The election of Barack Hussein Obama II as President signals the death of America as the baby boom generation once knew it unless whites heroically unite to preserve their heritage and assert their right to determine their own destiny. Otherwise America is doomed to either become a permanent Marxist-Socialist Third World country with no future, or else break apart in a manner that ranges somewhere between peaceful means and a very bloody Civil War Two scenario.

 

Part I: Snapshots: 2008-2009


Obama as "Bush in Blackface"

 

From Bad to Worse
to DISASTER?

 

Editor's Note: Please also see the section
"Snapshots: 2010-2012" below titled:

Obama the "Chief Executor" and
Black Angel of Death:
Destroying America
For His Mossad-CIA-MI6 "Death Cult" Handlers

 

"The average White American hasn't an idea in his head that didn't come from his television receiver." - Dr. William L. Pierce "Wherever you find the Negro everything is going down around him, and wherever you find the White man you see everything around him improving." -Robert E. Lee "Silicon Valley may be keeping the economy zooming along for now, but that is only a superficial sign of health, a misleading sign. America is like a man whose body is riddled with cancer, but who still manages to keep his shoes shined and his fingernails clean." - Dr. William L. Pierce (in the late 1990's). "A nation of slaves is always prepared to applaud the clemency of their master, who in the abuse of absolute power, does not proceed to the last extremes of injustice and oppression." -- Edward Gibbons, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire

 

 

Snapshot 2008-2009

Not "Guess Who Is Coming for Dinner,"
but rather, "Who is Inviting For Dinner"
at the White House?

Editor's Note by William B. Fox
Publisher, America First Books
Below are some accurate predictions as well as some wishful thinking published in Fall 2008.
Just about everything -- except the wishful thinking --has been proven accurate ever since.

 

The header for this web page "From Bad to Worse to Disaster?" was inspired by a comment made by Dr. Ralph Raico at the Mises Institute. In one of his lectures, while addressing the Bush administration, he voiced words to the effect "I never thought I would see the day where I would regret no longer having Bill Clinton." Now we face a scenario where we might actually regret no longer having George Bush, if such is actually possible. Please check out my other web page on Obama, Chapter 35 "The Election of `Bush in Blackface' and Another Mumbai False Flag" of my Mission of Conscience Trilogy that provides other insights and links regarding America's mystery President, and in particular strong evidence that Obama is a longstanding Mossad-CIA asset.. I view the candidacy and election of Barack Hussein Obama II for President of the United States as a major intellectual "rabbit hole" regarding the decline and fall of America. It should be obvious from the articles archived on this web page to any thinking individual that this turn of events has to be symptomatic of extremely serious problems on all levels of America society today. This should become especially obvious after one reads my Publisher's Preface to Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America, or some of my other articles such as "Thomas Jefferson and the `Incredible Truth' about Bush Cabal Wise Guys and False Flag Nukes" or my Foreword to Henry Ford's My Life and Work. Better yet, please read books like Final Judgment, The Judas Goats, The New Jerusalem, Viper's Venom and Rattler's Revenge for deep background on the alien, corrupt, and malevolent forces at the highest levels that made the Obama nightmare possible in the first place. At a time when the white population is in rapid demographic decline (we can also say "being genocided"), when America so desperately needs to recover entrepreneurial infrastructure along with its formerly very powerful and productive industrial base, and when America so desperately needs to resist Zionist hijacking of its foreign policy that is literally driving this country towards total bankruptcy or even World War III/Armageddon (see High Priests of War), what could be a more cruel and degrading joke than for the power elite to foist someone like Obama on this country as President? He probably does not even qualify as a "natural born citizen" as required by the Constitution and further defined in case law in order to be President. He is all smoke and mirrors --except when he staunchly supports Zionism at the expense of American nationalism and promotes nonwhite interests at the expense of beleaguered whites. We can also reasonably expect him to promote a brand of globalism that further reduces domestic industry and to support more spend-thrift government interventionism that generates ever more inflation and squeezes out ever more productive free enterprise. This slap in the face reminds me of Mike Piper's article "Franklin J. Moses, Reconstruction's Most Infamous Scalawag" about how vindictive Yankees once foisted a totally corrupt Reconstruction regime over economically prostrate whites in South Carolina. In the long run, all of this is terribly unwise. It will only create more misery, hate, and discontent in America. It is not going to be good for anyone --to include African Americans. Although Obama obviously charms many Americans as a fellow human being, there is strong evidence that he is captive to destructive special interests (particularly the Jewish lobby), alien ethnic genetic interests (fellow blacks and other nonwhites), and dysfunctional Marxist-Socialist ideology. While he may come across on TV to many people as an OK person, he is still way in over his head as President of the United States. However, if he can just figure out a way to turn the tables on the Zionist criminals who created the 9/11 inside job, restore the Constitution (just like Congressman Ron Paul's agenda), reverse the unnecessary invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, and (going back much further in time) eliminate the totally dysfunctional Federal Reserve Banking System, and top of all this restore a stable and sustainable relationship between whites and nonwhites in America, I may actually change my whole attitude towards Barack Obama and publicly celebrate him as a hero --but until such a time I am very much on guard with this man, to say the least. Paradoxically, it may turn out that Obama has nothing to lose and everything to gain by trying to be the kind of hero that I just described. Remember, Zionists are famous for their treachery. No matter what he does, they probably secretly want him dead after they have used him so that their controlled media can turn him into a liberal martyr like JFK while replacing him with arch-Zionist sympathizer VP Joe Biden. They would probably prefer to frame some white supremacists as patsies in a trumped-up assassination plot in order to discredit their political enemies rather than engineer a plane crash. The Zionists would probably also prefer to give Obama just enough time to get built up as a liberal hero while simultaneously taking some fall on failed military policies and a collapsing economy before giving him a Jewish mafia-Mossad-style "send-off." Sound far-fetched? Michael Collins Piper explains in Final Judgment how this kind of thing happened once before when JFK got hit by the Mossad and their CIA allies and replaced by arch-Zionist sympathizer VP Lyndon Baines Johnson. Not familiar with Zionist perfidiousness? Here is a good example from "Blacks Run Out of New Orleans" at Judicial-inc.biz What Happened To The Black's Best Friend? For 300 years, Jewish Liberals said: We are always there for our Black brothers. They brought most of them over in their slave ships, they auctioned them off, they started the NAACP, they tormented them with their B'nai B'rith Ku Klux Klan creation, and they were behind the welfare system that disintegrated the black family structure. Now, they gave the Blacks a bus ticket, boxes of MREs, and tenement housing scattered far across the rest of America. [Editor's Note: One might add that after blowing the levees just after Hurricane Katrina passed through to flood out the blacks, they also ran Blacks out using mercenaries, who included Israelis. The real aid to New Orleans has gone to Jewish real estate developers, casino operators, and other business owners. It has also gone to kosher co-tribalists in other disaster areas, such Florida hurricane victims]. Let us hope that in regard to treason, treachery, extreme double-standards, and assassination we really can see change in America. Yes we can!

"Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, Bill Clinton, Lynn Forester de Rothschild & Hillary Clinton" caption from TIU EXCLUSIVE! 100% Proof Hillary Clinton Will Be President!, post by Hei Hu Quan » Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:50 am. [Editor's Note: While it turns out that the author was wrong about Hillary Clinton becoming President, this was hardly a loss for the Rothschilds, since Obama has proven to be every bit as much a creature of the Rothschilds / City of London as the Clintons, as noted in regard to the BP-Gulf and Fukushima catastrophes. The following text is revealing]: "A couple of shows back I mentioned that I had absolute proof that Hillary Clinton is going to be installed as the next President of the U.S. Here is my evidence submitted as promised. The context is a July 3, 2003 soirée held by the Sir Evelyn and Lynn Forester de Rothschild exclusively for Hillary Clinton on their London, UK estate at the Orangery in Kensington Palace. The event was ostensibly billed as "a party to celebrate the launch of Hillary Clinton's new book Hillary". Only when have you ever heard of a party thrown for an ex-president's wife, for writing a goddamn book about herself?! Second to that, there is no record of anything similar being thrown for Barack Obama, however John "insane" McCain was invited to a luncheon on March 20th at the Spencer House, St. James's Place estate of Nathaniel Rothschild. Lynn Forester de Rothschild is also the lead of a 21 direct contributors to her campaign who wrote a letter dated March 26, 2008, to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, warning her to to back off and keep out of the superdelegate fight. The Rothschilds have long been 'Kingmakers' who dictate whom is strategically placed where, and if you check out the absolute turn these candidate (s)elections have taken you can see things in the background moving behind the scenes. This was decided long ago and the president has been already selected for installation for you, no voting necessary." [This illustration and caption also used on the "Chernobyl Nuclear Catastrophe" web page]

 

 

Obama as the Pawn of the Jewish Lobby

 

2009-08-17 Who Is Behind Barack Obama’s Rise to Stardom? by Victor Thorn, American Free Press 2009-06-22 Zionist Lobby Says Obama a Threat to Israel's Survival by Michael Collins Piper 2009-03-19 Freeman’s Fight: The Israel Lobby Gets Its Man—And Tips Its Hand by Philip Weiss "The American Conservative -- -Charles Freeman Jr.’s withdrawal of his acceptance of a high-level intelligence position in the Obama administration was a national-security drama more riveting than an episode of `24.' The moral was clear: even a president who owes his job to a progressive movement in American politics could not support a longtime public servant who had made the mistake of criticizing Israel." 2009-03-18 Israel's American Chattel by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts 2009-02-23 Rothschild Agents Take 10 Key Posts In Administration of Rookie President by Michael Collins Piper 2009-02-16 Zionist Militants Surround America's New President by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts 2009-01-26 Jewish Lobby Gives Obama His Marching Orders by Michael Collins Piper The former chief of staff Rahm Emanuel with a "knuckle-cracker-in-your-face Mr. President" attitude is also seen here "playfully thumbing his nose at his former House colleagues during the inauguration..." 2009-01-26 Obama’s Partisan, Profane Confidant Reins It In, Mark Leibovitch, New York Times. "WASHINGTON — Early this month, Barack Obama was meeting with the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, and other lawmakers when Rahm Emanuel, his chief of staff, began nervously cracking a knuckle. Mr. Obama then turned to complain to Mr. Emanuel about his noisy habit. At which point, Mr. Emanuel held the offending knuckle up to Mr. Obama’s left ear and, like an annoying little brother, snapped off a few special cracks...." 2008-11-24 RAHM EMANUEL: Ardent Zionist called Obama’s ‘Svengali’ by Victor Thorn, AFP ....Emanuel is a rampant warmonger who takes his cues from the neo-cons. In his book The Plan: Big Ideas for America, he wrote, “We need to expand the U.S. Army by 100,000 more troops.” What will America’s next target be under an Obama presidency? Sources close to Emanuel say that he has a “Zionist obsession with Iran.” To get a final idea of what we’re dealing with, consider this quote from U.S. war journalist Pat Dollard: Let me tell you right now, no exaggeration. Rahm Emanuel is the devil. He is . . . a Goebbels, a Mengele, a perfect Cromwell who would, without the faintest evidence of hesitation washing across his face for even a millisecond, order and even personally execute each and every human being he or Obama perceived to be an enemy of the regime. And if you ever personally offended him, and he had the opportunity to kill you, he would probably do it by starting with your children as you were made to watch. He is a bad guy. Some researchers have gone so far as to claim that Emanuel was the notorious “Mega” spy deep inside the Clinton administration who passed top-secret documents about Iran on to the Israeli government, causing a great deal of chaos among the various intelligence agencies. Be very wary of this man. Like the “Prince of Darkness” Richard Perle and Michael Chertoff before him (both of whom hold dual U.S.-Israeli citizenships), it may well be proven that his loyalties rest more with a fabricated little state in the Middle East than they do with us. 2008-11-15 Oh Come, Oh Come, Emanuel by Eric Gliebe. "Rahm Emanuel is a Jewish member of the House of Representatives who votes a documented 98% with the Democrats. His appointment marks a switch in tone for Obama, who promised, if elected, to reach across the isle to Republicans. Emanuel is not one of those guys who like to share power or reach across the isle. Associated Press calls him a man with sharp elbows and a `fiery partisan who doesn't mind breaking glass and hurting feelings.' In fact, he once sent a dead fish to one of his political rivals. After the Republicans blew out the Democrats in the 2002 off-year election, Emanuel publicly named those he considered "traitors" to the party and slammed a steak knife into a table with each name. Yeah -- just the kind of guy to heal wounds and bring us together!" 2008-10-10 An Open Letter to President-Elect Obama by Ralph Nader. "[We must note] your transformation from an articulate defender of Palestinian rights in Chicago before your run for the U.S. Senate to an acolyte, a dittoman for the hard-line AIPAC lobby, which bolsters the militaristic oppression, occupation, blockage, colonization and land-water seizures over the years of the Palestinian peoples and their shrunken territories in the West Bank and Gaza..." 2008-11-09 Rahm Emanuel Is Obama's Favorite Jew to Mock. Hey, lighten up folks, it is only another Jewish conspiracy! 2008-11-09 Journalist Reaches From Grave To Nail Rahm; Excerpts From Archived News Investigations By The Late Sherman H. Skolnick. This article also has a lot of good additional links to other articles about "Rahm-bo." If you accept the premise that the Mossad has been central to such attacks on America as 9/11, the Oklahoma City bombing, and the JFK assassination, and that Rahm is in tight with them, Obama's appointment of this man as White House Chief of Staff is practically a declaration of war against the U.S. Constitution and the American people. The barbarians are truly inside the gates! 2008-11-06 Obama Faced With Security Problem At Outset of Transition Process- Wayne Madsen Report November 6, 2008 - Another oh-so-clever smug and smirking Jewish supremacist who thinks he is at the top of his game, Israel Firster Rahm Emanuel wants to force 18-25 year old Americans to labor for the government "WMR has learned from informed U.S. intelligence sources that prospective Barack Obama White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel has an active FBI counter-intelligence file maintained on him. Emanuel's rise to the Chief of Staff position may pose a significant security problem for President-elect Obama if the FBI insists on conducting the full background security investigation normally required for senior White House officials. Questions about Emanuel's links to the Israeli intelligence service, the Mossad, were allegedly so great that President Bill Clinton was forced to dismiss Emanuel from the White House staff in 1998. One of the FBI agents who discovered Emanuel's dealings with Israeli intelligence was, according to our sources, the late FBI counter-terrorism Assistant Director John O'Neill. O'Neill retired after being set up in a smear operation involving a temporarily stolen brief case in 2001. O'Neill and another FBI agent who still works for the bureau and shall remain nameless at this point to protect him and his career discovered that Emanuel was heavily involved in the decision to place intern Monica Lewinsky close to President Clinton. O'Neill accepted the top security position for Kroll Associates at the World Trade Center. O'Neill was killed in the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center. WMR has also reported that O'Neill was a close friend of slain retired Houston CIA station chief Roland V. `Tony' Carnaby, who was similarly investigating Israeli intelligence operations in the Houston area when Houston police shot and killed him last April. Emanuel reportedly had knowledge of Israeli intelligence penetration of White House communications systems and Lewinsky, in sworn testimony before the Office of Independent Counsel, stated: `He [Clinton] suspected that a foreign embassy [it is now known that embassy was that of Israel] was tapping his telephones, and he proposed cover stories.' Lewinsky continued, `If ever questioned, she should say that the two of them were just friends. If anyone ever asked about their phone sex, she should say that they knew their calls were being monitored all along, and the phone sex was just a put on.' WMR has learned from U.S. intelligence sources that Emanuel was discovered to be part of a political intelligence and blackmail operation directed against Clinton by Israel's Likud Party and Binyamin Netanyahu to sink Clinton's proposed Middle East peace deal. We have also learned that the FBI investigation of Emanuel is part of a file code-named the `Mega file.' `Mega' is a reference to a top-level Mossad agent in the Reagan administration who was said to have run a number of Israeli agents, including U.S. Navy spy Jonathan Pollard." 2008-10-30 Obama: An Enormous Danger to America and the World by Dr. David Duke 2008-10-25 How Mossad Controls Our Political Parties by Chris Bollyn 2008-10-24 New Gallup poll shows 75% of U.S. Jews plan to vote Obama By Haaretz Service 2008-06-05 Son of a Zionist Terrorist: Rahm Emanuel’s Dirty Secret by Christopher Bollyn. This is Obama's pick for White House Chief of Staff 2005-10-20 "The Enforcer" by Joshua Green, Rolling Stone. If Nikita Khruschev banging his shoe at the U.N. turned you on, check out arch-Zionist "Rahmbo" Emanuel attacking a table top with a steak knife.

 

Obama lost without a teleprompter. (1:13) How well does America's "affirmative action/Manchurian candidate" President function without his teleprompter? Watch these gaffes! Also watch Gaffe 1, Gaffe 2, etc on YouTube.

 

Obama as fake-out leftist cover for
dangerous oligarchical-imperialist schemes
and domestic fascist power consolidation

 

2009-03-23 Global Elite Picked Obama Long Before Voters by Tom Fife 2009-02-16 Obama --President of Special Interests by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts 2009-01-26 President Obama's Inner Circle Filled with Elite Globalists by Victor Thorn, American Free Press 2009-01-26 Berlin Speech Exposed Wolf in Sheep's Clothing by Victor Thorn, American Free Press 2008-11-23 Position Paper: Council on Foreign Relations and Tack's Tackle Shop (PDF) By John W. Wallace. How the CFR seeks to abolish America's national sovereignty, and the CFR background of key Obama personnel.

 

Webster Tarpley on Alex Jones Tv:The Manchurian Candidate p1 (10:58) Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5

 

Webster Tarpley is the author of Obama: The Post Modern Coup
and Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography.

 

The Amazon book description for Obama: The Post Modern Coup provides a good overview of Tarpley's views: "Obama is a deeply troubled personality, the megalomaniac front man for a postmodern coup by the intelligence agencies, using fake polls, mobs of swarming adolescents, super-rich contributors, and orchestrated media hysteria to short-circuit normal politics and seize power. Obama comes from the orbit of the Ford Foundation, and has never won public office in a contested election. His guru and controller is Zbigniew Brzezinski, the deranged revanchist and Russia-hater who dominated the catastrophic Carter presidency 30 years ago. All indications are that Brzezinski recruited Obama at Columbia University a quarter century ago. Trilateral Commission co-founder Brzezinski wants a global showdown with Russia and China far more dangerous for the United States than the Bush-Cheney Iraq adventure. Obama's economics are pure Skull & Bones/Chicago school austerity and sacrifice for American working families, all designed to bail out the bankrupt Wall Street elitist financiers who own Obama. Obama's lemming legions and Kool-Aid cult candidacy hearken back to Italy in 1919-1922, and raise the question of postmodern fascism in the United States today. Obama is a recipe for a world tragedy. No American voter can afford to ignore the lessons contained in this book." (About the Author Webster Griffin Tarpley (Massachusetts 1946) is an intelligence expert and historian who has been studying and exposing covert operations for over thirty years. He is the author of George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography (1992) and 9/11 Synthetic Terror (2005). He has appeared on C-SPAN, CNN, Fox News, and many more. --This text refers to the Paperback edition.)

 

How To Brainwash A Nation (8:48) Uploaded on May 13, 2009. YouTube caption "This amazing interview was done back in 1985 with a former KGB agent who was trained in subversion techniques. He explains the 4 basic steps to socially engineering entire generations into thinking and behaving the way those in power want them to. It's shocking because our nation has been transformed in the exact same way, and followed the exact same steps." A friend who supplied the link to this video commented "Isn't it interesting that this former KGB agent is Jewish, and his father was a high-up party official. The Bolshevik Revolution was inspired by the teachings of Karl Marx; the leaders of the revolution were mainly Jewish; and, afterwards, about 85% of executive positions were held by Jews, overseeing the military, finance, propaganda, concentration camps, etc. Only later on did Stalin purge them (along with everyone else, it seems). Obama is backed by and surrounded by Jews in his administration; at least, his top advisors are Jews. Jewish culture is antithetical to our Northern European one & the founding principles of this country."

