Part
4
What Nationalist Principles
Might Have Defended Iceland?
First edition published
30 May 2010
Updated 24 Nov 2010
Iceland's
tragic experience in the face of predatory globalists should
underscore the theme that we live in a world filled with hidden
as well as open dangers. If you possess anything that is good
and positive, chances are there are people somewhere in the
world with a predatory or parasitic frame of mind who want
to steal it away from you. No one can afford to be "happy
go lucky" and live in a "fools paradise" any
more. "Naïveté" can easily lead to racial,
ethnic, and national suicide.
Anyone
who is incapable of consciously defining and defend their
strengths from a nationalist viewpoint will likely eventually
see these things get stolen out from underneath them. This
includes such intangibles as indigenous ethnicity, culture,
religion, and national sovereignty. As I explain on my "Reconciling
Libertarianism vs. Nationalism" web page, one requires
genuine forms of nationalism in order to preserve genuine
forms of libertarianism.
Adding
complexity to this situation is the fact that old proverb
"the enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend"
still applies.
On
the one hand, anarcho-libertarians like Max Keiser have performed
a valuable service to Icelanders by exposing the crooked financial
operations of major financiers in the City of London and New
York. Unfortunately, individuals like Kaiser are also capable
of offering advice that would be a total disaster for the
Icelandic people from a long term nationalist perspective.
If a person is not firmly grounded in nationalist principles,
he may blindly fall for such misdirection.
In
his 21 May 2010, 4th hour interview at 11 min, 25 sec, with
Alex Jones, Max Keiser commented:
Max Keiser:
...What is happening Iceland, you know we made a film in
Iceland about the collapse of the krona, the collapse of
the Icelandic economy, and I have gotten pretty friendly
with a lot of the legislators up in Iceland. I am proposing
to them that they introduce some new economic citizenship
so that anyone in the world who wants to escape, for example
a U.S. citizen who wants to escape the tyranny of the U.S.,
can buy a passport for Iceland. And to make it competitive,
so it only costs $20,000. Right now there are only two territories
or countries that offer economic citzenship: Nevis St. Kitts
and Dominica. They are both in the Bahamas. They cost $200,000
and $75,000 respectively. I am saying that Iceland, to be
competitive, they can offer economic citizenship for $20,000
and if they could get 200,000 or half a million citizens
from the U.S. to renounce U.S. citizenship and move to Iceland,
they could raise ten billion dollars immediately to help
recapitalize their country, and they are talking about rewriting
their constitution in ways that will favor free speech and
freedom of the press. Anyone who is interested in freedom
of the press would immediately want to immigrate to Iceland.
So you have these pockets of resistance and pockets of strength
from the work that you are doing directly and the work I
have been doing and now these people are starting to respond,
because global insurrection against the banking occupation
is on!
I
shudder to think what may happen if 340,000 New York Jews
were to buy citizenship in Iceland, and then use their new
majority to take over Iceland's Parliament and turn formerly
"Nordic" Iceland into a "New
Jerusalem," "New
Babylon," or even a "New
Neanderthaldom."
For
starters, we could expect a total change in Iceland's political
and social institutions. As I explain in my discussion of
Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology in my mutualism
vs. parasitism article, the real Israel is not a "democracy,"
but rather a paranoid, belligerant, Orwellian police state
run by Mossad criminal gangsters. One of the basic rules of
Right Wing 101 is that as a particular people rises in power,
they tend to increasingly imprint their own characteristics
on the surrounding environment, and we could expect no less
from a Jewish takeover.
We
could reasonable expect that Iceland would become "Israelized"
and its indigenous Nordic population would become "West
Banked" and "Gazad" just like what has happened
to Christian and Muslim Palestinians who once formed the majority
in Palestine. See, for example, the circa 1900 cartoon titled
"The New Jerusalem -- formerly New York" that appears
in the article "Revenge
of the Neanderthal" by Willis Carto, Barnes Review,
May/June 2010, which describes the late 19th century Jewish
invasion of New York City that completely altered the political
and social institutions of that city. See also the illustration
of butchered Palestinian children in Michael Collins Piper's
article "Teaching
Religious Hatred." I have provided both illustrations
below.
We
could also reasonably expect that some day little blond-haired
and blue-eyed Icelandic children will get on the extermination,
organ
theft, Mossad-related
snuff porn, global
pedophile ring, Child
"Protective" Services "legalized" kidnapping,
or even ritual
sacrifice target lists in Iceland just like Muslim and
Christian children who have been targeted by Jews for years
in Palestine.
|

Coming to Iceland soon with "economic citizenship"?
The article "Revenge
of the Neanderthal," by Willis Carto, Barnes
Review May/June 2010 has the following caption: "This
circa 1900 illustration from the popular Judge Magazine
is entitled `The New Jerusalem -- formerly New York' and
portrays the growing perception at the time that Jewish
people were literally invading the city in waves of late
19th Century and early 20th Century immigration by Jews,
overwhelmingly from Eastern Europe, and virtually establishing
a stranglehold on business, finance, and social affairs
in that teeming metropolis."
|
Would an "economic citizenship" policy also
bring this some day to Nordic children in Iceland? The article
"Teaching
Religious Hatred" by Michael Collins Piper, Barnes
Review, May/June 2010, has the caption: "Pathetic
images such as these --of innocent children butchered by the
Israeli military (which calls itself the "most moral"
military force on the entire planet) -- are seldom displayed
to the American people by the pro-Israel media in the United
States. These children were killed in northern Gaza, Palestine."
|
Having
already created a mess in America, to include subverting the
constitutional form of government created by its WASP founders,
we could expect New York Jews who immigrate to Iceland to
take everything that is currently positive about Iceland,
to include its stable and productive Nordic culture and its
Nordic libertarian traditions, and totally mangle all these
things in the exact same manner that they have already fouled
up the original democratic institutions of America's declining
WASP population.
In
addition, everywhere the Jews have gone in history, they have
shown an amazing tropism towards mixing up their host countries
on a racial and ethnic level. Jews invited Moors into Christian
Spain, and opened up the floodgates of Third World immigration
into America with immigration law changes in the mid-1960's.
Thanks to the Jewish influence in America, they have played
a key role in reducing the white population from 90% to less
than 70% today. Whites are still rapidly declining, in fact,
within a few years, the majority of new births in America
will be nonwhite, and in about 20 years, given present trends,
America will be majority nonwhite. Hence, once Jews buy up
enough control in Iceland to set the tone for Icelandic society,
we can expect them to change immigration policies to flood
Iceland from every corner of the planet with every form of
"wretched refuse" (in the words of the Zionist-Marxist
author Emma Lazarus, in her famous poem "The
New Collosus" about America's Statue of Liberty).
In
time, Nordic peoples would be reduced to less than 20% of
the total population in Iceland, just like the way WASPs and
Nordics have been reduced from over 60% of the white population
to less than 20% in America the last one hundred and fifty
years.
Nordic
Icelanders would soon find themselves servants in the house
of their ancestors, being "last hired and first fired."
Any native Icelanders who openly protest the alien invasion
will very likely find themselves getting summarily fired from
their jobs or even put through thought crime investigations
for the content of private conversations.
What
Icelander with even the slightest shred of patriotism and
loyalty to Nordic heritage would allow any of this to be inflicted
upon future generations in return for up front $10 billion
"economic citizenship" payments?
Max
Keiser reinforced my worst my fears in his 3rd hour interview
(MP3 link Here)
with Alex Jones on 16 Aug 2010, beginning at 8 minutes, 20
seconds:
Alex Jones: Max Keiser is our guest for
the remainder of the hour. We are going to get into the
economy and all the economic news that is coming in. Max,
in Atlanta Georgia and other cities we have seen people
getting into fights, riots breaking out over food stamps.
We have now got 42 million Americans -- just a few months
ago it was 40 million on food stamps -- the equivalent of
the digital soup lines. We see major police departments
laying off more than half of their police officers and saying
those that are left will only generate revenue
for the state. Will not help people who are being burglarized
or having their cars stolen. This is a road warrior scenario.
The taxes are going up, the services are being removed like
Argentina or some other country that has been looted by
these people. These global banks are offshore. They tried
to go into Europe in the last six months and loot that.
Merkel kicked them out, calling them criminal. So they have
come back towards the dollar. There is some talk of China
imploding, and a lot of manipulation happening there. So
break down this currency war, who is running it, and where
you see it going.
Max Keiser: Well, you know, here is how
I am making money on it. In other words I am not thinking
about saving anybody in America. Forget them. They are lost.
They won't save themselves. So here is how I am playing
it. I am buying Corrections Corp. of America. Trades on
the New York Stock Exchange. They have got a deal with ICE.
You know ICE goes down there and rounds up people and throws
them in jail. They have a deal with ICE. They pay them 11
million dollars a month. So Correction Corp of America is
paying ICE 11 million dollars a month to go round up people
to put them in prison because prisons are a hugely profitable
business. You own the prisons, you own the restaurants,
you own the hotels. CCA, Corrections Corp of America. So
bring it on! All those stupid people who are allowing their
government to arrest them and throw them in jail and treat
them like slaves and nincompoops, it is going to make money
for CCA. I'm passive Alex. I am not going to say anything
to help anybody there any more because I am making money
like the rest of the world. 95% of the world's population
is not American. They are looking at America now as a place
to zap money out, to make money. It is not a beacon of democracy.
