Facing Racial Realities
Europeans and Their Descendants Are
a Small and Shrinking Minority
Worldwide
by
Kevin Alfred Strom
Free Speech, July 1996
Volume II, Number 7
The message I am about to give you is a warning to America. It was
written by a non-White who actively supports and encourages the
dispossession of White people; a man who, when asked about
miscegenation, says he is "all for it." Nevertheless, he is a rare man
in America these days: he is man who states frankly what others are
afraid to speak of or even think about. As such, we are lucky to hear
from him. His truths are a warning to all White Americans. The author
has asked me to slightly rewrite his article so that Internet search
engines will have a harder time locating it. He has also asked me not to
use his real name because he fears the possible reprisals that often
follow truth-telling on racial matters. So I will refer to him by his
pen name of Henry Liu. Heed his warning to the West:
We're doing a pretty good job of infiltrating America and forcing Whites
to accept us. Asians ought to continue to have many children. We are
already more than half the Earth's population, and it won't be long
before the 12% White minority have all become Asian or African mixtures
since we've convinced them that intermarriage is good and normal. Over
such a planet we Asians can unfurl our racial flag.
The Republican Party enjoyed a brief height of glory in 1994 and 1995
when a conservative backlash outvoted the liberal-welfare-immigrant
voting bloc. However, their reign is already starting to crumble.
Consider this scenario: Clinton wins the 1996 election, the Religious
Right loses credibility by insisting upon anti-abortion and
biblical-education policies, and the media continue to allege ties
between right-wing extremists and Republicans. By the year 2000 the
combined voting power of White liberals, Blacks, and other minorities
makes Congress overwhelmingly Democrat. This starts a chain reaction in
which Congress votes to increase the immigration quota, more non-White
immigrants become voters, more of these voters lobby for increased
immigration quotas and for multicultural education. The schools teach
White children that Americans should be tolerant and accept infinite
immigration.
By 2030 immigrants, their White spouses, and other minorities make up
70% of the U.S. population. By popular demand Federal law enforcement
agencies go after any and all White people who resist us and put them
away in concentration camps.
By 2050, Whites have become 15% of the U.S. population. The U.N.
replaces the Federal government of America. Other Western nations are
forced under U.N. monitoring to accept millions of African, Asian, and
Middle Eastern citizens. The planet then becomes a game between Africans
and Asians only. Guess who will win that game?
White Americans have an average of 1.8 children per couple, and that
number is declining. The number of couples is also declining as
homosexuality and childlessness become ever more fashionable among
Whites. At the same time, I predict 10% of Caucasians will marry
non-Whites, while non-White immigrants continue to both come in
increasing numbers and have more children per couple.
At the present rate, pure Europeans in America will become a rare
species within decades. Given our ever-increasing standards of Political
Correctness, it does not seem likely that the White separatists will be
able to outlaw interracial marriages in time to make a difference. It
also seems unlikely that a vogue for having many children will ever
return for Whites: the media would oppose it as racist. Adoption of
non-White babies is also skyrocketing.
It's only a matter of time before U.S.A. stands for the United States of
Asia. Since China's one-child policy is falling apart and since White
people are so eager to adopt babies, we could have a profitable trade of
exporting Chinese babies to Western countries. Let's continue to show
them images of tortured orphans so that White couples will continue to
adopt Chinese children like there is no tomorrow. I have been asked by
other Asians: Are you suggesting that we start baby farms and harvest
the babies as trading commodities? Well, we've always been good at
trade, haven't we?
If the environmentalists complain, we can just accuse them of racism.
In place of China's one-child policy we could have the "export-the-rest"
policy. Every now and then we'll slaughter a kid and show it off to the
Western media, so that their churches will bend over backwards to adopt
more kids.
We may never be able to defeat the West militarily, but we sure as hell
can genetically.
