THERE'S A JEWISH WAR going on all around
us, and it is happening on two fronts and with numerous victims. It's a
war against White people, a war against the very survival of our kind
on Earth, and it's also a war against any people that wants to
have an independent country, free of internationalist and Zionist
supervision and control. In addition to the shooting war -- in which we are expected to provide the billions of dollars to be spent and the
thousands of young people to be slaughtered -- there's a parallel war
going on all over the globe: a war against freedom and free thought,
waged not by soldiers, and not with bullets and bombs but waged by
media oligarchs -- nearly all of them Jews -- and waged with paid-off
government censors, with distorted news reporting, and with engaging
and addictive -- but twisted, sick, and culture-destroying --
entertainment programs. And on every front, pro-White activists,
including National Vanguard activists, are fighting back with the most
powerful weapons known to the mind of man: love for our people -- and
the truth.
I talked about the expanding shooting war in the
Middle East last week. There's more evidence than ever piling up that
the Jewish stringpullers who control Bush are desperate to destabilize
and engage in violent "regime change" in any state that threatens
Israel's hegemony and power to conquer or destroy anyone they choose in
the Middle East. Next on their hit list are Iran and Syria. One of the
ways that we get the word out on the dangerous agenda of the Jewish
supremacists is via the Internet, primarily through
NationalVanguard.org. Recently NationalVanguard.org was recognized as
the legitimate news source that it is by Google News -- and the
supremacists went ballistic, fearful that millions more readers would
become aware of their crimes and their agenda.
Not too long ago, a reader of our
daily-updated news and comment Web site, NationalVanguard.org, did what
thousands of other readers of useful news sites have done: He wrote to
search engine giant Google and made a request that National Vanguard be
included in Google's very useful news index, news.google.com.
Now NationalVanguard.org had always been
included in Google's Web index, just like almost every other site in
the world. But the news index at news.google.com is something
very different than their main Web index. It provides an up-to-minute
indexing of real news sites, from CNN and Fox News to Pravda.ru and
Jihadunspun.com. It indexes radical Islamist news sites like Jihad
Unspun and even insignificant radical leftist news sites like
Infoshop.org. The only requirement is that the site actually provide
real news not available elsewhere that could be useful to readers of
Google News.
The reader can enter search terms and see
what news sites are saying on any given topic in the last few days (up
to just a few minutes ago, as the news index is crawled hundreds of
times a day), without the clutter of a million search results from old
static Web pages clogging their results screens. Google News readers
can even get search term results emailed to them in real time -- if you
want to read all the news stories which contain the search terms
"National Vanguard" you get them all in your inbox if you like -- but
be prepared for a clogged inbox.
As I said, one of our NationalVanguard.org
readers wrote to Google in February, politely asking them to consider
adding our site to their over 4,000 news sources. And, in a few weeks,
they did exactly that, writing back and saying:
"Thank you again for your submission. We
apologize for our delayed response. We have reviewed
www.nationalvanguard.org and will be including it in Google News in the
near future. You should be able to find articles from this site in
Google News within four to six weeks. Regards, The Google Team."
Once we were added, all of the people who entered keywords at Google News matching the subjects we were discussing at National Vanguard starting getting our stories right next to those of the New York Times or Fox News. And that is as it should be. But that is exactly what the
Jewish supremacists and other anti-White haters want to prevent at any
cost. The anti-White bigots who have their Google News email alerts set
to get any story that comes out mentioning National Vanguard or
even the words "White people" started receiving our stories. I'm sure
their blood pressure went up even more than it did when the ADL was
caught with stolen police files or when the Larry Franklin/AIPAC
investigation came out in the open.
Immediately the telephone calls and letters
began to inundate Google -- and I am sure that the honest editor, who
analyzed our site and found it contained significant original news
content presented in a professional and useful manner, had to face a
lot of heat from the more politicized or, shall we say, "ethnically
sensitive" higher-ups who may themselves be Jewish supremacists. And
Web pages run by anti-White zealots practically burned up with
"outrage."