It is not worth saving. It is just a place to make a few
extra bucks and then drop it, like a load of garbage on
the street.
Jones: Well Max, let me stop you. I know
you are being somewhat sarcastic. You normally talk about
doing things with stocks to be moral like going out and
trying to drive down the price of Coca Cola. If everybody
gets this casino, Gulag attitude, and give in to the evil--
Keiser: Look at the story -- look at the
story out of the UK. The NHS is launching a pill with a
patch. You swallow the pill, and then when your body through
the patch senses that the pill is wearing off it sends a
text email to you to take another pill. Now if that is not
the casino Gulag, we are going to have what we call "chip
and pill," the high tech tablets that will text you
when it is time to take another dose. So here you have all
these people in America, no job, no wages, on food stamps,
so here is a new pill that tells you when to give yourself
another pill. So now you have all these neurotic, psychotic
people with no jobs who are being dosed by themselves who
are "texted" for the pills.
Jones: And now the media is proposing lithium
in our water and vaccines that literally destroy neurons
in the brain to make you docile. We are entering something
worse than Soylent
Green.
Just
wait until Jews reduce Nordic people in Iceland to less than
20% of the population, and the country falls into further
chaos from the influx of a hodge podge of Third World peoples
and its conversion into a financially driven, Jewish-style
casino society. Jews in Iceland will then try to make money
off imprisoning Nordic Icelanders who dare to protest. They
will also denounce Nordic Icelanders who get marginalized
by this new system as "dumb schmucks" who get everything
they deserve.
After
Jews with ownership
in pharmaceutical companies make even more money by adding
toxic chemicals to drinking
water, food,
and vaccines,
which not only help keep Icelanders passive but also further
a global
depopulation agenda, Jews will then start packing their
bags in order to leave Iceland for some new victim country.
To
paraphrase Keiser, we can expect Jews and other "economic
citizens" to then say, "Iceland is not worth saving.
It is just a place to make a few extra bucks and then drop
it, like a load of garbage on the street."
A
major reason why America is in such terrible shape today is
because it allowed too many immigrants into this country with
purely "economic citizenship" motivations in the
late 19th century and throughout the 20th century. All these
rent-seekers care about is money. They can care less about
the moral, spiritual, cultural, racial, ethnic, or political
welfare of the people they exploit as their hosts.
I
have had considerable personal experience with high level
individuals who have turned their backs on Nordic-related
traditions that once laid the foundations for America in the
18th and 19th centuries. As one example, in 1990 I was put
through a "thought crime" Board of Inquiry in America
as a former Marine Corps officer based
upon my concerns expressed in off duty, private conversations
about illegal Third World immigration, Holocaustianity-related
disinformation,
and my interest in the revitalization of indigenous Nordic
religion. Please see my1990
letter to defense lawyer Donald W. MacPherson, Esquire
prior to a thought
crime Board of Inquiry. The Board exonerated me, finding
that virtually all the "findings of fact" of the
investigative officer were proven wrong, as noted in a 1
Feb 1991 letter from my defense counsel U.S. Navy Capt.
Charles Tucker. Nevertheless, the witch hunt hysteria put
a chill in mine spine that persists to this day. Capt. Charles
Tucker sent a letter
to the convening authority prior to the Board of Inquiry which
made the point that even if all the government charges were
true, the government still did not have a case under the First
Amendment.
More
recently, Alex Jones has described how at certain schools
in the American Southwest, American kids are prohibited from
displaying the U.S. flag, for fear it may appear insensitive
to illegal alien Mexican children, many of whom want to break
off the Southwestern U.S. to form "Aztlan." In "Leaked
Machete Script Reveals Race War Plot" Alex Jones
even describes a movie filmed in Austin, Texas with millions
of dollars of state government funding support that glorifies
in the slaughter of white Americans by illegal alien Mexican
immigrants.
We
can expect that once Jews and other aliens reach a certain
critical mass of influence in Iceland, it will become illegal
to show the current Icelandic flag in various places. Jewish-controlled
media in Iceland will brand this as some kind of expression
of "racism," "anti-Semitism," or "nativism,"
just as Jewish-controlled media in America have already totally
demonized the Confederate flag that was once part of the South
Carolina state flag. Icelandic school children will also be
told that if they show any reverence for Icelandic saga literature,
or display any Viking era symbols, this could also be construed
as unacceptable forms of "racism," "insensitivity,"
and "nativism" in the presence of the new alien
majority. Please
look at my Henrik Holappa
archive web page, about the persecution of a young, idealistic
Finnish nationalist for his opposition to the rape of Nordic
Finnish girls by African immigrants, and also please note
the "Elovena" billboard illustration which shows
only one of myriad ways that Jews viciously sneer at Finland's
Nordic national symbols. Please also consider Marine Marynova's
May/June 2010 Barnes Review article "Russia's
Christian Martyr's" which describes how Jews "hit
Russia and its people in the very heart." We could plausibly
expect no less for traditional Iceland once its Nordic leadership
element gets dispossessed by Jewish invaders.
None
of what I am describing is far-fetched. It has already happened
in some degree or another to America's declining WASP population,
which is undergoing a slow form of genocide. As mentioned
previously in this series, to the extent that both the American
Revolution and Protestant Reformation took place in countries
with majority Nordic demographics, one can make the case that
on a deep sociological level, America has been slowly reversing
both the American Revolution and the Protestant Reformation
in direct proportion to the decline of its WASP populations,
and in direct inverse proportion to the ascendancy of not
only Jews, but also totalitarian Catholic allies, who are
now as numerous as Protestants in America. (Please see may
additional discussion about Catholics in America in my "Handling
Real Nazis" discussion in Chapter
34 of my Trilogy). The rise of the police state
in America has grown in direct inverse correlation with the
decline of WASP demographics and influence.
Two other Western titles seem appropriate for
Iceland in addition to "The Good, the Bad, and
the Ugly" cited in Part
One. First, there is the movie "Bad
Company" (1972) --whose title characterizes
the Icelanders' investment banking relationships in
London and New York. Then there is "Butch
Cassidy and the Sundance Kid." Below, Butch,
played by Jewish actor Paul Newman, shows what has happened
to countries like Iceland, Ukraine, or even the United
States. "Circle
Z" bankers have derisively used the term "PIIGs"
(Portugal, Ireland, Italy, and Greece) for other victims.
Nationalists tend to believe that "character is
everything," whereas anarcho-libertarians and neo-Jacobins
tend to ignore character issues.

|
In
the long run, racial and ethnic character issues are everything.
A huge part of national as well as personal success involves
following long term policies that steer clear of entanglements
with "bad company." This is something that anarcho
libertarians like Max Keiser seem to be totally blind to.
Interestingly
enough, according to former Naval intelligence officer Wayne
Madsen, the father of the recent Jewish arch villain Bernie
Madoff (see my additional discussion in Appendix
III) tried to warn his son about the consequences of getting
in bed with "bad company" on Wall Street:
I
happen to agree with Ralph Madoff, namely that Wall Street
today is indeed run by "crooks and SOB's," particularly
of the Zionist sort, which it makes it all the more suspicious
why Iceland's leaders would leverage up their country and
make themselves vulnerable to the "tender mercies"
of these people, not to mention allowing these malefactors
to entice them into buying up companies around the world under
peak-market conditions.
Even
more ironic, when one takes a hard look at the indigenous
Nordic character of the Icelandic people, as well their abundant
energy resources and their high level of innate engineering
talent, it becomes obvious that they should first focus their
national economic strategy on hard manufacturing industries
that exploit their natural resources. This kind of strategy
is almost the total opposite of the highly leveraged, relationship-driven
financial strategy that got them into such serious trouble.
On
top of all of this, when one conducts a sociological analysis,
the exact same results emerge. A strategy based on the development
of natural resources and manufacturing not only fosters greater
economic independence, but also associates Icelandic business
leaders with more compatible and trustworthy people with similar
values, such as Scandinavian engineers who can help develop
their geothermal, hydropower, and possible offshore oil resources.
.
Conversely,
a national strategy in which Icelanders leverage themselves
to the hilt to engage in global financial imperialism puts
considerable pressure on Icelanders to entangle themselves
with Jewish central bankers and Wall Street cabalists who
routinely practice fraud by manipulating commodities, stock,
and capital markets and who also hold underlying contempt
for Western civilization.
Scandinavian
countries lead the world in technological innovativeness per
capita. Nordic workers are leaders in both physical and mental
productivity as well as craftsmanship. Nordic peoples have
historically been leaders in automation. On top of this, as
Eumonn Fingleton observes in his landmark work In
Praise of Hard Industries, industry rather than finance
is the critical driver of real wealth creation over the long
run. Therefore, it makes more sense for Iceland to aggressively
focus on developing its energy resources, which in turn would
drive manufacturing industries that capitalize on Icelandic
innovativeness, technological proficiency, and worker productivity.
