theme of increasing police state militarization of America with
Pittsburgh's "Storm Cops" at the G-20 meeting in fall
2009. Covered in the beginning of Police
State 4 video by Alex Jones. See also "PITTSBURGH
G20 SUMMIT PHOTOS," September 27, 2009, snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.com.
Pittsburgh False Flag "Anarchists,"
Cyber Militia, and the
Principles of Info War
First published Feb
Updated/revised 3 Dec 2012
number of very significant domestic and international political events
in summer-fall 2009 underscored the broader ideological undercurrents
behind the Info War and false flag attacks. These included the heavy-handed
police crack down on "anarchist" protestors at the Sept.
2009 Pittsburgh G-20 conference, the Orwellian environment surrounding
the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Obama in October, more revelations
about the bizarre personal life of the former FBI Director "Gay
Edgar Hoover," and the Copenhagen global warming conference scam
as I have already covered in Chapter
36, during this period there was rising global push-back against
swine flu mandatory vaccination, despite the scary outbreak in the
Ukraine. This was important good news stemming largely from Internet
and alternative media activism.
important topic for broader intelligence analysis that I will address
at the end of the chapter involves finding suitable principles for
a cyber intelligence militia like Ghost Troop to use in fighting back.
We have tried to perform a variety of functions, ranging from interdicting
specific false flag attack threats to addressing generalized PSYOPs
waged against the American people. Among other things, I will explore
the analyses of William S. Lind regarding the four generations of
warfare paradigm, and explain how Ghost Troop may fit within this
conceptualization as a volunteer counter covert 4th generation warfare
The Pittsburgh False Flag "Anarchists"
30 Sept 2009 Idaho Observer article "G20 Protestors
Blasted by Sonic Cannon" identified a dangerous police false
flag operation where "dissidents" become "anarchists.":
– Sept. 24-25 – Using sonic cannons, tear gas and flash
grenades, police created a near war-zone environment to disperse
and suppress G20 protesters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Sonic weapons
or long-range acoustic devices (LRADs) are used by the U.S. military
overseas to disable the enemy. LRADs can permanently damage the
eardrums and may cause fatal aneurysms. Effective out to 300 meters,
the emit a focused beam of sound.
G20 Meeting was “protected” by a massive, militarized
police contingent in full battle dress. Numerous surrounding police
jurisdictions gave allied support to the Pittsburgh police battalions.
has been the case with other G20 meetings, not all of the protesters
were protesters. Video has emerged of police agents posing as “anarchists”
protestors. These provocateurs and their violent antics tainted
an otherwise peaceful demonstration, justifying the excessive police
G20 is a group of international government, financial and industrial
interests that meet to plan their ongoing strategy to dominate world
policy and politics. They fulfill the very definition of fascism.
The inherent rights that would naturally accrue to free people were
once again violated en mass by deployment of militarized police
power and weaponry.
2009 Intelligence Report, The Nationalist Times publisher
Don Wassall explained the significance of this event from broader
G-20 meeting in Pittsburgh in late September showed off the newest
advances in police state technology and tactics.
were only an estimated 5,000 protestors for the event, mostly curious
college kids and the usual gaggle of scrawny anarchists –
but they were confronted by a massed presence of 6,000 heavily armed
cops who fired bean bags from shotguns, tear gas, OC spray, and
flash-bang grenades while wielding batons against the demonstrators,
who were kept far away from the globalist festivities. Also utilized
was an armored personnel carrier, which went through residential
neighborhoods, blasting a shrill, eardrum piercing sound from a
Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) that drove people off the streets
and into homes and buildings. Altogether four of the LRAD military
weapons were purchased and used – for the first time on Americans
-- courtesy of a $200,000 grant from Homeland Security, which also
paid $250,000 for the armored personnel carrier.
Kurt Nimmo of Infowars: “The G-20 police response
in Pittsburgh was a beta test. ‘We spent months getting ready
for this and it was a lot of preparation, but we’ll see the
dividends of that for a long time to come,’ Public Safety
Director Michael Huss told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.
other words, Pittsburgh is not going to stand down now that the
G-20 has departed. The ‘dividend’ is that it will remain
a militarized police state. . .
around the country local law enforcement is looking to the feds
to provide high-tech military hardware. San Francisco wants $125,000
for an armored vehicle and $200,000 for a mobile command vehicle.
Sparks, Nevada wants $600,000 to purchase a ‘live fire’
house its SWAT team can shoot up, and another $420,000 for a SWAT
armored vehicle. Gary, Indiana wants $750,000 for a host of ‘modernization’
upgrades to its police department, including ‘sub-automatic
guns’ and an armored vehicle. Ottawa, Illinois (population:
18,307) wants $60,000 to purchase, among other things, five ‘tactical
entry rifles.’ ‘
is our civilian law enforcement in an arms race, and who are they
arming against? Why us of course. What used to be six to ten man
SWAT teams are now platoon size of 25 if not more. The city police,
sheriffs, etc., are armed to the teeth and resemble SS units, this
is a way to circumvent Posse Comitatus in the coming martial law.”
addition to the above mentioned wish lists, many other cities are
using “stimulus” money to buy high-tech weaponry. As
The Nationalist Times has been writing for over 20 years,
multiculturalism is a failed and unworkable concept, and can only
be attempted to be held in place through every increasing police
mind flashed upon some major ironies from a historical perspective.
his brilliant series Conceived
in Liberty, Dr. Murray Rothbard described how once upon a
time in early American colonial history, Pennsylvania was a model
of libertarian idealism. It helped define "the American experience."
had naturally grown its population from settlers who forged their
way into wilderness. Between 1700 and the American Revolution, the
population had approximately tripled from the natural increase of
several generations of big families. Pennsylvania's population grew
to the size of a small European state. However, one thing the pioneers
left behind in Europe were professional lawyers, bureaucrats, court
retainers, aristocratic rent seekers, professional soldiery, and other
members of the "tax-eating" classes as opposed to "tax-producing"
entrepreneurs and common folk. (According to Dr. Ralph Raico of the
Mises Institute, the concept of the "tax-eating" vs. "tax-producing"
social dichotomy was central to the analysis of 17th and 18th century
French libertarians). Everything was handled on a local level, where
citizens typically served in multiple voluntary civic organizations,
such as the militia, fire departments, planning committees, and charities.
to Dr. Rothbard, the good people of colonial Pennsylvania had virtually
no central government by European standards. As a consequence, they
made an interesting discovery. They weren't missing anything! In fact,
they were much happier and more prosperous than most of their counterparts
back in the Old Country.
they had acquired a lot of land for almost nothing that was not available
back in Europe, but they had also regained something else that their
European forebears had lost over the centuries as a consequence of
gradual encroachments. They had regained ancient freedoms that once
existed among individuals within various European tribal groups prior
to takeover by rent-seekers!
historical experience of early Pennsylvanians serves as a role model
for what many libertarians such as the late Nobel Laureate Friedrich
von Hayek called "spontaneous order." The idea is that
man --or at least certain groups of people ---are fundamentally social
animals who instinctively create family, tribal, religious, and ethnic
bonds at the grass roots level as a form of "spontaneous order"
whenever any kind of order is needed, to include whenever centralized
control is either not present or removed. This natural and spontaneous
form of grass roots "order" is usually superior to centralized
order, particularly when it comes to engaging in business entrepreneurship
or defining moral and ethical relationships among people. If anything
politicians who represent "centralized order" are often
over-represented by pyschopathic career climbers, glad-handlers, and
bureaucratic rent-seekers and hence may be more corrupt than
common citizens, particularly those who run their own farms or businesses
and actually have to work for a living. Significantly, libertarians
often view "anarchism" as a smear word that statists, fascists,
and other "rent-seekers" use to muscle in on people who
are perfectly capable of running their own affairs at the local level.
itself carries important historic ironies. Located where the Allegheny
and Monongahela Rivers converge to form the highly strategic Ohio
River, Pittsburgh became a major focal point of the contest between
England and France for control of the Ohio Valley during the French
and Indian War, as evidenced by Braddock's
Defeat and other campaigns.
English prided themselves on their parliamentary traditions, individual
liberties, and the decentralization of their Protestant institutions
away from Vatican control. There was also still a strong straight-laced
Puritan influence from the New Englanders, whose ancestors believed
that the Pope was the anti-Christ. They felt contempt for French monarchical
absolutism and Catholic dogma. Seizing control of the Ohio Valley
had Manifest Destiny overtones of advancing "democracy"
by "Anglo-Saxons" against what they viewed as a morally
and politically degenerate people.
Rockwell once observed that the American Revolution was based on the
idea that over the long run, government tends to be more of the problem
than the solution. Piling more government on top of government, such
as the U.N., or the G-20 meeting, would hence involve creating even
more problems still.
views all these people as glorified "rent-seekers," or the
"tax-eating class" who abuse their authority by inventing
wasteful government programs as excuses to get something for nothing.
"Rent-seekers" are incapable of providing the kind of market-competitive
"value proposition" that I describe in Chapter
33, but instead look for nonproductive angles to chisel taxpayers
out of their assets.
worse, the G-20 Meeting was all about advancing the agenda of the
New World Order. Most of its participants belong to the Council on
Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, and other Rothschild-affiliated
organizations whose members routinely formulate high level policy
at secret meetings. Under U.S. law, policy formulation in secret meetings
is illegal and contrary to basic republican principles for a free
and open society.
Corbettt Report provides
link page for numerous major news sources that openly describe
how G-20 meetings advance the New World Order agenda. The following
apply to the Pittsburgh conference:
police strong arm men for the New World Order in Pittsburgh darkly
symbolize how everything that early Americans once stood for has now
been turned on its head. According to some news reports, the cops
even infiltrated agents provocateurs --that is, false flaggers --
into demonstrations posing as "anarchists."
terminology alone shows a repudiation of libertarian reverence for
"spontaneous order" as well as unmolested First Amendment
also suggests that certain Pittsburgh police are infected with a similar
parasitic rent-seeking mentality that I describe among politicians
29, Wall Street Robber Barons in Chapter
33, Big Pharma in Chapter
36, the military-industrial complex in Chapter
37 --or worst of all--the Mossad-CIA false flaggers I cover repeatedly
throughout this series.
The "False Flag" Nobel Peace Prize
of the most outrageous developments in the Info War took place on
October 9, 2009 when Norwegian Nobel Committee awarded
Obama the Nobel Peace Prize. From our viewpoint as anti-false-flag
activists, this award decision seemed to reinforce rather than help
defuse the PSYOPs that support the Zionist neo-con Global War on Terror
(GWOT) –and America's zombie march into “Stalingrad”
that I will explain later in this chapter.
award to Obama was analogous to the medical condition of hypothermia,
where the sensation of feeling warm all over is the exact opposite
of the reality of being close to freezing to death. As I will discuss
later in this section, there is strong evidence that "the usual
suspects" --of the false flag variety-- were behind this Orwellian
Rozoff commented in "World's
Sole Military Superpower's 2 Million-Troop, $1 Trillion Wars:"
his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech on December 10 the president
of the United States appropriated for his country the title of "the
world's sole military superpower" and for himself "the
Commander-in-Chief of the military of a nation in the midst of two
may well have been the first time that an American – and of
course any – head of state in history boasted of his nation
being the only uncontested military power on the planet and unquestionably
the only time a Nobel Peace Prize recipient identified himself as
presiding over not only a war but two wars simultaneously.
also have some strong personal motivations to examine this episode
in some detail. In my 5
Sept. interview on Dr. Rebecca Carley's Show "What's Ailing
America," I urged mass political support to nominate Jane Burgermeister,
Dr. Rebecca Carley, and Capt. Eric May to share next year's Nobel
Peace Prize for their outstanding activist work against the swine
flu false flag pandemic (see Chapter
36). I also think that the cyber militia methods identified in
this Mission of Conscience series are emerging as potent
tools to advance Alfred Nobel's objectives for Peace Prize winners.
Lastly, as a Norwegian-American I resent seeing Zionist Neocons manipulate
the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee behind the scenes (explained
later) and in essence abuse Nordic prestige more shamelessly than
took 25 years longer than George Orwell thought for the slogans
of 1984 to become reality.
Is Peace," "Freedom Is Slavery," "Ignorance
would add, "Lie Is Truth."
Nobel Committee has awarded the 2009 Peace Prize to President Obama,
the person who started a new war in Pakistan, upped the war in Afghanistan,
and continues to threaten Iran with attack unless Iran does what
the US government demands and relinquishes its rights as a signatory
to the non-proliferation treaty.
Nobel committee chairman, Thorbjørn Jagland said, "Only
very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the
world's attention and given its people hope for a better future."
the committee gushed, has created "a new climate in international
that to the 2 million displaced Pakistanis and the unknown numbers
of dead ones that Obama has racked up in his few months in office.
Tell that to the Afghans where civilian deaths continue to mount
as Obama's "war of necessity" drones on indeterminably...
When war becomes peace,
When concepts and realities are turned upside down,
When fiction becomes truth and truth becomes fiction.
When a global military agenda is heralded as a humanitarian endeavor,
When the killing of civilians is upheld as "collateral damage",
When those who resist the US-NATO led invasion of their homeland
are categorized as "insurgents" or "terrorists".
When preemptive nuclear war is upheld as self defense.
When advanced torture and "interrogation" techniques are
routinely used to "protect peacekeeping operations",
When tactical nuclear weapons are heralded by the Pentagon as "harmless
to the surrounding civilian population"
When three quarters of US personal federal income tax revenues are
allocated to financing what is euphemistically referred to as "national
When the Commander in Chief of the largest military force on planet
earth is presented as a global peace-maker,
When the Lie becomes the Truth. Obama's "War Without Borders"
are the crossroads of the most serious crisis in modern history.
The US in partnership with NATO and Israel has launched a global
military adventure which, in a very real sense, threatens the future
this critical juncture in our history, the Norwegian Nobel Committee's
decision to award the Nobel Peace Prize to President and Commander
in Chief Barack Obama constitutes an unmitigated tool of propaganda
and distortion, which unreservedly supports the Pentagon's "Long
War": "A War without Borders" in the true sense of
the word, characterized by the Worldwide deployment of US military
Zionist influenced media all over the world continues to promote
Barack Obama as a man of great intellect and a man of peace and
reasonableness. In fact, he has been controlled from the Zionists
for years and is even described by Jewish leaders as the first “Jewish
President” because he is completely a puppet Zionist power.
