On Saturday, October 11, I went to Washington, D.C. for the "First
Annual Conference on Racial Separatism," which was billed
as an "Alternative to Clinton's Town Hall Meeting on Race."
The speakers discussed alternatives to forced racial integration.
All of the speakers who were scheduled to speak this weekend
spoke on Saturday. Sunday was to be a roundtable discussion of
issues. Not wanting to stay overnight for that, I left after the
close of business Saturday.
The following are my notes on the conference. I cannot write
in shorthand, so my recounting of the conference is not as complete
as it could be. However, I think I got most of the important points.
Direct quotations are not necessarily verbatim.
Robert J. Hoy: served as the master of ceremonies.
Jeff Anderson: (Conference organizer)
Race cannot be made to be irrelevant by talk sessions and symbols.
Pres. Clinton's race commission includes Judith Cliff (sp?), who
believes (effectively) that the truth about race cannot be spoken.
The commission's Angela Owl (sp?), is an advocate of racial shuffling.
These people will be dictating racial policy.
The coalition for racial self-determination will give their report
(which will advocate life, liberty, and independence for all racial
groups) to Clinton's race commission. We represent the majority
opinion. Look at normal human behavior (esp. that of children).
Patterns of housing, churchgoing, and lunchtime seating arrangement
show a strong tendency toward self-segregation.
White liberals are hypocritical, in that they participate in
these patterns, while advocating race- mixing policies. Some of
JA's friends are horrified by his position, but once, a liberal
friend of JA was highly embarrassed when JA pointed out the particular
hypocrisy in the friend's case. These policies are genocidal in
that they are making it impossible to maintain culture (which
I believe he was implying is necessary for the preservation of
the race itself). Race mixing is the "disrespecting"
of culture.
Old racism is based on domination and subservience. Read Richard
McColluch's book, The Racial Compact. New racism denies racial
rights of self-determination by denying 1)territory, and 2) self-government.
Clinton has called for America to be the first multi-racial democracy,
but this is an oxymoron because it denies the rights of self-determination.
The power elite discuss Am. immigration situation as though it
is inevitable and ignore the fact that it is the ongoing result
of deliberate policy.
There is no religious justification for race mixing as the Bible
shows the end of the world with all racial groups intact.
There have been Am. Efforts at separatism, but they have been
weak and inadequate. There has been the Am. Colonization (of Blacks
back to Af.) Society, which included many prominent 19th and 19th
century individuals, including presidents. Marcus Garvey, advocated
repatriation to Af.
By mid 21st century, Blacks will be vastly outnumbered by Hispanics.
Separatism must be fair and have the support of all racial groups.
We must not consider any particular proposal as a final offer
take offense. We should instead, look at proposals as a starting
point.
Under JA's plan, everyone would have options. Blacks could be
repatriated to Af. if they wished. No one would be forced to go
anywhere. There will be conflict over reparations to Blacks, but
he urges that Whites make this sacrifice, in spite of principle,
in order to get peace and self- determination. JA tried to get
Black Caucus interested, but the members of the BC don't want
to link reparations with separatism.
Quebec might get the general principle of separatism started.
There might also be a Hispanic takeover of the Southwest US, which
would accomplish the same thing. We must create a moral revolution
but not a race war. All multi-ethnic societies have strife. We
should go forth as prophets.
Questions:
Willis Carto said that South has held things up due to their
desire for cheap labor. Stated that our present situation is like
an easily preventable train wreck that is happening because it
is not being addressed in a timely manner. Cited the falsification
of the T. Jefferson quote at the Jefferson memorial. Said that
Black repatriation could be paid for with money subtracted from
foreign aid to Israel.
Black guy asked how Whites could give land to Blacks which was
actually stolen from Indians. Ans.: History is replete with injustices.
One individual discussed JA's separation plan and suggested that
"reparations " be reworded to something like "Marshal
Plan."
Jared Taylor: "The Moral Basis for Racial
Separation"
Ordinarily, when people wish to separate, this is considered
to be OK. Not so with racial separation, esp. when Whites are
asking. Consider the liberalization of divorce law. Here, we allow
people who have promised to lived together for life to separate.
Yet, with race, people who have never expressed a desire to be
with one another are forced together. We have reached the point
where it has become necessary for one People to dissolve the Political
Bands which have connected them with another.
