion
work is The Money and the Power: The
Making of Las Vegas and Its Hold on America
by Sally Denton and Roger Morris. This book explains how the Jewish
gangsters who founded Vegas were linked to Jewish mobsters in other
American cities, and how they were able to spread their power tentacles
across America at the highest levels. Denton and Morris also note how Jewish gangsters have played
a key role in the history of Israel . Jews
have always dominated the vice industries in America , to include liquor, gambling,
and pornography.
See the Jewish
Crime, Jewish Mob page at Jewwatch.com,
the judicial-inc.biz
web pages on Jewish ultra
high level crime, espionage,
and targeted
executions, and also Jewish Supremacism by Dr. David
Duke and The International Jew by Henry Ford for more details.
Interestingly
enough, according to Dr. Kevin McDonald in his review
of the book Henry Ford and the Jews, "As TIJ [The
International Jew] notes, the Kehillah [central Jewish community
leadership] was organized in response to the comment by General
Bingham, the chief of police of New York City, that Jews were responsible
for 50% of the crime in the city." Jews
also have a long track record of dominating high level organized
crime around the world. It is no accident that most of the underworld
slang in major European countries in the 19th century came from
Yiddish. In that same century, the Jewish
Sassoon family ran the opium trade in China, founded Hong
Kong , and used the British army to subjugate the entire
country under the heel of their mega-criminal enterprise. The Sassoons
became one of the richest crime families in the world, and scion
Edward Albert Sassoon intermarried with the British branch of the
Rothschild family and was knighted. Since
ancient times, Jews have had a long history as slave dealers. In early America
, Jews dominated the Negro slave trade. Today, Jews dominate the
global white
slave trade. Israel has been a central hub for the exploitation and resale
of Slavic women since the fall of the Soviet Empire. In July 2001
"a
US State Department report placed Israel in the third section of its
`black list' on countries whose laws don't meet US criteria for
dealing with this crime and threatened economic sanctions."
In Israel , white sex slaves
are only allowed to keep three percent of their earnings. Jews
are also leaders in major white collar crime in America . As an example, see "Enron, Fastow, and the Looting
of America" by Dr. William Pierce. Major Wall Street swindles have been led
by Jews such as Ivan Boesky and Mike Milken, whose involvement in
the S&L debacle cost the U.S. taxpayer hundreds of billions of dollars. Jews
have produced a disproportionate number of spies and subversives
in America
, such as Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, nine of the Hollywood Ten
(six of the ten were dues-paying members of the Communist Party),
Jonathan Pollard, and the neo-con instigators behind the Larry Franklin-AIPAC
spy scandal. Even the Jewish ADL, a self-styled human rights and
Jewish defense organization, got its fingers caught in the espionage
cookie jar with the Roy Bullock bust in San Francisco . Please
note the Israeli spy
chronology listed at whatreallyhappen.com. In
American and Europe throughout
the 1930's, Jews typically made up over 50% of the membership of
communist party organizations, although they typically made up miniscule
portions of the overall population well below ten times this percentage.
Jews played a key role in financing the Bolshevik revolution, and
a key role in conducting the slaughter of tens of millions of non-communists.
These alleged Jewish atheists systematically looted and destroyed
Christian churches and slaughtered Russian priests while leaving
all synagogues unscathed. Jews
have been major perpetrators of war crimes and terror atrocities
in the Middle East . As some examples,
they were involved in the bombing of the King David Hotel that killed
92 people in 1946, the assassination of the Swedish U.N. mediator
Count Folke
Bernadotte, the massacre at Deir Yassein, the Lavon Affair,
the machine-gunning of disarmed Egyptian POWs in Sinai, the attack
on the U.S.S. Liberty (21 Americans dead, 92 maimed), passive-aggressive
allowance of the bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut in Oct
1983 (according to Victor Ostrovsky the Mossad knew all about the
suicide mission, but deliberately failed to warn the Marines, who
lost 245 men), the Sabra-Shatilla massacre in Lebanon, the Jewish
neo-con led wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq that have
dumped hundreds of tons of aerosolized depleted uranium in the Middle
East (cf. High Priests of War
by Michael Collins Piper), and the July-August 2006 war of naked aggression
against the civilian
population of Lebanon. In
August 2005, the World
Bank reported that Israel is one of the most corrupt countries in the West. Business
Data Israel (BDI) commented: "" Israel
is considered one of the riskiest places in the Western world, with
an unstable, inefficient regime, low accountability, a relatively
high rate of state corruption
and poor law enforcement." In addition, according to a 2006
BBC survey, 43% of the Israeli public
feels that some form of torture should be permissible, the highest
percentage of twenty five leading countries polled across the world.
Last but not least, Uri Avery observes in his article "Lovable Man?" that
the gap between rich and poor in Israel is one of the widest in the
industrialized world (contrary to northern European societies that
have traditionally had the largest middle classes relative to their
overall populations). Let
us pause for a moment and ask if this is what we would expect from
a nation supposedly serving a divine mission from God to be a light
unto the world?
Let
me close by at least covering some Jewish strengths: First,
as a group, they tend to be instinctively better at schmoozing and
“handling” people than starchy Nordic types.Schmoozing, after all, is a Yiddish word. Ralph
Townsend in his 1933 book Ways that Are Dark makes a fascinating
sociological point when he implies that Jews are to Nordics as the
Chinese are to the Japanese.It really resonates with my personal experiences dealing
with both Nordics and Jews in New York City . According
to Townsend, when Americans initially come in contact with both
Chinese and Japanese communities, they invariably like the Chinese
much more because the Chinese come across as much more affable,
whereas the Japanese tend to be much more reserved.However, after getting to know both groups
for several years, Townsend observed an amazing reversal where Americans
invariably prefer the Japanese.This is because while the Chinese are famous for being friendly
on a very superficial level, and for telling people what they want
to hear, they also have a bad track record for later betraying them.In contrast, the Japanese, while harder to get to know, are
more likely once they become friends to remain faithful friends
for life. Not
surprisingly, the Chinese are often referred to as “The Jews
of the East.” Also, Townsend observed that there is such a
huge distance between Chinese and Japanese that back in the 1930’s
the conventional wisdom in the San
Francisco prison system was that if a Chinese
person and Japanese individual were put in the same prison cell
in the evening, one of them would likely be dead the following morning.
Another
thing I grant the Jews.They make truly funny stand up comics.Some, like Rodney Dangerfield, don’t
get no respect for their considerable talents in this area. Others, like Jerry Lewis, go a long ways
towards disarming suspicions that we are dealing with bona fide
members of some kind of Chosen Master Race of God.
Jerry
Lewis as the Nutty Professor
That
having been said, I would also note that the mischief these wise
guys pull off in this world would be absolutely hilarious if there
weren’t so many people getting ruined and killed. Some times I almost wonder if characters
like Bizarro in the Superman comics or the Joker in Batman comics
are a case of art imitating Jews, or whether in fact it works the
other way around. Once
I became convinced that 9/11 was very likely a Mossad-CIA inside
job, and that the Israelis are prepared to drag America into World
War III and get us all killed if it might serve them an immediate
tactical advantage, I stopped laughing with these people, and instead
started laughing at them –if that.
A final word regarding the
complete analysis
There
is some important historical explanation that I wish to share with
the reader. First, I think it is important to explain how Jews developed
their hegemony in Britain and elsewhere in Europe beginning in the
17th century before they started commencing international banker
versions of "false flag" attacks against the United States
in the 19th century, which I describe in some detail in Chapter
33 of Book III when I review the important video The Money
Masters.
Of
course there is no substitute for studying the whole gamut of Jewish
history, to include the ancient history of Jews in Babylon and Rome
as well as Palestine, or the even the history of Jews in the Middle
Ages, to include their expulsion from England, hegemony in Spain,
and eventual establishment in Poland and elsewhere in Eastern Europe.
It is an amazing history, but unfortunately it is beyond the scope
of this chapter to go into it all here. However, I would like to
provide the following extract from pages 111 to 115 of Micheal Collins
Piper's outstanding book The
New Babylon to help the reader understand how Jews conquered
England as an important springboard for their eventual takeover
of the United States. Also very significant is the analysis by Dr.
Matthew Raphael Johson of the Jewish role in Polish history. It
is also important to note how Jews have always shown an affinity
towards absolutist or totalitarian regimes, similar to what they
are now trying to impose on America through the 9/11 inside job
(Chapter
7), Patriot Act and NSPD-51 (Chapter
23), and martial law training exercises (Chapter
31). Jews typically worked as the "financial KGB"
of despotic European rulers, helping them squeeze their subjects
through ferocious tax-collecting and other forms of monopolistic
rent-seeking. Last, but not least, Jews showed a special talent
for covert infiltration techniques of European power centers. I
discuss their special aptitude as the "Mongols of covert 4th
generation warfare" methods in more detail in Chapter
38. Prior
to the modern Jewish banks in the Rothschild sphere, there was also
a considerable Jewish presence in the world of money. The Economic
Historyof the Jews noted:
Medieval
princes used the commercial and financial services of individual
Jews. However, as an institution, the Court Jew is a feature of
the Absolutist State, especially in Central Europe, from the end
of the 16th century onward. Trying
as far as possible to extend his power over the whole of his territory,
the ruler set up a centralized administration as part of his court,
which at the same time became the power center, presenting a lavish
display of luxery. Economically, a Jew could be of great service
to such a ruler. In
Poland many landed estates were administered by Jews and a large
part of the trade in agricultural products was in their hands.
This,
combined with the emergence of early Jewish capitalist commercial
activity by Sephardim in the Netherlands, with their connections
with Levantine trade through Jews in the Ottoman Empire, made
the Jew in central Europe particularly suited to be anagent for
provisioning armies with grain, timber and cattle, as well as
a supplier of diamonds and other goods for conspicuous consumption. As
tax collecting and enlargement of the scope of taxation often
lagged considerably behind the growing expenditure of court, army
and bureaucracy, this type of regime developed an almost chronic
financial deficit. Here
the Jews with their organizational skill and their far-reaching
connections could help, through the frequent supply of commercial
credit or ready cash, as also through the supply of food stuffs,
cloth, and weapons for the army, the most important instrument
of the prince's power.
In
his 17 June 2010 Orthodox
Nationalist show titled The
Fall of Poland on the Voice of Reason Broadcast Network,
Dr. Mathew Raphael Johnson describes a particularly frightening
example about how Jews acquired sociological "training wheels"
for New World Order-type social domination in Poland. This would
later serve as a model for the United States. Quite a lot has been
written that compares the United States with imperial Rome and ancient
Babylon, but the Polish analogy is equally compelling. In essence,
Jews took over all the merchant classes, gained control over all
the money, and reduced whites to a slave underclass in Poland. To
make the analogy with American history, consider how "Robber
Barons" became a de facto ruling class in America following
the War Against Southern Independence. They became roughly analogous
to the Polish nobility of the Middle Ages. Then add the rise of
the Federal-bureaucratic elite --to include Mossad-CIA -- in the
20th century. On top of this, add ostensibly nongovernmental cartels
(but which are in fact in bed with government to benefit from government
subsidy and coercion) -- such as the military industrial complex
and corporate and centralized banking elites. In essence, this "Circle
B" and "Circle Z" alliance functions just like the
tight axis between the nobility and Jewry in Polish history (call
it "Circle N" for the Polish nobility and "Circle
J" for the Jews). The end game is much the same: a militarist
plantation society where most whites become a de fact slave underclass.
Consider
how Jews gained control over the issuance of money with the creation
of the privately owned Federal Reserve Banking System as America's
central bank in 1913 (see Chapter
33). Consider also how the U.S. Government today hires private
contractors to do its imperial dirty work as did Polish leders with
Germans and other mercenaries (see Chapter
27). Consider how today most Americans are saddled with debt,
without land, are "false flagged," and are even under
continual surveillance by the likes of Mossad-CIA, the NSA, IRS,
FBI, DHS, and other "alphabet" agencies. Americans are
being covertly mass-medicated and dumbed-down with chemical and
food additives (see Chapter
36 on "soft kill" covert biowar measures employed
against the U.S. population). The white middle class is being destroyed
in America, much like it was destroyed in Poland. Words like "serf"
or even "slave" may not be too far off the mark in describing
Americans today as well as the Polish people of the 16th- 17th centuries.
Consider
also how Jews have conducted a nonstop campaign to take away both
First and Second Amendment rights in U.S. (see the Rev
Ted Pike archive regarding attacks on Freedom of Speech), and
how Poland -- the European country with the greatest number of Jews
-- just happened to be completely disarmed and had the worst human
rights track record for white people. Dr. Johnson explains how the
Polish people were not only reduced to slavery --with fewer rights
than Russian serfs -- but the nobility was lawless, just like members
of Mossad-CIA and Jewish plutocrats like Larry Silverstein who appear
to "get away" with such outrages as the "9/11 inside
job". Under
the Jewish-dominated plantation-slave system, Poland lost the ability
to grow enough food for itself just like America has lost 75% of
its manufacturing capacity in recent decades and now lacks the ability
to produced enough quality goods to avoid trade deficits. Circle
"N" and Circle "J" in Poland also used imperial
wars as a distractor from domestic problems, just like "Circle
B" and "Circle Z" during the Bush Administration. I
could go on, but the analogies should become increasingly apparent
as one reads through my excerpt of Dr. Johnson's lecture below. Unfortunately
due to an editing glitch, the first few minutes of Dr. Johnson's
17 June MP3 lecture "The
Fall of Poland" (download HERE)
start with a different lecture on Ukraine spliced into it, but at
about six minutes it gets on to the topic of Polish history. I have
decided to provide a lengthy excerpt below so that the reader can
get a better sense of the different variables that have impacted
on Polish society, to include some important positive nuances, such
as the ability of certain Polish institutions to transmit elements
of Western culture to Eastern lands. In
regard to the negatives, as usual, I can almost hear certain readers
whining sarcastically in the background "Here we go again,
blame it all on the Jews!" My
response is, "True, it was not just the Jews, but
Jews nevertheless were unquestionably a key variable behind the
tragedy of Poland:" And
now for Dr. Johnson:
Dr. Mathew Raphael Johnson:...[8
min, 37 sec into the show]; [What] I have come across recently
is a work called the Fall of Poland, it is about 1,800
pages, in two volumes, by L. C. Saxton, which came out in 1852.
[Editor's note: Listed online as Fall
Of Poland (Volume 1); Subtitle: Containing
An Analytical And A Philosophical Account Of The Causes Which
Conspired In The Ruin Of That Nation, by Luther
Calvi Saxton, one paragraph review here].
And the thesis of the book is that the Polish nobility are the
cause of the destruction of Poland... ...
I want to make it very clear that the Polish people never had
any rights as individuals until very recently, really until the
post World I era. I want to say that the Polish nobility is
the cause of Poland's decline, Poland's destruction as a state.
But the Polish nobility were slave owners, and slave owners straight
up until the era of Catherine the Great of Russia, where Poland
was then partitioned among the three powers that I mentioned before.
What we are going to talk today is this mighty power that really
was a house of cards, and the Polish nobility, the aristocracy,
was the reason why the Polish empire was as permeable and really
as weak as it really was. I want to talk about the thesis of L.
C. Saxton which to a great extent dovetails with my own work on
the Polish question. And the first fact that will make sense out
of this idea is that only members of the aristocracy could own
land. No other person, not the middle classes, not the Jews, and
I will say this again, but 80% of the Jewish population of the
world at the beginning of the 17th century lived in the Polish
empire. Jews are a huge player here. Legally speaking, although
there were ways to evade this, they could not own land, only members
of old Polish nobility could own land, which means that land prices
generally were suppressed. Were kept low. But this is a product
of the oligarchic constitution of Poland, where only members of
the aristocracy were actually citizens. Only members of the aristocracy
speaking Latin, not Polish or Ukrainian or anything else, had
any political rights whatsoever. Political rights were very easily
translated into economic rights and vice versa. I want to say
that Saxton's thesis generally is that it was noble arrogance
that destroyed Poland and prevented her from developing centralized
military institutions, like all of her neighbors were doing. As
a result of that, she eventually was divided up among those powers
capable of doing so. But part of the way that this was done was
by the suppression of the urban populations, the so-called middle
classes, the professions, the merchants, and they were banned
from owning land. That element, that switched in Western Europe,
the middle part of the Middle ages to the high Middle Ages, the
middle classes in the towns, the people who were actually making
liquid money, who altered the nature of political opinion in the
West for better or for worse, that was not permitted
to develop in Poland. The merchants and the professions living
in the towns were forbidden to own land, and their economic world
was controlled by the nobility. The nobility will do everything
in their power -- and I want to say that say by 1600 the titled
nobility in Poland, maybe averaged about half a million, 450,000
people -- they destroyed any competition from the monarchy and
the church on the one side, and the popular masses as well as
the urban population on the other. Of all the states in Europe
in the Middle Ages, the Renaissance and the modern period, the
Polish version of serfdom was the most severe. And Saxton will
go so far as to say that serfdom did not exist in Poland, only
slavery existed in Poland. Serfdom and feudalism assumed that
nobles have responsibilities to those above them. And yet in Poland
there was nobody above the nobility. So the country essentially
was a series of noble estates worked by slaves. The nobles would
come together; the first noble assembly or Diet took place in
1331. They would come together and work out their own individual
problems. That was Polish politics for a long period of time.
