the False Flag Rosetta Stone
unfolding of the story of Captain May’s mission of conscience
reminds me of theplot
structure of the classic 1950’s science fiction movie The
in the movie, we are introduced to a monster that threatens an interstellar
earth expedition that has landed on a forbidden planet.As the movie progresses, we learn how unbelievably powerful
and dangerous this monster is.Towards the end of the movie we also learn the secret to the
monster.We learn about
its peculiar vulnerabilities, how very internal it is, and its capacity
to not only destroy its own creator and but everything around it.
far in this book we have been introduced to general outlines of a
predatory monster that obviously consists of Zionism, unlimited Federal
government, and controlled national media.It does nasty things like wage unprovoked
and unnecessary wars of aggression against Third World countries and
continually covers up casualty figures for its own imperial troopers
as well as innocent Third World civilians.
we are going to learn about how this monster is vastly more dangerous
and duplicitous than it has been described so far.We will begin to learn about how it not only tells big lies
to its own citizens, but also mass-murders them on its own soil.
will also learn about how this monster has dual characteristics much
like the monster in the movie.That is, it can simultaneously be both
physically very real while at the same time functioning on the level
of subconscious denial for most Americans.
both the monster in the movie as well the one in America
could never exist were it not for massive psychological repression
and denial.In the case
of America , this denial is maintained
through Info War, as waged by controlled national media and its sinister
we will begin to fathom this strange monster’s incredible capacity
for self-destructive evil in the future that is far greater than most
Americans can imagine.It has the potential to bring something
as bizarre as the group suicides at Jonestown or Masada to America on a national scale.
we have experienced for decades a slow form of suicide (that is now
accelerating) through the hollowing out of America ’s manufacturing base, the shrinking and biological
replacement of its formerly strong white middle class, and the continual
debauchment of Federal Reserve Notes.We have already experienced over forty million
Christian Zionists who pray for Armageddon.We also suffer a Zionist cabal that has dragged America into
futile Middle Eastern military adventures seasoned accompanied by
the use of torture, a neutron nuke, and mass depleted uranium poisoning.
most of 2003, Capt May confronted only a limited part of the monster.For all his bravery, he was still in denial and repression
regarding its claw tracks running through 9-11.
it took a former U.S.M.C. Captain to shake him out of his denial,
particularly given that the U.S. Marine Corps is hardly an organization
that specializes in providing anti-Establishment psychotherapy.
May described the initial
shake-up process during his 5 July 2006 Hal Turner interview:
Capt May: Then after I
had published a site on the Battle of Baghdad cover-up, as so much
happens on the Internet now, an Internet operative named Capt Jeff
Cross, a former Marine officer, got in touch with me. He had been
in New York City on the day of 9-11. He had been
transitioning out of the Marine Corps into civilian life. One of those
boots to business suits type programs. Hal Turner: Yes. Capt May: He was a competent officer who was on the
scene and he talked to me and he must have talked to me four or five
different times before he finally convinced me, because he had been
there, that the whole thing was what is called a false flag operation.
Meaning, the people who did it pretend to be someone else, or if there
is a story, pretending that someone did it different from the people
who actually did it. Turner: OK. Capt May: And his explanation was that it was all
CIA-Mossad. That it was a set-up operation all the way around. Turner: Now this fits with facts that I have reported
on this radio since the attacks of September 11th. The two aircraft
that took off out of Boston's Logan Airport which ultimately crashed
into the two towers at the World Trade Center in New York, the security
company that was responsible for airport security at Boston's Logan
Airport was an Israeli security firm and the men who staffed that
security firm were all or mostly ex-Israeli military. The idea that
these nineteen hijackers could have ever even gotten on those planes
was ridiculous. But then plane number one takes off, a few minutes
after take off it deviates from its flight plan and nobody can communicate
with the plane. Well in this country, as you know, since the 1970's,
the standard operating procedure is that the airport calls the FAA,
the FAA calls NORAD, NORAD scrambles a fighter jet to find out what
is wrong with the plane. Capt May: Sure. Ricky ticky. Like real fast. Turner: Right. This was not done for the first aircraft.
