with first principles and the scientific method
ebooks that find a truer path in uncertain times
election of Barack
Hussein Obama II as President signals the death of America
as the baby boom generation once knew it unless whites heroically
unite to preserve their heritage and assert their right to determine
their own destiny. Otherwise America is doomed to either become
a permanent Marxist-Socialist Third World country with no future,
or else break apart in a manner that ranges somewhere between
peaceful means and a very bloody Civil
War Two scenario.
I: Snapshots: 2008-2009
Obama as "Bush
Bad to Worse
Note: Please also see the section
"Snapshots: 2010-2012" below
Obama the "Chief
Black Angel of Death:
For His Mossad-CIA-MI6
"Death Cult" Handlers
"The average White American
hasn't an idea in his head that didn't come from his television
receiver." - Dr. William L. Pierce
"Wherever you find the Negro everything is going
down around him, and wherever you find the White man you
see everything around him improving." -Robert
"Silicon Valley may be keeping the economy zooming
along for now, but that is only a superficial sign of health,
a misleading sign. America is like a man whose body is riddled
with cancer, but who still manages to keep his shoes shined
and his fingernails clean." - Dr. William L. Pierce
(in the late 1990's).
"A nation of slaves is always
prepared to applaud the clemency of their master, who in
the abuse of absolute power, does not proceed to the last
extremes of injustice and oppression." -- Edward
Gibbons, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire
Who Is Coming
but rather, "Who is Inviting
For Dinner" at the White House?
Editor's Note by William B. Fox
Publisher, America First Books
Below are some accurate predictions as well as some wishful thinking
published in Fall 2008.
Just about everything -- except the wishful thinking --has been proven
accurate ever since.
header for this web page "From Bad to Worse to Disaster?"
was inspired by a comment made by Dr.
Ralph Raico at the Mises Institute. In one of his lectures,
while addressing the Bush administration, he voiced words to
the effect "I never thought I would see the day where I
would regret no longer having Bill Clinton."
we face a scenario where we might actually regret no longer
having George Bush, if such is actually possible. Please check
out my other web page on Obama, Chapter 35 "The
Election of `Bush in Blackface' and Another Mumbai False Flag"
of my Mission
of Conscience Trilogy that provides other insights
and links regarding America's mystery President, and in particular
strong evidence that Obama is a longstanding Mossad-CIA asset..
view the candidacy and election of Barack Hussein Obama II for
President of the United States as a major intellectual "rabbit
hole" regarding the decline and fall of America. It should
be obvious from the articles archived on this web page to any
thinking individual that this turn of events has to be symptomatic
of extremely serious problems on all levels of America society
should become especially obvious after one reads my Publisher's
Preface to Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup of America, or some of
my other articles such as "Thomas
Jefferson and the `Incredible Truth' about Bush Cabal Wise Guys
and False Flag Nukes" or my Foreword
to Henry Ford's
My Life and Work. Better yet, please read books like
Judas Goats, The
New Jerusalem, Viper's
Venom and Rattler's
Revenge for deep background on the alien, corrupt,
and malevolent forces at the highest levels that made the Obama
nightmare possible in the first place.
a time when the white population is in rapid demographic decline
(we can also say "being genocided"), when America
so desperately needs to recover entrepreneurial infrastructure
along with its formerly very powerful and productive industrial
base, and when America so desperately needs to resist Zionist
hijacking of its foreign policy that is literally driving this
country towards total bankruptcy or even World War III/Armageddon
Priests of War), what could be a more cruel and degrading
joke than for the power elite to foist someone like Obama on
this country as President? He probably does not even qualify
as a "natural born citizen" as required by the Constitution
and further defined in case law in order to be President. He
is all smoke and mirrors --except when he staunchly supports
Zionism at the expense of American nationalism and promotes
nonwhite interests at the expense of beleaguered whites. We
can also reasonably expect him to promote a brand of globalism
that further reduces domestic industry and to support more spend-thrift
government interventionism that generates ever more inflation
and squeezes out ever more productive free enterprise.
slap in the face reminds me of Mike Piper's article "Franklin
J. Moses, Reconstruction's Most Infamous Scalawag"
about how vindictive Yankees once foisted a totally corrupt
Reconstruction regime over economically prostrate whites in
the long run, all of this is terribly unwise. It will only create
more misery, hate, and discontent in America. It is not going
to be good for anyone --to include African Americans.
Obama obviously charms many Americans as a fellow human being,
there is strong evidence that he is captive to destructive special
interests (particularly the Jewish lobby), alien ethnic
genetic interests (fellow blacks and other nonwhites), and
dysfunctional Marxist-Socialist ideology.
he may come across on TV to many people as an OK person, he
is still way in over his head as President of the United States.
However, if he can just figure out a way to turn the tables
on the Zionist criminals who created the 9/11 inside job, restore
the Constitution (just like Congressman Ron Paul's agenda),
reverse the unnecessary invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, and
(going back much further in time) eliminate the totally dysfunctional
Federal Reserve Banking System, and top of all this restore
a stable and sustainable relationship between whites and nonwhites
in America, I may actually change my whole attitude towards
Barack Obama and publicly celebrate him as a hero --but until
such a time I am very much on guard with this man, to say the
it may turn out that Obama has nothing to lose and everything
to gain by trying to be the kind of hero that I just described.
Remember, Zionists are famous for their treachery. No matter
what he does, they probably secretly want him dead after they
have used him so that their controlled media can turn him into
a liberal martyr like JFK while replacing him with arch-Zionist
sympathizer VP Joe Biden. They would probably prefer to frame
some white supremacists as patsies in a trumped-up assassination
plot in order to discredit their political enemies rather than
engineer a plane crash. The Zionists would probably also prefer
to give Obama just enough time to get built up as a liberal
hero while simultaneously taking some fall on failed military
policies and a collapsing economy before giving him a Jewish
far-fetched? Michael Collins Piper explains in Final
Judgment how this kind of thing happened once before
when JFK got hit by the Mossad and their CIA allies and replaced
by arch-Zionist sympathizer VP Lyndon Baines Johnson.
familiar with Zionist perfidiousness? Here is a good example
Run Out of New Orleans" at Judicial-inc.biz
us hope that in regard to treason, treachery, extreme double-standards,
and assassination we really can see change in America. Yes we
Evelyn de Rothschild, Bill Clinton, Lynn Forester de Rothschild
& Hillary Clinton" caption from TIU
EXCLUSIVE! 100% Proof Hillary Clinton Will Be President!,
post by Hei Hu Quan » Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:50 am.
[Editor's Note: While it turns out that the author was
wrong about Hillary Clinton becoming President, this was
hardly a loss for the Rothschilds, since Obama
has proven to be every bit as much a creature of the Rothschilds
/ City of London as the Clintons, as noted in regard
to the BP-Gulf and Fukushima catastrophes. The following
text is revealing]:
couple of shows back I mentioned that I had absolute proof
that Hillary Clinton is going to be installed as the next
President of the U.S. Here is my evidence submitted as
promised. The context is a July 3, 2003 soirée
held by the Sir Evelyn and Lynn Forester de Rothschild
exclusively for Hillary Clinton on their London, UK estate
at the Orangery in Kensington Palace. The event was ostensibly
billed as "a party to celebrate the launch of Hillary
Clinton's new book Hillary". Only when have you ever
heard of a party thrown for an ex-president's wife, for
writing a goddamn book about herself?! Second to that,
there is no record of anything similar being thrown for
Barack Obama, however John "insane" McCain was
invited to a luncheon on March 20th at the Spencer House,
St. James's Place estate of Nathaniel Rothschild.
Forester de Rothschild is also the lead of a 21 direct
contributors to her campaign who wrote a letter dated
March 26, 2008, to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, warning
her to to back off and keep out of the superdelegate fight.
The Rothschilds have long been 'Kingmakers' who dictate
whom is strategically placed where, and if you check out
the absolute turn these candidate (s)elections have taken
you can see things in the background moving behind the
scenes. This was decided long ago and the president has
been already selected for installation for you, no voting
illustration and caption also used on the "Chernobyl
Nuclear Catastrophe" web page]
Partisan, Profane Confidant Reins It In,
Mark Leibovitch, New York Times. "WASHINGTON
— Early this month, Barack Obama was meeting with
the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, and other lawmakers when
Rahm Emanuel, his chief of staff, began nervously cracking
a knuckle. Mr. Obama then turned to complain to Mr. Emanuel
about his noisy habit. At which point, Mr. Emanuel held
the offending knuckle up to Mr. Obama’s left ear
and, like an annoying little brother, snapped off a few
EMANUEL: Ardent Zionist called Obama’s ‘Svengali’
by Victor Thorn, AFP
is a rampant warmonger who takes his cues from the neo-cons.
In his book The Plan: Big Ideas for America,
he wrote, “We need to expand the U.S. Army by
100,000 more troops.”
will America’s next target be under an Obama presidency?
Sources close to Emanuel say that he has a “Zionist
obsession with Iran.”
get a final idea of what we’re dealing with, consider
this quote from U.S. war journalist Pat Dollard: Let
me tell you right now, no exaggeration. Rahm Emanuel
is the devil. He is . . . a Goebbels, a Mengele, a perfect
Cromwell who would, without the faintest evidence of
hesitation washing across his face for even a millisecond,
order and even personally execute each and every human
being he or Obama perceived to be an enemy of the regime.
And if you ever personally offended him, and he had
the opportunity to kill you, he would probably do it
by starting with your children as you were made to watch.
He is a bad guy.
researchers have gone so far as to claim that Emanuel
was the notorious “Mega” spy deep inside
the Clinton administration who passed top-secret documents
about Iran on to the Israeli government, causing a great
deal of chaos among the various intelligence agencies.
Be very wary of this man. Like the “Prince of
Darkness” Richard Perle and Michael Chertoff before
him (both of whom hold dual U.S.-Israeli citizenships),
it may well be proven that his loyalties rest more with
a fabricated little state in the Middle East than they
do with us.
Come, Oh Come, Emanuel by Eric Gliebe. "Rahm
Emanuel is a Jewish member of the House of Representatives
who votes a documented 98% with the Democrats. His appointment
marks a switch in tone for Obama, who promised, if elected,
to reach across the isle to Republicans. Emanuel is not
one of those guys who like to share power or reach across
the isle. Associated Press calls him a man with sharp
elbows and a `fiery partisan who doesn't mind breaking
glass and hurting feelings.' In fact, he once sent a dead
fish to one of his political rivals. After the Republicans
blew out the Democrats in the 2002 off-year election,
Emanuel publicly named those he considered "traitors"
to the party and slammed a steak knife into a table with
each name. Yeah -- just the kind of guy to heal wounds
and bring us together!"
Open Letter to President-Elect Obama by Ralph
Nader. "[We must note] your transformation from an
articulate defender of Palestinian rights in Chicago before
your run for the U.S. Senate to an acolyte, a dittoman
for the hard-line AIPAC lobby, which bolsters the militaristic
oppression, occupation, blockage, colonization and land-water
seizures over the years of the Palestinian peoples and
their shrunken territories in the West Bank and Gaza..."
Emanuel Is Obama's Favorite Jew to Mock.
Hey, lighten up folks, it is only another Jewish conspiracy!
Reaches From Grave To Nail Rahm; Excerpts From Archived
News Investigations By The Late Sherman H. Skolnick. This
article also has a lot of good additional links to other
articles about "Rahm-bo." If you accept the
premise that the Mossad has been central to such attacks
on America as 9/11, the Oklahoma City bombing, and the
assassination, and that Rahm is in tight with them,
Obama's appointment of this man as White House Chief of
Staff is practically a declaration of war against the
U.S. Constitution and the American people. The barbarians
are truly inside the gates!
Faced With Security Problem At Outset of Transition Process-
Wayne Madsen Report November
6, 2008 -
smug and smirking Jewish supremacist who
thinks he is at the top of his game, Israel
Firster Rahm Emanuel wants
to force 18-25 year old Americans
to labor for the government
has learned from informed U.S. intelligence sources that
prospective Barack Obama White House Chief of Staff Rahm
Emanuel has an active FBI counter-intelligence file maintained
on him. Emanuel's rise to the Chief of Staff position
may pose a significant security problem for President-elect
Obama if the FBI insists on conducting the full background
security investigation normally required for senior White
about Emanuel's links to the Israeli intelligence service,
the Mossad, were allegedly so great that President Bill
Clinton was forced to dismiss Emanuel from the White House
staff in 1998. One of the FBI agents who discovered Emanuel's
dealings with Israeli intelligence was, according to our
sources, the late FBI counter-terrorism Assistant Director
John O'Neill. O'Neill retired after being set up in a
smear operation involving a temporarily stolen brief case
in 2001. O'Neill and another FBI agent who still works
for the bureau and shall remain nameless at this point
to protect him and his career discovered that Emanuel
was heavily involved in the decision to place intern Monica
Lewinsky close to President Clinton. O'Neill accepted
the top security position for Kroll Associates at the
World Trade Center. O'Neill was killed in the 9/11 attack
on the World Trade Center. WMR has also reported that
O'Neill was a close friend of slain retired Houston CIA
station chief Roland V. `Tony' Carnaby, who was similarly
investigating Israeli intelligence operations in the Houston
area when Houston police shot and killed him last April.
reportedly had knowledge of Israeli intelligence penetration
of White House communications systems and Lewinsky, in
sworn testimony before the Office of Independent Counsel,
stated: `He [Clinton] suspected that a foreign embassy
[it is now known that embassy was that of Israel] was
tapping his telephones, and he proposed cover stories.'
Lewinsky continued, `If ever questioned, she should say
that the two of them were just friends. If anyone ever
asked about their phone sex, she should say that they
knew their calls were being monitored all along, and the
phone sex was just a put on.'
has learned from U.S. intelligence sources that Emanuel
was discovered to be part of a political intelligence
and blackmail operation directed against Clinton by Israel's
Likud Party and Binyamin Netanyahu to sink Clinton's proposed
Middle East peace deal. We have also learned that the
FBI investigation of Emanuel is part of a file code-named
the `Mega file.' `Mega' is a reference to a top-level
Mossad agent in the Reagan administration who was said
to have run a number of Israeli agents, including U.S.
Navy spy Jonathan Pollard."
Amazon book description for Obama:
The Post Modern Coup
provides a good overview of Tarpley's views:
"Obama is a deeply troubled personality, the megalomaniac
front man for a postmodern coup by the intelligence agencies,
using fake polls, mobs of swarming adolescents, super-rich contributors,
and orchestrated media hysteria to short-circuit normal politics
and seize power. Obama comes from the orbit of the Ford Foundation,
and has never won public office in a contested election. His
guru and controller is Zbigniew Brzezinski, the deranged revanchist
and Russia-hater who dominated the catastrophic Carter presidency
30 years ago. All indications are that Brzezinski recruited
Obama at Columbia University a quarter century ago. Trilateral
Commission co-founder Brzezinski wants a global showdown with
Russia and China far more dangerous for the United States than
the Bush-Cheney Iraq adventure. Obama's economics are pure Skull
& Bones/Chicago school austerity and sacrifice for American
working families, all designed to bail out the bankrupt Wall
Street elitist financiers who own Obama. Obama's lemming legions
and Kool-Aid cult candidacy hearken back to Italy in 1919-1922,
and raise the question of postmodern fascism in the United States
today. Obama is a recipe for a world tragedy. No American voter
can afford to ignore the lessons contained in this book."
(About the Author Webster Griffin Tarpley (Massachusetts 1946)
is an intelligence expert and historian who has been studying
and exposing covert operations for over thirty years. He is
the author of George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography
(1992) and 9/11 Synthetic Terror (2005). He has appeared
on C-SPAN, CNN, Fox News, and many more. --This text refers
to the Paperback edition.)
To Brainwash A Nation (8:48) Uploaded on May
13, 2009. YouTube caption "This amazing interview was
done back in 1985 with a former KGB agent who was trained
in subversion techniques. He explains the 4 basic steps to
socially engineering entire generations into thinking and
behaving the way those in power want them to. It's shocking
because our nation has been transformed in the exact same
way, and followed the exact same steps." A friend who
supplied the link to this video commented"Isn't
it interesting that this former KGB agent is Jewish, and his
father was a high-up party official. The Bolshevik Revolution
was inspired by the teachings of Karl Marx; the leaders of
the revolution were mainly Jewish; and, afterwards, about
85% of executive positions were held by Jews, overseeing the
military, finance, propaganda, concentration camps, etc. Only
later on did Stalin purge them (along with everyone else,
it seems). Obama is backed by and surrounded by Jews in his
administration; at least, his top advisors are Jews. Jewish
culture is antithetical to our Northern European one &
the founding principles of this country."
America First Books editor comment: Tarpley
is a brilliant man, does great research, and puts out a lot
of good information to the public. I think that all of his material
is well worth considering. (I have a similar attitude towards
Alex Jones, incidentally, and I think that Capt
Eric May shares my sentiments here). However, my own personal
reservation is that Tarpley tends to pull a lot of punches when
it comes to drawing Zionist connections. He is certainly no
explicit racial nationalist like Dr. William Pierce or Dr.
