Chapter 5


Profiling the
Opposing Forces Commander
and His Kosher Handlers

First posted 23 May 2009
Most recently updated, reedited 8 July 2012

 

In the military intelligence world, it is extremely important to create a realistic behavioral model of ones adversary as a necessary first step towards making successful predictions.
The most basic version of profiling is called “the intelligence preparation of the battle field.”  Here, the intelligence officer maintains a detailed overview of the enemy situation, friendly situation, terrain, and other essential tactical factors. 
But this is only the tip of the proverbial ice berg.  Invariably, one also requires extensive “deep background” on an enemy, to include such “soft topics” as history, culture, personality profiles, and tactical and strategic doctrines.  All these things, whether directly or indirectly, influence an enemy’s behavior. 
In the Info War during the Bush administration we faced two primary enemies. To use cattle ranch parlance: “Circle B” and “Circle Z.” We also faced a much deeper organizational enemy, such as the "Rings within Rings" strategy described by G. Edward Griffin (described later in this chapter) and more nebuluous enemies with deep ethnic, religious, cultural, and other sociological roots that have been "position-building" for centuries.  
First, at the center of “Circle Bush” is a demented, alcoholic, sadistic, draft-dodging clown masquerading as President of the United States named George W. Bush. Continually leaning over his shoulder and whispering in his ear what to think and say are two gentile confederates: Bush’s totally unscrupulous “boy genius” political advisor Karl Rove and his arguably even more diabolical Vice President Dick Cheney.   Many different news reports claim that Rove and Cheney actually ran the White House, not Bush.

 

Secondly, heavily overlapping “Circle Bush” like a Venn Diagram is the vastly more powerful and dangerous “Circle Zionist,” comprising the utterly treasonous and deceitful Zionist neo-con power elite in control of major national media, key branches of the Federal government, and fiercely loyal to Greater Israel at the expense of whatever was left of the U.S. Constitution and legitimate American national interests.  An excellent book that provides deep background on these characters is The High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper. Later in this series I cite The New Jerusalem, The New Babylon and other workds by Michael Collins Piper, that explain important deep sociological, cultural, religious, and historical background.
The moment I say this, I can almost hear a whining, sarcastic, impatient voice in the background “Here we go again, blame it all on the Jews!”
Well, no, we don’t blame everything on the Jews.  The Jewish influence is both a cause and effect.  While it is true that the Zionist power elite creates enormous mischief in its own right, an alien group like this never would have risen to the top of American society were it not for so many things that had already gone wrong on so many different social, political, cultural and religious levels involving non-Jews.  We will try to address those issues as well.
One of my biggest problems in writing this book is that both Captain May and I make many assertions that are a few leaps ahead of what most Americans are exposed to either in their federally-funded schools or controlled national media.  This creates what Psychological Operations (PSYOPS) specialists call the “incredible truth” problem (or conversely what psychologists also call “cognitive dissonance”), where people often find it hard to believe ideas that have been clouded with disinformation or lie too far beyond what they are routinely told –even when these ideas are completely true.
For example, Americans are routinely told that they have the best, mostly highly evolved political system on the planet. 
Presenting evidence that George W. Bush is a man of bad character raises all kinds of deeper questions about what has gone so terribly wrong with the American political system –and who really controls it from behind the scenes-- that a latter day Caligula or Nero can rise to the top.  In fact, in his interviews, Captain May asserts that the political situation in America has deteriorated to the point that bad character has almost become a prerequisite for high office.
I agree with him that “must be blackmailable” has almost become a de facto job description for high office, particularly when the public remains lulled into complacency by controlled national media.  However, making this point requires not one, but an entire sequence of “dissonance reduction” or “deprogramming” steps before the public will fully subscribe to our viewpoint.
To provide full explanations, not only must we provide convincing evidence regarding Bush’s bad character, but we must also explain (a) why it suits the political objectives of the power elite behind the scenes to support someone like Bush (b) how the power elite is able to corrupt an honest democratic process through such tools as vote-buying, physical threats, control of national media, and vote fraud (c) how all of this reflects well-documented historical trends and confirmed sociological patterns (d) why “counter predators” in American society are so weak that they permit all of this to happen in the first place and (e) why Bush and the shadow power elite are so evil that they consciously try to “manage” the American public with false flag events, displaying a level of callousness reminiscent of the Morlocks who control Eloi flower children in H.G. Well’s The Time Machine.
I cannot cover (a) to (e) in this chapter alone, although I will touch upon these areas through the remainder of this book.  For now we need to focus on George W. Bush.  He serves as a useful intellectual “rabbit hole” (as in what led Alice to a strange whole new world in Alice in Wonderland) that in turn leads to the other areas.
As we deal with “rabbit hole” George Bush and follow on topics, I may need to request that the reader patiently show a “willing suspension of disbelief” until we connect enough dots to prove our case in a thoroughly coherent way.
Obviously the Bush/Zionist power elite problem did not emerge over night.  In fact, this power elite has been furiously at work furthering its agenda in America ever since the beginning of the 20^th century, if not earlier.  While its power base has grown, the effective influence of the old WASP power elite has been in corresponding decline. Through their growing infiltration of national media, finance, academia, and government, the Zionists have even created disinformational roadblocks to jam out truthful interpretations of the aforementioned areas (a) to (e). 
The fact that direct talk about Zionist power may seem so incredible to most Americans actually helps to prove rather than disprove their influence, especially once one understands the real nature of this power, as we will discuss towards the end of this chapter.
Back to Bush.  We can start by analyzing the character of George W. Bush himself, and then address members of his immediate family and their ancestors. Capt May provided the following analysis in this 4 August 2003 letter to an individual named Dr. Pesikoff: 

August 4, letter to Dr. Pesikoff

Certified letter of authority

Dear Dr. Pesikoff,

Thanks for suggesting the practical business of the notes and recollections you have regarding my case.  In the event of my death, kindly release my entire file to anyone who is interested.

To give credit where it’s due, your skepticism about the president helped me take a good, long look at his personality.  I think the following observations about George W. Bush deserve note:

1.      The Bush Dynasty rests on his shoulders.

2.      He has a grudge against Saddam Hussein, who tried to assassinate his father.

3.      He thinks he’s Shakespeare’s Henry V, making up for an ill-spent youth with a bellicose reign; but he’s acting like Richard III, who ruthlessly disposed of anyone impeding his power.

4.      He thinks he’s George Washington, saving his country; but he’s acting like George III by tyrannizing it.

5.      He thought he’d be called another George Patton for charging into Iraq ; but now fears that he’ll be called another George Custer.

6.      He is, like me, a dry alcoholic who has found something to keep him focused.  With me it’s tae kwon do and writing.  With him it’s power plays and politics.

7.      He is a born-again Christian who received his power in the Millennium through his brother’s intervention.  It’s a story worthy of the Old Testament, and a powerful affirmation of his belief that he is destined to lead us against Islam, which he may identify as the religion of the Antichrist.

8.      What he calls the Global War on Terror is an attempt to enforce global security through global domination.  It is World War Three in his mind, and he’ll make us mind him in fighting it.

9.      If he causes a world war he may view it as a fulfillment of the Revelation of John in the battle of Armageddon.

Starting with these personal reflections, I have investigated his character further through his acquaintances and intimates.  I have until now kept their names private, but believe that, given the frequency of my calls and meetings with them, they are safer revealed than concealed:

Chase Untermeyer, who was the best man at my marriage to Mrs. May.  Chase worked for the Reagan and Bush White Houses and is an intimate of the Bush family.

Paul Burka, who edits Texas Monthly Magazine and believes the Bush Team is capable of murder.  In a conversation in early April, I confided to him that I believed the “collateral damage” deaths of Arab journalists covering the Battle of Baghdad were assassination.  “That sounds like Bush” was his reply.

Frank Michel and David Langworthy, both editors for the Houston Chronicle and associates for over ten years.  Both men have confided to me that then-governor Bush was a bully when it came to the media, and that his team had bullied them on occasion.

From my conversations with these men I have learned the following specific character traits about the president:

1.      He is the shortest man in his family and is self-conscious about it.

2.      He affects a Texas accent (the only man in his family to do so), and cowboy manners.

3.      He is immature and reaches decisions without much prior consideration.

4.      Once he has made up his mind he is headlong and unswerving.

5.      He takes opposition to his decisions personally, and retaliates.

I’ll continue to develop these ideas here and there.  I hope you’ll agree with me that the commander in chief has some interesting issues.  Is this the stuff of an interesting paper?

The manuscript I’ve sent you is intact, minus my road trip letters, which contain little relevant information.

Eric

Captain May’s observations in August 2003 proved prescient.  Two years later, Doug Thompson would begin his 15 Aug 2005 article “Is Bush Out of Control?” with the following:

Buy beleaguered, overworked White House aides enough drinks and they tell a sordid tale of an administration under siege, beset by bitter staff infighting and led by a man whose mood swings suggest paranoia bordering on schizophrenia.
They describe a President whose public persona masks an angry, obscenity-spouting man who berates staff, unleashes tirades against those who disagree with him and ends meetings in the Oval Office with “get out of here!”
In fact, George W. Bush’s mood swings have become so drastic that White House emails often contain “weather reports” to warn of the President’s demeanor. “Calm seas” means Bush is calm while “tornado alert” is a warning that he is pissed at the world.
Decreasing job approval ratings and increased criticism within his own party drives the President’s paranoia even higher. Bush, in a meeting with senior advisors, called Senator Majority Leader Bill Frist a “god-damned traitor” for opposing him on stem-cell research.
“There’s real concern in the West Wing that the President is losing it,” a high-level aide told me recently.
A year ago, this web site discovered the White House physician prescribed anti-depressants for Bush. The news came after revelations that the President’s wide mood swings led some administration staffers to doubt his sanity.
Although GOP loyalists dismissed the reports an anti-Bush propaganda, the reports were later confirmed by prominent George Washington University psychiatrist Dr. Justin Frank in his book Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President. Dr. Frank diagnosed the President as a “paranoid megalomaniac” and “untreated alcoholic” whose “lifelong streak of sadism, ranging from childhood pranks (using firecrackers to explode frogs) to insulting journalists, gloating over state executions and pumping his hand gleefully before the bombing of Baghdad ” showcase Bush’s instabilities.
“I was really very unsettled by him and I started watching everything he did and reading what he wrote and watching him on videotape. I felt he was disturbed,” Dr. Frank said. “He fits the profile of a former drinker whose alcoholism has been arrested but not treated.”

 

 

On the 9 Dec 2007 Jeff and Mike Show, May provided some more evidence that Bush is a text book sadist who gets titillated by evil:

Capt May: Bush when he was Governor of Texas put to death the first woman in 120 years, Karla Faye Tucker.
Jeff Lynch: I remember that, and she found Christ in prison, and she did not ask to be released. She just said "Let me live," because now she found a purpose in her life, even behind bars, and he would not grant her any mercy.
Capt May: That is the deal, not that he had to give reprieve. Not that he had to believe her. But what came out was even more damning, which was that Bush was together with his buddies chuckling and making jokes, actually mocking Tammy Faye. He was saying, "Oh, oh, oh, please don't kill me." This is what he was doing with his buddies when she was being put to death. [As reported by Paul Begala, CNN]. So, you know, if you want to call Karla Faye a mad dog, and if you look at her crimes, it is not hard to make that argument. Man, I am not saying you cannot shoot a mad dog, and I am not saying that I could not shoot a mad dog, but if you sit there and laugh and have a good time shooting a mad dog, then you are a mad dog.
Mike Howard: Well, you are no better than the person who got --to a certain extent you are no better than the person you are condemning to death.
Capt May: That is the point. It is very interesting you would say that, because what Karla Faye said --she was a crack 'ho [whore]. And she evidently had a grudge against ex-boyfriends, drugs were involved --she and one of her homies went and murdered these people brutally.
Jeff. Yes.
Capt May: Using a pick axe.
Jeff: Using a pick axe, right in the head.
Capt May: And what she said was "Every time I hit him with a pick axe, I had an orgasm."
Jeff: Yes, that is pretty sick.
Capt May: However, when I say Bush gets off on evil, that is what I mean. I mean I think it is woven into his level all the way to the sexual level. In fact, if you know anything about the Skull and Bones --
Mike: You know that somewhere in the Oval Office he has whips and chains, leather hiding somewhere. I would not be surprised if some homo-erotic--
Capt May: Skull and Bones has homo-erotic initiation rituals.
Jeff: Yes!
Mike: Whipping him, maybe?
Capt May: One of the things that doesn't get talked up is that they all talk about their most erotic, youthful memories while the others sit around and self-stimulate.
Jeff: Yes, pretty sick.
Capt May: …Until the conclusion of that act. Now that is reprogramming your wires pretty deep down, buddy.
Mike: (laughter). In fact, I don't think I am going to sleep well tonight after that.

Bush ignored a plea to spare the life of Karla Faye Tucker by both the Pope and World Council of Churches.  Wayne Madsen provided further insight into the vicious side of Bush’s personality in “Bush’s `Christian’ Blood Cult: Concerns Raised by Vatican : ”

Bush's blood lust has been extended across the globe. He has given the CIA authority to assassinate those deemed a threat to U.S. national interests. Bush has virtually suspended Executive Orders 11905 (Gerald Ford), 12306 (Jimmy Carter), and 12333 (Ronald Reagan) which prohibit the assassination of foreign leaders. Bush's determination to kill Saddam Hussein, his family, and his top leaders with precision-guided missiles and tactical nuclear weapon-like Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) bombs is yet another indication of Bush's disregard for his Republican and Democratic predecessors. It now appears that in his zeal to kill Hussein, innocent civilian patrons of a Baghdad restaurant were killed by one of Bush's precision Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs). Like it or not, Saddam Hussein was recognized by over 100 nations as the leader of Iraq -- a member state of the United Nations. Hussein, like North Korea' Kim Jong Il, Syria's Bashir Assad, and Iran's Mohammed Khatami, are covered by Executive Order 12333, which the Bush mouthpieces claim is still in effect. Bush's "Christian" blood cult sees no other option than death for those who become his enemies. This doctrine is found no place in Christian theology.

 

 

Regarding evidence that Bush is a sexual pervert, James Guckert, aka Jeff Gannon, a $200/hour gay male prostitute, was able to get near George W. Bush nearly every day for 2 years.
Something perverse seems to also involve other members of his family. Consider for example the allegations connected to the  Franklin Cover-up Scandal where call-boys were taken on a midnight tour of the White House during the administration of George W. Bush’s father, George H. W. Bush
Speaking of the Bush family, in “American Caligula” May 28, 2004 thepeoplesvoice.org, author Raymond Ponzini observed:   

Lt. Cmdr. Al Martin, US Navy, (Ret) said, "You have to look at the entire Bush Family in this context - as if the family ran a corporation called “Frauds-R-Us,” George Jr.’s specialty was insurance and security fraud, Jeb’s specialty was oil and gas fraud, Neil’s specialty was real estate fraud, Prescott’s specialty was banking fraud, and George Sr.’s specialty? All of the above." Christopher Hitchens, Washington Editor for Harpers and columnist for The Nation said, “George Bush, he’s bad on drugs, he’s sick mentally and physically, if he was a dog he’d be shot. He’s a scumbag. That’s why he won’t be re-elected. He’s not morally, physically or mentally fit to be President.”

According to the online article "The Order of the Skull and Bones: Everything you always wanted to know, but were afraid to ask," the father George H. W. Bush, once ran a fake "War on Drugs:"

Before the Vietnam "War", the Golden Triangle was run by French Intelligence and Corsican mobsters. After the French bailed out and America moved in, the triangle was run by U.S. intelligence, with aid from Sicilian mobsters. This narcotics network is well documented in The Politics of Heroin in S. E. Asia by Alfred McCoy, The Great Heroin Coup by Henrik Kruger and Double-Cross by Sam and Chuck Giancana.
Vice-President George Bush, as Chairman of President Reagan's cabinet-level working group and as Director of the National Narcotics Interdiction System, was the highest U. S. governmental official involved in the "war on drugs".
Frances Mullen, Jr., former head of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), called Bush's efforts "an intellectual fraud" and "a liability rather than an asset". Soon after these statements, Mullen resigned and the resultant General Accounting Office (GAO) report was buried.
In July, 1985, the suppressed GAO paper reported that there were "no benefits from the National Narcotics Border Interdiction System, directed by George Bush. In fact, the overall effect was to encourage supply...."
Monika Jensen-Stevenson, a 60 Minutes producer, quit her job after the CBS news program refused to air the story she had uncovered relating to the covert drug trade. Her book, Kiss The Boys Goodbye, details how our intelligence community used the apparatus of the POW/MIA governmental agencies as a cover for the trafficking of opiates from the Golden Triangle.

This is an important precedent, given that this work shows how the son ran a fake war on terror, in which federal agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security and FBI do more to set up "Al Qaeda" terror acts than defend America against them. The drug theme also persists, given that Afghanistan went from having very little opium production under the Taliban to becoming a major world producer after George Bush's invasion in 2001. Last, but not least, the aforementioned quote that talks about only "French Intelligence and Corsican mobsters" being in control of the Golden Triangle is inaccurate. Many sources, such as Final Judgment, explain how both French Intelligence and the Corsican mafia were heavily infiltrated and influenced by the Mossad. Other sources identify Mossad as being the key player alongside the CIA, which it largely controls, in both the Golden Triangle and more recently during the George W. Bush administration in Afghanistan.
Having now established that George W. Bush has both serious personal problems and sordid family roots,  the next big question is how all of this impacted on his performance as President of the United States .
For starters, America is supposed to have a republican government that is specifically designed to prevent dictatorship –something that Bush has openly courted in both word and deed.  
This point is worth emphasizing.  For example, the book The End of Kings: A History of Republicans and Republicans by William Everdell explains the historical pattern where republican governments have usually always been instituted first and foremost as an attempt to solve the problem of tyranny, rather than as a tool to achieve any universal suffrage or wealth redistribution goals of “social democracy.”  These leftist things usually come later in the historical life cycles of republics. 
A tyrant can become a terrible parasite on a society, literally destroying it from within through such means as fomenting ill-advised wars, raising ruinous levels of taxation, and conducting murderous purges of honest and productive people. 
A republican government, which I interpret as nothing more than an effort to institute rational elements of the scientific method to government, is supposed to achieve enough transparency, accountability, and group input to prevent irrational and irresponsible excesses by any single individual.
As the famous libertarian historian Lord Acton observed, “Power corrupts, and power corrupts absolutely.”  Any one entrusted with sole power, by whatever name he is called,  be it “dictator,” “king,” “unitary executive,” “emperor,” “monarch,” “commissar,” or whatever, is at high risk of abusing it and ultimately turning into a tyrant. 
People with a dictatorial mentality become particularly dangerous when they feel that their power base is threatened and feel justified to try to preserve it at all costs, to include though the use of murderous covert operations.  In Russian history alone, Ivan the Terrible, Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin are good examples.
This is all pretty basic stuff that most Americans –the “counter predators” in our society-- should have been taught in High School civics classes if they have not been able to figure it out for themselves.  
Unfortunately, most Americans do not seem to be either adequately taught or self-informed in this area.  According to “Americans Test Low in Civic Literacy” by Michael Caprio.  1,700 out of 2,500 randomly selected Americans flunked the ISI civics test. According to other news reports about this same test, even seniors at elite universities such as Harvard did poorly.
Now back to “predator” George W. Bush.  He openly flirted with dictatorship in his rhetoric on many occasions with surprisingly little reaction from a dumbed-down public –or controlled national media.  Worse yet, this menacing language was backed by highly constrictive legislation, the use of torture, a greatly enhanced the surveillance state, and war criminal aggression abroad. 
Bush frequently flipped off subordinates and once screamed "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it’s just a goddamned piece of paper!” He also stated, “I’m the President and I’ll do whatever I goddamned please..."
At wikiquote for Bush online one can find the following:  

1998

·         “You don't get everything you want. A dictatorship would be a lot easier. “

o        Responding to the difficulties of governing Texas , "The Taming of Texas," Governing Magazine (July 1998); also cited in Is our Children Learning?: The Case Against George W. Bush (2000) by Paul Begala.)

2000

·         “I told all four [congressional leaders] that I felt like this election happened for a reason; that it pointed out — the delay in the outcome should make it clear to all of us — that we can come together to heal whatever wounds may exist, whatever residuals there may be. And I really look forward to the opportunity. I hope they've got my sense of optimism about the possible, and enthusiasm about the job. I told all four that there are going to be some times where we don't agree with each other, but that's okay. If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier... [Bush laughs out loud, audience laughs out loud] ...just so long as I'm the dictator [more laughter].”

o        Online NewsHour interview, Washington , DC , (December 18, 2000)' during his first trip to Washington as President-elect. The last sentence is also included in Fahrenheit 9/11

2001

·         “Dealing with Congress is a matter of give and take. The president doesn't get everything he wants, the Congress doesn't get everything they want. But we're finding good common ground. A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it.”

o        Statement, Washington , DC , (July 26, 2001); as quoted in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer (July 27, 2001).

2004

·         “It's not a dictatorship in Washington , but I tried to make it one in that instance.”

o        Describing his executive order making faith-based groups eligible for federal subsidies, New Orleans , Louisiana , January 15, 2004

In his 9 Dec 2007 Jeff and Mike show interview, Capt. May commented:

Capt May: ….King George Bush, who calls himself, by the way, the "unitary executive." Which is --you have heard of the theory of the unitary executive --the neo-con theory.
Jeff: Yes.
Capt May: Unitary executive is just in Latin what in Greek would be "monarch."
Mike: Uh-huh.
Capt May: Unitary is just "sole ruler." Sole commander. So the Bush --let's say the post-911 theory of U.S. government has become dictatorial.
Mike: Exactly.
Capt May: By its own definition. By its own terms.
Jeff: As he says, [feigning a mock Texas accent] "I'm the decider [guy]." (laughter)
Capt May: That is probably as close to dictatorship as it could come in speech. Actually, that is false. Because we all remember the expression from December 2000 one month before assuming office when Bush once told Congress during his visit there, "Dictatorship would be a hell of a lot easier as long as I could be the dictator."
Jeff: Yes, that is not a joking matter for a President to say.
Capt May: Well you know there are these categories of information, and as an Internet writer. You know I write for the Lone Star Iconoclast. I live off of them, they are my stock and trade. They are the little repeated, but often important phrases like the decider comment. Or when Bush said dictatorship would be better. Bush said that in 1999 when he was still Texas governor. So these kinds of statements give a great amount of information to the public, but the public never hears them.
Jeff: No.
Capt May: Because they are sanitized out by the media.
Mike: Of course.
Capt May: The mainstream media is not there to inform--
Jeff: No
Capt May: --But to misinform and disinform.
Jeff: Yes
Mike: It is the language version of money laundering.

