Part
3
Are Icelanders Victims of High Level
Subversion?
A False Flag Analysis
First edition published 30 May 2010
Updated 21 Dec 2010
 In
this section I use the term "false flag operation"
in an abstract sense to connote a major decoy operation by a
criminal/parasitic power elite to destabilize and exploit a
society for its own own benefit.
Deception
is inherently hostile, because it constitutes theft of truth.
The term "false flag" comes from the practice of certain
pirate ships who flew the flag of a friendly nation while closing
in on prey to keep them off guard until they could grapple and
board them. The pirates might wait until the vary last moment
to raise the Jolly Roger until it was too late for their surprised
victims to defend themselves.
As
I explain in Chapter
38 of my Trilogy, a false flag operation may be
viewed as key form of covert 4th generation warfare,
using the paradigm of military analyst William S. Lind.
On
the flip side of all this, a "nationalist" analysis
looks at factors that help keep a society healthy, strong, cohesive,
aware, and independent. Using a medical model, a "false
flag" operation is like a deliberate disease infection
process, whereas "nationalism" is similar to "whole
body health measures" that seek to boost the immune system
through adequate sleep, nutrition, exercise, and positive mental
attitude. In many ways "false flag" and "nationalism"
are inversely correlated with each other, like cat vs. rat or
"predator vs. counter predator" models in animal ecology.
There
are many different interesting permutations of the false flag
concept. In Chapter
7 and Chapter
8 of my Mission of Conscience Trilogy I explain
9/11 as a classic example of a violent, completely fabricated
false flag operation run by Mossad-CIA. In Chapter
38 I discuss other aspects of false flag operations that
help the reader form a deeper understanding, such as the nature
of covert forms of 4th generation warfare and the use of PSYOP
(Psychological Operations) in support of such campaigns.
 A
deception campaign can include an unnaturally positive event
as well as a completely fabricated violent attack or "MIHOP"
( Made It Happen On Purpose). A "sugar false flag"
operation might include an artificial liquidity-driven business
boom and bull market generated by a central bank. The central
bank typically increases the money supply, plus expands credit
by dropping interest rates and dropping fractional reserve requirements
of member banks. The surges in liquidity usually fuels a climate
of speculation, which in turn induces many businesses to get
overextended. This is situation becomes especially dangerous
when the same people who control the central bank are also tightly
in league with people who control major media and Wall Street
research departments. The sum total of all of this is often
enough to convince prudent people to drop their guard. When
the bust comes along, the overextended businesses go bankrupt.
Then false flag bankers who fabricated this artificial boom-bust
cycle can swoop in and gobble up good assets for pennies on
the dollar.
In
Chapter
33, I provide actual cases in American history from the
video The Money Masters where central bankers like
Nicholas Biddle during the Andrew Jackson era openly admitted
that they deliberately played these destructive games on the
public.
This
also reminds me of the 1962 Walt Disney movie The
Mooncussers, where pirates set up fake lighthouses
to lure merchant ships to run aground on moonless nights, and
then go out in rowboats to loot the ships, claiming them as
salvage.
A
sugar false flag operation can also be purely psychological
in nature. A growing number of Americans believe that the Moon
landings were a
hoax designed to garner false prestige for America, as discussed
in Chapter
38. This not only kept military space programs run through
NASA on the Congressional funding gravy train, but also helped
to offset America's blackened reputation from its failures in
Vietnam. Longer term, it also helped mask the steady decline
in the American industrial base and American competitiveness
that began in the mid-1960's, along with erosion of the white
middle class. It bought America's criminal power elite more
time to continue their looting of America and America's black
check support for Israel. It also created the illusion that
America could be as successful with "social reengineering"
as it had apparently been with "space engineering."
If a country is clever enough to be able to successfully make
a round trip to the moon, why can't it also be clever enough
to figure out a way to indulge in dropping LSD, race-mixing,
wife-swinging, extreme feminism, and other nihilistic expressions
of Jewish "cultural Marxism" promoted by Jewish Hollywood
and get away with all that as well?
Some
of the first major "mainstream" documentation of America's
decline appeared in the 1980's. This included the books Profits
Without Production by Seymour Melman (Alfred Knopf:
1983), U.S.
Competitiveness in the World Economy by Professor
Bruce R. Scott and George C. Lodge (Harvard Business School
Press, 1984), or the 16 April 1990 Forbes article "Why
Japan Loves Robots and We Don't" by Andrew Tanzer and Ruth
Simon.
In
fact, in 1987 Professor Bruce Scott at the Harvard Business
School published a paper titled "U.S. Economist in the
World Economy: An Update" which he used for the lecture
circuit. It begins:
The
U.S. has been in competitive decline since the mid-1960's;
continuing decline can be expected until major economy policy
and institutional changes are made...
America's
Zionist power elite has been served notice for a long time to
rehabilitate the white middle class and the Protestant work
ethic, and refocus America on the basics --or else. Instead,
they have continued to run America ever further down the road
of the casino economy geared towards financial speculation,
knowing full well that it will all come to a bad end. It is
like they are addicted to intrigues that produce quick gains,
whether it involves false flag operations that quickly manipulate
public opinion, or economic policies that offshore industry
which are designed to produce relatively quick short term profits
for a few while sacrificing the long term industrial prosperity
of America.
|
\
| Another
important type of false flag operation is the "LIHOP."
An "opportunistic" or "LIHOP" (Let It Happen
On Purpose) false flag operation embellishes an actual event so
much that that it contains most of the propaganda characteristics
of a completely synthetic false flag event. In Chapter
15 I explain how Hurricane Katrina in 2005 got magnified by
the likelihood that saboteurs blew up New Orleans dikes to create
artificial flooding, and in Chapter
34 I explain how media uproar over an alleged Von Brunn Holocaust
Museum shooting incident may have been a distortion and embellishment
of a "friendly fire"-related death of a museum guard.
|
|
Icelandic
leaders were penetrated by "Circle Z." They were deceived
into dangerously over-leveraging their country in the context
of extremely risky global financial markets. They were selectively
"thrown off the lifeboat" along with Lehman Bothers
by "Circle Z" bankers in the Sept-Oct 2008 time frame.
The potential damage to Icelandic national sovereignty has been
extremely serious.
Things
can always go from bad to even worse if Icelanders fail to wake
up. If Iceland ever gets saddled with a Zionist power elite
in permanent direct control of the country, we can expect that
they will eventually run Iceland completely into the ground
just like America. This would include not only the replacement
of productive industry with financial speculation, but also
the importation of enough racial and ethnic "diversity"
to create a heavy burden of permanent social strife. We could
also expect these criminals to try to keep most Icelanders fooled
most of the time through the routine use of various types of
false flag or black ops.
I
have adapted the following outline of false flag characteristics
from Chapter
8 of my Mission of Conscience series as part of
a preliminary analysis.
False flag operations typically
reflect major geopolitical interests
George
Soros is in a class of his own when it comes to addressing major
geopolitical interests. I have already provided Wayne Madsen
reports that detail his operations. I will briefly recapitulate
some points stated earlier here:
a)
Madsen stated: "Soros has long preyed on Iceland's economy.
WMR's sources reveal that during the winter of 2007-2008, Soros
hedge funds were shorting the Icelandic krona."
b)
Soros wants to use Wikileaks and other Iceland based entities
as false fronts to selectively attack competitors. Please note
my discussion in Chapter
38 about how Mossad-CIA has tried to exploit the prestige
other Scandinavian entities, such as Norwegian shipping companies
and the Nobel Prize Committee, for its own false front purposes
as well.
c)
After encouraging an artificial boom and bust cycle with Iceland,
Madsen claims that Soros wants to come in and buy up strategic
assets for cheap
d)
By increasing unemployment and other forms of social distress,
Soros hopes to stampede Iceland into the EU and other "common
market" or "free trade" organizations, thereby
reducing barriers to Zionist-controlled multi-national corporations
that want to move into Iceland and take over its natural resources.
A
number of major media have explicitly identified Iceland's potential
in the natural resource arena. The following are two examples.
Iceland
on Track for Joining EU by Ian Traynor, guardian.co.uk,
24 Feb 2010 states:
Foreign
policy analysts have long predicted a contest between the
US, Russia, Canada, and Scandinavia for control of the mineral
wealth and shipping lanes of the far north...
E.U.
Body Sees Strategic Reasons to Encourage Iceland
by Stephen Castle, New York Times, 24 Feb 2010 states:
On
Wednesday, the European Commission made no secret of its interest
in Iceland as a foothold in the Arctic region. Its rich mineral
resources will, analysts suggest, be increasingly contested
by global powers.
Stefan
Fuele, the European commissioner for enlargement, said that
there had been much discussion about the “strategic
importance of the Arctic.
“I
think this is where our partners from Iceland can be extremely
helpful,” he said at a press conference in Brussels.
On
Tuesday, Carl Bildt, the Swedish foreign minister, made a
similar argument at a meeting held by the European Policy
Center in Brussels, saying that Icelandic membership would
bring the Union into Arctic issues where “the E.U. is
virtually absent from the big play.”
At
the other extreme from natural resources, in the realm of ethnic
and cultural intangibles, "Circle Z" also has another
geopolitical objective. This involves ongoing psycho-political
warfare against Nordic peoples in particular, and the white
world in general.
a)
Jewish organizations spearheaded the immigration reform act
in the U.S. of the mid-1960's that opened up America to Third
World immigration. America has dropped from 90% white in the
1960's to around 70% today. Within a few years, more nonwhites
will be born in America than whites, and nonwhites will have
an absolute majority in about 20 years, given current trends.