The first aircraft is on its way now south from Boston
toward New York , when the second aircraft takes off. Fifteen or twenty
minutes into that flight, it too deviates from its flight plan and
loses communication, and again no military fighter jet was scrambled
anywhere around Boston or anywhere in Connecticut, or anywhere in
New York State, or anywhere in New Jersey. Plane number one hits the
NorthTower of the WorldTradeCenter at about
8:43 or 8:46 AM. Plane number two is still inbound. We have in New Jersey maybe sixty miles from my house
McGuire Air Force Base at which fighter jets are stationed. We also
have the Atlantic City Naval Air Station. Up north of us we have Ft
Stewart, in New York state, which
has fighter jets. Despite the fact that the first plane they lost
contact with had struck the WorldTradeCenter , and the second plane was also off course and out of
communication, no fighter jets were scrambled to even intercept the
second aircraft, which as we know, struck the second Tower. So right
there, that told me that our government was complicit in
these attacks. Maybe they didn't carry them out, but they knew it
was going to happen, and they let it happen on purpose. And then I
subsequently found out that they were actually in on it and probably
made the plan themselves. Why don't you pick it up from there. Capt May: Yes sir. Well you have gone through
the same discovery process that I did. You go from believing the story,
to seeing doubts, to thinking well, maybe they let it happen on purpose.
That is the LIHOP argument: Let it happen on purpose. Turner: Right. Capt May: And eventually we all wind up with the
MIHOP argument: Made It Happen On Purpose. Turner. Ahhh. Capt May: I just published an article in the Lone
Star Iconoclast about that very argument which is starting to
become dominant in the 911 research community. There are so many ways
of figuring the evidence. You probably heard that there were ongoing
Federal aviation drills simulating terrorist strikes on skyscrapers
with airplanes that day? Turner: Yes. Capt May: That was going on in real time. Cheney
was running it. Turner: OK. Capt May: When you hear that Cheney was in the bunker,
they were doing --you know the bunker drills they did June 19th of
this year? Turner: Right. Capt May: --a couple of weeks ago? Turner: Right. Capt May: That is the exact same drill that was going
on. It is a once a year drill that was going on the day of 9-11. In
other words, the Federal government was insulating itself against
any possible coup de etat by loyal officers. Turner: Right Capt May: The Federal government was running exercises
simulating exactly what they did, which allowed them to control everybody
and tell them to stand down. And the Federal government was coordinating
at every level what happened to New
York . You know it is a funny thing. If I
go out and burn down my own gas station, the first thing an insurance
guy is going to do is question hard to see what happened to see if
arson was the cause. Turner: That is correct. Capt May: But the biggest arson in U.S. history happened on 9-11, and
the day after it happened they started hauling away the junk to get
it out of the country. They destroyed the crime scene instantaneously,
and then do a point of commission, the first person they tried to
put in charge of the commission is Henry Kissinger, Beelzebub himself?
A British-Yiddish hit all the way.
Jeff Cross told May that he felt numerous explosions reverberating
through his building both before and during the collapse of the WorldTradeCenter towers.
The power and pattern of the explosions suggested a military-style
operation, far beyond any stories about aircraft collisions, jet fuel
fires, and alleged floor-by-floor “pancaking.”The official government story had to be a lie.
Cross tried to tell government officials about the anomalies.
Rather than encourage him, they warned him to remain silent. Capt.
May explained in a Zeph Daniel
interview how this created an analogy with his experience dealing
with the Battle of Baghdad cover-up.
May:[When Capt Cross contacted me] I had no
conflicts whatsoever about 9-11. I thought about it like I thought
of anything else but I did not have an ability to confirm or deny.
It was interesting to me, but I had no opinion. But then something
happened. Jeff started me out thinking maybe it could be true, because
he was so emphatic. It wasn't that the forensic evidence, even the
personal evidence of his experience when he was there moved me. What
moved me was his tone and his conviction and his experience in all
the various ways they tried to shut him down. Because the way the
tried to shut him down was the exact way they tried to shut me down.
