.
 The
massive Jewish-Catholic influx started with the major immigration
of Irish Catholics following the Potato Famine of the 1840's, and
culminated with the immigration tidal waves of Italian Catholics
from southern Italy, Jews from Eastern Europe, and other non-WASPs
in the late 19th century. Irish, Italian, and Polish Catholics formed
a tight political alliance under "Big Boss"/Tammany Hall-type
political machines that gained control over big cities such as New
York, Boston, and Chicago. Catholics became the front men and muscle
for the Jews as part of what effectively became a Jewish-Catholic
stealth takeover of the United States.
This
alliance became especially dangerous when it became backed by the
fiat money creation capabilities of both the Rothschild / City of
London-controlled Bank of England established in the late 17th century
and the privately owned Federal Reserve Banking System set up in
the U.S. in 1913. (For more on the tight Jewish-Catholic alliance,
please see my "Pat Buchanan" section on my Libertarianism
vs. Nationalism web page. "Fiat money" means
the ability to create money and credit out of thin air by command
or "fiat." When governments pay their bills through "fiat
money," this is often called "legalized counterfeiting"
by conservative economists. Please see The Money Masters
video, cited elsewhere in this article, for a primer on the history
of the Jewish-controlled central banks in the UK and U.S., or the
book The
Creature From Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin
which is an extremely well written introduction to the sordid history
of the Federal Reserve).
It
is important to note that Jews had already established powerful
positions in the UK and America prior to the massive Jewish-Catholic
influx of the late 19th century. As noted in Chapter
Five of my Mission
of Conscience
series where I quote from the invaluable work The
New Babylon by Michael Collins Piper, Jews had
already established very powerful positions in many European countries
by the 19th century. In the 17th century, Jews dominated all the
trades in Poland and reduced the common people to the worst form
of slavery in Europe. They dominated the banking system in the Netherlands,
and within decades after Oliver Cromwell readmitted Jews to Britain
in the 1650's, they set up the privately-owned central bank called
the Bank of England. Jews also began to intermarry with the British
royalty and ultimately came to dominate the UK as well. (See The
Nameless War (PDF) by Capt. Archibald Ramsey, former
Member of the British Parliament, for more details, archived at
iamthewitness.com).
Ever
since the 1650's, when the Director General of New Netherlands named
Peter Stuyvesant unsuccessfully tried to expel
Jews from New Amsterdam (later renamed New York City),
only to discover that these Jews had powerful "backup"
among their co-tribalists in the Netherlands, Jews have exerted
a significant influence in America behind the scenes. They were
major
ringleaders behind the slave trade to the Americas,
and their British counterparts made three major attempts to permanently
fasten a privately owned central bank on the United States in the
late 18th and early 19th centuries.
In Chapter
33 of my Mission of Conscience series, I provide
script extracts from the landmark video "The
Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of America"
(Duration: 3:35:19). The last major successful effort to rescind
a central bank prior to the War Against Southern Independence was
accomplished by President Andrew Jackson, who narrowly escaped an
assassination attempt that involved two misfired pistols at close
range that Jackson believed was meant to thwart his efforts against
the central bank. According to Andrew Hitchcock in "The
History of
the House of Rothschild", Oct 31, 2009, "President
Jackson would later claim that he knew the Rothschilds were responsible
for that attempted assassination. He is not the only one, the assassin,
Richard Lawrence, who was found not guilty by reason of insanity,
later bragged that powerful people in Europe had hired him and promised
to protect him if he were caught."
It
is also worth noting that Rothschilds/City of London were able to
muscle in on the development of the railroads and oil industries
in America in the 19th century, and helped exacerbate the animosities
between North and South that erupted into America's bloodiest conflict.
There
is strong evidence that American Revolution and War of 1812 never
really ended, and a combination of global Jewish financial power
and British imperialism (united together as a form of "British
Israel") was always feverishly working behind the scenes
to find ways to corrupt the U.S. government, destabilize America,
and take whatever other measures might be necessary to bring those
"impudent American rebels and colonial rascals" under
control. The British establishment was always nervous about what
Yanks south of the border of its Commonwealth Holding of Canada
were up to and always wanted its "colonies" back. After
all, the U.S. had invaded Canada both during the War of Independence
and the War of 1812, threatened war over the location of the border
between what is today Washington State and Canada (54-40
or Fight!), and the potential rise of American naval
power threatened Britannia's global rule over the waves. Irish Catholics
in America had even staged
their own military invasion of Canada in 1866.
The grand slam for the covert British-Israel stealth reconquest
of America took place when J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Paul
Warburg, and other Rothschild/City of London agents created the
privately owned Federal Reserve Banking System in 1913 (Again, please
see The Money Masters video or Chapter
33 of my Mission of Conscience
series for details). Elite Jews used their new financial muscle
and Catholic front men to take over major American newspapers and
Hollywood. (For details, see The
International Jew by Henry Ford). British-Israel
also shanghaied America into WWI on the British side under phony
pretexts as part of the Balfour Declaration that recognized Palestine
as a homeland for Jews. (Please see my discussion of this sordid
affair midway through my article "Thomas
Jefferson and the `Incredible Truth' about Bush Cabal Wise Guys
and False Flag Nukes," Sept 30, 2007). Plutocratic
Jews in New York City and London also played a key role in financing
and providing the Jewish talent behind the Bolshevik Revolution
(please see "Background
to Treason, Part 2" by Dr. William L. Pierce),
whose reign of terror wound up killing something approximating 60 million eastern
European gentiles (as estimated by Alexandr Solzhenitsyn).
At this point, if the reader has been following my discussion closely,
he or she will probably wonder: "If Irish Catholics hated the
British enough to conduct
a military invasion of Canada in 1866, why would they
serve as front men and muscle for the British-Israel stealth takeover
of America? After all, weren't the Rothschilds / City of London
ultimately in charge of trade in the UK and Ireland when the Irish
experienced the horrific potato famine-genocide of the 1840's?
For those unfamiliar with the potato famine, please consider the
following extract from the article "Food
Exports From Ireland During the Famine Years (1845-1849)":
Cecil Woodham-Smith, considered the preeminent authority on the
Irish Famine, wrote in The Great Hunger; Ireland 1845-1849 that,
"...no issue has provoked so much anger or so embittered relations
between the two countries (England and Ireland) as the indisputable
fact that huge quantities of food were exported from Ireland to
England throughout the period when the people of Ireland were dying
of starvation."
"Although the potato crop failed, the country was still producing
and exporting more than enough grain crops to feed the population.
But that was a 'money crop' and not a 'food crop' and could not
be interfered with."
According to John Mitchel, quoted by Woodham-Smith, "Ireland
was actually producing sufficient food, wool and flax, to feed and
clothe not nine but eighteen millions of people," yet a ship
sailing into an Irish port during the famine years with a cargo
of grain was "sure to meet six ships sailing out with a similar
cargo."
One of the most remarkable facts about the famine period is that
there was an average monthly export of food from Ireland worth 100,000
Pound Sterling. Almost throughout the five-year famine, Ireland
remained a net exporter of food.
Dr. Christine Kinealy, a fellow at the University of Liverpool and
the author of two scholarly texts on the Irish Famine: This Great
Calamity and A Death-Dealing Famine, says that 9,992 calves were
exported from Ireland to England during "Black'47", an
increase of thirty-three percent from the previous year. In the
twelve months following the second failure of the potato crop, 4,000
horses and ponies were exported. The export of livestock to Britain
(with the exception of pigs) increased during the "famine".
The export of bacon and ham increased. In total, over three million
live animals were exported from Ireland between 1846-50, more than
the number of people who emigrated during the famine years.
Dr. Kinealy's most recent work is documented in the spring, 1998
issue of "History Ireland". She states that almost 4,000
vessels carried food from Ireland to the ports of Bristol, Glasgow,
Liverpool and London during 1847, when 400,000 Irish men, women
and children died of starvation and related diseases. The food was
shipped under guard from the most famine-stricken parts of Ireland:
Ballina, Ballyshannon, Bantry, Dingle, Killala, Kilrush, Limerick,
Sligo, Tralee and Westport.
Here is an interesting quote: "[Existing policies] will not
kill more than one million Irish in 1848 and that will scarcely
be enough to do much good." - Queen Victoria's economist, Nassau
Senior. (From "Anti-Irish
quotes throughout history").
It looks to me like there is strong circumstantial evidence that
the Rothschilds / City of London deliberately implemented a depopulation,
destabilization, and degradation agenda for Ireland. It also looks
to me like they are doing the same kind of thing today with the
populations of Japan, North America, and Europe. Among other things,
they are using their controlled media to ignore Fukushima and other
environmental dangers so that the general population remains blissfully
ignorant of the way it is getting continually dosed with radionuclides
and myriad other poisons.
Again,
I raise the question, why would Irish Catholics in America during
the late 19th century and throughout most of the 20th century want
to collaborate with one of their most criminally dangerous, evil
enemies against WASPs, especially given that Nordic peoples have
done a lot of good things for Ireland such as found Dublin during
the Viking era and provide a disproportionate number of intellectuals?
How could Irish Catholics be so short-sighted and stupid?
One of the first thoughts that comes to mind in trying to answer
this question is the old joke, "God invented whiskey to prevent
the Irish from taking over the world." Perhaps hard liquor
has also prevented the Irish from figuring out who their worst enemies
are. ("I'm
in Brigadoon--Irish Drinking and Irish Pubs: Irish
drinking is good and bad," psychologytoday.com,
May 30, 2008 comments "If God were designing a way of drinking,
it wouldn't be the Irish way. The Irish have the lowest rate of
daily drinking (2% of men) and the highest rate of binge drinking.
(Half of men) in Europe. Low levels of daily drinking prolong life
and intellectual acuity; binge drinking accomplishes the reverse").
Given
my pro-indigenous Indo-European religious orientation (discussed
later in this article regarding the old Norse religion of Asatru),
I am also of the opinion that the Roman Catholic Church has done
much more harm than good to the Irish during their tragic history.
Apparently most Irish continue to embrace the worst kinds of Christian
and Jewish enemies, and hence become their own worst enemies. (Mike
or Valgard Murray, an Irishman who founded the Asatru
Alliance, probably agrees with me on this issue since
he has referred to Christianity as a "Semitic Slave God Religion.")
