The Suppressors
The New World Order Is Able
To Exercise Global Censorship
by
Kevin Alfred Strom
Free Speech, June 1996
Volume II, Number 6
There are three recent and related events I would like to bring to your
attention. The first is the sacking by Disney's Jewish owners of Bob
Grant, the only mainstream talk-radio host who, at least occasionally,
speaks the truth on racial matters. The second is the cancellation by
St. Martin's Press of best-selling author David Irving's latest book.
The third is the recent political trial of the Politically Incorrect
CP86 group in Holland.
New York City is, for all practical purposes, lost to the United States.
It has become a Third World city. Its political structure and
institutions are ruled by an elite consisting of a certain Middle
Eastern tribe and their White collaborators. Its streets are ruled by
often racially unidentifiable non-White gangs. It is an uncivilized and
dangerous place to live and work, unless you are wealthy enough to hide
behind the security systems and bulletproof glass of the skyscrapers and
limousines.
In New York City the controlled media are unable to maintain the
pretense that everything is still all right and that the American people
are still in charge, as they do in their "lie casts" to the rest of the
country. To make such an outrageous claim would lose the media masters
all their credibility, for New Yorkers know better. They know far better
than most of us what a sewer this country has become.
In such an environment it was inevitable that someone like Bob Grant
would be on the air. Bob Grant was an extremely popular talk-show host
on New York's WABC radio, the 50,000-watt flagship station of Cap
Cities/ABC. Bob Grant dared to acknowledge that there were racial
differences and that there was a racial problem in this country. He
never ever implicated the self-chosen in the decline of America, but he
did state openly the obvious truths that the man in the street had
waited to hear for so long. And that made him extremely popular.
He stated:
Minorities are the Big Apple's majority. You don't need the papers to
tell you that. Walk around and you know it.... To me, that's a bad
thing. I'm a white person.
and:
We have in our city, we have in our state of New York, we have in our
nation, not hundreds of thousands but millions of sub-humanoids,
savages, who really would feel more at home careening... along the sands
of the Kalahari or the dry deserts of eastern Kenya -- people who, for
whatever reason, have not become civilized. Am I the only one who makes
that observation? No, certainly not. Perhaps I express it more
directly, more candidly, far less euphemistically than politicians
would.
He even dared to question our present policy of allowing the worst among
us to breed us and themselves into more and more poverty and misery:
The only hope we have is something that we're not brave enough to do.
But if there is a brave new world of tomorrow, they will enact the Bob
Grant Mandatory Sterilization Plan. I wonder if they've ever figured out
how they multiply like that. It's like maggots on a hot day. You look
one minute and there are so many there, and you look again and wow,
they've tripled!
. . . Why not apply the laws of eugenics, the laws of heredity, as
discovered or proven out by Gregor Mendel? Why not take those laws and
use them on the most important species of all?
He also went beyond merely stating the obvious truths that "everybody
knows but no one is supposed to say" when he exposed some of the shady
and subversive connections of that New World Order saint, "Martin
Luther" King. He went so far as to state the simple facts that made King
a phony, a fraud, and a fake; and he characterized King's moral state
accurately when he called him a "scumbag" and a "bum." Hidden truths
were leaking out to the
hoi polloi, and we all know that
we can't allow that in our "free and democratic" society!
Though he disclaimed any affiliations with or sympathy for so-called
"racists," Grant did allow pro-White individuals to speak without being
cut off in a few instances. This enraged neo-Marxist and leftist groups
and individuals such as Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, Jesse
Jackson, and Jewish attorney Alan Dershowitz. Their agenda, you see,
cannot stand the light of day. And Grant, though on an obvious leash
himself, was letting too much light in the room for comfort. They had
been clamoring for Grant's removal for months to no effect. Cap
Cities/ABC, though heavily Jewish, had businessmen at the helm who
valued profits more than Zionist or leftist goals. And Grant was
extremely popular and extremely profitable for ABC.
Even after ADP, AMTRAK, Continental Airlines, Delta Airlines, First Data
Corporation, New Jersey Transit, Blue Cross, and Xerox had been
pressured into canceling their ads on Bob Grant's program, he was still
on the air, popular as ever, and the ad revenue kept pouring in.
But, as reported on this program, things have been changing at ABC. ABC
has been purchased by the Jewish-owned and controlled Disney Company,
making it arguably the largest media empire in the world today. Instead
of ultimately reporting to Thomas Murphy, everyone at ABC was now
reporting to Disney's chairman Michael Eisner and Disney's president
Michael Ovitz -- both Jews.
Soon ABC radio had a new Gentile overseer, Robert F. Callahan, Jr.;
described by the Unofficial Bob Grant Home Page on the Internet as Bob
"I never met a protest group I didn't cave in to" Callahan.
Knowing that they would now have a more sympathetic and a more Kosher
ear, the censors intensified their demands to ax Grant after the Disney
takeover. When Jesse Jackson demanded Grant's termination, Michael Ovitz
wrote back in true Machiavellian style:
"Although we have already determined how we will handle this situation,
I nevertheless appreciate your consideration and concern."
