INTRODUCTION
Intertwined Realities —
Jews, Israel, Money & Power:
Taboo Topics in our Modern World
Writing,
as he was, from a German perspective in 1879, at a time when Germany
was consolidating as a nation, Wilhelm Marr — who loudly dared
to challenge Jewish financial power (and who is often credited with
coining the term “anti-Semitism”) — predicted
Jewish finance would reign supreme in his native land, but at great
cost.
Yes,
Jewry shall raise Germany to a world power and make it the new
Palestine of Europe. It won’t come about by violent revolution
but by the voice of the people itself, as soon as German society
has reached that highest level of social bankruptcy and perplexity
toward which we are rushing headlong.
Don’t
blame Jewry for this . . . Our Germanic element has shown itself
culturally and historically powerless, incapable of achievement,
before alien domination.
This
is a fact, a raw, pitiless fact.
Marr
charged that the Jewish-controlled media in Germany impacted upon
all aspects of society: “State, church, Catholicism, Protestantism,
credo, and dogma must bow before the Jewish Areopagus, the daily
press,” he said. (And it is indeed interesting that even then
— as Marr noted — there was a growing concern with Jewish
influence over “the daily press.”)
And
just as Marr predicted, there did indeed arise a state of bankruptcy
and decay within Germany in the years following World War I, and
Jewry did rise to a preeminent position in Germany, more so than
ever before.
However,
of course, there was, in 1933, a popular revolution in Germany,
through the ballot box, that led to the rise of Adolf Hitler and
the National Socialist GermanWorkers Party and this resulted in
the diminution of Jewish influence in Germany where the Jewish powers
had reigned supreme. Germany was no longer, as Marr had said, “the
new Palestine.”
In
truth, of course,we now see the situation in America today being
akin to the situation in Germany prior to the German Revolution
of 1933. America’s economy is in a shambles, with Wall Street
pirates — many of them, even perhaps most of them, Jewish
— having brought the nation to the brink of bankruptcy, even
as an American president — GeorgeW. Bush — decimated
the nation’s treasure (and the blood of its youth) in pursuit
of wars demanded by the Jewish lobby. Yet, the Jewish power interests
— all acting in the sphere of influence of the Rothschild
Empire — do continue to hold sway over the course of American
affairs.
38 |
MICHAEL
COLLINS PIPER |
__________________________________________________________ |
Professor
Norman Cantor — a respected Jewish scholar — encapsulated
the immense power of the Jews in America today. In his controversial
book, The Sacred Chain, widely criticized for its candor,
Cantor wrote:
Jews
in the four decades after 1940 came home in American society to
suburban comfort, to penetration of academia and the privileged
bastions of the learned professions, to corporate business, to
politics and government and controlling levels of the media. Jews
were over-represented in the learned professions by a factor of
five or six.
In
1994 Jews were only three percent of the American population but
their impact was equivalent to an ethnic group comprising twenty
percent of the population.
Nothing
in Jewish history equaled this degree of Jewish accession to power,
wealth and prominence.
Not
in Muslim Spain, not in early 20th century Germany, not in Israel
itself, because there were no comparable levels of wealth and
power on a world-class scale in that small country to attain.
Cantor
concluded: “The Morgans, the Rockefellers, the Harrimans,
the Roosevelts, the Kennedys, the titans of bygone eras, they have
been superseded by the Jew as flawless achiever . . . .”
As
such, it has become an open secret in our world today that there
is a 300 pound gorilla in the room — the role of the Organized
Jewish Community — generally, though not always correctly,
known as “the Zionist movement” — that is a preeminent
power in our modern society, not only in the United States but in
most of theWest and elsewhere across the planet.
The
Jewish Power Interests have achieved a premier position in the United
States today and now (and not necessarily as a consequence, perhaps
in spite of, Jewish influence) the United States stands as virtually
the most powerful nation on the face of the earth, perhaps rivaled
only — in all reality — by Israel itself. So it is that
the American Jewish community has become the unrivaled elite in
the United States today. We may call them “the new elite.”
They are those who reign supreme.
It
must always be borne in mind, however, that the foremost influence
within the Jewish community has been, for several hundred years,
the European based Rothschild Empire. This dynasty has extended
its tentacles onto American soil, to the extent that, today, there
are wealthy and powerful Jewish families and financial interests
operating in the sphere of the Rothschilds who are substantial in
and of themselves. However, ultimately, the roots of this Jewish
power network in America goes back to the Rothschild family of Europe
which had established itself as the premier
JEWS, ISRAEL,
MONEY & POWER |
39 |
___________________________________________________________ |
banking concern directing global affairs through their influence
in such nations as France, Germany, Italy, Austria, and, of course,
England.
In
our modern era and in times preceding us, many people sometimes
described as “anti-Semites” have been heard to use the
term “the Jews” in discussing various aspects of American
and international affairs, both relating to domestic matters and
to the conduct of the various foreign policies of the nation states.
However, it would be incorrect to say that the use of the term “the
Jews” refers, in fact, to all people of the Jewish faith.
In
fact, many of those persons who use the term “the Jews”
often use that term in reference to the conduct, or perhaps we should
say “misconduct,” of the state of Israel or those Jews
inAmerica and elsewhere who lend their support to Israel.
Yet,
there is another aspect in regard to the use of that term“the
Jews” that is also perhaps even more preeminent. And again
the use of the term does not refer to all Jewish people, whether
in Israel or elsewhere.
No,
instead, the use of that term “the Jews” in a loose
and perhaps general sense, in this regard, actually refers to the
International Money Power. And this International Money Power, which
has a definitive Jewish aspect to its nature, stems from the intrigues
and machinations of a global banking dynasty, the Rothschild Empire,
whose tentacles span the globe.
