Starting with first principles and the scientific method
America First Books
Featuring ebooks that find a truer path in uncertain times

William B. Fox Archive


Dare anyone question official accounts of an
attack at this holy temple of Holocaustianity?
(wikipedia photo)

Braving the Guilt
by Association Gambit

In Order To Conduct
Real Research


by William B. Fox

June 12, 2009

William B. Fox

In his 10 June 2008 article "Why He Did It And Why Von Brunn Won't Be The Last," we see white rights attorney Edgar Steele wanting to strenuously distance himself from the alleged killer. Steele stated: "Would I defend Von Brunn for his actions today? Absolutely not, unless it was simply to secure him a fair plea deal or at a sentencing hearing. Never could I defend his conduct at trial. And, even then, I wouldn't do a single thing for him pro bono."
Steele summarized his understanding of Von Brunn's actions as follows:

Suddenly, the news today is full of yet another crazed-gunman-opens-fire story. James Von Brunn, inveterate Internet crank and author of "Kill the Best Gentiles," was shot by Washington, DC, National Holocaust Museum armed guards as he tried to force his way in with a rifle. Von Brunn shot and injured one of the guards before he, himself, was critically injured by another just inside the entrance. At the time of this writing, both Von Brunn and the injured guard are hospitalized and in "grave condition."

Why Did He Do It?

The TV news today is full of the question, always asked after one of these shootings, but never of those of us capable of providing the correct answer: "Why did he do it?" Always, the news anchors and pundits go on to answer their own question by dismissing the gunman of the moment as a right-wing, hate-filled nut case, illustrative of why further restrictions on liberty and gun ownership are necessary.