For more on this trend as it applies to Europe as well as North
America, see The
Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions
Imperil Our Country and Civilization by Pat Buchanan.
Jewish
controlled media in America routinely demonize white nationalists
and encourage multi-racialism and interracial marriage. (As
an example of a white nationalist viewpoint on this issue, please
see, "Who
Rules America?")
There
is also a conscious tactical advantage for Jews to encourage
race-mixing among non-Jews. The ancient formula is "be
publicly left wing towards people in the out-group to make them
drop their guard, and privately right wing among your in-group
to enhance their tribal strength and cohesion." A short
hand for this is "Communism for the gentiles, Zionism for
the Jews" as suggested in the title of Sir Winston Churchill's
famous article "Zionism
versus Bolshevism. A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People."
b)
Zionist groups have actively encouraged Third World immigration
into Scandinavian countries as well as America. See the article
"Will
Beautiful Norway be Snuffed Out?" Arthur Kemp,
22 April 2009. The city of Malmo Sweden is now almost completely
Muslim. Zionist groups in control of Finnish media have even
run billboard campaigns that mock indigenous white Finns, such
as the militant Negro woman in Finnish traditional attire who
stands in for the blond-haired, blue-eyed Elovena "poster
girl" of Finland on billboards. See the Henrik Holappa
archive
page for more details on Jewish media control in Finland
and anti-Finnish initiatives.
Jews
have historically harbored a longstanding racial hatred of whites
that reminds many researchers of the apparent race war between
Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals that took place over tens of thousands
of years. Some believe that Jews today actually reflect
Neanderthal DNA remnants.
|
 |
 |
| Mocking
indigenous, Nordic-looking Finns on a Helsinki billboard. Coming
to Iceland soon courtesy of the City of London, George Soros,
and the New World Order --if Icelandic people prove themselves
too gullible and weak to defend their own heritage, freedom,
and popular sovereignty. |
c)
Zionists have waged a continuing battle for political power
consolidation in both Europe and North America. They have simultaneously
shown contempt for genuine forms of Nordic libertarianism as
well as the Nordic peoples themselves.
Zionists
have converted London from a mostly Anglo-Saxon and Celtic city
after WWII into a majority nonwhite city, and have even promoted
a paranoid, Orwellian, surveillance society. For example, “`Intelligent'
Pre-Crime Surveillance Cameras Coming Within Five Years:
Minority Report style devices to monitor `suspicious' individuals"
by Steve Watson, Infowars.net, Sept 23, 2009
Britain
has more security cameras than any other country in Europe.
Estimates puts the total at 4.2 million, or one for every
14 people, with one million in London alone. Privacy International,
assesses that the British public is the most watched citizenry
in Europe.
To
put that in perspective, in the Communist police state of
China, which has a population of 1.3 billion, there are
just 2.75 million cameras, the equivalent of one for every
472,000 of its citizens.
At
the time of the America's War for Independence, the white
population in America was overwhelming WASP and Nordic. It
is also important to note that the Protestant Reformation
tended to flourish in those parts of Europe with majority
Nordic populations. In the last century, the Nordic percentage
of the white population in America has dropped from over 75%
to less than 25%. One might argue that on a deep demographic
and sociological level, by replacing Nordic stock, America
has effectively reversed both the American Revolution and
Protestant Reformation.
Today,
the steady march of the U.S. government towards an ever more
authoritarian police state shows all the most corrupt and
repressive tendencies of the Catholic Church of the late Middle
Ages. It is arguably worse on a secular level than everything
Martin Luther ever protested against. It also reflects a vastly
greater percentage of innately authoritarian people within
the general population than what existed in 1776. For more
on the rising police state and increased censorship and repression
in America, please see Chapter
28 and see Chapter
31 of the Trilogy. For more on demographic changes
that have biologically replaced Nordic America, see my "Handling
Real Nazis' discussion in Chapter
34.
In
my discussion of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology
in my mutualism
vs. parasitism article, I explain how part of the Jewish
tenancies towards multiracialism and monopoly may reflect
a subconscious tropism towards the Asiatic-despotic, Babylonian
type civilizations where Jews have spent much of their evolutionary
history as "professional minorities." Their unique
evolutionary history has "gone to seed," that is,
has become stamped in their DNA. Jews are a partially race-mixed
people, and people tend to instinctively reshape the environment
around them to share their own characteristics.
In
addition to all of this, the May/June
2010 issue of the Barnes Review argues that there
is strong evidence of Neanderthal genetic remnants within
Jewish populations. Many Jews today have facial features that
resemble Neanderthal reconstructions in museums. Jews have
no significant tradition of aesthetic art, and similarly no
art has been found on the walls of Neanderthal caves. Subterranean
Jewish hatred of gentiles may simply be a continuation "by
other means" of tens of thousands of years of prehistoric
race war between Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal populations in
Europe.
The
innate subconscious Jewish urge towards monopoly, collectivism,
deception, perversion, "neurosis," and psychopathic
behavior that I have just mentioned is almost the exact opposite
of the innate traits of rugged individualism, political decentralization,
wholesome grass roots culture, and manly, chivalrous competition
found among northern European groups like the Scots-Irish
in American history. As one example, the Scots-Irish are a
largely Anglo-Saxon-Celtic people originally from southern
Scotland. Teddy Roosevelt notes in The Winning of the
West how the Scots-Irish played a disproportionate role
in the pioneer culture that "won the West." James
Webb observes in Born
Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America how
they have produced great leaders like Andrew Jackson and George
Patton and were major founders of the country music industry
in places like Nashville, Tennessee and Austin, Texas.
Given
their track record, there should be little doubt that the
long term geopolitical objective of the Zionist oligarchy
in places like Tel Aviv, the City of London, and New York
is to degrade and even liquidate the racial, ethnic, and cultural
heritage of all Nordic peoples throughout Scandinavia and
replace them with aliens.
False
flag operations typically piggy back off honest operations
ostensibly designed to guard against the very evil that gets
executed
The
"piggy-backing" that took place with Iceland was
conducted on a more subtle and abstract level than the exploitation
of military exercises by Mossad-CIA on 9/11. However, an important
underlying principle of false flag operations remains the
same: the operation accomplishes the exact opposite purpose
for which it was publicly intended.
As an example of military exercises that got hijacked by "terrorist"
violence, Webster Tarpley, author of 9/11
Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, has counted 25 different
military exercises that took place at the same time that America
got hit by the 9/11 terror attacks. (See Chapter
8). Similarly, the anti-terror exercises that took place
in London on 7-7-2005 simulated the very subway and bus explosions
that actually took place. (See Chapter
13).
False
flag operators need choreographed exercises so that they can
use them as a template to precisely plan false flag events
on top of them. This includes decoying military and police
reactions to terror operations in progress by camouflaging
them as exercise "chatter. " Military and police
exercises also give false flag operators a valid excuse to
insert themselves in command posts (like "Cheney in the
Bunker" on 9/11) where they can better control military,
police, and even media reactions during all phases of the
operation. Lastly, they can divert part of the massive funding
for exercises to conduct actual false flag attacks.
Now
let us examine how malefactors were able to piggy back "abnormal"
on top of "normal" banking practices during the
Icelandic "privatization" process.
The
normal function of a banker in a healthy society is to facilitate
economic growth by prudently funding productive projects in
proportion to reward and risk. Bank loan officers should create
a well-informed, mutually beneficial relationship with borrowers
and focus on economic fundamentals like income, cash flow,
and assets. In the process, banks should also reward savers
for participating in the loan process and capital markets.
"Privatization" is supposed to enhance successful
entrepreneurship and economic growth by reducing ham-fisted
bureaucratic intervention.
Following
"privatization," Icelandic banks milked an image
of prudent lending practices and stable operations under the
old system to draw in savings. They used this equity capital
to leverage themselves to the hilt to make speculative acquisitions
overseas. They in essence performed a "bait and switch"
on their banking clients, implying a conservatism that did
not exist, and then deploying depositor capital into speculative
investments as financial middlemen that were unsuitable
given the background and lack of explicit consent
of most of their customers.
"Suitability"
and "consent" are key words in the securities industry.
"Speculative investment" often implies a gun-slinging,
impersonal, "devil take the hindmost," and "get
rich quick" attitude behind the deployment of capital
rather than friendly, mutually beneficial economic relationships.
"Speculative investment" also tends to focus on
"market sentiment," "futures" and other
intangibles rather than economic "fundamentals"
like current income, cash flow, and assets. Because of these
intangibles, it is much harder to prove deliberate fraud if
in fact that is what has taken place. In arbitration hearings
and court cases, it is much easier to go after a stock or
commodities broker on suitability and consent-related
issues than fraud-related charges.
Rather
than aid solid economic growth, the "privatized"
banks wound up imploding the Icelandic financial system. By
late 2008, the Icelandic government completely reversed all
privatization by reestablishing government control over 95%
of its banks. When all was said and done, the privatization
exercise in Iceland had accomplished the exact opposite
of everything intended for banks, depositors, borrowers, and
the overall economy alike, just like the hijacked military
and police exercises during New York 9/11 and London 7-7 facilitated
rather than prevented the very terror events exercised.
