WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first
things that they did was to confiscate all the privately-held
weapons, to deny the people the physical ability to resist
tyranny. But even more insidious than the theft of the people's
weapons was the theft of their history. Official Communist "historians"
rewrote history to fit the current party line. In many countries,
revered national heroes were excised from the history books, or their
real deeds were distorted to fit Communist ideology, and
Communist killers and criminals were converted into official
"saints." Holidays were declared in honor of the beasts
who murdered countless nations.
Did you know that much the same process has occurred right
here in America?
Every January, the media go into a kind of almost spastic
frenzy of adulation for the so-called "Reverend Doctor
Martin Luther King, Jr." King has even had a national
holiday declared in his honor, an honor accorded to no other
American, not Washington, not Jefferson, not Lincoln. (Washington and
Lincoln no longer have holidays -- they share the
generic-sounding "President's Day.") A liberal judge
has sealed the FBI files on King until the year 2027. What are
they hiding? Let's take a look at this modern-day plastic god.
Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher known at
the time only as "Daddy King." "Daddy King" named
his son Michael. In 1935, "Daddy King" had an
inspiration to name himself after the Protestant reformer Martin
Luther. He declared to his congregation that henceforth they were
to refer to him as "Martin Luther King" and to his son
as "Martin Luther King, Jr." None of this name changing
was ever legalized in court. "Daddy" King's son's real
name is to this day Michael King.
King's Brazen Cheating
We read in Michael Hoffman's "Holiday for a
Cheater":
The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the
Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by
Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled "Life is
What You Make It," according to the testimony of King's best
friend of that time, Reverend Larry H. Williams. The first book
that King wrote, "Stride Toward Freedom, - -was plagiarized
from numerous sources, all unattributed, according to documentation
recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D. Miller,
Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow. And no less an
authoritative source than the four senior editors of "The
Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- - (an official publication of
the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc., whose
staff includes King's widow Coretta), stated of King's writings
at both Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary:
"Judged retroactively by the standards of academic
scholarship, [his writings] are tragically flawed by numerous
instances of plagiarism.... Appropriated passages are
particularly evident in his writings in his major field of
graduate study, systematic theology." King's essay,
"The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God,"
written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of theologian
Edgar S. Brightman, author of "The Finding of God- -. Another
of King's theses, "Contemporary Continental Theology,"
written shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely
stolen from a book by Walter Marshall Horton. King's doctoral dissertation,
"A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul
Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman," for which he was awarded a
PhD in theology, contains more than fifty complete sentences
plagiarized from the PhD dissertation of Dr. Jack Boozer,
"The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich's Concept of God." According
to "The Martin Luther King Papers", in King's
dissertation "only 49 per cent of sentences in the section
on Tillich contain five or more words that were King's
own...."! In "The Journal of American History", June
1991, page 87, David J. Garrow, a leftist academic who is sympathetic
to King, says that King's wife, Coretta Scott King, who also
served as his secretary, was an accomplice in his repeated
cheating. Reading Garrow's article, one is led to the inescapable
conclusion that King cheated because he had chosen for himself a
political role in which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the
intellectual ability to obtain the title fairly, went after it by
any means necessary. Why, then, one might ask, did the professors
at Crozer Theological Seminary and Boston University grant him
passing grades and a PhD? Garrow states on page 89: "King's
academic compositions, especially at Boston University, were almost
without exception little more than summary descriptions... and
comparisons of other's writings. Nonetheless, the papers almost
always received desirable letter grades, strongly suggesting that King's professors
did not expect more...." The editors of "The Martin Luther
King Jr. Papers" state that "...the failure of King's
teachers to notice his pattern of textual appropriation is
somewhat remarkable...."
But researcher Michael Hoffman tells us "...actually the
malfeasance of the professors is not at all remarkable. King was
politically correct, he was Black, and he had ambitions. The
leftist [professors were] happy to award a doctorate to such a
candidate no matter how much fraud was involved. Nor is it any
wonder that it has taken forty years for the truth about King's
record of nearly constant intellectual piracy to be made public."
Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King's vision of a
racially mixed and Marxist America, purposely covered up his
cheating for decades. The cover-up still continues. From the New York Times of October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn
that on October 10th of that year, a committee of researchers at
Boston University admitted that, "There is no question but
that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation." However, despite
its finding, the committee said that "No thought should be
given to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree," an
action the panel said "would serve no purpose."
No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his
willful fraud as a student, the "reverend" and the "doctor"
should be removed from King's name.
Communist Beliefs and Connections
Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a
bona fide PhD, and his name isn't really "Martin Luther King,
Jr." What's left? Just a sexual degenerate, an
America-hating Communist, and a criminal betrayer of even the
interests of his own people.
On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin
Luther King and four others at a strange institution called the
Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander
Folk School was a Communist front, having been founded by Myles
Horton (Communist Party organizer for Tennessee) and Don West
(Communist Party organizer for North Carolina). The leaders of
this meeting with King were the aforementioned Horton and West,
along with Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged
members of the Communist Party, USA. The agenda of the meeting
was a plan to tour the Southern states to initiate demonstrations
and riots.
From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King's associate, advisor,
and personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin
joined the Young Communist League at New York City College.
Convicted of draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in
1944. On January 23, 1953 the Los Angeles Times reported his conviction and sentencing to jail for 60 days for
lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion. Rustin attended the 16th Convention
of the Communist Party, USA in February, 1957. One month later,
he and King founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, or
SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC was Dr. Martin Luther
King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth,
who was also the president of an identified Communist front known
as the Southern Conference Educational Fund, an organization whose
field director, a Mr. Carl Braden, was simultaneously a national
sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, of which you may
have heard. The program director of the SCLC was the Reverend Andrew
Young, in more recent years Jimmy Carter's ambassador to the UN
and mayor of Atlanta. Young, by the way, was trained at the
Highlander Folk School, previously mentioned.
Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin
organized the first of King's famous marches on Washington. The
official organ of the Communist Party, The Worker, --
openly declared the march to be a Communist project. Although he
left King's employ as secretary in 1961, Rustin was called upon
by King to be second in command of the much larger march on
Washington which took place on August 28, 1963.
Bayard Rustin's replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor
to King was Jack O'Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O'Dell.
According to official records, in 1962 Jack O'Dell was a member
of the National Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had
been listed as a Communist Party member as early as 1956. O'Dell
was also given the job of acting executive director for SCLC
activities for the entire Southeast, according to the St. Louis
"Globe-Democrat --of October 26, 1962. At that time, there
were still some patriots in the press corps, and word of O'Dell's
party membership became known.
What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports,
King fired O'Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the
fanfare, "immediately hired him again -- as director of the
New York office of the SCLC, as confirmed by the "Richmond
News-Leader --of September 27, 1963. In 1963 a Black man from
Monroe, North Carolina named Robert Williams made a trip to
Peking, China. Exactly 20 days before King's 1963 march on Washington,
Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to speak out on behalf
of King's movement. Mr. Williams was also around this time maintaining
his primary residence in Cuba, from which he made regular broadcasts
to the southern US, three times a week, from high-power AM transmitters
in Havana under the title "Radio Free Dixie." In these
broadcasts, he urged violent attacks by Blacks against White
Americans.
During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled
Negroes With Guns. The writer of the foreword for
this book? None other than Martin Luther King, Jr. It is also
interesting to note that the editors and publishers of this book
were to a man all supporters of the infamous Fair Play for Cuba Committee.
According to King's biographer and sympathizer David J.
Garrow, "King privately described himself as a Marxist."
In his 1981 book, "The FBI and Martin Luther King,
Jr.", Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC staff meetings,
"...we have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution....
The whole structure of American life must be changed.... We are
engaged in the class struggle."
Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as
King's behind-the-scenes "handler." Levison, who had
for years been in charge of the secret funnelling of Soviet funds
to the Communist Party, USA, was King's mentor and was actually
the brains behind many of King's more successful ploys. It was
Levison who edited King's book, Stride Toward
Freedom. It was Levison who arranged for a publisher.
Levison even prepared King's income tax returns! It was Levison
who really controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities
of the SCLC. Levison wrote many of King's speeches. King
described Levison as one of his "closest friends."
FBI:
King Bought Sex With SCLC Money
The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years been
aware of Stanley Levison's Communist activities. It was Levison's
close association with King that brought about the initial FBI
interest in King.
Lest you be tempted to believe the controlled media's lie
about "racists" in the FBI being out to "get"
King, you should be aware that the man most responsible for the
FBI's probe of King was Assistant Director William C. Sullivan.
Sullivan describes himself as a liberal, and says that initially
"I was one hundred per cent for King...because I saw him as
an effective and badly needed leader for the Black people in
their desire for civil rights." The probe of King not only
confirmed their suspicions about King's Communist beliefs and associations, but
it also revealed King to be a despicable hypocrite, an immoral
degenerate, and a worthless charlatan.
According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had direct
access to the surveillance files on King which are denied the
American people, King had embezzled or misapplied substantial
amounts of money contributed to the "civil rights"
movement. King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor, and numerous
prostitutes both Black and White, who were brought to his hotel
rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for
several days. These types of activities were the norm for King's
speaking and organizing tours.
In fact, an outfit called The National Civil Rights Museum in
Memphis, Tennessee, which is putting on display the two bedrooms
from the Lorraine Motel where King stayed the night before he was
shot, has declined to depict in any way the "occupants - -of
those rooms. That," according to exhibit designer Gerard Eisterhol, "would
be `close to blasphemy.'" The reason? Dr. Martin Luther
King, Jr. spent his last night on Earth having sex with two women
at the motel and physically beating and abusing a third.
Sullivan also stated that King had alienated the affections of
numerous married women. According to Sullivan, who in 30 years
with the Bureau had seen everything there was to be seen of the
seamy side of life, King was one of only seven people he had ever
encountered who was such a total degenerate.
Noting the violence that almost invariably attended King's
supposedly "non-violent" marches, Sullivan's probe revealed
a very different King from the carefully crafted public image.
King welcomed members of many different Black groups as members
of his SCLC, many of them advocates and practitioners of
violence. King's only admonition on the subject was that they
should embrace "tactical nonviolence."
Sullivan also relates an incident in which King met in a
financial conference with Communist Party representatives, not
knowing that one of the participants was an infiltrator actually
working for the FBI.
J. Edgar Hoover personally saw to it that documented
information on King's Communist connections was provided to the
President and to Congress. And conclusive information from FBI
files was also provided to major newspapers and news wire
services. But were the American people informed of King's real
nature? No, for even in the 1960s, the fix was in the
controlled media and the bought politicians were bound and determined to
push their racial mixing program on America. King was their man
and nothing was going to get in their way. With a few minor
exceptions, these facts have been kept from the American people.
The pro-King propaganda machine grinds on, and it is even
reported that a serious proposal has been made to add some of
King's writings as a new book in the Bible.
Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of this radio program is far
greater than to prove to you the immorality and subversion of
this man called King. I want you to start to think for
yourselves. I want you to consider this: What are the forces and
motivation behind the controlled media's active promotion of
King? What does it tell you about our politicians when you see
them, almost without exception, falling all over themselves to
honor King as a national hero? What does it tell you about our
society when any public criticism of this moral leper and Communist
functionary is considered grounds for dismissal? What does it
tell you about the controlled media when you see how they have
successfully suppressed the truth and held out a picture of King
that can only be described as a colossal lie? You need to think,
my fellow Americans. You desperately need to wake up.
(For a current schedule of this radio program, and for our
catalog of over 300 books, tapes, and videos that the controlled
media don't want you to see, send $1 to National Vanguard Books,
Department R, PO Box 90, Hillsboro WV 24946 USA.)
at
the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781