Without question, the Holocaust Museum shooting provided a tremendous "guilt by association" propaganda bonanza for Jewish organizations, Zionist national media, and the Obama administration, who lost little time using it to discredit "the usual suspects."
In "Slain Museum Guard's Kindness Repaid With Bullet," Stephen Tyrone Jones, a black man, became "The hero security guard gunned down at the U.S. Holocaust Museum [who] came face to face with evil when he opened the building's doors out of kindness for his 88-year-old killer, officials said."
President Barack Obama stated "I am shocked and saddened by today’s shooting at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. This outrageous act reminds us that we must remain vigilant against anti-Semitism and prejudice in all its forms. No American institution is more important to this effort than the Holocaust Museum, and no act of violence will diminish our determination to honor those who were lost by building a more peaceful and tolerant world."
Obama may have forgotten that it is the fallacy of ad misericordium (appeal to pity) to evaluate the historical validity of Holocaust Museum exhibits based solely upon ones emotional reaction to current events as opposed to scholarly study of historical facts.
In the 10 June Huffington Post article "James Von Brunn Apparently Part Of Obama `Birther' Movement," Sam Stein wrote: "Among the myriad of disturbing qualities of James Von his apparent belief that Barack Obama is not a citizen of the United States and therefore has no right to the presidency....Indeed a `birther' mindset is more a symptom of extremism than a cause."
Steins skirts the possibility that the so-called `birther' mindset is usually motivated by a simple desire to enforce the Constitutional requirement for only a "natural born" citizen to become president rather than anything to do with "extremism."
Glenn Beck stated 10 June on Fox News "A group that I have been warning about for a very long time are these 9-11 Truthers. The information we have at this point is that this guy [von Brunn] is a hero in the 9-11 Truth Movement, I do not know if that is true or not, that is the early report."
Washington's Blog noted: "Geraldo Rivera previously tried to do the exact same thing in connection with the Times Square bombing, and failed miserably. And the Simon Weisenthal Center previously accused credible 9/11 truth organizations of being terrorists, or at least helping to radicalize people into becoming terrorists."
In the 12 June Times Online article "White supremacist gunman James W. von Brunn had links to BNP" Kaya Burgess observed that "Todd Blodgett, a former White House aide who worked as an informant within white supremacist groups, said today that Mr von Brunn and his friend John de Nugent had attended meetings in Arlington County, Virginia, of the American Friends of the BNP. The organisation was set up to raise funds for the BNP but has since been disbanded."
I contacted John de Nugent, whose reaction to von Brunn was covered by national media. He said that he was simply an acquaintance —not a "friend." He never met von Brunn in person, nor attended a BNP meeting. He happened to exchange some emails and a few phone conversations after von Brunn became aware of de Nugent via email mass mailers and national publicity.
Regarding the clumsy link to the British National Party, the BNP probably does not screen out any members of the general public who want to attend its meetings. Therefore, von Brunn's attendance in no way implies BNP agreement with his tactics or beliefs. It is very coincidental that this cheap shot comes right after BNP Chairman Nick Griffin made a political breakthrough by getting elected as a Member of the European Parliament.
I have authored two online books of the series titled: Mission of Conscience: Capt. Eric May, The Info War, And Amazing Predictions Come True which document continuous patterns of false flag attacks, assassinations, and major media manipulation by Mossad-CIA and their allies. In chapter 12 I describe evidence for why Osama Bin Laden likely died in 2001, and Saddam Hussein may have killed by a bomb in April 2003, only to be kept "alive" by Mossad-CIA imposters. In chapter 17 I describe evidence presented by Michael Collins Piper in Final Judgment that Lee Harvey Oswald was used as a patsy by Mossad-CIA in the JFK assassination, and also evidence from his book The Judas Goats that Timothy McVeigh was part of a Mossad-CIA-ADL set-up for the Oklahoma City bombing.
Israelis have been known to repeatedly attack themselves to gain propaganda points. Consider the false flag attack on the Jewish refugee ship Patria in Haifa harbor in 1940 which killed 250 Jews or Naeim Giladi's description of covert Mossad bombings against Jews in Iraq in 1950 to precipitate the massive transfer of Iraqi Jews to Israel.
Israelis have also repeatedly made false flag attacks on Americans, their prime benefactors. Consider the 1954 Lavon Affair in Egypt, the 1967 attack on the U.S.S. Liberty, and their likely involvement in the 9-11 World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks.
Lastly, they have created fake domestic opposition to push their own political agenda. As one example, researcher Laird Wilcox documents in "Crying Wolf: Hate Crime Hoaxes In America" widespread instances where Jews have covertly desecrated tombstones, synagogues, national monuments, and other sensitive areas with swastikas and anti-Semitic epithets in order to draw public sympathy.
Another prime example is the article "Neo-Nazis are best simply ignored" by Ezra Levant:

In 1965 and 1966, the Canadian Jewish Congress helped organize the fledgling Canadian Nazi Party...
... they hired an ex-cop named John Garrity to go to work for the Canadian Nazi Party.
Garrity helped organize that rag-tag band of losers, though they never amounted to anything except for fodder for the press.
There were only a dozen active Nazis when Garrity joined them and they weren't really a political party. He called them "harmless misfits," and they were — their leader, John Beattie, was a nervous, gaunt, unemployed 24-year-old clerk who spent much of his time dodging angry Jews who tried to beat him up. (One of Garrity's jobs was to help Beattie escape street fights.)
Garrity brought more than just rum to the Nazis. He brought with him pretty much the only organizational talent the group had. They put him in charge of membership. Garrity called himself the "Heinrich Himmler" of the party, and a "Nazi leader for the Jewish Congress"...
....Of course, Garrity helped his paymasters at the CJC, too, giving them information about the names of party members and donors. And when Garrity finally quit the Nazis, he wrote a tell-all about his adventure in Maclean's magazine.