Obama’s biggest corporate contributor in his race for U.S.
President was the very Jewish, Goldman Sachs Corp, the most powerful
international financial house in the world. Obama went on to get
over 80 percent of the Jewish vote in the election.
prestige of the Nobel Prize and Obama’s universal media adulation
makes him far more effective in achieving Zionist aims, including
their number one objective: war against Iran.
biggest item on the Zionist agenda during the Bush administration
was the removal of the biggest Israeli enemy at the time: Saddam
Hussein. The most important issue now to Israel and Zionist power
around the world is war against Iran, the most powerful nation on
earth that opposes the Zionist regime.
greater Obama’s prestige around the world, the greater his
ability to orchestrate a Zionist instigated war against Iran.
short, the greater Obama’s popularity, the greatest danger
that this Zionist-controlled President can launch a catastrophic
war against Iran.
Nobel Prize winning Obama is far more able to sell the war as one
necessary rather than being a catastrophic and inhuman enterprise.
official citation of the decision is “unanimous,” for
the good publicity of the Nobel committee, as its decision-making
process remains secretive. It is not clear if this so-called “unanimity”
is true; should it be true, however, it would reveal a dangerous
sign of groupthink in the Norwegian Nobel committee, with the political
zealousness for its leftist ideological interests.
is all the more revealing, in the public statement by Thorbjoern
Jagland, chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, who told the
Associated Press: “If everything goes wrong, then one cannot
say that this was because of Barack Obama. It could be that it is
because of us, all the others, that didn't respond” to his
kind of fanatic zealousness to support a leader with ideological
views compatible with one’s own reminds us the fanatic zealousness
that many supporters of charismatic leaders in history have, in
blindly supporting their leaders and, even when things go wrong,
in fanatically blaming the failures of their leaders on others.
When Stalin and Mao committed mistakes which led to the deaths of
countless innocent civilians, their supporters wasted no time to
blame others who were accused to have betrayed their leaders, but
not on Stalin and Mao themselves...
other “Washington-watchers” the Norwegian Nobel Committee
may have become scared at what they were seeing. For a nation as
powerful and proud as the US, the kind of crisis it has been experiencing
for some time now, is life-threatening. And we all know the US always
looks for the solutions to its problems beyond its own borders.
By blaming others, by blackmailing them, invading them, occupying
them and destroying them. With Iran the target of US wrath, and
with the constant saber-rattling coming out of Washington, the Norwegians
must have been thinking they urgently needed to do something to
prevent a world disaster.
giving the Prize to Obama, the Norwegians may have hoped to put
moral pressure on him. It would be quite difficult for a Nobel Peace
Prize laureate to start a war against Iran. Therefore, the Prize
should be considered as a kind of “Preemptive Prize.”
with the prize, the Obama's prestige would grow, his spine would
get extra support and his shoulders might become just a bit broader.
Who knows, with enough support from the outside world (the “Rest
of the World,” or ROW) Obama might even stand up to his handlers.
is a huge moral and ethical problem behind any use of the Nobel Peace
Prize as a preemptive tool. It smells like the legal definition of
“The offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of something
of value for the purpose of influencing the action of an official
in the discharge of his or her public or legal duties.”
question there are broad sociological dimensions behind the Nobel
Prize Committee. For example, in my Henrik
Holappa archive web page, I list some articles suggesting that
many Norwegians have become so brainwashed by Zionist neocon-controlled
global media that they can no longer adequately defend their own ethnic-genetic
interests, national interests, or recapture Nordic popular sovereignty.
The following are two examples:
Beautiful Norway be Snuffed Out?‘In
2005, 64,000 children were born in Norway of two foreign-born parents,
compared to only 13,800 children born to parents of European origin’
By Arthur Kemp "The state-owned Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation
(Norsk rikskringkasting AS) or NRK has broken ranks with the rest
of the controlled media in Europe and has openly declared an emergency
over the Third World origin of sexual assaults in that country.
In a remarkable broadcast last week, NRK reported that `immigrants
from Kurdistan and North Africa' are behind most cases of aggravated
sexual assault in Norway. According to the NRK, police figures from
Oslo reveal that over the past three years, they have investigated
a total of 41 cases of rape in that city. All of these assaults,
reports NRK, were carried out by `non-western immigrants to Norway.'
According to the Norwegian police, the rapists terrorizing the beautiful
white women of Oslo are of `a Kurdish or African background”
and all have one thing in common, `namely the use of gross violence...Third
World immigrants are, the study showed, recipients of social security
benefits at a rate ten times that of native Norwegians - destroying
the liberal argument used by pro-immigration politicians in Norway
that immigration was necessary to maintain the social welfare state...'
Professor Unni Wikan On Rape. "`It is sensational how
blind and naive Norwegian can be towards non-Western men. Norwegian
women must use common sense,' says Wikan to Dagbladet.
Shocking numbers were published yesterday which show that the total
number of rapes in Oslo went up by 40% from 1999 to 2000. For the
first time, police classified rapists by ethnic background. The
statistics show that fully 65% of the rapists come from a non-Western
country." The rest of this article explores whether or not one of
Wikan's quotes was taken out of context and called for appeasement
of would-be Muslim rapists. One thing is clear; Norwegian women
are being forced to compromise Nordic culture to swarthy alien predators
in their midst.
Suspected Mossad-CIA collaborator and former Norwegian
Prime Minister (1996-1997) Thorbjorn
Jagland pictured with former U.S. Secretary of State and arch-Zionist
I do not need to engage in much social speculation regarding the Nobel
Peace Prize award to Obama. In his article "Behind
the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize" French political analyst Thierry
Meyssan provides us with a direct explanation that fingers Mossad-CIA.
This story is particularly fascinating because it meshes with our
discussions of Jewish-funded "colored revolutions" (Chapter
32), economic "hit man" operations in Third World countries
33), Obama as a Mossad-CIA asset (Chapter
35), and Obama's ties to the Zionist-controlled big pharma (Chapter
2006, the European Command (i.e. the regional command of U.S. troops
whose authority then covered both Europe and most of Africa) solicited
Barack Obama, a Senator of Kenyan origin, to participate in a secret
inter-agency (CIA-NED-USAID-NSA). The goal was to use his status
as a parliamentarian to conduct a tour of Africa that would allow
both to defend the interests of pharmaceutical companies (against
off-patent productions) and to counter Chinese influence in Kenya
and Sudan. We shall only examine the Kenyan episode here...
was then experiencing a booming economy. Since the beginning of
the presidency of Mwai Kibaki, the growth rate had increased from
3.9 to 7.1% of GDP and poverty had declined from 56 to 46%. These
exceptional results were achieved by reducing economic ties with
post-colonial Anglo-Saxon partners and replacing them with more
equitable agreements with China. To put an end to the Kenyan miracle,
Washington and London decided to topple President Kibaki and impose
a devoted opportunist: Raila Odinga. To that effect, the National
Endowment for Democracy oversaw the creation of a new political
party, the Orange Democratic Movement, and plotted a "color
revolution" in the forthcoming parliamentary elections of December
Obama was greeted like a native son and his journey was hyper-publicized.
He interfered in local politics and participated in Raila Odinga
meetings. He called for a "democratic revolution" and
his "companion", General Gration, gave Odinga one million
dollars in cash. These actions destabilized the country and raised
official protests from Nairobi to Washington. Following this tour,
Obama and Gen. Gration reported to General James Jones (then head
of the European Command and NATO Supreme Commander) in Stuttgart
before returning to the United States.
operation continued. Madeleine Albright, as NDI President (the branch
of the National Endowment for Democracy that specializes in handling
left-wing parties) traveled to Nairobi, where she oversaw the organization
of the Orange Movement...
the parliamentary elections of December 2007, a survey funded by
USAID announces the victory of Odinga. On election day, John McCain
announced that President Kibaki rigged the election in favor of
his party and that in fact the opposition led by Odinga had won.
The NSA, in conjunction with local phone operators, sent anonymous
text messages to the population. In areas populated by the Luo (Odinga’s
ethnic group), they read "Dear Kenyans, the Kikuyu have stolen our
children’s future... We must treat them in the only way that
they understand... with violence." ...Within days, this peaceful
country sank into sectarian violence. The riots caused over 1,000
deaths and 300,000 displaced. 500,000 jobs were lost.
Albright came back. She offered to mediate between President Kibaki
and the opposition trying to overthrow him. With finesse, she stepped
aside and placed in the spotlight the Oslo Center for Peace and
Human Rights. The board of this respected NGO was newly chaired
by the former Prime Minister of Norway, Thorbjørn Jagland.
with the Center’s traditional impartiality, he sent two mediators
on site, whose expenses were entirely footed by Madeleine Albright’s
NDI (that is to say ultimately out of the U.S. Department of State’s
budget): another former Norwegian Prime Minister, Kjell Magne Bondevik,
and former UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan (the Ghanaian is very
much on the scene in Scandinavian states since he married the niece
of Raoul Wallenberg). Compelled to accept the compromises forced
on him in order to restore civil peace, President Kibaki agreed
to create a prime minister post and to entrust it to Raila Odinga,
who immediately began reducing trade with China. Small gifts between friends
Kenyan operation stopped then but the lives of the protagonists
went on. Thorbjørn Jagland negotiated an agreement between
the National Endowment for Democracy and the Oslo Center, which
was formalized in September 2008. An attached foundation was created
in Minneapolis that allows the CIA to indirectly subsidize the Norwegian
NGO. It acts on behalf of Washington in Morocco and especially in
was elected President of the United States. Odinga declared several
days of national holiday in Kenya to celebrate the outcome of the
election in the United States. General Jones became a national security
adviser. He appointed Mark Lippert as Chief of Staff and General
Gration as Deputy. During the presidential transition in the U.S.,
the President of the Oslo Center, Thorbjørn Jagland, was
elected chairman of the Nobel Committee, despite the risk that such
a crafty politician would pose to the institution . The nomination
of Barack Obama for the Nobel Peace prize was filed no later than
January 31, 2009 (regulatory deadline, twelve days after he took
office in the White House.
debates took place as the Committee was still unable to agree on
a name in early September, as outlined in the usual timetable. On
September 29, Thorbjørn Jagland was elected Secretary General
of the Council of Europe following a behind-the-scenes agreement
between Washington and Moscow. This called for a favor in return.
Although membership of the Nobel Committee is incompatible with
a major executive political position, Jagland did not resign. He
argued that the law strictly prohibits the combination with a ministerial
office but says nothing about the Council of Europe. He then returned
to Oslo on October 2. The same day, the Committee appointed President
Obama for the 2009 Peace prize.
likes to use people from relatively "clean" countries as
cover for dirty operations. Various global transparency indices typically
rate the Scandinavian countries as the least corrupt in Europe, and
Israel as the most corrupt. Norwegians in particular go out of their
way to cultivate a "nice global citizen" image, in fact,
in the 1990's I recall seeing an opinion research piece in the old
Norway Times that headlined "It's Cute to Be from Norway."
Other countries like New Zealand or the Netherlands may not appear
quite so "cute," but they still have relatively clean images
awaiting exploitation as well. Not surprisingly, in the Cherbourg
Boat Affair of 1969, the Israelis used a "Norwegian"
shipping owner and Nordic-looking Israeli sailors to snake torpedo
boats right out from under the French. As another example, in 2004
we got the
passport scandal where "The prime minister of New Zealand
angrily denounced Israel and imposed diplomatic sanctions on it after
two suspected Mossad agents were jailed for six months for trying
on false grounds to obtain a New Zealand passport."
kinds of intrigues are finally creating blowback against the global
Zionist agenda in Nordic countries, just as the disastrous Georgian
invasion of South Ossetia in August 2008 sponsored by Israel and the
U.S. has increased pro-Russian tilt in Azerbaijan and other central
Asian countries, according to Dr. Mathew Raphael Johnson..
Sept. 6, 2009 article "Norway
leads the way and boycotts the apartheid state of Israel. It’s
time for Europe to follow!" commented: "In the wake
of the crisis after a Swedish newspaper revealed the heinous, and
criminal activity, of Israel which has been harvesting organs and
body parts from murdered Palestinians and selling them on to the USA
it seems that Israel is facing another crisis, this time with Norway.
The Norwegian Government Pension Fund, which has $400 billion in assets
under management, has sold its $5.4 million holding in Israeli defense
contractor Elbit Systems Ltd."
to growing Nordic resentment is the feeling that evil Zionists in
the City of London are trying to molest their dear little brother
Iceland. Both New World-resistant Russia under Putin, and EU-resistant
Norway under its Labor Party government, understand the Icelandic
desire to maintain independence. In contrast, the Obama regime is
so heavily in bed with the City of London and Mossad-CIA that it roots
for the other side; namely to absorb Iceland into the New World Order
his Oct. 7, 2009 article "Iceland
Political Leader Calls For Debt Moratorium As Government Crumbles,"
Webster Tarpley observed:
"London and The Hague are demanding $6 billion in restitution
for losses incurred by private Icelandic bankers operating in their
countries as Icesave, even though the Icelandic government had never
guaranteed these operations, and even though British and Dutch regulators
were deeply implicated in the Icesave debacle, which came in the
wake of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy.... If the politically desperate
Minister James Gordon] Brown and his Dutch retainer Balkenende
get their way, Icesave will turn into Iceslave a future of
poverty, unemployment, depopulation, and national collapse for Iceland,
which could never pay the sums being demanded."
by many "usual friends," Iceland resorted
to Norway and Russia for bailout loans. In the view
of STRATFOR, a loan "will give Russia the opportunity to challenge
the West in an extremely strategic venue." ("Strategic"
equates to "GIUK
Gap," "GIAK" meaning "Greenland-Iceland-United
Kingdom", as a key choke point in naval grand
its Naval facilities in 2006 as part of a geopolitical shift towards
new locations ranging between Romania and central Asia, another special
gift of Zionist neocon lunacy. Norway stepped
in with its own fighter jets and naval patrols to assist Iceland's
16 July 2009 article "Russia
approves 64 billion ISK loan to Iceland" stated: "Icelandic
President Olafur Ragnar Grimsson said a few months ago that Iceland
needs to find new friends since some close allies refused to grant
Iceland a loan. The President then offered to Russia use of the Keflavik
Airport for military operations but the Russian government denied
is a diplomatic disaster for America. But then again, what else should
we expect from the same Zionist neocons who have brought us misadventures
in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere in Central Asia, not to mention
the 9/11 inside job, London 7-7-2005, and the Wall Street shakedown
described in Chapter
Hoover in his younger years
The "False Flag" FBI Director
FBI Los Angeles field officer Ted Gunderson has talked about how pedophile
rings now involve the highest levels of CIA. Both on radio interviews,
and in my own conversation when I met him at a Barnes Review
/American Free Press conference in September 2006, he lamented
that the FBI is no longer what it used to be when he retired in the
early 1980's. The FBI stopped recruiting as many "All American"
types into its ranks.
underscores an important underlying theme in this Mission of Conscience
series about how we need more private citizen cyber vigilance groups
to help us monitor government officials who are monitoring us so that
they can receive adequate adult supervision.
