A hurt and confused White mother recently wrote a letter to the editor
of my local paper stating that her daughter had come home from public school
over the Christmas holiday with materials celebrating "Kwanzaa"
(the largely fictitious African-American Hanukkah analogue, which is slyly
claimed by its promoters to be non-religious in order to assure its patronage
with taxpayers' money). The public school had also provided her daughter
with Hanukkah candles and other materials to promote "understanding"
of our Jewish brethren, whose exalted religion is somehow exempted from
that pesky wall of separation between church and state. Also brought home
in the daughter's book bag were printed materials which were part of some
unpronounceable Cambodian celebration, which was, of course, presented
as equal with all these other celebrations of alien culture. Where, this
concerned mother wanted to know, was Christmas, which was not even mentioned
and might as well not have existed? Why, she asked,
couldn't Euro-American
Yuletide traditions at least be mentioned in the schools and presented
as a small part of our wonderful new world of diversity?
This poor, confused woman just doesn't get it. The one connecting
thread in all these crazed promotions of alien cultures, which change
from year to year depending on the Politically Correct fashions and conveniences
of the moment, is hatred of us, hatred of White people, and a desire
to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture forever. The
partly alien and partly traitorous elite which now rules this country and
which of course controls the public schools is determined to wipe us and
our genetic and cultural heritage off the face of the Earth. And
we are letting them do it. We are entrusting our children to their
most sophisticated experts in brainwashing, and one hears only a few pathetic,
cringing whimpers of protest, like the mother's letter I just mentioned.
Such "protests" might at most elicit a haughty snicker of contempt
from our enemies, but that is about all.
We of European descent must begin to organize, or we and our kind
will not survive the coming years. The time is long past when our country
was so rich and powerful we could let sentimentality rule and give away
ever-increasing amounts of our wealth and our precious soil. We have lost
so much, and we must not continue to pretend that this loss has not occurred.
We must acknowledge that we live in a nation ruled by alien occupiers and
the traitors who serve them. And we must begin to build a powerful resistance
to that occupation.
Some Americans are waking up. And some of these Americans occupy positions
of importance within one of the citadels of the enemy -- and that does
strike fear in the hearts of our enemies. One such man is Dr. Brent Nelson.
A college professor, a man with much to lose, we must admire Dr. Nelson
for his courage and learn from his research and his insights.
The following article is based on a speech given by Dr. Nelson to the
North Carolina Council of Conservative Citizens in November, 1994. In the
past I have often criticized conservatives, and not without reason. After
all, modern conservatism has utterly failed to conserve either our race
or our freedom, and most of its prominent spokesmen are now mere hirelings
of our enemies. But Dr. Nelson and the Council are doing something very
useful in moving conservative thinking away from its current obsession
with multiracial moneymaking and toward concern with race and Western destiny.
K.A.S.
The Balkanization of America
A year ago the U.S. Bureau of the Census published a report which revised
previous estimates of the future population of the United States. According
to the Census Bureau, there will be 400 million people in the United States
in the year 2050. One important fact about this figure is that it is much
greater than the optimum population for a land area the size of the United
States. Another important fact concerns the nature of that population.
In 2050 the United States will consist of several blocs of minority groups.
There will be no majority group. By 2050 European Americans, who for the
first 200 years of the existence of the United States had been its majority
population group and who had founded and maintained its culture, laws,
and economic life, will find themselves in the minority.
There is yet another important fact to be noted about this mass of 400
million people. This is a fact which suggests that the United States of
2050 will be America Balkanized, an America without Americans, an America
in which citizens will identify with their minority status and forget about
the nation as a whole. This is the fact that three of the four major population
blocs will constitute visible minorities. Three of the four blocs -- European
Americans or Whites, African Americans or Blacks, Asian Americans or Yellows
-- will be what the anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith has called "macrodiacritic"
groups. That is, more than 90 percent of their members are visibly identifiable.
The fourth bloc, Hispanic Americans, is a conglomerate created by the Federal
bureaucracy. Hispanics, who can belong to any race, will no doubt still
be a political bloc.