Garrity larded that report with personal insults toward Beattie and the Nazis. But he did acknowledge that they had never done, or even contemplated doing, anything illegal. All of the violence he witnessed was directed at Beattie, usually by Jewish vigilantes. "Sadly, it is the ... anti-Nazi extremists who, in their attempts to destroy Beattie, provide him with most of the publicity he craves. If it weren't for the riots and the assaults and the public protest meetings they hold, there'd be no real news in Beattie," Garrity wrote.
And that is the importance of this story and why I put it in my book about human rights commissions. Beattie hadn't done anything illegal. He was just a loser who believed in a discredited ideology. But the CJC wanted to bring in political censorship laws and I believe they needed to build up the threat to persuade Parliament to abridge Canada's freedom of speech.
Garrity puffed up a group of Nazi nobodies into a national menace, first through organizational support and then through spectacular media publicity. And, sure enough, Parliament enacted section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which censors offensive speech.

Please read my 10 March 2009 Lone Star Iconoclast article "Facing a Thought Crime Tribunal North of the Border!" about what an Orwellian disaster section 13 has become for Canadian citizens.
The list of Jewish-Israeli subterfuges is so long that we would be very naive to take any breaking news stories about attacks on Jewish lives and property in America at face value without first checking for inconsistencies, investigating the facts, and exploring alternative theories.

Capt May believes that Holocaust Museums probably serve as Mossad front operations. Many were completed according to Kabbalistic day-month numerical date codes such as 9-11 for the New York museum, 3-3 for Houston, 4-19 for Chicago, and 4-22 for Washington, D.C. This is also consistent with terror date code analysis for false flag bombing attacks that I cover in my two books.
A Holocaust Museum is certainly a very plausible false flag target. In fact, Capt. May published on June 10th "James von Brunn — Is He a Patsy?Holocaust Museum Shooting May Be a False Flag"

It is possible to have a "soft false flag" scenario where the accused is indeed guilty of a crime, but the circumstances behind the case are so embellished and distorted, and the national media reaction is so extremely biased, that it effectively becomes a full blown "Info War" propaganda event much like a completely fabricated false flag operation.
As an example of a possible "soft false flag" scenario, imagine if von Brunn's primary objective had been to simply take hostages to gain national media attention, similar to what he attempted in 1981 with Federal Reserve members before spending 6.5 years in Federal prison. Also please imagine that the security guard who died was accidentally shot by another guard.
A 1981 NYT article claims that Von Brunn was "disarmed after waving gun at security guard in Federal Reserve building in Washington." However, on pages 383 and 383 of his book Kill the Best Gentiles!, Von Brunn claims he carried no ammunition, and his primary purpose was political grandstanding:

7 December 1981, I hoped to reveal to the American People certain Facts regarding the World Marxist Conspiracy that are suppressed by the mass-media. I attempted to place the FED Board of Governors under legal, non-violent, citizens arrest - supported by D.C. statutes, and by Misprision of Felony statute under U.S. Treason and Sedition Law. I charge the FED with Treason, operation of a Fraudulent Enterprise, and Un-Constitutional Private Corporate Operations. I intended to hold the Board prisoners in the Board Room, demand that their fellow conspirators at CBS provide national TV-hookup; then, over TV to figuratively hand over the felons to the American people with an explanation of my charges against the FED. I then intended to hand over the prisoners, unharmed, to the President of the United States. I expected to stand trial in a U.S. Federal District Court, and prove the Fed’s culpability to a jury of my peers. I expected the jury to find the FED guilty and my citizens’ arrest of the felons upheld by statute. Thus, We the People would issue a mandam to the Congress of the United States to bring proceeding against the FED, a privately held corporation, under Federal Tort Law.
I failed to achieve my objectives at the FED Building. There was no violence. I voluntarily surrendered my unloaded weapons to the guard, a former U.S. Marine. I carried no ammo or explosives (all of these facts either omitted or distorted in the official record).