The
"privatizers" demonstrated a tremendous ability
to conduct concurrent speculative operations that piggybacked
off the old conservative banking operations. They also had
adequate government and local media power to contain any adverse
public reaction during the initial phases of their "outvasion."
The
Icelandic "privatization" and "outvasion"
had some other interesting features in common with New York
9/11 and London 7-7:
a)
All three operation were controlled or spearheaded at the
top by likely malefactors. Examples include "Cheney in
the Bunker" on 9/11, Israeli Prime Minister "Bibi"
Netanyahu who was within a few blocks of the explosions in
London on 7-7 (Chapter
13), and the "two Bjorgolfurs" who served as
billionaire point men of Iceland's banking "privatization"
program.
b).
Each operation was in actuality counterfeit in nature. For
example, on 9/11 U.S. fighter-interceptor assets were redeployed
to Alaska and other areas away from New York City and Washington,
D.C. During the London 7-7 terror attacks, the prime Muslim
"bombing suspects" were shot dead by police in London
rather than arrested and allowed to tell stories that might
contradict the official government story.
The
primary engine of Iceland's "privatization" program
was its central bank, which fueled international financial
empire-building, all done ostensibly in the name of "libertarian
ideology." Yet authentic libertarian ideology is generally
hostile to the very existence of a central bank, preferring
to keep money out of the hands of private centralized bankers
and politicians and in the hands of grass roots entrepreneurs.
It also tends to favor political and economic decentralization
and localism rather than international expansionism.
Please
read Chapter
33 of my Trilogy for detailed background on this issue.
The following is an extract that summarizes some particularly
relevant points:
A
key point of this chapter is that when we approach the concept
of the false flag operation on an abstract intellectual
level, the Fed Reserve Banking System and its Wall Street
allies qualify as continuing false flag operations against
America. They pick America's pocket while misdiagnosing
America's real economic problems.
On
the most basic level, the Fed is a "fiat money"
machine, and there is plenty that is wrong with just this
alone on a purely philosophical level.
The
great French philosopher Voltaire once commented that "fiat"
or "command" money always returns to its intrinsic
value --which is nothing (the value of the paper
a totally debauched currency is printed on). "Fiat
money" is money that is unsecured by any tangible asset
such as gold or silver. It can be created out of thin air
as easily as printing up notes.
What Voltaire was really saying is that history shows that
giving central bankers and politicians the power to issue
fiat money is like giving access to an unlimited supply
of booze to alcoholics. At a minimum, this is not a power
to be handed over lightly to anybody, and certainly not
on a permanent peacetime basis to the revolving door of
political hacks and Zionist cronies one experiences in a
corrupt democracy steered by Jewish controlled national
media.
The
ultimate danger, as I cover in my centralization
vs. decentralization article, is that eventually the
proverbial tail wags the dog. Rather than use the power
to print money as a last ditch resort, it becomes a first
resort. Politicians and central bankers start to invent
programs that "justify" printing ever more money.
Their ability to spend becomes a power drug, and they become
junkies. They even start promulgating unnecessary foreign
wars, Rube
Goldberg "domestic improvement" projects,
vote-buying pork barrel spending, and myriad other horrendous
forms of waste.
All
this contrasts sharply with the "free money" system
used by most Americans during many periods of colonial history
and most of the early 19th century. What this meant is that
Americans were free to use whatever they wanted for legal
tender. This included Spanish and French gold and silver
coins as well as U.S. dollar notes, which were backed up
by grains of silver in the 1792 coinage act.
One
of the ironies of a "free money" system is that
while on the surface it may sound "anarchistic, "
in reality history has demonstrated that it tends to evolve
into the most conservative and strait-laced of all financial
systems. When the common people are able to exercise their
free will, they tend to gravitate towards gold and silver-based
forms of money. This is because mines are generally incapable
of growing the global gold and silver supply more than about
4% a year, and furthermore, for thousands of years of practical
experience, gold and silver have always emerged as the best
forms of money on account of their special characteristics.
(For a more detailed discussion, please see my 2004 series
that starts with: "The
Dual Nature of Gold and a Mystery")
In
contrast, a central bank system, which sounds on the surface
like it is the most "controlled," "scientific,"
and "progressive" approach of all, is in reality
the exact opposite. Central banks have always tended to
debauch their currencies and create underlying social conditions
for increased political anarchy and moral disorder. Since
its inception, the Federal Reserve in 1913 has debauched
over 98% of the value of the dollar, and it currently looks
like this trend will not stop until the dollar reaches zero.
In
plain political terms, what it means to do away with a central
bank and fractional reserve system is that the control of
money and credit is kept out of the hands of politicians
and big money center bankers. Control of money and credit
is completely decentralized and kept in private hands. Just
like alcoholics who cannot get their hands on booze, there
is no longer any temptation for politicians and central
bankers to turn into wag-the-dog junkies who manipulate
money and credit as self-serving ends in themselves.
Dr.
Thomas DiLorenzo, another libertarian author, claims that
many academic studies show that the American economy performed
very well in the 19th century under free money circumstances,
where popular choice often dictated that the dollar remain
easily exchangeable with gold and silver.
In
addition, Dr. Murray Rothbard explained that the old, relatively
decentralized free banking system of the 19th century which
allowed local banks to fail actually worked pretty well,
all considering. It punished local bankers for their incompetence
and cleared out economic distortions at the local level
rather than allowing their bad lending decisions to continually
accumulate upwards at higher and more centralized levels
--leading to the kind of systemic overall financial system
blow out we face today. It also prevented fractional reserve
lending from getting too leveraged, as it is today.
According
to Dr. Rothbard, most Americans were able to devise personal
financial asset safekeeping strategies that easily compensated
for bank failures, which never amounted to more than 1-2%
of all banks in a given year. They usually kept their money
deposited in different banks or hidden on their property
in the form of gold and silver coins or notes tied to these
metals. Since under the old financial system the value of
the dollar appreciated by about 50% between 1813 and 1913,
keeping a little money stashed inside the mattress was actually
a good idea.
Banks
were vastly more conservative in this era, rarely lending
out more than about two to three times as much as they took
in with deposits, compared to over ten times today. They
were also less capable of manipulating the financial system.
In contrast, the very highly leveraged fractional reserve
system we have to today makes it relatively easy for banks
to manufacture artificial booms and busts through changes
in their lending policies. The video The Money Masters,
which I cover in detail later in this chapter, describes
historical cases where major money center bank tried to
deliberately create "false flag" artificial busts
to scare the public into supporting the creation of a privately
owned central bank.
The
common man generally liked the old free money system because
it helped bring stability and prosperity. The relative size
and prosperity of the middle class steadily grew in the
19th century. By 1900, the average working man could afford
live in a nice house and support a wife and large family.
America had a larger industrial base than England, Germany,
and France combined, and the average worker earned more
than twice his European counterpart. For reasons I do not
have the space to get into here, various economic and political
philosophies behind the "free money" system and
"nationalism" worked together in the 19th century
to promote industrial reinvestment in America plus empowerment
of a growing white middle class. There were also important
racial and ethnic factors behind the continued growth and
prosperity of the middle class in the 19th century, to include
the Protestant work ethic practiced by what was once the
overwhelmingly WASP population.
There
were other important ways in which the Icelandic "privatization"
of its banks was in fact a counterfeit inversion
of a genuine libertarian process. The following are three
additional examples:
a)
In the real world a successful privatization
process is generally a patient, well thought out, and well-coordinated
operation. In his Orthodox Nationalist MP3
lectures, Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson describes how incremental
privatizations conducted in Belarus, Uzbekistan, and Russia
(under Putin) have been vastly more successful than quick
"privatizations" encouraged by individuals such
as the George Soros "color revolutions" which have
invariably handed control over to Zionist "kleptocrats."
These latter versions of "privatization" have generally
resulted in increased economic malaise.
b)
The Icelandic "privatization" process handed control
over to individuals with little or no banking experience or
track record, as previously described in this work regarding
the "two Bjorgolfurs" and David Oddsson. I have
also provided accounts that describe this peculiar "privatization"
process as cronyism and lacking transparency.
c)
A number of Icelandic cheerleaders for the "privatization"
process and "outvasion" suggested that Iceland could
become another "Switzerland" of global banking.
However, Swiss banking has traditionally used a totally different
approach to attract depositors. Up until the 1990's, the Swiss
franc was on the gold standard with almost no inflation, totally
unlike the inflationary fiat money system operated by David
Oddsson's central bank. Swiss accounts offered confidentiality,
diversification, and certain tax advantages, such as an ability
for certain high net worth people to compound their wealth
without limit inside Swiss tax-deferred insurance annuities.
Unlike the Icesave accounts, Swiss accounts generally
did not try to push the risk envelop by offering top of the
market yields. Swiss banking business was gradually built
up over the centuries through satisfied relationships and
referrals rather than through quick and highly leveraged mergers
and acquisitions. Last, but not least, Swiss
bank accounts offered the allure of operating in the context
of long term Swiss political and economic stability,
whereas Zionist-allied Icelandic banks crassly exploited the
reputation of Nordic peoples for honesty and stability in
a very cynical manner.
There
are other important topic areas outside of banking addressed
on this web page that show false flag piggy-back characteristics.
In her 9 March 2010 interview
with Alex Jones, Birgitta Jonsdottir explained how she became
suspicious of the IMF:
I
was actually reading a secret document leaked to Wikileaks.
