Alert to Congress
Regarding Hate Bills and
the False Flag Attack Threat by William B. Fox February 26, 2009
Dear Fellow Citizen:
It is imperative that we stop all proposed hate crime legislation at the House Judiciary Committee level by calling up all members NOW. I have attached a list of House Judiciary members and their phone numbers at the end of this page. Don't forget to tell everyone about Rev. Ted Pike's How to Kill the Hate Bills video referenced below.
A perfect example of “bureaucratic mission creep” is portrayed in the documentary: “America: Freedom to Fascism” at:
It is incredible how the IRS has grown into an all-pervasive influence in American life with myriad rules and regulations with so little underlying real legal basis for collecting income taxes from individuals.
There is no such thing as innocuous legislative language that creates oversight bureaucracy to intensify punishments when individuals are charged with expressing politically-incorrect thoughts and attitudes. If we let this hate crime legislation pass, some day we will be saddled with “human rights tribunals” to monitor our speech and attitudes far more pervasive than the IRS. There will be no real freedom left in America.
Here is a sample email that I have sent to hundreds of Congressmen after personally making phone calls to Judiciary Committee members.
I hope that I can inspire you to take action to help awaken fellow citizens. Please pass this email on to others.
Dear Member of Congress:
Rev Ted Pike is a nationally well-known First Amendment activist whose emergency alert provided below should be required reading for all members of Congress.
Former Army intelligence officer Capt. Eric May and I have repeatedly achieved mass distribution on the Internet with our co-authored false flag alerts, a recent example of which is also provided below.
We are now faced with two issues that are so critical that over the last two days I have personally been on the phone and called not only my Congressman, but also every Congressional staffer of every member of the House Judiciary Committee. Now I wish to follow up with this email to every member of Congress, as well as to other government officials, media contacts, and the general public.
Too many Americans are complacent with the new Obama Administration. They are totally unaware of major points that I have made on my “Obama Nation” web page at: http://tinyurl.com/68rusg. There are strong indicators that the Obama Administration will actually be dangerously worse than the Bush Administration, if such is possible.
The Hate Crime Threat
The most immediate threat involves the proposed “hate crime” legislation described by Rev Ted Pike below, consisting of H.R. 256 and H.R. 262 currently in the House Judiciary Committee. When one looks underneath the hood, it is frighteningly Orwellian.
First, please take a look at the text of H.R. 256 (please go http://www.thomas.gov/ and in the Search Bill Summary & Status input box, enter “H. R. 256”)
Of course the whole hate crime concept is pernicious and completely out of step with underlying principles of the Anglo-Saxon Common Law to begin with. Please see my essay titled “The Hate Crime Law Concept: It is all very sinister for at least nine major reasons” at the very end of this email, that is also provided on my “Rev Ted Pike archive” web page at: http://tinyurl.com/44xyoo.
We have more than enough laws at it stands to handle assault and battery, murder, and other criminal behavior. Adding more laws has not addressed the fundamental causes of America’s problems. In fact, adding these laws is symptomatic of decadence and decline. As the Roman writer Tacitus once put it, "Where the state is most corrupt, then the laws are most multiplied."
At a time when America suffers from out of control Third World immigration across its porous borders, when the white population (not to mention the formerly productive middle class) is declining at about 1-2% a year as a percentage of the total population, and the public is reeling from the lies promulgated by the Bush administration and its Zionist neo-con cohorts to drag America into disastrous Middle Eastern adventures (for example see High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper), this bill will make it only that much easier for Federal authorities and special interest groups to intimidate and frame any racially conscious whites who dare to take a public stand for any form of white popular sovereignty or to criticize the Jewish lobby.
Any time there is any kind of conflict between members of different racial or ethnic groups, this will empower prosecutors to trump up more charges and throw the book with ever more draconian penalties against the accused, totally beyond the degree of any actual injury intended or inflicted. On my web page “Suppressed Nationalists, Historical Revisionists, and Other Dissidents” at: http://tinyurl.com/desbga I provide examples that show extreme political bias by Federal enforcers in their interpretation of the law --even without the enhancements of hate crime laws.
