I believe that even Thomas Jefferson would have agreed with this viewpoint. Quite a few Americans remember Jefferson as principle author of the Declaration of Independence, with its famous line "all men are created equal," but few appreciate how Jefferson got increasingly "Right Wing" as he got older. Later in life Jefferson stated that peoples from northern Europe held traits that are much more suitable for republican government than peoples from southern Europe. Jefferson viewed abolitionism as a race-mixing issue and as a threat to white self-determination, in addition to an individual human rights issue. He never freed his Negro slaves, although he advocated repatriating blacks to Africa and halting slave importation and slave trade activity. Jefferson stated explicitly that blacks are innately unsuitable to share full citizenship rights with whites, yet he also despised the institution of slavery. Jefferson believed that white Americans faced a horrible social dilemma, or as he put it in an 1820 letter on the Missouri slavery issue, ""But, as it is, we have the wolf by the ear, and we can neither hold him, nor safely let him go. Justice is in one scale, and self-preservation in the other."
In his article "Thomas Jefferson: Radical and Racist," Connor Cruise O'Brien acknowledges that Jefferson held hard core paleoconservative views that are fundamentally incompatible with modern liberalism. O'Brien supplies the last part of a Jefferson quote that 20th century "liberals" deceptively left off the Jefferson Memorial in Washington, D.C.:

In his letter to John Adams dated October 13, 1813, Thomas Jefferson also nailed the Jews good and hard for basically being a psychopathic race with no real moral compass or genuine concern for right and wrong:

In contrast, there were other racial and ethnic groups for whom Thomas Jefferson held genuine respect and real enthusiasm. He put considerable energy into developing an Anglo-Saxon grammar book and lauded the decentralized Anglo-Saxon legal and governmental system. Jefferson could also read Homer in the ancient Greek, which reflected the Heroic Era of a once highly Nordic people. Jefferson also created the "Jefferson Bible," deleting supernatural events in the four gospels, and advocated a naturalistic approach to religion consistent with indigenous Indo-European (read: Nordic) religiosity. This is a point that Dr. Hans Gunther explicitly makes towards the end of his classic work The Religious Attitudes of the Indo-Europeans. It is also probable that Jefferson agreed with Tom Paine's work The Age of Reason that debunked the Bible.
According to Six Historic Americans (1906) by John E. Remsburg:

Given his pro-natural religion and pro-Anglo Saxon indigenous views, I think it highly likely that if Jefferson were alive today, he would support the indigenous religious concept revitalized by Sveinbjorn Beinteinsson in Iceland in the 1970's. If they both lived at the same time, and Jefferson were President of the United States once again, Thomas Jefferson might have even invited Sveinbjorn over to the White House and Monticello as a special guest just like Tom Paine.
The beginning of wisdom is for Americans to wake up and see how their country has been steadily going downhill at an accelerating rate on a social and political level since 1861.
"Hermann (Arminius): The Liberator of Europe" by By Merlin Miller, The Barnes Review, Nov 26, 2009 helps to bring us up to date on the grave dangers America faces today.

