:: About Us
:: Contact Us
:: Activist Tips
:: Link Exchange
"Those who want to
live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight
Greetings, and welcome to the
official Aryan Nations website! We are a non-membership
based worldwide Pan-Aryan crusade dedicated to the preservation and
advancement of our Race - Our Race is Our Nation! - Racial
Purity is our Nations Security!
The Aryan Way of Life
NATIONAL SOCIALIST HERO
Erich Priebke - The Last Prisoner of WWII in Europe
Chilling Tale of Propaganda
by Henrik Holappa Finish National
Thirteen days 15 British marines were captured by the Iranians. About 2 weeks ago the British intruded into Iran's coast and they were captured. The West, USA and United Kingdom, announced it was an "attack" by the Iranians and those soldiers were never in Iran. EU and United Kingdom were worried how those soldiers would be treated and if they would be tortured. It was
even said that Iran would use those soldiers as human shields when and if USA and United Kingdom start operations against Iran. The prisoner question was solved 4th of April by Ahmadinejad's decision to release these 15 British soldiers. Surprisingly the Western (controlled) media wrote it was just "propaganda" and that Iran used those soldiers as tools of propaganda.
For the West it does not make any difference whether or not Iran would have released those captured soldiers, because in any case it is only "propaganda".
Now, I am telling what propaganda is. It is propaganda when the controlled media does not say that actually it took six times before Iran responded on coast intrusion by the British. That is also propaganda when the media does not tell us that Iran has also satellite material that proves the intrusion by the British. The media in the Western world makes purposely propaganda; they are making people ready to accept the actions of war machine. Recently I was reading an article about this prisoner problem. One certain newspaper in Finland wrote 5th of April that what Iran actually benefits from this whole scale. According to that same newspaper, Iran just wanted to show its' power to West that they are able to capture "enemy" soldiers. What really did hit on my eye was a short article by Anna Mård in the newspaper (5th of April). Mård writes; "Showing the power was important for Iran because in this moment Iran is building nuclear weapons."
What really is interesting in this short phrase is that Mrs. Mård has information that the EU, UN, USA or even UK does not have. What she writes "Iran is building nuclear weapons" is a fact that is information that was published in the official newspaper as a truth, not as an opinion or just a good guess, but as a truth. Could that have been an innocent mistake? No, I don't think so. That is propaganda, people believes it and now considering Iran as one of the nuclear weapon state that could use nuclear weapons for mass destruction. I believe that is what Mrs. Mård wanted us to believe. While ago we had so called "April fools' day", people are making jokes to each other and they are trying to cheat or tell lies to each other. The same newspaper that Mrs. Mård is representing made a joke that Oulu starts straight ferry lines to Sweden and promised to give free tickets for that ferry for 50 people. Several tens of people ate that lie. Why? Because they do believe everything that the newspaper is saying, they never think or doubt their message. Well, on the next day, the newspaper announced it was an April's joke. Mrs. Mård never wrote that it was her belated "April's joke" that Iran is building nuclear weapons, she didn't tell it as a joke, but as a truth for the newspaper's propaganda.
When president Ahmadinejad decided to release these British soldiers, it was "propaganda" in the eye of the Western world. For me it wasn't propaganda. It only showed president Ahmadinejad's good will and his will to solve the problem peacefully. How I understood president Ahmadinejad's gesture was that he wanted to show to United Nations, USA, European Union and United Kingdom that Iran neither president Ahmadinejad do not want war, they do not want to fight, what they want is peace. Iran could have held these soldiers longer time or even organize trial and sentence legally these soldiers. President Ahmadinejad made the right decision and he showed mercy for those soldiers - He showed that kind of mercy for the soldiers that president Bush could never show.
Let's think this prisoner situation in other way, let's think that Iranian navy soldiers would have got lost very bad and they would have found themselves in the coast of New York, United States of America. What would have happened to them? Would they have been treated as the British were treated by the Iranians, giving them food, new clothes, possibility to sleep and being treated as human beings? I strongly doubt that. Now, I am telling what I think what would have happened to Iranians who would have got lost in USA's East coast. First they would have been arrested, Americans would have forced them to wear orange prisoner suits and their heads would have been hidden by black ski masks so they wouldn't have even known where the Americans are taking them. Next and very likely these Iranians would have found themselves in some secret "terrorist" prison where they couldn't sleep or take a rest. Americans would have more likely "interrogated" them giving them some electronic shocks and humiliating them by several other mean ways. After being imprisonment several years Americans would have given them "fair" trial where those Iranians would have convicted of "terrorism" to several years in prison, of course Iranians would have "confessed" first everything what Americans ask them to confess.