In a few days, Jackson, Dershowitz, and the rest of the gang were
outdoing each other in taking credit for their obscene victory. Grant
was fired. According to an inside source at ABC, the conversation
between Callahan and Grant went like this:
CALLAHAN:
Bob, you've been with ABC for a long time and
are a valued member of our company. Unfortunately, times are changing,
and views such as yours which were once acceptable in the media are now
unacceptable. Don't get me wrong, Bob. I agree with a lot of your
views, but your views have become, well, controversial.
You know, Disney owns Cap-Cities/ABC now. Disney is a large,
family-oriented company. They don't like controversy, and frankly, Bob,
you've become a bit too controversial.
I'm sorry to have to tell you this, but you have to be off the air.
Here is the deal we're willing to offer you:
We will continue to pay you in full through the end of your contract
if
you agree to leave immediately and also agree the
separation was mutually agreed to.
If you do not agree, we will stop paying you and claim that your actions
were so racist and irresponsible they brought disrepute onto this
company and thereby constituted a breach of your contract.
Sure, you'll sue us, but that will take thousands of dollars and years
to get through the courts. You know, we have dozens of lawyers on
staff, we can tie this up in court for years. Bob, you're 67 years old.
Are you really up for a fight like that? And even though you'll win in
the end, is it really worth all the legal fees, time, and above all, the
aggravation?
Take the money and run, Bob. It's best for you, best for ABC, and best
for Disney.
GRANT:
I feel terrible about this. My life has been WABC
for years. This isn't the way I hoped things would end, but it looks
like I really have no choice.
Grant has now been offered a time slot at rival New York station WOR. I
await reports from my listeners in the urban jungle as to whether and
how much his leash has been tightened.
And I have a few words for the censors. You cannot suppress the truth.
By shutting down a source of truth, incomplete and partial though his
revelations were, you merely drive people to go farther and farther from
the lapdog media to find the truth they crave. And you confirm their
suspicions about the controlled media. Are you listening, Mr. Eisner?
From author Ingrid Rimland we bring you the story of David Irving and
the fight for historical truth:
David Irving, as any reader knows who has looked into World War II, is
one of Europe's finest mainstream writers and historians, with more than
35 impressive titles to his name. Not all that long ago, Irving was
easily one of the world's most monetarily successful scribes, sashaying
around England in a splendid brown Rolls Royce. He would routinely land
himself grand multimillion-dollar deals because he has this knack for
painting World War II both from a historically captivating and
convincing angle, yet with a deft and gleaming pen. He wrote such books
as Hitler's War, Churchill's War, Goering, and Dresden, the runaway best-seller on which his world-wide fame is
based.
I would also note here that he is one of the foremost experts in the
field of archival research. His work with original historical documents
has resulted in many important discoveries. His most recent book, which
his publisher recently canceled, is
Goebbels: Mastermind of the
Third Reich.
He was, and is by all accounts, one of the most successful authors who
writes in the popular historical vein. For decades his books were used
as handbooks in military colleges. It was raining manna from
Publishers Row, and David Irving had the spoon.
In the mid-1980s, Ernst Zündel, scouting everywhere for expertise
and information, started courting Irving as a potential witness for his
upcoming Great Holocaust Trial #2. Ernst had read many of the Irving
books and liked and admired the author -- a feeling which was not
mutual.
Up to that time, Irving had hardly heard of Ernst. He knew the usual,
distorted stories about this wild-eyed fool in Canada who claimed there
was no Holocaust. He was leery and distant with Ernst.
What's more, he was a firm believer in the Holocaust. He had told a few
snippets that didn't quite fit into the conventional "wisdom" of what
had happened during World War II, but no one would have counted David
Irving in those years among the ranks of the Revisionists.
David was vacationing in Florida when he was contacted by Zündel
and agreed to be a witness for the Zündel Defense. He wasn't
inexpensive either, but Zündel needed him.
A nonchalant David Irving arrived at the Toronto Airport in May of 1988
-- sun-bronzed from his vacation, in a Hawaiian shirt, sun glasses,
jogging pants, and sandals -- and without suit, dress shirt, or a tie
and looking just like the successful, laid-back writer that he was.
Ernst didn't think that was attire suited to impress a judge and jury.
And so he stuck him in Doug Christie's business suit (Christie is
Zündel's lawyer) -- they had the same long legs! -- and since he
didn't have an extra tie, dispatched someone to the Salvation Army
corner store to buy David Irving a 75 cent tie, and David, being a good
sport, slung it around his neck.
Here you have providence foreshadowing!
Every news clip, every photo emanating from that trial, which made
world-wide history, shows David Irving, British multimillionaire, clad
in his borrowed suit and his Salvation Army tie! -- while having no
idea, I am sure, that on that bright and merry day he marched straight
into his own personal, financial, and political demise.
The rest is in the transcripts that came out of the Second Zündel
Trial.
The famous author David Irving, renowned expert at documents, took one
look at the Leuchter findings [which prove that mass gassings could not
have taken place at Auschwitz as alleged] and knew that he saw what he saw.