The New Rome
In America, as in ancient Rome, we have been transitioning from a Republic to an Empire—and it is also destroying us. Like the Roman army, our military is spread very thin, trying to maintain forces in over 130 countries. We are fighting unjust and undeclared wars, and the cost in human life, ill will and financial indebtedness cannot be forever maintained.
Like the Roman Senate, our Congress also serves special interests rather than the interests of our people—creating an atmosphere of injustice and imbalance. Unconstitutional laws are being enacted daily, which further restrict our individual rights and pit various entities against each other by granting favored status to select groups.
Government has grown well beyond our Constitutional guidelines and a surreptitious police state is developing. Our currency is collapsing under the weight of the Federal Reserve’s unethical and unconstitutional interest charges and our government has gone on a socialist spending spree—with a philosophy of spreading the wealth and destroying any sense of personal or governmental responsibility. We are outsourcing our productivity through unfair trade agreements and the middle class is disappearing. Times as challenging as those faced by Arminius loom fatefully ahead for an unsuspecting America.
Like ancient Rome, we have become a multicultural, multiracial nation of immigrant servants and dependent wards— many of whom do not wish to assimilate with our traditional national identity. America’s “empire,” controlled by a select and self-ordained few, appears to be forcing the furtherance of a New World Order, which will totally destroy all national sovereignties and lead to a borderless, globalist “Third World” where the masses are governed by a parasitic ruling elite—Rome revisited.
Bizarre, to be sure—but throughout history, the quest for wealth and power has led ruthless men to conspire for their own gain. The result has usually been wars and famine, profiting a few and destroying the many. And today, the potential for a global armageddon is greater than ever.
Over the last one hundred years, the most effective enabler for empire builders has been the media. In all forms—motion pictures, television, radio and print—the public has been fed an increasing diet of false or superficial news and increasingly decadent entertainment. In Roman times, the masses were similarly entertained with violent and debasing diversions including life-and-death spectacles of all sorts at the local coliseum. When you can control the minds of the masses, you can convince them that any falsehood is true and any truth is false. You can also excite them to action—through manipulative intrigues.
The most effective forms of propaganda are usually cloaked in entertainment and through a steady process of indoctrination, we adopt beliefs and attitudes that are often contrary to our own best interests and nature. If we ask why the family unit is failing, faith is disappearing, ethnic identity is shunned and nationalism is scorned, the answer lies with the overwhelming effects of a mainstream media that is totally owned and controlled by a small, but cohesive group—dedicated to our destruction.
Hollywood has a definite agenda, which serves internationalists’ designs and is determined to undermine traditional American values and all that we hold dear—including; family, faith, ethnic identity and national sovereignty.

Where Are Our Heroes?
Where are our heroes today? Why do we only worship antiheroes, who promote decadence and despair? Why do our youth know so much more about Michael Jackson, Anna Nicole Smith and Madonna than real heroes? The answer most definitely lies with this controlled media—a great weapon—greater in power than all the legions of Rome. Our people need positive role models again. We need heroes—brave and honorable—who are willing to fight for truth, justice and liberty. We must be willing to sacrifice, as Arminius did, for the preservation of freedom and an honorable way of life.

Given these social and political realities, it is entirely probable that America will eventually fracture apart and give rise to ethnostates in which nationalism and folk culture will come roaring back as part of a cycle of history, reminiscent of the return to local "nationalisms" across Europe after the fall of the Roman Empire. "Militant Musings: From Nightmare 1995 to My Utopian 2050" by William S. Lind may prove prescient, just like Tom Chittum's work Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America.
I provide background commentary on how this breakup may take place in my Publisher's Preface to the 2007 ebook version of Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America. See also links to many other articles on this issue in the Tom Chittum author archive page.
My best guess at present is that America's initial breakup will be based upon disillusionment with massive corruption in the Federal government and banking system. There will be relatively little public mention of race and ethnicity as a unifying ideological factor behind secessionism.
This will be similar to how initial cracks in the Roman Empire started with the proverbial "fish that stinks from the head down." Hatred between factions that develop within power centers like major Wall Street firms (Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, etc), major Jewish organizations (JINSA, AIPAC, WZO, etc) and major federal alphabet agencies ( CIA, FBI, DHS, NSA, etc.) will certainly be a key factor.