 

In his Cracking Satan’s Code interview, Capt. May explained the relationship of Bush to Zionist neo-cons, and how their behavior reflects longstanding war plans for Greater Israel:

Capt May: Well, remember this war [in Iraq ] started with "Shock and Awe." "Shock and Awe" was the propaganda phrase we used to describe how we were going to scare the Moslems into peeing their pants and giving up, remember?
Hughes: Yes.
Capt May: There is nothing more shocking and awful than nukes. And I am not saying anything about what they want to do that they didn't say in a document they issued in 2000: The Project for a New American Century, which you know was made up of the neo-cons. And the neo-cons are nothing but a cute phrase used to describe the Jewish hardliners who are part of daddy Bush's, George Herbert Walker Bush's cabinet in the Iraq war. The ones who want to go all the way through and fight everybody.
Karen AnnHughes: And I want to point out something right here. Those particular people, that you just mentioned, during Hitler's regime, were very instrumental in killing Jews throughout Europe . And they are without mercy. They will do it again. [Editor’s Note: Ms. Hughes is probably referring to the Transfer Agreement negotiated in 1933 between Zionists and Nazis.  These Zionist leaders—similar to neo-cons today—cold-bloodedly selected Zionist zealots to emigrate from Germany to Israel , whereas less enthusiastic Jews were left behind to a highly uncertain fate. Also, see Chapter 34: "Saving Dr. Toben, Handling Real Nazis, and Countering the Holocaustianity Intellectual Blackjack," where Capt. May questions major elements of the Holocaust story peddled by controlled national media to the American public].
Capt May: Yes, this particular group when we talk about the Jews, we need to understand that there are three basic categories that I think of. One is what I call the self-hating Jews. And that means the Jews who really are going to say everything that I am about to say, but the other Jews say that they hate themselves. That they are lying about the Jews. They represent about 10% of the Jews. Then there is probably, oh, 60-70% of the Jews who are kind of the way towards Zionists that the Irish people are towards the IRA. They are not in on it, but they are not going to mess with it, and in their heart of hearts they are kind of for it. And then there is the hard edge, the 25% that is Zionist. And those are the criminal conspiracy.
Hughes: Right.
Capt May: And they are cabalistic. They use the Jewish technique of the Cabala. Something that they learned when they were in the Babylonian Exile, by the way, from the Babylonians which involved encrypting, encoding, numerology. It is a mystic and occult science or art. Very much parallel to Illuminatism, Free Masonry, and whatnot.
Hughes: Exactly.
Capt May: We are talking about all these codes and numbers, and everything we are talking about comes straight out of these two gangs. The Cabalistic Zionists, and the Illuminatist power elite, which calls itself Christian, but is really anti-Christian. So the Zionist Jews who are part of George Herbert Walker Bush's cabinet, and who wanted to go into a big war in the Middle East in 1991 and 1992, were the ones who gathered around Bush, gathered up all the media, finance, political influence of worldwide Zionism and brought George W. Bush to the Presidency. In 2000, they had published a document. This being one year before 9-11. In September 2000 they had published a document called The Project for a New American Century: Restructuring America's Defenses. By the way, "Restructuring America's Defenses" was also a code. "Restructuring America 's Defenses" or "R.A.D." It was intended to be a RADical restructuring of America 's defenses. Just a little joke they put on the front page of it. In that book they said the correct move in the world today was to take over the Middle East to get the oil and take care of Israel's territorial enemies and that it would be a great thing to do but in order to do it we would have to have a new Pearl Harbor. That is where you have heard the phrase "A New Pearl Harbor."
Hughes: Yes.
Capt May: The new Pearl Harbor was called for by the people who brought Bush to power one year before 9-11 and six months before Bush took the oath of office. When Bush came to office, the war plan was already agreed upon, and it was A Project for a New American Century: Restructuring America's Defenses. It was only about an eighty page long document. That document calls for everything within the power of modern weaponry and science to be brought to bear to fight this Third World War, which was predicated upon having what is called in Latin a causus belli, a reason for war. A new Pearl Harbor . They executed the new Pearl Harbor on 9-11 and everything they promised to do in a Project for a New American Century: Restructuring America's Defenses document, they are going to do. The same way that people after World War II said, "My God, how could we have been so stupid, Hitler said everything he was going to do in Mein Kampf." Well, the neo-cons, the people who brought in the Bush boys, said everything they were going to do in a Project for a New American Century. It is just that the media hasn't covered it. In that document they say, "We're going to go nuclear." They say, "We're going to have cyber warfare." They say --now this is how chilling and cold-hearted these rascals are-- "That we should fully explore the options of biological warfare, especially since biological warfare can target genotypes."
Hughes: Oh yes, they have got that down pat now.
Capt May: They are going to exterminate the Arabs.
Hughes: Yes.
Capt May: Look, everything they say was done to them in World War II is what they are going to do. That is the oldest hustle of all hustles. You know, if you tell somebody, "You are a murderer" and somebody tried to kill you, that is the best way to get them to drop their guard so that you can stab them in the back, isn't it?
Hughes: Oh gee. Oh my gosh.

Significantly, just as George W. Bush has openly talked about dictatorship, his Zionist neo-con handlers have openly espoused a totalitarian philosophy known as “Straussianism.”   Capt May addressed this in his interview with Dr. Kevin Barrett:

Capt May: You know Dr. Barrett, this whole discipline that we are talking about, this whole cryptanalysis is the actual word, from the Greek "crypto" meaning "secret" and "analysis" meaning "to discover" and "to investigate." This discovery or investigation into hidden things, hidden numbers, this "cryptanalysis," in Ghost Troop we commonly refer to it as the embedded code. Because the code is embedded all over the place. It is particularly in newspaper articles, in day groups, you will find it all over. And that is, by the way, one of the Straussian, neo-con idiosyncrasies is that they love to be like a bunch of bullies. They love to know that there is a joke at your expense but you don't know it.
Dr. Barrett: Well that is right. That actually is a very important part of the Straussian philosophy about a secret elite that knows what the general public doesn't know.
Capt May: They get it.
Dr. Barrett. That is right. That is very basic --they go back to Plato and the stories of Socrates, and they claim that actually there was this hidden wisdom that Plato and Socrates taught to their most gifted, or shall we say their most psychopathic students, and those students were taught that in fact that the ordinary teaching that all of us get from reading Plato and Socrates is false.
Capt May: The hoi polloi. The many.
Dr. Barrett: Right, that is just for the masses. And the true teachings is that there is no such thing as good in the world, there is no God, there is no transcendent, and only the really hard, hard core people like themselves, the arch-Machiavellian neo-con types are strong enough to face the unpleasant reality. And thus those people have not only the right, but the duty to assume complete power over everybody else, and to rule through lies, murder, -- whatever it takes. Because there is no rule [of law].
Capt May: Well if you have known Straussians, you will know that they will even talk about Machiavelli's twenty four books. And the first twelve books --they will break them down into numeric codes themselves. Part of the reason for that is that Leo Strauss himself, the father of the Straussian movement, was a Hungarian Jew and a Kabbalistic student. Strauss brought those principles of Kabbalah to political philosophy.
Dr. Barrett: That seems like a bad parody of mysticism. Numerology and mysticism, there is a long and fairly honorable tradition among this sort of thing among people who are trying to get close to God, but here it seems like they are trying to go in the other direction.
Capt May: Well, he writes his classic philosophy and the, what --"Philosophy and Political Persecution," no --Persecution and the Art of Writing, in which he says basically you have to lay it between the lines or the many will gang up and kill you. You can't really tell them the truth. So the whole secrecy motif is inherent even in the proto-neo-cons. The Straussians are all behind it. And let us talk about some of the numerics that --when I said that this would be embedded code, the reason I told you it was kind of a Straussian joke, it was the same way that, remember I said earlier that they had been telling us it is a global war since day one. So that one day we will not be able to bitch when they say, "By the way, global war meant World War, dummy, didn't you know that?"
Dr. Barrett: Well a lot of them are actually calling it World War III, and some are calling it World War IV.
Capt May: Yes, and in the same way this is the embedded code that we are talking about, but with the advent of the Iraq War, what did they tell you the media was going to be? Embedded media.
Dr. Barrett: Right.
Capt May: In other words the media was not only going to be embedded in the military, it was also going to be compromised. You know, there is a lot of eroticism and cruelty --you are going to embed media, that means media is in bed with government, so there was that part of it, and there is the idea that media is embedded with code…

The Straussian mindset has been an important factor in the ruthless way America has conducted its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan .  This includes the use of “Shock and Awe.”  The Arab Mind by Raphael Patai, is another example of a work by a neo-con that tries to provide justification for this ruthlessness.  Patai, incidentally, is a Hungarian-Israeli-American academic.
According to Pankay Mishra in his review “In search of monsters to destroy” (Guardian.co.uk 4 Oct 2008);

…The Arab Mind, originally published in 1973, was the bible of neocon commentators in Washington and New York cheerleading the Bush administration's audacious venture: what Condoleezza Rice in the new book by Bob Woodward, The War Within: A Secret White House History 2006-2008 (Simon & Schuster), describes as shifting the "epicentre of American power" from Europe, where it had rested since the second world war, to the Middle East. Widely read in the US military, The Arab Mind later inspired the modus operandi of the jailers of Abu Ghraib.
More surprisingly, respectable intellectuals, journalists and academics echoed its generalisations. Among these people was the historian Bernard Lewis, who assured Dick Cheney, one of his most devoted readers, that "in that part of the world, nothing matters more than resolute will and force". The New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman …exhorted the US to act "just a little bit crazy", since "the more frightened our enemies are today, the fewer we will have to fight tomorrow". Accordingly, Richard Armitage, assistant secretary of state and a relative moderate among the Bush administration's hawks, told Pakistani diplomats that the US would bomb their country "back to the stone age" if it did not withdraw its support for the Taliban.
…Could smashing up Iran or invading Pakistan become the face-saving formula for the exponents of "shock and awe"? Certainly, they see US force impressing the Persian and the Pakistani mind as it apparently has the Arab mind. And such is the crazy logic of a wounded militarism that, notwithstanding its battered economy, the US may soon be embattled on many more fronts in what is already its most damaging war.

So far in this chapter we have talked about George W. Bush as a demented psychopath, and how his Zionist neo-con handlers seem to have similar mental characteristics.  They are also bent towards secret society maneuverings and totalitarianism.  Notice also how the word “criminal” keeps popping up in these interviews as well.
Let’s pause for a moment and review some key words such as “psychopathic,” “secret societies,” “totalitarianism,” “criminality,” and “Zionist neo-cons.”
Certainly a next logical question is whether or not all these things relate to each other?    Furthermore, how do these horrible things rise to the top in our society?
At my web site www.americafirstbooks.com I wrestle with the issues in some detail by exploring scientific dualities in my article series “Reconciling Opposing Economic and Political Ideologies.” This can be accessed from “Resolving Ideologies” option on the home page tool bar.
As one example, we can try to approach this question by looking at the “centralized vs. decentralized” debate in management science.  This is essentially a libertarian mode of analysis.
Without question, the major trend in American history has been from a relatively decentralized society to one reflecting a high degree of imperial centralization.  As an example, Dr. Murray Rothbard observes in Conceived in Liberty that in the late colonial period, most Americans had almost no government by European standards.  Everything was handled on a local level.  Up until the War Between the States, total government remained below about 5% -10% of GDP. 
Once local power is shattered, power tends to gravitate towards the center.  This is certainly what began to happen after states’ rights were shattered by the Federal victory.  Today, total government in American consumes about 50% of GDP and reaches into all areas of Americans’ lives.  
If one accepts the premise by libertarian authors such as Harry Browne, author of the classic Why Government Doesn’t Work, that government is inherently bureaucratic, and is usually inferior when it comes to producing useful things compared to the private sector, it becomes easy to see how once government grows beyond a certain size, it tends to become more of a parasite than a producer.  Beyond a certain point, increasing centralization tends to create a fertile environment where intriguers tend to thrive at the expense of honest producers.  
We can also try to approach this question utilizing the environmental vs. genetics debate in psychology.  
On the genetic side of the equation, we can look at how the white population was overwhelmingly White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) in the early 1800’s. WASPs are mostly a Nordic or Nordic-Celtic people from Northern Europe with strong traditions of rugged individualism, a relatively large middle class of armed and self-sufficient free farmers (and fishermen and craftsmen), and various forms of parliamentary government going back to prehistoric times.  They take pride in their craftsmanship and ability to produce real and useful things.   They traditionally have a strong year-round work ethic and tend to be more far-sighted and self-disciplined in their operations than other groups.   Their innate temperamental traits have been sculptured by a long evolutionary history in a frost zone environment, with strong themes of technological adaptation and man vs. nature conflict.  They also put considerable emphasis on open, honorable, and chivalrous behavior.
Flash forward to mid 20^th century America, and we see WASP’s largely displaced in high finance and national media by Jews, who have very different cultural, social, and innate temperamental characteristics.  Among other things, Jews are much more adapted to the Asiatic-despotic social model, where the leaders typically utilize covert gangster tactics and trickery to rise to the top of a pyramidal social structure.  Jews are predisposed towards achieving quick gain through intrigue, financial speculation, and transactional businesses as opposed to going through the more laborious route of engineering and manufacturing real and useful things.  They tend to be more collectivistic than individualistic, as witnessed by their historic enthusiasm for “Kibbutz”-style communes and other communist experiments. 
I call this the "gorilla-gangster" social model. It is a common practice in nature for the strongest gorilla to grab everything for himself, to include monopolizing female gorillas into harems, while driving less advantaged males to the periphery. Although less likely to pass on their genes, the weaker males still serve a collective tribal purpose of acting as sentries against predators and adding numbers or "throw weight" to the herd.

 

"The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands." — Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, 'La Revue de Paris', p.574, published June 1, 1928

 

The human analog of the "gorilla-gangster" social model is called "Oligarchical Collectivism." Having evolved in pyramidal, Asiatic societies such as ancient Babylon, or as professional minorities who run authoritarian organized crime systems, Jews have imprinted in their DNA a tropism towards creating pyramidal power structures, where they stand at the top as the ruthless overlords, with race-mixed masses at their feet. They tried to overhaul Russian society in this fashion during the Bolshevik Revolution, and this is the trend promoted by the Zionist oligarchy on America today:

The Jewish Oligarchical Collectivist-Asiatic Despotic Social Model taken from George Orwell's 1984

 

Oligarchical collectivism as it is practiced today by America's Zionist overlords

"For the first time ever, the secret agenda of the planet’s ruthless Super-class is exposed in stark detail. This documentary film chronicles how men of power and influence have worked in stealth for centuries to establish an oppressive world government.
Learn how this global oligarchy controls the populace through drug trafficking, money laundering, staged terror attacks, media propaganda and debt.
The criminal controllers have successfully dominated the globe and are now in the final phase of consolidating power.
Invisible Empire is a damning indictment of the globalists through their own words and documents.
Worldwide tyranny isn’t coming, it’s here.
This isn’t conspiracy theory, it’s conspiracy fact. The New World Order is out in the open— all documented in stunning living color.
Unelected bureaucrats are establishing regional unions under one superstate.

Witness their plan for a global tax and a cashless surveillance society in which every man, woman and child is micro-chipped at birth."

 

In their ruthless scrambles to become top gorillas, Jews tend to be very opportunistic, manipulative, and chameleon-like.  They will opportunistically support any –I repeat ANY-- political, economic, or religious ideology --be it capitalism, communism, pro-gun ownership, anti-gun ownership, anarcho-libertarianism, fascism, neo-conservatism, New Age Hippie Counterculture, Christian Zionism, Straussianism, environmentalism, or Trotskyitism –if it serves their immediate tactical advantage.   In fact, Jewish organizations typically help fund and infiltrate both sides of political controversies so that no matter who wins, they can establish some control and influence.  Jews tend to deal in ideologies no differently from the way Jewish rag peddlers and pawn shop owners like to swap around rags and junk.
It is an interesting paradox that the most effective Zionists leaders like David Ben Gurion and Golda Meier have tended to be atheists.  For these Jews, political ideologies and religious theologies are simply mental play toys to be used on other peoples to accomplish tactical objectives rather than something to really believe in oneself.
This reminds me of the joke I once heard when I lived in New York City for ten years and was surrounded by Jews.  Here it is: Whenever you get two Jews together, you get three opinions. 
One of the favorite ideological playtoys and diversionary tactics of Jews in America is to promote phony forms of "Libertarianism" that helps keep WASPs and other groups too fragmented and individualized to stand up to them. Please see my "Libertarianism vs. Nationalism" web page where I delve into important details of this issue. In my "Iceland Gets `ENRONed,' Then Goes for `1776'" I provide a country analysis about how Mossad-CIA, the Russian Mafia, Goldman Sachs, the City of London, and other Jewish entities were able to exploit phony forms of libertarianism to infiltrate and ruin a Nordic country.
A very important point I emphasize at this point in my discussion is that while it may be possible to feel overawed and even intimidated with various forms of Jewish power, and perhaps even suffer forms of "Stockhold Syndrome," (see Chapter 37 where I discuss "predictive programing," "Stockhold Syndrome," "limited hangout," and other techniques that help a population incrementally learn how to "love Big Brother" over time), in the final analysis the gorilla-gangster social model cannot win --or at least as long as free societies exist outside of Jewish global domination. The gorilla-gangster social model is ultimately a parasitic, paranoid, stratified, control freak society that squeezes out innovation and entrepreneurship. Such societies tend to stagnate and fall by the wayside relative to innovative societies over time. Worse yet, the worst psychopaths tend to rise to the top, who enjoy such sadistic measures as "soft kill" false flag pandemics, and other "UN Agenda 21"-type global depopulation schemes. (Please read "Sustainable Development, Agenda 21, and Prince Charles" by activist researcher Joan Veon and related articles listed by Dr. Eric Karlstrom at his web site "9/11 New World Order"). In the final analysis, everyone, including members of the military and police who initially think they are "on the inside" become targets of the top power clique. (For example, witness the Stalinist purges of the late 1930's, where even high level "insiders" suddenly found themselves shot in the back of the head or in the GULAG as "outsiders."). As soon as the top "gorilla gangster" power elite is through using white Americans who serve as police and military to subdue the general population under a ruthless martial law scenario, they would probably be happy to replace them with millions of soldiers imported from China and elsewhere in Asia. Under tyranny, no one is safe.
Over the long run, economically successful, technologically advanced societies tend to have certain "loose-tight," characteristics. This includes a high degree of politically decentralization and chivalrous behavioral characteristics at the grass roots that protect private property and other entrepreneurial incentives. (For an excellent discussion of "loose-tight" management practices, please see the landmark work In Search of Excellence by Thomas J. Peters and Robert H. Waterman.
On a sociogical level, it is worth noting that Nordic peoples have been historically almost the mirror image opposite of Jews in terms of "gorilla gangsterism," preferring instead societies that guarantee individual rights. In my "Iceland Gets `ENRONed,' Then Goes for `1776'", I described how Iceland has been one of the most naturally libertarian and productive societies in human history on a per capita basis. It is unfortunate in this regard that the Nordic percentage of the U.S. white population has dropped from over 60% to less than 20% over the last 150 years, as noted in my Libertarianism vs. Nationalism web page, but things can still go from bad to even worse if nothing is done to arrest the continual push by Jews and their allies towards ever greater Asiatic despotism and racial destruction of Nordics and other whites in America.
Admittedly, it can be very tempting to want to join up with Jewish gorilla-gangsters in the short run, since the rewards can be so great. As one example, we learn in Stealth Pacs: How Israel's American Lobby Seeks to Control U.S. Middle East Policy by Richard Curtiss and They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby by fomer Congressman Paul Findley that U.S. elected officials who decide to play ball with Jews discover that Jews are very clever about taking part of the billions that the U.S. taxpayer gives to Israel and slipping it under the table to them as a generous kickbacks to give even more aid to Israel and Jewish causes. As another example, in his 31 Aug 2010 3rd hour interview with Alex Jones, Joel Skousen described how one of the pleasures of working for Mossad-CIA is that certain employees can get beautiful women delivered to their hotel rooms, who have been "paid for by the Company" [the "Company" is the nickname of "The CIA"].
What is not so pleasurable is coming to the realization that Mossad-CIA's activities are fundamentally parasitic to society over the long run. Alex Jones describes how Mossad-CIA's global drug trade has converted Mexico into a failed narco-state that has now brought untold misery to millions of people. Another good example involves episode 117 of The Corbett Report about the total outrage of black community leaders in Los Angeles after they discovered that Mossad-CIA was pushing crack-cocaine on them, following the strange "suicide" (according to a corrupt coroner) of journalist Gary Webb who somehow succeeded in shooting himself twice in the head according to the usual "official report."
We have to avoid Stockholm Syndrome and not let our greed glands get the best of us when confronted with gorilla-gangster predators. It helps to realize that Jews are not invincible, in fact one can make a case that is is only because of some unusual quirks of American history and peculiarities in the structure of American society that Jews have been able to get away with what they have for so long. (regarding "structural" issues, please see my discussion in Chapter 6 about the "Imperial, Orwellian, Zionist-Dominated, Neo-Jacobin, Multi-Racial, Multi-Cultural, Welfare-Warfare, Global Super State that Wages Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace"). Sooner or a later their corrupt machinations will collapse. It has in fact happened many times before in European history, and eventually historical cycles will catch up with Jewish malefactors in America as well. As an example, in his May/June 2010 Barnes Review article Revenge of the Neanderthal, Willis Carto explains the horrible Jewish track record for arousing host populations to turn on them:

A partial list of all the areas from which the Jews have been banished, sometimes on numerous occasions, over the last 998 years is lengthy. The list includes Mainz (four times), France (four times), Upper Bavaria (twice), England, Saxony, Hungary (twice), Belgium, Slovakia (twice), Austria, Lyon, Cologne, Netherlands, Brandenburg (twice), Warsaw, Spain, Italy (twice), Lithuania, Portugal, Naples (three times), Navarre, Nuremburg, Prussia, Genoa, Prague, Bavaria, the Papal States, Hamburg, Vienna, Moravia, Bohemia and Moscow. (A chart of these states/municipalities with the year of expulsion is found at left.)

	Partial List of Cities/States that
	have expelled Jews -- 1012-1933
	Country	Year		Country	Year		Country	Year
	Mainz	1012		Upper Bavaria	1442		Naples	1533
	France	1182		Netherlands	1444		Italy	1540
	Upper Bavaria	1276		Brandenburg	1446		Naples	1541
	England	1290		Mainz	1462		Prague	1541
	France	1306		Mainz	1483		Genoa	1550
	France	1322		Warsaw	1483		Bavaria	1551
	Saxony	1349		Spain	1492		Prague	1557
	Hungary	1360		Italy	1492		Papal States	1569
	Belgium	1370		Lithuania	1495		Hungary	1582
	Slovakia	1380		Portugal	1496		Hamburg	1649
	France	1394		Naples	1496		Vienna	1669
	Austria	1420		Navarre	1498		Slovakia	1744
	Lyons	1420		Nuremburg	1498		Moravia	1744
	Cologne	1424		Brandenburg	1510		Bohemia	1744
	Mainz	1438		Prussia	1510		Moscow	1891
	Augsburg	1438		Genoa	1515		Germany	1933

 

The reader might wonder, "What is wrong with these people. Why don't they ever learn?"
We must note how much of Jewish behavior is a genetically-based tropism that they will continue to act out, even it it causes them to overreach themselves and manifest self-destructive "Scorpion and the Frog" tendencies. Having been through business school and received military intelligence operations training, I am amazed at how the average Jew on the street, with no formal education at all in any of these areas, nevertheless tends to have amazing intuitive feel for all these things.  More than any other ethnic culture, Jewish society is heavily geared towards business and intrigue.  They are almost like a CIA in search of a country, which helps to explain why Israelis admire the Mossad more than any other organization in their country.
Another thing really struck me about the Jews is that they are the ultimate “city slickers” of mankind.  Throughout all recorded history, they have always been a more highly urbanized people than most other groups.  They have always particularly thrived in decadent multi-racial, multi-cultural cosmopolitan settings.  Contrary to the pastoral image created in the Bible, the real center of gravity of ancient Jews was Babylonia for over 1,500 years. In fact, this has been such a major part of their past that one suspects that it has become reverse imprinted in their DNA through a Darwinian process.  Whenever Jews rise in power, they tend to instinctively recreate the social environment around them in ways that fit their unique characteristics, which means recreating “Babylonia,” multiculturalism, and multiracialism whether it is good for the host population or not.
In fact, speaking of DNA, in Jewish Supremacism by Dr. David Duke, he cites genetic studies that claim that Jews as a group are twice as genetically distant from the average white person as any white ethnic group is from any other white group (for example twice the ethnic-genetic distance compared to the distance between Irish and Russians or between Scots and Greeks).
In order to better fasten themselves on to the American host population, Jews have had as collaborators in big cities many millions of Catholics and peoples from authoritarian, peasant societies of southern and eastern Europe who came in waves of immigration following the mid-18^th century.  These collaborators often envy and resent many of the aloof personality characteristics and attitudes of superiority of WASPs.  (WASPs tend to be emotionally distant and highly judgmental with each other, so nothing personal). 
Jews have also had as collaborators tens of millions of intellectually-challenged Christian Zionist Protestants suffering from the delusion that Jews are some kind of specially favored people of God exempt from criticism --rather than a race of utterly manipulative, psychopathic, deceitful, and shameless predators who resort to anything –to include telling lies about God – if it creates for them a tactical advantage.
All of these things have had a huge impact on the character of America ’s political and economic institutions –mostly for the worse.
Lastly, we can apply the mutualism vs. parasitism paradigm one finds in the field of sociobiology, where “parasitism” is roughly comparable to the term “criminal.”
Parasitism can be a very successful evolutionary strategy in certain tropical biomes, where as many as 50% of the animals species are parasites on the other species. 
Regarding humans, parasitism became an increasingly rewarding way of life in 20^th century America as the country became a more urbanized, multi-racial, and multi-cultural.  Whereas Americans in the early 1800’s typically retained strong Old World ethnic and cultural ties (for example the descendants of Puritans often retained ties to eastern England and the descendants of Scots-Irish could remember their clan origins in Scotland), the “melting pot” produced increasingly fragmented and disoriented whites who became increasingly inept, disunited, and powerless in regard to keeping a highly tribalistic, goal-oriented, and crafty people like the Jews in check.
Furthermore, whereas in most states of early America only literate land-owning white males could vote, following the War Against Southern Independence, the average ability of voters to comprehend the unique danger posed by the Zionist cabal began to deteriorate with the new mania for universal suffrage. For example, both women and former Negro slaves became enfranchised in the late 19^th century.  According to political science studies, women as a group vote about one standard deviation to the ideological left of men.  In accordance with the Right Wing 101 principle that groups tend to reorient the environment around them to suit their unique characteristics, when women as a group grow in political power, government tends to become “wetter,” more nanny-like, and more expensive (higher taxes are required to fund bleeding heart socialistic programs).   In regard to full-blooded blacks, most “culture fair” IQ tests show them about one standard deviation below whites.  This is not a particularly auspicious start in dealing with a very clever, subtle, and duplicitous people like the Zionists.
As usual, as “counter predators” within the electorate weaken, predators at the top multiply and grow more dangerous.
In my discussion of parasitism in my “mutualism vs. parasitism” article at my web site, I tie together the aforementioned terms such as “psychopaths,” “secret societies,” “totalitarianism,” “criminality,” and “Zionist neo-cons.”  Please see my extended discussion of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology on my web site. Among other things, I provide  evidence that Jews have a much higher rate of genetically-based psychopathy and homosexuality within their gene pool compared to whites, and explain why this might offer a survival advantage given their peculiar evolutionary strategy.
The following is an extract where I focus on the topic of Jewish criminality:

Jewish-dominated Hollywood falsely portrays Italian-Americans as criminal ringleaders in America , when in fact the real brains have always been Jewish. The same is true in Europe , where for centuries most of the underworld slang has come from Yiddish.
Michael Collin's Piper's Final Judgment gives an excellent overview of the Meyer Lansky operation in America , which dominated American organized crime for decades and played a key role in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Lansky's crime syndicate was closely tied to the Mossad, which dominates the global drug trade along with its partner the CIA. The book Supermob: How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America's Hidden Powerbrokers by Gus Russo, also describes Jewish domination of major organized crime tentacles that reach throughout America. An excellent companion work is The Money and the Power: The Making of Las Vegas and Its Hold on America by Sally Denton and Roger Morris. This book explains how the Jewish gangsters who founded Vegas were linked to Jewish mobsters in other American cities, and how they were able to spread their power tentacles across America at the highest levels. Denton and Morris also note how Jewish gangsters have played a key role in the history of Israel .
Jews have always dominated the vice industries in America , to include liquor, gambling, and pornography. See the Jewish Crime, Jewish Mob page at Jewwatch.com, the judicial-inc.biz web pages on Jewish ultra high level crime, espionage, and targeted executions, and also Jewish Supremacism by Dr. David Duke and The International Jew by Henry Ford for more details.
Interestingly enough, according to Dr. Kevin McDonald in his review of the book Henry Ford and the Jews, "As TIJ [The International Jew] notes, the Kehillah [central Jewish community leadership] was organized in response to the comment by General Bingham, the chief of police of New York City, that Jews were responsible for 50% of the crime in the city."
Jews also have a long track record of dominating high level organized crime around the world. It is no accident that most of the underworld slang in major European countries in the 19th century came from Yiddish. In that same century, the Jewish Sassoon family ran the opium trade in China, founded Hong Kong , and used the British army to subjugate the entire country under the heel of their mega-criminal enterprise. The Sassoons became one of the richest crime families in the world, and scion Edward Albert Sassoon intermarried with the British branch of the Rothschild family and was knighted.
Since ancient times, Jews have had a long history as slave dealers. In early America , Jews dominated the Negro slave trade. Today, Jews dominate the global white slave trade. Israel has been a central hub for the exploitation and resale of Slavic women since the fall of the Soviet Empire. In July 2001 "a US State Department report placed Israel in the third section of its `black list' on countries whose laws don't meet US criteria for dealing with this crime and threatened economic sanctions." In Israel , white sex slaves are only allowed to keep three percent of their earnings.
Jews are also leaders in major white collar crime in America . As an example, see "Enron, Fastow, and the Looting of America" by Dr. William Pierce. Major Wall Street swindles have been led by Jews such as Ivan Boesky and Mike Milken, whose involvement in the S&L debacle cost the U.S. taxpayer hundreds of billions of dollars.
Jews have produced a disproportionate number of spies and subversives in America , such as Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, nine of the Hollywood Ten (six of the ten were dues-paying members of the Communist Party), Jonathan Pollard, and the neo-con instigators behind the Larry Franklin-AIPAC spy scandal. Even the Jewish ADL, a self-styled human rights and Jewish defense organization, got its fingers caught in the espionage cookie jar with the Roy Bullock bust in San Francisco . Please note the Israeli spy chronology listed at whatreallyhappen.com.
In American and Europe throughout the 1930's, Jews typically made up over 50% of the membership of communist party organizations, although they typically made up miniscule portions of the overall population well below ten times this percentage. Jews played a key role in financing the Bolshevik revolution, and a key role in conducting the slaughter of tens of millions of non-communists. These alleged Jewish atheists systematically looted and destroyed Christian churches and slaughtered Russian priests while leaving all synagogues unscathed.
Jews have been major perpetrators of war crimes and terror atrocities in the Middle East . As some examples, they were involved in the bombing of the King David Hotel that killed 92 people in 1946, the assassination of the Swedish U.N. mediator Count Folke Bernadotte, the massacre at Deir Yassein, the Lavon Affair, the machine-gunning of disarmed Egyptian POWs in Sinai, the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty (21 Americans dead, 92 maimed), passive-aggressive allowance of the bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut in Oct 1983 (according to Victor Ostrovsky the Mossad knew all about the suicide mission, but deliberately failed to warn the Marines, who lost 245 men), the Sabra-Shatilla massacre in Lebanon, the Jewish neo-con led wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq that have dumped hundreds of tons of aerosolized depleted uranium in the Middle East (cf. High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper), and the July-August 2006 war of naked aggression against the civilian population of Lebanon.
In August 2005, the World Bank reported that Israel is one of the most corrupt countries in the West. Business Data Israel (BDI) commented: "" Israel is considered one of the riskiest places in the Western world, with an unstable, inefficient regime, low accountability, a relatively high rate of state corruption and poor law enforcement." In addition, according to a 2006 BBC survey, 43% of the Israeli public feels that some form of torture should be permissible, the highest percentage of twenty five leading countries polled across the world. Last but not least, Uri Avery observes in his article "Lovable Man?" that the gap between rich and poor in Israel is one of the widest in the industrialized world (contrary to northern European societies that have traditionally had the largest middle classes relative to their overall populations).
Let us pause for a moment and ask if this is what we would expect from a nation supposedly serving a divine mission from God to be a light unto the world?

Let me close by at least covering some Jewish strengths: 
First, as a group, they tend to be instinctively better at schmoozing and “handling” people than starchy Nordic types.  Schmoozing, after all, is a Yiddish word. 
Ralph Townsend in his 1933 book Ways that Are Dark makes a fascinating sociological point when he implies that Jews are to Nordics as the Chinese are to the Japanese.  It really resonates with my personal experiences dealing with both Nordics and Jews in New York City .
According to Townsend, when Americans initially come in contact with both Chinese and Japanese communities, they invariably like the Chinese much more because the Chinese come across as much more affable, whereas the Japanese tend to be much more reserved.  However, after getting to know both groups for several years, Townsend observed an amazing reversal where Americans invariably prefer the Japanese.  This is because while the Chinese are famous for being friendly on a very superficial level, and for telling people what they want to hear, they also have a bad track record for later betraying them.  In contrast, the Japanese, while harder to get to know, are more likely once they become friends to remain faithful friends for life.
Not surprisingly, the Chinese are often referred to as “The Jews of the East.” Also, Townsend observed that there is such a huge distance between Chinese and Japanese that back in the 1930’s the conventional wisdom in the San Francisco prison system was that if a Chinese person and Japanese individual were put in the same prison cell in the evening, one of them would likely be dead the following morning.
Another thing I grant the Jews.  They make truly funny stand up comics.  Some, like Rodney Dangerfield, don’t get no respect for their considerable talents in this area.  Others, like Jerry Lewis, go a long ways towards disarming suspicions that we are dealing with bona fide members of some kind of Chosen Master Race of God.

Jerry Lewis as the Nutty Professor

That having been said, I would also note that the mischief these wise guys pull off in this world would be absolutely hilarious if there weren’t so many people getting ruined and killed.   Some times I almost wonder if characters like Bizarro in the Superman comics or the Joker in Batman comics are a case of art imitating Jews, or whether in fact it works the other way around.
Once I became convinced that 9/11 was very likely a Mossad-CIA inside job, and that the Israelis are prepared to drag America into World War III and get us all killed if it might serve them an immediate tactical advantage, I stopped laughing with these people, and instead started laughing at them –if that.

A final word regarding the complete analysis

There is some important historical explanation that I wish to share with the reader. First, I think it is important to explain how Jews developed their hegemony in Britain and elsewhere in Europe beginning in the 17th century before they started commencing international banker versions of "false flag" attacks against the United States in the 19th century, which I describe in some detail in Chapter 33 of Book III when I review the important video The Money Masters.

A landmark work

Of course there is no substitute for studying the whole gamut of Jewish history, to include the ancient history of Jews in Babylon and Rome as well as Palestine, or the even the history of Jews in the Middle Ages, to include their expulsion from England, hegemony in Spain, and eventual establishment in Poland and elsewhere in Eastern Europe. It is an amazing history, but unfortunately it is beyond the scope of this chapter to go into it all here. However, I would like to provide the following extract from pages 111 to 115 of Micheal Collins Piper's outstanding book The New Babylon to help the reader understand how Jews conquered England as an important springboard for their eventual takeover of the United States. Also very significant is the analysis by Dr. Matthew Raphael Johson of the Jewish role in Polish history.
It is also important to note how Jews have always shown an affinity towards absolutist or totalitarian regimes, similar to what they are now trying to impose on America through the 9/11 inside job (Chapter 7), Patriot Act and NSPD-51 (Chapter 23), and martial law training exercises (Chapter 31). Jews typically worked as the "financial KGB" of despotic European rulers, helping them squeeze their subjects through ferocious tax-collecting and other forms of monopolistic rent-seeking. Last, but not least, Jews showed a special talent for covert infiltration techniques of European power centers. I discuss their special aptitude as the "Mongols of covert 4th generation warfare" methods in more detail in Chapter 38.
Prior to the modern Jewish banks in the Rothschild sphere, there was also a considerable Jewish presence in the world of money. The Economic History of the Jews noted:

Medieval princes used the commercial and financial services of individual Jews. However, as an institution, the Court Jew is a feature of the Absolutist State, especially in Central Europe, from the end of the 16th century onward.
Trying as far as possible to extend his power over the whole of his territory, the ruler set up a centralized administration as part of his court, which at the same time became the power center, presenting a lavish display of luxery. Economically, a Jew could be of great service to such a ruler.
In Poland many landed estates were administered by Jews and a large part of the trade in agricultural products was in their hands.
This, combined with the emergence of early Jewish capitalist commercial activity by Sephardim in the Netherlands, with their connections with Levantine trade through Jews in the Ottoman Empire, made the Jew in central Europe particularly suited to be anagent for provisioning armies with grain, timber and cattle, as well as a supplier of diamonds and other goods for conspicuous consumption.
As tax collecting and enlargement of the scope of taxation often lagged considerably behind the growing expenditure of court, army and bureaucracy, this type of regime developed an almost chronic financial deficit.
Here the Jews with their organizational skill and their far-reaching connections could help, through the frequent supply of commercial credit or ready cash, as also through the supply of food stuffs, cloth, and weapons for the army, the most important instrument of the prince's power.

In his 17 June 2010 Orthodox Nationalist show titled The Fall of Poland on the Voice of Reason Broadcast Network, Dr. Mathew Raphael Johnson describes a particularly frightening example about how Jews acquired sociological "training wheels" for New World Order-type social domination in Poland. This would later serve as a model for the United States. Quite a lot has been written that compares the United States with imperial Rome and ancient Babylon, but the Polish analogy is equally compelling. In essence, Jews took over all the merchant classes, gained control over all the money, and reduced whites to a slave underclass in Poland.
To make the analogy with American history, consider how "Robber Barons" became a de facto ruling class in America following the War Against Southern Independence. They became roughly analogous to the Polish nobility of the Middle Ages. Then add the rise of the Federal-bureaucratic elite --to include Mossad-CIA -- in the 20th century. On top of this, add ostensibly nongovernmental cartels (but which are in fact in bed with government to benefit from government subsidy and coercion) -- such as the military industrial complex and corporate and centralized banking elites. In essence, this "Circle B" and "Circle Z" alliance functions just like the tight axis between the nobility and Jewry in Polish history (call it "Circle N" for the Polish nobility and "Circle J" for the Jews). The end game is much the same: a militarist plantation society where most whites become a de fact slave underclass.
Consider how Jews gained control over the issuance of money with the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Banking System as America's central bank in 1913 (see Chapter 33). Consider also how the U.S. Government today hires private contractors to do its imperial dirty work as did Polish leders with Germans and other mercenaries (see Chapter 27). Consider how today most Americans are saddled with debt, without land, are "false flagged," and are even under continual surveillance by the likes of Mossad-CIA, the NSA, IRS, FBI, DHS, and other "alphabet" agencies. Americans are being covertly mass-medicated and dumbed-down with chemical and food additives (see Chapter 36 on "soft kill" covert biowar measures employed against the U.S. population). The white middle class is being destroyed in America, much like it was destroyed in Poland. Words like "serf" or even "slave" may not be too far off the mark in describing Americans today as well as the Polish people of the 16th- 17th centuries.
Consider also how Jews have conducted a nonstop campaign to take away both First and Second Amendment rights in U.S. (see the Rev Ted Pike archive regarding attacks on Freedom of Speech), and how Poland -- the European country with the greatest number of Jews -- just happened to be completely disarmed and had the worst human rights track record for white people. Dr. Johnson explains how the Polish people were not only reduced to slavery --with fewer rights than Russian serfs -- but the nobility was lawless, just like members of Mossad-CIA and Jewish plutocrats like Larry Silverstein who appear to "get away" with such outrages as the "9/11 inside job".
Under the Jewish-dominated plantation-slave system, Poland lost the ability to grow enough food for itself just like America has lost 75% of its manufacturing capacity in recent decades and now lacks the ability to produced enough quality goods to avoid trade deficits. Circle "N" and Circle "J" in Poland also used imperial wars as a distractor from domestic problems, just like "Circle B" and "Circle Z" during the Bush Administration.
I could go on, but the analogies should become increasingly apparent as one reads through my excerpt of Dr. Johnson's lecture below.
Unfortunately due to an editing glitch, the first few minutes of Dr. Johnson's 17 June MP3 lecture "The Fall of Poland" (download HERE) start with a different lecture on Ukraine spliced into it, but at about six minutes it gets on to the topic of Polish history. I have decided to provide a lengthy excerpt below so that the reader can get a better sense of the different variables that have impacted on Polish society, to include some important positive nuances, such as the ability of certain Polish institutions to transmit elements of Western culture to Eastern lands.
In regard to the negatives, as usual, I can almost hear certain readers whining sarcastically in the background "Here we go again, blame it all on the Jews!"
My response is, "True, it was not just the Jews, but Jews nevertheless were unquestionably a key variable behind the tragedy of Poland:"
And now for Dr. Johnson:

Dr. Mathew Raphael Johnson:...[8 min, 37 sec into the show]; [What] I have come across recently is a work called the Fall of Poland, it is about 1,800 pages, in two volumes, by L. C. Saxton, which came out in 1852. [Editor's note: Listed online as Fall Of Poland (Volume 1); Subtitle: Containing An Analytical And A Philosophical Account Of The Causes Which Conspired In The Ruin Of That Nation, by Luther Calvi Saxton, one paragraph review here]. And the thesis of the book is that the Polish nobility are the cause of the destruction of Poland...
... I want to make it very clear that the Polish people never had any rights as individuals until very recently, really until the post World I era. I want to say that the Polish nobility is the cause of Poland's decline, Poland's destruction as a state. But the Polish nobility were slave owners, and slave owners straight up until the era of Catherine the Great of Russia, where Poland was then partitioned among the three powers that I mentioned before. What we are going to talk today is this mighty power that really was a house of cards, and the Polish nobility, the aristocracy, was the reason why the Polish empire was as permeable and really as weak as it really was. I want to talk about the thesis of L. C. Saxton which to a great extent dovetails with my own work on the Polish question. And the first fact that will make sense out of this idea is that only members of the aristocracy could own land. No other person, not the middle classes, not the Jews, and I will say this again, but 80% of the Jewish population of the world at the beginning of the 17th century lived in the Polish empire. Jews are a huge player here. Legally speaking, although there were ways to evade this, they could not own land, only members of old Polish nobility could own land, which means that land prices generally were suppressed. Were kept low. But this is a product of the oligarchic constitution of Poland, where only members of the aristocracy were actually citizens. Only members of the aristocracy speaking Latin, not Polish or Ukrainian or anything else, had any political rights whatsoever. Political rights were very easily translated into economic rights and vice versa. I want to say that Saxton's thesis generally is that it was noble arrogance that destroyed Poland and prevented her from developing centralized military institutions, like all of her neighbors were doing. As a result of that, she eventually was divided up among those powers capable of doing so. But part of the way that this was done was by the suppression of the urban populations, the so-called middle classes, the professions, the merchants, and they were banned from owning land. That element, that switched in Western Europe, the middle part of the Middle ages to the high Middle Ages, the middle classes in the towns, the people who were actually making liquid money, who altered the nature of political opinion in the West for better or for worse, that was not permitted to develop in Poland. The merchants and the professions living in the towns were forbidden to own land, and their economic world was controlled by the nobility. The nobility will do everything in their power -- and I want to say that say by 1600 the titled nobility in Poland, maybe averaged about half a million, 450,000 people -- they destroyed any competition from the monarchy and the church on the one side, and the popular masses as well as the urban population on the other. Of all the states in Europe in the Middle Ages, the Renaissance and the modern period, the Polish version of serfdom was the most severe. And Saxton will go so far as to say that serfdom did not exist in Poland, only slavery existed in Poland. Serfdom and feudalism assumed that nobles have responsibilities to those above them. And yet in Poland there was nobody above the nobility. So the country essentially was a series of noble estates worked by slaves. The nobles would come together; the first noble assembly or Diet took place in 1331. They would come together and work out their own individual problems. That was Polish politics for a long period of time. And serfdom in Poland was far worse than serfdom in Russia or Germany, or Gaul, or any other place. Monarchs in general were powerless to deal with noble power. There were attempts, you see in France and elsewhere that a monarch will attempt to use the lower nobility to fight the upper nobility in order to divide them and therefore enhance royal power. These never quite worked. And I want to suggest -- I am not being dogmatic here -- I want to suggest to you that the reason that this occurred is largely because there was no middle class. There was no merchant class of native Polish stock in the cities that a King could go to. You had this in England, quite often, where a monarch can go to London or Kent, or you know some place like this, and promise the merchant class a level of power in exchange for money. This never occurred in Poland because the nobility controlled what little merchant activity there was. And whatever kind of reform effort that existed throughout Europe -- remember Poland was the Easternmost boundary of the Enlightenment and the Renaissance before that, and that kind of leaked into Ukraine, and as a result of that ended up leaking into Russia. So Poland was really a very, very important and sophisticated conduit of Western European culture into the Slavic world. This is one of the reasons that Ukraine is very Western-oriented in its approach to politics, liturgy, religion, and everything else, without ever altering the Orthodox faith in the center of this. This is one of those things that makes Ukrainian Orthodoxy different from Russian or Greek Orthodoxy. The conduit to that is the fact that Ukraine was under Polish rule for a very long period of time. But any kind of reform effort, to reorganize the state, to reorganize the Constitution, was destroyed at its inception by the nobility. There was never any sense even of representative government among the nobility. In fact representative government was destroyed by the nobility. What I want to suggest, I mean here is the central issue, no member of the aristocracy could engage in commerce of any kind whatsoever without falling into tremendous disgrace by and through their peers. Now, the Polish nobility was smart enough not to give over the necessary economic power, the merchant power, liquid banking power, to Poles. So what did they do? This is the thesis here. This is the central concept. They gave it to the the Jews. Like I said, about 80% of world's Jews will eventually move to the Polish empire even to the point where Jews prior to the Cossack revolt of Bohdan Khmelnytsky will view the Polish empire as the New Jerusalem, and even more than that, the Jews will view the Polish empire as in and of itself Messianic. The Messiah will come because the Jews have been given a tremendous level of power in the Polish Empire. Not until 21st century America, will the Jews ever gain this level of power. The Jews controlled all the money in Poland. They controlled all the commerce of Poland. They controlled the monarchy, and they controlled the nobility. And they did this through the fact that the only people who had any access to liquid money -- mobile fungible liquid money -- were the Jews that were deliberately imported from Khazaria, from southern Russia into the Polish Empire, and the nobles did this, to number one, to keep the monarchy away from money, to keep actual Poles away from money, and to keep any of their political opponents away from money. So by the middle of the 16th century, beginning of the 17th century, the nadir of the Polish empire, you had a powerless monarchy, you had a completely noble-dominated society, you had millions of slaves of Polish-Catholic nationality, and the towns like Kraków and elsewhere were populated by Jews who were given licenses by the nobility to engage in all banking, all trade, and the nobility collectively gave the Jewish population in Poland an absolute monopoly over the sale and distilling of alcohol. I want to suggest to you guys that a huge proportion of the modern Jewish mentality came into existence due to their immensely favorable treatment in the Polish empire in the beginning of the 17th century. So what does this all mean? As Ukrainian Orthodox used to say in the 17th century, Poland was an aristocratic Judaic republic. All commerce, all liquid money, was given over to the Jews by the Polish nobility collectively with the idea of keeping the nobles out of the merchant world, and the banking world, and keeping the peasants from getting wealthy by engaging in anything that concerned actual money, trade, and commerce. Both then as a cause and as a result of all this, the Polish nobility scorned anything having to do with commerce and gain. And like you had in Western Europe, in Russia and a lot of other places, the nobility had no sense of budgeting, no sense of controlling spending, and as a result went deeply into debt. How were these debts financed? They were financed by going to Kraków, going to the major cities, Gedansk and elsewhere, and taking money from the Jews. Taking money from the Jews in terms of taxes as well as loans. And not just the nobility, but also the monarchy, such as it was. And as a result, the Jews not only took all economic power, by 1700 the Jews were entirely in control of the money, but they were entirely in control of the monarchy. So what you had was a largely parasitic nobility, with the exception of those nobles that had manifest military talent, and it was those nobles, including those who became monarchs, like [John III] Sobieski, who had tremendous military talent, who built and maintained the Polish empire with Jewish liquidity, with Jewish money. Now as a result of all of this, the nobles passed in the Polish Diet --remember the capital was Kraków in the Renaissance, many privileges for themselves were passed in the Diet. No noble could be arrested until after the noble was convicted. Saxton's idea that there really was no such thing as law or politics in Polish society. And any real dispute was solved with violence, with duels or military factionalization within the nobility. And I want to make it clear that Saxton and pretty much anybody else who writes on Polish history makes it very clear that the Polish Army was not a centralized national army for the most part. The nobles could raise their own troops from their own estates, and they borrowed Jewish money to buy mercenaries from Germany or anywhere else. Needless to say, no noble ever paid taxes. This is one of the things that was central to the noble idea. No serf -- and I don't want to use the word serf here -- . Saxton and so many others use the word slave. Serfs did not have the rights that existed in Russia or even in Western Europe in the Middle Ages, and this goes straight up to the abolition of the Polish kingdom at the end of the 18th century. Polish serfs were slaves without rights, and rights or privileges of any kind. That was not the case in Russia. That was not the case in Western Europe. That was only the case in Poland. No serf can own weapons. Again, that was not the case in Russia either. Serfs could own weapons in Russia, as was proven by the Bolotnikov and Razin rebellions, but in Poland no serf or slave could own weapons, and no serf or slave could learn the military arts. Now one of the things the Polish nobility did to enhance the power of Jews, is to say that the Jews could not own land, all of their wealth had to exist in liquid form. Polish agriculture was always very weak, because a slave economy is never an efficient economy. In fact, and Saxton holds this, and a number of scholars do as well -- most Polish land was not in fact cultivated. Poland was involved in exporting food only sporadically, for the most part Jewish liquidity was borrowed for the sake of importing food from Russia and elsewhere. This is why it became very important for the Poles to take right bank Ukraine because there you had a level of fertility that did not exist in Poland, and a great yield could be produced with actual little effort.