In
turn, we find that — through the ages — there was a
long-standing Jewish dream for the establishment of a global order
— a new imperium — a New World Order, if you will. And
at the top of that New World Order pyramid we find the name Rothschild.
The House of Rothschild and its empire are the foundation for that
New World Order.
There
were many Jewish bankers and Jewish usurers in those many years
that preceded the rise of the Rothschild Empire at the end of the
18th Century, but it was not until the rise of the Rothschild dynasty
that this International Money Power emerged as the force that it
did evolve to be.
There
were Jewish bankers and usurers, active in many places throughout
Western Civilization and reaching into the Middle East, Africa,
Asia and Latin America — but it was not until the rise of
the Rothschild dynasty that this power achieved a unity it had never
seen before.
And,
in fact, it might be said — quite correctly — that the
rise of the Rothschilds set in place a “royal family”
of international Jewry, indeed a royal family of international finance.
And
in the years, decades, centuries that followed, the Rothschild fortune,
popularly known in Europe as “The Fortune,” did become
a central force in the international conduct of monetary policy
and, as a consequence, in the conduct of the international policies
of the various nation states, the various royal families and even
indeed the various “democracies” that were in place
and which evolved during that time frame in which the Rothschild
40 |
MICHAEL
COLLINS PIPER |
__________________________________________________________ |
Empire remained a constant, ever-present force
operating, not just behind the scenes, but quite overtly in its
influence upon the governments and peoples, not only in the “civilized”
world, but, ultimately, throughout the entire world as the British
Empire — in particular — reached across the globe with,
in many respects, the British Foreign Office a virtual arm of the
Rothschild dynasty.
Likewise
in other European nations — rivals to Britain — they
began to extend their reach onto other continents. The various branches
of the Rothschild family in Vienna, Paris, Frankfurt, Naples, along
with satellite influences in Hong Kong, Shanghai, even in Australia,
began to flex their power.
Thus,
in this respect, the term “the Jews” has often been
applied to the International Money Power and this International
Money Power, for a combination of reasons — religious, philosophical,
economic, all combined together in a geopolitical force —
did indeed lay the groundwork for what is popularly known today
as “The NewWorld Order.”
This
New World Order — which revolves around the operations of
the Rothschild Empire as it has instituted itself as a predatory
force within the affairs of the nations, most especially today the
United States — has, in fact, been intertwined with long-standing
Jewish philosophy going back to the days of the Babylonian Talmud
which is the guiding force behind Jewish religious thinking today.
So in this respect we do have before us a New Babylon.
Ultimately
it is not a coincidence that the charge of “anti-Semitism”
is leveled at individuals and institutions that have dared to raise
criticisms of the role of the International Money Power in world
affairs, even those that have not specifically referenced its Jewish
influences and antecedents. This has been a common phenomenon over
the centuries.
In
more recent times those who have dared, for example, to criticize
the privately-owned and controlled money monopoly known as the Federal
Reserve System — which, in fact, as we shall see, was a creation
of Rothschild-connected international banking forces operating on
American soil — have, at the very least, been “suspected”
of anti-Semitism or perceived to be “potential” anti-Semites,
by daring even to raise the issue of the propriety of the existence
of this system. Any discussion of the International Money Power,
any discussion of what is referred to as “the NewWorld Order,”
is considered “anti-Semitism” or potential “anti-Semitism”
precisely because any discussion of or research into these topics,
if carried out to its ultimate conclusion, would point in the direction
of the Rothschild family, the princes of the Jewish world elite.
In
1777, Maria Theresa, the Empress of Austria, said, “I know
of no more troublesome pest to the State than that nation which
brings people to a state of poverty by fraud, usury and financial
contracts, and which carries out all kinds of evil practices which
an honorable man would abominate.”
JEWS, ISRAEL,
MONEY & POWER |
41 |
___________________________________________________________ |
The
nature of this plutocratic edifice, its predatory structure, was
pinpointed in a provocative and detailed report issued by the German
government in 1940, a study which focused on the Rothschild (and
before that, primarily Jewish) financial stranglehold over the British
Empire. Entitled How Jewry Turned England into a Plutocratic
State,” the study asserted:
By
plutocracy one understands a form of government in which the election
of its members rest upon their possessing wealth. The word plutocracy
is derived from the Greek roots = riches and kratein = to rule.
Plutocracy therefore means: the rule of moneypower, or more freely
expressed: the government of Jewish gold.
The
historical example of a state ruled by riches and possession is
Carthage, in which the Jewish element was also represented. It
was governed by the rich merchants, who were represented by a
kind of “lower house” named “the Council of
the Three Hundred” and a “upper house” named
“the Council of the Thirty”. The people were barred
from exercising any influence on the government.
For
Jewry plutocracy is the most suitable form of government. Through
plutocracy the immense Jewish capitalism, without respect to the
number of Jews represented, of necessity procures a governing,
political position, for a plutocratic state, as history teaches
us, a small Jewish clique can dictate to a great state, if it
is in possession of the necessary amount of capital.
The
recognition of this plutocracy, in many respects, came to be what
many critics referred to as “the Jewish Problem,” resulting
in the rise of anti- Jewish feelings that even many Jewish writers
themselves, in turn, likewise referred to as “the Jewish Problem.”
And it is a problem that remains to this day — as even Jewish
writers have repeatedly acknowledged.
Pope
Clement VIII (who reigned from 1592 to 1605) said, in no uncertain
terms, “All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews,
their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate
people into a state of poverty, especially farmers [and] working
class people. . . .”
In
regard to this plutocratic domination, the words of German Jewish
industrialist and political figure Walter Rathenau (1867-1922) will
be recalled. Writing in 1909 in Vienna’s Neue Freie Presse,
Rathenau said: “Three hundred men, all of whom know one another,
guide the economic destinies of the continent and seek their successors
among their followers.”