David Duke, or explicit critic of Zionists like Michael
Collins Piper and Col
Donn de Grand Pre (whose works are carried by America First
Books). Although he is willing to draw some connections to Zionists,
he tends to do so only very skittishly. For example, although9/11
Synthetic Terror: Made in USAhas a lot of excellent
research and insights, the book fails to identify what was probably
the central role of the Mossad and Israel. I
believe strongly that it takes a foreign power whose leaders
feel a 3,000+
year old racial hatred of gentiles to mastermind and orchestrate
something as utterly diabolical as the "9-11 inside job"
(actually "9-11 outside job"). While there
were undoubtedly senior members of the Bush administration,
U.S. military, CIA, and FBI who were co-opted (witting or unwittingly)
by the conspirators, and furthermore while there are always
a certain percentage of psychopaths of any race --Jewish or
gentile-- at the head of any government agency in any country
around the world, I certainly do not think the average American
who goes to work for the FBI, CIA, or rises through the ranks
of the U.S. military is capable of pulling off this level of
question, Israel, the Jewish Lobby, and the Mossad exert tremendous
influence. Please recall the famous
quote by former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral
Thomas Moorer ""I've never seen a President -- I don't
care who he is -- stand up to them [the Israelis]. It just boggles
the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know
what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn't
writing anything down. If the American people understood what
a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise
up in arms. Our citizens certainly don't have any idea what
goes on." Consider
Judgment, where Michael Collins Piper provides evidence
that the mysterious death of former CIA Director William Colby
was a Mossad hit. The book itself focuses on why the Mossad
was in all likelihood central to the assassination of JFK. When
the Mossad demonstrates that it can murder the President of
the United States and former CIA Director on U.S. soil --and
then quietly slither away under the cover of Jewish supremacist-controlled
national media --that, my little Virginia, is real
does mention that Obama is not only in tight with Zbigniew
Brzezinski but also George Soros, who is a major Jewish neo-con
trouble-maker. As an example of such trouble-making, please
see my co-authored Mid-Summer
Alert Update. Also, from a traditional American conservative
perspective, Brzezinski is a fellow
traveler with Dr. Henry Kissinger, who in turn is a mouthpiece
of the Rothschilds and other elite Jewish plutocratic families.
for those who doubt that certain parts of the the CIA (probably
in partnership with the Mossad) has penetrated various state
government or nonprofit entities in domestic America such as
the Ford Foundation, check out Jesse
Ventura's video interview about how he was monitored as
Governor of Minnesota by the CIA, to include surveillance by
a CIA agent permanently emplanted in a state government upper
level management position. As another sampler of CIA-Mossad
penetration, please check out Mike Piper's article "Guess
Who’s in Charge of Guarding U.S. Nuclear Power & Weapon
Barack Obama Have a Personality Disorder? v1,
Uploaded on Oct 2, 2008. YouTube caption:
you are a victim of a cult of personality, you don't know
it until it is too late.
`To the extent that people are pathologically narcissistic,
they can be controlling, blaming, self-absorbed, intolerant
of others' views, unaware of others' needs and of the effects
of their behavior on others, and insistent that others see
them as they wish to be seen. ambitious and capable, the inability
to tolerate setbacks, disagreements or criticism, along with
lack of empathy, make it difficult for such individuals to
be a victim. To learn more:
Obama: The Making of a Fuehrer http://www.faithfreedom.org/obama.html
Obama as a narcissistic,
warns of dictatorship
Samuel Vaknin on Obama, an update at blueeyeview.blogspot.com.
Please scroll a fourth way down web page to his comments framed
inside a page outline. "I must confess I was impressed
by Sen.Barack Obama from the first time I saw him. At first
I was excited to see a black candidate. He looked youthful,
spoke well, appeared to be confident - a wholesome presidential
package. I was put off soon, not just because of his shallowness
but also because there was an air of haughtiness in his demeanor
that was unsettling. His posture and his body language were
louder than his empty words. Obama's speeches are unlike any
political speech we have heard in American history. Never
a politician in this land had such quasi `religious' impact
on so many people. The fact that Obama is a total incognito
with zero accomplishment, makes this inexplicable infatuation
alarming...The peace of the world depends on the strength
of America, and its weakness translates into the triumph of
terrorism and victory of rogue nations. It is no wonder that
Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, the Castrists, the Hezbollah, the
Hamas, the lawyers of the Guantanamo terrorists and virtually
all sworn enemies of America are so thrilled by the prospect
of their man in the White House. America is on the verge of
destruction. There is no insanity greater than electing a
pathological narcissist as president."
2008-11-01 The following interview took place between James
Edwards, host of the Political
Cesspool, and Bob Griswold, owner of Ready
Made Resources, on November 1, 2008. (Archived
online with the Republic Broadcasting Network).
Bob Griswold: One thing that I don't
know that people take into consideration if we think about
a Barack presidency, what will he do to immigration? And
what will that mean for any future elections in this country
if the floodgates to Mexico are opened and around the world.
We can see he has his own family of illegal aliens living
in this country. Can you imagine what America is going to
look in four years from now under a Barack presidency? James Edwards: (Laughter) Hey, you know
this show is too late at night, Bob, to really think about
that. We have got to go to bed soon, and you know I do not
want to have nightmares. But it is going to be very
scary. And that is the point I was getting at. I think I
mentioned in passing with Jema, and that is if Barack Obama
gets elected, God forbid. He could quite possibly have a
filibuster-proof majority in Congress. Jema said that it
is possible that you may have a couple of defectors, but
I just do not see that happening with Obama. Everyone is
going to want to please the New Savior. He is going to have
a totally complicit media that is going to go along and
support his every whim, and because of his race, he is going
to be completely protected from any criticism, because of
course you know if you criticize him you are a racist. So
I tell you, there is nothing to restrain Barack
Obama. There is nothing to restrain anything that man would
want to do should he be elected, and that is very
scary. Griswold: You brought up an interesting
point. Being in the business that I am in, I talk to many
people all over the country. And so many of them have told
me that they have gone to their place of employment --and
not that I am going to endorse John McCain-- but
they said "I am voting for John McCain," and they
are called a racist. The effort to squelch the free speech
and thought in this country, that you cannot even disagree
with this man without being labeled a racist, which will
under his presidency, I believe, be a crime, so that possibly
the very fact that you disagree with this man will make
you a racist, and racism will become a crime. Edwards: Well, you know to add on to the
foundation that you are building there, Bob, an excellent
article, if you want to imagine how bad it could be if Obama
is in fact elected and the power he might have, read Pat
Buchanan's recent article "Obama's
First 100 Days." Griswold: I have read it. Edwards: Those are all things he could
do theoretically and I just don't see anything to stop him
unless he has self-restraint, and he would be the first
I have seen with that much power to have it. Griswold: Well he has not shown self-restraint
in his life up until this point. He has been given a pass
to everything in his life. You know it is an interesting
characteristic about this man, as soon as he develops somebody
in the news that is not politically correct; Bill
Ayers or Rev
Wright or Tony
Rezko or the list goes on, he is one to throw these
people under the bus. He is willing to sacrifice anything
to get power. I mean his life long friend, Jeremiah Wright
--threw him under the bus. Edwards: Right, right. Griswold: The person who got him into politics
to begin with, Bill
Ayers --thrown under the bus. Tony
Rezko, the man who financed him --throw him under the
bus. And that is a concerning trait about this man that
he will do whatever it takes to get the power he craves.
And with this Messiah mentality and Messiah complex that
surrounds him, I really do worry if he is elected whether
America can survive even four years of this man.
The Federal courts alone. Who will he put in there for Federal
judges? I mean, I think he will put in people who will be
far left of what Bill Clinton would have appointed. Edwards: Well, Bob, with that being said,
and of course I cannot disagree with you...
enough, Rev Jesse Jackson accused Obama of selling out blacks
white" over the "Jena 6" affair. In a separate
incident, Jackson apologized to Obama for "crude comments"
that got on the air. According to a
news report: "Jackson charged that Obama had been
talking down to black people and added: `I want to cut his
Obama - Narcissist or Merely Narcissistic?"
by Sam Vaknin, Phd. A good oveview of Narcissism 101 and Obama.
Obama as a new messiah and corporate
marketing creation, using hypnotic technique
and attracting fanatical cult followers
web page used to link to some YouTube videos that depict Louis
Farrakhan calling Obama "the Messiah." They have since
been withdrawn off the Internet by his Nation of Islam. Other
interesting You Tube videos: Ann
Coulter compares Obama to Hitler; also Is
Mr. Obama Using Hitler's Tactics on his Followers?
= Hitler. If the comparison of Obama's rhetoric
and mannerisms with Hitler's seems very sketchy and far-fetched,
consider how the same very powerful and clever "Zionazis"
who have handled George W. Bush are now handling Obama. Furthermore,
consider how Bush has himself acted in a Hitlerian manner. 9/11
was his Reichstag Fire. His May 2003 "Mission Accomplished"
landing on the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln resembled scenes not only
from the movie Independence Day, but Leni Reifenstahl's
Triumph of the Will. For more in-depth analysis, see
the transcript of Frank Whalen's interview
of Capt Eric May, 3rd Hour, 23 February 2006, or GeorgeAnn Hughes
of Capt May, Part II, 19 January 2006, on The Byte Show:
Cracking Satan's Code. See also Capt May's article "America
Uber Alles" -- Our Nazi Nation." The premise
is that America's utterly corrupt Zionist neo-con plutocratic
elite is seeking to create a dictatorship, and will use techniques
borrowed from any autocratic playbook. Whether it is
Communist or Nazi, they do not care as long as it is effective
in subjugating America. Captain Eric May has told William Fox,
editor of American First books, that he views Obama as essentially
Bush in black face, and we can expect all of the same kinds
of authoritarian grabs for power --to include repeated attempts
at false flag operations. In fact, Obama is more dangerous than
Bush, because he is slicker, smarter, and sexier to many people.
Take for example "I
Got a Crush...On Obama" By Obama Girl that
scored 11.8 million web hits by Nov 2008. Or listen to "Obama"
sung as a Negro spiritual at the beginning of this video How
Obama Got Elected... Interviews With Obama Voters.
The cadence "O-bah-mah! O-bah-mah! Oh-bah-mah!" reminds
me of "Soma!
Soma! Soma!" from Aldous Huxley's Brave
New World. In view of the current American social and
political context, the "O-Bah-Mah" chant has a primitive,
eerie, decadent, and chilling "beauty" to it, analogous
(for you photographers out there) to saturated golden-hued landscape
colors glowing as the sun sets (symbolizing "golden years"
satisfaction just before dying) or that warm wonderful feeling
people report in the last phase of hyperthermia (just prior
to death --like America today). It is the "jungle"
that Dr. William Pierce writes about in his review of The
Bonfire of Vanities (see excerpt below)
taking over and enveloping us. Remember, "republicanism"
and "democracy" originally evolved as rational group
decision-making processes that apply to government, just as
the "scientific method" is a process for accumulating
and interpeting knowledge and finding truth. It is so "Third
World" that increasing percentages of Americans now approach
these things mostly on "gut."
the cult of Obama by Gene Healy, SFExaminer.
Examination of Obama’s Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques
in His Speeches (pdf) A scholarly white paper of
unknow authorship that makes strong arguments. "Obama’s
speeches contain the hypnosis techniques of Dr. Milton Erickson,
M.D. who developed a form of “conversational” hypnosis
that could be hidden in seemingly normal speech and used on
patients without their knowledge for therapy purposes. Obama’s
speeches intentionally contain: Trance Inductions - Hypnotic
Anchoring - Pacing and Leading - Pacing, Distraction and Utilization
- Critical Factor Bypass - Stacking Language Patterns - Preprogrammed
Response Adaptation - Linking Statements/ Causality Bridges
- Secondary Hidden Meanings/Imbedded Suggestions - Emotion Transfer
- Non-Dominant Hemisphere Programming.."
Obama as a serious threat to
the First Amendment
right of freedom of speech and peaceable assembly
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rule in question
is called "localism." Radio and television stations
are required to serve the interests of their local community
as a condition of keeping their broadcast licenses.
needs only three votes from the five-member
FCC to define localism in such a way that no radio station
would dare air any syndicated conservative programming.
is one of the rare issues on which Obama himself has been
outspoken. On September 20, 2007, Obama submitted a pro-localism
statement to an FCC hearing
held at the Chicago headquarters of Rev. Jesse Jackson
Sr.'s Operation Push.
the Obama transition team knows all about the potential
of localism as a means of silencing conservative dissent.
The head of the Obama transition team is John Podesta, President
and CEO of the Center for American Progress.
2007, the Center for American Progress issued a report,
Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio. This
report complained that there was too much conservative talk
on the radio because of "the absence of localism in
American radio markets" and urged the FCC to "[e]nsure
greater local accountability over radio licensing.
could America, ostensibly protected by the First Amendment,
also lose free speech on the internet?
starters, Congress could pass ADL's federal hate crimes
bill, the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act,
this winter. In 1971, Canada enacted ADL's very similar
federal hate law. Soon, it was extended to criminalize "hate
speech" originating on Canadian websites. Sec. 13.1
of Canada's human rights statute outlaws even such internet
speech as is "likely" to cause embarrassment to
federally protected groups.
the Obama/ADL hate bill is passed, internet "homophobic
hate speech" in evangelical media, as well as in pulpits,
will become illegal. The hate bill is ostensibly directed
only against violent hate crimes in the States. However,
a federal hate bill will quickly overflow such limits, as
prosecutors and judges broaden it to protection of the "hurt
feelings" of sodomites.
Hate Bill Steals God-Given Freedom by Rev Ted
Pike. If this goes through, one can kiss goodbye creating
any realistic checks on the "human tsunami" of illegal
immigration that is already swamping America.
Obama as a
serious threat to our
Second Amendment right to bear arms
One emailer posted at About.com
called this a replay of the "crotch salute." About.com
claims this is unfair on the web page "Obama's
Veterans Day / Ft. Hood Non-Salute," stating at
the end of the web page "there's a very good reason
why President Obama wasn't saluting when the above photo
was taken, even though everyone else on the dais was. C-Span
video footage reveals that the moment in question occurred
just after Obama was introduced and the band began playing
"Hail to the Chief." The video also shows Obama
saluting during the playing of the National Anthem.
Foreign Policy: No Sharp Break From Bush by Jim
Lobe. Under Obama, America will very likely continue to practice
global "bigmanship" rather than repair productive
infrastructure on the home front first. "Bigmanship"
is an anthropological term describing the behavior of redistributor
chiefs of primitive, zero-sum societies who posture and shift
wealth to cronies and engage in various forms of conspicuous
wealth consumption mainly for the purpose of prestige-enhancement
and paternalistic ego gratification.
Than Bush? by Ted Galen Carpenter.
American Leadership" by Barack Obama,
July/August 2007 Foreign Affairs, published by the
Council on Foreign Relations, a subsidiary of the Zionist globalist
elite. Obama calls for ever more global bigmanship and foreign
entanglements. According to the Wikipedia article about the
Council on Foreign Relations: "Michelle Obama was listed
as a director on the Chicago Council website until her husband
started gaining more attention during the 2008 Democratic nomination
Obama as a potential false flag operator
Israel needs a pretext to expand war
in the Middle East. Obama has a strong incentive to accomodate
his Zionist handlers and start running false flag terror operations
within the first 6-9 months of his presidency. Such operations
would not only milk his popularity ratings while they are still
relatively high, but also keep potential challengers off balance
or under lock down.
Was this cartoon a coded
warning to Obama? See 2009-04-09 interview comments below
Say NO to Mass Swine Flu Vaccinations Until Vaccines Are PROVEN
SAFE and NECESSARY! by Maj. William Fox, also archived
in the Lone Star Iconoclast.
Real Deal. Interview by Dr. Fetzer with Capt. May,
Maj. Fox, and SFC Buswell. Capt May thinks it was very strange
that Obama and Biden flew
separately to Denver on Feb 17th to sign the stimulus bill.
Normally this kind of signing is done in the Rose Garden or
somewhere else at the White House. Did Obama want to be close
to the USNORTHCOM HQ in case it was time for him and Biden to
pull another “Cheney in the bunker?” Also, very
peculiar, the next day the Zionist-controlled New York Post
the “Dead Monkey” cartoon. Did Obama draw ire
for failing to give the go ahead to administer a false flag
stimulus as expected? Capt. May, Maj. Fox, SFC Buswell, and
Dr. Fetzer still think that the Chicago Willis Tower (formerly
the Sears Tower) remains in the cross hairs, as reflected in
their 10 April alert.
2 hrs 5 min, 44.1 MB Download Here
Nuclear Obama — False Flag Unfurled coauthored
by Capt Eric May, Maj. William Fox, Dr. James Fetzer, and SFC
Donald Buswell. Also archived
at the Lone Star Iconoclast. 2009-02-12
Deal. Jim Fetzer interviews Maj. William Fox, who
along with Capt May are strenuously trying to second-guess possible
future false flag operations, since the most dangerous period
of the Obama administration, like the Bush administration, is
likely to be within its first nine months through Sept 2009.