Indeed, all four blocs will be relentlessly political, locked in a struggle
to determine how the increasingly scarce economic goods and natural resources
are to be distributed to each group. Can a nation so wracked by internal
struggle long endure? History suggests not. History suggests that by the
time that America lacks Americans to the extent that Yugoslavia now lacks
Yugoslavs, it will undergo a more or less painful process of deconstruction.
That time may, in fact, occur long before 2050.
The predicted great shift in the composition of the U.S. population
is attributed by the Census Bureau to an estimated yearly influx of 1 million
legal immigrants. There may be an equal number of illegal immigrants entering
the United States each year. The overwhelming majority of immigrants, both
legal and illegal, come from the Third World. Another factor which will
radically change the ethnic composition of the population -- a factor given
less attention by the Census Bureau -- is the differential birth rates
of the various groups involved. It is quite likely that, given current
trends, the European American will find himself in a minority long before
2050.
The three highly visible groups -- the Whites, Yellows, and Blacks --
are, of course, the three major races. Biologists refer to these races
as subspecies. The differences among them go far beyond skin color. There
is no point in enumerating all of those differences, but one fact about
these subspecies needs to be recognized. It has been summed up in a thought-provoking
essay called "Biological Subspecies of Man," written some thirty
years ago by Professor E. Raymond Hall, who was probably the foremost authority
on American mammals. Dr. Hall's observation regarding subspecies of mammals
is that two subspecies of the same species do not occur in the same geographic
area. Dr. Hall notes that there may be some intergradation (mixing) of
subspecies, but much more often one subspecies thrives and the other goes
into extinction. One subspecies proves to be more prolific than the other
and wins the territory for itself. Dr. Hall concluded that the natural
territory of a human subspecies is continental in scope. He warned that
two different subspecies of humans will not co-exist indefinitely on the
same continent. Ultimately one or the other will pass from the scene.
Territoriality is an imperative for man as it is for all other mammals.
European Americans know well that much of urban America and wide areas
of the South have become the territory of another subspecies. Is it too
farfetched to say that what is publicized as a crime wave is really the
strategy, combined with high birthrates, by which one subspecies is supplanting
another, either by outbreeding European Americans or by forcing them to
flee?
Territoriality is central to understanding the future America. Let current
trends go for another 50 years, and it is obvious that then the Southeast
will largely be African territory, and the Southwest mestizo-occupied
territory, with various urban enclaves in the West under the control of
Asians.
But why should we care about what will happen 50 years from now? The
answer to that is the fact that the future is already with us in many areas. America Balkanized is now a reality in southern California, southern
Florida, and in other places all across the continental United States.
The politics of Balkanization -- a recurrent cycle of polarization, confrontation,
and violence -- is already emerging in Los Angeles and Miami. But even
where one would least expect to find it there is evidence of the coming
Balkanization of America.
Let us consider one rather improbable example. The state of Arkansas
is in the center of the United States. It has less than 1 percent of the
U.S. population. It is almost the poorest of the 50 states. It has nothing
to attract immigrants, yet the immigrant influx is apparent even in Arkansas.
Rogers is a small city of about 30,000 people, located in the middle
of the Ozarks, in the extreme northwest corner of the state. Now the majority
of the schoolchildren in Rogers are Spanish-speaking. Only a few years
ago there were almost no Mexicans in the Ozarks. What happened? The answer
is that a huge poultry processing firm, Tyson Foods, has imported thousands
of Mexicans in order to use them as cheap, easily controlled labor.
In the extreme northeast corner of the state there is the small city
of Jonesboro, which has approximately 45,000 people. Jonesboro also has
a huge mosque with a 100-foot-tall minaret. This mosque was not built by
local Black Muslims. It was built by Moslems from the Arab states, students
at the local university who have come to the United States to study business
administration and learn how to manage American corporations which are
being bought up by their countrymen.
On the far western border of Arkansas there is Fort Smith. Almost 10,000
of the 90,000 people in Fort Smith are Asians. They have built a huge Buddhist
temple. Recently one of the schools in Fort Smith had to be shut down for
the day when gang warfare broke out between gangs of Cambodians and Blacks.
The Asians in Fort Smith were originally refugees housed at nearby Fort
Chaffee. Many of them stayed in Fort Smith when they were offered employment
in local factories.
