What would you say if a Liberal "social scientist"
told you to jump into a pool filled with five hundred ravenous
piranhas?
If you valued your life, you'd certainly refuse the
invitation.
But what if the Liberal "social scientist" tried to
convince you to go ahead and jump in, with the argument that
"not all of the piranhas are aggressive. Some of them
probably just want to make friends with you, and really aren't
hungry either. To say that a piranha is going to attack you, just
because he's a piranha, is a wicked stereotype, and probably
contributes to the piranhas' negative feelings about you."
If that argument was made to you, would you then jump into the
pool filled with piranhas? I don't think so. You'd probably
figure, quite logically, that even if there were one or two or
even a dozen piranhas that by chance or due to a recent meal
decided not to attack you, that certainly wouldn't change the
bloodthirsty behavior of the other 488. And it certainly wouldn't
change the outcome of any foolish foray into the pool.
But let's say you were foolish enough to listen to the Liberal
"social scientist," and you did jump into the pool filled
with piranhas. You somehow managed to survive. You made it to the
other side of the pool, where you jumped out, but you were
seriously injured in the process. After you got out of the
hospital, where your wounds were stitched up and your lost blood
was replaced, you were paid a visit by your old "friend,"
the Liberal "social scientist."
Needless to say, you weren't too happy to see him, but before
you could say a word, he started talking.
"I'm awfully sorry to see how you've been hurt," he
said, "but it isn't my fault at all, you see."
You replied, "You mean, oh great and wise social
scientist, that you can finally see that those piranhas are vicious
and I don't belong in the pool with them?"
"No, I don't mean that at all," answered the Liberal
"social scientist," "It's not the piranhas' fault
that you almost got eaten alive. It's not the poor piranhas'
fault at all! It's your fault!"
"My fault!" you exclaim, "How the hell could it
be my fault?"
"Ah, how little you bourgeois middle Americans
understand," sighed our Liberal genius, "Don't you see that what
happened to you only happened because those poor piranhas were
underprivileged and hungry? If you'd given them enough food and a
decent chance at life, then they wouldn't have attacked you like
they did. When was the last time you helped a piranha? They've
been struggling for centuries while your kind lived in luxury.
Don't you think it's time the tables were turned? And not only
that, but you ordinary Americans have caused the poor innocent
piranhas to feel left out in your society. Naturally they harbor negative
feelings about you, when you never want to have anything to do
with them. You should understand that we all hate what we don't
know. We must integrate piranhas into our society, keep them in
our swimming pools and bathtubs and introduce them into all our rivers,
mountain streams, and lakes. By associating with piranhas every
day, and by feeding them as much as they want to eat, eventually
a spirit of brotherhood will emerge and we and the piranhas will
live together in peace, harmony, and joyous diversity evermore.
But you, Mr. Ordinary American" - and here the Liberal
"social scientist" thrust his flabby little finger into
your face - "you are going to have to change your evil ways
before we can have that happy world!"
"You're out of your mind!" you reply. "Piranhas
may be fine in the Amazon jungle, but you're crazy if you think
we can live and associate with them every day. We and they just
don't belong together - and if you're so in love with piranhas,
why don't YOU go on a little swim with them? And if you think I'm
going to waste my money and time feeding them and helping them
multiply just so they can eat me and my family alive at some time
in the future, Mr. Genius social scientist, then you've got
another think coming!" With that you kick his delicate
carcass downstairs.
Still smarting from his fall, and rapidly retreating
backwards, the Liberal "social scientist" shakes his spindly fist
and calls back to you, "Your generation is hopeless. You'll
never understand the need to integrate with and support piranhas.
But your children will. Our 'brotherhood' program at the elementary school
will teach them that it's their duty to live with and help the
poor piranhas. They'll be swimming with them every day at the
school's pool. And that's just the first step! There's nothing
you can do about it!"
Gradually the voice of your former friend the Liberal fades
away, but he's certainly given you something to think about,
hasn't he?
