Who said this?
"I give... my most solemn pledge that I will to the very last stand
by the law of the state which forbids the marrying of White people with
Negroes."
Abraham Lincoln said that in the Lincoln-Douglas debates on September
16, 1859. When he said that it was a warning to America. But too many Americans
were complacent. America slept. Who said this?
"There is no room for two distinct races of White men in America,
much less for two distinct races of Black and White. I can conceive of
no greater calamity than the assimilation of the Negro into our social
and political life as our equal.... Within twenty years we can peacefully
colonize the Negro [to Africa] and give him our language, literature, religion,
and system of government under conditions in which he can rise to the full
measure of manhood. This he can never do here. We can never attain the
ideal union our fathers dreamed, with millions of an alien, inferior race
among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desirable."
Abraham Lincoln said that, shortly after the signing of his Emancipation
Proclamation. It was a warning to America of what might come if the wrong
course was followed. But Americans slept, and evil men forced us down that
wrong course.
Who said this?
"There is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all White people
at the idea of an indiscriminate amalgamation of the White race and the
Black race.... A separation of the races is the only perfect preventive
of amalgamation; but as immediate separation is impossible the next best
thing is to keep them apart where they are not already together. If White
and Black people never get together in Kansas, they will never mix blood
in Kansas. This is one self-evident truth."
Abraham Lincoln said that in Springfield, Illinois on June 26, 1857.
He was trying to warn us. But too many of us slept.
Who said this?
"The United States of America was established as a constitutional
republic. When the Constitutional Convention had completed its labors,
a citizen of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin what kind of government
had been set up. Franklin replied, "A republic -- if you can keep
it."
The word "democracy" is not found in either the Declaration
of Independence or the Constitution. ...In all the state papers of Presidents
for the first 125 years -- from Washington until Woodrow Wilson -- there
is no reference to the United States of America as a democracy.
Beginning in 1933 -- the year President Franklin D. Roosevelt extended
diplomatic recognition to Communist Russia, we became a democracy and since
that time a tremendous Government-supported propaganda has been directed
to all young people, to teach them to scorn those who insist that this
nation was established as a republic.
Soon the principal Communist-front organizations throughout the world
began to incorporate the words "democracy" or "democratic"
in their titles. Thus, in 1935, we found in the United States such Communist
organizations as the American League for Peace and Democracy, the Church
League for Industrial Democracy, the North American Committee to Aid Spanish
Democracy and many more. By 1940 there were more than 60 Communist-front
organizations in the United States, each with the word "democracy"
or "democratic" in its corporate title."
Congressman James E. Van Zandt of Pennsylvania said that in a speech
to the House of Representatives on March 30, 1953. It was a warning to
America. But America slept.
Who did this?
He enacted a law which made it illegal for anyone to be denied employment
or housing or accommodation on account of their racial or ethnic background.
He set up a government commission to enforce this law, which investigated
claims of racial or ethnic discrimination and which brought charges against
employers or officials who were suspected of such discrimination. This
law effectively eliminated the right of free association. Henceforth, no
one could freely decide whom he would hire, to whom he could sell, or by
whose side he would work.
The law was officially called the "All Race Law." The year
was 1920. The man who introduced the law was one Josef Dzhugashvili, who
four years later became head of state of the country where the "All
Race Law" was enacted, the Soviet Union, and who called himself Stalin.
Americans should have seen the writing on the wall and acted to prevent
such a tragedy from happening here. But too many -- far too many -- of
us were sleeping.
Who said this?
"We are unable to read in the 14th Amendment... any words or intendment
which prohibit the state from enacting legislation to preserve the racial
integrity of its citizens... so that it shall not have a mongrel breed
of citizens. We find that there is no requirement that the state shall
not legislate to prevent the obliteration of racial pride, but must permit
the corruption of blood, even though it weaken or destroy the quality of
its citizenship. Both sacred and secular history teach that nations have
better advanced in human progress when they cultivate their own... peculiar
genius."
Justice Buchanan of the Supreme Court of Virginia said that in June
1955, writing in the unanimous decision upholding the constitutionality
of the Virginia law barring interracial marriage. Even at that late date
in the ongoing Jewish-Communist assault against America, the states of
Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho,
Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska,
Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota,
Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming all had laws making
interracial marriage a crime. And many other states had had such laws just
a few years earlier. Justice Buchanan was sounding a clarion call to Americans
to wake up. But we slept.