Although
apologists have claimed that in this provocative statement Rathenau
did not suggest that those 300 were Jews or that they ruled over
the heads of the national governments, nonetheless he did say what
he said. Theodore Fritsch, the German writer who was well known
for his criti-
42 |
MICHAEL
COLLINS PIPER |
__________________________________________________________ |
cisms of Jewish power and who was the author of the best-selling
work, Handbook of the Jewish Question, reflected upon Rathenau’s
remarks. Fritsch noted in his 1922 essay, "The Desperate Act
of a Desperate People” (which, in fact, was written upon the
assassination of Rathenau) that Rathenau’s words were “a
remarkable avowal” that had not been fully understand in all
of its consequences. Fritsch assessed the matter:
From
the consequences in which it was said, it was clear that [Rathenau]
was not talking about ruling princes and statesmen but rather
a power group standing outside government which possesses the
means to enforce its will upon the world, including the governments.
Furthermore, since he spoke of the naming of successors, it is
obvious that there is a firmly structured organization operating
according to definite principles and a division of offices and
systematically pursuing its goals.
This,
said Fritsch,“substantiates nothing less than the fact that
a closed society, a shadow government or a super government, has
existed for a long time and that it directs economic and political
events over the heads of nations and governments.”
What
was the source of this shadow government, asked Fritsch? He provided
the answer: “Jewish high finance and its paid lackeys, allied
and spread throughout the entire world.”
Fritsch
pointed out that many people failed to draw proper conclusions from
the facts put forth by Rathenau. Reflecting upon the destructive
tragedy ofWorld War I, Fritsch said:
If
the 300 men of the secret world government directed the destiny
of the world, what was [that] world war all about? Would the 300
have been unable to prevent it? Since they did not prevent [the
war] they must have wanted it. If the 300 money powers made world
policy for decades, they therefore also made the world war. Perhaps
[they did so] in order finally to erect their mastery in the open
and to drive out the princes.
“It
is time,” wrote Fritsch, “that the nations finally recognize
this and bring the guilty to account.” He noted that the works
of Henry Ford, published in The International Jew, delivered
“exhaustive proof” as to how the Jewish financial interests
set the first world war in motion. Of the Jewish plutocrats, Fritsch
wrote that “He who boasts even secretly that he directs the
destiny of the world ought now to possess the courage and decency
to take the responsibility for the political events of
the world.”
JEWS, ISRAEL,
MONEY & POWER |
43 |
___________________________________________________________ |
Ironically,
Fritsch died in 1933, just at the time when his native land of Germany
began working to dismantle the power of the Rothschild Empire on
European soil, even as the groundwork was in place for the rise
of the Zionist state in the years that followed World War II, not
long afterward.
In
fact, the plutocratic elite — the Jewish aristocracy in the
whirl of the Rothschild dynasty — in fact, the Rothschilds
most especially — made the rise of political Zionism possible.
Zionism was an outgrowth of the global Imperialism that arose in
the swath of expanding plutocratic wealth and power across the planet.
The
late Palestinian-American philosopher Edward Said noted the synchronicity
between Zionism and Imperialism, writing that: “When we talk
about Zionism and Imperialism, we are talking about a family
of ideas, belonging to the same dynasty, springing out of the
same seed.” Said referred to the Zionist-Imperialist construct
(in the context of the Zionist occupation of Palestine) as “a
whole system of confinement, dispossession, exploitation and oppression
that still holds us down and denies us our inalienable rights as
human beings,” and yet the truth is that Zionist occupation
of Palestine is only but a microcosm, to speak, reflecting the Zionist
occupation of the entire globe — the establishment of the
Jewish Power Elite as the would-be arbiters of the course of world
affairs, bar none.
But
there are those who attempt to draw distinctions between the Rothschilds
and “the average Jew,” between the Zionist movement
and “the average Jew.” A popular and well-meaning refrain,
often heard as an almost ritualistic chant among a certain segment
of Americans who style themselves as “patriots” is that
“The average American Jew is just as much a victim of the
Rothschild Empire as every other American.” The “patriots”
will add further that “The average American Jew is not part
of the problem. If the average American Jew was made aware of the
intrigues of the Rothschilds, he would become as outraged as every
other American who does understand the nature of the problem.”
In
a similar vein, we often hear these same patriots assert that “Not
all Jews support Zionism.” They add that “Zionism is
not Judaism and Judaism is not Zionism.” These patriots hasten
to point out that there are groups of Jews, such as the Neturei
Karta, who actively oppose Zionism. However, referring to the Neturei
Karta, Rabbi Joseph Telushkin — a widely-read publicist for
what is very much recognized as “the” Jewish point of
view in our modern times — has said this:
Anti-Zionists
often point to the Neturei Karta as proof that one can oppose
Israel’s right to exist without being anti-Semitic. However,
pointing to the Neturei Karta to prove anything about Jewish life
is pointless.
44 |
MICHAEL
COLLINS PIPER |
__________________________________________________________ |
This
tiny group is as un-representative of Jewish views as the snake-handling
sects of West Virginia — which pass around poisonous snakes
during church services — are of Christianity.
Nor
indeed do the Neturei Karta accept the anti-Zionist contention
that the Jews are only a religion, and not a people. Furthermore,
they do believe in the right of the Jews to the land of Israel
and trust that someday God will send the Messiah — dressed
no doubt in the distinctive garb of the Neturei Karta —
to restore all the Jews there.
And
there are many American Jews who are not members of Neturei Karta
who’ve been outspoken critics of Israel and active opponents
of Zionism including several longtime friends of this author: 1)
the esteemed Dr. Alfred Lilienthal (who died at age 94 on Oct. 6,
2008); 2) the late Haviv Schieber, one of the founding fathers of
Israel and part of the Jabotinsky movement that spawned the neo-conservative
network in America today; 3) the late Jack Bernstein, author of
the widely-heralded work, The Life of an American Jew in Racist
Marxist Israel; and 4) Mark Lane, the pioneering critic of
the Warren Commission Report on the assassination of John F. Kennedy
and an unswerving advocate for civil liberties for all.