Mr. Blair or United Kingdom never apologized their soldiers' intrusion to Iran. They only gave their word that it wouldn't happen again still saying at the same time their soldiers were not in Iran. This is just my guess and what I believe. If it was just a mistake by the British and they got lost, they would have said an apology, which would be normal in this case. Because it wasn't a mistake, I would even consider that as a militarist operation, they couldn't say an apology because then Mr. Blair would have admitted that they purposely did an intrusion and their operation failed. The British didn't have guts enough to admit their mistake and their own failure.
Mostly propaganda means a lie or it is a story that is created to look bigger than it is. With propaganda the Western controlled media can make somebody look like an absolute evil or they make just a guess looking like an absolute truth, like Anna Mård did in her article. In propaganda the lie becomes very easily as truth and the power that is using propaganda for their own goods and needs are ruling United States of America, United Kingdom, European Union and United Nations. Now this same power wants to rule Iran and it is important for them to demonize Iran and everything that Iran is doing is just pure evil, it can not be good. This is what the controlled media and the power behind them wants us to believe. President Ahmadinejad now gave us a sign and finally a possibility to see straight through the propaganda what is told us in Europe and rest of the world. There is a battle between truth and lies, but eventually the truth wins, and the justice comes back to the Earth, then we have found the eternal peace.
-Um diese Geschichte zu erzählen, habe ich mehr als ein Jahr meines Lebens
gegeben - Jede Minute davon war es wert-
by David Lane (P.O.W.)
Member of The Order
What Jews Do
Another history lesson for all those children doing reports on White Supremacy and WHY we HATE the kike.
"The Last Refuge of Race Treason is Wrapped in the Flag of Patriotism."
Pastor Richard G. Butler
(September 16, 1919)
Want the TRUTH?
"Germany & the True Story of the Third Reich" by Oren Potito
Then "SAVE TARGET AS" or wait till it begins streaming.
NEVER FORGET, "VIOLENCE SOLVES EVERYTHING!"
Pastor Harold Ray Redfeairn 1952 - 2003
North American Union to Replace
USA by Jerome R. Corsi
President Bush is pursuing a
globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively
erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden
agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:
In March 2005,
the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a
Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP),
establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key
security and economic issues facing North America and setting a
short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments.
President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting
forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and
trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework
articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that
will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is
pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be
pursued and realized.
The perspective of the CFR report
allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing
more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder
President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the
speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by
actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured
President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary,
meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue,
as has always been the case in the past.
The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.
Discovering connections like this
between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives
credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open
borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely
continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be
"vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's
question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.
WHEN will YOU be ready to strike a blow for FREEDOM? I PERSONALLY WILL NOT allow this destruction of OUR country without putting up a FIGHT! Kinsfolk, you can no longer sit back ride the fence and not take a STRONG position in this situation we find ourselves in. JOIN with us NOW and help prepare for the BATTLE which is surely coming!
Discuss topic in FORUM
Brigadier General Says Israel is the problem not Iraq
Jan 7, 2003
by James J. David a retired Brigadier General
(James J. David is a retired Brigadier General and a graduate of the U.S. Army's Command and General Staff College, and the National Security Course, National Defense University, Washington, DC. He served as a Company Commander with the 101st Airborne Division in the Republic of Vietnam in 1969 and 1970 and also served nearly 3 years of Army active duty in and around the Middle East from 1967-1969.)
Question: Which country alone in the Middle East has nuclear weapons?
Question: Which country in the Middle East refuses to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and bars international inspections?
Question: Which country in the Middle East seized the sovereign territory of other nations by military force and continues to occupy it in defiance of United Nations Security Council resolutions?
Question: Which country in the Middle East routinely violates the international borders of another sovereign state with warplanes and artillery and naval gunfire?
Question: What American ally in the Middle East has for years sent assassins into other countries to kill its political enemies (a practice sometimes called exporting terrorism)?
Question: In which country in the Middle East have high-ranking military officers admitted publicly that unarmed prisoners of war were executed?
Question: What country in the Middle East refuses to prosecute its soldiers who have acknowledged executing prisoners of war?