One of many such pages was the
deceptively-titled HonestReporting.com, which organizes teams of
highly-motivated Jews to scour the Internet and local newspapers, and
is totally focused on making sure that no criticism of Israel in the
press goes unpunished. (HonestReporting.com, by the way, continues to
be indexed by Google News.) They stated last week, in an article with a
title as deceptive as their own name, "Nazis in the News":
"Now, Google News has chosen to include the
neo-Nazi site National Vanguard on its list of news outlets. National
Vanguard is a fringe 'white pride' organization whose lead sentence
from its current top article carefully distinguishes between Jewish
people and 'White people':
Then they quote National Vanguard saying:
"Today the Las Vegas National Vanguard's
'STOP IMMIGRATION' billboard returned to the Las Vegas skyline for the
third time -- after Jewish pressure, threats, and a court battle which
White people won this time....
Back to HonestReporting.com:
"We do however question Google's judgment in including these sites in its influential list of legitimate news outlets." http://tinyurl.com/43zb3
A few days after the Jewish pressure was
put on, Google capitulated, removing NationalVanguard.org from its news
index and stating through spokesman Steven Langdon: "Google News does
not allow hate content. If we are made aware of articles that contain
hate content, we will remove them."
Even Richard T. Kaplar, vice president of an industry group called The Media Institute decided to throw in his two cents on the National Vanguard issue, saying:
"Google is making an editorial decision on
who it carries and who it doesn't. News organizations have editorial
discretion over what they run and don't run. No one can force them to
run something if they don't feel like it."
Kaplar failed to mention that Google News did feel like indexing National Vanguard until the pressure campaign began. http://tinyurl.com/5kyp4
The Google-watchers at Google Blogoscoped, though falsely calling us a "hate site," took a more balanced approach
to the controversy saying that while it wasn't a clear-cut Free Speech
issue -- since Google News isn't obligated to carry anything at all or
even exist for that matter -- but did acknowledge that excluding National Vanguard lowers the usefulness of the news index:
"But does the exclusion of hate-sites lower
the strength of Google News to give a variety of different news
sources? Yes, it does. The more radical a site, the more it contrasts
[with] mainstream news." http://tinyurl.com/3r38e
But Google News, in dropping us, is going
back on its own stated principles, which include indexing all useful
news sites regardless of political affiliation or viewpoint. They
proudly announce on their "about" page:
"If we're missing a publisher that we
should be covering, please send us your ideas. While we can't guarantee
that we'll heed your recommendation, ...we do promise to review all the
suggestions we receive without regard to political viewpoint or
ideology."
It seems that quite a few people agree with us, as you can see at our own site or on various 'Net-focused online forums: http://tinyurl.com/4bdvs
Robert Moore writes:
"Nationalvanguard.org is no more biased
than any other news sources I've seen, albeit the bias is from a
different perspective and one that's seldom (if ever) seen in the
mainstream media. I really loved the article (apparently by the same
guy who runs the site) entitled 'Who Rules America?'"
Mark Neufeldt writes:
"National Vanguard must really be making an
impact to garner this overreaction. This is just the type of an
overreaction that will make people curious and hopefully will throw off
the yoke of the self-appointed thought-lords."
Another writer says:
"Whatever happened to free speech?
NationalVanguard.org is just as legitimate as Fox News, as far as I'm
concerned. If you don't like it, don't read it. It's that simple."
Rob Wostal writes:
"After reading this blog and looking up National Vanguard, I do have to ask, 'why is racial pride allowed to everyone except
whites?' That's a darn good question. Because of this, I think I will
bookmark National Vanguard. There was also a very good article there about the fact that the New York Times has settled the question about whether race is real or not. My college
professors were all saying, 'race is a social construct with no basis
in biology,' but it turns out that Stanford medical school has
discovered that there is a biological basis of race...."
Joe Carlson writes:
"I am more worried about censorship of news
services that may or may not be something I would care to read than I
am about being offended by a distasteful or abhorrent philosophical
underpinning to that news service. I believe the solution or answer to
bad speech or news is more speech, more news, more viewpoints. Stalin had the death penalty for anti-Semitism; do we want to go down that road really?"
Andrew Reilly writes:
"I read mainstream articles from the pipelined sources of AP, Reuters, UPI and the likes. Then I go to National Vanguard and get their take on the some event. It is quite funny and makes their
point of controlled media valid. I agree with Mark's post. National Vanguard must be making some progress to elicit such rabid protest."