Irish-Americans have paid dearly for their inability to identify
their worst enemies even in more recent times. For example, in the
book Final
Judgment by Michael Collins Piper, we learn about
the primary role of Israel and its Mossad in the assassination of
President John F. Kennedy. In the Pat Buchanan section of my Libertarianism
vs. Nationalism web page, I quote from a Buchanan article
that describes how the Democratic Party in America, which is financially
controlled by Jews, has stabbed the Irish Catholics in the back
in favor of other minorities now that they are now no longer as
useful today as they were a hundred years ago.
Jewish
control over Catholics early in the 20th century was certainly assisted
by Jewish control over big city political machines as well as central
banks. (See How
Jews Ruled and Ruined Tammany Hall, The Dearborn
Independent, 24 September 1921).
We
also learn in The
New Babylon how the Rothschilds managed Vatican
finances in the 19th century (probably in the 20th century as well).
In Chapter
29 of my Mission of Conscience series I provide
excerpts from Michael Collins Piper's The
Judas Goats and the works of Brother Nathanael
Kapner that explain Jewish control within the Vatican since WWII.
Admittedly,
the Vatican has played some complex games that have helped disguise
the "hidden hand" of Jewish control. On the one hand,
it supported Fascists and Nazis against Communists in many European
countries, such as in Germany, Italy, and Spain in the 1930's, but
at the same time supported the Jewish-Catholic alliance against
WASPs in America (despite the fact that Jews were the primary force
that funded and led Bolshevism) in order to boost Catholic power
and Catholic Third World immigration into America. As two interesting
examples of Catholic two-handedness, Rev. Charles Coughlin was able
to speak out to millions over the radio about the evils of the Federal
Reserve and other Jewish influences in the 1930's, but then was
ordered to permanently shut up by the Catholic hierarchy in the
1940's.
In
Appendix
A to Part
VI my Oslo-Utoya
7-22 series, I note how Catholics have tended to create
a "blur" in American politics by swinging back and forth
between WASPs and Jews, similar to the way Mestizos have historically
created ambiguity and uncertainty in Latin American politics by
swinging back and forth in their loyalties between descendents of
the original Spanish settlers and Indians (this is explained in
greater detail in The Rising Tide of Color by Dr. Lothrop
Stoddard). Mulattos have likewise tended to swing between whites
and Negroes (see, for example, The French Revolution in Santo
Domingo by Dr. Lothrop Stoddard where this swinging behavior
proved deadly for French whites who were ultimately exterminated
by blacks in what is today Haiti).
There
is also evidence that elite Jews came up with special "sweeteners"
to keep Catholics on board on board with them in America in the
early to mid-20th century. The Rothschilds/City of London probably
cut a deal with Irish Catholics in America whereby they would permit
Ireland to win its War
of Independence (1919-1921) in return for Irish Catholic
support for the Jewish Federal Reserve Bank takeover and the "Liberal
Minority Coalition" agenda in America. Interestingly enough,
the British establishment even went so far as to hand over British
naval bases to Ireland in 1938, a concession so extreme that
it shocked Winston Churchill.
Similarly,
Jews in America and Britain also probably cut a deal with Italian
Catholics. In return for continued Italian Catholic support in America,
they would prevent Italy from going communist. Hence, arch Zionist
Ze'ev
Jabotinsky would serve as a "Good Cop" by
supporting Mussolini and his rabidly anti-communist and pro-Catholic
Fascist movement, while Jewish Bolsheviks from Moscow were busy
playing "Bad Cop" in Spain by supporting the Communist
takeover bid that included executing priests and nuns before firing
squads and engaging in other "Red
Terror" activities, all of which played a significant
role in magnifying the bloodshed and bitterness of the Spanish
Civil War. Polish Catholics in America were probably
also bought off when Poland was generously awarded major territories
via the Versailles Treaty. After all, President Woodrow Wilson's
administration from
its inception was heavily advised by Jews, and his
delegation to Paris to negotiate the Versailles Treaty
was
no exception.
The Jewish-dominated Tammany-Hall/"Boss
Hogg" type patronage political machines that gained control
over major American big cities by the early 20th century began to
thoroughly infest the highest levels of the Federal Government as
well. Prime examples include the Woodrow Wilson and FDR administrations
(See President
Franklin D. Roosevelt's Jewish Cabal by VNN Network).
Let's
not forget the Jewish-Catholic collaboration that unleashed unlimited
Third World (mostly Catholic) immigration into America beginning
in the mid-1960's In Godfather
of the Immigration Mess -- Edward Kennedy, freerepublic.com,
Nov 7, 1994, we see how the Irish Catholic U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy
collaborated with the ADL and other nefarious Jewish organizations
to open up America's borders. It is worth noting that Ted's brother
John F. Kennedy had also collaborated with the ADL when he published
the pro-Third World immigration propaganda piece A
Nation of Immigrants in 1958).
In essence what Imperial Rome could not in accomplish in Germany
following their defeat
in the Teutoburg Forest, or the Catholic crusades could not
accomplish in eastern Europe against the armies of Alexander
Nevsky and Bohdan
Khmelnytsky, or the Spanish Armada could not accomplish in Britain
before the British naval forces of Sir Francis Drake, or the Catholic
Hapsburgs could not accomplish in Northern Europe against Protestant
forces commanded by Gustavus
Adolphus of Sweden, the Jewish-Catholic alliance has been able
to accomplish through stealth, deception, and financial fraud in
America.
Instead
of a traditional Nordic-style heroic culture of Northern Europe
with its respect for individual rights and consistent principles,
we see in America today the rise of the "Rat-Dog" society,
that is, a society with utterly unscrupulous rat-crooked intriguers
at the top (such as Zionist neo-cons), and obedient "dog people"
at the bottom willing to further the unlimited police state. (This
is the same basic idea as the Edward R. Murrow quote "A nation
of sheep will soon have a government of wolves." Sheep cannot
serve as counterpredators to wolf predators, therefore wolves rise
to the top in a nation of sheep.)
Since
the 9/11 false flag operation, we behold some of the most convoluted
international intrigues in American history, such as a long term
war against CIA-created
"Al Qaeda" in Afghanistan and Iraq, and later
U.S. support
for "Al Qaeda" in Libya and also
in Syria and also for a revised version of "Al
Qaeda" called "ISIS" in Iraq.
On
the domestic front, we behold the passage and maintenance of such
police state measures as the so-called Patriot Act, NDAA, and NSPD-51.
We see steadily increasing police militarization (see Chapter
23 and Chapter
31, Mission of Conscience), renewed gun confiscation
initiatives (see Obama
Outlaws AK-47 Rifles With Stroke Of His Unconstitutional Pen,
conservativebyte.com, July 17, 2014), Clergy
Response Team meddling in the affairs of churches (reminiscent
of the way the Roman Catholic Church insisted on sticking its corrupt
fingers into all aspects of life in the Middle Ages while killing
millions of innocent people during its endless campaigns
against "witches" and other "heretics"), DHS
gangstalking and EMF harassment against "beta test" population
groups (see "Leuren
Moret: DHS uses Berkeley, CA template to overthrow USA -- Gangstalking,
EMF, Grid Changes" (YouTube) 1:43:52" and
SILENT
WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS: Deborah Tavares joins Joyce Riley on The
Power Hour (YouTube) 1:30:20), and rampant
evidence of electronic vote tampering, It looks like
the Jewish-Catholic "fungus" has made enormous headway
towards erasing gains for liberty achieved by both the American
Revolution and the Protestant Reformation.
Today, the Nordic percentage of the population has been reduced
to less than 20% of the white population. (For more details on racial
decline, please see the "Specific avenues to reconcile libertarianism
and nationalism" section of my Libertarianism
vs. Nationalism web page). Whites themselves have become
a de facto minority now that most Americans under age 30 are nonwhite.
Jewish speculative finance, skyrocketing debt, and usury have replaced
the old WASP virtues widely practiced in the 19th century of operating
in the black and focusing on the production of useful goods. An
entitlement mentality has replaced the Protestant work ethic. The
Nordic penchant for honest, straightforward dealings, individual
meritocracy, reinvestment in the work force, rational long range
operational planning, and technological innovation has been replaced
with shamelessly lying propaganda, asset shuffling, and the ruthless
exploitation of low cost labor (to include the use America's burgeoning
prison labor system or through outsourcing American industry to
Third World countries).
Catholics now outnumber Protestants in America, and a Roman Catholic
totalitarian mentality continues to provide critical muscle behind
nonstop Jewish intrigues. The new "Rat-Dog" America stifles
innovation with mindless dogma and cronyism piled on top of ever
more brainless dogma and cronyism, all of which is in turn manipulated
by Jewish deceptions and cronyism piled on top of ever more Jewish
deceptions and cronyism. In essence, a Robber Baron-Corporate Sheeple-People
alliance has successfully squeezed out a large portion of the entrepreneurial
WASP/pioneer society that originally built this country and once
made it the most prosperous society on earth.
The
same Rothschild/City of London-U.S. axis that supported Bolshevik
Russia (see Behind
Communism by Frank Britton) has also targeted the Scandinavian
countries for infiltration and stealth takeover. Today most major
Finnish media is controlled by Jews (see my discussion of Finland
on my Henrik
Holappa web page), and a substantial portion of Swedish
and Norwegian media also falls under the "hidden hand."
So much has been infiltrated and corrupted at the highest levels
of Scandinavian societies that is is hard to tell what is left that
might be considered indigenous "Norwegian," "Swedish,"
Finnish," or pertains to some other northern European tribal
group. This corruption includes the kind of willful blindness and
childlike naïveté I have encountered among editors of the Norwegian
American Weekly in regard to Fukushima.
One
can find numerous examples in both speech and actions where top
leaders in the U.S. and UK express hostility towards any form of
indigenous European society. As one example. the British government
encouraged the Third World immigration that has now made London
55% nonwhite. As another example, in the article "Israel,
the ethnic-cleanse-nation par excellence!" we
see openly stated hostility on philosophical level against European
nationalism by a top American official:
NATO's
supreme commander, Gen. Wesley Clark, (who's original Jewish name
was Wesley Benjamin Jacob Canne Nemerovsky) on CNN news stated in
1999 (during the bombing of Serbia):
Let's
not forget what the origin of the problem is. There is no place
in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That's a 19th century
idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and
we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.
Clark
was hardly reprimanded for making his statement, but rather it was
backed by the U.S./NATO bombing of Serbia and the surrender of this
Christian country's longstanding province of Kosovo to Muslims.