The interview starts with outline of a possible false flag scenario
involving three explosions (two in Israel, a nuke in a U.S.
city) addressed in the 14 Feb 2009 Alert Chicago
False Flag? — Analysis and Hypothesis — coauthored
with Capt. Eric May. Maj Fox and Dr. Fetzer also address dysfunctional
macro economic, political, and social policies in America and
how they might get fixed. Unfortunately a Revere Radio blurb
cuts out where Maj Fox explains the motive for blowing up the
Dome of the Rock. The idea is that it would be deliberately
designed by the Mossad to appear to be a Muslim
false flag operation. This convoluted intrigue would be
designed to clear the way towards rebuilding the Temple of Solomon
--a major Zionist objective, while blaming the attack on Muslim
intriguers out to discredit Zionists. Incidentally, if this
were such a far-fetched scenario, why would the Muslim false
flag scenario be advocated
in an Israeli publication by a Middle East analyst? Also, the
Feb 2009 American Free Press article which Maj
Fox cites by Mark Glenn originally had the confusing title where
it called the burial site of Jesus at the Church of the Holy
Sepulcher the birthplace. Maj Fox has since cleared up this
confusion by correcting the title in his online
posting of this article. This article is significant because
Benjamin Netanyahu threatened an attack on this site. This show
is also on YouTube in five parts, part one beginning here.
Unfortunately Capt. May, who suffers from the late stages of
ALS, started suffering from breathing problems and had to bow
out of this show before he could speak.
2 hours, 28.2 MB Download Here.
Cops Dodge Blagojevich/Sears Tower Investigation
by William Fox with Capt Eric May. Also archived at LSI.
mother was White, but you never hear anything about her
side of his family. Obama talks only of the African man
who conceived Obama while wed to another and then abandoned
him. From Obama's first little book, Dreams of My Father:
"I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance
and animosity against my mother's race." Also
from Dreams of My Father: "I ceased to advertise
my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to
suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites."
up some recent pictures of Detroit. Google up the FBI web
site and track down the statistics on Black on White crime
today (50 times as much violent crime from individual Blacks
as from individual Whites).
was a member of virulent racist, anti-White Rev. Wright's
church for 20 years. Wright performed the Obamas' marriage.
Only after a public outcry did Obama condemn Rev. Wright's
"God damn America" sermon.
America's first affirmative action President of the
United States! If Obama had been white and continued to say
the same kinds of far left things as "Queen Hillary,"
do you really think the public and New World Order kingmakers
would have swung the election his way?
to open floodgates
of illegal immigration even wider
Please be aware that things can get much worse than granting
citizenship to an extra 12 million illegal aliens, on top of
the over 30 million Mexicans who have biologically replaced
the same number of whites in the last two decades (filling in
for white abortions and less than ZPG-level birthrates). If
Obama's neo-Marxist buddies have their way, they might try importing
a huge share of the in-excess of a billion poor Chinese and
poverty-strick people from India. The Chinese have already gained
footholds strategically close to America with their control
of the Panama Canal and creation of the world's
largest port in the Bahamas. People from India have already
gained major footholds in American in positions ranging from
running hotels and 7-11's to executive positons in Silicon Valley
firms. As the graph below shows, from simply considering differential
birth rates alone, we still have a huge crisis even if nonwhite
immigration is signficantly curtailed. Imagine if Obama's proposed
"hate crime" laws get passed, and it becomes illegal
to criticize the "human tsunami" bearing down on us,
how hopelessly America will get totally swamped. See the articles
by Frosty Wooldridge such as the "The
Next Added 100 Million Americans."
Obama increases white miscegenation
Family in Pictures by James Buchanan: "Do
we really want Barack Obama to ascend to the presidency, knowing
that this will send a message to millions of White American
girls, that race-mixing is `OK'? Do millions of White parents
want to effectively give their White daughters permission to
marry a Black man? 80 percent of Obama’s African relatives
are Muslims. Obama’s Indonesian step-father was a Muslim,
and Barack himself attended a Muslim school in Indonesia for
several years. Obama’s home country of Kenya is a desperately
poor, backward Third World nation, and there’s a great
chance a President Obama would spend billions of dollars in
foreign aid on Kenya and throw open the immigration door to
millions of his African cousins."
Obama Deception HQ Full length version (1:53:40)
(Makes many important points, but is light on the Zionist
dimension of the "oligarchy;" however, beginning
at 18:28 note the Rahm Emanuel and Henry Kissinger clips )
"business as usual" and bad change
October 2008 financial meltdown is not the result of a cyclical
economic phenomenon. It is the deliberate result of US government
policy instrumented through the Treasury and the US Federal
is the most serious economic crisis in World history.
"bailout" proposed by the US Treasury does not
constitute a "solution" to the crisis. In fact
quite the opposite: it is the cause of further collapse.
It triggers an unprecedented concentration of wealth, which
in turn contributes to widening economic and social inequalities
both within and between nations...
we are witnessing is continuity.
provides a " human face" to the status quo. This
human face serves to mislead Americans on the nature of
the economic and political process.
neoliberal economic reforms remain intact.
substance of these reforms including the "bailout"
of America's largest financial institutions ultimately destroys
the real economy, while spearheading entire areas of manufacturing
and the services economy into bankruptcy.
The central bank is an institution of the most deadly
hostility existing against the Principles and form of
our Constitution. I am an Enemy to all banks discounting
bills or notes for anything but Coin. If the American
People allow private banks to control the issuance of
their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation,
the banks and corporations that will grow up around them
will deprive the People of all their Property until their
Children will wake up homeless on the continent their
contrast to all this, Obama is basically just a "house
boy" for the kinds of utterly selfish and greedy financial
operators identified by Dr. Chossudovsky. President Thomas
Jefferson probably would have considered them full-scale
domestic enemies of our republic and tried to figure out
Constitutional ways to motivate local sheriffs, militia,
Army or Marines to put them all in jail or on bond awaiting
trial for well-founded criminal charges by now.
fact, speaking of the U.S. military, we may ultimately be
faced with a very unpleasant "kill or be killed"
dilemma. In our 9 Oct 2008 "Vigilant
Shield and Jokers Gone Wild" alert, we described
how the banksters had the bloody nerve to threaten U.S.
Congressman with martial law if they did not bail them out
of the consequences of their own corrupt and reckless handling
of the financial system.
...U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman of California discussed
the threat of martial law made to Congressmen during the
recent bailout bill debate: “Many of us were told
in private conversations that if we voted against this
bill on Monday that the sky would fall, the market would
drop two or three thousand points the first day and another
couple of thousand on the second day, and a few members
were even told that there would be martial law in America
if we voted no. That is what I call fearmongering…"
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary
of the Treasury under Reagan, told talk show host Alex
Jones on 3 Oct that the bailout bill gives economic
martial law power to the Treasury.
his article "A
Dawning Dictatorship? (911-2B & NSPD-51)"
Captain Eric May quotes Oregon Congressman Peter DeFazio:
"I just can’t believe they’re going to
deny a member of Congress the right of reviewing how they
plan to conduct the government of the United States after
a significant terrorist attack … Maybe the people
who think there’s a conspiracy out there are right."
Of course under NSPD-51, a financial emergency can also
serve as a trigger, just like a terrorist attack.
other words, if the American people and their elected government
representatives do not get law enforcement personnel and
the military on their side to face off the banksters, the
banksters and pro-Zionist national media tycoons will continue
their sneaky, deceitful campaign to set up soldiers and
police to violently suppress the people to serve their own
special interests at the expense of this country. Get it?
Hussein Obama II is likely to do nothing except take orders
from these financial parasites and help lead America into
even greater ruin. 2008-11-07 Obama:
Meet the new boss, same as the old bossblog
entry by "Devrim".
Obama as a tragic
repeater of FDR's
mistakes that prolonged and deepened
the Great Depression
first important fact to know about the Great Depression is that
the Federal Reserve Banking System largely created the conditions
for the Depression to begin with. (The Fed itself was created
by a very unsavory group of Jewish supremacist financiers and
their Morgan and Rockefeller cronies, as documented in G. Edward
Griffin's book The Creature from Jekyll Island, Eustace
Mullins' The Federal Reserve Conspiracy, and Henry
Ford's The International Jew) It doubled the money
supply in World War I, and roughly doubled it again during the
Roaring 20's, creating massive distortions in the economy. The
criminal Fed also increased fractional
reserve ratios and approved extremely speculative methods
on Wall Street so that fellow Members of the Tribe (MOT) could
better profit from insider borrowing privileges and inside information.
Then, after massively super-goosing the economy, the Fed took
the punch bowl away from the party, and was then able to eliminate
weaker independent banks to consolidate its power base while
various Members of the Tribe were able to scoop up major American
media and industrial assets for pennies on the dollar. Meanwhile,
frontmen like Herbert Hoover and FDR cast the blame everywhere
except upon the real culprits. (In contrast, Germany found a
leader less skitish about naming names). See America's
Great Depression by Dr. Murray Rothbard which explains
much of this in detail from his anarch-libertarian perspective.
Also, in my centralized
vs. decentralized discussion, I provide excerpts from Special
Privilege: How the Monetary Elite Benefit at Your Expense,
by Vincent LoCasio that describe how the Fed did the exact opposite
behind the scenes compared to what it was supposed to do when
originally sold to Congress in 1913. Lastly, please see my commentary
regarding the question: "What
is the proper role of the Federal Government (Feds) and central
bank (the Federal Reserve or "the Fed") in managing
the economy?" as part of my "Have
You Been Brainwashed?" quiz. Similarly,
major Jewish-controlled Wall Street firms today such as Goldman
Sachs and the now defunct Lehman Brothers were major contributors
to the Obama campaign. Don't hold your breath that Obama will
ever go after the banksters responsible for the reckless lending
that led to the aforementioned $700 billion taxpayer bailout.
Nor will he likely go after the Wall Street criminals who have
created over 500 trillion in derivatives, of which about 80
trillion (about 7 times the size of the U.S. economy) are considered
particularly toxic. Billionaire Warren Buffet once referred
to these derivatives as "Weapons of Mass Financial Destruction."
But don't hold your breath that Obama will ever name names.
Instead, like FDR, he will blame everyone except the real culprits.
next important fact to know is that one does not promote real
economic recovery by destroying the basis for successful "entrepreneurial
calculation," (the latter being a key phrase in "Austrian
what is this calculation made of? Simple. Just go to any publicly
listed company on the Internet and download its Form 10K. This
is essentially an outline of its business plan. Most business
plans try to explain how a company can offer a product with
a superior ratio of perceived value to price to the consumer
relative to the competition, and do so with worthwhile profit
expectations. In a nutshell, most of FDR's New Deal policies
provided disincentives for the normal process of entrepreneurial
calculation. The flawed policies vastly increased regulation
that increased costs to businesses. They raised taxes and provided
enormous disincentives to save and invest in businesses. They
set wage and price controls that hampered the ability of the
free market to sort out major asset price and labor price distortions.
most of FDR's policies were designed to serve as a smoke screen
for the exploitive and unAmerican agenda of the Jewish supremacist
power elite behind the Fed, Wall Street, Hollywood, and major
national media. These policies had very little to do with sound
economic realities for the American public at large. It was
not accidental either that FDR's administration was lousy with
Jewish supremacists and Reds (see for example The
Red Network by Elizabeth Dilling, Grand Dame
of the 1930's American Right). Given that government workers
and politicians are usually horrible at anything to do with
real economics compared to the private sector (see for example
Why Government Doesn't Work by Harry Browne), why should
we surprised that FDR's efforts to greatly expand government
at the expense of the private sector had such dismal results?
more in-depth discussion of this viewpoint, please search articles
with titles related to "FDR", "Depression,"
and "Fed" for libertarian economists archived a lewrockwell.com
and mises.org such as Lew
Murray Rothbard, Dr.
Hans-Herman Hoppe, Dr.
Robert Higgs, and Dr.
Ralph Raico. In
particular, please check out the series "Fascism
Comes to America" by Dr. Ralph Raico. Also, I
think that Lew Rockwell is particularly talented at writing
articles that are brief, clear, and to the point for the layman
to understand, such as "Don't
Trust the Depression Brain Trust," "Grand
Theft Society", "War
and Inflation" (Our Enemy the Fed), and "The
Frightful Face of Stimulus." Incidentally,
Dr. Robert Higgs and other libertarians believe that it is a
myth that World War II pulled America out of the Great Depression,
or at least in the way that Keynesian economists normally explain
it. According to the libertarians, America came out of the Depression
in a rear-end backwards way, almost despite itself and its New
Deal policies. Wartime inflation, combined with artificially
suppressed wages (for example low army pay for millions of G.I.s)
finally brought down real wages to a level so that it was now
economical to start hiring at full employment. In addition,
America's industrial base survived unscathed, whereas much of
its foriegn competition got bombed out. Regarding
the real economic impact of war vs. peace, please see the lecture
Thrives and What Dies During War" also archived
as an MP3
file by Dr.
Mark Thornton to help debunk the Orwellian notion that war
is inherently good for the economy. There
is one last question that I will address, namely that if government
intervention is so horrible, how was it that Hitler's National
Socialist policies seemed to be so successful in lifting Germany
out of its Depression? According to Dr. Hans Herman-Hoppe in
his lecture "The
Economic Doctrine of the Nazis" during the Mises
of Fascism conference, it is very ironic that in certain
key areas Adolf Hitler's program was actually more libertarian
than that of FDR! Another part of my answer is that sometimes
it is more the men who make the system than the system that
makes the men. When a group of patriotic Germans are giving
their 100% best efforts to self-finance and help fellow Germans
out of poverty and misery, even if a "socialist-bureaucratic"
paradigm is generally less efficient than a free enterprise
system, it may still work much better than an American New Deal
bureaucracy heavily staffed with Members of the Tribe, and furthermore
where the government is heavily indebted to international Jewish
banksters. A third part of my answer is that much of the German
recovery was "artificial" to the extent that it reflected
a distorted economy stimulated by government spending geared
towards building a war machine, and was not sustainable for
peace. However, other government-sponsored programs such as
the creation of the Autobahn and the Volkswagen (model
VW30 test-driven by the S.S.!) reflected intelligent domestic
investment that paid ample economic dividends. A fourth part
of my answer is that when certain people (such as Germans, Japanese,
and Scandinavian "Labor Party socialists") possess
a high level of innate intelligence, discipline, and vigor,
they often able to produce satisfactory results from government-driven
investment as well as private investment, although the latter
is usually always more efficient. A fifth part of my answer
is that in extreme circumstances, where the normal social and
economic fabric has been badly dislocated and torn, sometimes
a helping government presence is certainly better than no presence
We Kill the Fed? by Pat Buchanan. "Obama is
repeating the failed policies of Hoover and FDR, by refusing
to let prices fall. Obama, with his intervention to prop up
housing prices and Bernanke with his gushers of money to bail
out bankrupt banks and businesses are creating a new bubble
that will burst even more spectacularly."
the Economy Was Lost by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Will Obama's Deficits Be Financed? by Dr. Paul
of Fools by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Barack Obama as a reflection of
white guilt and self-hatred
an interview, Obama called his mother, "the dominant
figure in my formative years …The values she taught
me continue to be my touchstone when it comes to how I go
about the world of politics." Though Obama sometimes
tries to evoke an image of his mother being just a conservative
Kansan schoolgirl, the truth is that she was a radical cultural
Marxist and dedicated leftist of the first order, one with
a predilection for Black men so profound as to belie her
own self-hating, anti-White beliefs.
mother's outlook was formed in Mercer Island High School,
Bellevue, Washington, which has been described as being
"a hotbed of pro-Marxist radical teachers" at
the time she attended, one that had a Communist on its Board
and several unapologetically-Marxist teachers on staff who
advocated rejection of societal norms, rejection of Christianity
and the family and assigned readings by Karl Marx. This
is the fount from which Obama claims his "touchstone
is liberal and then there is Communist, the singular invention
of Russian Jew Karl Marx. One is American as apple pie.
The other is anti-American in the extreme. Yes, all these
years of a so-called "conservative" like George
W. Bush makes anybody look attractive. Problem is, Bush
was the idiot-child President. Obama, if his "touchstone
values" truly are rooted in Communism, could be far
Obama as a highly flawed individual
on many different levels; expect goofy
things from his administration:
of Air Force Airplane "Photo-Op" That Caused Panic
in New York City and Jersey City (1:13). See
also the web page Air
Force One Backup Flies Low Over Manhattan, Panics Residents,
and one individual's interpretation at .Obama
Air Force One Flies Low Over Manhattan, Panics People
(1:10) with the following caption:
a backup of the President Obama's Air Force One plane flew
very low over Manhattan and panicked the public. The public
were not even told this would happen, so they thought it was
going to be another terrorist again. How could anyone authorize
this? A spokesperson from the Whitehouse said it was part
of a photo op. How stupid is that!
Obama and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who had not
been told about the photo op, were both infuriated by the
called it `ill-conceived' and a `waste of taxpayers' money.'