They can succeed by manufacturing products where transportation
costs to and from Iceland of raw materials and finished goods
are a minor factor.
After
reviewing Icelandic economic literature, a slogan pops in
my mind: "Hard science and hard technology to produce
hard industry, hard jobs, and a hardened economy for a hardy
people."
|
"The
failed state of Iceland," by Elliot
Wilson Friday, 5 March 2010, Euromoney (PDF). Can we consider
some of this talk about "babes in the woods" and
"country bumpkins" as a form of "alienation"
from healthy Nordic roots and a failure to appreciate authentic
forms of Nordic-Celtic nationalism? |
The unproven Northern Dreki area controlled by Iceland.
To the right, currently producing fields close to Norway
and the UK. |
I
am left with the impression that Iceland's leaders suffered
from a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde dual personality problem
during the "outvasion" period. Iceland tried
to pursue the development of energy resources and hard
industry on the home front --which is typically a "nationalist"
policy -- while simultaneously trying to "out-Jew
the Jews" in the global financial arena -- clearly
an "internationalist" orientation.
In
the real world, there is such a thing as spreading oneself
too thin, and trying too hard to be all things to all
people.
It
is also a fact that when zoologists see mammals doing
bizarre things, like whales beaching themselves, the first
thing they suspect is that they have been infected with
a parasites. The same principle applies to Icelanders
vis a vis Zionists.
I
maintain that if Icelanders had been following genuine
nationalist principles, and kept their "national
immune system" up, they never would have got themselves
in the fix they find themselves in today. If they had
focused on executing quality business plans without getting
overextended, producing hard tradeable products from hard
industries, stayed out of debt, stockpiled food and gold,
they could face the global economic storms ahead with
a much greater sense of security.
This
idea that "nationalist principles" are guidelines,
like the "follow the yellow brick road" advice
in the Wizard of Oz , is nothing new. In fact, by one
interpretation, it is a core theme of the Old Testament.
If one interprets the Hebrew tribal deity "Yahweh"
from a secular viewpoint as code language for "a
vision of what is in the long term best interests to preserve
the tribal integrity, power, and self-determination of
the Hebrew people" and "apostasy" and "sin"
as "falling away" from these principles, then
basically what happens over an over again in the Old Testament
is that "Yahweh" punishes the Israelites whenever
they stop being good "nationalists" and instead
whore after alien gods, alien values, and other alien
social objectives. The Old Testament, followed by the
Talmud, is essentially an encoded nationalist survival
manual for Hebrews, particularly geared for the unique
sociological conditions of the Mideast where Jews were
usually submerged by invading imperial armies or functioned
as "professional minorities" scattered about
in the context race-mixing, decadent, Asiatic-despotic
civilizations.
The
troubling question for many dedicated scholars and honest
nationalists is what came first? Did the ancient Jews
originate as an international criminal mafia, who then
fabricated the Old Testament as a "false front"
to create undeserved "respectability" for themselves,
or is the usual "Sunday School version" closer
to reality, where the Jews originated as some kind of
historic people in Palestine who documented their "divine"
experiences as the self-anointed, self-Chosen Race of
Old Yahweh, continually misunderstood and persecuted by
all those horrible "anti-Semites" who keep popping
up everywhere? I have already mentioned how Isaac Asimov's
Bible
claims that the Book of Esther is based on an ancient
fictional novel, and I have also referred to Dr. Shlomo
Sand's The
Invention of the Jewish People, all of which
suggests that the Old Testament could comprise a "false
flag" form of Hebrew nationalism. In addition, the
"Revenge
of the Neanderthal" special issue of the Barnes
Review, May/June 2010, suggests that rather than
coming from God, a core genetic strain in Jews has evolved
from Neanderthals who have been involved in a race war
with Cro-Magnon Man for over 20,000 years.
If
God favors Neanderthal Man over Nordic and Celtic peoples,
God help us all.
From
a secular viewpoint, nationalist principles can also be
consistent with noble and honest "republican virtue"
concepts advocated by the founders of the American Republic,
as well as the founders of ancient Grecian City States
and the Roman Republic. They can also include heroic character
traits expressed in Icelandic sagas. This the idea that
in order for a republic to survive, the overwhelming majority
of its voting citizens must show a certain quality of
character in many areas. They must possess a certain level
of honesty, competence, mental toughness, social responsibility,
cohesion, and mutually supporting behavior. "Republican
virtue" includes loyalty to ones own people and nation,
which in turn implies "nationalism."
I
feel challenged in my effort here to explain how Iceland
has hurt itself by violating nationalist principles because
adequately defining and explaining nationalism has become
such a monumental task. This is for two major reasons.
First,
the Bilderbergers, Trilateralists, CFR members and other
Zionist-affiliated elitists in control of major banks
and media in America are generally hostile to the idea
of nationalism for every group of people on this planet
except Jews and Israel, in which case they are wildly,
hysterically, and unconditionally in favor of Jewish nationalism
(Zionism), even though this is a very twisted and criminal
form of nationalism. (Please see the 10 March 2010 article
Zionism
Unmasked: The Dark Face Of Jewish Nationalism,
by Dr. Alan Sabrosky, who is himself Jewish). Major media
in America have spewed out an incredible volume of poison
and disinformation about nationalism --particularly any
form of white nationalism.
At
the very top of their demonology list is any form of white
nationalism related to National Socialist Germany, the
Confederate States of America, or even early American
militias. Next down their list is any form of dissent
by members of America's dwindling white middle class.
(In his 22 April 2010 radio show, 3rd hour, Alex Jones
said that the Jewish ADL is calling for law enforcement
action against himself for daring to criticize the establishment,
even though he does not advocate any form of violence
or "white supremacism." In the 4th hour, Jones
said that the Department of Homeland Security now admits
it exists to ride herd on the American people, to include
groping women's breasts and men's genitalia as routine
"airport security procedures" to condition Americans
for serfdom, and not just to guard against "Al Qaeda").
Third on the list are any nationalist groups anywhere
in the world, to include the black nationalism advocated
by Marcus
Garvey and Malcolm
X, the American Indian Movement and Mohawk Nation,
secular nationalism advocated by Gamel Nasser and other
Arab leaders, Latin American nationalism advocated by
Hugo Chavez, Russian nationalism advocated by Vladimir
Putin, Malaysian nationalism expressed by Mahathir
Mohamad ...the list is endless. (See the Orthodox
Nationalist talk show by Dr. Mathew Raphael Johnson
for more on this global New World Order war on nationalism).
A
second reason why it is difficult to explain "nationalism"
to fellow Americans is the fact that on a structural and
social level since the 1770's, America has experienced
a steady accumulation of "stealth anti-nationalisms"
on all levels. America society has become increasingly
"pluralistic" and the federal government has
increasingly become more imperialistic, internationalist,
and blank check pro-Zionist. Most Americans have became
so conditioned to a relatively rootless, multi-ethnic
"Wild West" society (by traditional European
standards), that they have been incapable of fighting
much more than a delaying action against the steady erosion
of nationalist principles in America that has taken place
for over two hundred years.
To
resolve confusion over these issues, I have gone to some
effort to create Appendix
IV provided at the end of this work. It is titled:
"American
History and Genuine Nationalism, Tribalism and Nationalism,
Nationalist Axioms and Decision Rules, and Nationalism
and the Ideological Spectrum."
I
urge the reader to look at Appendix
IV. In an initial draft of this work, I included it
in the main text because I felt it covered basics required
to make my discussion of Iceland in the remainder of this
work much more understandable. I have only placed this
text in Appendix IV because it spends so much time talking
about America and the philosophy of nationalism, and not
directly about Iceland. But then again, we have to talk
about America and the philosophy of nationalism before
we can intelligently talk about Icelandic nationalism,
because Iceland currently falls under the dark shadow
of the anti-nationalism of Zionist neocons who control
most of the current U.S. Government. (Anti-nationalism,
that is, towards every country on this planet except Israel).
Iceland is also menaced by the Zionist-founded United
Nations and the Zionist New World Order. Iceland has also
had to deal with the UK Government, controlled by the
same Zionist-controlled, anti-nationalist City of London
that influences America. Last, but not least, Iceland
has made major overtures to Russia over the debt crisis.
On an ideological level, Russia may provide some opposition
to the New World Order, as discussed in Chapter
32, although Russia's 20th century history as a highly
authoritarian empire and military challenger of Western
nations can create a number of unpleasant "complicating
issues" for an "American nationalist" like
myself.
Let
us now look at writings by Icelanders about the "outvasion"
and consider how they reflect violations of nationalist
principles described in Appendix
IV.
"Estrogen
Will Not Cure Greed and Stupidity" by
Iris Erlingsdottir, Huffington Post, Feb 8, 2009
provides an excellent starting point to address Iceland's
problems from a nationalist perspective:
It
is the culture of the elite and greed, not the gender
of its leaders, that has led us into the current economic
catastrophe. This is a culture that does not believe
that the good of the many outweighs the good of the
few. It is instead a culture that believed - and still
does - that the greed of the individual market participants
would form some sort of invisible hand that would magically
regulate the markets better than any legislative or
regulatory body could....