Zeph: Which was? Capt May: Oh, you have death threats, intimidation.
Death threats against my spouse. Ridicule. Insinuations that I was
insane. Zeph: Oh, yes. Capt May: Disinformation people on the Internet who
would spread slander. Calls from officers. Emails from officers threatening
me with prison or retaliatory action. Outright promises of assassination
if I didn't stop. Intimidation is the cheapest form of Info War. You
scare somebody to death. It is impossible -at this point, you become
rather --in this form of warfare, like any other, eventually your
nerves --it is not that you get good nerves-- it is just that your
ability to live in a state of fear of violent death goes. You lose
your ability to be as scared as you were. It has nothing to do, I
am convinced, with bravery. It is just that you can't keep being scared.
You can't. You physically lose the process.
his article “False Flag
Prospects 2008” written in February
23, 2008, Captain May presented what he felt
was the strongest evidence that 9/11 was an inside job:
US 9/11 Commission
stumbled across strong evidence of treason by Dick Cheney when it
interviewed Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, who was present
in Cheney's famous command bunker as Flight 77 sped toward Washington , DC
. Cheney was at the center of national military exercises simulating
terrorist hijackings of US aircraft—at the very time that those
hijackings were occurring in real life. On May 23, 2003, Secretary
Mineta testified: "During
the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was
a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, "The
plane is 50 miles out." "The plane is 30 miles out."
And when it got down to "the plane is 10 miles out," the
young man also said to the Vice President, "Do the orders still
stand?" And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around
and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything
to the contrary?"
Commission co-chairman Lee Hamilton failed to follow up on the bombshell
revelation, and quickly switched the topic. Thanks to YouTube, Mineta's
astounding revelation and Hamilton 's amazing reaction are both viewable on a three minute
World Trade Center buildings collapsed in New York City on September
11, 2001: WTC 1 and WTC 2 (the Twin Towers) in the morning, and WTC
7 (the Salomon Building) at 5:20 p.m. EST. Given that all three buildings
were said to be unexpected collapses by all official sources, there
is no good reason—except for complicity—to explain how
it is that the BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 twenty minutes before
news damned itself by announcing that WTC 7 had collapsed—even
as it showed a live shot of downtown New York with WTC 7 still standing.
A few seconds later the building collapsed, understandably confusing
the newscasters: (Video removed by user)
owner of all three buildings was Larry Silverstein, who had recently
doubled the insurance value of the TwinTowers . Amazingly, "Lucky Larry," later stated in
a PBS interview that he and the New York Fire Department agreed to
a controlled demolition of WTC 7. Since skyscrapers are not wired
for demolition—unless someone intends to demolish them—Silverstein's
statement is an admission that 9/11 was an inside job: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100
"The Noble Lie"
believe that on the strength of the five YouTube links above an objective
investigation would have more than enough evidence to warrant impeachment
of Bush and Cheney on a charge of high treason, and to summon a grand
jury that would indict many others on charges of high treason against
Larry Silverstein and other apparent 9/11 collaborators. I believe
that the American people, if presented with a single news story containing
the five YouTube links above, would demand that the case of high treason
be carried to its logical conclusion.
though, won't impeach the president. The mainstream media, for which
I used to write, will not investigate and report the story. The military
that was used as a tool to mass murder American citizens will not
take action against traitors in uniform who knew exactly what they
were doing on 9/11, or the many more uniformed dupes who thought they
were conducting military exercises until the events of 9/11 occurred.
To this day there have been no adverse actions—which would require
investigation and evaluation—against any military person involved
in what even official apologists call the greatest defense failure
in American history. All of this shows that the fix is in, and that
we are in a fix.
could write volumes about 9/11 anomalies alone.However, the purpose of this book is not to provide a comprehensive
description of every false flag event, but rather to provide the reader
with enough of an overview to accept their reality and become attuned
to strategies to thwart their reoccurrence.
introduction would be complete without including the articles “21
Reasons to Question the Official Story about 9/11” by Dr.