A White House official told ABC News that President Obama
was `furious' when he found out, and the Director of the White
House Military Office, Louis Caldera, who approved the photo
op, was called into a meeting with White House Chief of Staff
Rahm Emanuel and Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina.
didn't sound like a fun meeting,' the White House official
Tracy…I am so sorry that you had to go through
that again. For the FIRST time I am REALLY ANGRY. I make
no apologies about this one. I AM MORE THAN UPSET. I am
shaking as I type this. This administrations incompetence
and arrogance and narcisissism knows NO BOUNDS! Obama
does not have one ounce of repect for AMERICANS that have
gone through one of the worst attacks on American soil
of our time. Where was the RESPECT and HONOR for that
City and its citizens? That skyline should be respected
in memorial…NOT USED FOR A STUPID PHOTO OP. No,
I believe it goes much further…. NO WORD FROM THE
PRESIDENT HIMSELF????????????????? WHAT AN UNMITIGATED
ASS AND UN AMERICAN PRETENDER TO OUR PRESIDENCY. HE OWED
YOU AN APOLOGY!!!! No, he can APOLOGIZE TO OTHER Nations
BUT NOT TO HIS CITIZENS? Freakin unreal. ANYONE…ANYONE…ANYONE
FREAKIN ONE, THAT IT NOT OUTRAGED BY THIS SHOULD SERIOUSLY
QUESTION THEIR SANITY. By Kelly In Texas on 04/28/2009
appraisal of Mr. Obama’s character is based on his
two books, Dreams From My Father (DMF) and The
Audacity of Hope (AOH). The advantage of relying
on these sources is that they are not only Mr. Obama’s
own words but his considered words. He cannot claim that
were written hastily and without reflection...
we assume that genes play a strong role in determining
character, what can we learn from Mr. Obama’s ancestry?
from the fact that he got himself an education, Mr. Obama’s
father’s behavior matches the modern stereotype
of the black man. He goes from one woman to another breeding
incontinently, and this explains why Mr. Obama has so
many half-brothers and half-sisters. He leaves Mr. Obama’s
mother when Barack is still a toddler and then reappears
rarely in the boy’s life. From Mr. Obama’s
account, he provided his mother with no money whatsoever,
and back in Africa he variously abandoned and neglected
his other women and children. He became a drunk and ruined
his job prospects by recklessly insulting influential
people. Here is Mr. Obama’s account of his half-sister
Auma describing his father’s behavior towards members
of the Kenyan elite:
“When he was passed up for a promotion, he complained
loudly. ‘How can you be my senior,’ he would
say to one of the ministers, ‘and yet I am teaching
you how to do your job properly?’” (DMF
Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, a white woman
from middle America, marries first an African then an
Indonesian, but neither marriage lasts. For someone of
her background to marry one person of a different race
and culture might be put down to love; marrying two looks
like a political statement. She takes Mr. Obama to Indonesia
then sends him back to the USA—Hawaii—after
several years to live with his mother’s parents.
Eventually she returns to the USA and takes an anthropology
degree, during which time Mr. Obama lives with her. After
she finishes her degree, she leaves Mr. Obama once more
with her parents while she goes abroad for anthropological
Obama’s description of his mother makes her sound
like a Margaret Mead anthropological naïf, forever
searching for the right approach to non-white, non-American
people while ironically insisting most of the time that
Mr. Obama be brought up as an American. Mr. Obama describes
her attitude towards blacks:
Every black man was Thurgood Marshall or Sidney Poitier;
every black woman Fannie Lou Hamer or Lena Horne. To
be black was to be the beneficiary of a great inheritance,
a special destiny, glorious burdens that only we were
strong enough to bear. Burdens we were to carry with
style. More than once, my mother would point out, “Harry
Belafonte is the best-looking man on the planet.”
(DMF p. 51.)
is clear that Mr. Obama’s parents were unusually
selfish and egotistical, far more concerned with satisfying
their own wants than caring for others, even their children.
Mr. Obama’s description of their personalities,
both through his own presumed recollection and that of
others, paints a picture of reckless self-absorption.
for his grandparents, if Mr. Obama is to be believed,
his grandfather was a restless, undisciplined man who
never made a success of anything, flitting from place
to place and job to job until he finally settled in Hawaii.
His grandmother, despite Mr. Obama’s attempt to
paint her as a feminist trailblazer as the first female
vice-president of a local Hawaiian bank, comes across
as curiously colorless for someone Mr. Obama claims loomed
very large in his emotional life...:
me sort of describe my overall policy.
I've said is that we would put a cap and trade system in
place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than
anybody else's out there.
was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and
trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse
gases emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will
create a market in which whatever technologies are out there
that are being presented, whatever power plants that are
being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of
that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed,
imposed every year. So
if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can;
it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going
to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's
will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest
in solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches.
only thing I've said with respect to coal, I haven't been
some coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take
coal off the table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed
to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean
way, we should pursue it. So
if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can.
just that it will bankrupt them.
does the triumvirate of Obama-Pelosi-Reid offer?
Barney Frank is calling for new tax hikes on the most successful
and a 25 percent across-the-board slash in national defense.
Sen. John Kerry is talking up new and massive federal spending,
a la FDR's New Deal. Specifically, we can almost surely
Swift amnesty for 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens
and a drive to make them citizens and register them, as
in the Bill Clinton years. This will mean that Nevada, Colorado,
New Mexico and Arizona will soon move out of reach for GOP
presidential candidates, as has California.
Border security will go on the backburner, and America will
have a virtual open border with a Mexico of 110 million.
Taxes will be raised on the top 5 percent of wage-earners,
who now carry 60 percent of the U.S. income tax burden,
and tens of millions of checks will be sent out to the 40
percent of wage-earners who pay no federal income tax. Like
the man said, redistribute the wealth, spread it around.
Social Security taxes will be raised on the most successful
among us, and capital gains taxes will be raised from 15
percent to 20 percent. The Bush tax cuts will be repealed,
and death taxes reimposed.
Two or three more liberal activists of the Ruth Bader Ginsberg-John
Paul Stevens stripe will be named to the Supreme Court.
U.S. district and appellate courts will be stacked with
Special protections for homosexuals will be written into
all civil rights laws, and gays and lesbians in the military
will be invited to come out of the closet. "Don't ask,
don't tell" will be dead.
The homosexual marriages that state judges have forced California,
Massachusetts and Connecticut to recognize, an Obama Congress
or Obama court will require all 50 states to recognize.
A "Freedom of Choice Act" nullifying all state
restrictions on abortions will be enacted. America will
become the most pro-abortion nation on earth.
hiring and promotions based on race, sex and sexual orientation
until specified quotas are reached will be rigorously enforced
throughout the U.S. government and private sector.
Universal health insurance will be enacted, covering legal
and illegal immigrants, providing another powerful magnet
for the world to come to America, if necessary by breaching
A federal bailout of states and municipalities to keep state
and local governments spending up could come in December
or early next year.
The first trillion-dollar deficit will be run in the first
year of an Obama presidency. It will be the first of many.
Quote: National Journal is out
with its ratings of the votes of the members of the Senate,
and it has found that the most liberal senator in 2007 was
Barack Obama. http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/01/31/politics/horserace/entry377545
1.shtml [Vice Presidential Candidate] Joe Biden ranked
the third most liberal Senator. http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/
This is not a moderate ticket, not a dig in and get some
bipartisan work done. It's a fringe ticket from the left,
and will only further polarize the nation...Obama
Record May Be Gold Mine For Critics; Eight Years As State
Senator Were Full Of Controversial Votes, Including Abortion
And Gun Control.
Obama voted against requiring medical care for aborted fetuses
who survive. (Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act,
Obama votes No. LINK
Obama argued the legislation threatened a woman's right
to abortion by defining the fetus as a child. (The child
had to have been already born, and alive) "It
would essentially bar abortions because the equal protection
clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this
was a child then this would be an anti-abortion statute,"
Obama said in the Senate's debate in March 2001. Obama may
also find himself fielding questions about his actions outside
public office, from his acknowledgment of cocaine use in
his youth to a more recent land purchase from a political
supporter who is facing charges in an unrelated kickback
scheme involving investment firms seeking state business.
Connection With an Accused Political Fixer Tony Rezco Raises
Questions Obama was known in the Illinois Capitol
as a consistently liberal senator. He had
a 100 percent rating from the Illinois Planned Parenthood.
Obama regularly supported gun-control measures,
including a ban on semiautomatic "assault weapons"
and a limit on handgun purchases... He also opposed letting
people use a self-defense argument if charged with violating
local handgun bans by using weapons in their homes. The
bill was a reaction to a Chicago-area man who, after shooting
an intruder, was charged with a handgun violation. Obama
occasionally supported higher taxes, joining other Democrats
in pushing to raise more than 300 taxes. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/17/politics/main2369157.shtmlQuote: Obama voiced support for the DC
Gun Ban on handguns, which is scheduled to be heard
by the Supreme Court next month. (The Supreme Court struck
down this gun ban as an Unconstitutional infringement on
the individuals right to bear arms, however Obama saw it
differently.) “The city of Chicago has gun
laws, so does Washington, DC, The notion that somehow local
jurisdictions can’t initiate gun safety laws to deal
with gang bangers and random shootings on the street isn’t
born out by our Constitution” Obama said.
The DC gun ban Obama supported, banned all guns including
handguns, forbid their sale, and required previously owned
firearms to be unloaded and disassembled inside homes. Proving
once more this is not a moderate ticket.
political observers are concerned that the Obama regime will
make another run --just like the Clintonistas in the early
1990s-- at infiltrating the U.S. military with open homosexuals.
William S. Lind commented:
"President Obama's first national security test will
in fact be a test of his honesty. Will he govern as the centrist
he presented himself as being during the campaign? If so,
he will allow present policies on women and gays in the military
to remain in place. Or, will he reveal himself as a cultural
Marxist who deceived the American public in order to get elected
and will govern from the left, not the center? If so, we will
witness many experiments against reality, with the U.S. armed
forces early victims."
of baby Obama in native African environment
Perhaps even more significant than the Kenyan birth certificate
is his documented Indonesian citizenship while in elementary school.
highly questionable background
about why Obama flunks the Constitutional requirement as a
"natural born citizenship" at theobamafile.com.
"For each presidential candidate, they can put the factual
history of their birth in the equation and see if they fit
the bill to be president of the U.S. (POTUS) under the Constitution
of the United States of America, Article II, Section 1, Clause
5, and the 14th Amendment, Section 1, and the relevant federal
law under U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and Perkins
v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939). As you can clearly see, Obama
is a citizen of the United States, but he's not a `natural
born citizen' of the United States, and, as such, is not eligible
for POTUS, because his father, a Kenyan, was not a U. S. citizen."
For the most complete, up-to-date discussion of Barry Soetero
(AKA Obama, or whatever), please see obamacrimes.com
run by Attorney Phil J. Berg. Based on his research to date
(this update made 24 Aug 2010) Berg maintains the following:
* The United States Constitution mandates
the President of the United States must be a United States
“natural born” Citizen – Article II, Section
* Obama was born in Mombasa, in what is now Kenya, Africa;
* Obama’s legal name is Barry Soetoro;
* Obama is an Indonesian Citizen as he was adopted/acknowledged
by his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian Citizen;
* The Healthcare bill (ObamaCare) signed into Law by Obama
on March 23, 2010 is unconstitutional and voidable
since he is ineligible to serve as President of the United
Obama is literally America's first illegal alien
president, a complete imposter, and should be impeached immediately.
He is a living testament to how most Americans are being cruelly
deceived by their controlled national media most of the
Notes from the video above, posted to YouTube 12 Oct
2008: Introductory Titles: "On
21 Aug 2008 Phil Berg filed a lawsuit against Barack Obama claiming
he was not qualified to become President of the United States
because he is not a natural born citizen. The case requires
Obama to present birth documents proving otherwise. Senator
Obama has not complied." Phil Berg:
"...Obama cannot produce a birth certificate, because the
birth certificate he would produce [from actually having been
born in Kenya] would indicate that he is not a natural born
citizen of the United States...It does not matter if he was
born in Hawaii or not [according to Obama's story], because
if he was born here, he lost his natural-born citizenship. How
do you lose your United States citizenship? Well what happened
is Obama's mother divorced the father. After that she remarried.
She remarried Lolo Soetoro from Indonesia. They got married
here in the United States. In his book, Obama states "My
stepfather went back to Indonesia before I did, and when I got
there, I went immediately to school there." And he spent
four years in school. Significant at that time was Indonesia
was at war. The only people who could go to school in Indonesia
were people that were citizens of Indonesia. So therefore his
stepfather had to do one of two things to get him to school.
He had to adopt him, or he had to acknowledge him. If he did
either one, that is how he went to school. Now we have records
--it is on my web site-- we have the school record, indicating
his name is Barry Soetoro, his nationality is Indonesia, and
his religion is Islam. That is how he went to school there.
Indonesia at that time did not provide for dual citizenships.
So he was now a citizen of Indonesia. The only thing he could
have done at that time when he came back, he could have gone
through immigration to come back to the United States. We don't
believe he did that. If he did do that, then he would be a naturalized
citizen at that point, not natural born any more, even if he
was natural born in the first instance, therefore a naturalized
citizen is not natural born, and cannot be President of the
United States... Not only is Obama trying to dismiss this case
under legal technicalities, which are proper, but also it is
an outrage that the Democratic National Committee has joined
in with Obama in these motions. Why is it an outrage? Because
the Democrat National Committee has a different role. I believe
they have a role to all Democracts in this country, and all
citizens in this country, to make sure that they put forth qualified
candidates. And when this law suit was filed, if they did not
know about it before, they knew about it when they were served,
and I feel they had an obligation to go to Obama and say "produce
credentials to us, and if you cannot produce them to us --"
they should have taken the next step and removed them from the
ballot and they can substitute a candidate for president. So
to join together with Obama, to hide from the public facts which
should be presented is a disgrace..[on the flip side, contending
Republican candidate John McCain, who was born in the Canal
Zone, immediately released his birth certificate]..on the other
hand you have Obama, who has refused to release any records.
And in my Federal court case, he is hiding behind legalisms,
which although proper, it is a disgrace because I think the
people in the United States deserve to know where you were born,
where you are a citizen from, and what is going on, why are
you hiding your background... I think he is a fraud and he doesn't
have these documents to produce. Obama has also refused to release
his medical records, his records from college, Occidental College,
Columbia University, and Harvard Law School. This is significant
because these documents might say where he is really a citizen
from. Many of us would release this information to future employers,
and we as citizens are going to employ Obama or McCain as President
of the United States...My question to Barack Obama is this,
if you are a natural born citizen, what are you hiding?
is the evidence, the terrifying truth, behind my radio ad
called "BARACK'S DANGEROUS BLACKMAILABILITY"
this: The Jewish psychopaths want ONLY blackmailable puppet
candidates for president. A "Mister Clean," especially
one with charisma, leadership and organizational ability,
would have to be eliminated.
coming out suggests that the actual father of Barack (it
is hard to call him "Obama" after you read the
below) was the black communist Franklin Marshall Davis,
whom Barack physically strongly resembles. However, a deal
was perhaps cut where another black, the African Barack
Obama (now called "Obama, Senior"), claimed paternity
of Barack, perhaps so he could stay in America. (He married
the pregnant Ann Dunham in 1961 and left her in 1963.)
Stanley Ann Dunham apparently engaged in many ménages
à trois with Davis and his white socialite wife.
Someone at least took the nude photos seen further below.
have no desire to dash the soaring hopes of blacks about
finally getting a "black president," but due to
his extreme blackmailability Barack will have to be a total
slave to the Jewish masters of the media, finance and politics.
the truly great Marcus Garvey of the 1920s, who wanted blacks
to go "back to Africa," and found millions of
black and white supporters until J. Edgar Hoover, doing
the Jews' bidding, railroaded him into prison, Barack will
HAVE to pursue black-white "integration" to the
harm of both races.
else can one explain that Barack has spoken to the National
Council of La Raza, the Mexican immigrant organization,
promising them he will legalize 40 MILION ILLEGAL HISPANICS.
These Mexicans are taking unskilled jobs -- gardening, maids,
babysitters, janitors, etc. -- that blacks have had for
the Jewish psychopaths order Barack to attack Iran and start
WWIII, either he obeys or they pull the plug not only on
his presidency but even on his US citizenship! Technically,
the man may actually be an illegal alien himself!
Franklin Marshall Davis. Believed
to have been a porn writer, poet, communist, and possible
FBI informant. Many also believe that Davis is the real
biological father of Obama.
The Communist Manifesto calls for "free
love." Very permissive attitudes towards ménages
à trois and porn writing would seem
to fit the orientation of "Bohemian Reds" (as opposed
to ferocious Stalinists, Trotskyites, or some other very authoritarian
or militant variety). Part of Karl Marx's logic was as follows:
since all humans (all featherless bi-peds found anywhere on
the planet) are theoretically literally equal, preserving
family, tribal, national, and racial lines through carefully
thought-out marriages does not matter. Eugenic mating allegedly
does not matter either. Furthermore, one can depend on a "collective"
like a village to raise the illegitimate offspring of wild
liaisons rather than a traditional family unit. Please note
that the Rothschild dynasty, which helped finance the mostly
Jewish-led Bolshevik movement, has practiced the extreme opposite
of "free love" for itself with well-planned marriages
that preserve Jewish ethnic-genetic interests and private
estate wealth. Apparently they hope that through "free
love" the goyim (gentiles) will recklessly invest
or dissipate their DNA while conversely the self-chosen can
continue to use greater selectivity to make their own gene
pool more competitive over time.
photo of a thoroughly race-mixed family. Ann Dunham’s
second husband was Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian, with whom
she bore a half-breed daughter, Maya Kassandra Soetoro.
Why would Barack Obama have any reservations about making
the entire U.S. just as mixed?