Likewise
there are other American Jews who are critics of Israel, but not
necessarily anti-Zionist per se. All of that having been
said, however, it is true that, in the bigger picture, most American
Jews — the overwhelming majority of American Jews —
have allowed themselves to be herded like sheep into the camp of
Zionism and support Israel, right or wrong.
Two
modern day Jewish writers who have obsessed on the subject of “anti-Semitism”
are Dennis Praeger and his colleague, Rabbi Joseph Telushkin. Their
book, Why the Jews? The Reason for Anti-Semitism (republished
in 2003) has said, among other things, that the Jewish claim that
they are chosen by God “to achieve the mission of bringing
the world to God and His moral law” has been a major cause
of anti-Semitism.
In
addition, they have said that the raison d’etre of
Judaism has been to change the world for the better and that this
attempt to change the world, “to challenge the gods, religious
or secular, of the societies around them, and to make moral demands
on others (even when not done expressly in the name of Judaism)
has constantly been a source of tension.”
And
it is interesting to note that Praeger and Telushkin acknowledge
that many of these “moral demands” made upon others
by Jews have not always been done “expressly in the name of
Judaism.”
(One
might conclude from this that the two are suggesting that Jews have
used “front” groups to pursue their agenda: groups and
spokesmen that are not Jewish per se but which are advocating a
Jewish agenda. The sug-
JEWS, ISRAEL,
MONEY & POWER |
45 |
___________________________________________________________ |
gestion that Jews have made “moral demands”
on others recalls, in a fashion, German politician Adolf Stoecker’s
reference, on one occasion to Jewish “pretensions of importance.”
He also reminded people of what he called the “degree of intolerance
[toward non-Jews] that will soon be unbearable” that has been
a constant phenomenon, particularly in Jewish writings.)
Praeger
and Telushkin also claim that there has been “profound envy
and hostility among many non-Jews” because of the fact that,
as the two authors proclaim, “the Jews have led higher-quality
lives than their non-Jewish neighbors in almost every society where
they have lived.”
(The
two Jewish publicists do not seem to be cognizant of the fact that
much of the criticism of the Jewish people has emerged from the
fact that the Jews have been perceived by others to have exploited
non-Jews and that this exploitation has allowed Jews to live “higher-quality
lives.”)
Another
reason for anti-Semitism, they say, is because others objected to
the way the Jews “lived by their all-encompassing set of laws”
and because “the Jews also asserted their own national identity.”
According to Praeger and Telushkin, this assertion of identity was
threatening to the nationalism of others. They add further that
“the implication of illegitimacy to everyone else’s
gods by the Jews has also caused anti-Semitism.”
This
is interesting in that the average Christian, especially in America,
would generally believe that the Jewish God is also the Christian
God, although, implicitly, the two Jewish writers are admitting
otherwise — a point that may confound many who simply do not
understand that the Christian God is most definitely NOT the Jewish
God, misunderstandings, misinformation — and Jewish-sponsored
dis-information — notwithstanding.
The
Jews, you see, want Christians to believe that they share the God
of Israel with the Jews when, in the actual Jewish view, nothing
could be further from the truth. And, in fact, the Jewish view,
at least in this respect, is quite accurate for, as informed Christians
know — and as we’ve said — the Christian
God is NOT and NEVER has been the Jewish God
It
is interesting to note that the authors also say that the Jew is
both a member of the Jewish people and the Jewish religion “and
this has been so since the beginning of Jewish history.” To
deny that nationhood is a component of Judaism, they write, is “as
untenable as to deny that God orTorah are components of Judaism.”
Praeger and Telushkin assert that “this is particularly evident
today, since Jewish nationhood is the one component of Judaism with
which both religious and committed secular Jews identify.”
The
authors do not comment on frequent assertions, appearing in Jewish
publications, that Jews are genetically or otherwise intellectually
superior to non-Jews. Preeminent examples are the much-heralded
April 2007 article “Jewish Genius” by Charles Murray
in Commentary, the voice of the American Jewish Committee,
a similar Commentary essay, entitled
46 |
MICHAEL
COLLINS PIPER |
__________________________________________________________ |
“Chosenness and Its Enemies,” published in December
of 2008, and the no holds- barred October 16, 2005 article (published
in New York magazine) entitled “Are Jews Smarter?”
which featured a quotation from Abe Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation
League who remarked, "If it's a genetic condition, it's not
for us to embrace or reject. It is what it is, and that's the way
the genetic cookie crumbles."
The
author of that last article added that she detected “a note
of pride” in Foxman’s voice in reflecting upon purported
Jewish intellectual superiority to all others, this coming from
one — Foxman — who proclaims his mission to fight theories
of racial supremacism!)
In
these pages we shall see that many preeminent Jewish writers forthrightly
express Jewish solidarity, Jewish exclusivity, Jewish chosen-ness
and even Jewish superiority and Jewish supremacy.
George
Bernard Shaw once said that it was no coincidence that the Nazis
— in promoting what was described (although not necessarily
correctly) as a theme of “racial superiority” —
were echoing the Jewish doctrine of a “chosen” people.
In that same vein, in 1971, Religion in Life, a liberal
Methodist journal, said “It is not surprising that Hitler
retaliated against the chosen race by decreeing that it was not
the Jewish, but the Aryan race, that was chosen.”
This
assertion of Judaism and Jewish identity as outlined by these Jewish
writers — who do reflect the modern-day Jewish outlook toward
the world — runs counter to the grand theme of well-wishers
who hoped to bring the Jewish people into the community of nations
and to assimilate them into each of the nations in which they lived
as a people.