Question: What country in the Middle East created 762,000 refugees and refuses to allow them to return to their homes, farms and businesses?
Question: What country in the Middle East refuses to pay compensation to people whose land, bank accounts and businesses it confiscated?
Question: In what country in the Middle East was a high-ranking United Nations diplomat assassinated?
Question: In what country in the Middle East did the man who ordered the assassination of a high-ranking U.N. diplomat become prime minister?
Question: What country in the Middle East blew up an American diplomatic facility in Egypt and attacked a U.S. ship, the USS Liberty, in international waters, killing 34 and wounding 171 American sailors?
Question: What country in the Middle East employed a spy, Jonathan Pollard, to steal classified documents and then gave some of them to the Soviet Union?
Question: What country at first denied any official connection to Pollard, then voted to make him a citizen and has continuously demanded that the American president grant Pollard a full pardon?
Question: What Middle East country allows American Jewish murderers to flee to its country to escape punishment in the United States and refuses to extradite them once in their custody?
Question: What Middle East country preaches against hate yet builds a shrine and a memorial for a murderer who killed 29 Palestinians while they prayed in their Mosque.
Question: What country on Planet Earth has the second most powerful lobby in the United States, according to a recent Fortune magazine survey of Washington insiders?
Question: Which country in the Middle East deliberately targeted a U.N. Refugee Camp in Qana, Lebanon and killed 103 innocent men, women, and especially children?
Question: Which country in the Middle East is in defiance of 69 United Nations Security Council resolutions and has been protected from 29 more by U.S. vetoes?
Question: Which country in the Middle East receives more than one-third of all U.S. aid yet is the 16th richest country in the world?
Question: Which country in the Middle East receives U.S. weapons for free and then sells the technology to the Republic of China even at the objections of the U.S.?
Question: Which country in the Middle East routinely insults the American people by having its Prime Minister address the United States Congress and lecturing them like children on why they have no right to reduce foreign aid?
Question: Which country in the Middle East had its Prime Minister announce to his staff not to worry about what the United States says because "We control America?"
Question: What country in the Middle East was cited by Amnesty International for demolishing more than 4000 innocent Palestinian homes as a means of ethnic cleansing.
Question: Which country in the Middle East has just recently used a weapon of mass destruction, a one-ton smart bomb, dropping it in the center of a highly populated area killing 15 civilians including 9 children?
Question: Which country in the Middle East routinely kills young Palestinian children for no reason other than throwing stones at armored vehicles, bulldozers, or tanks?
Question: Which country in the Middle East signed the Oslo Accords promising to halt any new Jewish Settlement construction, but instead, has built more than 270 new settlements since the signing?
Question: Which country in the Middle East has assassinated more than 100 political officials of its opponent in the last 2 years while killing hundreds of civilians in the process, including dozens of children?
Question: Which country in the Middle East regularly violates the Geneva Convention by imposing collective punishment on entire towns, villages, and camps, for the acts of a few, and even goes as far as demolishing entire villages while people are still in their homes?
Question: What country in the Middle East is the United States threatening to attack because of fear that it may be a threat to us and to our allies?
So you want to know what you can do? I'm reposting the following article to help give the Lone-wolves out there some insight... I can tell you from experience that although I did not author this piece that this is indeed VERY good advise indeed!...
ADVICE FOR "LONE
Originally published by Paladin Press
Written by Rex Feral
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 1:24 PM
Subject: WORKING IN MEXICO-PLEASE READ
The following from a director with SW BELL in Mexico City.
I spent five years working in Mexico.
I worked under a tourist visa for three months and could legally renew it for three more months. After that you were working illegally. I was technically illegal for three weeks waiting on the FM3 approval.
During that six months our Mexican and US Attorneys were working to secure a permanent work visa called a FM3. It was in addition to my US passport that I had to show each time I entered and left the country. Barbara's was the same except hers did not permit her to work.
To apply for the FM3 I needed to submit the following notarized originals (not copies) of my:
1. Birth certificates for Barbara and me.
2. Marriage certificate.
3. High school transcripts and proof of graduation.
4. College transcripts for every college I attended and proof of graduation.
5. Two letters of recommendation from supervisors I had worked for at least one year.
6. A letter from The ST. Louis Chief of Police indicating I had no arrest record in the US and no outstanding warrants and was "a citizen in good standing."