 

 

America First Books editor comment: Tarpley is a brilliant man, does great research, and puts out a lot of good information to the public. I think that all of his material is well worth considering. (I have a similar attitude towards Alex Jones, incidentally, and I think that Capt Eric May shares my sentiments here). However, my own personal reservation is that Tarpley tends to pull a lot of punches when it comes to drawing Zionist connections. He is certainly no explicit racial nationalist like Dr. William Pierce or Dr. David Duke, or explicit critic of Zionists like Michael Collins Piper and Col Donn de Grand Pre (whose works are carried by America First Books). Although he is willing to draw some connections to Zionists, he tends to do so only very skittishly. For example, although 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA has a lot of excellent research and insights, the book fails to identify what was probably the central role of the Mossad and Israel. I believe strongly that it takes a foreign power whose leaders feel a 3,000+ year old racial hatred of gentiles to mastermind and orchestrate something as utterly diabolical as the "9-11 inside job" (actually "9-11 outside job"). While there were undoubtedly senior members of the Bush administration, U.S. military, CIA, and FBI who were co-opted (witting or unwittingly) by the conspirators, and furthermore while there are always a certain percentage of psychopaths of any race --Jewish or gentile-- at the head of any government agency in any country around the world, I certainly do not think the average American who goes to work for the FBI, CIA, or rises through the ranks of the U.S. military is capable of pulling off this level of treason. Without question, Israel, the Jewish Lobby, and the Mossad exert tremendous influence. Please recall the famous quote by former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas Moorer ""I've never seen a President -- I don't care who he is -- stand up to them [the Israelis]. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn't writing anything down. If the American people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don't have any idea what goes on." Consider also Final Judgment, where Michael Collins Piper provides evidence that the mysterious death of former CIA Director William Colby was a Mossad hit. The book itself focuses on why the Mossad was in all likelihood central to the assassination of JFK. When the Mossad demonstrates that it can murder the President of the United States and former CIA Director on U.S. soil --and then quietly slither away under the cover of Jewish supremacist-controlled national media --that, my little Virginia, is real power. Tarpley does mention that Obama is not only in tight with Zbigniew Brzezinski but also George Soros, who is a major Jewish neo-con trouble-maker. As an example of such trouble-making, please see my co-authored Mid-Summer Alert Update. Also, from a traditional American conservative perspective, Brzezinski is a fellow traveler with Dr. Henry Kissinger, who in turn is a mouthpiece of the Rothschilds and other elite Jewish plutocratic families. Lastly, for those who doubt that certain parts of the the CIA (probably in partnership with the Mossad) has penetrated various state government or nonprofit entities in domestic America such as the Ford Foundation, check out Jesse Ventura's video interview about how he was monitored as Governor of Minnesota by the CIA, to include surveillance by a CIA agent permanently emplanted in a state government upper level management position. As another sampler of CIA-Mossad penetration, please check out Mike Piper's article "Guess Who’s in Charge of Guarding U.S. Nuclear Power & Weapon Sites?"

 

Does Barack Obama Have a Personality Disorder? v1, Uploaded on Oct 2, 2008. YouTube caption: "When you are a victim of a cult of personality, you don't know it until it is too late. DSM-VI `To the extent that people are pathologically narcissistic, they can be controlling, blaming, self-absorbed, intolerant of others' views, unaware of others' needs and of the effects of their behavior on others, and insistent that others see them as they wish to be seen. ambitious and capable, the inability to tolerate setbacks, disagreements or criticism, along with lack of empathy, make it difficult for such individuals to work cooperatively.' Don't be a victim. To learn more: Understanding Obama: The Making of a Fuehrer http://www.faithfreedom.org/obama.html

 

 

Obama as a narcissistic, unrestrained leader

 

2009-09-03 Broun warns of dictatorship 2009-02-04 Dr. Samuel Vaknin on Obama, an update at blueeyeview.blogspot.com. Please scroll a fourth way down web page to his comments framed inside a page outline. "I must confess I was impressed by Sen.Barack Obama from the first time I saw him. At first I was excited to see a black candidate. He looked youthful, spoke well, appeared to be confident - a wholesome presidential package. I was put off soon, not just because of his shallowness but also because there was an air of haughtiness in his demeanor that was unsettling. His posture and his body language were louder than his empty words. Obama's speeches are unlike any political speech we have heard in American history. Never a politician in this land had such quasi `religious' impact on so many people. The fact that Obama is a total incognito with zero accomplishment, makes this inexplicable infatuation alarming...The peace of the world depends on the strength of America, and its weakness translates into the triumph of terrorism and victory of rogue nations. It is no wonder that Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, the Castrists, the Hezbollah, the Hamas, the lawyers of the Guantanamo terrorists and virtually all sworn enemies of America are so thrilled by the prospect of their man in the White House. America is on the verge of destruction. There is no insanity greater than electing a pathological narcissist as president." 2008-11-01 The following interview took place between James Edwards, host of the Political Cesspool, and Bob Griswold, owner of Ready Made Resources, on November 1, 2008. (Archived online with the Republic Broadcasting Network). Bob Griswold: One thing that I don't know that people take into consideration if we think about a Barack presidency, what will he do to immigration? And what will that mean for any future elections in this country if the floodgates to Mexico are opened and around the world. We can see he has his own family of illegal aliens living in this country. Can you imagine what America is going to look in four years from now under a Barack presidency? James Edwards: (Laughter) Hey, you know this show is too late at night, Bob, to really think about that. We have got to go to bed soon, and you know I do not want to have nightmares. But it is going to be very scary. And that is the point I was getting at. I think I mentioned in passing with Jema, and that is if Barack Obama gets elected, God forbid. He could quite possibly have a filibuster-proof majority in Congress. Jema said that it is possible that you may have a couple of defectors, but I just do not see that happening with Obama. Everyone is going to want to please the New Savior. He is going to have a totally complicit media that is going to go along and support his every whim, and because of his race, he is going to be completely protected from any criticism, because of course you know if you criticize him you are a racist. So I tell you, there is nothing to restrain Barack Obama. There is nothing to restrain anything that man would want to do should he be elected, and that is very scary. Griswold: You brought up an interesting point. Being in the business that I am in, I talk to many people all over the country. And so many of them have told me that they have gone to their place of employment --and not that I am going to endorse John McCain-- but they said "I am voting for John McCain," and they are called a racist. The effort to squelch the free speech and thought in this country, that you cannot even disagree with this man without being labeled a racist, which will under his presidency, I believe, be a crime, so that possibly the very fact that you disagree with this man will make you a racist, and racism will become a crime. Edwards: Well, you know to add on to the foundation that you are building there, Bob, an excellent article, if you want to imagine how bad it could be if Obama is in fact elected and the power he might have, read Pat Buchanan's recent article "Obama's First 100 Days." Griswold: I have read it. Edwards: Those are all things he could do theoretically and I just don't see anything to stop him unless he has self-restraint, and he would be the first I have seen with that much power to have it. Griswold: Well he has not shown self-restraint in his life up until this point. He has been given a pass to everything in his life. You know it is an interesting characteristic about this man, as soon as he develops somebody in the news that is not politically correct; Bill Ayers or Rev Wright or Tony Rezko or the list goes on, he is one to throw these people under the bus. He is willing to sacrifice anything to get power. I mean his life long friend, Jeremiah Wright --threw him under the bus. Edwards: Right, right. Griswold: The person who got him into politics to begin with, Bill Ayers --thrown under the bus. Tony Rezko, the man who financed him --throw him under the bus. And that is a concerning trait about this man that he will do whatever it takes to get the power he craves. And with this Messiah mentality and Messiah complex that surrounds him, I really do worry if he is elected whether America can survive even four years of this man. The Federal courts alone. Who will he put in there for Federal judges? I mean, I think he will put in people who will be far left of what Bill Clinton would have appointed. Edwards: Well, Bob, with that being said, and of course I cannot disagree with you... Interestingly enough, Rev Jesse Jackson accused Obama of selling out blacks by "acting white" over the "Jena 6" affair. In a separate incident, Jackson apologized to Obama for "crude comments" that got on the air. According to a news report: "Jackson charged that Obama had been talking down to black people and added: `I want to cut his n_ts out.'" 2008-08-13 "Barack Obama - Narcissist or Merely Narcissistic?" by Sam Vaknin, Phd. A good oveview of Narcissism 101 and Obama.

 

John Pilger - Obama Is A Corporate Marketing Creation.avi (11:39) Australian journalist and documentary maker explains the king of "junk politics"

 

Obama as a new messiah and corporate
marketing creation, using hypnotic technique
and attracting fanatical cult followers

 

 

 

This web page used to link to some YouTube videos that depict Louis Farrakhan calling Obama "the Messiah." They have since been withdrawn off the Internet by his Nation of Islam. Other interesting You Tube videos: Ann Coulter compares Obama to Hitler; also Is Mr. Obama Using Hitler's Tactics on his Followers? and Obama = Hitler. If the comparison of Obama's rhetoric and mannerisms with Hitler's seems very sketchy and far-fetched, consider how the same very powerful and clever "Zionazis" who have handled George W. Bush are now handling Obama. Furthermore, consider how Bush has himself acted in a Hitlerian manner. 9/11 was his Reichstag Fire. His May 2003 "Mission Accomplished" landing on the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln resembled scenes not only from the movie Independence Day, but Leni Reifenstahl's Triumph of the Will. For more in-depth analysis, see the transcript of Frank Whalen's interview of Capt Eric May, 3rd Hour, 23 February 2006, or GeorgeAnn Hughes interview of Capt May, Part II, 19 January 2006, on The Byte Show: Cracking Satan's Code. See also Capt May's article "America Uber Alles" -- Our Nazi Nation." The premise is that America's utterly corrupt Zionist neo-con plutocratic elite is seeking to create a dictatorship, and will use techniques borrowed from any autocratic playbook. Whether it is Communist or Nazi, they do not care as long as it is effective in subjugating America. Captain Eric May has told William Fox, editor of American First books, that he views Obama as essentially Bush in black face, and we can expect all of the same kinds of authoritarian grabs for power --to include repeated attempts at false flag operations. In fact, Obama is more dangerous than Bush, because he is slicker, smarter, and sexier to many people. Take for example "I Got a Crush...On Obama" By Obama Girl that scored 11.8 million web hits by Nov 2008. Or listen to "Obama" sung as a Negro spiritual at the beginning of this video How Obama Got Elected... Interviews With Obama Voters. The cadence "O-bah-mah! O-bah-mah! Oh-bah-mah!" reminds me of "Soma! Soma! Soma!" from Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. In view of the current American social and political context, the "O-Bah-Mah" chant has a primitive, eerie, decadent, and chilling "beauty" to it, analogous (for you photographers out there) to saturated golden-hued landscape colors glowing as the sun sets (symbolizing "golden years" satisfaction just before dying) or that warm wonderful feeling people report in the last phase of hyperthermia (just prior to death --like America today). It is the "jungle" that Dr. William Pierce writes about in his review of The Bonfire of Vanities (see excerpt below) taking over and enveloping us. Remember, "republicanism" and "democracy" originally evolved as rational group decision-making processes that apply to government, just as the "scientific method" is a process for accumulating and interpeting knowledge and finding truth. It is so "Third World" that increasing percentages of Americans now approach these things mostly on "gut."

 

 

 

2009-03-31 Beware the cult of Obama by Gene Healy, SFExaminer. An Examination of Obama’s Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches (pdf) A scholarly white paper of unknow authorship that makes strong arguments. "Obama’s speeches contain the hypnosis techniques of Dr. Milton Erickson, M.D. who developed a form of “conversational” hypnosis that could be hidden in seemingly normal speech and used on patients without their knowledge for therapy purposes. Obama’s speeches intentionally contain: Trance Inductions - Hypnotic Anchoring - Pacing and Leading - Pacing, Distraction and Utilization - Critical Factor Bypass - Stacking Language Patterns - Preprogrammed Response Adaptation - Linking Statements/ Causality Bridges - Secondary Hidden Meanings/Imbedded Suggestions - Emotion Transfer - Non-Dominant Hemisphere Programming.."

 

Obama as a serious threat to the First Amendment
right of freedom of speech and peaceable assembly

 

2009-12-24 America Under Barack Obama, An Interview with Nat Hentoff by John W. Whitehead, "I try to avoid hyperbole, but I think Obama is possibly the most dangerous and destructive president we have ever had." 2009-04-25 Emergency Alert! Don't Give Pedophiles Hate Bill Protection by Rev. Ted Pike 2009-04-24 Pedophiles, But Not Veterans, video posted by Erick Erickson.The Democrats show favoritism to groups outside the realm of common sense. "Congressman Rooney offered an amendment to include veterans as a protected class in hate crimes legislation, but the Democrats voted down the amendment. Here’s Congresswoman Wasserman-Schultz denying that veterans need any protection: The Democrats were, however, more willing to consider extending hate crimes protection to pedophiles. That’s not a punch line. That’s just sick." 2009-04-24 Twisted H.R. 1913 Passes House Committee – Worst Attack on First Amendment Freedoms of Speech, Religion in American History by Rev. Michael Bresciani 2009-04-23 Judiciary Committee greenlights 'hate crimes' Members refuse to protect Christian pastors from charges by Bob Unruh, WorldNetDaily. "Members of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee today rejected an opportunity to protect Christian pastors who preach the biblical condemnation of homosexuality and approved on a 15-12 vote a `hate crimes' bill that supporters admit could be used to bring charges against religious leaders. The bill, H.R. 1913, now will be considered by the full House of Representatives. The committee rejected a number of amendments offered by several members seeking to protect religious liberty, to protect the unborn, to protect against violence by illegal aliens, and to clarify the bill's meanings of `gender identity' and `sexual orientation.' One of the rejected proposals was offered by Rep. Louis Gohmert, R-Texas, who sought to ensure ministers could not be prosecuted for abetting a `hate crime' simply because they preach from the Bible or another religious book." 2009-04-18 Emergency Alert!!! Demand Hate Bill Hearings! by Rev Pike 2009-04-02 Conyers Introducing New Hate Bill! by Rev Ted Pike. "Conyers’ bill will give government the right to enter law enforcement to punish violent hate crimes, punishing `as a principal' those pastors, writers, talk show hosts, etc. whose public speech incites violent hate crimes. It will also empower government to intervene to investigate and punish all non-violent bias crimes against persons or property. The government can do the same for alleged felonies. Its power will massively expand, with corresponding loss of states’ rights in law enforcement. The federal government will be able to nullify verdicts in state hate crime trials; it will force the remaining five US states without hate laws to submit to its statutes; lastly, it will create a federal hate crimes bureaucracy to "prevent" hate crimes in America through education and other means." 2009-03-25 We're All Terrorists Now by Edgar J. Steele 2009-03-18 Preparing for Civil Unrest in America: Legislation to Establish Internment Camps on US Military Bases By Michel Chossudovsky. 2009-02-26 Alert to Congress Regarding Hate Bills and the False Flag Attack Threat by William B. Fox. The hate bill threat is very serious. If we do not stop bills like H.R. 256 and H.R. 262 NOW at the House Judiciary Committee level, the consequences could be horrible. Of course the false flag attack threat is also horrible. Citizens awake! 2009-02-23 Christian Silence Before Hate Bill Threat by Rev Ted Pike. Wake up Christians --this proposed legislation is very dangerous! 2009-02-17 Pro-Lifers at Greater Risk From Hate Laws by Harmony Grant. By the way, "Pro-lifers" are not the only ones in danger. So is everyone else who does not buy into the blank check pro-Zionist, multi-racial, mutli-cultural, neo-Marxist agenda. 2009-02-16 Emergency Alert! Hate Bills Move Forward in House Judiciary. New Video Explains How to Stop Them! by Rev Ted Pike. Call your Congressman and stop H.R. 256 and 262 NOW! Ask him and his staff to watch the "How to Kill the Hate Bills" online video! 2009-02-11 Hate Laws: Rope Around Our Throats by Harmony Grant 2009-01-26 Hate Bill, ENDA Top Obama's Wish List by Rev Ted Pike 2009-01-15 ADL's New `Trojan Horse' Hate Bill by Rev Ted Pike 2009-01-09 Emergency Alert!!! Hate Bill Introduced Into Congress! Rev Pike 2008-11-18 Obama: High Priest of the Religious Left by Harmony Grant 2008-11-17 Obama Declares War on Conservative Talk Radio The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rule in question is called "localism." Radio and television stations are required to serve the interests of their local community as a condition of keeping their broadcast licenses. Obama needs only three votes from the five-member FCC to define localism in such a way that no radio station would dare air any syndicated conservative programming. Localism is one of the rare issues on which Obama himself has been outspoken. On September 20, 2007, Obama submitted a pro-localism written statement to an FCC hearing held at the Chicago headquarters of Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr.'s Operation Push. Furthermore, the Obama transition team knows all about the potential of localism as a means of silencing conservative dissent. The head of the Obama transition team is John Podesta, President and CEO of the Center for American Progress. In 2007, the Center for American Progress issued a report, The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio. This report complained that there was too much conservative talk on the radio because of "the absence of localism in American radio markets" and urged the FCC to "[e]nsure greater local accountability over radio licensing. 2008-11-12 Australia to end Internet Freedom by Rev Ted Pike How could America, ostensibly protected by the First Amendment, also lose free speech on the internet? For starters, Congress could pass ADL's federal hate crimes bill, the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act, this winter. In 1971, Canada enacted ADL's very similar federal hate law. Soon, it was extended to criminalize "hate speech" originating on Canadian websites. Sec. 13.1 of Canada's human rights statute outlaws even such internet speech as is "likely" to cause embarrassment to federally protected groups. If the Obama/ADL hate bill is passed, internet "homophobic hate speech" in evangelical media, as well as in pulpits, will become illegal. The hate bill is ostensibly directed only against violent hate crimes in the States. However, a federal hate bill will quickly overflow such limits, as prosecutors and judges broaden it to protection of the "hurt feelings" of sodomites. 2008-11-05 Obama's Hate Bill Steals God-Given Freedom by Rev Ted Pike. If this goes through, one can kiss goodbye creating any realistic checks on the "human tsunami" of illegal immigration that is already swamping America.

Obama as a serious threat to our
Second Amendment right to bear arms

 

2009-01-26 Obama Fires Opening Salvos in War on Guns by Pat Shannan, American Free Press 2008-10-17 Barack Hussein Obama - A Threat to Our Second Amendment Rights. This blogspot lists every item of gun ownership that Obama has opposed. It is practically everything one can imagine! 2008-09-25 Obama seeks to take down NRA ad "The Obama campaign has written radio stations in Pennsylvania and Ohio, pressing them to refuse to air an ad from the National Rifle Association."

 

 

Obama as a creature of Orwellian,
controlled national media

Obama has very little political experience compared to most white governors, senators, and congressmen. He has very little of substance to say. (Please note section below that deals with this issue). Imagine if a white candidate had tried to make it saying exactly what Obama says? Such a candidate probably would have never made it past Hillary Clinton or most other well-established white liberal candidates. Without question, Obama is America's "affirmative action" president. He has been packaged and sold by major national media slicker than Pepsi, Marlboro, the State of Israel, and the official government versions of the JFK assassination, Oklahoma City, and the 9-11 controlled demolition inside job. All of this raises the important "rabbit hole" question about who really controls national media in America. The following are links that I have also listed at my site map that help answer this question. "Who Rules America" by the National Alliance "Harvest of Shame II" How Bill Moyer's PBS documentary Buying the War exposes America's mainstream media as a Ministry of Lies Operation Mockingbird This Wikipedia article discusses the history of CIA operations to heavily influence domestic U.S. media. See also the article "The CIA's Family Jewels" about 25 years of other illicit domestic activities. Final Judgment explains how the CIA has been largely controlled by Israel and the Mossad and was used in a conspiracy to murder the President of the United States in downtown Dallas in broad daylight. The Judas Goats explains instances of FBI cooperation with Jewish groups to harass American patriots. In my guest editorial for Sgt Skull's Field Manual, I discuss the CIA-Mossad partnership involving the Golden Triangle and Afghanistan drug trades. See also, for example, Prof. Alfred McCoy’s The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade. Hopefully if we can maintain a free Internet most of these kinds of abuses and usurpations will continue to be exposed and fade in the light of truth. This is why it is so vitally important to stay on your elected government officials and demand that they not vote for so-called "hate crime" bills that serve as Trojan horses to steal our free speech rights. Please see the Rev Ted Pike and Harmony Grant archive for the latest information about this threat. Political Journalism Incest Chart from waynemadsenreport.com. "250+ 9/11 'Smoking Guns' Found in the Mainstream Media." This article explains how mainstream media fails miserably in its public responsibility to address basic questions, and instead sweeps them under the rug. Even when it reports important clues to conspiracy, it shows breath-taking willful blindness by failing to assemble the jigsaw puzzle when the resulting picture resembles the Star of David. "Who Owns the Media?" by Takebackthemedia.com "Who Runs the US Media? What you don't know can hurt you." by Alfons with Veterans for 9-11 Truth "Who Runs the Media" from Chapter 19 of My Awakening by Dr. David Duke. Who Controls the British Media? courtesy of natallnews.com. Who Controls the Canadian Media? courtesy of natallnews.com. 2008-11-16 HowObamaGotElected.com Takes A Look At Media Malpractice (video) Exit poll interviews of misinformed American voters show how little they knew, from howobamagotelected.com. 60% did not know what party controls Congress.