It was a brilliant source if you want to sort of dig deeper
into the real conspiracies of our world. And it was a manual
from the military sector in the U.S. talking about unconventional
warfare. And in the unconventional warfare, the section
about financial warfare, they talk about the IMF as one
of their choice weapons. So, you know, I encourage people
to study how the IMF functions.
I
have already provided quotes from G. Edward Griffin, John
Perkins, and other sources earlier in this work which characterize
the IMF and World Bank as Trojan Horse operations, so no need
to go into it further here.
In
regard to the topic of Wikileaks, I have also provided quotes
from former U.S. Navy Intelligence Officer Wayne Madsen about
how this can also serve as a Trojan Horse. For example Madsen
claims that George Soros wants to use Wikileaks as a false
front with maximum legal protection to selectively "out"
and defame his adversaries.
While
I am generally a staunch defender of the First Amendment and
a free press, let us for a moment consider how even "honest
and open journalism" can get hijacked to serve sinister
purposes. One example can involve cases when media that tell
the truth fail to tell the whole truth. This is also
known as "lying by omission."
In
Chapter
38, I discuss "limited hangouts," where propagandists
try to preoccupy their audiences with 70% of the truth in
order to steer them away from the 30% they do not want them
to know, or where they do not want them to "connect the
dots." One can argue that "limited hang out"
is the backbone of all successful propaganda, because
propagandists must feed their audiences enough truth to make
their lies credible. Truth then becomes the bait which wraps
around a hook of lies.
An
important variation of the "limited hangout" technique
is known as "hiding in plain site." The propagandists
will give his audience the truth, but at the same time manage
its reaction and perception through various "guilt by
association" or other emotional association techniques.
As an example, when shown something horrible, the audience
is shown opinion leaders who reassure the audience that passive
acceptance is the wisest reaction.
Anarcho-libertarian
ideology can be abused as a potent tool to support "hiding
in plain site" PSYOP's. Many Anarcho-libertarians have
a blind faith that "free markets" and "individual
choice" will create some kind of mystical, "invisible
hand" that always causes things to work themselves out
for the best over the long run. They also tend to have a blind
faith that all people are basically "good" and "rational"
will act as "mutualists" towards each other when
shown the logic of this behavior. This is a dangerously simplistic
and unreal view of human nature, that ignores the existence
of parasites (criminals), predators, and innate conflicts
of interest.
I
do not want to leave the reader with the impression that I
think Wikileaks is "bad" and should be canned. To
the contrary, I think that on the face of it, Wikileaks and
the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative are great ideas. One
reason why I created a pro-free
speech archive at my web site is that I believe that we
face very serious threats to the free Internet and intellectual
freedom around the world. Even if everything said about nefarious
infiltration plans by George Soros is true, this is still
is not any reason to pull the plug on the Wikileaks concept.
That would be like throwing the baby out with the dirty bath
water. Even great ideas are vulnerable to abuse. If anything,
if there are problems with concepts like Wikileaks, the Modern
Media Initiative, or any other free speech-related ideas,
this only shows that we need even more of these things
around the world.
Competition
creates better products, to include Internet sites that fight
for truth. Increased competition also reduces forms of media
monopoly and censorship.
I
would like to see other Scandinavian countries, not to mention
all countries around the globe, try to compete with
Iceland as free speech havens. This should include offering
protection for people like myself who offer pro-nationalist
views.
False
Flag operators typically require local control
In
Chapter
8 of the Trilogy I describe forms of local control:
The
plutocratic handlers of the CIA-Mossad team typically acquire
control of most major media within a target area.
In addition, they control key individuals in the
local government and police.
Control
exists in many forms, on many different levels.
Let us start with the macro social level.
Captain
May likes to talk about the “5 P’s” of
control in a society.
Politics, Police, Press, Preachers, and Professors.
In
his book Viper’s
Venom, p. 302, Col Donn de Grand Pre uses a similar
acronym of the “7 M’s”:
Money, Media, Markets, Medical, Mind, Morals, and
Muscle (military).
In
Chapter
6, I talk about how one can abstract the McKinsey 7-S
paradigm (shared values, structure, systems, style, staff,
skills, strategy) that describes key elements for small
business success to also apply towards understanding the
key elements of popular sovereignty and nationalism.
I
have already explained the shady back ground of George Soros
and the "two Bjorgolfurs," both of whom were formerly
the two richest men in Iceland. Obviously with their tremendous
wealth they were able to wield considerable control behind
the scenes.
The
media influence by George Soros does not appear to have been
any more benign in Iceland than in places in Eastern Europe
where Soros has sponsored "color revolutions," as
suggested by the following Madsen reports:
March
26-28, 2010 -- Wikileaks and Iceland media law are stalking
horses for Soros
Following
up on WMR's March 25, 2010 report on Wikileaks's ties to
U.S. intelligence, Mossad, and George Soros, WMR has received
additional information that points to the Icelandic media
law that would turn the economically-battered country into
an information safe haven for websites like Wikileaks as
being a contrivance of George Soros's Open Society Institute
(OSI)...
March
25-26, 2010 -- Suspicions abound that Wikileaks is part
of U.S. cyber-warfare operations
WMR
has learned from Asian intelligence sources that there is
a strong belief in some Asian countries, particularly China
and Thailand, that the website Wikileaks, which purports
to publish classified and sensitive documents while guaranteeing
anonymity to the providers, is linked to U.S. cyber-warfare
and computer espionage operations, as well as to Mossad's
own cyber-warfare activities.
...
Our Asian intelligence sources report the following: "Wikileaks
is running a disinformation campaign, crying persecution
by U.S. intelligence- when it is U.S. intelligence itself.
Its [Wikileaks'] activities in Iceland are totally suspect."
Wikileaks claims it is the victim of a new COINTELPRO [Counter
Intelligence Program] operation directed by the Pentagon
and various U.S. intelligence agencies. WMR's sources believe
that it is Wikileaks that is part and parcel of a cyber-COINTELPRO
campaign, such as that proposed by President Obama's "information
czar," Dr. Cass Sunstein.
In
January 2007, John Young, who runs cryptome.org, a site
that publishes a wealth of sensitive and classified information,
left Wikileaks, claiming the operation was a CIA front....."
...In
China, Wikileaks is suspected of having Mossad connections.
It is pointed out that its first "leak" was from an Al Shabbab
"insider" in Somalia. Al Shabbab is the Muslim insurgent
group that the neocons have linked to "Al Qaeda."
...WMR
has confirmed Young's contention that Wikileaks
is a CIA front operation. Wikileaks is intimately involved
in a $20 million CIA operation that U.S.-based Chinese dissidents
that hack into computers in China. Some of the Chinese hackers
route special hacking program through Chinese computers
that then target U.S. government and military computer systems.
After this hacking is accomplished, the U.S. government
announces through friendly media outlets that U.S. computers
have been subjected to a Chinese cyber-attack. The "threat"
increases an already-bloated cyber-defense and offense budget
and plays into the fears of the American public and businesses
that heavily rely on information technology...
...There
are strong suspicions that Wikileaks is yet another Soros-funded
"false flag" operation on the left side of the political
spectrum. WMR has learned that after former Senator Norm
Coleman (R-MN) decided to oppose Soros's choice of
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan's deputy Mark Malloch Brown
as President of the World Bank, succeeding the disgraced
Paul Wolfowitz, Soros put the Wikileaks operation into high
gear. "Daniel Schmitt" hacked into Coleman's supporters
list, stealing credit card info, addresses, and publishing
the "take" on Wikileaks. Democrat Al Franken, who was strongly
backed by Soros, defeated Coleman in a legally-contested
and very close election.
Half
of Icelanders believe that this corruption has infected
the media. The major media outlets are owned by the same
individuals widely suspected of manipulating the economy
for their personal benefit. With few exceptions, the reporters
repeat the right-wing narrative that the economy is already
on the rebound, and that the government should loosen its
controls.
The
Nov 2002 Euromoney article "Questions
over Landsbanki’s new shareholder" commented
on how the "two Bjorgolfurs" were able to escape
media scrutiny for some time:
Is
it a good idea for such a large stake in the bank to be
controlled by individuals with no track record in banking?
And what’s the background of these people who apparently
earned their fortune in the beverages business in Russia?
Indeed the validity of one of their first, key acquisitions
in Russia – a soft-drinks bottler in St Petersburg
– has been challenged vigorously in Russian and Icelandic
courts by the original owners.
Several
judgments have gone against the father and son. Even within
Iceland this does not seem to be well known.
Iceland
Turns Hard Left by Professor Hannes H. Gissurarson,
at blog.eyjan.is, 2 Feb 2009 commented on the high
degree of media consolidation in Iceland:
With
his sharp wit and forceful personality, Mr. Oddsson made
enemies not only on the left, but also among some of Iceland’s
„tycoons.“
In
2004, at the close of his tenure, there was a bitter conflict
between him and Iceland’s best-known tycoon, Jon
Asgeir Johannesson, the main owner of Baugur Group, which
controls more than 75% of the private media in Iceland.
Worried about so much power in the hands of one man, Mr.
Oddsson pushed for legislation that would have have barred
any market-dominant firm from controlling more than 25%
of any media company.
