Starting with first principles and the scientific method
America First Books
Featuring ebooks that find a truer path in uncertain times

The Dispossessed Majority
by Wilmot Robertson (June 1986). (Free pdf download page Here, Amazon listing Here.) This classic work helps explain the steady decline of WASPs in America, a long term historic process that began in the mid-19th century with changes in immigration preferences, first towards Catholics in the mid-1800's and then later towards Jews by the end of the 19th century. After the mid-1960's, massive waves of non-whites started flooding America. This decline is also reflected in Europe today, where even primal Nordic-Celtic WASP homelands in Scandinavia and the UK are under assault through massive third world immigration, Mossad assassinations, major media disinformation, and false flag massacres. See also Instauration online, to receive free PDF downloads of the magazine published by Wilmot Robertson from 1975-2000 to supplement his landmark work.

BBC caption: "Scientists believe the last blondes will be in Finland"

Blondes 'to die out in 200 years'

BBC News
Friday, 27 September, 2002
11:51 GMT 12:51 UK

[Editor's Note: Is it just hair color, or do the same recessive genetic traits that support real blond hair also correlate with unique innate psychological traits? Do these traits includes a special talent for entrepreneurial, long range rational operational planning that promotes genuine science and productive industry? Do they also correlate with a special kind of self-discipline, social altruism, and capacity for both centralized and decentralized organizational behavior that promotes genuine republican and democratic government? Do all these things get degraded on an innate level to a less imaginative, more mean-spirited, more "fossilized," and increasingly dysfunctional social order -- such as what America has experienced in the last 150 years -- as the Nordic gene pool gets increasingly drowned out with alien genes?]

The last natural blondes will die out within 200 years, scientists believe.
A study by experts in Germany suggests people with blonde hair are an endangered species and will become extinct by 2202.
Researchers predict the last truly natural blonde will be born in Finland - the country with the highest proportion of blondes.
But they say too few people now carry the gene for blondes to last beyond the next two centuries.
The problem is that blonde hair is caused by a recessive gene.
In order for a child to have blonde hair, it must have the gene on both sides of the family in the grandparents' generation.

Dyed rivals

The researchers also believe that so-called bottle blondes may be to blame for the demise of their natural rivals.
They suggest that dyed-blondes are more attractive to men who choose them as partners over true blondes.

BBC caption: "Bottle-blondes like Ann Widdecombe may be to blame "

But Jonathan Rees, professor of dermatology at the University of Edinburgh said it was unlikely blondes would die out completely.
"Genes don't die out unless there is a disadvantage of having that gene or by chance. They don't disappear," he told BBC News Online.
"The only reason blondes would disappear is if having the gene was a disadvantage and I do not think that is the case.
"The frequency of blondes may drop but they won't disappear."




outside Zio-UK-U.S.A. and
inside alien-occupied America!

Photo of the author of this web page while serving a period of reserve active duty as a USMCR Major in the G-2 Intelligence Section of the 4th Marine Division Headquarters in New Orleans, Lousiana during the Gulf War I era. I later received an honorable discharge and no longer have any official connection with the U.S. Marine Corps or any other U.S. Government entity -- and I am sure the feeling is mutual -- ie, these entities typically want to disavow any connection whatsoever with the kinds of highly independent social, political, and religious views expressed by individuals such as myself.



Preface by William B. Fox
Publisher, America First Books

First published in currrent form on the
4th of July, 2012


This web page pulls together many links and articles I have provided on other web pages pertaining to the topic of anti-Nordic genocide. As a "51% Norwegian" Norwegian-American this topic has become very personal for me. For starters, the Oslo-Utoya 7-22 mass murder of my Norwegian kinsmen was an unspeakably evil act of war. Its real perpetrators must be publicly identified and brought to justice! In addition, there are quite a few special interest groups here in the U.S. who have enabled the most likely perpetrators of Oslo-Utoya 7-22 -- namely Mossad-CIA-MI6 -- to get completely out of control. At a minimum these groups need to be verbally taken out behind the woodshed, and I deal with quite a few of them below. Regarding my own personal Norway-related background, see photos here. As a caveat, I am not in any way an official representative of any Norwegian or Norwegian-American organizations -- everything I write is just "one man's opinion."


Simulation of Fukushima radioactive Iodide 131 forecast by the
Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU) for 23-25 April 2011


Editor's Note: My gravest current concern involves not only the terrible radiation poisoning of Japan, but also the continuing flow of radiation around the northern hemisphere. The trends that I document in my week-by-week chart series have actually become worse. For example, we have seen continuing radiation spikes in rainfall in North America in 2012, and radioactive material is still accumulating in food and water supplies. It is invisible to our senses, yet it can have horrifying health effects just a few years into the future. In fact, it has already spiked the infant mortality rates and other "excess deaths" in America. One of my most recent activist efforts has involved organizing the 3 Feb 2012 interview by Dr. James Fetzer on The Real Deal talk show with radiation expert Leuren Moret and the eminent UK physicist Dr. Busby. (See America First Institute transcript for "Fallujah, Fukushima, and the Global Radiation Catastrophe," also posted in Part I and Part II installments at Veterans Today. (The Real Deal download page Here, MP3 download link Here, 41.2 MB, 1:59:59). Transcript archived at America First Institute under the same title, and also posted at Veterans Today as Part I and Part II. I also organized the 28 Oct 2011 interview with the same hosts and guest on the same show, posted at Veterans Today, Part 1:Catastrophic Effects of Radiation Contamination, and Part 2: New Bombs and War Crimes in Fallujah, and at AFI here. As indicated in the chart above, Leuren Moret has voiced her concern that Scandinavia as well the United States has been specifically targeted for "genetic mutilation" and other forms of "depopulation" through use of HAARP technology. The vectoring of radiation through these areas increases cancers, sterility, birth defects, and myriad other symptoms of radiation poisoning. The effects last for many generations. Despite the fact that Chernobyl took place in 1986, in some parts of Belarus and the Ukraine today only about 20% of the children are healthy. There is overwhelming evidence that the Fukushima melt-downs were deliberately induced by the same controllers of Mossad-CIA-MI6 who gave us Oslo-Utoya 7-22. Mossad-CIA-MI6 used HAARP technology to trigger the 3-11 earthquakes in Japan, and the Stuxnet virus to sabotage the Fukushima reactor backup systems. Leuren Moret said in November that Fukushima is very likely at least 300 times worse than Chernobyl (Dr. Chris Busby has voiced a similar opinion). Chernobyl caused the early deaths of over a million people in Europe in the twenty five year period since the 1986 melt-down. Therefore, in regard to Fukushima radiation, it is very possible that every month that goes by, between 500,000 to a million Americans are getting tagged with "early deaths" (this number would be much lower if the U.S. Government and other entities would bother to warn citizens to take such basic self-protective measures as staying out of the rain --when most fallout comes down). No one knows what the final fatality impact will be on North America and Europe. It is possible that when all is said and done, between 10 to 50 million Americans will die early deaths, and an even greater number of children of future generations will suffer major birth defects. Major portions of agricultural lands on the West Coast and in the Midwest may become too contaminated for farming for centuries to come. Meanwhile, as the situation continues to deteriorate, the people at the highest levels of the Obama administration and America's mainstream media who are most responsible for alerting the public and organizing constructive action are just remaining silent and inactive. Their behavior is so willfully blind and negligent, that when all of this is combined with toxic chemtrail spraying, vaccine and food additive poisons, and a longstanding policy of fostering depleted uranium contamination from military munitions, one is sorely tempted to go that extra intellectual step -- as has Leuren Moret -- and conclude that a criminal power elite must be executing some kind of deliberate global depopulation agenda.


(From my Oslo/Utøya 7/22 False Flag Terror web page)


Oslo/Utøya 7/22
False Flag Terror

A state-sponsored "rat bite" against a great but sometimes naive and overly trusting people when it comes to international intrigue and sizing up alien peoples.


It now appears extremely likely that the real "usual suspects,"
that is, Mossad-CIA-MI6 "Wise Guys"
with the
New York 9/11, Madrid 3/22, and London 7/7 "resume,"
decided it was time to punish Norwegian "heretics"
and serve Norway a "chopped-off horse head" on 7-22


...a plausible Norwegian response:

"We have been leading humanitarians and major contributors to the UN.
We complied with NATO requests to send troops to Afghanistan.
We even gave Obama the Nobel Peace Prize.
Now look at what you have done to us!"

Instead of using a predator drone, this go around New World Order
gangsters decided to use a brainwashed patsy as the lead front man


Look to Norway,
and Look at Yourself!


Scene above from the 2008 film Max Manus about a WWII Norwegian Resistance fighter

On 16 December 1942 President Franklin D. Roosevelt gave his famous "Look to Norway" speech, in which he stated:

"If there is anyone who still wonders why this war is being fought, let him look to Norway. If there is anyone who has any delusions that this war could have been averted, let him look to Norway; and if there is anyone who doubts the democratic will to win, again I say, let him look to Norway."

Today a key issue is no longer the Nazi occupation of Norway, but rather the Zionazi occupation of the United States, which has brought with it Mossad-CIA false flag attacks against America in a phony "War on Terror" once allegedly "led" by the Mossad-CIA figurehead Osama Bin Laden (most likely dead since December 2001), the depleted uranium poisoning of over 600,00 U.S. servicemen in trumped-up wars for Israel that have done vastly more to sabotage than support America's most vital national interests, the looting of over $28 trillion out of the American economy by Zionist bankers (not to mention continued off-shoring of America's most strategic industries and the cruel impoverishment and enslavement of Americans with skyrocketing usurious debt), the installation of a suspected unconstitutional illegal alien President, the nonstop displacement and even genocide of white (and in particular Nordic/WASP) populations in America, the deliberate poisoning of vaccines and food supplies, the imposition of police state oppression, the TSA goons who grope the private sectors of people like Congressmen Ron Paul and Gov. Jesse Ventura and behave vindictively towards Texas Legislators, the wanton destruction of the Gulf of Mexico, the Mossad-CIA Stuxnet virus sabotage of the Japanese nuclear industry and the global depopulation radiation warfare campaign conducted against Americans as well as the Japanese people...the list of horrors is almost endless and will continue to get ever worse until enough Americans finally demonstrate the backbone and resistance required to shrug off their tyrannical, Asiatic-despotic, "New Babylon" tormentors.


“The Scandinavians love the wider horizon, the salty air, and sometimes even the wild waves. The blood of adventure and freedom is still coursing in their veins”. Rønning, N. N., Fifty Years in America, p.104.

“As Rølvaag put it as early as 1907:”If a man is to realize in full measure the potentialities of his own being he must first of all learn to know the people of his own kin and his own people’s history and literature. This knowledge constitutes our cultural roots.” Semmingsen, Norway to America, p. 143.

“The strongest and most important characteristic of the Norwegian people, according to Rølvaag, is their love of freedom, which leads them to set their highest priority on individual rights under a common law. Since this last trait is the essence of the American ideal, it means that the Norwegian immigrant is already a good American before he even leaves home”. Rølvaag, Concerning Our Heritage, p. Introduction.

“To be free and independent has always been the greatest ambition of every true Norseman”. Nelson, O. A., History of Scandinavians in the United States, p. 20. “Stubbornness, firmness, and determination are qualities which the follower of Odin has been largely blessed with. To him no defeat was final. Failure meant only delay. He overcame all opposition, conquered every obstacle, defied every difficulty. Mountains, oceans, deserts, rivers, must not hinder his purpose.”

Quote Sources: Norwegian American Quotes and Facts: Giants of the Earth Heritage Center

The Norwegians are a strong, resolute, stubborn people. Practically all are Lutherans, and combine a Lutheran piety and sense of duty with a strong desire for material advancement. They are thrifty and eager to acquire a homestead. They are strong and stubborn individualists, lovers of freedom, law-abiding, and vigorous defenders of their Church. -- Carl Wittke, We Who Built America (1939)


American Gothic/Nordic America: Norwegian Americans, like others of Scandinavian heritage, have always been regarded as the "WASPiest of the WASPs" in the U.S. In the 19th century, when America was openly run by WASPs, it became the freest country and greatest industrial power in the world with the highest standard of living. A major factor was the Protestant work ethic, believed in and innately felt by a once dominant WASP majority. This emphasized hard work, self-discipline, honesty, thrift, rational planning, far-sightedness, personal freedom, entrepreneurship, protection of private property, and the creation of innovative, useful real goods and services. Then, beginning in the early 20th century, alien forces became increasingly powerful. They created the privately owned Federal Reserve Banking System in 1913 (which became their primary money machine). They seized control of Hollywood and major newspapers. They came to rule Wall Street and eventually even Congress itself. These aliens shifted America's values towards financial speculation, pork barrel rent-seeking, and immediate gratification. They promoted open borders and ethnic rootlessness for everyone except the themselves. They presided over organized crime and spread corruption throughout American society. It has been downhill for America ever since. And then on 9/11 they decided to grab for all the chips. This meant not only accelerating the dispossession of WASPs, but also pushing for their ultimate enslavement and even genocide. They even had the chutzpah to viciously strike deep inside the most sacrosanct ancestral WASP homelands, not to mention months earlier triggering the mass murder of the Japanese people on 3-11 with the Stuxnet virus sabotage of Fukushima reactors, only to be followed by nuclear doom spread across major portions of North America and elsewhere in the northern hemisphere. And so on 7-22-2011 we witnessed the cold-blooded mass murder of unarmed civilian men, women, and children inside Norway as part of a much larger global drama of unfolding mass death, destruction, chaos, and Ragnarok.

The Oslo/Utoya tragedy has sociological ramifications that are much bigger than Norway, Europe, or even North America. This is a shot over the bow for WASPs everywhere in the world. WASPs are getting kicked while they are "down." We can expect the evil power elite behind Oslo/Utoya to kick even harder in the future as WASPs continue their demographic decline and experience a corresponding reduction in economic and political power.


Indeed America, Look to Norway,
and Look at Yourself

and Stop Murdering
Nordic Peoples!


. . . For the continuation of my discussion of the Oslo-Utoya tragedy
please visit my
alternative media and open source intelligence web page:
(Please give it some time to load on your computer, it is very long)

Oslo/Utøya 7/22 False Flag Terror


This scene from the movie Harold and Maude is a pretty good metaphor for what WASP America has been doing to itself over the last century and half by allowing alien peoples into their living space and permitting them to take control of strategic bases of society such as finance, media, and government. The Nordic percentage of the U.S. population has been in steady decline since the mid-to-late 19th century. While run by WASPs in the 19th century, America achieved the greatest industrial base, the highest standard of living, and the most personal freedom in the world. While under Jewish-Catholic management in the 20th century, America has turned into a deindustrialized Third World economic, political, and social basket case country, filled with runaway corruption and continually mismanaged by Jewish-Catholic criminal mafias.


Works by William B. Fox that relate to anti-Nordic genocide and other white survival-related issues

2011-11-22 Oslo/Utøya 7/22 False Flag Terror: It now appears extremely likely that the real "usual suspects," that is, Mossad-CIA-MI6 "Wise Guys" with the New York 9/11, Madrid 3/22, and London 7/7 "resume," decided it was time to punish Norwegian "heretics." Another open source intelligence summary page with social commentary by William B. Fox.

2011-01-08 Else Christensen and The Odinist archive. An interesting approach for addressing the moral and cultural disorientation that permeates Western societies from top to bottom today. This includes the inability of too many ordinarily law-abiding and decent Westerners to act as effective counter-predators against Mossad-CIA predators, Zionist-controlled national media and other corporate Robber Barons (such as British Petroleum, Goldman Sachs, or even globalist Bill Gates' Microsoft --which has been strong supported and protected by NSA and Mossad-CIA), or phony "wars on terror" (see the Mission of Conscience series), or privately-owned central banking monopolies (such as the U.S.-based Federal Reserve or the Bank of England), or other forms of high level organized crime, economic rent-seeking, cultural perversion, and political hijacking.

2010-06-10 Reconciling Libertarianism and Nationalism To include thorny issues involved in reconciling anarcho-libertarianism with racial nationalism. A political issues overview web page.

2010-05-30 Iceland Gets `ENRONed,' Then Goes for `1776' A paleoconservative country analysis.
Part I: Introduction and Overview
Part II:
Act I: The "Bagel Western:" The "Good" Go Astray, and the Ideological Degradation of Iceland's "Immune System"
Act II: Enter "The Bad" and "The Ugly;" Alien "Pathogens"
Infiltrate and Inflame Iceland

Act III: Icelanders Leap Into Global Financial "Berserkerdom-Chutzpah"and "Zombie March" into an Icelandic Financial Version of "Stalingrad II"
Act IV: The City of London "Pulls the Trigger" On Iceland, While the U.S. Financiers Ignore Iceland and Rescue the "Better Connected"
Act V: Developing a Viable "Work Out" Strategy: As the City of London, IMF, EU, and Other Sharks Circle Closer
Act VI: Thinking Outside the Box: Populist Revolt, Female Prime Minister, Referendum, Modern Media Initiative...Global Activism?
Part III: Are Icelanders victims of high level subversion? A "False Flag" Analysis
Part IV: What nationalist principles might have defended Icelanders?
Part V: What can we do?
Part VI: References and Appendices

Significant Works by Other Authors

The Dispossessed Majority (PDF with text copy) by Wilmot Robertson (June 1986). (Free pdf download page Here, Amazon listing Here.) This is a classic work that helps to explain the steady decline across America of WASPs in particular and whites in general, leading to the situation today where more nonwhites are being born than whites. [Editor's Note: The book helps explain the racial basis for the ever increasing instability and nonproductivity that has taken place since it was first published, such as recurrent melt-downs and scams by Jewish-controlled Wall Street firms, out of control Mexican immigration that may be leading America into a Civil War Two scenario, the assault on primal Scandinavian and other white homelands in Europe through massive third world immigration that has created fertile ground for continuing Mossad assassinations and false flag massacres (like Norway on 7-22-2011), and the way in which America foreign policy permits "blood bankers," "economic hit men," and Mossad-CIA-MI6 malefactors to continually rampage around the world, "soft-killing" tens of millions of people in central Asia and Japan through depleted uranium radiation warfare and Stuxnet virus sabotage of Japanese nuclear reactors.]

Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds (PDF) by Dr. Robert S. Griffin. An overview of the life and philosophy of white nationalist intellectual Dr. William Pierce. Please also see the articles archive of Pierce understudy Kevin Strom at American First Books. In his younger years, Strom edited The Best of Attack! Revolutionary Voice of the National Alliance and National Vanguard Tabloid, a compilation of issues from 1970 to 1982, also a classic work. (Now in 64 MB PDF, download for free here).

Which Way Western Man? by William Gayley Simpson. The National Alliance has called this "The Survival Manual for the White race" and describes how "William Simpson... spent a lifetime of keen observation, careful analysis, and deep reflection developing the principal thesis of this book: that the single, undying purpose of all human activity should be the ennobling of man. In support of this thesis he looks at the foundations of Western society, at the structure of government, at the effects of technology and industrialization on man, at the role of the sexes, at economics, and at race. The book goes to the roots of the problems facing the White race today, and it shows the ways in which White society must be changed if the race is to survive. Which Way Western Man? is an encyclopedic work whose conclusions can be ignored by no one with a sense of responsibility to the future." [Editor's Note: I see in this work an ultimate anti-political correctness manual. It seeks to shatter all the major elements of controlled national media brainwashing that have terribly corrupted and misled our society. While one may not adopt all the contrarian views expressed in this work, exposure to this suppressed knowledge will certainly help any thinking individual engage in much more rigorous and in-depth analysis of America's very serious problems.] See also:

* One Man's Striving by William Gayley Simpson, originally serialized in National Vanguard Magazine, archived at America First Books

Racial Realities in Europe by Dr. Lothrop Stoddard. [Editor's Note: I think this book provides treasure chests of insight, particularly when linked in with theories of free enterprise business competition. Therefore I have created the extended essay below to explain many of these connections].

How Racial Realities in Europe and Theories of Entrepreneurial Business Competition
Provide Important Perspectives to Help Diagnose "What Is Ailing America"