The breakup of the Soviet Union is part of the growing recognition
of the morality of separatism. Further, the differences between
White Lithuanians and White Poles is far less significant than
those between Am. Blacks and Am. Whites. The popularity of self-determination
is represented in the loss of the former Eu. Colonies.
Racial separation was tried in the Civil War and resulted in
600,000 dead Am. That the Confederacy was destroyed in the past
does not mean that an attempt to separate today would be unsuccessful
(due to the growing acceptance of self-determination).
An enormous enforcement mechanism is needed to make racial harmony
appear to exist, due to the fact that racial harmony is contrary
to human nature. Since school children invariable self- segregate
at lunchtime, some schools have taken to assigning lunch seating
to ensure racial integration.
Once there was a Black minister installed at an all-White church
in the hopes of attracting Blacks to the congregation. Within
three years, all the Whites had quit the church.
Funeral homes are highly segregated due to consumer demand. Everywhere
people are *free* to celebrate diversity, they choose homogeneity.
Blacks opposed segregation because they wanted access to services,
not because they wanted to be with Whites. (The following statements
are by prominent Blacks.) Amos Quick (sp?) on a school board in
North Carolina said, "Separate but equal would be OK."
Alex Johnson said, "Brown was a mistake." Harry Edwards
said, "Integration has not been achieved because nobody wants
it."
There are now many Blacks with enough money to live in White
areas if they wanted to, but they generally do not.
If there is this desire for racial separation, why is it not
allowed to happen? Louis F. did not talk about racial separation
when given the opportunity.
A recent issue of "The Economist" said that all but
3 of 82 wars in the last 100 years or so have been the result
of some racial conflict within the boarders of the country where
the war took place. ( . . . or something like that. I kind of
missed it because I was writing something else.) Our government
is creating the conditions for war. Racial friction cannot occur
without forced mixing.
Questions:
The separation of India and Pakistan in 1947 was more the result
of actions of the British government rather any action of the
then infant U.N.
International commerce has a negative effect on regionalism.
A good case can be made for free trade, but there are more important
interests than economic ones.
The European people are generally opposed to Eu. union.
The prestige of bigness is a motive of governments to create
empires. This was likely the case with the Soviet Union.
Robert Brock:
Prefers to use the term "repatriation" because "separatism"
has been downgraded by liberals and Jews. Separatism started with
Hitler, who wanted to get rid of Jews. Jews recognized their mistake
and decided to get political power. They did this by co-opting
the Black vote. Outside force called integration broke up Black
culture. The Jew in Western society caused this. You was watching
the Black and not the Jew. Blacks had the words "slavery"
and "freedom." Now we have "racism" (which
has been imposed from the outside). You (Whites) have got to be
racists to survive or else you won't be White, you'll be chocolate-brown
bastards.
Liberalism is beginning to fall apart. (Referring to comments
of previous speaker) Louis F. could not advocate separatism on
Jew TV. The concept of "atonement" was meant to please
Jews. The MMM occurred on a Jewish holiday, and not on a date
of any significance to Blacks. It was the Jews who gave LF 2-1/2
hrs TV time and the other build up of the event. Black media is
not big enough to do this.
Repatriation is to send Blacks back to where they were taken
from. If educated Am. Blacks were repatriated to Af., Af. would
have a man on the moon within 3 yrs. Communist-inspired, 5-state
separatism within the boundaries and rule of the US is unacceptable.
Culture, economics, ethnicity(?), and language are necessary to
qualify for separatism. Ebonics is an attempt to qualify for separatism.
The only place Blacks could repatriate to would be Af. This is
a serious problem for Westernized Blacks. The rising tide of color
is here. Everyone (feminism, homosexual rights, etc.) is jumping
onto the Black bandwagon. It is in the interest of Whites to promote
repatriation due to the deteriorating situation of Whites.
Blacks are not going to go easily. Blacks are irked that Japanese
got reparations. This has fueled the racial movement. I have brought
forward my proposal for separatism; now you bring forward yours.
Tell Jews: "Yes, I'm a racist because I want to stay White."
or " . . . want to stay Black."
Osiris Akkebala, of the Pan-African Inter-National Movement
Gave honor and respect to Marcus Garvey. Was somewhat disturbed
that we (Black nationalists) have not been told the reason for
our being here (at the conference). He was annoyed that he had
to approach JA regarding getting Black nationalists together with
White nationalists, rather than having JA approach him. He stood
with David Duke when Duke was running for public office.