Meanwhile, there was no official U.S Government condemnation of
the nonstop Israeli ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in order to
acquire more lebensraum for the racially and ethically
pure Jewish state run by hardcore Zionists.
.
.jpg)
When
Ingunn Sigurdsdatter and Henrik Palmgren talked about how Norway and
other Scandinavian countries have been targeted for social reengineering
by people who fear and envy Nordic peoples, they are exactly right.
"Cro Magnon" Nordic peoples have been infiltrated and
manipulated by "Neanderthal"
Jews and their "Alpine" Catholic cronies who instinctively
hate them and take secret pleasure in promoting their dispossession,
brainwashing, and degradation. In essence, they seek to take down
Scandinavian societies on a national level with the same kind of
malice that the Thugs of India took down their victims on an individual
level. (For more on the Thugs, please see my "Parasitism"
article in my "Reconciling
Opposing Ideologies" series.)
The
nature of the attack on myself in terms of such elements as style,
innuendo, false allegations, and omissions.
Sometimes
the most offensive part of someone's message involves not just what
they say, but how they say it. Skaftun claimed that I engage
in "circular reasoning" that is "lacking in scientific
rigor" that has an "ouroboros effect" that makes one
"feel too much like shouting `Fire!' in a crowded theater"?
There
are a number of different plausible motivations for Skaftun's behavior.
One possibility is that she is just a fairly simple person who is
merely acting out prejudices she has absorbed from controlled national
media.
Then
there is a worst case scenario that is also quite plausible, namely
that Skaftun has a "handler" who hates me because I oppose
the Zionist New World Order/Mossad-CIA-MI6 agenda for a one world
government without borders, to include related schemes for global
depopulation and enslavement. I have committed the unpardonable sin
of wanting to save my fellow man from radiation-related poisoning,
sterility, and premature death rather than writing people off as "useless
eaters" fit for slaughter.
It
is worth revisiting some basic reasons why some very powerful people,
to include intelligence agencies, may be concerned about what appears
in the Norwegian American Weekly. Norway is a highly strategic
NATO partner and longstanding U.S. ally. It leaders have served in
prominent positions in the United Nations. Norway can help confer
prestige, such as by giving out the Nobel Peace Prize, or by becoming
a member of some kind of "Coalition of the Willing"-type
scheme trumped up by globalists for far-off military adventures. There
are as many Norwegian Americans in America as there are Norwegians
in Norway. The Norwegian American Weekly is a sole surviving
mass circulation paper for the Norwegian American community.
Unfortunately we are in a situation where no one can really prove
anything, but only go by "suspicious indicators." Furthermore,
no matter what kind of scenario we look at, Skaftun will probably
deny that she has a handler. Under one scenario, if Skaftun does in
fact have a handler, she will in all probability deny it because most
editors do not want to admit they have been corrupted. On the other
hand, if Skaftun does not have a handler, she will of course deny
that she has one in this situation as well because she will want to
tell the truth to clear her name.
Interestingly
enough, if I had hard evidence that Skaftun is an intelligence asset,
I might be reluctant to state that outright since it is a felony to
"out" a CIA agent.
Therefore,
under most scenarios, the best thing we can go by for now are "suspicious
indicators."
Are
there enough "suspicious" indicators to make a case that
Skaftun has a handler? Let's see. The three most prominent "suspicious
indicators" that I have detected in Skaftun's response to me
are as follows:
a) Possible deliberate use of "Twistspeak"
b) Possible use of a "William F. Buckleyism" Does
the Norwegian American Weekly serve a Buckley-style "Judas
Goat" function?"
c) Possible deliberate use of a "Ha! Ha!"
Let
us examine each of these indicators separately, as follows:
Possible
deliberate use
of
"Twistspeak"
"Twistspeak"
typically involves a situation where a victimizer ties to make himself
look like a victim while making the victim look like the victimizer.
It can also involve trying to get people to draw conclusions that
are the opposite of what they would normally derive from logical reasoning.
A variation of "twistspeak" is called "sophistry,"
namely the art of using rhetorical gimmicks and the exploitation of
faulty reasoning and ignorance to make weaker arguments look like
the stronger arguments, that is, making exceptions look like the rule,
and vice versa.
"Twistspeak"
is a term I first heard from
Lady Michele Renouf, a UK activist who has documented
very aggressive "best defense is a good offense" tactics
used by Zionists who oppress Palestinians, consistent with the Polish
proverb " The
Jew cries out in pain, as he strikes you."
I
do not know if Skaftun is Jewish, but I can certainly make the same
accusations back at her that she has made towards me. Her accusations
against me are "twistspeak" regarding what she herself could
be charged with.
In
regard to the accusation that I engage in "circular reasoning,"
the Norwegian American Weekly has repeatedly rejected my
Fukushima radiation alert letters, as if one rejection becomes a precedent
and justification for each following rejection without examining the
underlying facts and arguments. In this regard, it is NAW that has
engaged in circular reasoning, not myself.
In
addition, I have built my case based upon facts backed up by credible
references rather than simply dreaming up my premises out of thin
air. Rather than verify my facts, backed up by references, NAW has
simply dismissed my case out of hand. Again, the editors of the Norwegian
American Weekly have engaged in circular reasoning based on unexamined
premises, not myself.
In
regard to the accusation that I am "lacking in scientific rigor,"
I have gone to great lengths in this article to show how my work is
backed by credible references. My author
archive shows how I have organized interviews involving
leading scientists and academicians, to include Dr. James Fetzer,
Dr. Chris Busby, Dr. Majia Nadesan, and geoscientist Leuren Moret.
I have created considerable documentation on line, to include visual
evidence of widespread contamination in the Northern Hemisphere
as well as in-depth examinations of Chernobyl
and
other nuclear fiascos.
The
evidence is overwhelming that we are being bombarded with myriad nuclear,
chemical, and biological toxins, with Fukushima radiation posing the
greatest threat of all. I take all these threats seriously by researching
them, analyzing them, and issuing reports. In contrast, Skaftun dismisses
these threats by assassinating my character rather than by printing
my arguments and then trying to refute them with facts and logic.
Who is the real person in this situation who lacks scientific rigor?
In
regard to the accusation that the case I have presented makes one
"feel too much like shouting `Fire!' in a crowded theater,"
in many ways this is a more serious allegation than the previous ones
that I have just mentioned. After all, an individual who falsely and
deliberately shouts "Fire!" in a crowded theater commits
a criminal offense.
In
the section "False Alarms to Agencies of Public Safety"
under section 4905 of the Pennsylvania Criminal Code, a person who
"knowingly causes a false alarm of fire or other emergency to
be transmitted within any organization, official or volunteer, for
dealing with emergencies involving danger to life and property"
commits a first degree misdemeanor. This is punishable by no more
than 5 years in jail and a $10,000 fine. Depending on the circumstances,
there could be other types of charges that could get tacked on. They
include charges related to the incitement of public disorder and the creation of reckless
endangerment.
Certainly
an important test for criminal behavior involves a wanton disregard
for the truth, either on the part of a person who simply fabricates
a false fire alarm, or fails to check to verify that a real fire is
taking place before sounding an alarm.
Please
remember that things can work the other way around. When there really
is a fire brewing in a crowded theater, a failure
to shout "Fire!" and warn others can also be criminal. Hence
when it comes to the topic of finding criminal culpability behind
a decision about whether or not to sound a public alarm about Fukushima radiation, the evidence presented in this article suggests that Skaftun is much more liable to be investigated for criminal activity than myself.
We
are faced with a something vastly more dangerous than a fire in a
crowded theater. Radioactive fallout is invisible to the human eye
and tasteless, colorless, and odorless, yet it can inflict mass death
and disease on human populations and permanently damage their DNA.
Given
the incredible stakes, participating in a cover up is criminal. Every
citizen has a duty to verify the nature of this threat and warn others.
Skaftun
has not only accused me of engaging in circular reasoning, but has
also suggested that I am promoting other logical fallacies. When she
referred to my mention of my Norwegian background as an appeal to
"Norwegianness," she insinuated that I am advancing my case
through emotional appeal rather than the use of facts and logic.
The
main reason why I referenced my "Norwegianness" in my cover
letter to Skaftun was to express my disappointment over the fact that
I had already submitted eight letters about Fukushima to NAW and none
were printed. I was in effect saying, "I am part of this Norwegian
American community and I think I have a right to be heard." However,
I did not say, "The validity of my argument is based
on my `Norwegianness.'"
If
I were to base the validity of my Fukushima position on my "Norwegianness"
(I did not do this, but just for the sake of argument let us suppose
I did), this would not constitute a "circular argument."
Instead, I can think of at least four logical fallacies that would
come closer such as an "Appeal to Authority," "Bandwagon,"
"Argumentum Ad Misericordium," and "Special Pleading." (For
those unfamiliar with academic categorizations of logical fallacies,
one can run an Internet search of this topic and come up with many
good introductory web sites, such as " Logic
& Fallacies
Constructing a Logical Argument (1997)" or the Wikipedia
article " Logical
Fallacies." Normally the identification of logical
fallacies is used to defend against unintentionally made
illogical arguments. See, for example, the charming short story " Love
Is A Fallacy" by Max Shulman where an intelligent
college girl starts using the identification of logical fallacies
to avoid getting snowed by her date. However, this capability can
also be used for hostile purposes to deliberately deceive people,
as in the case of propaganda warfare or military Psychological Operations
(PSYOPs). See, for example,
Appendix I of the 31 Aug 1979 U.S. Army PSYOP manual).
An
"Appeal to Authority" fallacy could be based on the assumption
that Norwegians are inherently honest, intelligent, and rational people,
therefore if a Norwegian says something, then it has to be true. Unfortunately
Norwegians have their share of bad eggs, as noted in my discussion
of the Oslo-Utoya
7-22 cover up, and furthermore arguments can only be
proven or disproved based upon facts and logical reasoning pertaining
specifically to the arguments made, and not upon who voices them,
no matter how credible this individual may appear. Certainly if someone
is considered an expert in a certain field, that might be a strong
"indicator" that this person knows what he or she is talking
about when speaking within his or her area of expertise, but it is
never final proof of the validity of this person's arguments.
In
regard to the "Bandwagon" fallacy, this would be like saying,
"Hey, I am part of the Norwegian American community, and therefore
you should agree with what I am saying if you want to `join the club' and feel like you are a member of this same community."