As one example, because of his white separatist views, Federal agents first tried to frame Randy Weaver, and then killed his wife and son. Had it not been for the personal initiative of retired Green Beret Col. Bo Gritz to serve as a mediator, the Feds would have likely gone ahead with their plan to blow Weaver and the remainder of his family off Ruby Ridge, Idaho with high explosives. Next, Attorney General Janet Reno and her minions incinerated seventy six Branch Davidians, including seventeen children, in their Waco, Texas home. This ruthless action was largely motivated by their Identity Christian views. It would have been relatively easy to apprehend their leader David Koresh whenever he made a simple trip into town. In addition, there is strong evidence that former Congressman James Traficante, who dared to stand up to the Jewish lobby, got framed and received a draconian sentence totally out proportion to any real or imagined wrong-doing. See the book Target: Traficant by Michael Collins Piper. Lastly, there is also strong evidence of Federal bias behind the trial and lengthy imprisonment of white nationalist leader Shaun Walker based upon some kind of bar room scuff where egos but not bodies got bruised, and Walker himself may have not even been present.
More hate crime laws will only increase biased Federal influence and control of local police. They will make all the aforementioned problems even worse. In fact, we see no evidence that the political biases that caused these problems have gone away. To the contrary, in view of the recent election of arguably the most leftist president in American history, we see a strong indicator that Federal authorities will continue to promulgate their own macabre and peculiar versions of “bias crimes.”
As local police lose their autonomy, power gravitates towards the center where absolute power corrupts absolutely. Local police become pawns of the intrigues of high level bureaucrats and political operators. We already have way too much Federalization and militarization of local police as it stands.
The text of H.R. 262 (again, please go to http://www.thomas.gov/ and enter “H. R. 262”) proposes the creation of a “national clearinghouse and resource center.” I believe that Rev. Ted Pike’s fears are well-founded. This could likely create a Federally-funded, 24-hour centralized “thought control” command center run by a private self-styled “civil liberties group” such as the ADL, an unregistered agent of Israel, with a comprehensive database and strong arm power over local authorities.
We already see the deplorable endgame of similar legislation in Canada and England, after the usual “unintended consequences” and “bureaucractic mission creep” have run their course. We see cases of individuals who are harassed with heavy fines and threats of imprisonment for simply publicly criticizing members of certain “federally protected groups” such as Jews, blacks and homosexuals.
The situation in Canada has deteriorated to the point that now even members of certain “federally protected groups” such as Jews are protesting hate crime laws because even they feel unjustly curtailed. Many articles listed in the Rev. Ted Pike archived at: http://tinyurl.com/44xyoo document specific instances of all of these things.
Why even go down this road to begin with?
To better comprehend the scope of this nightmare, please start by viewing Rev. Ted Pike’s video “How to Kill the Hate Bills” at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER-rqGr-mAI referenced in the alert below, as well as the web page I have created for him at: http://tinyurl.com/44xyoo When we lose our First Amendment rights, we lose the most basic underpinning for the protection of all other rights.
The False Flag AttackThreat
As if the hate law threat is not ominous enough, we must also deal with the very real threat of a second 9-11 attack on American soil.
Capt Eric H. May and I have very recently issued another false flag alert. We believe strongly that the greatest threat of a repeat 9-11 false flag attack is most likely to take place within the first nine months of the Obama Administration, much as the first 9-11 attack took place within this same initial period of George Bush’s first term in the White House. To find out more about the innovative work of former Army intelligence officer Capt. May to thwart possible repeat false flag attacks, please link to the Captain May articles archive here: http://tinyurl.com/5f93lb.
The March 3, 2008 The Lone Star Iconoclast editorial by publisher Leon Smith "Time to Investigate Houston is Now" demanded a Congressional investigation based upon Captain May’s brilliant work. Please follow up on this.
Incidentally, we have uncovered strong evidence that the Mossad and some portion of the CIA orchestrated 9-11 as an inside job, therefore we see another peculiar example of “bias crimes” committed by Federal authorities. The Federal government has lacked the courage the bring World Trade Center Tower landlord and arch-Zionist Larry Silverstein before a grand jury to fully explain his self-admitted role in “pulling” World Trade Center 7, much less charge him with the “ugly anti-gentile” hate crime of likely being complicit in the deaths of 3,000 Americans, and promulgating unnecessary Middle Eastern interventionism resulting in over a million military and civilian casualties. The total financial costs will likely exceed $3 trillion, according to researchers Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes.
Although Rev Ted Pike is completely independent from Captain May and myself in terms of his political and religious views, the threats we address all stem from the same corrupt power elite. I mention in my concluding remarks below that this elite “would mobilize us into domestic tyranny and foreign wars, while distracting us from economic depression and the groups that brought it about.”