David Ray Griffin and “9/11
and the Neo-Con Agenda” by Dr. James Fetzer.
David Ray Griffin,author of
The New Pearl Harbor Revisited:
9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé, once sent May an email
stating admiration for his work.
Although the points are stated briefly, I give in each case the pages
in my most recent book---"The New Pearl
Harbor Revisited"---where the issue is documented
and discussed more extensively.
(1) Although the official account of 9/11
claims that Osama bin Laden ordered the attacks, the FBI does not
list 9/11 as one of the terrorist acts for which he is wanted and
has admitted that it "has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden
to 9/11" (NPHR 206-11).
(2) Although the official story holds that
the four airliners were hijacked by devout Muslims ready to die as
martyrs to earn a heavenly reward, Mohamed Atta and the other alleged
hijackers regularly drank heavily, went to strip clubs, and paid for
sex (NPHR 153-55).
(3) Many people reported having received
cell phone calls from loved ones or flight attendants on the airliners,
during which they were told that Middle Eastern hijackers had taken
over the planes. One recipient, Deena Burnett, was certain that her
husband had called her several times on his cell phone because she
had recognized his number on her Caller ID. But the calls to Burnett
and most of the other reported calls were made when the planes were
above 30,000 feet, and evidence presented by the 9/11 truth movement
showed that, given the technology of the time, cell phone calls from
high-altitude airliners had been impossible. By the time the FBI presented
a report on phone calls from the planes at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui
in 2006, it had changed its story, saying that there were only two
cell phone calls from the flights, both from United 93 after it had
descended to 5,000 feet (NPHR 111-17).
(4) US Solicitor General Ted Olson's claim
that his wife, Barbara Olson, phoned him twice from AA 77, reporting
that hijackers had taken it over, was also contradicted by this FBI
report, which says that the only call attempted by her was "unconnected"
and hence lasted "0 seconds" (NPRH 60-62).
(5) Although decisive evidence that al-Qaeda
was responsible for the attacks was reportedly found in Mohamed Atta's
luggage---which allegedly failed to get loaded onto Flight 11 from
a commuter flight that Atta took to Boston from Portland, Maine, that
morning---this story was made up after the FBI's previous story had
collapsed. According to that story, the evidence had been found in
a Mitsubishi that Atta had left in the LoganAirport
parking lot and the trip to Portland was taken by Adnan and Ameer Bukhari. After the FBI learned
that neither of the Bukharis had died on September 11, it simply declared
that the trip to Portland was made by Atta
and another al-Qaeda operative (NPHR 155-62).
(6) The other types of reputed evidence
for Muslim hijackers---such as videos of al-Qaeda operatives at airports,
passports discovered at the crash sites, and a headband discovered
at the crash site of United 93---also show clear signs of having been
fabricated (NPHR 170-73).
(7) In addition to the absence of evidence
for hijackers on the planes, there is also evidence of their absence:
If hijackers had broken into the cockpits, the pilots would have "squawked"
the universal hijack code, an act that takes only a couple of seconds.
But not one of the eight pilots on the four airliners did this (NPHR
(8) Given standard operating procedures
between the FAA and the military, according to which planes showing
signs of an in-flight emergency are normally intercepted within about
10 minutes, the military's failure to intercept any of the flights
implies that something, such as a stand-down order, prevented standard
procedures from being carried out (NPHR 1-10, 81-84).
(9) Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta
reported an episode in which Vice President Cheney, while in the bunker
under the White House, apparently confirmed a stand-down order at
about 9:25 AM, which was prior to the strike on the Pentagon. Another
man has reported hearing members of LAX Security learn that a stand-down
order had come from the "highest level of the White House"
(10) The 9/11 Commission did not mention
Mineta's report, removed it from the Commission's video record of
its hearings, and claimed that Cheney did not enter the shelter conference
room until almost 10:00, which was at least 40 minutes later than
he was really there, according to Mineta and several other witnesses,
including Cheney's photographer (NPHR 91-94).