"I am a God man." Do not omit God from our plan. We
are dealing with a troubling problem. The Creator will deal with
what He has created. We should not presume to know all the answers.
I am not a racist. Racism is when an individual or group dominates
another group for personal or racial gain. We need to understand
society to get to the cause or racism. Policy is given by those
at the apex of the power structure. They are at war with us. We
cannot succeed without one another.
Opposition to racial and natural order is by those committed
to the destruction of both Black and White. They are the enforcers
of the evil of assimilation. The power brokers disturb and confuse
the masses.
There is a distinction between segregation and separatism. We
must master the meaning of these words if we are to counter the
enemies' confusion of the masses. To advocate separatism does
not put one at odds with God. Our enemies play on our minds with
words and we tend to adopt them into our own thinking. We must
become sophisticated in this fight. The media apparatus that molds
minds highlights eccentrics to make the righteous separatists
look bad.
We know the condition of Am. society. There are signs that God
is ready to move. *Nothing* is seen as immoral in the eyes of
Am. We totally disrespect the Creator. There is nothing evil in
reclaim natural domicile. The power elite know the evil they have
perpetrated. Am. is not destined to always remain on top. Nature
moves in cycles.
We do not refer to ourselves as "African Americans,"
but "Africans in America." We should not analyze thing
in narrow detail, but operate in a wholeistic manner. The South
will not cut out 6 or 7 states for Blacks to achieve separation.
The hope of the world depends upon us delivering us (Blacks) back
to our domicile (Africa).
Questions:
(by Jared Taylor) Have you or your associates been in contact
with African authorities? Ans: No. We must first address the mind
frame of Africans in America.
Are you opposed to bourgeois Black Americans? Ans: Yes. Their
hatred of themselves extends to the motherland.
Comment upon previous attempts at repatriation. Ans: They were
only talk without being real attempts.
No Blacks should be forced to go back to Af. However, Blacks
should consider that they have nothing to look forward to in Am.
Don Black, sysop of Stormfront
Has spent 28 years working for White rights and White nationalism.
We must work now to avoid a bloody conflagration. Government should
get out of the business of race mixing. The details of racial
separatism get sticky. JA has suggested a racial separatism map.
We must work hard to ensure that we have the wherewithal to bring
this about.
The Internet provides an alternative to the controlled media.
In the future, there will be an alternative TV network on the
Internet. There is great potential in the Internet. It is interactive.
The details of separatism are contentious. This is the first
time he has met with members of other races in this type of forum.
Stormfront started as a BBS. About 2-1/2 yrs ago, the Stormfront
website was founded. The Internet began to grow exponentially
about 4 yrs ago. He has correspondents throughout the US. He would
be happy to link to Black nationalist websites and provide technical
assistance. He has found Thomas Jackson's "What is Racism"
is a very effective article.
Questions:
Internet freedom can be foiled, but it will not. It is very difficult
to impose censorship. When German censorship efforts attempted
to shut down Zundelsite, several mirror cites appeared to circumvent
this effort. Censorship is more difficult in the US, where free
speech is part of the national religion.
When e-mail is sent, it meanders through the Internet before
arriving at its destination. Any non- encrypted e-mail could be
read at any node along the way by someone with the right access.
On the other hand, when a request is made to visit a particular
web site, only the requester's ISP is identified. The only way
to obtain the requester's identity would be through the court
order of ISP records, an unlikely occurrence.
The Net cannot be shut down without draconian action. This is
not likely in the US.
Michael Hart:
(Those who were at the 1996 AR conference will recognize this
section as being highly similar to the talk he gave in Louisville.)
A nation is based on ethnicity and is different than a state,
which is a sovereign independent country. The principle of self-determination
is that the government derives its just power from the consent
of those governed. Multi-racial states have strife. He gave many
examples.
Blacks are a separate nation because they have a common ancestry,
language (dialect), ethnicity, and historical traditions -- frequent
demands for quotas, -- self-segregation, -- exclusively Black
organizations, -- extreme block voting, -- Kwanaza (sp?) to emphasize
Blackness, -- separatist curricula, -- identify themselves more
as Blacks than as Americans.
It is perfectly appropriate for Blacks to have a separate nation.
Even Blacks with a strong allegiance to the US have a strong affinity
to ethnicity. The "not-guilty" verdict in the O.J. Simpson
trial showed a deep racial division in the US.
Since 1968, the situation has deteriorated. Blacks are more angry
today. Louis Farrakkan (sp?) has more support than Malcolm X did.