Americans are confronted with rising, onorous taxation, and the Poles were squeezed dry with taxes as well. As one example, according to journalist-researcher John de Nugent, in order to enter their own houses of worship (typically a Catholic Church), Poles were often forced to pay a tax to a Jew standing in the doorway.
The world Jewish population expanded enormously while hosted by Poles and their dominions. The chapter 1648 Annus Mirabilis from The Revolutionary Jew and His Impact on World History by E. Michael Jones provides important additional background to Dr. Matthew Johnson's aforementioned lecture:

...Beginning with the Statute of Kalisz in 1251, the Jews of Poland were granted rights like nowhere else in Europe. They were even granted their own autonomous legal system, known as the kahal, which allowed them to adjudicate intra-Jewish disputes without recourse to the Polish Christian legal system. This autonomy, in turn, necessitated the intensive study of the Talmud, which, according Graetz, led to the peculiar corruption of Polish Jews. The reliance on the Talmud as the basis of Jewish legal autonomy created a culture of "hair-splitting judgment" among the rabbis, according Graetz, as well as "a love of twisting, distorting, ingenious quibbling, and a foregone antipathy to what did not lie within their field of vision," which in turn trickled down to find expression in the behavior of vulgar, who "found pleasure and a sort of triumphant delight in deception and cheating." Since by the end of the 18th century, the overwhelming majority of Jews lived in Poland, Jews in general earned, as a result, the reputation of being "a nation of deceivers," to give Immanuel Kant’s formulation. "It does indeed seems strange," Kant, the quintessential Enlightenment philosopher, continued, "to conceive of a nation of deceivers, but it is also very strange to conceive of a nation of merchants, the majority of whom, bound by an ancient superstition accepted by the state they live in, do not seek any civil dignity, but prefer to make good this disadvantage with the benefits of trickery at the expense of the people who shelter them and at the expense of each other. In a nation of merchants, unproductive members of society . .. . it cannot be otherwise"( Kant, Werke Bd. vii, p. 205-6). From his vantage point in Koenigsberg, the capital of what was then East Prussia, a country which the Teutonic Knights wrested by force from the Slavic natives, all Jews were Polish Jews.
...Largely as a result of the concessions of the Polish crown which began with the Statute of Kalisz, Poland became known throughout Europe as the "paradisus Judeorum," the paradise of the Jews. When persecutions would flare up in the traditionally Jewish sections of Europe, in the German principalities, particularly in the urban centers of the Rhein valley, as they frequently did throughout the middle ages, the Jews who wished to escape persecution inevitably headed east toward Poland, taking their language, "juedische Deutsch," or Yiddish with them...
A short summary of Jewish demographics gives some indication of how successful the Jews were in living under Polish rule. Between 1340 and 1772, when Poland was partitioned for the first time, the Jewish population of Poland increased 75-fold while, during the same period of time the Christian population only quintupled. The disparity in population increase is explainable in simple terms. Persecution in the west, largely during the period from the 11th to the 16th century, caused massive immigration. Jews moved to Polish territory during that period of time in unprecedented numbers. By the time Poland was partitioned for the third and final time in 1795, 80 percent of the world’s Jews lived there.
This phenomenal expansion of the Jewish population in Poland was matched by a correspondingly rapid increase in wealth, and that, in turn, corresponded to a dramatic expansion of the territorial limits of Poland. The Golden Age of Polish Jews, according to Pogonowski, lasted from 1500 to 1648. By 1634, which is to say toward the closing years of this age, Poland had become the largest country in Europe. Its territory extended from the Baltic almost to the Black Sea and from Silesia in the west to what is now the heart of the Ukraine, two hundred kilometers east of the Dnieper River. As a result, by the middle of the 17th century, as much as 60 percent of Poland’s population was not ethnically Polish, a situation which was bound to cause friction sooner or later, depending on how wisely the Polish rulers treated their alloethnic subjects.
Instead of wisdom, what followed was a classical case of cultural drift in which imperial expansion covered over internal decay until finally the contradictions and injustices which had become an integral part of the system became so insupportable that the bubble burst, and an orgy of violence followed, eventually dragging the Polish state into extinction. The story of Poland was in many ways the story of Imperial Rome writ small. Imperial expansion to the east into what is now the Ukraine, the Crimea and Belorus resulted in the creation of huge estates, some the size of western European countries like Holland and Switzerland. The estates were called Latifundia, an ironic comment on the blindness of the Polish nobility, who failed to see the mischief which the Latifundia system had wrought in ancient Rome. The Polish Noble’s republic was a classic oligarchy, as Plato defined the term in his Republic. As in ancient Greece, so in Poland; wealth concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, led to rebellion among the lower classes. As in ancient Rome, wealth concentrated in fewer and fewer hands fueled a system of imperialism in which the chief losers were the overwhelming majority of the Polish people, in particular, as in Rome, the citizen soldiers, who were driven to the wall by the monopoly conditions the Latifundia fostered. When the rebellion finally came, all Poles would be held responsible for the excesses of the magnates who created the system which had dispossessed the average Polish citizen in the first place.

On a deep sociological level, the way in which Jews were able to infiltrate Polish society, use it as an imperial riding horse to suit their own selfish needs, and all the while suck Polish society dry before they discarded it, is essentially the same social pattern and long term historical process that has been repeated in the UK and is currently playing out in the United States.
Poland not served as a working prototype of the parasitic "New Babylon," "New Jerusalem," or "New World Order" that took over what was once a proud white European country, but it also served as a springboard for Jewish recolonization across other areas of Europe, to include the reemergence of powerful Jewish banking families throughout Europe. The most notable example are the Rothschilds. According to Mike Piper in The New Babylon:

In all their varied activities, the Court Jews played a remarkable part in the development of international credit facilities, especially in the central European states, and to some degree in northern Europe also, from the mid-17th to the late 18th Centuries.
Generally, they were agents who arranged transfers of credit rather than possessors of vast capital in their own right; through their far-reaching commercial relationships and their organizing skill, they were able to provide funds more swiftly than most Christian bankers.
Because of their specialization in the money business, they were able to furnish the silver for the mints more easily, and could more easily act as army purveyors, once more because of their ability to organize and their network of family relationships. With their entrepreneurial spirit, they contributed in part to the process of industrialization within the frame of mercantilist policies.
There is no doubt that they were instrumental in the growth of the modern absolute state, and at the end of the era there emerged a group of several important Jewish private bankers who exemplify the transition to modern methods of economy and government, primarily the Rothschilds, the Goldsmids, the Oppenheimers, and the Seligmans.

The authors added, almost as an afterthought, "However, it should not be forgotten that the courts had their Christian bankers, entrepreneurs and army agents, too, who also played a part in this development." How kind of these Judeo-centric authors, writing for a Judeo-centric publishing house, to give credit to the Christians!
Great Britain's emergence--as the preeminent center of Jewish fmance-is vital for us to consider. During the" early years of World War II, Germany's news agency, World-Service, assessed this little-known history.

Jewry's rise to power in England took place in three sharply defined stages, which are separated by intervals of about 100 years.
Under Cromwell's rule and during the first half of the Revolution period, under Charles II, the Jews, after having been banned from England for a period of more than 350 years, again swarmed into England.
Cromwell's rule is characterized by an outspoken British imperial policy. With regard to his financial as well as his political policy Cromwell depended upon the Jews to be the backbone of his colonial expansion. Jewish agents carried on economic and political espionage for Cromwell, availing themselves of the Jewish business houses in foreign countries.
In Cromwell's time, exactly as 100 and 200 years later, a small ruling Jewish clique was formed, at whose head one Jew appeared as the backbone of the new colonial economic policy. In Cromwell's time it was the enormously rich Sephardic Jew Antony Fernandez Carvajal who occupied this position.
A hundred years later the second stage of the Jew's rise to power in England commences. The Jewish clique in England was then led by the exceedingly rich Sephardic Jew, Sampson Gideon, who also greatly influenced the English cabinet ministers. At that time the influence of the Jews on finance-capital in England was already so great, that without exaggeration one may say, that English Jews were controlling the English money market.
Under the leading of Sampson Gideon the Jews sought to break down the barrier-erected by the time-approved laws against the influx of foreign Jews. The English nation, aroused to anger, strenuously opposed this Jewish effort. The Jews therefore could accomplish nothing by constitutional means, but already their power was so great, and by working from behind the scenes the influential English Jews saw to it, that these time-approved laws were evaded and set at nought.
Again, a hundred years later, in the 19th Century, we encountered the last and most decisive period, during which the Jews attempted their emancipation. Jewish personalities such as Rothschild, Montefiore, Bernal, Montagu, Ricardo and Disraeli at the beginning of the Victorian age, fought for and gained equal rights for Jewry within English law.
Once the Jews .had been received at court and had been granted citizenship, the English nobility no longer felt degraded by intermarriage with Jews. Uninterrupted, the penetration and disintegration of the English nobility by Jewry now continued. Uninterrupted, the Jewish invasion of the ruling class, whose national opposition was broken down, was now continued on a broad basis.After Jewry had in this way succeeded in worming its way into the nobility, it could from this strong position carry on its campaign against the English nation.
It now began the third stage of its conquest of England. In a period of about 100 years it had accomplished this. In the reign of Queen Victoria the last resistance of the English nation was broken down. Judah had conquered England. Jewish-English Plutocracy was stabilized by the Jews and by sections of the ruling class, which was connected with it by ties of blood, and which was to be still further extended in the 20th Century. Jewish interest and the interest of the Jewish-English aristocracy were now identical.
Through this plutocratic system of government Jewish and British Imperialism were firmly welded together. The strong hands by which the Jews had bound the English nobility to themselves were those of blood relationship and finance-capital. Jewish gold now became the undeniable ruler of England. Jewish unscrupulousness and aggressiveness, shady Jewish avarice and greed from now on become the characteristics and the stamp of the ruling classes, now to be counted in with the Jews.
These were the cornerstones that were used in building up the British Empire in its present form. These are the foundations upon which it rests.

Further in the New Bablyon, Mike Piper continues:

While the Rothschild family held sway through their banks in London, Paris, Frankfurt,Vienna and Naples, there were also such big names in Jewish finance as Bleichroder in Berlin, Warburg in Hamburg, Oppenheim in Cologne and Speyer in Frankfurt who were also emerging as powerful lords of money who worked in conjunction with one another and with the Rothschilds, competing often to be sure, but all tied together by their Jewish heritage and traditions. There were also the Hambros of London, the Sassoons of Bombay and the Guinzberg house in St. Petersburg.
Although these banking empires were equivalent to what are called "merchant banks" or "investment banks" today, there was also a significant Jewish role in setting up so-called "commercial" banks (more akin to the "average" bank with which the average commoner would deal for fmancial services) such as the Deutsche Bank and the Dresdner Bank--two of Germany's "Big Three," Credit Mobilier and the Banque de Paris et des Pays-Bas in France, along with Banca Commerciale Italiana and Credito Italiano in Italy, and Creditanstalt-Bankverein and Banque de Bruxelles, among others.
In the United States, there were Jewish bankers rising: Haim Solomon of Revolutionary War fame (although there are those who dispute the claim that Solomon was "The Jewish Patriot Who Financed the American Revolution") and Isaac Moses who--along with Alexander Hamilton--founded the Bank of New York in 1784.
Krefetz cited such Jewish banking houses that rose in America from the period of 1840 onward: Bache, Goldman, Sachs, J. W Seligman, Kuhn Loeb, Ladenburg, Thalmann, Lazard Freres, Lehman Brothers, Speyer, and Wertheim. And Krefetz notes that these American-based Jewish banking houses had a tendency to intermarry and often acted in concert and thus projected "an image of concentrated power."
And needless to say, in the midst of this, the Rothschilds were indeed already operating on American soil through their American agent, August Belmont, who worked with many of these other Jewish capitalist forces.
What is interesting is that Krefetz suggested that these Jewish banks were unable to compete with what he calls "Protestant" banks among which Morgan, Drexel, Gould, Fiske, Harriman and Hill were the most prominent. But, as we shall see later in these pages, many of these elements were, in fact, under the sway of Rothschild and other Jewish influence.
For the record, Krefetz added, that, in his opinion, there is no real evidence of an international conspiracy of Jewish bankers, but that "some Jews in banking have conspired."
The money game, he said, "holds a fascination for Jews that some might say is equivalent to sex to the French, food to the Chinese, and power to the politician. And since the Diaspora [the scattering of Jewish communities], their financial concerns have always had an international flavor."
As early as 1879, the anti-Jewish German of partial Jewish descent, Wilhelm Marr, said candidly that Jewish Money Power had assembled a pre-dominant influence, in Germany in particular, but he recognized that this money power was international in scope. Marr described his own writings as "less a polemic against Jewry than confirmation of a cultural and historical fact." He said that any intemperate language he may have used "must be understood as no more than a cry of pain from one of the oppressed."
By the "oppressed," Marr was referring to the rest of the many Europeans and peoples worldwide who were, as one English writer put it, some years later, "under the heel of the Jew," --referring, indeed, to the Jewish Money Power.
Pointing out that many people had written unpleasant things about Jews and the organized Jewish community, Marr noted that, nonetheless, "our self conceit still keeps us from the open and honest admission that Israel has become a world power of the very first rank."
He emphasized that there was no religious prejudice in his writings. He was, he noted, simply enabling his readers to peer into what he called "the mirror" of cultural and historical facts. He advised readers of his pessimistic works to not blame him if that mirror showed those readers to be slaves.

"I'm Doing God's Work" by Texe Marrs, caption: "Lloyd Blankfein, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for Goldman Sachs, lackey for Lord Rothschild. [Jacob] Rothschild is cryptic holder of the title, `King of the Jews.'"

 

In his April 2010 article "I'm Doing God's Work," Texe Marrs explained how Goldman Sachs based in New York City has become not only the most powerful firm in America, but also one of the world's biggest trouble-makers.

A Pioneer of Treachery and Deceit
Strangely, even though Goldman Sachs was founded back in 1869 (an occult numerologically significant year), few outsiders had previously understood its great strength as the world’s unchallenged financial giant. In fact, it was Goldman Sachs that has pioneered financial treachery in many areas. The firm established the concept of "initial public offerings" (IPO) in 1906, in offering to the public the stock of Sears Roebuck and Company. Its Ponzi scheme shenanigans helped bring about the Stock Market Crash of 1929.
In 1970, Goldman Sachs was pivotal in the bankruptcy of the Penn Central Railroad. It masterminded the sale of stock of the Rockefeller Center, and in the 1980s, shepherded the conversion of the failed Soviet Union’s assets.
Thanks to Goldman Sachs’ "privatization" scam, former KGB and Communist Party bigwigs—Jews, naturally—ended up with almost all the vast property holdings of the Kremlin. These Jewish oligarchs remain in control of Russia and the dissolved Empire’s most prized assets, including its valuable oil and gold reserves.

Bush and Obama Both Pawns of Goldman Sachs
Today, Goldman Sachs enjoys unbelievable power to manipulate and orchestrate world events. Barack Obama’s entire administration is at their disposal. Obama is not the only President whose knees bend at the mere mention or whisper of the vaunted Goldman Sachs name. George W. Bush did whatever his Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson, told him to do. Paulson came to the White House from Goldman Sachs, where he once had Lloyd Blankfein’s job as CEO. Tim Geithner, Obama’s Secretary of the Treasury, as head of the New York Fed, took orders from Goldman Sachs. So, too, does Stephen Friedman, current Chairman of the New York Fed. Even President Bill Clinton was answerable to a Goldman Sachs overseer. His Secretary of the Treasury was Robert Rubin, a former Goldman Sachs executive.

Goldman Sachs, Warren Buffet, and Rothschild
Rothschild and Goldman Sachs have brought many other big-time stock market holders and political potentates into their web of control. In 2008, Berkshire Hathaway’s Warren Buffet, sometimes erroneously claimed to be "The Richest Man in the World," wisely ponied up to the bar with $10 billion, which he confidently invested in Goldman Sachs stock. California is also under Rothschild’s and Goldman’s thumbs. That state’s Governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, was chosen for his gubernatorial position at the behest of Lord Rothschild. Meanwhile, as it turns out, California’s bonds collapse and its near-bankruptcy is at least partly attributable to the fact that Goldman Sachs sold the bonds short and precipitated the crisis.
More recently, it came out that the Euro currency’s near collapse was caused by the fact that Goldman Sachs had first sold the corrupt Greek government billions in worthless derivatives (called CDOs or credit swaps). Then, taking the other side, Goldman sold the same derivative holdings short. The firm thus made money both ways, while the people of Greece are now devastated.

Goldman Sachs Key Role in America’s Demise
But it is America where Goldman Sach’s diabolical stratagems for money production have most recently had the more crushing effect. Richard Teitelbaum, reporting on Bloomberg.com (February 23, 2010), disclosed secret documents in the possession of a House Committee proving that the world’s now-raging financial crash and credit crisis ensued as a result of toxic derivatives minted by Goldman Sachs. The mortgage and real estate meltdown came about after Goldman Sachs had marketed trillions of dollars of these worthless, ponzi-scheme investments around the world and then turned around and sold them short.
Now comes the eye-opening part of this whole deal: Once the meltdown was in full array, George W. Bush’s Goldman Sachs protégée and Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Paulson, arranged for Goldman Sachs to receive a staggering $200 billion in insurance from the crooked, failed AIG insurance corporation which the feds had just taken over, as compensation for alleged "lost revenue" due to the crash.
What a deal! Goldman Sachs made money both ways on a crash and then got paid by the government a whopping $200 billion for losses it didn’t even have!
But that’s not all. To further drive America and the whole world into financial destitution and despair, Goldman Sachs and a partner firm, Morgan Stanley, manipulated the price of oil futures, rocketing that key industry commodity to unequalled heights of $147 per barrel. With that, the whole world’s economies, already teetering because of Goldman’s CDO/derivatives scam, went "kaput...bam." It was all over.

On page 169 of The New Babylon, Michael Collins Piper explains how the Jewish approach to banking has always contrasted with that of honest gentile bankers:

Discussing the matter of the Federal Reserve's interlocking ties with what [Henry] Ford referred to as "the Economic Plans of International Jews," Ford asserted, quite correctly: "The strength of Jewish Money is in its internationalism. It stretches a chain of banks and centers of financial control across the world and plays them on the side of the game that favors Judah."
Ford said that single Jewish banking houses in any given country would be no menace. As mere bankers in their own countries they would not, Ford said, occasion alarm. Ford noted that in conventional commercial banking, the Jews had not predominated and that traditional deposit banks were hardly a part of the Jewish fmancial network.
"The Rothschilds," said Ford, "were never bankers in a proper sense; they were money lenders to nations whose representatives they had corrupted to seek the loans. They. did business precisely on the plain of the money lender on the side street who seduces the rich man's son to borrow a large sum, knowing that the father will pay. That is scarcely banking. Brains of that sort may 'get' money but will not 'make' money."
Thus, said Ford, it was necessary to look at the international scope of Jewish banking power. This system, he said, did not require that a Jewish banking house be the most important fmancial power in any particular country. It was not the wealth and importance of any single such banking house, but, instead, he said, the wealth and importance of the world chain of me various Jewish banking houses that gave the strength to the International Money Power.
For example, Ford cited Paul Warburg of the Kuhn, Loeb & Company who was a prime mover behind the establishment of the Federal Reserve System in the United States. Warburg's enterprise was far from being the most powerful bank in the United States, but because of its international connections -- which were, as Ford said, "all Jewish" -- it took on a new aspect in terms of its impact on American life.
The record shows that it was indeed the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913 that set in place the framework for further expansion of Rothschild control over American fmance and industry.
Americans, of course, had little understanding of all of this. American author E. C. Knuth noted that in 1945 in his work, The Empire of "The City" that Senator Edward Hall Moore of Oklahoma had made public the fact that "the British government" owned vast holdings in 80 of the largest American industrial corporations, including General Motors and Standard Oil of Indiana. That Standard should be among them might come as a surprise to those naive Americans who have long believed that the Rockefeller family, which appeared to dominate Standard Oil, were somehow a "royal" family in American terms, when, in fact, the Rothschild influence extended even here into the ranks of such a famous "American" corporation.

This photo from a blog on Arnold Schwarzenegger has the following caption: "This is a picture of Arnold meeting with Warren Buffet and TRILLIONAIRE Lord Jacob Rothschild at one of his estates in 2002. The Rothschilds are the largest shareholders of the Federal Reserve Bank and are secretly one of the richest families in the world..."

The International Banking Cartel Part I (25:37), Part II (25:28), Part III (24:51 )

None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen (1971) echoes this viewpoint:

According to Professor Stuart Crane:

"If you will look back at every war in Europe during the Nineteenth Century, you will see that they always ended with the establishment of a 'balance of power'. With every re-shuffling there was a balance of power in a new grouping around the House of Rothschild in England, France or Austria. They grouped nations, so that if any king stepped out of line a war would break out and the war would be decided by which way the financing went. Researching the debt positions of the warring nations will usually indicate who was to be punished."

In describing the characteristics of the Rothschilds and other major international bankers, Professor Quigly tells us that they remained different from ordinary bankers in several ways: they were cosmopolitan and international; they were close to governments and were particularly concerned with government debt, including foreign government debts; these bankers came to be called "international bankers". (Quigly,Tragedy and Hope, p.52)

 

There are other books which provide important insights into the criminal character of Jewish financial practices, to include Confessions of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins, which documents the practice of paying off (or replacing through Mossad-CIA-sponsored assassinations and coups) various Third World leaders who are enticed to mire their countries in debt to Jewish-controlled big money center banks in the City of London and New York. Consider also Gold Wars: The Battle Against Sound Money As Seen From A Swiss Perspective by former Rothschild Banker Ferdinand Lips, who explains how leaders of global Jewish organizations used bogus charges for their own advantage regarding Swiss accounts of alleged Holocaust victims to intimidate Switzerland out of its longstanding gold standard.
At this point the reader may find it of particular interest to visit my discussion of America's totally dysfunctional financial system in Chapter 33 to learn about strong evidence that Jews tried to permanently fasten three highly corrupt central banks on the United States in the18th century and 19th centuries before they finally became successful with the establishment of the Federal Reserve Banking System in 1913. There is strong evidence that the Rothschilds tried to assassinate President Andrew Jackson for his opposition the third American central bank. There is also interesting circumstantial evidence that the Rothschilds and other Jews played a significant role in the assassinations of Presidents Abraham Lincoln and James Garfield. Last, but not least, there is overwhelming evidence provided by Michael Collins Piper in Final Judgment that the Mossad was central to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, who indirectly signaled an interest in curtailing the Federal Reserve.
Again, there is quite a lot of history I wish I could cover in this chapter to help the reader connect all the dots, but I do not have the space. Certainly I cannot encourage the reader enough to watch the full length video The Money Masters provided in Chapter 33 to get a good start. Three areas I would like to touch upon before closing out this chapter involve the continued consolidation of Jewish power in America and around the globe following World War II. This includes their push towards global New World Order dictatorship, as documented by Alex Jones in his documentary ENDGAME. I also want to address the highjacking of American foriegn policy documented by Michael Collins Piper in The High Priests of War, and the Mossad role in 9/11 covered by Victor Thorn in 9-11 Evil.

The Alex Jones documentary ENDGAME has a lot of good introductory material, particularly in the first half. (It seems to be a pattern in Alex Jones documentaries that his best material is in the first half, whereas the last half often goes off on tangents about various alleged high level Nazi networks and eugenics conspiracies, etc. I tend to agree with the first half and not the second half of much of many of his works, unless one substitutes the word "Zionist" for Nazi.").
The following segment of ENDGAME is not as far-fetched as it might appear to certain individuals who are newcomers to the strange world of high level "Circle Z" intrigue, especially when one considers that every country Jews have ever inhabited over the last twenty five hundred years has ultimately turned on them. Not surprisingly, most Jews suffer from unlimited paranoia, which goes hand-in-hand with the unlimited psychopathy that afflicts a significant percentage of the Jewish population. Books like Two Hundred Years Together by Alexandr Solzhenitsyn document the blood-chilling ruthlessness of Jewish Bolsheviks who played a key role in mass-murdering 60 million Slavic people. Therefore, we should be comfortable with the idea that if a paranoid and power-mad, criminal-psychopathic Jewish elite were ever permitted to achieve their goal of world domination, there would be absolutely no limit to the cruel and ruthless methods they would be willing to utilize to keep control at all costs. No limit whatsoever. We could expect them to treat all of humanity lower than cattle --lower even than the Christian and Muslim Palestinians that Israelis continue to genocide in Gaza and the West Bank.
At 3:51 into the his documentary, Alex Jones has the following comments about the "Blueprint for Global Enslavement."

In the near future Earth is dominated by a powerful world government. Once-free nations are slaves to the will of a tiny elite. The dawn of a new Dark Age is upon mankind. Countries are a thing of the past. Every form of independence is under attack. …with the family, and even the individual itself nearing extinction.
Close to 80% of the Earth’s population has been eliminated. Remanants of humanity are forced to live within highly-controlled compact prison-like cities. Travel is highly restricted. Superhighways connect the mega-cities and keep the population from entering into unauthorized zones.
No human activity is private.AI supercomputers chronicle and catagorize every action. A prison-planet dominated by a ruthless gang of control-freaks. Whose power can never be challenged.
This is the vision of the global elite. Their goal - a program of total dehumanization. The science of tyrrany is law.
A world-wide control grid. Designed to ensure the overlords’ monopoly of power forever. Our species will be condemned to this nightmare future unless masses are awakened to the New World Order master plan and mobilized to defeat it.
Erected by a secretive group the Georgia Guidestones are a testiment to the elites’ plan for a world religion, Global laws, with a global court and army to enforce it. And set in stone, it is written that the population never rise above 500 million.
In this film you will learn how our world is truly governed. You will see how highly secretive roundtable groups interlock to form a global intelligence network. This group has steered planetary affairs for hundreds of years. Now in the final stages, they prepare for open world government. A goal tyrants throughout history have lusted after.

At 7:20 into the documentary, we see an interview with Congressman Ron Paul, who comments:

President Bush said the New World Order was in tune. That’s what they were working for. The UN is part of that government. They’re working right now very significantly for a North American Union. There’s a lot of people in Washington right now who don’t care too much about our borders. They have a philosophic belief that national sovereignty is not important. That’s sort of the reason I have made a very strong suggestion we need not be in the United Nations for our national security.