In
regard to " Argumentum Ad Misericordium," this would be like saying,
"The Norwegian American Weekly has rejected my Fukushima
alert letters so many times it has caused me grief and therefore you
owe me sympathy by agreeing with my views."
In
regard to the "Special Pleading" fallacy, this would be
like saying, "The validity of my Fukushima alerts is now based
on a new criteria, namely "Norwegianness,' and never mind that
`Norwegianness' is completely irrelevant to Fukushima radiation dangers."
According to Wikipedia "The Ouroboros
or Uroboros ... is an ancient symbol depicting a serpent or
dragon eating its own tail." The caption for the illustration
above "Drawing by Theodoros Pelecanos, in the alchemical
tract Synosius (1478)." |
Is the use of the
phrase "ouroboros effect"
a deliberate "William F. Buckley"-style put-down?
Does the Norwegian American Weekly serve
a Buckley-style "Judas Goat" function?"
Ms.
Skaftun also claims that my Fukushima alert has an "ouroboros
effect." When I first saw this verbiage, I was immediately
reminded of the late William F. Buckley who liked to show off his
large vocabulary in an effort to send his critics scurrying for
their dictionaries. "Ouroboros" sent me to the dictionary as well, and no one has ever accused me of having a limited vocabulary.
This
is not the kind of overly erudite, rarified language I would ordinarily
expect from some nice Norwegian-American girl running an ethnic
newspaper addressed to lay people, especially when simply saying
"circular reasoning" is more than adequate to do the job.
In fact, she does say "circular reasoning" and then adds
the redundant phrase "ouroboros effect" on top, as if
adding an erudite layer of whipped cream on top helps prove her case.
There
could be a number of different motives for the way Skaftun bent
over backwards to appear erudite by using the word "ouroboros."
One motive could be to serve as camouflage, that is, give the appearance
of being erudite to the reader when in fact Skaften made no effort
to either present my argument by printing my Letter to the Editor
or respond to it on the level of facts and logic. Furthermore, the
tone of erudition may give the appearance to many readers
that Skaftun's position is intellectually superior to my own, and
therefore my position can be dismissed without even bothering to
print my main letter to the editor or attempting to refute its facts
and use of logic.
In
his book The
Judas Goats, Michael Collins Piper devotes more
than a chapter to explain how William F. Buckley infiltrated and
misled conservatism in America. Skaftun's use of a "Buckleyism"
such as "ouroborous" was not only inappropriate and untrue,
but it also reinforced my continuing concern that the Norwegian
American Weekly serves a Judas Goat function just like William
Buckley and his publication The National Review. After
all, one of the most effective ways to undermine ones opposition
is to lead it, and certainly taking control of the "last surviving
voice" of the Norwegian American community would be a great
way to lull Norwegian Americans into a false sense of security.
In
other words, whoever ultimately controls the Norwegian American
Weekly could be trying to reinforce the "Sleep My Little
Norway" sense of fake normalcy written about by Per-Aslak Ertresvåg
(Please see "The
interview that Norwegian newspapers would not print"
by Hans Gaardner, nyhetsspeilet.no, Fed 28, 2009 and related entries
on the Part
II web page of my Oslo-Utoya 7-22 false flag series).
Ingunn Sigurdsdatter also described "fake normalcy" promoted
by the Norwegian establishment in her
Red Ice Radio interview. It is possible that the Norwegian
American Weekly's ultimate handlers deliberately want to reinforce
a kind of childlike naïveté and "kitsch culture" in the
Norwegian American community, while simultaneously ignoring or marginalizing
people who insist upon addressing the most critical issues that
threaten us today -- like Fukushima radiation?
For
those readers who are unfamiliar with William
F. Buckley, Jr., he was the founder of the National
Review, which posed as a primary leader of American conservatism
during the Cold War. Major corporate media often selected Buckley
as a conservative spokesman for newspaper and TV interviews. He
was also founder and host of the PBS affairs interview show "Firing
Line" from 1966-1999. Many Americans viewed this as one
of the very few places on American television that addressed current
issues on a serious intellectual level.
.
Buckley
was a Yale graduate and practicing Catholic who never hesitated
to flaunt his Ivy League credentials in both his speech and demeanor.
He would typically lean back in his chair, sometimes wiggle his
tongue in his mouth, and speak with an affected tone of voice that
many people found condescending and irritating (including myself).
The use of highly erudite language that a speaker knows his audience
doesn't understand can be interpreted as a "put down,"
as if to say "I am smarter than you and if you are too uneducated
or stupid to understand me, that is your problem." It can also
be a form of overcompensation for some form of insecurity (as in
Shakespeare's famous phrase "The
lady doth protest too much, methinks"), in other
words, someone may overplay the trappings of intellectualism to
compensate for underlying feelings of guilt, insecurity, or self-doubt
about being a phony intellectual or Judas Goat underneath the surface.
It
is worth talking about Buckley and his National Review
in some detail, because this case illustrates how intelligence operatives
have been able to deeply infiltrate domestic media, proactively
steer American opinion, and utilize smear tactics against honest,
effective, and genuinely patriotic people.
It
is important to note a combination of legislation and executive
orders that were once created to prevent meddling by Federal civil
servants in domestic politics and media. A good starting point is
the First
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution: "Congress
shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting
the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or
of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,
and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Another example is the Hatch
Act of 1939.
Despite
this clear guidance, abuses of power have only increased in recent
decades. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) article "More
About FBI Spying" noted that "The FBI has
a long
history of abusing its national security surveillance powers...The
Church Committee, a Senate Select Committee that investigated COINTELPRO
in the 1970s...led to a series of reforms, including laws designed
to regulate government surveillance and internal guidelines (Attorney
General's Guidelines) which limited the FBI's investigative authority
and spelled out the rules that govern law enforcement operations.
These reasonable limits have been either abandoned or ignored since
9/11, however, through legislation like the USA Patriot Act, through
amendments to the AG Guidelines, and through an expansion of powerful
Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTF) that operate with virtually no
public accountability."
Interestingly
enough, the CIA's
own web site admits domestic snooping is still illegal,
for example in a FAQ it states:
Does the CIA spy on Americans? Does it keep a file on
you?
CIA’s mission is to collect information related to foreign
intelligence and foreign counterintelligence. By law, the CIA
is specifically prohibited from collecting intelligence concerning
the domestic activities of U.S. citizens. By direction of the
President in Executive Order 12333, as amended, and in accordance
with procedures approved by the Attorney General, the CIA is restricted
in the collection of intelligence information directed against
U.S. citizens. Collection is allowed only for an authorized intelligence
purpose; for example, if there is a reason to believe that an
individual is involved in espionage or international terrorist
activities. The CIA’s procedures require senior approval
for any such collection that is allowed, and, depending on the
collection technique employed, the sanction of the Director of
National Intelligence and Attorney General may be required. These
restrictions on the CIA, or similar ones, have been in effect
since the 1970s.
These
reassurances are contradicted by the recent article "CIA
Director Denies Spying on Senate Intel Committee"
by Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, 11 March 2011 that describes California
Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein's outrage after the CIA got caught
hacking computers to thwart an investigation into illegal detention
and interrogations under President George W. Bush:
"The
CIA just went and searched the committee's computers," California
Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein said in a lengthy speech on the Senate
floor, calling the the matter a "defining moment" for
the oversight of the Intelligence Committee. "I
have grave concerns that the CIA's search may well have violated
the separation of powers principles embodied by the United States
Constitution, including the speech and debate clause," she
said. "It
may have undermined the Constitutional framework essential to effective
congressional oversight of intelligence activity or any other government
function." Feinstein
added that the search may also have violated the Fourth Amendment
of the Constitution, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and an executive
order that prohibits the CIA from conducting domestic searches or
surveillance. She
said she has asked for an apology and an acknowledgment that the
CIA's actions were wrong but that "I have received neither."
See
also "CIA
confirms CIA spied on senate investigators examining CIA torture
programs," by sosadmin, July 31, 2014, at http://privacysos.org
(h/t to Red Ice Radio: CIA:
Spies and Lies")
I
provide additional background on post 9-11 pro-police state abuses
in Chapter
23 "NAU, NSPD-51 and the Creation of the Perfect
Police State Mouse Trap," Chapter
28
"“Internet Radicalization,' False Flag Ideological Warfare
(PSYOPs), and Internal Debate," and Chapter
31 "Marine Corps Martial Law and Synthetic Domestic
Enemies" in my Mission of Conscience series.
My
research into the Oslo-Utoya 7-22 tragedy has demonstrated to my
satisfaction the relevance of Mossad-CIA-MI6 abuses of power to
Norway. This tragedy illustrated the ease in which intelligence
services can bomb Norwegian government buildings, mass murder teenagers
at an island retreat, intimidate or buy off Norwegian officials,
frame a patsy, sustain a show trial, and control the corporate media
reaction.
It
is worth emphasizing that Norway is not the only vulnerable Scandinavian
country, for example in the "Israel"
section of Part
II of my Oslo-Utoya 7-22 series I comment "Both
Dr. Luukanen-Kilde and Henrik Palmgren took note of interesting similarities
with the assassinations of Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme and
leading Parliamentarian Anna
Lindh, both of whom dared to challenge Israel. Many assassination
researchers like myself strongly suspect central Mossad involvement."
Swedish
Prime Minister Olof Palme (1927-1986)
Assassination
victim
(Photo credit:
Norra Bantorget, Wikipedia)
For
more background on the Olof Palme assassination, please see the
free downloadable ebook Coup
d'Etat in Slow Motion (PDF), 1090 pages, by independent
researcher Ole Dammegård (see his web site here),
archived at thechristianidentityforum.net.
Mr. Dammegård comments on page 528, "To start with –
even if it might be hard to believe – there are several indications
that the CIA could have been involved in the assassination of the
Swedish Prime Minister. In that case this would only be one in a
long row of outrages organized by this much-feared organization."
Please also see Ole
Dammegård - Coup d'etat in Slow Motion: The Assassination
of Olof Palme, Red Ice Radio, Jan 6, 2013, where Mr.
Dammegård provides an overview of his work. At around 44 minutes
into this interview he notes that one reason why leaders such as
JFK and Olof Palme were assassinated in broad daylight rather than
simply poisoned in private is to send a fear message to anyone who
might challenge powerful entities behind the scenes like Mossad-CIA-MI6
and their ultimate controllers. If leaders such as Kennedy and Palme
are not safe, who is?