And serfdom in Poland was far worse than serfdom in Russia or
Germany, or Gaul, or any other place. Monarchs in general were
powerless to deal with noble power. There were attempts, you see
in France and elsewhere that a monarch will attempt to use the
lower nobility to fight the upper nobility in order to divide
them and therefore enhance royal power. These never quite worked.
And I want to suggest -- I am not being dogmatic here -- I want
to suggest to you that the reason that this occurred is largely
because there was no middle class. There was no merchant class
of native Polish stock in the cities that a King could go to.
You had this in England, quite often, where a monarch can go to
London or Kent, or you know some place like this, and promise
the merchant class a level of power in exchange for money. This
never occurred in Poland because the nobility controlled what
little merchant activity there was. And whatever kind of reform
effort that existed throughout Europe -- remember Poland was the
Easternmost boundary of the Enlightenment and the Renaissance
before that, and that kind of leaked into Ukraine, and as a result
of that ended up leaking into Russia. So Poland was really a very,
very important and sophisticated conduit of Western European culture
into the Slavic world. This is one of the reasons that Ukraine
is very Western-oriented in its approach to politics, liturgy,
religion, and everything else, without ever altering the Orthodox
faith in the center of this. This is one of those things that
makes Ukrainian Orthodoxy different from Russian or Greek Orthodoxy.
The conduit to that is the fact that Ukraine was under Polish
rule for a very long period of time. But any kind of reform effort,
to reorganize the state, to reorganize the Constitution, was destroyed
at its inception by the nobility. There was never any sense even
of representative government among the nobility. In fact representative
government was destroyed by the nobility. What I want to suggest,
I mean here is the central issue, no member of the aristocracy
could engage in commerce of any kind whatsoever without falling
into tremendous disgrace by and through their peers. Now, the
Polish nobility was smart enough not to give over the necessary
economic power, the merchant power, liquid banking power, to Poles.
So what did they do? This is the thesis here. This is the central
concept. They gave it to the the Jews. Like I said, about 80%
of world's Jews will eventually move to the Polish empire even
to the point where Jews prior to the Cossack revolt of Bohdan
Khmelnytsky will view the Polish empire as the New Jerusalem,
and even more than that, the Jews will view the Polish empire
as in and of itself Messianic. The Messiah will come because the
Jews have been given a tremendous level of power in the Polish
Empire. Not until 21st century America, will the Jews ever gain
this level of power. The Jews controlled all the money in Poland.
They controlled all the commerce of Poland. They controlled the
monarchy, and they controlled the nobility. And they did this
through the fact that the only people who had any access to liquid
money -- mobile fungible liquid money -- were the Jews that were
deliberately imported from Khazaria, from southern Russia into
the Polish Empire, and the nobles did this, to number one, to
keep the monarchy away from money, to keep actual Poles away from
money, and to keep any of their political opponents away from
money. So by the middle of the 16th century, beginning of the
17th century, the nadir of the Polish empire, you had a powerless
monarchy, you had a completely noble-dominated society, you had
millions of slaves of Polish-Catholic nationality, and the towns
like Kraków
and elsewhere were populated by Jews who were given licenses by
the nobility to engage in all banking, all trade, and the nobility
collectively gave the Jewish population in Poland an absolute
monopoly over the sale and distilling of alcohol. I want to suggest
to you guys that a huge proportion of the modern Jewish mentality
came into existence due to their immensely favorable treatment
in the Polish empire in the beginning of the 17th century. So
what does this all mean? As Ukrainian Orthodox used to say in
the 17th century, Poland was an aristocratic Judaic republic.
All commerce, all liquid money, was given over to the Jews by
the Polish nobility collectively with the idea of keeping the
nobles out of the merchant world, and the banking world, and keeping
the peasants from getting wealthy by engaging in anything that
concerned actual money, trade, and commerce. Both then as a cause
and as a result of all this, the Polish nobility scorned anything
having to do with commerce and gain. And like you had in Western
Europe, in Russia and a lot of other places, the nobility had
no sense of budgeting, no sense of controlling spending, and as
a result went deeply into debt. How were these debts financed?
They were financed by going to Kraków, going to the major
cities, Gedansk and elsewhere, and taking money from the Jews.
Taking money from the Jews in terms of taxes as well as loans.
And not just the nobility, but also the monarchy, such as it was.
And as a result, the Jews not only took all economic power, by
1700 the Jews were entirely in control of the money, but they
were entirely in control of the monarchy. So what you had was
a largely parasitic nobility, with the exception of those nobles
that had manifest military talent, and it was those nobles, including
those who became monarchs, like [John
III] Sobieski, who had tremendous military talent, who built
and maintained the Polish empire with Jewish liquidity, with Jewish
money. Now as a result of all of this, the nobles passed in the
Polish Diet --remember the capital was Kraków in the Renaissance,
many privileges for themselves were passed in the Diet. No noble
could be arrested until after the noble was convicted. Saxton's
idea that there really was no such thing as law or politics in
Polish society. And any real dispute was solved with violence,
with duels or military factionalization within the nobility. And
I want to make it clear that Saxton and pretty much anybody else
who writes on Polish history makes it very clear that the Polish
Army was not a centralized national army for the most part. The
nobles could raise their own troops from their own estates, and
they borrowed Jewish money to buy mercenaries from Germany or
anywhere else. Needless to say, no noble ever paid taxes. This
is one of the things that was central to the noble idea. No serf
-- and I don't want to use the word serf here -- . Saxton and
so many others use the word slave. Serfs did not have the rights
that existed in Russia or even in Western Europe in the Middle
Ages, and this goes straight up to the abolition of the Polish
kingdom at the end of the 18th century. Polish serfs were slaves
without rights, and rights or privileges of any kind. That was
not the case in Russia. That was not the case in Western Europe.
That was only the case in Poland. No serf can own weapons. Again,
that was not the case in Russia either. Serfs could own weapons
in Russia, as was proven by the Bolotnikov
and Razin
rebellions, but in Poland no serf or slave could own weapons,
and no serf or slave could learn the military arts. Now one of
the things the Polish nobility did to enhance the power of Jews,
is to say that the Jews could not own land, all of their wealth
had to exist in liquid form. Polish agriculture was always very
weak, because a slave economy is never an efficient economy. In
fact, and Saxton holds this, and a number of scholars do as well
-- most Polish land was not in fact cultivated. Poland was involved
in exporting food only sporadically, for the most part Jewish
liquidity was borrowed for the sake of importing food from Russia
and elsewhere. This is why it became very important for the Poles
to take right bank Ukraine because there you had a level of fertility
that did not exist in Poland, and a great yield could be produced
with actual little effort.
Americans
are confronted with rising, onorous taxation, and the Poles were
squeezed dry with taxes as well. As one example, according to journalist-researcher
John de Nugent, in
order to enter their own houses of worship (typically a Catholic
Church), Poles were often forced to pay a tax to a Jew standing
in the doorway. The
world Jewish population expanded enormously while hosted by Poles
and their dominions. The chapter 1648
Annus Mirabilis from The Revolutionary Jew and
His Impact on World History by E. Michael Jones provides important
additional background to Dr. Matthew Johnson's aforementioned lecture:
...Beginning
with the Statute of Kalisz in 1251, the Jews of Poland were granted
rights like nowhere else in Europe. They were even granted their
own autonomous legal system, known as the kahal, which allowed
them to adjudicate intra-Jewish disputes without recourse to the
Polish Christian legal system. This autonomy, in turn, necessitated
the intensive study of the Talmud, which, according Graetz, led
to the peculiar corruption of Polish Jews. The reliance on the
Talmud as the basis of Jewish legal autonomy created a culture
of "hair-splitting judgment" among the rabbis, according
Graetz, as well as "a love of twisting, distorting, ingenious
quibbling, and a foregone antipathy to what did not lie within
their field of vision," which in turn trickled down to find
expression in the behavior of vulgar, who "found pleasure
and a sort of triumphant delight in deception and cheating."
Since by the end of the 18th century, the overwhelming majority
of Jews lived in Poland, Jews in general earned, as a result,
the reputation of being "a nation of deceivers," to
give Immanuel Kant’s formulation. "It does indeed seems
strange," Kant, the quintessential Enlightenment philosopher,
continued, "to conceive of a nation of deceivers, but it
is also very strange to conceive of a nation of merchants, the
majority of whom, bound by an ancient superstition accepted by
the state they live in, do not seek any civil dignity, but prefer
to make good this disadvantage with the benefits of trickery at
the expense of the people who shelter them and at the expense
of each other. In a nation of merchants, unproductive members
of society . .. . it cannot be otherwise"( Kant, Werke Bd.
vii, p. 205-6). From his vantage point in Koenigsberg, the capital
of what was then East Prussia, a country which the Teutonic Knights
wrested by force from the Slavic natives, all Jews were Polish
Jews. ...Largely
as a result of the concessions of the Polish crown which began
with the Statute of Kalisz, Poland became known throughout Europe
as the "paradisus Judeorum," the paradise of the Jews.
When persecutions would flare up in the traditionally Jewish sections
of Europe, in the German principalities, particularly in the urban
centers of the Rhein valley, as they frequently did throughout
the middle ages, the Jews who wished to escape persecution inevitably
headed east toward Poland, taking their language, "juedische
Deutsch," or Yiddish with them... A
short summary of Jewish demographics gives some indication of
how successful the Jews were in living under Polish rule. Between
1340 and 1772, when Poland was partitioned for the first time,
the Jewish population of Poland increased 75-fold while, during
the same period of time the Christian population only quintupled.
The disparity in population increase is explainable in simple
terms. Persecution in the west, largely during the period from
the 11th to the 16th century, caused massive immigration. Jews
moved to Polish territory during that period of time in unprecedented
numbers. By the time Poland was partitioned for the third and
final time in 1795, 80 percent of the world’s Jews lived
there. This
phenomenal expansion of the Jewish population in Poland was matched
by a correspondingly rapid increase in wealth, and that, in turn,
corresponded to a dramatic expansion of the territorial limits
of Poland. The Golden Age of Polish Jews, according to Pogonowski,
lasted from 1500 to 1648. By 1634, which is to say toward the
closing years of this age, Poland had become the largest country
in Europe. Its territory extended from the Baltic almost to the
Black Sea and from Silesia in the west to what is now the heart
of the Ukraine, two hundred kilometers east of the Dnieper River.
As a result, by the middle of the 17th century, as much as 60
percent of Poland’s population was not ethnically Polish,
a situation which was bound to cause friction sooner or later,
depending on how wisely the Polish rulers treated their alloethnic
subjects. Instead
of wisdom, what followed was a classical case of cultural drift
in which imperial expansion covered over internal decay until
finally the contradictions and injustices which had become an
integral part of the system became so insupportable that the bubble
burst, and an orgy of violence followed, eventually dragging the
Polish state into extinction. The story of Poland was in many
ways the story of Imperial Rome writ small. Imperial expansion
to the east into what is now the Ukraine, the Crimea and Belorus
resulted in the creation of huge estates, some the size of western
European countries like Holland and Switzerland. The estates were
called Latifundia, an ironic comment on the blindness of the Polish
nobility, who failed to see the mischief which the Latifundia
system had wrought in ancient Rome. The Polish Noble’s republic
was a classic oligarchy, as Plato defined the term in his Republic.
As in ancient Greece, so in Poland; wealth concentrated in fewer
and fewer hands, led to rebellion among the lower classes. As
in ancient Rome, wealth concentrated in fewer and fewer hands
fueled a system of imperialism in which the chief losers were
the overwhelming majority of the Polish people, in particular,
as in Rome, the citizen soldiers, who were driven to the wall
by the monopoly conditions the Latifundia fostered. When the rebellion
finally came, all Poles would be held responsible for the excesses
of the magnates who created the system which had dispossessed
the average Polish citizen in the first place.
On
a deep sociological level, the way in which Jews were able to infiltrate
Polish society, use it as an imperial riding horse to suit their
own selfish needs, and all the while suck Polish society dry before
they discarded it, is essentially the same social pattern and long
term historical process that has been repeated in the UK and is
currently playing out in the United States. Poland
not served as a working prototype of the parasitic "New Babylon,"
"New Jerusalem," or "New World Order" that took
over what was once a proud white European country, but it also served
as a springboard for Jewish recolonization across other areas of
Europe, to include the reemergence of powerful Jewish banking families
throughout Europe. The most notable example are the Rothschilds.
According to Mike Piper in The
New Babylon:
In
all their varied activities, the Court Jews played a remarkable
part in the development of international credit facilities,
especially in the central European states, and to some degree
in northern Europe also, from the mid-17th to the late 18th
Centuries. Generally,
they were agents who arranged transfers of credit rather than
possessors of vast capital in their own right; through their
far-reaching commercial relationships and their organizing skill,
they were able to provide funds more swiftly than most Christian
bankers. Because
of their specialization in the money business, they were able
to furnish the silver for the mints more easily, and could more
easily act as army purveyors, once more because of their ability
to organize and their network of family relationships. With
their entrepreneurial spirit, they contributed in part to the
process of industrialization within the frame of mercantilist
policies. There
is no doubt that they were instrumental in the growth of the
modern absolute state, and at the end of the era there emerged
a group of several important Jewish private bankers who exemplify
the transition to modern methods of economy and government,
primarily the Rothschilds, the Goldsmids, the Oppenheimers,
and the Seligmans.
The
authors added, almost as an afterthought, "However, it should
not be forgotten that the courts had their Christian bankers,
entrepreneurs and army agents, too, who also played a part in
this development." How kind of these Judeo-centric authors,
writing for a Judeo-centric publishing house, to give credit to
the Christians! Great
Britain's emergence--as the preeminent center of Jewish fmance-is
vital for us to consider. During the" early years of World
War II, Germany's news agency, World-Service, assessed this little-known
history.
Jewry's
rise to power in England took place in three sharply defined
stages, which are separated by intervals of about 100 years.
Under
Cromwell's rule and during the first half of the Revolution
period, under Charles II, the Jews, after having been banned
from England for a period of more than 350 years, again swarmed
into England. Cromwell's
rule is characterized by an outspoken British imperial policy.
With regard to his financial as well as his political policy
Cromwell depended upon the Jews to be the backbone of his colonial
expansion. Jewish agents carried on economic and political espionage
for Cromwell, availing themselves of the Jewish business houses
in foreign countries. In
Cromwell's time, exactly as 100 and 200 years later, a small
ruling Jewish clique was formed, at whose head one Jew appeared
as the backbone of the new colonial economic policy. In Cromwell's
time it was the enormously rich Sephardic Jew Antony Fernandez
Carvajal who occupied this position. A
hundred years later the second stage of the Jew's rise to power
in England commences. The Jewish clique in England was then
led by the exceedingly rich Sephardic Jew, Sampson Gideon, who
also greatly influenced the English cabinet ministers. At that
time the influence of the Jews on finance-capital in England
was already so great, that without exaggeration one may say,
that English Jews were controlling the English money market.