(11) The 9/11 Commission's timeline for
Cheney that morning even contradicted what Cheney himself had told
Tim Russert on "Meet the Press" September 16, just five
days after 9/11 (NPHR 93).
(12) Hani Hanjour, known as a terrible pilot
who could not safely fly even a single-engine airplane, could not
possibly have executed the amazing trajectory reportedly taken by
American Flight 77 in order to hit Wedge 1 of the Pentagon (NPHR 78-80).
(13) Wedge 1 would have been the least likely
part of the Pentagon to be targeted by foreign terrorists, for several
reasons: It was as far as possible from the offices of Rumsfeld and
the top brass, whom Muslim terrorists presumably would have wanted
to kill; it was the only part of the Pentagon that had been reinforced;
the reconstruction was not finished, so there were relatively few
people there; and it was the only part of the Pentagon that would
have presented obstacles to a plane's flight path (NPHR 76-78).
(14) Contrary to the claim of Pentagon officials
that they did not have the Pentagon evacuated because they had no
way of knowing that an aircraft was approaching, a military E-4B---the
Air Force's most advanced communications, command, and control airplane---was
flying over the White House at the time. Also, although there can
be no doubt about the identity of the plane, which was captured on
video by CNN and others, the military has denied that it belonged
to them (NPHR 96-98).
(15) The Secret Service, after learning
that a second World Trade Center building had been attacked---which
would have meant that terrorists were going after high-value targets---and
that still other planes had apparently been hijacked, allowed President
Bush to remain at the school in Sarasota, Florida, for another 30
minutes. It thereby revealed its foreknowledge that Bush would not
be a target: If these had really been surprise attacks, the agents,
fearing that a hijacked airliner was bearing down on the school, would
have hustled Bush away. On the first anniversary of 9/11, the White
House started telling a new story, according to which Bush, rather
than remaining in the classroom several minutes after Andrew Card
whispered in his ear that a second WTC building had been hit, immediately
got up and left the room. This lie was told in major newspapers and
on MSNBC and ABC television (NPHR 129-31).
(16) Given the fact that the Twin Towers
and WTC 7 had steel columns running from their basements to their
roofs, they simply could not have come down as they did---straight
down at virtually free-fall speed---unless these columns had been
sliced by means of explosives. Therefore, the official theory, according
to which the buildings came down because of fire plus (in the case
of the TwinTowers ) the
impact of the planes, is scientifically impossible (NPHR 12-25).
(17) The destruction of the TwinTowers had many other features---such as the horizontal ejections
of steel beams, the melting of steel, and the sulfidation and thinning
of steel---that can be explained only in terms of powerful explosives.
For example, the fires could not have come within 1000 degrees Fahrenheit
of the temperature needed to melt steel (30-36).
(18) Members of the FDNY (Fire Department
of New York) provided oral histories shortly after 9/11 in which one
fourth of them testified to having witnessed explosions in the TwinTowers . Explosions in the WTC 7 as well as the towers were
also reported by city officials, WTC employees, and journalists (NPHR
27-30, 45-48, 51).
(19) Mayor Rudy Giuliani told Peter Jennings
of ABC News that day: "we set up headquarters at 75 Barclay Street
. . . , and we were operating out of there when we were told that
the World Trade Center was gonna collapse. And it [the SouthTower ] did collapse before we could actually get out of the
building." However, there was no objective basis for expecting
the towers to collapse; even the 9/11 Commission admitted that none
of the fire chiefs expected them to come down. The FDNY oral histories
show that the information that they were going to collapse came from
the Office of Emergency Management---Giuliani's own office. How could
Giuliani's people have known that the towers were going to come down,
unless they knew that the buildings had been laced with explosives?
(20) NIST, which produced the official reports
on the Twin Towers and (recently) WTC 7, has been "fully hijacked
from the scientific to the political realm," so that its scientists
are little more than "hired guns," a former employee has
reported, and the 9/11 Commission was no more independent, being run
by Philip Zelikow, who was essentially a member of the Bush White
House (NPHR 11, 238-51).