___________________
I hope that my little fable of the Liberal "social
scientist" and the piranhas has brought home to you the folly and
stupidity of the American people, who have allowed themselves to
be bullied and intimidated into accepting the conversion of their
country into a sewer.
And it isn't just "Liberal social scientists" who
are pushing us down the road to national ruin. The greatest stumbling
block we face is alien and anti-American control of the mass
media. By twisting the facts to suit their own agenda, by leaving
out important information that Americans ought to know, and by
distracting our attention and wasting our precious time with game
shows, soap operas, and silly ball games, the media controllers
lull us to sleep, create a false impression of inevitable victory
for their side, and paralyze patriotic Americans' will to resist.
All of this is spelled out in detail in our research report on
media bias entitled Who Rules America? I urge every one of you
who hasn't done so already to obtain a copy of this meticulously researched
paper. It names names and pulls no punches. You've known for
years that the media were biased. After reading Who Rules America?
you will finally understand why they are biased. You will finally understand
the real and exact nature of the enemy we face.
To receive this report along with our big catalog of books,
tapes, and videos just send one dollar to National Vanguard
Books, Department R, PO Box 90, Hillsboro WV 24946 USA. That's
one dollar to National Vanguard Books, Department R, PO Box 90,
Hillsboro WV 24946 USA.
One of the worst things that the controlled media do to us, is
to give us an entirely false picture of the political spectrum.
They foster the illusion that the alternative to Liberalism is
Conservatism. Then they try to paint the only real alternative to
Liberalism, which is Nationalism, as some kind of
"hate" or "bigotry." Nothing could be further
from the truth.
First, let's dispose of the Conservative illusion. At one
time, Conservatism did present a real alternative to the Liberal
disease. Americans, and I mean real Americans, the sons and
daughters of those Europeans who founded and built this country,
prior to the Second World War, still controlled a majority of the wealth, property,
and political power in this country. But ever since then, our
fortunes have been on the decline. Governmental policies and
media propaganda have divided this country up into slices and delivered
them on a silver platter to the special interests and minority
groups, which are highly organized and relatively united in their
hatred of us. There's been a revolution, Mr. Ordinary White
American, and you lost. How can you be a
"conservative," when there's so little to conserve? The
time for Conservatism has long passed, its time was 50 years ago
and more.
What passes for Conservatism today is just "Liberalism
Light." They don't want to send the ravenous piranhas back
to the Amazon jungles, they just want to "integrate"
with them a little more slowly. They wouldn't ever dare say that
we ought not to even try to live with piranhas - oh no! the Conservatives
say they love living with piranhas more than anybody! Some of
their best friends are piranhas! Let's just teach the piranhas to
be a little nicer, give them "neighborhood schools" and
"enterprise zones" and soon we'll have brotherhood
without any disturbing declines in our stocks and bonds!
Naturally, the Liberals and their masters are just delighted
to have such "conservatives" as adversaries. A little
slower under Bush and Reagan, a little faster under Bill and
Hilary, still we move inexorably toward national suicide.
The real alternative to Liberalism, which the Liberals
themselves well know, is Nationalism. That's why the Liberals and
the controlled media smilingly tolerate people like William
Buckley, Ronald Reagan, and George Bush. They know that such
patsies pose no real threat to their anti-American agenda. But
they become apoplectic with rage when a real nationalist comes on
the stage of history. That's why they organize smear campaigns
against this radio program, and try to have us taken off the air.
That's why patriotic Americans must come to understand that any
"conservative" spokesman who is tolerated and given a
forum in the controlled media - is himself controlled. That's why
patriotic Americans must come to realize that any real patriot is
going to be smeared and vilified and viciously attacked by the
media. We must come to appreciate such attacks as a badge of
honor, as an indication that America's enemies are afraid of us,
afraid of the righteous anger of an awakened American people.
The real alternative to Liberalism is Nationalism. Nationalism
is synonymous with patriotism. Nationalism means that you put the
interests of your nation first. Nationalism means you recognize
that your nation consists its people, who are united by a common
heritage of blood, language, and culture; much more than it consists
of a geographic area between two artificial lines drawn on a map.