Today, European man is losing out in numbers and economic prowess to
Mongolian man. Even though Mongolians far outnumber Europeans in
population, Whites have enthusiastically brought in Mongolian immigrants
for assimilation and intermarriage. The one-way traffic of immigration
occurs on top of lower birth and fertility rates for Whites. It appears
that one day soon Asians can prepare to unfurl their racial flag over a
vanquished planet. My critics say: When an Asian and a Caucasian join
together, the kid is half Asian and half Caucasian. Neither the
Caucasians nor the Asians have won in the match. But my critics are
wrong. As the lineage becomes three-fourths-Asian, 7/8-Asian,
15/16-Asian there comes a point when the person is, for all practical
purposes, Asian. Asian nations need merely to export a tiny percentage
of their burgeoning populations in order to make U.S.A. stand for the
United States of Asia.
Imagine a 22nd century when California becomes New Khalistan, Kansas
becomes New Canton, Wyoming becomes New Wuhan, Louisiana becomes New
Lhasa, North Dakota becomes New Dakka, Indiana becomes New India,
Pennsylvania becomes New Pusan, and Washington, DC, becomes New
Haiphong. Southern parts of the United States might be given to Latin
American nations, so that Texas becomes Nuevo Sonora and Florida becomes
Nuevo Cuba.
We could have Aryan reservations in the hills of Appalachia, and their
exotic Christian religion would be showcased in museums. There are
already more Muslims than Episcopalians in America, so I suppose that it
might become the state religion. Buddhists and Hindus would follow close
behind.
Overpopulation is often cited as a major problem in China and other
Asian countries. Yes, the birthrate has been slightly reduced, but there
is another solution which Asians are quietly implementing. Asian
countries are exporting their excess populations to America, making more
space at home, while America becomes more Asian. Naturally we are happy
that Americans are not being informed of this in their media. As Sun
Tzu would say: Sow confusion among your enemy and weaken them.
American school children are already learning about the aboriginal First
Nations -- the Mongolians -- who rightfully own this continent. They are
now learning about the crimes of the European invaders and usurpers, and
soon all American school children will learn of the ultimate destiny and
purpose behind it all: the new United States of Asia.
For those of us with Asian mothers, let us take this day to thank them
for bringing us into the world. Let us pray that our holy genes will
continue to spread across the planet until the day that the yellow sun
will shine upon the Earth and the yellow moon will guide us through the
darkness.
You have been reading the thoughts of Henry Liu. I am glad that Mr. Liu
has given us this warning, and I am glad that a few people in this
country are still unafraid to exercise their freedom of speech.
The word "racism" has been turned into a synonym for evil. But racism
only means having racial feelings -- a feeling of kinship with your
racial brothers and sisters, a feeling of understanding and belonging, a
feeling of being part of a culture, a part of something bigger than
ourselves.
Racial feelings are inborn in us. They are good and natural. And it is one of this century's most
horrible deceptions to paint them as somehow wrong. If you want to call
our normal racial feelings racism, then so be it. We'll call those
feelings racism.
As long as there are races there will be racism. It is inborn, has an
evolutionary purpose and survival value, and is even present in
non-human species. Racial feelings are about as likely to disappear as
are sexual feelings.
Actually, racism is good and necessary for the continued branching off
of new types of human beings from the existing stocks. Evolution, so far
as we know, operates primarily by such branching, and racial feelings
are an important part of what keeps the branches apart. At some point,
homo sapiens sapiens refused to breed with the sub-men around him.
Mallards and wood ducks can interbreed, and may even do so under certain
freak conditions. But the mentality of these birds, even when they live
in the same territory, makes them shun the other type. The branches,
once one, are now separate for all time.
Most Whites -- even most liberal Whites -- instinctively choose Whites
as neighbors, school mates, and life mates. This is good and natural and really has nothing at all
to do with the emotion of hate. Evolution, branching, and separation
have brought about all the wonderful diversity of creation that we see
around us. It is Nature's way. It is God's way. And virtually all of
natural history is testament to the natural preference of species,
subspecies, and races to cleave to their own kind.