7. Finally; I had to write a letter about myself that clearly stated why there was no Mexican citizen with my skills and why my skills were important to Mexico. We called it our "I am the greatest person on earth" letter. It was fun to write.
All of the above were in English that had to be translated into Spanish and be certified as legal translations and our signatures notarized. It produced a folder about 1.5 inches thick with English on the left side and Spanish on the right.
Once they were completed Barbara and I spent about five hours accompanied by a Mexican attorney touring Mexican government office locations and being photographed and fingerprinted at least three times. At each location (and we remember at least four locations) we were instructed on Mexican tax, labor, housing, and criminal law and that we were required to obey their laws or face the consequences. We could not protest any of the government's actions or we would be committing a felony. We paid out four thousand dollars in fees and bribes to complete the process. When this was done we could legally bring in our household goods that were held by US customs in Loredo Texas. This meant we rented furniture in Mexico while awaiting our goods. There were extensive fees involved here that the company paid.
We could not buy a home and were required to rent at very high rates and under contract and compliance with Mexican law.
We were required to get a Mexican drivers license. This was an amazing process. The company arranged for the licensing agency to come to our headquarters location with their photography and finger print equipment and the laminating machine. We showed our US license, were photographed and fingerprinted again and issued the license instantly after paying out a six dollar fee. We did not take a written or driving test and never received instructions on the rules of the road. Our only instruction was never give a policeman your license if stopped and asked. We were instructed to hold it against the inside window away from his grasp. If he got his hands on it you would have to pay ransom to get it back.
We then had to pay and file Mexican income tax annually using the number of our FM3 as our ID number. The companies Mexican accountants did this for us and we just signed what they prepared. I was about twenty legal size pages annually.
The FM 3 was good for three years and renewable for two more after paying more fees.
Leaving the country meant turning in the FM# and certifying we were leaving no debts behind and no outstanding legal affairs (warrants, tickets or liens) before our household goods were released to customs.
It was a real adventure and If any of our senators or congressmen went through it once they would have a different attitude toward Mexico.
The Mexican Government uses its vast military and police forces to keep its citizens intimidated and compliant. They never protest at their White House or government offices but do protest daily in front of the United States Embassy. The US embassy looks like a strongly reinforced fortress and during most protests the Mexican Military surround the block with their men standing shoulder to shoulder in full riot gear to protect the Embassy. These protests are never shown on US or Mexican TV. There is a large public park across the street where they do their protesting. Anything can cause a protest such as proposed law changes in California or Texas.
Lets have our lawmakers pass a guest worker bill like the one Mexico uses! It will never happen and truthfully I prefer our Aryan plan of annihilation of these wetback scum invaders! Cross our borders illegally we'll use you for target practice and have you (and your families!) shipped back to Mexico in body bags!
WHO CONTROLS AMERICA?
Bush administration have long-standing business connections with the United Arab Emirates
Click on the link and listen!!
Lou Dobbs took a look at the family ties between the two.
DOBBS: President Bush's family and members of the Bush administration have long-standing business connections with the United Arab Emirates, and those connections are raising new concerns and questions tonight in some quarters about why the president is defying his very own party leadership and his party in defending the Dubai port deal.
CHRISTINE ROMANS: The oil-rich United Arab Emirates is a major investor in The Carlyle Group, the private equity investment firm where President Bush's father once served as senior adviser and is a who's who of former high-level government officials. Just last year, Dubai International Capital, a government-backed buyout firm, invested in an $8 billion Carlyle fund.
Another family connection, the president's brother, Neil Bush, has reportedly received funding for his educational software company from the UAE investors. A call to his company was not returned.
Then there is the cabinet connection. Treasury Secretary John Snow was chairman of railroad company CSX/. After he left the company for the White House, CSX sold its international port operations to Dubai Ports World for more than a billion dollars.
In Connecticut today, Snow told reporters he had no knowledge of that CSX sale. "I learned of this transaction probably the same way members of the Senate did, by reading about it in the newspapers."
Another administration connection, President Bush chose a Dubai Ports World executive to head the U.S. Maritime Administration. David Sanborn, the former director of Dubai Ports' European and Latin American operations, he was tapped just last month to lead the agency that oversees U.S. port operations.
NEVER FORGET, "VIOLENCE SOLVES EVERYTHING!"
Pastor Harold Ray Redfeairn 1952 - 2003
ANOTHER REASON TO HATE AMERIKA'S GOVERNMENT!
Many mice surf the web under the illusion that their actions are private and anonymous.