December, former Naval Intelligence officer Wayne Madsen posted "The
Truth About `Gay Edgar Hoover,'" which gives new meaning
to the concept that for most people in high places, posturing is the
December 4-6, 2009 -- The truth
about "Gay Edgar Hoover."
separate and well-informed sources, including a former White House
press photographer and a noted researcher on the late FBI director
J. Edgar Hoover, have confirmed that not only was Hoover gay, which,
according to FBI agents interviewed by one of our sources, was well-known
to a number of FBI agents, but was a cross-dresser, as well. Apparently,
it was Hoover's fondness for male nude figurines that prompted the
few FBI agents invited to visit Hoover's home to wonder about their
celebrated "tough guy" director.
addition, Hoover's longtime close association with his deputy director
Clyde Tolson -- some would call it a gay marriage -- set off
the "gaydar" among many seasoned FBI agents.
who was known as "Weird Mary" by his neighbors who lived near his
eerily quiet home at 4936 31st Place in northwest Washington,
DC, was often spied wearing either a dress or an old woman's-style
house coat while watering his flowers and rosebushes. Hoover masked
his face by wearing a beekeeper's hat and face net, according to
one source who often passed by "Weird Mary's" home. Hoover insisted
on being called "Mary" when in the company of gay partners at his
home and at parties with very exclusive invitation lists.
homosexual and transvestite antics were also known to the Mafia,
which used the information to blackmail Hoover into never waging
a full scale onslaught by the FBI against its top leaders, including
mob financier Meyer Lansky.
Hoover's relationship with Tolson seemed monogamous enough, WMR
learned from one informed source that Hoover once had a homosexual
relationship with a young Chilean diplomat assigned to the Chilean
embassy in Washington.
"Mary" and "Franny"
source who is familiar with the child abuse scandals of the Roman
Catholic Church also revealed to WMR that Hoover also frequently
swapped young males, some underage, for the purposes of sex
with the gay Archbishop of New York City, Francis Cardinal Spellman,
known as "Franny" in New York's gay community. Hoover and Spellman
shared something in addition to young males -- a fervent commitment
to right-wing politics.
boy swapping between Hoover and Spellman was known to President
John F. Kennedy through the Archbishop of Boston, Richard Cardinal
Cushing, who, although a heavy drinker, was straight but despised
Spellman with a passion. Cushing reportedly told Kennedy and his
brothers Robert and Teddy about Spellman and Hoover. Hoover, who
maintained an extensive personal file on the Kennedys, as he did
a number of U.S. political and other leaders, realized that he faced
a situation of "mutually assured destruction" if he exposed any
of the Kennedys' affairs.
Kennedy was not the only president to know about Hoover's secret
life style. When White House Chief of Staff H. R. Haldeman informed
President Richard Nixon of Hoover's sudden death in May 1972, Nixon
replied, "Jesus Christ! That old cocksucker!"
passage reinforces the observation made in prior chapters by Capt.
May that as he went up the chain of command of the FBI, it became
increasingly perverse and political in its policies.
I must add that while for libertarian ideological reasons it may be
healthy to have a few laughs on the FBI as an overweening federal
political police as well as anti-criminal force, there still remain
important reasons why certain members of the FBI deserve our respect
Carto, publisher of the American Free Press, once opined
that for all his faults, things could have been vastly worse for America
in the 1930's-1940's if Hoover had not been FBI Director. The Venona
Papers and other leaked Soviet archives prove that the threat of high
level Communist infiltration and takeover of America was in fact worse
than even Sen. Joe McCarthy stated. One shudders to think what may
have happened if an evil Jewish genius like Leon Trotsky, father of
the Red Terror, had taken control of the FBI.
think that most sane Americans would infinitely prefer someone like
"Weird Mary." In fact, maybe it took a "Weird Mary"
to play the complex double games necessary to navigate through such
a dangerous situation, where Jews controlled the central bank and
were trying every trick in the book to achieve outright takeover.
an important second point, for all the FBI's faults, the Department
of Homeland Security under American-Israeli dual-loyalist Michael
Chertoff was hardly a sigh of relief. The FBI has at least been around
for a while, and has been staffed with many middle managers from solid
American middle class backgrounds who can provide some kind of counter
inertia to dangerous recent creatures like Jonathan Pollard, Michael
Chertoff, Larry Franklin, Rahm Emmanuel, Janet Napolitano, or perhaps
even Barack Hussein Obama II himself. Things are still dangerous like
in the 1930's despite the fact that superficially the flavoring of
problems may seem different.
but not least, the FBI does in fact go after common criminals. Any
American, myself included, could easily find ourselves in an unexpected
situation where we suddenly have to report a crime to the FBI or ask
the FBI for assistance, so maybe it is not wise to go too far in knocking
as the value of the dollar goes to zero, and America comes under extreme
social stress, maybe someone will come out of the FBI just like the
way Vladimir Putin came out of the KGB in Russia, or perhaps even
out of the U.S. Armed Forces like the way Gustaf
Mannerheim came out of the Finnish and Russian militaries, and
decisively help Americans navigate through very difficult political
circumstances, to include finally turning the tables on the Zionists
and helping most parts of America sort themselves out and become productive
spite of everything, we must remain calm and cool, for reasons I will
explain later. As Professor Bob Whitaker has famously put it, "The
situation is terminal, but not serious."
The "Climategate" PSYOP
if Holocaustianity, false flag global pandemics, and the 9/11 cover
up is not enough to keep responsible debunkers busy, the "Global
Warming" PSYOP heated up again when Obama visited Copenhagen
in December. Many individuals who called in to Republic Broadcasting
Network hosts were fearful that Obama was going to sign away the last
of America's sovereignty in a U.N. treaty designed to coercively curtail
Toro! Michael Crichton" by Donald W. Miller, Jr., MD and
Case for Skepticism on Global Warming" by Michael Crichton
himself explain why scientists have failed to establish a meaningful
correlation between CO2 emissions and global warming. The famous author
Michael Crichton has been a leading activist against the Global Warming
scam, somewhat comparable to the crusades by Jane Burgermeister and
Dr. Rebecca Carley against toxic vaccines and Capt. May's campaign
against false flag attacks.
Michael Crichton on Environmentalism as a Religion
Crichton explains, one of the strongest correlations for historic
earth heating and cooling cycles is sunspot activity. Besides, the
earth is due for another ice age, which has been taking place in cycles
about every 20,000 years. Nevertheless, this does not stop the globalists
from trying to institute international coercive measures to tax carbon-producing
Toro! Michael Crichton" does an excellent job of identifying
key Info War ingredients behind the Global Warming push:
do so many people (including those 1,500 scientists) believe in
global warming? One reason, as one of the characters in State of
Fear puts it, is that "all reality is media reality."
People who get their information from watching television and reading
the New York Times do not learn the true facts of the matter.
Media reality says there is man-made global warming, which if not
constrained will be catastrophic...
some scientists their views on this subject can affect their livelihood.
Government and NGOs (non-governmental organizations) award $2 billion
in grants each year for climate research. These organizations expect
the scientists they fund to support the idea that global warming
is a problem. As Michael Crichton points out (in his Caltech lecture),
we now live in an "anything-goes world where science – or
non-science – is the hand maiden of questionable public policy…
Evidentiary uncertainties are glossed over in the unseemly rush
for an overarching policy, and for grants to support the policy
by delivering findings that are desired by the patron."
are two other reasons why people believe in human-caused global
warming despite strong evidence against it. Global warming is like
a religion. In "Distinguishing
Reality from Fantasy, Truth from Propaganda," a lecture given
to the Commonwealth Club in September 2003, Michael Crichton identifies
environmentalism as "the religion of choice for urban atheists"...
warming also has ideological underpinnings. "Environmentalism
is the last refuge of socialism," as one observer puts it.
Although socialism may have failed as an economic model, many believe
it can halt man-made global warming and, by this means, reform civilization...
enough, in his 18 Dec 2009 article "Shakedown
in Copenhagen," by Patrick J. Buchanan also exposed the Climategate
you would know what Copenhagen is all about, hearken to this nugget
in The Washington Post's report from the Danish capital.
Prime Minister Meles Zenari -- who is representing all of Africa
here -- unveiled his proposal Wednesday for a system in which rich
countries would provide money to poor ones to help deal with the
effects of climate change. ...
said he would accept $30 billion in the short term, rising to $100
billion by 2020. ... This was seen as a key concession by developing
countries, which had previously spurned that figure ... as too low."
was a time when a U.S. diplomat would have burst out laughing after
listening to a Third World con artist like this.
not the Obamaites. They are already ponying up...
you slice through the blather about marooned bears and melting ice
caps, oceans rising and cities sinking, global warming is a racket
and a crock. It is all about money and power.
has always been about an endless transfer of wealth from America,
Europe and Japan and creation of a global bureaucracy to control
the pace of world economic and industrial development.
game: enrichment and empowerment of global elites at the expense
of Western peoples whose leaders have been bamboozled by con artists...
Cyber Activism and the
Covert 4th Generation Warfare Model
are stuck with an important intellectual problem. As cyber militia,
how do we conceptualize the nature of this perpetual war being waged
against the common people of America -- ranging from false flag attacks
to PSYOPs-- within the context of the overall study of war itself?
problem is particularly acute, because we want to portray ourselves
as essentially defensive and peaceful civilians focused upon objective
analysis, yet we are up against extraordinarily evil people willing
to promulgate assassination, nuclear terror, and mass pandemic genocide
-- all of which can easily drive any relatively sane and normal person
into extreme militance and partisanship for perfectly legitimate reasons.
matters further, our enemies frequently cloak their extremely hostile
and treasonous behavior behind mountains of lies and phony false fronts
to create appearances of normalcy and legitimacy. Most of the public
has no idea about this war for very high stakes taking place behind
the scenes. Nor do they understand how they are being manipulated.
massive public pushback against mandatory swine flu vaccinations in
fall 2009, or the high level U.S. military pushback involving the
Summer 2007 B-52 Loose Nukes affair, or the firing of U.S. CENTCOM
commander Admiral Fallon in Spring 2008, I do not think that most
members of the American public or military fully grasp the real underlying
source of the trouble.
good starting point to understand how both "false flag"
attacks and "Info War" fit into the spectrum of the study
of warfare itself is the four generation paradigm developed by Col
John Boyd and his star protege William S. Lind.
conceptualization has gained enough visibility even within establishment
military science circles that one needs to understand the parlance,
even if one does not fully agree with the ideas themselves.
punch line is that I view a key mission of a cyber militia like Ghost
Troop as one of countering covert forms of 4th generation warfare.
But before I can make this case, or explain why I believe that Zionists
are deliberately waging covert 4th generation warfare against America
--to include the use of false flag attacks - we first need to understand
William Lind's model:
William S. Lind's Four Generations of War
First Generation of Modern War runs roughly from 1648 to 1860. This
was war of line and column tactics, where battles were formal and
the battlefield was orderly…
Generation warfare was… Developed by the French Army during
and after World War I, it sought a solution in mass firepower, most
of which was indirect artillery fire. The goal was attrition, and
the doctrine was summed up by the French as, "The artillery
conquers, the infantry occupies." Centrally-controlled firepower
was carefully synchronized, using detailed, specific plans and orders,
for the infantry, tanks, and artillery, in a "conducted battle"
where the commander was in effect the conductor of an orchestra.
Generation warfare, like Second, was a product of World War I. It
was developed by the German Army, and is commonly known as Blitzkrieg
or maneuver warfare. Third Generation warfare is based not on firepower
and attrition but speed, surprise, and mental as well as physical
dislocation. Tactically, in the attack a Third Generation military
seeks to get into the enemy's rear and collapse him from the rear
forward: instead of "close with and destroy," the motto
is "bypass and collapse." In the defense, it attempts
to draw the enemy in, then cut him off. War ceases to be a shoving
contest, where forces attempt to hold or advance a "line;"
Third Generation warfare is non-linear. Not only do tactics change
in the Third Generation, so does the military culture. A Third Generation
military focuses outward, on the situation, the enemy, and the result
the situation requires, not inward on process and method (in war
games in the 19th Century, German junior officers were routinely
given problems that could only be solved by disobeying orders).
Orders themselves specify the result to be achieved, but never the
method ("Auftragstaktik"). Initiative is more important
than obedience (mistakes are tolerated, so long as they come from
too much initiative rather than too little), and it all depends
on self-discipline, not imposed discipline. The Kaiserheer and the
Wehrmacht could put on great parades, but in reality they had broken
with the culture of order.
Fourth Generation war, the state loses its monopoly on war. All
over the world, state militaries find themselves fighting non-state
opponents such as al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, and the FARC. Almost
everywhere, the state is losing.
Generation war is also marked by a return to a world of cultures,
not merely states, in conflict… ….we have pointed
out over and over that the 4th Generation is not novel but a return,
specifically a return to the way war worked before the rise of the
state. Now, as then, many different entities, not just governments
of states, will wage war. They will wage war for many different
reasons, not just "the extension of politics by other means."
And they will use many different tools to fight war, not restricting
themselves to what we recognize as military forces.