This is the real problem, not the lack of more “hate crime” laws. If anything, we need even more freedom of speech to speak truth to power, sort out our problems, and develop peaceful strategies to handle high level malefactors. This is why we urgently need for members of Congress to not only take a principled stand and stop all hate crime legislative initiatives, but to also roll back all the existing hate crime laws currently on the books.
William B. Fox
America First Books,
P.O. Box 137
Sarver, PA 16055
EMERGENCY ALERT! Hate Bills Move Forward
In House Judiciary New Video Explains
How to Stop Them!
By Rev. Ted Pike 16 Feb 2009
Since Feb. 9, subcommittees of the House Judiciary have considered two pending federal hate crime bills—HR 256 and 262. Our strategy to defeat them requires high-volume calls of protest, but Capitol phone lines have been jammed all week because of the stimulus bill. Now that controversy has dimmed.
It’s time for you to take action.
The Judiciary told me that, because of the president’s support, this legislation will be moved forward much more rapidly than usual. The previous version of hate bill HR 256 passed overwhelmingly in the House two years ago. Today, the Democrat-controlled House Judiciary could move these bills onto the floor of the House with blitzkrieg rapidity. Unless Americans determine not to let our nation turn into an “anti-free-speech” police state like Canada and shout “NO!” right now.
To stop these hate bills, we must repeat the sensationally effective and simple strategy that helped defeat the hate bill two years ago:
1. Phone or email the House and Senate members from your state. Call toll-free 1-877-851-6437 or toll 1-202-225-3121.
2. Take 10 minutes each morning or on your lunch break to also call or email the 40 members of the House Judiciary Committee. (Found here at www.truthtellers.org.) In about a week, you can voice your freedom-saving message to all: “Please don’t vote for the federal hate crimes bills, HR 256 and HR 262. Also, don’t vote for the Employment Nondiscrimination Act (ENDA). Hate and bias crime laws took away free speech in Canada and much of Europe.” (ENDA is the workplace hate bill high on Obama’s wish list but not yet introduced in Congress.)
Also, watch and share our new, powerful 10-minute video, How to Kill the Hate Billsat www.truthtellers.org. This film describes how the two hate bills, HR 256 and 262, and ENDA, will end freedom: and how we can keep that from happening!
'How to Kill the Hate Bills'
Share this video widely—and start calling Congress!
It is fatal to wait until these bills slip through the House and Senate Judiciaries, where they will certainly be passed by liberals on the floors of House and Senate. Our best chance of victory is to generate controversy now—hopefully magnified by House and Senate Republicans.
Two years ago, we bombarded the House Judiciary with calls and powerfully helped defeat not only the hate bill but five other pieces of Orwellian legislation!
With God’s help, we can repeat that miracle. CALL NOW!
After I listened to the brief audio part of the report, I found no reason to reject the identification of the speaker as an inside source. As for the particulars of disaster preparations, they are consistent with specific inside information I have been receiving since April/May 2006.
I will further analyze the Chicago scenario in an upcoming column. For the time being, I hope that concerned patriots will review this article and its links. Please forward it, especially to the Chicago area and its first responders. With further networking we shall assimilate and circulate information that the mainstream media withholds or distorts.
The new Chicago information dovetails with the December 2008 article by Major William B. Fox. It was widely published and discussed, and it detailed successful effort by Internet activists to forestall a false flag attempt against the 110-story Sears Tower on May 3, 2006 (its 33rd anniversary).
On Feb. 12th, Dr. James Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, interviewed me on February 12th on his program, "The Real Deal." (archive: http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/). 3 We discussed a hypothetical but plausible false flag scenario involving three simultaneous explosions. Two explosions would take place in Israel, and one in the U.S.
The first explosion, carried out in Israel and blamed on Muslims, would take place at the site of crucifixion and burial of Jesus, and outrage Christians worldwide.
The third explosion would probably involve a nuclear device in a U.S. city. The body count would be substantially increased from the 3,000 killed on 9-11 to insure that we would want to nuke Muslims and not ask too many questions before doing it.
Any attack like the three above would mobilize us into domestic tyranny and foreign wars, while distracting us from economic depression and the groups that brought it about.
Captain Eric H. May, a former Army intelligence officer and NBC editorial writer, is the military-political editor of the Lone Star Iconoclast. Major William B. Fox, a former Marine, is a Harvard Business School honors graduate and publisher of AmericaFirstBooks.com.
