HOUSTON, 7/22/10 -- Before you
shoot angry email at the publishers of this article, consider
the reason they let you read it: America is at risk from an
insidious terrorist nation. Does this seem like a bit of wording
straight out of Fox News? So be it. Sometimes the most exciting
news comes from the most unexpected sources ...
"Fox News: Israeli Spyring", Fall 2001,
http://100777.com/node/180
Carl
Cameron's four-part investigative series is compelling journalism,
and exposes Israeli fingerprints all over 9/11. Fox pulled it
down from its website shortly after it aired, offering no explanation.
Good thing the Internet had copied and could post it.
After
the Fox report, consider these words of warning from the U.S.
Army, published the day before 9/11 about the Israeli Mossad
intelligence agency:
"Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning.
Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like
a Palestinian/Arab act."
"U.S.
troops would enforce peace under Army study,"
Washington Times, 9/10/2001,
http://www.public-action.com/911/sams.html
Afterward,
take a look at this:
Report: Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks good for Israel",
Haaretz, 4/16/08,
http://www.haaretz.com/news/report-netanyahu-says
-9-11-terror-attacks-good-for-israel-1.244044
Speaking
of the Israeli prime minister, read what the British had to
say about him:
"British anger at terror celebration",
The Times, 7/20/06, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article690085.ece
Is
it really so far a stretch to be alert to Jewish terror? Really?
To be perfectly honest about it, had this article been headlined
with "Muslim terror" or "Arab terror," would
it have seemed strange at all?
"I
don't care if Americans think we're running the news media,
Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we
get to keep running them."
"How Jewish is Hollywood?", LA
Times, 12/19/08, http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/19/opinion/oe-stein19
|