According to: "No hand over heart from Obama during national anthem" "Weeks after coming under fire for his refusal to wear an American flag pin, Democratic presidential contender Sen. Barack Obama is again facing questions about his patriotism from some conservative blogs -- this time for apparently failing to put his hand over his heart during a rendition of the national anthem at an Iowa campaign event [on Sept 16, 2008]...Meanwhile, rival Democratic candidates Gov. Bill Richardson (D-AZ) and Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) strike a traditional anthem pose beside him, holding their right hands over their hearts." "Barack Obama Refuses to Salute Flag, Anthem?" by David Emery, About.com, October 30, 2007, claims that Obama is being portrayed unfairly. One emailer posted at About.com called this a replay of the "crotch salute." About.com claims this is unfair on the web page "Obama's Veterans Day / Ft. Hood Non-Salute," stating at the end of the web page "there's a very good reason why President Obama wasn't saluting when the above photo was taken, even though everyone else on the dais was. C-Span video footage reveals that the moment in question occurred just after Obama was introduced and the band began playing "Hail to the Chief." The video also shows Obama saluting during the playing of the National Anthem.

 

Obama's globalist/anti-"America First" orientation

 

2008-11-11 Obama's Foreign Policy: No Sharp Break From Bush by Jim Lobe. Under Obama, America will very likely continue to practice global "bigmanship" rather than repair productive infrastructure on the home front first. "Bigmanship" is an anthropological term describing the behavior of redistributor chiefs of primitive, zero-sum societies who posture and shift wealth to cronies and engage in various forms of conspicuous wealth consumption mainly for the purpose of prestige-enhancement and paternalistic ego gratification. 2008-11-07 Worse Than Bush? by Ted Galen Carpenter. 2007-08 "Renewing American Leadership" by Barack Obama, July/August 2007 Foreign Affairs, published by the Council on Foreign Relations, a subsidiary of the Zionist globalist elite. Obama calls for ever more global bigmanship and foreign entanglements. According to the Wikipedia article about the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations: "Michelle Obama was listed as a director on the Chicago Council website until her husband started gaining more attention during the 2008 Democratic nomination race."

 

 

Obama as a potential false flag operator

 

Israel needs a pretext to expand war in the Middle East. Obama has a strong incentive to accomodate his Zionist handlers and start running false flag terror operations within the first 6-9 months of his presidency. Such operations would not only milk his popularity ratings while they are still relatively high, but also keep potential challengers off balance or under lock down.

Was this cartoon a coded warning to Obama? See 2009-04-09 interview comments below

 

2009-09-05 Alert! Say NO to Mass Swine Flu Vaccinations Until Vaccines Are PROVEN SAFE and NECESSARY! by Maj. William Fox, also archived in the Lone Star Iconoclast. 2009-04-09 The Real Deal. Interview by Dr. Fetzer with Capt. May, Maj. Fox, and SFC Buswell. Capt May thinks it was very strange that Obama and Biden flew separately to Denver on Feb 17th to sign the stimulus bill. Normally this kind of signing is done in the Rose Garden or somewhere else at the White House. Did Obama want to be close to the USNORTHCOM HQ in case it was time for him and Biden to pull another “Cheney in the bunker?” Also, very peculiar, the next day the Zionist-controlled New York Post ran the “Dead Monkey” cartoon. Did Obama draw ire for failing to give the go ahead to administer a false flag stimulus as expected? Capt. May, Maj. Fox, SFC Buswell, and Dr. Fetzer still think that the Chicago Willis Tower (formerly the Sears Tower) remains in the cross hairs, as reflected in their 10 April alert. 2 hrs 5 min, 44.1 MB Download Here 20090410 Chicago's Nuclear Obama — False Flag Unfurled coauthored by Capt Eric May, Maj. William Fox, Dr. James Fetzer, and SFC Donald Buswell. Also archived at the Lone Star Iconoclast. 2009-02-12 The Real Deal. Jim Fetzer interviews Maj. William Fox, who along with Capt May are strenuously trying to second-guess possible future false flag operations, since the most dangerous period of the Obama administration, like the Bush administration, is likely to be within its first nine months through Sept 2009. The interview starts with outline of a possible false flag scenario involving three explosions (two in Israel, a nuke in a U.S. city) addressed in the 14 Feb 2009 Alert Chicago False Flag? — Analysis and Hypothesis — coauthored with Capt. Eric May. Maj Fox and Dr. Fetzer also address dysfunctional macro economic, political, and social policies in America and how they might get fixed. Unfortunately a Revere Radio blurb cuts out where Maj Fox explains the motive for blowing up the Dome of the Rock. The idea is that it would be deliberately designed by the Mossad to appear to be a Muslim false flag operation. This convoluted intrigue would be designed to clear the way towards rebuilding the Temple of Solomon --a major Zionist objective, while blaming the attack on Muslim intriguers out to discredit Zionists. Incidentally, if this were such a far-fetched scenario, why would the Muslim false flag scenario be advocated in an Israeli publication by a Middle East analyst? Also, the 16 Feb 2009 American Free Press article which Maj Fox cites by Mark Glenn originally had the confusing title where it called the burial site of Jesus at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher the birthplace. Maj Fox has since cleared up this confusion by correcting the title in his online posting of this article. This article is significant because Benjamin Netanyahu threatened an attack on this site. This show is also on YouTube in five parts, part one beginning here. Unfortunately Capt. May, who suffers from the late stages of ALS, started suffering from breathing problems and had to bow out of this show before he could speak. 2 hours, 28.2 MB Download Here. 20081223 Chicago Cops Dodge Blagojevich/Sears Tower Investigation by William Fox with Capt Eric May. Also archived at LSI.

 

Jeff & Mike talk: most likely 911 type false flag attack target in 2009.(3:02) Uploaded on Dec 20, 2008. YouTube caption: "Jeff & Mike talk with Captain May, (former Army military intelligence and public affairs officer, as well as a former NBC editorial writer) and Major Fox, about the most likely 911 type false flag attack target in 2009.". (Please see the Capt May or Maj Fox archive for full MP3 download)

 

 

20081211 `Black Bush' Barack? False Flag Frankenstein? coauthored by Capt. Eric May, Maj. William Fox and Dr. James Fetzer. Also archived at The Lone Star Iconoclast. 2008-11-14 Obama Warned of ‘Spectacular’ al-Qaeda Attack During Transition. Please see the archived articles by Capt Eric May and Maj William Fox to understand why we believe most of the "terror warnings" relayed by global media from "Al Qaeda" are really politically motivated contrivances of "Al CIA-Mossad-duh." Among other things, Benazir Bhutto (in a statement shortly before her death) and an alleged Saudi Intelligence spokesman are probably correct that Osama Bin Laden died within a few years following the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. Experts have exposed virtually all the "Bin Laden" tapes in recent years as fakes. A number of sources such as "Afghan article says US Bin-Ladin hunt phoney" by Juan Cole suggest there never was a serious attempt to catch Bin Laden. Staging a second 9-11-type false flag terror strike would provide a perfect excuse for Obama and his New World Order handlers to censor all criticism of the burgeoning neo-Jacobin dictatorship they have in mind for us through Internet lockdown and other draconian measures. 2008-11-09 Bush's False Flag Finale? (A Vigilant Shield Update) coauthored by Major William B. Fox and Captain Eric H. May. "The election of Barack Hussein Obama II would appear to present no obstacle to any planned false flag attack. He has just selected Zionist Rahm Emanuel as his White House Chief of Staff. This is most alarming foreshadowing..."

 

 

Obama as an anti-white leader
of a European-founded nation

2009-01-26 The Obamas' Problem With America: Radical black theology pervades thinking of those close to Democratic chief executive by Victor Thorn, American Free Press 2008-06-27 Baracknophobia by Edgar J. Steele: Obama's mother was White, but you never hear anything about her side of his family. Obama talks only of the African man who conceived Obama while wed to another and then abandoned him. From Obama's first little book, Dreams of My Father: "I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race." Also from Dreams of My Father: "I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites." Google up some recent pictures of Detroit. Google up the FBI web site and track down the statistics on Black on White crime today (50 times as much violent crime from individual Blacks as from individual Whites). Obama was a member of virulent racist, anti-White Rev. Wright's church for 20 years. Wright performed the Obamas' marriage. Only after a public outcry did Obama condemn Rev. Wright's "God damn America" sermon.

 

America's first affirmative action President of the United States! If Obama had been white and continued to say the same kinds of far left things as "Queen Hillary," do you really think the public and New World Order kingmakers would have swung the election his way?

 

Obama threatens to open floodgates
of illegal immigration even wider

2008-10-22 Obama Wants 12 Million Illegals to Get Citizenship David A. Patten 2008-10-28 The Great Obama Swindle of 2008: Obama the Illegal Alien by Raymond Kraft 2008-11-02 AP: Obama Aunt From Kenya living in US illegally by Eileen Sullivan and Elliot Spagat. Please be aware that things can get much worse than granting citizenship to an extra 12 million illegal aliens, on top of the over 30 million Mexicans who have biologically replaced the same number of whites in the last two decades (filling in for white abortions and less than ZPG-level birthrates). If Obama's neo-Marxist buddies have their way, they might try importing a huge share of the in-excess of a billion poor Chinese and poverty-strick people from India. The Chinese have already gained footholds strategically close to America with their control of the Panama Canal and creation of the world's largest port in the Bahamas. People from India have already gained major footholds in American in positions ranging from running hotels and 7-11's to executive positons in Silicon Valley firms. As the graph below shows, from simply considering differential birth rates alone, we still have a huge crisis even if nonwhite immigration is signficantly curtailed. Imagine if Obama's proposed "hate crime" laws get passed, and it becomes illegal to criticize the "human tsunami" bearing down on us, how hopelessly America will get totally swamped. See the articles by Frosty Wooldridge such as the "The Next Added 100 Million Americans."

 

 

Obama increases white miscegenation and dispossession

2008-10-29 Obama’s Family in Pictures by James Buchanan: "Do we really want Barack Obama to ascend to the presidency, knowing that this will send a message to millions of White American girls, that race-mixing is `OK'? Do millions of White parents want to effectively give their White daughters permission to marry a Black man? 80 percent of Obama’s African relatives are Muslims. Obama’s Indonesian step-father was a Muslim, and Barack himself attended a Muslim school in Indonesia for several years. Obama’s home country of Kenya is a desperately poor, backward Third World nation, and there’s a great chance a President Obama would spend billions of dollars in foreign aid on Kenya and throw open the immigration door to millions of his African cousins."

 

 

The Obama Deception HQ Full length version (1:53:40) (Makes many important points, but is light on the Zionist dimension of the "oligarchy;" however, beginning at 18:28 note the Rahm Emanuel and Henry Kissinger clips )

 

 

Obama: somewhere between
"business as usual" and bad change

2009-03-31 Another War Lost? by William S. Lind "Here we see how little `change' the Obama administration really represents. The differences between the neo-liberals and the neocons are few. Both are militant believers in Brave New World, a globalist future in which everyone on earth becomes modern." 2009-03-30 Obama Looks More and More Like Bush by Timothy V. Gatto 2009-03-01 Change for the Worse by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts 2009-01-01 2009 Top-Ten List for Boys Crying Wolf by Edgar J. Steele 2008-11-19 What the Clinton Appointment Means And why we won't see any change in American foreign policy by Justin Raimondo 2008-11@15 The Obama Team: Harbinber of No Change by Joel Skousen 2008-11-14 Torture – Yes We Can? Obama and the national security question: the sellout accelerates by Justin Raimondo. "A recent Wall Street Journal piece describing the transition process as it relates to intelligence-gathering reveals we aren't going to see much change in this vitally important realm, the one in which the Bush administration truly made its blackest mark. This will `create tension within the Democratic party,' we are told, apparently because even the worst party hacks will have a hard time going along with the revised Obama Doctrine on the issue of torture. According to the Journal, Obama's advisors on intelligence matters are `centrists' in the Clinton mold and outright Republicans, who favor torture `with oversight.' These, we are told, are the `pragmatists,' likely candidates for positions in Obama's national security bureaucracy. `He's going to take a very centrist approach to these issues,' avers Roger Cressey, who served as a counter-terrorism official under Clinton as well as Bush II. It's a grotesque commentary on the moral health of the nation when advocacy of torture is considered `centrist.' One shudders to imagine what it means to be right-of-center." 2008-11-17 Does Barack Obama Offer Hope for New Mideast Dynamic? by Jeff Gates, AFP "When he convened his foreign advisory team, he placed pro-Israeli Madeleine Albright at the head of the table. She was secretary of state for President Bill Clinton. When he convened his economic policy team, Lawrence Summers took the lead. Recently forced out as president of Harvard University, former Treasury Secretary Summers handpicked the pro-Israeli advisory team that oversaw the oligarchization of Russia. The largest fraud in history, Mikhail Gorbachev estimated that the financial pillage exceeded $1 trillion. Eight of the top nine oligarchs qualify for Israeli citizenship." 2008-11-10 Conned Again? Obama, Rahm-bo and the End of the New American Century by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts 2008-11-09 Who are the Architects of Economic Collapse? Will an Obama Administration Reverse the Tide? by Dr. Michel Chossudovsky: The October 2008 financial meltdown is not the result of a cyclical economic phenomenon. It is the deliberate result of US government policy instrumented through the Treasury and the US Federal Reserve Board. This is the most serious economic crisis in World history. The "bailout" proposed by the US Treasury does not constitute a "solution" to the crisis. In fact quite the opposite: it is the cause of further collapse. It triggers an unprecedented concentration of wealth, which in turn contributes to widening economic and social inequalities both within and between nations... ...What we are witnessing is continuity. Obama provides a " human face" to the status quo. This human face serves to mislead Americans on the nature of the economic and political process. The neoliberal economic reforms remain intact. The substance of these reforms including the "bailout" of America's largest financial institutions ultimately destroys the real economy, while spearheading entire areas of manufacturing and the services economy into bankruptcy.

 

 

 

 

Editor's note by William B. Fox: I think Dr. Chossudovsky's analysis is brilliant and right on target. To really put things into perspective on the deeper level of economic theory, please see my commentary regarding question 16: "How is real wealth created in American society?" and question 28 "Where should we locate `system risk' in the creation of money and credit?" in my "Have You Been Brainwashed?" series. Please also see my discussion of the vital role of grass roots entrepreneurial calculation and technology-driven manufacturing infrastructure in chapter 4 "Where and How Do We Make Money?" and Chapter 5 "Robo-Political Economy" in my work I Robot Entrepreneur. Also see my historical discussion about how the financial sector has usurped and strangled the once productive American manufacturing sector in the last century in my centralized vs. decentralized discussion in my "Resolving Opposing Political and Economic Ideologies" series. In particular, please note the discussion of Special Privilege: How the Monetary Elite Benefit at Your Expense, by Vincent LoCasio. Also, please peruse the archived works of Dr. Murray Rothbard (for example the classic: "What Has Government Done To Our Money?") as well archived works by other great conservative, pro-free market writers such as Congressman Ron Paul, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Lew Rockwell, Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo, Dr. Ralph Raico,and Dr. Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Last, but not least, an excellent book called Keynes At Harvard: Economic Deception As A Political Credo published by Zygmund Dobbs and the Veritas Foundation in the early 1960's, explains how mainstream economic theory suffered a conspiratorial, central banker-financed coup de etat in American universities in the 1930's. Please also consider our audio archive and check out links in the "High Fraud/High Greed Economy/Financial System" section, such as the YouTube Video The Money Masters. Check out G. Edward Griffin's classic work The Creature From Jekyll Island: A Second Look At the Federal Reserve, which is extremely well-written, just like a great detective novel. After all this reading, you should come to appreciate why early American presidents such as Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson --or for that matter most 19th century populist political movements in America-- were staunch foes of a fiat-money-driven central bank and alternatively strong advocates of a forcefully decentralized monetary system typically based on hard assets such as gold and silver. Just like they preferred an "inefficient" trial by jury system compared to more efficient single judge or tribunal system as a guard against political tyranny, early American leaders also required a heavily regulated, forcefully decentralized financial system to avoid the possibility of the kind of highly consolidated financial power that we suffer under today. Remember, when you empower the financial sector, the financial tail starts to wag the general economic dog. Most economic power should reside within the manufacturing sector in the heartland, and the financial sector (globally headquartered today in places like New York City and the City of London) should be kept deliberately chained down, fragmented, and "inefficient" as a check against economic tyranny. To give the reader an idea about how extremely distorted our economy has become, in his book In Praise of Hard Industries: Why Manufacturing, Not the Information Economy, Is the Key to Future Prosperity, Eamonn Fingleton observes that in a healthy economy, manufacturing should stand at about 33 % of GDP. Today it is below 12% in America. In contrast, the financial sector, which is normally at around 5% of S&P sectors, increased during the 2000 bubble to about 25% of GDP. Thomas Jefferson once said: The central bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the Principles and form of our Constitution. I am an Enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but Coin. If the American People allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered. In contrast to all this, Obama is basically just a "house boy" for the kinds of utterly selfish and greedy financial operators identified by Dr. Chossudovsky. President Thomas Jefferson probably would have considered them full-scale domestic enemies of our republic and tried to figure out Constitutional ways to motivate local sheriffs, militia, Army or Marines to put them all in jail or on bond awaiting trial for well-founded criminal charges by now. In fact, speaking of the U.S. military, we may ultimately be faced with a very unpleasant "kill or be killed" dilemma. In our 9 Oct 2008 "Vigilant Shield and Jokers Gone Wild" alert, we described how the banksters had the bloody nerve to threaten U.S. Congressman with martial law if they did not bail them out of the consequences of their own corrupt and reckless handling of the financial system. ...U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman of California discussed the threat of martial law made to Congressmen during the recent bailout bill debate: “Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against this bill on Monday that the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points the first day and another couple of thousand on the second day, and a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted no. That is what I call fearmongering…" Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under Reagan, told talk show host Alex Jones on 3 Oct that the bailout bill gives economic martial law power to the Treasury. In his article "A Dawning Dictatorship? (911-2B & NSPD-51)" Captain Eric May quotes Oregon Congressman Peter DeFazio: "I just can’t believe they’re going to deny a member of Congress the right of reviewing how they plan to conduct the government of the United States after a significant terrorist attack … Maybe the people who think there’s a conspiracy out there are right." Of course under NSPD-51, a financial emergency can also serve as a trigger, just like a terrorist attack. In other words, if the American people and their elected government representatives do not get law enforcement personnel and the military on their side to face off the banksters, the banksters and pro-Zionist national media tycoons will continue their sneaky, deceitful campaign to set up soldiers and police to violently suppress the people to serve their own special interests at the expense of this country. Get it? Barack Hussein Obama II is likely to do nothing except take orders from these financial parasites and help lead America into even greater ruin. 2008-11-07 Obama: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss blog entry by "Devrim".