by William B. Fox
Publisher, America First Books
Last updated 27 June 2012

There is a very important implicit punch line to Dr. Lothrop Stoddard's Racial Realities in Europe worth mentioning (but not explicitly laid out in this work), namely that not only are there vast differences between human races, but also between different groups of Caucasians. Some groups -- particularly the "Nordics" from Scandinavia and "northern Celts" from places like Scotland and England -- have a superior capacity to function as innovators and long range operational planners with strong chivalrous instincts. They are capable of sustaining steadily growing yet politically stable advanced industrial economies. Other groups of Caucasians (particularly from certain southern European countries) are relatively petty, mean, unimaginative, unintelligent, and authoritarian. Because of their innate makeup, the societies they dominate are much more likely to be characterized by chronic social and political instability and prolonged periods of economic stagnation.
It is not an accident that various global corrupt indexes generally rate northern European countries as being relatively less corrupt than southern European countries. Technology indices also routinely show that northern European countries produce vastly more innovation per capita than southern European counterparts.
Of course there are exceptions to sweeping generalizations made here. For example, northern Italian Catholics who tend to be more on the Nordic-Celtic side are sociologically a different animal than southern Italian Catholics who more "Mediterranean" and who may even have strains of non-Caucasian racial groups. Without question certain southern European Catholic societies have produced some extremely gifted individuals. So have other areas of southern Europe such as the Balkans, which produced the electrical genius Nikola Tesla who was born of Serbian Orthodox parents. However, speaking in broad generalities about overall population groups, I believe Dr. Stoddard's characterizations are reasonably accurate.
This book implies that even the melting pot in America that existed prior to the massive non-white Third World immigration that began in the mid-1960's was a huge mistake because it created a sociological "blur" that ultimately merged, diluted, and then dragged down the most innovative, productive, and chivalrous WASP founding stock, and infiltrated their individualistic society with massive numbers of rent-seeking, essentially lower quality groups of whites with peasant mentalities who corrupted republican government with their graft, pork barrel tactics, and gangsterism. It basically supports the American Party or "Know Nothing" plank of the 1840's, as well as the Protestant side of the factional conflict brought to public attention in more recent times in the Martin Scorsese film Gangs of New York.
To really appreciate Racial Realities in Europe, it is important to also relate Dr. Stoddard's observations to theories regarding the nature of small business competition explained by many business analysts and leading libertarian authors.
Dr. Ralph Raico, a libertarian lecturer who is archived at the Mises Institute, has observed that the breakup of the old Roman Empire was a good thing for the cause of liberty, because the emergent principalities across Europe now gave people more "rights of exit." If a ruler started to oppress his people with draconian laws and higher taxes, it was now much easier for his most productive people to exit his realm for better opportunities next door, whereas under imperial Roman rule one often had to travel vastly further to escape corruption and tyranny. Therefore, competition between dozens of emergent principalities was analogous to the way small business competition for talent tends to produce vastly better wages and working conditions compared to industry groups that have grown stagnant under the monopolistic control of conglomerates (analogous to imperial Rome). Therefore, the ethnic and other tribal differences in Europe that supported the breakup of the Roman Empire were a good thing.
Dr. Murray Rothbard, another libertarian lecturer archived at the Mises Institute, observed that most innovation and new job creation in an economy comes out of small companies. What really drives up wages in an economy is not the ability of unions to wring them out of management, but rather the ability of small to medium-sized business entrepreneurs to scale up productivity with technological innovation, and then share those productivity gains by paying relatively higher wages to attract and retain talented people. This competition between successful, growing, productive companies is what really drives up wages over the long run. At the same time the innovation generated by small companies drives down relative product costs. Hence, we can achieve a virtuous circle when a truly entrepreneurial economy is allowed to fluorish.
It is worth making two asides to further support this perspective. First, I happen to agree with In Praise of Hard Industries: Why Manufacturing, Not the Information Economy, Is the key to Future Prosperity by Eamonn Fingleton which states that the manufacturing sector is the key to real long term economic progress. Nothing can scale up productivity and reduce product costs on a continuing basis like manufacturing. This underscores the need to maintain a relatively decentralized economic system that enables WASPs -- who have always led the pack in engineering prowess -- to manifest their entrepreneurial prowess in this sector.
In contrast, financial manipulation by central banks and Wall Street -- an area where Jews have always excelled -- and growth of government bureaucracy -- an area where innately authoritarian, glad-handing, cronyistic, conventional-thinking Catholic Alpines have always excelled -- are vastly less important in the overall picture. In fact, once these areas grow beyond a certain point, they become cancerous burdens on the rest of society.
The history of 19th century America shows how manufacturing prowess can (and should) trump financial manipulation and government bureaucracy. Prior to the War of Northern Aggression Against Southern Independence, government rarely consumed more than 5% of GDP. Today it is well over ten times that percentage. In addition, during most of the 19th century, a privately owned central bank usually did not exist and the money supply -- often pegged to gold and silver -- was kept vastly more constant than in the 20th century. The value of the dollar actually increased between 1813 and 1913 by over 50% despite the fact that the supply of Federal paper money doubled between 1861-1865 to help finance the Federal war effort. This steady gain in purchasing power took place because continuous gains in manufacturing productivity steadily reduced the general cost of goods in the context of a fairly constant money supply. This gave people steadily growing purchasing power even if their wages remained constant. By 1900, the average American worker had approximately twice the standard of living of his European counterparts.
Getting back to Racial Realities in Europe, it is interesting to me to me how Nordics in Scandinavia tend to have a mind-set reminiscent of entrepreneurs in small companies, whereas the Alpine and Mediterranean peoples of central and southern Europe tend to reflect the bureaucratic mentalities of people who thrive in large corporations and conglomerates. It is also equally interesting to observe patterns in European history, whereby when Nordics decline as a percentage of overall population groups, their cultures tend to shift towards "corporatism." Dr. Stoddard illustrates this point in Chapter 6: Alpinized Germany where he describes how the social and political institutions of Germany became dramatically more authoritarian as the percentage of Nordics in the general population declined dramatically with the Thirty Years War of the 17th century.
A trend towards "corporatism" can become part of a self-reinforcing negative feed-back loop. Big corporations attend to attract managers with more of a bureaucratic than entrepreneurial mind-set, who tend to feel threatened by free-thinking, independent-minded entrepreneurial types. "Corporatists" tend to become increasingly focused on using "perception management" techniques to get promoted as opposed to making real improvements in product lines and operations. Quite often medium to large-sized companies find that the only really effective way they can acquire innovation is by engaging in mergers and acquisitions with small companies rather than trying to rely on innovation from within.
Just as "power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely" (to paraphrase the famous libertarian historian Lord John Dalberg-Acton), the heads of large conglomerates are often completely divorced from any genuine commitment to real product development. They are typically more focused on "financial engineering" than any real product engineering. Similarly, heads of empires (that is, political conglomerates which have interesting similarities to corporate conglomerates) often become more occupied with intrigue than productive rule; for example, by waging aggressive war to steal resources, or advancing themselves by parasitically crippling others through subterranean entities such as Dope Inc. and Mossad-CIA-MI6 false flag attacks.
When large corporations become particularly corrupt and dysfunctional, a prime solution often used by corporate leaders and Wall Street power brokers to restore product line focus, transparency, and innovation is to break firms apart into various new companies formed around certain product lines, as noted in the classic work In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies by Thomas J. Peters and Robert H. Waterman. This is analogous to secessionism and separatism on a macro political level, which does not have to be violent like America's War of Northern Aggression Against Southern Independence.
In his chapter The Nordic North, Dr. Stoddard explains how cooler heads prevailed when Norway demanded independence from the Sweden in 1905. Swedish leaders decided to let Norway go peacefully. Since then, Norway and Sweden have kissed and made up on many social, political, and economic levels even though they are still officially completely independent countries, and I do not think there is hardly anyone in Norway or Sweden today who regrets that both countries avoided a bloody war in 1905. If Norway had not seceded in 1905, I believe that both Norway and Sweden today would have probably wound up becoming much more captive to draconian policies of the European Union and the private Zionist bankers who manipulate the EU behind the scenes. Norway would have wound up looking more like badly exploited Greece, Italy, and Portugal than the relatively independent and prosperous country that exists today. .
In order to be successful, small companies often need a certain critical mass level of entrepreneurial people. Conversely, as the percentage of bureaucratic big company types increase within small companies, the quality of innovation tends to decline.
Similarly, the Nordic countries must maintain a certain level of homogeneity to preserve the "Viking traits" that give them an edge in technological innovation and entrepreneurial start-ups.
One technique that medium to large-sized corporations often use to reduce high level cronyism, incompetence, and corruption and restore innovative excellence and rational management practices is to bring on board successful entrepreneurs from small companies as their new CEO's. This is analogous on a macro-historical and political level to the Nordic and Nordic-Celtic tribes who steadily migrated southwards over the past several thousand years and became the ruling classes of countries in southern Europe and southern Asia. This includes the original Indo-European or Nordic ruling classes of early Sumerian civilization, the earliest Egyptian dynasties, Greece of the heroic and Golden Age, the founders of the Roman Republic, and the ruling classes of Italy, Spain, France, and other countries in the Middle Ages up through the Renaissance. It also includes the Aryan settlers of the Indus Valley who gave India its earliest civilization, to include the early Hindu religion, and their counterparts who settled Iran and created Persian dynasties (the name "Iran" is derived from the word "Aryan" which means "noble one").
In my environmental vs. genetics article, I describe how frost-zone sculptured gene pools tend to have an enormous advantage over peoples with warmer evolutionary backgrounds in terms of technological innovation and the ability to institute far-sighted, rational procedures to government and business. This has applied not only to Nordics and Celts, who originated in north eastern Europe and north central Asia, but also the Turkish founders of the Ottomon Empire and the Mongolian founders of longstanding Chinese dynasties who also originated in the cold northern Asian lands.
One obvious implication of the big Zionist push for a "one world government" that seeks to eliminate all separate "nationalisms" outside of Jewish nationalism (which in the eyes of Zionists must be preserved and empowered at all costs) is that Jewish New World Order activists are simply trying to create on a macro-political level what the old Soviet system created on an economic level, namely a new form of tyranny ("new wine") poured into an "old wine" monopoly bottle. As usual, this will stifle honesty, rational process, and protection against oppression on a political level, just like the old Soviet system stifled entrepreneurship, innovation, and transparency on an economic level.
There have been many large successful companies in American corporate history who have taken pride in helping to create small companies rather than put them out of business. (In contrast to Rothschild, Rockefeller, and Morgan monopolists who openly preached that "competition is a sin.") For example I have seen diagrams of many generations of start-up companies spawned by Hewlett Packard in California's Silicon Valley and Tektronix in Portland Oregon's "Silicon Forest." The folks at HP and Tektronix used to be proud of this, taking the sportsmanlike attitude that "competition is good for us" and "all boats rise together with the rising tide" within their industry group.
In healthy industries, small companies and large companies enjoy a symbiotic and mutually beneficial rather than a hostile and mutually destructive relationship. Rather than crush and stamp out little businesses, the biggest companies usually take the attitude that the continuous creation of little businesses is healthy in the long run for everyone in the industry. Therefore, by political analogy, when European and North American political leaders start consolidating everything on a country, state, and provincial level, and start driving out small "nationalisms" and "States Rights," this should be a warning sign that something very anti-symbiotic, anti-liberty, anti-transparency, anti-ethnic, anti-productivity, anti-innovation, and anti-honesty could be taking place.
Europe in the post-Napoleonic War part of the 19th century experienced a long stretch of unparalleled real economic growth in Europe. I believe that an important factor that led to this prolonged period of success was the fact that Northern European Protestant countries had broken free of a Catholic-dominated Europe during the Protestant Reformation, and Nordic countries were now free to play an independent entrepreneurial and symbiotic role towards the rest of Europe, much like the role of small entrepreneurial companies towards larger companies in healthy industries.
It is worth underscoring this point, namely that smaller, more entrepreneurial, independent northern European countries were the leaders of the industrial revolution compared to more stagnant parts of southern Europe with vastly larger populations and resources. The southern Catholic countries generally tended to act like large "me-too" or "late adopter" large bureaucratic corporations or imperial conglomerates as the northern European countries tended to provide the main leadership in technological, scientific, and economic progress.
America "worked" in the 19th century not only because of the greater creativity, innovativeness, work ethic, far-sightedness of its once dominant WASP population, during a time when the Federal government consumed only about 5% of GDP compared to well over ten times that amount today, but also because it held first generation immigrant groups from Northern Europe who competed with each other for honor and prestige in regard to their ethical values and productivity -- and who also fit in well with the innate core values of Scottish and English Protestant Americans whose ancestors had lived in America since the 17th century. For example, when I once worked in Queens and Manhattan industrial real estate, I ran across many cases where I would review the history of certain industrial sites, and discover that they were initially developed by English, German, Scottish, and other northern European-descended entrepreneurs in the 19th century. These American industrialists typically took great pride in building industry in America to not only make money and enhance American industrial might, but also for social purposes, such as to create jobs for young men who wanted to get married and start families. They also funded schools and public libraries and other social service institutions to help make sure their own immigrant group did not look bad before other immigrant groups.
As an interesting variation on this first generation immigrant community self-help theme, The Promise of America by Dr. Odd S. Lovoll describes how the Norwegian American community in Wisconsin and Minnesota in the 19th century bent over backwards to find jobs and lodging for young Norwegian immigrant girls because they felt it would be too embarrassing for the Norwegian American community if these young Norwegian lasses turned to prostitution.
One of the unfortunate trends in American history involves the way in which the pride of Northern European ethnic groups steadily withered away in the 20th century, whereas Jewish mutual help groups continued their militant solidarity on steroids, even to the point of participating in espionage operations for Mossad. In his book By Way of Deception, former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky describes how Mossad, which has only about 2,000 full time employees, usually enjoys the cooperation of most Jews around the world in its "sayanim" program. I discuss this in more detail in Chapter 8 of my Mission of Conscience series in regard to Mossad-CIA-MI6 false flag attacks run against the U.S.
Unfortunately, as I make arguments which favor "nationalism" among white ethnic groups and small countries, I encounter considerable resistance which has been conditioned into Americans' minds over the last hundred years by non-WASP controlled media, particularly media ultimately owned by Rothschild-Rockefeller-Bilderberg-type globalists. One of their major propaganda claims, which finds itself into many establishment history books, is the erroneous idea that "nationalism" was the primary cause of the horrors of both World War I and World War II. Therefore, they erroneously suggest, "nationalism" is just too dangerous and obsolete to be taken seriously anymore and everyone around the world must now move on to something different. They claim that mankind everywhere has no choice but to embrace their concept of "mankind's last and best hope for peace" -- that is, the United Nations establishment which supports phony tax schemes, usurious "blood bankers," "perpetual war" armies, high level criminal-parasitic economic "hit men," "soft kill" biowar campaigns against unsuspecting civilian populations, and other U.N. Agenda 21-type global depopulation mass murder programs.
My counter to the globalists' anti-nationalist propaganda is that the leading actors behind the World War I tragedy were not relatively benign homogeneous nation-states consistent with the Scandinavian social model of the 19th century romantic nationalist era, but rather aggressive multi-racial, multi-cultural empires that were typically run behind the scenes by alien power elites who were frequently working against the best interests of their European subjects. For example, in The New Babylon, Michael Collins Piper explains how Jews moved into England en masse during the mid-17th century. They subsequently created the privately owned Bank of England and heavily intermarried with the British aristocracy. By the mid-19th century, over half of the ruling class manifested Jewish traits. The UK fell firmly under the control of the Rothschilds and City of London. Even the British monarchy has within its not-so-royal veins bodily essences of Jewish aliens, not to mention the blood of "Vlad the Impaler" out of Transylvania (the inspiration for "Count Dracula").
Jews played a significant role in the secret societies that carried out the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria that triggered WWI. They controlled major newspapers in the UK, France, Germany, and elsewhere that whipped up jingoistic rather than authentic nationalist war fervor. With amazing timing, they had created the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank in the U.S. in late 1913, the year prior to the outbreak of WWI. This served as a ready "financial war machine" to fund America's unnecessary entry into the war a few years later with the Balfour Declaration. (Please see my 30 September 2007 article Thomas Jefferson and the "Incredible Truth" about Bush Cabal Wise Guys and False Flag Nukes which explains the fabricated incidents used by Zionists to bring America into WWI).
In 1916 the German Kaiser made a peace offer for all belligerents to simply call off hostilities and return to their pre-war borders. However this merciful approach was not to be. The U.S. entry into the war dragged it on for two more years, costing millions more lives, and creating such utter exhaustion that many major European powers became highly vulnerable to Communist or fascist takeover.
Adding insult to injury, Jewish plutocrats played a leading role in financing and supporting Jewish leaders of the Bolshevik Revolution. Jewish advisors who surrounded Woodrow Wilson also played a key role in setting up the onerous terms of the Versailles Treaty. They saddled Germany with an unpayable indemnity and re-drew political boundaries in defiance of ancient tribal territories. Their "Talmudic" approach to creating peace in Europe created so much bitterness that it set the stage for World War II as a "continuation war" of WWI.
The upshot of this discussion is that the outbreak of WWI and WWII really had very little to do with the kinds of nationalist principles espoused by honest European patriots, but instead had quite a lot to do with the violation of these principles. For starters, if major European powers -- as well as America -- had been more genuinely nationalistic in the years leading up to WWI, Zionist aliens never would have got their hands on the strategic bases of power necessary to work their evil mischief. The countries that got embroiled in WWI would also have very likely been run by more honest and responsible men genuinely concerned about the welfare of their own citizens as opposed to acting like unscrupulous political opportunists willing to waste their fellow citizens in a senseless conflict.
Racial Realities in Europe also helps us understand American history from a different perspective compared to most "establishment" histories espoused today. America started moving in the wrong sociological direction when so-called "Founding Fathers' secretly usurped the Articles of Confederation during the "Conspiracy in Philadelphia" (see the Gary North article below) and seriously degraded the ability of each state to exercise full sovereignty rights, to include the ability to control the flow of non-residents of each state across its own borders. If we can conceptualize North America as being similar to an "industry group," it would benefit by having dozens of independent Nordic and Celtic ethnostates in its northern territories which have a symbiotic relationship to other North American countries further south, analogous to the entrepreneurial role of northern European vs. more bureaucratic central and southern European countries in European history. Having only two countries -- the U.S. and Canada -- has been analogous to creating an industry group duopoly.
All of this was bad enough, and it certainly put America in a precarious "at risk" situation throughout most of the early to mid 19th century, however, the real coup de grace came with the "King Lincoln" dictatorship during the War of Northern Aggression Against Southern Independence. During this disaster, any real ability of individual states to serve as a check against growing Federal power was completely destroyed (Thomas Jefferson and James Madison noted in the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 and 1799 that States Rights was the primary bulwark to prevent the growth of Federal tyranny). The de facto ideology of the United States became an American-flavored version of the neo-Jacobin brand of "liberal fascism" pioneered by Napoleon Bonaparte. Beginning in the 1860's, the Federal Government cast off the last real restraints against a long and steady march that continued throughout the 20th century towards unlimited government and total defiance of the Constitution. By eliminating State's Right, the Federal Government eliminated all forms of real decentralized political competition just like a industry monopolist eliminates all small business competition. By embracing forced racial and ethnic integration, the Federal government smothered Nordic/Celtic entrepreneurial tribal culture and accelerated a de facto Jewish-Catholic dispossession of WASPs from the strategic bases of society.
On an ethnic level, the Federal government made its first major foray into the forced racial integration business during the so-called "Reconstruction Era" by installing anti-Southern white carpetbagger regimes in the South. Southern whites were often not allowed to vote, and their legislatures were manned by illiterate former Negro slaves. Many states were also tormented by exploitive Jews. See for example, Franklin J. Moses, Reconstruction's Most Infamous Scalawag by Michael Collins Piper about one of South Carolina's worst governors.
Then to make matters even worse, waves of "wretched refuse from teeming shores" brought in as low cost industrial labor joined up with Jews to ultimately accomplish a racial-ethnic coup de etat on a national level in the 20th century, beginning with the utterly corrupt Jewish-Catholic (particularly Irish and Italian Catholic) political machines that took over big cities like New York and Chicago in the late 19th century. This is analogous on an economic level to greedy unions that only focus on hiking benefits regardless of gains in productivity, and end up raising costs to the point that they kill the golden geese (entrepreneurs) that lay the golden eggs (continuous innovation) and induce management teams to move their operations somewhere else.
The Jewish-Catholic alliance created enough "front men" and "muscle" for Jews to create and sustain the private Federal Reserve Banking System (the "Fed") in 1913. Historian and libertarian author Thomas DiLorenzo has called this act the "final nail in the coffin of the republic." Jews were then able to work their inside angles on the Fed and closely allied major Wall Street firms to complete their financial conquest of the strategic bases of American society and then hijack America on a broader social, political, and economic level.
In a period of a hundred years, Jews played a key role in converting America from a 90% white country with the most prosperous economy and the largest industrial base in the world in 1912 -- built on the "Protestant work ethic" -- to a soon-to-become majority nonwhite, bankrupt, de-industrialized, highly unstable, Third World political and economic basket economy mainly driven by greed, speculation, rent-seeking, and deceit by 2012. But all of this never would have happened without lower quality groups of whites described by Stoddard in this book who created the sociological blur, voting blocks, and "power drive train" that Jews could exploit in their climb to power over old line WASPs.
This book suggests on an implicit level an interesting policy objective looking forward, namely that Nordics may be better off in the long run in their own relatively small homogeneous countries like Iceland, Sweden, and Norway instead of getting mixed up with other Caucasian groups in imperial systems. Similar to the paleo-diet concept in nutrition, it appears that people tend to function best on a political level in a societies that replicate important features of the evolutionary environment in which their ancestors evolved in over the last several thousand years. Nordics have peculiar psychological traits that have come from evolving in relatively dispersed, homogeneous tribal environments that demand considerable technological innovation and adaptation under harsh semi-Arctic conditions. They can only really perpetrate those traits which are their strengths when they are allowed to retain the homogeneous tribal environments of their ancestors, just like entrepreneurs who run small companies require a certain critical mass of like-minded people to retain their innovativeness.
Imagine if the U.S. and Canadian governments were to recognize all of these things as "anthropological facts of life" and then go about consciously creating Nordic and northern Celtic ethnostates in North America. Wouldn't that be a shocking ideological turnabout?
Unfortunately I do not think that most American political leaders today have either the wisdom or political clout in the face of the Zionist oligarchy to rehabilitate the white middle class and protect the golden geese who lay the golden eggs of productive entrepreneurship. Until we see a major paradigm shift in America, we will probably continue to see bought-and-paid-for political "leaders" lead us further down the path of more doom, gloom, misery, and death rather than return America to the proven upward path led by WASP's in the 19th century. As just two examples on the "doom-gloom" side, the Federal government responses to the ongoing Fukushima radiation threat that I have documented in my "Aerial Dance of Mass Death and Genetic Destruction" Week-by-week Fukushima radiation and fallout projections and companion articles serious -- or to the still ongoing British Petroleum crisis in the Gulf of Mexico -- have both been so horrendously pathetic and even deliberately criminal that they leaves one almost speechless.
Dr. Lothrop Stoddard created many other important classics besides Racial Realities in Europe. Please also see other classic works by Stoddard online such as:

* The French Revolution in San Domingo (1914) via Google Books
* The New World of Islam (1921)
* The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy (1922 edn.) via Google Books
* The Revolt Against Civilization: The Menace of the Under-man (1922) via Google Books; also available at:
* Into the Darkness (1940)


Three Extracts From the 2011-11-22 Oslo/Utøya 7/22 False Flag Terror web page:

a) From de Richelieu to Robespierre How the History of France Provides a Grim Warning For Dispossessed WASPs in America and Elsewhere
Appendix A
c) Appendix B



Siege of La Rochelle (1881) by Henri Motte (1846-1922). In this romanticized depiction of Cardinal de Richelieu, "The Red Eminence" leads the forces of Catholic Monarchist absolutism that laid siege to La Rochelle and eventually crushed the last bastion of Protestant political autonomy in France. We see similar contempt for WASP's with the Jewish-Catholic aggression against America on 9/11 and the Mossad-CIA-MI6 attack on Norway on 7-22.


From de Richelieu to Robespierre
How the History of France Provides a Grim Warning
For Dispossessed WASPs in America and Elsewhere

By William B. Fox

If Nordic and related Celtic peoples in North America, Europe, and Australia and New Zealand fail to get their act together, the downside risks coming into view are terrifying. An excellent example is documented in the book The French Revolution by Nesta Webster and Early Civilizations of the Nordic Peoples by Roger Pearson that describe the events that led up up to the mass murder of leading Nordic and Celtic Frenchmen during the Jacobin Terror.
Many political analysts believe that the historical political tendencies of France provide better comparables for the United States than, say, Weimar Germany. For starters, America is more of a racially and ethnically composite country, like the France described in Lothrop Stoddard's chapter Composite France in Racial Realities in Europe.
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts made an excellent historical analogy when he referred to the federal ideology that evolved out of King Lincoln's war (1861-1865) as "neo-Jacobinism" to connoted a top down, leftist orientation (please see my "Reconciling Opposing Political and Economic Ideologies" discussion to see how this relates to other ideologies). Between the Articles of Confederation and "America's Lenin," government consumed less than 5% of GDP. The "government monster" has now grown to the point that it consumes between 50-70% of GDP, and most of this is wasted to benefit special interests at the expense of the people. Nevertheless, government leaders posture as enlightened, progressive liberals who want to benevolently help the people (this is the leftist part of "neo-Jacobin" ideology) and unite disparate groups within their realm ("we are all part of the brotherhood of humanity") while using top down police state tactics to keep their vassals subservient to them at all costs. But of course "government knows best" and "we are the government, we are here to help you," as usual. This type of leftist or "environmental" authoritarian or "top down" ideological approach propped up de Richelieu, the Jacobins, and Napoleon in France, and it has been going strong in America under "liberal fascist" despots like the Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, and FDR administrations. (Please see landmark article "Shattering the Icon of Abraham Lincoln" by Sam Dickson for his excellent analysis of the impact of the Lincoln-Wilson-FDR "Liberal Trinity" on American history). Liberal fascism is alive and well today with the current "Global War On Terror" national security state.
Both Racial Realities in Europe and The Dispossessed Majority are a very valuable books, because they help Americans overcome their anarcho-libertarian and neo-Jacobin indoctrination to see how there are important biological elements behind the advance of the authoritarian state in the history of France and "Alpinized Germany" as well as America that actually go against advances in science and the application of reason in political, social, and religious philosophies. It is as if Alpine and Mediterranean peoples have a totally different set of cognitive and emotional reflexes, very different from the streak of individualism found among Nordic and certain Celtic peoples. These instinctive tendencies thrust their social and political institutions in authoritarian directions as they gain the upper hand in demographics and political and economic power. It is even more this way with Jews, who have a higher level of innate criminality than any other group, as well as their own unique tropism towards monopolistic tendencies, as I explain in my analysis of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology in my mutualism vs. parasitism article.
What makes this comparative analysis tricky is that when Nordic and certain Celtic peoples are in the majority, and set the tone for society, these other groups engage in adaptive mimicry. In addition, a minority of people in these other groups may actually be very competitive with Nordic and Celtic peoples and similar to them on an emotional and intellectual level, blurring things even more. However, once alien groups gain control, the mimicry begins to fall away, and suppressed innate traits that characterize the people as a whole rise to the surface.
All the advances in our understanding of political science issues, and all other logic on all other issues will not necessarily prevent authoritarian people from continuing their addiction to authoritarian measures, and the same for people like Jews with their addiction to intrigue. In fact, at some certain point continued discussions about the logic of decentralized, libertarian policies can be self-deceptive for Nordic peoples, because it can actually "train the dog to bite them," that is, teach innately authoritarian and criminal people new forms of adaptive mimicry to deceive WASPs long enough until the Jewish-Catholic stealth invasion takes over.
In the long run, for innately authoritarian people, the ideology de jeure does not really matter, whether it is secular or religious in nature. It does not matter a great deal whether it involves Catholicism in the 17th century, Jacobinism in the 18th century, neo-Jacobinism in the 19th century, Marxism in the 20th century, or Zionist neo-conservatism of the 21s century. The innate tropism towards authoritarianism remains constant. If you discredit a religious approach towards regimenting society with the Enlightenment, the innately authoritarian Liberal Minority Coalition will simply come back at you with an authoritarian secular state approach like the CIA or Department of Homeland Security. This kind of problem will never go away as long as Nordic and certain Celtic peoples allow alien peoples in their societies to grow in power and influence over them, which is why the most conservative solution to this problem is to re-establish fully autonomous and sovereign, homogenous, tribal, Nordic and Celtic ethnostates. Another alternative is for Nordic-Celtic peoples to form a ruling class, but is always a very tricky and risky long term situation. Under-classes usually envy and resent any ruling class over them. They often try to to use liberal propaganda to subvert their will to rule, or create an unstable demographic situation by out-breeding them.
Now let us consider the history of France, where we see a tug of war with Nordics and Celts in favor of decentralization, innovation, and individual initiative, and Alpines, Mediterraneans and Jews push for centralization, dogmatic conformity, and collectivism. When the latter start winning, we see very tragic consequences, similar to what we are experiencing in America today -- and which might get vastly worse.
To help set the stage, let us consider the impact of Nordic and Celtic peoples on general European history, as taken from Roger Pearson's Early Civilizations of the Nordic Peoples. This is a huge topic, so I can only address some key elements here taken.
We see strong evidence that Nordic or Indo-European peoples created Sumer, the earliest civilization, and blond mummies are found among the earliest ancient Egyptian dynasties. The Ionians and Dorians who created the heroic and classical eras of ancient Greece, which included the earliest prototypes of modern science, mathematics, republicanism, and democracy -- all of which was light years ahead of anything that was ever created by Jews -- were Nordic or Nordic-Celtic peoples who had migrated southward from the northlands. As some supporting evidence, the Wikipedia article "Greco-Roman hairstyle" notes "Homer, Achilles, Odysseus and other heroes are represented with blonde hair." See also New Evidence Indicates Legendary Greek Tales Took Place in the Baltic by John Tiffany, Jan/Feb 2007 Barnes Review.
Then along came the Sabine and Oscian tribes from Germany (back when Germany was a majority Nordic land) who founded the Roman Republic in 508 B.C. and its patrician class. They practiced egalitarian Nordic-Celtic tribal values and other forms of traditional social structure, to include the usual large middle class of land-owning, armed, free farmers who held strong citizen soldier traditions and who also practiced various forms of parliamentary government. However, as Rome became more successful, it increasingly expanded its control over alien peoples and absorbed them into its growing empire. In order to accommodate these disparate peoples, its ideology become more leftist on a superficial level. At the same time, in order to maintain the iron grip necessary to maintain the discipline of the formidable Roman military machine, and suppress potential rebellion within its growing de facto plantation social structure (like the Spartacus revolt), Rome increasingly resorted to more brutal, authoritarian, and otherwise fascistic tactics on an de facto level, while still pumping out benevolent leftist rhetoric for public consumption on the rhetorical level. This shift in ideology, in both theory and practice, that took place as the Roman Republic transitioned into the Roman Empire shows amazing
similarities to French and U.S. history as both countries trended towards the neo-Jacobin imperial state.
Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely, and before long the heavily centralized and race-mixed Roman Empire became so corrupt and dysfunctional that by the 5th century AD it became fatally vulnerable to invasion by the same kinds of Nordic-Germanic tribesmen who founded the Roman Republic in 508 B.C.
Interestingly enough, as Rome rotted internally, it also became more vulnerable to stealth invasion from within by Jews. The same predator vs. counter-predator, rat vs. cat analogy that I applied regarding Cossacks vs. Jews earlier on this web page also seemed to apply to "Old Romans" vs. Jews. Contrary to the impression left with many readers of the New Testament that Jews were some kind of pastoral people concentrated in Palestine during this period, in reality Jews were always a very urban people spread throughout not only the Roman Empire, but also Babylonia (which was actually the Jewish center of gravity, not Palestine). Jews dominated the slave trade, became powerful enough to bribe and intimidate major Roman politicians, and were denounced by Roman contemporaries for their corrupt and deceitful practices. Many critics of Christianity believe that wealthy Jews in the Roman Empire provided major initial support for the spread of Christianity (invented by their own tribesmen) as a limited hangout PSYOP to encourage gentiles to replace their own tribal history with that of the Jews. Christianity also helped turn the Roman Empire on its head by confusing manly instincts with forms of mystical pacifism. Niccolò Machiavelli wrote that Romans of the pagan early Roman Republic era were inherently more virtuous than Christianized Romans who came later, and William Gayley Simpson's Which Way Western Man? explains Jewish theological and sociological subversion in greater detail.

Germanic Peoples (Wikipedia)


In the centuries that followed the collapse of the Western Roman empire in the 5th century AD, we see many Nordic-Germanic and closely related Celtic tribes migrating southward through Europe, often setting up provincial governments that reflect their tendencies towards decentralization and parliamentary government (called Things). Germany remained highly decentralized throughout the Middle Ages by contemporary standards, and was also very supportive of human liberty. In fact, according to William Shirer in The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, Germans of the 16th century were ahead of Elizabethan English in the protection of human rights. The Old Swiss Confederacy remained very decentralized and Lombards, who originated in Scandinavia, set up principalities throughout most of Italy. The Swedish Viking Rus formed the Novgorod Republic in Russia. Nordic Visigoths in Spain formed the parliamentary Cortes. Germanic Franks (from which France gives its name) also ruled France in a relatively decentralized, provincial manner for centuries (with some exceptions like the rule of Charlemagne), so much so that by the 17th century many provincial leaders could still raise their own private armies and conduct separate treaty negotiations with foreign powers.
France began a process of centralization in the late Renaissance. A particularly famous "evil genius" behind French centralization was named Armand Jean du Plessis, Cardinal-Duc de Richelieu et de Fronsac, better known to history as simply Cardinal de Richelieu. He is the arch villain in the Dumas' The Three Musketeers and the inspiration for Ken Russell film The Devils. In the latter film, a French cardinal trumps up false charges of heresy against provincial leaders as backdoor method to remove them from power and proceed with a campaign of knocking down the castle walls of all the provinces to eliminate their ability to resist central control.
The Wikipedia article Cardinal de Richelieu observes:

Richelieu is also notable for the authoritarian measures he employed to maintain power. He censored the press, established a large network of internal spies, forbade the discussion of political matters in public assemblies such as the Parlement de Paris (a court of justice), and had those who dared to conspire against him prosecuted and executed. The Canadian historian and philosopher John Ralston Saul has referred to Richelieu as the "father of the modern nation-state, modern centralised power [and] the modern secret service."

The high point of de Richelieu's campaign to crush provincial leaders and ideological dissenters came with his successful siege of La Rochelle, as noted in the Wikipedia article: Siege of La Rochelle.

The Siege of La Rochelle (French: Le Siège de La Rochelle, or sometimes Le Grand Siège de La Rochelle) was a result of a war between the French royal forces of Louis XIII of France and the Huguenots of La Rochelle in 1627-1628. The siege marked the apex of the tensions between the Catholics and the Protestants in France, and ended with a complete victory for King Louis XIII and the Catholics.

After the fall of La Rochelle, all that French Protestants had left for their own protection was "moral suasion." Their lives and fortunes literally hung on whatever particular whims a particular French King and his loftiest Catholic advisors might have at the moment.


The Devils (Ken Russell - 1971)
review caption: "Cardinal Richelieu and his power-hungry entourage seek to take control of seventeenth-century France, but need to destroy Father Grandier - the priest who runs the fortified town that prevents them from exerting total control. So they seek to destroy him by setting him up as a warlock in control of a devil-possessed nunnery, the mother superior of which is sexually obsessed by him [below]. A mad witch-hunter is brought in to gather evidence against the priest, ready for the big trial [above]."

State-sponsored hysteria then and now. Back then, in 17th century France, it was de Richelieu's Inquisition. Today in early 21st century America, it is the CIA-FBI-DHS police state apparatus. Back then, it was The Devils. Today, it is first an overseas version of Muslim "Al Qaeda" -- originally created by Mossad-CIA -- followed by the even more hysterical "White Al Qaeda," which allegedly bedevils America from the inside with "Homegrown Lone Wolves" and other strange entities according to "Big Sis" Janet Napolitano and her Department of Homeland Security. [Above, an obsessed "Big Sis" of a 17th century French convent. Although she is also single like Janet Napolitano, in some areas the analogy breaks down, for example, note her preference for wearing black and white as opposed to the colors of a "Red Eminence" like de Richelieu depicted in the official Janet Napolitano photo below].


The current trend involved in the ratcheting up of the post 9/11 police state in America, along with a corresponding growth in the power of Jews and their Catholic minions over WASPs in America, ultimately points towards an endgame for Protestant America similar to what French Protestants (Huguenots) experienced with the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes in France.We can expect controllers of America's Department of Homeland Security, CIA, media monopolies, and other shadow government controllers to some day become every bit as impatient with political dissenters as Louis XIV became with the Huguenots. The Wikipedia article on the Edict of Nantes.

The Edict of Fontainebleau (October 1685) was an edict issued by Louis XIV of France, also known as the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes of 1598, which had granted to the Huguenots the right to practice their religion without persecution from the state. Though Protestants had lost their independence in places of refuge under Richelieu, they continued to live in comparative security and political contentment. From the outset, religious toleration in France had been a royal, rather than a popular policy. The lack of universal adherence to his religion did not sit well with Louis XIV's vision of perfected autocracy: "Bending all else to his will, Louis XIV resented the presence of heretics among his subjects."
By this edict, Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes and ordered the destruction of Huguenot churches, as well as the closing of Protestant schools. This policy made official the persecution already enforced since the dragonnades created in 1681 by the king in order to intimidate Huguenots into converting to Catholicism. As a result of the persecution by the dragoons billeted upon prominent Huguenots and the subsequent Edict of Fontainebleau, a large number of Protestants — estimates range from 210,000 to 900,000 — left France over the next two decades, seeking asylum in England, the United Provinces, Sweden, Switzerland, Brandenburg-Prussia, Denmark, the Habsburg's Holy Roman Empire, South Africa and North America. On January 17, 1686, Louis XIV himself claimed that out of a Huguenot population of 800,000 to 900,000, only 1,000 to 1,500 had remained in France.