Under
the leading of Sampson Gideon the Jews sought to break down
the barrier-erected by the time-approved laws against the influx
of foreign Jews. The English nation, aroused to anger, strenuously
opposed this Jewish effort. The Jews therefore could accomplish
nothing by constitutional means, but already their power was
so great, and by working from behind the scenes the influential
English Jews saw to it, that these time-approved laws were evaded
and set at nought. Again,
a hundred years later, in the 19th Century, we encountered the
last and most decisive period, during which the Jews attempted
their emancipation. Jewish personalities such as Rothschild,
Montefiore, Bernal, Montagu, Ricardo and Disraeli at the beginning
of the Victorian age, fought for and gained equal rights for
Jewry within English law. Once
the Jews .had been received at court and had been granted citizenship,
the English nobility no longer felt degraded by intermarriage
with Jews. Uninterrupted, the penetration and disintegration
of the English nobility by Jewry now continued. Uninterrupted,
the Jewish invasion of the ruling class, whose national opposition
was broken down, was now continued on a broad basis.After Jewry
had in this way succeeded in worming its way into the nobility,
it could from this strong position carry on its campaign against
the English nation. It
now began the third stage of its conquest of England. In a period
of about 100 years it had accomplished this. In the reign of
Queen Victoria the last resistance of the English nation was
broken down. Judah had conquered England. Jewish-English Plutocracy
was stabilized by the Jews and by sections of the ruling class,
which was connected with it by ties of blood, and which was
to be still further extended in the 20th Century. Jewish interest
and the interest of the Jewish-English aristocracy were now
identical. Through
this plutocratic system of government Jewish and British Imperialism
were firmly welded together. The strong hands by which the Jews
had bound the English nobility to themselves were those of blood
relationship and finance-capital. Jewish gold now became the
undeniable ruler of England. Jewish unscrupulousness and aggressiveness,
shady Jewish avarice and greed from now on become the characteristics
and the stamp of the ruling classes, now to be counted in with
the Jews. These
were the cornerstones that were used in building up the British
Empire in its present form. These are the foundations upon which
it rests.
Further
in the New Bablyon, Mike Piper continues:
While
the Rothschild family held sway through their banks in London,
Paris, Frankfurt,Vienna and Naples, there were also such big names
in Jewish finance as Bleichroder in Berlin, Warburg in Hamburg,
Oppenheim in Cologne and Speyer in Frankfurt who were also emerging
as powerful lords of money who worked in conjunction with one
another and with the Rothschilds, competing often to be sure,
but all tied together by their Jewish heritage and traditions.
There were also the Hambros of London, the Sassoons of Bombay
and the Guinzberg house in St. Petersburg. Although
these banking empires were equivalent to what are called "merchant
banks" or "investment banks" today, there was also
a significant Jewish role in setting up so-called "commercial"
banks (more akin to the "average" bank with which the
average commoner would deal for fmancial services) such as the
Deutsche Bank and the Dresdner Bank--two of Germany's "Big
Three," Credit Mobilier and the Banque de Paris et des Pays-Bas
in France, along with Banca Commerciale Italiana and Credito Italiano
in Italy, and Creditanstalt-Bankverein and Banque de Bruxelles,
among others. In
the United States, there were Jewish bankers rising: Haim Solomon
of Revolutionary War fame (although there are those who dispute
the claim that Solomon was "The Jewish Patriot Who Financed
the American Revolution") and Isaac Moses who--along with
Alexander Hamilton--founded the Bank of New York in 1784. Krefetz
cited such Jewish banking houses that rose in America from the
period of 1840 onward: Bache, Goldman, Sachs, J. W Seligman, Kuhn
Loeb, Ladenburg, Thalmann, Lazard Freres, Lehman Brothers, Speyer,
and Wertheim. And Krefetz notes that these American-based Jewish
banking houses had a tendency to intermarry and often acted in
concert and thus projected "an image of concentrated power."
And
needless to say, in the midst of this, the Rothschilds were indeed
already operating on American soil through their American agent,
August Belmont, who worked with many of these other Jewish capitalist
forces. What
is interesting is that Krefetz suggested that these Jewish banks
were unable to compete with what he calls "Protestant"
banks among which Morgan, Drexel, Gould, Fiske, Harriman and Hill
were the most prominent. But, as we shall see later in these pages,
many of these elements were, in fact, under the sway of Rothschild
and other Jewish influence. For
the record, Krefetz added, that, in his opinion, there is no real
evidence of an international conspiracy of Jewish bankers, but
that "some Jews in banking have conspired." The
money game, he said, "holds a fascination for Jews that some
might say is equivalent to sex to the French, food to the Chinese,
and power to the politician. And since the Diaspora [the scattering
of Jewish communities], their financial concerns have always had
an international flavor." As
early as 1879, the anti-Jewish German of partial Jewish descent,
Wilhelm Marr, said candidly that Jewish Money Power had assembled
a pre-dominant influence, in Germany in particular, but he recognized
that this money power was international in scope. Marr described
his own writings as "less a polemic against Jewry than confirmation
of a cultural and historical fact." He said that any intemperate
language he may have used "must be understood as no more
than a cry of pain from one of the oppressed." By
the "oppressed," Marr was referring to the rest of the
many Europeans and peoples worldwide who were, as one English
writer put it, some years later, "under the heel of the Jew,"
--referring, indeed, to the Jewish Money Power. Pointing
out that many people had written unpleasant things about Jews
and the organized Jewish community, Marr noted that, nonetheless,
"our self conceit still keeps us from the open and honest
admission that Israel has become a world power of the very first
rank." He
emphasized that there was no religious prejudice in his writings.
He was, he noted, simply enabling his readers to peer into what
he called "the mirror" of cultural and historical facts.
He advised readers of his pessimistic works to not blame him if
that mirror showed those readers to be slaves.
"I'm
Doing God's Work" by Texe Marrs, caption: "Lloyd
Blankfein, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for Goldman
Sachs, lackey for Lord Rothschild. [Jacob] Rothschild is cryptic
holder of the title, `King of the Jews.'"
In
his April 2010 article "I'm
Doing God's Work," Texe Marrs explained how Goldman
Sachs based in New York City has become not only the most powerful
firm in America, but also one of the world's biggest trouble-makers.
A Pioneer of Treachery and Deceit Strangely,
even though Goldman Sachs was founded back in 1869 (an occult
numerologically significant year), few outsiders had previously
understood its great strength as the world’s unchallenged
financial giant. In fact, it was Goldman Sachs that has pioneered
financial treachery in many areas. The firm established the concept
of "initial public offerings" (IPO) in 1906, in offering
to the public the stock of Sears Roebuck and Company. Its Ponzi
scheme shenanigans helped bring about the Stock Market Crash of
1929. In
1970, Goldman Sachs was pivotal in the bankruptcy of the Penn
Central Railroad. It masterminded the sale of stock of the Rockefeller
Center, and in the 1980s, shepherded the conversion of the failed
Soviet Union’s assets. Thanks
to Goldman Sachs’ "privatization" scam, former
KGB and Communist Party bigwigs—Jews, naturally—ended
up with almost all the vast property holdings of the Kremlin.
These Jewish oligarchs remain in control of Russia and the dissolved
Empire’s most prized assets, including its valuable oil
and gold reserves.
Bush and Obama Both Pawns of Goldman Sachs Today,
Goldman Sachs enjoys unbelievable power to manipulate and orchestrate
world events. Barack Obama’s entire administration is at
their disposal. Obama is not the only President whose knees bend
at the mere mention or whisper of the vaunted Goldman Sachs name.
George W. Bush did whatever his Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson,
told him to do. Paulson came to the White House from Goldman Sachs,
where he once had Lloyd Blankfein’s job as CEO. Tim Geithner,
Obama’s Secretary of the Treasury, as head of the New York
Fed, took orders from Goldman Sachs. So, too, does Stephen Friedman,
current Chairman of the New York Fed. Even President Bill Clinton
was answerable to a Goldman Sachs overseer. His Secretary of the
Treasury was Robert Rubin, a former Goldman Sachs executive.
Goldman Sachs, Warren Buffet, and Rothschild Rothschild
and Goldman Sachs have brought many other big-time stock market
holders and political potentates into their web of control. In
2008, Berkshire Hathaway’s Warren Buffet, sometimes erroneously
claimed to be "The Richest Man in the World," wisely
ponied up to the bar with $10 billion, which he confidently invested
in Goldman Sachs stock. California is also under Rothschild’s
and Goldman’s thumbs. That state’s Governor, Arnold
Schwarzenegger, was chosen for his gubernatorial position at the
behest of Lord Rothschild. Meanwhile, as it turns out, California’s
bonds collapse and its near-bankruptcy is at least partly attributable
to the fact that Goldman Sachs sold the bonds short and precipitated
the crisis. More
recently, it came out that the Euro currency’s near collapse
was caused by the fact that Goldman Sachs had first sold the corrupt
Greek government billions in worthless derivatives (called CDOs
or credit swaps). Then, taking the other side, Goldman sold the
same derivative holdings short. The firm thus made money both
ways, while the people of Greece are now devastated.
Goldman Sachs Key Role in America’s Demise But
it is America where Goldman Sach’s diabolical stratagems
for money production have most recently had the more crushing
effect. Richard Teitelbaum, reporting on Bloomberg.com (February
23, 2010), disclosed secret documents in the possession of a House
Committee proving that the world’s now-raging financial
crash and credit crisis ensued as a result of toxic derivatives
minted by Goldman Sachs. The mortgage and real estate meltdown
came about after Goldman Sachs had marketed trillions of dollars
of these worthless, ponzi-scheme investments around the world
and then turned around and sold them short. Now
comes the eye-opening part of this whole deal: Once the meltdown
was in full array, George W. Bush’s Goldman Sachs protégée
and Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Paulson, arranged for Goldman
Sachs to receive a staggering $200 billion in insurance from the
crooked, failed AIG insurance corporation which the feds had just
taken over, as compensation for alleged "lost revenue"
due to the crash. What
a deal! Goldman Sachs made money both ways on a crash and then
got paid by the government a whopping $200 billion for losses
it didn’t even have! But
that’s not all. To further drive America and the whole world
into financial destitution and despair, Goldman Sachs and a partner
firm, Morgan Stanley, manipulated the price of oil futures, rocketing
that key industry commodity to unequalled heights of $147 per
barrel. With that, the whole world’s economies, already
teetering because of Goldman’s CDO/derivatives scam, went
"kaput...bam." It was all over.
On
page 169 of The
New Babylon, Michael Collins Piper explains how the Jewish
approach to banking has always contrasted with that of honest gentile
bankers:
Discussing
the matter of the Federal Reserve's interlocking ties with what
[Henry] Ford referred to as "the Economic Plans of International
Jews," Ford asserted, quite correctly: "The strength
of Jewish Money is in its internationalism. It stretches a chain
of banks and centers of financial control across the world and
plays them on the side of the game that favors Judah." Ford
said that single Jewish banking houses in any given country would
be no menace. As mere bankers in their own countries they would
not, Ford said, occasion alarm. Ford noted that in conventional
commercial banking, the Jews had not predominated and that traditional
deposit banks were hardly a part of the Jewish fmancial network.
"The
Rothschilds," said Ford, "were never bankers in a proper
sense; they were money lenders to nations whose representatives
they had corrupted to seek the loans. They. did business precisely
on the plain of the money lender on the side street who seduces
the rich man's son to borrow a large sum, knowing that the father
will pay. That is scarcely banking. Brains of that sort may 'get'
money but will not 'make' money." Thus,
said Ford, it was necessary to look at the international scope
of Jewish banking power. This system, he said, did not require
that a Jewish banking house be the most important fmancial power
in any particular country. It was not the wealth and importance
of any single such banking house, but, instead, he said, the wealth
and importance of the world chain of me various Jewish banking
houses that gave the strength to the International Money Power.
For
example, Ford cited Paul Warburg of the Kuhn, Loeb & Company
who was a prime mover behind the establishment of the Federal
Reserve System in the United States. Warburg's enterprise was
far from being the most powerful bank in the United States, but
because of its international connections -- which were, as Ford
said, "all Jewish" -- it took on a new aspect in terms
of its impact on American life. The
record shows that it was indeed the establishment of the Federal
Reserve in 1913 that set in place the framework for further expansion
of Rothschild control over American fmance and industry. Americans,
of course, had little understanding of all of this. American author
E. C. Knuth noted that in 1945 in his work, The Empire of
"The City" that Senator Edward Hall Moore of Oklahoma
had made public the fact that "the British government"
owned vast holdings in 80 of the largest American industrial corporations,
including General Motors and Standard Oil of Indiana. That Standard
should be among them might come as a surprise to those naive Americans
who have long believed that the Rockefeller family, which appeared
to dominate Standard Oil, were somehow a "royal" family
in American terms, when, in fact, the Rothschild influence extended
even here into the ranks of such a famous "American"
corporation.
This photo from a blog
on Arnold Schwarzenegger has the following caption: "This
is a picture of Arnold meeting with Warren Buffet and TRILLIONAIRE
Lord Jacob Rothschild at one of his estates in 2002. The Rothschilds
are the largest shareholders of the Federal Reserve Bank and
are secretly one of the richest families in the world..."
The summary
web page regarding Dope,
Inc. titled "The
Pusher" has the following caption for this illustration: "Global
Teutonic Zionists - Working towards that New World Order: 1) Lord Jacob
de Rothschild. 2) His spooky son, Nathaniel. 3) Baron John de Rothschild,
who recently said they are working towards global governance. 4) Sir
Evelyn de Rothschild. His wife Lynn Forrester is a big mover and shaker
in the Democratic party. 5) David Rockefeller, Sephardic Crypto-Teutonic,
who’s son Nick told film director Aaron Russo about 9/11 in advance.
6) Nathan Warburg. His family was not only instrumental in creating
the Federal Reserve, etc. they were also behind the rise of Adolf Hitler.
7) Henry Kissinger, Globalist genocidal schemer. 8 George Soros, another
Teutonic schemer and NGO manipulator. 9) Paul Volcker, Crypto-Jew big-time
Globalist and economic advisor to Obama. 10) Larry Summers, Crypto-Teutonic
economic advisor to Obama. 11) Lloyd Blankfein, CEO to the rapidly growing
Goldman Sachs banking behemoth. 12) Ben Shalom Bernanke, current Teutonic
master of the Federal Reserve (a private entity, neither “Federal”
nor a “Reserve”). What’s the common denominator here?"
Interesting enough, various Rothschilds have
been willing to become more public as of late and grant interviews.
The following from YouTube: Sir
EVELYN DE ROTHSCHILD talks about the current banking GLOBAL FINANCIAL
CRISIS Caption: "In 2003, following the retirement of Sir
Evelyn de Rothschild as head of N M Rothschild & Sons of London,
the English and French firms merged to become one umbrella entity
called "Group Rothschild." Ownership was shared equally
between the French and English branches of the family under the leadership
of David de Rothschild. In 2007, the English branch sold their share
to the French branch. The French branch now fully own N M Rothschild
& Sons."
Evelyn
De Rothschild Warning Masses - Too Late (Holding Bonds, Oil, Gold).
12 Dec 2008. A Vatic Project web
page comments: "Watch this first video to understand just
how evil these people are. Listen to Rothschild and how he supports
Browns actions (remember Brown had to resign when his pedophilia at
high levels of gov came out and was exposed). Notice how he passes
on blame to the lowest levels of the system and yet they were the
puppet masters in the bringing down of the American financial system.
Notice how he "feels sorry for the pensioners" after his
Goldman sachs extracted trillions from the retirement funds. How psychopathic
can you get???"
"If you will look back at every war in Europe during the
Nineteenth Century, you will see that they always ended with the
establishment of a 'balance of power'. With every re-shuffling there
was a balance of power in a new grouping around the House of Rothschild
in England, France or Austria. They grouped nations, so that if
any king stepped out of line a war would break out and the war would
be decided by which way the financing went. Researching the debt
positions of the warring nations will usually indicate who was to
be punished."
In describing the characteristics of the Rothschilds and other major
international bankers, Professor Quigly tells us that they remained
different from ordinary bankers in several ways: they were cosmopolitan
and international; they were close to governments and were particularly
concerned with government debt, including foreign government debts;
these bankers came to be called "international bankers".
(Quigly,Tragedy and Hope, p.52)
There
are other books which provide important insights into the criminal
character of Jewish financial practices, to include Confessions
of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins, which documents the
practice of paying off (or replacing through Mossad-CIA-sponsored
assassinations and coups) various Third World leaders who are enticed
to mire their countries in debt to Jewish-controlled big money center
banks in the City of London and New York. Consider also Gold
Wars: The Battle Against Sound Money As Seen From A Swiss Perspective
by former Rothschild Banker Ferdinand Lips, who explains how leaders
of global Jewish organizations used bogus charges for their own advantage
regarding Swiss accounts of alleged Holocaust victims to intimidate
Switzerland out of its longstanding gold standard. At
this point the reader may find it of particular interest to visit
my discussion of America's totally dysfunctional financial system
in Chapter
33 to learn about strong evidence that Jews tried to permanently
fasten three highly corrupt central banks on the United States in
the18th century and 19th centuries before they finally became successful
with the establishment of the Federal Reserve Banking System in 1913.