Hollywood romanticizes the buccaneer
version of 4th generation warfare in the swashbuckling fictional
Blood (1935), starring Erroll Flynn. Many real life buccaneers
in the Caribbean alternated between nonstate warlike enterprises
"for a cause," that is, 4th generation warfare as
a continuation of the religious wars of the 16th and 17th
centuries between Protestants against Catholic Spain, and
pro-state activities, such as when Henry
Morgan became acting governor of Jamaica, elements of
the "Sea Beggars"(Geuzen)
helped lay the foundation of the Dutch
Republic navy, or
Jean LaFitte and his followers assisted Major General
Andrew Jackson in the Battle
of New Orleans.
Beyond William S. Lind
I am in essential agreement with Lind’s conceptualization, except
for a few areas where I tweak his model. I think Lind’s timeline
from 1648 to 1860 is chronologically and conceptually too constrictive.
On an abstract conceptual level, we see line and column tactics of
First Generation warfare used by the ancient Greek phalanx and many
other ancient armies. Many ancient and medieval armies also used catapults,
ballistas, and massed arrow volleys which archived a similar purpose
as massed artillery fire employed in Second Generation warfare in
the 19th and 20th centuries.
second point is that all these forms of warfare are not necessarily
mutually exclusive. They can take place simultaneously or in various
sequences. As one example, the Viet Cong engaged in political organizing
and tunnel and cache preparation for five years before they turned
violent. This was 4th generation warfare. In the early stages of their
violent insurgency, they resorted to both first and third generation
tactics. They usually lacked the heavy weapons to use 2nd generation
tactics until the last phase of the war when the North Vietnamese
Army became a major player. First generation tactics, such as human
wave assault attacks or the use of advancing infantry skirmish lines
to uncover enemy positions, are still used even in modern warfare
in cases where commanders need to tightly control their troops. This
can be because the troops are politically unreliable, unsophisticated,
or otherwise advantageous to use as cannon fodder. In fact, William
Lind accuses the U.S. military of still relying heavily on first generation
tactics, to the extent that it often likes to move infantry like a
screening force through enemy-held territory, and then rely on supporting
arms such as massive artillery or air power to destroy the enemy once
they bump into something.
like Lind's conceptualization of 4th generation warfare as "nonstate.
" It is like a catchall to describe a form of conflict that is
simultaneously more primitive in some areas, and more sophisticated
and diversified in other areas, compared to generations 1-3.
of the biggest problems with 4th generation warfare is that its practitioners
are usually incapable of holding any specific territory or protecting
civilian populations from occupation by an enemy army. They are usually
constrained to hit-and-run tactics in the face numerically stronger
and better equipped conventional armies. This can make the civilian
populations that they represent vulnerable to terrible reprisals.
an important function of most states is to defend lives and property,
the state usually feels compelled to put up a 1-3rd generation warfare
fight to defend territory in order to retain legitimacy.
libertarians define the state as whoever is the territorial monopolist
on violence within a given area. Whoever can monopolize violence can
usually also monopolize taxation, media, and life itself.
this definition, 4th generation warfare practitioners are usually
just powerful enough as political organizers to put up a fight, but
not so powerful that they can monopolize violence within a territory
on a sustainable basis. Once 4th generation warfare practitioners
become powerful enough to become the long term territorial monopolists
on violence, historians often switch gears and begin to call them
are quite a few interesting historical examples of 4th generation
actors who --abracadabra!-- suddenly become "the state"
once they decided to permanently hold and administer a territory,
such as the great Ukrainian nationalist Cossack leader Bohdan
Khmelnytsky or the head of a nomadic Mongolian clan named Ghengis
Khan. Another interesting example involves Henry
Morgan, who made a quick transition from preying on the Spanish
Main as a roving non-state privateer in the Carribean to becoming
acting governor of Jamaica.
is equally interesting to observe 4th generation actors who have all
the raw economic power and other influence to immediately create a
state, but for various social and political reasons decide to deliberately
keep their power base camouflaged for extended periods of time. One
example involves the Rothschilds, Schiffs, Sassoons, Warburgs, and
other Jewish dynasties in the 19th century and part of the 20th century.
When they decided to suddenly parlay all this power into the creation
of "the state" on 14
May 1948 -- Ouila! -- behold the State of Israel!
practice of 4th generation warfare can have many different dimensions.
For starters, we need to distinguish between its overt and covert
forms, as well as the underlying racial, ethnic, and cultural character
of its combatants.
is interesting to me that historic masters of overt forms
of 4th generation warfare tend to be very mobile and have decentralized
leadership structures that put great emphasis on personal honor, self-discipline
and initiative. They often operate from various "sanctuaries"
that may include mountainous terrain, frozen steppes, tunnels, islands,
or cross-border lands of "neutral" countries. They include
various "barbarian" tribes (Hun, Mongols, Vikings), privateers
(Dutch Sea Beggars, English Buccaneers of the Caribbean), and independent
militia or insurgents (Cossack hosts of Ukraine and Russia, Watauga
settlement of American Revolution, Viet Cong, or even guerillas of
the Cuban Revolution). All this makes sense, since they usually need
to be able to outfight, outmaneuver, outrun, and hide from military
forces sent against them by conventional states in order to survive.
the Wikipedia article on T.
E. Lawrence. Left, Lawrence at Rabegh, north of Jidda, Arabia,
1917. Right: Emir Faisal's party at Versailles, during the Paris
Peace Conference of 1919. Prince Faisal (front), T. E. Lawrence,
third from right.
of Arabia: How one of Britain's most brilliant military tacticians
created the Taliban's battle strategy by Neil Faulkner,
Independent.co.uk, 17 Sept 2010, notes that "One can identify
15 distinct principles of guerrilla warfare [from the works of Lawrence
of Arabia]. They are extraordinary. They invert many principles of
conventional military theory, such as concentration of force, and
the centrality of pitched battle to destroy the enemy's main forces
and will to fight. In this sense, they are the work of a brilliant
maverick...Guerrilla warfare is as old as human conflict, but Lawrence's
treatises represent the first systematic conceptualisation of its
strategy. And this conceptualisation is remarkably comprehensive.
Later theorists of guerrilla warfare – notably Mao, Nguyen Giap
and Che Guevara – have added little of substance. Lawrence is
the real teacher of the guerrilla fighter...":
1. Strive above all to win hearts and minds
2. Establish an unassailable base
3. Remain strategically dispersed
4. Make maximum use of mobility
5. Operate mainly in small, local groups
6. Remain largely detached from the enemy
7. Do not attempt to hold ground
8. Operate in depth rather than en face (i.e. not in lines)
9. Aim for perfect intelligence about the enemy
10. Concentrate only for momentary tactical superiority
11. Strike only when the enemy can be taken by surprise
12. Never engage in sustained combat
13. Always have lines of retreat open
14. Make war on matériel rather than on men
15. Make a virtue of the individuality, irregularity, and unpredictability
many 4th generation fighters have been able to quickly ramp up from
nonstate to state or even superstate. This challenges us to conduct
a deeper functional analysis of the popular sovereignty concepts I
addressed in Chapter
6. Once all the key elements of "sovereignty" become
embedded within a paramilitary organization, the formal creation of
"the state" can almost become an after thought.
is correct that most people in the U.S. military today don't get 4th
generation warfare. One reason is because the U.S. Government, controlled
by Zionists, wants to them to continue thinking like obedient functionaries.
the imperial state is a jealous master. It wants its subjects to worship
it as a surrogate "tribal chieftain" and bearer of "culture"
and "identity." For purely selfish reasons, the imperial
state wants it citizens to think like peasants and serfs and always
"Come to Pappa" --the imperial state-- for all their psychic
imperial, Zionist-dominated, neo-Jacobin, multi-racial, multi-cultural
global super state that is America today usually does not want its
own military establishment to "get it" because then U.S.
military personnel might start to think "dangerous thoughts."
They might start pursuing their own separate sovereignty rights, just
like some of the secessionist rumblings coming out of Texas and Idaho,
which challenge the Zionist plutocracy. Why else would the Director
of the Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, who judicialinc.biz
identifies as a likely Jewish lesbian, express fear about returning
Iraqi veterans becoming potential "terrorists"? (See Chapter
we see an interesting paradox. The U.S. government on one level sends
its young warriors to fight against 4th generation actors like the
Taliban and "Al Qaeda" in Afghanistan, but on another level
their de facto CFR-Bilderberg-Rothschild rulers do not want them to
understand a bigger picture that includes themselves.
is also another important paradox at play. The U.S. military's greatest
4th generation warfare enemy is not in the Iraq-Af-Pak-Iran-Yemen
theater, but rather it lies in the rear. The ultimate threat lies
on Wall Street, within the Federal Reserve Banking System, and within
the top offices of the Pentagon.
Zionist neocons who occupy these top positions are the all-time masters
of covert forms of 4th generation warfare on an ongoing basis.
This is exactly what Col Donn de Grand Pre meant when he titled his
book series "Barbarians Inside the Gates."
is no accident that the Mossad, considered by many to be the most
effective espionage organization in the world, has the support of
millions of "sayanim" or Jewish "helpers" around
the world. According to Victor Ostrovsky in By
Way of Deception, it is the most admired organization in
Israel. In fact, Ostrovsky claims that the Mossad effectively runs
is it any accident that Jewish covert operations are able to effectively
"politicize," "militarize," and "weaponize"
all areas of civilian endeavor, ranging from national media used for
PSYOPs, to the use of entrepreneurial businesses as false fronts,
to the exploitation of the financial system to grab control of the
strategic bases of target countries.
...A few words from the
"Mongols of Covert
4th Generation Warfare"
Jews are the "Mongols" of covert forms of 4th generation
warfare, every bit as much as the Mongols themselves were the masters
of overt forms. Jews run organized crime in America and other
major countries around the world, which is a mainstay of covert 4th
generation warfare. They are also typically leaders in the types of
businesses that involve brokerage and other forms of mediation.
reason why William S. Lind is correct that the U.S. military does
not "get" 4th generation warfare is because most professional
military people have never acted as political or business brokers.
Nor have they ever tried to run their own businesses or engage in
any form of grass roots political organizing. Instead they get promoted
by inventing and fulfilling bureaucratic projects within the context
of a bureaucratic environment. They get a steady paycheck for affecting
attitudes consistent with those of their superiors and the general
tone of their organization. They are not forced to think like entrepreneurs
and brokers and take entrepreneurial risks. Instead, on an intellectual
and emotional level, many of them function amazingly like proles,
Party members, and other functionaries in Orwell's 1984.
As James Billington put it in his definition of the apparatchik,
they are quite often men "...not of grand plans, but of a hundred
carefully executed details."
personnel are certainly very sensitive to all the little signals of
hostility and marginalization that are involved in competing for bureaucratic
funding and promotion. However, most military commanders have no real
feeling or understanding for subtle forms of warfare in unstructured
environments involving business, economics, media, competing civilian
cultures and ethnicities, or grass roots civilian politics. They are
mainly trained to drive ships and tanks and planes, hold troop inspections,
and operate weapons that put steel on steel.
is also interesting to observe how both overt and covert practitioners
of 4th generation warfare may choose to deliberately understate themselves,
much like a poker player who hides his high cards. The following are
some famous examples.
The New Babylon, Michael Collins Piper describes how the
Rothschilds were obsessive in the 19th century about keeping their
position in society and extent of wealth out of the papers, even though
many acknowledged them as "the financial rulers of Europe."
"Taliban" means "the students." This hardly sounds
like an insurgent army on the surface.
mafia in America has often called itself "La Cosa Nostra"
or "Our Thing."
Upon A Time in America," and "Goodfellas"
are particularly interesting not only because of the innocuous-sounding
names, but also because they illustrate a gray zone between "organized
crime" per se and "4th generation warfare."
way to distinguish between run-of-the-mill criminals who are definitely
not "4th generation" fighters and real insurgents is the
extent to which they are socially, politically, ethnically, ideologically,
and culturally organized, and motivated to sustain violence or economic
warfare to create a "nation within a nation" that pursues
alternative sovereignty rights.
his book Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup Of America, Thomas Chittum describes
mushrooming numbers of highly armed Mexican, Asian, and other gangs
in America that are not only engaged in criminal behavior, but also
consciously seek to create ethnically independent little mini-"nations
within a nation", such as the vision of "Azatlan."
a final example, the "Sea Beggars" get the "humility"
prize for an innocuous-sounding name. Regarding "criminal-related"
issues, they occasionally acted in the gray zone, functioning more
like pirates than privateers when they ran out of supplies.
Sea Beggars were named after a Dutch group of "Geuzen"
or "beggars" who humbly petitioned their Spanish occupation
overlords in the 16th century for religious freedom in the face of
a threatened Inquisition. Some time after their humble requests were
thrown back in their faces, they continued to "beg" the
Spaniards with the muzzle flashes of broadsides that won major naval
battles. They played an important role in the
Dutch War For Independence that culminated in the Dutch
Republic. Wikipedia states:"Some
of the forefathers of the great Dutch naval heroes began their naval
careers as Sea Beggars, such as Evert Heindricxzen, the grandfather
of Cornelis Evertsen the Elder."
Sea Beggars were definitely a 4th generation force. They had a distinctive
culture, ethnicity, religion, ideology, and urge towards the establishment
of full-blown separate sovereignty rights relative to the Spanish
The Nine Principles of War
we "abstract" and apply the nine principles of war taught
in most American service academies to the Info War and our volunteer
civilian cyber militia activities? I think so.
nine principles of war consist of Mass, Objective, Offensive, Security,
Economy of Force, Maneuver, Unity of Command, Surprise, Simplicity;
did General Schwarzkopf apply the Nine Principles of War?”
by LCDR Roberta Stein, is one example of an online analysis that addresses
a conventional, boots-on-the-ground military campaign. In her article,
LCDR Stein sequences "MOOSEMUSS" as "OUESOMMSS"
(could be pronounced "awesomes"), or Objective, followed
by Unity of Command and Effort, Economy of Force, Security, Offensive,
Maneuver, Mass, Surprise, and Simplicity. I have decided to utilize
this approach in the following short list of definitions:
Direct every military operation toward a clearly defined, decisive,
and attainable objective. III. UNITY OF COMMAND AND EFFORT
For every objective, seek unity of command and unity of effort IV. ECONOMY OF FORCE
Economy of force is the judicious employment and distribution of
forces. V. SECURITY
Security results from the measures taken by a commander to protect
his forces. VI. OFFENSIVE
Seize, retain, and exploit the initiative. VII. MANEUVER
Place the enemy in a position of disadvantage through the flexible
application of combat power? VIII. MASS
Synchronizing all the elements of combat power where they will have
decisive effect on an enemy force in a short period of time is to
achieve mass IX. SURPRISE
Strike the enemy at a time or place or in a manner for which he
is unprepared. X. SIMPLICITY
Prepare clear, uncomplicated plans and concise orders to ensure
following is my attempt to adapt and reinterpret conventional warfare
principles in our role as a counter covert 4th generation warfare
Direct every military operation toward a clearly defined,
decisive, and attainable objective.
first and most immediate objective has been to proactively investigate
and publicize analyses of false flag indicators in order to thwart
repeat false flag attacks conducted by a hostile foreign entity such
as the Mossad which acts directly against the American national interest
and subverts popular sovereignty. This is a reasonably clear and definable
my interview with Mark Dankof on his Republic Broadcasting Network
Show described in Chapter
37, I explained how we try to stay focused on attacking the parasite
and not the host. In other words, we want to bolster counter intelligence
activities to prevent military and police exercises from getting hijacked.
do not oppose defense or preparedness-related exercises in themselves.