Let us now flash forward a little over a hundred years to the 1780's. Leading members of the French intelligentsia and nobility have experienced the Enlightenment, which has exposed contradictions and absurdities in Christian Fundamentalism. One might think that this would help take some of the hard edge off of intolerance based on theological issues that supposedly created so much religious conflict in the prior century. On top of this, French nobility and intellectuals have been exposed to the libertarian ideals of the American Revolution. Once again, one would think that the intolerance and very hard treatment demonstrated by the likes of de Richelieu and Louis XIV towards the Huguenots would be a thing of the past. Right?
Wrong! Despite major advances in science and political theory, the French Revolution degenerated into one of the most savagely ruthless and destructive spectacles in history.
This kind of paradox has me gravely concerned about lies ahead for America as highly authoritarian members of the Liberal Minority Coalition continue to ratchet up their strong arm control methods and fail to take positive steps to address such current dangers as the Fukushima radiation poisoning, America's hollowed out industry, and GMO contamination of food supplies -- problems which they themselves have aided and abetted by while maintaining politically expedient mafia-like camaraderie with the perpetrators of these evils.
There were quite a few paradoxes surrounding the French Revolution. First, King Louis XVI went deep into debt to help finance the American Revolution. This put France under so much financial stress that helped cause the revolution that deposed him.
Secondly, the initial phase of the French Revolution was supported by many members of the French nobility who later became its many of its leading victims. They intended the revolution to be a nonviolent reform revolution. They included the Marquis de Lafayette who had been a close friend of George Washington and who had made a major contribution towards the American victory.
Third, one of the reasons why the revolution degenerated from its initial reform phase tolerated by the King and supported by many nobles to the second very deadly phase that got hijacked by savage Jacobins is because many nobles were very naive about how to control a revolutionary process once it was set into motion. According Nesta Webster's The French Revolution, all the "fire" or dynamic revolutionary organization was on the side of the Jacobins. In contrast, members of the ancien regime remained amazingly passive. Webster believes that when King Louis XVI was confronted with viciously criminal subversives as opposed to well-intentioned idealistic reformers, he was too naive to see the difference and deal with the subversives in the very firm and decisive manner that they deserved.
Lastly, the French nobility not only failed to understand how to prevent the revolutionary process from getting out of control, but was also naive about the extreme levels of hatred that could be aroused against them. De Richelieu and other centralizers had put much of the nobility on retainer as an additional move to make them less autonomous and more dependent upon the monarchy. The Jacobins then blamed the nobility for acting like parasites on the people rather than blame the centralizers who created the problem in the first place. In fact, according to Nesta Webster, despite this centralization, France was still Europe's leader in population size, industry, commerce, and general standard of living by the 1780's, contrary to the image created by works such as Les Miserables. In fact, if pre-revolutionary France was so horrible, one might ask why Thomas Jefferson, who spoke French and had been U.S. minister to France from 1785-1789 -- and who had even traveled around the country a bit -- would write the following in his Autobiography:

"So ask the traveled inhabitant of any nation, In what country on earth would you rather live?—Certainly in my own, where are all my friends, my relations, and the earliest & sweetest affections and recollections of my life. Which would be your second choice? France."

The Nordic peoples have always excelled at new technology and entrepreneurial business development, and one might expect that any reasonable and patriotic revolutionaries who might be genuinely concerned about the future welfare of France would first consider devising a plan to take the descendants of the Nordic Frankish nobility off retainer, restore local autonomy and self-sufficiency, and put them back to work rather than send them to the guillotine.
Jacobins who grabbed control of the French Revolution -- the same revolutionaries who advocated worship of the Goddess Reason -- also perpetrated some of the most destructive insanities in world history. 5,000 militant Jacobins based in Paris kept a country of about 25 million people in such a state of terror that ordinary middle class people in Paris wore shabby clothing for fear that if they dressed up more, envious neighbors might report them to a revolutionary committee and send them off to the guillotine. French Revolution's Hidden Depopulation Agenda by Andrew Smith, 30 Aug 2011,, states:

The popular version of the French Revolution told by today's mainstream media is a monstrous falsehood. This "Tale of Two Cities" account has the Storming of the Bastille and The Reign of Terror happening for the benefit of France. Nothing could be further from the truth.
The assault on the Bastille was a fraud. Professional terrorists told Parisians a Royalist Army marched on Paris to destroy them and that everyone in Paris should therefore arm themselves from the armory at the Bastille. But there was no armory at the Bastille and there were few weapons. And the storming was not to free political prisoners. There were no political prisoners in the Bastille. Bastille Day therefore represents a day of French slaughter and disgrace, although extravagantly celebrated each year on July 14.
The Reign of Terror was a thoroughly malicious pre-Marxist depopulation program. According to
"Pol Pot's regime is surprisingly similar to the French Revolution, 200 years before. Both revolutions began in the French capitol of Paris. Both revolutions conducted deadly purges, resulting in the death of many. Also, when they took over, both Pol Pot and the French declared, 'This is the year zero.' They both made their own 10 day calendar and rejected the thought of any God. Both revolutions were curtailed within a decade."
And both were financed by the Illuminati Bankers.
After the radical Jacobin (French proto-communists) leaders guillotined the monarchy and the moderates within the Revolutionary Convention, they seized power with a vengeance and immediately commenced the mass murder that today we call the Reign of Terror.
Firmly in control by the spring of 1793, they calmly and carefully discussed the proportion of the French population to be suppressed to make France a model (communist) republic.
Before the genocide began, the population of France was 25,000,000. In early 1793 Jean Bon St André openly stated in the Revolutionary Convention, "[I]n order to establish the Republic securely in France, the population must be reduced by more than half."
More radical leaders made even more gruesome proposals. Maximilien Robespierre, the most aggressive annihilation advocate, blithely proposed that 23,000,000 be culled from the French census.
We should consider whether Robespierre and the other French Jacobin could ever have dreamed up such a massive depopulation program on their own.
How could they believe that such a program of murder and mayhem could possibly benefit France? Obviously, they acted upon the prompting of the originators of depopulation theory, the scholars (like Jeremy Bentham) of the British East India Company (BEIC) a/k/a Illuminati Bankers. The first BEIC experiment in depopulation occurred 20 years earlier, the Bengal famine of 1770 (10,000,000 dead).
According to Jeffery Steinberg's April 1994 EIR essay, "The Bestial British Intelligence Of Shelburne and Bentham":
"Speeches were prepared by Bentham and translated and transported by diplomatic pouch and other means to Paris, where leaders of the Jacobin Terror, Jean-Paul Marat, Georges Jacques Danton, and Maximilien de Robespierre delivered the fiery oratories. Records of East India Company payments to these leading Jacobins are still on file at the British Museum."
How else could buffoons like Robespierre (35 years old) and St Just (27 years old) take control of France and lay waste to it? How could a simple minded, miserable worm like Pol Pot take command of the Cambodian genocide 200 years later?...

The same Rothschilds-City of London group which today controls Mossad-CIA-MI6 and recently gave us the Fukushima radiation catastrophe from its Stuxnet virus, not to mention Oslo-Utoya 7-22, is the direct lineal descendant of the same Rothschild-City of London gang that inflamed the Jacobin side of the French Revolution. Not surprisingly, many historical accounts claim that even during the worst phases of the Terror the property of the French Rothschilds and other leading Jews was never touched.
In contrast, many wigmakers claimed that one of the best ways to get blond hair was to attend the guillotine executions of aristocrats. Nordics suffered in other ways as well. Lothrop Stoddard pointed out that Nordics tend to be taller than the average population and also tend to be more likely to serve as warriors for idealistic causes. After doing a disproportionate amount of dying as front line soldiers in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, Nordic genetic stock declined significantly in France (as it already had in Germany during the Thirty Years War, and also as it has been in continuous decline in America). The average height of the French soldier dropped by an inch or two when it was all over. (John de Nugent noted on his Joan of Arc web page "Hans F. K. Günther wrote in his Racial Life of the Indo-European Peoples that a study of recruits in Napoleon’s army in the year 1800 showed 70% had BLUE EYES, reflecting the original French look before the wars of Napoleon and WWI decimated the true French stock. The French are basically a keltic-germanic-mediterranean mixture. The northeastern province of Lorraine, next to Alsace, then in Germany, specifically was heavily keltic-germanic"). In addition, Celtic peoples of France also suffered horribly, such as the genocided Vendee and untold numbers of Celtic women and children who got mowed down, bayoneted, or drowned in other regions.
Despite all the high minded idealism of the French Revolution and the military glory subsequently won by Napoleon and his armies, the 19th century economic performance statistics of France tell a tragically different story. France began a long period of steady decline in its relative output of industrial and scientific and technological development relative to other European countries, particularly as Great Britain and America gained steam during the earliest 19th century phase of the industrial revolution. .
Nesta Webster makes another very important point in The French Revolution, namely that if one could back to the mid-1780's in a time machine, and try to warn the average Frenchman about the horrors that lay ahead over the next ten years, most of Frenchmen of that era would probably find this "reality projection" to be completely unbelievable. Too fantastic and too horrible to be worth thinking or worrying about. Not even Jules Verne could come up with something this bizarre and crazy.
But it happened.
I have heard other writers make a similar point how the average Russian in the year 1913 would probably find a realistic description by a time traveler about what actually happened over the next thirty years to be completely unbelievable. Again, too fantastic and too horrible to be worth thinking or worrying about. (Incidentally, the Jacobin version of the French Revolution was a major inspiration for the horrors of the Bolshevik Revolution).
So it is from this perspective that I now look at someone like Janet Napolitano, or other likely Rothschild-City of London minions at the CIA HQ in Langley, and ask myself if we might be looking at more Robespierres. If we do not suffer under a Robespierre now (actually we are suffering right now with the Fukushima radiation and other poisons being directed as us), will we suffer someone like Louis XIV who retracted the agreements with the Huguenots and savagely persecuted them. Why wouldn't any reasonable person in America be gravely concerned about his situation?
Imagine if a time traveler from the future -- who is totally credible visits you and tells you that New York 9/11, London 7/7, Fukushima 3/11, and Oslo-Utoya 3-11 are "red alert" foreshadows of a fate awaiting America that is every bit as horrible -- if not worse -- than Jacobin France and Bolshevik Russia. He also tells you that if you act now, you might be able to prevent the coming horror -- or at least most of it. He also tells you " Doing nothing is not an option." He points out that the people who right now think they can keep a low profile are still getting victimized by Fukushima radiation, dog-training searches for humans, sterility for future generations from GMO foods, toxic vaccine additives, chemtrail carcinogens, and myriad other evils that are being visited upon us by a totally psychopathic power elite. Acting like a "sheeple" will only delay, but not prevent, your doom. However, if you act now, you have some chance of leaving a better world for posterity.
So I ask, What are you going to do about it?


DHS "Big Sis" / "Godmother" Janet Napolitano: a de Richelieu - Robespierre "Red Eminence" wannabe? The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has developed a very dangerous new capability in the continuing Jewish-Catholic stealth war against WASPs in America, where it can round up and mass murder Nordic Americans in FEMA camps with the same racial envy and hatred that motivated ancient Mayans to ritually murder Nordic seafarers. A very disturbing indicator of an evil depopulation mentality is the fact that DHS has made no effort to alert the American public about the continuing -- and accumulating -- Fukushima radiation threat, which remains extremely serious. Of Roman Catholic/southern Italian ancestry (perhaps Jewish as well, she has been closely associated with the Jewish ADL and Wikipedia states "daughter of Jane Marie, née Winer" --an often Jewish name), Napolitano's public career has been highly supportive of the Liberal-Minority Coalition agenda addressed by Wilmot Robertson in The Dispossessed Majority. She has consistently alarmed civil libertarians, for example, please see "Homeland Security Targets `Anti-Semitic Extremists' by Brother Nathanael Kapner and More Proof The Department Of Homeland Security And TSA Are Actively Destroying America by Madison Ruppert, 30 July 2011. Alex Jones is not a big fan of Napolitano either, in fact on his 21 Oct 2011 show he called her "Janet the Troll," "Witch," "Monster," "Anti-American Pig," "Magic Weasel Fairy," and "Jack-booted Little Miss Hitler" (see transcript excerpt below).


Is Janet Napolitano a "Suspicious Individual" or "Person of Special Interest" Regarding Anti-WASP Genocidal Tyranny in America?

We may be lucky this go around that the Obama Administration has botched things so badly that it has lost momentum. There may be just barely enough free thinkers and activists left in America today to keep possible Robespierre wannabes like Napolitano and her minions at bay (although we are still faced with other horrendous problems such as handling Fukushima radiation, out of control Third World immigration, and overcoming a hollowed out industrial base, and myriad other problems), but just wait another ten to twenty years when the percentage of Nordics and other whites has declined even further, and their political and economic influence has diminished that much more, and then people like Napolitano and their Jewish backers might be able to fully indulge their Neanderthal-like bloodlust, just like their lunatic counterparts during the French Revolution and Bolshevik Red Terror.
In his 21 Oct 2011 show, Alex Jones used some colorful terms such as
"Janet the Troll," "Witch," "Monster," "Anti-American Pig," "Magic Weasel Fairy," and "Jack-booted Little Miss Hitler" to describe Ms. Napolitano. (, archived at GCN Alex Jones Show archives, First hour, download here, 6.9 MB, 58 min). In order to be fair to both Alex Jones and Ms. Napolitano, I have decided to provide a transcript of everything that Alex Jones said between ad breaks so that the reader can fully understand the context of this criticism.

Alex Jones

Alex Jones does give Ms. Napolitano a little bit of dispensation by recognizing that she inherited polices that were commenced under arch-Zionist Michael Chertoff in the Bush Administration. (This is the same utterly shameless high level Bush Administration insider who let the infamous "dancing Israelis" return to Israel following 9/11 with barely a slap on the wrist, and who has also engaged in grotesque self-dealing through his ownership interests in a company that makes the unnecessary X-ray scanner machines that genetically mutilate and give cancer to both passengers and TSA workers alike at airports). In addition, Jones provides an excellent snap shot of a wide variety of other very serious issues that currently plague America, ranging from Orwellian media control, to devious schemes by globalist bankers to dupe American taxpayers into more trillion dollar bailouts of banker follies, to DHS lawlessness and insubordination towards U.S. Senators. All of this additional background may help the reader better understand Alex Jones' less than rosy evaluation of Ms. Napolitano's character:

Alex Jones: [24:08] ...That's right, before you start watching your television, within about a minute the trained mind -- the TV trains your brain -- goes into a REM-like sleeping, waking, sleep-walking state. Scientific fact. In fact Darrin McBreen and Rob Dew put together an incredible subliminal message report last night, showing subliminal messages in TV shows, ads, magazines, television ads, you name it, and by the way, we are going to have Peter Schiff on tonight, on the nightly news, to break down the 9-9-9 Plan. Because it is not just 9% income tax, 9% VAT, 9% sales tax, which are two new taxes that the Feds will administer, and it is not that they can just jack up the income tax once they have lower it to 9 [percent], which you know they will do, income taxes [originally started in the early 20th century] at 1% for the top 1%, then they are going to continue with the social security FICA part, that is around 9%, so you have 9-9-9, and then they could just jack all those up. I mean, it is such a nightmare. And it is exactly what central banks, the very same big megabanks do through their central banks that masquerade as governments all over the world. That is a big deal. And listen, you cannot expect these criminals to do anything but this. Criminals have committed such monstrous level crimes, once they have gone for broke, once they have committed global assassinations and invaded now dozens of countries -- it is over a dozen wars -- not five, six, seven or eight that are going on right now. And I listed some of those with [Webster] Tarpley yesterday. He was saying six or seven wars, and I went on and said "Mexico, Columbia, and just started listing other places where wars are going on. Once the elite gets to this point with corruption, you go off the edge. And that is why I have a Detroit Free Press article saying they have got checkpoints all over the state now searching people for drugs without warrants, and they are taking people's cell phones and downloading them into the police systems, and some of them are passive digital snoopers in the police cars that just grab the stuff off your phone as you drive by. The paper says courts have ruled you can't do this. Well why are they doing it? Because they don't care. They don't care anymore, do you understand? An FBI agent couldn't stick their hands down your pants two years ago. The FBI won't do it today because they are actually following --still -- even though they are corrupt -- the Constitution. They had to make a new agency called the TSA that first grabs the outside, and now the inside, and they say it is OK. And now Federal judges have ruled, well if your state police are searching people's pants, as long as they are TSA-certified it is OK. Or, "Oh, there are law suits over a school prom, people are doing TSA-style searches. This is now standard training for security and police." [Editor's Note: In other programs Jones has described how TSA and police go to entrances at sporting events, school proms, and highway checkpoints in order to randomly pat down people as part of a national dog training programming to condition the American people for slavery]. They will have TSA come in and oversee it and certify you in Santa Fe and now they can grab your 17 year old daughter's breasts and genitals, or son. See, the TSA is a magic fairy, and Janet the Troll Napolitano, who said she doesn't like my web site and the Drudge Report calling her a troll -- I never called you a troll, but if the name fits, you know, a troll is a troll by any other name -- OK, you're a troll -- don't tell me what to -- I don't care what you do, you -- you -- you -- witch! You don't tell me what to do you, you monster!! It's my First Amendment, you PIG! You ANTI-AMERICAN PIG!!! Excuse me [Jones pauses and exhales] the point is she floats around like a magic weasel, a magic weasel fairy and waves a wand and now there is no Fourth Amendment. I have got a big stack of news articles on that here, but all over the country they want to search our cars for drugs or guns, just randomly, as if we are guilty until proven innocent, and then here it is in the news, C-SPAN" "Homeland Security told the Senate Judiciary Committee Wednesday that they authorize illegals when they feel like it to work in the U.S." She ignores Federal law. She is the fairy. She waves the wand -- stick their hands down your pants, put you in a microwave oven [an airport X-ray scanner]. "Napolitano: DHS authorizing illegal aliens to work in the U.S." Just what Obama did two or three months ago when he said "We will decide now to deport or whatever, I will ignore law." It is like saying, "I'll decide if I prosecute murder or not." Or, "I'll decide if I can kill U.S. citizens without a trial and arrest them or not." It is total tyranny. Here is another one "Union president testifies ICE Headquarters ordered agents not to arrest illegals including fugitives." I have known this for years, but here it is, they admit it to Congress. And then [Senator] Orrin Hatch, I have got the article right here, he complains now that they are putting in microwave oven scanners even when he says, "No, I don't want to" they order him to. They have got other Senators with Napolitano in [Senate hearing committees] there complaining about it, well as much as I don't like Napolitano, the jack-booted little Miss Hitler, the point is, this all started under Bush. The thirty million dollar contract that Michael Chertoff is getting for naked body scanners in Austin, you know, that's Bush! [29:53] [Editor's Note: Please see Chapter 29 of my Mission of Conscience series which explains how the "Panty bomber" episode in Dec 2009 used to "justify" the X-ray scanners was another government-contrived false flag operation, and also how the scanners provide dangerous radiation not only to passengers, but also TSA workers].


Some summary comments regarding America's suspected "de Richelieu-Robespierre" wannabe:

Janet Napolitano has a stated mission to fight the "War on Terror" (which is phony, see Chapter 12). Her real mission, in all likelihood, is to provide strong arm support for Jewish financiers and their collaborators who have looted America with their "derivatives" schemes and other intrigues to the tune of tens of trillions of dollars. (Please see Chapter 33 about their shenanigans). These criminals have deliberately refused to rebuild America's industrial base -- the real source of real new jobs and economic growth -- therefore leaving Americans with extremely serious structural economic problems that are leading America towards massive social dislocations, more unemployment, and other forms of impoverishment and degradation. Rather than openly and honestly address this problem, they deny it while they continue to engage in massive financial fraud. They ultimately plan to "make ends meet" or "sweep everything under the rug" with slave-labor camps and genocide. Napolitano's operation is a central part of this evil plan.
Another implied mission for Ms. Napolitano is to advance the continuing Jewish-Catholic takeover of America. This means the continued the squeeze-out of WASPs in high level jobs and also the continued degradation of the American Revolution and Protestant Reformation and other WASP political, cultural, and religious legacies.
In regard to undermining the Protestant Reformation, which stood for political and theological decentralization, Paul Joseph Watson commented in his article Chuck Baldwin: Restoring The Republic:

Baldwin says we have more to fear from Washington DC than we do from Tehran or from Afghanistan, pointing to a program that seeks to recruit pastors as martial law pacifiers for FEMA in the event of a national emergency. Baldwin relates how a pastor from Ohio who attended a FEMA training seminar confirmed to him that there is a program to enlist pastors and clergymen to be part of clergy response teams, the primary goal of which would be to use the clergymen to encourage their constituents to submit to following government orders upon declaration of martial law, including the confiscation of firearms.

Napolitano also aids and abets the biological displacement/genocide of WASPs with open borders policies with Mexico and out of control illegal immigration with other Third World countries. Other skullduggery includes gun-running schemes designed to undermine the Second Amendment right to bear arms and myriad other artifices that sneer at what little is left of the U.S. Constitution, whose followers she has actually targeted as "suspicious individuals."
Napolitano wants to implement legislation that would enable DHS to arbitrarily deny the ability of any person to get a job in America, and her TSA underlings are encouraged to grope the intimate parts of travelers at airports and humiliate them, a form of "dog training" that has been applied to Congressman Ron Paul, Gov. Jesse Ventura, and Texas State Legislators. This "dog training" is now also being applied to other types of transportation terminals and attendees at sporting events.
It is worth emphasizing that despite endless waves of Fukushima radiation passing over America, DHS has deliberately refused to alert Americans to take the most basic protective measures such as to stay out of the rain and watch what they eat. Given that Fukushima is likely to be 100 to 1,000 worse than Chernobyl, which caused the deaths of over a million Europeans in a 25 year period, it is possible that Janet Napolitano is aiding and abetting the unnecessary early deaths and incapacitation of over ten million Americans simply out political expediency (or NWO "global depopulation" ideology), and in violation of the ultimate spirit of her oath of office. (Her airport scanners have also caused unnecessary cancers in thousands of TSA employees).
This is not the traditional WASP concept of honorable behavior. In fact, this amazing level of shameless rent-seeking and dogmatic political expediency that blindly serves privileged criminal special interests is one of many reasons why the American Party tried to keep Catholics out of the U.S. beginning in the 1840's, and Thomas Jefferson felt that southern Europeans were vastly less fit for republican government than northern Europeans.
We should not be terribly surprised if an implied collateral mission for Ms. Napolitano, whether she is consciously aware of it or not, is to keep kicking WASPs while they are "down." This is not exactly the way WASPs treated her ancestors during a much earlier era when they got off the boat fresh from southern Italy, a stagnant society which can never quite get rid of its mafia infestation problems -- and always seems to export them abroad among with Roman Catholic communities. As some background, please see Mafia is now Italy's 'biggest bank' - and they're squeezing the life out of small business (quite literally) by Nick Pisa,, 12th January 2012.
Far from making any kind of positive contribution to America, Napolitano is simply supporting the continued spread of Roman Catholic-style totalitarianism, Italian mafia-style corruption, and Jewish-style criminal gangsterism. She is now playing a lead role in the conversion of America into a pyramidal Asiatic-despotic "rat-dog" society with "rat-like" criminal mafia on top and "dog-peasants" on the bottom. (See my discussion of pyramidal societies in Chapter 5).
Bye bye the old Nordic-Celtic concept of the desirability of maintaining a large self-sufficient middle class of armed free men who retain "top of the food chain/king predator" instincts and a heroic "land of free, home of the brave" culture.
Is this what Nordic Americans deserve for having been so "happy go lucky" for so long, for having been so blinded by anarcho-libertarian and neo-Jacobin ideology that they believed Catholics and Jews could eventually ever become "just like them," any more than the Mayans described by Thor Heyerdahl who killed the blond tribesmen? Nordic-Americans have been every bit as naive as Norwegians when they granted political asylum to Leon Trotsky in believing that Catholics and Jews require anything less than either complete separation or continued "adult supervision."
After all, what are Jews and Catholics trying to tell us now that they are ruthlessly exploiting their power positions by trying to impose a cruel, hypocritical, and even genocidal police state over the rest of America?
Instead of creating some kind of Zionist-Marxist-Catholic New World Order fantasy utopia --or whatever it is their mad and evil schemes might entail - everything might ultimately backfire on them. What they might really accomplish is import social strife characteristic of "Northern Ireland" and resurrect the "Gangs of New York" -- except this go around the story is told from a sympathetic Protestant viewpoint rather than the viewpoint of the Roman Catholic director Martin Scorsese.

Some latest high level initiatives in the Jewish-Catholic war against WASP liberty

2011-12-09 Napolitano Jokes With CFR Elitists Over Drudge “Big Sis” Moniker: DHS chief is proud at being named after the fictional dictator of a totalitarian state by Paul Joseph Watson,
2011-? The Illuminati Choice for 2012: Newt Gingrich is Their Chosen as the Republican Party's Nominee for President by Texe Marrs
"...Gingrich a Loyal Zionist Puppet
For now, though, it’s all Newt Gingrich. He has been ultra-loyal both to the Jewish money men and to the secretive Vatican group Opus Dei, another group of money men. A fanatical Israel supporter, Gingrich is continually pimping for more wars and death in the Middle East. He supported the Bush torture and gulags and can be counted on to siphon trillions from the U.S. Treasury into the coffers of Wall Street’s Jewish bankers and ponzi scheme artists.
To prepare Gingrich for his role as Rothschild front man in 2012, Newt recently “converted” to Catholicism. In February, 2010, some 500 Catholic millionaires, initiates of the Opus Dei affiliate Legatus, met in Dana Point, California to honor Gingrich and former President and Jew-Catholic loyalist George W. Bush. Gingrich was lauded by the group for his conversion and even gave his “Christian testimony” regarding his leaving the Southern Baptist denomination to become a convert to “Holy Mother Church.” His new wife—his third—was on hand..."
The Jewish Jesuits
Also present was Jesuit Father Robert Spitzer, a Jew who is Chairman of the Vatican’s Magis Institute and Spitzer Center. The Jesuit Order is, in fact, a crypto-Jewish organization and Spitzer is one of the many Jews who claims to have converted to Catholicism. He and the debauched Gingrich must have really been laughing up their sleeves.
Legatus has some 1,800 members, with a heavy presence in the United Sates, Canada, and Ireland. Gingrich thrilled the attendees in California by showing them the new film his company, Gingrich Productions, has produced about the “exemplary life of the late Pope John Paul II.” The theme of the Legatus conference was “Challenging the Culture.”
Gingrich’s Third Wave Plan for America.
And just what kind of “culture” does Mr. Gingrich want to see take hold in America? In my insightful, eye-opening book, Circle of Intrigue, I unmask the traitorous anti-American intentions of Gingrich and his associates in crime. “I have an enormous political ambition,” Gingrich told the Washington Post. “I want to shift the entire planet and I’m doing it.”
This planetary shift of Gingrich’s takes a number of dangerous forms. It is, in fact, all part of the revolutionary socialist movement which Gingrich calls the “Third Wave.” The Plan calls for nothing less than to radically change America into a fascist “paradise” with citizens stripped of constitutional rights. What is planned is a virtual high tech prison, an Orwellian Police State superintended by the self-appointed `Masters'”...
2011-11-04 Vatican Suggests One All-Powerful Bank Run by One All-Powerful Global Entity by Richard Walker, " [Editor's Note: I listed this article once before in the Other Government and MSM Questionable Behavior Patterns section, but repeat it here because it reinforces such important points. In view of everything that has been written in the financial press about how a primary factor behind bank corruption involves excessive centralization ("power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely" applies to the banking industry as well as government), and also in view of everything that has been written about how a common practice of criminal executives is to try to "kick problems upstairs" to sweep bigger problems under bigger rugs, for the Vatican to now call for total global centralization almost sounds like something out of a Larry Wilde ethnic joke book. (Sample joke: Did you hear what happened on the first day of 1967 Arab-Israeli War? Answer: The whole Italian army surrendered!) As a group, Catholics seem to have this tropism towards corrupt authoritarianism that just never quits, just like Jews as a group seem to have a permanent addiction for Asiatic despotism and financial manipulation over real productivity. All these things make it dangerous in the long run for WASPs to subordinate themselves on a social, political, and economic level to Catholics, not to mention Jews who are even worse. ...And so now you know why Protestants shed rivers of blood during the Protestant Reformation to free themselves from these people!]
2010-03 Boys Town and the Pope (pdf),


Appendix A

"Possible Motive for Oslo-Utoya False Flag Terror:
Act out subterranean ethnic / racial hatred for
Cro-Magnon / Nordic peoples
also a look at significant emotional, cognitive,
and political/economic power differences
between Jews, Catholics, and WASPS


The CIA, The Vatican, Knights of Malta, Fascism, Rockefeller and Kissinger caption: "Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI since 2005, giving a salute." Elsewhere the article notes "Adolf Hitler was also a Roman Catholic. "


When WASPs try to function in a society where they have not only become another minority, but are now subordinated to Catholics and Jews, they begin to experience enormous problems in terms of basic functionality that simply never existed when they lived in homogeneous Nordic societies and were in control of their own destinies.
For starters, in regard to the diffusion of innovations paradigm developed by Everett Rogers, Nordic societies tend to have a vastly higher percentage of individuals in the innovators, early adopters, and early majority category. This is a major reason why Scandinavian societies generally have a higher level of scientific innovation per capita than most other countries in the world, and seem to be better at anticipating and heading off looming social problems before they get overtaken by them, as noted in Lothrop Stoddard's chapter "The Nordic North." Once Nordic societies start heading in a bad direction, it is easier for whistle-bowers to speak up and for society as a whole to honestly lay its cards on the table as a necessary prerequisite towards accurately identifying the real nature of the underlying problems and developing wise long term solutions.


Wikipedia caption for diagram in the diffusion of innovations article: "The diffusion of innovations according to Rogers. With successive groups of consumers adopting the new technology (shown in blue), its market share (yellow) will eventually reach the saturation level. In mathematics the S curve is known as the logistic function."