Count
Stanislaus de Clermont-Tonnerre expressed this humanitarian outlook
(that the Jews — as a group — reject) when he said in
1789 in the French national assembly — during the debate over
the question of whether to grant Jews equal rights — that
“the Jews should be denied everything as a nation, but granted
everything as individuals. . . .There cannot be one nation within
another nation.”
The
aforementioned respected Jewish advocates, Praeger and Telushkin
complain that such an attitude toward the Jews was essentially this:
“To be equal to non-Jews, the Jews would have to abandon their
Jewish national identity; that was the price of emancipation.”
And so it is that the Jews reject assimilation and continue to insist
they are “God’s Chosen People” standing above
all others.
Praeger
and Telushkin addressed the question as to how American Jews would
react if war broke out between the modern state of Israel and the
United States. They make the extraordinary assertion that it is
a “fact” that “democracies do not go to war against
one another,” and that the only way in which the U.S. and
Israel could find themselves at war with one another
JEWS, ISRAEL,
MONEY & POWER |
47 |
___________________________________________________________ |
would be if either country “abandoned its democratic and other
moral principles.” This, in itself, is interesting inasmuch
as there are those who (rightly) question whether or not the two
countries do indeed follow “democratic and other moral principles.”
However,
in any event, Praeger and Telushkin say that if Israel and the United
States did find themselves at war, an individual — whether
Jew, Christian or atheist — “would be obligated to follow
the dictates of his moral values which are (or should be) higher
than all governments. Loyalty to any country should never mean supporting
the country’s policies when they are morally wrong.”
In
a sense, then, it is possible — by their judgment (representing
the mainstream of Jewish thinking today) — that American Jews
could oppose the United States if they believed that U.S. policies
toward Israel under some particular circumstance could be “morally
wrong.”
While
polls taken within the American Jewish community suggest there are
those who find problems with many of Israel’s actions —
domestically and internationally — many of these same people
will admit, when pushed to the wall, that they would find it difficult
to take up arms against Israel if Israel were perceived to be a
threat in some way to the United States.
Now,
of course, the average response from the organized Jewish community
in the United States is to say that there would “never”
be any instance where Israel would stand in opposition to the United
States because, after all, despite the occasional differences between
the United States and Israel — or so they say — Israel
and the United States are steadfast friends. “Israel and the
United States are one,” they are often heard to proclaim —
perhaps a little too enthusiastically, as if they don’t really
even believe that themselves.
All
of this is a broad assumption, of course, as if to suggest that
under no circumstances could the United States and Israel ever have
a serious disagreement that could injure the much-touted “special
relationship”between the two presumed “allies.”
So
taken together then, this presents a problem when discussing the
integrally and intricately related question of the Rothschild Empire
and the International Money Power and the manner in which they are
so entwined with the state of Israel and the global Zionist movement,
which, in itself, in all modern-day reality, goes far beyond the
state of Israel.
Zionism,
as we understood it, on a general basis, in its first official incarnation
at the turn of the 19th Century, was supposed to be a drive to establish
a Jewish homeland, but it has reached far beyond that. And today,
no matter how much one might protest, the fact remains that the
interests of the state of Israel are linked to the cultural, political,
financial, religious and philosophical — indeed emotional
— concerns and interests of the world Jewish community.They
are virtually inseparable.
48 |
MICHAEL
COLLINS PIPER |
__________________________________________________________ |
And
when the Rothschild family did commit itself to the Zionist movement
and the state of Israel that emerged in Palestine, that was a major
geopolitical development on the world stage. Prior to that time
there were (as we noted earlier) many powerful Jewish families —
including key members of the Rothschild family — who were,
in fact, hardly supportive, indeed actually opposed to, the concept
of establishing a Jewish state — anywhere.
But
with the evolution of the Rothschild Empire moving in support of
a Jewish state, this marked a critical juncture and one that has
not showed any signs of diminishing. So no matter how much we would
hope (or pretend) that the Jewish people, in the United States,
for example, in particular, would ever be willing to support any
move by the United States to withdraw its support for Israel or
even make any movement to curtail Israel’s ventures in the
Middle East, even in the name of preserving Israel in the face of
danger, we have to recognize that the American Jewish community
as a whole, through the egis of their leadership, have bound themselves
in a most strident fashion to the furtherance of the interests of
Israel.
Furthermore,
we must consider the fact that Israel, thanks largely to the patronage
of the United States, through the annual infusion of untold billions
of dollars from the United States, not to mention other untold billions
provided to Israel by Germany in reparations payments for “the
Holocaust,” has emerged in and of itself as a super-power
on the global stage.
Standing
alone, Israel is one of the world’s nuclear powers, putting
Israel in an undisputed position of being not only a central force
in the Middle East but around the planet. Israel’s nuclear
missiles are not just aimed at Cairo and Baghdad and Tehran and
Tripoli and Riyadh. Israel also has missiles aimed at Moscow and
Rome and Berlin and Paris.
So
we have Israel — a creation originally of Rothschild Empire
patronage — acting as a preeminent geopolitical and military
force in the world arena. And inasmuch as the lobby for Israel has
become a potent force in the United States entirely separate from
the general Jewish agenda on domestic issues, the fact remains that
Israel is itself an extension, yet another tentacle, of the Rothschild
family and their International Money Power.
This
is truly amazing when we realize that Israel is an entirely artificial
creation, an entirely concocted artificial state which has no historic
foundation, despite many myths to the contrary. (For an exploration
of this little understood subject, see John Tiffany’s powerful
exposition — “Ancient Israel: Myth vs. Reality —
in the May/June 2007 issue of The Barnes Review.)