If von Brunn was primarily motivated at the Holocaust Museum to engage in political grandstanding once again, this could become a "soft false flag" event if Zionist-controlled national media were to ignore actual evidence and instead portray von Brunn as a would-be mass-murderer who was part of some kind of fantastic neo-Nazi conspiracy across America that can only be contained by invoking severe hate crime laws, confiscating all privately owned guns, invoking martial law, and throwing all critics of Israel and Jews in jail, don't you know.
Other plausible false flag scenarios may involve some combination of LIHOP (Let It Happen On Purpose) and MIHOP (Made it Happen on Purpose). We have strong evidence from post 9-11 directives that the Federal government monitors emails and other communications of significant political dissidents. Given that von Brunn may have manifested increased signs of hostility and instability (as described by John De Nugent in the National Post article "Details of Holocaust museum shooting emerge as James von Brunn charged with murder"), Mossad-CIA-ADL may have baited him into entering the museum unarmed. Mossad agents dressed as security guards might have shot both the black security guard who met von Brunn at the door, as well as von Brunn himself, and then planted the .22 rifle on von Brunn as evidence.
Given Mossad-CIA's long and sorry track record for deception, none of these hypothetical scenarios are preposterous until anyone produces hard evidence to the contrary.
Capt May has identified many anomalies in news reports that bear further investigation. The following are some examples:
First, we still have no hard photographic evidence from numerous surveillance cameras in the area confirming newspaper reports that von Brunn, an elderly former U.S. Naval officer, double-parked his car and approached the Holocaust museum entrance while allegedly carrying a .22 rifle and wearing a Confederate hat (according to one source, overlooked by others).
According to 10 June 2009 CNN Transcripts, a witness named Maria claimed that security guard Stephen Tyrone Powers was a victim of "friendly fire:"

HENRY: And then you saw some of the return fire from the security personnel?
MARIA: Yes, it hit the security man. I am not sure where, but he was flat on his back.

The police said at first that von Brunn was carrying a shotgun, then this changed to a "rifle." Later in the afternoon the rifle became a .22.
Von Brunn somehow walked by or near heightened security surrounding William Cohen, the former Jewish Secretary of Defense in the Clinton Administration. Cohen was ostensibly present in connection with a play written by his black wife to be shown in the museum. The presence of a high level Jewish person like Cohen at the crime scene is eerily reminiscent of the presence of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the vicinity of the July 7, 2005 London Terror bombing. In Chapter 13 of Book I explain why this was likely another Mossad-CIA operation.
Once von Brunn got inside the museum, according to one source, security guards stationed about twenty yards away at a security desk somehow ducked for cover while firing a fairly tight pattern that impacted against the museum door.

Holocaust Museum bullet holes

Several witnesses reported the sounds of four or five shots, whereas police reported eleven shell casings on the floor. "Evidence technicians recovered eight .38 caliber cartridges casings, three .22 caliber cartridge casings, and a .22 caliber rifle loaded with ten live rounds of ammunition."
The timing of this incident was amazingly coincidental, coming only ten days after two other "lone nut" stories. Scott Roeder murdered abortion physician Dr. George Tiller on May 31st, and Muslim Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad murdered U.S. Army recruiters Pvt. William Long and Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula on June 1st.
Scholar Michael Hoffman has noted:

"FBI agent Ronald Farnsworth said in a court affidavit that von Brunn, driving a red 2002 Hyundai, double parked outside the museum entrance on 14th Street SW near the Mall at 12:44 p.m., got out of the car and walked toward the building, carrying the rifle at his side. Johns, a guard at the museum for six years, 'was kind enough to open the door'...D.C. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier said at a news briefing yesterday. Von Brunn 'raised his rifle, aimed it at [Johns] and fired one time,' hitting the guard in the upper left side of his chest, Farnsworth wrote, adding, 'The defendant continued through the door and raised his firearm as if to fire again." Washington Post, June 12, 2009
My question is, how often does a policeman casually open the door to a secure facility for a man carrying a rifle? Was Officer Johns set up? Had he been told in advance to expect an elderly man carrying a prop to enter the museum and to allow him to do so? You will notice that once Von Brunn had created a "Holocaust" martyr by shooting Johns, he was immediately neutralized.