At 11:07 into the documentary, we get some important background history:

... Archduke Franz Ferdinand, was assassinated while traveling in a motorcade. The “Black Hand” - a Serbian secret society with connections to French and British intellegence took credit. World War I had begun.
Armaments companies financed by Rothschild-controlled banks in Germany, France, England, and Austria bankrolled all factions. At least 20 million were killed in the war. It was a conflict so terrible, the people vowed to never fight again. They dubbed it the “War to End All Wars”.
The question is “Why did they want war?” Well, first of all, there’s money and power- But secondly, they wanted to create the League of Nations. They had this in their plans all along, and as a consequence, once the war was over, or about to be over, they began to formulate this idea of a League of Nations so this would never ever happen again.
Hundreds of years of practice made the British experts at hiding their empire behind puppet governments and councils. In the name of stopping all future conflicts, they proposed that countries would join a “League of Nations.” Their true intention was for the League to serve as a framework for world government.
President Woodrow Wilson, who had spearheaded the establishment of the private Federal Reserve System in the United States in 1913, strongly supported the establishment of the League of Nations. Woodrow Wilson was a very naïve President.

At 16:29 into the documentary, we get an introduction to secretive elite groups who have included senior U.S. Government officials. They have met in secret to handle U.S. policy with high level foreign leaders in criminal violation of the U.S. Logan Act.

In the build-up to World War II, and during the conflict, the bankers financed both sides just as they had done with Napolean. After the rise and fall of the Third Reich, Europe lay in ruins.
Once again, the elite claimed, that only global governance could save humanity from certain destruction. And this time the elite would succeed in setting up their world body. In April of 1945, at the Presideo naval base in San Francisco The United Nations was founded by the victors of World War II.
The United Nations complex was then built in New York City on land donated by John D. Rockefeller. Shortly after, the Elite established the United Nations as their base in the United States the newly-formed World Council quickly began work.
On the next phase in their plan the incremental formation of continental “super states”. The first step in their tri-lateral plan was the creation of the European Union.
Unifying Europe had been tried many times, and was extremely unpopular. Where Napolean and Hitler had failed to accomplish their goals using force, the Globalists would succeed, using stealth.
The British spearheaded the formation of the Council of Europe on May 5, 1949. The Treaty of London claimed to only establish trade ties between European nations like NAFTA or GATT in North America. Its true intention was the formation of a European super-state.
WE SHALL HAVE WORLD GOVERNMENT WHETHER OR NOT YOU LIKE IT. BY CONQUEST OR CONSENT. -James Warburg, in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, February 17, 1950
In 1954, the Elite of the planet met in secret at the Bilderburg Hotel, in Oesterbek, Holland. The Builderburg Group would later admit that their mission was the formation of the EU (European Union). Once the EU was established under the guise of trade deals, North American Union, and Asian Union would be formed.
The three interlocking superstates form the core of the global government. While the United Nations would serve as a world regulatory and enforcement body. Over the third-world sub regions.
The Bilderburg Group consists of the heads of all of the managing rountable groups that steer individual countries. Picture the elite power structure of the world as a giant pyramid. With only the elite of the Elite at the tip-top of the capstone.
The group has been so secretive, that until the mid-1980’s, the controlled corporate media denied its existence. Into the late 1990’s coverage only consisted of rare, one-line mentions.
[Skip to: 47:02] ...Builderburg was founded by David Rockefeller and the Rothschilds in Europe. They’re still the main powers.
Baron Evelyn de Rothschild, male, attended for many years. Rothschild is still represented. You’ll see them on the list of participants…
Somebody will represent the Rothschild Group. They are the main powers behind Builderburg. Dutch Royal Shell is part of the Queen’s fortune… Of course, the Rockefellers have always had heavy oil interests…that is the original source of their old money…

 

 

It is important to grasp that these elite groups did not suddenly appear overnight, but gradually grew in power through a long term covert "position-building" process. One good source consists of excerpts of G. Edward Griffin in "Episode #058 - Meet Carroll Quigley" on the Corbett Report or the Nov. 2007 online transcript of a speech made by Griffin which makes similar points, beginning with discussing secret societies set up by Cecil Rhodes.
Once one begins to understand that Rhodes was a Rothschild agent, and that high level Jews like the Rothshilds possess a behavioral tropism towards "oligarchical collectivism," "gorilla-gangster" monopoly, and criminal intrigue, everything that Griffin says makes perfect sense. It also becomes totally clear how the main levers of power and influence in both American and British society could become infiltrated and hijacked to serve evil purposes while most Americans and UK citizens naively go about their daily lives.

At the end of the 19th Century, a secret society was formed by Cecil Rhodes. Cecil Rhodes as all of you know, I’m sure, was one of the wealthiest men in the world. He was the political head man in South Africa, the chancellor I believe they called him, and while he was there he was able to acquire control over all of the diamond deposits and the gold deposits of South Africa — all of the mineral reserves, and in that period of time he amassed one of the greatest, if not, the greatest fortune in the world. What people don’t realize is that when he died, none of that money went to his heirs. Where did it go?
It went through a series of seven wills to create a secret society. The purpose of the secret society was to create a structure that would literally control the world — from behind the scenes, in a fashion that the average man or woman would never see it or never suspect it even existed.
The Rhodes Scholarship which most people know about was just the tip of the iceberg that created in one in one of the wills of Cecil Rhodes. The purpose of the Rhodes Scholarship was to provide a funnel or a recruiting mechanism to find the most appropriate, the most likely individuals — young men and women who could be recruited into this secret society. It should come as no surprise that William Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. It fits perfectly into this scenario.
This secret organization is not just of historical interest. It exists today and, according to Quigley and other observers who are close to it, it is the most important single historical force in the world since World War I. Now just think about that for a moment. Is it true? Well, we’ll cover a few facts and you judge it for yourself.
The goal of the secret organization originally was to expand the British Empire and the men who were behind it — not necessarily the royalty, but the real political figures behind it, and I’ll mention some of their names in a moment — to extend the British Empire to control the world. Rhodes and his associates believed that the British had acquired the highest culture, the highest level of morality according at least to his definitions of morality, and the highest standard of living, the most perfect language. He felt that the race was superior and that for the benefit of the rest of the world, for their good, it was their responsibility — this group, using the British Empire — it was their responsibility to rule the world for the benefit of the world, of course. That was very carefully spelled out in their writings and their goals
Now this evolved not too long after the organization was put into motion it changed. The goal changed. World domination didn’t change. Control from behind the scenes by a very small elect group didn’t change. But what did change is that the focal point for this was no longer the British or England, but it was to be a New World Order, international in scope and to be housed through an international organization of some kind. Initially they had hoped that it would be the League of Nations and all of their members worked very hard to create the League of Nations for that purpose. When that failed, then they set their sites on the United Nations, which finally was put into action and now is on a fast track to becoming the very structure which they had projected as their goal. And now, of course, the central of all of this instead of being in England is focused primarily in New York.
Now the method by which this secret organization was to accomplish this incredible goal was not to be visible and not to go forth and influence the people directly. The people weren’t even supposed to suspect that such a thing was going on. The people were not even supposed to know the names primarily of the big players. They weren’t to be in the news at all. The way this was to be done was indirectly through the power centers of society, as they’re called. The strategists behind this are brilliant and they realized that human beings have a herd instinct. We clump together, most of us, a few hermits get off in the wilderness and do okay, but most of us get nervous out in the wilderness and we congregate into villages and cities and, beyond that, we come together in organizations like this. We have leaders. We join labor unions. We affiliate with political parties. We come together in church organizations and we send our kids to schools that are organized, and we have girl scouts and boy scouts. The way we operate is that we work through groups and organizations and we follow leaders. They had this all figured out. They said, “Therefore, the way for us to lead the masses is not directly one on one, but what we must do is control the leadership of the organizations to which people belong. We don’t need that many people to do that.” So with just one percent or one-tenth of one percent of the population, we can control the entire population by controlling the power centers of society. That was their strategy from the beginning, and it is their strategy today, and I might add, it is an extremely effective strategy.
The structure of this secret organization was outwardly modeled after the Jesuit Order. Yes, incredible isn’t it. But Rhodes was an admirer of the organizational genius, in his mind, of the Society of Jesus, the Jesuit Order, and he said we should use that as our model. He didn’t take it straight across but he took many elements from it and, at the deeper level, though, it is interesting I think and very instructive to note that he borrowed the structure of classic conspiracy control directly from Adam Weishaupt. Now, those of you who have studied this thing, you recognize that name. Adam Weishaupt was the founder of the Illuminati and we all know a little bit about the Illuminati because it was disbanded in Bavaria shortly after it was formed, and their secret records and notebooks and so forth were seized and placed into the public records, so you can go to a library today and read verbatim the organizational structure of the original Illuminati. There is a debate as to whether or not the Illuminati really were destroyed or whether it just went underground and still exists today. I think that debate is interesting and I have my opinions about it, but they’re just opinions. In the final analysis, it’s not too important because we know that there are shoots coming up from the ground with identical structures all over the place. Now whether those shoots are coming up from seeds or roots, I don’t think makes too much difference. The fact is that we have had many organizational imitations of the Illuminati and this secret one that we’re talking about here created by Cecil Rhodes is a perfect example.
Now what is that structure I’m talking about? It’s what they call rings within rings within rings. That’s the way they usually refer to it, and what that means is this: Weishaupt said that in the center of his Illuminati organization, there would be a controlling group of maybe three or four people — just a small number. These in turn would create a membership ring around them of a larger number of perhaps 20 or 30 or something like, and the members of that ring would not be aware that they were being dominated and controlled by the inner circle. Now that outer ring, in turn , thinking that they were the whole enchilada, would then create a larger ring around it comprising of hundreds or perhaps thousands of people, and those people would not suspect that they were being dominated and directed by an inner ring. And then finally that last ring would create still another one that would reach out to mass organizations — reach out to the masses. And in that fashion Weishaup said that a few of us in the center through this carefully controlled structure or rings within rings can control the world, and the people being controlled would never know that that’s how it worked. Now that’s the structure that Weishaupt created and described at some length and it’s interesting to me that Rhodes selected that very structure for his secret society.
Now, let’s take a look –{something dropped} I’m glad there’s not lead attached to that.{laughter} But the result of all this, ladies and gentlemen, is that this structure — this secret society – remains invisible to the average person. It remains invisible not only because of its structure and because of its secrecy, but also because it has had the foresight of not having a name. Now just think about that for a minute. If you say that you have an organization or you create an organization and somebody says, well what are we going to call ourselves, and the answer is we’re not going to call ourselves anything. We’re not going to have a name. That way, nobody can talk about us. Brilliant! And that’s what they decided to do. Quigley himself doesn’t know how to describe it. At some places in his books he calls it the network. In other places he calls it the Rhodes group. In other places he just calls it the group. It has no name. Therefore, it’s another reason that it’s invisible to the average person today.
At the inner-circle of this organization that I am describing, that was called the “Society of the Elect.” It originally consisted of Cecil Rhodes and a small brain trust of his very wealthy and influential political cronies from British politics and British banking. The center of gravity, as I said earlier, shortly thereafter — after Rhodes death — didn’t take long before the center of gravity shifted away to the Rockefeller group which was very quick to move into that circle and now we see that there are centers or secondary centers of influence within the Rockefeller group and centers within such organizations as The Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission, to name just a few. The goal shifted away from creating and world empire based in England to a world empire based in New York called the New World Order but based on the model of collectivism.
The secondary rings around this Society of the Elect that Cecil Rhodes created were called “roundtables.” That’s the name they gave them — roundtables, and these existed in the Untied States, Britain and all of the former British dependencies. Finally there was a tertiary group or ring around that which was created. Each of those roundtables in each of the countries, created another ring larger around it, and they called those in most of the British dependencies “The Royal Institute for International Affairs.” You’ll find that in England, you’ll find it in Canada, and so forth. That’s what it’s called. It’s still there. Very powerful, prominent institutions in British politics and all of these countries. In the United States, for some reason which I’ve never been able to find out, they didn’t choose that name I suppose because royal wouldn’t be an acceptable word in the United States, so in the U S. they call it the Council on Foreign Relations. And ladies and gentlemen, after 100 years of penetration into the power centers of society, the Rhodesian Network, I call it — I have given it a name and I hope you’ll pick it up and use it because we have to identify this group — I call it the Rhodesian Network, or the Rhodesians — after 100 years the Rhodesians are very close to the final achievement of their goal in the western world.
Now I add the phrase “in the western world” because we must not lose sight of the fact when we’re looking at this group, that there is another group out there which is just as dangerous, just as secret and just as cunning as the Rhodesians. And they, by the way, took a clue from the Rhodesians and they got rid of their name a few years ago. We used to call them Communists and then they got rid of the name. They pretended to go away; they pretended that they crumbled overnight — a great miracle. They’re still there! I call them the Leninists. They have never renounced the theories or the goals of Lenin, they just renounced Communism. Well, they never really had Communism in any of those countries any way, they always refer to themselves as Socialists or Leninists or what have you. But all the old former Communist commissars simply took their hat off that said Communist on the front of it and turned it around and now it says Social Democrat, but you notice it’s the same heads underneath the hats. The heads didn’t change, nor did their real policies.
I want to emphasize that there is another very large and powerful and dangerous group out there which I call the Leninists. And the Leninists and the Rhodesians are often seen warring against each other. Let’s take a look at Mr. Bush in Washington, D.C. and in Venezuela we’ve got Chavez. Now there’s a perfect example of the Rhodesians versus the Leninists, and they fight each other, they’re opposed to each other, they criticize each other, they hate each other, but the world that they want is the same. The only thing they disagree with is not ideology; it’s who is going to run this New World Order — the so called left or will it be the so-called right, and when you peel off all of those labels and you look underneath, you’ll find that in all of these camps, what they really stand for is collectivism. That’s the word we should be using. They’re all collectivists in nature but then they wrap themselves in flags and different rhetoric and they appear to oppose each other, but I want to emphasize just because we are focusing tonight on one group goes not mean that that is the only place we need to keep our guard up, because we have another equally potential group very much alive in the world today.

Melvin Sickler has provided an online condensation of a paper "Why A Bankrupt America" by Jack Newell and Devvy Kidd that provides important additional insights into the Council on Foreign Affairs and the Trilateral Commission::

Edward Mandell House 

The Council on Foreign Relations was founded in 1921 by Edward Mandell House, who had been the chief advisor of President Woodrow Wilson. Actually, he was more than just a prominent aide of the President; he dominated the President. He was referred to as Wilson’s "alter ego" (other self), and was credited for being the most powerful individual in the United States during the Wilson Administration from 1913 until 1921. 
House was a Marxist whose goal was to socialize the United States. In 1912, House wrote the book "Philip Dru: Administrator" in which he stated that he was working for "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx." In this book, House laid out a plan for the conquest of America, telling how both the Democratic and Republican Parties would be controlled, and be used as instruments in the creation of a socialistic government. And he asked for the establishment of a state-controlled central bank, which were both proposed in "The Communist Manifesto". And it was in 1913, during the very first year of the House-dominated Wilson Administration, that both of these proposals became law. The Federal Reserve Act was passed, which brought into power a private central bank to create the money of the United States, taking this power away from the united States Congress. And the 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution, the graduated income tax as proposed by Karl Marx, was also ratified. 

The Council on Foreign Relations 

In 1921, House and his friends formed the Council on Foreign Relations whose purpose right from its conception was to destroy the freedom and independence of the United States, and to lead the country into a one-world government. 
Right from its beginning, in 1921, the CFR began to attract men of power and influence. In the late 1920’s, important financing for the CFR came from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Foundation. In 1940, at the invitation of President Roosevelt, members of the CFR gained domination over the State Department, and they have maintained this domination ever since. 

Its intentions

 The late Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton’s mentor), Professor of History at Georgetown University, member of the CFR, stated in his book, "Tragedy & Hope": "The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established." 
Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the Cfr for 16 years, warned the American people of the organization’s intentions: "The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereingty of the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government." 
And Dan Smoot, a former member of the FBI Headquarters staff in Washington, D.C., summarized the organization’s purpose as follows: "The ultimate aim of the CFR is to create a one-world socialist system, and to make the U.S. an official part of it." 
In other words, the CFR’s activities are treasonous to the U.S. Constitution. Their goal is to put an end to the United States of America, and to make the country a part of their global government scheme. 

Its influence 

In 1944 and in 1948, the Republican candidate for President, Thomas Dewey, was a CFR member. In later years, Republicans Eisenhower and Nixon were members of the CFR, as were Democrats Stevenson, Kennedy, Humphrey, and McGovern. (Note: We believe Kennedy became disloyal to the CFR prior to his assassination.") The American people think that they have a choice when they vote for a President, but the truth of the matter is , with few exceptions: Presidential candidates for decades have been CFR members. 
In one of the CFR’s annual reports, published in 1978, it listed a membership of 1878 members. Eleven of its members at this time were United States Senators, with even more Congressmen belonging to the organization. 284 of its members listed in this report were United States Government officials. And the Chairman of the Board of this immensely powerful pyramid was stated as being none other than David Rockefeller himself. 
The CFR not only has its members in the United States Government, but its influence has also spead to other vital areas of American life. According to Newell: "Its members have run, or are running, NBC and CBS, ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Washington Post’, ‘The Des Moines Register’, and many other important newspapers. The leaders of ‘Time’, ‘Newsweek’, ‘Fortune’, ‘Business Week’, and numerous other publications are CFR members. The organization’s members also dominate the academic world, top corporations, the huge tax-exempt foundations, labor unions, the military, and just about every segment of American life." 
Barry Goldwater states in his book, "With No Apologies", on page 231: 
"Does it not seem strange to you that these men just happened to be CFR and just happened to be on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, that absolutely controls the money and interest rates of this great country without benefit of Congress? A privately owned organization, the Federal Reserve, which has absolutely nothing to do with the United States of America!" and Newell continues to write: "Not every member of the CFR is fully committed to carrying out Edward Mandell House’s conspiratorial plan. Many have been flattered by an invitation to join a study group, which is what the CFR calls itself. Others go along because of personal benefits, such as a nice job and a new importance. But all are used to promote the destruction of U.S. sovereignty." 

All aspects of American life are dominated

 The members of the CFR dominate almost every aspect of American life, yet most Americans have never even heard of the Council on Foreign Relations. One reason for this is probably because there are over 170 journalists, correspondents, and communications executives who are members of the CFR, and who do not write about the organization. Also, it is an express condition of membership that no one is to disclose what goes on at CFR meetings. 
Congressmen John R. Rarick had warned: 
"The CFR, dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education, and mass communication-media, should be familiar to every American concerned with good government, and with preserving and defending the U.S. Constitution and our free-enterprise system. Yet, the nation’s right-to-know machinery, the news media, usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities. 
"The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitution Republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship." 
The CFR now has its main headquarters at the corner of park Avenue and 68th Street in New York City, in a building given to the organization by the Rockefeller family in 1929. Its main goal is still to create a one-world government by destroying the freedom and independence of all nations, especially the United States. And David Rockefeller continues to be its Chairman of the Board.

The Trilateral Commission

Unfortunately, the Council on Foreign Relations is not the only group proposing an end to the sovereignty of the United States. In 1973, The Trilateral Commission was founded to work for the same goal: a one-world government.
The Trilateral Commission's roots stem from the book, "Between Two Ages", written by Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1970. In this book, Brzezinski praised Marxism, thought of the United States as obsolete, and praised the formation of a one-world government. His thinking closely parallels that of CFR founder Edward Mandell house.

Marxism

On page 72, Brzezinski writes: "Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief."
On page 83, he states: "Marxism disseminated on the popular level in the form of Communism, represented a major advance in man's ability to conceptualize his relationship to his world."
On page 123, we find: "Marxism supplied the best available insight into contemporary reality."
What Mr. Brzezinski fails to tell his readers is that approximately 100 million human beings have been murdered under Marxism "in the form of Communism" just in this Twentieth Century. It has enslaved a billion more, and has been responsible for those who live in Communist-dominated countries. There is nothing like being brainwashed!

For world government

Zbigniew Brzezinski's "Between Two Ages" was published in 1970 while he was a professor in New York City. David Rockefeller read the book and, in 1973, launched the new Trilateral Commission, whose purposes include linking North America, Western Europe, and Japan "in their economic relations, their political and defense relations, their relations with developing countries, and their relations with Communist countries."
As Newell writes: "The original literature of The Trilateral Commission also states, exactly as Brzezinski's book had proposed, that the more advanced Communist States could become partners in the alliance leading to world government. In short, David Rockefeller implemented Brzezinski's proposal."
Rockefeller appointed Zbigniew Brzezinski to be the Director of The Trilateral Commission.

It is also worth mentioning that some secret societies are very peculiar in other ways, to say the least. They include the exotic rituals behind Yale's Skull and Bones, which has been a prime source of CIA leaders, and bizarre sexual behavior practiced at Bohemian Grove, which is attended once a year by 1,500 of America's most influential leaders.
Once when commenting upon the topics of San Francisco, homosexuals, and Bohemian Grove, former President Richard Nixon commented: "But it's not just the ratty part of town. The upper class in San Francisco is that way. The Bohemian Grove, which I attend from time to time . . . It is the most faggy goddamned thing you could ever imagine with that San Francisco crowd. I can't shake hands with anybody from San Francisco."
The Corbett Reports "Episode #042 - The Bohemian Grove" provides evidence that Bohemian Grove has been the site where little boys imported for homosexual prostitution have also been subjects of in-house hard-core gay porno flicks. At at least on of these kids was murdered after being forced to participate.

To perform a really complete analysis, it would help to start by creating lists of personalities connected with both “Circle B” and “Circle Z,” such as the one provided by blogger "Barney Rubble" in the comments section of the Infowars.com article "9/11: The Case for Controlled Demolition."
Books like 9-11 Evil by Victor Thorn and High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper are gold mines of insight that help to take us to a next higher level of identifying motivations and ultimate objectives of current circles of malefactors.

 

On pages 88 and 89 of 9-11 Evil, Victor Thorn comments on Zionist neocon kingpin Richard Perle, nicknamed by many colleagues "The Prince of Darkness":

...Our nation's War Machine takes it marching orders from an entity called the Defense Policy Board, which most certainly wields more power than the current Defense Secretary on 9-11, Donald Rumsfeld.
...the Defense Policy Board was under the direct tutelage of Richard Perle on the morning of 9-11; and no more psychotic, rabid Zionist infected with pure evil could be found anywhere in Washington, D.C. Perle wielded so much power that in 1986 The Washington Post quoted a high-ranking State Department official who called him "the most powerful man in the Pentagon." [As a side-note, many of the references in this section are culled from Michael Collins Piper's The High Priests of War, which is an invaluable source for this subject. Many thanks for his years of top-notch work.]
Perle was also once referred to as "The person in charge of World War III" by Britain's Labor Party Leader Denis Healey in the 1980's; plus, "In 1970, after the National Security Council ordered a wiretap of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, Perle was revealed to be passing classified information to an officer of the Israeli Embassy" [The High Priests of War]. Last but not least, Perle - who was appointed as head of the Defense Policy Board by George W. Bush himself -- became very wealthy selling weapons to the Israeli Defense Force [the most bloodthirsty killers on earth].
In a December, 2002 interview, author John Pilger provides a clearer understanding of Richard Perle's paranoid, Dr. Strangelove mentality where he advocates multiple wars in simultaneous theaters of engagement:

This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq ... this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war ... our children will sing great songs about us years from now.

The Prince of Darkness's lunatic vision of an imperialistic Israeli war machine is just plain scary. But Perle wasn' t the only mastermind manning the Pentagon guns. On April 9. 2003 in the Magazine Forward, Ari Shavit revealed, "The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neo-conservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish."