Cruisin' with Larry Sinclair? In
a speech before
the National Press Club, in a YouTube
clip, and in his Jeff
Rense interview, Larry Sinclair charged that he took
cocaine and had oral sex with Illinois state representative
Barack Obama in a limo between 3-8 Nov 1999. He has also
Obama to the murder of alleged gay lover Donald Young, former
choir master at Obama's church. Barack Obama admitted
to teenage drug use in his 1995 autobiography called,
Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance
(David Dees satiric art,
not an actual photograph).
Arch-neoconservative Michael Savage
Alan Wiener, in a Jewish family ) attacks Janet Napolitano,
Director of the Department of Homeland Security (strong
evidence of Jewish ties, if not ancestry, also her real
sexual orientation is a widespread topic of speculation) because
of the DHS list of suspected "terrorists" which includes
what Savage views as loyal, patriotic Americans. He also thinks
Obama & Co. may try to pull off another "Reichstag
Fire." (See also Capt. May and Maj. Fox discussion of the
serious danger of a potential false flag operation above). Savage
states: "I have studied revolutions before. We have a revolution
in this country. Obama is a revolutionary. He has appointed
one radical left winger after another, in one department after
another, and in one legal position after another..." 2009-04-16 "Republicans
criticize report on right-wing groups" by
Eileen Sullivan, AP "WASHINGTON — Republicans on
Wednesday said a Homeland Security Department intelligence assessment
unfairly characterizes military veterans as right-wing extremists.
House Republican leader John Boehner described the report as
offensive and called on the agency to apologize to veterans.
The agency's intelligence assessment, sent to law enforcement
officials last week, warns that right-wing extremists could
use the bad state of the U.S. economy and the election of the
country's first black president to recruit members. The assessment
also said that returning military veterans who have difficulties
assimilating back into their home communities could be susceptible
to extremist recruiters or might engage in lone acts of violence.
`To characterize men and women returning home after defending
our country as potential terrorists is offensive and unacceptable,'
said Boehner, R-Ohio."
Stands Behind Extremism Report"(Washington
Times) "...She stands by the report sent to law enforcement
that lists veterans as a terrorist risk to the U.S. and defines
`rightwing extremism” as including groups opposed to abortion
as the triumph of style over substance
He Can't A black libertarian lady explains why
the Obama phenomenon is all about modern liberal "feel
good" politics and little else. 2008 Obamanable
Showmanby H. Millard
as a product of the totally
corrupt Chicago political machine
Shakedown: How Close Is Obama? by Victor Thorn,
American Free Press
Real Obama by black Stanford fellow Dr. Thomas
Sowell. " The story of Obama's political career is not
a pretty story. He won his first political victory by being
the only candidate on the ballot-- after hiring someone skilled
at disqualifying the signers of opposing candidates' petitions,
on whatever technicality he could come up with. Despite his
words today about `change' and `cleaning up the mess in Washington,'
Obama was not on the side of reformers who were trying to
change the status quo of corrupt, machine politics in Chicago
and clean up the mess there. Obama came out in favor of the
Daley machine and against reform candidates. Senator Obama
is running on an image that is directly the opposite of what
he has been doing for two decades. His escapes from his past
have been as remarkable as the great escapes of Houdini."
Obama's Marxist-socialist tendencies
Is Obama creating a civil war in America? "Be
outraged, [Academy Award-winning Actor Jon] Voight advises.
`Do not let the Obama administration fool you with all their
cunning Alinsky methods. And if you don’t know what that
method is, I implore you to get the book Rules for Radicals,
by Saul Alinsky . Mr. Obama is very well trained in these methods,'
he continues, citing a television campaign critical of the Republican
Party and contentious town-hall meetings about health care reform.
`The real truth is that the Obama administration is professional
at bullying, as we have witnessed with ACORN at work during
the presidential campaign. It seems to me they are sending down
their bullies to create fist fights among average American citizens
who don’t want a government-run health care plan forced
upon them,' Mr. Voight says. `So I ask again. Is President Obama
creating a civil war in our own country?'”
Capitalism Gone with a Whimper by Stanislav Mishkin.
"...Then came Barack Obama's command that GM's (General
Motor) president step down from leadership of his company. That
is correct, dear reader, in the land of "pure" free
markets, the American president now has the power, the self
given power, to fire CEOs and we can assume other employees
of private companies, at will..."
Freedom Was Lost by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts. "[The]
first step in the enserfment of the American people was taken
in envy. The rich were the targets of the income tax. Once in
place, the income tax was extended by law and by inflation until
ordinary people were being taxed at rates several times as high
as the original top rate for the rich."
adopts plan for 'volunteer' corps Also requires new evaluation
of 'mandatory' service for all by Bob Unruh. Also
known as the "Obama Brigade," or the "Generations
Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act" or just H.R.
1388. "Many, however, are raising concerns that the program,
which is intended to include 250,000 `volunteers,' is the beginning
of what President Obama called his `National Civilian Security
Force' in a a speech last year in which he urged creating an
organization as big and well-funded as the U.S. military. He
has declined since then to elaborate." Communism is all
about central planning, and the creation of government-directed
industrial armies is specifically mentioned in the Communist
Manifesto. Regimented social service operations are similar
We There Yet, Are We There Yet? Let's Check Marx and Engels's
List by Robert Higgs. Unfortunately many Americans
have already been heavily conditioned to accept the philosophical
underpinnings of Marxism. They are inclined to blindly follow
the Obama Pied Piper.
The Great Slave Revolt of 2008 by H. Millard
Obama’s Wealth Redistribution “Tragedy”
By James Edwards
Would Raise Taxes Starting at $6,100 by James Buchanan
Obama & handlers steal
white sovereignty rights
term "sovereignty," in the abstract, means the capacity
of a people to determine their own destiny. People who enjoy
full sovereignty rights are able to maximize their ability to
live in their own nation, with their own values, run by their
own people (the ones most likely to promote their long term
welfare and prosperity), with an indigenous culture that helps
them to rise to their highest level of achievement. People who
lack sovereignty rights are typically subjugated and oppressed
by an alien, dominant power. They stand a much greater chance
of living lives of frustration and degradation, and even getting
marginalized into extinction (or to put it more bluntly, getting
"genocided.") . See for example, "Are
We The Kurds of the Future?" by Kevin Strom. See
also my commentary for question 20 "Why
should a society have the right to determine it's own destiny?"
in my "Have
You Been Brainwashed?" quiz. Please note how I discuss
the McKinsey 7-S model (conceptually applicable to the survival
and success of nations as well as small companies), and how
the elements that promote sovereignty are both intangible (for
example shared culture, history, race and ethnicity, and superordinate
goals) and tangible (for example right to tax, make treaty alliances
with other powers, control financial system, maintain armed
forces and make war, control borders, form ones own government,
and select own people to control strategic bases of the society
such as media, banking, military, and industry). Barack
Hussein Obama II has voiced support for black nationalist goals
while a twenty plus year member of Rev Wright's "God damn
America" black church. While as an "international
nationalist" I think it is perfectly healthy for blacks
to support black nationalism, I have serious problems with someone
promoting such goals as President of the United States at the
expense of whites. It would be much more appropriate for Obama
to run for president of Kenya, Nigeria, or the Congo where his
ethnic genetic interests
would be much more closely aligned with those of the host population.
just as affirmative action is in actuality a theft of the white
right to meritocracy and the basic right to enjoy opportunities
proportional to talent and hard work, Obama's occupancy of the
White House steals from whites many of their most important
sovereignty tools required to control their own destiny.
of the most basic axioms of Right Wing 101 is that the closer
people tend to be towards each other in race and ethnicity,
the greater the odds that they will have a mutualist/altruistic
relationship, and conversely, the greater the ethnic-genetic
distance, the greater the risk that a parasitic or predatory
relationship will eventually develop. This is one reason why
it is much safer for people to have individuals of their own
racial and ethnic group manning the strategic bases of power
over them. Obama robs white Americans of their right to a white
leader that defends white priorities and white values. In fact,
he openly and actively supports Jewish control of national media,
banking, and American foreign policy at the expense of white
American interests. He certainly does not promote or even defend
indigenous European culture and indigenous Indo-European religion.
Instead, he has been closely associated with both the Muslim
and Christian religions at different times in his life, both
of which are universalistic, left wing religions developed by
alien Semitic peoples. Please see my further discussion of this
issue in my mutualism
vs. parasitism section, to include my analysis of Jewish
criminal totalitarian psychopathology --which Obama is in
bed with. We
can expect the Obama regime to push America even further in
the direction of "parasite government" as depicted
below, as opposed to "productive government." Please
also see some of my other diagrams contrasting productive vs.
parasite modes for citizenship and morality. They are also included
in my mutualism
vs. parasitism discussion.
Productive Government ..................................................
Parasite Government ..................................................
Protects lives, property, and human rights
Maliciously destroys lives and property, undermines civil
Renders socially useful services in proportion to the taxes
it collects. Eliminates waste.
Grows bureaucracy and waste while raising taxes regardless
of services rendered to taxpayers
Increases government accountability and transparency, protects
whistle-blowers. Demystifies its processes and makes itself
open to grass roots input.
Ruthlessly suppresses any criticism or any challenges to power.
Creates a sense of religious awe about itself to stifle objective
criticism. Launches ideological crusades without concrete justifications.
This is typically done as a smokescreen to hide corruption and
special privileges for crony groups.
Demonstrates consistent principles and inspires admiration
both at home and abroad
Practices extreme double standards and inspires hatred and
loathing at home and around the world
Serves the interests of honest, competent, hard-working, loyal
people in society, to include their vital cultural and genetic
Serves a few narrow corrupt and disloyal interests at expense
of everyone else. Undermines the cultural and racial coherence
of core population.
Policies favor strong domestic economic development and job
creation, to include the steady strengthening of the technological
and manufacturing base.
Runs down domestic manufacturing base while empowering potential
Genetic viewpoint: . . In
vs genetics article, I discuss the landmark Mankind
Quarterly article "Zoological
Subspecies of Man" by Dr. Norman Hall which argues
that tribalism and "racism" occur naturally in
virtually all other mammalian species besides man, to include
monkeys, rats, and moose. In his book A New Theory of
Evolution, the famous British Anthropologist Sir Arthur
Keith argued that tribalism and racism persist as genetic
traits because they have served a positive evolutionary
function in primitive environments to help Evolutionary
Breeding Units (EBU's), or tribes, preserve their superior
genetic characteristics compared to less successful EBU's.
. . Given that racism has a
genetic basis, we should not be surprised then when we see
repeated failures by leftist states and modern liberal media
to eradicate it. Communism not only failed to erase ethnicity
in the former Yugoslavia and former Soviet Union, but paradoxically
helped create tremendous ethnic and racial "blow-back."
. . .Even interracial marriage
can create dangerous complications rather than blended racial
solutions. According to Dr. Lothrop Stoddard in The
Rising Tide of Color, the mixture of whites and Indians
in South America created Mestizo classes that often acted
more like a third race rather than a resultant race. Instead
of solving the two-way white vs. Indian racial conflict,
race mixing often created new three-way conflicts and an
even bigger mess. Mestizos have often swung back and forth
between whites and Indians in their political loyalties,
adding to the political instability that has generally plagued
latin American regimes.
. . . Also, in his work The French Revolution in Santo
Domingo, Dr. Stoddard explained how the mixture of
French colonial whites and blacks in Haiti created a mulatto
class that eventually sided with blacks to exterminate all
the whites on the island. Later the pure blacks waged a
campaign to purify the island of mulattoes. All of this
took place before in the early 1800's long before the advent
of the Ku Klux Klan, Nazi Party, another white supremacist
groups that Jewish organizations such as the ADL would have
us believe are at the root of all our racial problems. . . .The Jewish British Prime
Minister Benjamin Disraeli once summed it up when he said,
racial question is the key to world history…all is
race, there is no other truth." Ironically, his
Jewish brethren who run America's controlled
national media simultaneously promote extreme anti-racism
in their programming directed at gentiles, while privately
among themselves they practice virulently pro-Jewish racist
support for Israel and other Members of the Tribe everywhere
around the world. (If these double standards confuse you,
please skip down to the last paragraph in this discussion
for an informative link). . . .In regard to the bullet
point: "When a group falls below 75% of the total population,
instability and fission climb," this 75% figure is
not carved in stone, but rather is an intuitive number that
I derived from reading Chapter 15 "Bloody Lessons of
Tribal Europe" of Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup of America by Tom Chittum
(carried by America First Books). The following extract
from Civil War Two helps to explain this point:
. . . .
. .The lesson is clear: The more monoethnic a European
nation is, the more likely it is to be peaceful and stable.
The more multiethnic a European nation is, the more likely
it is to experience tribal civil wars. There is simply
no real arguing with this brutal fact . . .[p. 131]
. . .[Chittum provides a list of European countries that
depicts their percentages of ethnic minorities. The most
multi-ethnic country of Bosnia experienced the most civil
war dead. The least multi-ethnic were the most stable
and generally devoid of civil war. The quotation ahead
commences on page 133]. . . . The most multiethnic
European nation produced the most multiethnic dead. If
there had been only Moslems residing in Bosnia, there
would have been no civil war in Bosnia. . . . Is America a multi-tribal
country and therefore unstable? With each and every passing
day, more and more Americans of all ethnic groups are
perceiving their tribal affiliation as more self-definitive
and more important than their common American nationality.
By this measure we are increasingly unstable. . . .More bad news: Of the
European countries, the median size of the most numerous
ethnic group is 89%. In America, the most numerous ethnic
group (the English-speaking whites) is only 75% of the
total population and falling. By this measure, America
is again not as internally stable as most European nations.
Twelve European nations have primary ethnic groups that
are 75% or less of their total population. Seven of these
twelve nations are fighting wars, are occupied, or have
internal secessionist terrorists. . . .More bad news: Of the
European countries, the median size of the second largest
ethnic group is 5%. In America, our second largest ethnic
group (the blacks) is 12%. By this measure, America is
again not as stable as most European nations. Twelve European
nations have secondary ethnic groups that are 12% or more
of the total population. Four are fighting wars, two are
occupied by foreign troops, one is fighting internal terrorists.
. . . More bad news: Of the
European countries, the median size of the third largest
ethnic group is 1%. In America, our third largest ethnic
group (the Hispanics) is 9%. By this measure, America
is again not as stable as most European nations. Two European
nations have third ranking ethnic groups that are 9% or
more of the population. One is fighting a civil war, the
other occupied. . . .More bad news: In America,
88% of the people speak the most widely-used language
(English) as their primary language. Of the European countries,
the median size of this [p. 134] percentage is 94%. By
this measure, America is again not as stable as most European
nations. . . .More bad news: There
are now about six million Moslems in America, and they
are expected to outnumber Jews by the end of this decade.
America has been described as a Judeo- Christian nation.
Are we now to be a Judeo-Christian-Moslem nation and all
that it implies? The concept of freedom of religion can
absorb only so much cultural diversity. As the Moslem
percentage of the population grows, it is predictable
that they will demand and eventually get laws allowing
polygamy, chopping off the hands of criminals, death by
stoning for adulterers, and the host of other antique
horrors Moslems embrace. In Miami, Dade County has a special
maintenance squad that cleans up dead chickens, goats,
lizards, voodoo powder, and other "hex" items
found each morning on the grounds of the county courthouse.
These items are ritually deposited there by adherents
of the Voodoo, Santeria, and similar religions whose members
are appearing before the court on various charges. Almost
all are immigrants from the Caribbean islands. Eventually,
our diversity will increase to the point that there will
be no common basis for our laws. That's why America is
becoming an undemocratic imperial system, and that's why
we'll break up in a civil war.
. . .In regard
to the statement "Jewish national
media masters who promote white decline are hypocritical
since they typically favor the exact opposite for their
own group in Israel compared to Palestinians"
[this statement is provided in another
part of the "Have You Been Brainwashed?" Quiz]
please see the Aug 2000 Free Speech online article
Nature of the Beast" by the late Dr. William Pierce.
This hypocrisy is part of an ancient PSYOPS (psychological
operations) formula that works as follows: "Be privately
right wing among members of your own tribe to maintain unity
and cohesion, and be publicly left wing towards people outside
your tribe to make them drop their guard and not oppose
your own tribe." In other words, preach steadfast and
courageous in-group loyalty for your own kinsmen (patriotism),
and conversely preach peaceful brotherly love and egalitarianism
towards strangers (modern liberalism and "liberal minority
coalition politics"). Among Jews, the formula in the
early 20th century was "Zionism for us, Communism for
the gentiles." In my environmental
vs. genetic duality article, I discuss liberal minority
coalition politics in greater detail (please go to the site
and enter the search words "liberal minority"
to pick up the thread). Now that pure communism has become
extremely shop worn in the West, many formerly Trotskyite
Jews have switched over to a new schmiel called
which has absolutely nothing to do with authentic American
conservatism. Please see The
High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper (carried
by America First Books) for more details on this amazing
...Who chooses what government we live
under? Those who cast the votes, or as Stalin observed,
those who count them? Do We The People pick those who
govern us, or does a private company, owned by the CIA
controlled media, and operating without any public oversight?
Have We The People consented by vote to bear the $65 trillion
burden of a government's reckless fiscal policy, or was
that consent and that vote fraudulently obtained?