Unfortunately
this kind of fear conditioning and political correctness brainwashing
seems to have had an effect on the public reaction to Fukushima
and many other critical issues.
A
discussion of the hijacking of American conservatism has relevance
to Norwegian-Americans on broader ideological level as well. Dr.
Odd S. Lovoll pointed out in his book Promise
Fulfilled, Norwegian-Americans as a group tend
to adhere to traditional American conservative values more than
most Americans. In addition, Michael Collins Piper provides evidence
in The Judas Goats that Buckley had Jewish-Catholic ancestry,
which supports the theme I have discussed earlier in this article
about a Jewish-Catholic stealth war against WASPs in America.
On
page 61 of The Judas Goats, Michael Collins Piper establishes
William F. Buckley's credentials as `“former” CIA officer
William F. Buckley, Jr.' On page 183, Piper notes in parentheses:
Buckley,
who served as a CIA operative in Mexico under the tutelage of his
CIA “godfather”E. Howard Hunt, raised eyebrows among
even some of the “responsible conservatives” when he
not only accepted membership in the Rockefeller-financed Council
on Foreign Relations, but also popped up at the secretive international
Bilderberg confab in Cesme, Turkey in 1975.
On
page 214 we also learn:
The
Mexican capital was, during the Cold War period, according to all
accounts, the Western Hemisphere’s primary nest of international
intelligence intrigue. It was in Mexico City where — as we’ve
noted — E. Howard Hunt served as the CIA’s station chief
and one of his CIA lieutenants was none other than future pundit,
William F. Buckley, Jr., who emerged as a leading figure in the
effort to bend traditional American conservatism toward internationalism.
Mexico City was also a major base of operations for Israel’s
Mossad...
When
one becomes a full-fledged intelligence officer, whether it is in
the CIA, military, or some other "national security" agency
one typically accepts tremendous constraints on what can say for
the rest of ones life. I can speak from personal experience
on this issue, as described in Chapter
25 of my Mission of Conscience series:
My
second very significant military experience regarding Info War took
place in 1992 when I showed up for the first day of the regular
Intelligence Officer course at the Navy and Marine Corps Intelligence
Center in Dam Neck, Virginia. I had previously completed both phases
of the Interrogation of Prisoner of War Reserve Officer Course at
this same school. This had provided me with intelligence as a secondary
military occupational specialty. This go around, however, at the
very inception of the course at zero-dark-thirty (as they say in
the military, probably around 0530 hours) I was told to sign a statement
which said that anything I might write of any significance for the
rest of my life, to include anything for civilian publication, would
have to be reviewed and cleared by a Special Security Officer (SSO).
I was also told that I could take a moment to examine my rights,
and doing so would not be held against me.
I
took a moment to examine my rights by calling up Capt. Tucker, my
counsel in the Board of Inquiry, to go over the fine print the same
way I ordinarily go through real estate contracts. If nothing else,
as a safeguard in case I were ever to come into conflict with the
military, I wanted to create a memorandum for the record that I
had examined certain provisions and been given certain assurances
at the time when I signed the document.
My
contractual “attitude” was not well-received by the
Intel school staff. Despite the fact that I eventually agreed to
sign the document, subject to certain annotations and memorandum
of understanding, they immediately revoked my Sensitive Compartmented
Information (SCI) security clearance and sent me home.
Because
I no longer had an SCI clearance, I then got immediately relieved
of my billet as OIC of the Interrogation Translation Team. I submitted
an appeal package to the Naval Intelligence Command, and was subsequently
given a lame response over the phone by a representative. He said
that since I seem to be so keenly intent upon preserving my right
to openly state my opinions on controversial issues, I am basically
incompatible with being a spook.
It
is very likely that Buckley was under CIA control his entire life,
and the CIA was able to guide and censor everything he wrote and said
publicly, just like what certain military intelligence officials threatened
to do to myself.
Next,
we need to consider how Buckley served as a "Judas Goat"
for American conservatism. In the Chapter: "An Interlude . .
. An introduction to Part III, The Rise of the “Responsible
Conservatives” The Cold War Era Subversion of the American Nationalist
Movement," (pages 179-180) of The
Judas Goats, Michael Collins Piper explained how
Buckley helped turn American Conservatism on its head:
At
the height of the Cold War — during the mid-1950s —
there occurred in America the birth of a “new” so-called
“conservative” movement whose leaders, especially one
William F. Buckley, Jr., declared their movement to be boldly internationalist.
They were intent on “winning” the Cold War — even
at the expense of a hot war — and they had no desire to bring
American troops home to protect American soil.
In
reality, they were venturing out on a global imperium, to crush
Communism and to crush those old-line elements in America —
the traditional conservatives, nationalists, those “discredited”
forces who made up the America First movement that fought U.S. intervention
in the European war that became World War II — and they were
loudly and proudly declaring their intention to smash any “nativist”
elements that would dare raise questions about the need for American
boys to be dispatched into global brush-fire wars or into conflicts
in the Middle East arising from the establishment of the state of
Israel.
A
host of “ex-Communists” — yes, the ubiquitous
Trotskyites — surrounded William F. Buckley Jr. in those halcyon
days when the young Yale graduate — scion of an oilman whose
father was ultimately discovered to have oil interests, in, of all
places, Israel — launched his crusade. Buckley’s National
Review magazine became “the” voice for what Buckley
and his colleagues came to describe as the voice of “responsible
conservatism” and his “ex-Communist” writers became
the intellectual vanguard of the “new” American conservatism,
thanks to friendly publicity from the major (controlled) media in
America.
Foremost
among those promoted by Buckley was no less than James Burnham who,
at one point earlier in his career, was said to have been considered
Leon Trotsky’s “chief spokesman” within American
“intellectual” circles...
.
. . So it was that those whom we here call “The Buckley Gang”
soon proved to be the guiding force within the “conservative”
movement, even as old-line American nationalists were being pushed
to the sidelines. Today there are more than a few who say that Buckley’s
National Review was a CIA propriety — a CIA “front”
— from the start. At the very least it was a font for “ex”
Trotskyite thinking, which was now evolving into what we call “neo-conservatism”
today. And all throughout that evolution, a devotion to the Zionist
Internationale remained consistent.
The
bottom line was that there was indeed a new twist in the American
conservative philosophy — at least as it was being dictated
by Buckley — and many good Americans enticed by Buckley’s
claim to “conservatism” fell into line, led to the slaughterhouse
as the innocent lambs they were, guided by The Judas Goats —
The Enemy Within.
Many other credible sources are in general agreement with Michael Collins Piper's assessment of Buckley, to include the libertarian author David Gordon. In his Nov. 17, 2005 article archived at lewrockwell.com with the sarcastic title "Birthday Tribute to William F. Buckley, Jr.," Gordon describes how in the 1950's:
 ...Buckley was able within a few years to seize control of much of the American Right. As [Dr. Murray] Rothbard noted in a speech in 1992, "Very quickly, National Review became the dominant, if not the only, power center on the right wing. This power was reinforced by a brilliantly successful strategy (perhaps guided by NR editors trained in Marxist cadre tactics) of creating a battery of front groups. . . And so, with almost Blitzkrieg swiftness, by the early 1960s, the new global crusading movement, created and headed by Bill Buckley, was almost ready to take power in America." To Rothbard's penetrating analysis, one has only to add that Buckley, along with his Senior Editors James Burnham and Willmoore Kendall, had all served as CIA agents.
But before taking power, one task remained: "all the various heretics of the Right" must be purged — ‘all the groups that were in any way radical or could deprive the new conservative movement of its much-desired respectability in the eyes of the liberal and centrist elite, all these had to be jettisoned."
Isolationists, such as John T. Flynn, were among the first to be booted out. In Up From Liberalism, Buckley refers with respect to "three famous professors, [the revisionist historians] Charles Tansill, Harry Elmer Barnes, and the late Charles Beard" (p.31); and, as late as 1958, National Review published Barnes's "Hiroshima: Assault on a Beaten Foe". But Buckley eventually found the company of Henry Kissinger much more to his liking than that of such extremists as his once close friend Revilo Oliver. Anyone who dissented from Cold War orthodoxy had no place at National Review...
Earlier in this article, Gordon notes how Buckley's intellectual hit man activities included targeting Dr. Murray Rothbard, who today is widely respected for his contribution to the American libertarian movement:
After Rothbard's death in January 1995, Buckley reacted with malicious spite. In an obituary published in National Review on February 6, 1995, Buckley classed Rothbard with the cultist David Koresh. He wrote: "In Murray's case, much of what drove him was a contrarian spirit." Rothbard, in Buckley's view, was mentally ill, the victim of "deranging scrupulosity". Buckley did not scruple to mock Rothbard, who, "huffing and puffing in the little cloister whose walls he labored so strenuously to contract", was left with "about as many disciples as David Koresh had in his little redoubt in Waco. Yes, Murray Rothbard believed in freedom, and yes, David Koresh believed in God."
Gordon notes how Buckley claimed he was an heir to traditional American conservative principles while at the same time undercutting them: "Buckley's contradiction is that he denied this: he thought he could be fully libertarian while at the same time supporting a militaristic foreign policy and a domestic assault on civil liberties, all in the name of 'anti-Communism.'"
The
values once held by traditional American conservatives were very similar
to the values held by their counterparts in Scandinavia during the
Romantic Nationalist period of the 19th century. On both sides of
the Atlantic, conservatives promoted limited government that lived
within its means and was respectful of human rights. Conservatives
felt that charity should begin at home and that the dominant ethnic
group of a nation had a right to perpetuate itself (In other words,
WASPs should be able to maintain America as a WASP country, and Scandinavia
should remain the homeland of Nordic peoples). They were also wary
of big government, imperial ventures, large standing armies, and foreign
entanglements. ("...
Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice?
It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world..." said George Washington in his Farewell Address). Americans of the 19th century basically kept their
military out of European affairs, and Scandinavians generally tried
to avoid militaristic imperialism and maintain a neutrality policy
similar to Switzerland.
In
contrast to all of this, Buckley was promoting conservative support
for perpetual big government that lived beyond its means fighting
nonstop foreign crusades. This included permanently basing troops
throughout Western Europe and other parts of the world. In regard
to "nativism," Buckley was hostile to most forms of it with
the exception of the brand practiced by the exclusively Jewish state
of Israel. Rather than surround himself with WASPs and promote traditional
American conservatism, Buckley practiced Catholicism, associated with
ex-Trotskyite Jews, and promoted a perverse brand of Jewish-designed
"neo-conservatism" designed to replace authentic American conservatism.