There is strong evidence that the Rothschilds tried to assassinate
President Andrew Jackson for his opposition the third American central
bank. There is also interesting circumstantial evidence that the Rothschilds
and other Jews played a significant role in the assassinations of
Presidents Abraham Lincoln and James Garfield. Last, but not least,
there is overwhelming evidence provided by Michael Collins Piper in
Final
Judgment that the Mossad was central to the assassination
of President John F. Kennedy, who indirectly signaled an interest
in curtailing the Federal Reserve. Again,
there is quite a lot of history I wish I could cover in this chapter
to help the reader connect all the dots, but I do not have the space.
Certainly I cannot encourage the reader enough to watch the full length
video The Money Masters provided in Chapter
33 to get a good start. Three areas I would like to touch upon
before closing out this chapter involve the continued consolidation
of Jewish power in America and around the globe following World War
II. This includes their push towards global New World Order dictatorship,
as documented by Alex Jones in his documentary ENDGAME. I
also want to address the highjacking of American foriegn policy documented
by Michael Collins Piper in The High Priests of War, and
the Mossad role in 9/11 covered by Victor Thorn in 9-11 Evil.
The
Alex Jones documentary ENDGAME has a lot of good introductory
material, particularly in the first half. (It seems to be a pattern
in Alex Jones documentaries that his best material is in the first
half, whereas the last half often goes off on tangents about various
alleged high level Nazi networks and eugenics conspiracies, etc. I
tend to agree with the first half and not the second half of much
of many of his works, unless one substitutes the word "Zionist"
for Nazi."). The
following segment of ENDGAME is not as far-fetched as it
might appear to certain individuals who are newcomers to the strange
world of high level "Circle Z" intrigue, especially when
one considers that every country Jews have ever inhabited over the
last twenty five hundred years has ultimately turned on them. Not
surprisingly, most Jews suffer from unlimited paranoia, which goes
hand-in-hand with the unlimited psychopathy that afflicts a significant
percentage of the Jewish population. Books like Two
Hundred Years Together by Alexandr Solzhenitsyn document
the blood-chilling ruthlessness of Jewish Bolsheviks who played a
key role in mass-murdering 60 million Slavic people. Therefore, we
should be comfortable with the idea that if a paranoid and power-mad,
criminal-psychopathic Jewish elite were ever permitted to achieve
their goal of world domination, there would be absolutely no limit
to the cruel and ruthless methods they would be willing to utilize
to keep control at all costs. No limit whatsoever. We could expect
them to treat all of humanity lower than cattle --lower even than
the Christian and Muslim Palestinians that Israelis continue to genocide
in Gaza and the West Bank. At
3:51 into the his documentary, Alex Jones has the following comments
about the "Blueprint for Global Enslavement."
In
the near future Earth is dominated by a powerful world government.
Once-free nations are slaves to the will of a tiny elite. The dawn
of a new Dark Age is upon mankind. Countries are a thing of the
past. Every form of independence is under attack. …with the
family, and even the individual itself nearing extinction. Close
to 80% of the Earth’s population has been eliminated. Remanants
of humanity are forced to live within highly-controlled compact
prison-like cities. Travel is highly restricted. Superhighways connect
the mega-cities and keep the population from entering into unauthorized
zones. No
human activity is private.AI supercomputers chronicle and catagorize
every action. A prison-planet dominated by a ruthless gang of control-freaks.
Whose power can never be challenged. This
is the vision of the global elite. Their goal - a program of total
dehumanization. The science of tyrrany is law. A
world-wide control grid. Designed to ensure the overlords’
monopoly of power forever. Our species will be condemned to this
nightmare future unless masses are awakened to the New World Order
master plan and mobilized to defeat it. Erected
by a secretive group the Georgia Guidestones are a testiment to
the elites’ plan for a world religion, Global laws, with a
global court and army to enforce it. And set in stone, it is written
that the population never rise above 500 million. In
this film you will learn how our world is truly governed. You will
see how highly secretive roundtable groups interlock to form a global
intelligence network. This group has steered planetary affairs for
hundreds of years. Now in the final stages, they prepare for open
world government. A goal tyrants throughout history have lusted
after.
At
7:20 into the documentary, we see an interview with Congressman Ron
Paul, who comments:
President Bush said the New
World Order was in tune. That’s what they were working for.
The UN is part of that government. They’re working right now
very significantly for a North American Union. There’s a lot
of people in Washington right now who don’t care too much
about our borders. They have a philosophic belief that national
sovereignty is not important. That’s sort of the reason I
have made a very strong suggestion we need not be in the United
Nations for our national security.
At
11:07 into the documentary, we get some important background history:
...
Archduke Franz Ferdinand, was assassinated while traveling in a
motorcade. The “Black Hand” - a Serbian secret society
with connections to French and British intellegence took credit.
World War I had begun. Armaments
companies financed by Rothschild-controlled banks in Germany, France,
England, and Austria bankrolled all factions. At least 20 million
were killed in the war. It was a conflict so terrible, the people
vowed to never fight again. They dubbed it the “War to End
All Wars”. The
question is “Why did they want war?” Well, first of
all, there’s money and power- But secondly, they wanted to
create the League of Nations. They had this in their plans all along,
and as a consequence, once the war was over, or about to be over,
they began to formulate this idea of a League of Nations so this
would never ever happen again. Hundreds
of years of practice made the British experts at hiding their empire
behind puppet governments and councils. In the name of stopping
all future conflicts, they proposed that countries would join a
“League of Nations.” Their true intention was for the
League to serve as a framework for world government. President
Woodrow Wilson, who had spearheaded the establishment of the private
Federal Reserve System in the United States in 1913, strongly supported
the establishment of the League of Nations. Woodrow Wilson was a
very naïve President.
At
16:29 into the documentary, we get an introduction to secretive elite
groups who have included senior U.S. Government officials. They have
met in secret to handle U.S. policy with high level foreign leaders
in criminal violation of the U.S. Logan Act.
In
the build-up to World War II, and during the conflict, the bankers
financed both sides just as they had done with Napolean. After the
rise and fall of the Third Reich, Europe lay in ruins. Once
again, the elite claimed, that only global governance could save
humanity from certain destruction. And this time the elite would
succeed in setting up their world body. In April of 1945, at the
Presideo naval base in San Francisco The United Nations was founded
by the victors of World War II. The
United Nations complex was then built in New York City on land donated
by John D. Rockefeller. Shortly after, the Elite established the
United Nations as their base in the United States the newly-formed
World Council quickly began work. On
the next phase in their plan the incremental formation of continental
“super states”. The first step in their tri-lateral
plan was the creation of the European Union. Unifying
Europe had been tried many times, and was extremely unpopular. Where
Napolean and Hitler had failed to accomplish their goals using force,
the Globalists would succeed, using stealth. The
British spearheaded the formation of the Council of Europe on May
5, 1949. The Treaty of London claimed to only establish trade ties
between European nations like NAFTA or GATT in North America. Its
true intention was the formation of a European super-state. WE
SHALL HAVE WORLD GOVERNMENT WHETHER OR NOT YOU LIKE IT. BY CONQUEST
OR CONSENT. -James Warburg, in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
February 17, 1950 In
1954, the Elite of the planet met in secret at the Bilderburg Hotel,
in Oesterbek, Holland. The Builderburg Group would later admit that
their mission was the formation of the EU (European Union). Once
the EU was established under the guise of trade deals, North American
Union, and Asian Union would be formed. The
three interlocking superstates form the core of the global government.
While the United Nations would serve as a world regulatory and enforcement
body. Over the third-world sub regions. The
Bilderburg Group consists of the heads of all of the managing rountable
groups that steer individual countries. Picture the elite power
structure of the world as a giant pyramid. With only the elite of
the Elite at the tip-top of the capstone. The
group has been so secretive, that until the mid-1980’s, the
controlled corporate media denied its existence. Into the late 1990’s
coverage only consisted of rare, one-line mentions. [Skip
to: 47:02] ...Builderburg
was founded by David Rockefeller and the Rothschilds in Europe.
They’re still the main powers. Baron
Evelyn de Rothschild, male, attended for many years. Rothschild
is still represented. You’ll see them on the list of participants… Somebody
will represent the Rothschild Group. They are the main powers behind
Builderburg. Dutch Royal Shell is part of the Queen’s fortune…
Of course, the Rockefellers have always had heavy oil interests…that
is the original source of their old money…
It
is important to grasp that these elite groups did not suddenly appear
overnight, but gradually grew in power through a long term covert
"position-building" process. One good source consists of
excerpts of G. Edward Griffin in "Episode
#058 - Meet Carroll Quigley" on the Corbett Report or the
Nov.
2007 online transcript of a speech made by Griffin which makes
similar points, beginning with discussing secret societies set up
by Cecil Rhodes. Once
one begins to understand that Rhodes was a Rothschild agent, and that
high level Jews like the Rothshilds possess a behavioral tropism towards
"oligarchical collectivism," "gorilla-gangster"
monopoly, and criminal intrigue, everything that Griffin says makes
perfect sense. It also becomes totally clear how the main levers of
power and influence in both American and British society could become
infiltrated and hijacked to serve evil purposes while most Americans
and UK citizens naively go about their daily lives.
At
the end of the 19th Century, a secret society was formed by Cecil
Rhodes. Cecil Rhodes as all of you know, I’m sure, was one
of the wealthiest men in the world. He was the political head man
in South Africa, the chancellor I believe they called him, and while
he was there he was able to acquire control over all of the diamond
deposits and the gold deposits of South Africa — all of the
mineral reserves, and in that period of time he amassed one of the
greatest, if not, the greatest fortune in the world. What people
don’t realize is that when he died, none of that money went
to his heirs. Where did it go? It
went through a series of seven wills to create a secret society.
The purpose of the secret society was to create a structure that
would literally control the world — from behind the scenes,
in a fashion that the average man or woman would never see it or
never suspect it even existed. The
Rhodes Scholarship which most people know about was just the tip
of the iceberg that created in one in one of the wills of Cecil
Rhodes. The purpose of the Rhodes Scholarship was to provide a funnel
or a recruiting mechanism to find the most appropriate, the most
likely individuals — young men and women who could be recruited
into this secret society. It should come as no surprise that William
Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. It fits perfectly into this scenario. This
secret organization is not just of historical interest. It exists
today and, according to Quigley and other observers who are close
to it, it is the most important single historical force in the world
since World War I. Now just think about that for a moment. Is it
true? Well, we’ll cover a few facts and you judge it for yourself. The
goal of the secret organization originally was to expand the British
Empire and the men who were behind it — not necessarily the
royalty, but the real political figures behind it, and I’ll
mention some of their names in a moment — to extend the British
Empire to control the world. Rhodes and his associates believed
that the British had acquired the highest culture, the highest level
of morality according at least to his definitions of morality, and
the highest standard of living, the most perfect language. He felt
that the race was superior and that for the benefit of the rest
of the world, for their good, it was their responsibility —
this group, using the British Empire — it was their responsibility
to rule the world for the benefit of the world, of course. That
was very carefully spelled out in their writings and their goals Now
this evolved not too long after the organization was put into motion
it changed. The goal changed. World domination didn’t change.
Control from behind the scenes by a very small elect group didn’t
change. But what did change is that the focal point for this was
no longer the British or England, but it was to be a New World Order,
international in scope and to be housed through an international
organization of some kind. Initially they had hoped that it would
be the League of Nations and all of their members worked very hard
to create the League of Nations for that purpose. When that failed,
then they set their sites on the United Nations, which finally was
put into action and now is on a fast track to becoming the very
structure which they had projected as their goal. And now, of course,
the central of all of this instead of being in England is focused
primarily in New York. Now
the method by which this secret organization was to accomplish this
incredible goal was not to be visible and not to go forth and influence
the people directly. The people weren’t even supposed to suspect
that such a thing was going on. The people were not even supposed
to know the names primarily of the big players. They weren’t
to be in the news at all. The way this was to be done was indirectly
through the power centers of society, as they’re called. The
strategists behind this are brilliant and they realized that human
beings have a herd instinct. We clump together, most of us, a few
hermits get off in the wilderness and do okay, but most of us get
nervous out in the wilderness and we congregate into villages and
cities and, beyond that, we come together in organizations like
this. We have leaders. We join labor unions. We affiliate with political
parties. We come together in church organizations and we send our
kids to schools that are organized, and we have girl scouts and
boy scouts. The way we operate is that we work through groups and
organizations and we follow leaders. They had this all figured out.
They said, “Therefore, the way for us to lead the masses is
not directly one on one, but what we must do is control the leadership
of the organizations to which people belong. We don’t need
that many people to do that.” So with just one percent or
one-tenth of one percent of the population, we can control the entire
population by controlling the power centers of society. That was
their strategy from the beginning, and it is their strategy today,
and I might add, it is an extremely effective strategy. The
structure of this secret organization was outwardly modeled after
the Jesuit Order. Yes, incredible isn’t it. But Rhodes was
an admirer of the organizational genius, in his mind, of the Society
of Jesus, the Jesuit Order, and he said we should use that as our
model. He didn’t take it straight across but he took many
elements from it and, at the deeper level, though, it is interesting
I think and very instructive to note that he borrowed the structure
of classic conspiracy control directly from Adam Weishaupt. Now,
those of you who have studied this thing, you recognize that name.
Adam Weishaupt was the founder of the Illuminati and we all know
a little bit about the Illuminati because it was disbanded in Bavaria
shortly after it was formed, and their secret records and notebooks
and so forth were seized and placed into the public records, so
you can go to a library today and read verbatim the organizational
structure of the original Illuminati. There is a debate as to whether
or not the Illuminati really were destroyed or whether it just went
underground and still exists today. I think that debate is interesting
and I have my opinions about it, but they’re just opinions.
In the final analysis, it’s not too important because we know
that there are shoots coming up from the ground with identical structures
all over the place. Now whether those shoots are coming up from
seeds or roots, I don’t think makes too much difference. The
fact is that we have had many organizational imitations of the Illuminati
and this secret one that we’re talking about here created
by Cecil Rhodes is a perfect example. Now
what is that structure I’m talking about? It’s what
they call rings within rings within rings. That’s the way
they usually refer to it, and what that means is this: Weishaupt
said that in the center of his Illuminati organization, there would
be a controlling group of maybe three or four people — just
a small number. These in turn would create a membership ring around
them of a larger number of perhaps 20 or 30 or something like, and
the members of that ring would not be aware that they were being
dominated and controlled by the inner circle. Now that outer ring,
in turn , thinking that they were the whole enchilada, would then
create a larger ring around it comprising of hundreds or perhaps
thousands of people, and those people would not suspect that they
were being dominated and directed by an inner ring. And then finally
that last ring would create still another one that would reach out
to mass organizations — reach out to the masses. And in that
fashion Weishaup said that a few of us in the center through this
carefully controlled structure or rings within rings can control
the world, and the people being controlled would never know that
that’s how it worked. Now that’s the structure that
Weishaupt created and described at some length and it’s interesting
to me that Rhodes selected that very structure for his secret society. Now,
let’s take a look –{something dropped} I’m glad
there’s not lead attached to that.{laughter} But the result
of all this, ladies and gentlemen, is that this structure —
this secret society – remains invisible to the average person.
It remains invisible not only because of its structure and because
of its secrecy, but also because it has had the foresight of not
having a name. Now just think about that for a minute. If you say
that you have an organization or you create an organization and
somebody says, well what are we going to call ourselves, and the
answer is we’re not going to call ourselves anything. We’re
not going to have a name. That way, nobody can talk about us. Brilliant!
And that’s what they decided to do. Quigley himself doesn’t
know how to describe it. At some places in his books he calls it
the network. In other places he calls it the Rhodes group. In other
places he just calls it the group. It has no name. Therefore, it’s
another reason that it’s invisible to the average person today. At
the inner-circle of this organization that I am describing, that
was called the “Society of the Elect.” It originally
consisted of Cecil Rhodes and a small brain trust of his very wealthy
and influential political cronies from British politics and British
banking. The center of gravity, as I said earlier, shortly thereafter
— after Rhodes death — didn’t take long before
the center of gravity shifted away to the Rockefeller group which
was very quick to move into that circle and now we see that there
are centers or secondary centers of influence within the Rockefeller
group and centers within such organizations as The Bilderberg Group
and the Trilateral Commission, to name just a few. The goal shifted
away from creating and world empire based in England to a world
empire based in New York called the New World Order but based on
the model of collectivism. The
secondary rings around this Society of the Elect that Cecil Rhodes
created were called “roundtables.” That’s the
name they gave them — roundtables, and these existed in the
Untied States, Britain and all of the former British dependencies.