Tim Pyne writes:
"I just thought I'd say that Google's
decision to cowardly remove 'hate' news sites from news.google.com is
entirely contrary to the ideal of freedom of information and free
inquiry. Who will be the one to decide which news is 'hate'? Is
anything not subject to the discretion of our would be censors...?" http://tinyurl.com/4bdvs
So there you have it. As there are honest
agents in the FBI, investigating AIPAC and opposing Chertoff and the
Jewish supremacists, so there are honest editors working for large
corporations like Google -- editors willing to stand up for their own
principles of open and unbiased indexing of the news. And at least one
such editor gave us and our writers and editors a fair shake. I
suggest that everyone who receives this broadcast write a polite letter
of approval to Google News for doing that -- and also telling them what
you think of their knuckling under to Jewish pressure. Simply send a
civil email to suggestions@google.com and let them know your views.
In New Jersey, the racial war against White
people came to students in the person of a high state official last
month who berated the children in the almost all-White audience at a
local school for over an hour, trying to inculcate a sense of guilt in
them merely because they were born White. In this case, not all the
Whites took the attack lying down, as our report from the New Jersey
National Vanguard unit indicates:
On Monday, March 7, 2005, New Jersey
Secretary of State Regena L. Thomas spoke to students at Haddonfield's
Paul VI High School as part of the ceremonies for the awarding of a
small "Martin Luther King Commission" grant to the school.
Students were told that the Secretary would
be giving a talk on "bullying." The students were not prepared for what
Thomas had in store for them. She spent approximately two hours
attacking and berating the White students. She accused all of the White
students of being "racists," and said that they were stupid and
ignorant.
The students were bewildered as to what
precipitated these attacks and insults by a paid government official,
as there had been no previous racial incidents or issues at the school.
Thomas even went so far as to use crude and threatening "gangsta"-style
language, claiming that if her son had been there, he would "jack them
up."
At one point during the assembly, Thomas
shouted so loudly into the microphone that one of the loudspeakers was
damaged and had to be replaced. Some of the students felt physically
threatened by Thomas as she paced angrily back and forth during her
lecture, actually shouting in the faces of some of the students in the
front rows.
The attacks on the White students were so
severe that a large number of faculty and students got up and walked
out during Thomas's tirade. The next week, students planned a mass
walkout to protest her refusal to apologize, but school officials
thwarted that plan by locking the students in the building. Students
circulated protest posters with an 'X' drawn across Thomas's picture.
Many concerned parents later called the
school to complain about the incident and to question why school
officials allowed this to take place. Some school officials tried to
cover up the real nature of the event-but the students, many of whom
were eyewitnesses, made sure that the truth got out.
Thomas brought racial tension to a school
where there had been none before. Parents and students have written
letters to Governor Richard J. Cody to let him know what his Secretary
of State has done-and to let him know that she is unfit to hold office.
No response has yet been received from the Governor's office.
Finally, after many phone calls to local
media outlets, very limited coverage was given by one local news
program-coverage that fell sadly short of exposing the anti-White
nature of the attack on the students.
The attack on these children was completely
unprovoked. Its purpose was to racially intimidate them and instill in
them a profound sense of guilt-simply for being born White.
The White students at Paul VI High School
have learned a very important lesson: In our multicultural, multiracial
society, Whites have no right of redress when unjustly treated. The
biased media-and the media-intimidated politicians and local
officials-will almost always align themselves against Whites.
But there is hope.
There is one organization that is working
for the long-term interests of White people: National Vanguard. We are
building new media and new community to help make sure that White
children and families will have a decent future. Join us today.
And National Vanguard is right there in
northern New Jersey, meeting with and educating residents of the area
who've just had a little bit of multiracialist hate rubbed right in
their faces. We're there, explaining to them the reasons why the system
and the media are against them, and what they need to do to regain
their freedom. We're there, distributing the text of that report in
print in the form of a flyer.
And National Vanguard activists all over
the U.S. will be distributing our Yellow Ribbon Campaign flyer all this
month, April 2005. ( http://www.nationalvanguard.org/yellow.pdf ) We'll be getting the word out about the spurious origins of the Iraq
war and the dangers of expanding that war into Iraq and Syria. The
future of our country hangs in the balance, and we will make the truth
known no matter what the difficulties. The crimes of the Jewish
censors, the Jewish warmongers, and the Jewish supremacist haters will
be exposed. We will get the truth out to our people, Google or no
Google. We're on the 'Net and we're on your street -- and we will save our nation, our race, and our civilization. Our children are depending on us.
at
the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781