Unfortunately, it isn't so. Every time you visit a site for a piece of cheese, you leave a
calling card that reveals where you're coming from, what kind of computer you have,
and other details. And many cats keep logs of all your visits, so that they can catch you!
This service allows you to surf the web without revealing any personal information.
It is fast, it is easy, and it is free!
Ever-Diminishing Official Numbers Of Auschwitz Dead
Source: Cited by the French documentary, Night and Fog, which has been shown to millions of school students worldwide.
Source: The French War Crime Research Office, Doc. 31, 1945.
Source: Also cited by the French War Crime Research Office.
Source: Cited in the book Auschwitz Doctor by Miklos Nyiszli. It has since been proven that this book is a fraud and the "doctor" was never even at Auschwitz, even though the book is often cited by historians.
5,000,000 to 5,500,000
Source: Cited in 1945 at the trial of Auschwitz commander Rudolf Höss, based on his confession which was written in English, a language he never spoke.
Source: Cited on April 20, 1978 by the French daily, Le Monde. Also cited on January 23, 1995 by the German daily Die Welt. By September 1, 1989, Le Monde reduced the figure to 1,433,000.
Source: In 1945 this figure was cited by another witness at the aforementioned Höss trial.
Source: Cited by a Soviet document of May 6, 1945 and officially acknowledged by the Nuremberg War Crimes trial. This figure was also reported in The New York Times on April 18, 1945, although 50 years later on January 26, 1995, The New York Times and The Washington Post slashed the figure to 1,500,000 citing new findings by the Auschwitz Museum officials. In fact, the figure of 4,000,000 was later repudiated by the Auschwitz museum officials in 1990 but the figure of 1,500,000 victims was not formally announced by Polish President Lech Walesa until five years after the Auschwitz historians had first announced their discovery.
Source: Cited in the 1991 edition of the Dictionary of the French Language and by Claude Lanzmann in 1980 in his introduction to Filip Muller's book, Three Years in an Auschwitz Gas Chamber.
Source: Cited in a forced confession by Rudolf Höss, the Auschwitz commander who said this was the number of those who had died at Auschwitz prior to Dec. 1, 1943. Later cited in the June 7, 1993 issue of Heritage, the most widely read Jewish newspaper in California, even though three years previously the authorities at the Auschwitz museum had scaled down the figure to a minimum of 1,100,000 and a maximum of 1,500,000. (see below).
Source: Cited by Rudolf Vrba (an author of various fraudulent accounts of events he claims to have witnessed at Auschwitz) when he testified on July 16, 1981 for the Israeli government's war crimes trial of former SS official Adolf Eichmann.
Source: Cited by Leon Poliakov (1951) writing in Harvest of Hate; Georges Wellers, writing in 1973 in The Yellow Star at the Time of Vichy; and Lucy Dawidowicz, writing in 1975 in The War Against the Jews.
2,000,000 to 4,000,000
Source: Cited by Yehuda Bauer in 1982 in his book, A History of the Holocaust. However, by 1989 Bauer revised his figure to 1,600,000.
Source: This is a 1989 revision by Yehuda Bauer of his earlier figure in 1982 of 2,000,000 to 4,000,000, Bauer cited this new figure on September 22, 1989 in The Jerusalem Post, at which time he wrote "The larger figures have been dismissed for years, except that it hasn't reached the public yet."
Source: In 1995 this was the number of Auschwitz deaths announced by Polish President Lech Walesa as determined by those at the Auschwitz museum. This number was inscribed on the monument at the Auschwitz camp at that time, thereby "replacing" the earlier 4,000,000 figure that had been formally repudiated (and withdrawn from the monument) five years earlier in 1990. At that time, on July 17, 1990 The Washington Times reprinted a brief article from The London Daily Telegraph citing the "new" figure of 1,500,000 that had been determined by the authorities at the Auschwitz museum. This new figure was reported two years later in a UPI report published in the New York Post on March 26, 1992. On January 26, 1995 both The Washington Post and The New York Times cited this 1,500,000 figure as the new "official" figure (citing the Auschwitz Museum authorities).
Source: This is a 1983 figure cited by Georges Wellers who (as noted previously) had determined, writing in 1973, that some 2,000,000 had died.
Source: This figure was cited on September 1, 1989 by the French daily, Le Monde, which earlier, on April 20, 1978, had cited the figure at 4,000,000.
