. . .The following quote was lifted
from an article
at the CNS Foundation (Children's Neurobiological Solutions) web
site: "WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Scientists said on Thursday
they injected stem cells derived from an aborted human fetus into
the brain of a laboratory monkey still in its mother's womb and
found that they integrated nicely, pointing to the possibility
of repairing brain abnormalities in human fetuses."
. . .The hideous creature created
by these scientists was no longer a baby monkey. It ceased to
be a monkey when cells from a murdered and butchered fetal human
were "integrated nicely" into it. At that point it became
a human-animal hybrid, neither human nor animal, but a hideous
and unnatural abomination that has no place in all Creation.
. . .This event is a milestone on
the road to the utter and irreversible destruction of the human
race and every existing moral code ever devised by humans. Scientists
have been creating various human-animal hybrids for years, but
this is the first instance that I know of where a human-primate
hybrid was created, and the first instance where the hybridization
was accomplished by "integrating" human brain cells
into animal brain cells. This fetal creature had a hybrid brain.
. . .These scientists have erected
a defense of euphemisms and twisted logic to mask the true nature
of their hideous creations. Under the old classification system
that existed prior to genetic engineering, all living creatures
were classified as belonging to a distinct species, the only exceptions
were hybrids, creatures such as mules that were created by crossing
two distinct but closely related species. Keep it in mind that
this classification system was developed prior to the discovery
of DNA and the technology of genetic engineering.
. . .Prior to the discovery of DNA
and genetic engineering, no human-animal hybrids existed. As a
result, not a single legal, moral or religious code developed
since the beginning of time has actually had to deal with human-animal
hybrids. When scientists created the first human-animal hybrids
by introducing human genes into mouse embryos some years ago,
they discontinued the existing classification system. They did
not call their creations "human-animal hybrids" or even
"hybrids." They announced their crafted monsters to
the world as "transgenic animals."
. . .This euphemistic abomination
accomplished much from the point of view of the scientists. For
one thing, they applied their euphemism of "transgenic animals"
to all creatures whose DNA came from two different species without
bothering to distinguish between human-animal hybrids and hybrids
whose DNA came from two different animals. And why not? To many
scientists, humans are just another species of animal. No kidding,
that's really how these sickos think. Armed with this deceitful
euphemism, they could talk about their abominable experiments
without having to admit that they were creating monstrous human-animal
hybrids.
. . .I have seen entire newspaper
and magazine articles that discussed some particular "transgenic
animal' at length without ever mentioning that some of the DNA
used to create the abomination came from a human. The press has
gone along with this euphemism, almost never referring to these
creations as human-animal hybrids, or even revealing in many cases
that the genetic makeup of these creatures is part human.
. . .Another benefit flowing from
this euphemism concerns the legal status of their creations. Because
human-animal hybrids are classified as animals, they are property,
which is essentially the way every traditional legal and moral
code on earth treats animals. These scientists now have a whole
new class of semi-human creatures that they may create, destroy,
confine, experiment upon, and slaughter and sell as food. I'm
not absolutely sure that any of the meat from human-animal hybrids
has yet found its way to the supermarket shelves, however, I have
my suspicions.
. . .Some years ago, a genetic engineering
firm with facilities in Texas introduced human genes regulating
growth hormones into cattle embryos for the expressed purpose
of creating larger, so-called "transgenic" cattle whose
meat and milk would be sold for human consumption. The experiment
was abandoned when the resulting so-called "calves"
(which were really human-cattle, or calf-baby hybrids) grew to
such an unnatural size that these part-human monsters had to be
cut out of the wombs of their cow surrogate mothers. Other hybrids
that were born had multiple and thus expensive health problems,
which made the experiment untenable from an economic perspective,
so the corporation discontinued the project. I suspect that some
of these part-human monsters may have been slaughtered and sold
for human consumption. After all, thousands of pounds of "beef"
will fetch a price, and any corporation, hi-tech or not, has to
keep an eye on the bottom line.
. . .Other human-animal hybrids,
such as human-pig hybrids, have been created in great numbers
for the purpose of creating organs or blood that may be donated
to humans. I have never heard of any instance when any of these
human-animal hybrids have been slaughtered for human consumption,
so I can not say for a fact that any of this hideous cannibal
food has been sneaked into the food supply. However, like the
appearance of this human-monkey hybrid, it is only a matter of
time until we're all eating cannibal food. And cannibal food it
will be. Consider the human DNA in these hybrids. Consider all
the human hormones and other human substances that this human
DNA produces in these hybrids. When you consume the flesh of a
human-animal hybrid you will be eating the human DNA and all the
other human substances produced by the human DNA. It will be just
exactly as if you were eating a stew made of both human flesh
and animal flesh. That's cannibalism, plain and simple.
. . .Furthermore, at what point of
increasing human DNA will we stop sending these human-animal hybrids
off to the slaughterhouse and start sending them off to kindergarten?
I'll bet that you've never heard this question asked by anyone
to anyone. Ask yourself why. I have never heard any of the usual
media-oriented activists who speak up against genetic engineering
refer to these creatures as human-animal hybrids, not a single
one. They rant on and on about the threat of genetically modified
killer tomatoes and the perils of cloning. While these topics
are of legitimate concern, they are emphasized to the point that
the topic of human-animal hybrids is entirely excluded from the
stooge media debate. And you will not find any reaction from the
traditional guardians of our morality, our religious leaders.
I have never heard a single one speak out specifically against
this ongoing hybridization of humans and animals.
. . .Note that the article quoted
above did not say if the fetal human-monkey hybrid was destroyed.
Mark my words, it's only a matter of time before some scientist
holds a press conference and proudly displays a human-monkey hybrid
he has allowed to come to term. With human brain cells "nicely
integrated" into it, it might well be able to speak and probably
answer simple questions, or perhaps be set to some simple tasks.
. . .I say that any creature whose
DNA is part human and part animal is a human-animal hybrid. I
say that the existence of these human-animal hybrids will ultimately
destroy every existing legal and moral code ever devised, and
I say that they will be replaced by something unspeakable. I say
that the unspeakable moral code that will replace our existing
moral codes was designed in advance by Globalists to advance their
unspeakable New World Order, and I say that these human-animal
hybrids are being brought into existence not for scientific reasons,
but intentionally to destroy our existing moral codes. Remember
the unspoken motto of the New World Order - Out of Chaos, Order.
I say that all human/animal hybrids should be destroyed, burnt,
and their ashes sent straight to Hell, along with the satanic
madmen who created them.
at
the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781