An excellent illustration of superior Nordic operational planning and execution on an anecdotal level is the book The Arctic Grail: The Quest for the Northwest Passage and The North Pole, 1818-1909 by Pierre Berton, which described how different groups of Norwegians and British competed against each other in the late 19th century and early 20th century to be the first to navigate the Northwest passage and reach the North and South Poles. The author commented that while researching this book, it struck him how the Norwegian explorers consistently made it look easy, whereas the British kept making mistakes and losing people left and right.
I also once read a completely separate article in The Marine Corps Gazette about leadership under extreme conditions by Norwegian and British explorers that came to the same conclusion, but did not state it as explicitly. The British were more likely than the Norwegians to let their pride and ego interfere with shrewd operational planning and making rational trade-offs. Ironically, the Norwegians and English are normally viewed as having a lot in common as fellow northern Europeans, but here was a case where relatively small differences in a normal day-to-day environment can literally become a matter of life and death under extreme conditions.
Superior Nordic performance tends to show up in other areas as well. In international rankings along such criteria as lack of corruption and scientific literacy, Scandinavian countries consistently rate at the top of the list. In contrast, southern European countries tend to fall closer to the bottom.
There is another fascinating study of relative northern European ethnic/national performance under conditions of extreme stress titled A Genius for War by Trevor N. Dupoy. A reviewer noted: "The impetus for writing this book came while Trevor Depuy was constructing a mathematical model for a World War II war game based on the records of actual engagements between the Germans and Allies. Much to his surprise, he learned that even after several years of total war, homeland bombardment and facing numerically superior enemies, the Germans still retained a 30% edge in combat effectiveness. That is, on the battlefields of Europe in 1944, 100 German troops were the equivalent 130 US or British troops."
Although Israel is located in Asia, Ashkenazi Jews probably like to think of themselves as superior to most Europeans, yet I saw one study where Israel was rated more corrupt than all the countries of Europe!
To keep things in perspective, I think it is very important for readers to grasp how Nordic technological prowess, individualism, and analytical independence evolved as a Darwinian adaptation to a severe semi-Arctic environment which demanded such skills. For thousands of years, most Norwegians have lived under highly dispersed conditions on homesteads. Their ability to survive was heavily dependent upon their individual capabilities, and their ability to be a jack of all trades. They typically had to do a variety of things well, whether it involved fishing, farming meager soil, hunting, or preparing for hard winters. This included building seaworthy boats and navigating the North Sea under a wide variety of conditions, to include very dark and rainy winters and through violent storms. All of this required strength in a variety of mental traits, such as flexibility of mind, imagination, innovativeness, toughness, and courage. In this kind of environment, it is not "perception is reality," but rather "reality is reality."
Catholic societies have historically evolved in peasant societies in warmer climates. The ability to survive and pass on ones genes had more to do with continuously executing very stereotyped, routine, and unimaginative farming operations, and staying within the political graces of the "Good ol' boy network" in the local village and their feudal master. This is much more of a "don't rock the boat," "go along to get along," and "perception is reality" kind of evolutionary environment compared to the much harder physical challenges and more dispersed social conditions that shaped Norwegians further to the north.
Not surprisingly, these kinds of people are more likely to function within self-contained universes of dogma fed to them by authorities than to think independently for themselves about underlying realities. In addition, whenever they discover dogmas to be false, they are more likely to shrug their shoulders and "go along to get along." As a consequence, in Catholic societies unproven dogmas tend to get piled upon unproven dogmas without as many iconoclastic "counter predators" to keep "dogma" predators in check compared to Nordic societies.
In addition, in Catholic societies many more forms of nonproductive rent-seeking entities tend to get piled on top of each other, certainly much more so than Nordic societies. All things held equal between the two societies, Catholic societies are more likely to become stagnant, nonproductive, and noncompetitive from the higher ratio of dogmatists, mindless bureaucrats, and other rent-seekers relative to truly analytical thinkers and real producers.
One difficulty I have in explaining these differences is that we are comparing population groups with each other rather than individuals. This means we are dealing with statistical concepts. One can always find individuals within any group who defy particular stereotypes. For example, in Racial Realities in Europe, Dr. Lothrop Stoddard has the chapter "Composite France" which describes Nordic and Celtic peoples in the north and Alpine and Mediterranean peoples in southern France. (Italy has similar differences with more Nordics and Celts north of Rome vs.more Alpines, Mediterraneans and people with mixed and degenerate racial stock to the south). It is possible to find blond-haired blued Catholics from northern France who have very similar behavioral characteristics and competencies compared to Nordic Scandinavians.
While Catholic societies may have fewer innovators and early adopters as a percentage of their bell curves compared to Nordic societies, they also tend to have vastly greater population sizes in southern Europe, which means that the absolute number of innovators and early adopters in certain southern European countries may actually be higher than in certain Nordic countries.
We should also bear in mind that not all Catholic societies taken as a whole are the same. For example French, German, Polish, and Italian Catholics have sometimes gone to war with each other. Even the Catholic Cardinal de Richelieu, who at times savagely persecuted Protestants inside France, supported Protestant armies outside of France against Catholic armies, because among other things, he was more afraid of getting encircled by the Catholic Habsburg Empire than having Protestant countries on his flanks.
Catholics societies tend to have a greater diversity of people compared to Nordic societies, to include higher percentages of incompetent and criminally dangerous people. One good example involves Italian, Corsican, and Irish Catholic mafias, whose modus operandi are alien to Nordic societies. A huge problem with the mass immigration of Catholics into America beginning in the 1840's is that criminal mafia subgroups of "bad Catholics" were able to slide in on the coat tails of "good Catholics."
A friend of mine summed it up well when he observed that the addition of Catholics to America created a huge sociological "blur" that previously did not exist to any great extent back when the United States was overwhelmingly WASP. In terms of their family structures, tendencies towards rent-seeking, and tolerance of graft and corruption, many Catholic groups are sociologically about halfway between WASPs and Jews. In their political behavior, they tend to opportunitistically swing back and forth between WASPs and Jews in their loyalties much like the way Mestizos tend to swing back and forth between whites and Indians in Latin American politics, or Mulattos between whites and blacks.
Catholics have provided vital front men and "muscle" for Jews in America's big cities and other power centers. They have also provided a critical "power drive train" and a "sociological blur" that has enabled extremely psychopathic Jews who rise to the top to carry out their evil schemes. (For example, please see Final Judgment about the Mossad-CIA murder of JFK and the The High Priests of War about the shanghai of American foreign by Israel). On top of all this, thanks to the melting pot ideology, intermarriage between Catholics and WASPs in America has weakened WASP identity even further, making it even harder for WASPs to differentiate themselves on a cultural, moral, and ethnic level from the greater levels of corruption and inefficiency that historically accompany Catholics and Jews.
In his book Ways That Are Dark, Ralph Townsend makes an analogy between Japanese and the Chinese (the latter are often called "The Jews of the East") based upon his experience with the American consulate in Shanghai in the early 1930's that I found strikingly similar to my experience with Norwegians as compared to Catholics and Jews in New York City. Townsend said that Americans who were initially new to both the Japanese and Chinese invariably favored the Chinese over the Japanese upon initial contact, because the Chinese were much better at acting affable and telling Americans what they want to hear. However, after gaining a few years of experience dealing with both groups, Townsend noted that Americans invariably began to prefer the Japanese over the Chinese. The reason is that the Chinese were notorious for double-crossing Westerners, whereas Japanese were much more reliable and "honorable" by Western standards. (Please see additional comments on this topic in my Preface to Townsend's Ways That Are Dark)
Similarly, Nordic peoples tend to stand further apart and gesticulate less when they speak with each other (as noted in Body Language by Julius Fast), and come across as a bit more cold, starchy, and reserved compared to back-slapping, good-buddy, hail fellow well-met Irish and Italian Catholics and Jews. Nordics are a stoic people. Nordic men don't hug and kiss their close male friends and kinsmen like Italian men, or for that matter many French counterparts. I recollect surfing a Finnish web site, in which someone stated that small talk is almost unknown in Finland (Finns get down to business very quickly). In contrast, with Jews it is almost the opposite, after all, schmooze is a Yiddish word. As another interesting anecdote, when former U.S. Senator from Texas, U.S. Senate Majority Leader and President Lyndon Johnson visited Finland in the late 1950's, he did a "Howdy-Partner" hand pumping, back-slapping greetings routine when he first met Finnish dignitaries at the airport. This perceived "excessive familiarity" drew a very negative reaction in the Finnish press. (In fairness to real Texans as well as Finns, there is strong evidence that both LBJ and his wife Lady Bird were crypto-Jews and cooperated with Mossad-CIA-MI6 to assassinate John F. Kennedy while U.S Vice President in order to become President. The stories of Johnson's "vulgarities" are myriad, ranging from cussing out the slightest errors of Congressional aids and White House staffers to showing off his belly surgical scars to reporters to dictating to female secretaries while sitting on the toilet. Johnson was more of a perverse, crooked, "schmalzy-kitschy" version of a "Texas Cowboy" than the real thing, and maybe this is what the Finns sensed right away). These kinds of anecdotes give one a sense of what an Icelandic scholar meant when he referred to fellow Nordics as "An aristocratic people with egalitarian tendencies."
On a purely interpersonal level, most Americans probably have an initial personal preference for Irish and Italian Catholics and Jews, just like Ralph Townsend's description of 1930's Americans in China who initially preferred the Chinese over the Japanese. However, if performance, productivity, long range planning, honesty and operational efficiency are the name of the game, most people discover that dealing with people like the Irish Catholics often produces more glad-handing than real results -- just look at the level of corruption in Irish Catholic-run places like Chicago and Boston! Dealing with the Jews tends to result in too many scams, too much intrigue, too much criminal gangsterism, too much treachery, too much financial speculation, and not enough real productivity and other honest results. Just look at the state of Israel -- an economic basket case hopelessly dependent on massive foreign aid wheedled out of Congress and from Pentagon black budgets ever since inception -- with no end in sight! And then, on top of all the tens of trillions of dollars that Americans and Europeans have already given Israel, these parasites have the nerve to pull New York 9/11, London 7/7, and now Oslo/Utoya 7-22! They also threaten Americans with FEMA slave-death camps, have their TSA goons "dog train" Americans with genital-groping at airports, and have their media remain silent while Fukushima radiation continues to poison America and Europe --from their Stuxnet virus!. Their depravity and shamelessness is infinite.
The book In Praise of Hard Industries: Why Manufacturing, Not the Information Economy, Is the key to Future Prosperity by Eamonn Fingleton points out that in the long run, the real foundation of healthy economic growth involves the continued maintenance and development of a strong, vigorous, and innovative manufacturing base. A healthy, advanced industrialized society maintains its manufacturing base at about 33% of GDP. (An important reason why America is not healthy is because "under Jewish management" the U.S. manufacturing base has been reduced to less than 10% of GDP over the last several decades). Nothing can scale up wages and productivity growth like manufacturing. Conversely, if one loses this manufacturing base, one loses the real basis of a productive economy. This can have dire consequences. In fact, instead of living in an expanding economic pie where jobs and plentiful and real pay scales are always rising, the exact opposite trend starts to take place as the industrial base shrinks, as America has discovered in the last several decades as it has outsourced over 75% of its industrial base in order to make short term transactional profits and exploit cheap Third World labor.
Jews are addicted to short term transactional profit taking and can not identify with the long term industrial growth strategies once favored by WASPs when they ran this country in the 19th century with the Protestant work ethic. Jews are also addicted to immediately shifting production towards the lowest cost labor anywhere in the world the world that they can find it, unlike WASPs who were better at nurturing and driving up worker productivity on the home front, which in turn hiked real wages.
It gets even worse from a WASP perspective. When WASPs complain about how America is falling apart, Jews and Catholics may pay lip service, but they fail to take any timely and decisive steps to fix the underlying problems. Instead they continue to hire their own kind and squeeze out even more WASPs at the top.
It is the same old pattern. Jews tend to react to problems created by too much intrigue by adding even more deception (for example, by trying to sell us the phony Iraq WMD's, fake Al Qaeda, and Global War on Terror as a distracter from America's escalating economic problems). Catholics tend to react to problems created by a dwindling entrepreneurial class and by a declining supply of independent critics (for example, related to the steady decline of WASPs in America) with even more authoritarian regulation (for example, myriad additional regulations created by the Department of Homeland Security) and even more dogmatic fanaticism completely decoupled from common sense and reality (for example, by putting veterans, "Constitutionalists", and Ron Paul supporters on the MIAC suspect list; for more on the Missouri Information Analysis Center or "MIAC" please see Chapter 23 and Chapter 28).
Many Irish and Italian Catholics act like white versions of Negroes in Zimbabwe and South Africa. As both of these Africans countries started to fall apart from black incompetence following the step-down in white rule, the blacks in power continued to hire more blacks and squeeze out more whites, to include looking the other way as millions of whites were made unemployed and even homeless. As black gangs started to go around kill white farmers and squat on their land, black authorities looked the other way.
Not only are we seeing many Irish and Italian Catholic leaders in America act like "white Negroes," but we are also seeing the resurrection of many Catholic ghosts that most Americans thought were put to bed in the 19th century when WASP success with the industrial revolution, advances in science, and the spread of the Enlightenment left orthodox Catholicism in the dust.
I can discern a resurrection of the ancient "Viva Yo!" authoritarian mentality described by James Michener in his book Iberia, which means "Hooray for me, and to hell with everyone else!!!" It is the mentality of the iron-fisted fascist-caesarist-conquering-slave whipping cuadillo on steroids. How dare Muammar Gaddafi try to surrender under a white flag -- slaughter him and his entire motorcade in cold blood! How dare Norwegians withdraw from attacking Libya -- smack them hard with Oslo-Utoya! How dare the Japanese support Palestinians or balk at Jewish international banker demands -- dirty nuke their country through the Stuxnet virus!!
One of the most shocking aspects of all this from a WASP perspective is how our ancestors saw all of power-mad, intolerant, brutal arrogance centuries ago -- yet the ghosts of the past keep roaring back. For example, when Britain requested a measure of political and religious independence in the 16th century, the Vatican and Spanish empire could only think about sending mighty Armadas to crush them, well-equipped with torture racks and thumb screws. When the Dutch complained about abusive Spanish Catholic rule in the 16th century, the Spanish empire responded with a brutal military occupation. Pushed to the wall, the humble "we beg of thee" petition by Dutch leaders transformed into the "Sea Beggar" insurgency at sea and the "Dutch Revolt," which ultimately became successful in throwing off the Spanish yoke.
The upshot is that as long as Nordic Norwegians are allowed to run their own homogeneous Nordic society, one can safely bet that they will always be at the forefront of self-sufficiency, standards of living, and technological progress. If one could make stops in a time machine at 50 year intervals years into the future, one could feel strongly assured that so long as Norwegians are able to maintain their fragile Nordic folk culture, and also maintain a society made up overwhelmingly of Nordic peoples and ruled by Nordic peoples, they will always be all right by themselves. It is also very likely they will always have some surplus left over to continue providing humanitarian aid to other peoples around the world.
You can't say this about any predominately Catholic or Jewish-controlled countries in this world.
Catholic countries tend to be more stagnant than their WASP counterparts. I got a strong sense of this when I traveled through Europe on a Eurail Pass in 1980. As a rule of thumb, as one traveled from northern to southern Europe, the level of "randomness" and "disorder" seemed to increase across all aspects of society. (I explain the evolutionary logic behind all of this in my online environmental vs. genetic duality article, particularly where I reference Why Civilizations Self-Destruct by Dr. Elmer Pendell). As one example of increasing social disorder as one heads southward, I could set my watch by the time that trains arrived and departed at German train stations, whereas at the main station in Rome, I saw many trains making last minute changes in both tracks and time. I heard Germans quietly joke among themselves that "Africa begins south of the Alps." As mentioned earlier, southern Italy and Sicily are so heavily infested with criminal mafias that no one has ever been able to figure out how to get rid of them. Sometimes I almost wonder if another reason why my kinsmen in Norway got whacked on 7-22 is because perhaps some Norwegian might have told a bad Italian joke about someone's mother, grandmother, or godfather or whatever and it inadvertently got back to former CIA Director, and current Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, who may subconsciously envy and hate WASPs because of ethnic-genetic distance factors involving his Roman Catholic/southern Italian ancestry.
One of the biggest problems with Catholic societies is that they tend to be so authoritarian, so status quo, and otherwise stagnant that they are incapable of continually expanding the proverbial economic pie. Their politicians are usually incapable of living within their means and maintaining a stable currency, Their industrialists are heavily reliant on northern European companies for expertise. One can almost predict with mathematical certainty that every so often the economic pie will stop expanding, and in fact start contracting. This puts everyone in Catholic society through a nasty "life boat" situation. (Please recall the proverbial "life boat" paradigm used for discussions of situation ethics, where the "captain" of an over-packed boat in the middle of the ocean may have to make hard decisions about who to throw overboard as the storm waves rise higher, or who not to accept on board who is swimming towards the lifeboat from a sinking ship). In the macro-social equivalent of the :lifeboat" paradigm, those very same jovial Catholics who are such terrific glad handers at the local pub can suddenly turn very mean, vicious, and duplicitous. I personally would prefer to hang out with fellow frosty Nordics who have a vastly greater capacity for long range operational planning and implementation, and trade a few backslaps in the short run for greater social stability and productivity in the long run.

The Alfred Hitchcock film Lifeboat is a good metaphor for the typical endgame in societies where Jews and Catholics have shoved WASPs aside and think they have all the answers, as witnessed by the current global depopulation agenda, encroaching police state, and recurring false flag terror attacks.

Of course as much as Catholic societies tend to be more unstable compared to WASP societies, Jewish society is even more uncertain. Nobody on this planet has any idea what Israel might look like fifty years from now, or whether it will even be around. It will be hard for Israel to continue soaking tens of trillions more dollars of aid out of the U.S. like it has since its inception, one reason being that the U.S. is undergoing various forms of bankruptcy and major demographic changes so fast that no one knows how much longer the U.S. itself is going to be around. Will Jewish globalists succeed in their psychotic plans to depopulate over 80% of humanity, microchip the survivors, and rule with an iron hand over the entire planet from Jerusalem? Will they fulfill their age-old vision of "Greater Israel" that extends from the Nile to the Euphrates -- after genociding all Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank off the face of the planet? Will they implement their "Samson Option" plan to take down all of earth with nuclear weapons, going a bit further than their current Fukushima "dirty nuking" of the northern hemisphere -- after their sabotage via HAARP and the Stuxnet virus -- a global catastrophe that is already rated 300 times worse than Chernobyl? Will they continue with the depleted uranium stealth mass murder of millions of innocent civilians ranging from Gaza to Lebanon to Iraq to Afghanistan (and also in countries like Iran and Pakistan caught in-between? -- see Leuren Moret's discussion of the stealth depleted uranium wars, which have also incapacitated 55% of American soldiers). Will Jewish plans somehow go wrong, and cause an enraged global population suddenly turn on Jews everywhere?
Without question, when it comes to Jews, the plausible menu of possible future outcomes is vastly more diverse, extreme, and bizarre than anything I am aware of involving either Catholic or WASP societies.

Larry and Rudy make another fine Jewish-Roman Catholic wise guy "contribution" to America on 9/11

One of the great tragedies I have observed from first hand experience is that on a deep sociological level, in a large urban, multicultural, multiracial environments like New York City, Chicago, or Los Angeles, WASPs (particularly "Scandinavian types") have a very hard time competing for economic and political power against Jews and Catholics. In fact, in the absence of any extraordinary social or political measures (like the secessionism behind the Protestant Reformation) they tend to get squeezed out over time. A lot of the reasons are sociobiological or instinctive in nature, in which the evolutionary history of Nordic peoples makes them poorly equipped in terms of their innate temperamental traits for the kinds of political struggles waged in major urban environments. I could write endless pages on this topic alone, but would like to save that discussion for another time. Suffice to say for here that there is plenty on an anecdotal level that helps illustrate the case. For example, when a wave of Norwegian immigrants arrived at Ellis Island in the 1870's, most of them could not wait to move on to the open spaces and start clearing farms and ranches in places like Minnesota and North Dakota. Norwegians who remained in New York City area tended to congregate in lower density areas like Brooklyn rather than live higher density Manhattan. Norwegians tend to be a blend of both the physical and intellectual, producing a disproportionate share of both research scientists and explorer-adventurers. In contrast, Jewish immigrants were delighted to pack themselves in like sardines in the already most densely populated parts of Manhattan and stay there. This should not be terribly surprising, since throughout most of their evolutionary history in the last several thousand years the Jews have been the most urban of all peoples and have tended to segregate themselves from other peoples in their own ghettos. This brings us back to a saying that I mentioned earlier, namely that you can take Jews out of the ghetto, but you can't take the "ghetto" out of the Jews.
* Jews are much more aggressive about cold-call canvassing and aggressive business networking than Scandinavians. They are famous for their "chutzpah" and fast-talking ability to sell refrigerators to eskimos and sand to Arabs. They are also the biggest professional whiners on this planet, forever milking sympathy by whatever means necessary, obsessing over all real or imagined tales of persecution. All these traits can actually help business success in certain dense, impersonal, urban environments where mass-marketing aggressiveness and transactional expertise can directly correlate with sales success. In contrast, Scandinavians are almost at the other extreme compared to stereotypical Jewish traits, emphasizing stoicism, plain dealing, modesty, and putting the focus on the creation of quality products that sell themselves ahead of hype.
* In Chapter 38 of my Mission of Conscience I observe how Jews are in a state of permanent war against the gentile world:

The Jews are the "Mongols" of covert forms of 4th generation warfare, every bit as much as the Mongols themselves were the masters of overt forms. Jews run organized crime in America and other major countries around the world, which is a mainstay of covert 4th generation warfare. They are also typically leaders in the types of businesses that involve brokerage and other forms of mediation.

In contrast, Scandinavians typically act like happy-go-lucky, naive, disorganized individualists in a normal civilian peacetime environment. I am reminded of an observation made by a tactics instructor back when I was in military officer training, namely "A bad plan, well-executed, can defeat an opponent who has no plan at all." Scandinavians and other WASPs around the world generally speaking have no plan to cope with the sophisticated permanent covert 4th generation warfare threat aimed at them by Jews and their allies.
Another important advantage that Jews enjoy over Scandinavians -- who always tend to naively project their own rationalistic and altruistic tendencies on to other peoples -- is the element of surprise. ("Surprise" is one of the "principles of war" contained in U.S. Army Field Manual FM 3-0). I mean this in the same sense that James A. Michener described a real life villain in his book Rascals in Paradise named Sam Comstock According to Michener, Comstock had a "secret weapon," namely a plan that was so bizarre that no one could believe anything so evil and irrational was in progress until it was upon them --and by then it was usually too late. Comstock's plan as a crewman on a whaling ship was to murder his captain and declare a mutiny in daytime while his own ship was running in parallel with another whaling ship in the mid-Pacific, and then take the ship to some isolated island, beach it, and then just "hang out." What is incredible is he actually succeeded in murdering his captain, organizing a mutiny, peeling away from the other whaling ship with his crimes undetected in broad daylight, and making it to an isolated island -- where disenchanted fellow crewman finally turned on him and killed him. (See more discussion of Comstock in my parasitism article).
Similarly, Zionist plans for starting ever more wars in Asia, Africa, and South America; hollowing out the U.S. economy and then imploding it, waging global depopulation radiation warfare, promoting open borders policies to deliberately biologically replace WASPs and other whites with nonwhites, inserting toxins in drinking water, vaccines, and chemtrails, and attacking Norway on 7-22 -- all these things make me suspect that latter-day Sam Comstocks are running Israel, the U.S., and UK.
If Scandinavians and other WASPs can come up with viable plans that realistically deal with this madness, and can start to organize themselves, then I think they can stand a realistic chance of being able to defend themselves against Jewish criminals and their minions. The problem is that so far I do not see any real evidence of a serious planning and organization process taking place.
The first step in any planning process for a hostile environment involves accurately completing the intelligence cycle, which in this case means that Nordic peoples must thoroughly understand the "friendly situation" (this includes gaining an intimate knowledge of their own inherent characteristics, resources, and natural strategies), as well as the "enemy order of battle" (which includes a through knowledge of the characteristics of natural adversaries).
At this point I would like to review some major Jewish characteristics. Serious farmers and ranchers among Jews are almost unknown, in fact, the Talmud forbids manual labor. Jews are almost nonexistent in hard contact or adventure sports. (In contrast Norwegians are usually over represented in fishing -- one of the dangerous occupations in the world -- and also in military service and adventure sports). Jews are about ten times under-represented compared to the general occupation in regard to U.S. military service, but ten times over represented in brokerage and financial service industries and various professions.
Part of Jewish success in America is due to the fact that during much of the late 19th century and 20th, economic and political power tended to concentrate in the biggest cities in America. The Jews were there en masse. They also spent more time than any other groups developing strategies to benefit their own kind.
Another reason for the Jewish rise to a supremacist position in America involves the Jewish will for power. It is greater than that of any other ethnic group in America, to include their willingness to be totally ruthless. As an example, in my discussion of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology in the parasitism section of my mutualism vs. parasitism article, I describe how Jews have been the longstanding leaders of organized crime in America. Jews also account for over 90% of the most serious and treasonous espionage cases against the United States. They also much more skilled at leading double lives, with a higher rate of homosexuality than any other ethnic group.
Most of my fellow WASP friends who initially came to New York City from the heartland tend to be very naive. They also tend to go through some amazingly similar phases as they get to know the Jews from first hand experience. Initially they are very impressed with the Jews because of their sophistication, cleverness, financial savvy, and formidable skill in "handling" people. However, after they start gaining considerable first hand interpersonal experience, other impressions start to sink in, such as the idea that the Jews are very unnatural and psychopathic people who carry quite a lot of subterranean hatred within themselves towards all other peoples. (Where do you think the phrase "neurotic New Yorker" comes from?) If they are not kept in check, the Jews can even become an extremely dangerous people -- even towards themselves.


Hey Larry, Michael, Rudy, Janet, Richard, and Eric baby!
Thanks for making our case
! We just love ya'! Keep up it up!!!


Sometimes I almost wonder if Jews like Larry Silverstein and Michael Chertoff, Italian Catholics like Rudy Giuliani and Janet Napolitano, Irish Catholics like Richard Daley of Chicago, (away in Israel while we were worried about a repeat 9/11 attack on the Sears Tower) and African Americans like Eric Holder are all secretly working for the Ku Klux Klan. [Please see my "Editor's Note" in the paragraph below for some qualifications about the real KKK in American history]. It would be extremely hard to come up with a group of "leaders" whose abusive practices would not do more to bring discredit upon Jews, Catholics, Blacks and "Miscellaneous Other Liberal-Minority Coalition types" and eventually cause WASPs to return to mid-19th century attitudes.
The early to mid-19th century was an era when most Americans lived on farms and tended to derive their opinions from common sense and first hand experience rather than channeled by Zionism, Marxism, and corporate-controlled mass media -- and also before American political attitudes got "iconized" and "totalitarianized" by "The American Lenin". Not only do the aforementioned groups habitually pile authoritarianism on top of authoritarianism, and corruption on top of corruption, and therefore show that they are unfit for republican government -- the standard Protestant criticism of Catholics and Jews and "Miscellaneous Others" -- but what they are trying to do to us today is actually far worse than anything ever predicted by the American Party (also called the "Know Nothing Party") of the 1840's or the Ku Klux Klan of the1920's that wanted to keep Catholics and Jews and "Miscellaneous Others" out of America.
I challenge the reader to go to any historical archives and find any predictions that are as bizarre and murderous as the the idea that some day, after gaining the upper hand in America, Jews and various Catholic minions and "Miscellaneous Others" would dare to put up the Georgia Guidestones and consciously work towards the mass murder-depopulation of over 80% of humanity, or aid and abet mass false flag pandemics as well as radiation poisonings, or would consider it desirable to create a micro-shipped global drone population.
[Editor's Note: Ironically, I am using the Jewish-Hollywood stereotype of the KKK to spoof the kinds of Jews and Catholics who have made this stereotype possible in the first place. The underlying political, social, and historical reality is actually quite different. In fact, like so many things that involve America's multicultural, multi-ethnic, "melting pot" society, the ideological history is something of a convoluted, erratic, blurry mess, often ruled by political expediency and crisis management considerations rather than any consistent principles. For example, the American Party or "Know Nothing Party" of the 1840's, which existed well before the Klan was created in 1865, was primarily against Catholic immigration. According to Michael Collins Piper, it even had some Jews in leadership roles! As a prime example of Jewish infiltration of top spots in a "conservative cause," Judah P. Benjamin served as the Secretary of State and Secretary of War for the Confederate States of America. (The possibility that the Rothschilds of Britain and France might provide critical funding and other forms of support for the Confederate cause was probably a major factor for why he obtained his position). When the Ku Klux Klan was originally founded in 1865, the primary issue was getting rid of oppressive Yankee-run carpetbagger governments in the South. (In many Southern states, whites were no longer allowed to vote, and their legislatures were run by illiterate former black slaves who were handled by unscrupulous Jews and Yankee abolitionists out to vindictively punish the South and confiscate much of their remaining property by imposing onerous taxes. In some areas, all-Negro Union occupation units roamed about at will and raped white women. For one perspective into this hell on earth, see "Franklin J. Moses, Reconstruction's Most Infamous Scalawag" by Michael Collins Piper about one of the most corrupt Jewish politicians in American history who served as governor of South Carolina). Anti-Catholicism was not the major issue at this time, in fact, a number of top leaders of the Confederacy were French Catholics, such as Gen. Pierre Gustave Toutant Beauregard, victor of the First Battle of Manassas and other major campaigns, and Admiral Raphael Semmes, Captain of the raider C.S.S. Alabama and one of the greatest naval commanders in American history. (According to Wikipedia, Semmes' "1869 Memoirs of Service Afloat During The War Between the States ....was viewed as one of the most cogent, but bitter, defenses of the Lost Cause.") Then by the 1920's, especially after the publication of The International Jew by Henry Ford, the Klan gained millions of members nationwide and started to focus on resistance to Jews. Many Klan groups started to drop anti-Catholicism. For example Rev. Charles Coughlin, a Catholic priest, offered to officiate at a funeral of a Klansman as a form of reconciliation, and his offer was accepted. Later on, when Dr. David Duke was head of Klan organization in Louisiana in his younger years in the 1960's and early 1970's (before he decided to go more "mainstream" and become a Louisiana State representative), he responded to a false ADL charge that he was trying to stir up animosity between Catholics and Protestants by observing that most of the members of his Klan organization in Louisiana were Catholics! He also observed that their Klan activities were always nonviolent, perfectly legal, and completely in keeping with the Constitution. Then came another interesting ideological twist. In his Foreword to the Judas Goats, Mike Collins Piper comments: "Edward R. Fields, a veteran American nationalist, once revealed in his popular journal, The Thunderbolt, when the FBI did have infiltrators inside the KKK, the FBI instructed its informants that while it was permissible for them to make anti-Black public utterances, they should avoid making anti-Jewish remarks, an interesting revelation indeed." In other words, now it was "OK" for certain Klan organizations to be anti-black, but no longer anti-Catholic or anti-Jewish, thanks to "FBI guidance."]
Getting back to Norway, the "Viking" motif often used by Scandinavian societies, in modern parlance, symbolizes societies that value courage, innovation, entrepreneurship, rugged individualism, exploration, the creation of useful goods, and the willingness to take on tough challenges to achieve tough success. In essence, the small Scandinavian countries are similar to entrepreneurial companies in their culture, and sometime even behave like small companies. And in fact, the Scandinavian countries have always been world leaders, particularly on a per capita level, in regard to new technological development and the development of successful entrepreneurial companies with top quality products.
Often as companies get larger, they lose the ability to innovate. Among other things, they begin to attract people who are better at bureaucratic politics than entrepreneurial analysis, goal setting, and execution. In order to pursue new business plans, it is very common for individuals with entrepreneurial talent to break away from big companies to form their own relatively small start-up companies.
Similarly in order to move ahead during the Renaissance, Scandinavians and other northern Europeans had to break away from the Catholic Church on a social, political, and economic level as well as on a theological level to free themselves from the massive centralized corruption and rent-seeking identified by Martin Luther and other Protestant reformers.
I am reminded of the joke "God invented whiskey to prevent the Irish from taking over the world." In the case of Scandinavians, it appears that the Good Lord invented their rugged individualism to accomplish the same purpose. It seems like most Scandinavian heroes are stoic, rugged individualist, with their own view of things, whether we are talking about the "Ash Lad" ("Askeladden"), a main character in many Scandinavian folk tales, or WWII resistance fighters like Jan Baalsrud, subject of We Die Alone: A WWII Epic of Escape and Endurance by David Howarth and Stephen E. Ambrosee Die Alone. In regard to the Wikipedia article "Askeladden", it notes that:

In modern parlance, the Ash Lad is an individualist, free-thinker, and nonconformist who is capable of deep abstract, analytical thinking "outside the box", or who can create a scientific paradigm shift. He is capable of acting as a true visionary or innovative early adopter. In contrast, the older brothers are more conformist and conventional. [Editor's Note: In Norwegian fairy tales, the Ash Lad has older brothers who try to take on a difficult challenge and fail, and this of course is where the Ash Lad steps in and proves himself].