The
investment advisers and their political allies viewed
themselves as Nietzschean beings who were not subject
to the rules that bound the masses but rather were obliged
to form their own moral code. Obviously, these supermen
were entitled to any financial rewards they could grasp
and were not bound by such trivial concerns as national
pride, religious dogma, or civil law. Like the Egyptian
pharaohs, the only loyalties they recognized were to
their immediate families and to one another.
Like
the pharaohs, they built monuments to their greatness.
They basked in the glow of publicity conferred upon
them by the media they owned. They gave themselves extravagant
parties that cost several times the average worker's
annual salary. They gambled the life savings of the
ordinary people on foreign companies, so that their
renown would extend to distant shores.
Now,
that it has become clear that the beliefs underlying
this culture are horribly wrong, it is not enough to
replace its male members with female members of this
same culture. Change must come from a completely different
place.
My
"nationalist response": All societies,
regardless of ideology or social structure (be they "capitalist,"
"communist," "socialist," "libertarian,"
or whatever), have a bell-shaped distribution curve of
talent where people with brains (IQ's over 130) or superior
"connections" tend to accumulate a disproportionate
share of the wealth and power. All societies, regardless
of ideology and social structure, require some form of
"trickle down" or "paternalism" where
people in the center and left side of the bell curve depend
on people on the right hand side of the curve to create
well-paying jobs and productive industry.
In
a decadent society, people with ability and power simply
live for themselves and neglect people in the center and
to the left. Sometimes "libertarianism" can
be a cop out where smart people claim that some mystical
"invisible hand" of the free market will take
care of everything. Actually they are abdicating power
and responsible to people who will "take care"
of Iceland's rank file all right --and I mean this in
the macabre sense of the term -- like the Israeli white
slave dealers who "take care " of Ukrainian
women by luring them through false advertising to Israel
where they are forced into sex slavery.
In
a kleptocracy or tyranny, people with power or ability
prey on people in the center or the left side of the bell
curve rather than try to help them. In the case of a society
that suffers false flag attacks, false flag pandemics,
and Agenda 21 depopulation programs, the power elite is
literally at war with the common man.
In
the long run, simply passing more laws will not solve
this problem. As the late libertarian writer Harry Browne
observed, laws are least effective where they are needed
at the most -- at the top. As the Roman writer Tacitus
once observed, "Where the state is most corrupt,
the laws are the most multiplied." It is hard to
get top people to enforce laws on themselves, or to live
by the spirit of laws in resolving gray areas of policy
if deep in their hearts they feel contempt for the people
they rule over.
In
the long run, creating more government agencies will not
solve this problem either. Once government grows beyond
a certain size, it tends to become a self-serving bureaucratic
cancer. It increases centralization and various forms
of tyranny.
The
American Revolution was largely a libertarian revolt which
held that government over the long run is more of the
problem than the solution. An important implication of
this viewpoint is that in the long run it is self-defeating
to not only increase the size of government within ones
existing nation, but also to add layers of international
government on top of it like the EU, United Nations, or
IMF.
A
more subtle implication was voiced by Dr. Ralph Raico
in one of his Mises
Institute lectures, namely that downsizing countries
and governments by breaking them apart may be beneficial,
similar to the way breaking apart large dysfunctional
corporate conglomerates into smaller businesses often
dramatically improves managerial efficiency and attention
to product quality through increased focus and competition.
Similarly, Dr. Ralph Raico believes that the breakup of
the Roman Empire was a good thing, because this created
competition between smaller states and put pressure on
rulers to reduce taxes and forms of tyranny in order to
avoid losing their most talented people to competing states.
At one point Italy, Germany, and France were divided up
into more than a dozen principalities each. This probably
reduced overall corruption and aided the flowering of
European civilization in the late Middle Ages.
Dr.
Raico is voicing a libertarian approach to nationalism,
that makes a political analogy between small countries
and the virtues of small business competition and innovation.
This contrasts with German National Socialist ideology,
which sought to integrate parts of Europe under the control
of an authoritarian, German imperial super state.
In
the long run, multiracialism is not the solution. As Tom
Chittum observes in Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup of America, history
shows that once a dominant ethnic group begins to drop
below 75% of a total population, countries tend to become
increasing unstable and likely to fission apart. As Dr.
Norman Hall observes in Zoological
Subspecies in Man, or the British anthropologist
Sir Arthur Keith observed in A
New Theory of Human Evolution, humans have tribal
instincts that have been deeply ingrained in their nature
as a result of long evolutionary processes. Wise statesmen
try to work within the context of human tribal instincts
rather than suppress them with a police state or leftist
propaganda. Please see my additional commentary in answer
to question 7 "What
does it mean when a dominant ethnic group begins to decline
as a percentage of the overall population?" in
my Have
You Been Brainwashed? quiz.
In
the long run, the least bad solution seems to
be to preserve homogeneous ethnic groups as the core of
the nation-state. This tribalistic "glue" in
society enforces common values and group solidarity through
shared ethnic culture, heritage, and indigenous religion
on a grass roots level without resorting to the police
state or byzantine laws as an enforcement apparatus. Tribal
competition between different states can be a positive
thing if kept within sportsmanlike (chivalrous) bounds.
A
number of scholars argue that over the long run, tribal
morality is the most potent form of morality in existence.
They include Dr. Raymond Cattell, author of Beyondism:
Religion From Science, and A
New Morality From Science: Beyondism, and William
Gayley Simpson, author of Which
Way Western Man? In fact, Simpson believed that
tribal morality is more potent than Christianity, which
is a leftist, universalistic religion invented by Jews
that tends to undermines white tribalism in favor of global
evangelism.
Iceland
has not gone far enough with the indigenous religious
revitalization advocated by Sveinbjorn Beinteinsson. If
people like David Oddsson or Olafur Grimsson practiced
both indigenous religion and authentic nationalism, Iceland
never would have got itself into such a mess. Instead
of pursuing the higher road to Nordic self-sufficiency,
it has taken the lower road to Babylon and allowed itself
to get blind-sided by "Neanderthals."
There
exist alternative interpretations regarding the value
of Nietzsche's work compared to the disdain that Iris
Erlingsdottir has shown him (a common attitude among many
"mainstream" writers and academics these days)
that are worth mentioning here. A number of noteworthy
American paleoconservatives have praised his work. As
two examples, The
Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche by H. L. Mencken
views Nietszche as an original thinker who developed important
insights through the way he compared the ethical implications
of Darwin's theory of evolution to other moral, ethical,
and religious systems. In Which
Way Western Man?, the former Christian minister
and author William Gayley Simpson found Nietzsche to be
an important "de-brainwashing tool" in his intellectual
development regarding major religious and social issues.
Nietzsche helps to eliminate a lot of "intellectual
fire walls" between the way the world appears in
biology and zoology text books, and the way it is portrayed
by many liberal Christian churches today, to include the
way so many modern liberal "Christian" churches
condone or openly support white masochism, white self-hatred,
homosexuality, cultural Marxism, race-mixing, and blank
check support for Zionist criminality ("Christian
Zionism"). Among other things, Nietzsche's clear
enunciation of the "naturalness" and moral worthiness
of the "will to power" can help many neurotic,
impotent, inadequate and effeminized males recapture some
manhood, realism, and pragmatism in their approach to
life.
It
is true that Nietzsche liked to make outrageous comments
to grab attention and provoke thought. However, as it
pertains to this discussion, Nietzsche offered many valuable
insights that deserve to be taken seriously. Nietzsche
admired the pagan tribal religion of the ancient Greeks
of the heroic era (from around 900-500 B.C.) and excoriated
Christianity as a religion deliberately fabricated by
Jews with bad intent to turn the Roman world on its head
in his last work The
Anti-Christ. It is quite possible that if Nietzsche
were alive today, he would condemn Oddsson, Grimmson,
and the two "Bjorgolfurs" for being decoupled
from their authentic Nordic tribal religious roots, and
for whoring after Jewish "Neanderthals"
like George Soros and the Rothschilds or phony Jewish
libertarians like Milton Friedman who are in the final
analysis biological as well as ideological enemies of
Nordic peoples.
Returning
to Ms. Erlingsdottir's article, she states:
Iceland
was, not so long ago, a flat, homogenous society. The
children of the richest people went to public schools
with the children of its ordinary citizens. The largest
house wasn't that much bigger than an average house.
At some time in their lives, most young men went to
sea on fishing boats, and most young women worked in
the fish processing factories. Foreign vacations were
the exception, not the rule.
The
children of my generation, however, began to hold themselves
apart from the rest of us. They
did not work with fish. They received their educations
abroad. They do not eat our traditional foods. Their
high positions were given to them by right of birth,
rather than by merit.
My
"nationalist response": The Japanese
have proven that it is possible to develop a thoroughly
modern, industrialized society, and still maintain racial
and ethnic homogeneity. They have figured out ways to
fill jobs considered dirty or dangerous without importing
aliens.
Realizing
that they must retain a homogeneous society to survive
as a people in the long run (a social reality no different
than what the Nordic peoples face), the Japanese have
maintained a firm policy against importing alien labor.