Although
parliament passed the law, President Olafur R. Grimsson,
who has close ties to Mr. Johannesson, refused to sign
it. Needless to say, Mr. Johannesson has since used his
media empire to conduct a relentless campaign against
Mr. Oddsson. Strangely, the Icelandic left is joining
forces with Mr. Johannesson against Mr. Oddsson. However,
the government cannot easily dismiss the central bank
governor, who is supposed to be independent.
Regarding
forms of bank regulatory control, many sources claim that
it was practically nonexistent during the "outvasion"
period. Following the October 2008 crash, many politicians
dragged their feet and refused to come forth with the facts
and explain how the public was set up. All of this suggests
a high degree of high level compromise.
Insiders usually personally
profit –in more ways than one
In
the Mission of Conscience series, I describe how
a false flag operation typically coincides with short term
insider profit-making opportunities. For example, there was
an unusually high level of put options placed on airline stocks
just before 9/11. The World Trade Center towers were economic
white elephants which were under-tenanted and functionally
obsolescent. They also had major asbestos problems. They were
prohibitively expensive to tear down and replace by normal
means. Their controlled demolition under the guise of a "terrorist"
attack on 9/11 was a quick and dirty way around these problems
for certain New York real estate operators like "Lucky
Larry" Silverstein who made billions in insurance proceeds.
|
"Lucky Larry," the "god of Jewish Lightning,"
scored"green stuff," over the dead bodies of some
three thousand Americans who died on 9/11, over 90,000 real
American casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan, trillions of
squandered dollars, and over a million dead Iraqi civilians.
If Zionists like Silverstein have no qualms about making money
by killing off fellow Americans, why would they care about
killing off Icelanders, Norwegians, or other Scandinavians
to make even more money?
|
A
caller to Michael Collins Piper's talk show on Republic Broadcasting
Network dubbed Silverstein "The god of Jewish lightning."
This slang term originated in the late 19th century shortly
after the arrival of millions of Jews to New York City to denote
the all-too-common practice where Jews stuck with failing businesses
would burn them down to come out ahead with the insurance proceeds.
In
many ways, insider profiteering in a case like Iceland is more
subtle than cashing in on buildings hit by "Jewish lightening."
In essence, infectious greed swept the whole society, causing
a major portion of the population to leverage to the hilt to
make speculative gains or sell off assets without showing any
concern whatsoever for who will be in control of Iceland fifty
years from now, or what the underlying demographics will look
like (from the influx of Third World labor), or what will happen
to indigenous Icelandic culture and other ethnic values.
Two
of the most obvious examples of insider profiteering regarding
Iceland involved George Soros and the "two Bjorgolfurs."
Soros cashed in on the decline of the Icelandic Krona, and the
"two Bjorgolfurs" rocketed in net worth during the
"privatization" and "outvasion" periods
to become billionaires by piling up debts that ran the risk
of wiping out unsuspecting fellow citizens.
On
the back side of the infectious greed episode of the "outvasion"
period, many people in leadership post ions continue to put
their selfish interests first rather than finally set a personal
example of self-sacrifice for the common good in order to restore
a sense of justice.
In
her 9 March 2010 Alex Jones interview, Birgitta Jonsdottir described
continued insider special privilege and self-dealing:
Birgitta: Well the interesting thing,
the really disturbing thing about the bankers in Iceland,
or the Icelandic bankers, is that none of their assets have
been frozen. Most of them are living in London, and as many
people know London is ranked among the fifth best tax havens
in the world. And so they are actually getting back their
companies. They are getting back the power and lots of write
offs, and that is making a lot of people very upset and
angry.
Jones: OK, be clear, flesh that out. The
bankers that sold you out in your own country, most of them
don't even live in your country, and the banks know that
they are their minions so they are staying in power.
Birgitta: Yes, I mean they have lost their
banks, but they have not lost their companies. So I mean
one of the oligarchs, Icelandic oligarchs, he owns the biggest
independent media outlet in Iceland. So you can imagine
what sort of news you are getting from that outlet.
|
Above: Iceland's elite is still nowhere near as corrupt
and treasonous as America's Zionist power elite. They are
covering up the the real cause of death of thousands of fellow
citizens...or the use thermite to bring down their own buidings...or
the use of depleted uranium to poison foreign civilians...or
false flag pandemics... or at least not yet. But just give
them more time hanging out with the "globalists,"
and they just might get there some day. Below: If the multi-national
pharmaceutical industry does not care about permanently injuring
millions of American kids in order to make money selling toxic
vaccines (most of which are produced without American oversight
in China), why would they care about doing the same damage
to Icelanders and other Scandinavian people if this might
ring the cash registers as well? (See Jane Burgermeister's
theflucase.com for
more details).
|
|
False
flag attacks usually require massive use of generalized background
illusion
There
were actually many different layers of deception at work in
the initial phases of the Iceland "bear trap," some
of which were material, and others which were purely ideological.
On
a material level, "Circle Z" investment banking firms
lured Icelanders into very aggressive business takeovers around
the world in the context of dangerously leveraged and manipulated
global markets. In the short run, this helped the "Circle
Z" bankers generate commissions and advisory fees. It also
helped cash out co-tribesmen who sought to sell their businesses
in peak-market conditions.
There
were also many long term deceptions at play. On an ideological
level, Zionist oligarchs in American and the UK have been pushing
"environmental" ideologies for many decades, particularly
of the top-down variety. A well-documented source on the nature
of this campaign when it comes to economic theory is Keynes
At Harvard: Economic Deception As a Political Credo authored
by Zygmund Dobbs and other prominent Harvard alumni who formed
the Veritas Foundation in the early 1960's. See also The
Money Masters video in Chapter
33 of the Trilogy and its discussion about how
Zionist oligarchs gained control of major American media and
funded academic chairs beginning in the early 20th century to
promote their agenda. Henry Ford's The International Jew
provides excellent insights into how the Rothschilds, Warburgs,
and other elite Jewish families played a key role in setting
up the U.S. Federal Reserve in 1913, and parlayed their control
of U.S. media to shanghai America into WWI on the side of Britain
under the Balfour Declaration deal. I discuss this episode in
greater detail in my article "Thomas
Jefferson and the `Incredible Truth' about Bush Cabal Wise Guys
and False Flag Nukes."
Keynesianism
is an environment top down (or "neo-Jacobin") economic
philosophy that justifies continuous big government intervention
and central bank manipulation in the economy. The "monetarist"
school of economic advocated by professor Milton Friedman, who
influenced David Oddsson with his "libertarianism,"
is another "environmental" philosophy that ignores
racial and ethnic differences.
In
the real world, Jewish tribalism is a major factor in explaining
Jewish political and economic behavior in power centers like
New York, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., and the City of London.
Jewish power could never survive in America without the ability
of a Jewish-controlled central bank to engage in virtual unlimited
taxation of Americans through its ability to issue fiat money
and expand credit in a fractional reserve system. Former Fed
Chairman Alan Greenspan, who is Jewish, admitted this much in
his famous essay "Gold
and Economic Freedom" where he explained why the modern
welfare state could never survive under the spending "strait
jacket" of the old gold standard.
I
have listened to many financial talk shows in which leading
money managers puzzle over how a former self-styled "libertarian"
member of the Ayn Rand inner circle like Alan Greenspan could
preside over one of the most inflationary central banks in history.
(See, for example the transcript "What
Does Mr. Greenspan Really Think?" where James
Puplava interviewed Lawrence M. Parks, Ph.D, November 6, 2002).
For me, the answer is very simple; Greenspan's "libertarianism"
is voiced for public consumption. In private, Greenspan's first
loyalty is to Israel and other Jewish interests. Yes, Alan Greenspan
probably does love libertarianism somewhere within his fractured
personality structure, but he also loves Israel and Zionism
even more. He knows full well that Israel could never survive
very long if Zionists did not use America as a superpower riding
horse. They could never accomplish this feat without first creating
and controlling its central bank. This in turn gives them the
ability to create money and credit out of nothing, and literally
buy off America for Jewish interests as well as fund pro-Zionist
superpower programs.
Only
a central bank can create nearly unlimited fiat money and bank
credit. Only a central bank can come up with the trillions of
dollars necessary to fund American military adventures overseas
necessary to support Israeli interests in the Middle East and
around the world, to include the economic "hit man"
activities described by John Perkins. Only such a central bank
can finance the domestic pork barrel spending programs that
buy votes for the Jewish-led liberal minority coalition explained
by Wilmot Robertson in The Dispossessed Majority, giving
Jews major domestic political power. Only through such a central
bank, with its incredible ability to subsidize Jewish-owned
Wall Street firms and enrich insiders with inside information,
can Jews achieve a vastly higher percentage of billionaires
than any other ethnic group in America.
Milton
Friedman's "monetarist" school of economics critiques
Keynesianism from the "environmental bottom up" anarcho-libertarian
perspective, but still keeps its adherents safely within an
"environmental" intellectual sandbox for "problem-reaction-solution"
manipulation purposes of "controlled opposition."
Monetarism is tolerant of the existence of the central bank,
instead of calling for its outright abolition.
This
contrasts with hardcore anarcho-libertarians like Dr. Murray
Rothbard or paleo-conservatives like Thomas Jefferson or Henry
Calhoun. In this way, someone like Oddsson can get programmed
by crafty serpents like Friedman to think he is reforming bureaucratic
stodginess within the Icelandic economy along "libertarian"
pathways, and then later grab the helm of the central bank to
fuel international financial imperialism without any pangs of
conscience, and all the while never suspecting that he could
be walking Iceland into a trap created by a bad tribe. In other
words, Oddsson was probably ideologically "false-flagged."
|
This 7-8 Oct 2005 Mises
Institute seminar implicitly comments on the Iceland tragedy.