The Ash Lad confronts a Troll in the forest. This particular type is certainly much larger than the Mossad-CIA-MI6 version which probably planted the bomb in Oslo. There is actually a scientific "troll hypothesis" that links Trolls to Mossad-types discussed elsewhere on this web page, I kid you not!

Scandinavians have not only seceded from Catholic countries, but have also seceded from each other, such as when Norway completed its break from Sweden in 1905, and Iceland which became a separate country in 1944 from Denmark. However, when viewed from an entrepreneurial perspective, this is healthy so long as the counties do not become too vulnerable to a hostile takeover, as they say in business parlance, or a military overthrow, as they say in political science.
In his Mises Institute lecture, Dr. Ralph Raico observed that the breakup of the Roman Empire served the cause of liberty, because now rulers had competition. If they raised taxes too much, or became too oppressive, their most talented subjects had more exit options to simply go somewhere else. This served as a deterrent against oppressive behavior.
Many business analysts note how when entrepreneurs merge with big companies, they typically lose their innovativeness. Furthermore, as companies grow larger, they not only become inherently bureaucratic, but increasingly become taken over by political managers who are more interested in utilizing intrigue to get to the top than focusing on new product development. The analogy with political systems should be obvious, namely that one reason why Europe generally "worked" in the 19th century is because it was divided up into more natural states whose competition with each other had many of the advantages of small business competition. Each small state requires its own distinctive culture, analogous to "corporate culture" in the McKinsey 7 S model, that gave a sense of purpose and cohesion. As Europe became more consolidated with empires, and later into the EU, and as doctrines of multiracialism have eroded indigenous European cultures, the levels of overall corruption have skyrocketed. Productivity has declined. All of this is analogous to what business observers see all the time with the rise of imperial corporations.
America "worked" in the 19th century because it was politically decentralized. The Federal government extracted less than 5% of GDP, compared to a total government "take" of somewhere around 50% - 70% today, and up until 1865 a large segment of the population took States' Rights very seriously). Furthermore, first generation immigrant groups from northern Europe retained strong indigenous European values, to include the Protestant work ethic. America started to become totally dysfunctional in the 20th century after the Federal government crushed all forms of states rights and foisted mandatory social integration, essentially making America like a big corrupt corporation, or a latter day imperial Rome or New Babylon.
In the business world, when corporations become too big and too corrupt, the obvious solution is typically to spin off product lines as separate companies, and create a unique corporate culture for each firm that focuses on specific productivity goals. Similarly in the political sphere, as empires become too big and corrupt, the obvious answer should be to break them apart and restore cohesive tribal cultures.
Seen from this perspective, America is too bloated with disparate racial and ethnic groups and too obsessed with playing political games to keep itself together and dominant in the world at all costs, to include sponsoring false flag attacks. Furthermore, the most corrupt globalists have risen to the top and are using the U.S. as "the sole remaining superpower" to impose their insane globalist-Zionist schemes on the rest of the planet. The most obvious answer to this political problem, seen from the perspective of standard business practices, is to break America apart into logical ethnic and geopolitical components as quickly as possible in the most sane, peaceful, and reasonable manner possible.
Given that there are at least as many Norwegian Americans in America as Norwegians and Norway, and furthermore that the United States still remains one of the largest reservoirs of Nordic genes in the world (despite the long term relative decline of this population since the mid 19th century -- it also remains to be seen what percentage will be mutilated from Fukushima radiation -- in some parts of Belarus and the Ukraine only 20% of the children are healthy on account of residual Chernobyl radiation), one would think that Norway's leaders would want to spend more time finding ways to help constructively manage the painful transitional processes that lie ahead -- and also help warn people around the world about the continuing Fukushima radiation hazards -- rather than spend so much time hanging out with Zionist globalist malefactors like George Soros and Larry Summers while sweeping open discussion of the immigration issue under the rug. (See the photo illustrations of Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg with this bunch provided above).
It is important to note that entrepreneurial Nordic tendencies are a two edged sword, where they can be great strengths in some environments, and great weaknesses in others. They also have important biological/evolutionary as well as cultural components.
Nordic tendencies are a product of the requirement to make far-sighted technological adaptations in a continuing war with nature in a harsh Nordic environment. Passing on ones genes had quite a lot to do with staying focused on long range operational goals and adapting and improvising to meet them. As previously mentioned, people were typically dispersed in the rugged fjord lands. A large percentage of Norwegians made their living from fishing, considered one of the most dangerous occupations in the world, where most men could expect to eventually die at sea. Even in farming, the margins of survival were so slim that it was not uncommon for animals kept in a barn through the winter to be so weak that they had to be carried to pastures to graze in the spring. Survival had quite a lot to do with individual hard work, resourcefulness, and the ability to stay mentally tough and focused on critical long term issues. It supported more of a "lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way" operational approach to life than a touchy-feely political approach.

Germany 1914
by Friedrich August von Kaulbach

Because of their well-roundedness, athletic qualities, and emphasis on heroic values, it is not uncommon for political cartoonists to associate Norwegians and other peoples of the North with "king predator" animals at the top of the food chain, just like the animal symbols that once appeared on the shields of their warriors. These animals include lions (a heraldic symbol of Norway), unicorns (a symbol of Britain along with the lion), bears (Russia), wolves (worshipped by Mongols), double eagles (Germany, Russia, Austria), and dragons (on the sails of Viking ships). These are all real or mythical animals that retain all the hunter instincts of their most ancient ancestors. They are also the most proud, noble, and intelligent animals of their food chain, are highly exploratory, engage their prey in a bold and powerful manner, and are often chivalrous in their competition with their own kind. They may be tamable, but they can rarely if ever be domesticated. Deep down inside, they are always a bit wild.
All these characteristics, incidentally, have a correlation with the maintenance of a healthy republican society, where individuals feels empowered enough to resist state intrusion into their personal space. They also feel exploratory and dominant enough to want to have a say in their government. The acknowledgement of "human rights" may be viewed as an attempt to curtail overly vicious competition, much like the chivalrous competition instinctively practiced between "king predator" mammals such as wolves and bears of the Northlands when they duel over a female.


Left: Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom; Right: Coat of Arms of Norway

All of this is quite unlike the viciously demeaning and slave-inducing mentality behind the genital-groping "dog training" visited upon Ron Paul and Governor Jesse Ventura by TSA goons squads at U.S. airports, all of which has been directed by an Orwellian Jewish-Catholic "Big Sis" named Janet Napolitano. This DHS mogul-godmother is promulgating an unnecessary and wasteful "War on Terror" against the mythical, Mossad-CIA-created "Al Qaeda." All of this has interesting historical similarities to Janet Napolitano's totally corrupt Roman Catholic forebears who once went by the Malleus Maleficarum witch hunter's manual and burned untold numbers of women at the stake based upon scientifically unsupportable assumptions.
Catholics tend to come more from Alpine and Mediterranean Caucasian racial stock of central and southern Europe where survival meant executing routine, unimaginative, and stereotyped farming operations consistently and well. It also meant making a special effort to getting along with drinking pals at the local pub, who are a potent source of social intelligence and a conduit of rewards from people with power. Therefore, in the Catholic world politics and dogma typically trumps operational performance and the ability to bluntly address objective reality. It is more about getting along to go along. This is why we should not be terribly surprised that the Catholic Church often preferred to burn scientists like Bruno at the stake rather than listen to newfangled ideas about the earth revolving around the sun which conflicted with Catholic earth-centric dogma. Because of their subservient and obedient nature, it is not uncommon for political cartoonists to associate Catholics with animals that have had enough hunter instinct bred out of them so that they are now thoroughly domesticated, like dogs and sheep. In fact, the Catholic Church openly refers to its own members as sheep and its bishops carry sheep staffs. How ironic that the word "dogma" contains the word "dog," since the underlying nature of Catholicism seems to be well-endowed with both qualities.
Jewish survival has very much involved learning how to live by ones wits in a war of man against man, where for most of Jewish evolutionary history Jews have lived in small colonies as aliens among host societies in highly urbanized areas in multi-racial, multi-cultural, Asiatic and southern European fleshpot civilizations, trading with gentiles, but almost never intermarrying with them and always remaining a "people apart." The Talmud forbids manual labor, and the Jewish world has always been heavily focused on middleman-type business that have a strong emphasis on manipulation and group coalition formation tactics. The Jewish world has always been more focused on transactions and psychological manipulation than achieving excellence in craftsmanship in the creation of real and useful things. Jews have always also been disproportionately involved in organized crime and high level confidence schemes that exploit the credulity of their hosts. Because of their peculiar relationship with host societies, and their heavy reliance on deception, manipulation, and passive aggressive stealth tactics, it is not uncommon for political cartoonists to associate Jews with parasitic or particularly cruel, vicious, treacherous, subterranean, stealthy, or poisonous animals such as spiders, rats, octopi, snakes, sharks, and weasels.
All of this leads up to another important point, namely that the evolutionary history of a people often makes them "prisoners"of their genes on both a group social performance level as well as on an individual level . A good clue to what may help a group achieve peak performance is analogous to the paleo-diet concept, where eating unrefined foods without preservatives that largely replicates the diet of ones Stone Age ancestors has been proven to be an important component to balanced and optimal nutrition.
Since Norwegians have evolved in a homogenous dispersed tribal environment with a distinctive Nordic folk culture, and where technological success has been an important component to their survival, one can begin to grasp how applying the paleo-diet concept on a sociological level implies maintaining very different social and political policies in Norway than what might be preferred by Jews and Catholics in their own territories. In fact, in the ten years I spent living in New York City following my graduation from business school, where I had quite a lot of interaction with Jewish, Catholic, and Nordic groups on both a social and professional level, I observed that in dense urban environments like New York City, Scandinavians have numerous sociological problems in preventing groups like Jews and Catholics from ganging up on them, squeezing them out, and taking over once their Scandinavian resourcefulness has produced enough positive things for other groups to want to loot.
Scandinavians have to consciously come to grips with the real character of alien peoples like Jews and Catholics and consciously develop group strategies to defend their interests against them, because there is very little in their indigenous culture that prepares them to handle this threat. A major reason for this is that for most of their evolutionary history they have had to deal with problems involving fishing and agriculture and cold winters in rural settings where they have functioned mostly on an individualized, family, or clan level. There simply were no Jews and Catholics around who were applying sophisticated "rat-dog" gangster tactics against them in urbanized settings. It is hard to adapt to something on an evolutionary level if it simply never existed throughout most of ones evolutionary environment. In fact, Nordic peoples are legendary for projecting their honest, altruistic, and rationalistic tendencies on to alien peoples, which is a major basis for their equally legendary naïveté.
One might ask why Norwegians should ever be forced to adapt to nasty alien things inside their own territory if they don't have to. Not all imports are good, just like the introduction of syphilis and mosquitoes to the Hawaiian islands. Isn't a major reason why people form their own nations with their own borders is to protect their own people from nasty and alien things that can now be kept outside? This is certainly a major reason why Jews and Jesuits were barred from Norway in the Norwegian Constitution of 1814.
The simplest solution for Norwegians is to continue as much as possible with the kind of social and political environment that has worked for them over the last several thousand years. This means retaining a homogeneous Nordic society and distinctive, free-thinking and free-spirited Nordic folk culture. In fact, based upon my first hand experiences with Nordic peoples (as well as Jews, Catholics, Muslims and other peoples) in New York City and elsewhere in America, I am not sure that there realistically are any alternatives to this course of action that will stop the stealth genocide of Nordic peoples that is already taking place. To put it bluntly, Norwegians need for Norway to be their own "tribal reservation" just like most other indigenous peoples who also require their own territory. In fact, I am now convinced that Nordic peoples find multiculturalism and multiracialism to be innately toxic. Certainly more so than Catholics, who tend to come from more polyglot southern European societies, and mostly definitely true in regard to Jews. Once overdosed with a certain levels of "New World Order" toxicity, Nordic societies start going into dysfunctional shutdown, analogous to the way Panda bears stop mating in Zoo environments if they are not kept close enough to their natural environment, to include maintaining the presence of bamboo trees. (This is also true of other "king predator" animals brought into captivity such as wolves and bears who tend to become very unhappy and neurotic when they have lost their freedom). Hence, a desire to preserve the Norwegian people ultimately has nothing to do with being "anti-Jewish" or "anti-Catholic" or "anti-Muslim" or "anti-" anything else per se, but rather has everything to do with recognizing the peculiar innate constraints placed upon Nordic society by virtue of their unique evolutionary history.
Other Americans besides myself view Catholics as being highly authoritarian, as noted in the article Is America Anti-Catholic?:

Alan Cooperman reports in today’s Washington Post [23 May 2002] that "anti-Catholic attitudes, including a belief that Roman Catholics are not permitted to think for themselves, are common in the United States, according to a survey released today by the Rev. Andrew Greeley, a priest, sociologist and best-selling author."
A rather surprising discovery, one might think. But what does Greeley see as constituting anti-Catholicism? Cooperman offers the following examples: "The survey of 550 non-Catholic Americans, conducted in March, found that 73 percent believed that Catholics ‘do what the pope and the bishops tell them to do,’ with 52 percent saying that Catholics ‘really are not permitted to think for themselves.’"

It is not terribly surprising that Catholic leaders often find themselves mixed up with highly authoritarian organizations, where authoritarianism gets piled upon authoritarianism, and where power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely (in the words of the famous 19th century Lord Acton of Britain, who was quite anomalous as a Catholic libertarian). As an example, in the article "The Vatican, the Pope and all the Jesuits saluted Hitler’s Nazi Regime" we learn that:

The current Pope Ratzinger, himself a former Hitler Youth member, born in Bavaria Germany. The Vatican controls, and is linked directly to the European Central Bank, IMF, Former Nazi bank – the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), Goldman Sachs, The Rothschild Financial dynasty, the corrupt Fascist (fasces) Global Financial System and the offshore Central Mafia Bankster Cartel. The current Governor of California, Schwarzenegger is an Austrian Zionist who’s father was a member of the Austrian Nazi Party, is financed by Lord Jacob Rothschild and is a self confessed lover of Hitler and dictator rule. Henri Kissinger were responsible as architects of foreign policy for many years and formulated acts of genocide and war crimes around the world. Henri Kissinger was born Heinz Alfred Kissinger in Fürth, Bavaria, to a family of German Jews. Do you see where we are heading, the Fourth Reich.

Sheeple Heil!


The web page "Summary of Key Findings" at, dated October 2011, claims that Catholics comprise only 23.9% of Americans, and total Protestant membership is at 51.3%. Seemingly this would suggest there is nothing to worry about regarding any possible Catholic "takeover conspiracies." However, other facts tell a different story.
According to Catholic growth in influence in America, a blog posting at under the heading "Re: Cynthia McKinney outs the 99% Zionist Jewish Control of D.C":

Religious Affiliation of the U.S. Supreme Court

John Roberts (Chief Justice)... Catholic
Stephen G. Breyer... Jewish
Ruth Bader Ginsburg..Jewish
Anthony M. Kennedy...Catholic
Antonin Scalia.......Catholic
David H. Souter......Episcopalian
John Paul Stevens....Protestant
Clarence Thomas......Catholic
Samuel Alito.........Catholic

Religious Affiliation of U.S. Governors

U.S. Governors -- number -- percentage
Catholic.....22 - 44%
Methodist.....6 - 12%
Baptist.......6 - 12%
Presbyterian..4 - 8%
Episcopalian..3 - 6%
Mormon........2 - 4%
Jewish........2 - 4%

According to Religious Affiliation in the U.S. Senate (Wikipedia), we get the following:

Roman Catholic - 24
Presbyterian - 15
Jewish - 13
Methodist and United Methodist - 11
Baptist and Southern Baptist - 10


Interestingly enough, we see the biggest disparity of Catholics relative to the general population in the Supreme Court and among state governors, whereas in the U.S. Senate we do not see this disparity, however, we do see it among Jews who have 13 co-tribalists in the Senate compared to somewhere between 3-6% of the total population (according to many sources it is very hard to get a reliable estimate of the real Jewish percentage of the total U.S. population since many Jews become "crypto-Jews" through phony conversions to Christianity to hide their Jewishness, or fail to report their real numbers to avoid overly alarming gentiles).
As Michael Collins Piper points out in The New Jerusalem, the key is to ask who controls the main strategic choke-points of power, which in a large imperial, multiracial, multicultural society such as the United States, means who controls the mainstream media, central bank, and Wall Street and has the highest net worth. Everyone else, to include Supreme Court Justices, state governors, and Senators, are almost like figureheads. Looking at America from Piper's perspective, we see Jews in the majority almost everywhere at the top.
The next question is to ask who keeps popping up as shills for these real movers and shakers, and the answer still seems to be the same as in the late 19th century and early 20th century when corrupt Jewish-Catholic political machines ran America's biggest cities. Jews called the shots, and Italian and Irish Catholics served as their primary front men and muscle. And they still do. During and after 9/11, Roman Catholic Mayor of New York City Rudy Giuliani kept things covered up for high level criminals (see Chapter 29 of my Mission of Conscience series, where I quote from Webster Tarpley's classic work 9/11 Synthetic Terror, on page 228, about Giuliani's wise guy tactics). The Jewish-Roman Catholic Janet Napolitano took over DHS once arch-Zionist Michael Chertoff was ready to step down and earn some extra shekels vending airport scanners after the absurdly phony "Panty Bomber" episode (see Chapter 39). In Chicago, Irish Catholic mayor Richard Daley was busy hobnobbing with his friends in Israel during 2-4 May 2006 at a time when 9/11 Truth activists were very concerned that a repeat 9/11 might bring down the Chicago Sears Tower (later renamed the Willis Tower; please see Chapter 19 for background on the May Day episode, and also Chapter 11 and Chapter 35 for an overview of activist campaigns, to include my Lone Star Iconoclast article and alert "Chicago Cops Dodge Blagojevich/Sears Tower Investigation"). When it comes to totally corrupt Jewish-Catholic political machines in America's biggest cities, it just seems like the more things change, the more they stay the same.
This raises the question about whether many high level Catholics who are connected with high level Jews still hang on to the dream of conquering by stealth or false flag attacks what the Spanish Armada who faced Sir Francis Drake in the English Channel failed to accomplish. Or are they trying to also complete the unfinished work of the Catholic Armies in Germany who faced Gustavus Adolphus, the great Swedish "Lion of the North" and "Father of Modern Warfare." Or would they also like to complete the conquest of the Ukraine and Russia for Catholicism, a project once thwarted by such great Russian and Ukrainean heroes such as Bohdan Khmelnytsky (referred to by some historians as the "George Washington of the Ukraine") and Alexander Nevsky?
One wonders if the same dogmatic intolerance that once motivated French Catholics to mass murder the Cathars and Huguenots in the name of religion, and then later genocide the Vendee in the name of the French Revolutionary State, might resurface some day, if only Protestants become so weak as "counterpredators" that they can no longer keep these latent "predators" in check. Primal authoritarian Catholic urges that were openly expressed in religious form in the 17th century have not completely gone away, in fact, in a secular age these tendencies tend to simply come back in some secular form. I have observed quite a few intellectuals with a "Catholic" background try to act as libertarians, and even here I see them dogmatically push "individual freedom and expression" to absurd limits. As an additional irony, this can generate so much moral chaos and social instability over time that it can later be used as a justification for authoritarian intervention by more traditional Catholics who favor enormous restrictions on personal liberties.
When we start looking at disturbing demographic trends in America, and the physical anthropological characteristics of groups which are now growing in power, these kinds of concerns become even more palpable.
First, let us start with demographic decline of Nordics relative to whites in America, a process that has been slowly but steadily taking place since the mid-19th, and which has accelerated with the steady decline of the white population relative to the overall population of the United States since the mid-1960. On my Libertarianism vs. Nationalism web page, I note the following:

Regarding racial nationalism and libertarianism, there is a strong element of "libertarianism" in the DNA of certain European populations, with the greatest concentrations in Nordic peoples, as explained in Appendix I and Appendix IV of my Iceland series. In Chapter III: The Nordic North of Racial Realities in Europe, Dr. Lothrop Stoddard stated clearly that he believed that only Nordics have demonstrated the capability to maintain viable republican and parliamentary systems for any extended period. An important reason why America is turning into a police state is the fact that over the last one hundred and fifty years, the Nordic or Nordic-Celtic percentage of the white population has declined from over 60% to less than 20%, while at the same time getting usurped in power centers by innately criminal Jews and innately authoritarian Catholic-Alpine peoples.
One rough rule of thumb for Nordic decline can be found in the reduction in the number of people with blue eyes, since this is a recessive genetic characteristic commonly found among Nordics that quickly becomes submerged when they interbreed with other peoples. According to the Wikipedia article on eye color:
A 2002 study found that the prevalence of blue eye color among Caucasians in the United States to be 33.8 percent for those born from 1936 through 1951 compared with 57.4 percent for those born from 1899 through 1905. Blue eyes have become increasingly rare among American children, with only one out of every six or 16.6%, which is 49.8 million out of 300 million (22.4% of white Americans) of the total United States population having blue eyes. The plunge in the past few decades has taken place at a remarkable rate. A century ago, 80 percent of people married within their ethnic group. Blue eyes were routinely passed down, especially among people of Western and Northern European ancestry.

To maintain genuinely libertarian social and political institutions, Nordic countries have to maintain the Nordic integrity of their gene pools. They also have to maintain Nordic control of the strategic bases of their societies, such as media, banking, military, government, religion. A strong libertarian-populist movement in Nordic countries can serve as a watchdog against high level Zionist infiltration and corruption, such as the "Pots and Pans Revolution" in Iceland that exposed many high level malefactors. In addition, by maintaining a Nordic leadership elite that shares the same ethnicity as the working class, it is more likely that the leaders will have a long term sense of stakeholdership and will have more vision and discipline about bringing into fruition long term industrial development plans that benefit society as a whole, rather than engaging in speculative financial operations that risk looting the country for the benefit of the power elite only.

From the perspective of behavioral and ethnic "ecology," Mossad-CIA-MI6 "predator's" never would have dared to "false flag" a Nordic homeland were it not for the fact that WASPs have become so weak in America as "counter-predators". From my Reconciling Libertarianism and Nationalism web page, I note that:

..On a more subtle level, just because a particular topic is totally taboo in current public discussion does not prevent it from remaining a very real factor in human affairs. For example, one taboo topic remains Protestant vs. Catholic conflict, supposedly rendered a "non-issue" by the "melting pot" and enlightened rationalist instruction in our public schools long ago. Yet in big cities like New York, Chicago, and Boston, Italian and Irish Catholics often ally themselves with Jews against WASPs.
As Dr. Lothrop Stoddard explained in his landmark 1924 work Racial Realities in Europe, one reason why this conflict is unlikely to ever completely go away is that "Protestantism" has had a high historical correlation with "Nordics" and closely related Celts, whereas "Catholicism" has had a much higher correlation with other types of Celtic, Mediterranean, and Alpine branches of Caucasian peoples --and each group has distinctive cognitive, temperamental, and emotional characteristics embedded in their DNA that can make "getting along" tricky on certain social, political, and economic issues. Among other things, "Alpines" as a group tend to be much more authoritarian and dogmatic compared to "Nordics," who tend to be more adventurous, individualistic, rationalistic, emotionally distant (often interpreted or misinterpreted by others as "arrogance") and entrepreneurial. (See more discussion by Dr. Stoddard in Appendix I of Part 6 of my Iceland Gets "ENRONed" series, as well as in the "Handling Real Nazis" section of Chapter 34 of the Mission of Conscience series.)
After reading Racial Realities in Europe, one might get the impression that the policy of forcefully entangling Nordics with other types of whites within the context of the "pluralistic" American empire has been a long term sociological disaster. It has actually reversed the process in which Nordics separated themselves on a social and political as well as theological level from other whites in Europe during the Protestant Reformation, or later separated themselves from the British Empire during the American War of Independence.
Today "federalism" has become America's omnipresent secular state religion, and the U.S. Government -- disproportionately influenced by Jews at the top and non-Nordics everywhere else -- has taken on all the corrupt, totalitarian, dogmatic, and inefficient characteristics of the Catholic Church that Martin Luther protested against in the 16th century. The Catholic Church of the late Middle Ages had become a totally corrupt rent-seeking operation masquerading as a religion, and today the U.S. Government, intertwined with a nexus of military-industrial-central banking-big corporate interests, Mossad-CIA, and the Jewish Lobby, are all essentially just a governmental and special interest version of the same thing. Both systems were supported on the backs of large masses of gullible, petty people with a lowly peasant mentalities who were incapable of acting as the intelligent counter predators necessary to keep tyrannical predators in check.
Reminiscent of the "witch-hunts and wars of religion and imperial conquest" once promoted by the 16th and 17th century Catholic Church, Mossad-CIA today creates false flag terror attacks, Guantanamo torture, the Al Qaeda boogeyman (see Chapter 12), and the destruction of civil liberties at home. Meanwhile, in the Gulf of Mexico, the Rothschild-controlled oil company British Petroleum has exercised its "Divine Right" to control the Obama Administration, violate virtually all safety standards, manipulate major media and local police, and shorten the lives of millions of Americans (let them eat cake!) by flaunting prohibitions against using the highly toxic dispersant Corexit.
If old northern European heroes and heroines who fought for political decentralization and human liberty in the face of "New World Order" threats of their era could turn in their graves, then Arminius, Martin Luther, Queen Elizabeth I of England, and Gustavus Adolfus would probably be running high RPM right now. Don't forget Thomas Jefferson either, who once created an Anglo-Saxon grammar book to help Anglo-Americans regain a greater sense of their roots, and later in life stated that peoples from northern Europe were better suited for republican government than people from southern Europe. (See. Elena Kagan and the Decline of WASP America by Kevin MacDonald, Ph. D, The Nationalist Times, May 2010, for more on what happens when Jews and their minions displace WASPs).
In spirit, if not in actual public statements, the current phony "War on Terror," and creation of the "Homeland Security" apparatus (currently run by a Catholic of probable Jewish descent named Janet Napolitano, and formerly by a Jew named Michael Chertoff who turned loose the 9/11 "dancing Israelis" and "art students" and has been a major profiteer on cancer-causing airport body scanners) and the Federally-controlled, militarized police state (see Chapter 31 of the Mission of Conscience series), might be interpreted as a devious Jewish-Catholic effort to further marginalize and even ultimately eliminate WASP influence in America, just as initial 16th and 17th century Protestant gains got wiped out in France and Austria in the animated map below.