In his 10 June article "Now Playing At the Holocaust Museum `The Lone Nut' (What A Coincidence)" Michael Hoffman wrote:

Today another "lone nut" has changed the course of history. Like "lone nut" James Earl Ray and "lone nut" Sirhan Sirhan, as well as "lone nuts" Arthur Bremer and Ted Kaczynski, James von Brunn now joins the ranks of the Cryptocracy's hit parade. What a "coincidence"!
With his shooting at the U.S. Holocaust Museum, Von Brunn has reinvigorated the old 20th century Black/Zionist coalition, on the very day when African-American U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder was due to visit the museum to hear a reading of the script of "Anne and Emmett," a play about Anne Frank and Emmet Till. What a "coincidence"!
The author of the "Anne and Emmett" play is Janet Langhart Cohen, the Black wife of former Secretary of Defense William Cohen who directed American forces during the NATO holocaust against the churches, monasteries and people of Christian Serbia in 1999. What a "coincidence"!
Von Brunn has acted a part in the self-fulfilling prophecy of The Holocaust mythos, by reenacting it in miniature. By doing so he will enter the museum's canon of devil goyim who can't seem to resist attacking symbols of Judaic culture and innocence. He has victimized the eternal victims, squaring their vision of themselves as forever hated and perpetually persecuted. What a "coincidence"!
The religion of Orthodox Judaism is designed so as to capitalize on and benefit from any violent attack on it or it adherents. Without such violence from outsiders, attacks are sometimes orchestrated from within.
During the regime of Republican President George W. Bush, the "threat from the extreme Right" was de-emphasized by the Cryptocracy. White crusader golem were needed to support and staff the war in Afghanistan against Muslims, and the war in Iraq against Arabs. With those goals now pretty much accomplished and a Black Democrat in the White House, the powers-that-be seem to have decided to reanimate the "extreme Right wing threat" and raise it back to the marquee bogeyman role it played during the regime of Bill Clinton, when the Oklahoma City Bombing was mounted by a supposed lone nut duo, but which researchers like David Hoffman (no relation to this writer) have reported was a conspiracy deeply connected to the US government itself — including to such government front groups as the "Aryan Republican Army" bank-robbery gang and "Aryan Nations."
Since Americans are saddled generation after generation with a government-mouthpiece media, the lone nut gambit remains forever young in the eyes of those who are dependent for their news on echo-chamber journalists and talking heads who repeat as gospel whatever officialdom happens to declare about the gunman.
Years later, "when the hurly burly's done and the battle's lost and won," the real conspiracy is usually thawed for public consumption. For example, there are few independent thinkers today who believe that McVeigh and his sidekick single-handedly destroyed the Murrah building, or that Ray Killed Martin Luther King, or that Kaczynski was not a patsy like Lee Harvey Oswald.
For now, however, the alchemical processing cooker is on high as the groundwork for the criminalization of "Holocaust' denial" is being established, and the high priests of Holocaustianity are given renewed pledges of unquestioning obeisance by America's governing class and opinion-moulding elite. As the script thickens its plot line, hysterical idolization of all things Judaic, rabbinic and Israeli approaches vertiginous new heights of fawning subservience.
The 400 children murdered last December and January in Gaza by the descendants of "Holocaust' Survivors," have been deposited in the dustbin of history. There never was and never will be an exhibit at the synagogue-masquerading-as-a-museum about the the horrors of the Israeli holocaust against the Palestinians; but it won't be long before the iconic image of a Black policeman who died defending America's most hallowed Judaic shrine, will earn a perpetual memorial there.
Our masters govern by methods that overrule all documentation and silence all arguments: assassination, stealth, treachery, the doublecross and most of all, the inculcation of the doublemind. Their guarantee of last resort comes courtesy of a bullet fired by a "lone nut" who emerges from obscurity to rescue the Cryptocracy's chestnuts from an impending fire, or secure it victory where it would otherwise experience eclipse. What a "coincidence"!
James von Brunn's six-pointed star will forever shine in the Cryptocracy's lone nut firmament.