In
Chapter Eighteen "William F. Buckley, Jr. Self-Appointed “Responsible
Conservative,” of The
Judas Goats, page 185, we learn more about Buckley's
Jewish connections, to include the strong possibility that he was
part Jewish himself:
At
almost precisely the time that the FBI was enlisting high-ranking
Communist Party USA official Morris Childs, as described earlier,
a host of “ex-Communists” banded together under the
leadership of William F. Buckley, Jr. to form the editorial bulwark
of Buckley’s fortnightly magazine National Review.
In
the succeeding years Buckley — in alliance with his close
friend and collaborator, Zionist operative Marvin Liebman —
began a heavy-handed war against hard-line American nationalists,
attempting to isolate them and deny them respectability. In so doing,
Buckley was actively aided and abetted by the mainstream media monopoly
in America.
In
The
New Jerusalem, this author’s earlier work, a point
about Buckley was raised that probably had never before been committed
to print, and in the context of what we are about to examine, is
probably worth repeating here: Although Buckley is widely recognized
as an Irish Catholic and is known as a devout Catholic, his Roman
Catholic antecedents are not from his Scotch-Irish father’s
side, as widely believed, but, are instead from his mother’s
side.
Although
Buckley’s mother was born to a German Catholic family based
in New Orleans named Steiner, the late Chicago Tribune columnist
Walter Trohan privately told intimates that it was his understanding
that the Steiner family was originally Jewish and converted to Roman
Catholicism, as did many Jewish families in New Orleans during the
18th and 19th centuries.
In
any case, whatever his real ethnic heritage, young Buckley —
enthusiastically encouraged by his cohorts and friendly promoters
in the major media — authoritatively began to “draw
the lines” and determine what was “proper” and
permissible for American conservatives to discuss and what was not.
Buckley announced that anyone who dared raise questions about such
issues as Zionism or the power of elite groups such as Bilderberg
and the Council of Foreign Relations was “beyond the pale”
and delving into “fever swamps.”
Buckley
and his “ex-Communist” allies and their minions declared
themselves to be “responsible conservatives” and actively
waged war against anyone they deemed not to be . . .
Finally,
no discussion of Buckley is complete without considering how he exploited
his posturing as a "conservative" to serve as a intellectual
hit man against other conservatives. On page 209 we learn about his
attack on Pat Buchanan:
[William
F. Buckley, Jr.] . . . leveled a blast at Buchanan during the 1992
primary campaign, hinting that Buchanan was an “anti-Semite.”
Buckley had bragged publicly and repeatedly that it was his “job”
to expel populists and nationalists from Republican ranks. Buchanan,
at that time, was the number one target.
In
"Chapter Nineteen: The Vatican’s Own Enemy Within: Buckley
Associate Malachi Martin ’s Secret
Role as a Subversive Acting on Behalf of Zionist Interests,"
of The
Judas Goats, on page 188, Piper raises a question
about how Buckley may have aided and abetted subversion within the
Catholic Church:
The
identity of an operative for the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of
B’nai B’rith inside the Catholic Church during the Second
Vatican Council in the early 1960s has been revealed: the late ex-priest-turned-best-
selling author, Malachi Martin, a longtime close associate of none
other than William F. Buckley, Jr., himself an outspoken Roman Catholic.
As a result of the revelations concerning Buckley’s friend
Martin, some prominent Catholic traditionalist critics now call
Martin a “de facto Zionist double agent” and a “priest-spy
for Zionism” — labels that will come as a surprise to
many good traditionalist Catholics who viewed Martin, at least in
his later years, as their ally.
One
can find more details on the subversive activities of Malachi Martin
in Chapter
29 of my Mission of Conscience series.
Buckley
was also part of a campaign to put the newspaper The Spotlight
and its allied organization Liberty Lobby out of business. The Spotlight/Liberty
Lobby was certainly more oriented towards the traditional "America
First" brand of conservatism than the National Review.
On page 186 of The Judas Goats we learn how Buckley's anti-Spotlight/Liberty
Lobby campaign started with the law suit filed by CIA operative
E. Howard Hunt against Liberty Lobby:
Hunt
filed his suit against Liberty Lobby shortly after The Spotlight
published an explosive story in its August 14, 1978 issue in which
the author, former high-ranking CIA official Victor Marchetti, charged
that the CIA intended to frame Hunt for involvement in the assassination
of John F. Kennedy.
Although
Hunt admitted under oath that the story could be true — that
his colleagues at the CIA could indeed be targeting him as a scapegoat
in the crime of the century — he still persisted in pursuing
his lawsuit.
When
the case went to trial, Hunt won a potentially devastating $650,000
libel judgment against Liberty Lobby. However, due to errors in
jury instructions by the trial judge, Liberty Lobby was able to
wage a successful appeal and the case was ordered for re-trial.
During
that second trial in January of 1985, famed JFK assassination investigator
Mark Lane came on board as Liberty Lobby’s defense counsel.
Much to Hunt’s dismay, Lane brought forth evidence that revealed,
contrary to Hunt’s denials, that Hunt had been in Dallas just
prior to the JFK assassination in the company of CIA-backed Cuban
exiles. The jury rejected Hunt’s arguments and ruled against
him — a major victory for Liberty Lobby. Then, after the trial,
jury forewoman Leslie Armstrong announced publicly that she and
her colleagues had concluded that Lane’s defense was on target
and that the CIA had indeed been involved in the assassination of
President Kennedy.
•
During the period leading up to the final victory in the Hunt case,
Liberty Lobby’s sources advised the populist institution that
Hunt’s case was being actively assisted by the CIA, to the
point that the CIA actually provided attorneys and others to assist
Hunt. What’s more, it was discovered that Hunt’s CIA
protege, millionaire dilettante, William F. Buckley, Jr.,was also
providing Hunt tactical and financial assistance.
Buckley,
who was Hunt’s deputy in the CIA station in Mexico City in
the early 1950’s, had long harbored a grudge against Liberty
Lobby’s newspaper, The Spotlight, which had quickly
outpaced Buckley’s own publication, National Review,
in terms of circulation and outreach. .
On
page 187 we learn more about how Buckley openly supported Hunt and
his allies:
When
Buckley published a 1971 smear of Liberty Lobby, it came out in
sworn testimony that a primary source for Buckley’s smear
was syndicated columnist Jack Anderson. Along with his mentor, the
late Drew Pearson, Anderson had bragged for years that much of the
garbage that they peddled about Liberty Lobby came directly from
the Anti- Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith, a
known conduit for Israel’s spy agency, the Mossad. Pearson’s
own ex-mother-in-law, newspaper publisher Cissy Patterson, once
called Pearson “both undercover agent and mouthpiece for the
ADL.”
After
Liberty Lobby launched an extended investigation of Buckley and
his affairs, some details (but not all) of which were published
in The Spotlight, Buckley then filed his own libel suit against
Liberty Lobby in 1980, almost directly on the heels of his friend
Hunt’s libel suit. Again, after much expense to Liberty Lobby,
the case came to trial in 1985 — just months after Hunt’s
case had been laid to rest.
During
the trial Buckley declared that he had a “mission” to
expose Liberty Lobby but despite the high expectations of Buckley
and his sycophants who were on hand expecting victory, a District
of Columbia jury had a big surprise for the former CIA officer.
Although
Buckley had sued for millions of dollars in damages, the jury awarded
Buckley only one dollar (plus $1,000 in punitive damages). When
the verdict was announced, a Buckley supporter in the courtroom
burst into tears. Buckley — like his CIA mentor, Hunt —
had failed to destroy Liberty Lobby.
In
any case, the sordid career of the aging enfant terrible, William
F. Buckley, Jr., is drawing to a close. However, his manipulations
— from the 1950s and well into the early years of the 21st
century — did much to lay the groundwork for the evisceration
of traditional American nationalism. Buckley indeed can be ranked
as one of the most destructive of the Judas Goats.
When
we consider whether or not the Norwegian American Weekly
is playing a similar Judas Goat role compared to Buckley and the National
Review, we might consider major items on the Zionist New World
Order agenda that are totally contrary to traditional Norwegian conservative
values, and whether or not NAW supports these things actively or through
its silence.
Leuren
Moret and other astute observers believe that the NWO is deliberately
dosing people around the world with radiation, chemtrails, harmful
chemical additives to food and water, and other forms of toxicity
as part of a global depopulation agenda. Does NAW object? Not hardly.
It does not even address this issue, but instead censors people like
myself.
In
total contravention to the historic Scandinavian policy of neutrality,
Norwegians have been used as cannon fodder since the end of the Cold
War in support of the phony "Global War on Terror" in far-off
lands such as Afghanistan and Libya. Does NAW object? Not hardly.
Does it expose Oslo-Utoya 7-22 as a Mossad-CIA-MI6 "black op"?
Not hardly. Instead, it supports the Breivik "lone nut"
cover story which is no more tenable than the Lee Harvey Oswald "lone
nut" official U.S. Government fairy tale about the JFK assassination.
Historically,
Scandinavian societies have been considered Nordic homelands. Does
NAW expose extreme double standards, whereby the New World Order staunchly
supports the exclusive Jewishness of Israel, but seeks massive Third
World immigration into the U.S. and Scandinavia? Not hardly.
There
is a very long list of items on the New World Order agenda that I
do not have space to go into here, but suffice to say, NAW does not
identify them or take any kind of clear stand against them. What might
this be telling us?
Possible use
of a "Ha! Ha!"
A
"Ha! Ha!"is a way of mocking people by replicating something
about them in a perverse, ironic, or macabre form. Leuren Moret has
commented in her interviews that it is frequently used by Mossad-CIA-MI6
as a "signature." As one example, many people who follow
false flag operations believe that the date selected for the 2006
bombing in Mumbai, India on July 11th (represented as "7-11"),
was a black joke on Indians who run 7-11 convenience stores in America.