They take the attitude that having a chronic labor shortage
as a consequence of successful industrialization is a
"nice problem to have." They also take the attitude
that it is better to err on the side of having a Spartan
spirit and learning to pick up after oneself rather than
become decadent and expected to be waited on by low cost
alien immigrant labor. It is also better to have your
own people counting your money instead of the Jews.
In
the final analysis, preserving the tribal integrity of
ones own society is a question of vision and will. There
is no reason why Icelanders cannot fulfill this vision
for themselves. They still have a relatively homogeneous
society and rich indigenous culture and religion to build
upon.
There
were many places in 19th century America where relatively
homogenous northern-European descended homesteader communities
practiced this kind of ethos, and prospered as a result.
Once the Jewish-dominated neo-Jacobin American empire
finally comes apart at the seams, it will be possible
for certain parts of this country to recapture this way
of life.
Many
Japanese view chronic labor shortages as not only a "nice
problem to have" from a national employment perspective,
but also as a positive incentive to increase automation.
As I point out in my online ebook I,
Robot Entrepreneur, many robotics experts expect
robots with a human level intelligence in perhaps as soon
as 15 years. This will further reduce any need to important
alien peoples as low cost service labor. The Japanese
have always been global leaders in robotic installation.
Technological
innovation has always been a strong suit of Nordic peoples.
If they absolutely have to solve a labor shortage over
the next 15 years, the best way to about this and retain
their tribal integrity is to import Nordic peoples who
have become disgusted with their treatment by the U.S.,
UK, Australia, and other oppressive Zionist-controlled
societies around the world.
Returning
to Ms. Erlingsdottir's article, she states:
Iceland
is not America. We are bound by a common history, a
common ancestry, and a common language, not by the ideals
of liberty and equality. When the bonds that hold us
together are broken, there's nothing left. Americans
can reasonably argue about different ways to best realize
the dream of freedom, but you do not disagree on that
dream itself. Icelanders, however, are nothing without
a sense of community.
My
"nationalist response": I am very glad
Iceland is not America, and I honestly hope Iceland can
stay that way. I hope that Icelanders can preserve a society
where they can be just as Nordic as they want to be instead
of having to kowtow to Zionism, multi-culturalism, multi-racialism,
political correctness, cultural Marxism, and other noxious
effluents secreted by the more "Neanderthal"
parts of American society today.
The
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts interview with Alex Jones on 7
April 2010 (third hour) provides a perfect example why
many Americans like myself are seriously questioning what
it is left in America today that might be worth emulating.
Dr. Roberts, a well respected American conservative
columnist, was brought on the Alex Jones show to explain
himself after he penned his final column "Truth
Has Fallen and Has Taken Liberty With It" on
24 March 2010:
Alex Jones: ...[:50] We were
talking about how it has now come out and been admitted
that Cheney wanted to start nuclear war with Russia
[by sponsoring the Sept 2008 Georgia invasion of South
Ossetia] I guess to stay in power or something, and
that on 8-8-8 ---that same group is still in control
of Obama, I mean we are dealing with real psychopaths,
Dr. Roberts?
Dr. Roberts: Yes. They are insane people.
The United State government is in the clutches of insane
people. Not only are they insane, they are evil. In
fact, they are probably the most evil that have ever
had their hands on government. And the American people
haven't a clue. They have no clue at all. They have
no clue what is in store for them. And it is because
nobody was ever held accountable. So in her murder mysteries,
Agatha Christi, the famous English detective novelist,
she makes the point that when a murderer kills the first
person, he then finds it easier to kill the second,
and the third, and the fourth. And the more he can kill,
the easier it gets for the taking of lives. And I think
this is what we see with our government. They have gotten
away with so many things, there is no accountability,
and now they are just reckless. And this is why I say
it makes you wonder about the consequences of the United
States government where there is a nuclear-armed Soviet
Union and a China. And moreover a China with a powerful
economy and financial power over the United States.
The recklessness of the United States government, will
do the same thing that Hitler did. He marched off into
Russia and destroyed himself. How will our destruction
come about?
Alex Jones: And he destroyed 20 million
Germans in the process. You are coming back for an hour
on the 15th, we will talk about your ideas for solutions
here, but it is the naive level of the American people.
It is because we are too good. We are Americans, has
allowed this absolute evil to grow.
Dr. Roberts. I think that is true.
People cannot accept what their eyes and ears should
be telling them and so the government never gets held
accountable. And of course elections don't matter because
it is the same group in Washington. No matter who gets
elected to office, it is always the same interest groups...[3:40].
My
"nationalist response": I have come
to the conclusion that Nordic racial and ethnic homogeneity
is a tremendous asset. A major reason why America has
got itself into such terrible trouble is because in various
increments over the last century and a half, it has abandoned
the homogeneity provided by the overwhelmingly WASP population
groups who created the foundation for America prior to
the War Against Southern Independence (1861-1865).
At
the time of American Revolution, the white population
in America had levels of homogeneity in various sectors
that were nearly on the same level as Iceland. They included
the descendents of Puritans in New England, Scots-Irish
along the frontier (descended from an Anglo-Saxon people
from southern Scotland), and the German-speaking "Pennsylvania
Dutch" (actually Rhine West Bank German Lutherans).
In
Chapter
34 of my Trilogy I describe how Nordic characteristics
had a unique impact on 19th century America compared to
other groups:
...When
I read books about Northern European ethnic communities
in America in the 19th century, I am left with the feeling
that the 20th century melting pot really cost us something
dear. Those 19th century white ethnic communities were
typically the mainstay of the Protestant work ethic
and other values that once made America one of the most
productive, innovative, and economically self-sufficient
countries on earth. They had a vastly greater capacity
to adhere to a long term vision, delay gratification,
save, invest wisely, and show pride in craftsmanship.
This sense of ethnic pride and competition gave Americans
more of an incentive to stay on their good behavior
on a grass roots level. There is wisdom in retaining
Northern European white ethnic tribal competition.
As
an example, in The
Promise of America, Dr. Lovoll talks about
how Norwegian-American communities in Minnesota used
to go out of their way to provide lodging and jobs for
young Norwegian immigrant women because it would be
too embarrassing if any of these girls turned to prostitution.
Norwegians in the Northern Midwest often laughed at
various Irish Catholics who were less than half as efficient
in clearing land and building farms. One can infer from
Dr. Lovoll's scholarly work that Irish losers would
often go back to Chicago to become bar tenders, cops,
drunks, and glad-handing politicians who work for the
Jews --just like Mayor Richard Daley today.
Books
like The
Passing of the Great Race by Madison Grant have
documented how Nordics have been in decline as a percentage
of the white population in America ever since the mid
to late 19th century, and they have been replaced by Catholic
immigrants from Southern Europe with a higher degree of
innate authoritarianism and childlike emotional dependency
and lower percentages of innovators and early adopters
in their population groups. Then to add insult to injury,
America got hit by waves of millions of Jewish immigrants
in the late 19th century who brought with them a vastly
higher degree of criminal gangsterism, collectivism, monopolism,
and neurotic psychopathology.
Using
counter predator vs. predator ecological models, we can
easily predict what will likely happen as the percentage
of innately libertarian people decline within an overall
population group, and the percentages of authoritarian
meatheads and criminal gangsters increases. Eventually
the "heroes" (the independent-minded, virtuous
libertarians) will get completely swamped by the "dog
people" and the "rats."
Significantly,
I get the sense from "Estrogen
Will Not Cure Greed and Stupidity" by
Iris Erlingsdottir, Huffington Post, Feb 8, 2009,
that even with a fairly homogenous Nordic-Celtic population,
Iceland just barely has the critical mass to keep its
own "rats" in check:
....Members
of the elite-greed club are not bound to the rest of
us by this sense of community. They are Icelanders only
by accident of birth and feel no existential obligation
to our nation. They were willing to sacrifice the nation's
wealth to enrich themselves, but they will not sacrifice
their wealth to save their countrymen. They belong to
a transnational class of plutocrats, and have forfeited
their right to participate in our attempts to remedy
the harms they have wrought on our society.
Having
a woman Prime Minister and an equal number of male and
female cabinet ministers is all good. But any positive
changes Johanna and her female colleagues will bring
about will be because they are in tune with the values
of society at large, rather than the values of the current
ruling elite. Not because they are women, but because
they are Icelanders.
My
"nationalist response": Gender issues
aside, Iceland will never fully overcome this debacle
until a larger percentage of its leaders become dedicated,
fully informed nationalists --taking what I call the "international
nationalist" approach that I describe in greater
detail on my americafirstbooks.com home page. They must
maintain an unswerving loyalty to preserve the heritage
and sovereignty of their own people, while developing
the sophistication to deal with a complex and often dangerous
external world filled with human predators and parasites.
The
history of nations is typically written in blood and sacrifice.
It is typically necessary to tap into deeply felt, common
religious instincts to motivate altruistic sacrifice for
the common good. There is nothing better for motivating
preservation of a tribal nation state than a tribal religion.