Just think about all it really means if the elections
are being rigged on a massive scale.
It means that the contract between ruler and ruled is
broken. The government does not govern with the consent
of the governed, it rules by treachery and deception.
The crown it wears is a stolen one, usurped from the people
by three voting machine companies and one media owned
results-announcer totally beyond review and reproach.
Obama as the reductio ad absurdum
of the flawed premises behind the Orwellian, Zionist-dominated,
neo-Jacobin, Multi-racial, Multi-Cultural, Welfare-Warfare,
Global-Imperialist Super State that Wages Perpetual War for
picked up the term "neo-Jacobin"
from Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, which describes perfectly the
authoritarian leftist establishment that has characterized
the Federal government ever since the King
Lincoln era. When power is diminished on a local level,
it tends to gravitate towards the center, and ever since the
Federal government crushed State's rights, we have suffered
a trend towards ever more unlimited central government. In
addition, by 1861 the U.S. Government became a full blown
empire, since an empire by definition means a government that
insists upon holding together its provinces by force rather
than by voluntary consent. Ever since the inception of the
War Against Southern Independence, the U.S. Government has
steadily moved ever further towards the ideological left as
it has tried to rhetorically hold together the increasingly
disparate peoples cobbled together within its empire under
the guise of righteously defending "equality."
prime foreign example of neo-Jacobin government in the "modern"
era was the government of Napoleon Bonaparte, which preached
"Liberty, Fraternity, and Equality" while controlling
all the newspapers in France and keeping a secret police spy
on every block of Paris. My 1957 Encyclopedia Britannica
also identifies Napoleon's government as a prime example of
modern (leftist) fascism, especially after it tried to create
some kind of "United States of Europe" through conquest.
governments typically promise greater freedom on a rhetorical
level while taking it away in substance. The title of the
Slaves, Enslaving Free Men: A History of the American Civil
War by Dr. Jeffrey Hummel about the true legacy of
the War of Northern Aggression Against Southern Independence
hints at this Orwellian aspect of the neo-Jacobin state. Since
the term "liberty" originally meant simply "absence
of the state," the use of coercive state power and interventionism
to promote "liberty and freedom" or the absence
of itself has got to have Orwellian overtones.
state" was coined by the libertarian writer Dr. Murray
Rothbard. It describes double-barrelled pork barrell government
in which politicians try to buy off their constituents with
various benefit programs, while enhancing loyalty to the state
by waging periodic wars ("War
is the health of the state" as Randolph Bourne observed,
since war gives the state tremendous opportunities to suppress
dissent, consolidate its power, and whip up patriotic emotion
to aggrandize itself). One example involves Otto von Bismarck,
the German leader who created a social welfare system to buy
loyalty on the part of German workers in order to make them
more willing to serve as soldiers for Greater Germany.
see my centralized
vs. decentralized discussion of "ponzi government"
where pork politicians stay in power by soaking taxpayers
to pay off special interests, who in turn give them campaign
contribution kick-backs to use for re-election campaigns.
Pork politicians also soak the financial system with deficit
spending to buy votes through social programs, creating a
growing debt burden that will usually eventually result in
a financial crisis --hence the "ponzi" lack of sustainability--
but they usually hope to be out of office and retired by the
time someone else has to worry about it.
"Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace" comes from the
of a book by historian Harry Elmer Barnes and a more
recent work by Gore Vidal. In my centralized
vs. decentralized discussion, I discuss how a ponzi government
can morph into an evil government that periodically runs false
flag operations to start wars that help perpetuate its own
existence. Again "war is the health of the state,"
as George Orwell also observed in 1984. I have been
very active with Capt
Eric May trying to prevent a repeat 9/11 false flag operation
designed to further the cruelly exploitive power base of Obama's
good buddies, the Zionist neo-con "War
Party that never sleeps."
has come a long way from the time of the American War of Independence.
This was essentially a libertarian revolution fought by people
with strong white racial and ethnic roots. Please see my commentary
to question 13 "Does
ethnic solidarity matter in the defense of liberty?"
in my "Have You Been Brainwashed?" quiz about the
tremendous rootedness of Americans descended from such groups
as English Puritans, Scots-Irish,
and German Rhine West Bank Protestants (misnamed "Pennsylvania
New Englanders provide one of the most striking examples of
shared ethnicity, culture, religion, and history. They were
descended from Puritans, who themselves mostly from eastern
England, the most "Nordic" part of the British isles,
no doubt influenced by many waves of immigration from Angles,
Saxons, and Jutes (from Denmark and northern Germany) and
later influxes of Danish and Norwegian Vikings. New England
was effectively a "Nordic ethnostate." (See The
Cousin's Wars by Kevin Philips). Both the Puritans and
their New England descendants were a solidly middle class
social phenomenon with strong traditions of local self-government,
similar to Scandinavian societies. A large number of their
ancestors fought for or supported the "New
Model Army" of Oliver Cromwell and Parliament in
the English Civil War and echoed its unique blend of political
and religious radicalism combined with Spartan soldierly virtues.
(As one interesting anecdote provided by Philips, in one particular
year during the English Civil War, half of the graduating
class at Harvard went back to England to fight for Cromwell/Parliament).
At the outset of the American Revolution, Cromwell remained
a big hero for most New Englanders, and the patriot militias
that fought at Lexington and Concord and subsequently drove
the British back into Boston were to a large extent the resurrected
Cromwellian "New Model Army" fighting against Royalist
identity, roots, and solidarity began to quickly blur as America
moved westward. In order to rapidly conquer a continent and
fend off the countering imperial pretensions of the British,
Spanish, Mexicans, Russians, and French, American leaders
adopted a fast growth strategy that meant flooding America
with disparate European peoples to obtain quick cheap labor
and achieve fast settlement of Western land. This was basically
the old Roman imperial social model in disguise, and as a
consequence American history has loosely resembled that of
the Roman Republic later morphing into the Roman Empire and
then even later becoming terminally corrupt. America
is now so far neo-Jacobin-leftist that it has become saddled
with a black president who is totally decoupled from the ethnic
genetic interests of its White Anglo-Saxon Protestant
founders. Obama promotes global interventionist policies that
are totally decoupled from the early American libertarian
distrust of standing armies, foreign entanglements, imperial
bureaucracies, and other structural threats to individual
my "Resolving Opposing Political and Economic Ideologies"
I explain how America has moved diagonally away from "genetic
bottom up" to "environmental top down" category.
Today both "modern liberals" and "neo-cons"
are almost diametrically opposed on such issues as racial
preferences, global interventionism, and government spending
compared to ideological positions once held by classical liberals
(early Whigs) and Tory conservatives.
I do not think any
of the Founding Fathers (whether Federalist, anti-Federalist,
or something else) would have been caught dead elevating a
left wing Negro to the top political position of their country
or fighting ruinous foreign wars on behalf of Jewish supremacist
criminals at the expense of their own society.
is the slick poster boy culmination of a perverse historical
transformation, the tip of the ice berg of a thoroughly sick,
deracinated, and fractured society that cannot adequately
defend itself from the continuing massive illegal alien Mexican
invasion across its southwest border while at the same time
devoting vast resources towards policing Iraq's borders with
Iran and Syria and Afghanistan's border with Pakistan.
it gets worse. Historically, leftist authoritarian governments
have been vastly more murderous than right wing fascist governments.
Simply count up the tens of millions of innocents slaughtered
by the Bolsheviks, Maoists, and Kymer Rouge and see what can
come even close. Things get even worse still when leftist
authoritarian governments are run very paranoid, racially
alien leaders, such as when the majority of Bolshevik leaders
were comprised of Jews. Then the leftist authoritarianism
has a way of turning into a race war in disguise. With the
U.S. government today, we not only have the neo-Jacobin ideology
and NSPD-51-type martial law provisions in place (thanks Bush!),
but we are now ruled by an unholy alliance of both Negros
and Jews, with all the subconscious racial hatred, paranoia,
and envy towards whites that comes with both groups combined.
good, my little Virginia. Not good at all.
Obama as a logical outgrowth
of America's interracial
"pet adoption" craze
Bryant came up with an interesting analogy to describe America's
current racial situation. Back in the 1960's, when America was
still 90% white, the country was like a big white dog that decided
to adopt a lot of cute little black (Negro), brown (Hispanic),
olive (Jewish), and yellow (Asian) puppies. Now the big white
dog has grown old and tired, and all around him all his former
"pets" are now like full grown adults at least his
size. Some of them have become ornery and vicious and repeatedly
shove aside or even snap at the aged white dog step-father.
have met quite a few white couples who have adopted cute little
non-white children with the same mentality held by many folks
who patroize pet stores and buy cute little kittens or puppies.
Prodding them along are many very left wing, super-universalistic
Christian churches who preach that interracial adoption is somehow
highly moral and desirable. (Please see my Religious
Crisis page for more discussion of various forms of liberal
Christian insanity). The idea that one's cute little nonwhite
"pet" can someday grow up to become President of the
United States must be a real thrill for many nonwhite pet owners
across America who secretly fear that they are acting like race
traitors by allowing their innate altruism to be parasitically
invested in the support of competing ethnic-genetic interests.
variation on this theme has occurred when Federal bureaucrats
have "adopted" alien peoples and forcefully integrated
them into white society. For example, after the fall of South
Vietnam, Hmong tribesmen from Laos were resettled in lilly white
Scandinavian and German American communities in the northern
Midwest. In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, poor black folks
from the greater New Orleans area were redistributed by the
Feds around America, or to include deliberate efforts to infiltrate
Mormon communities in Utah considered "too white."
himself has been "adopted." While living in Hawaii,
he was raised by his two white maternal grandparents. Some articles
appearing in The American Free Press and elsewhere
claim that that Obama has been adopted by New World Order plutocrats
who have recognized his potential as a "rising star"
going back at least a couple of decades. There
are some important fallacies behind the "interracial pet
adoption" concept. First, nonwhites are not "pets."
They are people. Treating them like "pets" is simply
a more subtle form of white supremacism. Secondly,
throughout history interracial adoption has been relatively
"unnatural." Most people in most eras have lived and
reproduced within the context of racially and ethnically homogeneous
tribal units (or what the late British anthropologist Sir Arthur
Keith called "Evolutionary Breeding Units --or EBU's).
As I have already discussed elsewhere on this web page, Keith
argued that interracialism goes instinctively against the grain
because it erodes the genetic advantages held by successful
EBU's, analogous to the way small businesses must internally
reinvest cash flow and protect their property rights relative
to competitors to continue to grow and prosper. I have also
Subspecies of Man" by Dr. Norman Hall which
also argues for an evolutionarily adaptive and instinctive basis
for human racism and other forms of tribalism. As
an interesting ironic side note regarding this issue, sometimes
the radical right and radical left are in greater agreement
than the so-called "center." As an example, back when
I was in college in the mid-1970's I once attended a discussion
panel that included the leader of a Communist organization.
This Red condemned "Operation Baby Lift," which was
a scheme by the Ford Administration to airlift Vietnamese orphans
to America during the collapse of South Vietnam. Presumably
the Asian children would be adopted by white parents. The Communist
spokesman decried this as an example of "imperialist kidnapping."
Even more interesting, Vietnam's Communist leaders subsequently
showed their own racism by expelling half-breed Vietnamese children
created by liasons with white and negro American servicemen.
However, I must add that this was probably a peculiar situation.
Generally speaking, leftists tend to be much more amenable to
race-mixing than right wingers.
Obama as an accelerator of dysgenic decay
vs. genetics discussion, I describe the importance of
genetics in human affairs. In his book The
Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions
Imperil Our Country and Civilization, Patrick
J. Buchanan describes how demographic trends threaten the
very biological existence of Western Civilization and all
of its accomplishments over the last 3,000 years --its music,
culture, science, religion --everything!.
influence can only reinforce the permanent dumbing down process
in America on an innate biological level, accelerating further
the extensive damage already done to the white gene pool as
a consequence of feminism (encourages more gifted women to
have relatively fewer children than stupid women), welfare
programs (a negative eugenics program where the U.S. government
pays lazy and stupid women to have proportionately more children
than the general population), and forced integration (encourages
white women to miscegenate with alien peoples, thereby increasing
the ethnic-genetic fracturing of a once productive, fairly
homogeneous white society). The following is an extract from
vs. genetics discussion.
Scientific support for genetic
Thanks to the Internet, and the
fact that more Americans tend to become open to new
ideas as the country falls apart, accumulated scientific
research on the role of genetics is making a bigger
impact. In fact, even some national media are now following
along kicking and screaming.
As one example Dan Seligman’s May 12, 2003 Forbes
Rothman Strikes Again,” states, “In
The IQ Controversy: The Media and Public Policy (1988),
Rothman and Mark Snyderman collected data showing that
the press overwhelmingly attributed IQ differences in
the population to various cultural artifacts. The authors
also surveyed 661 experts —
academic psychologists, cognitive scientists, test specialists
who decisively rejected these cultural explanations
and collectively stated that some 60% of IQ variance
reflected the different genes of the high and low scorers.”
Other experts weigh in higher. Dr. Arthur Jensen in
Bias In Mental Testing reports,
"Estimates of h² (ie., "broad heritability,"
which includes all of the genetic variance) for various
standardized tests of intelligence vary from about .50
to .90 in different samples and populations, with a
central tendency close to .75." (p. 244). In Intelligence
and National Achievement, Dr. Raymond
Cattell reported, "The accumulating evidence that
60-80% of intelligence should end... [a reluctance by
most people to believe that intelligence is substantially
inherited]. It is about as heritable as stature. By
shifting from a generation with poor nutrition to one
very well fed we can get a shift of average stature
from about 5 ft. 7 ins. to 5 ft. 9 ins., but you cannot
go on doing this."
Some of the best evidence to remove "environmental
noise" comes from studies of identical twins who
have been separated at birth and raised in different
environments. The April 13, 1987 U.S. News
& World Report article "The Gene
Factor" provided the following examples where the
Minnesota Center for Twin and Adoption Research compared
hundreds of identical twins against the general population
and analyzed statistical variation. The percentages
below show how much the traits are determined by heredity:
are born, not made
Mixes easily, affable, likes to be the center
Respect tradition and authority, follows the rules
Easily distressed and frustrated, feels vulnerable and
Tendency to become lost in thought and abstraction
Keeps to oneself, feels exploited, thinks "world
is out to get me"
Confident, cheerful, upbeat
Avoids risks and dangers, takes safe route even if more
Tends to be physically violent, has a taste for revenge
Works hard at setting and achieving goals, a perfectionist
Plans carefully, tries to make rational decisions
Prefers emotional closeness
Another interesting percentage worth considering
is contained in the 1991
study, by J.M. Bailey and R.C. Pillard,
which found a .52 genetic contribution to male
Dr. William M. Fox reports in his book American
Values Decline (offered by
America First Books) evidence for strong heritability
among criminals as well:
...[A] Swedish study involved
1,775 adopted men and women who were born between
1930 and 1949. Of the men who had been born to law-abiding
parents and reared in good adoptive homes, only
3 percent had been convicted of a crime. Of those
born to law-abiding parents and reared in unfavorable
adoptive homes, 7 percent had been convicted. However,
of those who had been born to a convicted parent
and reared in good adoptive homes, 12 percent had
been convicted, and of those born to a convicted
parent and reared, in unfavorable adoptive homes,
the rate soared to 40 percent!" [from Jerry
E. Bishop, "Probing the Cell: Researchers Close
in On Some Genetic Bases of Antisocial behavior,"
The Wall Street Journal,
February 12, 1986, page 19.]
What makes discussion of racial issues tricky
for many people is the fact that genetic traits
in populations tend to manifest themselves as bell-shaped
statistical curves. This makes sense, since genetic
traits originate with DNA molecules, which in turn
are continually replicating. Most DNA will perfectly
replicate most of the time, but we can inevitably
expect slight errors from mutation and other causes
on each side of the norm. These errors decline in
frequency the more they deviate from the norm, creating
a bell-shaped distribution.
Hence, when we compare groups on a genetic level,
we have to compare statistical bell-shaped curves
for one group against averages for another. People
who try to confuse a genetic issue often use the
technique of favorably comparing someone on the
right hand side of a bell-shaped curve that characterizes
one population group with people in the left hand
side of a different bell-shaped population. This
can disguise the fact that the first population
taken as a whole may be decidedly inferior to the
second population group.
The 22 Jan 2006 National Vanguard article
Are Crazy Part 3 carried overlapping IQ graphs
that illustrate the differences between blacks and
whites. These data are taken from the National Longitudinal
Study of Youth, Version 1. According to The
Bell Curve, by Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles
Murray, these kinds of overall population differences
have persisted despite massive resources expended
by environmentalists to eradicate them.
The differences between white
and black populations involve far more than
skin color and IQ test results. There are
also significant differences in brain structure.
For example, frontal lobe development is correlated
with abstract intelligence, and whites have
a higher ratio of frontal lobe to anterior
lobe area compared to blacks. They also have
a larger average brain
size, a higher density of cerebral folding,
and other anatomical features that correlate
with greater intelligence, as noted
by such researchers as Dr. Carleton S. Coon,
Dr. F. W. Vint, and Dr. C. J. Connoly.