In the world of political illusion, it is quite a trick to
aggressively run a globalist central bank and simultaneously
have ones countrymen think that one is "libertarian." |
I
would invite the reader to consider the "Economics
of Fascism" seminar run by the libertarian Mises Institute.
An important characteristic of fascism, apart from promoting
glorification of the state, increasing police state control,
and promoting jingoistic interpretations of patriotism, is the
way in which top government and business leaders join together
to create government-subsidized monopolies and cartels. This
business and state power consolidation typically creates a central
planning environment where leaders feel that they can make their
own laws.
This
seminar pointed out that on certain economic issues in the mid-1930's,
such as wage-price controls, Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal
was actually more "interventionist" than the regimes
of Hitler and Mussolini, and therefore arguably more "fascist."
Although this 2005 seminar does not specifically talk about
Iceland, one can easily see how the same underlying general
policies that applied to the Peron regime in Argentina, FDR
in America, Mussolini in Italy, and Hitler in Germany can also
be applied to Iceland's central bank- fueled international expansionism
by a government-crony company partnership.
Iceland’s
Conservatives Try to Rewrite History" by Íris
Erlingsdóttir, Huffington Post, 4 Feb 2009,
gives us a sense about how a phony brand of libertarianism produced
something close to the Mises Institute interpretation of "fascism."
Accordingly,
the country’s banks were privatized in 2003. However,
in keeping with their libertarian philosophy, no effective
regulatory and supervisory bodies were created. Instead, Iceland’s
political patronage system decided who was going to own the
banks and what their reporting requirements would be.
Certain
Icelandic bankers also sold assets back and forth to each other
to inflate their values, and used deposits to leverage extremely
speculative investments, to include corporate takeovers.
Iceland
Crisis Report: President Criticized for His Part, Iceland
Review Online, 13 April 2010, raised another important
issue, namely the inappropriate use of such intangibles as Iceland's
heritage and image:
The
task force covers in detail how the president developed “his
theory” on the supremacy of Icelandic companies and
their executives. “The president was efficient in painting
a beautified, arrogant and patriotic picture of the superiority
of Icelanders based on an ancient heritage.”
I
have previously mentioned how President Grimsson traveled to
Israel with his Jewish wife, attended globalist meetings, and
even raised eyebrows when he flew on the private jet of the
Russian Jewish tycoon Abramovich from Alaska to England to watch
a soccer match. His public behavior alone promoted a falsely
"ennobled" and sugary view of Jewish people. He certainly
was not handing out copies of Jewish
Supremacism by Dr. David Duke.
The
passage above suggests that he also promoted a jingoist interpretation
of Nordic heritage that created a sense of false pride which
in turn helped set up Icelandic bankers for their fall.
The
famous military strategist Sun Tzu summarized the importance
of accurately sizing up "enemies " and "friendlies"
as follows:
|
"If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not
fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but
not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer
a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will
succumb in every battle."
-- Sun Tzu, The
Art of War. III. Attack by Stratagem, verse 18. |
A
big part of the overall problem, apart from pure greed, is that
many Icelandic leaders were probably brainwashed by Zionist-controlled
media in the U.S. and U.K. to think that international Jewish
bankers are somehow noble and worthy of trust and respect, when
in fact the exact opposite is true. Earlier in this work I provide
a quote from Max Keiser who refers to the leadership of the
mostly Jewish-run firm Goldman Sachs as "scum." In
my Trilogy, I provide strong evidence that 9/11 and
London 7-7 were the work of Mossad-CIA. Furthermore, Israeli
treachery against America is a long story, which includes the
Lavon Affair, the 1967 attack on the U.S.S. Liberty, and Oklahoma
City bombing.
None
of these Icelanders had probably ever read books like The
Dispossessed Majority by Wilmot Robertson, A People
That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy
by Dr.
Kevin McDonald, The International Jew by Henry
Ford, Jewish
Supremacism by Dr. David Duke, "snake books"
like Viper's
Venom and Rattler's
Revenge by Col Donn de Grand Pre, or more recent Michael
Collins Piper books like Final
Judgment, The
New Jerusalem, The
Judas Goats, and The
New Babylon. See also my Trilogy Chapter
5 "Profiling the Opposing Forces Commander" regarding
"Circle Z." These kinds of materials provide important
preliminary "threat briefs," to use military intelligence
jargon.
Significantly,
it is also very important to understand the underlying character
of other ethic groups besides Jews. In my "Handling Real
Nazis" discussion in Chapter
34 of the Trilogy, I explain that one reason why Jews have
become so powerful in America is that they have been able to
use Irish and Italian Catholics to front for them. The Jews
have always exploited Catholic envy towards WASP's. A writer
quoted in The Dispossessed Majority described the mafia
in America as a happy marriage of Jewish brains and Italian
Catholic brawn. Final Judgment by Michael Collins Piper
records a conversation where Joseph Kennedy, the father of John
F. Kennedy, made a conscious decision to side with the Jews
after World War II so that his son could become the first Irish
Catholic President of the United States. That certainly wound
up being a pact with the Devil. One might wonder about President
Olafur Grimsson's own personal pact with Jews.
Virtually
all racial and ethnic groups carry their own peculiar mixture
of strengths and weaknesses, and Nordic and Nordic-Celtic peoples
are no exception. One can get a sense of this from Appendix
I below where I provide an extract from Chapter
One of Dr. Lothrop Stoddard's classic work Racial
Realities in Europe. Among other things, he
describes how Nordic peoples have problems adapting to dense
multi-racial, multi-cultural urban environments. This has been
an important factor in their demographic decline in Europe and
America. In contrast, Jewish people are better adapted at crowding
themselves into big cities and rising to the top through intrigue
than most any other ethnic groups in America.
 From
my personal observation, having lived in New York City for ten
years and been a member of various organizations heavily attended
by both Jews and Scandinavians, I think Stoddard's characterization
is on target in many ways, but also simplistic. He is correct
that there are profound sociological differences between the
two groups that are rarely discussed in mass media and history
text books, yet have a major impact on relative performance
in the real world.
On
the asset side of the ledger, in his Chapter III "The
Nordic North" in Racial
Realities in Europe by Dr. Lothrop Stoddard,
portrays Nordics as being relatively level-headed and sensible
compared to most other European groups. Other sources portray
them as being relatively modest and unostentatious, who value
thrift, hard work, and tough success. A number of heroes in
sagas, such as Harald Hardrada, developed a track record early
in their careers for conducting a thorough reconnaissance of
their enemies in order to always devise superior stratagems
in battle. Another good example is Hermann the Cherusci,
mentioned earlier in this work, who once served in the Roman
Army and came to intimately know the very enemy he would later
decisively defeat in battle.
Conducting
a thorough reconnaissance and acting in a level-headed manner,
is exactly what Icelandic bankers failed to do in their business
dealings with Wall Street brokers and central bankers. Therefore,
I am left with a serious question about President Grimsson's
ability to interpret and reinforce the best parts of the Nordic
character.
I
discuss other peculiarities of the Nordic character in my "Handling
Real Nazis" discussion in Chapter
34 of the Trilogy, so no need to go into it here.
Before
ending this discussion section, there is another vitally important
Info War dimension that I must address that involves a very
expansive historical, ideological, and religious perspective.
In
regard to the topic of generalized psychological preconditioning
in support of deception operations that degrade nationalist
defense mechanisms, Iceland was once a center stage actor in
one of the greatest PSYOP campaigns ever applied to Nordic peoples,
namely the Christianization of northern Europe during the Viking
era.
One
reason why Iceland produced most of the saga literature of the
Middle Ages is because Iceland refused to persecute pagan Norsemen
as heavily as other Scandinavian countries, hence most of what
we know today about the the Old Norse religion called Asatru
comes from Icelandic writers like Snorri
Sturluson.
If
one knows where to look, there are many eminent sources that
explain how Christianity may be viewed as PSYOP created by Jews
against gentile society. In his book The
Anti-Christ, the philosopher Friedrich
Nietszche viewed Christianity as a psychological warfare
weapon developed by ancient Zionists to "transvaluate"
or invert instinctive Roman values as revenge for the Roman
destruction of Jerusalem.
Other
sources view Christianity as a "limited hangout" and
"Red Herring." Although Jesus confronts Pharisees
and ultimately gets crucified by them, Jews still come out ahead
as as some kind of divinely privileged "People of the Book"
whose tribal history must somehow take priority over everyone
else's. Christianity is also a form of "predictive programming,"
because it shows bad Jewish behavior "in plain sight,"
but in a context that conditions the target audience to accommodate
and accept it (to include trying to change it through evangelism)
rather than completely repudiate it.
Last,
but not least, Christianity is viewed by some sources as a "counterfeit
substitute" for a healthy tribal religion. Christianity
originally thrived in urban areas of the Roman Empire among
people who had become detribalizd in ancient Rome's version
of America's "melting pot." Christianity can stimulate
forms of social altruism without being a tribal religion just
like a Playboy foldout stimuates a sexual response in men in
the absence of a real woman and real sex. Imperialists like
the Emperor Constantine liked Christianity because it provided
a universalistic ideological-religious formula to help integrate
different tribes into their empires.