Wikipedia caption from article The Protestant Reformation: "Reformation and Counter Reformation in Europe. Protestant lands in blue (with gains and the losses due to the Counter Reformation), Catholic in olive."


There was nothing accidental about the Protestant roll-back depicted above. For example, as part of the Counter Reformation, the Pope created the Jesuits who took a personal loyalty oath to their temporal maximum leader, underscoring an authoritarian theme that would later be echoed in the 20th century. According to "Fascism, Sequel to Communism:"

Hitler's feared SS troops and the Gestapo were also closely connected with the Jesuits. Hitler referred to Himmler, who headed the SS, as "our Ignatius of Loyola." The SS's black uniforms were based on the Jesuits' robes and many Jesuits participated in the SS - including Himmler's uncle who was a senior SS officer and a Jesuit priest. The SS skull and cross bones also appears at the ceremony of the Jesuit oath

Jesuits also swore to infiltrate and subvert Protestantism and republican government. Part of the Jesuit oath, administered within the higher "inner circle," went as follows:

...Therefore to the utmost of my power I will defend this doctrine and His Holiness's right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Lutheran Church of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden and Norway, and the now pretended authority and Churches of England and Scotland, and the branches of same now established in Ireland and on the continent of America and elsewhere and all adherents in regard that they may be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome...
...will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the militia of the Pope...

Chapter 5 of the Mission of Conscience series contains an important historical example of a particularly horrible Jewish-Catholic Alliance. An excerpt from the lecture "The Fall of Poland" by Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson describes how a partnership between a corrupted Polish Catholic nobility and Jewish middlemen reduced the Polish people into the worst form of slavery in Europe during the 16th-17th centuries. More often than not, Jews manipulated the nobility rather than the other way around.
During this dark period, 80% of the world's Jewish population moved to the Polish empire, which became not only "The New Jerusalem," but also a prototype for the kind of "New World Order" tyranny that Jews would later try to fasten on to the United States and entire world.
What Would It Take? by Edmund Connelly, Occidental Observer, 15 July 2010 makes the point that things could go from bad to worse when white Americans -- on track to become an absolute minority in a couple of decades-- could become extermination targets, just as millions of whites have already been driven into poverty and starvation in South Africa under black rule.
Given the seriousness of this overall situation, Alex Jones is not doing his audiences a favor when he fails to inform them regarding the racial motivations behind anti-WASP marginalization in particular, and anti-White genocide in general, by an alien power elite. Nor is he helping European Americans when he fails to inform them about the richness of their own indigenous European roots that they could draw upon for strength and cohesion in the battle for survival ahead.
At root, there is a very simple biological explanation behind America's trend towards unfettered globalism and the police state within American borders. It all started when WASP's once ran this country in the 19th century and created the highly prosperous infrastructure of universities and "home garage middle class tinkerers" that promoted scientific and technological advancement. They also created political institutions that protected individual liberty. Much of this was based upon the innate individualism of Nordic or closely related Celtic peoples like the Puritans, Anglo-Saxons, Scandinavians, Scottish, and Scots-Irish. These peoples are noted for their legendary "Faustian spirit" that glorifies scientific as well as geographic exploration.
Then in poured Catholics and Jews from stagnant, corrupt societies in Southern and Eastern Europe. Initially, they all felt profound inferiority complexes in the face of impressive WASP achievements, where America once led the world in inventiveness and was on track to have a greater industrial base than France, Germany, and Britain combined. The Catholics and Jews engaged in "adaptive mimicry," assuming enough WASP values (superficially at least) to aid their rise to the top. Over time, they incrementally exploited their political (and even criminal mafia) organization to edge more individualized WASPs out of the strategic power bases of American society.
Flash forward today, and Jews and Catholic are so firmly in the saddle that they think they have everything under control (we even have a Jewish-Catholic head of the Orwellian-sounding "Department of Homeland Security" named Janet Napolitano ), and WASPs are a dispensable commodity that can be sneered at, marginalized, and even disposed of. Catholics and Jews now take for granted the subtle "loose-tight" temperamental characteristics more commonly found among WASP's ("loose-tight" --a term frequently used in In Search of Excellence by Waterman and Peters -- means a talent for finding the right balance between "centralized" and "decentralized decision-making processes based on upon particular situations). "Adaptive mimicry" soon becomes replaced with"chip-on-the-shoulder" arrogance, and the innate crookedness of Jews and innate authoritarianism of Catholics works its way to the surface. We now see the same shameless "rent-seeking" and "feather-bedding" mentality in bloated federal bureaucracies (disproportionately filled with Jews and Catholics) that exploit the phony "War on Terror" that Americans once saw in spades in a much earlier era in American history with "Jewish lightning" in Brooklyn, "Kosher Nostra" racketeering in Las Vegas, and vulgar grubbing Irish Catholic "patronage" political machines in Chicago. Not surprisingly, as WASP's are being liquidated through their low reproductive rates, and inability to defend their ethnic as well as geographic "territory," America is assuming all the stagnant and corrupt characteristics of the societies that many Catholics and Jews originally came from in the 19th century. America increasingly looks more like southern Italy, back alley Dublin, and Israel (rated by many sources as more corrupt than most European countries) and less and less like Scandinavia and Merry Olde England.
In the long run, social analysis is really fairly simple. As the Jewish British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli once observed in the 19th century, "In the long run, it is all racial." (Check out the "Bioresponse" chart elsewhere on the Reconciling Libertarianism and Nationalism web page created by Harvard professor Edward Wilson where he conceptualizes "group genetic response" as a "Log 10 [seconds]" mathematical evolutionary function across time).
Human tribalism and innate differences in productivity between human groups are fundamental facts of life that will never go away. In the long run, it is far wiser to deal with these things out in the open than to try to suppress them. In fact, by allowing Jews and Catholics to engage in "adaptive mimicry" to get the upper hand over them, one might say that WASP's "trained the dog to bite them." Worse yet, they have allowed Jewish-controlled media monopoly allied with forms of government coercion to forcefully integrate WASPs with Jews and Catholics so thoroughly throughout all areas of American society that Catholic and Jewish deficiencies are now WASP problems, whether WASPs deserve these problems or not on their own. When Jews and Catholics do insanely criminal, authoritarian, or stupid things and go down, they automatically pull WASPs down with them. In retrospect, it was incredibly foolish for WASPs to expose the fate of their children and all future generations to the shaky results of anarcho-libertarian "dog training" applied to alien peoples...

Our next step is to explore scientific explanations from physical anthropological viewpoint regarding why America's real rulers may feel such a deep instinctive hatred towards WASPs that they may feel a hidden urge to kill them through false flag attacks both at home (like 9/11 or the Ft. Hood shootings) or abroad (like London 7/7 or Norway 7-22) as well as implement economic policies that completely impoverish them. As documented on my Leuren Moret archive and Fukushima web pages, they even feel an urge to savagely reduce a large percentage of the earth's population through radiation warfare, false flag pandemics, and other nefarious means. We are talking about some extremely evil and dangerous people at the very highest levels.
I have reproduced below links to most of the table of contents of the special issue of The Barnes Review titled The Revenge of the Neanderthal. I have also reproduced my discussion in Appendix VI: The Revenge of the Neanderthal, Ethnic-Genetic Distance, and the Neanderthal-Troll Connection contained in Part 6 of my Iceland Gets "ENRONed," Then Goes For "1776" series.
I think that after reviewing this information, the reader will agree that we have extremely serious social problems that must be addressed and resolved as soon as possible.



The Revenge of the Neanderthal

Table of Contents

The following are some sample articles that explain the Neanderthal background of Jews, raising the question about whether Jews are simply continuing a race war "by other means" that has been going on for tens of thousands of years between Neanderthals and Cro Magnon Man. For a complete list of articles, please visit the Table of Contents of the May/June 2010 special issue of The Barnes Review.

"The truth about the Neanderthal is a historical web that is finally being untangled. . . ."

ISRAELI SAYS: “WE WERE INVENTED” by Willis Carto, "An eminent Israeli historian says the perceived origin of the Jewish people is anything but true. . . ."

‘MY ANCESTORS WERE NEANDERTHALS’ by Willis Carto, " Jewish scholar Stan Gooch has written extensively on the Neanderthal origins of today’s people known as `the Jews.'”

Russian Royal Family Murdered by Neanderthals: RUSSIA’S CHRISTIAN MARTYRS by Marina Marynova, "The royal family of Russia were perhaps the first most prominent victims of Jewish Bolshevism. Here’s the sad story of their brutal murders. . . "

The Postwar Neanderthal Triumph: WHO REIGNS SUPREME? by Michael Collins Piper, "Have the heirs to the Neanderthal finally achieved global supremacy? . . ."

PARTING THOUGHTS: THE ETERNAL CONFLICT by George Kadar, "...The 20th century in the Western world can be rightfully called the "Century of the Neanderthal" and it is up to us to stop this process."



The ethnic-genetic distance concept:

Throughout history people have tended to practice the axiom that as ethnic-genetic distance decreases, the chances for altruistic and mutualistic behavior tends to increase. Conversely, as ethnic-genetic distance increases, the chances of predatory or parasitic behavior also tends to increase, all other things being held equal. See the article "Zoological Subspecies in Man" by Dr. Raymond Hall which explains how this behavior is not only common among homo sapiens, but virtually all other mammalian species. Therefore, this behavior is the instinctive result of evolutionary forces common throughout nature.
If one knows where to look, one can find anthropologists like the late Sir Arthur Keith who wrote A New Theory of Evolution that explained why "tribalism," or the maintenance of "Evolutionary Breeding Units," is adaptive social behavior for natural environments.
The most unnatural environments created by man are typically cities. Interestingly enough, for over 2,500 years, the Jews have been one of the most urbanized peoples on this planet. Not surprisingly, it is common to hear people who have come to know the Jews well in big cities (as I have) criticize them as being one of the most "unnatural" peoples on this planet, heavily divorced from "healthy instincts" (Jews are typically overly represented in highly perverse social and political organizations, ranging from the North American Man-Boy Love Association to the Communist Party; the British historian Arnold Toynbee called them a "fossil civilization;" Jews are over-represented around the world at the highest levels of organized crime, and make up the majority of traitors caught spying against America) and are strongly attracted to ideological manipulation as an end itself (the "brokerage mentality" described in Winning Through Intimidation by Robert Ringer; see also The Painted Word by Tom Wolfe about how Jews like modern art more for its ideological statement than anything to do with aesthetics). See "The Scam of Modern Art" by Willis Carto and my own discussion of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology in my mutualism vs. parasitism article.
While Jews are famous for being extremely tribalistic among their own kind, they tend to encourage the exact opposite behavior among gentiles. In fact, Jews tend to encourage unnatural relationships among gentiles both in terms of unnatural divisions and unnatural alliances. They encourage unnatural divisions by supporting feminism, which encourages animosity between men and women, and Marxist class warfare, which stirs up unnecessary strife between people of shared race, ethnicity and nationality. Jews also like to promote unnatural alliances by encouraging interracial marriage, multi-racial immigration, miscegenation, and homosexuality.
Once Jews are allowed to thoroughly work their influence on a gentile society, it's social fabric is typically severely ruptured on all levels. Its overall level of social and economic efficiency tends to decline to Third World levels. This seems to be the story of America in the last few decades.
The following are some key articles on the ethnic-genetic interest concept:.


"Ethnic Genetic Interests: The scientific basis for racial activism" by Michael Rienzi, American Renaissance, Feb 2003
"What We Owe Our People: A scientist explains the genetic basis of nationalism," by Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, January 2005; also listed here.

Jewish Ethnic-Genetic Distance From Whites

Interestingly enough, even Jewish-controlled sources like the New York Times host articles that explain Jewish genetic similarities among each other, and distance from gentiles, such as "Studies Show Jews’ Genetic Similarity" by Nicholas Wade, NYT, June 9, 2010:

The shared genetic elements suggest that members of any Jewish community are related to one another as closely as are fourth or fifth cousins in a large population, which is about 10 times higher than the relationship between two people chosen at random off the streets of New York City, Dr. Atzmon said.
Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews have roughly 30 percent European ancestry, with most of the rest from the Middle East, the two surveys find. The two communities seem very similar to each other genetically, which is unexpected because they have been separated for so long.

In Chapter 14: "Jewish Evolutionary Strategy and Claims of Jewish Superiority" of his book Jewish Supremacism, Dr. David Duke provides insight into how Jews reflect enormous genetic distance from white gentile populations. Jews are able to compensate for these differences to some extent by engaging in various forms of behavioral and superficial genetic adaptive mimicry:

...The first thing I found was information on the set of genetically borne diseases that occur almost exclusively in the Jewish community, such as Tay-Sachs disease. Their presence certainly indicated a genetic variance specific to the Jewish population and illustrated a genetic difference from the Gentiles. Soon I found scientific papers dealing precisely with the issues I sought. [footnote 628, 629]
Genetic researchers Sachs and Bat-Miriam discovered amazing similarity between the Jewish populations of nine countries of North Africa, the Middle East, and Central Europe. Conversely, they found sharp differences between Jews and non-Jews from those same countries. [footnote 630]
In studying blood group data, Mourant, Kopec, and Doma-
niewska-Sobczak wrote in a book called The Genetics of the Jews that it may be said that, in general, blood group data…support the relative homogeneity of the main historical Jewish communities. [footnote 631]
Now, here we have mainstream Jewish anthropologists and geneticists -- the same groups who chronically preach to us that there are no great differences between Blacks and Whites -- boldly assert that the Jewish people are genetically distinctive and relatively homogenous! They argue that some differences exist between the Ashkenazim and the Sephardim (the main ethnic division among Jews), but that essentially Jews are a single people with a limited genetic resemblance to the European populations among whom they dwell. [foonote 632]

• In blood group data, two major studies, one in 1977 by Bonné- Tamir, Ashbel, and Kenett and one by Karlin, Kenett, and Bonné-Tamir in 1979, found when using fourteen polymorphic loci, no significant difference in Jewish populations from Iraq, Libya, Germany, or Poland. They estimated that the genetic distance between Gentiles and Jews living in the same area is three to five times

[Top of page] 330 [chapter title] JEWISH EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY

greater than for Jews living in the different nations studied. In the 1977 study, the researchers state “not much admixture has taken place between Ashkenazi Jews and their Gentile neighbors during the last 700 years or so.” [footnote 633, 634]

• Mille and Kobyliansky discovered in studies of dermatologlyphic data that Ashkenazim (Eastern European Jews) are much more similar to Sephardim (Middle-Eastern and European Jews) than they are to the non-Jewish Eastern Europeans.
[footnote 635]

• Kobyliansky and Livshits in using cluster analysis on 25 morphological characteristics, estimated that Jews in Russia were six times more distant from Russians than Russians were from Germans. They also found the Jews to be completely separate from the twenty-four other ethnic groups studied in Russia, Germany, and Poland.
[footnote 636]

• Another study compared modern Jews and those of 3,000-year-old Jewish skeletons discovered in the Middle East. Sofaer, Smith, and Kaye studied dental morphology from Morocco, Kurdish Iraq, and Eastern European countries. They found more likeness between the widely scattered Jewish populations than for the Gentile groups living near them. The ancient Jewish skeletal group turned out to be far more similar to the three Jewish populations than for every non-Jewish group studied except for one, an Arab Druse group from the 11th century.
[footnote 637]

One researcher summed up the overall genetic differences by saying that there was probably at least three times more genetic difference between an average Jew in France and his Gentile Frenchman neighbor than between an average French Jew and a Jew living in Russia or the Middle East.
The Jewish studies amazed me. I would not have guessed that Jews were that genetically different from all Europeans. I knew a few Jews who were indistinguishable from the potpourri of other European-Americans. From their appearance, it seemed impossible that there was three times more genetic difference from us than from Jews in remote regions of the world. But, the research proved that a wide genetic difference existed between Jew and European. I wondered why they did not seem that dramatically different in their appearance.
Fritz Lenz suggested back in the 1930s that Jewish resemblance to the European populations did not mean that their genes were similar.638 He suggested that their similar external resemblance could have emerged from the natural selection of genes within the Jewish gene pool. These genes could simply be a small cluster of genes that lay dormant in the Jewish pool or that were introduced by limited genetic mixture with Gentiles, and which then were selectively favored by the social environment. Genes that caused a greater corporeal resemblance to that of the Gentile host could have favorable results in acceptance, accumulation of wealth, as well as social advancement leading to reproductive success.

[Book title] JEWISH SUPREMACISM [top of page] 331

By a somewhat similar process, distinct species of butterflies not closely related, come to resemble one another without narrowing their genetic distance. A very small set of genes influencing appearance within the Jewish population could thus be favored, causing a greater similarity of appearance to the Gentile population while not narrowing their overall genetic alienation from their host population. Over many generations, the external resemblance to Gentiles could increase while the parts of the brain that affect behavioral tendencies and abilities could be unaffected.
According to evolutionary genetics, it is possible that Jews have come to more resemble their hosts in their external appearance while at the same time becoming even more distant in their mental and behavioral characteristics. Whatever the questions of physical appearance, there seemed little doubt that Jews are indeed very different from Europeans and that they had maintained that genetic difference for a very long time.
I also ran across a number of popular sources arguing that high Jewish-Gentile intermarriage rates would end their genetic distinctiveness from European Gentiles. As in so many other matters dealing with the Jews, there is a wealth of information on the issue, an underlying reality that is very different from popular perceptions.


Jews = Hybridized Neanderthals = Troll Relatives?

Interestingly enough, quite a few sources on the Internet explain how it is very likely that Troll mythology among northern European peoples evolved from pockets of Neanderthal peoples that were later overtaken by immigrations of Nordic and Celtic peoples. Hence, the recent attacks on Iceland via Zionists such as the Rothschild-controlled City of London, George Soros, and Goldman Sachs might be viewed as a "Troll attack" on a Nordic nation.

According to the web page "Troll" at the web site "Fantasy Your Guide On The Web."

...In the genre of paleofiction, the distinguished Swedish-speaking Finnish paleontologist Björn Kurtént has entertained the theory (e.g. in Dance of the Tiger) that trolls are a distant memory of an encounter with Neanderthals by our Cro-Magnon ancestors some 40,000 years ago during their migration into northern Europe. Spanish paleoanthropologist Juan Luis Arsuaga provides evidence for these types of encounters in his book, The Neanderthal's Necklace. The theory that Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons occupied the same area of Europe at the same time in history has been theorized based on fossil evidence. Other researchers believe that they just refer to neighboring tribes. The problem with this theory is that neither Neanderthals or Cro-Magnons existed in this part of Europe during the ice-age. Most of Scandinavia was covered by a large glacier and the area was not occupied until much later.

My response to the "problem with this theory" cited by this author above is that Ice sheets have advanced and retreated multiple times over the last 50,000 years. There could be pockets of Neanderthal tribes that survived even into the historic era throughout northern Europe, just as there are tiny pockets of somewhat blond-haired and blue-eyed peoples who have survived in various places in Central Asia in places like Afghanistan (for example in Nuristan) and Iran even though the original populations have been repeatedly overrun and colonized by alien peoples. Lastly, people can import mythologies with their migrations from other geographic areas. For example, the Jan/Feb 2007 Barnes Review carried an article "The Baltic Origins of Homer’s Epics" which argued that "Here is compelling evidence that the events of Homer's Iliad and Odyssey took place in the Baltic and not the Mediterranean. Reveals how a climate change forced the migration of a people and their myth to ancient Greece and identifies the true geographic sites of Troy and Ithaca in the Baltic Sea and Calypso’s Isle in the North Atlantic Ocean—following Homer’s own geographic descriptions."'
A Pravda discussion forum thread web page has the following entry under "Re: Neanderthals" discusses evidence for Neanderthals in Finland:

English summaries 3/2000
Signs of Neanderthal man unearthed in Finland by Juha Valste and Antti Halkka
Pages 4-11
For a long time, the oldest known signs of people in Finland post-dated the latest Ice Age, making them less than 10,000 years old. Now, at Susiluola, in Kristiinankaupunki, western Finland, stone implements and signs of fire have been discovered which are around 120,000 years old. These indicate that people have existed here during the Eem interglacial warmer period between two ice ages. All the human forms as old as these in Central and southern Europe have been Neanderthals.
Tales have long been told about Susiluola (it’s name - for some obscure reason - means "wolf cave" in Finnish). The old folk were convinced that Susiluola had been inhabited by mankind sometime during the Stone Age. Recently, a curious local inhabitant was given permission to excavate the cave. The National Board of Antiquities had no money to fund this operation, no available staff, and in fact little interest in the project.
Digging deeply into the cave floor deposits, amateur geologists soon unearthed blackened stones and roughly made stone implements. They immediately abandoned their project, gracefully making way for a thorough professional scientific examination of the cave strata. Thus far, the site has yielded approximately 30 stone implements and over a hundred fragments produced during their shaping. There are no rock types in the area from which it would be an easy job to manufacture weapons and tools. Some of the artifacts have been carved from red shale.
There are many layers in the deposits on the cave floor, some of which constitute original floor surfaces, whereas others have been built up from stones and earth transported there by either water or ice. Pollen and spores from trees and other kinds of plants have been found in the strata associated with human occupation. These sub-fossils tell us that the climate 120,000 years ago was rather warm, in other words similar to what it is today.
Susiluola represents the first Neanderthal dwelling site that has even been found in Fennoscandia.
Not unnaturally, it has caused a sensation among anthropologists and geologists in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark.

The Wikipedia article on "Trolls" (as of May 2010) has the following interesting comment:

Many of the fairytale and folklore descriptions of "Trolls" are similar to characteristics of Neanderthal people. Neanderthal people overlapped with us (Homo Sapiens) for 30,000 to 50,000 years.

[Editor's Note: In light of all this research, perhaps it would be perfectly reasonable to suggest that on 7-22 Norway got hit with a bona fide troll attack of the Mossad-Jewish-Neanderthal variety].




Norwegians and other Scandinavians have always led the world in the output of technological innovation per capita, just like their New England counterparts whose "Yankee Ingenuity" was the prime source of American inventiveness and world-leading new industries in the 19th century.


Three Gross Misconceptions
that Too Many Americans (Like Glenn Beck)
Have About Norway and Norwegians

(Including the wise guys at the CIA's Langley, VA HQ who probably
aided or abetted the Mossad/MI6 side of the Oslo/Utoya attacks)

by William B. Fox

. . . Continuing with "just one man's opinion" from a "51% Norwegian," Norwegian - American perspective, with background Norway-related photos here. I must emphasize that my views are not officially connected with or representative of any Norwegian or Norwegian-American associations. The mass murder of my Norwegian kinsmen on 7-22 was an unspeakably evil act of war. This must be avenged, and its real perpetrators must be publicly identified and brought to justice!


In this essay, I will cover the following misconceptions and fallacies:

a) Norway, being a Nordic country, somehow has "Nazi-like" characteristics
b) Small countries like Norway and Iceland are "obsolete" and "anachronistic" in a "globalized"world.
c) "Homogeneity" in a white (particularly a Nordic) country is somehow reprehensibly "racist," economically "irrational," and disruptive to a harmonious, global order


a) Norway, being a Nordic country, somehow has "Nazi-like" characteristics

There are two very good approaches for handling this issue, which has gained increased relevance after Glenn Beck mistakenly compared the Norwegian Labor Party conference area on Utoya island with Hitler Youth camps. (See my listing of articles related to this episode in the 25-28 July time frame in my Norwegian Government and MSM Questionable Behavior Patterns section).
The first approach is to note that Nordic peoples have historically been world leaders in certain key democratic areas such as human rights and parliamentary government. These are areas that the America public usually considers antithetical to major characteristics of Nazism.
One advantage of this approach is that we can explore these antithetical areas without getting mired in detailed discussions up front about National Socialist ideology and revisionist histories of World War II, which inevitably leads to a frank discussion about Allied/Zionist disinformation as well as the real nature of "Nazi propaganda." Instead, we can focus on exploring indigenous Nordic characteristics, a topic which provokes far less anxiety in most audiences.
In addressing fellow Americans, a first major point I would like to make is that "Nordic" is not as foreign as it may originally sound. In fact, in early America, "Nordic" was "down home."
I have mentioned elsewhere on this web page that the Puritans who settled New England came from the most Nordic part of England that was heavily settled by Norwegian and Danish Vikings and also other Norsemen from other eras. Norway has a charm and quaintness that is reminiscent of Norman Rockwell paintings of WASP New England. New Englanders of the colonial period were anthropologically almost identical to Norwegians; in fact it striking to me how descriptions of the personalities, values, and social structure of the original "New England Yankee" is virtually identical to most characterizations I have run across of "stereotypical Norwegians." For example, the article The Puritan and the Yankee: A long semi-scholarly footnote on a sentence observes:

Thinking of Yankee in terms of character traits involves notions of independence, straightforwardness, integrity, community, responsibility, the sense that right is right, and a combination of shrewdness and frugality. The visual representation of the Yankee for me is in Norman Rockwell's "Freedom of Speech" painting. The major figure is standing and speaking to the town meeting. He is not a crusader, nor is it a big deal. He is speaking his mind and doing it candidly. Emerson's essay on "Self Reliance" is a literary expression of the Yankee spirit. It may be that Ben Franklin is a prototype of a Yankee. We too easily forget that though he came to prominence in Philadelphia, Franklin lived his formative years in New England. His writings show the commonsense practicality often associated with the Yankee mentality.



This is identical to how I would characterize most Norwegians, or at least native Nordic Norwegians, and not the miscellaneous featherless bipeds from Third World countries that have been allowed into Norway following World War II in the name of multiracialism, multiculturalism, globalism, and other destructively deceptive and parasitic Zionist New World Order agendas.


Upper left: John Wayne, of Scottish and Scots-Irish descent, played "rugged individualist" heroic roles that are closer to the Norwegian character than Glen Beck's comic book conception of Hitler Youth. In this screen shot from True Grit, Wayne plays an aging one-eyed U.S. Marshall who can still fearlessly go after bad guys, reminiscent of the supreme deity of Norse mythology Odin who trades an eye for wisdom at the Well of Mimir and confronts evil Loki and his army of perverse creatures during Ragnarök with pure valor. Upper right: Gen George Patton, of Scots-Irish descent, famous for his brilliant initiative and controversial outspokenness as well as his outstanding leadership as a combat general. Below: actor James Stewart and actress Carroll Baker find romance along the Ohio River frontier in this publicity photo from Hollywood's 1962 classic epic How the West Was Won, aptly characterized by one critic as "America's answer to Leni Riefenstahl." Also of Scottish descent, Jimmy Stewart frequently played heroic America pioneer archetypes reminiscent of explorers and other adventurers in Norse sagas.


Another important group we might relate Norwegians to in addition to Anglo-Saxon/Nordic English are the half Nordic, half Celtic peoples of Scotland. Norwegians have historically been more directly involved with Scotland than Germany. Like the Scottish people, or even the Scots-Irish (WASPs from southern Scotland who settled in northern Ireland), the Norwegians have a certain streak of "rugged individualism" as well as "stoicism" in their character. As an interesting personal anecdote, while traveling with my parents in Scotland in the late 1960's, a Scottish business executive privately confided to my father who was then teaching as a college professor, "We feel closer to the Norwegians than the British!"
If someone feels that they absolutely must try to compare Norwegians with hardline warrior figures in some nearby country separated by an ocean, even if they have to stretch things a bit, people like Gen. Douglas MacArthur, Gen. George Patton (see Born Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America by James Webb), William Wallace (popularized in the movie Braveheart) or even character actors like John Wayne (of Scottish and Scots-Irish background) and Jimmy Stewart (of Scottish descent) who were famous for "playing themselves" (in real life Stewart became a Brigidier General in the U.S Air Force Reserves) are all actually a little bit closer to Norwegians in terms of behavioral characteristics, heroic culture, social institutions, and ethnic-genetic distance than Glenn Beck's "comic book" and "Jewish-Hollywood" level of understanding of "Hitler Youth."
In many respects, Norway is basically a nation of "high-end" hillbillies and fishermen from the fjord country who have more in common with the Scots-Irish who contributed a disproportionate amount of America's earliest country music (experienced today through such venues as "Grand Ole Opry," "Blue Grass" concerts, and "Austin City Limits") than anything to do with jackboot brass bands or, for that matter, Jewish urbanites like George Soros, Jonathan Pollard, and Bernie Madoff who give America most of its high level white collar crime, assassinations, espionage, Stuxnet virus attacks, GMO seed monopolies, toxic vaccine additives, dysfunctional social re-engineering (I call it "serial macro-social pedophilia") and other very evil things thing that are literally poisoning our country -- and others as well.


Back in 1990's I saw a Norway Times article about a 1950's antique car club in western Norway, where Norwegian re-enactors dressed like Marilyn Monroe, James Dean, and other icons of the "Happy Days" era. Their slogan was "We are more American than most Americans." I later saw article about how Icelandic fisherman often make it a point to arrive at fishing grounds earlier and stay later and in stormier weather than their British counterparts, even if they lose more people at sea. They could legitimately claim as fellow adherents to a heroic seafaring culture that they are "more British than the British." Similarly Norwegians often try to one-up the Brits as well, for example if tall ships come into port, the Norwegians might have their cadets climb up to higher masts compared to their British counterparts to stand at attention on the rigging. This reminds me of how the U.S. Marine Corps makes it a special point to appear more "military" and "gung ho" than the U.S. Army in just about everything. It also reminds me of how many Texans take pride in the "Alamo" and "Lone Star Republic" mystique and view themselves as tougher "cowboys" and better "fighters" compared to lesser mortals across the U.S.A.
The History Channel series: Barbarians - The Vikings, has the following introduction which explains some of Scandinavia's own unique historical mystique, although I argue in Chapter 34 some of the "barbaric"-related interpretations contained in the following passage reflect bias by Christian historians against pagan Norsemen:

Late in the eighth century, they burst from the frigid seas of the North, to take the world by storm. For the next three hundred years, they ravaged the civilized nations. Nothing can stop them. Not the oceans. Not the dread of the unknown. Not the rulers of Europe. They are the Vikings, and behind their barbaric legend lies an even more spectacular reality. Explorers, settlers, and traders, Vikings strike out across the sea in search of plunder and legitimate wealth...