Finally there was a tertiary group or ring around that which was
created. Each of those roundtables in each of the countries, created
another ring larger around it, and they called those in most of
the British dependencies “The Royal Institute for International
Affairs.” You’ll find that in England, you’ll
find it in Canada, and so forth. That’s what it’s called.
It’s still there. Very powerful, prominent institutions in
British politics and all of these countries. In the United States,
for some reason which I’ve never been able to find out, they
didn’t choose that name I suppose because royal wouldn’t
be an acceptable word in the United States, so in the U S. they
call it the Council on Foreign Relations. And ladies and gentlemen,
after 100 years of penetration into the power centers of society,
the Rhodesian Network, I call it — I have given it a name
and I hope you’ll pick it up and use it because we have to
identify this group — I call it the Rhodesian Network, or
the Rhodesians — after 100 years the Rhodesians are very close
to the final achievement of their goal in the western world. Now
I add the phrase “in the western world” because we must
not lose sight of the fact when we’re looking at this group,
that there is another group out there which is just as dangerous,
just as secret and just as cunning as the Rhodesians. And they,
by the way, took a clue from the Rhodesians and they got rid of
their name a few years ago. We used to call them Communists and
then they got rid of the name. They pretended to go away; they pretended
that they crumbled overnight — a great miracle. They’re
still there! I call them the Leninists. They have never renounced
the theories or the goals of Lenin, they just renounced Communism.
Well, they never really had Communism in any of those countries
any way, they always refer to themselves as Socialists or Leninists
or what have you. But all the old former Communist commissars simply
took their hat off that said Communist on the front of it and turned
it around and now it says Social Democrat, but you notice it’s
the same heads underneath the hats. The heads didn’t change,
nor did their real policies. I
want to emphasize that there is another very large and powerful
and dangerous group out there which I call the Leninists. And the
Leninists and the Rhodesians are often seen warring against each
other. Let’s take a look at Mr. Bush in Washington, D.C. and
in Venezuela we’ve got Chavez. Now there’s a perfect
example of the Rhodesians versus the Leninists, and they fight each
other, they’re opposed to each other, they criticize each
other, they hate each other, but the world that they want is the
same. The only thing they disagree with is not ideology; it’s
who is going to run this New World Order — the so called left
or will it be the so-called right, and when you peel off all of
those labels and you look underneath, you’ll find that in
all of these camps, what they really stand for is collectivism.
That’s the word we should be using. They’re all collectivists
in nature but then they wrap themselves in flags and different rhetoric
and they appear to oppose each other, but I want to emphasize just
because we are focusing tonight on one group goes not mean that
that is the only place we need to keep our guard up, because we
have another equally potential group very much alive in the world
today.
Melvin
Sickler has provided an online
condensation of a paper "Why A Bankrupt America" by
Jack Newell and Devvy Kidd that provides important additional insights
into the Council on Foreign Affairs and the Trilateral Commission::
Edward Mandell House
The
Council on Foreign Relations was founded in 1921 by Edward Mandell
House, who had been the chief advisor of President Woodrow Wilson.
Actually, he was more than just a prominent aide of the President;
he dominated the President. He was referred to as Wilson’s
"alter ego" (other self), and was credited for being the most powerful
individual in the United States during the Wilson Administration
from 1913 until 1921. House
was a Marxist whose goal was to socialize the United States. In
1912, House wrote the book "Philip Dru: Administrator" in which
he stated that he was working for "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl
Marx." In this book, House laid out a plan for the conquest of America,
telling how both the Democratic and Republican Parties would be
controlled, and be used as instruments in the creation of a socialistic
government. And he asked for the establishment of a state-controlled
central bank, which were both proposed in "The Communist Manifesto".
And it was in 1913, during the very first year of the House-dominated
Wilson Administration, that both of these proposals became law.
The Federal Reserve Act was passed, which brought into power a private
central bank to create the money of the United States, taking this
power away from the united States Congress. And the 16th Amendment
to the United States Constitution, the graduated income tax as proposed
by Karl Marx, was also ratified.
The Council on Foreign Relations
In
1921, House and his friends formed the Council on Foreign Relations
whose purpose right from its conception was to destroy the freedom
and independence of the United States, and to lead the country into
a one-world government. Right
from its beginning, in 1921, the CFR began to attract men of power
and influence. In the late 1920’s, important financing for
the CFR came from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Foundation.
In 1940, at the invitation of President Roosevelt, members of the
CFR gained domination over the State Department, and they have maintained
this domination ever since.
Its intentions
The
late Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton’s mentor), Professor of
History at Georgetown University, member of the CFR, stated in his
book, "Tragedy & Hope": "The CFR is the American Branch
of a society which originated in England, and which believes that
national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule
established." Rear
Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the Cfr for 16 years, warned
the American people of the organization’s intentions: "The
most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective
in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the
sovereingty of the national independence of the United States. A
second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the
Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily,
they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up
in the control of global government." And
Dan Smoot, a former member of the FBI Headquarters staff in Washington,
D.C., summarized the organization’s purpose as follows: "The
ultimate aim of the CFR is to create a one-world socialist system,
and to make the U.S. an official part of it." In
other words, the CFR’s activities are treasonous to the U.S.
Constitution. Their goal is to put an end to the United States of
America, and to make the country a part of their global government
scheme.
Its influence
In
1944 and in 1948, the Republican candidate for President, Thomas
Dewey, was a CFR member. In later years, Republicans Eisenhower
and Nixon were members of the CFR, as were Democrats Stevenson,
Kennedy, Humphrey, and McGovern. (Note: We believe Kennedy became
disloyal to the CFR prior to his assassination.") The American people
think that they have a choice when they vote for a President, but
the truth of the matter is , with few exceptions: Presidential candidates
for decades have been CFR members. In
one of the CFR’s annual reports, published in 1978, it listed
a membership of 1878 members. Eleven of its members at this time
were United States Senators, with even more Congressmen belonging
to the organization. 284 of its members listed in this report were
United States Government officials. And the Chairman of the Board
of this immensely powerful pyramid was stated as being none other
than David Rockefeller himself. The
CFR not only has its members in the United States Government, but
its influence has also spead to other vital areas of American life.
According to Newell: "Its members have run, or are running, NBC
and CBS, ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Washington
Post’, ‘The Des Moines Register’, and many other
important newspapers. The leaders of ‘Time’, ‘Newsweek’,
‘Fortune’, ‘Business Week’, and numerous
other publications are CFR members. The organization’s members
also dominate the academic world, top corporations, the huge tax-exempt
foundations, labor unions, the military, and just about every segment
of American life." Barry
Goldwater states in his book, "With No Apologies", on page 231: "Does
it not seem strange to you that these men just happened to be CFR
and just happened to be on the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve, that absolutely controls the money and interest rates of
this great country without benefit of Congress? A privately owned
organization, the Federal Reserve, which has absolutely nothing
to do with the United States of America!" and Newell continues to
write: "Not every member of the CFR is fully committed to carrying
out Edward Mandell House’s conspiratorial plan. Many have
been flattered by an invitation to join a study group, which is
what the CFR calls itself. Others go along because of personal benefits,
such as a nice job and a new importance. But all are used to promote
the destruction of U.S. sovereignty."
All aspects of American life are dominated
The
members of the CFR dominate almost every aspect of American life,
yet most Americans have never even heard of the Council on Foreign
Relations. One reason for this is probably because there are over
170 journalists, correspondents, and communications executives who
are members of the CFR, and who do not write about the organization.
Also, it is an express condition of membership that no one is to
disclose what goes on at CFR meetings. Congressmen
John R. Rarick had warned: "The
CFR, dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of
the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and
influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor,
military, education, and mass communication-media, should be familiar
to every American concerned with good government, and with preserving
and defending the U.S. Constitution and our free-enterprise system.
Yet, the nation’s right-to-know machinery, the news media,
usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain
conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their
activities. "The
CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power
in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government
to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals
and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level
decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitution
Republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship." The
CFR now has its main headquarters at the corner of park Avenue and
68th Street in New York City, in a building given to the organization
by the Rockefeller family in 1929. Its main goal is still to create
a one-world government by destroying the freedom and independence
of all nations, especially the United States. And David Rockefeller
continues to be its Chairman of the Board.
The Trilateral Commission
Unfortunately,
the Council on Foreign Relations is not the only group proposing
an end to the sovereignty of the United States. In 1973, The Trilateral
Commission was founded to work for the same goal: a one-world government. The
Trilateral Commission's roots stem from the book, "Between Two Ages",
written by Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1970. In this book, Brzezinski
praised Marxism, thought of the United States as obsolete, and praised
the formation of a one-world government. His thinking closely parallels
that of CFR founder Edward Mandell house.
Marxism
On
page 72, Brzezinski writes: "Marxism is simultaneously a victory
of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory
of reason over belief." On
page 83, he states: "Marxism disseminated on the popular level in
the form of Communism, represented a major advance in man's ability
to conceptualize his relationship to his world." On
page 123, we find: "Marxism supplied the best available insight
into contemporary reality." What
Mr. Brzezinski fails to tell his readers is that approximately 100
million human beings have been murdered under Marxism "in the form
of Communism" just in this Twentieth Century. It has enslaved a
billion more, and has been responsible for those who live in Communist-dominated
countries. There is nothing like being brainwashed!
For world government
Zbigniew
Brzezinski's "Between Two Ages" was published in 1970 while he was
a professor in New York City. David Rockefeller read the book and,
in 1973, launched the new Trilateral Commission, whose purposes
include linking North America, Western Europe, and Japan "in their
economic relations, their political and defense relations, their
relations with developing countries, and their relations with Communist
countries." As
Newell writes: "The original literature of The Trilateral Commission
also states, exactly as Brzezinski's book had proposed, that the
more advanced Communist States could become partners in the alliance
leading to world government. In short, David Rockefeller implemented
Brzezinski's proposal." Rockefeller
appointed Zbigniew Brzezinski to be the Director of The Trilateral
Commission.
It
is also worth mentioning that some secret societies are very peculiar
in other ways, to say the least. They include the exotic rituals behind
Yale's Skull and Bones, which has been a prime source of CIA leaders,
and bizarre sexual behavior practiced at Bohemian Grove, which is
attended once a year by 1,500 of America's most influential leaders.
Once
when commenting upon the topics of San Francisco, homosexuals, and
Bohemian Grove, former President Richard Nixon commented:
"But it's not just the ratty part of town. The upper class in
San Francisco is that way. The Bohemian Grove, which I attend from
time to time . . . It is the most faggy goddamned thing you could
ever imagine with that San Francisco crowd. I can't shake hands with
anybody from San Francisco." The
Corbett Reports "Episode
#042 - The Bohemian Grove" provides evidence that Bohemian
Grove has been the site where little boys imported for homosexual
prostitution have also been subjects of in-house hard-core gay porno
flicks. At at least on of these kids was murdered after being forced
to participate.
To
perform a really complete analysis, it would help to start by creating
lists of personalities connected with both “Circle B”
and “Circle Z,” such as the one provided by blogger
"Barney Rubble" in the comments section of the Infowars.com
article "9/11:
The Case for Controlled Demolition." Books
like 9-11 Evil
by Victor Thorn and High
Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper are gold mines of
insight that help to take us to a next higher level of identifying
motivations and ultimate objectives of current circles of malefactors.
On
pages 88 and 89 of9-11
Evil, Victor Thorn comments on Zionist neocon kingpin Richard
Perle, nicknamed by many colleagues "The Prince of Darkness":
...Our
nation's War Machine takes it marching orders from an entity called
the Defense Policy Board, which most certainly wields more power
than the current Defense Secretary on 9-11, Donald Rumsfeld. ...the
Defense Policy Board was under the direct tutelage of Richard Perle
on the morning of 9-11; and no more psychotic, rabid Zionist infected
with pure evil could be found anywhere in Washington, D.C. Perle
wielded so much power that in 1986 The Washington Post quoted a
high-ranking State Department official who called him "the
most powerful man in the Pentagon." [As a side-note, many of
the references in this section are culled from Michael Collins Piper's
The High Priests of War, which is an invaluable source
for this subject. Many thanks for his years of top-notch work.] Perle
was also once referred to as "The person in charge of World
War III" by Britain's Labor Party Leader Denis Healey in the
1980's; plus, "In 1970, after the National Security Council
ordered a wiretap of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, Perle was
revealed to be passing classified information to an officer of the
Israeli Embassy" [The High Priests of War]. Last but
not least, Perle - who was appointed as head of the Defense Policy
Board by George W. Bush himself -- became very wealthy selling weapons
to the Israeli Defense Force [the most bloodthirsty killers on earth].
In
a December, 2002 interview, author John Pilger provides a clearer
understanding of Richard Perle's paranoid, Dr. Strangelove
mentality where he advocates multiple wars in simultaneous theaters
of engagement:
This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There
are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going
to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq ... this is entirely the
wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the world
go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece
together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war ... our children
will sing great songs about us years from now.
The
Prince of Darkness's lunatic vision of an imperialistic
Israeli war machine is just plain scary. But Perle wasn' t the only
mastermind manning the Pentagon guns. On April 9. 2003 in the Magazine
Forward, Ari Shavit revealed, "The war in Iraq was
conceived by 25 neo-conservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish."
On
page 12 ofHigh
Priests, Piper notes: "On December 13, 2002, Counterpunch
magazine, published by maverick Irish-born American-based journalist
Alexander Cockburn, featured an article raising the questions of “the
Bush administration’s dual loyalties” and provided a fascinating
overview of the neo-conservative network that ultimately led America
to war. The authors were Bill and Kathleen Christison, a husband-and-wife
team of former veteran U.S. Central Intelligence Agency analysts.
They cited the Israeli sympathies of top neo-conservative policy makers
inside the Bush administration, pointing out that—indeed—these
neo-conservatives were closely aligned with the ideology of the Likud
bloc in Israel. Their summary of the “cast of characters”
among the neo-conservatives is precise and worth noting:"
Deputy
Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz leads the pack. He was a protégé
of Richard Perle, who heads the prominent Pentagon advisory body,
the Defense Policy Board. Many of today’s neo-conservatives,
including Perle, are the intellectual progeny of the late Senator
Henry “Scoop” Jackson, a strong defense hawk and one
of Israel’s most strident congressional supporters in the
1970s. Wolfowitz
in turn is the mentor of Lewis “Scooter” Libby, now
Vice
President Cheney’s chief of staff who was first a student
of Wolfowitz and later a subordinate during the 1980s in both the
State and the Defense Departments. Another
Perle protégé is Douglas Feith, who is currently undersecretary
of defense for policy, the department’s number-three man,
and has worked closely with Perle both as a lobbyist for Turkey
and in co-authoring strategy papers for right-wing Israeli governments. Assistant
Secretaries Peter Rodman and Dov Zakheim, old hands from the Reagan
administration when the neo-cons first flourished, fill out the
subcabinet ranks at Defense. At lower levels, the Israel and the
Syria/Lebanon desk officers at Defense are imports from the Washington
Institute for Near East Policy, a think tank spun off from the pro-Israel
lobby organization, AIPAC. Neo-conservatives
have not made many inroads at the State Department, except for John
Bolton, an American Enterprise Institute hawk and Israeli proponent
who is said to have been forced on a reluctant Colin Powell as undersecretary
for arms control. Bolton’s special assistant is David Wurmser,
who wrote and/or co-authored with Perle and Feith at least two strategy
papers for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu in 1996. Wurmser’s
wife, Meyrav Wurmser, is a co-founder of the media-watch web-site
MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute), which is run by retired
Israeli military and intelligence officers and specializes in translating
and widely circulating Arab media and statements by Arab leaders.
A recent investigation by The Guardian of London found
that MEMRI’s translations are skewed by being highly selective.
Although it inevitably translates and circulates the most extreme
of Arab statements, it ignores moderate Arab commentary and extremist
Hebrew statements. In
the vice president’s office, Cheney has established his own
personal
national security staff, run by aides known to be very pro-Israel.