(21) The official story about 9/11 is now
rejected by constantly growing numbers of physicists, chemists, architects,
engineers, pilots, former military officers, and former intelligence
officials (NPHR xi).
David Ray Griffin. The New Pearl
Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé.
Olive Branch Press, September, 2008, ISBN-10: 1566567297
David Ray Griffin is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global
Research Articles by David Ray Griffin
is now very strong evidence that the official government explanation
about the buildings coming down because of “pancaking”
is not only completely implausible, but furthermore hydrogen mini-nukes
would have been required for the towers to come down at nearly free-fall
speed and at the same time experience pulverization of most of their
6 April 2009 American Free Press article “More
Than 600 Architects Say 9/11 an Inside Job” by Mark Anderson
describes in greater detail why the official government “pancaking”
completely implausible. For starters,
the buildings came down at nearly free-fall speed, which was over
six times faster than any even remotely plausible “pancaking”
scenario. On top of this, retired physics instructor
Chuck Boldwyn has debunked this government story even further through
his structural analysis.Dr.
James Fetzer has brilliantly summarized his findings in his article
9/11 Research `Anti-Semitic'?":
About Boldwynn's paper, his thesis is very clear:
that it would have taken the equivalent of 48,000 tons of explosives
to equal the kinetic energy (energy of motion) that the top 16 floors
of the North Tower (taking the plane to have hit at the 94 floor
and subtracting 94 from 110 = 16) would have had to exert upon the
bottom 94 floors for their "collapse" to have initiated
the collapse of those 94 floors. John Skilling, one of the senior
engineers of the firm that built the towers, had observed that they
could carry 20 times the expected "live load" (that is,
physical steel and concrete structure plus office furniture and
human beings) that they would ever be expected to carry. Charles
believes it was actually much greater than that, but even using
Skilling's more conservative figures, he has calculated that the
force required to collapse the lower 94 floors (using vector addition
and subtraction of forces) which would have required the combined
weight of some 588 16-floor equivalents (taking into account that
those uppermost 16 floors were not as heavy as lower 16 floor units
because the steel was not as thick) before collapse would ensue;
or, using the thought of those 16 floors falling through space downward
onto the lower 94, that that 16-floor unit would have to be elevated
to a height of 120 miles above the remaining 94 for it to possess
enough energy of motion to collapse the remaining 94; or, alternatively,
that the energy required would be equivalent to that of 2.4 (Hiroshima
sized) atomic bombs, which clearly was not available from the miniscule
potential energy that was allegedly released by the fires weakening
the steel and causing the top 16 floors to collapse on the bottom
is helpful for us to familiarize ourselves with the behavior of mini-nukes.In chapter 17, I quote Joe Vialls’ description of the
effects of a mini-nuke likely used in the Bali
bombing. “…Less than six inches in diameter
and burning at a staggering 300,000 degrees centigrade, the fireball
was a perfect shimmering sphere, made possible by 99.78% Plutonium
239 manufactured at the Dimona nuclear facility in the NegevDesert .Five microseconds passed while this fission
monster from hell expanded, then the already-cooling fireball tore
its angry way out into the street above, vaporizing all victims standing
within thirty feet while simultaneously spreading two tons of deadly
microscopic roadbed shrapnel in a lethal arc across KutaBeach …”
photos of the World Trade Center tower destruction resemble
hydrogen bomb tests. In fact, many videos and photos of the World
Trade Center towers coming down show repeated orange flashes emanating
from inside the building as pulverized building material is simultaneously
being blown out in all directions.As one example, one can see some orange flash effects in the
"Destruction of the towers by explosions is clear
according to the photographs and reports of the eye witnesses.