In
a modern context, however, the establishment of Israel in 1948 —
and the intrigues surrounding it — go back to the Balfour
Declaration and, as we shall see, that involved the effort by the
British to get the United States involved in the war in the Old
World that became known as World War I.
The
Balfour Declaration — dated November 2, 1917 — written
by British
JEWS, ISRAEL,
MONEY & POWER |
49 |
___________________________________________________________ |
Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour to Britain’s
Lord Rothschild asserted a “declaration of sympathy with Jewish
Zionist aspirations” and that the British government viewed
“with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national
home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to
facilitate the achievement of this object.”
In
fact, the Balfour Declaration was the consequence of international
intrigue that was designed specifically for the purpose of bringing
the United States into the war in Europe between Britain and Germany.
The intent was to utilize powerful Jewish interests in the United
States in pressuring President Woodrow Wilson to provide American
blood and treasure to the British war effort. In return for their
assistance on behalf of Britain, the Jewish warmongers were promised
Britain’s assistance in the establishment of a Jewish state
in Palestine.
Lest
anyone believe this is some extraordinary conspiracy theory, please
note that in 1936, in a then-confidential memo (long ago made public)
to the British Commission on Palestine, James Malcolm, a central
figure in the circumstances surrounding the issuance of the Balfour
Declaration, stated flatly that the first object in the series of
events orchestrating the declaration “was to enlist the very
considerable and necessary influence of the Jews, and especially
of the Zionist or Nationalist Jews, to help us bring America into
the War at the most critical period of the hostilities.”
Writing
in Great Britain, the Jews and Palestine, Samuel Landman
— who at the period of the negotiations leading to the Balfour
Declaration, was secretary to the Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann
(and who later served as secretary of the World Zionist Organization)
— confirmed Malcolm’s assessment of the circumstances
saying:
The
only way (which proved so to be) to induce the American President
to come into the war was to secure the cooperation of Zionist
Jews by promising them Palestine, and thus enlist and mobilize
the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of Zionist Jews in
America and elsewhere in favour of the Allies on a quid pro
quo contract basis.
So
what does all of this mean? To put it bluntly, simply: the Jews
got the United States involved in World War I. The subsequent events
that led to WorldWar II — certainly — and later U.S.
involvement in the Middle East can be summarized likewise. In short,
Jewish power led to the loss of 53,000 American lives in World War
I and 292,131 more in World War II — wars fought largely —
if not solely — for Jewish interests.
That
having been said,we are not here to propound the thesis that all
Jews are in sync with the demands of the International Money Power,
nor
50 |
MICHAEL
COLLINS PIPER |
__________________________________________________________ |
are all Jews inclined to support the demands of the Jewish lobby
in the United States (whether in terms of its agenda, either domestically
or internationally), nor are even all Jews in Israel a part of the
problem.
But,
needless to say, the sorry fact remains that there are a substantial
number of powerful Jewish organizations that do have a major impact
on shaping the mindset of “the Jews” and here, in reference
to the Jews we are referring to the Jews as a people, and not just
the International Money Power which is in the grip of the Rothschild
Empire, the royal family of international Jewry. These organizations
have influential chapters operating all across America and the West.
They include not only the ADL and the American Jewish Congress and
the American Jewish Committee — not to mention the infamous
American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) — but many
others. Their impact on the thinking of the greater number of Jewish
people is tremendous in scope and depth.
And
this is not to suggest that all of these organizations are necessarily
in lock-step agreement with one another. They are not. There are
differences of opinion on a variety of issues. However, in the bigger
picture, they are concerned with the needs and desires of the Jewish
community as a whole. At the same time, though, they would not have
their power and influence if it were not for the fact that they
are, when all is said and done, an integral part of the international
power network of the Rothschild dynasty inasmuch as it exists as
the primary financial force governing and directing not only the
worldwide Jewish community, but, through its influence in the various
nation states, the very policies of those countries. And today,
most especially, sad to say from an American perspective, the United
States of America.
The
United States of America is, indeed, the primary military and financial
bulwark of The New World Order — the Jewish dream of a global
Imperium. That is the sad but simple truth.
For
many years so many American patriots were obsessed with the idea
that the United Nations was somehow going to be — and still
may be (they think) — the mechanism by which a New World Order
would be instituted, but as we have noted, the United Nations has
been sidelined. This is a point that cannot be overemphasized. This
is a point that has been reflected upon elsewhere. This author’s
books, The High Priests ofWar, The Golem and The
Judas Goats have reflected in some detail on this matter.
But
the fact remains that the United States stands as the foremost mechanism
for the creation of a New World Order. This uncomfortable reality
is one that cannot be denied, one that presents a sorry situation
American patriots must now reckon with. And, in that regard, it
is also a fact that is well known by people around the globe who
understand (more so than most Americans) that the American government
is held captive by the mass media and those who control that media:
the International Money Power.
JEWS, ISRAEL,
MONEY & POWER |
51 |
___________________________________________________________ |
Those
nations around the globe and those leaders therein who have stood
up to the International Money Power have been targeted for destruction.
Saddam Hussein of Iraq was among the most notable of recent years.
But it cannot be denied — though there will be those who will
be uncomfortable with this assertion — that Adolf Hitler himself
was, in fact, the first major figure of modern times targeted for
destruction precisely because of the policies that he sought to
institute — economic and social policies that were designed
to diminish the role of international Jewish finance in controlling
and directing the course of Germany’s — and Europe’s
— future.
There
could be much more written here about the situation in Germany before
the rise of Hitler, but suffice it to say, once again, the reason
Hitler was targeted for destruction was that Hitler was asserting
German national sovereignty in the face of the Jewish plutocracy
and what is referred to today as the New World Order.