"'Crime
Once Exposed Has no Refuge but in Audacity." -Tacitus,
by Iris Erlingsdottir, January 19, 2009 observed:
Unfortunately,
there was no moral underpinning behind the actions taken
by the government, ostensibly for the public good. Rather
than protecting the public, high-ranking government
officials had used the occasion to solidify their positions
and to enrich themselves, their relatives and their
friends. Knowledgeable oversight of the financial sector
never materialized, and warnings of impending disaster
were ridiculed and ignored.
When
a commercial opportunity arose, it went to one of the
in-crowd. When an important position opened in the government,
it went to one of the in-crowd. As was happening in
the United States, talent, competence and experience
took a back seat to loyalty.
My
"nationalist response" The issue that
Ms. Erlingsdottir raises here is more complicated than
whether or not commercial or government jobs go to members
of a particular Icelandic "in-crowd."
On
the one hand, Icelanders need to preserve tribal loyalty
and protect their society against alien infiltrators who
would shamelessly rape their country if left unchecked.
On the other hand, they have to guard against forms of
cronyism and nepotism that undermine meritocracy or could
reward criminality.
Norwegian
and Japanese nationalists have developed some interesting
"hybrid" approaches to try to address these
questions.
The
Norwegian government has retained 50% ownership of Statoil,
one of its leading energy firms. In many respects, this
is analogous to a "poison
pill" defense used by corporate boards of directors
on Wall Street to prevent hostile merger and acquisitions
by aliens.
Libertarians
like the late Harry
Browne, author of Why
Government Doesn't Work (PDF), are correct that
"government" --particularly large government
that has "outgrown" direct contact with its
constituents -- is typically all about dim-witted, wasteful
bureaucrats who try to grow their departmental interests
like cancers. Bureaucrats also typically lack the entrepreneurial
talent necessary to create real wealth.
Despite
all these problems with government ownership, the prospect
of complete takeover by Zionist kleptocrats like George
Soros is vastly worse. Hence, retaining some kind of government
ownership may be the least bad of many bad options. At
least 50% of the profits are guaranteed to flow to a government
that hopefully will pass them on to the people of Norway,
rather than loot them out of the country, as in the case
of the Jewish oligarchs who took over Russian natural
resource companies during Yeltsin era.
In
an effort to promote competitive meritocracy while retaining
"all in the family" tribal control, the Japanese
have promoted"in-house" competition. METI,
the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry
("MITI"
prior to 2001), encouraged the policy that within each
strategic industry Japan should have at least three different
competitors owned and operated by Japanese.
I
think that a huge problem with Iceland's power elite is
that it is not adequately committed to nationalism and
industrialization. Instead, it has been brainwashed by
the "Yuppie" values of the "me" and
"X" generations encouraged by Jewish-controlled
media in America and the UK.
In
his 7 April 2010 1st hour interview with Alex Jones, (36:01
into this show) Alan Watt of "Cutting Through the
Matrix" commented on how horrible this brainwashing
in America and the UK has become:
Alan Watt: [36:17]...Yes,
and what you find too is that the big authors who worked
for the Fabian Society, which is just a specialized
arm to control left wing for the socialized world, to
bring in on behalf of the elite, results by the elite
themselves, and funded by them...international affairs,
they are all specialized branches of the same thing.
And you will find their authors have talked about this
particular age we are in today. One of them was Arnold
Toynbee, a professor at Oxford. He was the one who taught
Rhodes Scholars for world government on behalf of the
elite. And he said in his own history books as a philosopher
and historian, he said that this is what happens at
the end of an age when an empire is going down. Now
the elite always moves out before the empire crashes,
by the way. You never see that the rich people get put
under. And they bring homosexuality to the fore, lesbianism.
Party, party, party for the wealthy elites, and then
the rest emulate that too. There are fewer and fewer
children. Infanticide becomes very common. And so they
know the techniques of bringing down society. Everyone
is partying, having fun. Entertainment, drama, plays
staged as never before. And this can be re-implemented
at any time in any culture in any empire. As long as
you bring in the same formula in sequence, you can recreate
that and bring the people down to a particular slave
level. And that was also said by Professor Carol Quigley
who was a historian for the Council on Foreign Relations.
And he taught at the U.S. State Department. He taught
the diplomats, and he also taught the guys in the Pentagon.
So they use knowledge for weapons. Knowledge is power.
And it can be weaponized, if you understand the techniques
and formulas to reintroduce the same sequences, you
can bring people down as you control them.
Every stage of the way. And today we are living as a
Sodom and Gomorrah. Regular television now is basically
pornography. They are bringing up live, simulated sex
shows on British morning TV. This kind of stuff. This
is the key, too. To break all natural bonding rules
that create a strong cultural society. And it starts
really with a man and a woman. That is the first target.
You divide them, you conquer them, you then separate
the children. The state rears the children with new
values, which are all politically correct. Every intake
in kindergarten is taught to a scientific formula so
that then taken the previous year are given a little
upgrade from the previous year before them, for what
they will expect to happen culturally in their society
in their lifetime, so that when it happens they think
it is normal. And Beria, who was a KGB, or NKVD head
of the Soviet Union in 1934 at an international communist
meeting talked about this. He said that is takes 70
years to alter a society in a cultural way to our advantage.
Now, he said, in 1934 it takes five years through indoctrination
of the intakes of children. Today it is down to year
by year by year through kindergarten. It is a scientific
indoctrination, so that they will be brought up in a
world where brain-chipping will be normal, hermaphroditic
beings cloned in laboratories will be normal, all kinds.
There will be no such thing as pedophilia anymore. That
is another big goal. The destruction of all normality
means that you are defenseless against the big boys
because you have no cultural values to hold on to and
stand up for. When you cannot stand up for anything,
you are totally defeated. .
Alex Jones: You are now a blank slate
that they can program anything they want into. You are
an empty hard drive.
Watt: Yes.
Alex Jones: Now I want to go over this,
contestants turn torturers in French TV game show...
My
"nationalist response": The situation
has deteriorated to the point that one must consciously
resist global media to avoid being poisoned by it. This
should be a conscious objective of the Icelandic Modern
Media Initiative.
Industrial
development usually requires much longer planning periods
and payback time horizons than speculative financial trading
operations. However, over the long run, it is really the
only road to true wealth, as Eamonn Fingleton explains
in In
Praise of Hard Industries: Why Manufacturing, Not the
Information Economy, Is the key to Future Prosperity.
Only hard industry can provide tradable goods with a superior
ratio of quality to price, thereby increasing physical
wealth and earning a source of foreign exchange. Only
automation can make infinite, sequential improvements
in productivity and cost reduction. A long term sense
of caretakership by the elite in a society towards its
own work force and national resources is vitally important
to help motivate long term planning and reinvestment for
industry.
Deep
down inside your business leaders have to care
about enhancing the domestic industrial power of their
nation. They have to take pride in creating good jobs
for young men entering the job market who need to support
wives and families. Instead, in degenerate counties like
the U.S.and UK, we have too many "business leaders"
who only care about making as much money as quickly as
possible by by cutting covers anyway they can, so that
they can afford more cocaine and hookers. They could care
less about the growing ranks of the unemployed or underemployed
from deindustrialization and outsourcing as long as it
does not happen to them.
Anarcho-libertarian
economic ideology, where somehow the "free market"
will magically improve living standards while everyone
just looks out for himself can actually be a smokescreen
and cop-out to justify criminal and treasonous behavior
towards ones own nation and people. This is why I continually
insist that while anarcho-libertarians can make many good
points, they reflect only 25% of reality at best and may
only be considered "necessary but not sufficient."
"'Crime
Once Exposed Has no Refuge but in Audacity." -Tacitus,
by Iris Erlingsdottir, January 19, 2009 observed:
And
as the Americans learned when disaster struck New Orleans,
loyalty can't hold back the floodwaters once the dam
bursts. As thousands of Icelanders are swimming in debt,
the top officials and plutocrats fly over in their private
jets, mouthing words of pity, but not accepting any
responsibility for allowing matters to get out of hand.
Not one member of the government has resigned or accepted
responsibility, and not a single member of the financial
elite has admitted any error. No investigations appear
to be under way, but the government has appointed a
special prosecutor: the sheriff of Akranes, a rural
town of 6,000, is to investigate some of the most complicated
financial crimes of all times! And we are told that
we need to "move forward" and "stop pointing
fingers!"
Somehow,
the members of this small tribe got it into their heads
that they were special, and that the rules applicable
to everyone else did not apply to them. They see themselves
as indispensable to the proper functioning of the government
and the business enterprises -- despite all evidence
to the contrary -- and cannot conceive turning over
the reins to others.
Ultimately,
their failure is their lack of trust and solidarity
with their countrymen. They had to have known long ago
that the house of cards they had constructed would fall,
and take down their country with them. Rather than coming
clean early on and trusting their political opponents
to work out a solution, they funneled money to foreign
bank accounts, foreign businesses, and foreign homes
to ensure that they would escape the wreckage, then
used their contacts in the government to keep the illusion
intact as long as possible, while they jumped in their
lifeboats.
My
"nationalist response": The "members
of this small tribe" that Ms. Erlingsdottir refers
to above have actually committed treason and embraced
the parasitic values of an alien tribe called Zionists.