Moreover, he turned out to be a principled, courageous man who testified
to what he saw. He publicly repudiated his erroneous view on what is
called the "Holocaust" right on the witness stand!
He testified to what these findings meant for history. It is to his
eternal credit, and shows the measure of the man, that he has stuck to
his own guns and has been ever since -- at great costs both monetarily
and in his private life -- one of the world's most often quoted, and
hence most vilified Revisionists.
He has paid dearly for his stand. The lavish literary contracts soon
dried up. Book-club and paperback contracts diminished. His lecture
tours were sabotaged. Like other Revisionists who have dared to speak
the truth based on the facts they have found, Irving has been hounded,
harassed, threatened, hurt, and intimidated. He has been banned from
Australia for what he said, and he has been barred for life and sent in
handcuffs out of Germany for what he might have said
there.
A vicious effort has been made to tie him to the Oklahoma bombing. A
smear book recently came out describing David Irving as a sexual
deviate. It just goes on and on. There is no end to it.
The latest now is this, sent to us yesterday from the offices of the
Institute for Historical Review:
. . . ALERT!
We just received word that St. Martin's Press is going to cancel the
upcoming book by David Irving on Goebbels due to the extreme pressure to
which it has been subjected since announcing that book.
A spokesman at St. Martin's would not confirm or deny that the book was
being canceled, but did say that a press release was being prepared at
this moment, and if not ready by tonight would most likely be ready by
Thursday morning.
The toll-free number for St. Martin's is 800-221-7945. Irving's editor
is Tom Dunne . . .
And it happened. St. Martin's, so craven in their capitulation to Jewish
censorship that they claimed not to have read the book they were about
to issue, canceled publication.
So what you witness here is yet another example of escalating Holocaust
terrorism and subsequent "self-censorship" by publishers -- in the same
vein as the attack on Marco Polo in Japan, a magazine
which [tentatively questioned Jewish accounts of WWII and] subsequently
ceased publication.
Just think about it for a moment: Is this going to stop people from
reading Irving's books? Of course not. His books will be ever more in
demand, and yet one more of many question marks about what really is behind the Holocaust to warrant such drastic and
desperate steps will get imprinted in the public mind.
Who is it that tells you and me we cannot read what David Irving writes
on Goebbels? What's in it that's so dangerous?
We'll want to find that book! We'll want to tell our friends who'll
tell their friends ... and on and on and on.
Which goes to show ... force begets counter force.
In Holland political correctness has reached a frenzy of fanaticism that
even Orwell would have found incredible. In Holland there is a
nationalist political party called CP86. According to party spokesman
Tim Mudde:
The CP86 developed from an old party which was founded in the 1980's
under the name Center Party. The word Center [meant] not capitalist and
not communist, not right, not left, but center ... an early form of
Third Way politics in Holland. In 1984 there was a split and [later] the
more radical faction ... reformed under the name Center Party 86, [or]
CP86. In the beginning of the 90's there was a large group of young
people who became members of the CP86, and then the politics became
pretty much radical, more or less like the BNP [British National Party]
in England.
Recently, leaders of CP86 have been put on trial for, believe it or not,
their party's slogan, which is "Our Own People First." Sounds insane,
but where multiracialists rule, the legal system could make the Red
Queen blanch.
How could this have taken place? Tim Mudde explains:
In September 1993 our houses were searched, the houses of our board
members, the presidium. They tried to locate weapons and all sorts of
illegal things. But since they didn't manage that, we were [put on
trial] for our propaganda which we used in elections in 1994, mainly for
town-councils and for parliament....
[They are now trying] to convict us on our usual very mild form of
propaganda. I think the people in the States wouldn't understand what
the fuss is all about. The only thing we say is that there are more
black criminals than white criminals. We don't even say that's a
biological thing. We just happen to see things clearly.
In the 2nd of May in 1995 we were convicted as being a criminal
organization, with some heavy fines for the members and for the party,
also jail sentences on probation. Of course we will take this to a
higher court because we think that if we really get convicted there will
be no more nationalist opposition in Holland, and probably anywhere else
in Europe because the European Union members are working closely
together to ... ban every form of nationalist movement.
One of our leaflets was ... against [having a] multiracial society....
Another leaflet reads, "Don't let yourself be discriminated against just
because you're Dutch." And another, which is one of our main slogans
reads, "Our own people first." This is also the slogan of the fourth
biggest party in Flanders, and if they ban it in Holland there's a big
chance they'll try to ban the Flemish Block also, which means nearly 20%
of the Flemish voters will be convicted as criminals ....
Last year I mentioned this trial on American Dissident Voices. The result of the trial was the conviction of several prominent
members of CP86 on the charge of "using an illegal slogan." Fines and
jail terms were imposed. The victims of this travesty of justice have
appealed and are patiently waiting for another turn in a court system
which has obviously been captured by the enemies of their people. We
wish them well.
A parting comment -- the next time you look at the night sky think of
ORION -- Our Race Is Our Nation.
.
at
the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781