In the picture [above], a range of cutting charges have just
exploded in the down left sector and a typical white cloud is
formed outwards from the wall." (caption and picture from
expose911.com:-could an aviation
strike make the buildings collapse?)
the photograph above, one can also see the top third of World Trade
Center Tower One leaning over about 30 degrees as the building is
coming down.In Chapter
20 I mention how Sgt First Class Donald Buswell, a member of Ghost
Troop with a background in Explosive Ordnance Disposal and Intelligence,
immediately recognized that ifonly TNT explosives had been used, the upper section would
have left a large shell of wreckage off to the side of the building.
excellent article which summarizes the case for the use of nukes is
US Government's Usage of Atomic Bombs - Domestic - WTC" by
Ed Ward, MD:
August 1958: "Mere fact that the U. S.has developed atomic munitions
suitable for use in demolition work." Declassified January
1967, "The fact that we are interested in and are continuing
studies on a weapon for minimizing the emerging flux of neutrons and
internal induced activity." Declassified March 1976, "The
fact of weapon laboratory interest in Minimum Residual Radiation (MRR)
devices. The fact of successful development of MRR devices." The
factual evidence indicates that our government is using and has used
3rd or possibly 4th generation hydrogen bombs
domestically and internationally. The evidence for international usage
is not quite as strong as the domestic usage, but when domestic usage
is considered, the international usage seems inescapable. The process
of exclusion based on the known facts leaves only one viable option
for the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings - a
relatively pure hydrogen bomb.
following article “9/11 and the Neo-Con Agenda” by Dr.
James Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, does an excellent
job of introducing people to the broader strategic motivations for
the false flag attack.Dr.
Fetzer has frequently interviewed Captain May on his talk show and
has cosigned numerous false flag alerts:
9/11 and the Neo-Con Agenda
By Dr. James Fetzer
We cannot support the troops by “staying
the course” when the Commander-in-Chief is marching
them over a cliff.
—Jim Fetzer (15 April 2008)
is a crucial link between the anti-war movement and the 9/11 truth
movement, because exposing the truth about 9/11 destroys the justification
for those wars. We
are told not to discuss conspiracy theories, but if 19 Islamic fundamentalists
hijacked four planes, outfoxed the most sophisticated air defense
system in the world, and perpetrated these atrocities under the control
of a guy off in a cave in Afghanistan , then 9/11 involved a conspiracy. If
we can’t talk about conspiracies, we can’t talk about
9/11. Why would this administration want to suppress public discussion
of 9/11? To conceal the truth about the war or to conceal the truth
Lies about the War
were told big lies about the war, including, first, that Saddam was
responsible for 9/11. But during a press conference, Bush himself
had to admit that Saddam had “nothing” to do with 9/11.
were told, second, that Saddam was in cahoots with al Qaeda. But several
investigations have revealed that not only was Saddam not in cahoots
with al Qaeda, but he was actively tracking down its leaders to incarcerate
or even kill them.
honest generals have told us al Qaeda is not responsible for more
than 10% of the opposition to US
presence in Iraq and that our presence there is the greatest recruiting
tool al Qaeda possesses.
fact, an admiral—who may face imminent demotion—was quoted
in The New York Times (11 April 2008) observing
that no more than 40-50 foreign fighters were entering the country
each month. How great a threat can that represent?
hacks tell us differently. Compare what General
William Odom, who is retired, has said, with the words of General David
Petraeus, who is not.
we were told that Osama bin Laden was responsible for 9/11. But our
FBI—our own FBI!—has acknowledged that it has “no hard evidence” connecting
Osama bin Laden to the events of 9/11.
thought there was “a confession tape”? But in his first
video, which is the only one that appears to be authentic, Osama said
that he had nothing to do with 9/11 and that the killing of innocent
women and children is contrary to the tenets of Islam.
said that he opposed the presence of US forces in Saudi
Arabia , the home of Mecca
—the two most holy sites in Islam—and our one-sided stance
regarding the Israeli-Palestinian issue.
so-called “confession tape” involves a different “Osama”
who does not look the same and has a different voice. It is the product
Lies about 9/11
we have been told lesser lies about 9/11. You don’t have to
have read the books of David
Ray Griffin to know these things, but it helps.
the TwinTowers , the fires burned neither long
enough nor hot enough to cause the steel to weaken, much less melt.