The Hate Crime Law Concept:
It is all very sinister for at least nine major reasons
by William B. Fox
The whole "hate crime" concept serves at least nine sinister purposes:
1) It encourages the use of "legal terrorism," where laws are used as snares to wage legal harassment campaigns. Deep-pocketed entities wear out and bankrupt their political adversaries by dragging them through nuisance litigation. Employers become scared to hire or retain politically conscious straight white males for fear that they could become targets of nuisance "civil rights" and "hate crime"-related suits or backdoor whisper campaigns or negative national media spin that could hurt their businesses.
2) "Hate crime" laws support political "victimhood" for "minorities." In fact, they work so well to promote artificially inflated white guilt that we see numerous cases of "hate crime" hoaxes staged by minorities, such as the Tawana Brawley affair.
3) The "hate crime" concept creates a "guilt by association" climate regarding certain topics, thereby helping to inhibit certain types of thought and analysis. This has been particularly true regarding topics involving racial differences or criminal behavior by Jews. The big danger is that once certain types of "thought" is tainted with a "criminal association," and the focus of "criminality" is taken off certain actions, then any thing that the people in power do not like can be tainted with "criminality." For starters, any ideas or attitudes that they find "subversive" for any reason can become criminalized as "seditious" ("sedition" implies arousing some form of "hatred" or "dislike" for the state). This is how Stalin was able to liquidate members of the Bolshevik old guard he did not like during the 1930's show trials. "Disloyalty" was defined as anything the self-styled "infallible leader" of the Communist Party happened to say is "disloyal" for the moment. Conditioning the general public to accept the concept of "hate crime" is an important step towards this kind of total police state tyranny. After all, if the government today can triple penalties when someone commits a violent act against a minority member while voicing a racial epithet, just wait until they can catch you doing some little illegal thing that involves the government and then find a way to link this to something you have said that is critical of the government (immediately construed as "hateful" of course) so that they can then multiply the penalties three, five, ten, or however many times they like. So for example if a cop catches you going three mph over the speed limit on a Federal road like an Interstate, they will know that you deliberately went over the speed limit because you happened to once say something critical of the government a few years back and therefore must have a "bad" (or "hateful") attitude. Therefore you deserve perhaps a one hundred times multiplied penalty such as ten years in a penitentiary as just desserts. If this sounds totally absurd, just reflect on how once upon a time people got shot in the old Soviet Union for very simple things like owning a copy of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. See how it works?
4) "Hate crime" laws deflect attention away from the fact that the white population in America is being slowly genocided, and that it has its own moral right to exist. As Thomas W. Chittum observes in Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America, the white population in America has been steadily declining by about 1-1.5% of the total population a year for many, many years. An American Renaissance article observed that in recent decades, 30 million white Americans have been replaced by 30 million Mexicans. European history shows that once a dominant ethno-racial group drops below 75% of the total population within a country, it tends to become increasingly unstable. Chronic instability in turn tends to lead to things like secessionism, civil war, or police state repression designed to keep things unified at all costs.
5) "Hate crime" laws deflect attention away from the fact that under certain circumstances the emotion of "hate" is both healthy and desirable. People instinctively feel hatred towards those things which threaten to destroy them. It motivates them to take defensive action for their own preservation. If you believe in the right of self-defense, you must believe that the trait of hatred has survived as an instinct through evolution because it is vitally necessary for basic survival.
6) "Hate crime" laws tend to give the Federal government additional leverage points to control local state police. Give the massive resources of the Federal government, local state police then feel more intimidated to do whatever master puppeteer bureaucrats back in Washington, D.C. want them to do, no matter how arbitrary, ridiculous, or self-serving these things might be.
7) The piling on of more and more "hate crime" laws deflects attention away from the fact that in healthy societies, relatively few laws are needed for people to get along. The ancient Roman writer Tacitus once noted that "Where the state is most corrupt, then the laws are most multiplied." The late libertarian writer Harry Browne noted how the Anglo-Saxon Common Law is generally based on a few very simple, common sense principles.