In
this respect, then, in our modern day we likewise often find reference
in the major broadcast and print media to people and institutions
who have been cast in the role of demons and villains, ranging from
outspoken American nationalist figures such as Willis Carto and
David Duke (the latter whom the media constantly reminds us is a
“former leader of the Ku Klux Klan”) — to persons
such as Black Muslim leader Minister Louis Farrakhan of the Nation
of Islam and a host of additional figures — a handful of politicians,
academics, commentators and others — who are openly and regularly
defamed as “anti-Semites” for daring to criticize Israel
or question the Jewish agenda in any way, shape or form, no matter
how justifiably.
However,
there is an interesting twist on this, for there are many figures
both in the United States and elsewhere who are not necessarily
cast as “anti- Semites” per se but who are
attacked by the mass media — which is, in fact, substantially
in the hands of Jewish families and financial interests —
as being “anti-American” — even called “communists”
or denounced as being in the sway of Cuban leader Fidel Castro.
We
refer specifically, in the first place here, to Venezuela’s
hard-driving strongman, Hugo Chavez, an unabashed nationalist. He
has been a primary target of the mass media in the United States.
Another
target is Russian leader Vladimir Putin. The American media has
raised questions about Putin, suggesting he is a throwback to Czarism
or Stalinism or a horrible modern-day combination thereof. Seldom,
though, in the mass circulation media — at least initially
— did we hear it hinted outright that either Chavez or Putin
might be anti-Jewish or — as the term is most commonly rendered
— “anti-Semitic.” But they were reviled as great
villains.
However,
note this: in small circulation journals of great influence
that circulate in Jewish circles, as well as in politically-oriented
(ostensibly “secular”) journals such as Rupert Murdoch’s
pro-Israel Weekly Standard, we did
52 |
MICHAEL
COLLINS PIPER |
__________________________________________________________ |
indeed find accusations of anti-Semitism leveled
at Chavez and Putin.
It
wasn’t until relatively recently that The Washington Post
featured a prominently-placed commentary by Abraham Foxman, national
director of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith,
in which Foxman specifically addressed what he called Chavez’s
“anti-Semitism.”
However,
such rumblings about Chavez and Putin (and many others) in the Jewish
press had been regular and long-standing.
The
point is that the manner in which the mass media addressed this
issue — or otherwise not addressed this issue — has
been interesting.
For
popular consumption, people such as nationalist leaders
of the stripe of Chavez and Putin (and Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad)
have been cast by the mass media as “anti-American”
villains, but we were not told the real reason why they
were being cast so: The reason being that all of these leaders and
their countries do stand in opposition to Jewish power and influence,
in opposition to the Jewish Utopia, that is, The New World Order.
And
we would be remiss in not mentioning Malaysia’s outspoken
longtime former prime minister, Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, who has been
a foremost critic of attempts by international predators to dictate
the policies of his own republic. Dr. Mahathir has likewise come
under fire as an “anti- Semite” for daring to stand
up to Zionist Imperialism.
In
fact, Dr. Mahathir represents the thinking of many people —
big names and people not so well known alike.
(And
I am proud to say that I have had the pleasure of spending time
with Dr. Mahathir who is, as I have said repeatedly, both a gentle
man and a gentleman. My book, The Golem, detailing Israel’s
drive for nuclear supremacy, is dedicated in part to this genuine
leader in the cause of world peace.)
The
case of another powerful Southeast Asian statesman — Ferdinand
Marcos of the Philippines — also comes to mind.
And
here I can bring some first-hand information that will come as a
shock to those who prefer to worship the myth that Jews are no more
influential politically and financially than other groups on our
planet today.
In
the late 1980s, the weekly populist newspaper for which I was a
correspondent, The Spotlight, featured a series of disturbing
articles detailing how the international plutocratic interests —
working through the Reagan administration and the CIA (and Israel’s
Mossad) — were working to dislodge Marcos as ruler of the
Philippines. The reason was that Marcos was refusing to knuckle
under to the plutocratic elite, refusing to allow his national policies
to be dictated by the powers-that-be. In addition, Marcos was in
control of a massive gold treasure that these interests wanted for
themselves.
In
fact, as The Spotlight reported, Marcos’ vast personal
wealth was as a consequence of his having procured a substantial
portion of a gold hoard accumulated by the Japanese duringWorldWar
II, as the Japanese looted the
JEWS, ISRAEL,
MONEY & POWER |
53 |
___________________________________________________________ |
Asian nations that they conquered. In short, Marcos’wealth
did not come — contrary to reports by the “mainstream”
media — from embezzling money from his nation’s treasury
or from U.S. foreign aid to the Philippines.
As
it was, Ferdinand Marcos became aware of the truthful reportage
by The Spotlight and its chief correspondent, Andrew St.
George, and later invited St. George to visit with him at the Marcos
family home in exile in Hawaii. Not only did St. George have the
pleasure of spending time with the Marcos family at their villa
in Honolulu, but our publisher, Willis Carto, and I myself —
on other occasions — did likewise.
In
fact, I spent an entire very memorable day at the Marcos home, mostly
in the company of Imelda, who is quite the charmer and who was justly
known as “the most beautiful woman in Asia.” And although
the president was quite busy, he took time off to stop by for a
few minutes and said, quite pointedly, “Thank you for all
of the good work that The Spotlight is doing. We have appreciated
it very much.”
And
it was for good reason that Imelda told me — in utmost candor
but quite casually and with some reflection — that “As
long as we were in good standing with the Jewish people in New York,
everything went well for us. But when they turned against us, everything
fell apart.”
This
is exactly what she said to me that day in April of 1987 as we sat
on her veranda overlooking the Pacific sharing a box of chocolates.
And
I can tell you that although I certainly knew of the immense power
of international Jewry, her comment sent chills down my spine.
I
kid you not.
Here
was one of the wealthiest and most powerful people on the face of
the planet telling me in no uncertain terms that it was —
well — the Jews, who had brought about the demise of the Marcos
regime.