It is not possible to placate minority separatist (e.g. Quebec).
Blacks will not be satisfied with anything other than their own
independent state.
The US needs to be separated into 3 separate states: a Black-separatist
state (BSS), a White- separatist state (WSS), and an integrated
state (IS). Territory would be based on population, not on relative
wealth. Everyone should be able to choose whether to live in either
the IS or the appropriate separatist state. This would be fair:
to Black who feel aggrieved, to Whites who have lost their rights,
to those who desire continued integration, and to libertarians
who advocate choices.
(The following bracketed comments by Mr. Hart are from the 1996
AR conference. There, he went into more detail on the logistics
of separation.)
[Such a plan would take 20 or 30 years to gain support. More
popular support is needed. "Conservatives" would choose
the WSS, and it would be prosperous. A boundary committee should
be elected to draw borders requiring the fewest people having
to move. The separate states should be relatively contiguous.
After boundaries are announced, everyone should have 6 month period
to revise their choice. Before relocation, boundaries may need
to modified if more people than expected choose one state or another.
People would have 1 or 2 years to relocate. Government should
compensate for relocation.]
[Just solutions to problems are complicated. Ideas cannot be
enacted by political minorities.]
[Upon questioning, he said that his map would like be more complicated
than he had so far indicated. Hispanics should get their own territory,
an idea that many in the audience did not approve of.]
Questions:
Someone stated that Mr. Hart's plan placed more emphasis on the
rights of individuals rather than on the more important issue
of racial survival. Ans: Plan does address racial survival since
separate "states" are required for racial survival.
Thomas Chittum, mercenary and author
Was a soldier in US uniform in Viet Nam. Worked as merc. for
hire in Rhodesia. He became quite casual about killing the people
there. However, there was no racial motivation involved. "You
could have pointed out a Swede and I would have shot him for the
price of a Big Mac and given you back change." He worked
for some time in Croatia. Everyone there but the leadership realized
that a war was coming. One man there told him, "I knew war
was coming, so I gave up smoking and took up jogging." He
pursued this line of work because he was attracted to the kill-
rape-burn lifestyle. However, he has had war experiences that
caused him to become psychotic. He is not a "Rambo,"
but an experienced infantry soldier.
His book (Civil War Two, published
by American Eagle Publishing Co., POB 1507, Show Low, AZ 85901)
is not like The Turner Diaries, which
advocates and provides instruction on the killing of anyone not
a White Gentile. The book is instead a likely scenario of impending
civil war.
At one time, the US was an ethnostate with Whites comprising
89% of the population. Non-Whites were militarily repressed from
liberation. Now, Whites are about 74% of the population and declining
at a rate of 1/2% per year. Therefore, the US is now a multi-racial
empire. Empires are not stable. The chief problem is not only
demographics or race, but the military domination of North America.
A virtual nation of internationalists is being created.
Working-class Whites are now in the back of the Affirmative Action
bus and it's going to get worse. In about 20 years, the Southwest
will be solidly Hispanic. Their allegiance lies outside of the
US and they will not be easily stopped. Look for a Yugoslavia-style
war to kill millions of people. In the Southwest, a riot will
start that will make the "Rodney King" riot look like
a picnic. The riot will engulf the entire region and be strong
enough to take over armories in the area. The Southwest will be
annexed by Mexico.
America stole Texas. US citizens were invited to help settle
the Texas region. The Mexican government expected that the settlers
would assimilate to Mexican culture. However, so many Americans
came, that there were inadequate Mexicans with which to assimilate.
History is now running in reverse.
There is no hope for any change of course with the present government.
No matter who we send to Washington, they will be bribed. Submitting
all legislation to referenda would be preferable.
Military empires almost always end in violence. There is no hope.
Head for the hills. The only benefit of the future is that "I
get $1.29 royalty for every book I sell." The only people
who remain behind will be bloody fools who will pay for their
mistake with their lives.
Questions:
Immigration is a demographic invasion.
We don't have much time left to fix this problem peacefully.
Non-White gangs are moving from social and criminal format to
a military format with political goals.
There will be White resistance, the nucleus of which will probably
be local police departments and the military.
The skinheads will be cannon fodder.
[Thomas Chittum maintains a webpage at http://members.aol.com/chittum/cw2index.html.
--Editor's Note: This is no longer active]
Question authority,
Ken P.
at
the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781