Therefore, it would be more appropriate to call them a
"criminal gang" rather than use a word like
"tribe" which might cast unnecessary aspersions
on healthy and legitimate forms of Nordic-Celtic Icelandic
tribalism.
I
think that another important reason for the selfishness
of the power elite is that it has been programmed with
selfish "Yuppie" values that confuse"libertarianism"
with "libertinism." A viable nationalist policy
must openly make the distinction, and clearly denounce
libertinism.
Throughout
history, successful libertarian societies have sought
to simply decentralize political power and social responsibility,
but not get rid of these things. If anything, such societies
need even more social responsibility and initiative
on a local level, not less.
In
addition, on a cultural level successful libertarian societies
have simply sought to decentralize such manly and womanly
virtues as mental toughness, far-sighted social planning,
and law enforcement, but not get rid of these things either.
In
order for a libertarian society to work, one often needs
a spirit of self-sacrifice and volunteerism, where the
common citizen goes out of his way to take on additional
responsibilities to insure the success of the overall
society. As an example, Tennessee adopted the motto "The
Volunteer State" from the early 19th century
pioneer era when the values of its citizens were much
closer to the libertarian values of medieval Icelanders.
In
contrast, the libertine
is an amoral, irresponsible, and selfish person who
seeks to exploit freedom for his own personal gratification,
and could care less about what social burdens he dumps
on others.
A
number of historians have observed that Scandinavian farmers
in the Midwest in the 19th century who worked their own
land were typically tougher on themselves than any lords
of the manor were on serfs in the old country. Similarly,
as volunteer members of militias or sheriff's posses,
they typically showed greater courage and initiative than
most European professional soldiers or police. Lastly,
as voting members of a republic, these citizens tried
to be even better informed and vigilant than aristocratic
rentier classes in old Europe.
One
of the main reasons why America is in such sad shape today
is because so many of our own "leaders" have
used "freedom" as an excuse to shirk rather
than assume greater individual responsibilities. .
As
one example, the late Harry Browne, who was once a Presidential
candidate for the Libertarian Party, said during one of
his online seminars said that fighting never resolves
anything. He said that he never saw a conflict he would
not walk away from and handle through reason.
Although
I like Harry Browne's book Why Government Doesn't
Work, I view his expression of pacifism as a form
of self-indulgent cowardice. Most early American libertarians
ranging from soldiers in the American Revolution to settlers
on the Oregon Trail, had almost the opposite attitude.
|
 |
 |
Left:
Eric the Red, an example of a medieval Icelandic "libertarian"
who was no pacifist. Right: An example of Hollywood art imitating
life. Steve McQueen plays "Nevada Smith," whose
personal vengeance against the murderers of his parents is
consistent with early American libertarian values of the frontier.
|
In
a true libertarian society, men actually have to be tougher
and more proactive on average than citizens who want to feel
"protected" by professional police furnished by a
"statist" society. As
another example which demonstrated post WWII confusion between
libertarianism and libertinism, Hugh Hefner conflated "real
freedom" with "anti-Puritanism" in his 1966 interview
on William Buckley's Firing Line. |
Having
previously referred to Puritans in this work as "hardline
followers of an inverted religion fabricated by Asiatic Jews
with possible Neanderthal lineage," I am not overly fond
of their theology either. However, the self-restraint of the
Puritans, who came from the most Nordic part of England, reflected
a certain stern streak in the Nordic character. Their personal
drive and self-discipline was an important component of the
old Protestant work ethic that helped make America the greatest
industrial power with the highest standard of living in the
19th century.
It
is hard to be a good libertarian when one is destitute. Therefore,
a certain level of rationality, self-restraint, and work productivity
is required to build a successful economy and sustain a viable
libertarian society.
Regarding
Hefner's Playboy
Philosophy, some of the biggest constraints on sexual
morality have more to do with "objective reality"
than any particular religious or political ideology, as Dr.
Raymond Cattell might have pointed out in a book like A
New Morality From Science: Beyondism. Most men are more
constrained by their financial ability to support a family
than their ability to have sex. If a guy knocks up a girl,
usually somebody has to help take care of her and raise the
kid. Conversely, if a man never gets a girl pregnant, his
own family line dies out. If everyone within a tribe or race
fails to reproduce, they effectively genocide themselves.
In
many ways, Hugh Hefner was simply slick about working the
porno cash register on a society that had become highly
disoriented from Jewish cultural Marxism promoted by Jewish-controlled
national media and also by WWII Allied propaganda that condemned
the conscious German Nationalist Socialist emphasis on supporting
large and healthy white families.
Part
of the severity of the early Puritans in America came from
the fact that many of them had to deal with a very harsh environment,
to include a very real threat of getting wiped out by winters
or Indian attacks.
It
is also worth mentioning that the original focus of the libertarian
ideals of the American Revolution was to combat tyranny, not
to promote self-indulgence. To overcome the forces of tyranny,
one requires a certain critical mass of men motivated to engage
in self-sacrifice for the long term common good, rather than
focused upon immediate personal gratification and self-indulgence.
Remember, at the onset of an insurrection, tyrants typically
control the financial system and military forces, whereas
rebels are typically poverty stricken and have mostly honor
and moral suasion on their side to organize successful resistance.
One of the greatest enemies of true patriots are informers
who give police state oppressors the information they need
to unjustly smear them in controlled media or to even round
patriots up and kill them. This is because tyrants typically
have more than enough money (since they typically control
the banking system and can literally print it) to buy off
corrupt able people. Resistance to tyranny has never been
easily, particularly once the moral backbone of ones own nation
has been eroded.
The
libertine can be an irresponsible social parasite or criminal.
By dumping unwarranted banking system risk on their fellow
citizens, and by encouraging a bad national strategy that
ruined society as a whole while benefiting only a few, Iceland's
irresponsible leaders were practicing libertinism and not
libertarianism.
Before
leaving the topic of sex and society, some good excellent
additional reading that squarely exposes flaws in Hefner's
philosophy have been written by Dr. Henry Makow, a Canadian-Jewish
writer. His works provide valuable links to other sources.
The following are some examples Dr. Makow's insightful works:
2010-02-28 Most
Men are Victims of Porn
2009-02-24 Why
All Porn is Gay (Encore)
2001-11-01 Playboy
and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution
The
article "Wall Street on the Tundra" by Lewis comments
upon important redeeming character traits of Icelanders:
“I
think it is easier to take someone in the fishing industry
and teach him about currency trading,” he says, “than
to take someone from the banking industry and teach them
how to fish.”
He
then explained why fishing wasn’t as simple as I thought.
It’s risky, for a start, especially as practiced by
the Icelandic male. “You don’t want to have
some sissy boys on your crew,” he say s, especially
as Icelandic captains are famously manic in their fishing
styles. “I had a crew of Russians once,” he
says, “and it wasn’t that they were lazy, but
the Russians are always at the same pace.” When a
storm struck, the Russians would stop fishing, because it
was too dangerous. “The Icelanders would fish in all
conditions,” says Stefan, “fish until it is
impossible to fish. They like to take the risks. If you
go overboard, the probabilities are not in your favor. I’m
33, and I already have two friends who have died at sea.”
My
"nationalist response": The "nationalist"
viewpoint looks at character traits as a potential source
of national "comparative advantage," whereas the
"environmental viewpoint" generally ignores them.
America
is a good example where the environmental viewpoint, or "egalitarianism,"
has been pushed to such extremes that it is actually inverted.
For example, most Americans are brainwashed by their controlled
media and education system to believe that Jews are most noble
people on earth, whereas in most other countries throughout
history they have been viewed as one of the most deceitful,
psychopathic, and ignoble of all races, as noted in the "Neanderthal-related"
articles. Americans are also taught to not only be oblivious
to the steady decline of its Nordic population, but consider
it "racist" to raise the topic, and even rejoice
in the way Nordic Americans have been biologically replaced
by illegal Third World immigrants.
This
anecdote about how Icelandic fisherman are willing to be more
daring than Russians is an excellent example where alleged
"hillbilly traits" can be a fantastic strength.
On
a military level, "valor," "toughness,"
and "initiative" have been longstanding"trademarks"
of Nordic peoples. For example, The
History Channel -Barbarians - The Vikings begins "Late
in the eighth century, they burst from the frigid seas of
the North, to take the world by storm. For the next three
hundred years, they ravaged the civilized nations. Nothing
can stop them. Not the oceans. Not the dread of the unknown.
Not the rulers of Europe. They are the Vikings, and behind
their barbaric legend lies an even more spectacular reality.
Explorers, settlers, and traders, Vikings strike out across
the sea in search of plunder and legitimate wealth..."
In
more recent centuries we have seen either Nordic peoples or
closely related peoples employ a tremendous combination of
valor and small unit initiative to achieve impressive battlefield
results. A classic example was the Battle of King's Mountain,
South Carolina during the War of Independence, where militia
made up of Anglo-Saxon-Celtic and Scots-Irish Americans surrounded
and annihilated a British and Tory unit of equal size utilizing
innovative and flexible tactics. One of the American leaders,
Isaac Shelby of Tennessee, exhorted
his men "When we encounter the enemy, don't wait
for a word of command. Let each of you be your own officer,
and do the very best you can....If in the woods, shelter yourselves
and give them Indian play; advance from tree to tree...and
killing and disabling all you can...."