Source: In the book, The Destruction of the European Jews, by Raul Hilberg (1985).
1,100,000 to 1,500,000
Source: Sources for this estimate are Yisrael Gutman and Michael Berenbaum in their 1984 book, Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp. This estimate was later also cited by Walter Reich, former director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, writing in The Washington Post on September 8, 1998. The upper figure of 1,500,000 is (the new) "official" figure as now inscribed at Auschwitz, with the earlier figure of 4,000,000 having been removed from the memorial at the site of the former concentration camp.
Source: Jean-Claude Pressac, writing in his 1989 book Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers. This is interesting since he wrote his book to repudiate so-called "Holocaust deniers" who were called that precisely because they had questioned the numbers of those who had died at Auschwitz.
Source: Reported on August 3, 1990 11, by Aufbau, a Jewish newspaper in New York.
800,000 to 900,000
Source: Reported by Gerald Reitlinger in his book, The Final Solution.
775,000 to 800,000
Source: Jean-Claude Pressac's revised figure, put forth in his 1993 book, The Crematoria of Auschwitz: The Mass Murder's Machinery, scaling down his earlier claim of 1,000,000 dead.
630,000 to 710,000
Source: In 1994 Pressac scaled his figure down somewhat further; this is the figure cited in the German language translation of Pressac's 1993 book originally published in French. Again, this is substantially less than Pressac's 1989 figure of 1,000,000.
135,000 to 140,000
Source: This is an estimate based on documents held by the International Tracing Service of the Red Cross. It is known that International Tracing Service has a complete set of registration documents. This is thought to include a complete set of roll-call data which includes twice daily tallies of those who died. Although the International Tracing Service of the Red Cross has such records, they have never officially published an accurate count of those who died, or even an accurate report as to exactly which documents they hold. However, totals from these records have been obtained by various interested parties.
The estimate of 135,000 is roughly corroborated by the "Auschwitz death books." The death books themselves are wartime German camp records, which were captured by the Soviets towards the end of the war, and hidden in Soviet achieves, until released to the Red Cross in 1989.
The death books consist of 46 volumes which document each death at Auschwitz (each death certificate consists of the deceased person's full name, profession and religion, date and place of birth, pre-Auschwitz residence, parents' names, time of death, and cause of death as determined by a camp physician). The records for the most important years, 1942 and 1943, are almost complete (there are also a few volumes for the year 1941, but none for the year 1944 or January 1945 (when Auschwitz was evacuated)).
The Auschwitz death books contain the death certificates of some 69,000 individuals, of whom about 30,000 were listed as Jews. You may view various eThe above mentioned, ever declining numbers of alleged dead at Auschwitz, are graphically illustrated by the following pictures of plaques from the camp.
The first is the plaque that was on display at the Auschwitz camp from 1948 until 1989 (note the "4 million" victims).
The second is the plaque currently on display at Auschwitz.
Note the dramatically reduced number of victims, now only 1.5 million.
A casual reduction in the number of deaths by some 2.5 million.
Deaths at Auschwitz drop by a whopping 2.5 million, but 6,000,000 dead Jewish prisoners, remains the same.http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2004/08/156377.php
This information may help the many school children whom have been writing asking for information concerning the so-called holocaust. There never was a holocaust I wish there were but unfortunately it's nothing but another jewish fable, a holohoax as we call it, used to extort money out of countries, companies and anyone who will listen to the poor crying jews! Someday the jews will be exposed to the world as the lying, traitorous bastards they really are and it will lead to their extermination. Till then we'll just continue to target the Allen Berg type kike and shut their big mouths, permanently! Never forget, "Violence Solves Everything!"
HITLER'S HAKENKREUZ WAS NOT A SWASTIKA
The swastika myth has been exposed. Debunked is the claim that the swastika was used by Hitler as a sankrit sign for “good luck” and stolen from an eastern culture (or that it was reversed for "evil").
The myth began in translations of Hitler’s book “Mein Kampf” containing the only comments ever made about the symbol by the leader of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nazis). Hitler did not use the word "swastika." Hitler used the German word “hakenkreuz.” The most literal translation is “hooked cross.” Most readers intuitively understand “hooked cross” or "crooked cross" or even “hakenkreuz,” but not “swastika.” There is no evidence that Hitler knew “swastika.” The word "swastika" as used in English for the symbol of the National Socialist German Workers' Party was a misleading translation of "hakenkreuz."