Norwegian Americans have always been disproportionately represented in dangerous or rough occupations like fishing, lumber jacking, combat military units, and ranching. It is not uncommon to see a Norwegian-American test his mettle for kicks, like trying to do a head stand on high rise construction beam as a steel worker, or standing on top of a tree five stories off the ground he has just "topped" as a lumberjack, or trying to see if he can ride his horse across a natural arch as a cowboy. It has always been the case that blond-haired, blued-eyed Nordic women have been vastly over-represented compared to other females in adventure sports like rock climbing, parachuting, and scuba diving. Scandinavians have always been a unique blend of both the athletic and intellectual, excelling in both areas. Scandinavian-Americans are probably closer to America's original pioneer culture of the 18th and 19th centuries than most U.S. citizens today, and in this sense may qualify as "more American than most Americans."

I have attended quite a few social and business-related meetings held by Norwegians or Norwegian Americans where one of the lingering big questions in the back of my mind was "What's the big deal about `Nordic' peoples"? My initial impression has been that both Norwegians and Norwegian Americans seem to act like pretty normal and ordinary people to me, preoccupied with handling the same kinds of human problems all other Americans have to deal with. They put their pants on in the morning the same way as anybody else, and try to avoid the flu bug like everyone else as well. I have never seen any Hitlerian "Aryan Superman" stuff going on at any Norwegian or Norwegian American events.

Then an idea hit me. One thing that seems to distinguish Norwegians is not that they are so "superior," but rather they seem to be a bit more well-rounded and more "normal" and relatively "less dysfunctional" compared to other groups. In other words, Norwegians strike me as being more like super normal rather than like supermen.
Interestingly enough, I once read account by an individual who should have been an expert on "Nazi Aryan supermen" that helped validate this perception. It was by Leon DeGrelle, a Belgian political leader who later became Waffen S.S. General under Hitler and saw considerable combat on the Eastern Front. He wrote about his experiences in Norway in Campaign in Russia. When the Third Reich was close to surrendering, he rushed to Oslo while it was still under Nazi occupation to catch a private plane which then took him to Spain, where he received political asylum. During the few days he spent in Oslo, he said that he was generally impressed with the Norwegians as a well-rounded people. They appeared to be both intelligent and physically robust, with a healthy, wholesome, and upbeat approach to life. He didn't say anything about Nordic Aryan Nazi supermen, just that he encountered a well-rounded, energetic, intelligent, and wholesome people.
The Norwegian population group seems to have fewer people with behavior and character disorders, and their group traits are skewed more in the direction of innovators and early adopters, which suggests an aptitude for long range planning and implementation. However, just because a bell-shaped distribution of traits in a population are skewed in a particular direction, doesn't mean that there still are not dysfunctional people at the other end of the curve. They are there for sure, just like all other population groups. Please see my environmental vs. genetics discussion for more on the "sociobiological" implications of "bell curves."
I am reminded of an account of America's invasion of Cuba during the Spanish American War where a military historian noted that the Americans were disorganized and their operational plan was a mess, but they won over the Spaniards anyway because the Spaniards were even more disorganized and their operational capabilities were an even bigger mess. That is probably a pretty accurate way to compare Norwegians with most other white ethnic groups in America. (However, as previously mentioned, unless they become consciously aware of their own characteristics, as well as those of alien peoples, and explicitly develop and conscientiously implement a group "game plan," individualistic, free-spirited, and "naive" Norwegians tend to experience major sociological problems holding their own in competition with nasty, vicious, and duplicitous Jews and their Catholic mafia allies for economic and political power in multi-racial, multicultural, urban environments).
As one example of relative functioning, according to Michael Rivero at, Catholic statistics show that about 12% of priests are pedophiles, and as Rivero puts it, they like to "diddle" with little kids. A long time ago Norwegians and other Protestants figured out that requiring celibacy among religious leaders typically creates more problems than it solves over the long run. Now given the fact that most Norwegian Lutheran ministers are married and that pedophilia is almost unheard of among them, I would ask if this makes Norwegians somehow "Aryan superman" for simply taking a common sense approach on this issue? I don't think so. I just think they are acting just a little bit more "normal" and "sensible" than certain dogmatic Catholic counterparts.
In Chapter 34 Saving Dr. Toben, Handling Real Nazis, and Countering the Holocaustianity Intellectual Blackjack of my Mission of Conscience series, I describe how Norwegian-Americans have also historically been "extra normal" when it comes to staying out of jail.

Crime statistics in America support the Scandinavian claim to lower corruption and greater overall honesty. For example, in his book Promise Fulfilled: A Portrait of Norwegian Americans Today, Dr. Odd S. Lovoll writes on page 174:

A concept of a relatively low rate of criminal activity and imprisonment has of course some basis in historical fact, as Pinderhughes documents. In calculations of "nationality and criminals" for Wisconsin, where nativity for convicts was carefully recorded, in 1892, O.N. Nelson announced with ethnic exuberance that whereas the Irish had one convict for 2,328 of their population in the state, and the German one in 4,388, the Scandinavian-born had only one in 6,028, and that furthermore convicts from Scandinavia served on average much less time in prison than, for instance, the German-born, indicating that their crimes had been less severe.

Admittedly "crime" can be a tricky concept when we look under the hood at the specifics. Different racial and ethnic groups tend to predominate within certain types of crime. For example, blacks and Hispanics lead America in the rate of violent street crime, whereas Jews lead in the rate of high level nonviolent white collar crime, organized crime, and espionage. As an example, although certain "official statistics" show somewhere around 3% of the total population, Jews are always in the majority among individuals arrested as high level Wall Street swindlers or as spies for hostile foreign intelligence services arrested by the FBI counterintelligence.

Norwegians also appear to be "extra normal" when it comes to personal hygiene and compassion for animals and other human groups. Unlike the Jews described in Dr. William Pierces' articles Shocking Differences (Free Speech, April 2001) and Feces, Fetuses, Etc. (American Dissident Voices 5 May 2001), Norwegians are not morbidly preoccupied with excretory functions. Unlike the Chinese described in these same articles, Norwegians are not callously indifferent to the suffering of animals, but invest considerable time and effort into supporting organizations that try to prevent cruelty to animals -- and fellow humans as well.
Another example of "extra normality," involves the "loose-tight" decision-making characteristics described in the book In Search of Excellence. This basically means the ability of managers to function in both a centralized and decentralized decision-making mode at the same time. I go into all of this into more detail in my centralization vs. decentralization article, but suffice to say for our purposes here that it implies the ability of a manager to honestly solicit grass roots input and admit that he and his superiors have made mistakes in order to address problems in an objective manner and take appropriate corrective action. Norwegians tend to be relatively better at operating on this level compared to most other white ethnic groups. Managers in many other ethnic groups tend to experience chronic "alpha male" issues, where grave concerns about "saving face," "keeping up appearances," "maintaining bearing and command presence" and other political and emotional elements take priority over purely rational and objective decision-making processes. Mangers in other ethnic groups are more likely to engage in cover-ups instead of bringing problems out into the open and honestly resolve them.
We are left with the question, does the ability to function on a more rational and objective level in the decision-making process imply "super man" stuff? Once again, I do not think so. I think all of this simply suggests a more balanced temperament, a more altruistic social conscience, and a better capability to subordinate ones own pride and ego when necessary.
Regarding the way in which Nordic traits are antithetical to key characteristics of German National Socialism -- or at least the viciously anti-German, Jewish Hollywood interpretation of National Socialism fed to the American public -- let us first observe that Adolf Hitler's approach is usually considered highly authoritarian, centrist, militaristic, and imperialistic. In contrast, ever since prehistoric times Nordic peoples have been noteworthy for their parliamentary institutions (called Things, as in the case of the Icelandic Althing, one of the longest running forms of republican government in the West), with an emphasis upon individual rights and political decentralization In the 20th century, the foreign policy of Scandinavian governments focused upon neutrality rather than imperialism, and their military establishments have always been kept subordinated to civilian leaders.
In his classic work Racial Realities in Europe, Lothrop Stoddard helps to clear up the way in which many Americans confuse German "Nazi" authoritarianism and "Nordic culture." In his Chapter Alpinized Germany, Stoddard describes how the racial balance in Germany shifted dramatically after the 30 Years War of the 17th century from Nordic to Alpine. The Alpine peoples tend to be highly authoritarian and conventional wherever they are found on this planet, whether in eastern Europe, Germany, Italy, France, or the United States.
While "under Nordic management" Germany was very decentralized in the Middle Ages, and became increasingly centralized in the modern era as the Nordic percentage of the overall population declined. This is similar to the pattern we have seen in U.S. history, where increased centralization of the Federal government has been directly correlated with the decline of Nordics as a percentage of the overall U.S. population, a trend that began in the mid-19th century. However, since Germany retained a "thin veneer" of a Nordic culture (as Stoddard put it), and because Adolf Hitler and other Nazis happened to admire Nordics, many Americans continue to confuse "Nazism" with "Nordicism."
In Part I of my Part 6: References and Appendices to my Iceland Gets ENRONed series, I provide an extract from Chapter One of Racial Realities in Europe by Lothrop Stoddard which gives an overview of Nordic characteristics. I am in general agreement with Stoddard based upon my own personal experiences, although I think the realities may be a little more complex than what he has stated -- but Stoddard is a good start for neophytes.
An important aspect of Stoddard's analysis is the way he describes Nordic weaknesses and vulnerabilities as well as strengths. As one example, in Appendix VII, I have provided an excerpt from "Chapter XI The Inner Dikes" from The Rising Tide of Color by Dr. Lothrop Stoddard which provides an example about how Nordics and other types whites tend to get themselves displaced over time by alien peoples. Unless Nordics become consciously aware of their own unique strengths and weaknesses, as well as those of competing groups, and unless Nordics develop a conscious strategy to survive as a distinct group, they tend to melt away over time amidst competing racial and ethnic groups. This is particularly true in dense urban environments like London, New York, Chicago, or Los Angeles, where Nordic "individualism" and the peculiar Nordic sense of idealism can become a disadvantage in competition with other groups like Jews and Catholics. Under such circumstances, Nordics tend to get squeezed out over time. Worse yet, once they are diminished, the "adaptive mimicry" displayed by other groups towards WASPs also starts to fall by the wayside. In the place of the old mimicry the natural traits of these groups begins to rise to the surface. Catholics become ever more mindlessly authoritarian, dogmatic, reactionary, and cruelly intolerant, and Jews become ever more psychopathic, duplicitous, megalomaniacal, vicious, delusional, and otherwise dangerous.
As previously mentioned on this web page, many sources describe how the settlement of Nordic tribes in parts of Europe during different historical periods tended to correlate with increased political decentralization and parliamentary or republican forms of government. This case is explicitly made in Early Civilizations of the Nordic Peoples by Roger Pearson and implicitly made in The End of Kings: A History of Republics and Republicans by William Everdell.
One of the big ironies that comes with discussing Nordic historical success in providing ruling elites or winning wars since ancient times (to include the Viking era) is that it may provide an overly simplified impression of Nordic robustness and superiority that simply does not exist. My personal impression from interacting with Norwegian and Norwegian American groups is that even in a homogeneous Nordic society, the margins for a viable, productive, and self-sustaining society are very thin. After you subtract out the fact that women as a group tend to vote about one standard deviation to the ideological left and tend to be "later adopters" than men, and also subtract out the percentage of the population which is so tied down with making a living they simply cannot afford to invest themselves in dealing with the toughest social issues, and then factor in that certain percentage of the population which is inherently criminal, stupid, or lazy (they exist in every population group around the world to some greater or lessor degree), and after we discount many other other types of "load factors," Norwegian society just barely retains enough highly intelligent innovators and early adopters to sustain an advanced industrial society. A homogeneous Nordic society just barely has enough highly intelligent, tough-minded people to act as adequate "counter predators" to keep in check innately authoritarian "predators" (like so many Catholics) or innately criminal people (like so many Jews). The indigenous Nordic folk culture is very fragile, and it does not take the addition of many alien peoples before one overstresses, swamps, and ruins everything that once made Norway such a charming, self-sufficient, and productive little country.
There is an important analogy I need to make involving the Protestant vs. Catholic conflict in Northern Ireland. In my essay "Handling Real Nazis" at the end of Chapter 34 Saving Dr. Toben, Handling Real Nazis, and Countering the Holocaustianity Intellectual Blackjack of my Mission of Conscience I cite an article that appeared in Psychology Today magazine in 1960's which observed how the differences between Protestants and Irish Catholics go much deeper than theology. They involve profound psychological differences regarding attitudes towards authoritarianism, individualism, collectivism, work, and other important areas. (Please see Chapter 34 for more background discussion, to include mention about how the Scots-Irish Protestants have significantly greater Nordic-High Celtic ancestry). Just like the way many Germans privately joke about how "Africa begins south of the Alps," many Protestants view the Irish Catholics as a pathetic people with too much "load" in their gene pool. (In my James Buchanan section of my Reconciling Libertarianism and. Nationalism web page I describe how 19th century British cartoonists often viewed Irish Catholics as "Simians" who were fundamentally unfit to rule themselves). In their view, the Irish Catholic population has too many drunks, too many petty-greedy rent-seekers, too many glad-handers, too many "Hail Mary, Hail Pope, Hail Pedophile Priests!" and "Lucky Charms" genuflecters, too many Liberal-Minority-Coalition mafia aficionado wise guys, too many homely-dowdy-envious proletarians, too many white trash knuckle-heads -- you get the picture. (Some Scots-Irish even call Irish Catholics "bog wogs" and the "niggers of western Europe"). Many North Ireland Protestants ("Scots-Irish") do not want to be blended in with the Irish Catholics or subordinated to them any more than someone who can just barely swim in the ocean wants to try to rescue someone who is thrashing around and cannot swim and is going under. Northern Ireland Protestants can just barely manage their own problems as it is.
Of course many Irish Catholics are perfectly aware of the contempt that many Scots-Irish, English, and other people in the UK feel for them, and this, combined with centuries of bitter experience under British rule, has caused many Irish Catholics to ally themselves with Jews against WASPs come hell or high water. (Many Italian Catholics have a similar underdog complex, but for somewhat different sociological reasons. On my Reconciling Libertarianism and. Nationalism web page I comment on an embedded film clip from True Romance -- the Sicilians that features a confrontation between a Sicilian mafia don played by Chris Walken and a retired cop played by Dennis Hopper that is just priceless).
A classic example of Irish Catholic attachment to Jews involves Joseph Kennedy, father of President John F. Kennedy, who apparently felt very hurt by the way he was rejected by Boston WASP society. According to Final Judgment, after World War II JFK's father made a conscious decision to ally himself with Jews so that one of his sons could have a shot at becoming the first Roman Catholic president of the United States. Of course Joe Kennedy knew "the score" better than most Americans about how Jews had set up the U.S. Federal Reserve Banking System, dragged America unnecessarily into WWI, had been major supporters of Bolshevism, had incited war and massive hatred against Germany, and had pushed other very dangerous and destructive policies. In addition, the Kennedys were skating on very thin ice in other ways. When JFK was assassinated, there was no "Irish mafia" capable of adequately retaliating against the Jewish mafia. Despite all this, Joe Kennedy & Sons decided to have a full throttle love affair with the Jews, to include supporting their multiracial agenda.
In 1958 JFK published A Nation of Immigrants in league with the Jewish ADL which called for loosening up immigration restrictions towards Third World peoples, which certainly did not help the plight of Nordic Americans and other WASPs who were already in decline. Then in the mid-1960's JFK's brother Senator Teddy Kennedy and other fellow Democrats joined with the ADL and other Jewish groups to pass "immigration reform" legislation that opened up the floodgates of Third World immigration, causing the white population to decline from 90% in the early 1960's to the situation that exists today where "Most people over 60 are non-Hispanic whites, and most under 40 are not." Most Third World immigrants tend to be Catholics rather than Protestants, and they are more likely to support the Democratic Party than Republicans, so the Kennedys were able to gain both a political as well as demographic advantage for their party and for Catholic hegemonic interests at the expense of declining WASPs and the ability of America to remain a First World country.
In any event, it is not the case that only Norwegians are worried about compromising and diluting their fragile demographics and indigenous folk culture by getting infiltrated by alien peoples with dubious loyalties and discordant temperamental traits. This is actually a fairly common concern with many other groups throughout Europe, as Tom Chittum observes in Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America. (This includes the way many northern Italian Catholics feel about southern Italian Catholics, and northern French about southern French). In fact, by traditional European right wing tribal standards, America today is a land of mongrelized, rootless, Jewish-brainwashed, neo-Jacobin leftist crazies. No wonder the Nordic percentage of the U.S. population has been in steady decline over the last 150 years. No wonder criminal groups like Mossad-CIA-MI6 can rise to the top without any cohesive European American groups being able to keep them in check, and even worse, Mossad-CIA-MI6 gangsters can continuously pull off evil stunts around the world like London 7/7, Fukushima 3-11, and Oslo-Utoya 7-22.
For anyone interested in examining the topics I have addressed so far in greater detail, I offer more insights about Nordic peoples, the evolution of their distinctive traits, and how these traits affect their social and political institutions in my Reconciling Opposing Political and Economic Ideologies series, to include my web pages on centralization vs. decentralization, environment vs. genetics, and mutualism vs. parasitism.
The second approach I advise for handling the Nordic vs. Nazi issue, which makes a good sequel to the first approach, involves confronting German National Socialist ideology and WWII revisionist history head-on. This includes addressing the propaganda war waged by the Allies against the Axis, and thoroughly examining the real underlying social and political realities behind all combatants
With this approach, we are less focused on characterizing indigenous Nordic culture, and more focused on how many Americans may have become brainwashed by extremely biased, selective, and even disinformational propaganda that benefited only certain special interests. As we ask cui bono? (or "who benefits), we may end up spending more time looking at the Jewish owners of the Bank of England and the privately owned Federal Reserve Banking System in the United States, not to mention Jewish owners of Hollywood and other major players behind global Zionism, than anything to do with Germany, Russia, France, or the Nordic peoples in Scandinavia. (Please read Chapter 33 and view the embedded video The Money Masters before you decide that I am being totally off the wall here).
In the process of conducting an honest inquiry into the real nature of Zionism, German National Socialism, Italian Fascism, Soviet Communism, Winston Churchill's government, and the FDR Administration, we may begin to make some valuable discoveries. The following are some examples:
* Zionist Israel is much more "national socialist" in a negative way than Germany ever was, yet the U.S. gives it blank check support. (See Life of An American Jew in Racist, Marxist Israel by Jack Bernstein, an American-Jewish writer.) Jews are also vastly more destructive in terms of the total amount of human suffering that they have caused on this planet compared to German Nazis. If one factors in the Jewish Bolshevik Revolution (60 million deaths, estimated by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn), as well as deaths and wasted lives caused by Jewish manipulation of the economy (for example the artificial causes of the Great Depression from financial manipulation by the privately controlled Federal Reserve, see Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins and The Great Depression by Dr. Murray Rothbard), not to mention the tens or hundreds of millions of people likely to die as a consequence of the Mossad's Stuxnet sabotage of the Fukushima reactors, Jewish-caused deaths around the globe are well over a 100 times worse than anything ever allegedly done by the Germans. In fact, it is possible that the Fukushima disaster may turn into a major extinction event, making many Jews look more like Loki in the Old Norse Ragnarok story or Satan in the Bible than real people.
* World War II, in many ways, still has not ended. The world is still wrapped up in a continuing propaganda war that demonizes all forms of nationalism (particularly white nationalism) outside of Jewish nationalism (Zionism). The only "approved" form of nationalism, called Zionism, is deemed noble and wonderful by controlled national media. Zionists still benefit from reparations stemming from exaggerated "holocaust" claims. They justify extreme aggression against other peoples, such as the genocide of much of the Japanese population following the 3-11 Stuxnet virus attack, based upon exaggerated feelings of victimhood and paranoia. This propaganda war also involves suppression of individuals who wish to simply examine facts in an objective manner. See, for example, my discussion of the persecution of professional historians who wish to critically examine Zionist accounts of "the Holocaust" in Chapter 34 Saving Dr. Toben, Handling Real Nazis, and Countering the Holocaustianity Intellectual Blackjack of my Mission of Conscience. I also cover suppression of individuals who wish to scientifically understand the role of genetics on group as well as individual behavior in my environmental vs. genetic article.
* All the "goodies" are not on one side, and all the "baddies" are not on the opposing side during World War II. There were excesses committed on all sides. Also, going back to World War I (many argue that WWII was simply a continuation of WWI) Germany did not have "sole guilt" for starting this mindlessly destructive war. There was plenty of blame to go around for all the belligerents. Maintaining a simplistic, black and white, comic book view of history does much more harm than good, particularly because it continues to damage the self-esteem and capacity for productive self-determination held by many different peoples. This includes German and Italian Americans in America, and nationalists within European countries who seek to resist their own dispossession.
There is no substitute for reading viewpoints on all sides of a historical issue. One good source is The Barnes Review, for whom Michael Collins Piper has been a frequent writer. It is also worth revisiting my editor's note at the end of Capt. Eric May's 30 Sept 2011 article Amerika Uber Alles: Our Nazi Nation, where I commented:

While I think that Captain May's analysis has tremendous merit, to include his comparison of the totalitarian nature of both Zionism and Nazism, we should also note that there are some important differences between Adolf Hitler and George Bush. For example, according to Michael Collins Piper, Hitler was heavily decorated for combat service, whereas Bush avoided Vietnam. Hitler rose to power after Germany had already experienced Treaty of Versailles humiliation and loss of territory, a hyperinflationary depression, and a scary communist takeover attempt by the Spartacists. Many Germans were legitimately fearful that without strong rightist leadership their country would relapse into depression and suffer a ruthless communist takeover. In contrast, George Bush inherited what was once a strong country defended by two major oceans. America already had access to the cheapest oil on the planet. (In 1998, the price of oil dropped to a 50-year inflation-adjusted price low of around $10.75 a barrel. This was at a time when America encouraged a vastly more even-handed policy between Israel and the Arab world). Bush has now created vastly worse social conditions leading towards the real possibility of World War III ruin, a hyperinflationary depression, and a possible complete fascist takeover. Hitler was democratically elected as Chancellor, whereas there is strong evidence that George Bush stole his two Presidential elections. Hitler inherited an authoritarian state pioneered by Bismarck and Kaiser Wilhelm, whereas Bush is wrecking the last vestiges of the U.S. Constitution, principled republicanism, and American democracy. Adolf Hitler, who was himself an artist, encouraged heroic neo-classical artistic revivalism through sculptors such as Arno Breker and architects like Albert Speer. In contrast, I associate George Bush with such "Animal House in the West Wing" vulgarities as flipping off the press and once screaming "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it’s just a goddamned piece of paper!” His wife once made a crude joke at a formal supper about husband George milking a male horse. Lastly, Hitler supported German national interests and white ethnic-genetic interests against Jewish multi-racialism and multi-cultural leftism directed at gentiles, whereas George Bush supports Zionist globalism, open borders with Mexico, free trade with Red China, multi-racialism, and Israeli aggression in the Middle East against American national interests and against the ethnic-genetic interests of America's dwindling white middle class. As additional commentary on this issue, in my site map I quote from page 18 the 23 Oct 2006 American Free Press:

...University of Wisconsin professor Kevin Barrett has come out with a new book, which argues that the U.S. government was involved in the Sept. 11 attacks. Responding to a recent article about his book, Barrett commented on a report that he has compared President Bush to Adolf Hitler: “Hitler had a good 20 to 30 IQ points on Bush, so comparing Bush to Hitler would in many ways be an insult to Hitler.”

An important irony we cannot overlook is the fact that the Nazis acquired many of their tactics and techniques from the Communists. Josef Goebbels was an ardent socialist before he converted to Nazism. S.A. leader Ernst Roehm was such an ardent socialist that he and many close followers got purged by Hitler during the famous "Night of the Long Knives." Eric Hoffer, in The True Believer, observes that some of the Nazi's best converts were former Communists. In the biography Adolf Hitler by John Toland, we even see a photo of a renter's strike in which Nazi and Communist flags hung outside apartment windows are mixed together.
And who were at the forefront of justifying, organizing, financing, and promoting global Communism? According to Winston Churchill in his famous 1920 article "Zionism vs. Bolshevism: The Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People" it was the Jews. Hence, we see a completed circled from Jewish Bolshevism to German National Socialism back to Jewish neo-con "Zionazism" in America today.

Last, but not least, if one is interested in the viewpoint from folks who totally jumped ship from America's controlled national media ideological matrix, two good starting points are:
"The Measure of Greatness" and "By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War" by Dr. William L. Pierce, former Chairman of the National Alliance.
"The Enigma of Hitler" by Leon Dagrelle. For more extensive reading, consider Dagrelle's major work "Hitler: Born At Versailles." Leon Dagrelle became a leading general under Hitler in the Waffen S.S. and subsequently escaped to Spain to live out his life as a writer.


Albert Speer (left), Adolf Hitler, and Arno Breker (right) making note of French cultural achievements while in Paris in June 1940 following the German victory in the Battle of France. Although Speer and Breker were civilians, they were issued uniforms for this special occasion.

* Most Americans must overcome emotional hysteria generated by WWII propaganda before they can engage in rational analysis.
It is worth emphasizing that while many things done by German Nazis and Italian Fascists may not have been very pretty, the extremely serious threats faced by both the German and Italian people were not very pretty either, and their motivation to find manly and decisive ways to organize themselves to handle these threats is certainly understandable, even if we might disagree with certain tactics. For example, Germany came within a hair of being taken over by hardcore Communists directly supported by Lenin and his Jewish Bolshevik gang in 1919 who had already signaled that they were prepared to conduct major GULAG Archipelago-scale liquidations. In the early 1920's most Germans were wiped out by hyperinflation. German-speaking peoples who had been ruled by fellow Germans for centuries were put under the heel of abusive aliens by the Versailles Treaty. Stalin built the largest war machine in Europe and planned to roll across Europe and exterminate tens of millions of its best people. (See Joachim Hoffman's review of Stalin’s War of Extermination: 1941 -1945, also Did Hitler Save Europe From Communism? by Jim Marrs,, 28 Nov 2011).
There is actually quite a long list of very real threats that worried the average German in the 1920's and 1930's, but there is no need to go into further details here, except to point out that Karl Marx's saying "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce" seems to now apply when we compare Nazi Germany with Zio-Nazi America. The key point behind this discussion is that with far less social stress than what the Germans ever faced in the 1920's and 1930's, Americans have allowed themselves to get hijacked into a tragi-farce police state and also into very destructive and disastrous foreign military adventures that have yanked most of the moral high ground out from under Americans in terms of ever pointing the finger at German National Socialists again. In addition, there must be something overly simplistic about their view of the world if Americans can allow themselves to get maneuvered into such a mess. I think a good starting point is to look at how WWII propaganda made German National Socialists looks like bad guys who always wear black hats, and simultaneously made the Jews out to be the good guys who always wear the white hats. I think that everything that I have laid out on this web page about Zionist skullduggery and Jewish characteristics should help the reader understand how erroneous, overly simplistic, and potentially dangerous this comic book view of the world can be.

b) Small countries like Norway and Iceland are "obsolete" and "anachronistic" in a "globalized"world.