Other
historic examples include the Dutch-descended Boer Kommando
units, that fought the British army to a standstill although
badly outnumbered in the Boer War, or the part-Nordic, part-Finno-Ugric
peoples whose patrols wreaked havoc deep behind Soviet Army
lines in the Winter War.
In
his article "Military
Matters: Learning from Norway" William S. Lind laments
the lack of interest by the U.S. military in developing fluid
maneuver warfare tactics that were once exemplified by "Norway's
greatest naval commander, Peter Wessel Tordenskjold."
The
1998 Reader's Digest article "What
makes them so tough? The harder the challenge, the more Norwegians
like it," by Lucinda Hahn has the following abstract
summary "Norwegians' superior showing in winter sports
is traceable to their abiding love for life and its challenges.
Everyone, including children and elderly people, takes weekend
skiing tours in the forest. They are never bothered by the
cold temperature for they are always attired warmly."
This, combined with their stoicism and adventurousness, usually
characterizes them as a "hardy
people."
Fishing
was was once classified as one of the most dangerous occupations
in America, more so than being an IRS or FBI agent, steeplejack,
coal-miner, or high rise steel worker. Its practice for thousands
of years by Nordic peoples has been both a reflection of their
character, and at the same time has also put a stamp on their
character. It is quite common in sociobiology for genetic
sculpturing influences to serve as both a cause and an effect
at the same time.
Dr.
Odd S. Lovoll, a retired Norwegian-America professor of Scandinavians
studies at St. Olaf's college, told me once that he had conducted
a study of fishing villages in western Norway. He was surprised
at the relative scarcity of graves of adult males compared
to women and children. The local people told him that in earlier
eras, most men who spent their lives at sea could expect to
eventually run out of luck, get caught in a bad storm, and
drown.
These
character traits can have enormous social, political, and
even economic implications. My 1957 edition of Encyclopedia
Britannica notes that the northern European countries
tended to be much more resistant to fascism than the southern
European countries in the 1930's.
Referring
to predator vs. counter-predator ecological models, it takes
a certain critical mass within the general population of individual
initiative, intelligence, and courage to face off the bullying
of would-be tyrants. Using the diffusion of innovations paradigm,
it also takes a certain critical mass of innovators and early
adopters as critical thinkers to see through and resist tyrant
propaganda
In
his 7 April 2010 (2nd hour) interview with Alex Jones, Dr.
Paul Craig Roberts deplored the lack of individual courage
and self-sufficiency found in America today, combined with
a reliance by the state on bullying rather than reason:
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: [36:13]...Where
is it going? The local police now are militarized. If you
go to a gun club, all the police will be there. They have
got automatic . weapons. There will twenty, thirty, forty
or fifty of them and they are practicing massed fire, and
what is it all about? It is for controlling the people who
pay our salaries. So the whole thing is set up to prevent
any kind of opposition from the population. And it is like
you say, they can now declare anybody to be a terrorist.
And therefore they can confiscate not just your life and
rights, but all your assets. So it is a police state. People
are not aware of this. They still pray the government is
there to protect them in some way. I get a lot of emails
from people who are already suffering the types of intrusions
where they read my book about how the law has been destroyed
and they are wondering what they can do. Of course they
haven't any rights, so they can't do anything. I don't know
how much of it is a plan of the direct goal in mind, or
how much it is just police grabbing power. And of course
it does not much matter, because under either system we
have lost our rights. It is very hard for people, even if
they are organized, and have weapons, to resist because
of the kinds of weapons that police and military have. I
mean, they have military rifles, to the kinds of weapons
that people have is feeble.
Alex Jones: And now under NORTHCOM we have
the military everywhere, conditioning the public at DWI
checkpoints, at the Kentucky Derby, at football games, searching
children, running checkpoints on the highways, an armed
camp drilling and training to go after us.
Roberts: Right.
Jones: I want to cover one other issue
before we get into the economy, Dr. Roberts. Have you seen
the gun camera footage from three years ago in Iraq that
Wikileaks released a few days ago. They said that they have
got scores of these videos that they are going to be releasing
where they are killing the kids and shooting a minivan trying
to get a wounded reporter off the street, and a secondarily
I get these emails, it is a minority of emails, saying "How
dare you criticize our troops? This is a war" Well
yes, this is a war that was built on lies on WMD's, we go
invade the country, we kill over a million of them, and
there is this droning, brainwashed message that we have
got to support the troops by keeping them in two or three
or five or six tours, and treating them like garbage when
they get back. There is just this mindless supposed patriotism
to worship tyranny. It is very reminiscent of what happened
in Nazi Germany.
Dr. Roberts. Yes, that is right. They are
Brown Shirts. I have been calling them Brown Shirts for
years, and you have described it accurately. That is exactly
the situation. This is another reason I thought writing
for these people is pointless. I mean, they cannot fathom
the danger they are in. And many of them, of course, are
still fighting the Vietnam War. They are still angry that
we did not win the war, but suppose we had won, what would
be any different? The whole thing is some form of emotional
infantilism. There are still people who are three years
old. They are ruled by some sort of blind emotion which
is incapable of thought. They cannot even take in facts.
So talking to them is a waste of time.
Alex Jones: Well it is arrested development.
They are very childlike. Facts meaning nothing. And it is
this petty power trip that they are part of the state. They
are part of the system. They are winners. But that very
system is destroying their future as well, and as you know,
as someone who has researched history, once you get into
one big lie, then it is a bigger lie, a bigger lie, and
then things accelerate at the end, and do you now agree
that we have now reached that acceleration point where all
of this preparatory slide into tyranny and corruption has
seemed fast, but we ain't seen nothing yet.
Dr. Roberts. Yes, that is true, and if
you look at the complicity of the Federal courts, even the
supreme court, I mean how quiet they have been and tolerant
of this. And the law schools, and the law deans, and the
bar associations, and the law firms. Where ever you have
looked there is just acceptance. There is essentially acceptance
of this. You would have thought all the prestigious law
schools would be on their high horse. The bar associations.
People would be screaming "What are you doing? You
can't destroy civil liberties on the basis of a hoax?"
But that is exactly what is happening. And people are accepting
it. They just try to find some way to make money out of
it.
In
contrast to the mental "hardening of the arteries"
evident across America, "Wall Street Tundra," the
author explains how a Nordic spirit of personal initiative,
problem solving flexibility, and heroism is still alive and
well in Iceland:
...
No one thought that Icelanders might have some natural gift
for smelting aluminum, and, if anything, the opposite proved
true. Alcoa, the biggest aluminum company in the country,
encountered two problems peculiar to Iceland when, in 2004,
it set about erecting its giant smelting plant. The first
was the so-called “hidden people”—or,
to put it more plainly , elves—in whom some large
number of Icelanders, steeped long and thoroughly in their
rich folkloric culture, sincerely believe. Before Alcoa
could build its smelter it had to defer to a government
expert to scour the enclosed plant site and certify that
no elves were on or under it. It was a delicate corporate
situation, an Alcoa spokesman told me, because they had
to pay hard cash to declare the site elf-free but, as he
put it, “we couldn’t as a company be in a position
of acknowledging the existence of hidden people.”
The other, more serious problem was the Icelandic male:
he took more safety risks than aluminum workers in other
nations did. “In manufacturing,” say s the spokesman,
“you want people who follow the rules and fall in
line. You don’t want them to be heroes. You don’t
want them to try to fix something it’s not their job
to fix, because they might blow up the place.” The
Icelandic male had a propensity to try to fix something
it wasn’t his job to fix.
My
"nationalist response": This is an interesting
passage because it makes individual initiative look like a
weakness. This is typical of many Nordic traits, which tend
to be duel-edged swords. They are great strengths in some
situations, "weaknesses" in others. This has to
be factored into any nationalist analysis that looks for areas
of "comparative advantage" regarding competition
with other countries.
It
can be a misleading over-generalization to state that in manufacturing
you do not want people who try to fix something that is not
their job to fix.
Two
of the greatest inventors in American history saw themselves
as "tinkerers" and "experimenters," namely
Thomas Edison and Nicolas Tesla. Edison said that genius was
99% perspiration and 1% inspiration. While Tesla was more
theoretical in his approach than Edison, he still continually
engaged in abstract forms of tinkering.
Nordic
New Englanders of the 18th and 19th centuries gave rise to
the term "Yankee Ingenuity" through their propensity
to tinker. They contributed successful inventions completely
out of proportion to their percentage of the overall population.
In
My
Life and Work, Henry Ford talks about how he was
always looking for ways to increase shop floor beneficial
suggestions and innovation. The Scanlon
Plan is another famous example in American management
history of an incentive system designed to increase shop floor
"heroes."
In
fact, one can make the case that when the Japanese started
to take the shop floor quality improvement ideas of W.
Edwards Deming more seriously than their American counterparts
in the 1960's, this became symptomatic of the beginning of
America's long decline in manufacturing capabilities.
|
|