8) "Hate crime" laws have been a disaster in Canada, Britain, and other supposedly "Western" countries, full of draconian "unintended consequences." People have been thrown in jail for making relatively mild criticisms regarding such topics as homosexuality, Holocaust claims, and pro-nonwhite racial policies. Significantly, the greatest promoter of "hate laws," the ADL, also blindly supports corrupt police state practices in the exclusively Jewish State of Israel. Please see my analysis of breathtaking examples of Jewish supremacist tyranny, criminality, psychopathology, arrogance, and hypocrisy in my mutualism vs. parasitism discussion. Not all Jews are bad, but for reasons that I explain in this article, they seem to have problems preventing sociopaths from rising to the top.
9) The ultimate goal of "hate crime" laws is to strangle any freedom of speech that supports awareness of Jewish criminal conduct, Jewish usurpation of our Constitution, and the overall Jewish contribution towards the destruction of America. They do not want us to know about how millions of Jews occupy our power centers in our biggest cities. They do not want us to think too hard about the implications of their incredible ethnic solidarity, control of major national media, control of major wealth and businesses, and control of the privately owned central banking cartel called the Federal Reserve. They do not want us to know about Jewish orchestration of Bolshevik mass murder in Russia, the Lavon Affair, the murder of JFK, their spy nests, their domination of organized crime, their creation of wide-open borders to the Third World, their deliberate assault on the U.S.S. Liberty, their ethnic cleansing of Palestine, their probable central involvement in executing the 9-11 attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center buildings, and hosts of other crimes documented in books such as Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, TheHigh Priests of War, and The Viper's Venom. They want us to trust the "New World Order" elite totally and completely forsake popular sovereignty, the Constitution, and other traditions of freedom and self-determination related to our European ancestry and cultural heritage.
The Internet took them by surprise, so now they require more "hate crime" laws. They need to restore the curtain of darkness and the wall of illusion. They need to continue their campaigns to mainstream homosexuality, promote "life-style" abortions, and legitimize their Kosher brand of high treason against America. Despite scholarly evidence that much of the Old Testament may be based upon fabricated stories (see my discussion of religion in my online "Religious Crisis" web page), or polls that show that most American Jews are atheists, they still need to posture as a self-anointed, specially favored people of God.
At a time when America is on the ropes economically with skyrocketing debt and loss of industry -- at a time when America desperately needs to protect its own borders and to rebuild its internal industry, savings, and economic viability -- they unmercifully use us up as their continuing cannon fodder for global interventionism. They could care less if they suck us so dry that they set the stage for a Civil War Two disaster in North America.
Yes, my fellow Americans, ask not why America should continue serving as a willing stooge of Big Oil and Zionism in the Middle East. Ask not why America should willingly crucify itself for the benefit of the exclusively Jewish state of Israel. Ask not why you as a white person or as a member of a white community or even as a member of the white race even have a right to survive. (The same type of basic survival question also applies to non-Jewish nonwhites). They only want us to think in "approved" areas suggested by hate crime laws regardless of the utterly destructive consequences to ourselves.
All of this having been said, I would like to revisit some of the aforementioned points with some additional commentary.
As mentioned, "Legal Terrorism" involves entities with deep pockets who maliciously apply laws to drag their less well-financed adversaries through lengthy and costly legal proceedings in order to intimidate, bankrupt or otherwise neutralize them as the first objective, regardless of the merits of the cases involved. As four examples, in "Don't Practice Legal Terrorism," (Forbes, 09.04.06), Paul Johnson charges that overzealous, deep-pocketed government regulators threaten to kill entrepreneurial risk-taking with interventionist legal actions. In the book Legal Terrorism: The Truth About the Christic Institute, Dr. Susan Huck charged that a liberal institute misapplied Federal racketeering laws to drag out proceedings and potentially bankrupt former CIA officers, who were later awarded $1 million by a court for defendant's legal expenses. In the book The ACLU Vs. America: Exposing the Agenda to Redefine Moral Values, authors Alan Sears and Craig Osten claim that the ACLU has misused its deep pockets to wage a campaign of "legal terrorism" in support of its radical leftist agenda against poorly financed conservative adversaries. Lastly, the book Trial on Trial: The Great Sedition Trial of 1944 by Lawrence Dennis describes how FDR deliberately dragged prominent American rightists through lengthy court proceedings on spurious charges in the early 1940's with the intent of impoverishing them, wasting their time, and intimidating would-be activists. Please see the Nov-Dec 1999 The Barnes Review online article "A Mockery of Justice: The Great Sedition Trial of 1944 " by Michael Collins Piper and Ken Hoop about this sad affair. . . . In other words, proposed "hate crime" laws are really about creating additional minefields of legal snares that dramatically increase legal defense costs, liability risks, and administrative costs for "little guys" who dare to express dissident views. They are the ones who ultimately get driven under the table before plutocrats, well-endowed institutions, and deep-pocketed corporations. "Hate crime" laws are ultimately about big money boys who feel their power slipping away before a free Internet. They are desperately trying to preserve their special privileges, hide their corruption, and remain empowered to abuse others. . . .Hate crime laws have virtually nothing to do with reducing or managing real "hate." In the final analysis, they have nothing to do with protecting gays, minorities, and other groups who are already adequately protected by the Constitution, tort law, and a vast menu of civil rights laws. However, as Rev Pike explains in his article "The Funeral of Free Speech," they have everything to do with putting state police under centralized federal command and creating a separate thought crime tribunal system (similar to what already exists in Canada) which is a major step towards a perfect police state. In fact, by suppressing civil liberties, the passage of "hate crime" laws actually increase overall hatred, alienation, and resentment in society. If they are passed, they may even help spark revolutionary rebellions. This is one reason why ADL Jewish supremacists and their Establishment collaborators talk about eliminating all private gun ownership, installing "total surveillance," and quietly going about building more FEMA detention camps.
