The Sexual War:
How the Natural Feelings of Whites
Are Being Perverted
by Kevin Alfred Strom
Free Speech, January 1997
Volume VIII, Number 1
The war against the survival of the European race is being waged on many
fronts: economic, political, psychological, and sexual. Let us take a
look at the sexual war against White people.
The most overt sexual warfare takes the form of the promotion of racial
mixing, which is inserted into virtually every form of entertainment
offered to us in print or electronically. Jewish-owned MTV pumps out
morally and racially defiling images and music to our young people 24
hours per day via satellite and cable, and thousands of money-hungry
record stores and radio stations make sure that our youngsters can take
the sweet poison with them wherever they go.
But a more covert sexual warfare is taking place simultaneously. You
need to learn to recognize it when you see it. Every creature on this
planet, male or female, of whatever species, is born with the necessary
instincts which lead it to do what it needs to do to ensure the survival
of the next generation. Any species which failed to do these necessary
things would quickly pass from the Earth.
Creatures, such as man, which reproduce sexually require that males
fertilize females, that the children be born, and that the children be
nurtured and protected to an extent sufficient to result in an increase
-- or at least not a prolonged decrease -- in the numbers of the
species.
For our species, sexual attraction between male and female serves the
purpose of conception. Love between the couple bonds them together for
the purpose of nurturing the children, and a special kind of love for
the child makes the mother and father willing to sacrifice and even die
if necessary so that the child may live.
Although we may analyze and justify these behaviors on purely rational
grounds, it is not upon the calculations of reason that we act in the
interests of our children; it is not by the light of logic that we act
so that there might be children of our kind after we as individuals die.
No, these actions of ours are based upon a different kind of light -- an
inner light that tells us that the healthy White child is a sacred being
to be protected at any cost, an inner voice that tells us that our mate
and our offspring are to be provided with the necessities of life and
protected from danger. In short, there is an instinct that tells us,
and has told us since the dawn of man, to do the things that must be
done so that our kind will be perpetuated through the ages.
Revealed in this light, our sexual nature can be seen for what it really
is: a unity of erotic love, family formation, and the birth and
nurturing of our children. This unity is absolutely essential for the
continued survival of our race. Breaking up this unity is one of the
highest priorities of our enemies. That is the grand strategy of those
who are prosecuting the sexual war against White people.
A recent article in my local newspaper confirms that nurturing behavior
is not only instinctive but that the instincts have a definite genetic
basis. So far, the proof only extends to mice, but it is known that the
same gene exists in humans, and there is every reason to believe that
all instincts, including our own, are determined by genetic structure.
BOSTON-- "Mom" Gene Spurs Mice To Nurture Little Ones
Scientists have discovered a "good mother" gene, an inborn trigger that
prompts female mice to care for their young. When this gene is missing,
mice show no interest in their babies. Instead, they curl up in a
corner and let the young ones die. The discovery is part of an effort
by scientists to learn the genetic factors that control complex
behaviors in animals.
This particular gene, called fosB, is a kind of regulatory switch that
turns on other genes in response to outside cues. In this case, the
gene is probably activated by the sight and smell of baby mice. Humans,
too, have a fosB gene. Whether it plays any role in prompting women to
nurture their babies is unknown. "Whether this would be relevant to
other mammals -- including people -- remains to be considered in the
future," said Dr. Michael E. Greenberg. "You can't say anything more
about that."
The study was conducted by Jennifer R. Brown, a doctoral student in
Greenberg's lab at Children's Hospital in Boston. It was published in
the mid-July issue of the biweekly journal Cell. The scientists began
by creating a "knockout" mouse, an animal that was missing the fosB
gene. The goal was to learn the gene's function by seeing how the
animal acted without it. The mutant mice seemed normal until they gave
birth. Ordinarily, a female mouse put in a cage with her babies will
crouch over them and keep them warm within a minute. "The mutant will
go and investigate them but fails to retrieve them and eventually goes
off in a corner and ignores them," said Greenberg. Not fed or tended in
any way, the babies die in a day or two. The gene also controls
nurturing in male mice (although this drive is less pronounced in
males).
Those who would destroy us do not yet have the ability to genetically
alter us, but what they can do, and what they have been doing for
decades, is to take advantage of the fact that as intelligent creatures
we can make conscious decisions that run contrary to our instincts.
Knowing that our conscious mind can override our instincts, they seek to
fill that conscious mind with every possible kind of suicidal idea, from
racial mixing to interracial adoption to the slaying of our healthy
children in their mother's womb.
Now I am not one of those who says that abortions must be absolutely
prohibited. For example, as a thoroughgoing racial separatist, I do not
presume to tell other races how they must govern their societies. They
should be allowed to have whatever policies they choose -- on the other
side of a secure border from us. I do not ask a woman to bear a child
which is the result of rape. I do not ask a woman to bear a child which
is deformed. I do not ask a woman to bear a child if its birth would
kill the mother.
But today greater numbers of White children are being killed in the womb
than ever before. And when we are speaking of killing our own
offspring, if we are true to the instincts that ensure our survival and
make us what we are, we must recognize that we are speaking of a
particularly horrifying kind of killing. There is something almost
unbelievably depraved about women committing this obscene act for no
other reason than convenience. Any society that encourages such
behavior is revealing a death-wish that may well prove fatal. But it
would be a mistake to blame only White women for the large numbers of
abortions today. How many White men have directly or indirectly
encouraged their mates to have abortions? How many have been able to
provide the emotional and financial support that a woman with children
-- and children themselves -- need, but have refused to do so? It has
become too acceptable for both men and women to look after only their
own interests.
Since the 1973 decree by the Supreme Court legalizing abortion, at least
17,600,000 White children have been aborted. Had they been allowed to
live, many of these children would be young parents by now. In a
strange but probably not entirely unintended irony, we have the brown
flow from Mexico to "replace" these dead White children. Thus we lose
battle after battle in the sexual war against White people.
It isn't only by encouraging convenience abortion that our enemies seek
to break the fundamental unity of love, family, and children which is
our natural sexual nature. They also encourage the idea that sexual
intercourse is a consequence-free recreation, and that any path -- any path -- to sexual pleasure and happiness is as valid
as any other. Not only is homosexuality elevated to the status of an
"equal" alternative to natural behavior, not only is the special
feminine nature to be thrown out the window so that women can be
degraded into an impossible and spiritless "equality" with men, but the
more "advanced" thinkers on the campuses you subsidize are now telling
our students that their inborn sexual identity may be discarded at will
and another taken up in its place.
If you find that unbelievable, consider the following excerpts from an
article entitled "Gender School," by Shannon Bell, from the magazine, Ctheory. Ctheory states that it is published with the
assistance of the Dean of Arts and Science, and the Department of
Political Science, of Concordia University in Montreal, Canada. The
article concerns a being named "Kate" Bornstein who calls itself a
"transgender transsexual."
Shannon Bell, is the author of a book published by the Indiana
University Press and the author of a piece published by St. Martin's
Press. She teaches political science at York University and teaches the
"sociology of intimacy," whatever that is, at the University of Toronto.
Part 1: Gender School
"Sex is f***ing, everything else is gender," Kate told us on the first
day of gender school: a four-part, sixteen-hour Cross-Gendered
Performance Workshop which was part of the Buddies in Bad Times Theater
summer school program. Kate is a Buddhist male-to-female transsexual
performance artist and gender educator. Kate has been both male and
female and now is not one or the other, but both and neither.
The Cross-Gender Workshop aimed at deconstructing gender: shedding
gender, trying on a new gender; getting to zero point and then
constructing a new gender... . The only constraint on selecting a
character was that it be some version of the opposite gender.
I decided on the male object of my desire: I had done this before, but
I had never stood in the shoes of the object of my desire: a butch
chickenhawk. I had usually done boy; the crossover from woman to boy
is pretty easy for a butch-femme. Besides, when women do male, our male
often comes out boy due to similarity in skin, size, weight, and
energy. This time I was going to do the sort of male that brings me to
my knees: the sardonic, gruff, older boy lover in the tradition of Jean
Genet, Allen Ginsberg, and a couple of less famous, but no less
impressive boy lovers whom I have had the pleasure of sharing with boys...
.
Part 2: The Opposite Sex -- Is Neither!
Maggie, a goddess-in-training, "has taken a wrong turn at the moon and
ends up in late-20th-century North America." Her current goddess
training exercise is to allow her body to act as a conduit for seven
people who are "neither male nor female, neither here nor there, and
neither dead nor alive." Maggie is to hold the gateways of higher
awareness open for them as they each tell their own story of crossing
gender. . . .
There is Ruby, the she-male drag queen performer: breasts, big hair,
lots of make-up, and a penis. She is dying, her body ripped apart by
AIDS lesions. There is Kat, who enters Maggie's body as she is waking
up from sex change surgery (male to female). Kat, a compulsive support
group joiner who concludes that "gender's just something else to belong
to.î. . .
Part 3: Kate on Kate, An Interview
Shannon: In the Cross-Gender Performance workshop you gave some
very right-on definitions of gender.
Kate: Gender is simply a way to classify people. Depending on
the time and the culture, there are different criteria for the
classification. In this culture, at this time, it is genital. Gender
assignment happens at birth when the doctor inspects for a penis. The
infant is assigned gender corresponding to the presence or absence of
the penis. There are more and more people who are questioning gender,
and not by dint of Gender Studies Programs. In them they mainly focus
on: What is the difference? They don't study gender. There is a field
that is questioning gender and that is ethnomethodology. Kessler and Mc
Kenna's An Ethnomethodological Approach deserves tons of credit. Part
of the dedication in the book I am writing is to them.
Shannon: Gay men taught me to be the kind of woman I am now.
And more recently, I learned how to be a goddess from Annie Sprinkle: I
took her ten hour Slut and Goddess Transformation Salon. I also learned just from being her friend.
You were a het (heterosexual) guy until what age?
Kate: Yo, what do you want to know for? Until I was
thirty-five or thirty-six.
Shannon: You changed genders, then became a lesbian. Did
your taste in women change?
Kate: No, but I was finally able to be with the women I really
wanted to be with. I can't tell you how many women I approached when I
was a straight man only to find out they were lesbian.
Shannon: What is your taste in women?
Kate: I like a little bit of danger. I'm into S/M and I am a
switch. I appreciate someone who is into switching . . . .
Shannon: What does it mean to be a sexual outlaw?
Kate: A sexual outlaw is a person who breaks sexual, or in
this case, gender rules. The prime directive of gender in this culture
is, if you are a woman, thou shalt not be a man. And if you are a man,
it is thou shalt not be a woman. And in sex, thou shalt be
heterosexual.
. . . There is a transgender liberation happening. Leslie Kleinberg
writes about it in her book Transgender Liberation. Within the transgender movement there is a hierarchy: at the top of the
heap are the post-operative transsexuals who pass, next down are those
who don't pass as well, and then down and down and down. But it depends
on where you are standing. If you are standing in the shoes of a
she-male, that is the top of the heap. At the bottom of anyone's heap is the closet case who puts on his wife's panties when she
is away on a business trip.
There it is in all its sick glory. You may find it hard to believe, but
the most offensive portions of this article have been edited out.
Lest you think that I exaggerate the importance of these two extremely
sick individuals, may I remind you that "Kate" Bornstein, who used to be
a nice Jewish boy and now is a mutilated I don't know what, has had its
book published by Routledge Press and has had its work favorably
reviewed by Brenda Danet of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Ms.
Danet said in part:
. . . the photographs in Kate Bornstein's part- autobiographical, part
analytic book on her transformation from a formerly married, biological
male to a transsexual lesbian invite readers to compare her formerly
male "look" with the new- female/lesbian one. Can that dashing man in a
marine officer's uniform really be the same person as the attractive
woman with the long, luxuriant hair, plunging neckline and earrings in
the frontispiece photograph?
While any writer who dares to write on behalf of the European race is
excoriated and censored, and sometimes even arrested and jailed,
perverted corrupters of youth like Bornstein, Bell, and Danet are
respected by universities and publishing companies!
In ancient Peru lived a tribe of Indians, not far from the famous and
mysterious lines of Nazca. We know them only by their paintings, which
display a high degree of skill. The current inhabitants of the area
have no knowledge of the people who made the paintings. They have
disappeared without a trace. What little we know about these people we
glean from the paintings they created. And what paintings they are!
They are filled from top to bottom and margin to margin with depictions
of sexual activity. They show themselves engaging in almost every
conceivable type of sexual congress -- sometimes even in groups. But
what is really remarkable about these paintings is not that they show
such obsession with sex, but that they do not portray one particular kind of sex. They do not portray normal sexual intercourse between a man and a woman. They do
not portray the kind of sexual intercourse which leads to the conception
of children. And the creators of these paintings are now extinct. Draw
your own conclusions.
The perverts do not have to recruit everyone in the country to achieve
similar results. Our race both in America and in its home countries in
Europe is already failing to reproduce itself, and its actual numbers
are falling, while alien immigrants with higher birthrates stream across
our borders and fill our maternity wards. Those who recruit for
homosexual sodomy are a factor in pushing us ever closer to the edge of
racial suicide. Every recruit for them is how many White children never
born?
I am aware of the objections that some may raise in light of the
evidence that homosexuality can be genetic in origin. I agree that some
defective individuals may carry a gene or genes that predispose them
toward a perversion of the sexual instincts. And I further admit that
it would be a good thing if such genes were not carried forward to
future generations, and therefore I agree that to the extent that
toleration of homosexual behavior may prevent such pitiable creatures
from conceiving children, it may have a eugenic effect.
But I also believe that the factors that control sexual behavior are not
absolutely bipolar. Some men are more masculine than other men, who are
more masculine than others still, until you reach men who seem
effeminate in many ways but who are still definitely heterosexual in
their proclivities and relations with women. There are also men who
seem asexual. Then there are the truly defective types who form the
foundation of the homosexual group.
Sexuality, particularly male sexuality, is a very powerful drive that
demands satisfaction. If a teenage male, perhaps not the most masculine
and perhaps a bit afraid of women, but who in ordinary circumstances
would lead a healthy sex life and contribute good children to the race,
is approached at an impressionable age and convinced to try homosexual
perversions, and if this constitutes his first sexual experience, he may
be pushed over the edge and identify himself with the sodomites and
become habituated to the practice of sodomy to satisfy his sexual
needs. It is not by coincidence that the perverts have always
concentrated their recruiting on teenagers, as even a cursory glance at
the increasingly open homosexual literature will prove to you. Oxford
and Cambridge Universities, for example, were infamous for the
indoctrination and recruitment of queers and Communists, and they were
often one and the same.
This recruitment is often elaborated beyond perverted intercourse to
include the idea that the young man is joining a secret fraternity of
the very best people who are "changing the world for the better" by
destroying traditional Western values, an argument which sadly does hold
some appeal for "idealistic" young men sick to death with modern society
and ready for a glorious revolutionary alternative. What they get is anal sodomy, death by infectious disease, and an
anti-Life philosophy that perverts almost every aspect of their thinking
and makes them into enemies of the race and culture which gave them
birth. It is really very, very sad.
When homosexuality was strongly disapproved of, its recruiting
activities and its anti-Life culture had little or no chance to develop,
and the victims of the genetic defect were often objects of pity and
sympathy. They were even sometimes honorable participants in the
culture of the West. The defect was kept secret as much as possible,
and only in the most depraved examples of the breed like the famous
exemplar of the French Revolution, the "Marquis" de Sade, was the
defect elevated to the level of a virtue.
A professor acquaintance of mine opines that it is almost impossible to
succeed in the world of modern "art" today unless you are a Jew or a
homosexual. In the giant bi-coastal con game that the art world has
become, these two categories often overlap.
We all know what they have done to our art. Splotches, dabs, and
unrecognizable scrawls are far from the worst of it. Ugliness and the
desecration of all that is noble and beautiful are far from the worst of
it. What is to follow is probably not even the worst of it.
The level of newspaper writing reaches new lows of vulgarity every year,
and when I quote from articles I will use the word "excrement" in place
of other words which are now apparently permitted in general circulation
publications, and which I have edited out.
The British newspaper New Statesman and Society waxed
eloquent recently over an art exhibition at the South London Gallery by
a pair of arty perverts who call themselves "Gilbert and George." The
article is titled "Fecal Fulminations: Gilbert and George's Naked
[Excrement] Pictures." It states:
Representations of human feces and the male nude are the most noteworthy
features of collaborators Gilbert and George's current exhibition of
paintings at the South London Gallery. The works have the capacity to
astonish, but they are ultimately unsatisfying.
Now there's a real criticism for you! Thank you,
New Statesman, for putting these culture destroyers in their place.
"Unsatisfying!"
After bewailing the fact that some other critics can't handle this sweet
couple's "homoeroticism," the article continues:
Naked [Excrement] Pictures, their new work, is a
collection of huge jewel-colored photographs hung from floor to ceiling
at the South London Gallery. The Victorian civic building is the
perfect setting. . . . This might be the chapel of a neo-Gothic church
with stained-glass windows by Burne-Jones or William Morris. Except
that the pictures are full of the artists' own huge, hand-colored, giant
[excrement], flying [excrement], cruciform [excrement], penile
[excrement], and Gilbert and George with their Y-fronts round their
ankles, or exposing their anuses. . . .
The catalogue quotes the bible, reminding us that we are no more than
dust (or [excrement]) and came into this world naked. There is an
implied humanitarianism. The artist "lays his arm around the shoulders
of the other human [excrement] or saves him like someone drowning at
sea. . . ." In this work, Gilbert holds George like the dead body of
Christ brought down from the cross. Elsewhere in "[Excrement] World"
the artists gather at the foot of the cross, like the lamentors in a
classical painting. Only this time the cross is made of their own
[excrement].
As Freud wrote: "Defecation affords the first occasion on which the
child must decide between a narcissistic and an object loving attitude.
He either parts obediently with his feces, ‘sacrifices’ them to his
love, or else retains them for purposes of auto-erotic satisfaction."
For Freud the anal phase is arrested, pre-genital. The [excrement] is
synonymous with the penis; a means of procreation. Defecation becomes
the child's most valuable "gift" to be given or withheld . . . ."
So there you have it. "Gilbert and George" conceal their real names and
ethnicities, but their "art" says it all. Severed of all moorings in
European culture, if they ever had any, and severed of all ties to the
natural and healthy values that well up from the soul of European man,
these perverts vend their obscene degradation of our bodies and our
instincts to the accolades -- or at most the amused boredom -- of the
current cultural establishment. This should, but apparently does not,
cause all reasonable men and women to think very long and hard about the
exact nature of that current establishment.
Let me make it clear that I have nothing at all against nudity in art.
Art reproductions, including nudes, grace the walls of my home. The
glorification of the idealized human form began in the Classical
civilization founded by our race. This beautiful form of artistic
expression was renewed when our race rediscovered itself in the
Renaissance, and continued until 1945. It is an integral part of our
culture and our nature.
But to link the beauty of the human body with its waste products -- to
degrade both woman and man by portraying them as receptacles for
unnatural acts -- that is a product of the mentality of an alien race,
Freud's race, or the product of a European mentality perverted beyond
recognition by the anti-culture that surrounds homosexuality.
And what of Freud's race, the Jews? Richard Grenier, himself of Jewish
ancestry, said the following about Jewish influence on the theater in
the June 1993 issue of National Review and in a later
follow-up letter:
Just who are the legions of theatergoers that have made homosexual
theater commercially viable? Here we come to a curious recognition.
Starting after World War II, Jewish playwrights have succeeded on
Broadway in large numbers, and at the same time Jews have come to
dominate Broadway audiences. When I returned to America from Europe in
1977, and was required for professional reasons to see almost everything
on Broadway, I was intrigued to find theater audiences that seemed
overwhelmingly Jewish -- a point perhaps more noticeable to the son of a
Jewish mother. So I found it not especially surprising that, in a
recent week of diligent theatergoing in New York, at the more
commercially successful homosexual works, I got the impression that the
audiences were something like 10 per cent homosexuals and 90 per cent
heterosexual Jews -- to all appearances well-to-do, liberal,
husband-and-wife couples. We had some heterosexual Gentiles in the
audiences, no doubt, but they appeared to be a distinct minority.
During a preview of Angels in America, when one of the
characters uttered an expletive in Yiddish, the house positively roared
with laughter. . . .
Many liberal Jews... have fully accepted the parallel between
discrimination based on race or religion and discrimination based on
'sexual orientation.' This parallel is reflected in the AIDS plays --
indeed, it is more than reflected. To put it plainly, these plays are
about Jews and Jewishness almost as much as they are about
homosexuality. The plays' authors are almost all Jewish. Angels
in America is by Tony Kushner, Jeffrey is by Paul
Rudnick, and both music and lyrics to Falsettos are by
William Finn. The Night Larry Kramer Kissed Me is by the
only Gentile, David Drake, but the title's Larry Kramer is Jewish and a
real person. He is the author of The Normal Heart and The Destiny of Me, two angry AIDS- homosexual plays of
1985 and 1992, respectively. (Barbara Streisand is currently planning a
movie version of The Normal Heart.) In all these plays a
homosexual, usually the Jewish protagonist's Gentile lover, dies of
AIDS. This is the fixture of these homosexual works, novels as well as
plays... .
The leading Jewish figures are homosexuals and most of the leading
homosexuals are Jews. The characters talk endlessly about Jews and
homosexuality, homosexuality and Jews. The playwrights themselves find
a correlation. Am I not to notice this?. . ."
The health effects of homosexual sodomy, which I have discussed in other
programs, are destructive to our race. The anti-natal effects of
homosexual recruitment are destructive to our race. The demoralization,
perversion, and confusion that result from homosexual culture distortion
are destructive to our race. The creation of a moneyed and amoral class
with great political influence but no responsibility to future
generations is destructive to our race.
There is no doubt that the promotion of homosexuality is a major front
in the sexual war now being waged against White people. And the sexual
war against us is just a theater in the total war being waged against
the White race worldwide. So it will go until you and I put a stop to
it.
.
at
the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781