Here are just some of the more
obvious Judas Goats operating on
American soil today . . . And there
are many, many more . . .

. . . . . ..

. . .Like the four-legged Judas Goats that they mimic (in return for great profit and widespread fame), the ostensibly “human” version of The Judas Goats comes in all shapes and sizes.
. . .Some are big and loud like “right wing” bombast king, Rush Limbaugh, and his “left wing” counterpart, Michael Moore.
. . .Rush has been leading traditional American conservatives — the poor little lambs — to the abattoir since he first popped up out of nowhere to become the biggest, loudest and fattest voice of “conservative” talk radio ever, then branching out into TV-land.
. . .Those who call Rush’s program to attempt to talk about such “no no” topics as Zionism, the Federal Reserve money monopoly, or such global power groups as the Trilateral Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations or the Bilderberg meetings are sure to get mocked, slandered or otherwise chased right off the air — if they even get on the air in the first place.
. . .And although he would no doubt consider Rush Limbaugh to be “on the other side,” the truth is that Michael Moore is just as much of a Judas Goat as Rush. Moore put out his now-infamous Fahrenheit 9-11 film that ignored all the very serious questions about the official government line as to what really happened on that tragic day on September 11, 2001 and presented audiences a phony “cover story” that implied that the Saudi royal family were ultimately behind 9-11, twisting and distorting very real facts and misdirecting attention away from where the ultimate guilt for that crime really lies. Moore is not only distasteful, but his propaganda and disinformation are as well.
. . .Other Judas Goats are devilishly good looking, albeit a bit smarmy themselves, like Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Anne Coulter, all of whose views on the issues mirror those of big, fat Rush. They are all tried-and-true promoters of international Zionism and its global agenda. For his part, Hannity once went out of his busy way to personally call the national office of The Spotlight newspaper to tell the editor, a fellow Irishman,Vince Ryan, that Hannity absolutely hated the nationalist newsweekly. Hannity told Ryan, “I’m a big supporter of Israel and I don’t like your paper. Take me off your subscription list immediately.”

SEAN HANNITY	.........	LAURA INGRAHAM
ANNE COULTER		BILL O'REILLY

. . .Hannity has a daily talk show on 500 affiliates on the ABC Radio Network and a daily one-hour television show on Fox News, reaching millions of people four hours every day with his pro-Zionist message. And he’s been rewarded with two New York Times best-sellers.
. . .Laura Ingraham gets lots of ink — perhaps befitting the good-looking blonde that she is. And her rise to fame may be no coincidence, considering the fact that she started out as an attorney with the powerful Wall Street law firm of Skadden, Arps, one of whose ruling partners was Kenneth Bialkin, longtime chairman of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, one of the primary forces for the Israeli lobby in America.
. . .Anne Coulter, who has been bestowed the honor of being a nationally syndicated columnist, has four New York Times best-sellers to her name, certainly more evidence that so-called “conservative” writers who shill for the Zionist cause have no trouble getting their books published and widely promoted by the major book distribution centers.
. . .And then there’s Bill O’Reilly — another “talking head” promoted by Zionist billionaire Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News — whose “O’Reilly Factor” is staple viewing for a lot of good patriotic Americans who don’t know that they are being led to the slaughter by a Judas Goat.
. . .O’Reilly has two New York Times best-sellers to his name, again, as we’ve said, proving that the establishment publishing industry will definitely promote “conservative” books if they toe the Zionist line on the issues that really count to those who reign supreme in America.
. . .So it is that these are just a handful of modern-day Judas Goats of the more obvious type. In The Judas Goats — The Enemy Within, we will meet many, many more, including those more insidious types who are not so blatant in their displays of loyalty to the powers-that-be.
. . .And there are many, many more . . .

___________________________________________________________

“What are you doing here?” the Republican Elephant and the Democratic Donkey inquire of each other as they arrive on Wall Street to collect contributions flowing from the coffers of “The Trusts” into the campaign funds of both major political parties. This classic 1904 cartoon demonstrates that, by the turn of the century, international financial interests — especially agents of the European-based Rothschild banking dynasty — had already gained a clear stranglehold on the American political and economic process.

Masters Need Serfs

. . .The masters of the global plantation need serfs who are willing to donate their first-born to assorted foreign military adventures. Otherwise, nationalism — which is often a response to oppression, both perceived and real — cannot be suppressed. And that means markets cannot be exploited. Since the war in Vietnam, all is not well back at the Republic.
. . .Real folks are watching real earnings decline, at the same time that Wall Street gushes over the corporate downsizing that has stock prices soaring. "Losing your job is good for us," they're basically saying.
. . .Even militia members now salute the anti-war protesters of the Sixties, and regret that they weren't listening at the time.
. . .Without the "communists" to kick around anymore, some of those who once underwrote Wall Street's global interests by donating their first-born are now describing themselves as patriots and populists.
. . .Many of them have taken a fresh look at the international ruling class, and resurrected a long but gnarly tradition of anti-establishment, isolationist nationalism. Much of the political thinking among these new patriots is immature, and is short on both research and scholarship.
. . .Even so, it still describes the world better than what's left of the Left, with its self-interested insistence on multiculturalism and political correctness.
. . .The conspiracy theories peddled by patriots make more objective sense today, than the reasons they were given for our involvement in Vietnam did in the Sixties. That's progress of sorts.

— Daniel Brandt
NameBase Newsline
July-September 1995