In fact, under ordinary circumstances, we strongly support these things.
We do not want to appear like we are encouraging military or police
to shirk their ordinary duties in any way.
course in order to make this objective comprehensible to most readers,
it should be accompanied with a "situation" statement. This
is similar in concept to the sequencing of the standard NATO five
paragraph order, whose acronym "SMEAC" begins with "situation"
as in Situation, Mission, Execution,
Admin and Logistics, Command and
whole Mission of Conscience series has helped explain the
overall "situation," so no need to revisit the topic here,
except to point out that a major purpose of a situation brief should
be to explain why the current establishment in America today --to
include national media, the Jewish Lobby, Wall Street, the central
bank, the Obama administration, FBI, DHS, and Pentagon --are so heavily
infiltrated and compromised that our efforts are necessary.
next objective is to provide analysis that defeats the web of lies
and illusion, commonly called "Info War," necessary to support
false flag attacks. This can include analyses of the basics of ideology
and propaganda warfare.
third objective is to provide analysis that exposes the deeper sociological
basis of false flag attacks and "Info War." This means educating
the public about the true nature of "Alien" and "Predator"
and other natural enemies of the Constitution within our society who
pose a perpetual threat.
third objective fits hand and glove with the first objective, to the
extent that it addresses everything below the waterline of the proverbial
iceberg that one must understand in a complete intelligence analysis
order to fully comprehend what appears above the water line in the
form of false flag attacks and "Info War."
fourth objective is to inspire adequate financial and political support
to defend ourselves, disseminate our message, and work towards achieving
a reasonably sane and viable society. This last objective enables
us to survive, leverage our influence, and even roll back malevolent
forces identified in the first three objectives.
with the fourth objective, in the "Why We Fight" section
6, I explain why the concept of increasing popular sovereignty
is a superordinate goal that is consistent with our goal of protecting
the Constitution and defeating high-level criminal behavior.
fifth objective is to inspire the formation of other activist groups
and more effective citizen vigilance activity in America and around
the world. This includes at the very least activism to preserve a
free Internet and free speech.
believe strongly that there is no one segment in American society
that holds all the answers for America's problems moving forward,
to include the military. We need a wide variety of groups with a wide
variety of backgrounds serving as activists and informing each other
through the Internet as a "collective intelligence medium"
for Americans to find our way through the difficulties that lie ahead.
anti-genocide objective: In wrapping up this section, I want
to add a sixth objective which is more of my own personal objective,
not necessarily shared by other members of Ghost Troop, but is nevertheless
too important for me personally to avoid mentioning.
of control "Alien" and "Predator" means much more
than endless threats of false fag attacks involving violent terrorist
acts. We saw beginning in spring and summer 2009 how it could mean
false flag pandemics directed at all of humanity. The ultimate agenda
in that case involved global depopulation. It threatened the worst
mass genocide seen in human history.
topic of ethnic, tribal, racial, or cultural survival is relevant
to this threat because I think that mankind is instinctively tribal
in nature, and the cyber activist groups that will endure the longest
and be the most effective will likely have tribal as well as ideological
motivations. Furthermore "Alien," or unlimited Zionism,
is one of the most tribalistic forces on this planet. It will require
the reawakened, healthy tribalism of one or more competing groups
to act as a successful counterpredator to keep the predatory criminal
Zionist brand of tribalism in check. Anarcho-libertarianism and left
wing "anti-racist" ideology alone cannot do the job.
but not least, I believe that Dr. William Pierce was correct in his
Conservatives Can't Win," or Kevin Strom in his article "Multiracialism
and Conservatism." For that matter, I encourage the reader
to visit my own answer to the question "Why
Have Conservatives Been So Ineffective in America?" in my
"Have You Been Brainwashed?" quiz. One requires a decisive,
over arching objective to win in the long run.
conservatives in America are too cowardly and limited in their worldview
and political activism. A truly effective rightist is conscious of
the need to protect and assert the indigenous culture, religion, and
physical type of his own people. He is very much aware of the extent
to which they have retained or lost their full sovereignty rights
that I address in chapter 6.
me as a Scandinavian-America, the alternative to tyrannical Zio-federal
government and Jewish-controlled multi-racial and multi-cultural degradation
is the creation of independent Nordic or Nordic-Celtic ethnostates
in North America, each with its own vibrant and productive indigenous
culture, and each with as many sovereignty rights as possible.
I harbor two over-arching objectives. It is either to whole-heartedly
support the U.S. Government so long as it can treat my own people
--and other peoples as well -- with adequate respect, or the creation
of alternative ethnostates in North America that can enable my own
people to survive, determine their own destiny, and otherwise enjoy
full popular sovereignty rights.
quite some time, Western countries have been in the grip of psychopathic
elites. They can do very evil things on short notice. Who could have
predicted in 1788 that the Celtic Vendee of western France would become
the targets of outright government-sponsored genocide within only
a few years? Who could have predicted in 1913 that the Ukrainian Kulaks
and various Cossack groups --traditionally the bulwarks of Ukrainean
and Russian patriotism, conservatism, and productivity-- would some
day become the targets of government-sponsored mass genocide campaigns?
Russians and Ukraineans in 1913 probably would have thought any person
who suggested such a thing was a likely candidate for the lunatic
things are now happening to America. The country is bankrupt. It can
not control its skyrocketing debt or the hemorrhaging of its strategic
industries. We have a neo-communist Black President in the White House
who is also likely a front man for Mossad-CIA. He is surrounded by
Zionist neocon subversives and funded by the same types of Jewish
plutocrats who supported the Bolshevik Revolution.
top of all this, I believe that Jane Burgermeister, Capt. May, and
Dr. Rebecca Carley (all of whom I wish to nominate for the 2010 Nobel
Peace Prize) are correct that the psychopathic power elite tried to
hit us with a global population reduction pandemic last summer.
particular group of people is safe. We need all the activist help
and citizen vigilance we can muster from people of all backgrounds.
of my own personal strategy to avert genocide is to not only address
the threat to global humanity --as well as the obvious threats to
our Constitution and civil liberties-- but also to tailor my discussion
of the nature of the threat to my own particular ethnic group -Scandinavian
Americans or WASPs-- to try to intensify their motivation for activist
action. I think that Americans of other racial and ethnic backgrounds
should try to do the same thing with their own people. The process
of getting the nationalisms of various peoples around the world to
work together for common positive goals is what I call "international
my own people as an example, I can try to appeal to their pride and
heritage. At the time of the American Revolution, this country was
overwhelmingly WASP in its demographic composition. Going back further
in time to the Reformation, those countries which were overwhelmingly
Nordic or Nordic-Celtic went Protestant, whereas virtually all of
the majority non-Nordic countries in Europe tended to remain shackled
to the very corrupt and centralized Catholic Church. This speaks volumes
to me, particularly today when the U.S. Government increasingly acts
like a secular version of the unscrupulous Catholic Church of the
late Middle Ages -- heavily immersed in the use of torture, witch
hunts, and intrigue-- that ultimate drove my Northern European ancestors
to arms in order to protect their ancient rights and liberties.
historical record shows me that Nordic-Celtic peoples tend to have
a higher percentage of innovators, early adopters, technologically
proficient people, free spirits, free thinkers, nonconformists,
and individualists within their populations relative to other white
ethnic groups. They also have greater percentages of people with the
innate self restraint, altruism, and chivalry necessary to sustain
principled republican, scientific, and technological institutions.
their percentage within the overall population continues to decline
(a sad trend in effect since 1861, according to Madison Grant in his
classic work The Passing of the Great Race), America is not
only effectively reversing the American Revolution and the Protestant
Reformation on a deep sociological level, but is also surrendering
any real chance that it can restore a world class, innovative, and
competitive industrial base. Instead, it is stacking the deck that
it will turn into a a permanent, poverty-laden Third World country
like Brazil, India, or Nigeria.
long as we can maintain a free Internet, and enough of a climate of
freedom so that activist groups can speak out, I would like to remain
cautiously optimistic that we can muddle through our coming crises
in a relatively nonviolent and rational way, reminiscent of the way
Britain muddled through its bankruptcy crisis under Margaret Thatcher
or the Russians muddled through the collapse of the Soviet Union and
Zionist kleptocracy in the 1990's.
the other hand, I can also foresee plausible scenarios that are utterly
ghastly and horrible. They are even worse than what Tom Chittum describes
in his classic work Civil War II: The Coming Breakup of America.
These scenarios might duplicate the bloodiest phases of the French
Revolution, Bolshevik Revolution, or the destruction of Germany during
the Thirty Years' War.
am not saying that such horrible things will necessarily take place,
only that the downside risks are becoming increasingly plausible and
worrisome as potential future scenarios.
I encourage multi-pronged approaches by as many private citizen vigilance
groups as possible:
(a) Anarcho-libertarian approach, because anarcho-libertarians
do a lot of good work to expose establishment corruption, and many
people simply do not share my nationalist sentiments on an emotional
(b) Paleo-conservative "international nationalist" approach,
particularly one that helps people get through IQ levels 1-4 described
have already seen the success of the international approach through
the way Jane Burgermeister in Austria was able to quickly work with
Dr. Rebecca Carley and other activists in America to develop an effective
alterative media response to the swine flu false flag pandemic threat.
Capt. May, to his credit, recognized the significance of Jane Burgermeister's
work early. We need to build on this kind of success.
raising the "internationalist nationalist" issue, I am adding
some extra levels to the "IQ Test" that Capt. May discussed
in his earlier talk show interviews when discussed levels 1-2:
IQ Level One: Figuring out that 9/11 was an inside
job IQ Level Two: Figuring out that if the inside job
perpetrators of 9/11 have not been brought to justice, and national
media continue to warn about likely terror strikes, then we need
citizen vigilance efforts to try to thwart the real possibility
of repeat attacks.
all this, I would add the following two additional IQ levels
IQ Level Three: Figuring out that repeat false
flag threats must stem from deep sociological roots such as "Predator"
(out of control federal government) and "Alien" (out of
control Zionism), and "Dumber and Dumber" (the general
public has become an increasingly incompetent, lazy, and gullible
as a counter predator over the last 100 years towards false flag
predators, which is why these monsters are so out of control today
). IQ Level Four: If we can not muzzle the repeat
false flag threat by muzzling Predator and Alien through the normal
democratic process, then Americans need to start reinventing alternative
forms of popular sovereignty to protect themselves from these monsters.
This means reinvoking all the tactics of alternative nation-building
that patriotic nationalists have used for ages, such as forms of
secessionism and the creation of alternative media and racial, ethnic,
and national identities. It can also entail looking for foreign
allies such as what American Revolutionaries established with France,
except first we must exhaust all legal and nonviolent forms of support.
Hopefully the required changes can take place in a reasonably peaceful
and rational manner.
excellent example of beneficial , peaceful foreign assistance to American
patriots is RT
(Network), formerly Russia Today online television, sponsored
by the state-owned Russian news agency RIA
Novosti. Capt. May has frequently commented on how Russians are
willing to run stories that mainstream "American" media
will not touch. Note how former Naval Intelligence Officer Wayne Madsen
is a regular contributor to RT. A good example is provided below,
where he is part of the panel on "Cross Talk on Media: Brainwash,
January 14, 2010 -- RT: Media Bias
need more independent sources like RT around the world who can work
with American patriots and challenge America's controlled national
media. According to the RT segment above, 90% of U.S. media is controlled
by six mega-companies. (They left out Mossad-CIA). The more truly
independent alternative media in this world, the better.
III. UNITY OF COMMAND AND EFFORT
For every objective, seek unity of command and unity of effort
interesting paradox of a cyber militia like Ghost Troop is that as
an analytical civilian operation dedicated to free thought and free
speech, American citizen-soldier traditions run contrary to the kinds
of authoritarian "unity of command" often found among active
we prefer generalized "mission orders" analogous to broad
goals given to unit commanders in maneuver warfare that enable them
to retain enormous flexibility while reacting to unfolding general
our ultimate Commanding Officer is "General Truth" in the
same vein that the supreme commander behind the Russian victory in
fighting Napoleon was "General Winter." If nothing else,
adherence to Truth will bring us victory against the Matrix of Deception
just as Winter annihilated Bonaparte's Grand Armee.
honorary commander-in-chief of Ghost Troop can only be someone like
the ghost of Thomas Jefferson. America's third President listed
the following three things on his tombstone as his greatest accomplishments:
"...AUTHOR OF THE DECLARATION
OF AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE
OF THE STATUTE OF VIRGINIA FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
AND FATHER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA... "
not perfect by any means, Jefferson nevertheless had important strengths
worth emulating. He unquestionably displayed a Faustian search for
knowledge as a true Renaissance Man. When faced with tyranny, he risked
life, fortune, and sacred honor to oppose it, just as we today must
battle the creeping totalitarianism of Predator and Alien.
standing general orders consist of the U.S. Constitution. However,
as I discuss in regard to the "Constitution Cult" problem
in the "Maneuver" section below, drilling down on exactly
what our oath to protect and defend the Constitution means can create
many interesting social and intellectual challenges. After all, Barack
Hussein Obama II taught Constitutional law for ten years, but despite
this, I think that every major libertarian writer in America today,
to include Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, James Bovard, and Nat Hentoff,
would agree that this has failed to prevent "Bush in Blackface"
or "Bush II" from continuing the assault on our civil liberties.
moral authority comes from our basic right of self-defense, to include
our right to avoid becoming additional casualty figures from more
false flag attacks. This also include our right to prevent our own
deaths or paralysis from vax-assassination campaigns (Chapter
36), avoid getting herded like cattle into FEMA slave camps, and
avoid brainwashing by controlled national media and Holocaust propaganda.
moral authority also stems from our ability to say things that appear
fair, truthful, accurate, insightful enough to be widely read on the
Internet. As civilians we have no legal "command" authority
any type of organization, we always have certain leadership issues
that must always be dealt with, such as defining goals, avoiding infiltration
and takeover by hostile parties, encouraging creativity and initiative,
and maintaining "brand consistency" and quality control
in our product.
of the greatest problems that any dissident movement faces today is
the possible of getting infiltrated or disrupted by the FBI's COINTELPRO,
the ADL, Mossad-CIA, or any other establishment organs of repression.
In the long run, it is much safer if we can employ "swarm tactics"
and work in sympathy with many other independent organizations rather
than try to build a monolithic movement. Indeed, we have benefited
from many "Secret Sharer's" -- people who we are unlikely
to ever meet or get to know in person-- who have helped our alerts
go viral on the Internet.
the other hand, there is such a thing a becoming too atomized and
individualized. While it is great to reward individual initiative,
man is inherently a tribal animal. He usually needs the social reinforcement
of close friends and some kind of group to stay in the fight for any
extended period of time. Therefore, I would tweak Louis Beam's Leaderless
Resistance model. Yes, I agree that resistance should be decentralized,
but not so decentralized that people lose necessary social support.
IV. ECONOMY OF FORCE
Economy of force is the judicious
employment and distribution of forces.
our vantage point, "force" means the liberating power of
making suppressed "truths" known to the public, because
truth is a powerful sword. According to one translation
of Victor Hugo: "There is one thing stronger than all the armies
in the world, and that is an idea whose time has come."
of our biggest challenges is to find ways to get truthful information
across to the public about extreme threats in ways that are easily
digestible and credible. We do not want to overstress people, but
at the same time we must try to be completely truthful.
also want people to feel optimistic and empowered enough to engage
in effective activist action. If our message makes people feel depressed
and fatalistic, then we have failed in our ultimate purpose, even
though the content itself may be completely truthful.
are many "economy of force" issues involved in measuring
out and dispensing "truth." How much reasonable speculation
is appropriate before one starts engaging in unnecessary "fear
mongering?" How much editing of truth can one perform to fit
time and space constraints before one is guilty of "limited hangout?"
have had success with 500 word alerts that seem to fall within the
attention span of most readers. At the same time, I am trying to tell
as much of the complete story as I can to the public through this
extensive Mission of Conscience series. Hopefully we can
now enjoy the best of both worlds.
is axiomatic that in the long run, people tend to pay a greater price
for their delusions than anything they gain from them, both in terms
of real costs and opportunity costs. Furthermore, truth does not fear
investigation or revision.
humans are creatures of emotion and instinct as well as logic. In
his article "Are
Americans Too Broken for the Truth to Set them Free? Counterpunch,
4 Dec 2009, Bruce E. Levine explained: .
people become so broken that truths of how they are being screwed
do not “set them free” but instead further demoralize
them? Has such a demoralization happened in the United States? Do
some totalitarians actually want us to hear how we have been screwed
because they know that humiliating passivity in the face of obvious
oppression will demoralize us even further? What forces have created
a demoralized, passive, disCouraged U.S. population? Can anything
be done to turn this around? Can
people become so broken that truths of how they are being screwed
do not “set them free” but instead further demoralize
It is called the “abuse syndrome.” How do abusive pimps,
spouses, bosses, corporations, and governments stay in control?
They shove lies, emotional and physical abuses, and injustices in
their victims’ faces, and when victims are afraid to exit
from these relationships, they get weaker; and so the abuser then
makes their victims eat even more lies, abuses, and injustices,
resulting in victims even weaker as they remain in these relationships.
the truth of their abuse set people free when they are deep in these
abuse syndromes? NO. For victims of the abuse syndrome, the truth
of their passive submission to humiliating oppression is more than
embarrassing -- it can feel shameful; and there is nothing more
painful than shame....
we are faced with another important economy issue, namely managing
our emotions, health, and spirituality.
have heard quite a few talk radio show hosts quote the character Howard
Beale from the movie Network
with the line "I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take
this anymore!" They think Americans are too apathetic, and we
need to whip up anger to get activists moving.
think this is an immature approach to political activism. People who
"act out" risk being rated unstable by their peers. They
also risk burnout, or get caught up in a negative feedback circle
where they can become addicted to the "pornography of rage"
where the proverbial lion has to hear himself roar in order to function,
but becomes noxious to bystanders who do not enjoy hearing the expressions
of the greatest difficulties I have experienced in my own close personal
dealings with Zionists is their incredible gift for telling big lies
and saying extremely vicious things while acting very casual, calm,
and even jocular. They are amazingly good at playing their cards close
to the vest. The problem with most gentiles is that once they catch
on to what is really going on behind the scenes, and they blow up
with anger, most bystanders will simply see the gentile anger, but
they will remain totally clueless about the passive aggressive Jewish
behavior that prompted this anger in the first place. The gentile
gets left holding the bag, looking like an unstable buffoon, and the
Zionist gets to walk away with another smirk on his face. "Gotcha!"
one deals with Zionists, one cannot let them get ones goat, even though
in fact quite a few of them are extremely evil and dangerous people.
think that Dr. Lorraine Day was also correct when she noted that for
our long term health, we need to learn how to eat right, avoid toxins,
exercise, learn how to manage stress, and maintain positive spirituality.
activism, one often catches more flies with honey than vinegar. Our
enemies try to take our message and make it appear "marginal,"
"hateful," and "extreme." Jewish controlled media
has spent untold millions of dollars demonizing anything to do with
Nazis (see ADL support of Nazis in Chapter
34) and the Klan as hate mongers. Their next step is to try to
link Americans with conservative views with either of these entities
on a superficial level that forever keeps Americans in a fearful,
disorganized, and "political correctness-walking on egg shells"
reality, my message is very "normal" by traditional American
conservative standards, it is just the country that has become hijacked
by coldly manipulative, extremist Zionist neocons.
conservative activist, Lady Michele Renouf, summed it up well when
she quoted Dostoyevsky "Beauty
Will Save the World." Beauty will inspire us to rise above
the ugliness, inhumanity, and dark intrigues of Zionist plutocrats.
article 19 Jan 2009 article in the Idaho Observer titled
"Are You Fighting Out of Love for Those Who You Are Fighting
For or Hatred For Those You Are Fighting Against?" by Darrell
van Mastrigt, editor of the Innocence Denied newsletter, talks about
the power of love that motivated Don Harkins, editor and publisher
of The Idaho Observer, to stay in the fight prior to his
tragic death from cancer:
spirit will live through everyone he has touched in life because
it was full of love. Love for Ingri [his wife]. Love for truth.
Love for justice. Love for us. His words made me wonder if an advocate
is stronger by fighting out of love for those he is fighting for
or by hatred towards those he is fighting against. Seeing, hearing
and feeling the impact Don has had in my life, and for so many others,
has given me the answer.
burns strong and hot until there is nothing left. Love sustains
through good and bad while growing stronger over time. Love never
gives up and it never loses hope because it is always needed. Don
fought with love because it made him stronger...
is also interesting how various military and intelligence organizations
who train individuals how to engage in effective behavior while under
extreme stress, typically encourage the exact opposite of "acting
officer training often focuses on the ability to organize and discipline
oneself to get a lot done in very little time while maintaining a
stoic demeanor. One Marine career retention poster shows a reconnaissance
Marine on beach in combat gear holding an automatic rifle with words
to the effect: "We get more done by 9:00 AM than most people
get accomplished all day." I also like another Marine recon slogan:
"Swift, Silent, and Deadly."
is not "I'm mad as hell" type "acting out" behavior.
This is beyond open displays of anger.
another interesting example, the book The O.S.S. and I by
William Morgan describes training methods for guerillas and spies
to be dropped into Nazi-occupied France. The Office of Strategic Services,
the WWII precursor of the CIA, taught agents to techniques to remain
very calm, use ones head, and avoid showing ones hand under conditions
of extreme stress. For
example one bit of advice for the spy who has been freshly inserted
"in country" is to not try to do too much too soon, but
rather to spend some time relaxing and familiarizing oneself with
ones environment in order to learn how to appear very calm and "normal."
One technique was to sit on a park bench out side a Gestapo headquarters
and just try to feel calm while reading a newspaper as German soldiers
walk back and forth. Another bit of advice when planting explosives
to blow up a bridge was to try to casually walk away once the timer
is set in order to practice being calm, rather than run. The idea
is that once one stops acting calm, one starts making more mistakes.
his book By Way of Deception, Victor Ostrovsky talks about
how Mossad agents are sometimes encouraged not to carry guns. They
are told that their most dangerous weapon is their own brain, and
their ability to think through situations in advance. If they have
not though through a situation in advance, then being found in possession
of a gun will probably not do much to save them.
interesting individual, Hans Joachim Scharff, who is profiled in Raymond
Toliver's book The Interrogator, got everything he wanted
out of all but ten of 510 Allied airmen he interrogated for the Luftwaffe
in World War II. He never got angry and he never used torture. To
the contrary, he usually acted very personable, charming, and humble.
He put the emphasis on meticulously doing his homework, and using
his head about every move he made. In fact, he was so well-respected
that in the post-war era, when he relocated to southern California
and became a U.S. citizen, he was honored by U.S. Air Force associations
compromised of the very men he had interrogated!
think that an important aspect of "economy of force" in
the Info War is to distinguish between "truth effrontery,"
which is what we try to practice, and "shock jock" which
is inappropriate for a defensive, analytical, academic-leaning approach.
In "truth effrontery" we try to tell the plain truth in
the clearest, calmest, most direct way possible. In "shock jock,"
activists deliberately act like the proverbial bull in the china shop
by engaging in intemperate language and dragging in extraneous issues
that needlessly entangle and sensationalize an issue in order to get
attention or even communicate hostility to the audience. I have already
described examples of "shock jock" in Chapter
Security results from the measures taken by
a commander to protect his forces.
the term "security" has a very different meaning for a cyber
intelligence unit than, say, an infantry unit in the field that worries
about enemy soldiers infiltrating their perimeter to slit their throats.
our case, "security" means keeping our guard against factors
that can degrade our degree of truthfulness, the quality of our analysis,
damage our reputation, impair our efficiency, undermine our working
relationships, or subject us to unnecessary legal action.
are also faced with a peculiar cultural and psychological problem
in facing a covert 4th generation warfare opponent like the Zionists.
In a Northern European culture, people have chivalrous and rationalistic
instincts that tend to make them naive and "happy go lucky"
in a normal civilian, peacetime environment. In contrast, many Zionists
engage in covert 4th generation warfare --to include psycho-political
warfare -- in all environments.
for an "intelligence" unit, we are not particularly concerned
about leaking our modus operandi to the pubic, since we have decided
to become "public people" who work purely "open source."
We invite imitators. We have no agendas that encourage illegal behavior.
We believe that if anything, government-sponsored intelligence services
are too secretive and compartmentalized. Our biggest problem is not
in guarding secrets, but rather we have more information that we want
to share with the public than we have time to post on the Internet.
We also wish we could find more time to do interviews. Far from retaining
secrets, we often cannot disclose information to the public fast enough.
main tools of our enemies in the Infowar involve the use of propaganda
to brainwash the public into support policies that ultimately benefit
the power elite at their expense. I have a fairly simple definition
of propaganda, namely the deliberate use of logical fallacies to steer
thinking and public sentiment.
are typically the same fallacies identified in college
textbooks on informal logic. Logical fallacies such as Ad
Hominem, "Glittering Generality" or "Hasty
Generlization," and "Bandwagon"
were specifically listed in the appendix of an older version of the
U.S. Army PSYOPs manual as propaganda techniques. An quaint introduction
for the uninitiated is the story "Love
Is a Fallacy" from the Dobbie Gillis TV series of the 1950's.
a broader intellectual level, a major goal of our enemies is to engage
in "sophistry," which the ancient Greeks identified as the
fine art of making weaker arguments appear to be the stronger arguments.
I am reminded of certain multiple choice question alternatives once
offered in a reading
comprehension section of the Graduate Management Admission Test:
A if the item is a MAJOR OBJECTIVE in making the decision, the
is, one of the outcomes or results sought by the decision-maker;
B if the item is a MAJOR FACTOR in making the decision, that is,
a consideration, explicitly mentioned in the passafe, that is basic
in determining the decision;
C if the item is a MINOR FACTOR in making the decision, that is,
a secondary consideration that affects the criteria tangentially,
relating to a Major Factor rather than to an Objective;
D if the item is a MAJOR ASSUMPTION in making the decision, that
is, a supposition or projection made by the decision-make before
weighing the variables;
E if the item is an UNIMPORTANT ISSUE in making the decision, that
is, a factor that is insignificant or not immediately relevant to
process of making an accurate analyses of most complex political and
economic issues usually involves properly sorting out all of the above
elements. In contrast, an important objective of our enemis is typically
to turn all these things on their head, whereby major objectives are
portrayed as minor objectives and vice versa, major factors are treated
as minor factors and vice versa, and major assumptions are treated
as unimportant issues and vice versa.