If there is any "good" behind "hate crime laws," it is the fact that their absurdity helps thinking Americans understand the recklessly selfish, crooked, and irresponsible behavior of various members of America's alien ruling elite who continue to poison and trash up this once truly great country.
Expressed in another way, once the extremely dangerous nature of the "hate crime" legislative initiatives finally sinks in, it should make responsible Americans really wonder about the malevolent and crooked character of the people who keep relentlessly pushing it.
House Judiciary Committee
• John Conyers (Mich.), Chairman 202-225-0072 email@example.com
• Howard L. Berman (Calif.) 202-225-4695 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Rick Boucher (Va.) 202-225-3861 email@example.com
• Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.) 202-225-5635 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Robert C. Scott (Va.) 202-225-8351 [email@example.com no longer valid]
• Melvin L. Watt (N.C.) 202-225-1510 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Zoe Lofgren (Calif.) 202-225-3072 email@example.com
• Sheila Jackson-Lee (Texas) 202-225-3816 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Maxine Waters (Calif.) 202-225-2201 email@example.com
• Tammy Baldwin (Wis.) 202-225-2906 firstname.lastname@example.org
• William D. Delahunt (Mass.) 202-225-3111 email@example.com
• Robert Wexler (Fla.) 202-225-3001 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Linda Sanchez (Calif.) 202-225-6676 email@example.com
• Steve Cohen (Tenn.) 202-225-3265 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Hank Johnson (Ga.) 202-225-1605 email@example.com
• Luis Gutierrez (Ill.) 202-225-8203 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Brad Sherman (Calif.) 202-225-5911 email@example.com
• Charles Gonzalez (Texas) 202-225-3236 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Anthony D. Weiner (N.Y.) 202-225-6616 email@example.com
• Adam B. Schiff (Calif.) 202-225-5828 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Dan Maffei (N.Y) 202-225-3701 email@example.com
• Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fla.) 202-225-7931 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Pedro Pierluisi (P.R.) 202-225-2615 email@example.com
• Lamar S. Smith (Texas), Ranking Member 202-225-4236 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Jim Sensenbrenner (Wis.) 202-225-5101 email@example.com
• Howard Coble (N.C.) 202-225-8611 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Elton Gallegly (Calif.) 202-225-5811 email@example.com
• Bob Goodlatte (Va.) 202-225-5431 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Dan Lungren (Calif.) 202-225-3951 email@example.com
• Ted Poe (Texas) 202-225-6565
• Darrell Issa (Calif.) 202-225-3906 firstname.lastname@example.org
• J. Randy Forbes (Va.) 202-225-6365 email@example.com
• Steve King (Iowa) 202-225-5526 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Jason Chaffetz (Utah) 202-225-7751 email@example.com
• Trent Franks (Ariz.) 202-225-4576 firstname.lastname@example.org
• Louie Gohmert (Texas) 202-225-3035 email@example.com
• Jim Jordan (Ohio) 202-225-2676 [firstname.lastname@example.org no longer valid]
• Tom Rooney (Fla.) 202-225-5792 email@example.com
• Gregg Harper (Miss.) 202-225-5031 firstname.lastname@example.org
Consolidated emails for all members of the House Judiciary Committee: