.
AFP
has fearlessly reported on the overwhelming evidence that
vaccines are dangerous and ineffective—and in particular
mercury is implicated as a primary cause for the epidemic
of autism. The Establishment media did hooplas and danced
for joy trumpeting what they called the “good news”—“Court
Rules Mercury Does Not Cause Autism.”
To
protect the big pharmaceutical manufacturers of vaccines
from lawsuits that would bankrupt them, Congress passed
a law forbidding the parents of children killed or harmed
by vaccines from suing the pharmaceutical giants. However,
victims can sue in a secret court (“the Vaccine Court”)
and damages will be paid by the U.S. taxpayer. So when actress
Jenny McCarthy’s son developed autism, she sued in
the mysterious Vaccine Court created in 1986 by the pharmaceutical
industry, with the support of Congress. It ruled against
her—and the media exploded with joy. Look at their
ads. If Big Pharma went bankrupt, who would finance the
Establishment “News” Hours?
This
same media was strangely silent when the court case of Bailey
Banks vs. Health and Human Services was unsealed. (The
media also failed to report the case of Hannah Poling, or
give it the headlines it was due, when the court found in
her favor and awarded her family compensation because of
the overwhelming evidence showing vaccines caused her autism.)
The
ruling states, “The Court found that Bailey would
not have suffered this delay but for the administration
of the MMR [mumps-measles-rubella] vaccine. . . a proximate
sequence of cause and effect leading inexorably from vaccination
to PDD [Autism].”
“It
was heartbreaking to hear about Bailey’s story, but
through this ruling we are gaining the proof we need to
open the eyes of the world to the fact that vaccines do,
in fact, cause autism,” said Jenny McCarthy. “Bailey
Banks’ regression into autism after vaccination is
the same story I went through with my own son and the same
story I have heard from thousands of mothers and fathers
around the country. Our hope is that this ruling will influence
decision- and policy-makers to help the hundreds of thousands
of children and families affected by this terrible condition.”
Ms.
McCarthy was outraged by what she called the curious and
hypocritical method of operation of the secret Vaccine Court
that not only protects vaccine makers from liability but
supports a policy that has tripled the number of vaccines
given to U.S. children— all after being made aware
of the fact that these vaccines do, in fact, cause autism
and repeatedly ruling in favor of families with children
hurt by their vaccines.
McCarthy
and tens of thousands of other parents want to know why
is a secret court, which no one knows about or understands,
quietly paying these families for vaccine injuries and autism—and
hiding it from the general public? Deirdre Imus, Generation
Rescue board member and founder of the Deirdre Imus Environmental
Center for Pediatric Oncology says, “Over the past
20 years, the vaccine court has dispensed close to $2 billion
in compensation to families whose children were injured
or killed by a vaccine.”
Most
Americans don’t even know about this secret court—or
why their own children might have physical and/or mental
problems caused by excessive use of dangerous vaccines.
If they knew how many court cases would have been filed
or how much money has been paid out to victims, families
might proceed in a different direction, i.e., sue the vaccine
makers and pharmaceutical industry into bankruptcy.
The
good news is that AFP has reported miraculous cures of “incurable”
autism with good nutrition and detoxification of mercury
and other harmful substances. Ms. McCarthy said that her
son is now free of all symptoms of his former autism—due
to good nutrition, detoxification and, of course, “lots
of love.” But love is not enough. The healing process
is hard work. The best thing is to remove the cause. She
and her pediatrician are outraged that the establishment
medical monopoly refuses to look honestly at the evidence
again mercury poison in vaccines and children, like her
son, who have been cured of “incurable” autism.
 Ralph
Forbes can be reached for comment at justrite@ipa.net.
For more on this subject and other health subjects,
go to www.KarenCares4U.com and use the password
AFP for free access to valuable health information
available exclusively to A merican Free Press
readers. |
|
Page B.8
Vaccine Act
Shields Big-Pharma
Congress makes it impossible to hold
vaccine makers accountable
by Jon Hood
The
Third Circuit ruled in late March that children who allege
injuries caused by vaccines can’t pursue design defect
claims, since Congress explicitly prohibited such suits
in an attempt to shield manufacturers from liability. The
decision, announced in Bruesewitz v.Wyeth Home Products
Corp., is at odds with a previous state court decision,
signaling that the issue may eventually find itself before
the Supreme Court.
The
court granted summary judgment to defendant Wyeth laboratories,
ruling that the immunity written into the National Childhood
Vaccine Injury Act preempts all design defect claims. Essentially,
the court held that Congress's pronouncement, as federal
law, bars state suits predicated on defective design.
In
2008, however, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled that manufacturers
are only immune from design liability if the vaccine is
shown to be “unavoidably unsafe.” That case,
American Home Products Corp. v. Ferrari, said that
design defect cases would thus require individual hearings
to determine if the injury could have been prevented. The
Ferrari case is currently before the Supreme Court on certiorari,
and a direct circuit split may offer the high court incentive
to hear it.
The
Vaccine Act provides that manufacturers are immune from
suits dealing with “side effects that were unavoidable
even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied
by proper directions and warnings.” The problem, according
to Third Circuit Judge D. Brooks Smith, is that “unavoidable,”
the key word in this phrase, is not defined in the Act.
Looking
to Congressional intent, Judge Smith pointed out that under
the Ferrari analysis, all design defect claims will be entitled
to an initial hearing on whether the problem was “unavoidable.”
According to Smith, this “construction is contrary
to the structure of the Act because it doesn’t bar
design defect claims.
Last
month, in a similar case, the Supreme Court held that suits
alleging that manufacturers failed to warn of possible dangers
were not preempted.
The
suit was brought by the parents of 17-year-old Hannah Bruesewitz,
who alleged that DPT shots were responsible for her residual
seizure disorder and serious developmental delay. DPT is
a combination of three vaccines used to inoculate against
whooping cough, tetanus, and diphtheria, an upper respiratory
tract illness. Bruesewitz received three DPT shots within
six months of her birth, and subsequently suffered a string
of seizures.
A
British study commissioned in the 1980s showed that 1 in
140,000 doses of DPT lead to neurological problems including
seizures, decreased consciousness, or brain disease. In
serious cases, the reactions can be fatal. Bruesewitz's
parents alleged that a Congressional report discovered two
deaths and 66 serious injuries resulting from the vaccine.
Jon
Hood writes for ConsumerAffairs.com, an independent
webbased consumer news and resource center.
This article appeared on www.HealthTruthRevealed.com,
the website of health crusador Greg Ciola. |
|
April
20-27
at
the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781