(For more details about the bombing, see Chapter
21 of my Mission of Conscience series). Similarly,
researchers who have uncovered the key role of Mossad-CIA-MI6 in orchestrating
the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing as a false flag attack meant to discredit
the American militia movement chose the date April 19th, the same
date as the start of the American Revolution at Lexington and Concord,
as a way of both mocking and trying to implicate the so-called "Patriot
Movement." (See Chapter
17 of my Mission of Conscience series
and the excellent documentary "OKC
Bombing" The Forerunner to 9/11" with ace American
Free Press journalist Pat Shannan for more background on OKC
as a false flag operation)
The
use of Cabalistic numerology can also be interpreted as a "Ha!
Ha!" This typically involves using dates that are divisible by
11, for example, 9-11, 3-11, London 7/7, Oslo-Utoya 7-22. One particularly
fiendish aspect of this signature is that there are so many dates
divisible by 11 where nothing happens that it has poor predictive
value. In addition, another possible predictor, namely the fact that
most false flag attacks tend to coincide with military or police exercises,
also has poor forward-looking predictive value (that is, there are
many more military and police exercises that have no terror events
associated with them than there are ones with such events). This puts
someone who tries to issue warnings by looking at scheduled military
and police exercises that coincide with numerologically significant
dates in a horrible "damned if you do, damned if you don't position."
If one issues alerts based on this system, and nothing happens, one
might be accused of fearmongoring or even sedition. On the other hand,
after an event takes place like Oslo-Utoya 7-22, which coincided with
police exercises, one is left with a sinking feeling of "Ha!
Ha! Gotcha!" and "Oh my God, they really did it! Why didn't
we put our guard up?"
So
far only one reader response to what Skaftun printed about me has
been published in the Norwegian American Weekly. It was a letter from
"Kristin Bervig Valentine, Professor Emerita Communication, Arizona
State University" that supported Skaftun's position. Is it simply
a coincidence that this academic who pooh-pooh's Fukushima comes from
Arizona State University in stark contrast to Dr. Majia Nadesan who
is also from Arizona State University?
Dr.
Nadesan been a leading activist to raise public awareness of grave
Fukushima-related dangers. I have spent considerable time organizing
and transcribing interviews that Dr. James Fetzer has hosted on his
Real Deal talk show with Dr. Nadesan. She has been a leading
activist to raise public awareness of grave Fukushima-related dangers.
Interestingly
enough, during the Red Ice Radio interview
with Ingunn Sigurdsdatter, Henrik Palmgren and his guest
discussed the use of strategically placed bloggers and trolls on the
Internet and also professors at universities that the establishment
can use to shill for itself and talk down dissenters:
Henrik
Palmgren: ...When you talk negatively about the vaccinations
for example, or anything else, where you basically break the mold
of the established view on any issue, really, you have for a little
bit been the go-to person, so you have experienced that first
hand of how it is to be put on the outside and basically ridiculed
on that level, correct?
Ingunn Sigurdsdatter: Very much. What they do
primarily when you get out out of line and want to take the conversation
or discourse into another direction is that they start tagging
you and name-calling you, kind of based on advanced rules which
are trauma-based mind control. So when you have a trauma that
is deeply embedded in the minds of the people, in the psyche,
such as the Holocaust, the Norwegian killings at UtØya
in 2011, when you actually hint to these events, and associate
them to your name, then people are immediately repulsed. So if
you speak against the government you will immediately be called
an anti-Semite
EP: Yep
IS: Or on the other hand they will be hinting
that OK, you are supporting Anders Behring Breivik.
EP: Yes, I know, that is funny.
IS: And checkmate and then you are just expelled
from the game.
EP: Right.
IS: And you are placed under the radar of the
national NSA and registered on their list as promoting hatred.
EP: Sure, oh yes, yes.
IS: Even if what you really promoted, what I
am promoting and all the people like me is the opposite. We promote
no wars, no killings, no GMO’s, no pesticides. So what the
governments do is actually play us like fiddles through the emotional
programming we were filled up with since we were children. But
it is interesting to see because you touched briefly upon that,
and the tools that you use, the state uses some agencies to promote
the scientific world view such as the human ethical society for
instance. They also pay a wide range of Internet trolls and bloggers,
right?
EP: Sure.
IS: Yes, so these so-called humanist organizations
are very much related to these more militant arms of the skeptic
societies. So what we see is that they actually place university
professors in strategic positions, and then they can just pretend
to represent the expertise and will always be called upon if the
media needs an opinion from someone, they will always call upon
these. So they have a list of people that they always call, right?
[45:28]
EP: Oh, definitely, exactly.
IS: And they can be relied upon because they
will kind of instill the established consensus within the people
and they will never speak wrong words.
Dr. Kristin Bervig Valentine
The online article "Kristin Valentine earns accolade for lifetime of teaching excellence," by Debra Palka, asu.edu/news/faculty_students, July 16, 2002 suggests that Dr. Valentine is a real person and not simply a phony intelligence front, like the fake Osama Bin Laden after December 2001 or the phony Saddam Hussein after April 2013 (See Chapter 12 of my Mission of Conscience series which describes how the identities of these famous individuals got hijacked by Mossad-CIA-MI6). I invite Professor Valentine to call me or send me an email after she has had a chance to review the evidence contained in this article and other Fukushima-related web pages at my americafirstbooks.com web site and demonstrate to me that she has a mind of her own and is not simply some kind of shill, web troll, or Buckley-type Judas Goat. I will happy to reproduce online whatever she sends me in writing and link to it here, provided that I have a chance to provide my own rebuttal if I feel a further need to defend myself.
Concluding
Remarks:
Is There Such A Thing As Bending Over Too Far Backwards
to
Accommodate the Nuclear Industry and the New World Order?
Does
the Norwegian American Weekly ever seriously address the
stealth
genocide of Nordic peoples as a consequence of unrestricted
Third World immigration? The answer is no. Does it address how brainwashed
Norwegian women have become vulnerable to rape attacks by Muslims
and other alien men? (For example, see Norway:
Professor Unni Wikan On Rape, May 31, 2007, "`It
is sensational how blind and naive Norwegian can be towards non-Western
men. Norwegian women must use common sense,' says Wikan to Dagbladet.
Shocking numbers were published yesterday which show that the total
number of rapes in Oslo went up by 40% from 1999 to 2000. For the
first time, police classified rapists by ethnic background. The statistics
show that fully 65% of the rapists come from a non-Western country.").
Again, the answer is no. And of course as mentioned earlier, it has
never mentioned Mossad-CIA-MI6 as a prime suspect behind Oslo-Utoya
7-22. Therefore, we should not be terribly surprised over NAW's refusal
to address other hard realities, such as the Fukushima radiation threat
and other serious forms of environmental contamination.
All
of this should raise very disturbing questions. At what point does
an ethnic newspaper that claims to be the sole surviving voice in
print for Norwegian-Americans paint such a highly edited and sugary
view of reality that it becomes guilty of serving as a treasonous
form of "limited hangout" for the enemies of this ethnic
group? At what point do "sins of omission" become criminal
negligence, willful blindness, and malevolent disinformation?
Imagine
if you are sound asleep inside your house in the middle of the night
and a neighbor notices that a fire is beginning to envelop your house
from the outside, what kind of criminal offense would this person
commit by maintaining a false sense of normalcy and failing to alert
you?
If
your gene pool is under attack from the greatest radionuclide contamination
event in human history, do people who knowingly refuse to warn you
also commit a criminal offense? At what point in our current world
crisis environment does "the sole surviving voice of the Norwegian
American community" become worse than useless by ducking critical
issues?
Why
should we have to wait five, ten, or fifteen years -- whatever the
incubation period will be for accumulated toxicity from Fukushima
radiation and other contaminants -- when most members of the Norwegian
American community will probably either be dead or seriously crippled
by environmental contaminants from a threat that they were
never warned about in the first few years following
the inception of the of the Fukushima catastrophe -- to form an enduring
judgment on this question?
I
do not want to put the Norwegian American Weekly out of business,
since just about any kind of Norwegian American paper that helps maintain
a sense of community and Nordic heritage is better than nothing. By
the same token I do not want to see a paper that shirks its civic
responsibilities in the midst of what is arguably the greatest civil
defense emergency in the history of mankind go without the criticism
it deserves.
However,
I would not mind seeing Ms. Skaftun get replaced with someone who
is more competent in terms of grasping critical issues. We also need
someone who is more credible in terms of protecting Nordic interests.
She raised questions about her own background when she wrote " ...This
would imply that we chose content for the paper based on criteria
like a person's "Norwegianness" (in which case surely I
would be the first one denied a voice)."
Granted,
Norway is a relatively small country. It's trade is heavily integrated
with giant countries such as the U.S. and UK. It is not hard to understand
why its leaders want to make every effort get along. However, sometimes
bending too far with the breeze can backfire, causing one to "give
away the store" or look like a coward or traitor in regard to
protecting vital interests.
The
prestige of Scandinavian countries has always been an important factor
in their relations with the rest of the world, particularly countries
that retain Nordic populations. In previous historical periods, such
as during Viking Age, Norsemen earned considerable respect for their
heroic, exploratory cultures. Nordic peoples have also been leaders
in the progress of civilization throughout history, and have provided the ruling classes of the most advanced nations since ancient times. (See Early Civilizations of the Nordic Peoples [PDF] by Roger Pearson and Racial Realities In Europe by Dr. Lothrop Stoddard for a good primer).
A
good example regarding how "heroic intangibles" can "make
or break" a Scandinavian country is the following story reproduced
from my Henrik
Holappa web page about how Josef Stalin's personal respect
for Finnish President Carl Gustaf Mannerheim enabled Finland avoid
becoming ruthlessly crushed and occupied by the Red Army and Soviet
secret police towards the end of World War II. Instead, Finland was
allowed to become merely "Finlandized" by the Soviet Union.
GUSTAF
MANNERHEIM, WE SALUTE YOU!
Wikipedia
caption: "Mannerheim leaves the President's Residence in
Helsinki on 4 March 1946 after his short presidency." |
Baron
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim.