It is only by acknowledging the wisdom of our racial feelings that the
wonderful qualities of our race can be preserved. Our society once
protected (admittedly in an imperfect way) the gene pool that produced
Da Vinci, Aristotle, Mozart, Beethoven, and the builders of the Saturn V
rocket. It does not do so any longer. The multiculturalists and
multiracialists are in the ascendant in the West and promulgate a moral
paradigm in which defense of our gene pool is evil ("racist"). This, in
my view, is destructive, even genocidal.
White Americans -- and Whites around the world -- are, in increasing
numbers, beginning to see themselves (again) as a people with a common
history and common interests and values. Whites instinctively feel a
kinship that they do not feel with Arabs, Africans, Asians, or
Australoids. They inwardly respond to Beethoven as they cannot respond
to the call from the Minaret or the beat of African drums. They are
inspired by the Gothic spires of Germany and Spain, the Parthenon, the
Pantheon, and the Arch of Titus; but the Wailing Wall, the altars of the
Incas, and the cryptic tribal art on the walls of the New York subway
system, fascinating though they may be, remain alien.
The fact that other races see us as one people, and at times attack us
as one people, aids this process of rising racial consciousness. A
similar situation prevails among Blacks. European Americans are
awakening, and we are starting to take charge of our own destiny again.
Such is the way that peoples and nations are formed. Such is the way of
Nature. And the screams from the ivory towers of the academic elite will
not stop this process.
One of the latest hysterical screams from the academic left is the claim
that the White race simply does not exist, that there is no such thing
and never has been. A large number of degreed whores of Academe say so
-- but then they also think that Bill Moyers can be taken seriously.
There is a political agenda behind the "there is no such thing as the
White race" malarkey, and it exposes itself every time the obvious
corollary is stated: If there is no such thing as the White race, then
there is no collective responsibility for the real and imagined sins it
committed against the equally imaginary African, Amerind, and other
races which stand impatiently in the handout lines for what's left of
the tax money after the bureaucrats have taken their cut.
No more affirmative action -- races do not exist! No more "Holocaust"
reparations -- races do not exist! No more "diversity" training --
races do not exist! Oh, that would never do. It is only the White race
which does not -- cannot -- exist. It cannot exist, because if its
existence were admitted, then the genocide which is now being practiced
against it would become immediately obvious. And even a few honest
liberals might pale at that and spoil the whole show.
The multiracialists have painted themselves into a corner. What to do?
Probably just mumble that the "oppressed" groups are "peoples,"
"nations," or something of the sort. And they will hope that Whites
never wake from their stupor and coalesce into a "people" just as
conscious of its interests and destiny as, say, the Jews.
What a different world that would be. If it is illegitimate morally and
untenable scientifically for Whites to organize on the basis of a
perceived common race or ethnicity (or even to claim that their race
exists), then surely the same would hold true for Jews and Blacks.
Perhaps one day "liberal" true believers will wake up and discover that
nothing exists. That is the end of the road for their mode of thinking.
The verb "to be" is anathema to them. The thought that there might be an
absolute reality outside themselves, a reality which is what it
is regardless of their wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or
decrees is as intolerable to them as it is to a two-year-old. Believe it
or not, they have even developed a language (called "e-prime") -- a
version of English which eschews completely the verb "to be."
"Liberals" are very suggestible, and are really the victims of, not the
originators of, the "race does not exist, but some races must be
favored" swindle. It is convenient to demonize and dehumanize people
that you are going to commit genocide upon. And it is easier to commit
genocide when you convince your henchmen that the victims really don't
exist. That is what the "White race does not exist" con is really all
about. It is a warrant for genocide.
Another lie which the academic elite rams down the throats of our
children on a daily basis is that their technique of genocide -- racial
mixing -- is really good for us because it brings "hybrid vigor."