 

To Austrian/classical economists, white nationalists, and paleo- conservatives alike this is a grotesque surrealistic nightmare

 

 

Obama as a tragic repeater of FDR's
mistakes that prolonged and deepened
the Great Depression

 

The first important fact to know about the Great Depression is that the Federal Reserve Banking System largely created the conditions for the Depression to begin with. (The Fed itself was created by a very unsavory group of Jewish supremacist financiers and their Morgan and Rockefeller cronies, as documented in G. Edward Griffin's book The Creature from Jekyll Island, Eustace Mullins' The Federal Reserve Conspiracy, and Henry Ford's The International Jew) It doubled the money supply in World War I, and roughly doubled it again during the Roaring 20's, creating massive distortions in the economy. The criminal Fed also increased fractional reserve ratios and approved extremely speculative methods on Wall Street so that fellow Members of the Tribe (MOT) could better profit from insider borrowing privileges and inside information. Then, after massively super-goosing the economy, the Fed took the punch bowl away from the party, and was then able to eliminate weaker independent banks to consolidate its power base while various Members of the Tribe were able to scoop up major American media and industrial assets for pennies on the dollar. Meanwhile, frontmen like Herbert Hoover and FDR cast the blame everywhere except upon the real culprits. (In contrast, Germany found a leader less skitish about naming names). See America's Great Depression by Dr. Murray Rothbard which explains much of this in detail from his anarch-libertarian perspective. Also, in my centralized vs. decentralized discussion, I provide excerpts from Special Privilege: How the Monetary Elite Benefit at Your Expense, by Vincent LoCasio that describe how the Fed did the exact opposite behind the scenes compared to what it was supposed to do when originally sold to Congress in 1913. Lastly, please see my commentary regarding the question: "What is the proper role of the Federal Government (Feds) and central bank (the Federal Reserve or "the Fed") in managing the economy?" as part of my "Have You Been Brainwashed?" quiz. Similarly, major Jewish-controlled Wall Street firms today such as Goldman Sachs and the now defunct Lehman Brothers were major contributors to the Obama campaign. Don't hold your breath that Obama will ever go after the banksters responsible for the reckless lending that led to the aforementioned $700 billion taxpayer bailout. Nor will he likely go after the Wall Street criminals who have created over 500 trillion in derivatives, of which about 80 trillion (about 7 times the size of the U.S. economy) are considered particularly toxic. Billionaire Warren Buffet once referred to these derivatives as "Weapons of Mass Financial Destruction." But don't hold your breath that Obama will ever name names. Instead, like FDR, he will blame everyone except the real culprits. The next important fact to know is that one does not promote real economic recovery by destroying the basis for successful "entrepreneurial calculation," (the latter being a key phrase in "Austrian economics.") And what is this calculation made of? Simple. Just go to any publicly listed company on the Internet and download its Form 10K. This is essentially an outline of its business plan. Most business plans try to explain how a company can offer a product with a superior ratio of perceived value to price to the consumer relative to the competition, and do so with worthwhile profit expectations. In a nutshell, most of FDR's New Deal policies provided disincentives for the normal process of entrepreneurial calculation. The flawed policies vastly increased regulation that increased costs to businesses. They raised taxes and provided enormous disincentives to save and invest in businesses. They set wage and price controls that hampered the ability of the free market to sort out major asset price and labor price distortions. Ultimately, most of FDR's policies were designed to serve as a smoke screen for the exploitive and unAmerican agenda of the Jewish supremacist power elite behind the Fed, Wall Street, Hollywood, and major national media. These policies had very little to do with sound economic realities for the American public at large. It was not accidental either that FDR's administration was lousy with Jewish supremacists and Reds (see for example The Red Network by Elizabeth Dilling, Grand Dame of the 1930's American Right). Given that government workers and politicians are usually horrible at anything to do with real economics compared to the private sector (see for example Why Government Doesn't Work by Harry Browne), why should we surprised that FDR's efforts to greatly expand government at the expense of the private sector had such dismal results? For more in-depth discussion of this viewpoint, please search articles with titles related to "FDR", "Depression," and "Fed" for libertarian economists archived a lewrockwell.com and mises.org such as Lew Rockwell, Dr. Murray Rothbard, Dr. Hans-Herman Hoppe, Dr. Robert Higgs, and Dr. Ralph Raico. In particular, please check out the series "Fascism Comes to America" by Dr. Ralph Raico. Also, I think that Lew Rockwell is particularly talented at writing articles that are brief, clear, and to the point for the layman to understand, such as "Don't Trust the Depression Brain Trust," "Grand Theft Society", "War and Inflation" (Our Enemy the Fed), and "The Frightful Face of Stimulus." Incidentally, Dr. Robert Higgs and other libertarians believe that it is a myth that World War II pulled America out of the Great Depression, or at least in the way that Keynesian economists normally explain it. According to the libertarians, America came out of the Depression in a rear-end backwards way, almost despite itself and its New Deal policies. Wartime inflation, combined with artificially suppressed wages (for example low army pay for millions of G.I.s) finally brought down real wages to a level so that it was now economical to start hiring at full employment. In addition, America's industrial base survived unscathed, whereas much of its foriegn competition got bombed out. Regarding the real economic impact of war vs. peace, please see the lecture "What Thrives and What Dies During War" also archived as an MP3 file by Dr. Mark Thornton to help debunk the Orwellian notion that war is inherently good for the economy. There is one last question that I will address, namely that if government intervention is so horrible, how was it that Hitler's National Socialist policies seemed to be so successful in lifting Germany out of its Depression? According to Dr. Hans Herman-Hoppe in his lecture "The Economic Doctrine of the Nazis" during the Mises Institute Economics of Fascism conference, it is very ironic that in certain key areas Adolf Hitler's program was actually more libertarian than that of FDR! Another part of my answer is that sometimes it is more the men who make the system than the system that makes the men. When a group of patriotic Germans are giving their 100% best efforts to self-finance and help fellow Germans out of poverty and misery, even if a "socialist-bureaucratic" paradigm is generally less efficient than a free enterprise system, it may still work much better than an American New Deal bureaucracy heavily staffed with Members of the Tribe, and furthermore where the government is heavily indebted to international Jewish banksters. A third part of my answer is that much of the German recovery was "artificial" to the extent that it reflected a distorted economy stimulated by government spending geared towards building a war machine, and was not sustainable for peace. However, other government-sponsored programs such as the creation of the Autobahn and the Volkswagen (model VW30 test-driven by the S.S.!) reflected intelligent domestic investment that paid ample economic dividends. A fourth part of my answer is that when certain people (such as Germans, Japanese, and Scandinavian "Labor Party socialists") possess a high level of innate intelligence, discipline, and vigor, they often able to produce satisfactory results from government-driven investment as well as private investment, although the latter is usually always more efficient. A fifth part of my answer is that in extreme circumstances, where the normal social and economic fabric has been badly dislocated and torn, sometimes a helping government presence is certainly better than no presence at all.

 

 

We got your money, We gonna Spend it, We gonna tax you

 

Obama's Liberal-Voodoo Economics

 

2009-04-02 Should We Kill the Fed? by Pat Buchanan. "Obama is repeating the failed policies of Hoover and FDR, by refusing to let prices fall. Obama, with his intervention to prop up housing prices and Bernanke with his gushers of money to bail out bankrupt banks and businesses are creating a new bubble that will burst even more spectacularly." 2009-02-23 How the Economy Was Lost by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts 2009-02-12 How Will Obama's Deficits Be Financed? by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts 2009-02-08 Ship of Fools by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

Barack Obama as a reflection of
white guilt and self-hatred

2009-02-16 Harvard Hates Whites—Does America, Too? by Edmund Connelly 2008-06-27 Baracknophobia by Edgar J. Steele: In an interview, Obama called his mother, "the dominant figure in my formative years …The values she taught me continue to be my touchstone when it comes to how I go about the world of politics." Though Obama sometimes tries to evoke an image of his mother being just a conservative Kansan schoolgirl, the truth is that she was a radical cultural Marxist and dedicated leftist of the first order, one with a predilection for Black men so profound as to belie her own self-hating, anti-White beliefs. Obama's mother's outlook was formed in Mercer Island High School, Bellevue, Washington, which has been described as being "a hotbed of pro-Marxist radical teachers" at the time she attended, one that had a Communist on its Board and several unapologetically-Marxist teachers on staff who advocated rejection of societal norms, rejection of Christianity and the family and assigned readings by Karl Marx. This is the fount from which Obama claims his "touchstone values" flow. There is liberal and then there is Communist, the singular invention of Russian Jew Karl Marx. One is American as apple pie. The other is anti-American in the extreme. Yes, all these years of a so-called "conservative" like George W. Bush makes anybody look attractive. Problem is, Bush was the idiot-child President. Obama, if his "touchstone values" truly are rooted in Communism, could be far worse.

 

 

 

Obama as a highly flawed individual
on many different levels; expect goofy
things from his administration:

 

Video of Air Force Airplane "Photo-Op" That Caused Panic in New York City and Jersey City (1:13). See also the web page Air Force One Backup Flies Low Over Manhattan, Panics Residents, and one individual's interpretation at .Obama Air Force One Flies Low Over Manhattan, Panics People (1:10) with the following caption: "Yesterday a backup of the President Obama's Air Force One plane flew very low over Manhattan and panicked the public. The public were not even told this would happen, so they thought it was going to be another terrorist again. How could anyone authorize this? A spokesperson from the Whitehouse said it was part of a photo op. How stupid is that! President Obama and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who had not been told about the photo op, were both infuriated by the incident. Bloomberg called it `ill-conceived' and a `waste of taxpayers' money.' A White House official told ABC News that President Obama was `furious' when he found out, and the Director of the White House Military Office, Louis Caldera, who approved the photo op, was called into a meeting with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina. `It didn't sound like a fun meeting,' the White House official said."

 

2009-04-27 Air Force One Backup Flies Low Over Manhattan, Panics Residents (Video) One blogger consoled "Tracy" who ran out of her building when the plane approached: Tracy…I am so sorry that you had to go through that again. For the FIRST time I am REALLY ANGRY. I make no apologies about this one. I AM MORE THAN UPSET. I am shaking as I type this. This administrations incompetence and arrogance and narcisissism knows NO BOUNDS! Obama does not have one ounce of repect for AMERICANS that have gone through one of the worst attacks on American soil of our time. Where was the RESPECT and HONOR for that City and its citizens? That skyline should be respected in memorial…NOT USED FOR A STUPID PHOTO OP. No, I believe it goes much further…. NO WORD FROM THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF????????????????? WHAT AN UNMITIGATED ASS AND UN AMERICAN PRETENDER TO OUR PRESIDENCY. HE OWED YOU AN APOLOGY!!!! No, he can APOLOGIZE TO OTHER Nations BUT NOT TO HIS CITIZENS? Freakin unreal. ANYONE…ANYONE…ANYONE FREAKIN ONE, THAT IT NOT OUTRAGED BY THIS SHOULD SERIOUSLY QUESTION THEIR SANITY. By Kelly In Texas on 04/28/2009 11:07 am 2009-03-27 Barack Obama in His Own Words (Part I of III) by Robert Henderson, Special to American Renaissance News: "This appraisal of Mr. Obama’s character is based on his two books, Dreams From My Father (DMF) and The Audacity of Hope (AOH). The advantage of relying on these sources is that they are not only Mr. Obama’s own words but his considered words. He cannot claim that were written hastily and without reflection... If we assume that genes play a strong role in determining character, what can we learn from Mr. Obama’s ancestry? Apart from the fact that he got himself an education, Mr. Obama’s father’s behavior matches the modern stereotype of the black man. He goes from one woman to another breeding incontinently, and this explains why Mr. Obama has so many half-brothers and half-sisters. He leaves Mr. Obama’s mother when Barack is still a toddler and then reappears rarely in the boy’s life. From Mr. Obama’s account, he provided his mother with no money whatsoever, and back in Africa he variously abandoned and neglected his other women and children. He became a drunk and ruined his job prospects by recklessly insulting influential people. Here is Mr. Obama’s account of his half-sister Auma describing his father’s behavior towards members of the Kenyan elite: “When he was passed up for a promotion, he complained loudly. ‘How can you be my senior,’ he would say to one of the ministers, ‘and yet I am teaching you how to do your job properly?’” (DMF p. 215.) Mr. Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, a white woman from middle America, marries first an African then an Indonesian, but neither marriage lasts. For someone of her background to marry one person of a different race and culture might be put down to love; marrying two looks like a political statement. She takes Mr. Obama to Indonesia then sends him back to the USA—Hawaii—after several years to live with his mother’s parents. Eventually she returns to the USA and takes an anthropology degree, during which time Mr. Obama lives with her. After she finishes her degree, she leaves Mr. Obama once more with her parents while she goes abroad for anthropological fieldwork. Mr. Obama’s description of his mother makes her sound like a Margaret Mead anthropological naïf, forever searching for the right approach to non-white, non-American people while ironically insisting most of the time that Mr. Obama be brought up as an American. Mr. Obama describes her attitude towards blacks: Every black man was Thurgood Marshall or Sidney Poitier; every black woman Fannie Lou Hamer or Lena Horne. To be black was to be the beneficiary of a great inheritance, a special destiny, glorious burdens that only we were strong enough to bear. Burdens we were to carry with style. More than once, my mother would point out, “Harry Belafonte is the best-looking man on the planet.” (DMF p. 51.) It is clear that Mr. Obama’s parents were unusually selfish and egotistical, far more concerned with satisfying their own wants than caring for others, even their children. Mr. Obama’s description of their personalities, both through his own presumed recollection and that of others, paints a picture of reckless self-absorption. As for his grandparents, if Mr. Obama is to be believed, his grandfather was a restless, undisciplined man who never made a success of anything, flitting from place to place and job to job until he finally settled in Hawaii. His grandmother, despite Mr. Obama’s attempt to paint her as a feminist trailblazer as the first female vice-president of a local Hawaiian bank, comes across as curiously colorless for someone Mr. Obama claims loomed very large in his emotional life...: 2008-10-27 Fifty Reasons to Vote Against Barack Obama: 50-26 Paul Ibrahim, Reasons 2008-10-27 Fifty Reasons to Vote Against Barack Obama: 25-1 Paul Ibrahim, Reasons

 

Obama as one of America's most leftist politicians

 

Obama chums it up with gay hero Kameny

2009-07-01 Obama Says Foes of Homosexuality Hold to ‘Worn Arguments and Old Attitudes’ "That’s how President Obama describes the thinking of millions upon millions of Americans who oppose homosexual behavior [watch his elitist “gay pride” speech HERE.] At a recent Oval Office ceremony, President Obama shakes the hand of Frank Kameny — a hero to homosexual activists but a bigoted extremist to pro-family activists on the receiving end of his intemperate letters. Kameny smears Christian conservatives as “Christianofascists” and says “gay is godly,” even though he’s an atheist. (Kameny also wrote AFTAH that bestiality is OK “as long as the animal doesn’t mind.”) Christians, Jews, Muslims, and all moral-minded Americans must resist Obama’s use of the bully pulpit to undermine timeless truths by advancing the `gay' agenda of turning aberrant and unhealthy sex and gender confusion into `civil rights."” 2009-02-15 Obama warned over ‘welfare spendathon’ The new administration's economic stimulus plan may undo reforms that cut the dole queues, critics say, by Tony Allen-Mills, (London) Sunday Times. 2009-01-26 Obama's Connection to Terrorist Disturbing by Victor Thorn, American Free Press 2008-11-02 Audio: Obama Tells SF Chronicle He Will Bankrupt Coal Industry by P. J. Gladnick. Guess what audio interview segment from a 17 Jan 2008 San Francisco Chronicle got suppressed until just right before the election? Forget about strong scientific evidence that sunspot cycles are the key factor behind global warming and cooling cycles (in fact a number of scientists claim we are now heading towards a mini-ice age). Also, forget about the fact that coal is one of America's greatest energy/natural resource assets. Obama has got all the answers for the coal mining industry --wipe it out! Here is what our aspiring Maximum Commissar had to say: Let me sort of describe my overall policy. What I've said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else's out there. I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year. So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted. That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches. The only thing I've said with respect to coal, I haven't been some coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off the table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it. So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It's just that it will bankrupt them. 2008-10-28 Obama's First 100 Days by Patrick J. Buchanan What does the triumvirate of Obama-Pelosi-Reid offer? Rep. Barney Frank is calling for new tax hikes on the most successful and a 25 percent across-the-board slash in national defense. Sen. John Kerry is talking up new and massive federal spending, a la FDR's New Deal. Specifically, we can almost surely expect: -- Swift amnesty for 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens and a drive to make them citizens and register them, as in the Bill Clinton years. This will mean that Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico and Arizona will soon move out of reach for GOP presidential candidates, as has California. -- Border security will go on the backburner, and America will have a virtual open border with a Mexico of 110 million. -- Taxes will be raised on the top 5 percent of wage-earners, who now carry 60 percent of the U.S. income tax burden, and tens of millions of checks will be sent out to the 40 percent of wage-earners who pay no federal income tax. Like the man said, redistribute the wealth, spread it around. -- Social Security taxes will be raised on the most successful among us, and capital gains taxes will be raised from 15 percent to 20 percent. The Bush tax cuts will be repealed, and death taxes reimposed. -- Two or three more liberal activists of the Ruth Bader Ginsberg-John Paul Stevens stripe will be named to the Supreme Court. U.S. district and appellate courts will be stacked with "progressives." -- Special protections for homosexuals will be written into all civil rights laws, and gays and lesbians in the military will be invited to come out of the closet. "Don't ask, don't tell" will be dead. -- The homosexual marriages that state judges have forced California, Massachusetts and Connecticut to recognize, an Obama Congress or Obama court will require all 50 states to recognize. -- A "Freedom of Choice Act" nullifying all state restrictions on abortions will be enacted. America will become the most pro-abortion nation on earth. -- Affirmative action -- hiring and promotions based on race, sex and sexual orientation until specified quotas are reached will be rigorously enforced throughout the U.S. government and private sector. -- Universal health insurance will be enacted, covering legal and illegal immigrants, providing another powerful magnet for the world to come to America, if necessary by breaching her borders. -- A federal bailout of states and municipalities to keep state and local governments spending up could come in December or early next year. -- The first trillion-dollar deficit will be run in the first year of an Obama presidency. It will be the first of many. Welcome to Obamaland! According to the following Sept 8, 2008 blog entry: Quote: National Journal is out with its ratings of the votes of the members of the Senate, and it has found that the most liberal senator in 2007 was Barack Obama. http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/01/31/politics/horserace/entry377545 1.shtml [Vice Presidential Candidate] Joe Biden ranked the third most liberal Senator. http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/ This is not a moderate ticket, not a dig in and get some bipartisan work done. It's a fringe ticket from the left, and will only further polarize the nation...Obama Record May Be Gold Mine For Critics; Eight Years As State Senator Were Full Of Controversial Votes, Including Abortion And Gun Control. Obama voted against requiring medical care for aborted fetuses who survive. (Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, Obama votes No. LINK Obama argued the legislation threatened a woman's right to abortion by defining the fetus as a child. (The child had to have been already born, and alive) "It would essentially bar abortions because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this was a child then this would be an anti-abortion statute," Obama said in the Senate's debate in March 2001. Obama may also find himself fielding questions about his actions outside public office, from his acknowledgment of cocaine use in his youth to a more recent land purchase from a political supporter who is facing charges in an unrelated kickback scheme involving investment firms seeking state business. Obama's Connection With an Accused Political Fixer Tony Rezco Raises Questions Obama was known in the Illinois Capitol as a consistently liberal senator. He had a 100 percent rating from the Illinois Planned Parenthood. Obama regularly supported gun-control measures, including a ban on semiautomatic "assault weapons" and a limit on handgun purchases... He also opposed letting people use a self-defense argument if charged with violating local handgun bans by using weapons in their homes. The bill was a reaction to a Chicago-area man who, after shooting an intruder, was charged with a handgun violation. Obama occasionally supported higher taxes, joining other Democrats in pushing to raise more than 300 taxes. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/17/politics/main2369157.shtml Quote: Obama voiced support for the DC Gun Ban on handguns, which is scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court next month. (The Supreme Court struck down this gun ban as an Unconstitutional infringement on the individuals right to bear arms, however Obama saw it differently.) “The city of Chicago has gun laws, so does Washington, DC, The notion that somehow local jurisdictions can’t initiate gun safety laws to deal with gang bangers and random shootings on the street isn’t born out by our Constitution” Obama said. http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/02/15/obama-says-us-must-end-gun-vio lence-after-campus-shooting-in-home-state/comment-page-2/ The DC gun ban Obama supported, banned all guns including handguns, forbid their sale, and required previously owned firearms to be unloaded and disassembled inside homes. Proving once more this is not a moderate ticket. Many political observers are concerned that the Obama regime will make another run --just like the Clintonistas in the early 1990s-- at infiltrating the U.S. military with open homosexuals. William S. Lind commented: "President Obama's first national security test will in fact be a test of his honesty. Will he govern as the centrist he presented himself as being during the campaign? If so, he will allow present policies on women and gays in the military to remain in place. Or, will he reveal himself as a cultural Marxist who deceived the American public in order to get elected and will govern from the left, not the center? If so, we will witness many experiments against reality, with the U.S. armed forces early victims."