In
Which
Way Western Man? former Christian minister William
Gayley Simpson explains how Christianity may be viewed as a
leftist, universalistic religious version of communism by promoting
collectivism, authoritarianism, escapist mysticism, and detribalization.
In Rascals
in Paradise, James Michener and Grove Day describe
how "Blackbirders,"
or slave traders of the Pacific in the 19th century, preferred
to raid native villages that had been Christianized to find
new slaves to work plantations and mines, because they found
that Christians generally put up less resistance and made more
docile workers compared to pagans. Similarly, Nicolo Machiavelli
wrote that he found pagan Romans of the early Roman Republican
era to be more virtuous than the Christianized Romans who came
later, and Salvian the priest wrote
around 440 A.D. that his fellow Roman Christians "doubtless
seek Roman humanity among the barbarians, because they cannot
bear barbarian inhumanity among the Romans." In other words,
pagan Teutons and other tribal Nordic folk are more inherently
virtuous than Christianized Romans. In The
Dispossessed Majority by Wilmot Robertson, we learn
how Christianity has acted as a Jewish passport to Western civilization,
enabling Jews to posture as "The People of the Book"
in order to infiltrate European countries that would ordinarily
reject them as aliens or even as a dangerous international criminal
mafia. In fact, the first century B.C. Roman philosopher Cicero
wrote:
"The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows
how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what
power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation
of rascals and deceivers" and the first century A.D. Roman
philosopher Seneca wrote in De Superstitione: ""The
customs of that most criminal nation have gained such strength
that they have now been received in all lands. The conquered
have given laws to the conquerors."
An
important element to the "know thyself" dictum is
to stay attuned to indigenous religious and cultural values.
In the first part of this work, I described how Sveinbjorn Benteinnsson
of Iceland revitalized the open practice of the Old Norse religion
Asatru in his country for the first time in a thousand years
in the 1970's. |
Caption from Religious
Crisis web page: "This photograph by Martin Fackler
for his March 19, 2007 New York Times article `Renewed
Interest in Japanese Who Died in Epic Battle' had the
caption: `Yoshitaka Shindo, grandson of the Japanese commander
on Iwo Jima, during the March 14 commemoration of the battle.'
This event included the Japanese practice of pouring water
over the memorial stone to cleanse it, which has Shinto roots.
Other news reports have described Shinto priests returning
to the island to perform ceremonies. Iwo
Jima has been returned to Japan and now supports a Japanese
Air Base." Most nationalist Japanese leaders "get
it." Sveinbjorn Beinteinsson did as well. |
|
In
my author archive web page, I provide the following introduction
regarding why I think the indigenous religious concept is so
important for the long term survival of any nation:
I
have come to the conclusion that it is impossible to have
a truly effective nationalist movement without the preservation
of ones very own indigenous tribal religion. After all, nationalism
is ultimately based on the ethic that "charity begins
at home" (as in "America First" — get
it?). If you do not have enough respect for the ancestors
of your own people to preserve the most fundamental cultural,
religious, racial, and ethnic components of their "folk
soul," what is there to build on? Why would you feel
particularly motivated to help build their economy and industrial
base, safeguard their political rights, maintain national
defense, and otherwise promote their popular sovereignty and
long term prosperity?
This
conclusion has come from a longstanding search for truth on
many different levels, ranging from the theological to the
political levels. (See, for example, our William
Simpson home page, which links to his classic works One
Man's Striving and Which
Way Western Man? for an in-depth comparison of Christian
theology with a naturalistic viewpoint). However, as an important
political aggravation, many conservatives such as myself are
extremely unhappy with the extreme leftism and anti-rationality
of most Christian Churches. They have seriously undermined
Western societies. For example, in the early 1990's the Dutch
Reform Church supported Black Marxists against White South
Africans, and helped convert South Africa from the most prosperous
country in Africa into the wretched social, political, and
economic basket case we see today. The early phases of the
same deplorable long term trend seem to be taking place here
in America. Most Christian churches in America support out
of control Third World immigration into this country. This
is literally displacing and replacing the white population,
yet most Christian leaders never publicly defend dispossessed
whites, despite the potentially very dangerous consequences.
(See Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup of America by Tom Chittum).
Deluded Christians attack American white nationalist leaders,
while conversely supporting nonwhite
leaders and Jewish
supremacists in control of national media. The aforementioned
Jewish supremacists, incidentally, support the continued Israeli
genocide of West Bank and Gaza Palestinians, the neo-Marxist
cultural war continually being waged against white Americans,
and the escalation
of American military interventionism in the Middle East
—even if it leads to global Armageddon.
While
I doubt that practitioners of an indigenous religion such
as Asatru will ever become more than a minority within Christian
American, I do believe that even as a minority they can eventually
provide an effective counter weight to left wing, self-debasing,
deluded Christians and megalomaniacal, subversive Zionist
gangsters.
That
having been said, I have found that rediscovering the indigenous
ancestral faith of my own ancestors has been spiritually satisfying
regardless of macro-political considerations. I would do it
anyway even if I lived in a majority Asatru country without
any serious social or political problems...
Controlled
national media typically pre-condition victims to accept illusion
specific to false flag attacks prior to their occurrence
Virtually all of the Icelandic writers I have reviewed to date recollect
that during the "outvasion" period, leading Icelandic
media were mostly cheerleaders for reckless bankers. I have
already touched on all this in my "False Flag Operators
Require Local Control" section where I quote Europe's
Biggest Financial Swindle Since World War II, by
Iris Erlingsdottir, Huffington Post, June 16, 2009,
who states "Half of Icelanders believe that this corruption
has infected the media. The major media outlets are owned by
the same individuals widely suspected of manipulating the economy
for their personal benefit. With few exceptions, the reporters
repeat the right-wing narrative that the economy is already
on the rebound, and that the government should loosen its controls."
I also quote Iceland
Turns Hard Left by Professor Hannes H. Gissurarson,
at blog.eyjan.is, 2 Feb 2009, who stated "... Jon
Asgeir Johannesson, the main owner of Baugur Group ...controls
more than 75% of the private media in Iceland. Worried about
so much power in the hands of one man, Mr. Oddsson pushed for
legislation that would have have barred any market-dominant
firm from controlling more than 25% of any media company..."
There
are actually two levels of media that heavily impact on Icelanders.
First, their home media, and secondly, the U.S. and UK media.
If home media is not actively working to counteract U.S. and
UK mainstream media, then the latter can take over by default.
I
followed U.S. and UK financial media very closely from 1995-2005
as a stockbroker, and less closely beginning in 1980, and have
found that these media generally act as cheerleaders for Zionist
financiers right up until the point that they finally get charged
with crimes.
One
of the most extreme examples involved Mike Milken, Ivan Boesky,
and the firm Drexel Burnham Lambert in the last 1980's. Business
Week magazine ran a cover story lauding Milken as a "new
power" on Wall Street. Financial World respectfully
portrayed Boesky as a great Wall Street sage. Fortune Magazine
acted as an apologist for Drexel Burnham. The adulation of these
financial "rock stars" only desisted after
massive criminal charges were finally filed, and books like
Den
of Thieves by James Stewart began to appear in book
stores that exposed the depth and breadth of their criminality.
The
same general pattern applied to the Enron
fiasco, as well as the more recent Bernie Madoff scandal.
I have provided Wayne Madsen reports that pertain to the Madoff
scandal in Appendix
III of Part
6 because of evidence that Madoff was tied in with Mossad-CIA.
His theft of $50 billion is truly breathtaking.
Speaking
of Jewish swindlers, and Jewish-controlled American media cheerleaders,
on his Republic Broadcasting Network radio show, author Michael
Collins Piper has frequently remarked that one of the best
places to find out what is really taking place in America comes
from Jewish media geared for Jewish audiences, such as The
Jerusalem Post or Forward, because their editors
tend to assume that most gentiles are disinterested in what
they reveal to their co-tribesmen.
Hopefully
in the future Icelanders and other Scandinavians can develop
enough alternative media that accurately sizes up alien peoples
that they will be able to overcome their chronic tendencies
towards naïveté.
False
flag operators usually require powerful intimidation propaganda
Iceland's
hangover, part I, J by Iris Erlingsdottir, Huffington
Post, January 16, 2009 explains how ordinary "peer
pressure" was adequate to keep most people in line during
the "outvasion" period.
"Was
it possible to work in the banks, in a relatively senior position
and not know that things were seriously wrong?"
"I
guess some of us suspected that something was not right..."
She hesitates. „I mean, of course people knew things
were not quite right perhaps, but nothing like this! When
you look back now, it's obvious that the emperor was naked
riding a huge elephant in the living room, but nobody said
anything. I guess we all just wanted it to be true. And you
didn't want to say anything negative or second-guess your
superiors, because you wanted to be loyal or not ruin your
chances ...I don't know. It's like being in a dysfunctional
or abusive relationship; you are unable to see the craziness
when you are in it. It's only after you are out of the relationship
that you see how insane it was."
The
clearest case of hardball intimidation propaganda came from
the City London, when it branded Icelanders "terrorists,"
as noted in the 9 March 2010 Alex Jones interview.
Jones: And to add insult to injury,
they use anti-terror laws to try to take people's money.
Birgitta: Yes, and what they did just shortly
after the collapse, Mr.