When
Imelda referred to “the Jewish people in New York,”
she didn’t mean the rabbis in the diamond district, or the
furriers on Fifth Avenue, or the Orthodox butchers in Brooklyn or
the pawnbrokers in Harlem. No, she meant the international banking
houses of the Rothschild Empire.
And
it should be pointed out — in light of the ongoing financial
scandal that is creating such havoc in the American system —
that The Spotlight specifically named Maurice “Hank”
Greenberg, the now-infamous figure behind the AIG insurance giant,
as one of the key behind-the-scenes players in the conspiracy to
destroy the Marcos family.
And
it likewise is no coincidence that Zionist hard-liner Paul Wolfowitz,
who later rose to fame as one of the “neo-conservatives”
in the George W. Bush administration, pushing for the war against
Iraq, was also one of those acting in concert against Ferdinand
and Imelda Marcos.
One
final note about Mrs. Marcos and her famous “shoe collection.”
Contrary to the lies of the Zionist-controlled media, the fact is
that most of
54 |
MICHAEL
COLLINS PIPER |
__________________________________________________________ |
the many thousands of shoes held in her famous closets at Malacanang
Palace in Manila had actually been gifts to her from the Philippine
shoe industry. She told me this herself. It seems that virtually
every time one of the shoe companies brought out a new line, they
would send the First Lady samples in every color. Many of the shoes
didn’t even fit!
But
it would have been unseemly, of course, for the First Lady of the
republic to be discovered dumping the shoes in the palace trash,
so consequently they were put away — only to be discovered
when the palace was over-run after the CIA- and Mossad-directed
coup d’etat that forced the Marcos family into exile
and made into a sensational cause celebre by the worldwide
media, which used those very shoes as “evidence” that
somehow the Marcos’s had embezzled millions — maybe
billions — from their nation’s treasury, when nothing,
as we have seen, could be further from the truth.
And
just for the record, the day I visited Imelda she laughingly pointed
out to me that she was wearing a $10 pair of sandals she had purchased
at a chain discount store.
So
although Imelda’s now-legendary shoe collection was well known
to every man, woman and child who opened a newspaper or a magazine
everywhere across the globe and was the subject of countless comic
monologues on television and caricatured in cartoons for weeks on
end, hundreds of millions of people all over the world knew absolutely
nothing about the gold that was the real source of their wealth.
Thus,
utilizing lies and disinformation, the American media made villains
of the Marcos family just as they have made villains of so many
others who have stood up to the Jewish elite, in one form or another,
for the past century. It is a fact of political life that cannot
be denied, any more than one can deny the preeminent role of Jewish
influence in the mass media today.
So
press manipulation of public perception in the United States of
foreign leaders is craftily calculated and represents a very real
agenda which is, in fact, the agenda of international Zionism as
it is intertwined with the International Money Power: the Rothschild
Empire and its global tentacles, that power bloc which we can, in
fact, correctly refer to — as it has been referred to throughout
the centuries — as “the Jews.”
The
great American poet Ezra Pound — an unswerving critic of the
Jewish plutocrats, indeed all plutocrats — foreshadowed the
rise of nationalist leaders such as Ferdinand Marcos, Vladimir Putin,Hugo
Chavez, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Dr. Mahathir Mohamad when he wrote:
Parts
of the world prefer local control, of their own money power and
credit. It may be deplorable (in the eyes of Wall Street and Washington)
that such aspirations toward personal and national liberty still
persist, but so it is.
JEWS, ISRAEL,
MONEY & POWER |
55 |
___________________________________________________________ |
Some
people, some nations, prefer their own administration, to that
of Baruch and . . . the Sassoons, and the problem is: how many
more millions of British, Russians, and Americans of both the
northern and southern American continents, plus Zulus, Basutos,
Hottentots, etc. and the lower, so-called lower races, phantom
governments, Maccabees and their sequelae, are expected to die
in the attempt to crush out European and Japanese independence?
Why
should all men under 40 be expected to die or be maimed in support
of flagrant injustice, monopoly and a dirty attempt to strangle
and starve out 30 nations?
Pound
had it right. The concept of the global plutocracy and the preeminent
role of the International Jewish Money Power is something that does
indeed affect the course of global affairs.
These
are uncomfortable matters of discussion, in particular for the average
American,who has been conditioned by the mass media to be wary of
examining matters relating to the Jewish people in other than the
most positive fashion. The image of “the terrors of Adolf
Hitler” has been the subject of nightmares for many Americans
who have been repeatedly advised of the sufferings of the Jewish
people, but these Americans are unaware of many of the events which
led to the rise of Hitler and the circumstances which resulted in
the uprooting of Jewish people during WorldWar II.
And
it should be emphasized that there were millions upon millions throughout
Europe — people of many nations and cultures — who rallied
behind Hitler’s policies regarding the Jewish Money Power.
And even Jewish historian, Saul Friedlander, in his two-volume work
on the Holocaust, has noted the little-known fact that many leaders
and members of the anti-Nazi resistance movements in various nations
actually endorsed Hitler’s policies toward the Jewish money
power, despite the fact they still opposed German troops occupying
their homelands — an amazing fact indeed.
But
all of this is just a preliminary (albeit necessarily lengthy) introductory
commentary on an explosive topic that must be fully understood.
All of this has been put forth to acknowledge the “controversial”
nature of this subject about which so much has been written and
yet still remains so esoteric and mysterious, thanks in part to
the often foolish and outlandish themes about the New World Order
that emanate from “big names” and “big mouths”
in the alternative media, on Internet radio, and in a raft of silly
videos and other works that fail to address the big picture.
Thus,
we begin our study of the facts — not the myths — about
the Rothschild Empire and what the NewWorld Order really does
constitute, the widespread falsehoods and misinformation notwithstanding
. . .