 

Exclusive Dr. Jerome Corsi, Obama "the greatest deception in American History"!!, (33:32) Published on Mar 23, 2012. YouTube caption: Appearing on Liberty Talk Radio, Dr. Jerome Corsi explains his latest article on wnd.com "Postman: Ayers family put 'foreigner' Obama through school" How Postman Allen Hulton came to know President Obama as the foreign exchange student the Ayers family put through college. Jerome also discusses the current investigation conducted by Sheriff Joe Arpaio, what information we could be seeing next, and how President Obama is the greatest deception in American History. http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/postman-ayers-family-put-foreigner-obama-through-school/?cat_orig=us"

NEED FOR CHANGE AREAS CENSORED

"Censored" satire of baby Obama in native African environment
Perhaps even more significant than the Kenyan birth certificate
is his documented Indonesian citizenship while in elementary school.

Barack Obama's highly questionable background

See discussion about why Obama flunks the Constitutional requirement as a "natural born citizenship" at theobamafile.com. "For each presidential candidate, they can put the factual history of their birth in the equation and see if they fit the bill to be president of the U.S. (POTUS) under the Constitution of the United States of America, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, and the 14th Amendment, Section 1, and the relevant federal law under U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939). As you can clearly see, Obama is a citizen of the United States, but he's not a `natural born citizen' of the United States, and, as such, is not eligible for POTUS, because his father, a Kenyan, was not a U. S. citizen." For the most complete, up-to-date discussion of Barry Soetero (AKA Obama, or whatever), please see obamacrimes.com run by Attorney Phil J. Berg. Based on his research to date (this update made 24 Aug 2010) Berg maintains the following: * The United States Constitution mandates the President of the United States must be a United States “natural born” Citizen – Article II, Section I; * Obama was born in Mombasa, in what is now Kenya, Africa; * Obama’s legal name is Barry Soetoro; * Obama is an Indonesian Citizen as he was adopted/acknowledged by his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian Citizen; and * The Healthcare bill (ObamaCare) signed into Law by Obama on March 23, 2010 is unconstitutional and voidable since he is ineligible to serve as President of the United States. Obama is literally America's first illegal alien president, a complete imposter, and should be impeached immediately. He is a living testament to how most Americans are being cruelly deceived by their controlled national media most of the time. 2011-03-30 Obama is a illegal alien using deceased Thomas Woods social security number. SSN 042-68-4425 was stolen by Obama, biglicknews.blogspot.com. [Rense.com] 2011-03-17 Another look at Obama's Social Security number by Jack Cashill, wnd.com. [Rense.com] 2009-10-19 Frank Davis & the Obama Paternity Controversy by Victor Thorn, AFP. "Has the Obama birth certificate debate been a deliberate distraction to divert attention away from an even more crucial issue—the identity of his real father? In a September 26 interview, journalist and Illinois senatorial candidate Andy Martin theorized that communist poet Frank Marshall Davis may actually be the man who sired Obama, and that this pivotal event is the foundation for his later meteoric rise in politics." Frank Davis was likely an FBI informer, and his son Barack Obama has likely been a CIA asset. 2008-11-10 Dismissal of Suit Against Obama Proves Nothing by Pat Shannon, AFP 2008-11-06 Comrade Barack Obama is Not America's Next President by Devvy Kidd 2008-11-03 Barack Obama Born in Kenya: Case Breaking Open: Audiotapes of Barack Obama’s Grandmother finally become available. "Philadelphia attorney Philip J. Berg has recently released audio of Obama’s grandmother saying that Barack Obama was born in Kenya." 2008-10-28 The Great Obama Swindle of 2008 Raymond Kraft

 

The Court Case - Obama's Eligibilty in Question (9:10) Uploaded on Sep 28, 2009 http://www.darkconspiracies.com, Listen as Philip J. Berg; attorney explains the Obama eligibility case that he is spearheading. Many interesting facts are uncovered and examined.

 

 

Notes from the video above, posted to YouTube 12 Oct 2008: Introductory Titles: "On 21 Aug 2008 Phil Berg filed a lawsuit against Barack Obama claiming he was not qualified to become President of the United States because he is not a natural born citizen. The case requires Obama to present birth documents proving otherwise. Senator Obama has not complied." Phil Berg: "...Obama cannot produce a birth certificate, because the birth certificate he would produce [from actually having been born in Kenya] would indicate that he is not a natural born citizen of the United States...It does not matter if he was born in Hawaii or not [according to Obama's story], because if he was born here, he lost his natural-born citizenship. How do you lose your United States citizenship? Well what happened is Obama's mother divorced the father. After that she remarried. She remarried Lolo Soetoro from Indonesia. They got married here in the United States. In his book, Obama states "My stepfather went back to Indonesia before I did, and when I got there, I went immediately to school there." And he spent four years in school. Significant at that time was Indonesia was at war. The only people who could go to school in Indonesia were people that were citizens of Indonesia. So therefore his stepfather had to do one of two things to get him to school. He had to adopt him, or he had to acknowledge him. If he did either one, that is how he went to school. Now we have records --it is on my web site-- we have the school record, indicating his name is Barry Soetoro, his nationality is Indonesia, and his religion is Islam. That is how he went to school there. Indonesia at that time did not provide for dual citizenships. So he was now a citizen of Indonesia. The only thing he could have done at that time when he came back, he could have gone through immigration to come back to the United States. We don't believe he did that. If he did do that, then he would be a naturalized citizen at that point, not natural born any more, even if he was natural born in the first instance, therefore a naturalized citizen is not natural born, and cannot be President of the United States... Not only is Obama trying to dismiss this case under legal technicalities, which are proper, but also it is an outrage that the Democratic National Committee has joined in with Obama in these motions. Why is it an outrage? Because the Democrat National Committee has a different role. I believe they have a role to all Democracts in this country, and all citizens in this country, to make sure that they put forth qualified candidates. And when this law suit was filed, if they did not know about it before, they knew about it when they were served, and I feel they had an obligation to go to Obama and say "produce credentials to us, and if you cannot produce them to us --" they should have taken the next step and removed them from the ballot and they can substitute a candidate for president. So to join together with Obama, to hide from the public facts which should be presented is a disgrace..[on the flip side, contending Republican candidate John McCain, who was born in the Canal Zone, immediately released his birth certificate]..on the other hand you have Obama, who has refused to release any records. And in my Federal court case, he is hiding behind legalisms, which although proper, it is a disgrace because I think the people in the United States deserve to know where you were born, where you are a citizen from, and what is going on, why are you hiding your background... I think he is a fraud and he doesn't have these documents to produce. Obama has also refused to release his medical records, his records from college, Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard Law School. This is significant because these documents might say where he is really a citizen from. Many of us would release this information to future employers, and we as citizens are going to employ Obama or McCain as President of the United States...My question to Barack Obama is this, if you are a natural born citizen, what are you hiding?

 

 

 

From 23 Feb 2009 American Free Press

2008-11 Barack's Dangerous Blackmailability by John de Nugent: Here is the evidence, the terrifying truth, behind my radio ad called "BARACK'S DANGEROUS BLACKMAILABILITY" First, this: The Jewish psychopaths want ONLY blackmailable puppet candidates for president. A "Mister Clean," especially one with charisma, leadership and organizational ability, would have to be eliminated. Information coming out suggests that the actual father of Barack (it is hard to call him "Obama" after you read the below) was the black communist Franklin Marshall Davis, whom Barack physically strongly resembles. However, a deal was perhaps cut where another black, the African Barack Obama (now called "Obama, Senior"), claimed paternity of Barack, perhaps so he could stay in America. (He married the pregnant Ann Dunham in 1961 and left her in 1963.) Worse, Stanley Ann Dunham apparently engaged in many ménages à trois with Davis and his white socialite wife. Someone at least took the nude photos seen further below. I have no desire to dash the soaring hopes of blacks about finally getting a "black president," but due to his extreme blackmailability Barack will have to be a total slave to the Jewish masters of the media, finance and politics. Unlike the truly great Marcus Garvey of the 1920s, who wanted blacks to go "back to Africa," and found millions of black and white supporters until J. Edgar Hoover, doing the Jews' bidding, railroaded him into prison, Barack will HAVE to pursue black-white "integration" to the harm of both races. How else can one explain that Barack has spoken to the National Council of La Raza, the Mexican immigrant organization, promising them he will legalize 40 MILION ILLEGAL HISPANICS. These Mexicans are taking unskilled jobs -- gardening, maids, babysitters, janitors, etc. -- that blacks have had for 400 years! If the Jewish psychopaths order Barack to attack Iran and start WWIII, either he obeys or they pull the plug not only on his presidency but even on his US citizenship! Technically, the man may actually be an illegal alien himself!

 

 

Sample censored photo of Obama's mother, allegedly involved in inter-racial ménages à trois at the time with Obama's real father.

Franklin Marshall Davis. Believed to have been a porn writer, poet, communist, and possible FBI informant. Many also believe that Davis is the real biological father of Obama.

 

 

The Communist Manifesto calls for "free love." Very permissive attitudes towards ménages à trois and porn writing would seem to fit the orientation of "Bohemian Reds" (as opposed to ferocious Stalinists, Trotskyites, or some other very authoritarian or militant variety). Part of Karl Marx's logic was as follows: since all humans (all featherless bi-peds found anywhere on the planet) are theoretically literally equal, preserving family, tribal, national, and racial lines through carefully thought-out marriages does not matter. Eugenic mating allegedly does not matter either. Furthermore, one can depend on a "collective" like a village to raise the illegitimate offspring of wild liaisons rather than a traditional family unit. Please note that the Rothschild dynasty, which helped finance the mostly Jewish-led Bolshevik movement, has practiced the extreme opposite of "free love" for itself with well-planned marriages that preserve Jewish ethnic-genetic interests and private estate wealth. Apparently they hope that through "free love" the goyim (gentiles) will recklessly invest or dissipate their DNA while conversely the self-chosen can continue to use greater selectivity to make their own gene pool more competitive over time.

"I approve this political message"?
Che Guevara displayed in an Obama campaign office!

Uncensored photo of a thoroughly race-mixed family. Ann Dunham’s second husband was Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian, with whom she bore a half-breed daughter, Maya Kassandra Soetoro. Why would Barack Obama have any reservations about making the entire U.S. just as mixed?

Cruisin' with Larry Sinclair? In a speech before the National Press Club, in a YouTube clip, and in his Jeff Rense interview, Larry Sinclair charged that he took cocaine and had oral sex with Illinois state representative Barack Obama in a limo between 3-8 Nov 1999. He has also linked Obama to the murder of alleged gay lover Donald Young, former choir master at Obama's church. Barack Obama admitted to teenage drug use in his 1995 autobiography called, Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance (David Dees satiric art, not an actual photograph).

 

Obama surrounded by other radical leftists

Michael Savage Imitates and Rips 'Big Sis' Janet Napolitano - January 7, 2010 (1:10)

 

 

Arch-neoconservative Michael Savage (born Michael Alan Wiener, in a Jewish family ) attacks Janet Napolitano, Director of the Department of Homeland Security (strong evidence of Jewish ties, if not ancestry, also her real sexual orientation is a widespread topic of speculation) because of the DHS list of suspected "terrorists" which includes what Savage views as loyal, patriotic Americans. He also thinks Obama & Co. may try to pull off another "Reichstag Fire." (See also Capt. May and Maj. Fox discussion of the serious danger of a potential false flag operation above). Savage states: "I have studied revolutions before. We have a revolution in this country. Obama is a revolutionary. He has appointed one radical left winger after another, in one department after another, and in one legal position after another..." 2009-04-16 "Republicans criticize report on right-wing groups" by Eileen Sullivan, AP "WASHINGTON — Republicans on Wednesday said a Homeland Security Department intelligence assessment unfairly characterizes military veterans as right-wing extremists. House Republican leader John Boehner described the report as offensive and called on the agency to apologize to veterans. The agency's intelligence assessment, sent to law enforcement officials last week, warns that right-wing extremists could use the bad state of the U.S. economy and the election of the country's first black president to recruit members. The assessment also said that returning military veterans who have difficulties assimilating back into their home communities could be susceptible to extremist recruiters or might engage in lone acts of violence. `To characterize men and women returning home after defending our country as potential terrorists is offensive and unacceptable,' said Boehner, R-Ohio." 2009-04-15 "Napolitano Stands Behind Extremism Report" (Washington Times) "...She stands by the report sent to law enforcement that lists veterans as a terrorist risk to the U.S. and defines `rightwing extremism” as including groups opposed to abortion and immigration.'

 

 

Obama as the triumph of style over substance 2008-11-06 No He Can't A black libertarian lady explains why the Obama phenomenon is all about modern liberal "feel good" politics and little else. 2008 Obamanable Showman by H. Millard Obama as a product of the totally corrupt Chicago political machine 2009001-26 Chicago Shakedown: How Close Is Obama? by Victor Thorn, American Free Press 2008-10-07 The Real Obama by black Stanford fellow Dr. Thomas Sowell. " The story of Obama's political career is not a pretty story. He won his first political victory by being the only candidate on the ballot-- after hiring someone skilled at disqualifying the signers of opposing candidates' petitions, on whatever technicality he could come up with. Despite his words today about `change' and `cleaning up the mess in Washington,' Obama was not on the side of reformers who were trying to change the status quo of corrupt, machine politics in Chicago and clean up the mess there. Obama came out in favor of the Daley machine and against reform candidates. Senator Obama is running on an image that is directly the opposite of what he has been doing for two decades. His escapes from his past have been as remarkable as the great escapes of Houdini."

 

Obama's Marxist-socialist tendencies

2009-08-21 Voight: Is Obama creating a civil war in America? "Be outraged, [Academy Award-winning Actor Jon] Voight advises. `Do not let the Obama administration fool you with all their cunning Alinsky methods. And if you don’t know what that method is, I implore you to get the book Rules for Radicals, by Saul Alinsky . Mr. Obama is very well trained in these methods,' he continues, citing a television campaign critical of the Republican Party and contentious town-hall meetings about health care reform. `The real truth is that the Obama administration is professional at bullying, as we have witnessed with ACORN at work during the presidential campaign. It seems to me they are sending down their bullies to create fist fights among average American citizens who don’t want a government-run health care plan forced upon them,' Mr. Voight says. `So I ask again. Is President Obama creating a civil war in our own country?'” 2009-04-27 American Capitalism Gone with a Whimper by Stanislav Mishkin. "...Then came Barack Obama's command that GM's (General Motor) president step down from leadership of his company. That is correct, dear reader, in the land of "pure" free markets, the American president now has the power, the self given power, to fire CEOs and we can assume other employees of private companies, at will..." 2009-04-05 How Freedom Was Lost by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts. "[The] first step in the enserfment of the American people was taken in envy. The rich were the targets of the income tax. Once in place, the income tax was extended by law and by inflation until ordinary people were being taxed at rates several times as high as the original top rate for the rich." 2009-03-19 House adopts plan for 'volunteer' corps Also requires new evaluation of 'mandatory' service for all by Bob Unruh. Also known as the "Obama Brigade," or the "Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act" or just H.R. 1388. "Many, however, are raising concerns that the program, which is intended to include 250,000 `volunteers,' is the beginning of what President Obama called his `National Civilian Security Force' in a a speech last year in which he urged creating an organization as big and well-funded as the U.S. military. He has declined since then to elaborate." Communism is all about central planning, and the creation of government-directed industrial armies is specifically mentioned in the Communist Manifesto. Regimented social service operations are similar in concept. 2008-11-11 Are We There Yet, Are We There Yet? Let's Check Marx and Engels's List by Robert Higgs. Unfortunately many Americans have already been heavily conditioned to accept the philosophical underpinnings of Marxism. They are inclined to blindly follow the Obama Pied Piper. 2008 The Great Slave Revolt of 2008 by H. Millard 2008-20-21 Obama’s Wealth Redistribution “Tragedy” By James Edwards 2008-10-28 Obama Would Raise Taxes Starting at $6,100 by James Buchanan

 

Obama & handlers steal white sovereignty rights

 

The term "sovereignty," in the abstract, means the capacity of a people to determine their own destiny. People who enjoy full sovereignty rights are able to maximize their ability to live in their own nation, with their own values, run by their own people (the ones most likely to promote their long term welfare and prosperity), with an indigenous culture that helps them to rise to their highest level of achievement. People who lack sovereignty rights are typically subjugated and oppressed by an alien, dominant power. They stand a much greater chance of living lives of frustration and degradation, and even getting marginalized into extinction (or to put it more bluntly, getting "genocided.") . See for example, "Are We The Kurds of the Future?" by Kevin Strom. See also my commentary for question 20 "Why should a society have the right to determine it's own destiny?" in my "Have You Been Brainwashed?" quiz. Please note how I discuss the McKinsey 7-S model (conceptually applicable to the survival and success of nations as well as small companies), and how the elements that promote sovereignty are both intangible (for example shared culture, history, race and ethnicity, and superordinate goals) and tangible (for example right to tax, make treaty alliances with other powers, control financial system, maintain armed forces and make war, control borders, form ones own government, and select own people to control strategic bases of the society such as media, banking, military, and industry). Barack Hussein Obama II has voiced support for black nationalist goals while a twenty plus year member of Rev Wright's "God damn America" black church. While as an "international nationalist" I think it is perfectly healthy for blacks to support black nationalism, I have serious problems with someone promoting such goals as President of the United States at the expense of whites. It would be much more appropriate for Obama to run for president of Kenya, Nigeria, or the Congo where his ethnic genetic interests would be much more closely aligned with those of the host population. Worse, just as affirmative action is in actuality a theft of the white right to meritocracy and the basic right to enjoy opportunities proportional to talent and hard work, Obama's occupancy of the White House steals from whites many of their most important sovereignty tools required to control their own destiny. One of the most basic axioms of Right Wing 101 is that the closer people tend to be towards each other in race and ethnicity, the greater the odds that they will have a mutualist/altruistic relationship, and conversely, the greater the ethnic-genetic distance, the greater the risk that a parasitic or predatory relationship will eventually develop. This is one reason why it is much safer for people to have individuals of their own racial and ethnic group manning the strategic bases of power over them. Obama robs white Americans of their right to a white leader that defends white priorities and white values. In fact, he openly and actively supports Jewish control of national media, banking, and American foreign policy at the expense of white American interests. He certainly does not promote or even defend indigenous European culture and indigenous Indo-European religion. Instead, he has been closely associated with both the Muslim and Christian religions at different times in his life, both of which are universalistic, left wing religions developed by alien Semitic peoples. Please see my further discussion of this issue in my mutualism vs. parasitism section, to include my analysis of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology --which Obama is in bed with. We can expect the Obama regime to push America even further in the direction of "parasite government" as depicted below, as opposed to "productive government." Please also see some of my other diagrams contrasting productive vs. parasite modes for citizenship and morality. They are also included in my mutualism vs. parasitism discussion.