Darling, the UK finance minister decided to -- and Mr.
Brown, the Prime Minister of the UK, said to put terrorist
acts on Iceland, which classified us among other nations just
as North Korea, Zimbabwe, and other instances such as Al Qaeda
-- What this did, during the middle of our financial melt
down in Iceland, was that it dried up all loan lines to Iceland
and we were facing food shortages and medicine shortages...
Earlier
in the show Alex Jones asked why people around the world allow
themselves to be intimidated:
Jones: It is a mind game. Can the
Ken Lay, Bernie Madoff types that are running the international
banking scam, take over the planet, set up a bank of the world
that you pay all your carbon taxes to, that is being announced.
Can they make Spain, the U.S., England, Iceland, Argentina,
Nigeria, pay 30 plus percent compounded interest on fraudulent
crud they created and sold to governments. Why aren't
they going bankrupt? Why aren't they being arrested for the
fraud? Why aren't countries saying, "No, we are not going
to give into your financial terrorism?" They told Iceland
they would destroy them in the last year if they didn't capitulate
and basically become debt slaves of these people in perpetuity...
The
most obvious answer on a macro level is that their politicians
have been bought off by the banksters, who also control major
media.
In
her interview with Alex Jones, Birgitta described how the banks
continued to try to intimidate the Icelanders, even when they
were over a barrel.
Jones: And to be clear, the banks
have done this in Argentina, in Greece, in Spain, in the U.S.
They make this fiat derivatives bubble. It is just made up,
crud paper, they certify it as AAA gold-rated, they sell it
to governments, they sell it to citizens, they get all the
wealth. And then it came out that Goldman Sachs and others,
by design, mainstream news, McClatchy
newspapers and others, they then blow it out at the time
of their choosing and use the implosion to then come in and
buy everything up. And Iceland is the only modern country
to be put through this scam, to say "No." Continue.
Birgitta: It was a long way to get to that
now, I tell you. A lot of fight. In general, what happened
as I am sure that most of the listeners to this show understand
how the IMF works. So what happened after the terrorist act
was placed on Iceland? The UK and the Netherlands government
said that with a little help from our Nordic friends, said
OK, if you want to get any loans, or [have] the loan lines
open, you have to go into an IMF program. And in order for
you to go into an IMF program, you are going to have to solve
this Icesave dispute, which is this dispute about the banks
that were in the UK and Holland.
Jones: And so let me just stop you for a
moment. Going back a year ago, the food is not being shipped
in, everything is falling apart. They are saying we have got
to sell all the government assets, take citizens' tax money,
all for these banks, and the BBC reported "Iceland,
Britain's Unlikely New Enemy," this is from a year
ago, and it says until a few days ago, Britain was admired
and respected by the average Icelander, but the UK's move
to seize the assets of this isolated European state have provoked
a backlash of feeling of escalating resentment. They "Treated
us like terrorists," grabbing the government accounts,
grabbing people's bank accounts, saying "we are going
to take your money under terror laws and give it to the bankers."
Continue.
Birgitta: It was maybe not that extreme.
They took over an Icelandic bank called the Heritable Bank
in London. But what they did is they dried up the credit lines
to Iceland. The long lines so everybody had to forego cash
in a time of complete financial meltdown.
Jones: But that is what it said. In some
cases people could not even get their money out for a while
though.
Birgitta: Yes, yes, yes. Everything was blocked.
Students and people from Iceland living abroad could not get
money out of their Internet banks and so forth, so they had
to either starve or rely on friends and family if they had
any in the area. But it also created a very different, difficult
paradox because the Social Democratic Party that is in power
now in Iceland had just one dream, and that is to join the
European Union. So within all of this turmoil they decided
let's apply for an application or to join the U-A [Editor's
Note: She probably meant to say EU].
Jones: Just like Greece ten years ago, you
have got to go into debt and sign the deals with these bankers
as part of their rules to get into the EU.
Birgitta:Well also how the bankers have used
it. The UK and the other governments basically blackmailed
us with the EU application as well and said "We will
not support your EU application unless you decide to go into
court over Icesave. Unless you just choose to --, you are
going to have to chose to become isolated, from North Cuba,
or Cuba North, or do what we tell you. And that they went
even so far as wanting to make a hell of a lot of money out
of us by giving us, forcing us to pay huge interest on this,
but we managed to stop that. And right now I am in a committee
of the leadership, working on finding a solution to this and
I found it completely unacceptable that the Icelandic nation
will take on any burden from this ordeal.
False
Flag attacks typically have Kabbalistic or Masonic numerological
significance.
Chapter
8 of the Trilogy puts numerological analysis in
perspective: :
Numeric
analysis is typically the last line of analysis that Capt. May uses
to possible false flag dates in making his predictions.
We
already covered one of the first lines of analysis in Chapter
5 where we talked about profiling the opposing forces commander
and his kosher handlers.
In the “why we fight” section of Chapter
6, we also discussed important trends and structural changes
in American history that must also be considered in any deep
analysis.
Occult
numerology may be the last line of analysis, but since there
is strong evidence that it influences the behavior of false
flag malefactors, we would be unprofessional to ignore it.
In
Chapter
8 I also explain how false flag operators have an amazing
affinity for the number "11, " as expressed in such
things as dates, building silhouettes (the twin World Trade
Center towers), and number of floors (take the 110 stories in
each of the World Trade Center towers and delete the zeros as
a standard numerological practice to get "11" for
each).
The
Rothschilds, Sassoons, Schiffs, and other very powerful Jewish
families covered in my "Circle
Z" discussion go back far in time, and so do amazing
"11"-related coincidences. For example, the World
War I Armistice was signed “on
the eleventh
hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month."
Kabbalistic
numerologists love "1's. They typically ignore zeroes in
dates, and add the digits within year and day fields or else
retain the last two digits of a year field added together to
reinforce a "1" pattern. Hence, 11-11-1918 at 11:00
AM becomes 11-11-19-11. This is "9/11" on numerological
steroids, because it has five extra "1's."
In
the Book I Chronology
I mention how the Georgia
Guidestones were dedicated on 3-22, which is the Skull and
Bones number "322",
and of course "22" is a multiple of the favored "11"
number.
Interestingly
enough, the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, Alistair Darling,
also appears to be an "11 aficionado." The Wikipedia
article "The
2008-2010 Icelandic Financial Crisis" states: "Alistair
Darling MP announced that he was taking steps to freeze the
assets of Landsbanki in the UK. The Landsbanki Freezing Order
2008 was passed at 10 a.m. on 8 October 2008 and came into force
ten minutes later. Under the order the UK Treasury froze the
assets of Landsbanki within the UK, and introduced provisions
to prevent the sale or movement of Landsbanki assets within
the UK, even if held by the Central Bank of Iceland or the Government
of Iceland.
The freezing order took advantage of provisions in sections
4 and 14 and Schedule 3 of the Anti-terrorism,
Crime and Security Act 2001, and was made `because the Treasury
believed that action to the detriment of the UK's economy (or
part of it) had been or was likely to be taken by certain persons
who are the government of or resident of a country or territory
outside the UK.'"
Hence, Darling's Order implemented on October 8, 2008 at 10:10
becomes 10-08-10; 10, 10, which in turn becomes 1-8-1-1-1. This
becomes "8/11" on steroids, because it has two extra
"1's."
Earlier
in this work I cited the work of Ellen Brown, who described
how Alistair Darling pulled the trigger on Northern Rock on
9-11 in 2007, and also pulled the trigger on Lehman Brothers
the weekend after its stock got "bombed" on 9-11 in
2008.
The
Kabbalists also seem to like anagrams. 10-8-2008 can equates
to 1-8-1 which is the anagram of 8-11. A British government
PDF about the event shows 081008, or 818, anagram of 1-88. Perhaps
this even resonates with the fact that President George W. Bush
announced the establishment of the Office of Homeland Security
on 10-08-2001, which can also decode to 1-8-1.
It
could also be that Iceland falls under a different Kabbalistic
numerological system related to an "8" system as opposed
to "9" in New York. China is an example of an "8"
country. In Chapter
32, I mention that "The Peking Olympics started at
8:08 PM (and 8 seconds) on 8-8-08. According to Wikipedia, “The
number 8 is associated with prosperity and confidence in Chinese
culture”.
8-8-08
was also the day when Georgia, a country armed and advised by
Israel and the U.S., attacked South Ossetia.
As
another possible example of a country outside of the "9"
pattern for New York, India expressed the number "7"
during the "7-11" Mumbai bombing in 2006 covered in
Chapter
21. However, in trying to interpret this number, we were
left to wonder if this may be less of a Kabbalistic pattern
and more of an inside Mossad-CIA sick joke on Indian owners
of 7-11 stores in America.
We
need to do more research on Icelandic numeric coincidences.
For example, Jón Ásgeir Jóhannesson, is
listed as No. 7 in the article""Top
10: Who’s To Blame For The Icelandic Crash."
The 27 Dec 2008 article: " The
Isle That Rattled the World " states that Jóhannesson
"traveled by yacht, jet and helicopter all emblazoned `101'
-- the name of a chic Reykjavik hotel owned by his wife."
In
Occult numerology, you always knock out the zeroes, so "101"
becomes 11. Just a coincidence, or more evidence of Zionist-Kabbalist
infiltration and degradation of the Icelandic people?
|
|
at
the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781