It would be great if the national dialog could stay focused upon examining the pathologies of various individuals or interest groups. Unfortunately dictatorial laws are already in place in America for the government to conduct massive roundups of suspected "terrorists," as I explain in chapter 23 of Book II titled "NSPD-51 and the Creation of the Perfect Police State Mouse Trap."
Also very ominous is the upcoming National Level Exercise (NLE) '09 in July which "will be the first major exercise conducted by the United States government that will focus exclusively on terrorism prevention and protection, as opposed to incident response and recovery." As stated at the FEMA web site, "This year the United States welcomes the participation of Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United Kingdom in NLE 09."
Do we need for Mexican military forces to help us deal with domestic "terrorism prevention and protection"? Consider how King George III imported Hessian mercenaries during the American Revolution, and "King Lincoln" imported a large army of foreign mercenaries, and also relied on the Russian Navy to help protect the ports of New York and San Francisco, during the War Against Southern Independence. The involvement of foreigners to help curb ill-defined domestic "terrorists" should be deeply troubling.
Capt. May's honest disclosure in his recent article "James von Brunn vs. Capt. Eric H. May on Race and the Jews"exposes him to risks. There are quite a few "investigators" in government, national media, and among special interest organizations such as the ADL and SPLC who are more interested in fabricating "guilt by association" political smears than finding truth. As an example, certain officials in the Department of Homeland Security recently tarred Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans, Ron Paul Libertarians, Constitutionalists, gun owners, anti-abortionists, and other dissidents as potential terrorists. Please see the March 25th article "We're All Terrorists Now" by Idaho activist attorney Edgar Steele.
Such ultra paranoid statements would be hilarious if these officials were not so serious about using labels to intimidate the general population out of its First Amendment rights.
Free thinking political dissidents are virtually guaranteed to get placed on somebody's suspect "lists" for their willingness to not only openly express their views, but also stay in contact with highly controversial individuals and ideas in order to access different viewpoints and gather evidence. The dilemma for all Americans is that if everyone runs for cover, and silently surrenders to the threat of "guilt by association," then this country will go from at least having some chance of preserving liberty and rational dialog to none at all.
We advocate a rational, open, and peaceful approach for resolving America's problems. War, deception, and false flag operations go hand in hand and frequently have unintended consequences. The best way to prevent reoccurrences of the kind of tragedy that took place at the Holocaust museum is to uncover the truth about high level government malfeasance, false flag attacks, irresponsible Holocaust exaggerations, Zionist criminality, and forms of high level corruption that do continuing violence to our integrity both as individuals and as a people.

* * * * * * * * *


William B. Fox is a former Marine Corps Major with experience in logistics, public affairs, and military intelligence. He is an honors graduate of the Harvard Business School, a Phi Beta Kappa graduate from the University of Southern California, and publisher of