In his book The External Morphology
of the Primate Brain, that involved
a study of 60 brains of whites and negroes,
Dr. Connoly observed:
"Comparing the two large
groups of Whites and Negroes, while the variability
is large and there is much overlapping, the mean
values reveal significant differences. The dimensions
correlate well with what we might expect from
a knowledge of the cranium in the two races. The
Negro brain is on the average relatively longer,
narrower, and flatter than the brain of the Whites.
The frontal region, as measured by the projectional
distance to midpoint of central sulcus, is, relative
to the total length of the brain, larger in male
Whites than in Negroes, while the parietal is
larger in Negroes than in Whites . . . . It can
be said that the pattern of the frontal lobes
in the White brains of our series is more regular,
more uniform than in the Negro brain . . . . The
White series is perhaps slightly more fissurated
and there is more anastomosing of the sulci .
. . . It is a matter of frequencies."
Obviously one can find examples
of blacks on the extreme right end of the
bell curve who are smarter than most whites.
But one needs to compare both curves together
to really grasp the significant population
differences. The graph shows a vastly greater
number of people with IQ's over 120 who are
whites who are able to provide intelligent
leadership to society. In contrast, the black
population is weighed down with a vastly larger
number of border-line mentally retarded people.
The graph also explains why intermarrying
black and white populations of equal size
results in a disaster for any society that
wants to remain a technologically advanced
First World country. If total population size
is kept constant, the number of people with
IQ's over 120 drops by 90%.
We can use the bell curve concept to not only
compare two different populations, but also
get a sense regarding how a particular characteristic
might be graduated along a spectrum within
a population group. As an example, in his
diffusion of innovations theory, Everett M.
Rogers suggested that the bell curve (presumably
for white people) might be divided as follows:
innovators (2.5%), early adopters (13.5%),
early majority (34%), late majority (34%)
and laggards (16%). Obviously an advanced
technological society capable of sustainable
innovation, scientific analysis, and rational
political institutions needs to maintain relatively
higher percentages of the first few categories
on an innate genetic level than various stagnant
Third World countries.
Obama also personifies the advanced stage of dysgenic
decay described in Dr. Elmer Pendell's book Why
Civilizations Self-Destruct, where charlatans
and sociopaths are more likely to rise to the top
of a population that has become too degraded to keep
them in check. As I also observe in my environmental
vs. genetic duality discussion:
basic model for understanding the evolution
of genetic differences
For starters it is critical
to understand how different geographic environments
(or "environmental stresses") sculpture
the distributions of traits in human gene
pools in different ways, and how these gene
pools can degrade over time. Here I am using
"environment" to mean a physical
environment such as an Ice Age glacier or
a sub-saharan jungle. These physical environments
tend to select people in different ways. This
use of the word "environment" to
mean a geological environment that selects
for human genes in a certain way is different
from the use of the word "environmental"
used at the beginning of this article to mean
"learned" or "nurtured"
In his landmark work Why
Civilizations Self-Destruct, Dr.
Elmer Pendell explained that human gene pools
are subject to the Second Law of Thermodynamics,
just like other animals. This law states that
chemical reactions in the universe tend towards
greater randomness. This applies to chemical
reactions that sustain life processes inside
the human cell and replicate DNA. In other
words, in the absence of natural selection,
animals that reproduce at a zero population
growth rate accumulate dysfunctional mutations
and other forms of genetic load over time
and suffer gradual and continual degradation
in their abilities. Because of this deteriorative
pressure, Dr. Pendell believed that animal
species only achieve bare survival equilibrium
with their geological environment. The Second
Law of Thermodynamics prevents populations
from developing capabilities in excess of
the selective pressures of their physical
Dr. Pendell believed that Ice Age environments
imposed vastly more severe demands on human
problem solving skills than tropical environments.
Humans who lacked the ability to create winter
survival technology and who also lacked the
ability to delay gratification to prepare
in the summer for the winters tended to get
killed off at a faster rate. This skewed the
innate traits of frost zone gene pools towards
In contrast, human groups that remained in
temperate zones failed to develop this greater
technological adapativeness. The Second Law
of Thermodynamics kept them in bare equilibrium
survival with the lower requirements of their
One might see an analogy with the case of
the dodo bird. A group of dodos once flew
into a particular tropical-zone island where
there no ground predators. As dodos established
their home on this island, the ones which
remained capable of flight had no particular
survival advantage over birds incapable of
flight. Over time, mutations which inhibited
flight spread through the dodo bird population.
By the time European sailors discovered the
island, no dodos could fly anymore. Non-flight
"genetic load" had saturated the
dodo population. Sailors could grab dodos
off the ground at will, and they quickly became
In his landmark book My
Awakening, Dr. David Duke
provides an excellent summary of the selective
differences between frost zone and sub-Saharan
African conditions (p. 93):
minimal shelter needed for survival
extremely harsh climate
no winter —
warm, well-made clothing —
no clothing required for survival
ability to make/control fire —
fire not required for survival
long periods of resource deprivation
resources more abundant
periods of little vegetation, few small animals
or birds —
food gathering less problematic in tropical
foresight, planning and delayed gratification
necessary for survival
little seasonal change, immediate gratification
in resource scarce, male-provisioned, hunting
society, monogamy favored
in female provisioned gathering society, polygamy
male provisioned society, less sexual and physical
female provisioned society favors male aggression
and sexual drive
promiscuous behavior resulting in fights often
leads to death of mate and children
death in fights from sexual competition not
critical for survival of mates and children
sculpturing of territorial needs and chivalrous
Dr. Duke provides some extended
discussion to explain the evolutionary impact
of frost zones that is well worth reading. He
notes on page 92:
During most of the last 80,000
years, Europe endured temperatures much colder than
today. Modern Europeans emerged about 35,000 years
ago and met the crucible of the Wurm glaciation
(24,000-10,000 B.C.). Temperatures in Europe and
Asia probably averaged around 18 degrees (F) colder
than the present.
We see significant technological adaptiveness and
comparatively higher IQs among all races or racial
subgroups that have had a significant frost zone
sculpturing tenure, including eskimos, Japanese,
and Mongols. Conversely, we see a relative lack
of technological adapativeness among tropical peoples.
Another example besides Negroes are the Piraha Tribe
of the Amazon, which has proven completely incapable
of learning how to add 1 + 1 despite months of instruction
I would like to interject my personal view that the
frost zone evolutionary environment likely sculptured
temperamental traits in many other areas besides an
aptitude for technological problem solving.
It appears that whites in general, and the Nordic branch
of Caucasoids in particular, have lived for a longer
evolutionary period than other races under extremely
dispersed conditions near Ice Age glaciers in relatively
small family or tribal units. The key selective factors
involved man vs. nature technological innovation themes.
Man vs. man guile or artful sociability was probably
not a particularly significant factor. In fact, in some
ways it probably helped to err on the side of having
a high sense of individual territoriality to prevent
competitors from stealing ones food in cold winters.
A vivid anecdotal example of this behavior is described
at the beginning of a book called Sissu
about the Finnish Winter War against the Soviets. According
to a folk tale, which was perhaps apocryphal, a Finn
heard that someone wanted to build a cabin several miles
away. He pulled out his puukku knife to go kill him
because he felt the stranger was invading his territory.
In his essay "The
History of Freedom in Antiquity," the eminent
British 19th century historian Lord Acton commented
on how a strong need for personal freedom is very ancient
among white people:
According to a famous saying of the most famous authoress
of the continent, Liberty is ancient; and it is Despotism
that is new. It has been the pride of recent historians
to vindicate the truth of that maxim. The heroic age
of Greece confirms it, and it is still more conspicuously
true of Teutonic Europe. Wherever we can trace the
earlier life of the Aryan nations we discover germs
which favouring circumstances and assiduous culture
might have developed into free societies. They exhibit
some sense of common interest in common concerns,
little reverence for external authority, and an imperfect
sense of the function and supremacy of the state.
Where the division of property and of labour is incomplete,
there is little division of classes and of power...
In his book Body Language,
Julius Fast talks about how people from Northern Europe
stand much further apart from each other in their conversations.
Interpersonal interactions among Nordic peoples often
strike others as being a bit stuffy and distant. As
a rule of thumb, as one heads further south in Europe,
people stand increasingly closer to each other in conversation,
and have more informal protocols. It is not uncommon
for Mediterranean fathers to hug and kiss their own
sons and kiss other men, which is unheard of in northern
countries. Going further south, Julius Fast points out
how Arabs stand very close to each other. To deny an
Arab your breath is to insult him.
This very different sense of personal territoriality
among population groups has political implications.
"Human rights" is probably related to an instinctive
requirement to preserve significant personal territory
The origin of the cultural and behavioral trait of chivalry
is also an important issue. In "The
Passing of the Great Race" Madison
Grant wrote (page 168).
The Nordics are, all over the world,
a race of soldiers, sailors, adventurers and explorers,
but above all, of rulers, organizers, and aristocrats
in sharp contrast to the essentially peasant and democratic
character of the Alpines. The Nordic race is domineering,
individualistic, self reliant, and jealous of their
personal freedom both in political and religious systems
and as a result they are usually Protestants.
Chivalry and knighthood and their still surviving but
greatly impaired counterparts are peculiarly Nordic
traits and feudalism, class distinctions and race pride
among Europeans are mainly traceable for the most part
to the north." (p. 228).
The social status of woman varies largely with race,
but here religion plays a part. In the Roman Republic
and in Ancient Germany women were held in high esteem.
In the Nordic Countries of today, women's rights have
received much more recognition than among the southern
nations with their tradition of Latin culture."
Chivalrous competition is very common among frost zone
mammals such as wolves, reindeer, foxes, bears, and
bears. One of the greatest threats to chivalry is parasitism.
While parasitism is very common in tropical environments,
where animals are close enough for parasites to easily
hop from host to host, the high degree of animal dispersion
in Arctic environments works in the opposite direction.
In chivalrous competition, males will spar to compete
for females. They compete just enough to show dominance,
but refrain from destroying the loser by drawing blood.
This enables the more fit males to disproportionately
reproduce, thereby maintaining the strength of the herd.
However, by not killing off the weaker males, the herd
retains the greater safety of numbers to ward off packs
Chivalrous government is an anomaly among most human
societies. Most human societies around the planet become
very pyramidal is they become very large. The people
at the top typically become increasingly vicious to
fend off any real or perceived competitors.
We can see how chivalrous instincts must be spread among
the general population in order for Western Civilization
to become viable. Parliamentary debate depends on the
ability of individuals to voice their dissent without
getting assassinated. The right to face ones accusers
in a trial by jury depends upon not being up against
vicious mafia groups who ruthlessly kill off all witnesses.
Scientific debate requires the ability to advance a
new theory that contradicts leading scientists without
losing ones job.
In order for competitive free markets and for free enterprise
capitalism to remain viable, both the government and
the largest corporations must refrain from using their
power to viciously squeeze out competitors and rig the
One reason why America is breaking down, incidentally,
is the increase in vicious, anti-chivalrous behavior
throughout society. We see this in the case of people
who lose their jobs for voicing not politically correct
opinions. In contrast, back in the early 19th century
chivalrous values once made America once of the most
admired countries on earth.
Today America has become despised around the world.
High Priests of War by Michael Collins
Piper documents how America's foreign policy has been
high-jacked by Jewish neo-cons who viciously
smear all domestic critics of their influence. Torture,
which is very commonly used by Israelis against Palestinians,
is now widely used overseas by Americans.
An interesting indicator of America's depravity involves
the sad case of Jewish spokesman and national media
darling Dr. Alan Dershowitz. He hardly ennobles either
the Harvard University faculty or America's Jewish community.
He has artfully tried to reduce public repugnance towards
the use of torture
and has viciously attacked
his colleague Dr. Stephen Walt, former Dean of Harvard's
Kennedy School of Government, for the report
co-authored with Dr. John Mearsheimer of the University
of Chicago that criticizes the Jewish Lobby's role in
American foreign policy.
Critics of Jews have historically viewed them as an
an alien racial group instinctively incapable of acting
like chivalrous gentlemen. For over two thousand years
their evolutionary history has been focused on man vs.
man competition where they have been outsiders in highly
urbanized environments forced to live by their wits.
Critics such as Henry Ford in his International
Jew series claim that Jews as a group
are more likely to produce a disproportionate number
of people who are prone to engage in covert, deceitful,
vicious, criminal, Mafia-like behavior. In business
they have a greater tendency to act as vicious monopolists.
In their view, Jews tend to be incompatible with chivalrous
republican government and principled free enterprise
This has some similarities to Ralph Townsend's analysis
That Are Dark about the Chinese (offered
by America First Books). To him, it is no accident
that the Chinese are often referred to as "The
Jews of the East." For well over two thousand years
the Chinese have endured conditions of extreme deprivation
and overcrowding, in which Darwinian survival depended
heavily on artful man vs. man diplomacy, to put it politely.
In addition to their considerable business acumen, Townsend
claims that the Chinese have an amazing capacity to
ingratiate themselves with Americans. They can quote
high-minded platitudes of Confucius one moment and then
just as easily break their word with Westerners the
next. According to Townsend, writing in 1933, the Chinese
language has no real equivalent of the word "lie"
that carries with it any sense of the moral repugnance
that accompanies its usage in the West.
Townsend noted that the Japanese, who have absorbed
some Caucasoid genes from the Ainu, have a very different
cultural personality that is much closer to Western
concepts of personal honor. Townsend observed an interesting
paradox that begins with the fact that initially Americans
tend to like the Chinese more than the Japanese. The
Chinese seem much more affable and gregarious, whereas
the Japanese appear more reserved. However, Townsend
claimed that after Americans have had enough dealings
with both the Chinese and Japanese to begin to understand
each group, most Americans start to prefer the Japanese.
They discover that they have more in common with the
Japanese on the honor issue, and that is more important
to them in the long run.
In regard to the comparing the Chinese with Jews, if
one compares Ways
That Are Dark with Jewish
Supremacism by Dr. David Duke, one
can see that the Chinese are qualitatively very different
from Jewish supremacists in many important ways. Among
other things, the Chinese have had their own land base
and self-contained civilization for thousands of years.
Their religious institutions make it possible for them
to find contentment within their own borders without
defining themselves relative to other peoples or making
it a divine mission to perpetually infiltrate and exert
control over other societies under false pretenses.
The origins of advanced civilizations
According to Dr. Elmer Pendell in Why
Civilizations Self-Destruct, advanced
civilizations began when peoples of the north headed
southwards to warmer lands where survival was much easier.
Dr. Pendell defined civilization as the sum total of
problem-solving improvements made by people over time.
Hence, the peoples of the north had excess genetic capacity
in terms of intelligence and robustness that could now
be invested towards the continuous problem solving processes
required to create advanced civilizations.
However, once in the warmer lands, the peoples of the
north were no longer subjected to savage sculpturing
factors. Their offspring tended to decline over time
in average fitness much like the dodo bird. In addition,
the civilizations they created developed niches that
allowed people of low ability to reproduce at a faster
rate than people of higher ability.
Paradoxically, as the material improvements and monuments
of civilizations accumulated over time, giving the external
appearance of an increasingly advanced civilization,
the underlying genetic quality was steadily deteriorating.
Eventually, the ratio of nonproducers to producers increased
to the point that bygone civilizations began to stagnate.
At this tipping point, they began to lose traction in
their ability to anticipate
and solve problems. Eventually they became so overwhelmed
by their accumulating problems that they went into decline.
At this point let me interject that while I agree with
Pendell that dysgenic decay is an important long term
underlying factor, I see evidence that many civilizations
seem to fall apart well before their underlying gene
pools are totally depleted due to the accumulation of
I think that there are two extremely important addition
reasons to help explain the accelerated decline of various
civilizations. One reason is that over time civilizations
tend to become more centralized and tyrannical, which
degrades their ability to engage in rational innovation
and problem-solving on a grass roots level. In cover
this process in some depth in my centralization
vs. decentralization discussion. Please note my
libertarian analysis regarding how centralized government
tends to turn into ponzi government, which in turn tends
to turn into evil government.
In addition, as societies become more centralized and
individuals become less self-sufficient, people with
increasingly criminal traits, parasitic modus operandi,
and other mental
health problems tend to rise to the top and set
the tone of society. This also severely degrades the
ability of a society to engage in rational grass roots
problem solving and innovation. I discuss the "criminal
personality" and parasitism in depth in my mutualism
vs. parasitism discussion.