Who said this?
"It seems that segregation is not only recognized in constitutional
law and judicial decision, but that it is also supported by general principles
of natural law. As nature had produced different species, so it has produced
different races of men. Distinguishing racial features have not been produced
by men, or man-made laws. They are the result of processes of evolution
and it seems natural and customary for different species and different
races to recognize and prefer as intimate associates their own kind. Nature
has produced white birds, black birds, blue birds and red birds, and they
do not roost on the same limb or use the same nest. Such recognition and
preference for their own kind prevails among other animals. It prevails
among all people, among the yellow, black, and red-skinned races. The law
recognizes these natural and instinctive principles and practices of life.
It does not attempt to inhibit them. It would be futile to attempt to do
so. This nation's experience with the Eighteenth Amendment shows that there
are forces of nature that cannot be changed by constitutional amendment
or judicial decree....
During recent years there has been a tendency prompted by over-zealous
champions of democracy to extend democratic processes and legal procedure
into fields where they are not qualified to serve. ...This tendency has
been incited and increased by open champions and subversive agents of the
world revolution which has been advancing under the banner of Communism.
The open and avowed purposes of such revolutionaries are to eradicate all
religion and to destroy our system of laws and jurisprudence....
Those who intentionally or unwittingly are overburdening democratic
and legal processes and destroying the delicate balance and apportionment
of powers upon which our way of life depends, play into the hands of the
revolutionaries. While they may think they are championing freedom and
liberalism, they are bringing about a totalitarianism which will destroy
the very object they seek to serve. This court therefore concludes that
segregation itself is not unconstitutional or unlawful...."
Those were the words of, believe it or not, a Federal District Judge,
a native of the state of Ohio, Judge Robert N. Wilkins, in 1952. The decision
rendered found against the NAACP, an organization founded, funded, and
for many years actually headed -- not by Blacks whose interests it purported
to serve -- but by Jews, many of them with long and documented ties to
the anti-American movement described by Judge Wilkins, and which now loots
America at will and defames, imprisons or kills many of those who oppose
its rule. But while these revolutionists were overturning our ancient laws,
most of us were asleep.
On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court of the United States decreed that
racial separation in America's public schools must end, regardless of the
expressed wishes of the people and the traditions of two hundred years.
The court at that time was headed by a man named Earl Warren. While Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court, Earl Warren made friendly visits at taxpayer
expense to Communist heads of state in Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia.
Of six such foreign trips, five were to visit states of the Communist Bloc.
So pro-Communist was the Warren Court that Communist Party spokeswoman
Dorothy Healy said on June 17, 1957, of three simultaneous decisions made
by the court that day dismantling anti-Communist legislation, "This
is the greatest victory the Communist Party ever had."
Warren had almost no legal experience to qualify him for the position
of Chief Justice of the highest court in the land, but that exalted office
was his reward for supporting the takeover of the Republican Party by the
forces friendly to internationalism, Zionism, and Communism who were represented
by Dwight Eisenhower in 1952.
Four days after the assassination of President John Kennedy in November
1963, the Communist newspaper The Worker stated:
"We believe that President Johnson on the one hand and Congress
on the other should act at once to appoint respective extraordinary investigating
commissions with full power to conduct a searching inquiry into all the
circumstances around the assassination of the President and the murder
of the suspect. Such an investigating commission, headed by the chief Justice
of the Supreme Court, should be composed of citizens and experts who enjoy
the confidence of the nation."
Two days after this Communist editorial appeared, Lyndon Baines Johnson
appointed the Chief Justice, Mr. Earl Warren, to head his President's Commission
on the Assassination of President Kennedy, popularly known as the Warren
Commission. The liepapers and the boob-tubes, for some inexplicable reason,
never mentioned the facts about Warren and his background. So we all slept.
When the Warren Court handed down its decree declaring that henceforth
America's schools must be racially mixed, upon what did they base their
decision? Was it based upon law, precedent, or constitutional principles?