Additional Update References

20090611 The Exploitation Of The Holocaust Museum Shooting by Robert Stark,
20090612 Von Brunn: Sept. 11 was 'USA-Israel inside job' Interestingly enough, this article does an unfair "guilt by association" number on the author of this article. It states: "Von Brunn sometimes sent several e-mails a day to friends and fellow white supremacists. The messages were obtained by The Associated Press from William B. Fox, who was on von Brunn's e-mail list."
This wording can create the false impression that I was a "friend" of Von Brunn and a "white supremacist," and therefore a sympathizer with his suspected lethal tactics and overall philosopy
I was a passive recipient of emails from von Brunn, but never corresponded with him or solicited his materials. He started sending me mass distribution emails on general topics after he saw my coauthored 24 Oct 2008 Lone Star Iconoclast article "Orwellian Alert! British Crackdown Threatens Us All" posted on the Internet. I could hardly be called an "acquaintance" much less a "friend." While I certainly advocate that whites should have the same right to survival, self-defense, group identity, and self-determination as other races, I do not advocate that whites should exploit or oppress other races, which is a connotation that most people get today from the term "white supremacism."
However, it is true that I received and accumulated mass distribution emails from von Brunn. I volunteered this fact and forwarded 21 of his most recent emails to Mike Ahlers, Homeland Security Producer at CNN and also Ben Nuckols, Baltimore Bureau Associated Press. My goal was to help provide them with background information to better understand the state of mind of von Brunn, particularly since Capt. May was concerned that von Brunn may be a part of some kind of soft false flag operation. .
The unsophisticated reader might also get the subliminal impression that because Von Brunn agreed with the view that 9-11 was an inside job, that members of the 9-11 Truth Movement somehow agree with Von Brunn's philosophy and tactics. This is completely irrational and ridiculous, as Dr. James Fetzer explains in his recent article "Is 9/11 Research `anti-Semitic?'" However, it is not uncommon for certain segments of the general public to subliminally accept irrational and ridiculous ideas when they do not stop to think about what certain media may be feeding them.
As a final comment, I would also note that even if I had spoken with von Brunn over the phone and exchanged emails with him, so what? I am in touch with all kinds of extremely controversial people all the time on many ends of the political and religious spectrum. It is not practical or feasible to know everything about everyones' background that one comes in contact with, to include all their political views or what sort of trouble they might get into. It is impossible to live in free society where people can efficiently access new ideas and facts if people become fearful of anyone who sounds the slightest bit controversial.
20090615 Journalist Calls For Rounding Up 'Hate Promoters' by Robert Stark,

Bonnie Erbe who is a contributing editor for US News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program wrote a recent article titled "Round Up Hate Promoters Now, Before Any More Holocaust Museum Attacks." In regards to the recent shooting at the Holocaust Museum, Erbe has a suggestion, "isn't it time we started rounding up promoters of hate before they kill?" She also ties in the shooter in the museum incident with Reverend Wright.
Recently the Plains State ADL Director denounced the 1st Amendment by saying that "freedom of speech does not extend to racist groups, nor give their supporters the right to threaten and intimidate others or commit acts of violence."

20090616 Some suspect conspiracy in Holocaust Museum case by Mike M. Ahlers CNN
20090616 Rifle used in museum shooting too old to trace, official says by Carol Cratty CNN
20090618 FBI: Child porn on accused museum shooter computer. John de Nugent wrote in a 20090618 email:

...My first reaction.. these may be just verbal talking points..... the Jews clearly want to link porn and racism and say all WN activists are child molesters and the like....Von Brunn told me three weeks ago he GAVE AWAY his computer. But now the FBI says they "found it at his apartment." Really? But if he gave it away, and why would he lie to me about that, how was it found "at his apartment"? How convenient they "found" child porn..... COINTELPRO lives.... why looky what we found!.... Who really put it there? On an unguarded computer of a harsh government and Jewish critic? And Cui bono? Who benefits from this story? It defames all anti-Jewish activists -- guilt by association -- with the worst moral taint possible and with NO proof. Even if the accusation is later quietly dropped this is designed to pollute the public impression of all white activists and leave a sinister, lingering aftertaste down in the unconscious mind. The public will remember only "the accused" child porn collector James von Brunn..... Sure, if he hates Jews he must love sex with kids.....the ultimate non-sequitur.... Once accused of child porn or molestation the slur always leaves after-effects. Already in many Europeans countries the political police seeks constantly to juxtapose in all public communications that "we must shield the public from racism and child porn." This is purest character assassination; I have never ever heard anyone say von Brunn was not a decent individual morally, even his ex-wife. He sounded like a total straight arrow on the phone. Your tax dollars at work, to smear all white activists in the dim eyes of the gullble, dumbed-down public. "Gee, ma, the FBI found child porn on that racist shooter's computer.. the guvmint would never lie....Obama, he promises change....." I will tell you all who is into writing child porn novels, but as a Jewish neo-con he gets a pass: Cheney's chief of staff, the serious felon who got off with a slap on the wrist. This multimillionaire gets a $250K fine and a commuted 30-month sentence from Bush and is disbarred until 2012. Let's recall that although this pervert likes the cute name "Scooter" his real first name is the rather more Jewish-sounding "Irving."
"Wikipedia: Libby's first and only novel, The Apprentice, about a group of travelers stranded in northern Japan in the winter of 1903 during a smallpox epidemic, was first published in a hardback edition, by Graywolf Press, in St. Paul, Minnesota, in 1996 and reprinted as a trade paperback, by St. Martin's Thomas Dunne Books, in 2002. After Libby's indictment in the CIA leak grand jury investigation, in 2005, St. Martin's Press reissued The Apprentice as a mass market paperback (Griffin imprint).[42][43][44] It has been described as "a thriller ... that includes references to bestiality, pedophilia and rape."[44]
"I strongly doubt the integrity of the FBI agents making this claim. This seems an obvious setup to create a wave of hatred against all white activists who are peaceful and family-oriented citizens as I am." John de Nugent

