Empire or Nation?
”History is littered with wars which everybody knew would never happen."— Enoch Powell, Member of the British Parliament
. . .America was born in blood. America suckled on blood. America gorged on blood and grew into a giant, and America will drown in blood. This is the spectre that is haunting America, the spectre of Civil War II, a second civil war that will shatter America into several new ethnically-based nations. Many will denounce this truth as racist and as a call to violence. It is neither. Rather, it is the result of an objective examination of the historic, demographic, political, economic, and military developments that are relentlessly propelling America towards a second civil war. Simply and directly put, America will explode in tribal warfare in our lifetime and shatter into several new ethnically-based nations. And as America breaks up the very concept of multiethnic democracy will likewise be forever shattered. Artillery will blast our cities to flaming wastelands infested with psychotic snipers. Packs of feral dogs will tear at charred corpses hanging out of burnt-out tanks. Long columns of doomed refugees will clog our highways. Bands of guerrillas will stalk about the countryside — raping, looting, murdering, clashing with each other. Food production will all but cease. The hungry will fight to the death over scraps of garbage. Millions will starve, and millions more will die from infectious diseases. Behold the vision of Civil War II.
. . .The underlying cause of this second civil war is nothing less than the very nature of our country and its peoples. There
are essentially two types of geopolitical entities — empires and nations — and they're best considered by contrasting each to the other.
. . .Empires are generally larger, sometimes even global in scope, and more likely to be geographically fragmented. Nations, on the other hand, are usually smaller and geographically continuous.
Empires consist of peoples of different religions, languages, cultures, races, and nationalities. One of these groups, a minority itself dominates the others by naked military power. Nations, on the other hand, are dominated by one group that makes up a majority of the population. Finally and most important, nations are inherently stable while empires are always inherently unstable. Nations are naturally stable because a majority of the people mutually recognize each other as co-nationals. Multiethnic empires never achieve true internal stability. They survive only by unrelenting military and police suppression of their inhabitants, and break up the minute the dominant group loses the military power, or the will, to shackle the empire's peoples together.
To understand the future, study the past. Throughout world history, all multiethnic empires have broken up, and almost always in cataclysmic violence. Therefore, the question is not if the multiethnic American Empire will shatter, but when and under what circumstances.
The former Soviet Union and the former Yugoslavia are classic examples of multiethnic empires that recently shattered in tribal violence. The Russians had historically been the majority ethnic group in the former Soviet Union. However, the percentage of Moslems had been steadily increasing while the percentage of ethnic Russians had been steadily falling and had sunk to about 50% in the mid 1980s. The old Soviet Union did not long survive the decline of its dominant ethnic group, and neither will America. Actually, the Russian Empire is still with us, just renamed and shrunk down to a more nation-like, and therefore more stable, demographic base. (Russia is now about 80% ethnic Russians.) Clearly,
America is a hybrid displaying both empire-like and nation-like characteristics. America is empire-like in its immense size, its geographic fragmentation, and its great diversity of races, religions, language groups, nationalities, and cultures. America is nation-like only in that it is still dominated by the English-speaking Europeans, the group that's been the majority in this country since its beginning in revolutionary violence. It is instructive to recall that America was born in revolutionary violence because the British establishment was treating us as second-class citizens to be exploited in their multiethnic empire.
Now, ongoing and dramatic changes in this country's ethnic composition are rapidly transforming America into a more empire-like entity, a naturally unstable political card-house doomed to collapse exactly as every other multiethnic empire throughout world history. Projections by the Census Bureau indicate that by approximately 2050 AD, less than sixty years from now, nonwhites will become majority in America, and Europeans a minority. The current (1992) figures are: Whites 74.8% Blacks 11.9% Hispanics 9.5% Asians 3.1% Indians 0.7%. The projections for 2050 AD are: Whites 52.5% Blacks 14.4% Hispanics 22.5% Asians 9.7% Indians 0.9% (See Figure 1).
How fast is America being transformed? In the 1960s America was about 89% white, then a liberalization of the immigration laws caused a surge in the nonwhite population. Since the Sixties the white percentage of the population has fallen at about the rate of 1/2 a percentage point every year. It is clear from the census projections that the government expects (and is actually causing) this process to continue at about the same or an increased rate.