Unfortunately vast numbers of Americans have been dog-trained by their controlled national media to think that we require some kind of all-wise, all munificent, centralized federal establishment to be the ultimate arbiter and regulator of all problems and issues at the state, county, and even small town level. In addition, they have been conditioned to think we need a similar "United Nations" establishment to manage all affairs between all nations at the international level.
Many Americans have also been conditioned to feel that through some kind of super magical process, we will see incredibly intelligent, wise, and self-restrained people get installed at these higher levels. They will put in longer hours than Santa Claus and his elves making toys before Christmas in order to wisely plan our destiny and keep us safe from terrorists hiding behind every bush. They will also help protect us from free-thinking nationalists lurking behind potted palms and other scary goblins.
I could go on, but I think the reader gets the idea. When it comes to the Federal Government and United Nations, Americans have been heavily conditioned to hold highly authoritarian and even collectivistic attitudes. Quite often, this conditioning has been very subtle. For example, I think of a painting that I have seen in a number of Sunday school classrooms that show a large ghost of Jesus standing next to the United Nations Building, billed as "the last best hope for humanity."
When we mentally switch gears and consider that in many important respects governments function much like businesses, and all the problems and issues we find in business competition also have valid analogies in international relations, suddenly the world looks very different.
I have already explained earlier on this web page how Norway is analogous to a small, entrepreneurial company in terms of the way it relates economically to other countries around the world. I also described the observation by Dr. Ralph Raico, namely that the dissolution of the western Roman Empire was good for human liberty, because the existence of many competing states made it easier for productive people to exit to a competing country if they were mistreated in their home country. This in turn created an incentive for rulers to reduce taxes and alleviate oppression and unnecessary exploitation of productive people.
One important pattern commonly found in business is that it is small companies rather than giant corporations and conglomerates that tend to produce most of the innovation and new jobs. As companies get larger, they tend to become more bureaucratic and more likely to promote managers who are more interested in playing political games to advance their careers rather than focus on productivity and quality improvements. They tend to "buy" innovation when they need it by acquiring small companies or their intellectual properties instead of originating patents in-house. They also tend to become more corrupt, whereby top executives cut corners to pay themselves bigger salaries and bonuses than they are worth, and use their corporate influence over politicians to pass legislation to shut out their competition. The famous saying by Lord Acton, namely "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely" applies in the business world as well as in government. In extreme cases large corporations become fertile ground for "psychopathic nesting" in which the most unscrupulous people rise to the top.
Once large corporations become so corrupt and dysfunctional that they trend towards bankruptcy, a common practice on Wall Street to restore efficiency and transparency is to spin off various product lines as separate companies.
Because of the special characteristics frequently offered by small companies, many large companies in an industry group find it beneficial to be surrounded by many small companies in a kind of symbiotic, ecological relationship.
The analogy with politics should be immediately obvious here: Why can't medium and large countries find it beneficial to be surrounded by small countries? Why the mania for "one world government" that abolishes all separate nations? It is like abolishing all separate retail businesses in America and forcing everyone to buy from one big state-run department store like in the old Soviet Union. It is no different when you eliminate competition and create monopolies in politics any more than in business.
The late Dr. Murray Rothbard observed in his Mises Institute lectures that a key factor for driving up wages over the long run is not the ability of unions to force up pay scales by threatening to strike. Nor is it government "stimulus" per se. The real driver involves the ability of thriving companies that are making productivity gains and product quality improvements to pay higher salaries to attract the quality people they need.
There are two other very important factors worth mentioning here, namely the enhancement of manufacturing capabilities, and the development of cohesive and productive corporate cultures. I will explain their relevance to Norway and the small country issue later, but first let me go over what I mean by each of these two factors.
Eumon Fingleton observes in his book In Praise of Hard Industries that in the long run, manufacturing industries have a vastly better capacity to continuously generate new real wealth and raise wages than any other industry, because continuous improvements in machinery that can run 24 hours a day can generate limitless productivity gains, and wages are usually a small component of total plant and equipment costs (and therefore easier to raise), whereas various types of service industries are heavily constrained by the physical limitations of humans. A corollary of this observation is that it is important to retain possession of manufacturing facilities in order to continuously tinker and improve upon them rather than lose possession of them to foreigners overseas. It is also better over the long run to nurture a skilled and stable work force at home compared to gaining a short term profit advantage by outsourcing to the lowest cost labor abroad.
Let us now address the culture issue. In Search of Excellence and other books about management methods acknowledge the need to develop a positive, cohesive, winning corporate culture to achieve success. In the McKinsey "7 S" model that covers major ingredients for successful functioning, this is called "Superordinate goals." (I provide a "7 S" diagram and additional discussion in Chapter 6).
Back in the 19th century America had a winning culture with its large WASP middle class that practiced the Protestant work ethic. The Liberal Minority Coalition described by Wilmot Robertson in The Dispossessed Majority has helped to wreck all this, and not surprisingly we are seeing the consequences as the American economy continues its tragic decline.
Now back to Norway and the small country question. As a small, relatively homogenous Nordic country, Norway retains a social culture relatively free of social strife where people can focus most of their time and attention on the creation of useful products. Since Norway generally refrains from imperialist adventures, it can devote more of its time and energy towards trying to develop products from the ground up that offer an attractive price to quality ratio that people want to buy on the free market.
In contrast, much bigger countries like the UK and U.S. spend disproportionate amounts of time engaging in overseas military adventures and intelligence operations intrigues to bully people into giving them something for nothing, rather than developing useful products that people want to buy. For example, both the UK and U.S. run Dope Inc. (see the book by Lyndon LaRouche and his staff) in which they use Mossad-CIA-MI6 to cover for opium production and distribution out out of Afghanistan and other places. As an economic activity, addictive drug use is parasitic. While drug-peddling generates enormous amounts of cash for certain special interests, the consumption of addictive drugs generally does more to tear down productive human resources in society and increase social costs through enhanced corruption than help productivity growth.
America needs to protect its white middle class, not dilute and dispossess it with illegal aliens. It needs to nurture its strategic industries and continually improve upon them rather than sell them out to foreigners. It needs to respect the need for political and economic decentralization to foster entrepreneurship and innovation. It also needs to respect these things on an international level as well, to include having a supportive attitude towards the Scandinavian countries, which have always been world leaders in entrepreneurship as well as the defense of individual liberty.
Clearly a world with many competing nations creates many additional firewalls to help prevent a dark totalitarian world from taking over, where all media is monopolized everywhere, all political parties are completely infiltrated and covertly controlled by intelligence agencies who practice "controlled opposition" and "full spectrum dominance" tactics, and everyone is micro-chipped and enslaved to psychopathic elite that gets sadistic enjoyment out of periodically abusing, assassinating, and culling out major portions of the population. The "firewalls" of national borders create bastions where people can dare to tell the truth, rather than always feel forced to only say what a master wants to hear.
Dr. Murray Rothbard once told an amusing anecdote that illustrated this point perfectly. He observed that in Communist China under Mao Tse Tung, there were no free markets which could help show how supply and demand forces set prices. In a centralized, communist command economy, prices could only be arbitrarily set by bureaucrats in the absence of a free market to convey price information. This led to huge price distortions, analogous to stories about $600 hammers in America procured by the military-industrial complex under cost-plus pricing programs for favored companies.
Then someone in Red China hit on a novel idea: why not import catalogs from Hong Kong to get a better idea regarding what things should cost? According to Rothbard, the Red Chinese actually adopted this practice. Then a joke went around that after the entire world was taken over by the Communists, they would have to leave Hong Kong alone as a free market society so that rest of the world could import their catalogs to figure out what things are supposed to cost.
Similarly, after the Rothschilds-City of London, Mossad-CIA-MI6, and other nefarious entities succeed in killing off much of the earth's population with radiation poisoning and other "soft kill" weapons, and then finish micro-chipping the rest of humanity to turn them into totally obedient robo-slaves, followed by the total control of all economic activity by a vast bureaucracy, the New World Order rulers in Jerusalem might still have to leave Norway and Iceland alone so that there will still be someone around who can provide an honest record of human history -- and provide catalogs with free-market pricing to boot.
One can argue that a major reason why America is such a mess today is because too many de facto monopolies have grown like cancers in this country. They have squeezed out honest and productive people. They have have placed most of the economic and political power in the hands of psychopaths and other criminals who are actively working against the best interests of the American people in particular, and humanity in general. These monopolies include the Jewish -controlled Federal Reserve Banking System in America and the Bank of England in the UK.
Zionists have parlayed these money machines into control over major Wall Street markets, and have also diversified their wealth into significant control over other strategic industries, to include media, pharmaceuticals, and precious metals. The monopolies also include American government as a whole, which has grown from about 5% of GDP (from the 1780's to 1861), to now comprising somewhere between 50-70% of the overall economy. Certain sub-sectors of the government have also grown extremely powerful, such as the CIA, which has bragged about being able to control any journalists of note, and which has infiltrated state governments across America (as reported by Gov. Jesse Ventura). The FBI, which routinely infiltrates and misdirects political movements on all ends of the political spectrum through its COINTELPRO operations.
The upshot of all this is that America is run largely top-down by an unholy partnership of megalomaniacal, quasi-psychotic Zionists and pompous bureaucratic careerists who think they know what is best for America, but barely have a comic book level of understanding of important economic and social issues. (Many of them sit on the new "Principals Committee" and think it is hilarious that Muammar Gaddafi and his staff got blown away under a white flag). They certainly have no capability to "think outside the box" when necessary. The American system has indeed become simply a secular version of the corrupt, imperialistic, and dysfunctional Catholic Church of the late Middle Ages combined with all the ugliness of a scatological Jewish ghetto-gutter mentality.
This helps to paint the hostility of America's power elite towards productive, successful, and less corrupt small countries like Norway in a new light. It is like the contempt that a pedophile feels for a healthy young child who feels too clean and unblemished for his dark and degenerate senses.
If North America itself had more independent states, this would increase the margin of safety in favor of the preservation of free speech and productivity. It would reduce the power base of the aforementioned anti-small state macro-social pedophiles. It would also diminish the influence of global depopulation lunatics and mass microchip enslavement aficionados.
The problem is not that we have small countries like Norway and Iceland in this world, but rather that we don't have enough of them. We absolutely need more forms of decentralized economic and political power around our planet to help restore sanity and accountability.

c) "Homogeneity" in a white (particularly a Nordic) country is somehow reprehensibly "racist," economically "irrational," and disruptive to a harmonious, global order

Unfortunately many Americans have been pre-programmed by Jewish media to immediately interpret this question from some very nasty and misleading viewpoints. I have already described in the first section how many Americans have been dog-trained by controlled media to falsely link anything that is "pro-white" or "Nordic" with something that is reprehensibly "pro-Nazi."
One very tragic reason for this is that most white Americans are the product of a melting pot society that has completely severed its links to indigenous Europe cultures. On a deep cultural and ethnic level many of them have become like mongrels -- rootless white trash -- so gullible and brainwashed that they are willing to fight and die for a highly criminal people like the Jews before they would stand up for the survival of their very own people!
Worse yet, many white Americans such as German-Americans, Italian Americans, Russian Americans, and English Americans may be filled with unfairly negative feelings towards the land of their ancestors as a consequence of anti-Russian propaganda during the Cold War, anti-German and anti-Italian propaganda during World War II, and anti-British propaganda during the War of 1812 and American War for Independence.
These misguided Americans are like kids raised in an orphanage without any knowledge of their real parents who do not understand what it is like to be raised in a stable family with loving parents and real relatives and real ancestors. In this sense, most white Americans are "ethnic orphans." Like real orphans at places like Boys Town, Nebraska who can easily become prey to pedophile rings, some of which have been run by government agencies like the CIA (see The Franklin Cover-up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska by John W. deCamp), Americans are often victims of what I call "serial macro-social pedophiles" like the Zionist neocons portrayed in The High Priests of War by Mike Piper.
These serial macro social pedophiles take idealistic but rootless and naive Americans and use them up in misbegotten wars for Israel around the world that actually work against legitimate American national interests. We also see macro-social pedophilia at work inside the U.S. by Jewish organizations like the ADL, who are always trying to find ever more ingenuous ways to sodomize free speech in America (see my Rev. Ted Pike archive).
Often the ADL will identify an area of the United States such as northern Idaho which it feels is "too white" and start to run a campaign to aggressively introduce nonwhites into the area, whether it is good for the local community or not. They wish to obliterate any sense of white heritage or cohesion, just like a sexual pedophile seeks to traumatize an unblemished little child. ADL campaigns typically include creating agents provocateurs such as phony pro-white activists who act in a very unattractive manner to discredit their position in public debate.
In my parasitism article that covers Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology, I discuss the research by the French author Herve Ryssen, French author of The Mirror of Judaism, The Jewish Fanatic, the Jewish Mafia, The Psychoanalysis of Judaism, and the online article "The Psychopathology of Judaism." According to Ryssen, Jewish communities have a high rate of sexual pedophilia and incest as well as homosexuality. When we combine all of this with their Neanderthal-level of ethnic-genetic distance, we should not be terribly surprised when Jews act out their dark and twisted impulses on a macro-social level against white communities in Idaho and elsewhere across America.
A major reason why a "serial macro social pedophile" like the ADL is often able to get away with these outrageously criminal tactics is because most white Americans are "ethnic orphans" and do not have a strong enough ethnic identity to want to stand up for anything, but instead remain passive "sheeple" and even gullibly believe that actively destroying Western Civilization with "diversity" is a good thing. I am reminded of the famous quip by the Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev: "The Americans? Why, you spit in their faces and they think it's dew."
A very effective approach to address the multi-racial, multicultural issue, even for brain-dead American ethnic orphans, is to simply appeal for consistent standards across all racial and ethnic groups. Generally, virtually all racial, ethnic, and tribal groups throughout history have felt that they have a right to survive as a distinct entity. Most people want to be able to determine their own destiny, and preserve their own culture. Therefore, if Europeans are willing to acknowledge the right of Third World peoples to have their countries, why can't Europeans ask for the same thing for themselves in return?
Interestingly enough, Dr. David Duke claims that he successfully used this approach when he was invited to speak in an Arab country on the Saudi Arabian peninsula. When asked why he opposed Muslim integration into Europe, Duke asked a rhetorical question. If Muslims resent having Europeans colonize their countries in the Middle East, alter their cultures, and meddle in their internal affairs in other ways, why shouldn't Europeans feel the same way about Muslim immigration into their own countries? Dr. Duke claims that his Muslim audience seemed to nod in agreement with him.
There is another important approach that helps clarify this issue without appearing to be "anti-" any particular racial or ethnic group, or demand reciprocity. It is more inwardly focused. I call it the "paleo-diet" approach, which is based on the concept that an important component of a truly healthy diet is anchored on the kind of diet that ones ancestors became adapted to over a period of thousands of years. This may vary with different peoples. For example, in ancient times if one was a Polynesian and one could not stomach poi (made from taro), one could be in very serious trouble, because on many long voyages poi was all Polynesians had outside of catching fish, and on many islands taro was the main staple. It is easy to see how people who could not stomach poi and fish would either tend to select themselves out by not going on long voyages in the first place, or else suffer various forms of adverse Darwinian selection in areas where eating taro was a necessity. Not surprisingly, native Hawaiians tend to have a greater appetite for poi than most other people.
In my own case, I can drink milk like it is water and eat fish at any time of day. I view that as an indicator of Norwegian ancestry, because in many parts of Norway fish and cows are the primary food sources. I have encountered a number of fellow whites who are allergic to milk, immediately get seasick and want to throw up the moment they are in small boat that starts to rock, and intensely dislike the smell of fish odors that I find pleasing. They cannot fathom why I never get seasick when tossed about on a violent ocean and am happy to eat fish for for breakfast and lunch and dinner. Maybe I am some kind of northern European X-man mutant, or else maybe they are the ones who are strange, or whatever. The point is that the "paleo-diet" that works for me is different than the one that works for them, and I also think there are distinct differences in social-interactive-cognitive tastes as well as taste buds, that cause a person like myself to function better in a different kind of society than the kind of society that is preferred by these other whites.
Human behavior is both genetic as well as environmental, and we learn from sociobiology that genetically-based traits apply on a group level as well as an individual level (as one example, I discuss the evolution of group-level "altruism" in my environmental vs. genetics article). Sometimes groups can acquire temperamental traits that are not necessarily "logical," but instead reflect quirks in the evolutionary selective process. It is very common to see these kinds of evolutionary quirks in the animal world. For example bats, which are ordinarily reasonably strong fliers, have to drop off a cliff edge or a branch in order to take off and cannot get airborne off a flat floor, but instead flop around. Similarly, Panda bears require an environment that closely mimics their natural environment, to include bamboo shoots, or else their fertility rate in captivity plummets. Also as another example, bees are normally pretty good about hovering about like a helicopter, however, when placed inside a thimble with an open top, they simply cannot get out.
Similarly, let us consider how Norwegians and other Nordic peoples have evolved in a unique environment involving a dispersed homogenous tribal society with a coherent folk culture and a focus on technological adaptation in a continuing war with nature under extreme quasi-Arctic conditions. This description of the original evolutionary environment for Norwegians alone, utilizing the paleo-diet concept, should provide a good clue about where "baseline functioning" for Norwegian society lies. Conversely, we might expect that when we depart from this evolutionary baseline, for example insert Norwegians into a "New Babylon" urban jungle like New York City where they are surrounded by ferociously psychopathic Jews and dogmatic Catholic mafia (like Rudy Giuliani and Richard Daley) and leftist Democratic Party/pro-New World Order Negro "yes men" (like Obama and Holder) and miscellaneous other "diversity pets" of "serial macro-social pedophiles," we start to "pull on a rubber band," or even worse, Norwegians may even begin to experience various forms of social dysfunction reminiscent of bats on floors, bees in thimbles, and Panda bears in zoos in the face of such an alien environment.
I have had quite of experience interacting with Scandinavians and other groups (to include Catholics and Jews) in dense urban environments, and it is clear to me that Nordics must have a clear understanding of their own innate characteristics as well as those of alien peoples, and on top of this develop and consciously adhere to a realistic action plan or else they and other types of WASPs will inevitably tend to get squeezed out over time, just as they have been squeezed out in the U.S. and UK.
The punchline behind this phenomenon is that it is ultimately not "logical" or "ideological" in nature. Instead, it is primarily evolutionary, sociobiological, and genetic in origin. I am convinced that the only way that Scandinavian peoples like the Swedes, Norwegians, and Icelanders can survive as a people over the long run, and not be infiltrated and completely taken over and corrupted by aliens, is to maintain a homogenous Nordic society on their own territory and retain an indigenous tribal culture. This is just the way it is -- "the facts of life."
Last, but not least, I have developed another approach which supports my paleoconservative leanings in defense of the existence of small ethnostates and also in defiance of the multiracial, unipolar, New World Order. This consists of a thought experiment, and based upon my audience tests so far, it seems to work pretty well to help people understand the logic of this position. It goes as follows:
Imagine that in the early 20th century, some conqueror had rolled over Europe and retained adequate military force everywhere to enforce his wildest whims. Imagine if he believed that ethnic nationalism was a thing of the past, and therefore commenced a forceful deportation program in which over 90% of the indigenous inhabitants of every European city would be spread out over all the other countries, so that no European city would have a dominant ethnic population anymore. Imagine if he also erased all European borders and established pure free trade. Imagine that he also completely controlled all media and brainwashed most people to believe that multi-racialism and multiculturalism are the wave of the future, and people should focus all their efforts on making money without concern for the social ramifications. His government, as the central authority over all of Europe, claims that only it can preserve individual rights and promote perfect equality between all European ethnic groups and individuals and combat all forms of "racism" and "xenophobia."
What we would have here, in essence, is a leftist, top down, "Neo-Jacobin" government. (Please note how I categorize "environmental top down Neo-Jacobin ideology" on the ideology map in the Introduction to my "Reconciling Ideologies" series). Let us imagine as well that this leader was able to implement his policies for about 30 years, or however long it takes to see their impact. What might we expect the long term outcome to be? I would suggest the following:
a) Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Therefore I would expect the central government and media monopoly to become very corrupt over time, heavily geared towards meeting the needs to the supreme leader and his inner circle, and increasingly decoupled from the needs of common people.
b) Since the supreme value is now to make money, and the ethnic pride of every European group has been crushed or suppressed, I would expect that values across Europe would shift towards immediate gratification and speculative gain rather than prudent long term investment.
c) Once people become materialistic and rootless beyond a certain point, they can no longer effectively unite to assert traditional values and serve as counterpredators against criminal predators. Since Jews are better adapted for this kind of environment than any other group, I would expect them and similar groups rich in psychopathic traits to start rising to the top. This will then enter Europe into whole new levels of vicious corruption, where power elites will start routinely engaging in assassinations, massive financial system theft, false flag operations, and other forms of extremely selfish, deceitful, and destructive competition. In addition, since few people retain core ethnic loyalties, business leaders will start importing Third World peoples as low cost labor, causing racial and ethnic strife to skyrocket.
d) At some point the ratio of parasitic, rent-seeking, petty, mean, vicious people to altruistic and productive people will rise to a tipping point where it becomes obvious that Europe has become terminally decadent and dysfunctional. The complete process for this to happen might take much longer than 30 years, but let us say for the sake of argument that trend towards terminal decadence becomes obvious in about 30 years.
A society that is in terminal decadence is no longer able to effectively organize itself and handle major threats. Such a society can no longer resist accelerating Third Word immigration that threatens to completely swamp all original white ethnic groups. No one can stop ever-rising levels of corruption that make it increasingly difficult to do business in a stable environment.
Imagine in our hypothetical scenario that we begin to see unmistakable signs that Europe as a whole is slipping into terminal decadence. Moral disorder and infectious greed is taking over everywhere. The White birthrate has plummeted, whites are being replaced by Third World peoples everywhere, and many areas of Europe are now taking on Third World characteristics.
Imagine that there are still some remnants of the old Europe that live in their own "ethnic neighborhoods" around Europe, however, thanks to a "melting pot" ethic promoted by the supreme leader that entourages intermarriage, these groups have been disintegrating over time, although it may not be too late to reconstitute most of them.
Now, at this point in our hypothetical scenario, imagine that the supreme leader suddenly dies and you, dear reader, are just as suddenly installed in his place. What are the most obvious first steps that come to your mind to sort out and reverse the slide towards terminal decadence and white obliteration?
The most obvious solution to me to sort out this mess is to try to repatriate the scattered ethnic groups and restore the old nation states of Europe, and simultaneously try to decentralize political and media power down to the nation state level. Admittedly, it will take time to rebuild racial, ethnic, and national identity and pride, but every other course of action seems to be worse.
Once nation states are rehabilitated, people will feel motivated to think in broader social terms besides making quick money for themselves. The will also be interested in investing in intangibles such as maintaining a coherent indigenous folk culture that supports the survival of their own people over the long term.
The new competition between different countries will break the old centralized European governmental monopoly, and reduce the level of corruption that the unitary executive brought with him. More competition between different corporations in different countries will also reduce the abusiveness of top managers, since it is now easier for them to lose talented employees to their competition.
If the reader agrees so far with the general thrust of this thought experiment, I will now throw in a punchline that relates to the history of the United States. Isn't it fair to say that even though European immigrant groups voluntarily scattered themselves across North America in the 19th century while under the sway of "melting pot" ideology, the net effect has been the same as if it had been done by coercion, as in our thought experiment?
Isn't it fair to say that the "War to Save the Union" waged in the name of protecting liberal ideals has had the same long term net effect as if America had been conquered and consolidated by a foreign invader? Isn't it also fair to say that ever since 1861, the federal government has gone in the exact opposite philosophical direction compared to decentralization methods that would work for our hypothetical scenario involving a conquered and forcefully integrated Europe -- or to use a corporate analogy -- would be needed to restore honesty, transparency, and productivity in a bloated and corrupt large corporation?
Dr. Murray Rothbard made the point in his Mises Institute lectures that in the name of "saving the Union" -- at all costs -- more lives were expended between 1861-1865 than if America had remained highly decentralized under the Articles of Confederation. Then we might expect only relatively small brush fire wars to break out on a decentralized level between fully sovereign states, costing nowhere near as much in aggregate as the lives that were lost and the destruction that was wrought during the War of Northern Aggression Against Southern Independence.
In addition, in the process of "saving the Union," and hence creating a centralized multi-racial, multi-cultural, imperial New Babylon society, we have gained a totally corrupt Jewish plutocracy in America that is completely decoupled from the values of America's original WASP founding stock. This alien power elite thinks that it has a divine right to rule by whatever means necessary. This includes creating and playing off false divisions against each other in American society, neutering legitimate grass roots political movements with COINTELPRO-type infiltration programs, and running false flag attacks to keep Americans distracted with phony enemies and phony wars. After all, "war is the health of the state" and it is also the health of the alien-dominated, neo-Jacobin empire.
If we wish to rebuild nationalist decentralization in North America, why should we ignore time-proven ethnic, racial, and religious fault lines here any more than if we try to rebuild ethnostates in Europe?
Interesting enough, not only are the Norwegians and other Scandinavians among the most prosperous peoples in Europe, but we also see a similar pattern here in America. North Dakota, which has the largest percentage of Norwegian Americans of all states, combined with a large percentage of German Americans, is one of the most economically prosperous and stable states in America, with the most rational and self-disciplined state banking system. It has been hurt the least by the current economic downturn.
It is worth making an aside regarding German-Americans. America's original German immigrants, misnamed "Pennsylvania Dutch" (a corruption of "Pennsylvania Deutsch") were Rhine West bank Lutherans. They came from the most Nordic part of Germany, and among other things that demonstrated their superior craftsmanship and engineering skills, contributed the "Pennsylvania Rifle" (later renamed the "Kentucky Rifle") that played a key role for Patriot side during many important battles of the War of Independence. A prime example was the Battle of King's Mountain. (The "Pennsylvania rifle" had twice the effective range of the "Brown Bess" standard army issue musket of the British army, but took twice as long to reload. Hence, it was best used to pick off enemy soldiers at stand off range without necessarily closing in on them). I do not know about the Nordic component of German-Americans in North Dakota, but I do know that historically Norwegian Americans get along well with German Americans in places like Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and North Dakota -- and without running any of Glen Beck's Hitler Youth camps either!
Isn't it interesting that the state in America with the highest percentage of Nordics and other WASPs, and the lowest percentage of southern European Catholics and Jews, and with the fewest nonwhites, would be the most prosperous? (How long this situation will last is up for question, depending on how long it will take before the U.S. breaks apart and reorganizes itself, vs. the rate in which the ADL and various U.S. government agencies and misguided Christian organizations subject North Dakota to their serial macro-social pedophilia. Given that the dollar is headed for zero, and radioactive contamination is building up in America's breadbasket, things are probably going to come to a head sooner than most people imagine).
Isn't it interesting that Zionist leaders, whose society in Israel is rated as more corrupt than virtually any European country, and who are forever in need of massive foreign aid, insist on calling the shots in America? They install people like Panetta and Napolitano into high positions whose ancestors come from parts of Europe that are considered the next most corrupt and dysfunctional after Israel.
Meanwhile, Norwegian Americans like myself, whose ancestors have the best track record for honesty, productivity, and stability, are marginalized. What does that tell you about the power structure in America today, and America's totally upside down national priorities, where bank robbers like Jewish Goldman Sachs run the banking system, and people who do not care about incapacitating 55% of American soldiers with depleted uranium -- or importing drugs from Afghanistan and Columbia -- or waging wars for the exclusive benefit of Israel and the heavily Mossad-connected military industrial complex and the Jewish "blood bankers" -- and who maintain open borders with Mexico -- all these kinds of people openly run our "national defense" instead!
If everything that I have said is correct, then all of this then leads to another important question. What kind of people would try to use false flag terror on a people like the Norwegians, and on top of this cram multi-racialism and multiculturalism down their throats, knowing full well that in the long run this means anti-Nordic genocide, while at the same time demanding homogeneity and exclusivity for their own people -- in Israel?
I leave it to the reader to come up with his or her own answer, which at this point should be obvious.


Miscellaneous References

2007-06-12 From Hiroshima to Iraq, 61 years of uranium wars, A suicidal, genocidal, omnicidal course by Leuren Moret,, previously published San Francisco Bay View 26 December 2006.

...The end game

Behind all of the civil wars, big wars and small wars in the past 60 years are special interests in Britain and the U.S. Henry Kissinger’s fingerprints are all over the depopulation program and the use of depleted uranium. Kissinger was recruited from academia by the Rockefellers, but his real master is Jacob Rothschild and the London Money Power.

The ultimate goal of the global ruling elite is to strip the economic resources of nations and gain total control of the world’s wealth while reducing the global community to the elite fascist capitalists’ and communists’ original concept of communism: a one-class system of dumbed down slave workers. This has been a stated goal of the ruling elite for several hundred years, even before the global population had increased to the modern levels that are causing concern. [Editor's Note: This also includes Nordic societies as well as Third World peoples because of their long histories of sustaining relatively large middle classes of armed free men. This makes them a threat to the pyramidal, Asiatic-despotic social model that tyrannical globalists seek to fasten on all of mankind. For more on the "gorilla-gangster," neo-feudal, pyramidal social model being planned for "citizens of the world" by master criminals like Kissinger and the Rothschilds, please see Chapter 5 Profiling the Opposing Forces Commander, “Circle B,” and His Kosher Handlers, “Circle Z” in my Mission of Conscience series].

Here is a statement by David Rockefeller, chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations from 1970 to 1985: “Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”36

Modern agricultural technologies imposed by the IMF and the World Bank have actually decreased food production in regions where ancient indigenous agricultural technologies produced 10 times more food, such as around Lake Titicaca, in Peru and Bolivia. The “population explosion” is an excuse for intentional depopulation and massive genocide by ruling elites and it is now rapidly being implemented on a scale that is unprecedented.

Since 1991, in Iraq, Yugoslavia and Afghanistan, the U.S. and its British military partner have looted and bombed the cultural relics of those countries into radioactive rubble, destroying families and erasing the collective memory and expression of ancient cultures and civilizations. The looting of the Baghdad Museum was planned in the Pentagon in January 2003 with the same antiquities dealers who looted the Nazi collections after WW II. The destruction of national identity is also part of “the plan.”

“To achieve one-world government,” said Brock Chisholm, former director of the U.N. World Health Organization, “it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, their loyalty to family traditions and national identification.”

The ultimate elite fascist capitalists’ and communists’ dream is underway, and the citizens of the world are the real target of the “war on terrorism” at local, regional and global levels. The purpose of this war is to bring about a global authoritarian state. Genocidal programs are now being carried out globally through any methods possible and extend to a scale of mass human genocide.

The ultimate war crime is omnicide, which has changed the genome of all living things on Earth. The genome of all living things, which evolved over 4.5 billion years, has been changed irreversibly in less than a century. The ruling elites have made this decision for all of us. This is a game where everyone loses … on the Queen’s Death Star...


Viking Prayer -- 13th Warrior

Lo there do I see my father.
Lo there do I see my mother and my sisters and my brothers.
Lo there do I see the line of my people back to the beginning.
Lo, they do call to me.
They bid me take my place among them,
n the halls of Valhalla,
Where the brave, they live forever.


Followed by the final battle between the Vikings and the Wendel.


Norsemen in Vinland reenactment at the Centennial Pageant,
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1925, photo taken from
The Promise of America by Dr. Odd S. Lovoll

The America First Institute

Please visit our donation page
and support our cause



Short URL for this web page:

The Cowpens Flag, one of many circular star patterns used by "American Whigs" (or "Patriots")