2009-06-23 New ADL Hate Bill Attacks America by Rev Ted Pike. The language in this proposed bill now treads on "thought crime" territory. This and other articles in the Rev. Ted Pike archive document a dangerous trend towards draconian repression in America.
2009-06-27 Thought Crime Bills Threaten Talk Radio by Kurt Nimmo.

In the wake of a series of crimes the corporate media and the ADL have linked to “white supremacists” (the killing of police officers in Pittsburgh and the attack by James von Brunn on the Holocaust museum in Washington), the ADL and its partners on the so-called left have engaged in an orchestrated campaign to demonize groups and individuals that are not racist or separatist.
The Department of Homeland Security drafted a template for this persecution with its report on “rightwing extremism.” The DHS and police agencies around the country have linked pro-life, states’ rights and anti-illegal immigration activism and support for the Second Amendment to racist thought crime as defined by the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center.During a speech delivered at the Anti-Defamation League National Leadership Conference in Washington, DHS secretary Janet Napolitano admitted the agency enjoys a special relationship with the ADL. Napolitano said the ADL and DHS “have had some good partnerships” and said the agency has placed its employees in the ADL’s “advanced training school to educate us on the tactics used by extremists and terrorists."
After the white supremacist Richard Poplawski allegedly killed three police officers in Pittsburgh, the ADL attempted to link radio talk show host Alex Jones to the crime. “One of Poplawski’s favorite places for such conspiracy theories was the Web site of the right-wing conspiracy radio talk show host Alex Jones. Poplawski visited the site, Infowars, frequently, shared links to it with others, and sometimes even posted to it,” the ADL wrote in an article on Poplawski.

2009-06-29 ADL Exploits Tragedy to Push Limit on Free Speech by Michael Collins Piper, American Free Press.

Here’s the story that’s not been reported anywhere else: On June 12, the conservative Washington Times— which regularly touts the globalist and Zionist agenda— featured a headline story announcing that “Debate arises on legality of Holocaust denial,” as a consequence of what happened at the Holocaust Museum, adding fuel to the fire.
So now the propaganda drive for legislation targeting not just “Holocaust denial” but all manner of political freedom of expression is being rejuvenated.
Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi, the wealthy American founder of the Israel Project, one of many well-funded Jewish lobby operations, was quoted in the Washington Times article as saying that public distribution of so-called “hate literature” as well as “hate” on public access cable should be outlawed.

The short URL for this article:

Support the America First Institute — Here



Flag carried by the 3rd Maryland Regiment at the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781

© America First Books
America First Books offers many viewpoints that are not necessarily its own in order to provide additional perspectives.