The deputy director of the staff, John Hannah, is a former fellow
of the Israeli-oriented Washington Institute. On
the National Security Council staff, the newly appointed director
of
Middle East affairs is Elliott Abrams, who came to prominence after
pleading guilty to withholding information from Congress during
the Iran-contra scandal (and was pardoned by President Bush the
elder) and who has long been a vocal proponent of right-wing Israeli
positions. Putting him in a key policymaking position on the Palestinian-Israeli
conflict is like entrusting the henhouse to a fox. Probably
the most important organization, in terms of its influence on Bush
administration policy formulation, is the Jewish Institute for National
Security Affairs (JINSA). Formed after the 1973 Arab-Israeli war
specifically to bring Israel’s security concerns to the attention
of U.S. policymakers and concentrating also on broad defense issues,
the extremely hawkish, right-wing JINSA has always had a high-powered
board able to place its members inside conservative U.S. administrations.
Cheney, Bolton, and Feith were members until they entered the Bush
administration. Several lower level JINSA functionaries are now
working in the Defense Department. Wolfowitz
himself has been circumspect in public, writing primarily about
broader strategic issues rather than about Israel specifically or
even the Middle East, but it is clear that at bottom Israel is a
major interest and may be the principal reason for his near obsession
with the effort, of which he is the primary spearhead, to dump Saddam
Hussein, remake the Iraqi government in an American image, and then
further redraw the Middle East map by accomplishing the same goals
in Syria, Iran, and perhaps other countries. But
his interest in Israel always crops up. Even profiles that downplay
his attachment to Israel nonetheless always mention the influence
the Holocaust, in which several of his family perished, has had
on his thinking. One source inside the administration has described
him frankly as “over-the-top crazy when it comes to Israel.”
Although this probably accurately describes most of the rest of
the neo-con coterie, and Wolfowitz is guilty at least by association,
he is actually more complex and nuanced than this.
Piper
goes on to spell out how the Zionist octopus has spread its tentacles
throughout Washington, D.C. and national media. Most alarming of all,
he identifies how the ultimate agenda of the Zionists is to "use
up" America as their riding horse and then callously throw America
in the trash heap. In other words, their agenda is fundamentally hostile
to America and traditional conservative values. They may be rightfully
considered traitors and domestic enemies of the U.S. Constitution
and the legitimate national interests of the United States of America.
A FINAL WORD . . .
Who will be ruling America . . .
when America is ruling the New World Order?
An examination of “the secret agenda behind the agenda”
of the High Priests of War.
The
United Nations—as we have known it—can effectively be
considered a ghost of the past. The UN has been shelved, sidelined,
consigned to the trash heap—at least temporarily—by
the one world dreamers who once saw the global body as the means
of establishing a world hegemon. Today’s imperialists now
envision Uncle Sam as their officially- designated world policeman
or, in their more academic terms “the center of a new international
system.” The goal is “a world that looks like America,
and is therefore safe for all.” However,
despite the rhetoric—which might please the ears of many grass-roots
American patriots (or those who fancy themselves that)—it’s
not quite so simple. There’s more to this agenda than meets
the eye. What
might be described as The Grand Scheme for a New World Order—in
the wake of America’s new “imperial” role—was
imparted in quite candid fashion in a major two-part policy paper
in the Summer 2003 and Winter 2004 issues of The Journal of
International Security Affairs, house organ of the definitively
influential Jewish Institute for National Security Policy (JINSA),
which has been referenced repeatedly in the pages of The High
Priests of War. Once
a previously little-known Washington think tank, JINSA is now often
publicly acknowledged as perhaps the most specific guiding force
behind Bush administration foreign policy today. So when something
appears in a JINSA publication, there’s a lot of weight behind
it. The
author, Alexander H. Joffe, a pro-Israel academic, has been a featured
writer in the pages of this JINSA publication, and that he was given
so much space to tout his theories certainly reflects the high regard
in which his views are held. Joffe’s
two-part series was entitled “The Empire That Dared Not Speak
Its Name.” In his essay, Joffee frankly admitted that “America
is an empire” and asserts that, yes, this is a very good thing. Joffe
says that when the UN dared to take on Zionism, that marked the
demise of the UN in the minds of the internationalists. Joffe writes:
“The end of the General Assembly as a credible body may plausibly
be ascribed to the infamous ‘Zionism is Racism’ resolution
in 1975.” The JINSA author contends that the world should
be “grateful” that the UN has been “discredited,
reduced to farce and ultimately ground to a halt,” referring,
of course, to UN positions that the Zionists and their allies in
the world empire movement find offensive. As
a result of the UN being shelved as a world government vehicle,
writes Joffe, “We now have the opportunity, and obligation,
to begin again.” However, he warns that the emerging European
Union (EU) is a
threat to the dream of a global empire. The
JINSA writer asserts that the EU is an “alternative vision
for the international community,” one that, as he puts it,
frankly is “the authentic countervision to an American Empire.”
According to the Zionist writer, the biggest problem with Europe
and the EU is that “culture remains at the core of Europe’s
problems. Nationalism was a doctrine born in Europe, as were its
vicious mutant offspring: fascism and communism.”. (Note:
A fervent advocate of Israeli super-nationalism, the writer, Joffe,
doesn’t seem to see the lack of logic in his attack on other
peoples’ nationalism—but then, again, honesty has never
been integral to the hardline Zionist point of view.) Joffe
complains that although “the new European Empire is multicultural
in theory . . . in reality it is dominated politically and culturally
by France and economically by Germany.” Today, in the EU,
he says, “driven by a sense of postcolonial guilt and postwar
ennui the door have been thrown open to all ideas. At the most sinister
levels it has permitted and even legitimized a vast explosion of
unhinged thought and action, namely anti-Americanism, anti-Semitism,
and a wide variety of conspiracy theories.” (The
so-called “conspiracy theories” that so alarm this Zionist
theoretician are those that dare to challenge the “official”
views of what really happened on September 11, 2001. He is inflamed
that millions of people in Europe and the Muslim world—not
to mention the United States— have raised questions about
Israeli foreknowledge and/or involvement in those events.) In
any case, what Joffe describes as “the other kind of liberal
internationalism” is what the Zionist movement favors and
Joffe defines it:
The
American Empire has no real or theoretical competitors. The goal
of the American Empire in the 21st century is not territorial
control or the exploitation of resources but political and economic
leadership which defends and advances American interests, and
which promotes the development and well being of all nations.
Given our history and our values, that future lies in leveraging
the American Empire in such a way that it becomes the basis of
a new democratic international system. Ultimately
the only answer for a stable and prosperous planet will be a global
system that is structurally and morally similar to the American
union—semiautonomous states with secular, liberal democratic
systems; where states have both prescribed rights and agreed upon
responsibilities in a larger secular, liberal democratic framework;
one equipped with checks and balances and meaningful institutions;
with governance based on rule of law and tolerant and pluralist
values.
In
the second-part of his extended essay, published in the Winter 2004
issue of JINSA’s journal, Joffe pursued this line of thought
further, expanding on his call for what he described as “an
empire that looks like
America.” Amazingly,
Joffe frankly talks about the United States engaging in massive
imperial conquests in the trouble-torn regions of frica—presumably
after the United States has already made havoc in the Arab countries
of the Middle East:
The
conditions under which America and its allies would simply take
over and restore African countries are far from clear. What are
the thresholds for intervention? What are the procedures and outcomes?
Who will fight and who will pay? The restoration of Africa would
involve long-term commitments and immense costs, of the sort that
could only be paid for by Africa itself. That is to say, it would
probably require American economic control, to go along with political
and cultural control. Colonialism is always pay as you go, and
it is not pretty. The question is both whether Africa can pay
the price (or afford not to) and whether America has the stomach.
Of
course, Africa is not the only target of Joffe and his like-minded
schemers (and that is precisely what they are, however, “extreme”
that term may be perceived). In fact, Joffe talks of a wide-ranging
global agenda— well beyond the African continent. In
the end, however, Joffe lets the cat out of the bag, about the real
intentions of those who are using United States military power as
the mechanism for a bigger agenda. “New arrangements,”
he says, “must
come into being under American leadership to provide an alternative
for states that are willing to accept rights and responsibilities.”
Joffe dreams of a United Nations that has been re-made under the
imperial force of the
United States. And ultimately, he predicts the possibility of a
world government, writing:
Possibly,
after a period of chaos and anger, which in any event would simply
intensify existing states of being, the institution [the United
Nations] might be bludgeoned into changing. [Note his use of the
term “bludgeoned.”—MCP] Rather
than a club that admits all, the 21st century United Nations might—
someday, somehow—be remade into an exclusive, by invitation,
members-only group, of free, democratic states, sharing similar
values. Or in the end, replaced by one. That day, however, may
be decades off.
Should
there be any doubt that he is talking about world government, note
Joffe’s concluding words:
The
best way to preserve the American empire is to eventually give
it up. Setting the stage for global governance can only be done
with American leadership and American-led institutions of the
sort schematically outlined here.
So
it is. Despite all the high-sounding rhetoric about “democracy,”
what it all comes down to—in the words of this pro-Israel
ideologue—is the use of America’s military power to
advance another (secret) agenda altogether. Even many of those grass-roots
American flag-wavers (who may be genuine patriots) who relish the
concept of an American empire may find Joffe’s concepts somewhat
different from what they otherwise might perceive. But
here, in the pages of a devotedly pro-Zionist journal, we learn
precisely what the “story behind the story” actually
happens to be. It has nothing to do, really, even with a “strong
America” or, for that matter, even with America itself. The
United States of America is simply a pawn—albeit a powerful
one—in the game, being ruthlessly shifted about in a scheme
for world dominance by an elite few operating behind the scenes. And,
in the end, this does tell us very much about who The High Priests
of War really are and what their agenda is really all about. There’s
no mystery at all. What
remains to be determined is what the American people—and all
other real patriots in nations around the globe—intend to
do about it. The question is this: will the world finally decide
it is time to declare
war on The High Priests of War?
—MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER
George
Bush: The Unauthorized Biography (pdf) by Webster Tarpley
and Antony Chaitkin, 1992, about Bush Sr. First published in 1992,
it stated: "The thesis of this book is simple: if George Bush
were to be re- elected in November 1992 for a second term as the president
of the United States, this country and the rest of the world would
face a catastrophe of gigantic proportions."
More on "Circle Z" (to include "The
Black Nobility" and "City of London")
[continually updated] Rothschilds
by Soren Dreier, at http://sorendreier.com/category/all-posts/society/rothschilds/
2011-12-14 History
— Damned Lies, Part Three by Tom Valentine
2011-12-13 Damned
Lies, War and Money, Part Two by Tom Valentine
2011-12-12 History
of Money, War—All damned Lies! Part One by Tom
Valentine, Veterans Today
2011-10-08 A
Black Nobility Bloodline, Part 2 of 5 - The Windsor wealth,
vaticproject.blogspot.com. [Editor's Note: Parts 1-5 contained in
the web page forThe
Biggest Secret, Chapter 18)
2011-08-21 The
Rothschilds, aangirfan.blogspot.com
2011-08-09 Growing
Israeli Tyranny by Stephen Lendman, Rense.com.
2011-08-02 Israel
- Rogue State Land Of Inequality by Stephen Lendman,
Rense.com. "Growing
millions worldwide understand Israel's decades-long project to colonize
Palestine, dispossess its people, steal their land, and terrorize
them into submission. They also know it hasn't worked nor will it. Too
few, however, know how growing social and economic inequality affects
most Israelis. Since at least the mid-1980s, state policies have disproportionately
favored the rich, causing wealth disparities, unemployment, poverty,
hunger, homelessness and gradual loss of social benefits. A
race to the bottom followed, notably since mass privatizations in
the 1990s, placing profits about human needs as in America where only
corporate and elitist interests matter. As
a result, recent studies show 1.77 million Israelis are poor in a
population of 7.7 million (including Jews, Arabs and members of other
faiths). About 850,000 children live in poverty. About 69% of them
lack nutritional security. Around 75% of them miss meals, and 83%
of them lack proper dental care. Some, in fact, beg for money or steal
to eat... " [Editor's
Note: Israel is not only judged in the August 2005
World Bank report as more corrupt than Western countries, but
this highly artificial state also has a pyramidal social structure
consistent with a tropism towards monopolistic practices and Asiatic
despotism -- even among fellow Jews. Prior to when Jews showed up
en masse in America in the late 19th century, WASPs created one of
the most economically succesful countries in history with a large
and prosperous middle class; in contrast, America "under Jewish
management" (bolstered by "armies" of Irish and Italian
Catholics who served as Jewish "muscle" and "front
men" in totally corrupt big city political machines in places
like New York City and Chicago) evolved in the 20th century towards
a majority nonwhite Third world basket case economy and tyranny. Nevertheless,
all this time fast-talking Jews insisted that they had all the answers]
2011-02-09 The
Rothschild Octopus, vaticproject.blogspot.com.
2010-12-07 The
Israeli Lobby Owns the Congress, Hollywood and the White House,
an interview with Wayne Madsen by Kourosh Ziabari, Rebel News, "Madsen:...As
many Saudis know, the Sauds are not only in lockstep with the Americans
and Israelis but they are descendant from a Jewish merchant family
that originally lived in what is now Kuwait. Wahhabism in fact serves
the interests of Israel's Zionist Judaism, both emphasize extremism
and sectarianism that keeps the Middle East in constant turmoil and
extends the rule of the Wahhabi Sauds and Zionists."
2010-12-05 Gordon
Duff: AIPAC Ordered Bush to Attack Iran; A Look Behind the Curtain"...A
highly placed source within the White House and CIA confirmed, in
an interview, that the invasion of Iran was scheduled for 2006 but
planned in 1999... Everything was going to happen in Bahrain. Plans
were to attack Americans, blow up clubs, restaurants. There were plans
to stage a `Tonkin Gulf' type attack and blame it on Iranian torpedo
boats. Guys in the military were aware of this and there was strong
opposition. Marine Colonel Joe Molofsky was the real hero here. He
did more to scramble administration plans than anyone else, Molofky
and General Mattis. These were really straight shooters, how I learned
to trust the Marine Corps..." ...Q.
Orders? From where? A.
“All of it, all foreign policy issues, were out of AIPAC, they
ran everything in the Bush administration. That was the whole point
of it. We never were told why we had to destroy Iran only that it
had to be done. Nobody ever asked why. Nobody ever believed Iran had
a credible nuclear program and, eventually, we were all very certain
they never would. There was never an issue about Iran being a threat
or not. There was never an issue of motive of any kind. These were
orders, plain and simple, the administration that will come into office
in 2001 will be tasked with destroying Iran, tasked by AIPAC who will
control all key position in the administration.”
2010-09-02 The
State And Local Bases Of Zionist Power In America by
James Petras, Rense.com
2010-07-31 Rothschild's
Black Gold Empire by Texe Marrs. The author makes some
very provocative points, to include the following: "...6.
Chinese national oil companies (actually Rothschild clones) are now
the major petroleum suppliers to the whole world. Yet, China possesses
little oil of its own—China’s oil largesse comes from
its cooperative dealings with Rothschild, Israel, and the U.S.A. 7.
Because of the global oversupply problem—too much oil being
drilled and pumped up out of the earth—it was decided that the
booming Gulf of Mexico oil source must be indefinitely closed down.
Chevron, Conoco, Exxon-Mobil, BP and other multinational oil corporations
would henceforth be either limited or prohibited from operating oil
derricks in the Gulf. Pemex, the Mexican national oil company, would
also be limited in its production, and, down south, Brazil’s
national oil corporation, Petrobras, would be given a strict quota. 8.
China is now the preferred #1 oil spigot for all the world’s
economies. Rothschild’s Jewish oil billionaire pals in Israel
as well as China’s Communist bureaucrats are today the planet’s
new masters of oil. 9.
BP, an oil company already infamous for its despoiling the earth,
has been made the scapegoat for the closing of much of the Gulf of
Mexico’s oil spigots. In preparation for the derrick’s
destruction, much of BP’s assets were transferred in advance
of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill disaster to other Rothschild affiliates
across the world in Libya and the Middle East, and especially the
majority of its Russian oil assets, which were turned over to four
Russian Jewish billionaires, called the `Oligarchs.'" Marrs
makes another important point, namely it is a pattern for the Rothschilds
to use major corporations as riding horses for their intrigues, even
if they ruthlessly "use them up" in the process. As one
example, read about the Blanchard
- Barrick Gold, JP Morgan Chase suit where gold dealer Blanchard
identified a likely conspiracy in which Barrick seriously endangered
itself with short positions to artificially drive the price of gold
down to 50 year inflation adjusted lows in the late 1990's. Another
interesting earlier example of conspiratorial manipulation was the
"London
Gold Pool" episode during the Johnson Administration in the
1960's, in which certain observers believe that the Rothschilds help
swindle the United States out of much of its gold reserves. Please
also see my "The
BP-Gulf Disaster As a False Flag Operation" intelligence
summary web page.