Seize, retain, and exploit the initiative.
is a tricky topic to address, since for moral and political purposes
we want to cultivate and maintain an image of being essentially "defensive"
in nature. However, paradoxically enough, there are many ways we can
assert various forms of strong offensive power even while maintaining
this "defensive" posture.
currently enjoy an enormous advantage from the fact that the Internet
is now exposing the mountains of lies that have accumulated in the
hands of our Predator and Alien enemies through their national media
control for over a hundred years. As their house of cards crumbles
before the Internet, this sometimes creates the illusion that we have
"offensive power" when in reality we, like thousands of
other cyber activists, are simply kicking in the rotten door.
under even relatively benign conditions, there is a considerable potential
to generate heat and light by simply telling the straight truth in
public. This is because there are so many people who engage in intellectual
repression under even normal circumstances. For example, how many
people who have grown up in a "religious household" are
able to entertain the rationalist ideas of the Enlightenment?
favorite tactic is called "truth effrontery," a form of
"political grandstanding." This involves discussing Predator
and Alien-related issues in a very matter of fact, calm manner without
going through any of the usual political correctness hand wringing
can also engage in "truth effrontery" on a broader philosophical
level, by pointing out important facts and insights that challenge
the very existence of tyrannical Predator and Alien. In the "Maneuver"
section of this discussion, I go into some detail into what I call
"turning movement" philosophical issues.
feel strongly that it is not enough to try to thwart specific false
flag attacks, whether they consist of threats to Texas-based oil refineries,
the Chicago Willis Tower, or cities in the Pacific Northwest. We must
go on the strategic counteroffensive and sustain it until we have
achieved victory, and muzzled Predator and Alien once and for all
so that never again will they present a threat to come back at us
and enslave us.
Place the enemy in a position of disadvantage
through the flexible application of combat power
it comes to thwarting false flag attacks, we have two basic maneuvers.
first approach, which is heavily focused on breaking news and exercise
schedules, is to publicize indicators in advance of an event such
as a major military exercise that we believe has a plausible likelihood
of serving as a riding horse for the false flag attack. Since false
flag attacks are inherently criminal and treasonous in nature, there
is a credible chance that conspirators will scurry like cockroaches
once a spotlight is shined in their direction.
is analogous to the allopathic medical model, where one tries to use
a drug or surgical procedure to attack a specific disease condition
before it spreads and grows worse. In regard to military tactics,
it would be similar to launching a spoiling attack along a specific
front to disrupt an enemy as he is massing his troops and logistical
stores to attack you. It might also be equated to Sun Tzu's concept
of balking the enemy's plans, as he discussed in the following passage
from his classic work The Art of War:
1. Sun Tzu said: In the practical art of war, the best thing of
all is to take the enemy's country whole and intact; to shatter
and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to recapture
an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment
or a company entire than to destroy them.
2. Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme
excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's
resistance without fighting.
3. Thus the highest form of generalship is to balk the enemy's
plans; the next best is to prevent the junction of the enemy's forces;
the next in order is to attack the enemy's army in the field; and
the worst policy of all is to besiege walled cities.
second approach, which is ongoing, is to counter the general psychological
environment and body of beliefs required to support a false flag attack.
Since false flag attacks reflect a union of unlimited "Predator"
(federal government) and out-of-control "Alien" (Zionism),
we will never stop this evil until we figure out a way to discredit
these monsters on a broad ideological level as well as interdict specific
broader approach, which I call "Counter-PSYOPS", is analogous
to the homeopathic medical model, where naturopathic healers focus
on rebuilding the immune system through adequate nutrition, exercise,
avoidance of toxins in food and vaccines, adequate sleep, positive
attitude (spirituality) and stress management.
good military analogy would be the "turning movement," where
one's own forces typically seize a highly strategic position in the
enemy's rear that forces him to pull back his forward lines, even
though they have not been attacked directly. One historical example
involves the campaign by Gen. Douglas MacArthur where he landed Marines
deep in the rear of North Koreans at Inchon, threatening all of their
supply lines and communications, and forcing all the Communists forces
to quickly retreat out of the southeaster part of South Korea all
the way back up into North Korea. Another example involves the Richmond-Petersburg
campaign during the War for Southern Independence, where Gen.
Ulysses Grant's forces successfully wrapped around and seized railroads
south of Richmond that comprised the last major supply routes for
Robert E. Lee's Army, forcing the Confederates to retreat from Richmond
are myriad historical distortions and political and economic ideologies
that provide a one-sided view of reality in support of Predator and
Alien, which I would consider PSYOPs. In fact, our enemies have already
executed ideological "turning movements" against us over
the last two hundred years in order to undermine traditional American
conservative values. As some examples, "Federalism," the
"Whig Theory of History" (see "Shattering
the Icon of Abraham Lincoln" by Sam Dickson),and "Neo-Jacobinim"
are all ideologies whose one-side presentation undermine States Rights
and various other forms of political decentralization in America.
Marxism, Zionism, and Christian Zionism have served as potent ideologies
whose one-sided presentation camouflages the alien nature of Jews
and Israel and gives them both a very specially privileged position
in American society. Not surprisingly, Jews have shown an unusual
affinity for both Marxism and Zionism. See, for example "Zionism
versus Bolshevism. A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People"
by the Rt. Hon. Winston S. Churchill.
do matter. As Dr. Rebecca Carley puts it, we first have to
focus on achieving a nonviolent "revolution of consciousness."
An important first step in defeating Predator and Alien is to deal
with all the faulty reasons for why people have been brainwashed to
love these monsters.
have already provided some in depth discussion of examples of what
I regard as evil PSYOPs, such as my links to critiques of Keynesianism
33 and irresponsible Holocaustianity exaggeration in Chapter
34. In an earlier draft of this ebook, I went on for many pages
specifically outlining all the leading ideologies that I believe have
brainwashed Americans, and ways that I think we can counter-PSYOP
these evil PSYOPs, however, I later decided to provide this additional
work as attachments and supplements at some future date to avoid turning
this chapter into a book itself.
closing out this section, there is one last PSYOP I need to mention
because I believe it illustrates perfectly the interesting concept
of a "sugar false flag." This is the "Moon Hoax"
in 1969. This was "too wonderful" in a mirror image way
to how the attacks on Washington, D.C. and New York on 9/11 were "too
horrible." Nevertheless, both events were deliberately fabricated
by the same totally shameless and criminal power elite to serve their
long term interests.
the 4 Sept 2009 interview "The
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax" Part II, Dr. James Fetzer's guest
Rich DellaRosa opined that the hoax helped distract the world away
from America's problems in Vietnam.
would go a step further. The Zionist power elite wanted to create
a mass false confidence on steroids that America could reengineer
itself socially in the same apparent way it was able to engineer itself
into a successful Moon Landing. Racial integration, multi-culturalism,
out-sourcing of industry, blank check support for Israel, One World
Government --everything on the modern liberal and Zionist agenda were
now going to work, because America now became the "can do"
country where "this time it is different."
I often wonder if Wall Street in the late 1990's was also the subject
of a "sugar false flag" from the way the stock markets were
heavily manipulated upwards by the Fed, other central banks, and major
Wall Street allies in order to generate a prolonged "feel good"
environment prior to 9/11 and the Zionist-led invasions of Afghanistan
and Iraq. One of the purposes of a sugar false flag is encourage the
general public to keep its guard down and go about "business
as usual" as high level malefactors work feverishly behind the
scenes to get their ducks in a row for their next major high level
Synchronizing all the elements of combat power where they will have
decisive effect on an enemy force in a short period of time is to
a cyber intelligence unit heavily involved in analysis, we employ
a very different and much more abstract form of "mass" than
the stereotypical concentrations of troops, tanks, planes, and artillery
that might confer superior combat power in an infantry attack.
"mass" or "potency" comes from our ability to
deliver hard-hitting, truthful, deep analysis to the public in a timely
this section I would like to explain some analytical approaches that
I have found to be particularly helpful in looking at a wide variety
of social, political, and economic issues, namely:
a) The Constraint Analysis Approach
b) The Real Estate Appraisal Approach (adapted to generalized intelligence
c) The "Three-Bin" Approach for Country-related Case Study
d) Fundamental vs. Technical approaches used by securities analysts
approach is frequently used in operations
research. It is also known as "linear
programming" in computer science.
I find particularly fascinating about constraint analysis is the way
its underlying concepts can be transferred to apply to a wide variety
of fields, ranging from understanding political and economic systems
to military strategy and false flag operations. The methodology typically
involves three basic steps:
Grasp how things work on a total system level. What are all the critical
variables? How do all the "moving parts" mesh with each
other? What are the inputs and outputs to the system?
Identify all the "process flows" and their critical nodes
or "choke points." In other words, as things flow from steps
"A" to "Z," what are all the critical points along
the process that impact on the quality and rate in which outcomes
get produced? It helps to diagram
the system. What are the most constraining factors in each process
Identify the various costs and benefits of trying to free up constraints
within all the various critical points of the process flows. (The
marginal costs to free up constraints are called shadow
prices). Find the lowest cost solutions to maximize desired outputs.
may sound like a lot of dry operations research jargon to many readers,
but on a conceptual level I can show how it is very relevant to what
we try to accomplish in running interdiction missions against potential
false flag attacks.
strategy has been defined as finding ways to maximize the constraints
on ones enemy, to include his access to power bases, while doing the
exact opposite for ones own side.
their tremendous financial and other governmental resources, Mossad-CIA
is extremely constrained in certain areas. When we can identify critical
nodes, and apply the right pressure at the right time, we can stop
them cold, just like the way loose lips can sink ships or a sling
shot aimed at just the right spot can fell a big giant.
prior chapters I have already identified many of these constraints.
For starters, false flag activities are extremely criminal. False
flag operators have to operate in secrecy. They typically have to
propagandize the public and put potential activists to sleep ahead
of time. They also frequently need to piggy-back off military exercises.
Lastly, they usually need to depend on "fear momentum."
Many rely on occult numerology to assign target dates.
these things are potential constraining points or "nodes"
in their operational "process flows" that we can possibly
target as part of our interdiction strategy.
Estate Appraisal Approach:
we are not involved in appraising real estate, however, on a conceptual
level, the three different perspectives used to appraise real estate
can be abstracted and applied to false flag analysis.
three standard approaches to real estate appraisal are the income,
production, and market comparable approaches. Let us look first at
how they apply to real estate, and then how they can be applied to
political, economic, and intelligence analysis.
real estate, this means creating an estimate of property value based
upon the rental income it is likely to generate. In its simplest "back-of-the-envelope"
form, it involves a two step process where one first acquires rent
roll data, and then applies a "capitalization rate" to a
total annual income estimate to estimate a viable offering price for
analogue of collecting a rent roll for false flag analysis is the
age-old key to detective fiction and murder mysteries, namely "Cui
Bono?" or "who benefits.
analogue of finding the "cap rate" is to determine who has
the power to commit the heinous act and sustain a cover up.
excellent example of this form of analysis was the booklet "JFK:
The Mystery Unraveled" published by the old SPOTLIGHT in the
1980's. It first provided a list of various entities that could benefit
from the death of JFK. Next, it analyzed who had the power to sustain
the cover up. That reduced everything down to one group of suspects:
Zionists. This is a thesis that a journalist of the former SPOTLIGHT
(later reincarnated as The American Free Press once the SPOTLIGHT
folded in 2000), Michael Collins Piper, pursued in his classic work
the first step in analyzing 9/11 using this approach is to analyze
all the parties who benefited. Next, we determine for our "cap
rate" who has the resources to pull off the operation and sustain
the cover up. Once again, the list narrows to one prime suspect.
are many forms of deep analysis that assist our structural analysis.
For example, in my "Centralized
vs. Decentralized" online essay, I provide a libertarian
analysis about how government can degenerate over time from a limited
government, to a ponzi-pork barrel racket, and then finally slide
into the terminal "evil" government phase. In this last
phase, oligarchical leaders protect their special privileges and ruthless
rent-seeking by waging covert war on the people. Hence, the false
flag attack is symptomatic of evil government.
vs. Parasitism" article, in the "Functional
Analysis of Jewish Criminal Totalitarian Psychopathology"
section, I try to explain how an utterly criminal Zionist oligarchy
has received more support from America than any other country in history.
As part of the Cui Bono? analysis, I necessarily have to explain the
dynamics of psychopathy so that we can understand why such a group
would feel motivated to viciously turn on its prime benefactor.
real estate, this approach involves asking what a building would cost
if one had to acquire raw land and hire a construction company to
put up the building from scratch.
applied to other fields, this is essentially the "tinkering"
approach used by self-taught great inventors such as Thomas Edison
and Henry Ford used. One starts by asking basic questions and then
building a body of understanding through the deductive process. The
Mises Institute, a libertarian think tank, calls this the "Praxeology"
or "deductive" approach.
great advantage of this approach is that one focuses on specific problems.
It does a much better job than the other approaches to avoid ideological
preconceptions. It enables one to conduct political analysis from
the ground up and detect bugs and errors along the way that typically
comprise mental logjams for people think only on an ideological level.
In addition, one teaches oneself how to think independently, connect
all the dots, and understand how all the "moving parts"
of a situation mesh together without being spoon-fed by other people.
If one has the time and resources, this is the best of all approaches,
although one also needs to use the other approaches as well for a
are several "sub-approaches" typically incorporated into
this deductive or "praxeology" approach: Learning
how to ask the right questions: I am reminded of a corporate
law course I once took as a graduate student, where for each homework
assignment, we were supposed to read a state supreme court opinion
on a legal case, and then figure out the best formulation of the legal
question that was being addressed. As Thomas Pynchon stated,
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have
to worry about answers." Learning
how to dissect down to the roots: This involves learning how
to question all ones assumptions to test their validity to avoid the
problem of "garbage in- garbage out." The
thought experiment: This involves taking a relatively simple
situation and then demonstrating that one understands what is going
on as one adds layers of complexity to replicate a real world situation.
his lectures at the Mises Institute, one can hear Dr. Murray Rothbard
use the example of Robinson Crusoe to try to explain economic actions
taken in a very primitive environment in ways that are conceptually
consistent with economic theory for actors in an advanced industrial
economy. Economic concepts such as "entrepreneurial calculation,"
"marginal utility," and "time preference" can
be applied to simple projects like collecting coconuts as well as
more complex operations like running an automobile manufacturing operation.
After all, truthful knowledge should be interrelated and consistent,
so micro-economic theory should mesh with macro-economics. Interestingly
enough, a big complaint made by many Austrian economists with the
Keynesian economic theory currently practiced by the Federal Reserve
is that it is typically completely decoupled from the common sense
economic realities that most people generally experience in managing
their own small businesses or their own personal financial affairs.