 Wikipedia
has the following comments
about how this former Russian Army officer and later Finnish Commander-In-Chief
during the Winter War and Continuation War successfully navigated
Finland through extremely difficult circumstances near the end
of WWII:
A
month after he took office [as President of Finland], the Continuation
War was concluded on harsh terms, but ultimately far less
harsh than those imposed on the other states bordering the Soviet
Union. Finland retained its sovereignty,
its parliamentary
democracy and market
economy. Territorial losses were considerable, all Karelia
and Petsamo were lost. Numerous Karelian
refugees needed to be relocated. The war
reparations were very heavy. Finland also had to fight the
Lapland
War against withdrawing German troops in the north, and
at the same time demobilize its own army. It is widely agreed
that only Mannerheim could have guided Finland through these
difficult times, when the Finnish people had to come to terms
with the severe conditions of the armistice, their implementation
by a Soviet-dominated Allied Control Commission, and the task
of post-war reconstruction.[33]
Mannerheim's
term as president was difficult for him. Although he was elected
for a full six-year term, he was in his late seventies, and
had accepted the office reluctantly after being urged to do
so. The situation was exacerbated by frequent periods of ill-health,
the demands of the Allied
Control Commission, and the war
responsibility trials. He was afraid throughout most of
his presidency that the commission would request that he be
prosecuted for crimes
against peace. This never happened. One of the reasons to
this was Stalin's respect for and admiration of the Marshal.
Stalin told a Finnish delegation in Moscow in 1947 that the
Finns owe much to their old Marshal. Due to him Finland was
not occupied.[34]
Despite Mannerheim's criticisms of some of the demands of the
Control Commission, Mannerheim worked hard to carry out Finland's
armistice obligations. He also emphasized the necessity of further
work on reconstruction in Finland after the war...
...On
5 December 2004, Mannerheim was voted as the greatest Finnish
person of all time in the Suuret suomalaiset (Great Finns) contest.
We
must note that an important reason why Finland had to make such
horrendous concessions to the Soviet Empire is because the United
States was under the control of FDR and a Zionist clique who were
allied with Stalin. They and their UK allies --under the control
of the Zionist City of London-- were more than happy to feed Finland
to the Soviet bear, just like the way they betrayed eastern Europe
to Soviet occupation. They even handed anti-Communist Russian
soldiers to certain death by Stalin in "Operation
Keelhaul" and
abandoned U.S. prisoners of war (P.O.W.'s) of the Germans who
fell into Soviet hands. (The U.S. also abandoned
American P.O.W.'s in the Korean and Vietnam Wars).
Another
example where personal heroism decisively affected the destiny of
a Scandinavian country for the better that I also cite on my Henrik
Holappa web page is Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden, who
successfully beat back major encroachments of the Jewish-Catholic
"fungus" of his era:
.
THE COURAGE OF GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS
THE LION OF THE NORTH
WILL INSPIRE US ONCE AGAIN!
"Gustavus Adolphus is one of the most inspiring
characters of the Reformation. The rapid rise to fame of Gustavus
Adolphus, the young King of Sweden, his military innovations
and dramatic victories in battle turned the tide in The Thirty
Years War and saved Protestant Germany from annihilation .
. . He championed the cause of Protestantism and secured religious
freedom for centuries to come." (quote from reformationsa.org)
|
Fortunately,
heroic traditions still persist in certain areas of Scandinavian
societies. As one example, in Part
4 of my Iceland
Gets ENRONed series, I quote from the article "Wall
Street on the Tundra" by Michael Lewis which describes
the heroic culture of Icelandic fishermen:
“I
think it is easier to take someone in the fishing industry and teach
him about currency trading,” he says, “than to take
someone from the banking industry and teach them how to fish.”
He
then explained why fishing wasn’t as simple as I thought.
It’s risky, for a start, especially as practiced by the Icelandic
male. “You don’t want to have some sissy boys on your
crew,” he says, especially as Icelandic captains are famously
manic in their fishing styles. “I had a crew of Russians once,”
he says, “and it wasn’t that they were lazy, but the
Russians are always at the same pace.” When a storm struck,
the Russians would stop fishing, because it was too dangerous. “The
Icelanders would fish in all conditions,” says Stefan, “fish
until it is impossible to fish. They like to take the risks. If
you go overboard, the probabilities are not in your favor. I’m
33, and I already have two friends who have died at sea.”
Hence,
when Norwegian officials kow tow too much, such as when they gave
Obama the Nobel Peace Prize, or when the Norwegian Institute for Air
Research (NILU) shut down its Fukushima plume forecasts on May 11,
2011, this kind of weak behavior can tarnish the image of Norwegians
as heirs to a heroic ancient culture to the point that their actions
invite rather than deter aggression, just like the way a floundering,
limp fish in the ocean can attract sharks.
In
the very hostile, dangerous, unstable, and treacherous world we live
in today, ignorance is not bliss. In the long run we typically pay
a price for our ignorance and delusions that is greater than anything
we gain from these things, both in terms of real costs and opportunity
costs. If the Norwegian American community is going to survive (currently
it is not surviving --its numbers are rapidly declining), it needs
to get better organized and it leaders will have to approach the world
with the kind of tough-minded realism that one might find, for example,
in the business development/competitive analysis departments of successful
companies in highly competitive industries, among scouts for leading
professional football teams, or the intelligence sections of large
military units engaged in successful combat operations. A cohesive
group with a bad plan that is well executed will often defeat other
groups with no plans or cohesion at all. This is a major reason why
Jewish, Italian, Irish Catholic, and other non-WASP mafias have been
squeezing out fragmented and happy-go-lucky WASP groups in America.
The willful blindness and the perverse form of "Nordic naïveté"
currently shown by the recent editors of the Norwegian American
Weekly is ultimately a path to oblivion. In today's highly competitive
and treacherous world, any ethnic group that is unwilling or incapable
of taking a firm stand for its own survival is an ethnic group on
the path to extinction..
The
three most recent editors of NAW, namely Christy Olsen Field, Kelsey
Larson, and Emily Skaftun, will likely pay a terrible personal price
in the next 10-15 years for their willful blindness. As previously
noted from references cited in my Fukushima alerts, the residents
of Seattle breathed somewhere between
5-10 hot particles a day from late March 2011 and throughout
April. We have been receiving "hot rains" from Fukushima
across America ever since the inception of the catastrophe.
Admittedly,
it is hard to quantify risk when it comes to specific individuals,
because everyone has different levels of resistance to disease. Nevertheless,
5-10 hot particles a day for over a month is very serious. In the
absence of aggressive nutrition, detoxification, and radiation mitigation
programs, it is probably a good guess that all three of these ladies
will be dead from lung cancer and other diseases exacerbated by radiation
10-15 years from now.
I
ask that readers join me in protesting the censorship of my Fukushima
alerts by Norwegian American Weekly staff members. In a world
of sharks, this paper must stop its "limp fish" behaviors
and start confronting the greatest radiation disaster in the history
of mankind in a heroic manner. At a minimum, Skaftun & Company
owe me a public apology. They also owe the Norwegian American community,
not to mention other people around the world, the civil defense alerts
now required by humanity for survival.
2014-04-14
Ingunn
Sigurdsdatter - Norway Happiest Country on Earth Myth & Awakening
the Norsemen, transcript
of the Red Ice Radio interview by Henrik Palmgren
2012-09-12
Fukushima
Plumes, Norway Update: Fukushima Radiation and Oslo-Utoya
7/22 False Flag More Ominous Than Ever (Transcript)
Dr. James Fetzer interviews Leuren Moret and Major William B. Fox
on The Real Deal talk show. Transcription by myself.
2012-07-04 Anti-WASP/Anti-Nordic
Genocide. This web page is a compilation of material
I have previously created on other web pages, to include Oslo-Utoya
7-22.
2011-12-17 Emergency
Civil Defense Alert! The Continuing
“Fukushima 3-11”
Radiation Catastrophe and Its Relevance to
“Oslo-Utøya 7-22" coauthored
by William B. Fox, Dr. James H. Fetzer, founder of Scholars for
9/11 Truth, and W. Leon Smith, Publisher of The Lone Star Iconoclast
2011-11-22 Oslo/Utøya
7/22 False
Flag Terror: It now appears extremely likely
that the real "usual
suspects," that is, Mossad-CIA-MI6
"Wise Guys" with the New York 9/11, Madrid 3/22,
and London 7/7 "resume," decided
it was time to punish Norwegian "heretics."
An open source intelligence summary series with social commentary
by William B. Fox.
2011-08-04 Henrik
Palmgren interview with Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde – The Norway
Massacre, Anders Behring Breivik & Mind Control,
Red Ice Radio,
2010-12-24 Dear
Norwegian American Weekly; The BP-Gulf Catastrophe Continuing
Threat and Avenues for Effective Activism by William
Fox. These avenues include promoting the aggressive development
of sea-swimming robots that can determine the degree of hydrocarbon
pollution in ocean water down to extreme depths, and also exploit
new nanofiber technologies to clean hydrocarbons out of ocean and
fresh water.
|
The interview conducted by Dr. James Fetzer titled "
The
cumulative
impact of 
William
B. Fox, is a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, an honors graduate
of the Harvard Business School, and publisher of 
"In
a personal email, environmental researcher Dr. Ilya Perlingieri
explained the dangers of Japan dumping thousands of tons of
radioactive water in the Pacific, saying:
In
this last half of the two hour interview, Leuren Moret and Major
William Fox describe more symptoms of the ever unfolding Fukushima
radiation horror, such as mass wildlife kills, growing hermaphroditism
and other signs of mutation among plants and animals alike,
and even splotches
of Chernobyl-style "red forest syndrome" detected in Michigan.
Naval oranges, almonds, dried prunes and pistachios grown
in California are now showing signs of serious contamination. Alaska
wildlife such as seals and polar bears have been showing symptoms
of radiation poisoning. Even members of Alaska Airlines flight crews
are reporting hair loss and other signs of radiation sickness. 
_San_Diego-large.JPG)
In
fact, speaking of being at CBS, when I first got there, you know,
sometimes being there, at a certain place, tells you something
that you don't really feel from just getting it in books. When
I was at the CBS headquarters, I would look south. I looked down
6th Avenue, and it looks like a human [made] Grand Canyon with
all the tall skyscrapers. Within two blocks south is Rockefeller
Center which had the NBC headquarters. So then I walked on the
other side of the building, facing north, and at that time in
1984, the ABC headquarters was about two blocks north looking
towards Central Park. I was aware that according to studies, most
Americans at that time got their information from television network
news, and those three networks had a 75% rating, which means that
most Americans got most of their news from three networks whose
headquarters were located within a two block radius of CBS. Just
three entities. The executives there in the CBS headquarters,
if they would make a job move, they would just go two blocks to
NBC or ABC. Quite a few of them would all go through Grand Central
Station commuting to and from work. I thought, that right there
tells me that there is a tremendous concentration of media in
this country. [1:00:34] 
patterns used by "