There is definitely an unvirtuous circle involved here
in which all of these factors viciously feed on each
other. Dysgenic decay encourages increasing centralization,
because a declining level of overall competence in the
overall population makes its more likely that "the
masses" will become increasingly less self-sufficient
as individual adults and instead assume an increasingly
child-like level of dependency on their rulers. They
will simultaneously become less capable of heading off
various forms of tyranny. Similarly, as a population
becomes weaker in terms of its innate character and
intelligence, it becomes less capable of resisting criminal
descent to the Third World
if there's any group of people in America who deserve to
suffer, it's the White middle-class. It's the people who
have been warned for decades about where this country is
headed, but who were too shortsighted, too timid, and above
all too greedy, too selfish, to do anything about it. During
the 1960s, when Blacks were rioting and burning our cities,
middle-class Whites refused to take a strong stand against
them because that would disrupt the country even more and
would be bad for business; instead they tried to appease
the Blacks with all sorts of new civil rights laws and other
government programs. They tried to buy them off. The Whites
just wanted to continue indulging themselves; they didn't
want to do anything that might require a bit of austerity
in return for the long-term improvement of the country.
the 1970s, when the real push was on to racially integrate
the country through forced busing and forced housing and
forced employment laws, and many White working-class people
were demonstrating in the streets against this forced racial
integration, the comfortable middle class, which was not
being as adversely affected as the blue-collar class, refused
to become involved. The White lawyers and doctors and accountants
and professors and engineers and small businessmen just
looked the other way and kept on stuffing their faces. Their
kids weren't being bused to Black schools; their employment
wasn't being threatened by affirmative action. They certainly
weren't going to jeopardize their own comfort and security
and respectability, just because of what was happening to
working-class White kids and working-class White parents.
course, many middle-class Whites were concerned about the
degenerative trends which were all too obvious in America
during the 1960s and 1970s. They just weren't concerned
enough to do anything. Their solution was just to vote Republican
and keep making as much money as possible, so that they
could insulate themselves and their own immediate families
from what was happening around them, and to hell with everyone
else. And so we had the Reagan era, and the White middle
class thought that their strategy of compromise and appeasement
and selfishness had worked.
of course, it hadn't worked. Such strategies never work
in the long run. People who will not fight eventually will
be eaten by people who will fight. A community whose members
are so self-centered that they will work only for their
own personal benefit and not for the common good eventually
will be destroyed by its enemies.
our enemies have been at work, day and night. They opened
our borders to the subhumanity of the Third World and began
building up their numbers. They encouraged feminism and
began reducing our numbers by persuading our women that
careers were more important than families. They infiltrated
and took over our educational establishment and taught our
children that they should be ashamed of their own race,
that their own history and traditions weren't worth learning
the children of the White middle class learned instead that
doing drugs and putting safety pins through their noses
and wearing baseball caps backward and listening to Black
rappers is cool. And the daughters of the White middle class
began bedding down with Blacks and becoming pregnant with
mongrel babies, and their parents didn't like it, but they
tolerated it, as long as they could hang onto their money
and their comfort and their lifestyle. And eventually the
enemies of our people were strong enough to launch the Clinton
era. But the members of the White middle class were still
comfortable, and so they tolerated the Clinton era too,
with all of its treason and degeneracy. They tolerated the
total Judaization of their government. They tolerated the
Clinton government's bombing of Belgrade to force Serbia
into line with the New World Order. They didn't like it,
but they tolerated it.
so now the fruits of all that toleration are almost ready
to be harvested -- and it's about time. It's about time
for the White middle class to have to deal with the problem
of 30 million Blacks who believe they are entitled to reparations
and who very shortly will be clamoring for $100,000 from
every White family. They believe they're entitled to at
least five trillion dollars in reparations from us, because
we tolerated the Jewish media pumping expectations of that
sort into them during the past 50 years. We tolerated all
of the Hollywood films and the television propaganda telling
them about how they were persecuted and mistreated by us
for 400 years and that they really are equal to us, and
the only thing which has kept them from achieving what we
have achieved is White racism. We knew it wasn't true --
we knew it was Jewish lies -- but we tolerated that propaganda
rather than risk being called "racists" for contradicting
it or "anti-Semites" for pointing out who the
we also proved to 30 million Blacks that we're a bunch of
wimps who won't fight for our people or for our own rights.
They believe that the White man owes them five trillion
dollars and that he doesn't have the guts or the gumption
to stop them from taking it...
Since World War II: An Interview with Dr. William L. Pierce
1988-April-May National Vanguard Magazine
review of the Tom Wolfe novel Bonfire
of the Vanities by Dr. William L. Pierce. An
extract of this review is also provided in my "Environmental
vs. Genetic Duality" discussion. Preceding the Dr.
Pierce quote, I describe how white people often like to play
"Man Who Would Be King" by living as supposedly
enlightened and benevolent leaders surrounded by nonwhites
rather than living among equals in racially homogeneous white
societies like their European ancestors. This can lead to
some very unpleasant surprises down the road. In fact, Barack
Obama may be viewed as the ultimate expression of the encroaching
"jungle" that Dr. Pierce warns about in his review.
An important variation of the "Man Who Would Be
King" syndrome was illustrated in the superb novel
of the Vanities by American author Tom Wolfe.
It is about a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) bond
trader named Sherman McCoy who lives in New York City.
He and his Wall Street colleagues make huge incomes, live
in very upscale housing, enjoy the most expensive luxuries,
and call themselves "Masters of the Universe."
Unlike the "Man Who Would Be King" characters
[in the Rudyard
Kipling novel or the 1975
action-adventure movie], McCoy does not actively go
in search of an alien people to work with. Instead, McCoy's
hubris comes from failing to recognize how an effective
support base of fellow whites has rotted out from under
him. Meanwhile alien peoples and the alien values that
they represent have quietly enveloped McCoy's world like
an anaconda, leaving McCoy in an extremely "leveraged"
social situation without knowing it.
Roger Ebert created an excellent review
of the Hollywood version of this story, but perhaps the
hardest hitting commentary about the underlying novel
was written by the late Dr. William Pierce for the April-May
1988 issue of National Vanguard
...McCoy lives in an artificial world, a world separated
by a wall of money from the encroaching jungle all around.
His parents are living reminders of an earlier day,
when the jungle existed only in patches here and there,
and White people did not have to have scads of money
to keep the animals at bay. But the jungle has grown
mightily since then, and its denizens have multiplied
and become much bolder...
One night, however, McCoy gets a close up glimpse of
the jungle. While driving his mistress back from the
airport he makes a wrong turn and becomes lost in the
Bronx. He evades a Black mugging attempt, and the experience,
though it shakes him badly at the time, only strengthens
his belief in his superiority: he fought the jungle
with his bare hands and he won! He is truly a Master
of the Universe in every way!
But the jungle is much more dangerous than McCoy realizes:
its really threatening denizens are not the Blacks and
Puerto Ricans who form the bulk of its population, but
the Jews who control them and are able to move back
and forth from their world to McCoy's at will...Even
at the book's end, when the Jews and their minions have
ganged up on him and pulled him into the jungle for
good, there is no indication that McCoy is any wiser
about their ways...
The preceding sentence notwithstanding, Wolfe's tale
is not one of classic Jewish conspiracy. His Jews act
in concert, for the most part —
although there is one Jewish judge who refuses to go
because it serves their immediate personal interests
to do so. They do enjoy pulling a WASP down, but there
are no formal meetings of the Learned Elders in the
synagogue to plot strategy.
Nor is it primarily a cautionary tale about the dangers
of the jungle. It is really a morality play about the
White man and what he has done to himself: about his
dangerous delusions, his dangerous lack of contact with
the real world, his dangerous loss of virtue and manhood.
Sherman McCoy stands for the leadership stratum of his
race in the closing years of the 20th century. He is
all the eager White business executives and entrepreneurs,
the ambitious White educators and publicists, who have
cast all other considerations aside in their single-minded
scramble for status and wealth; who, having suppressed
every vestige of racial consciousness, have allied themselves
with Jews as readily as with men of their own blood
whenever there was an advantage to it; who have ignored
the encroachments of the jungle so long as they perceived
no personal threat from it, and even abetted them when
there was a personal gain involved; who have become
so well adapted to plutocracy that they have forgotten
the virtues becoming an aristocrat —
virtues such as self-discipline, toughness, bravery,
a sense of personal honor; and who nevertheless maintain
the dangerous vanity that they are aristocrats —
Masters of the Universe —
and still are in control of their world.
the tragedies of
Rhodesia and South Africa
Nelson Mandela (center)
giving communist salute alongside Joe
Slovo (rt.), Jewish leader of the South African Communist Party
Ever since World War II, the American
Liberal-Zionist Establishment has promoted the usurpation of
white self-rule by blacks everywhere in Africa, and has generally
created mostly disaster as a consequence. The Spotlight
(predecessor of the American Free Press) ran articles
in the early 1990's claiming that the CIA and Mossad funded
Marxist African groups against white rule, and even ran disruption
campaigns against white nationalists utilizing personnel and
equipment stationed in the U.S. embassy in South Africa. Now
these evil chickens are coming home to roost inside America
the Hidden Hand of Jewish Extremism and Its Effect on South
Africa. A review of four books, three by Jewish
authors, which describe the Jewish-black alliance that wrecked
a once great white country.
White South Africa - What Went Wrong? by Arthur
Mandela: The Legend and the Legacy: Part I,
see also Part
II by Sarah Maid of Albion. How the once most prosperous
country in Africa was turned into another Third World hell hole
with over a million whites having already fled the country,
two million reduced to grinding poverty, rampant theft and murder
everywhere, and worse things yet to come. Generally the historical
pattern has been once nonwhites become the voting majority,
nonwhite leaders become the permanent norm. They tend to naturally
revert to Marxist-socialist policies (remember that anthropological
"bigmanship" phenomenon described earlier on this
web page?) that ultimately suck whites completely dry in favor
Smith the last White leader of Rhodesia disappears into a crack
in the sky at 88. "After years of political
contortions and external pressure from the British and US governments,
free elections were held in early 1980 in which Mugabe’s
Zanu-PF swept to victory, winning most of the seats in the new
parliament. Nkomo’s Zapu held on to its Ndebele strongholds
and formed the opposition. Smith’s Rhodesia Front claimed
all 20 reserved seats in a reflex vote by the white electorate.
At first it seemed that Smith’s dire predictions about
the future might prove to be ill-founded. Despite Mugabe’s
inflammatory rhetoric, whites kept their land and foreign investment
was encouraged. Smith continued to excoriate Mugabe as a Marxist
dictator, but was seen as an increasingly irrelevant figure.
In 1987, he was expelled from parliament for 12 months after
criticising sanctions imposed on neighbouring South Africa.
By the time his suspension was lifted, the whites had lost their
seats in parliament. During the 1990s, as Mugabe’s regime
became increasingly corrupt and violent, Smith took a grim delight
in seeing his predictions come true. `It helps lift my depression
that the majority of black people are saying it is time to get
rid of this bunch of corrupt gangsters,' he said. In his memoirs,
The Great Betrayal (1997), he put the blame for Rhodesia’s
collapse on almost everybody except himself. `During UDI we
had the greatest national spirit in the world, a fantastic country,
great race relations, the happiest black faces in the world
… if our friends hadn’t betrayed us, we’d
have won,' he wrote."
Negro-Jewish Alliance that Destroyed Rhodesia.
Instead of Obama-Rahmbo, it was Mugabe-Hoogstraten, and the
results were bone-chilling. A poster-board summary from judicial-inc.biz.
Things First by Kevin Strom. The subversion of
the Dutch Reform Church was an important factor in the destruction
of white-ruled South Africa.
Other Obama-Related Web Pages
Against Obama This web site has some good home
town insights into the real Obama during his campaign months
leading up to the presidential election. The web master signed
off stating: "This site spent much time focused on the
failures of Chicago’s political machine and Barack Obama’s
inaction as a state senator, and US Senator…..the reality
is, the results of these failures (highest murder rate in
the country, highest sales taxes in the country, public schools
under-funded and mismanaged, public hospitals being mismanaged,
infrastructure falling apart, high unemployment) are still
seen, and felt, today….and will continue to be problems
that we will face every day moving forward…. Also,
I spent a great deal of time examining Barack Obama’s
many questionable relationships and ties…I do not regret
doing so…..In all honesty, I hope that these ties prove
to be innocuous…and not a predicator of future decision
Obamacrimes.com Home of attorney Phil Berg who
filed a law suit to determine Obama's real country of birth Theobamadisaster.com Theobamafile.com
"A privileged African-American, who has not shared the
black American experience By birth, blood and training, a
Muslim, who was a member of a Marxist, Black-African church
for 20 years. A socialist whose politics are rooted in Marx
and whose tactics were conceived by the communist, Alinsky
A master at shaping his own mythology and completely unqualified
to be Commander in Chief And, he is not now, nor ever has
been, a `natural
born citizen' -- his father was a foreigner."
Trying very hard to find a way to close on an upbeat note
[Editor's Note: This was written in Fall 2008 and reflects
an effort on my part to try to maintain an upbeat and optimistic
attitude. Unfortunately all of my worst fears about Obama
have proven correct].
the preface of this web page, I commented: "While he
may come across as an OK person, he is still way in over his
head as President-elect of the United States. However, if
he can just figure out a way to turn the tables on the evil
Zionist criminals who created the 9/11 inside job, the unnecessary
invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, and (going back much further
in time) the totally dysfunctional Federal Reserve Banking
System, and top of all this restores a stable and sustainable
relationship between whites and nonwhites in America, I may
actually change my whole attitude towards Barack Obama and
publicly celebrate him as a hero --but until such a time I
am very much on guard with this man, to say the least."
would add that sometimes the best free thinkers (or agnostics
or atheists) are individuals who once deeply immersed themselves
into fundamentalist Christianity enough to see how all the
moving parts are supposed to come together. (I am an example
of this from my own personal experience). Often the radical
left and radical right are more like the ends of a horse shoe
than two polar opposites, to the extent that radical people
often have in common a desire to understand how things really
work underneath the surface rather than just accept pat answers
and status quo. (I am also a personal example of this, having
dabbled with aspects of the radical left before moving more
towards the libetarian right). Sometimes the radical left
sees things in a similar way to the radical right, particularly
when class struggle and racial struggle overlap each other.
is possible that Obama has gone so far to the left, and has
been so heavily exposed to the full stench of corrupt politics
and criminal Zionism, that he is disgusted with it all deep
down inside while thoroughly understanding what it is all
about from personal experience. He could be well-positioned
to help move this country back to the right and do some serious
cleaning up of systemic corruption.
as it took anti-commie "gut fighter" Richard Nixon
to defuse right wing concerns when he reopened talks and trade
with Red China, maybe it takes a liberal black to turn the
tables on criminal Zionists and neo-Marxist race-mixers and
open borders liberals.
am caught in a dilemma. On the one hand, I would be foolish
to blindly trust Obama to turn out to be a "good guy"
without solid evidence. Dr. William Pierce was correct when
he described in his article "Lordy,
Lordy!" how too much Pollyannaish thinking has been
a major factor that has gotten us into this horrible mess
to begin with.
the other hand, I might also be foolish if I declare myself
Obama's sworn enemy and do not leave him maneuvering room
to prove himself. Sometimes positive miracles happen.
then again, what makes me very apprehensive is that it is
also possible that we could experience a gigantic "negative
miracle." Obama and his Jewish Supremacist buddies might
utilize their considerable political cleverness in order to
engineer a martial law clamp down on America that eventually
devolves into a latter-day, neo-Jacobin terror. Who knows
what America is in for once we get hit with full blown financial
system collapse and hyperinflation that renders the dollars
worthless. We might see rivers of blood flow beneath dictatorial
savage ferocity that rivals Robespierre, Trotsky, and Pol
far the indicators lean heavily in the negative direction.
For starters, many conservatives agree with me that designated
White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel (described earlier
on this web page) is a pretty scary guy, in many ways more
so that Michael
Chertoff, if such is possible. So far the Democratic Party
continues to deliver more than its fair share of neo-Commies.
if they had even a shred of honesty and patriotism, they would
be at least hinting at opening up an honest investigation
regarding the 9/11 inside job, not to mention the outrageous
war profiteering on no-bid contracts conducted by Bush cabal
cronies in its Middle Eastern military adventures. Instead,
in style and deed, they feel more like Zio-Marxist revolutionaries
--like real Reds-- out to grab all the chips.
John Toland's book Adolf Hitler, he describes a news
correspondent's wire dispatch sent within the first few years
after the World War I Armistice: "Germany is having a
nervous breakdown. There is nothing sane to report!"
It was during this period that Germany experienced a revolutionary
takeover attempt by communists that came very close to being
successful as well as massive hyperinflation.
wonder if we are going there over the next four years.
is very sad that we have to go through such guess work and
intrigue with our political leaders. How much more straightforward
and safer it would be to simply elect as President an honest,
stable white leader who openly espouses and defends white
values and heritage, while at the same time taking seriously
his oath to protect and defend the Constitution (a novel new
idea!) and showing humanity towards other races.
a final note --don't "coocoon" and let fear paralyze
you. Get in the habit of being active beginning right
now. Start preparing to survive the hard times ahead.
Create a support base for activism. Passivity only encourages
highly opportunistic or possibly even sociopathic people like
Obama and Emanuel to become that much more tyrannical. If
we can develop enough protest counter force and political
organization, we may actually succeed in bottling up the evil
that they may have in store for us. Start opposing them now.
(To use a military analogy, hit the enemy amphibious invaders
out in the surf before they can take the beach, and as a fall-back,
keep hitting them on the beach before they can establish a
beach-head futher inland. Fight them all the way, and never
let up, and never give up an inch for free). Start fighting
Obama right now by telling electors across America
to not elect him by virtue of his lack of documentation proving
that he is a naturalized citizen qualified to be President.
Also, start mobilizing and expressing protest against all
proposed "hate crime" laws. Our First Amendment
rights are the most precious of all, and we can never afford
to give an inch here either. Even if your protests may fail
over any particular short-term issues, you may still succeed
at waking up and educating a lot of people, and that in itself
can have tremendous value in achieving victory regarding the
biggest long term issues.