Hybrid vigor refers to exceptional growth which sometimes manifests
itself when scientists cross or hybridize strains of plants or animals
experimentally. Hybrid vigor signifies nothing in terms of the human
genius needed to create and sustain a civilization. Where it exists,
such as in corn or apple trees, it usually peters out after a few
generations.
A far more important concept in the crossing of human races is
"regression to the mean." This means that even if you mate a Negro
genius with a White person the offspring are, on average, likely to
exhibit Negroid characteristics more typical of the average Negro, and
not necessarily of that particular Black genius, and this is even more
true of succeeding generations.
Regression to the mean in the case of interbreeding with Africans means
regression to the African mean, with Asians to the Asian mean. Neither
holds out promise of raising the level of the upper half of our bell
curve -- rather the opposite. The other races
have
mixed
with Europeans, and everywhere the results are, to say the least,
unimpressive. They have nothing to offer us.
Some advocates of racial mixing point to areas where the other races are
superior to Whites: Blacks in athletic ability, Asians in social unity,
etc. But we cannot (yet) select such characteristics, especially when
you are talking about random interbreeding as advocated by liberals and
Communists. In the long run you will get random combinations of the different characteristics, most of which will
not
be superior. You will get regression to the mean. For
such a questionable experiment, you would destroy one of Nature's
creatures? Would you force bald eagles and fish eagles to mate? Lions
and tigers?
The European race has all the diversity it needs for health and further
evolutionary development. It is a moral and environmental crime of the
highest order to destroy it by breaking down all its defenses against
interbreeding.
The academic whores and shills who call for genocide are always prating
about how we can't say for sure how much of our intelligence and our
civilization is genetically determined and how much is caused by
environment. (They used to say that it was all environmental, but the
evidence is too contrary, so they've given up on that score.)
But I say to them -- even you admit that you don't know that our unmatched civilization is not the result of our
genetic makeup. If it is, and you obliterate that unique genetic code,
do you realize the enormity of what you have done?
Whites should be allowed to re-erect their traditional barriers against
mating and social contact with non-Whites in order to preserve our kind.
Anything else is genocide.
I can hear the academic genocide-justifiers coming out of their holes
and whispering to our young people -- "There is only one race -- the
human race. We are all one species."
There is a great deal of debate on species boundaries. The question has
been raised: Should the races be treated as separate species, or just
subspecies of the same species? They certainly vary enough for
subspecies classification. After all, some species of mammals differ so
little that a human observer cannot tell them apart. (Two species of
Siberian hamsters come to mind. Among these two species a scent,
discernible only to the hamsters and laboratory olfactory instruments,
is the main difference and the means by which the female chooses a mate
of the correct species.) The position that there are no subspecies among
men -- that they do not even exist -- is indeed a novel one. It would
imply that the Australoid, the Capoid, and the European, each developing
separately for at least one hundred thousand years and possessing
startling physical differences, are not only the same species but must be defined as the same subspecies. No one can
scientifically defend such a thesis.
I cannot speak for anyone else, but in my eyes the European race,
imperfect as it may be, is a race of light and beauty. It is the race of
Shelley and Keats and Poe and Shakespeare, the race of the Parthenon and
Chartres Cathedral and Stonehenge, the race of Mozart and Beethoven and
Liszt and Brahms, the race of Vermeer and Raphael and Rossetti, the race
of Caesar and Alexander and Washington and Jefferson, the race of Ford
and Marconi and Goddard and Von Braun and Shockley.
And our race
is
threatened. Nowhere is our birthrate above
replacement level. Everywhere our borders have been opened and the new
elite teaches our children that intermarriage is good and desirable.
Everywhere the new elite teaches our children that to defend our genetic
heritage is the very definition of evil.
The end result, if trends continue, will be genocide. The end result
will be death for the uniquely beautiful, intelligent, and creative
people called by the name of the goddess Europa.
.