2010-07-28WAR
on The World: Rothschild League’s 30 Facts Evidencing Gulf Oil
Disaster Was Planned by Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri
Kane.
2010-07-27 Queen
Elizabeth Fronts for Rothschilds ("Crown")
by By Alcuin Bramerton.
2010-04-07 The
Major Jewish American Organizations Defend Israel’s Humiliation
of America, by James Petras, "When Israel announced
a major new Jews-only building project of 1600 homes in occupied East
Jerusalem, it was not only “spitting in the face” of visiting
Vice President Biden, it was demonstrating its power to humiliate
America and Americans."
2010-04 "I'm
Doing God's Work: CEO of World's Most Evil and Corrupt Bank,
Goldman Sachs, Arrogantly Boasts" by Texe Marrs,
Power of Prophecy Newsletter, "`Number 85, Broad
Street, in lower Manhattan (New York City) is where the money is.
All of it.' This was what The Sunday Times, one of Britain’s
most prestigious and internationally known newspapers reported on
November 9, 2009. The newspaper went on to say that this address is
"the site of the best cash-making machine that global capitalism
has ever produced." But, said the paper, the firm that operates
out of this site is much more than only an economic Goliath, it is
also "a political force more powerful than governments."
2010-03-11 RT: "Mossad
Loves Killing People in Bedrooms --Author" Israel
has no problems with cold-bloodedly killing a democratically elected
Hamas leader in a foreign city. In fact, Israeli PM's routinely sign
off on assassinations around the world. After this killing, the popularity
of Mossad in Israel went up. Former Mossad officer Victor
Ostrovsky claims that Mossad can generally recruit at least a third
of the world Jewish population as sayanim, or "helpers"
in its espionage operations, which reflect a covert form of permanent
4th generation warfare against humanity around the world. (More on
4th generation warfare concepts in Chapter
38). As Israel and the global Jewish population continue to gain
in power and influence, welcome to a world increasingly ruled by the
threat of cold-blooded assassinations everywhere.
"RT: Apparently
Israeli PM is very Happy With Murder Success"
Caption: "There is no doubt that the Hamas leader’s
murder in Dubai hotel is a Mossad job. Moreover, its agents have
deliberately showed their faces to CCTV cameras, said espionage
expert and author Gordon Thomas..."
"Shadow," "Deep State," or "Secret Elite"-Related
Web Sites
The
Black Nobilityresource page[Editor's Note: This web page reminds me of rense.com; namely
after one filters out gibberish about UFOs, reptilians, etc, there
is actually quite a lot of good information]. MI6
Are the Lords of the Global Drug Tradeby James Casbolt The
Shadow Government: Its Identification and Analysis by
Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D. Edward
Bernays, Wikipedia article (November 22, 1891 –
March 9, 1995, was an American pioneer in the field of public relations
and propaganda along with Ivy Lee, referred to in his obituary as
"the father of public relations".[1] Combining the ideas
of Gustave Le Bon and Wilfred Trotter on crowd psychology with the
psychoanalytical ideas of his uncle, Dr. Sigmund Freud, Bernays was
one of the first to attempt to manipulate public opinion using the
subconscious...Born 1891 in Vienna to Jewish parents, Bernays was
a double nephew of psychoanalysis pioneer Sigmund Freud....In Propaganda
(1928), Bernays argued that the manipulation of public opinion was
a necessary part of democracy:
The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits
and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic
society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute
an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
...We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our
ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is
a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized.
Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they
are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. ...In almost
every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics
or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are
dominated by the relatively small number of persons...who understand
the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they
who pull the wires which control the public mind.
Davidduke.com Preface to Jewish Supremacism
— latest edition caption:
"President Obama in the White House with Chabad Lubavitch
leader Levi Shemtov...Chabad is a Jewish extremist organization
that literally believes that the purpose of all Gentiles is to
`serve Jews' and that Gentiles are inferior and have in fact `satanic
souls.' Do a Google Search and read about one of Chabad’s
leading rabbis, Yitzhak Ginsburgh who recently endorsed a book
in Israel calling for the murder of Gentile babies who hold a
`potential threat for Israel.' Also documented below is a statement
by Ginsburgh in Jewish Week where he says it is moral
for a Jew to kill a Gentile and steal his liver because Jewish
life has `infinite value' as compared to `inferior' Gentiles.
All this is well documented and proven, so why no outrage at the
close relationship of the President of the United States to this
extremist Jewish hate group, and why does the national and international
media cover up what should be a scandal of huge proportions? This
embargo of truth about Jewish extremism shows you who really is
in control of politics and media — doesn’t it? "
Articles
archive by the late Dr. William L. Pierce regarding Israel, Jewish
media control, Jewish foreign policy, and Jewish organized crime.
Please click on links contained in the brackets below. Please
also see discussion of Dr. Pierce in the "Nationalist" section
of the web page "Reconciling
Libertarianism and Nationalism."
Israel
Day of Infamy: The Attack on the U.S.S. Liberty [111]
June 7, 1997
Child Porn, Ecstasy, and Pardons [160]
February 3, 2001
Please also see the America First Books archive
of the works of Kevin Alfred Strom, a brilliant individual who served
as Dr. Pierce's understudy in the last two decades of his life. Please
also see other works by Kevin Strom at his web site kevinalfredstrom.com.
The
following are some sample articles that explain the Neanderthal
background of Jews, raising the question about whether Jews are
simply continuing a race war "by other means" that has
been going on for tens of thousands of years between Neanderthals
and Cro Magnon Man. For a complete list of articles, please visit
the Table
of Contents of the May/June 2010 special issue of The Barnes
Review.
REVENGE
OF THE NEANDERTHAL by Willis A. Carto,
"The truth about the Neanderthal is a historical web that is
finally being untangled. . . ."
ISRAELI
SAYS: “WE WERE INVENTED” by Willis Carto,
"An eminent Israeli historian says the perceived origin of
the Jewish people is anything but true. . . ."
‘MY
ANCESTORS WERE NEANDERTHALS’ by Willis Carto,
" Jewish scholar Stan Gooch has written extensively on the
Neanderthal origins of today’s people known as `the Jews.'”
PARTING
THOUGHTS: THE ETERNAL CONFLICT by George Kadar, "...The
20th century in the Western world can be rightfully called the "Century
of the Neanderthal" and it is up to us to stop this process."
The ethnic-genetic
distance concept:
Throughout
history people have tended to practice the axiom that as ethnic-genetic
distance decreases, the chances for altruistic and mutualistic behavior
tends to increase. Conversely, as ethnic-genetic distance increases,
the chances of predatory or parasitic behavior also tends to increase,
all other things being held equal. See the article "Zoological
Subspecies in Man" by Dr. Raymond Hall which explains how
this behavior is not only common among homo sapiens, but
virtually all other mammalian species. Therefore, this behavior
is the instinctive result of evolutionary forces common throughout
nature. If
one knows where to look, one can find anthropologists like the late
Sir Arthur Keith who wrote A New Theory of Evolution that
explained why "tribalism," or the maintenance of "Evolutionary
Breeding Units," is adaptive social behavior for natural
environments. The
most unnatural environments created by man are typically
cities. Interestingly enough, for over 2,500 years, the Jews have
been one of the most urbanized peoples on this planet. Not surprisingly,
it is common to hear people who have come to know the Jews well
in big cities (as I have) criticise them as being one of the most
"unnatural" peoples on this planet, heavily divorced from
"healthy instincts" (Jews are typically overly represented
in highly perverse social and political organizations, ranging from
the North American Man-Boy Love Association to the Communist Party;
the British historian Arnold Toynbee called them a "fossil
civilization;" Jews are overrrepresented around the world at
the highest levels of organized crime, and make up the majority
of traitors caught spying against America) and are strongly attracted
to ideological manipulation as an end itiself (the "brokerage
mentality" described in Winning Through Intimidation
by Robert Ringer; see also The Painted Word by Tom Wolfe
about how Jews like modern art more for its ideological statement
than anything to do with aesthetics). See "The
Scam of Modern Art" by Willis Carto and my own discussion
of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology in my mutualism
vs. parasitism article. While
Jews are famous for being extremely tribalistic among their own
kind, they tend to encourage the exact oppositive behavior among
gentiles. In fact, Jews tend to encourage unnatural relationships
among gentiles both in terms of unnatural divisions and unnatural
alliances. They encourage unnatural divisions by supporting feminism,
which encourages animosity between men and women, and Marxist class
warfare, which stirs up unnecessary strife between people of shared
race, ethnicity and nationality. Jews also like to promote unnatural
alliances by encouraging interracial marriage, multi-racial immigration,
miscegenation, and homosexuality. Once
Jews are allowed to thoroughly work their influence on a gentile
society, it's social fabric is typically severely ruptured on all
levels. Its overall level of social and economic efficiency tends
to decline to Third World levels. This seems to be the story of
America in the last few decades. The
following are some key articles on the ethnic-genetic interest concept:.
Interestingly
enough, even Jewish-controlled sources like the New York Times host
articles that explain Jewish genetic similarities among each other,
and distance from gentiles, such as "Studies
Show Jews’ Genetic Similarity" by Nicholas Wade,
NYT, June 9, 2010:
The
shared genetic elements suggest that members of any Jewish community
are related to one another as closely as are fourth or fifth cousins
in a large population, which is about 10 times higher than the relationship
between two people chosen at random off the streets of New York
City, Dr. Atzmon said.
Ashkenazic
and Sephardic Jews have roughly 30 percent European ancestry, with
most of the rest from the Middle East, the two surveys find. The
two communities seem very similar to each other genetically, which
is unexpected because they have been separated for so long.
In
Chapter 14: "Jewish Evolutionary Strategy and Claims of Jewish
Superiority" of his book Jewish Suprmacism, Dr. David
Duke provides insight into how Jews reflect enormous genetic distance
from white gentile populations. Jews are able to compensate for
these differences to some extent by engaging in varioius forms of
behavioral and superficial genetic adaptive mimickry:
...The
first thing I found was information on the set of genetically
borne diseases that occur almost exclusively in the Jewish community,
such as Tay-Sachs disease. Their presence certainly indicated
a genetic variance specific to the Jewish population and illustrated
a genetic difference from the Gentiles. Soon I found scientific
papers dealing precisely with the issues I sought. [footnote
628, 629] Genetic
researchers Sachs and Bat-Miriam discovered amazing similarity
between the Jewish populations of nine countries of North Africa,
the Middle East, and Central Europe. Conversely, they found sharp
differences between Jews and non-Jews from those same countries.
[footnote 630] In
studying blood group data, Mourant, Kopec, and Doma-
niewska-Sobczak wrote in a book called The Genetics of the Jews
that it may be said that, in general, blood group data…support
the relative homogeneity of the main historical Jewish communities.
[footnote 631] Now,
here we have mainstream Jewish anthropologists and geneticists
-- the same groups who chronically preach to us that there are
no great differences between Blacks and Whites -- boldly assert
that the Jewish people are genetically distinctive and relatively
homogenous! They argue that some differences exist between the
Ashkenazim and the Sephardim (the main ethnic division among Jews),
but that essentially Jews are a single people with a limited genetic
resemblance to the European populations among whom they dwell.
[foonote 632]
•
In blood group data, two major studies, one in 1977 by Bonné-
Tamir, Ashbel, and Kenett and one by Karlin, Kenett, and Bonné-Tamir
in 1979, found when using fourteen polymorphic loci, no significant
difference in Jewish populations from Iraq, Libya, Germany, or
Poland. They estimated that the genetic distance between Gentiles
and Jews living in the same area is three to five times
[Top of page] 330 [hapter title] JEWISH EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY
greater than for Jews
living in the different nations studied. In the 1977 study, the
researchers state “not much admixture has taken place between
Ashkenazi Jews and their Gentile neighbors during the last 700
years or so.” [footnote 633, 634]
•
Mille and Kobyliansky discovered in studies of dermatologlyphic
data that Ashkenazim (Eastern European Jews) are much more similar
to Sephardim (Middle-Eastern and European Jews) than they are
to the non-Jewish Eastern Europeans. [footnote
635]
•
Kobyliansky and Livshits in using cluster analysis on 25 mor phological
characteristics, estimated that Jews in Russia were six times
more distant from Russians than Russians were from Germans. They
also found the Jews to be completely separate from the twenty-four
other ethnic groups studied in Russia, Germany, and Poland.
[footnote 636]
•
Another study compared modern Jews and those of 3,000-year-old
Jewish skeletons discovered in the Middle East. Sofaer, Smith,
and Kaye studied dental morphology from Morocco, Kurdish Iraq,
and Eastern European countries. They found more likeness between
the widely scattered Jewish populations than for the Gentile groups
living near them. The ancient Jewish skeletal group turned out
to be far more similar to the three Jewish populations than for
every non-Jewish group studied except for one, an Arab Druse group
from the 11th century. [footnote 637]
One
researcher summed up the overall genetic differences by say ing
that there was probably at least three times more genetic difference
between an average Jew in France and his Gentile Frenchman neighbor
than between an average French Jew and a Jew living in Russia
or the Middle East. The
Jewish studies amazed me. I would not have guessed that Jews were
that genetically different from all Europeans. I knew a few Jews
who were indistinguishable from the potpourri of other European-Americans.
From their appearance, it seemed impossible that there was three
times more genetic difference from us than from Jews in remote
regions of the world. But, the research proved that a wide genetic
difference existed between Jew and European. I wondered why they
did not seem that dramatically different in their appearance.
Fritz
Lenz suggested back in the 1930s that Jewish resemblance to the
European populations did not mean that their genes were similar.638
He suggested that their similar external resemblance could have
emerged from the natural selection of genes within the Jewish
gene pool. These genes could simply be a small cluster of genes
that lay dormant in the Jewish pool or that were introduced by
limited genetic mixture with Gentiles, and which then were selectively
favored by the social environment. Genes that caused a greater
corporeal resemblance to that of the Gentile host could have favorable
results in acceptance, accumulation of wealth, as well as social
advancement ó leading to reproductive success.
[Book title] JEWISH SUPREMACISM
[top of page] 331
By
a somewhat similar process, distinct species of butterflies not
closely related, come to resemble one another without narrowing
their genetic distance. A very small set of genes influencing appearance
within the Jewish population could thus be favored, causing a greater
similarity of appearance to the Gentile population while not narrowing
their overall genetic alienation from their host population. Over
many generations, the external resemblance to Gentiles could increase
while the parts of the brain that affect behavioral tendencies and
abilities could be unaffected. According
to evolutionary genetics, it is possible that Jews have come to
more resemble their hosts in their external appearance while at
the same time becoming even more distant in their mental and behavioral
characteristics. Whatever the questions of physical appearance,
there seemed little doubt that Jews are indeed very different from
Europeans and that they had maintained that genetic difference for
a very long time. I
also ran across a number of popular sources arguing that high Jewish-Gentile
intermarriage rates would end their genetic distinctiveness from
European Gentiles. As in so many other matters dealing with the
Jews, there is a wealth of information on the issue, an underlying
reality that is very different from popular perceptions.
Jews = Hybridized Neanderthals =
Troll Relatives?
Interestingly
enough, quite a few sources on the Internet explain how it is very
likely that Troll mythology among northern European peoples evolved
from pockets of Neanderthal peoples that were later overtaken by
immigrations of Nordic and Celtic peoples. Hence, the recent attacks
on Iceland via Zionists such as the Rothschild-controlled City of
London, George Soros, and Goldman Sach might be viewed as a "Troll
attack" on a Nordic nation.
...In
the genre of paleofiction, the distinguished Swedish-speaking
Finnish paleontologist Björn Kurtént has entertained
the theory (e.g. in Dance
of the Tiger) that trolls are a distant memory of an
encounter with Neanderthals by our Cro-Magnon ancestors some 40,000
years ago during their migration into northern Europe. Spanish
paleoanthropologist Juan Luis Arsuaga provides evidence for these
types of encounters in his book, The
Neanderthal's Necklace. The theory that Neanderthals
and Cro-Magnons occupied the same area of Europe at the same time
in history has been theorized based on fossil evidence. Other
researchers believe that they just refer to neighboring tribes.