In the center of the state, in Little Rock, a group of Chinese American
investors representing business interests in Hong Kong held a meeting in
August of this year and announced their intention to establish a new community
to be called Chinatown, Arkansas. Chinatown, Arkansas, is to be developed
on 500 acres to be purchased south of Little Rock and will be the home
of 2,000 Chinese immigrants. It will include a shopping center and two
schools. The investors promised that at least one out of every four jobs
created by Chinatown, Arkansas, will be given to local people. Moreover,
they promised that if Chinatown, Arkansas, is successful in achieving its
purpose of facilitating the transfer of Hong Kong businesses to the United
States, then similar Chinatown developments will arise in Missouri, Oklahoma,
Texas, Tennessee, Mississippi, and Louisiana.
A delegation from the Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce was present
and expressed its enthusiasm for the projected Chinatown, Arkansas. The
mayor of Little Rock also expressed his gratitude. In his words, "A
culturally diverse community really has something to offer." The mayor
said that he was happy that Chinatown would offer some jobs to local people,
but he did not say whether or not any member of his own family might be
ready to apply for one of those jobs.
Even where we would least expect it, there is today a foreshadowing
of the coming America, an America in which European Americans will no longer
be able to speak of "our country" but only of "this
country."
What is behind the immigrant invasion? The answer is obvious. It was
apparent in each of the examples cited. The culprits responsible are not
the Illuminati, not the Insiders, not the Humanists, not even the Communists.
No, the cause of America's surrender to the immigrant invasion is simply
the shameless, hoggish greed of the ruling elite of this nation!
The ruling elite can dispatch hundreds of thousands of troops to Kuwait,
Somalia, Rwanda, and Haiti, but for some reason a few thousand men cannot
be spared to patrol the nation's southern border and stop the influx of
illegal immigrants. The reason, of course, is that the elite is quite
happy with the nation's highly permeable borders. The Wall Street
Journal has even editorialized in favor of open borders.
The strategy of the elite is clear: In the new global economy the American
elite will become part of an international elite, while the mass of Americans
who work for a living must accept their future place in a global labor
pool. In other words, the overwhelming majority of European Americans are
supposed to accept a way of life that will be somewhere between the European
standard and that prevailing in the Third World.
What can be done about this threat to the future of our people?
There are at least three possible courses of action.
First, we can continue to do what we have been doing. That is,
communicating our views to our elected representatives in Washington, D.C.
This is an essential, never-ending task. If we cease to undertake it, there
will be no voice against those who urge our representatives to open our
borders to an even larger influx of immigrants.
Second, we can work to change the legislative bodies by encouraging
people who agree with us to run for election. We need candidates who will
express our views. It is much more cost-effective to put in office people
who already agree with us than it is to attempt to convert to our views
those officeholders who may be hostile to us. Even unsuccessful campaigns
are useful in mobilizing the people and broadcasting our views. It is also
useful to put on the ballot referenda such as Proposition 187 in the recent
California elections.
Third, we can begin to work for the implementation of a long-range
strategy in which we turn away from the legislative talk shops and look
to the rank and file of our own people. We need to work to build a sense
of community among European Americans that is as strong as the sense
of community that now exists among African Americans and Asian Americans.
There is now a large population of European Americans, but there is not
a community of European Americans led by European Americans who are conscious,
avowed leaders of that community.
There is a nationwide African American community led by African Americans
who are leaders not because they are accepted as part of the ruling elite,
but because they are leaders of their community as such. They are race
leaders.
European Americans have no race leaders. There is no end of European
Americans who belong to the ruling elite, but -- claiming to represent
all Americans -- they are not our leaders.
In America, unlike Eastern Europe, the politics of Balkanization is
the politics of race. The politics of race terrifies the ruling elite because
it is a politics which is carried on outside of the legislative talk shops.
It is a politics which is rooted in life, which defines friend and enemy
once and for all. It is a politics which is climactic. It is a politics
which is final.
A great campaign in that politics has begun. We cannot look to the ruling
elite for leadership in that campaign. If it is to be found anywhere, we
must look to ourselves alone.
Editor's Note: Dr. Brent A. Nelson is the author of America Balkanized: Immigration's Challenge to Government.
at
the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781