Logically, we should smell some rats on these economic issues, as
I have already done in Chapter
can use the "praxeological" or "deductive" approach
to analyze false flag attacks by placing oneself in the shoes of some
hypothetical operational planner for Mossad-CIA. As a thought experiment,
one starts out by trying to identify all the problems that such a
planner would need to solve from A to Z in order to pull off a 9/11
inside job and get away with it. Or expressed differently, how does
one go about mass-murdering 3,000 Americans and then get the FBI to
help sustain the cover-up and on top of this continue to soak America's
Congress for trillions more dollars in direct and indirect aid for
Israel while keeping national media on your side?
is similar to the concept "It takes a thief to catch a thief."
To understand the criminal conspirator, you must first learn how to
think like him, and learn how to think through his operational planning
the way he does, step by step.
the "Why We Fight" perspective, the "thought experiment"
also serves as a valuable tool to address important issues and concepts.
the "Republican Virtue" concept frequently discussed by
patriot leaders at the time of the American Revolution. One way to
approach this concept is to compare it to a business partnership.
Imagine that in order to prevent tyranny, one divides up ownership
and managerial control in a business venture among many different
people. What are the minimal qualities of cooperation, moral character,
competence, and social responsibility that one should expect of individuals
before one accepts them as a coequal partners to run a company? How
should a partnership punish or exclude other partners who show themselves
to be dishonest or irresponsible? And now for the clincher, why should
we parcel out citizenship rights with any less care than we might
go about sharing partnership rights in a business?
of the interesting results of vigorously pursuing the "republican
virtue" thought experiment is that it makes one seriously question
the validity of the ethic of "universal suffrage," particularly
after one considers objective research into the level of character
flaws and other weaknesses in the general population.
real estate, this involves tries to find properties on the market
that are as similar as possible to the property one is trying to appraise,
and then extrapolate the market-pricing of their features.
is very similar to what is known as the "case study" method
in academia, or the "case law" approach in legal jurisprudence,
where one looks at many historic situations that seem to be similar
to ones own, and tries to make logical comparisons.
important advantage of this approach compared to the Production (
or "deductive" or "praxeological") approach is
that typically real world situations are much more complex than theoretical
models we can use as "thought experiments." Furthermore,
people often filter out important variables based upon their own biases,
creating a "garbage in, garbage out" problem in their deductive
process. Therefore, the "case study" method helps to capture
"Problem-Reaction-Solution" can not only be
used to steer thinking, but also to stampede public behavior
into highly contrived "choices" designed by the power
elite to suit their interests. The case study
approach helps avoid overly channelized analysis.
is more than just "academic." In fact, this approach provides
an important defense against what is known as the "false Hegelian
Dialectic" used by our Info War enemies to falsely steer our
thinking. This deception tries to portray the opposing sides of an
issue in a false manner to manipulate public opinon. It usually provides
a false representation of the pros and cons involved in an argument,
and omits or distorts important alternative ideas and options. This
faulty argument construction, also known as the fallacy of the bifurcated
argument in informal logic, or the "problem-reaction-solution"
approach in PSYOPs, is particularly effective when the power elite
can not only control our flow of information, but also force us to
react at a faster speed than we have time to adequately access and
weigh truthful and balanced information.
media often present only the "left" vs. "right"
(or "environmental vs. genetic") paradigm, and ignore other
dualities that I identify in my online "Resolving
Opposing Ideological Viewpoints" series such as "centralization
vs. decentralization" or "mutualism vs. parasitism"
(or "mutually supportive productive honesty" vs "criminal
exploitation"). Furthermore, controlled media might try to distort
the political debate even further, by portraying modern liberals,
Jews, and homosexuals as trendy, intelligent, and charming people,
and straight white male conservatives as brutal and inarticulate oafs.
In reality, throughout history there have been thousands of different
kinds of leftist and rightist movements, each with unique variations
regarding such factors as ethnicity, specific political objectives,
degree of authoritarianism or decentralization, and levels of honesty.
case study approach forces one to focus on real world examples that
may contain important nuances and variables that one might overlook
in the initial phases of an analysis, or in trying to use an alternative
approach such as the praxeological approach mentioned earlier in this
in a man-made environment like computer programming, analysts can
use an approach that has similarities to the case study method where
they run simulations that show how complex systems made up of myriad
variables interact with each other over time under different scenarios.
regard to our analysis of false flag attacks, our first step in using
the case study approach is to build a historical data base of all
suspected attacks. Then we can try to filter out common patterns.
In fact, we do see quite a few similarities among such cases as the
JFK assassination, assault on the U.S.S. Liberty, Oklahoma City Bombing,
9/11, Madrid 3-11-2004, and London 7-7-2005.
"Three Bin" Country Analysis Approach
are a number of "sub-approaches" that can assist the case
study analysis approach. For example, back in 1984 I took a "Business,
Government, and the International Economy" course where the professor
encouraged us to take country case studies and sort their information
into the following three "bins:" Context:
In the case of a false flag operation, we look at the history
of false flag attacks, as well as the history of social and political
phenomena that relate to false flag attacks, such as the history of
"terrorism," of intelligence organizations like the Mossad,
CIA, and Russian FSB and former KGB and GRU, and also look at the
history of social, political, and economic challenges faced by countries
involved with false flag attacks. Objectives:
What are the likely short term, intermediate, and long term goals
of all relevant players? This dovetails with the "Cui Bono"
analysis I have described earlier in the "Income" approach
area above. Performance:
How well have all the various countries and intelligence agencies
relevant to false flag attacks been able to fulfill their social,
political, and economic objectives? What are their capabilities both
now and in the future?
vs. Technical approaches used by securities analysts
securities analysis, "fundmental analysis" typically involves
looking at the basic ability of a company to function successfully
and grow over the long term in order to increase its earnings or asset
value and in turn its stock price. This usually means looking at such
basic factors as financial fundamentals (strength of cash flow, balance
sheet, and income statements), quality of leadership (track record,
expertise, and reliability of the management team), the strength of
the product line and new product development, and the viablilty of
the corporate strategy. In other words, what is the "reality"
behind the company. Typically fundamental analysis is most effective
for long run predictions, since over the long run market valuations
tend to regress towards rational rules of thumb that compare rates
of return with competing investments. The investment style that corresponds
with this mentality is typically called "value investing."
"technical analysis," approach typically focuses on market
sentiment, trends, and buying and selling behavior in order to help
predict stock price behavior. Here, "perception is reality."
The idea is that in the short run, market behavior is heavily influenced
by such emotional or instinctive as herd psychology, false pride,
impulsiveness, and excessive fear and greed. In the short run, most
investors act like overgrown children rather than fully rational and
well-informed adults. The investment strategy that typically coincides
with this view point is called "momentum investing." An
interesting emergent field in business psychology that studies this
area is called behavioral finance. The idea is that most people are
still biological "cavemen" and their cognitive and emotional
processes are still heavily geared towards addressing prehistoric
problems. They tend to misapply these instinctive tendencies when
engaged in common stock investments, since this is involves a very
different problem-solving paradigm than the general thrust of their
evolutionary cognitive development over the last one hundred thousand
it comes to analyzing "Info War," the "fundamental"
approaches involves collating facts and analyses regarding "black
ops" and then applying deductive logic, much like the way Sherlock
Holmes solves murder mysteries.
"technical approach" can involve looking at how controlled
national or local media promote logical fallacies (propaganda) to
prevent the public from drawing logical conclusions. For example,
I have heard people like Capt. May, Wayne Madsen, Gov. Jesse Ventura,
and Alex Jones comment innumerable times that America's national media
controllers must think the American public is pretty cowardly, gullible,
lazy, and stupid to take at face value official government versions
of the JFK assassination, 9/11, or the more recent "Panty Bomber"
episode used to "justify" airport scanners. Certainly a
big part of black op-related "technical analysis" involves
looking at what has happened to America that has caused so many Americans
to become so gullible or heavily in denial.
Strike the enemy at a time or place or
in a manner for which he is unprepared.
principle of "Surprise" obviously has a very different meaning
for us as a volunteer unit dedicated towards openly dissemination
of truth to the public compared to, say, an infantry unit preparing
to attack its enemy.
best success in achieving surprise has taken place when we have surprised
ourselves as much as the public by opportunistically jumping on hot
issues and producing timely alerts that just happen to go viral on
the Internet. Our 2008 Mayday alert achieved twice the reach of the
Kennebunkport Warning in Summer 2007.
another paradoxical way , we achieve "surprise" by consistently
sticking to our policy of "truth effrontery." By relying
totally on open source material, and by rejecting secrecy, we are
in many ways like an "anti-intelligence" intelligence unit.
This is probably something that most conventional intelligence professionals
would have a very hard time getting used to.
also achieve "surprise" in another unique way. The agents
of both Predator and Alien suffer from their own ideological blinders
and are frequently their own worst enemies. We achieve "surprise"
when we can consistently embarrass them before the public by simply
exposing the ways they over reach themselves.
have been spoiled by their own success. For most of the last eight
decades (at least) they have become used to seeing journalists cower
and pull in their horns for fear of being called "anti-Semitic"
or some other label. Up until the advent of the free Internet, their
bullying tactics were adequate to keep most Americans intimidated
most of the time.
Zionists thrive best in very racially and culturally mixed social
environments where most people remain focused most of the time on
having a nice life and making money and taking care of their families.
In such an environment, a combination of bribery and bullying by groups
like the ADL goes a long way.
think that much of this Zionist behavior is semi-conscious. It is
a tropism that has developed from a unique evolutionary history of
nearly three millennia where Jews have existed in small colonies among
host nations, heavily focused on middle man operations and high end
criminal operations to survive. Through a unique Darwinian process,
this has bred a unique mentality well suited for covert forms of 4th
generation warfare. However, it has also inbred psychopathic forms
of greed that are without bounds.
much of this behavior is semi-conscious for Jews, I think that it
always a bit of a surprise to them when they finally break down the
social structure or hijack a nation to the point that they start generating
truly focused and determined opposition. Zionists always seem to push
to the limit until they finally create the enemies they deserve. They
always overreach themselves. In many ways, this is a very
tragic and pathological situation.
make a long story short, we do not have to try to "surprise"
anybody. We can just stand back and help Predator and Alien stumble
into the pits they dig for themselves.
Prepare clear, uncomplicated plans and concise
orders to ensure thorough understanding
think that we can observe the principle of "simplicity"
in a number of important ways to effectively communicate truth to
rather than beat around the bush with euphemisms and talk only about
mysterious things like "Illuminati," "Levantines,"
or :"Bilderbergers," we should come right out and say "Jews"
if this is what we really mean. This is especially true with the Internet,
where we can say what we really think and not have to worry about
getting misquoted in sound bytes by hostile media channels. The Internet
is an outstanding medium for plain, straight talk, and we should use
it for such.
also think that Occam's
Razor in biology is the best way to go in the long run regarding
explanations. Occam's Razor states that when confronted with various
theories that try to explain biological phenomenon, the simplest and
most common sense explanation is typically the most likely to be correct.
can apply a similar principle to explain the behavior of Alien and
Predator. For example, in nature, when animals start acting very strangely,
such as when whales start beaching themselves, the first thing that
most Zoologists suspect is that they have been infected with parasites.
when the United States attacks itself in false flag operations, squanders
trillions of dollars to support Zionists who give nothing in return,
and liquidates its founding Northern European genetic stock in favor
of Third World illegal immigrants, and provides a home base for pharmaceutical
companies that plot global false flag pandemic genocide, obviously
something very strange is going on.
keeping with Occam's Razor, I believe that one of the first things
that most reasonable people should suspect when confronted with these
facts is that America is infected with dangerous parasites.
good companion video for this video is Alex
Jones on UFO and Project Blue Beam (20 Dec 2009) on staged
UFO events to distract the public. There are declassified U.S. Government
plans known to the public for over 15 years to project a giant Buddha,
Jesus, or UFOs in the sky with holograms. "The New World Order
is about hoaxes, all about control, all about mass panic." Jones
discusses his interviews with Dr.
Robert M. Bowman, former head of the "Star Wars" program.
Senior staff in the Vatican have talked about UFO's, Larry King Live
has had guests who talk about how it is real, a prominent astronaut
has come out and said that UFOs are visiting the world... and all
of this seems to be coming out at once. This looks contrived to Alex
Jones. He also describes how the the use of advanced techology with
"black ops" and the creation of religious hoaxes with holograms
or use of fake alien invasions to panic the public can constitute
the ultimate "false flag" operation.
Has Fallen and Has Taken Liberty With It, Good-bye,
by Paul Craig Roberts.
Council of Europe is investigating big pharma’s role in hyping
a false swine flu pandemic in order to gain billions of dollars in
sales of the vaccine.
media helped the US military hype its recent Marja offensive in Afghanistan,
Marja as a city of 80,000 under Taliban control. It turns out
that Marja is not urban but a collection of village farms.
there is the global warming scandal, in which climate scientists,
financed by Wall Street and corporations anxious to get their mitts
on `cap and trade' and by a U.N. agency anxious to redistribute income
from rich to poor countries, concocted a
doomsday scenario in order to create profit in pollution.
one looks, truth has fallen to money....
Iceland, Then the World by Michael Collins
Theory With Jesse Ventura: Global Warming
Theory With Jesse Ventura: Global Warming, Part 1,
6, and Part
7 "Global Warming Premiered
Wed, December 16 at 10P Whether global warming is real or not,
it's believed some people are using the issue to make billions
of dollars, start a one-world government and control our lives,
from the cars we drive to the foods we eat. Jesse Ventura starts
with Al Gore and goes far beyond as he uncovers the evidence
that leads to one man thought to be behind the global warming
Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty? October 14, 2009 Lord
Christopher Monckton presentation in St. Paul, MN on the subject
of global warming "In this 4-minute excerpt from his speech,
he issues a dire warning to all Americans regarding the United
Nations Climate Change Treaty that is scheduled to be signed
in Copenhagen in December 2009."
Study of psychopathic societies (high fraud, high greed, high predator/
to Without Conscience - the website devoted to the study of psychopathy.
These pages represent the efforts by Dr. Robert D. Hare and his associates,
colleagues and students in studying forensic psychology here in Canada
and around the world." ponerology.com
"PONEROLOGY: THE STUDY OF EVIL: In the author’s opinion,
Ponerology reveals itself to be a new branch of science born out of
historical need and the most recent accomplishments of medicine and
psychology. In light of objective naturalistic language, it studies
the causal components and processes of the genesis of evil, regardless
of the latter’s social scope..."