 

Productive Government ..................................................	.....	Parasite Government ..................................................
Protects lives, property, and human rights		Maliciously destroys lives and property, undermines civil liberties
Renders socially useful services in proportion to the taxes it collects. Eliminates waste.		Grows bureaucracy and waste while raising taxes regardless of services rendered to taxpayers
Increases government accountability and transparency, protects whistle-blowers. Demystifies its processes and makes itself open to grass roots input.		Ruthlessly suppresses any criticism or any challenges to power. Creates a sense of religious awe about itself to stifle objective criticism. Launches ideological crusades without concrete justifications. This is typically done as a smokescreen to hide corruption and special privileges for crony groups.
Demonstrates consistent principles and inspires admiration both at home and abroad		Practices extreme double standards and inspires hatred and loathing at home and around the world
Serves the interests of honest, competent, hard-working, loyal people in society, to include their vital cultural and genetic interests		Serves a few narrow corrupt and disloyal interests at expense of everyone else. Undermines the cultural and racial coherence of core population.
Policies favor strong domestic economic development and job creation, to include the steady strengthening of the technological and manufacturing base.		Runs down domestic manufacturing base while empowering potential enemies
Maintains stable, trustworthy environment that honors contracts, encourages mutually beneficial trade relations		Foments international distrust through unnecessary aggressive wars, deception, barbaric practices such as torture, use of DU Weapons of Mass Destruction on helpless civilians, etc.
Maintains the value of currency, honors commitments to retirees, eliminates unnecessary cash drains on taxpayer		Debauches the currency, cripples or bankrupts country with debt
Protects productive capabilities of the private sector or at least leaves it alone	...	Squeezes out the private sector

 

Please also my discussion of the question "What does it mean when a dominant ethnic group begins to decline as a percentage of the overall population?" in my "Have You Been Brainwashed?" quiz. As Tom Chittum points out in his classic work Civil War Two: The Coming Break Up of America, flooding a country with alien peoples and reducing its white majority tends to do the exact opposite of creating blissful "diversity:" Genetic viewpoint: . . In my environmental vs genetics article, I discuss the landmark Mankind Quarterly article "Zoological Subspecies of Man" by Dr. Norman Hall which argues that tribalism and "racism" occur naturally in virtually all other mammalian species besides man, to include monkeys, rats, and moose. In his book A New Theory of Evolution, the famous British Anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith argued that tribalism and racism persist as genetic traits because they have served a positive evolutionary function in primitive environments to help Evolutionary Breeding Units (EBU's), or tribes, preserve their superior genetic characteristics compared to less successful EBU's. . . Given that racism has a genetic basis, we should not be surprised then when we see repeated failures by leftist states and modern liberal media to eradicate it. Communism not only failed to erase ethnicity in the former Yugoslavia and former Soviet Union, but paradoxically helped create tremendous ethnic and racial "blow-back." . . .Even interracial marriage can create dangerous complications rather than blended racial solutions. According to Dr. Lothrop Stoddard in The Rising Tide of Color, the mixture of whites and Indians in South America created Mestizo classes that often acted more like a third race rather than a resultant race. Instead of solving the two-way white vs. Indian racial conflict, race mixing often created new three-way conflicts and an even bigger mess. Mestizos have often swung back and forth between whites and Indians in their political loyalties, adding to the political instability that has generally plagued latin American regimes. . . . Also, in his work The French Revolution in Santo Domingo, Dr. Stoddard explained how the mixture of French colonial whites and blacks in Haiti created a mulatto class that eventually sided with blacks to exterminate all the whites on the island. Later the pure blacks waged a campaign to purify the island of mulattoes. All of this took place before in the early 1800's long before the advent of the Ku Klux Klan, Nazi Party, another white supremacist groups that Jewish organizations such as the ADL would have us believe are at the root of all our racial problems. . . .The Jewish British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli once summed it up when he said, ""The racial question is the key to world history…all is race, there is no other truth." Ironically, his Jewish brethren who run America's controlled national media simultaneously promote extreme anti-racism in their programming directed at gentiles, while privately among themselves they practice virulently pro-Jewish racist support for Israel and other Members of the Tribe everywhere around the world. (If these double standards confuse you, please skip down to the last paragraph in this discussion for an informative link). . . .In regard to the bullet point: "When a group falls below 75% of the total population, instability and fission climb," this 75% figure is not carved in stone, but rather is an intuitive number that I derived from reading Chapter 15 "Bloody Lessons of Tribal Europe" of Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America by Tom Chittum (carried by America First Books). The following extract from Civil War Two helps to explain this point: . . . . . .The lesson is clear: The more monoethnic a European nation is, the more likely it is to be peaceful and stable. The more multiethnic a European nation is, the more likely it is to experience tribal civil wars. There is simply no real arguing with this brutal fact . . .[p. 131] . . .[Chittum provides a list of European countries that depicts their percentages of ethnic minorities. The most multi-ethnic country of Bosnia experienced the most civil war dead. The least multi-ethnic were the most stable and generally devoid of civil war. The quotation ahead commences on page 133]. . . . The most multiethnic European nation produced the most multiethnic dead. If there had been only Moslems residing in Bosnia, there would have been no civil war in Bosnia. . . . Is America a multi-tribal country and therefore unstable? With each and every passing day, more and more Americans of all ethnic groups are perceiving their tribal affiliation as more self-definitive and more important than their common American nationality. By this measure we are increasingly unstable. . . .More bad news: Of the European countries, the median size of the most numerous ethnic group is 89%. In America, the most numerous ethnic group (the English-speaking whites) is only 75% of the total population and falling. By this measure, America is again not as internally stable as most European nations. Twelve European nations have primary ethnic groups that are 75% or less of their total population. Seven of these twelve nations are fighting wars, are occupied, or have internal secessionist terrorists. . . .More bad news: Of the European countries, the median size of the second largest ethnic group is 5%. In America, our second largest ethnic group (the blacks) is 12%. By this measure, America is again not as stable as most European nations. Twelve European nations have secondary ethnic groups that are 12% or more of the total population. Four are fighting wars, two are occupied by foreign troops, one is fighting internal terrorists. . . . More bad news: Of the European countries, the median size of the third largest ethnic group is 1%. In America, our third largest ethnic group (the Hispanics) is 9%. By this measure, America is again not as stable as most European nations. Two European nations have third ranking ethnic groups that are 9% or more of the population. One is fighting a civil war, the other occupied. . . .More bad news: In America, 88% of the people speak the most widely-used language (English) as their primary language. Of the European countries, the median size of this [p. 134] percentage is 94%. By this measure, America is again not as stable as most European nations. . . .More bad news: There are now about six million Moslems in America, and they are expected to outnumber Jews by the end of this decade. America has been described as a Judeo- Christian nation. Are we now to be a Judeo-Christian-Moslem nation and all that it implies? The concept of freedom of religion can absorb only so much cultural diversity. As the Moslem percentage of the population grows, it is predictable that they will demand and eventually get laws allowing polygamy, chopping off the hands of criminals, death by stoning for adulterers, and the host of other antique horrors Moslems embrace. In Miami, Dade County has a special maintenance squad that cleans up dead chickens, goats, lizards, voodoo powder, and other "hex" items found each morning on the grounds of the county courthouse. These items are ritually deposited there by adherents of the Voodoo, Santeria, and similar religions whose members are appearing before the court on various charges. Almost all are immigrants from the Caribbean islands. Eventually, our diversity will increase to the point that there will be no common basis for our laws. That's why America is becoming an undemocratic imperial system, and that's why we'll break up in a civil war. . . .In regard to the statement "Jewish national media masters who promote white decline are hypocritical since they typically favor the exact opposite for their own group in Israel compared to Palestinians" [this statement is provided in another part of the "Have You Been Brainwashed?" Quiz] please see the Aug 2000 Free Speech online article "The Nature of the Beast" by the late Dr. William Pierce. This hypocrisy is part of an ancient PSYOPS (psychological operations) formula that works as follows: "Be privately right wing among members of your own tribe to maintain unity and cohesion, and be publicly left wing towards people outside your tribe to make them drop their guard and not oppose your own tribe." In other words, preach steadfast and courageous in-group loyalty for your own kinsmen (patriotism), and conversely preach peaceful brotherly love and egalitarianism towards strangers (modern liberalism and "liberal minority coalition politics"). Among Jews, the formula in the early 20th century was "Zionism for us, Communism for the gentiles." In my environmental vs. genetic duality article, I discuss liberal minority coalition politics in greater detail (please go to the site and enter the search words "liberal minority" to pick up the thread). Now that pure communism has become extremely shop worn in the West, many formerly Trotskyite Jews have switched over to a new schmiel called "neo-conservativism" which has absolutely nothing to do with authentic American conservatism. Please see The High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper (carried by America First Books) for more details on this amazing story. 2011-04-05 Vote Fraud and the Bankruptcy of the United States by Michael Rivero, whatreallyhappened.com: ...Who chooses what government we live under? Those who cast the votes, or as Stalin observed, those who count them? Do We The People pick those who govern us, or does a private company, owned by the CIA controlled media, and operating without any public oversight? Have We The People consented by vote to bear the $65 trillion burden of a government's reckless fiscal policy, or was that consent and that vote fraudulently obtained? Just think about all it really means if the elections are being rigged on a massive scale. It means that the contract between ruler and ruled is broken. The government does not govern with the consent of the governed, it rules by treachery and deception. The crown it wears is a stolen one, usurped from the people by three voting machine companies and one media owned results-announcer totally beyond review and reproach.

 

 

 

Obama as the reductio ad absurdum of the flawed premises behind the Orwellian, Zionist-dominated, neo-Jacobin, Multi-racial, Multi-Cultural, Welfare-Warfare, Global-Imperialist Super State that Wages Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace

 

I picked up the term "neo-Jacobin" from Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, which describes perfectly the authoritarian leftist establishment that has characterized the Federal government ever since the King Lincoln era. When power is diminished on a local level, it tends to gravitate towards the center, and ever since the Federal government crushed State's rights, we have suffered a trend towards ever more unlimited central government. In addition, by 1861 the U.S. Government became a full blown empire, since an empire by definition means a government that insists upon holding together its provinces by force rather than by voluntary consent. Ever since the inception of the War Against Southern Independence, the U.S. Government has steadily moved ever further towards the ideological left as it has tried to rhetorically hold together the increasingly disparate peoples cobbled together within its empire under the guise of righteously defending "equality." A prime foreign example of neo-Jacobin government in the "modern" era was the government of Napoleon Bonaparte, which preached "Liberty, Fraternity, and Equality" while controlling all the newspapers in France and keeping a secret police spy on every block of Paris. My 1957 Encyclopedia Britannica also identifies Napoleon's government as a prime example of modern (leftist) fascism, especially after it tried to create some kind of "United States of Europe" through conquest. Neo-Jacobin governments typically promise greater freedom on a rhetorical level while taking it away in substance. The title of the book Emancipating Slaves, Enslaving Free Men: A History of the American Civil War by Dr. Jeffrey Hummel about the true legacy of the War of Northern Aggression Against Southern Independence hints at this Orwellian aspect of the neo-Jacobin state. Since the term "liberty" originally meant simply "absence of the state," the use of coercive state power and interventionism to promote "liberty and freedom" or the absence of itself has got to have Orwellian overtones. The term "welfare-warfare state" was coined by the libertarian writer Dr. Murray Rothbard. It describes double-barrelled pork barrell government in which politicians try to buy off their constituents with various benefit programs, while enhancing loyalty to the state by waging periodic wars ("War is the health of the state" as Randolph Bourne observed, since war gives the state tremendous opportunities to suppress dissent, consolidate its power, and whip up patriotic emotion to aggrandize itself). One example involves Otto von Bismarck, the German leader who created a social welfare system to buy loyalty on the part of German workers in order to make them more willing to serve as soldiers for Greater Germany. Please see my centralized vs. decentralized discussion of "ponzi government" where pork politicians stay in power by soaking taxpayers to pay off special interests, who in turn give them campaign contribution kick-backs to use for re-election campaigns. Pork politicians also soak the financial system with deficit spending to buy votes through social programs, creating a growing debt burden that will usually eventually result in a financial crisis --hence the "ponzi" lack of sustainability-- but they usually hope to be out of office and retired by the time someone else has to worry about it. "Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace" comes from the title of a book by historian Harry Elmer Barnes and a more recent work by Gore Vidal. In my centralized vs. decentralized discussion, I discuss how a ponzi government can morph into an evil government that periodically runs false flag operations to start wars that help perpetuate its own existence. Again "war is the health of the state," as George Orwell also observed in 1984. I have been very active with Capt Eric May trying to prevent a repeat 9/11 false flag operation designed to further the cruelly exploitive power base of Obama's good buddies, the Zionist neo-con "War Party that never sleeps." America has come a long way from the time of the American War of Independence. This was essentially a libertarian revolution fought by people with strong white racial and ethnic roots. Please see my commentary to question 13 "Does ethnic solidarity matter in the defense of liberty?" in my "Have You Been Brainwashed?" quiz about the tremendous rootedness of Americans descended from such groups as English Puritans, Scots-Irish, and German Rhine West Bank Protestants (misnamed "Pennsylvania Dutch"). The New Englanders provide one of the most striking examples of shared ethnicity, culture, religion, and history. They were descended from Puritans, who themselves mostly from eastern England, the most "Nordic" part of the British isles, no doubt influenced by many waves of immigration from Angles, Saxons, and Jutes (from Denmark and northern Germany) and later influxes of Danish and Norwegian Vikings. New England was effectively a "Nordic ethnostate." (See The Cousin's Wars by Kevin Philips). Both the Puritans and their New England descendants were a solidly middle class social phenomenon with strong traditions of local self-government, similar to Scandinavian societies. A large number of their ancestors fought for or supported the "New Model Army" of Oliver Cromwell and Parliament in the English Civil War and echoed its unique blend of political and religious radicalism combined with Spartan soldierly virtues. (As one interesting anecdote provided by Philips, in one particular year during the English Civil War, half of the graduating class at Harvard went back to England to fight for Cromwell/Parliament). At the outset of the American Revolution, Cromwell remained a big hero for most New Englanders, and the patriot militias that fought at Lexington and Concord and subsequently drove the British back into Boston were to a large extent the resurrected Cromwellian "New Model Army" fighting against Royalist absolutism. Ethnic identity, roots, and solidarity began to quickly blur as America moved westward. In order to rapidly conquer a continent and fend off the countering imperial pretensions of the British, Spanish, Mexicans, Russians, and French, American leaders adopted a fast growth strategy that meant flooding America with disparate European peoples to obtain quick cheap labor and achieve fast settlement of Western land. This was basically the old Roman imperial social model in disguise, and as a consequence American history has loosely resembled that of the Roman Republic later morphing into the Roman Empire and then even later becoming terminally corrupt. America is now so far neo-Jacobin-leftist that it has become saddled with a black president who is totally decoupled from the ethnic genetic interests of its White Anglo-Saxon Protestant founders. Obama promotes global interventionist policies that are totally decoupled from the early American libertarian distrust of standing armies, foreign entanglements, imperial bureaucracies, and other structural threats to individual liberty. In my "Resolving Opposing Political and Economic Ideologies" introduction I explain how America has moved diagonally away from "genetic bottom up" to "environmental top down" category. Today both "modern liberals" and "neo-cons" are almost diametrically opposed on such issues as racial preferences, global interventionism, and government spending compared to ideological positions once held by classical liberals (early Whigs) and Tory conservatives. I do not think any of the Founding Fathers (whether Federalist, anti-Federalist, or something else) would have been caught dead elevating a left wing Negro to the top political position of their country or fighting ruinous foreign wars on behalf of Jewish supremacist criminals at the expense of their own society. Obama is the slick poster boy culmination of a perverse historical transformation, the tip of the ice berg of a thoroughly sick, deracinated, and fractured society that cannot adequately defend itself from the continuing massive illegal alien Mexican invasion across its southwest border while at the same time devoting vast resources towards policing Iraq's borders with Iran and Syria and Afghanistan's border with Pakistan. But it gets worse. Historically, leftist authoritarian governments have been vastly more murderous than right wing fascist governments. Simply count up the tens of millions of innocents slaughtered by the Bolsheviks, Maoists, and Kymer Rouge and see what can come even close. Things get even worse still when leftist authoritarian governments are run very paranoid, racially alien leaders, such as when the majority of Bolshevik leaders were comprised of Jews. Then the leftist authoritarianism has a way of turning into a race war in disguise. With the U.S. government today, we not only have the neo-Jacobin ideology and NSPD-51-type martial law provisions in place (thanks Bush!), but we are now ruled by an unholy alliance of both Negros and Jews, with all the subconscious racial hatred, paranoia, and envy towards whites that comes with both groups combined. . Not good, my little Virginia. Not good at all.

Obama as a logical outgrowth
of America's interracial
"pet adoption" craze

 

The late "Birdman" Bryant came up with an interesting analogy to describe America's current racial situation. Back in the 1960's, when America was still 90% white, the country was like a big white dog that decided to adopt a lot of cute little black (Negro), brown (Hispanic), olive (Jewish), and yellow (Asian) puppies. Now the big white dog has grown old and tired, and all around him all his former "pets" are now like full grown adults at least his size. Some of them have become ornery and vicious and repeatedly shove aside or even snap at the aged white dog step-father. I have met quite a few white couples who have adopted cute little non-white children with the same mentality held by many folks who patroize pet stores and buy cute little kittens or puppies. Prodding them along are many very left wing, super-universalistic Christian churches who preach that interracial adoption is somehow highly moral and desirable. (Please see my Religious Crisis page for more discussion of various forms of liberal Christian insanity). The idea that one's cute little nonwhite "pet" can someday grow up to become President of the United States must be a real thrill for many nonwhite pet owners across America who secretly fear that they are acting like race traitors by allowing their innate altruism to be parasitically invested in the support of competing ethnic-genetic interests. A variation on this theme has occurred when Federal bureaucrats have "adopted" alien peoples and forcefully integrated them into white society. For example, after the fall of South Vietnam, Hmong tribesmen from Laos were resettled in lilly white Scandinavian and German American communities in the northern Midwest. In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, poor black folks from the greater New Orleans area were redistributed by the Feds around America, or to include deliberate efforts to infiltrate Mormon communities in Utah considered "too white." Obama himself has been "adopted." While living in Hawaii, he was raised by his two white maternal grandparents. Some articles appearing in The American Free Press and elsewhere claim that that Obama has been adopted by New World Order plutocrats who have recognized his potential as a "rising star" going back at least a couple of decades. There are some important fallacies behind the "interracial pet adoption" concept. First, nonwhites are not "pets." They are people. Treating them like "pets" is simply a more subtle form of white supremacism. Secondly, throughout history interracial adoption has been relatively "unnatural." Most people in most eras have lived and reproduced within the context of racially and ethnically homogeneous tribal units (or what the late British anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith called "Evolutionary Breeding Units --or EBU's). As I have already discussed elsewhere on this web page, Keith argued that interracialism goes instinctively against the grain because it erodes the genetic advantages held by successful EBU's, analogous to the way small businesses must internally reinvest cash flow and protect their property rights relative to competitors to continue to grow and prosper. I have also discussed "Zoological Subspecies of Man" by Dr. Norman Hall which also argues for an evolutionarily adaptive and instinctive basis for human racism and other forms of tribalism. As an interesting ironic side note regarding this issue, sometimes the radical right and radical left are in greater agreement than the so-called "center." As an example, back when I was in college in the mid-1970's I once attended a discussion panel that included the leader of a Communist organization. This Red condemned "Operation Baby Lift," which was a scheme by the Ford Administration to airlift Vietnamese orphans to America during the collapse of South Vietnam. Presumably the Asian children would be adopted by white parents. The Communist spokesman decried this as an example of "imperialist kidnapping." Even more interesting, Vietnam's Communist leaders subsequently showed their own racism by expelling half-breed Vietnamese children created by liasons with white and negro American servicemen. However, I must add that this was probably a peculiar situation. Generally speaking, leftists tend to be much more amenable to race-mixing than right wingers.