Another way to highlight the demographic transformation of America is to consider an America without any increase or decrease in the total population. In this illustrative case, a daily decrease of about 3,000 white people would be offset by a daily increase of about 3,000 nonwhite people. At this rate America would also be reduced to about 50% white by
the middle of the next century. That's how rapidly America is being transformed. It's as if every day 3,000 whites were disappearing and being replaced by 3,000 minorities. Every single day! This is a sort of statistical ethnic cleansing engineered through liberal immigration laws and unchecked illegal immigration.
It's time to start thinking the unthinkable. When Civil War II fractures the multiethnic American Empire, what military patterns will the conflict take on as events unfold? What new nations will emerge, and where will their boundaries be based on current ethnic patterns and the military resources of these new nations? And what signs will measure our inevitable slide into all-out ethnic warfare?
It must be kept firmly in mind that there is nothing critical about any particular date or set of percentages. Many other factors will also affect the rate of our downward spiral into ethnic warfare and the partitioning of the multiethnic American Empire by Civil War II. Key events should be closely monitored and dispassionately analyzed. Consider the following events and decide for yourself if America is proceeding towards a second civil war or not....
Trends in American Riots
Urban riots have long been a fact of American life, and many were ethnic in nature. Today, they are almost exclusively ethnic in nature, and it doesn't take much to ignite one. Electrical blackouts, unpopular legal decisions, traffic accidents, real and imagined police brutality, and racial incidents of all sorts are commonly followed by ethnic riots. Urban riots have preceded almost every revolution and civil war in western civilization since the Industrial Revolution, and they are now preceding Civil War II in America. If you disagree, consider these trends in rioting:
Trend 1: Heavy Weapons
Watch future riots to see if heavy weapons such as attack aircraft, artillery, or armored vehicles are used to suppress
them. If they are, we'll know we've taken another critical step towards Civil War II. Actually, in the Los Angels riot of '92, armored personnel carriers were used by the Los Angeles police to flush out organized snipers in the predominately black Jordan Downs housing project.¹ Armored personnel carriers are not police vehicles; armored personnel carriers are military attack vehicles. Armored vehicles were necessary because the riot was not actually a riot, but a hybrid somewhere between a riot and a war. It is a stark fact that these riots are increasingly taking on the characteristics of outright warfare, and that the police are increasingly and necessarily taking on the characteristics of armies in order to fight these wars. This ongoing conversion of our police departments into military formations is reflected by their increasing use of armored vehicles, helicopters, bullet-spraying assault rifles, combat helmets, bulletproof vests, military uniforms, sniper rifles, and military organizational structures such as SWAT teams.
Trend 2: Ethnic Militias
Watch riots for confrontations between armed ethnic militias, because such confrontations will certainly precede Civil War II. Actually, a confrontation between armed ethnic militias has already occurred. In the Los Angeles riot of '92, Korean merchants spontaneously formed a de facto ethnic militia.² They armed themselves with pistols and shotguns, stationed themselves on the roofs of the buildings in their shopping center, and coordinated their defense of their property with citizen band radios. In so doing they successfully defended their property against similar armed ethnic militias composed of black street gang members that torched much of Los Angeles. In the Los Angeles riot of '92, armed ethnic
Robert Vernon, L.A. Justice, Focus on the Family Publishing, 1993, pp. 22-27.
Newsweek, “The Siege of L.A.”, May 11, 1992, p.38
militias confronted each other on American soil, but the significance was missed, intentionally or otherwise, by the politically-correct establishment media. Why?
Trend 3: Barricades
. . .When rioters erect barricades, they're taking an important step, consciously or unconsciously, towards creating a new nation, however small or temporary. These barricades are boundaries. They proclaim that all on one side are of the same tribe, and that all on the other side are foreigners. These barricades are physical boundaries that are preceded by and reflect the boundaries in the hearts and minds of those who erected them. After these physical barricades are torn down by the police, the barricades still remain in the hearts and minds of those who erected them, and therein lies the real problem, because barricades in hearts and minds can not be torn down by any amount of police force.
Trend 4: Siege of Police Stations
. . .Nations do not allow hostile armed forces on their territory, so watch for rioters laying siege to police stations and military installations. The media will call these sieges attempts to punish the police or capture their weapons, but that's only half the truth. The greater truth is that, consciously or unconsciously, these rioters are creating a new nation, and that they perceive the police as the occupying army of a foreign power. Also, watch for attempts to seize radio and television stations, and government buildings.