However, after the first breakup, I think that there will eventually be many further breakups, just like after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. At this point, self-conscious white ethno-states will likely emerge.
As previously mentioned, at one point in the Middle Ages, France, Germany, and Italy were each further subdivided into over a dozen independent principalities or states. New generations of Americans will grow up in emergent societies where the entire ideological matrix of the Zionist-dominated, neo-Jacobin, multi-racial, multi-cultural globalist super state of today will have been totally shattered and discredited. They will look back on the America of today, complete with its torture, wars of aggression, exploding debt, Jewish values, and Third World race-mixing, and view it as one of the most degenerate periods in human history. A true "New Babylon."
They will also look back at the America of today as "The New Vatican Conspiracy." In 20th century America, Catholics became as numerous as WASPs and often acted as "muscle" and "shills" for Jewish "brains" in big city political machines, the federal bureaucracy, and organized crime. Half way through Chapter 29 I provide specific evidence furnished by Michael Collins Piper regarding Zionist infiltration and takeover of the Vatican. Catholics often allied themselves politically with the Jews as part of the "liberal minority coalition," such as when Sen. Ted Kennedy and his Irish Catholic compatriots joined with Jews to open up the floodgates of Third World immigration in the mid-1960's, or when Ted Kennedy's father Joe openly stated that he would ally himself with Jews in order to get an Irish Catholic in the White House (see Final Judgment). More often than not, Catholics would swing back and forth politically between Jews and WASP's, similar to the way mestizos swing back and forth between whites and Indians in Latin America politics, always telling WASP's just enough of what they wanted to hear to keep WASP's complacent, but never taking a firm enough stand to stop the steady encroachment of Jewish power or the steady flood of nonwhite Catholics into the country. Catholics ultimately dragged down the innovative and independent-minded qualities of the old white middle class and fostered a level of corruption, inefficiency, and authoritarianism on a secular level that was worse than anything the Protestant Reformation ever protested against on a religious level in 16th and 17th century Europe, effectively reversing both the American Revolution and Protestant Reformation in America on a deep sociological level.
Relatively homogeneous Nordic countries may become role models for whatever pockets of Nordic Americans survive the wreckage of the old USA under William S. Lind's My Utopian 2050 scenario. Same for Scotland for Americans who are more on the Celtic side. The World War II slogan "Look to Norway" will take on a whole new meaning. The prophecy made by the late British National Party founder John Tyndall in the early 1990's will probably prove correct, namely that the 21st century will wind up looking more like the 19th century than the 20th century.
Tyndall's prophecy makes a very important implicit point worth examining in more detail here. Both Europe and America of the early 19th century worked.
Admittedly, these societies practiced quite a few things on an ideological level that are very unattractive to most Americans and Europeans today. However, there is one thing you cannot take away from them. They worked, whereas the America and Europe that exists today does not work.
Instead of practicing covert Mossad-CIA and covert economic hit man tactics, 19th century societies discussed superior social efficiency and racial realities out in the open. Only white males with property could vote. Male chauvinism was the norm, and white women were too busy making babies and keeping homes to compete with men in the work place or promulgating Marxist feminism. Catholics and WASPs and various other racial and ethnic groups were segregated into separate countries or classes. Jewish subversives were placed under heavy restriction. Both European and American society saw the early phases of classical liberalism, which sought to restrain government growth and interventionism while curbing special privilege and pork barrel spending. Most countries were on some kind of free market or hard money financial system typically tied to gold and silver that could operate independently of a central bank. Most white Americans were very conscious of their European racial, cultural, and national roots and thought nothing of giving preference to their own kind first in everything, ranging from business to social networking. Last, but not least, most countries were self-consciously nationalistic. This culminated in the period of romantic nationalism of the late 19th century across Europe, a time often remembered today with considerable nostalgia where the sun seemed to shine everywhere; the Europe of the "City of Light" or "Gay Paree", of great Russian composers, of German science and Italian opera, of Victorian class, elegance, optimism, and grandeur in England, of Jean Sibelius in Finland and Edvard Grieg in Norway.
I could go into considerable detail on the policy differences between today's societies and the early 19th century, to include some timing issues about certain policies that might look good in one era, but serve as delayed action time bombs for other areas. I can also talk about exogenous events, namely how the flowering of European civilization that existed in the late 19th century in countries ranging from Britain to France to Italy and Russia got smashed in the 20th by the repeated battering rams of World War I and World War II and Jewish Marxism. But suffice to say, even if one does not understand how all the moving parts of early to mid 19th century societies worked compared to society today, there is one thing you can not take away from these earlier societies: they worked.
Back then, both Europe and America made unparalleled progress in industrialization and the advancement in their living standards. They all saw a rising middle class. In contrast, our societies today wallow ever deeper into debt and the misery of relentless de-industrialization. The middle class shrinks, and the gap between the rich and poor grows larger.
Back then, white populations everywhere, to include Nordic peoples, were steadily on the demographic increase. Today, they are everywhere on the decline and threatened with extinction or increased dispossession and subservience to alien peoples.
Back then, the evil Jewish genie was better kept in the bottle, with the exception of startling Rothschild and other Jewish central banker wealth that was quietly amassing behind the scenes. Today, the Zionist New World Order is on the loose and wreaks havoc everywhere.
Back then, European and American societies worked. Today, they increasingly look like the Titanic going down, submerged by rising tides of Zionist power and Third World encroachment.
Given these grim realities, let us now examine how white Americans might go "back to the future" as America seems to lunge ever deeper into an ever darkening tunnel:

Rebuild European-American communities in America

To avoid "reinventing the wheel," the quickest and most practical approach is probably to build upon existing European ethnic groups and nationalities in America.
This is a trickier issue than it may appear. On the surface it appears so simple. First, attend meetings of ethnic societies pertaining to your own ancestors. Learn about their language, culture, history, and indigenous religious values. Support their cultural activities.
Secondly, follow alternative media like American Free Press, Republican Broadcasting Network, Genesis Communications Network, and many of the additional sites and sources I provide in my site map at my web site or in my Mission of Conscience series at my web site.
Once you become comfortable with your level of social networking and knowledge of the "Info War," start raising consciousness in others so that they can begin to do the same thing. Circle the wagons by placing your own kind first in as many areas of life as possible, to include your choice of friends, neighbors, and work associates.
From my experience as an open activist since 1990, perhaps the best advice I can give involves a favorite saying of Thomas Jefferson, namely "Pick things up by their smooth handle." I interpret this to mean it is wisest in the long run to go about political consciousness-raising and social networking in the most natural, straightforward, spontaneous, common sense and appropriate way possible, with minimal gimmickry.
Before I start talking about "complications," I need to emphasize that on one level it should be this simple. We have truth on our side. U.S. citizens should be protected both by their natural rights and Bill of Rights to speak their minds. America originated with homogeneous white ethnic communities and states which held the upper hand over the federal government.
One should not allow "fearmongoring" to intimidate oneself into silence or submissiveness. One should not allow "predictive programming" to frame how one thinks about social problems or expresses dissent. One should be able to speak his mind without fear of retaliation.
And now, I need to discuss "complicating" factors, as promulgated by "Predator and Alien" and other social re-engineer's.
One factor involves cognitive dissonance. Americans have been fed so many lies for so long that it takes time to overcome them. An activist often has to be calm and patient. Push too hard, too fast, and it can backfire.
Another factor involves creating an appropriate posture. At one extreme, federal agents provocateurs and informers have been known to frame or entrap people who say things that might sound like they are advocating some form of illegal violence against the government. They have also been known to infiltrate nonwhites into white ethnic groups in an effort to provoke legally actionable confrontations. At a lessor extreme, if someone sounds too militant, this can alienate many people.
As a third factor, we are faced with enemies who are anything but innocent. They effectively practice covert 4th generation warfare against us on a permanent basis. (See Chapter 38 where I explain William S. Lind's paradigm). They are totally radicalized and manipulative. The article "The Way of TV Deception: Glen Beck Judas Goat for the Right," by Monica Stone, Idaho Observer, May 2010, commented:

There are no signs that this highly radicalized and militant Jewish community will mellow out any time soon. To the contrary, Zionist neocons still push for more war, more intrigues, and more false flag operations with no end in sight.
European ethnic groups have typically had a vastly more innocent "live and let live" world view. Unfortunately, as social pressures continue to rise in America, trying to approach these groups becomes even more tricky. On the one hand, if we fail to explicitly identify the enemies of our people, then our communities will be unable to adequately defend themselves. On the other hand, if we define ourselves relative our enemies, we risk becoming reactionaries and sinking down to the level of our enemies. We can also risk becoming decoupled from the natural beauty within our own indigenous cultures that should motivate us to celebrate them regardless of whether or not we face external threats.
As a fourth factor, we are often bedeviled with "false friends" who tell us what we want to hear, but in a time of a real crisis, are worse than useless. As an example, in my "Handling Real Nazis" section of Chapter 34 I talk about Catholic groups that swing back and forth in their loyalties between WASPs and Jews just like the way mestizos swing between Spanish-descended whites and Indians in Latin American politics. It may be foolish to needlessly make enemies of these people, but at the same time it may also be equally foolish to heavily rely on them. In the long run, when one needs real friends through thick and thin, blood is thicker than anything else.
Last, but not least, until the trend in America towards economic implosion and the police state reverse, we will remain under considerable psychological pressure to organize and find solutions. This in turn makes it more difficult to approach people in a natural way that educates them quickly, yet at the same time avoids pushing so hard that we alienate them.

Build cultural, social, economic, and other ties with those sharing close ethnic-genetic interests around the world

It is very important for European Americans to retain ties with the European mother countries for a variety of reasons.
First, the old countries have developed indigenous tribal cultures over a very long periods of time that are very rich, detailed, and natural. On the other hand in America, the land of "Las Vegas," social, political, and cultural movements have a tendency to be more artificial and reactionary in flavor.
Second, freedom in America can support freedom in European countries, and vice versa. "Iceland is Burning" by Iris Erlingsdottir, Huffington Post, describes an Icelandic protestor who called upon the world to show solidarity.
It works the other way around when it comes to America. The existence of "modern media initiatives" to maximize free speech in Iceland and in other Scandinavian countries can help deter Internet lock-down in America. If authorities in America believe that there are too many alternative media sources offshore that are outside their control grid, they may hold off on a crack down.
Economic and political power in America can support their counterparts in the old country, and vice versa. As an example, the Finnish American community provided substantial financial assistance to help save Finland from Soviet tyranny during the Winter War. If America undergoes complete economic collapse and the police state, the economic and political assistance may have to work the other way around next time. One hand washes the other.
Without question, America is entering a period of increasing political and economic instability (see Police State IV embedded within this work). Very dark scenarios that appeared ridiculous in the 1960's have now become plausible looking three decades into the future, even if they may still not appear very probable. It is quite possible that North America could become a cauldron where no one will be safe, and any ethnic group --to include Scandinavian Americans -- can get targeted like the Vendee during the French Revolution.
Worse yet, America is in the clutches of Zionists who are biologically the same tribal group that ran the secret police who orchestrated the deaths of 60 million people in Soviet Russia (the number provided by Alexandr Solzhenitsyn).

"Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! Follow the precepts of Comrade Stalin. Stamp out the fascist beast once and for all in its lair! Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, kill, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army.

The article "Ilya Ehrenberg - The Man Who Invented The 'Six Million' " also points out his important tie-in with the invention of "Holocaustianity."

 

The crowning achievement of Ehrenburg's career came on December 22, 1944, when this hate-crazed fiend became the first person to mention the kabbalistic figure of Six Million alleged Jewish victims of National Socialism, and then proceeded to introduce that figure into Soviet propaganda.
After the war he joined with co-racial and fellow propagandist Vasily (Iosif Solomonovich) Grossman to produce a fictitious "Black Book" and lay the foundation for what has come to be known as "The Holocaust." The rest is history.
Ehrenburg never forgot his Jewish roots, and before his death he arranged for the transfer of his private archives to the tribal cult center at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem.

All of this reinforces points I have made elsewhere in this chapter about how the perpetrators of Holocaustianity also use it as an intellectual blackjack to promote white self-hatred and undermine white sovereignty. It seems like many white American women today hate themselves as much as Ehrenberg hated German women, and they show this self-hatred through race-mixing. The Scandinavian-American community in America was silent (with the exception of myself and maybe a handful of others) in the Strom and Holappa cases because it has been beaten over the head with this evil intellectual blackjack by deceitful Jews.

Support specific initiatives

There are many areas involving alternative media and political consciousness raising where we can identify, analyze, and interdict high level criminality before it gets out of control.

Support Nordic-Celtic spiritual reawakening