 

 

Obama as an accelerator of dysgenic decay

 

In my environmental vs. genetics discussion, I describe the importance of genetics in human affairs. In his book The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization, Patrick J. Buchanan describes how demographic trends threaten the very biological existence of Western Civilization and all of its accomplishments over the last 3,000 years --its music, culture, science, religion --everything!. Obama's influence can only reinforce the permanent dumbing down process in America on an innate biological level, accelerating further the extensive damage already done to the white gene pool as a consequence of feminism (encourages more gifted women to have relatively fewer children than stupid women), welfare programs (a negative eugenics program where the U.S. government pays lazy and stupid women to have proportionately more children than the general population), and forced integration (encourages white women to miscegenate with alien peoples, thereby increasing the ethnic-genetic fracturing of a once productive, fairly homogeneous white society). The following is an extract from my environmental vs. genetics discussion. Scientific support for genetic differences Thanks to the Internet, and the fact that more Americans tend to become open to new ideas as the country falls apart, accumulated scientific research on the role of genetics is making a bigger impact. In fact, even some national media are now following along kicking and screaming. As one example Dan Seligman’s May 12, 2003 Forbes article: “Professor Rothman Strikes Again,” states, “In The IQ Controversy: The Media and Public Policy (1988), Rothman and Mark Snyderman collected data showing that the press overwhelmingly attributed IQ differences in the population to various cultural artifacts. The authors also surveyed 661 experts — academic psychologists, cognitive scientists, test specialists — who decisively rejected these cultural explanations and collectively stated that some 60% of IQ variance reflected the different genes of the high and low scorers.” Other experts weigh in higher. Dr. Arthur Jensen in Bias In Mental Testing reports, "Estimates of h² (ie., "broad heritability," which includes all of the genetic variance) for various standardized tests of intelligence vary from about .50 to .90 in different samples and populations, with a central tendency close to .75." (p. 244). In Intelligence and National Achievement, Dr. Raymond Cattell reported, "The accumulating evidence that 60-80% of intelligence should end... [a reluctance by most people to believe that intelligence is substantially inherited]. It is about as heritable as stature. By shifting from a generation with poor nutrition to one very well fed we can get a shift of average stature from about 5 ft. 7 ins. to 5 ft. 9 ins., but you cannot go on doing this." Some of the best evidence to remove "environmental noise" comes from studies of identical twins who have been separated at birth and raised in different environments. The April 13, 1987 U.S. News & World Report article "The Gene Factor" provided the following examples where the Minnesota Center for Twin and Adoption Research compared hundreds of identical twins against the general population and analyzed statistical variation. The percentages below show how much the traits are determined by heredity:

 

Extroverts are born, not made

Extroversion	Mixes easily, affable, likes to be the center of attention	61%
Conformity	Respect tradition and authority, follows the rules	60%
Worry	Easily distressed and frustrated, feels vulnerable and sensitive	55%
Creativity	Tendency to become lost in thought and abstraction	55%
Paranoia	Keeps to oneself, feels exploited, thinks "world is out to get me"	55%
Optimism	Confident, cheerful, upbeat	54%
Cautiousness	Avoids risks and dangers, takes safe route even if more difficult	51%
Aggressiveness	Tends to be physically violent, has a taste for revenge	48%
Ambitiousness	Works hard at setting and achieving goals, a perfectionist	46%
Orderliness	Plans carefully, tries to make rational decisions	43%
Intimacy	Prefers emotional closeness	33%

Another interesting percentage worth considering is contained in the 1991 study, by J.M. Bailey and R.C. Pillard, which found a .52 genetic contribution to male homosexuality. Dr. William M. Fox reports in his book American Values Decline (offered by America First Books) evidence for strong heritability among criminals as well: ...[A] Swedish study involved 1,775 adopted men and women who were born between 1930 and 1949. Of the men who had been born to law-abiding parents and reared in good adoptive homes, only 3 percent had been convicted of a crime. Of those born to law-abiding parents and reared in unfavorable adoptive homes, 7 percent had been convicted. However, of those who had been born to a convicted parent and reared in good adoptive homes, 12 percent had been convicted, and of those born to a convicted parent and reared, in unfavorable adoptive homes, the rate soared to 40 percent!" [from Jerry E. Bishop, "Probing the Cell: Researchers Close in On Some Genetic Bases of Antisocial behavior," The Wall Street Journal, February 12, 1986, page 19.] What makes discussion of racial issues tricky for many people is the fact that genetic traits in populations tend to manifest themselves as bell-shaped statistical curves. This makes sense, since genetic traits originate with DNA molecules, which in turn are continually replicating. Most DNA will perfectly replicate most of the time, but we can inevitably expect slight errors from mutation and other causes on each side of the norm. These errors decline in frequency the more they deviate from the norm, creating a bell-shaped distribution. Hence, when we compare groups on a genetic level, we have to compare statistical bell-shaped curves for one group against averages for another. People who try to confuse a genetic issue often use the technique of favorably comparing someone on the right hand side of a bell-shaped curve that characterizes one population group with people in the left hand side of a different bell-shaped population. This can disguise the fact that the first population taken as a whole may be decidedly inferior to the second population group. The 22 Jan 2006 National Vanguard article "Multiracialists Are Crazy Part 3 carried overlapping IQ graphs that illustrate the differences between blacks and whites. These data are taken from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth, Version 1. According to The Bell Curve, by Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray, these kinds of overall population differences have persisted despite massive resources expended by environmentalists to eradicate them.

 

 

 

The differences between white and black populations involve far more than skin color and IQ test results. There are also significant differences in brain structure. For example, frontal lobe development is correlated with abstract intelligence, and whites have a higher ratio of frontal lobe to anterior lobe area compared to blacks. They also have a larger average brain size, a higher density of cerebral folding, and other anatomical features that correlate with greater intelligence, as noted by such researchers as Dr. Carleton S. Coon, Dr. F. W. Vint, and Dr. C. J. Connoly. In his book The External Morphology of the Primate Brain, that involved a study of 60 brains of whites and negroes, Dr. Connoly observed: "Comparing the two large groups of Whites and Negroes, while the variability is large and there is much overlapping, the mean values reveal significant differences. The dimensions correlate well with what we might expect from a knowledge of the cranium in the two races. The Negro brain is on the average relatively longer, narrower, and flatter than the brain of the Whites. The frontal region, as measured by the projectional distance to midpoint of central sulcus, is, relative to the total length of the brain, larger in male Whites than in Negroes, while the parietal is larger in Negroes than in Whites . . . . It can be said that the pattern of the frontal lobes in the White brains of our series is more regular, more uniform than in the Negro brain . . . . The White series is perhaps slightly more fissurated and there is more anastomosing of the sulci . . . . It is a matter of frequencies." Obviously one can find examples of blacks on the extreme right end of the bell curve who are smarter than most whites. But one needs to compare both curves together to really grasp the significant population differences. The graph shows a vastly greater number of people with IQ's over 120 who are whites who are able to provide intelligent leadership to society. In contrast, the black population is weighed down with a vastly larger number of border-line mentally retarded people. The graph also explains why intermarrying black and white populations of equal size results in a disaster for any society that wants to remain a technologically advanced First World country. If total population size is kept constant, the number of people with IQ's over 120 drops by 90%. We can use the bell curve concept to not only compare two different populations, but also get a sense regarding how a particular characteristic might be graduated along a spectrum within a population group. As an example, in his diffusion of innovations theory, Everett M. Rogers suggested that the bell curve (presumably for white people) might be divided as follows: innovators (2.5%), early adopters (13.5%), early majority (34%), late majority (34%) and laggards (16%). Obviously an advanced technological society capable of sustainable innovation, scientific analysis, and rational political institutions needs to maintain relatively higher percentages of the first few categories on an innate genetic level than various stagnant Third World countries. Barack Obama also personifies the advanced stage of dysgenic decay described in Dr. Elmer Pendell's book Why Civilizations Self-Destruct, where charlatans and sociopaths are more likely to rise to the top of a population that has become too degraded to keep them in check. As I also observe in my environmental vs. genetic duality discussion: A basic model for understanding the evolution of genetic differences For starters it is critical to understand how different geographic environments (or "environmental stresses") sculpture the distributions of traits in human gene pools in different ways, and how these gene pools can degrade over time. Here I am using "environment" to mean a physical environment such as an Ice Age glacier or a sub-saharan jungle. These physical environments tend to select people in different ways. This use of the word "environment" to mean a geological environment that selects for human genes in a certain way is different from the use of the word "environmental" used at the beginning of this article to mean "learned" or "nurtured" behavior. In his landmark work Why Civilizations Self-Destruct, Dr. Elmer Pendell explained that human gene pools are subject to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, just like other animals. This law states that chemical reactions in the universe tend towards greater randomness. This applies to chemical reactions that sustain life processes inside the human cell and replicate DNA. In other words, in the absence of natural selection, animals that reproduce at a zero population growth rate accumulate dysfunctional mutations and other forms of genetic load over time and suffer gradual and continual degradation in their abilities. Because of this deteriorative pressure, Dr. Pendell believed that animal species only achieve bare survival equilibrium with their geological environment. The Second Law of Thermodynamics prevents populations from developing capabilities in excess of the selective pressures of their physical environment. Dr. Pendell believed that Ice Age environments imposed vastly more severe demands on human problem solving skills than tropical environments. Humans who lacked the ability to create winter survival technology and who also lacked the ability to delay gratification to prepare in the summer for the winters tended to get killed off at a faster rate. This skewed the innate traits of frost zone gene pools towards technological adapativeness. In contrast, human groups that remained in temperate zones failed to develop this greater technological adapativeness. The Second Law of Thermodynamics kept them in bare equilibrium survival with the lower requirements of their physical environment. One might see an analogy with the case of the dodo bird. A group of dodos once flew into a particular tropical-zone island where there no ground predators. As dodos established their home on this island, the ones which remained capable of flight had no particular survival advantage over birds incapable of flight. Over time, mutations which inhibited flight spread through the dodo bird population. By the time European sailors discovered the island, no dodos could fly anymore. Non-flight "genetic load" had saturated the dodo population. Sailors could grab dodos off the ground at will, and they quickly became extinct. In his landmark book My Awakening, Dr. David Duke provides an excellent summary of the selective differences between frost zone and sub-Saharan African conditions (p. 93):

 

 

 

Prehistoric European-Asian Conditions	Prehistoric Sub-Saharan Africa
complex-sturdy shelter-critical	minimal shelter needed for survival
winter — extremely harsh climate	no winter — comfortable climate
warm, well-made clothing — critical	no clothing required for survival
ability to make/control fire — critical	fire not required for survival
long periods of resource deprivation	resources more abundant
periods of little vegetation, few small animals or birds — hunting necessary	food gathering less problematic in tropical climes — gathering favored
foresight, planning and delayed gratification necessary for survival	little seasonal change, immediate gratification favored
in resource scarce, male-provisioned, hunting society, monogamy favored	in female provisioned gathering society, polygamy favored
male provisioned society, less sexual and physical aggression favored	female provisioned society favors male aggression and sexual drive
promiscuous behavior resulting in fights often leads to death of mate and children	death in fights from sexual competition not critical for survival of mates and children

 

 

Evolutionary sculpturing of territorial needs and chivalrous instincts: Dr. Duke provides some extended discussion to explain the evolutionary impact of frost zones that is well worth reading. He notes on page 92: During most of the last 80,000 years, Europe endured temperatures much colder than today. Modern Europeans emerged about 35,000 years ago and met the crucible of the Wurm glaciation (24,000-10,000 B.C.). Temperatures in Europe and Asia probably averaged around 18 degrees (F) colder than the present. We see significant technological adaptiveness and comparatively higher IQs among all races or racial subgroups that have had a significant frost zone sculpturing tenure, including eskimos, Japanese, and Mongols. Conversely, we see a relative lack of technological adapativeness among tropical peoples. Another example besides Negroes are the Piraha Tribe of the Amazon, which has proven completely incapable of learning how to add 1 + 1 despite months of instruction by anthropologists. Professor J. Philippe Rushton has put together the IQ map provided below that illustrate his article: "Winters Are Good For Your Genes: Lynn Book Finds World Average IQ 90, Declining From North To South."

 

 

I would like to interject my personal view that the frost zone evolutionary environment likely sculptured temperamental traits in many other areas besides an aptitude for technological problem solving. It appears that whites in general, and the Nordic branch of Caucasoids in particular, have lived for a longer evolutionary period than other races under extremely dispersed conditions near Ice Age glaciers in relatively small family or tribal units. The key selective factors involved man vs. nature technological innovation themes. Man vs. man guile or artful sociability was probably not a particularly significant factor. In fact, in some ways it probably helped to err on the side of having a high sense of individual territoriality to prevent competitors from stealing ones food in cold winters. A vivid anecdotal example of this behavior is described at the beginning of a book called Sissu about the Finnish Winter War against the Soviets. According to a folk tale, which was perhaps apocryphal, a Finn heard that someone wanted to build a cabin several miles away. He pulled out his puukku knife to go kill him because he felt the stranger was invading his territory. In his essay "The History of Freedom in Antiquity," the eminent British 19th century historian Lord Acton commented on how a strong need for personal freedom is very ancient among white people: According to a famous saying of the most famous authoress of the continent, Liberty is ancient; and it is Despotism that is new. It has been the pride of recent historians to vindicate the truth of that maxim. The heroic age of Greece confirms it, and it is still more conspicuously true of Teutonic Europe. Wherever we can trace the earlier life of the Aryan nations we discover germs which favouring circumstances and assiduous culture might have developed into free societies. They exhibit some sense of common interest in common concerns, little reverence for external authority, and an imperfect sense of the function and supremacy of the state. Where the division of property and of labour is incomplete, there is little division of classes and of power... In his book Body Language, Julius Fast talks about how people from Northern Europe stand much further apart from each other in their conversations. Interpersonal interactions among Nordic peoples often strike others as being a bit stuffy and distant. As a rule of thumb, as one heads further south in Europe, people stand increasingly closer to each other in conversation, and have more informal protocols. It is not uncommon for Mediterranean fathers to hug and kiss their own sons and kiss other men, which is unheard of in northern countries. Going further south, Julius Fast points out how Arabs stand very close to each other. To deny an Arab your breath is to insult him. This very different sense of personal territoriality among population groups has political implications. "Human rights" is probably related to an instinctive requirement to preserve significant personal territory before government. The origin of the cultural and behavioral trait of chivalry is also an important issue. In "The Passing of the Great Race" Madison Grant wrote (page 168). The Nordics are, all over the world, a race of soldiers, sailors, adventurers and explorers, but above all, of rulers, organizers, and aristocrats in sharp contrast to the essentially peasant and democratic character of the Alpines. The Nordic race is domineering, individualistic, self reliant, and jealous of their personal freedom both in political and religious systems and as a result they are usually Protestants. Chivalry and knighthood and their still surviving but greatly impaired counterparts are peculiarly Nordic traits and feudalism, class distinctions and race pride among Europeans are mainly traceable for the most part to the north." (p. 228). The social status of woman varies largely with race, but here religion plays a part. In the Roman Republic and in Ancient Germany women were held in high esteem. In the Nordic Countries of today, women's rights have received much more recognition than among the southern nations with their tradition of Latin culture." (p. 228). Chivalrous competition is very common among frost zone mammals such as wolves, reindeer, foxes, bears, and bears. One of the greatest threats to chivalry is parasitism. While parasitism is very common in tropical environments, where animals are close enough for parasites to easily hop from host to host, the high degree of animal dispersion in Arctic environments works in the opposite direction. In chivalrous competition, males will spar to compete for females. They compete just enough to show dominance, but refrain from destroying the loser by drawing blood. This enables the more fit males to disproportionately reproduce, thereby maintaining the strength of the herd. However, by not killing off the weaker males, the herd retains the greater safety of numbers to ward off packs of predators. Chivalrous government is an anomaly among most human societies. Most human societies around the planet become very pyramidal is they become very large. The people at the top typically become increasingly vicious to fend off any real or perceived competitors. We can see how chivalrous instincts must be spread among the general population in order for Western Civilization to become viable. Parliamentary debate depends on the ability of individuals to voice their dissent without getting assassinated. The right to face ones accusers in a trial by jury depends upon not being up against vicious mafia groups who ruthlessly kill off all witnesses. Scientific debate requires the ability to advance a new theory that contradicts leading scientists without losing ones job. In order for competitive free markets and for free enterprise capitalism to remain viable, both the government and the largest corporations must refrain from using their power to viciously squeeze out competitors and rig the markets. One reason why America is breaking down, incidentally, is the increase in vicious, anti-chivalrous behavior throughout society. We see this in the case of people who lose their jobs for voicing not politically correct opinions. In contrast, back in the early 19th century chivalrous values once made America once of the most admired countries on earth. Today America has become despised around the world. The High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper documents how America's foreign policy has been high-jacked by Jewish neo-cons who viciously smear all domestic critics of their influence. Torture, which is very commonly used by Israelis against Palestinians, is now widely used overseas by Americans. An interesting indicator of America's depravity involves the sad case of Jewish spokesman and national media darling Dr. Alan Dershowitz. He hardly ennobles either the Harvard University faculty or America's Jewish community. He has artfully tried to reduce public repugnance towards the use of torture and has viciously attacked his colleague Dr. Stephen Walt, former Dean of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, for the report co-authored with Dr. John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago that criticizes the Jewish Lobby's role in American foreign policy. Critics of Jews have historically viewed them as an an alien racial group instinctively incapable of acting like chivalrous gentlemen. For over two thousand years their evolutionary history has been focused on man vs. man competition where they have been outsiders in highly urbanized environments forced to live by their wits. Critics such as Henry Ford in his International Jew series claim that Jews as a group are more likely to produce a disproportionate number of people who are prone to engage in covert, deceitful, vicious, criminal, Mafia-like behavior. In business they have a greater tendency to act as vicious monopolists. In their view, Jews tend to be incompatible with chivalrous republican government and principled free enterprise competition. This has some similarities to Ralph Townsend's analysis in Ways That Are Dark about the Chinese (offered by America First Books). To him, it is no accident that the Chinese are often referred to as "The Jews of the East." For well over two thousand years the Chinese have endured conditions of extreme deprivation and overcrowding, in which Darwinian survival depended heavily on artful man vs. man diplomacy, to put it politely. In addition to their considerable business acumen, Townsend claims that the Chinese have an amazing capacity to ingratiate themselves with Americans. They can quote high-minded platitudes of Confucius one moment and then just as easily break their word with Westerners the next. According to Townsend, writing in 1933, the Chinese language has no real equivalent of the word "lie" that carries with it any sense of the moral repugnance that accompanies its usage in the West. Townsend noted that the Japanese, who have absorbed some Caucasoid genes from the Ainu, have a very different cultural personality that is much closer to Western concepts of personal honor. Townsend observed an interesting paradox that begins with the fact that initially Americans tend to like the Chinese more than the Japanese. The Chinese seem much more affable and gregarious, whereas the Japanese appear more reserved. However, Townsend claimed that after Americans have had enough dealings with both the Chinese and Japanese to begin to understand each group, most Americans start to prefer the Japanese. They discover that they have more in common with the Japanese on the honor issue, and that is more important to them in the long run. In regard to the comparing the Chinese with Jews, if one compares Ways That Are Dark with Jewish Supremacism by Dr. David Duke, one can see that the Chinese are qualitatively very different from Jewish supremacists in many important ways. Among other things, the Chinese have had their own land base and self-contained civilization for thousands of years. Their religious institutions make it possible for them to find contentment within their own borders without defining themselves relative to other peoples or making it a divine mission to perpetually infiltrate and exert control over other societies under false pretenses. The origins of advanced civilizations According to Dr. Elmer Pendell in Why Civilizations Self-Destruct, advanced civilizations began when peoples of the north headed southwards to warmer lands where survival was much easier. Dr. Pendell defined civilization as the sum total of problem-solving improvements made by people over time. Hence, the peoples of the north had excess genetic capacity in terms of intelligence and robustness that could now be invested towards the continuous problem solving processes required to create advanced civilizations. However, once in the warmer lands, the peoples of the north were no longer subjected to savage sculpturing factors. Their offspring tended to decline over time in average fitness much like the dodo bird. In addition, the civilizations they created developed niches that allowed people of low ability to reproduce at a faster rate than people of higher ability. Paradoxically, as the material improvements and monuments of civilizations accumulated over time, giving the external appearance of an increasingly advanced civilization, the underlying genetic quality was steadily deteriorating. Eventually, the ratio of nonproducers to producers increased to the point that bygone civilizations began to stagnate. At this tipping point, they began to lose traction in their ability to anticipate and solve problems. Eventually they became so overwhelmed by their accumulating problems that they went into decline. At this point let me interject that while I agree with Pendell that dysgenic decay is an important long term underlying factor, I see evidence that many civilizations seem to fall apart well before their underlying gene pools are totally depleted due to the accumulation of genetic load. I think that there are two extremely important addition reasons to help explain the accelerated decline of various civilizations. One reason is that over time civilizations tend to become more centralized and tyrannical, which degrades their ability to engage in rational innovation and problem-solving on a grass roots level. In cover this process in some depth in my centralization vs. decentralization discussion. Please note my libertarian analysis regarding how centralized government tends to turn into ponzi government, which in turn tends to turn into evil government. In addition, as societies become more centralized and individuals become less self-sufficient, people with increasingly criminal traits, parasitic modus operandi, and other mental health problems tend to rise to the top and set the tone of society. This also severely degrades the ability of a society to engage in rational grass roots problem solving and innovation. I discuss the "criminal personality" and parasitism in depth in my mutualism vs. parasitism discussion. There is definitely an unvirtuous circle involved here in which all of these factors viciously feed on each other. Dysgenic decay encourages increasing centralization, because a declining level of overall competence in the overall population makes its more likely that "the masses" will become increasingly less self-sufficient as individual adults and instead assume an increasingly child-like level of dependency on their rulers. They will simultaneously become less capable of heading off various forms of tyranny. Similarly, as a population becomes weaker in terms of its innate character and intelligence, it becomes less capable of resisting criminal exploitation.