On page 12 of High Priests, Piper notes: "On December 13, 2002, Counterpunch magazine, published by maverick Irish-born American-based journalist Alexander Cockburn, featured an article raising the questions of “the Bush administration’s dual loyalties” and provided a fascinating overview of the neo-conservative network that ultimately led America to war. The authors were Bill and Kathleen Christison, a husband-and-wife team of former veteran U.S. Central Intelligence Agency analysts. They cited the Israeli sympathies of top neo-conservative policy makers inside the Bush administration, pointing out that—indeed—these neo-conservatives were closely aligned with the ideology of the Likud bloc in Israel. Their summary of the “cast of characters” among the neo-conservatives is precise and worth noting:"

Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz leads the pack. He was a protégé of Richard Perle, who heads the prominent Pentagon advisory body, the Defense Policy Board. Many of today’s neo-conservatives, including Perle, are the intellectual progeny of the late Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson, a strong defense hawk and one of Israel’s most strident congressional supporters in the 1970s.
Wolfowitz in turn is the mentor of Lewis “Scooter” Libby, now Vice
President Cheney’s chief of staff who was first a student of Wolfowitz and later a subordinate during the 1980s in both the State and the Defense Departments.
Another Perle protégé is Douglas Feith, who is currently undersecretary of defense for policy, the department’s number-three man, and has worked closely with Perle both as a lobbyist for Turkey and in co-authoring strategy papers for right-wing Israeli governments.
Assistant Secretaries Peter Rodman and Dov Zakheim, old hands from the Reagan administration when the neo-cons first flourished, fill out the subcabinet ranks at Defense. At lower levels, the Israel and the Syria/Lebanon desk officers at Defense are imports from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a think tank spun off from the pro-Israel lobby organization, AIPAC.
Neo-conservatives have not made many inroads at the State Department, except for John Bolton, an American Enterprise Institute hawk and Israeli proponent who is said to have been forced on a reluctant Colin Powell as undersecretary for arms control. Bolton’s special assistant is David Wurmser, who wrote and/or co-authored with Perle and Feith at least two strategy papers for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu in 1996.
Wurmser’s wife, Meyrav Wurmser, is a co-founder of the media-watch web-site MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute), which is run by retired Israeli military and intelligence officers and specializes in translating and widely circulating Arab media and statements by Arab leaders. A recent investigation by The Guardian of London found that MEMRI’s translations are skewed by being highly selective. Although it inevitably translates and circulates the most extreme of Arab statements, it ignores moderate Arab commentary and extremist Hebrew statements.
In the vice president’s office, Cheney has established his own personal
national security staff, run by aides known to be very pro-Israel. The deputy director of the staff, John Hannah, is a former fellow of the Israeli-oriented Washington Institute.
On the National Security Council staff, the newly appointed director of
Middle East affairs is Elliott Abrams, who came to prominence after pleading guilty to withholding information from Congress during the Iran-contra scandal (and was pardoned by President Bush the elder) and who has long been a vocal proponent of right-wing Israeli positions. Putting him in a key policymaking position on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is like entrusting the henhouse to a fox.
Probably the most important organization, in terms of its influence on Bush administration policy formulation, is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). Formed after the 1973 Arab-Israeli war specifically to bring Israel’s security concerns to the attention of U.S. policymakers and concentrating also on broad defense issues, the extremely hawkish, right-wing JINSA has always had a high-powered board able to place its members inside conservative U.S. administrations. Cheney, Bolton, and Feith were members until they entered the Bush administration. Several lower level JINSA functionaries are now working in the Defense Department.
Wolfowitz himself has been circumspect in public, writing primarily about broader strategic issues rather than about Israel specifically or even the Middle East, but it is clear that at bottom Israel is a major interest and may be the principal reason for his near obsession with the effort, of which he is the primary spearhead, to dump Saddam Hussein, remake the Iraqi government in an American image, and then further redraw the Middle East map by accomplishing the same goals in Syria, Iran, and perhaps other countries.
But his interest in Israel always crops up. Even profiles that downplay his attachment to Israel nonetheless always mention the influence the Holocaust, in which several of his family perished, has had on his thinking. One source inside the administration has described him frankly as “over-the-top crazy when it comes to Israel.” Although this probably accurately describes most of the rest of the neo-con coterie, and Wolfowitz is guilty at least by association, he is actually more complex and nuanced than this.

Piper goes on to spell out how the Zionist octopus has spread its tentacles throughout Washington, D.C. and national media. Most alarming of all, he identifies how the ultimate agenda of the Zionists is to "use up" America as their riding horse and then callously throw America in the trash heap. In other words, their agenda is fundamentally hostile to America and traditional conservative values. They may be rightfully considered traitors and domestic enemies of the U.S. Constitution and the legitimate national interests of the United States of America.

 

 

A FINAL WORD . . .

Who will be ruling America . . .
when America is ruling the New World Order?

An examination of “the secret agenda behind the agenda”
of the High Priests of War.

The United Nations—as we have known it—can effectively be considered a ghost of the past. The UN has been shelved, sidelined, consigned to the trash heap—at least temporarily—by the one world dreamers who once saw the global body as the means of establishing a world hegemon. Today’s imperialists now envision Uncle Sam as their officially- designated world policeman or, in their more academic terms “the center of a new international system.” The goal is “a world that looks like America, and is therefore safe for all.”
However, despite the rhetoric—which might please the ears of many grass-roots American patriots (or those who fancy themselves that)—it’s not quite so simple. There’s more to this agenda than meets the eye.
What might be described as The Grand Scheme for a New World Order—in the wake of America’s new “imperial” role—was imparted in quite candid fashion in a major two-part policy paper in the Summer 2003 and Winter 2004 issues of The Journal of International Security Affairs, house organ of the definitively influential Jewish Institute for National Security Policy (JINSA), which has been referenced repeatedly in the pages of The High Priests of War.
Once a previously little-known Washington think tank, JINSA is now often publicly acknowledged as perhaps the most specific guiding force behind Bush administration foreign policy today. So when something
appears in a JINSA publication, there’s a lot of weight behind it.
The author, Alexander H. Joffe, a pro-Israel academic, has been a featured writer in the pages of this JINSA publication, and that he was given so much space to tout his theories certainly reflects the high regard in which his views are held.
Joffe’s two-part series was entitled “The Empire That Dared Not Speak Its Name.” In his essay, Joffee frankly admitted that “America is an empire” and asserts that, yes, this is a very good thing.
Joffe says that when the UN dared to take on Zionism, that marked the demise of the UN in the minds of the internationalists. Joffe writes:
“The end of the General Assembly as a credible body may plausibly be ascribed to the infamous ‘Zionism is Racism’ resolution in 1975.” The JINSA author contends that the world should be “grateful” that the UN has been “discredited, reduced to farce and ultimately ground to a halt,” referring, of course, to UN positions that the Zionists and their allies in the world empire movement find offensive.
As a result of the UN being shelved as a world government vehicle, writes Joffe, “We now have the opportunity, and obligation, to begin again.” However, he warns that the emerging European Union (EU) is a
threat to the dream of a global empire.
The JINSA writer asserts that the EU is an “alternative vision for the international community,” one that, as he puts it, frankly is “the authentic countervision to an American Empire.” According to the Zionist writer, the biggest problem with Europe and the EU is that “culture remains at the core of Europe’s problems. Nationalism was a doctrine born in Europe, as were its vicious mutant offspring: fascism and communism.”.
(Note: A fervent advocate of Israeli super-nationalism, the writer, Joffe, doesn’t seem to see the lack of logic in his attack on other peoples’ nationalism—but then, again, honesty has never been integral to the hardline Zionist point of view.)
Joffe complains that although “the new European Empire is multicultural in theory . . . in reality it is dominated politically and culturally by France and economically by Germany.” Today, in the EU, he says, “driven by a sense of postcolonial guilt and postwar ennui the door have been thrown open to all ideas. At the most sinister levels it has permitted and even legitimized a vast explosion of unhinged thought and action, namely anti-Americanism, anti-Semitism, and a wide variety of conspiracy theories.”
(The so-called “conspiracy theories” that so alarm this Zionist theoretician are those that dare to challenge the “official” views of what really happened on September 11, 2001. He is inflamed that millions of people in Europe and the Muslim world—not to mention the United States— have raised questions about Israeli foreknowledge and/or involvement in those events.)
In any case, what Joffe describes as “the other kind of liberal internationalism” is what the Zionist movement favors and Joffe defines it:

The American Empire has no real or theoretical competitors. The goal of the American Empire in the 21st century is not territorial control or the exploitation of resources but political and economic leadership which defends and advances American interests, and which promotes the development and well being of all nations. Given our history and our values, that future lies in leveraging the American Empire in such a way that it becomes the basis of a new democratic international system.
Ultimately the only answer for a stable and prosperous planet will be a global system that is structurally and morally similar to the American union—semiautonomous states with secular, liberal democratic systems; where states have both prescribed rights and agreed upon responsibilities in a larger secular, liberal democratic framework; one equipped with checks and balances and meaningful institutions; with governance based on rule of law and tolerant and pluralist values.

In the second-part of his extended essay, published in the Winter 2004 issue of JINSA’s journal, Joffe pursued this line of thought further, expanding on his call for what he described as “an empire that looks like
America.”
Amazingly, Joffe frankly talks about the United States engaging in massive imperial conquests in the trouble-torn regions of frica—presumably after the United States has already made havoc in the Arab countries of the Middle East:

The conditions under which America and its allies would simply take over and restore African countries are far from clear. What are the thresholds for intervention? What are the procedures and outcomes? Who will fight and who will pay? The restoration of Africa would involve long-term commitments and immense costs, of the sort that could only be paid for by Africa itself. That is to say, it would probably require American economic control, to go along with political and cultural control. Colonialism is always pay as you go, and it is not pretty. The question is both whether Africa can pay the price (or afford not to) and whether America has the stomach.

Of course, Africa is not the only target of Joffe and his like-minded schemers (and that is precisely what they are, however, “extreme” that term may be perceived). In fact, Joffe talks of a wide-ranging global agenda— well beyond the African continent.
In the end, however, Joffe lets the cat out of the bag, about the real intentions of those who are using United States military power as the mechanism for a bigger agenda. “New arrangements,” he says, “must
come into being under American leadership to provide an alternative for states that are willing to accept rights and responsibilities.” Joffe dreams of a United Nations that has been re-made under the imperial force of the
United States. And ultimately, he predicts the possibility of a world government, writing:

Possibly, after a period of chaos and anger, which in any event would simply intensify existing states of being, the institution [the United Nations] might be bludgeoned into changing. [Note his use of the term “bludgeoned.”—MCP]
Rather than a club that admits all, the 21st century United Nations might— someday, somehow—be remade into an exclusive, by invitation, members-only group, of free, democratic states, sharing similar values. Or in the end, replaced by one. That day, however, may be decades off.

Should there be any doubt that he is talking about world government, note Joffe’s concluding words:

The best way to preserve the American empire is to eventually give it up. Setting the stage for global governance can only be done with American leadership and American-led institutions of the sort schematically outlined here.

So it is. Despite all the high-sounding rhetoric about “democracy,” what it all comes down to—in the words of this pro-Israel ideologue—is the use of America’s military power to advance another (secret) agenda altogether. Even many of those grass-roots American flag-wavers (who may be genuine patriots) who relish the concept of an American empire may find Joffe’s concepts somewhat different from what they otherwise might perceive.
But here, in the pages of a devotedly pro-Zionist journal, we learn precisely what the “story behind the story” actually happens to be. It has nothing to do, really, even with a “strong America” or, for that matter, even with America itself.
The United States of America is simply a pawn—albeit a powerful one—in the game, being ruthlessly shifted about in a scheme for world dominance by an elite few operating behind the scenes.
And, in the end, this does tell us very much about who The High Priests of War really are and what their agenda is really all about. There’s no mystery at all.
What remains to be determined is what the American people—and all other real patriots in nations around the globe—intend to do about it. The question is this: will the world finally decide it is time to declare
war on The High Priests of War?

—MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER

 

Additional Update References

More on "Circle B"

2007 The Bush Dynasty of Death: Four Generations of Wall Street War-Making and War-Profiteering by Dr. Eric T. Karlstrom, 9/11 New World Order.

George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography (pdf) by Webster Tarpley and Antony Chaitkin, 1992, about Bush Sr. First published in 1992, it stated: "The thesis of this book is simple: if George Bush were to be re- elected in November 1992 for a second term as the president of the United States, this country and the rest of the world would face a catastrophe of gigantic proportions."

More on "Circle Z" (to include "The Black Nobility" and "City of London")

[continually updated] Rothschilds by Soren Dreier, at http://sorendreier.com/category/all-posts/society/rothschilds/

2011-12-14 History — Damned Lies, Part Three by Tom Valentine
2011-12-13 Damned Lies, War and Money, Part Two by Tom Valentine
2011-12-12 History of Money, War—All damned Lies! Part One by Tom Valentine, Veterans Today
2011-10-08 A Black Nobility Bloodline, Part 2 of 5 - The Windsor wealth, vaticproject.blogspot.com. [Editor's Note: Parts 1-5 contained in the web page for The Biggest Secret, Chapter 18)
2011-08-21 The Rothschilds, aangirfan.blogspot.com
2011-08-09 Growing Israeli Tyranny by Stephen Lendman, Rense.com.
2011-08-02 Israel - Rogue State Land Of Inequality by Stephen Lendman, Rense.com.
"Growing millions worldwide understand Israel's decades-long project to colonize Palestine, dispossess its people, steal their land, and terrorize them into submission. They also know it hasn't worked nor will it.
Too few, however, know how growing social and economic inequality affects most Israelis. Since at least the mid-1980s, state policies have disproportionately favored the rich, causing wealth disparities, unemployment, poverty, hunger, homelessness and gradual loss of social benefits.
A race to the bottom followed, notably since mass privatizations in the 1990s, placing profits about human needs as in America where only corporate and elitist interests matter.
As a result, recent studies show 1.77 million Israelis are poor in a population of 7.7 million (including Jews, Arabs and members of other faiths). About 850,000 children live in poverty. About 69% of them lack nutritional security. Around 75% of them miss meals, and 83% of them lack proper dental care. Some, in fact, beg for money or steal to eat... "
[Editor's Note: Israel is not only judged in the August 2005 World Bank report as more corrupt than Western countries, but this highly artificial state also has a pyramidal social structure consistent with a tropism towards monopolistic practices and Asiatic despotism -- even among fellow Jews. Prior to when Jews showed up en masse in America in the late 19th century, WASPs created one of the most economically succesful countries in history with a large and prosperous middle class; in contrast, America "under Jewish management" (bolstered by "armies" of Irish and Italian Catholics who served as Jewish "muscle" and "front men" in totally corrupt big city political machines in places like New York City and Chicago) evolved in the 20th century towards a majority nonwhite Third world basket case economy and tyranny. Nevertheless, all this time fast-talking Jews insisted that they had all the answers]
2011-02-09 The Rothschild Octopus, vaticproject.blogspot.com.
2010-12-07 The Israeli Lobby Owns the Congress, Hollywood and the White House, an interview with Wayne Madsen by Kourosh Ziabari, Rebel News, "Madsen:...As many Saudis know, the Sauds are not only in lockstep with the Americans and Israelis but they are descendant from a Jewish merchant family that originally lived in what is now Kuwait. Wahhabism in fact serves the interests of Israel's Zionist Judaism, both emphasize extremism and sectarianism that keeps the Middle East in constant turmoil and extends the rule of the Wahhabi Sauds and Zionists."
2010-12-05 Gordon Duff: AIPAC Ordered Bush to Attack Iran; A Look Behind the Curtain "...A highly placed source within the White House and CIA confirmed, in an interview, that the invasion of Iran was scheduled for 2006 but planned in 1999... Everything was going to happen in Bahrain. Plans were to attack Americans, blow up clubs, restaurants. There were plans to stage a `Tonkin Gulf' type attack and blame it on Iranian torpedo boats. Guys in the military were aware of this and there was strong opposition. Marine Colonel Joe Molofsky was the real hero here. He did more to scramble administration plans than anyone else, Molofky and General Mattis. These were really straight shooters, how I learned to trust the Marine Corps..."
...Q. Orders? From where?
A. “All of it, all foreign policy issues, were out of AIPAC, they ran everything in the Bush administration. That was the whole point of it. We never were told why we had to destroy Iran only that it had to be done. Nobody ever asked why. Nobody ever believed Iran had a credible nuclear program and, eventually, we were all very certain they never would. There was never an issue about Iran being a threat or not. There was never an issue of motive of any kind. These were orders, plain and simple, the administration that will come into office in 2001 will be tasked with destroying Iran, tasked by AIPAC who will control all key position in the administration.”
2010-09-02 The State And Local Bases Of Zionist Power In America by James Petras, Rense.com
2010-07-31 Rothschild's Black Gold Empire by Texe Marrs. The author makes some very provocative points, to include the following:
"...6. Chinese national oil companies (actually Rothschild clones) are now the major petroleum suppliers to the whole world. Yet, China possesses little oil of its own—China’s oil largesse comes from its cooperative dealings with Rothschild, Israel, and the U.S.A.
7. Because of the global oversupply problem—too much oil being drilled and pumped up out of the earth—it was decided that the booming Gulf of Mexico oil source must be indefinitely closed down. Chevron, Conoco, Exxon-Mobil, BP and other multinational oil corporations would henceforth be either limited or prohibited from operating oil derricks in the Gulf. Pemex, the Mexican national oil company, would also be limited in its production, and, down south, Brazil’s national oil corporation, Petrobras, would be given a strict quota.
8. China is now the preferred #1 oil spigot for all the world’s economies. Rothschild’s Jewish oil billionaire pals in Israel as well as China’s Communist bureaucrats are today the planet’s new masters of oil.
9. BP, an oil company already infamous for its despoiling the earth, has been made the scapegoat for the closing of much of the Gulf of Mexico’s oil spigots. In preparation for the derrick’s destruction, much of BP’s assets were transferred in advance of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill disaster to other Rothschild affiliates across the world in Libya and the Middle East, and especially the majority of its Russian oil assets, which were turned over to four Russian Jewish billionaires, called the `Oligarchs.'"
Marrs makes another important point, namely it is a pattern for the Rothschilds to use major corporations as riding horses for their intrigues, even if they ruthlessly "use them up" in the process. As one example, read about the Blanchard - Barrick Gold, JP Morgan Chase suit where gold dealer Blanchard identified a likely conspiracy in which Barrick seriously endangered itself with short positions to artificially drive the price of gold down to 50 year inflation adjusted lows in the late 1990's. Another interesting earlier example of conspiratorial manipulation was the "London Gold Pool" episode during the Johnson Administration in the 1960's, in which certain observers believe that the Rothschilds help swindle the United States out of much of its gold reserves. Please also see my "The BP-Gulf Disaster As a False Flag Operation" intelligence summary web page.
2010-07-28 WAR on The World: Rothschild League’s 30 Facts Evidencing Gulf Oil Disaster Was Planned by Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri Kane.
2010-07-27 Queen Elizabeth Fronts for Rothschilds ("Crown") by By Alcuin Bramerton.
2010-04-07 The Major Jewish American Organizations Defend Israel’s Humiliation of America, by James Petras, "When Israel announced a major new Jews-only building project of 1600 homes in occupied East Jerusalem, it was not only “spitting in the face” of visiting Vice President Biden, it was demonstrating its power to humiliate America and Americans."
2010-04 "I'm Doing God's Work: CEO of World's Most Evil and Corrupt Bank, Goldman Sachs, Arrogantly Boasts" by Texe Marrs, Power of Prophecy Newsletter, "`Number 85, Broad Street, in lower Manhattan (New York City) is where the money is. All of it.' This was what The Sunday Times, one of Britain’s most prestigious and internationally known newspapers reported on November 9, 2009. The newspaper went on to say that this address is "the site of the best cash-making machine that global capitalism has ever produced." But, said the paper, the firm that operates out of this site is much more than only an economic Goliath, it is also "a political force more powerful than governments."
2010-03-11 RT: "Mossad Loves Killing People in Bedrooms --Author" Israel has no problems with cold-bloodedly killing a democratically elected Hamas leader in a foreign city. In fact, Israeli PM's routinely sign off on assassinations around the world. After this killing, the popularity of Mossad in Israel went up. Former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky claims that Mossad can generally recruit at least a third of the world Jewish population as sayanim, or "helpers" in its espionage operations, which reflect a covert form of permanent 4th generation warfare against humanity around the world. (More on 4th generation warfare concepts in Chapter 38). As Israel and the global Jewish population continue to gain in power and influence, welcome to a world increasingly ruled by the threat of cold-blooded assassinations everywhere.

 

2010-02-13 Israel is accused of waging covert war across the Middle East by Sheera Frenkel, The Times. Also archived at RBN.
2010-01-18 Rothschilds & Rockefellers: Trillionaires Of The World, The New World Order Observer
2009-12-20 Bended Knees: Zionist Power in American Politics by James Petras, Dissident Voice
The History and Timeline of the House of Rothschild at jewwatch.com
2003-11-09 Rothschilds Conduct "Red Symphony" by Henry Makow
[Undated] "The Pusher" [Ed. Note a good summary page, that includes links to Dope Inc.: Britain's Opium War Against the U.S by Konstandinos Kalimtgis also by David Goldman and Jeffrey Steinberg, produced by Lyndon LaRouche]

"Shadow," "Deep State," or "Secret Elite"-Related Web Sites

The Black Nobility resource page [Editor's Note: This web page reminds me of rense.com; namely after one filters out gibberish about UFOs, reptilians, etc, there is actually quite a lot of good information].
MI6 Are the Lords of the Global Drug Trade by James Casbolt
The Shadow Government: Its Identification and Analysis by Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D.
Edward Bernays, Wikipedia article (November 22, 1891 – March 9, 1995, was an American pioneer in the field of public relations and propaganda along with Ivy Lee, referred to in his obituary as "the father of public relations".[1] Combining the ideas of Gustave Le Bon and Wilfred Trotter on crowd psychology with the psychoanalytical ideas of his uncle, Dr. Sigmund Freud, Bernays was one of the first to attempt to manipulate public opinion using the subconscious...Born 1891 in Vienna to Jewish parents, Bernays was a double nephew of psychoanalysis pioneer Sigmund Freud....In Propaganda (1928), Bernays argued that the manipulation of public opinion was a necessary part of democracy:

The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ...We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. ...In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons...who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.

See also Episode #33 "Meet Edward Bernays" The Corbett Report.

Other valuble Corbett Report documentaries on MP3, along with web page documentation. (I recommend all the episodes, which I have listened to. However, the following are some noteworthy examples):
Episode #131 Bilderberg 2010
Episode #113 Meet George Soros
Episode #106 Meet Henry Kissinger
Episode #101 New World Order 101
Episode #090 Our Leaders Are Psychopaths
Episode #089 Meet Donald Rumsfeld
Episode #088 You Are Being Programmed
Episode #087 The UN Doesn't Love You
Episdoe #070 How to Predict the Future
Episode #058 Meet Carroll Quigley
Episode#047 Problem, Reaction, Solution
Episode #037 Globalization is Not Your Friend
Episode #034 The Scientific Dictatorship
Episode # 026 Meet the Rockefellers
Episode #008 Meet the North American Union
Episode # 006 Feudalism 2.0
Episdoe #005 Central Banking is a Hoax

Brother Nathanael Kapner on "Circle Z". Brother Kapner is a Jewish convert to Christianity.

2009-07-30 Bernanke - The Rothschild Puppet # 131
2008-12-21 Greek Riots & The Rothschild Bankers # 17
2008-09-25 Is The Bailout A Rothschild Trick? # 57
2008-06-17 Is Sarkozy A Rothschild Puppet? # 9
2008-04-29 How The Rothschild Dynasty Operates # 86
2008-03-26 Judeo Masonry & The Ruin Of Europe # 9
2008-01-27 The Rothschild-Israel Occult Connection # 9

2007-12-02 Rothschilds & Rockefellers, TRILLIONAIRES of the World by NEW WORLD ORDER

American Racial Nationalist View Points:

Davidduke.com Preface to Jewish Supremacism — latest edition caption: "President Obama in the White House with Chabad Lubavitch leader Levi Shemtov...Chabad is a Jewish extremist organization that literally believes that the purpose of all Gentiles is to `serve Jews' and that Gentiles are inferior and have in fact `satanic souls.' Do a Google Search and read about one of Chabad’s leading rabbis, Yitzhak Ginsburgh who recently endorsed a book in Israel calling for the murder of Gentile babies who hold a `potential threat for Israel.' Also documented below is a statement by Ginsburgh in Jewish Week where he says it is moral for a Jew to kill a Gentile and steal his liver because Jewish life has `infinite value' as compared to `inferior' Gentiles. All this is well documented and proven, so why no outrage at the close relationship of the President of the United States to this extremist Jewish hate group, and why does the national and international media cover up what should be a scandal of huge proportions? This embargo of truth about Jewish extremism shows you who really is in control of politics and media — doesn’t it? "

 

Articles archive by the late Dr. William L. Pierce regarding Israel, Jewish media control, Jewish foreign policy, and Jewish organized crime. Please click on links contained in the brackets below. Please also see discussion of Dr. Pierce in the "Nationalist" section of the web page "Reconciling Libertarianism and Nationalism."

Israel

• Day of Infamy: The Attack on the U.S.S. Liberty [111] June 7, 1997
• In Your Ear, Mr. Clinton [112] October 18, 1997
• Special Treatment [113] March 13, 1999
• The "Peace Process" [114] circa February 2001
• The Greatest Betrayal [115] December 29, 2001

Jewish media control

• With Malice Aforethought: A Review of the Movie "The Crying Game" [116] September 18, 1993
• Brainwashing in America [117] circa April 1995
• Disney and the Jews: Eisner and His Kind Must Stop Harming Our Children [118] circa September 1995
• The Destructive Media [119] April 13, 1996
• The Meaning of Democracy: The Controlled Media Have the Most Say in Who Is Elected [120] September 28, 1996
• Time To Do What's Right, Why Does it Matter Who Controls the Media? [121] March 22, 1997
• Exposing the Warmongers [122] November 22, 1997
• Media Myths [123] August 15, 1998
• David Geffen, Steven Spielberg, and Bill Clinton [124] August 22, 1998
• Lies, Murder, and Jews [125] May 1, 1999
• Fooling the People [126] May 29, 1999
• The Division of America [127] July 17, 1999
• Lies and the History Channel [128] February 5, 2000
• The Hurricane [129] February 19, 2000
• Mike Wallace's Lesson [130] June 30, 2001
• Fast and Furious [131] July 7, 2001
• Why We Deserve Their Contempt [132] July 14, 2001
• The Jews Are Our Misfortune [133] July 21, 2001
• Journalists and Canadians [134] January 5, 2002
• Media-Driven Law [135] February 2, 2002
• Senator Feinstein and Police Chief Parks [136] March 23, 2002
• The FBI, the ADL, and Christina Long [137] June 8, 2002

Jewish foreign policy

• Get Set for War: Will the Next Four Years See Americans Dying for Israel? [138] December 21, 1996
• The White Farmers of Zimbabwe [139] December 6, 1997
• Bill, Monica, and Saddam [140] February 21, 1998
• Jewish Policy Against Iraq [141] February 28, 1998
• Why the Jews Want War [142] April 10, 1999
• What Makes Madeleine Run [143] April 17, 1999
• The Bigger War [144] May 15, 1999
• The Value of Talk [145] May 22, 1999
• State-Sponsored Terrorism [146] June 5, 1999
• Smell the Blood [147] June 26, 1999
• As Ye Sow . . . [148] April 4, 2001. In this article Dr. Pierce predicts the upcoming 9/11 attacks
• A Fatal Influence [149] April 6, 2002
• Tiptoeing around Our Problems [150] April 13, 2002
• A Third World War? [151] May 18, 2002

Jewish organized crime

• Jews and the White Slave Trade [152] January 24, 1998
• Paying the Organizatsiya [153] May 16, 1998
• The Russian Economy [154] September 5, 1998
• Shuffling Toward the Slaughterhouse [155] September 11, 1999
• The Evil Among Us [156] July 1, 2000
• The Nature of the Beast [157] July 8, 2000
• The Rubes and the Carnies [158] July 15, 2000
• The Jewish Mob in America [159] July 22, 2000
• Child Porn, Ecstasy, and Pardons [160] February 3, 2001

Please also see the America First Books archive of the works of Kevin Alfred Strom, a brilliant individual who served as Dr. Pierce's understudy in the last two decades of his life. Please also see other works by Kevin Strom at his web site kevinalfredstrom.com.