The problem with this theory is that neither Neanderthals or Cro-Magnons
existed in this part of Europe during the ice-age. Most of Scandinavia
was covered by a large glacier and the area was not occupied until
much later.
My
response to the "problem with this theory" cited by this
author above is that Ice sheets have advanced and retreated multiple
times over the last 50,000 years. There could be pockets of Neanderthal
tribes that survived even into the historic era throughout northern
Europe, just as there are tiny pockets of somewhat blond-haired
and blue-eyed peoples who have survived in various places in Central
Asia in places like Afghanistan (for example in Nuristan)
and Iran even though the original populations have been repeatedly
overrun and colonized by alien poeples. Lastly, people can import
mythologies with their migrations from other geographic areas. For
example, the Jan/Feb
2007 Barnes Review carried an article "The Baltic
Origins of Homer’s Epics" which argued that "Here
is compelling evidence that the events of Homer's Iliad and Odyssey
took place in the Baltic and not the Mediterranean. Reveals how
a climate change forced the migration of a people and their myth
to ancient Greece and identifies the true geographic sites of Troy
and Ithaca in the Baltic Sea and Calypso’s Isle in the North
Atlantic Ocean—following Homer’s own geographic descriptions."'
Signs
of Neanderthal man unearthed in Finland by Juha Valste and Antti
Halkka
Pages
4-11
For
a long time, the oldest known signs of people in Finland post-dated
the latest Ice Age, making them less than 10,000 years old. Now,
at Susiluola, in Kristiinankaupunki, western Finland, stone implements
and signs of fire have been discovered which are around 120,000
years old. These indicate that people have existed here during the
Eem interglacial warmer period between two ice ages. All the human
forms as old as these in Central and southern Europe have been Neanderthals.
Tales
have long been told about Susiluola (it’s name - for some
obscure reason - means "wolf cave" in Finnish). The old
folk were convinced that Susiluola had been inhabited by mankind
sometime during the Stone Age. Recently, a curious local inhabitant
was given permission to excavate the cave. The National Board of
Antiquities had no money to fund this operation, no available staff,
and in fact little interest in the project.
Digging
deeply into the cave floor deposits, amateur geologists soon unearthed
blackened stones and roughly made stone implements. They immediately
abandoned their project, gracefully making way for a thorough professional
scientific examination of the cave strata. Thus far, the site has
yielded approximately 30 stone implements and over a hundred fragments
produced during their shaping. There are no rock types in the area
from which it would be an easy job to manufacture weapons and tools.
Some of the artefacts have been carved from red shale.
There
are many layers in the deposits on the cave floor, some of which
constitute original floor surfaces, whereas others have been built
up from stones and earth transported there by either water or ice.
Pollen and spores from trees and other kinds of plants have been
found in the strata associated with human occupation. These sub-fossils
tell us that the climate 120,000 years ago was rather warm, in other
words similar to what it is today.
Susiluola
represents the first Neanderthal dwelling site that has even been
found in Fennoscandia.
Not
unnaturally, it has caused a sensation among anthropologists and
geologists in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark.
The
Wikipedia article on "Trolls"
(as of May 2010) has the following interesting comment:
Many
of the fairytale and folklore descriptions of "Trolls"
are similar to characteristics of Neanderthal people. Neanderthal
people overlapped with us (Homo Sapiens) for 30,000 to 50,000 years.
Tyranny as a Jewish construct, hysterical demonization of European Nationalism, Jewish agenda in America, and more
Sorry for missing my Friday deadline folks. I have a friend visiting San Diego, so I've been busy showing off America's Finest City. If you have never visited San Diego, it is an absolute must!
Anyways, I have a few news items to highlight this week. Here we go.
A major theme of my writing here is the fact that the entire "Global War on Terror" is an Israeli or - to be more specific - a Jewish racket, devised and propagandized by Jewish intellectuals and public policy makers going back to the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism in 1979.
The primary goals of the "Global War on Terror" are:
to advance Israel's geopolitical agenda in the Middle East, namely the destruction and elimination of Israel's adversaries in the region using American military might; and
to justify the creation of an Orwellian Jewish-run police state in the West.
The "Global War on Terror" paradigm was manufactured and developed over time to replace the Cold War paradigm in international relations, and 9/11 served as the "catalytic event" required to initiate it.
In his book, The War on Truth: 9/11, Disinformation, and the Anatomy of Terrorism, Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed discusses in great detail the ideological foundations for the "Global War on Terror," beginning in the summer of 1979 at the aforementioned Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism, which was organized largely by current Israeli Prime Minister and major 9/11 war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu, who was working on behalf of The Jonathan Institute. The Jonathan Institute eventually published International Terrorism: Challenge and Response in 1981, which was edited by Netanyahu and consisted of the written or transcribed speeches of all the participants of the conference.
In the Forward of this book, we learn (bold and italics mine):
The Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism was conveyed by The Jonathan Institute on July 2-5, 1979 to focus public attention on the grave threat that international terrorism poses to all democratic societies, to study the real nature of today's terrorism, and to propose measures for combating and defeating the international terror movements. [...]
It was the intolerable spectacle of legitimatization of terror groups and the frequent capitulation to their demands that made the Jerusalem Conference so necessary. The United Nations has proven itself to be hopelessly incapable of dealing with the problem. The Western governments themselves have too often tried to make their separate deals, fearing that a full-fledge battle against terrorists and their supporters could have negative economic or political consequences.
In the face of such paralysis, pusillanimity and impotence, the Jerusalem Conference was convened to begin the formulation of an anti-terror alliance in which all the democracies of the West must join.
Israel and Jewish intellectuals, politicians, and public policy makers not only intellectually manufactured and propagandized the "Global War on Terror" paradigm, Israel also geared it's economy towards the Homeland Security and police state industry shortly before 9/11, allowing them to capture this tyrannical and Orwellian market which exploded following 9/11. As I highlighted last week, virtually all surveillance technology, drone technology, and other Homeland Security related services and technologies are developed and sold by Israeli companies.
For further confirmation of this fact, check out what The
Times of Israel is reporting this week:
There are two big “waves” set to hit Israeli hi-tech in the coming year, according to Gadi Tirosh, a general manager at venture capital fund Jerusalem Venture Partners. One wave will consist of new companies working in the cybersecurity space, as protecting government, enterprise, and consumers from hacking, online espionage, and cyber-terrorism becomes even more vital than in the past.
The second wave concerns the place where many of these security-oriented companies will set up shop — Beersheba, a city which will soon host many of the IDF’s advanced technology facilities. As the city grows, multinational giants, like Deutsche Telecom, Ness Technologies, EMC, and others are setting up R&D facilities in the city, drawing from the graduates of Ben Gurion University’s large body of engineering students.
It’s the perfect place, said Tirosh, for JVP to set up its new cybersecurity incubator. “As computer attacks get more sophisticated, they are more difficult to prevent,” Tirosh told the Times of Israel. “There is a big demand for advanced technology to keep cyberspace safe, and we are actively recruiting companies working in this space that have promising technologies. Beersheba, with its high-tech environment created by Ben Gurion University, the IDF’s large tech facilities, and international R&D facilities, will provide a very supportive environment for our startups. It’s a triangle that will benefit everyone involved,” Tirosh said. [...]
The cybersecurity incubator is new — and unique, said Tirosh, as JVP will be operating the only incubator in the world working with early stage companies in cybersecurity and big data (at least for now). But the incubator is not JVP’s first foray into cybersecurity; a graduate of the firm’s incubators, CyberArk, is now one of the world’s largest cybersecurity companies, offering a unique method to prevent hackers from even getting close to critical systems.
The companies that emerge from the incubator will become pillars of future cyber-defense efforts, said Tirosh. “We in Israel are as vulnerable to APT attacks as anyone else, but we have a good defense system, with government and private organizations working together to cyber-defend the country,” Tirosh said. “It’s a good model, one that we know our graduates will integrate into successfully.”
Also, please read Jewish journalist Max Blumenthal's piece at Mondoweiss entitled, "Meet the Israeli-linked firm that sold Big Brother machines to Mubarak, Qaddafi - and Washington," which further documents the Israeli connection to the NSA spy scandal I highlighted last week. Israel and world Jewry are the driving force behind and prime beneficiaries of virtually every single form of tyranny we see in our world today.
Moving right along, two articles appeared in the Jewish press this past week which sought to further demonize "those evil Nazis" and perpetuate the lies told about the German military and their European allies during WWII. The Times of Israel ran a headline entitled, "Friends and neighbors shocked by Minnesota man's Nazi past," which reported on Michael Karkoc, a Ukrainian American who allegedly "led an SS unit responsible for WWII atrocities," according to the headline. The Jewish Daily Forward published an article entitled, "No. 1 Most-Wanted Hungarian Nazi Used Dog Whips on Jews," informing their readers "98-Year-Old Laszlo Csatary Will Finally Face Justice" in the sub-headline.
Organized Jewry will never stop promoting and propagandizing their fake history and alleged "persecution" at the hands of "those evil Nazis." Honest and truthful individuals must expose and reject the Big Jewish Lies concerning WWII, Adolf Hitler, and National Socialist Germany, and that's what I'll continue to do here.
Speaking of all the Jewish lies endlessly disseminated about WWII,
National Socialist Germany, Hitler, and the fake Jewish "Holocaust,"
check out this headline from the UK's The
Daily Mail:
Just four days before the end of the war in Europe, a unit of Canadian soldiers was advancing through a thick forest in the north-east of Holland. Accompanying them was a member of the highly secret British Special Service Unit, a man called Joe Corry.
By any measure, Corry had had an eventful war. He had assassinated a Nazi scientist with a crossbow, watched D-Day from a house on the landing beaches, rescued the nuclear scientist J Robert Oppenheimer (the so-called father of the atom bomb) from Holland, attached limpet mines to U-boats, been shipwrecked off Newfoundland, and had even worked with the future James Bond author, Ian Fleming, himself an intelligence officer.
But despite everything he had seen, nothing could prepare Corry for what he would witness that day. For hidden deep in the forest was a Nazi ‘experimental’ extermination camp, the sight of which would remain with him for ever.
‘The living and dead evidence of horror and brutality beyond one’s imagination was there,’ wrote Corry years later. ‘People were lying, crawling and shuffling about, in stinking ankle-deep mud and human excrement.’
A young girl came up to him, crying for help, but there was little that Corry could do. A rabbi then approached and kissed the back of Corry’s hand, mumbling what Corry could only assume was a prayer.
As Corry walked around the camp, he was presented with increasingly horrific sights, including heaps of corpses and rows of ‘living skeletons’ crammed into blockhouses.
A few days later he returned, and saw two inmates tearing flesh from a long-dead horse and ‘gulping huge bites’.
What Corry saw that day nearly seven decades ago was an all-too-vivid example of the Holocaust, in which six million Jews were murdered on the orders of Adolf Hitler.
No wonder that earlier this year publishers Simon & Schuster jumped at the opportunity to re-issue his extraordinary memoir, first published to little fanfare in 1990.
The new edition, out in 2014, has been described by Corry’s editor as ‘everything you’d want to read in a World War II memoir — it’s a gripping, rollercoaster account of extreme bravery and resourcefulness, that also packs a powerful and emotional punch’.
There is, however, just one problem: it simply isn’t true.
There were no such ‘experimental extermination camps’ in Holland, and the concentration camps that had been on Dutch soil had been discovered well before May 4 — the day of the German surrender in Holland.
In fact, nearly everything Corry claims about his wartime experiences is fictitious. There was no ‘Special Service Unit’; Professor Oppenheimer was in the U.S. throughout the war; there were no British troops hiding in houses on the D-Day beaches.
The list of falsehoods is astonishing and blatant. [...]
Sadly, Corry’s tale is part of a growing problem within the publishing industry, which is selling to the public a growing number of ‘memoirs’ about the Holocaust and World War II that should really belong on the shelves marked ‘fiction’.
The article goes on to highlight other examples of "Holocaust" actors and fraud artists who have been paraded in front of the cameras or written fictitious "memoirs" or "biographies" to sell the fake Jewish "Holocaust" narrative to the world. Even mainstream, German-hating publications like The Daily Mail have to report on these liars. Truly amazing stuff folks. The bigger, more extravagant, and emotion-laden the lie, the more likely the public will accept it, as Adolf Hitler himself explained in Mein Kampf:
But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to Justice. All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.
From time immemorial; however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew "The Great Master of Lies". Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail.
- Adolf Hitler, quote from Mein Kampf (page 184-185)
Two other articles appearing in the Jewish press this past week sought to warn Jewry and the global public about the rise of "anti-Semitic" or "xenophobic" right wing political parties in Europe. In the past, we've seen organized international Jewish political and financial interests pressure national governments in Europe to ban or outlaw nationalist political parties, such as the Golden Dawn in Greece and Jobbik in Hungry.
This week, The Times of Israel ran a headline entitled, "New anti-Semitic Polish party claims 'bad Jews' run the country," which lamented that a Polish court can’t "ban ‘Together Party of the Slavonic Empire,’ whose charter speaks of importance of ‘the Pole of true Slavonic blood’," according to the sub-headline. Obviously, organized Jewry has a major problem with anyone or any organization openly exposing Jewish criminality and subversion, and works overtime to get them either banned, marginalized, or discredited.
The Jewish Daily Forward ran the rather ominous headline "The Specter of Xenophobia Stalks Europe: Radical Nationalism, Not Islam, Is Continent's Biggest Threat." A major aspect of the Jew World Order agenda is the vehement demonization of nationalism and national sovereignty (at least for White European peoples), and the elimination of racial or national consciousness. European or White Nationalism is constantly equated with "hate" or "bigotry" or "xenophobia" in an attempt to marginalize or slander those of us with legitimate, rational, and healthy nationalist viewpoints.
To wrap this up, check out two of the leading headlines appearing this week in the Jewish owned and operated New York Times, the primary establishment-serving news outlet in America today. Both articles were written by the Jew Adam Liptak, and provide discerning readers with an insight into the Jewish agenda in America.
The first headline, published on June 17th, is entitled, "Justices Block Law Requiring Voters to Prove Citizenship." A brief excerpt:
The Supreme Court ruled on Monday in a 7-to-2 decision that Arizona may not require documentary proof of citizenship from people seeking to vote in federal elections there.
The ruling was the second in two terms to reject Arizona laws that the state’s officials justified as responses to illegal immigration. In both cases, the court insisted that the federal government has the dominant role when it comes to national issues like controlling the borders and how federal elections are conducted. [...]
The second headline was published yesterday, June 22nd, and is entitled, "Supreme Court Weights Cases Redefining Legal Equality." A brief excerpt:
Within days, the Supreme Court is expected to issue a series of decisions that could transform three fundamental social institutions: marriage, education and voting.
The extraordinary run of blockbuster rulings due in the space of a single week will also reshape the meaning of legal equality and help define for decades to come one of the Constitution’s grandest commands: “the equal protection of the laws.”
If those words require only equal treatment from the government, the rulings are likely to be a mixed bag that will delight and disappoint liberals and conservatives in equal measure. Under that approach, same-sex couples who want to marry would be better off at the end of the term, while blacks and Hispanics could find it harder to get into college and to vote.
But a tension runs through the cases, one based on different conceptions of equality. Some justices are committed to formal equality. Others say the Constitution requires a more dynamic kind of equality, one that takes account of the weight of history and of modern disparities.
The four major cases yet to be decided concern same-sex marriage, affirmative action in higher education and the fate of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which places special burdens on states with a history of racial discrimination.
Formal equality would require that gay couples be treated just like straight couples when it comes to marriage, white students just like black students when it comes to admissions decisions and Southern states just like Northern ones when it comes to federal oversight of voting. The effect would be to help gay couples, and hurt blacks and Latinos.
But such rulings — “liberal” when it comes to gay rights, “conservative” when it comes to race — are hard to reconcile with the historical meaning of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause, adopted in the wake of the Civil War and meant to protect the newly freed black slaves.
The agendas being promoted by organized Jewry - amnesty for illegal aliens, "equal rights" for faggots and lesbians, elevation of "minorities" over White Americans, federal tyranny and suppression of states' rights, etc. - are totally un-American and unacceptable to me and millions of other people in the United States. Let me know what you think in the comment section.