In "Mein Kampf" Hitler gives little information about his selection of the symbol, but he states "a dental surgeon from Starnberg submitted a good design very similar to mine, with only one mistake, in that his swastika with curved corners was set upon a white background." Hitler in his own words states that the design was not enough like the hard-cornered "S" letters of the sieg rune as used also in the "SS" division. Some people have identified the dental surgeon as Dr. Friedrich Krohn, and they claim that Krohn's design also pointed in the opposite direction, which was changed to point clockwise by Hitler. Another source claims that many National Socialists accepted Krohn's design, but Hitler insisted changing it. All of the above shows Hitler's deliberate alteration of the original proposals into a specific goal-oriented symbol of "S" letters.
Hitler's Hakenkreuz was not a swastika. A swastika can point left or right, and historically sits flat on one side in a square shape.
1. The socialist swastika's arms reach clockwise. Before modern times, the most common representation of swastikas was with arms that reached counter-clockwise. The reason that the National Socialist German Workers' Party turned their swastika's arms to reach clockwise was to highlight the letter “S” shape for “socialism.”
2. The socialist swastika is turned 45 degrees to the horizontal. The reason that the National Socialist German Workers' Party turned their swastika 45 degrees to the horizontal was to highlight the letter “S” shape. In ancient times, the swastika is usually flat on one side in a square shape, not a diamond.
3. The socialist swastika repeats the thunder-bolt "S" characters commonly used for words beginning with "S" in other symbolism by the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
4. The socialist swastika resembles a rune from the ancient Germanic alphabet that corresponds to the letter "S" used as a stylized "S" in other Nazi symbolism.
The "S is for Socialism" symbol is a mnemonic device today because a hackneyed abbreviation for "National Socialist German Workers' Party" is used exclusively by media and government schools so that most people who use the abbreviation do not know what the abbreviation abbreviates (National Socialist German Workers' Party).
This is addressed to all those e-mails and posts on
the forum that constantly complain that we are using a symbol from India, we
are NOT! Read this article and get it through your thick, non-white heads.
The symbol that Adolf Hitler designed belongs to us, National Socialist
Aryans. Case closed.
Qur’an 4:95 “Not equal are those believers who sit at home and receive no injurious hurt, and those who strive hard, fighting Jihad in Allah’s Cause with their wealth and lives. Allah has granted a rank higher to those who strive hard, fighting Jihad with their wealth and bodies to those who sit (at home). Unto each has Allah promised good, but He prefers Jihadists who strive hard and fight above those who sit home. He has distinguished his fighters with a huge reward.”
"Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight
NEVER FORGET, "VIOLENCE SOLVES EVERYTHING!"
Pastor Harold Ray Redfeairn 1952 - 2003
We shall not capitulate... no never. We may be destroyed, but if we are, we shall drag a world with us... a world in flames. - The Aryan Prophet, Adolf Hitler
Welcome to the new Order, the jew World Order!
The hegemonic Zionist neo-conservative
control almost every aspect of our government!
TERROR SHOULD BE MET WITH GREATER TERROR!
The Aryan Prophet, Adolf Hitler, 1943
Ariel Sharon: your typical domineering jew
The jew is a parasite, an enemy of our Western Civilization.
PLEASE TAKE NOTE: Do NOT send snail mail or e-mails describing plans that you may have involving illegal acts, this is VERY stupid on the part of those whom send information such as this. DO NOT send anything describing or suggesting violent acts, PERIOD! This website, community forum and chat are most likely monitored by Z.O.G. and their agents and I want no part of a RICO roundup scenario by involving A.N. with this stupidity. I have ended membership, the need to collect and maintain information on kindred, to reduce the possibility of agents of Z.O.G. gaining information which could have plausibly be used against members. Please, there is no need to tell Aryan Nations before or after the fact of any acts which could overtly expose you as a target with the authorities. Each of us are responsible for our OWN actions in life and each of us know what needs doing. There is absolutely no reason to incriminate yourselves by opening your mouths to us or anyone else. If you forget everything else remember this - "Silence Is Golden" and "Loose Lips Sink Ships." 88! - Director Kreis
Fair use notice of copyrighted material:
This site contains some copyrighted material that in some cases has not been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I make such material available
to advance the understanding of politics, human rights, the economy, democracy,
and social justice issues. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For
more information go to:
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted
material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Best viewed using Microsoft Internet Explorer 1024 x 768 Pixels