Also, please see the archive of Dr. Revilo Oliver. His works include:
The Jewish Psyche by Revilo P. Oliver (Liberty Bell, November 1985)
The Jewish Strategy (PDF)

 

The Revenge of the Neanderthal, Ethnic-Genetic Distance, and the Neanderthal-Troll Connection

Table of Contents

The following are some sample articles that explain the Neanderthal background of Jews, raising the question about whether Jews are simply continuing a race war "by other means" that has been going on for tens of thousands of years between Neanderthals and Cro Magnon Man. For a complete list of articles, please visit the Table of Contents of the May/June 2010 special issue of The Barnes Review.

REVENGE OF THE NEANDERTHAL by Willis A. Carto,
"The truth about the Neanderthal is a historical web that is finally being untangled. . . ."

ISRAELI SAYS: “WE WERE INVENTED” by Willis Carto, "An eminent Israeli historian says the perceived origin of the Jewish people is anything but true. . . ."

‘MY ANCESTORS WERE NEANDERTHALS’ by Willis Carto, " Jewish scholar Stan Gooch has written extensively on the Neanderthal origins of today’s people known as `the Jews.'”

Russian Royal Family Murdered by Neanderthals: RUSSIA’S CHRISTIAN MARTYRS by Marina Marynova, "The royal family of Russia were perhaps the first most prominent victims of Jewish Bolshevism. Here’s the sad story of their brutal murders. . . "

The Postwar Neanderthal Triumph: WHO REIGNS SUPREME? by Michael Collins Piper, "Have the heirs to the Neanderthal finally achieved global supremacy? . . ."

PARTING THOUGHTS: THE ETERNAL CONFLICT by George Kadar, "...The 20th century in the Western world can be rightfully called the "Century of the Neanderthal" and it is up to us to stop this process."

 

The ethnic-genetic distance concept:

Throughout history people have tended to practice the axiom that as ethnic-genetic distance decreases, the chances for altruistic and mutualistic behavior tends to increase. Conversely, as ethnic-genetic distance increases, the chances of predatory or parasitic behavior also tends to increase, all other things being held equal. See the article "Zoological Subspecies in Man" by Dr. Raymond Hall which explains how this behavior is not only common among homo sapiens, but virtually all other mammalian species. Therefore, this behavior is the instinctive result of evolutionary forces common throughout nature.
If one knows where to look, one can find anthropologists like the late Sir Arthur Keith who wrote A New Theory of Evolution that explained why "tribalism," or the maintenance of "Evolutionary Breeding Units," is adaptive social behavior for natural environments.
The most unnatural environments created by man are typically cities. Interestingly enough, for over 2,500 years, the Jews have been one of the most urbanized peoples on this planet. Not surprisingly, it is common to hear people who have come to know the Jews well in big cities (as I have) criticise them as being one of the most "unnatural" peoples on this planet, heavily divorced from "healthy instincts" (Jews are typically overly represented in highly perverse social and political organizations, ranging from the North American Man-Boy Love Association to the Communist Party; the British historian Arnold Toynbee called them a "fossil civilization;" Jews are overrrepresented around the world at the highest levels of organized crime, and make up the majority of traitors caught spying against America) and are strongly attracted to ideological manipulation as an end itiself (the "brokerage mentality" described in Winning Through Intimidation by Robert Ringer; see also The Painted Word by Tom Wolfe about how Jews like modern art more for its ideological statement than anything to do with aesthetics). See "The Scam of Modern Art" by Willis Carto and my own discussion of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology in my mutualism vs. parasitism article.
While Jews are famous for being extremely tribalistic among their own kind, they tend to encourage the exact oppositive behavior among gentiles. In fact, Jews tend to encourage unnatural relationships among gentiles both in terms of unnatural divisions and unnatural alliances. They encourage unnatural divisions by supporting feminism, which encourages animosity between men and women, and Marxist class warfare, which stirs up unnecessary strife between people of shared race, ethnicity and nationality. Jews also like to promote unnatural alliances by encouraging interracial marriage, multi-racial immigration, miscegenation, and homosexuality.
Once Jews are allowed to thoroughly work their influence on a gentile society, it's social fabric is typically severely ruptured on all levels. Its overall level of social and economic efficiency tends to decline to Third World levels. This seems to be the story of America in the last few decades.
The following are some key articles on the ethnic-genetic interest concept:.

 

"Ethnic Genetic Interests: The scientific basis for racial activism" by Michael Rienzi, American Renaissance, Feb 2003

"What We Owe Our People: A scientist explains the genetic basis of nationalism," by Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, January 2005; also listed here.

Jewish Ethnic-Genetic Distance From Whites

Interestingly enough, even Jewish-controlled sources like the New York Times host articles that explain Jewish genetic similarities among each other, and distance from gentiles, such as "Studies Show Jews’ Genetic Similarity" by Nicholas Wade, NYT, June 9, 2010:

The shared genetic elements suggest that members of any Jewish community are related to one another as closely as are fourth or fifth cousins in a large population, which is about 10 times higher than the relationship between two people chosen at random off the streets of New York City, Dr. Atzmon said.

Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews have roughly 30 percent European ancestry, with most of the rest from the Middle East, the two surveys find. The two communities seem very similar to each other genetically, which is unexpected because they have been separated for so long.

In Chapter 14: "Jewish Evolutionary Strategy and Claims of Jewish Superiority" of his book Jewish Suprmacism, Dr. David Duke provides insight into how Jews reflect enormous genetic distance from white gentile populations. Jews are able to compensate for these differences to some extent by engaging in varioius forms of behavioral and superficial genetic adaptive mimickry:

...The first thing I found was information on the set of genetically borne diseases that occur almost exclusively in the Jewish community, such as Tay-Sachs disease. Their presence certainly indicated a genetic variance specific to the Jewish population and illustrated a genetic difference from the Gentiles. Soon I found scientific papers dealing precisely with the issues I sought. [footnote 628, 629]
Genetic researchers Sachs and Bat-Miriam discovered amazing similarity between the Jewish populations of nine countries of North Africa, the Middle East, and Central Europe. Conversely, they found sharp differences between Jews and non-Jews from those same countries. [footnote 630]
In studying blood group data, Mourant, Kopec, and Doma-
niewska-Sobczak wrote in a book called The Genetics of the Jews that it may be said that, in general, blood group data…support the relative homogeneity of the main historical Jewish communities. [footnote 631]
Now, here we have mainstream Jewish anthropologists and geneticists -- the same groups who chronically preach to us that there are no great differences between Blacks and Whites -- boldly assert that the Jewish people are genetically distinctive and relatively homogenous! They argue that some differences exist between the Ashkenazim and the Sephardim (the main ethnic division among Jews), but that essentially Jews are a single people with a limited genetic resemblance to the European populations among whom they dwell. [foonote 632]

• In blood group data, two major studies, one in 1977 by Bonné- Tamir, Ashbel, and Kenett and one by Karlin, Kenett, and Bonné-Tamir in 1979, found when using fourteen polymorphic loci, no significant difference in Jewish populations from Iraq, Libya, Germany, or Poland. They estimated that the genetic distance between Gentiles and Jews living in the same area is three to five times

[Top of page] 330 [hapter title] JEWISH EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY

greater than for Jews living in the different nations studied. In the 1977 study, the researchers state “not much admixture has taken place between Ashkenazi Jews and their Gentile neighbors during the last 700 years or so.” [footnote 633, 634]

• Mille and Kobyliansky discovered in studies of dermatologlyphic data that Ashkenazim (Eastern European Jews) are much more similar to Sephardim (Middle-Eastern and European Jews) than they are to the non-Jewish Eastern Europeans. [footnote 635]

• Kobyliansky and Livshits in using cluster analysis on 25 mor phological characteristics, estimated that Jews in Russia were six times more distant from Russians than Russians were from Germans. They also found the Jews to be completely separate from the twenty-four other ethnic groups studied in Russia, Germany, and Poland. [footnote 636]

• Another study compared modern Jews and those of 3,000-year-old Jewish skeletons discovered in the Middle East. Sofaer, Smith, and Kaye studied dental morphology from Morocco, Kurdish Iraq, and Eastern European countries. They found more likeness between the widely scattered Jewish populations than for the Gentile groups living near them. The ancient Jewish skeletal group turned out to be far more similar to the three Jewish populations than for every non-Jewish group studied except for one, an Arab Druse group from the 11th century. [footnote 637]

One researcher summed up the overall genetic differences by say ing that there was probably at least three times more genetic difference between an average Jew in France and his Gentile Frenchman neighbor than between an average French Jew and a Jew living in Russia or the Middle East.
The Jewish studies amazed me. I would not have guessed that Jews were that genetically different from all Europeans. I knew a few Jews who were indistinguishable from the potpourri of other European-Americans. From their appearance, it seemed impossible that there was three times more genetic difference from us than from Jews in remote regions of the world. But, the research proved that a wide genetic difference existed between Jew and European. I wondered why they did not seem that dramatically different in their appearance.
Fritz Lenz suggested back in the 1930s that Jewish resemblance to the European populations did not mean that their genes were similar.638 He suggested that their similar external resemblance could have emerged from the natural selection of genes within the Jewish gene pool. These genes could simply be a small cluster of genes that lay dormant in the Jewish pool or that were introduced by limited genetic mixture with Gentiles, and which then were selectively favored by the social environment. Genes that caused a greater corporeal resemblance to that of the Gentile host could have favorable results in acceptance, accumulation of wealth, as well as social advancement ó leading to reproductive success.

[Book title] JEWISH SUPREMACISM [top of page] 331

By a somewhat similar process, distinct species of butterflies not closely related, come to resemble one another without narrowing their genetic distance. A very small set of genes influencing appearance within the Jewish population could thus be favored, causing a greater similarity of appearance to the Gentile population while not narrowing their overall genetic alienation from their host population. Over many generations, the external resemblance to Gentiles could increase while the parts of the brain that affect behavioral tendencies and abilities could be unaffected.
According to evolutionary genetics, it is possible that Jews have come to more resemble their hosts in their external appearance while at the same time becoming even more distant in their mental and behavioral characteristics. Whatever the questions of physical appearance, there seemed little doubt that Jews are indeed very different from Europeans and that they had maintained that genetic difference for a very long time.
I also ran across a number of popular sources arguing that high Jewish-Gentile intermarriage rates would end their genetic distinctiveness from European Gentiles. As in so many other matters dealing with the Jews, there is a wealth of information on the issue, an underlying reality that is very different from popular perceptions.

 

Jews = Hybridized Neanderthals = Troll Relatives?

Interestingly enough, quite a few sources on the Internet explain how it is very likely that Troll mythology among northern European peoples evolved from pockets of Neanderthal peoples that were later overtaken by immigrations of Nordic and Celtic peoples. Hence, the recent attacks on Iceland via Zionists such as the Rothschild-controlled City of London, George Soros, and Goldman Sach might be viewed as a "Troll attack" on a Nordic nation.

According to the web page "Troll" at the web site "Fantasy Your Guide On The Web."

...In the genre of paleofiction, the distinguished Swedish-speaking Finnish paleontologist Björn Kurtént has entertained the theory (e.g. in Dance of the Tiger) that trolls are a distant memory of an encounter with Neanderthals by our Cro-Magnon ancestors some 40,000 years ago during their migration into northern Europe. Spanish paleoanthropologist Juan Luis Arsuaga provides evidence for these types of encounters in his book, The Neanderthal's Necklace. The theory that Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons occupied the same area of Europe at the same time in history has been theorized based on fossil evidence. Other researchers believe that they just refer to neighboring tribes. The problem with this theory is that neither Neanderthals or Cro-Magnons existed in this part of Europe during the ice-age. Most of Scandinavia was covered by a large glacier and the area was not occupied until much later.

 

My response to the "problem with this theory" cited by this author above is that Ice sheets have advanced and retreated multiple times over the last 50,000 years. There could be pockets of Neanderthal tribes that survived even into the historic era throughout northern Europe, just as there are tiny pockets of somewhat blond-haired and blue-eyed peoples who have survived in various places in Central Asia in places like Afghanistan (for example in Nuristan) and Iran even though the original populations have been repeatedly overrun and colonized by alien poeples. Lastly, people can import mythologies with their migrations from other geographic areas. For example, the Jan/Feb 2007 Barnes Review carried an article "The Baltic Origins of Homer’s Epics" which argued that "Here is compelling evidence that the events of Homer's Iliad and Odyssey took place in the Baltic and not the Mediterranean. Reveals how a climate change forced the migration of a people and their myth to ancient Greece and identifies the true geographic sites of Troy and Ithaca in the Baltic Sea and Calypso’s Isle in the North Atlantic Ocean—following Homer’s own geographic descriptions."'

A Pravda discussion forum thread web page has the following entry under "Re: Neanderthals" discusses evidence for Neanderthals in Finland:

English summaries 3/2000

Signs of Neanderthal man unearthed in Finland by Juha Valste and Antti Halkka

Pages 4-11

For a long time, the oldest known signs of people in Finland post-dated the latest Ice Age, making them less than 10,000 years old. Now, at Susiluola, in Kristiinankaupunki, western Finland, stone implements and signs of fire have been discovered which are around 120,000 years old. These indicate that people have existed here during the Eem interglacial warmer period between two ice ages. All the human forms as old as these in Central and southern Europe have been Neanderthals.

Tales have long been told about Susiluola (it’s name - for some obscure reason - means "wolf cave" in Finnish). The old folk were convinced that Susiluola had been inhabited by mankind sometime during the Stone Age. Recently, a curious local inhabitant was given permission to excavate the cave. The National Board of Antiquities had no money to fund this operation, no available staff, and in fact little interest in the project.

Digging deeply into the cave floor deposits, amateur geologists soon unearthed blackened stones and roughly made stone implements. They immediately abandoned their project, gracefully making way for a thorough professional scientific examination of the cave strata. Thus far, the site has yielded approximately 30 stone implements and over a hundred fragments produced during their shaping. There are no rock types in the area from which it would be an easy job to manufacture weapons and tools. Some of the artefacts have been carved from red shale.

There are many layers in the deposits on the cave floor, some of which constitute original floor surfaces, whereas others have been built up from stones and earth transported there by either water or ice. Pollen and spores from trees and other kinds of plants have been found in the strata associated with human occupation. These sub-fossils tell us that the climate 120,000 years ago was rather warm, in other words similar to what it is today.

Susiluola represents the first Neanderthal dwelling site that has even been found in Fennoscandia.

Not unnaturally, it has caused a sensation among anthropologists and geologists in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark.

The Wikipedia article on "Trolls" (as of May 2010) has the following interesting comment:

Many of the fairytale and folklore descriptions of "Trolls" are similar to characteristics of Neanderthal people. Neanderthal people overlapped with us (Homo Sapiens) for 30,000 to 50,000 years.

 

Other Jewish studies:

Please see my "Mutualism vs. Parasitism" article that is part of my "Reconciling Opposing Political and Economic Ideologies" series. This article provides important insights into Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology.

2013-06-23 News from the Jews

Tyranny as a Jewish construct, hysterical demonization of European Nationalism, Jewish agenda in America, and more

Sorry for missing my Friday deadline folks.  I have a friend visiting San Diego, so I've been busy showing off America's Finest City.  If you have never visited San Diego, it is an absolute must!

Anyways, I have a few news items to highlight this week.  Here we go.

A major theme of my writing here is the fact that the entire "Global War on Terror" is an Israeli or - to be more specific - a Jewish racket, devised and propagandized by Jewish intellectuals and public policy makers going back to the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism in 1979.

The primary goals of the "Global War on Terror" are:

1. to advance Israel's geopolitical agenda in the Middle East, namely the destruction and elimination of Israel's adversaries in the region using American military might; and 
2. to justify the creation of an Orwellian Jewish-run police state in the West.

The "Global War on Terror" paradigm was manufactured and developed over time to replace the Cold War paradigm in international relations, and 9/11 served as the "catalytic event" required to initiate it.  

In his book, The War on Truth: 9/11, Disinformation, and the Anatomy of Terrorism, Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed discusses in great detail the ideological foundations for the "Global War on Terror," beginning in the summer of 1979 at the aforementioned Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism, which was organized largely by current Israeli Prime Minister and major 9/11 war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu, who was working on behalf of The Jonathan Institute. The Jonathan Institute eventually published International Terrorism: Challenge and Response in 1981, which was edited by Netanyahu and consisted of the written or transcribed speeches of all the participants of the conference.

In the Forward of this book, we learn (bold and italics mine):

The Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism was conveyed by The Jonathan Institute on July 2-5, 1979 to focus public attention on the grave threat that international terrorism poses to all democratic societies, to study the real nature of today's terrorism, and to propose measures for combating and defeating the international terror movements. [...] 

It was the intolerable spectacle of legitimatization of terror groups and the frequent capitulation to their demands that made the Jerusalem Conference so necessary. The United Nations has proven itself to be hopelessly incapable of dealing with the problem. The Western governments themselves have too often tried to make their separate deals, fearing that a full-fledge battle against terrorists and their supporters could have negative economic or political consequences.

In the face of such paralysis, pusillanimity and impotence, the Jerusalem Conference was convened to begin the formulation of an anti-terror alliance in which all the democracies of the West must join.

Israel and Jewish intellectuals, politicians, and public policy makers not only intellectually manufactured and propagandized the "Global War on Terror" paradigm, Israel also geared it's economy towards the Homeland Security and police state industry shortly before 9/11, allowing them to capture this tyrannical and Orwellian market which exploded following 9/11. As I highlighted last week, virtually all surveillance technology, drone technology, and other Homeland Security related services and technologies are developed and sold by Israeli companies.

For further confirmation of this fact, check out what The Times of Israel is reporting this week:

There are two big “waves” set to hit Israeli hi-tech in the coming year, according to Gadi Tirosh, a general manager at venture capital fund Jerusalem Venture Partners. One wave will consist of new companies working in the cybersecurity space, as protecting government, enterprise, and consumers from hacking, online espionage, and cyber-terrorism becomes even more vital than in the past.

The second wave concerns the place where many of these security-oriented companies will set up shop — Beersheba, a city which will soon host many of the IDF’s advanced technology facilities. As the city grows, multinational giants, like Deutsche Telecom, Ness Technologies, EMC, and others are setting up R&D facilities in the city, drawing from the graduates of Ben Gurion University’s large body of engineering students.

It’s the perfect place, said Tirosh, for JVP to set up its new cybersecurity incubator. “As computer attacks get more sophisticated, they are more difficult to prevent,” Tirosh told the Times of Israel. “There is a big demand for advanced technology to keep cyberspace safe, and we are actively recruiting companies working in this space that have promising technologies. Beersheba, with its high-tech environment created by Ben Gurion University, the IDF’s large tech facilities, and international R&D facilities, will provide a very supportive environment for our startups. It’s a triangle that will benefit everyone involved,” Tirosh said. [...]

The cybersecurity incubator is new — and unique, said Tirosh, as JVP will be operating the only incubator in the world working with early stage companies in cybersecurity and big data (at least for now). But the incubator is not JVP’s first foray into cybersecurity; a graduate of the firm’s incubators, CyberArk, is now one of the world’s largest cybersecurity companies, offering a unique method to prevent hackers from even getting close to critical systems.

The companies that emerge from the incubator will become pillars of future cyber-defense efforts, said Tirosh. “We in Israel are as vulnerable to APT attacks as anyone else, but we have a good defense system, with government and private organizations working together to cyber-defend the country,” Tirosh said. “It’s a good model, one that we know our graduates will integrate into successfully.”

Also, please read Jewish journalist Max Blumenthal's piece at Mondoweiss entitled, "Meet the Israeli-linked firm that sold Big Brother machines to Mubarak, Qaddafi - and Washington," which further documents the Israeli connection to the NSA spy scandal I highlighted last week.  Israel and world Jewry are the driving force behind and prime beneficiaries of virtually every single form of tyranny we see in our world today.

Moving right along, two articles appeared in the Jewish press this past week which sought to further demonize "those evil Nazis" and perpetuate the lies told about the German military and their European allies during WWII.  The Times of Israel ran a headline entitled, "Friends and neighbors shocked by Minnesota man's Nazi past," which reported on Michael Karkoc, a Ukrainian American who allegedly "led an SS unit responsible for WWII atrocities," according to the headline.  The Jewish Daily Forward published an article entitled, "No. 1 Most-Wanted Hungarian Nazi Used Dog Whips on Jews," informing their readers "98-Year-Old Laszlo Csatary Will Finally Face Justice" in the sub-headline.

Organized Jewry will never stop promoting and propagandizing their fake history and alleged "persecution" at the hands of "those evil Nazis."  Honest and truthful individuals must expose and reject the Big Jewish Lies concerning WWII, Adolf Hitler, and National Socialist Germany, and that's what I'll continue to do here.

Speaking of all the Jewish lies endlessly disseminated about WWII, National Socialist Germany, Hitler, and the fake Jewish "Holocaust," check out this headline from the UK's The Daily Mail:

Just four days before the end of the war in Europe, a unit of Canadian soldiers was advancing through a thick forest in the north-east of Holland. Accompanying them was a member of the highly secret British Special Service Unit, a man called Joe Corry.

By any measure, Corry had had an eventful war. He had assassinated a Nazi scientist with a crossbow, watched D-Day from a house on the landing beaches, rescued the nuclear scientist J Robert Oppenheimer (the so-called father of the atom bomb) from Holland, attached limpet mines to U-boats, been shipwrecked off Newfoundland, and had even worked with the future James Bond author, Ian Fleming, himself an intelligence officer.

But despite everything he had seen, nothing could prepare Corry for what he would witness that day. For hidden deep in the forest was a Nazi ‘experimental’ extermination camp, the sight of which would remain with him for ever.

‘The living and dead evidence of horror and brutality beyond one’s imagination was there,’ wrote Corry years later. ‘People were lying, crawling and shuffling about, in stinking ankle-deep mud and human excrement.’

A young girl came up to him, crying for help, but there was little that Corry could do. A rabbi then approached and kissed the back of Corry’s hand, mumbling what Corry could only assume was a prayer.

As Corry walked around the camp, he was presented with increasingly horrific sights, including heaps of corpses and rows of ‘living skeletons’ crammed into blockhouses.

A few days later he returned, and saw two inmates tearing flesh from a long-dead horse and ‘gulping huge bites’.

What Corry saw that day nearly seven decades ago was an all-too-vivid example of the Holocaust, in which six million Jews were murdered on the orders of Adolf Hitler.

No wonder that earlier this year publishers Simon & Schuster jumped at the opportunity to re-issue his extraordinary memoir, first published to little fanfare in 1990.

The new edition, out in 2014, has been described by Corry’s editor as ‘everything you’d want to read in a World War II memoir — it’s a gripping, rollercoaster account of extreme bravery and resourcefulness, that also packs a powerful and emotional punch’.

There is, however, just one problem: it simply isn’t true.

There were no such ‘experimental extermination camps’ in Holland, and the concentration camps that had been on Dutch soil had been discovered well before May 4 — the day of the German surrender in Holland.

In fact, nearly everything Corry claims about his wartime experiences is fictitious. There was no ‘Special Service Unit’; Professor Oppenheimer was in the U.S. throughout the war; there were no British troops hiding in houses on the D-Day beaches.

The list of falsehoods is astonishing and blatant. [...]

Sadly, Corry’s tale is part of a growing problem within the publishing industry, which is selling to the public a growing number of ‘memoirs’ about the Holocaust and World War II that should really belong on the shelves marked ‘fiction’.