Let's look at the contrasting positions of Liberalism and
Nationalism on a few important issues. Maybe you're really a
Nationalist and didn't know it!
One of the first things you must understand is that Liberals
are essentially internationalist in their outlook. To them, it is
immoral to put your nation first. Their ultimate goal is world
government. Not many people know it, but prominent Liberal tycoon
Ted Turner, the owner of CNN and several other television networks,
is so internationalist-minded that he has forbidden his
announcers from even using the word "foreign," because that
would imply, horror of horrors, that we were Americans! On the
other hand, though we Nationalists hate no one, and we recognize
our kinship with our cousins of European descent and culture
overseas, we do put the interests of Americans before those of
other nations. We say it is treason to openly or secretly plan
the transfer of our money, resources, or authority to the United
Nations or any other international entity. When a Nationalist
government comes to power in America, those who have betrayed our
nation will be tried for treason.
Liberals say that "free trade" is good for us. We
say that "free trade" only benefits super-rich
international corporations and those internationalists who want
to equalize our living standards with those of the Third World so
that we can be more comfortably merged into a one-world
government, their so-called New World Order. We say that America
should trade with foreign countries, yes, but only if and when it benefits the
American people. One word the Liberals never utter is the word
"tariff." For over one hundred years in America, the
tariff, which means just a fee charged to foreigners for the privilege
of importing goods to this country, was the federal government's
main source of income. Americans paid no income taxes, since the tariff provided
the funds instead, and the differential in prices caused by cheap foreign
labor was equalized at the border, encouraging the development of American
industry. A future Nationalist government will once again
encourage American industry and restore our status as the leading industrial
nation of the world.
Liberals will tell you that, since everyone is inherently
equal, that the cause of inner-city crime and violence is poverty
- and naturally that poverty is all our fault. Nationalists
recognize the facts of Nature, and one of those facts is that
some groups do not belong in our advanced Western society. The result
of their being forced to live with us is unhappiness and
resentment, and all too often crime and violence. A future nationalist
government will not force incompatible peoples to live together
just to validate some crack-brained social theory. We will let
each people have its own territory and true independence and freedom.
Liberals say that guns cause violent crime. They don't trust
the people with effective firearms, and they would like to
arrange things so that only the police and the military have
them. Nationalists understand that an armed population is our
only defense against criminals and against tyranny by Liberals or
anyone else. Nationalists demand the right of our people to be
armed, just as our founding fathers did, and for the same reason
- because we know the government is not always benevolent.
Liberals say we should subsidize the never-ending maternity of
those in the very lowest-achieving and least productive sectors
of our society, and tax the producers to do it. Nationalists say
that we should discourage the lowest among the low from having
children, who would only continue the cycle of dependence and misery
into future generations. Instead of paying welfare mothers and
sending food or low-interest loans to Third World countries; let's
give subsidies and low-interest loans to our own young married
couples so they can have a better chance at getting an early
start at raising children who will be a credit to their nation.
For decades, Liberals have flushed our money down the toilet
in their never-ending pursuit to change the laws of Nature and
bring their twisted dream of "brotherhood" to fruition.
Not only have they spent all the money they could squeeze by
taxes and inflation out of our productive people, but they have
also mortgaged our children's birthright by deficit spending. For
years, these deceivers and liars told us that "deficit
spending is good for you ... it stimulates the economy ... we
only owe it to ourselves, etc., etc." Now the chickens have
come home to roost, and we are faced with a debt of immense
proportions and potentially catastrophic consequences.
Nationalists say that government expenditures will always fall
upon the shoulders of the productive portion of the American
people, and should be limited to those necessary government
functions to guarantee our security and secure the future of our
children. Crackpot schemes of world salvation should only be
funded by those foolish enough to believe in them.
Keep on thinking free - and keep on listening to AMERICAN
DISSIDENT VOICES.
For the very latest program update, and for our eye-opening
catalog of books and tapes, send $1 to National Vanguard Books,
Department R, PO Box 90, Hillsboro WV 24946 USA.
at
the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781