No, for all of these at that time had stood steadfast during the entire
prior history of this nation for separation of the races. The Warren Court's
decision was based instead on the findings of self-described "experts"
in the fields of psychology, sociology, and anthropology, fields which
for decades had been infiltrated by aliens and traitors in the service
of America's enemies. They piously testified about the great psychological
harm that was being inflicted by having White schools for White children
and Black schools for Black children. The "experts" were certainly
right, as anyone can see by observing how much better American schools
are now than in 1954. Ostensibly on the basis of these flimsy and empirically
unvalidated claims, but really just in accordance with what they planned
to do all along, Warren and his accomplices changed the meaning of our
Constitution and sentenced millions of sweet innocent little boys and girls
to a living hell and in many cases actual physical rape, torture, and death.
One of these "experts" was one Theodore Brameld, an alleged
authority on psychology who was perhaps not coincidentally an acknowledged
member of at least ten different Communist front and Communist-dominated
organizations, and whose name often appeared in a favorable light in the
columns of the Communist newspaper The Daily Worker. He was listed
there as a supporter of an organization calling itself the American League
for Peace and Democracy, which had formerly called itself the American
League Against War and Fascism, and which was, according to the Senate
Internal Security Committee, engaged "in an effort to create public
sentiment on behalf of a foreign policy adapted to the interests of the
Soviet Union" and which was in addition "the largest of the Communist
front movements in the United States."
Another of these large-brained fellows to whom the court listened so
intently was a man named E. Franklin Frazier, who had been cited by the
U.S. House of Representatives for his membership in Communist organizations
no fewer than 18 times. He held a leading position with the Communist magazine Social Work Today, which in its February 1942 issue gave him credit
for making the magazine's progress possible. In 1949, Frazier wrote a book
entitled The Negro in the United States, which was not only reviewed
favorably in The Worker and the Daily People's World, but
which was actually distributed by the Communist Party and advertised in
its "Workers Book Shop" catalogs for 1949 and 1950. Not only
E. Franklin Frazier, but his book which had been officially adopted by
the Communist Party, USA, were cited as authorities by the United States
Supreme Court in their judicial decision outlawing racial separation in
the public schools.
Warren's record was available to anyone who bothered to look for it
at the time. Frazier's and Brameld's records were also available for anyone
who cared to find them. They were published (and not for the first time)
in the Congressional Record on May 26, 1955, by Senator James O. Eastland.
But most Americans preferred to remain asleep.
It is *uncomfortable to realize that your country is being taken over
by its enemies. It is *frightening to find yourself living in a conquered
and occupied nation. It is *terrifying to think of your future in a nation
where our enemies have twisted and perverted the meaning of our founding
documents and distorted or omitted the true statements and feelings of
our founding fathers. So to avoid discomfort, we prefer to remain asleep.
We fill our lives with the diminishing circle of little pleasures and amusements
still allowed us by our new masters, or with the new pleasures which they
serve up to us on their heaping plate of stinking pornography, mindless
sports and gratuitous violence, amusements crafted with the express purpose
of distracting us from the real issues of life.
Sleep is pleasant and a little of it is necessary, but our enemies well
know that continuous sleep differs little from death, and they also well
know that if we sleep long enough they will be able to kill us with impunity,
an eventuality which has not yet transpired primarily because they aren't
finished raping us and sucking our blood.
Americans have been warned so many times. I warn you again now. We must
awaken. We must base all of our decisions on what is best for the survival
of our people. We must understand that, as great as our churches and our
governmental principles may be, it is not what a man believes about eternity
or what system of government he advocates that makes him one of us. It
is race -- it is biological kinship alone -- that determines who we are.
It is on the basis of what is best for the survival of our people that
we must judge the goodness of any action or policy. If an action hurts
our people, it is bad. If it helps our people, it is good. We made our
society and all its institutions because of who we are, not the other way
around. Nations are biological entities -- not political or geographic
ones. It is on that basis that we will survive as a people or pass forever
from the universe.
Our enemies now occupy the highest offices of the land, and -- do not
be deceived -- they have as their servants the leaders of both political
parties. Now we who are awakened must not only feel the severe discomfort
of an ugly reality, but also the hatred and scorn of our enemies as spewed
forth daily from their printing presses and broadcasting towers. They call
us "haters." But we do not hate other peoples. We hate only him
who would destroy all races and nations, him whose tools were once Communism
and revolution, but are now internationalism, Zionism and the police powers
of the state he has usurped from the sleeping citizens.
at
the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781