The article goes on to highlight other examples of "Holocaust" actors and fraud artists who have been paraded in front of the cameras or written fictitious "memoirs" or "biographies" to sell the fake Jewish "Holocaust" narrative to the world. Even mainstream, German-hating publications like The Daily Mail have to report on these liars. Truly amazing stuff folks. The bigger, more extravagant, and emotion-laden the lie, the more likely the public will accept it, as Adolf Hitler himself explained in Mein Kampf:

But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to Justice. All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.

From time immemorial; however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew "The Great Master of Lies". Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail.
- Adolf Hitler, quote from Mein Kampf (page 184-185)

Two other articles appearing in the Jewish press this past week sought to warn Jewry and the global public about the rise of "anti-Semitic" or "xenophobic" right wing political parties in Europe.  In the past, we've seen organized international Jewish political and financial interests pressure national governments in Europe to ban or outlaw nationalist political parties, such as the Golden Dawn in Greece and Jobbik in Hungry.

This week, The Times of Israel ran a headline entitled, "New anti-Semitic Polish party claims 'bad Jews' run the country," which lamented that a Polish court can’t "ban ‘Together Party of the Slavonic Empire,’ whose charter speaks of importance of ‘the Pole of true Slavonic blood’," according to the sub-headline.  Obviously, organized Jewry has a major problem with anyone or any organization openly exposing Jewish criminality and subversion, and works overtime to get them either banned, marginalized, or discredited.

The Jewish Daily Forward ran the rather ominous headline "The Specter of Xenophobia Stalks Europe: Radical Nationalism, Not Islam, Is Continent's Biggest Threat."  A major aspect of the Jew World Order agenda is the vehement demonization of nationalism and national sovereignty (at least for White European peoples), and the elimination of racial or national consciousness. European or White Nationalism is constantly equated with "hate" or "bigotry" or "xenophobia" in an attempt to marginalize or slander those of us with legitimate, rational, and healthy nationalist viewpoints.

To wrap this up, check out two of the leading headlines appearing this week in the Jewish owned and operated New York Times, the primary establishment-serving news outlet in America today.  Both articles were written by the Jew Adam Liptak, and provide discerning readers with an insight into the Jewish agenda in America.

The first headline, published on June 17th, is entitled, "Justices Block Law Requiring Voters to Prove Citizenship."  A brief excerpt:

The Supreme Court ruled on Monday in a 7-to-2 decision that Arizona may not require documentary proof of citizenship from people seeking to vote in federal elections there.

The ruling was the second in two terms to reject Arizona laws that the state’s officials justified as responses to illegal immigration. In both cases, the court insisted that the federal government has the dominant role when it comes to national issues like controlling the borders and how federal elections are conducted. [...]

The second headline was published yesterday, June 22nd, and is entitled, "Supreme Court Weights Cases Redefining Legal Equality." A brief excerpt:

Within days, the Supreme Court is expected to issue a series of decisions that could transform three fundamental social institutions: marriage, education and voting.

The extraordinary run of blockbuster rulings due in the space of a single week will also reshape the meaning of legal equality and help define for decades to come one of the Constitution’s grandest commands: “the equal protection of the laws.”

If those words require only equal treatment from the government, the rulings are likely to be a mixed bag that will delight and disappoint liberals and conservatives in equal measure. Under that approach, same-sex couples who want to marry would be better off at the end of the term, while blacks and Hispanics could find it harder to get into college and to vote.

But a tension runs through the cases, one based on different conceptions of equality. Some justices are committed to formal equality. Others say the Constitution requires a more dynamic kind of equality, one that takes account of the weight of history and of modern disparities.

The four major cases yet to be decided concern same-sex marriage, affirmative action in higher education and the fate of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which places special burdens on states with a history of racial discrimination.

Formal equality would require that gay couples be treated just like straight couples when it comes to marriage, white students just like black students when it comes to admissions decisions and Southern states just like Northern ones when it comes to federal oversight of voting. The effect would be to help gay couples, and hurt blacks and Latinos.

But such rulings — “liberal” when it comes to gay rights, “conservative” when it comes to race — are hard to reconcile with the historical meaning of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause, adopted in the wake of the Civil War and meant to protect the newly freed black slaves.

The agendas being promoted by organized Jewry - amnesty for illegal aliens, "equal rights" for faggots and lesbians, elevation of "minorities" over White Americans, federal tyranny and suppression of states' rights, etc. - are totally un-American and unacceptable to me and millions of other people in the United States.  Let me know what you think in the comment section.

Posted by John Friend

2011-11-22 Oslo/Utøya 7/22 False Flag Terror: It now appears extremely likely that the real "usual suspects," that is, Mossad-CIA-MI6 "Wise Guys" with the New York 9/11, Madrid 3/22, and London 7/7 "resume," decided it was time to punish Norwegian "heretics." Another open source intelligence summary page with social commentary by William B. Fox. This addresses a much broader sociological picture than simply the rise of Zionist power, such as the extent to which WASP disorientation and a lack of real cohesion and unity has lead to steady WASP decline in the last 150 years in the face of the rise of the totally corrupt Jewish-Catholic political machines that took over major American cities in the early 20th century. The Vatican, which has often been infiltrated by Jews, has often worked with Jews to reverse the Protestant Reformation in America as well as the American Revolution. This web page links to the online ebook version of the classic work The Disppossessed Majority which explains WASP decline in greater detail. The following are some other chapters in the Mission of Conscience series that help explain the rise of Jewish power from either a macro economic and financial perspective, or help us better undersand the Jewish system of Liberal Minority Coalition alliances that has steadily waged stealth warfare against declining WASP America.

Chapter 33 Wall Street Coup de Etat and Banker False Flags Against America. This provides important insights into how the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Banking System in 1913 provided critical financial rocket fuel to aid the envelopment of America by high level Jews and their minions.
Chapter 34 Saving Dr. Toben, Handling Real Nazis, and Countering the Holocaustianity Intellectual Blackjack. The section "Handling Real Nazis" talks about how certain Irish, Italian, and other Catholics have often played a key role as "front men" and "muscle" for Jewish power in America in places like New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles.
 Chapter 38 Pittsburgh False Flag "Anarchists," Cyber Militia, and the Principles of Info War. Among other things, this chapter looks at the four generations of warfare paradigm advocated by William S. Lind and other military analysts to explain how Jews may be viewed as the "Mongols of covert 4th generation warfare."

2011-03-25 The 3-11 2011 Tohoku Quake-Tsunami-Nuclear Catastrophe: LIHOP or MIHOP "False Flags" or Something Else? This open source intelligence and alternative media summary page provides compelling evidence that the same ultra high level criminal cabal that brought us the BP-Gulf Catastrophe, America's (in all probability) unconstitutional illegal alien Mossad-CIA-asset President, and the 9/11 "inside job" is at again, only this time around helping to precipitate a runaway nuclear melt-down situation in Japan that is now blanketing America with "low level radiation" fallout. As bad as things are now, they could get even worse if malefactors decide to precipitate major earthquakes and nuclear power plant meltdowns along the West Coast or near the New Madrid Fault in the Mid-West roughly paralleling the Mississippi River.
2010-07-06 (or thereabout) The root of all evil - the deceptive smokescreen of Jewish pseudonyms by John Kaminski
2010-06-25 "Israel Is A Lunatic State." A Jewish commentator named Norman Finklestein explains why Israel consciously tries to act like a lunatic, mad dog state:

"Israel Is a Lunatic State"

 

2010-05-30 Iceland Gets `ENRONed," Then Goes for `1776' A paleoconservative country analysis by William B. Fox about Jewish subversion of a Nordic country that let its guard down.
Part I: Introduction and Overview
Part II:
Act I: The "Bagel Western:" The "Good" Go Astray, and the Ideological Degradation of Iceland's "Immune System"
Act II: Enter "The Bad" and "The Ugly;" Alien "Pathogens"
Infiltrate and Inflame Iceland
Act III: Icelanders Leap Into Global Financial "Berserkerdom-Chutzpah"and "Zombie March" into an Icelandic Financial Version of "Stalingrad II"
Act IV: The City of London "Pulls the Trigger" On Iceland, While the U.S. Financiers Ignore Iceland and Rescue the "Better Connected"
Act V: Developing a Viable "Work Out" Strategy: As the City of London, IMF, EU, and Other Sharks Circle Closer
Act VI: Thinking Outside the Box: Populist Revolt, Female Prime Minister, Referendum, Modern Media Initiative...Global Activism?
Part III: Are Icelanders victims of high level subversion? A "False Flag" Analysis
Part IV: What nationalist principles might have defended Icelanders?
Part V: What can we do?
Part VI: References and Appendices
2009-08-27 Donald Bostrom Swedish Journalist on Israeli organ harvesting at vodpod.co
2008-03-27 Before Rockefeller, There Was Rothschild by Deanna Spingola

1984 The World Order: A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism The history and practices of the parasitic financial elite by Eustace Mullins. An online version of a classic book.

Catholic Allies of the Jewish New World Order

2012-07-04 Anti-WASP/Anti-Nordic Genocide. This web page is a compilation of material I have previously created on other web pages, to include Oslo-Utoya 7-22. This includes an extended essay where I explain how Italian and Irish Catholics served as critically important front men and muscle for Jews in big cities like New York City and Chicago during their rise to power in the late 19th and early to mid 20th centuries. As another significant factoid, the Vatican has always had a reputation for operating one of the greatest intelligence networks in the world. Roman Catholics are also very organized and potent and well-funded, just like Jews. In fact, at times the highest levels of the Vatican have been infiltrated by Jews. During the 19th century, the Rothschilds were primary bankers for the Vatican. In Chapter 29 Candidate Klock, The Spook Nuke Threat and the Ron Paul Libertarian Revolution I provide the following example of Jewish infiltration -- and Catholic collaboration:

People like Rudy Giuliani and Mayor Richard Daley of Chicago raise important sociological issues that lie just below the water line of controlled national media coverage in America. Please recollect that Richard Daley of Chicago was in Israel during the May 2-4, 2006 Chicago Sears Tower alert period, as discussed in Chapter 19.
Giuliani, Silverstein, and Daley reinforce the theme that with the decline of the former WASP majority in America, America has reversed much of the American Revolution and Protestant Reformation on a deep sociological basis, and the U.S. Government is increasingly taking on all the characteristics of the totally corrupt Roman Catholic Church of the late Middle Ages. Many scholarly works reinforce this theme, to include the Dispossessed Majority by Wilmot Robertson, and the Passing of the Great Race by Madison Grant. The Wikipedia article "Anti-Catholicism" quotes Thomas Jefferson as follows: " "History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government,"^[13] and, "In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own."^[14]
I discovered while living amidst "unmeltable ethnics" in New York City for ten years that on a sociological basis, many Italian and Irish Catholics communities are about halfway between WASPs and Jews in terms of family structures, basic values, and modus operandi. Frequently both Italian and Irish Catholics brag about how wonderfully well they get along with Jews, to include Boston Irish Catholics who supported Senator Kennedy when he allied himself with the Jewish ADL and opened up the floodgates of Third World immigration in the mid 1960's. Often in American politics we see Catholic groups waffle back and forth in their loyalties between WASPs and Jews similar to the way in Latin American politics one frequently sees mulatoes waffle between whites and blacks, or mestizoes waffle between whites and Indians.
One reason why my fellow Nordic and Nordic-Celtic Americans in the heartland remain so horribly naive and disinformed is because elite Jews have surrounded themselves with many Irish and Italian Catholic front men who publicly pooh-pooh all "conspiracy theories," no matter how real. The Dispossessed Majority quotes an individual who referred to the mafia in America as a happy marriage between Jewish brains and Italian brawn. In the "Obvious Goats" section of his book The Judas Goats, Michael Collins Piper identifies Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity as two examples of Fox News "face men" who have disgraced fellow Irish Catholic Americans on account their pro-Zionist toadying.
It gets worse. In Chapter 19 "Zionist Spy Inside the Vatican" of The Judas Goats, p. 189, Piper describes Zionist hijacking of Vatican II by a spy named Malachi Martin:

It was Cincinnati-based Lawrence W. Patterson who was apparently the first-ever national publisher to unveil Martin as the so-called “priest-spy”inside the Vatican who, in Patterson’s words, was the key figure in “saving the Vatican II documents which have since been used to begin the attempted melding of Zionism and Catholicism. ”
In the April 1991 issue of his magazine Criminal Politics, Patterson called Martin the magazine’s “fake conservative of the month, fronting for the Trilateral/Zionist cause, ” and outlined the explosive evidence indicting Martin...
...Relying largely on an indubitably “mainstream” article, “How the Jews Changed Catholic Thinking” by Joseph Roddy — published in the January 25, 1966 issue of the now-defunct Look magazine — Patterson pointed out that the Look article revealed quite candidly that a priest working inside the Vatican was shuttling back and forth between Rome and New York during the Vatican II proceedings.
The priest was providing inside information about proposed
Catholic Church “reforms” to not only The New York Times, but also to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith and the American Jewish Committee and its magazine, Commentary.
Then,as the article noted, this confidential information leaked from inside the Vatican was then used to pressure the Vatican into making major changes in church policy.
The Look author would not identify the priest by his real name,
referring only to him as “Timothy Fitzharris-O’Boyle, ”but also explained that this priest also wrote for Commentary under the name “F. E. Cartus” and had written a book, entitled The Pilgrim, under the name “Michael Serafian. ”
(The Pilgrim was a 1964 book, rushed into print, according to
Michael A. Hoffman II, for the very purpose of divulging efforts by traditionalists inside the Vatican to counter the proposed revolution in church teachings.)
As Lawrence Patterson’s investigation determined, when Malachi Martin (by then an internationally-known writer) released his 1974 book, The New Castle, a filler page listing “books by Malachi Martin”indicated that Martin had written the forementioned book, The Pilgrim,“under the pseudonym, Michael Serafian.”...
And as if Patterson’s revelations (based on Martin’s own published acknowledgment) are not enough evidence that he was indeed the “priest-spy” inside the Vatican, a July 31, 1999 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel obituary for Martin said that he had published The Pilgrim under the “Michael Serafian” pseudonym.
Almost immediately after completing his subversive ventures inside the Vatican, Martin left the priesthood and went to New York where he began writing for the American Jewish Committee’s Commentary (under his real name) and acting as “religious editor” for William F. Buckley, Jr.’s National Review. In the years that followed, Martin’s novels and other works received widespread international promotion in the organs of the major media, making Martin almost certainly a multi-millionaire...
...The damage done to the church by the revolutionary conclave known as Vatican II may never be undone and the future will remember Malachi Martin as a treacherous Judas Goat of the worst order.

According to a footnote provided by Piper to an illustration of Pope Paul VI on page 190 of The Judas Goats, even the Pope himself during Vatican II had suspicious Jewish connections:

 

* BETTER KNOWN UNDER HIS TITLE of Pope Paul VI—under which name he implemented the controversial Vatican II “reforms” that re-directed and distorted traditional Roman Catholic doctrine—at a time when Judas Goat Malachi Martin (see accompanying chapter) was acting as an agent inside the Vatican II conference on behalf of Zionist interests. On more than one occasion Montini (above) publicly wore the Freemasonic emblem known as the “ephod,” the symbol worn by Caiaphus, the Jewish High Priest who ordered the death of Jesus Christ. Montini’s ephod can be seen (circled) at the bottom of his portrait. At right is an ephod in which Hebrew letters can clearly be seen at the top. Said to be of Jewish extraction, Montini was buried Jewish-style, in a plain wooden box, in a ceremony at the Vatican which featured not a single crucifix. Many traditionalist Catholics consider Montini a Judas Goat. Zionist interests have also forcefully infiltrated Protestant fundamentalist churches, promoting the “dispensationalist” doctrine, first cooked up by John Darby in the 1840’s and then widely promoted in the 20th century by Cyrus Scofield, whose famous “Scofield Reference Bible” was financed by the Zionist Rothschild family-funded Oxford University Press in London. Today, Rothschild-sponsored “dispensationalism” dictates the pro-Zionist stance of the so-called “Christian Right,” a major influence in the Republican Party. Thus, an alliance between Radical Judaism and Radical Christianity is responsible for the misconduct of U.S. foreign policy for the benefit of the Zionist imperium under President George W. Bush, a fervent disciple of dispensationalism surrounded by Zionist fanatics.

 

In more recent years, we have also seen disturbing evidence of high level Zionist subversion of the Catholic Church. In his May 2, 2008 article "Pope Affirms Jewish Noahide Laws # 55," Brother Nathanael Kapner wrote:

JEWS HAVE FOUND AN ALLY in Pope Benedict XVI. Following in the steps of his predecessor, Pope John Paul II, who officially recognized modern day Jews as the ‘Chosen People of God’ Here, Pope Benedict is fulfilling the same role of pandering to the Jews.
In his recent visit to America from April 15-20 2008, Pope Benedict met with representatives of the Jewish community on the eve of the Jewish Passover on April 18 2008 at 5 PM Here and reiterated that they are God’s “chosen” - of which any thinking Sunday School student would easily refute Here! The Pope said:
— “Shalom! It is with joy that I come here just a few hours before the celebration of your Passover to assure you of my prayers as you recall the wonders God performed in liberating His *chosen people.*” — Here
In a Bilateral Commission Meeting between the Vatican delegation and the Chief Rabbi Shear Yashuv Cohen in Jerusalem in 2007 Here an agreement was made which recognized that “Jewish tradition emphasizes the Noachide Covenant as containing the universal moral code which is incumbent upon all humanity.” (Cf Genesis 9).
So then? Not only are Jews “absolved” by the Vatican of their guilt for crucifying the Messiah Jesus — now Pope Benedict recognizes their leadership since they are the “Chosen People of God” and that the “Noahide Laws are Jewish tradition.” Hence who will ultimately be the moral authority that governs the so-called Noahide Laws? Jews, that’s who. Anti-Christian Jews!

Fortunately, we are beginning to see signs of a turn-around. On his Republic Broadcasting Network talk show, Michael Collins Piper has spoken with many Catholic callers who expressed concern about longstanding Rothschild involvement in Vatican finances, as well as possible Zio-Communist infiltration during Vatican II and other eras...

2012-06-23 How Racial Realities in Europe and Theories of Entrepreneurial Business Competition Provide Important Perspectives to Help Diagnose "What Is Ailing America". This is an extended essay that I have added to my Articles Archive web page.
2012-05-31 Government and Major Media Denial and Cover-ups Regarding Chernobyl and Fukushima Radiation: How Americans Have Been Brainwashed Into Thinking They Still Live in a Free Society and How `Deep' or `Mobile Defense' Tactical Concepts Have Been Used to Control Them. This is the most recent update of my special essay provided on my Chernobyl Catastrophe web page.
2011-07-29 Alex Jones Connection to Project Mockingbird through Pat Buchanan and Thomas Braden, rumormillnews.com. This web page includes a video that exposes Jesuit infiltration of America's power centers. While it does not talk about Jews, there is no question that various Catholic orders and Jews have been close collaborators in major subversive operations throughout many periods in history. For example, Chapter 32 Neo-Con Bloodying of the Russian Bear and Putin vs. the New World Order, I mention the great Cossack leader Bohdan Khmelytsky, who defeated Polish efforts to conquor the Ukraine. The Wikipedia article on this leader describes the perception held by many Russian and Ukrianian nationalists that Jews and Jesuits worked together to subvert Ukraine in preparation for Polish Catholic conquest and marginalization of the Eastern Orthodox Church.

....Khmelnytsky was viewed as a national hero of Russia for bringing Ukraine into the "eternal union" of all the Russias — Great, Little and White Russia. As such, he was much respected and venerated in Imperial Russia. His role was presented as a model for all Ukrainians to follow — to aspire for closer ties with Great Russia. This view was expressed in a monument commissioned by the Russian nationalist Mikhail Yuzefovich, which was installed in the center of Kiev in 1888[24][25]
The original variant of the monument (created by Russian sculptor Mikhail Mikeshin) appeared too xenophobic even for the Russian authorities, as it was to depict a vanquished Pole, Jew, and a Catholic priest under the hoofs of the horse. A more moderate version was installed, but the inscription on the monument read "To Bogdan Khmelnitsky from one and indivisible Russia."

As another interesting example, the Norwegian Constitution of 17 May 1814, considered one of the most democratic instruments of its era, specifically forbade Jews and Jesuits from entering Norway, obviously viewing both as dangerous fifth columnists. The Wikipedia article notes:

...A relic from the earlier laws of Denmark-Norway, Paragraph 2 originally read, "The Evangelical-Lutheran religion remains the public religion of the State. Those inhabitants, who confess thereto, are bound to raise their children to the same. Jesuits and monastic orders are not permitted. Jews are still prohibited from entry to the Realm." In 1851 the last sentence was struck after the Norwegian poet Henrik Wergeland had campaigned for the rights of the Jews, and in 1897 also the next but last sentence. Monastic orders were permitted 1897, but the ban on Jesuits was only lifted 1956.

 

Videos

 

Please visit the Alex Jones discussion in the "Libertarian" section of the web page "Reconciling Libertarianism and Nationalism." Alex Jones has been a leading producer of documentaries that examine the New World Order power structure, to include Don't Tread on Me: Rise of the Republic (May 2010), Police State 4: The Rise of FEMA (April 2010), Invisible Empire A New World Order Defined (produced with Jason Bermas, April 2010), Terror Storm II (Feb 2010, Terror Storm I first released July 2006), Endgame (Nov 2009), Fall of the Republic (Oct 2009), and The Obama Deception (March 2009), 9/11 -The Road to Tyranny (Feb 2007). Jones was executive producer for 9/11 Truth classic Loose Change Final Cut (Feb 2007).

 

2010-01-28. Jim Cramer states: “You know what, the Bavarian Illuminati, the Trilateral Commission, Goldman Sachs, & The Queen of England are not all bad!

Secret Societies Bilderberg Group Jesse Ventura Tru TV, 2010
Part-2 Part-3 Part-4 Part-5 Part-6 Premiered: Wed, December 30 at 10P Show notes state: "They're thought to be a group of the world's elite who meet once a year at a luxury hotel and decide how they will run the world. It's believed they plan to thin out the population through disease-and vaccines. Jesse Ventura infiltrates the Bilderberg Group." Also available on YouTube, as provided below:

2009-12-30 Jesse Ventura Conspiracy Theory - Secret Societies - EPISODE 5

Jesse Ventura Conspiracy Theory - Secret Societies - Part 1, see also Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5; "Secret Societies, Premiered Wed, December 30, 2009 at 10P They're thought to be a group of the world's elite who meet once a year at a luxury hotel and decide how they will run the world. It's believed they plan to thin out the population through disease-and vaccines. Jesse Ventura infiltrates the Bilderberg Group."

 

Books Online

The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed
Behind Communism by Frank L. Britton
The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel by Jack Bernstein
Jewish Ritual Murder by Arnold Leese
The Talmud Unmasked by Rev. I. B. Pranaitis
1995 Bloodlines of the Illuminati (pdf) by Fritz Springmeier [Editor's Note: I heard the Alex Jones interview of Springmeier on the second hour of his Friday, 27 Jan 2012 talk show and this sounds like a work that has impressed many people, particularly Christians. This, like The Curse of Canaan by Eustace Mullins listed below, is an example of a Christian interpretation of the history of "Satanic" dynastic activity, to include the use of secret societies. Even if one were to disagree with Springmeier on his Christian interpretation of various "Satanic" or occult practices (as I do myself with my secular interpretation of history), there is an underlying thread of logic that gives credibility to the idea that various ruling elites engage in occult/secret society practices. To the extent that they embrace an "Asiatic-despotic" or pyramidal-authoritarian social model, they need various means to rule through fear, deception, and to enforce dynastic group loyalty and secrecy. In essence, they are simply mafia or CIA-type gangs who need psychological aids to continuously engage in whatever cruel and manipulative practices they feel are necessary to keep up appearances, stay in control, and keep the "masses" in line. They engage in various forms of ritual symbolism that reinforce their sense of superiority and will to power, as well as reinforce their willingness to be as cold and ruthless as they feel is necessary to always stay in control of other people. No room for silliness!].
1987 The Curse of Canaan (pdf) by Eustace Mullins. [Ed. Note: Like Bloodlines of the Illuminati listed above, this is another example of a classic Christian interpretation of dynasties that utilize occultic-type PSYOPS to maintain control. It does not list references. On an intellectual level I think there are some good leads and insights sprinkled inside these types of books, but finding them is like picking and choosing while bargain-hunting at a rummage sale].

 

Books

Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy by Michael Collins Piper
The Golem: A World Held Hostage . . . Israel’s Nuclear Hell Bomb and the Road to Global Armageddon by Michael Collins Piper
The New Babylon by Michael Collins Piper
The New Jerusalem by Michael Collins Piper
9-11 Evil by Victor Thorn. See reviews by John Kaminski, John Tiffany, and others.
Under the sign of the Scorpion- the Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire by Jüri Lina

 

Miscellaneous Web Sites

firstlightforum.com
americanfreepress.net
davidduke.com
nationalvanguard.org
americafirstinstitute.com
infowars.com

Flag carried by the 3rd Maryland Regiment at the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781

© America First Books
America First Books offers many viewpoints that are not necessarily its own in order to provide additional perspectives.