 

Obama symbolizes America's
descent to the Third World

2008-11-05: 2008 Election Marks a Great Disaster for the White Race: We are following in the footsteps of Rhodesia and South Africa. by James Buchanan 2000-11-18 Lordy, Lordy! Payback Time Is Here by Dr. William L. Pierce Really, if there's any group of people in America who deserve to suffer, it's the White middle-class. It's the people who have been warned for decades about where this country is headed, but who were too shortsighted, too timid, and above all too greedy, too selfish, to do anything about it. During the 1960s, when Blacks were rioting and burning our cities, middle-class Whites refused to take a strong stand against them because that would disrupt the country even more and would be bad for business; instead they tried to appease the Blacks with all sorts of new civil rights laws and other government programs. They tried to buy them off. The Whites just wanted to continue indulging themselves; they didn't want to do anything that might require a bit of austerity in return for the long-term improvement of the country. In the 1970s, when the real push was on to racially integrate the country through forced busing and forced housing and forced employment laws, and many White working-class people were demonstrating in the streets against this forced racial integration, the comfortable middle class, which was not being as adversely affected as the blue-collar class, refused to become involved. The White lawyers and doctors and accountants and professors and engineers and small businessmen just looked the other way and kept on stuffing their faces. Their kids weren't being bused to Black schools; their employment wasn't being threatened by affirmative action. They certainly weren't going to jeopardize their own comfort and security and respectability, just because of what was happening to working-class White kids and working-class White parents. Of course, many middle-class Whites were concerned about the degenerative trends which were all too obvious in America during the 1960s and 1970s. They just weren't concerned enough to do anything. Their solution was just to vote Republican and keep making as much money as possible, so that they could insulate themselves and their own immediate families from what was happening around them, and to hell with everyone else. And so we had the Reagan era, and the White middle class thought that their strategy of compromise and appeasement and selfishness had worked. Well, of course, it hadn't worked. Such strategies never work in the long run. People who will not fight eventually will be eaten by people who will fight. A community whose members are so self-centered that they will work only for their own personal benefit and not for the common good eventually will be destroyed by its enemies. And our enemies have been at work, day and night. They opened our borders to the subhumanity of the Third World and began building up their numbers. They encouraged feminism and began reducing our numbers by persuading our women that careers were more important than families. They infiltrated and took over our educational establishment and taught our children that they should be ashamed of their own race, that their own history and traditions weren't worth learning about. And the children of the White middle class learned instead that doing drugs and putting safety pins through their noses and wearing baseball caps backward and listening to Black rappers is cool. And the daughters of the White middle class began bedding down with Blacks and becoming pregnant with mongrel babies, and their parents didn't like it, but they tolerated it, as long as they could hang onto their money and their comfort and their lifestyle. And eventually the enemies of our people were strong enough to launch the Clinton era. But the members of the White middle class were still comfortable, and so they tolerated the Clinton era too, with all of its treason and degeneracy. They tolerated the total Judaization of their government. They tolerated the Clinton government's bombing of Belgrade to force Serbia into line with the New World Order. They didn't like it, but they tolerated it. And so now the fruits of all that toleration are almost ready to be harvested -- and it's about time. It's about time for the White middle class to have to deal with the problem of 30 million Blacks who believe they are entitled to reparations and who very shortly will be clamoring for $100,000 from every White family. They believe they're entitled to at least five trillion dollars in reparations from us, because we tolerated the Jewish media pumping expectations of that sort into them during the past 50 years. We tolerated all of the Hollywood films and the television propaganda telling them about how they were persecuted and mistreated by us for 400 years and that they really are equal to us, and the only thing which has kept them from achieving what we have achieved is White racism. We knew it wasn't true -- we knew it was Jewish lies -- but we tolerated that propaganda rather than risk being called "racists" for contradicting it or "anti-Semites" for pointing out who the liars were. And we also proved to 30 million Blacks that we're a bunch of wimps who won't fight for our people or for our own rights. They believe that the White man owes them five trillion dollars and that he doesn't have the guts or the gumption to stop them from taking it... 1992-11-7 America Since World War II: An Interview with Dr. William L. Pierce 1988-April-May National Vanguard Magazine review of the Tom Wolfe novel Bonfire of the Vanities by Dr. William L. Pierce. An extract of this review is also provided in my "Environmental vs. Genetic Duality" discussion. Preceding the Dr. Pierce quote, I describe how white people often like to play "Man Who Would Be King" by living as supposedly enlightened and benevolent leaders surrounded by nonwhites rather than living among equals in racially homogeneous white societies like their European ancestors. This can lead to some very unpleasant surprises down the road. In fact, Barack Obama may be viewed as the ultimate expression of the encroaching "jungle" that Dr. Pierce warns about in his review. An important variation of the "Man Who Would Be King" syndrome was illustrated in the superb novel Bonfire of the Vanities by American author Tom Wolfe. It is about a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) bond trader named Sherman McCoy who lives in New York City. He and his Wall Street colleagues make huge incomes, live in very upscale housing, enjoy the most expensive luxuries, and call themselves "Masters of the Universe." Unlike the "Man Who Would Be King" characters [in the Rudyard Kipling novel or the 1975 action-adventure movie], McCoy does not actively go in search of an alien people to work with. Instead, McCoy's hubris comes from failing to recognize how an effective support base of fellow whites has rotted out from under him. Meanwhile alien peoples and the alien values that they represent have quietly enveloped McCoy's world like an anaconda, leaving McCoy in an extremely "leveraged" social situation without knowing it. Roger Ebert created an excellent review of the Hollywood version of this story, but perhaps the hardest hitting commentary about the underlying novel was written by the late Dr. William Pierce for the April-May 1988 issue of National Vanguard magazine: ...McCoy lives in an artificial world, a world separated by a wall of money from the encroaching jungle all around. His parents are living reminders of an earlier day, when the jungle existed only in patches here and there, and White people did not have to have scads of money to keep the animals at bay. But the jungle has grown mightily since then, and its denizens have multiplied and become much bolder... One night, however, McCoy gets a close up glimpse of the jungle. While driving his mistress back from the airport he makes a wrong turn and becomes lost in the Bronx. He evades a Black mugging attempt, and the experience, though it shakes him badly at the time, only strengthens his belief in his superiority: he fought the jungle with his bare hands and he won! He is truly a Master of the Universe in every way! But the jungle is much more dangerous than McCoy realizes: its really threatening denizens are not the Blacks and Puerto Ricans who form the bulk of its population, but the Jews who control them and are able to move back and forth from their world to McCoy's at will...Even at the book's end, when the Jews and their minions have ganged up on him and pulled him into the jungle for good, there is no indication that McCoy is any wiser about their ways... The preceding sentence notwithstanding, Wolfe's tale is not one of classic Jewish conspiracy. His Jews act in concert, for the most part — although there is one Jewish judge who refuses to go along — because it serves their immediate personal interests to do so. They do enjoy pulling a WASP down, but there are no formal meetings of the Learned Elders in the synagogue to plot strategy. Nor is it primarily a cautionary tale about the dangers of the jungle. It is really a morality play about the White man and what he has done to himself: about his dangerous delusions, his dangerous lack of contact with the real world, his dangerous loss of virtue and manhood. Sherman McCoy stands for the leadership stratum of his race in the closing years of the 20th century. He is all the eager White business executives and entrepreneurs, the ambitious White educators and publicists, who have cast all other considerations aside in their single-minded scramble for status and wealth; who, having suppressed every vestige of racial consciousness, have allied themselves with Jews as readily as with men of their own blood whenever there was an advantage to it; who have ignored the encroachments of the jungle so long as they perceived no personal threat from it, and even abetted them when there was a personal gain involved; who have become so well adapted to plutocracy that they have forgotten the virtues becoming an aristocrat — virtues such as self-discipline, toughness, bravery, a sense of personal honor; and who nevertheless maintain the dangerous vanity that they are aristocrats — Masters of the Universe — and still are in control of their world.

 

 

 

 

Obama repeats the tragedies of
Rhodesia and South Africa

 

Nelson Mandela (center) giving communist salute alongside Joe
Slovo (rt.), Jewish leader of the South African Communist Party

 

Ever since World War II, the American Liberal-Zionist Establishment has promoted the usurpation of white self-rule by blacks everywhere in Africa, and has generally created mostly disaster as a consequence. The Spotlight (predecessor of the American Free Press) ran articles in the early 1990's claiming that the CIA and Mossad funded Marxist African groups against white rule, and even ran disruption campaigns against white nationalists utilizing personnel and equipment stationed in the U.S. embassy in South Africa. Now these evil chickens are coming home to roost inside America 2009-03-26 Exposing the Hidden Hand of Jewish Extremism and Its Effect on South Africa. A review of four books, three by Jewish authors, which describe the Jewish-black alliance that wrecked a once great white country. 2008-08-20 A White South Africa - What Went Wrong? by Arthur Kemp

 

 

2008-06-24 Mandela: The Legend and the Legacy: Part I, see also Part II by Sarah Maid of Albion. How the once most prosperous country in Africa was turned into another Third World hell hole with over a million whites having already fled the country, two million reduced to grinding poverty, rampant theft and murder everywhere, and worse things yet to come. Generally the historical pattern has been once nonwhites become the voting majority, nonwhite leaders become the permanent norm. They tend to naturally revert to Marxist-socialist policies (remember that anthropological "bigmanship" phenomenon described earlier on this web page?) that ultimately suck whites completely dry in favor of nonwhites. 2007-11-23 Ian Smith the last White leader of Rhodesia disappears into a crack in the sky at 88. "After years of political contortions and external pressure from the British and US governments, free elections were held in early 1980 in which Mugabe’s Zanu-PF swept to victory, winning most of the seats in the new parliament. Nkomo’s Zapu held on to its Ndebele strongholds and formed the opposition. Smith’s Rhodesia Front claimed all 20 reserved seats in a reflex vote by the white electorate. At first it seemed that Smith’s dire predictions about the future might prove to be ill-founded. Despite Mugabe’s inflammatory rhetoric, whites kept their land and foreign investment was encouraged. Smith continued to excoriate Mugabe as a Marxist dictator, but was seen as an increasingly irrelevant figure. In 1987, he was expelled from parliament for 12 months after criticising sanctions imposed on neighbouring South Africa. By the time his suspension was lifted, the whites had lost their seats in parliament. During the 1990s, as Mugabe’s regime became increasingly corrupt and violent, Smith took a grim delight in seeing his predictions come true. `It helps lift my depression that the majority of black people are saying it is time to get rid of this bunch of corrupt gangsters,' he said. In his memoirs, The Great Betrayal (1997), he put the blame for Rhodesia’s collapse on almost everybody except himself. `During UDI we had the greatest national spirit in the world, a fantastic country, great race relations, the happiest black faces in the world … if our friends hadn’t betrayed us, we’d have won,' he wrote." 2006-12-01 The Negro-Jewish Alliance that Destroyed Rhodesia. Instead of Obama-Rahmbo, it was Mugabe-Hoogstraten, and the results were bone-chilling. A poster-board summary from judicial-inc.biz. 2003-06-14 First Things First by Kevin Strom. The subversion of the Dutch Reform Church was an important factor in the destruction of white-ruled South Africa.

 

 

 

 

Other web sites

Other Obama-Related Web Pages   Chicagoans Against Obama This web site has some good home town insights into the real Obama during his campaign months leading up to the presidential election. The web master signed off stating: "This site spent much time focused on the failures of Chicago’s political machine and Barack Obama’s inaction as a state senator, and US Senator…..the reality is, the results of these failures (highest murder rate in the country, highest sales taxes in the country, public schools under-funded and mismanaged, public hospitals being mismanaged, infrastructure falling apart, high unemployment) are still seen, and felt, today….and will continue to be problems that we will face every day moving forward…. Also, I spent a great deal of time examining Barack Obama’s many questionable relationships and ties…I do not regret doing so…..In all honesty, I hope that these ties prove to be innocuous…and not a predicator of future decision making….." Obamacrimes.com Home of attorney Phil Berg who filed a law suit to determine Obama's real country of birth Theobamadisaster.com Theobamafile.com "A privileged African-American, who has not shared the black American experience By birth, blood and training, a Muslim, who was a member of a Marxist, Black-African church for 20 years. A socialist whose politics are rooted in Marx and whose tactics were conceived by the communist, Alinsky A master at shaping his own mythology and completely unqualified to be Commander in Chief And, he is not now, nor ever has been, a `natural born citizen' -- his father was a foreigner." Critical Books Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography by Webster Tarpley Obama Nation by Dr. Jerome Corsi. See review by John Hendershot. Obama - The Postmodern Coup by Webster Tarpley The Case Against Barack Obama: The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate by David Freddoso MP3's Download here. 2008-11-05 Webster Tarpley discusses Obama opposition plan Download here. 2008-11-05 Dr. David Duke provides his initial response to the Obama election.. Download here: 2008-11-01 Bob Griswold, owner of Ready Made Resources, delivers a razor sharp political commentary on Obama with James Edwards of The Political Cesspool archive on republicbroadcasting.org. He also talks about the need of people to be prepared and fully stocked with survival supplies. Download here 2008-09-27 "Hosts James Edwards and Bill Rolen talk with the administrator of TheObamaFile.com, a website containing a wealth of information that Barack Obama doesn't want you to read; the hosts then analyze the fallout from the first Presidential `debate' at Ole Miss" Download here. 2008-08-17 Dr. Ralph Raico explains why "war is the health of the state." Also, commentary on how Obama and Democrats are unlikely to be any different as statists from neo-con Republicans. He coveres the US government's economic depredations, police state enactments, and wars of aggression in this lewrockwell.com podcast. Trying very hard to find a way to close on an upbeat note [Editor's Note: This was written in Fall 2008 and reflects an effort on my part to try to maintain an upbeat and optimistic attitude. Unfortunately all of my worst fears about Obama have proven correct]. At the preface of this web page, I commented: "While he may come across as an OK person, he is still way in over his head as President-elect of the United States. However, if he can just figure out a way to turn the tables on the evil Zionist criminals who created the 9/11 inside job, the unnecessary invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, and (going back much further in time) the totally dysfunctional Federal Reserve Banking System, and top of all this restores a stable and sustainable relationship between whites and nonwhites in America, I may actually change my whole attitude towards Barack Obama and publicly celebrate him as a hero --but until such a time I am very much on guard with this man, to say the least." I would add that sometimes the best free thinkers (or agnostics or atheists) are individuals who once deeply immersed themselves into fundamentalist Christianity enough to see how all the moving parts are supposed to come together. (I am an example of this from my own personal experience). Often the radical left and radical right are more like the ends of a horse shoe than two polar opposites, to the extent that radical people often have in common a desire to understand how things really work underneath the surface rather than just accept pat answers and status quo. (I am also a personal example of this, having dabbled with aspects of the radical left before moving more towards the libetarian right). Sometimes the radical left sees things in a similar way to the radical right, particularly when class struggle and racial struggle overlap each other. It is possible that Obama has gone so far to the left, and has been so heavily exposed to the full stench of corrupt politics and criminal Zionism, that he is disgusted with it all deep down inside while thoroughly understanding what it is all about from personal experience. He could be well-positioned to help move this country back to the right and do some serious cleaning up of systemic corruption. Just as it took anti-commie "gut fighter" Richard Nixon to defuse right wing concerns when he reopened talks and trade with Red China, maybe it takes a liberal black to turn the tables on criminal Zionists and neo-Marxist race-mixers and open borders liberals. I am caught in a dilemma. On the one hand, I would be foolish to blindly trust Obama to turn out to be a "good guy" without solid evidence. Dr. William Pierce was correct when he described in his article "Lordy, Lordy!" how too much Pollyannaish thinking has been a major factor that has gotten us into this horrible mess to begin with. On the other hand, I might also be foolish if I declare myself Obama's sworn enemy and do not leave him maneuvering room to prove himself. Sometimes positive miracles happen. But then again, what makes me very apprehensive is that it is also possible that we could experience a gigantic "negative miracle." Obama and his Jewish Supremacist buddies might utilize their considerable political cleverness in order to engineer a martial law clamp down on America that eventually devolves into a latter-day, neo-Jacobin terror. Who knows what America is in for once we get hit with full blown financial system collapse and hyperinflation that renders the dollars worthless. We might see rivers of blood flow beneath dictatorial savage ferocity that rivals Robespierre, Trotsky, and Pol Pot. So far the indicators lean heavily in the negative direction. For starters, many conservatives agree with me that designated White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel (described earlier on this web page) is a pretty scary guy, in many ways more so that Michael Chertoff, if such is possible. So far the Democratic Party continues to deliver more than its fair share of neo-Commies. Remember, if they had even a shred of honesty and patriotism, they would be at least hinting at opening up an honest investigation regarding the 9/11 inside job, not to mention the outrageous war profiteering on no-bid contracts conducted by Bush cabal cronies in its Middle Eastern military adventures. Instead, in style and deed, they feel more like Zio-Marxist revolutionaries --like real Reds-- out to grab all the chips. In John Toland's book Adolf Hitler, he describes a news correspondent's wire dispatch sent within the first few years after the World War I Armistice: "Germany is having a nervous breakdown. There is nothing sane to report!" It was during this period that Germany experienced a revolutionary takeover attempt by communists that came very close to being successful as well as massive hyperinflation. I wonder if we are going there over the next four years. It is very sad that we have to go through such guess work and intrigue with our political leaders. How much more straightforward and safer it would be to simply elect as President an honest, stable white leader who openly espouses and defends white values and heritage, while at the same time taking seriously his oath to protect and defend the Constitution (a novel new idea!) and showing humanity towards other races. As a final note --don't "coocoon" and let fear paralyze you. Get in the habit of being active beginning right now. Start preparing to survive the hard times ahead. Create a support base for activism. Passivity only encourages highly opportunistic or possibly even sociopathic people like Obama and Emanuel to become that much more tyrannical. If we can develop enough protest counter force and political organization, we may actually succeed in bottling up the evil that they may have in store for us. Start opposing them now. (To use a military analogy, hit the enemy amphibious invaders out in the surf before they can take the beach, and as a fall-back, keep hitting them on the beach before they can establish a beach-head futher inland. Fight them all the way, and never let up, and never give up an inch for free). Start fighting Obama right now by telling electors across America to not elect him by virtue of his lack of documentation proving that he is a naturalized citizen qualified to be President. Also, start mobilizing and expressing protest against all proposed "hate crime" laws. Our First Amendment rights are the most precious of all, and we can never afford to give an inch here either. Even if your protests may fail over any particular short-term issues, you may still succeed at waking up and educating a lot of people, and that in itself can have tremendous value in achieving victory regarding the biggest long term issues.

 

 

 

 

Forward to
Part II: Snapshots: 2010-2012

Obama the "Chief Executor" and
Black Angel of Death:
Destroying America
For His Mosad-CIA-MI6 "Death Cult" Handlers

The "Cowpens Flag," a circular star pattern popular among "Whigs" and "Patriots"