Jet fuel is primarily kerosene, most of which burned up in those spectacular
fireballs. If it could have such effects, our Coleman lanterns and
camping stoves would melt when we use them.
towers were pulverized from the top down. Each floor stands motionless
awaiting its destruction. They were turned into very fine dust and
the buildings were destroyed to below ground level. There were no
was destroyed by a classic controlled demolition at 5:20 PM. All of
its floors fell together in a complete, abrupt, and symmetrical collapse
in about 6.5 seconds. When it was over, there was a stack of about
7 floors of “pancakes”. Their modes of demolition were
at 4:57 PM, the BBC reported that WTC-7 had collapsed, 23 minutes
before the event occurred. If anyone wonders whether there is any
collusion between the intelligence agencies, the government, and the
mass media, I cannot imagine a better example.
Pentagon presents many oddities. Pilots
for 9/11 Truth has taken the black box data that the National
Transportation Safety Board says came from the plane that hit the
building and discovered that the data corresponds to a flight with
a different approach and altitude than the official account describes.
was too high at 300 feet to have taken out any lampposts and, one
second from the building, it was 100 feet too high to have impacted
with it. Such a plane may have swooped over the Pentagon, but it could
not have hit it.
two lime-green civilian fire trucks were on the scene almost immediately
and extinguished the fires in the first 15-20 minutes. The billowing
black clouds that were later observed from the Capitol came from a
series of enormous dumpsters in front of the building rather than
from the building itself. They were a special effect. We are being
played for saps.
for the government insist that there is so little debris at the crash
site in Shanksville because the plane crashed into an abandoned mine
we know what to do with miners trapped in mine shafts: We bring out
the heavy equipment and work non-stop in the hope that someone may
have miraculously An
Air Force officer who is an expert on plane crashes, Colonel George
Nelson (retired), has told me that it looked to him as though someone
had taken a bulldozer, dug a trench, filled it with trash, and blown
are not alone in our concerns with what we have been told by our government
about 9/11. Jesse Ventura and Ralph Nader are two of the latest to
join us. If you want to know why hundreds of military officers, intelligence
experts, pilots, scientists, and members of the families of survivors
support 9/11 truth, visit Patriots
Why All These Lies?
to the Center for Public Integrity, prominent members of the administration
made nearly 1,000
lies to induce Americans to support a war in Iraq . These were made by George
W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz,
and others. Why were they lying to us?
reason may be because real national security depends upon (a) a sound
economy, (b) military strength, and (c) our moral standing in the
world. Bush has vitiated all three. (a) The war alone is estimated
to run $1-3 trillion and the nation is bankrupt.
ongoing rotations are (b) weakening our military and are not sustainable,
as general after general has observed. And if you doubt the morality
of this practice, view the film “Stop-Loss”.
launching wars of aggression in violation of international law, the
UN Charter, and the US Constitution, combined with the practice of
torture, (c) the US
has lost its moral standing in the eyes of the world. Instead of being
the most admired and respected of nations, we are now—together
with our ally, Israel
—the most despised and reviled.
our greatest source of security from attack has been our moral standing,
for Bush to describe himself as “the security president”
is no more than a sick joke.
The Real Reasons for War
they want to conceal the real reasons for going to war? There appear
to be three: oil, Israel , and ideology. OIL:
It’s easier to steal their oil than it is to find it ourselves.
For a war that was supposed to pay for itself, we are shelling out
$1 billion a week for gasoline to move our equipment around in Iraq .
haven’t heard that ExxonMobile is offering to provide that gas
for free to support our troops! Where do you suppose those profits
Dick Cheney’s latest visit to the Middle East, al Maliki rushed
to Basra to oversee an attack
on the militia forces of al Sadr. Basra
is not just the second largest city in Iraq
but sits astride the large oil fields in south and eastern Iraq .
pacifying the conflict there, ExxonMobile, Shell, BP and other companies
will not be comfortable taking oil from that region. I have no doubt
that the Bush-Cheney “benchmark” for success in Iraq is that the country has been
pacified sufficiently for that purpose. That’s their bottom
line. ISRAEL.Israel has had a long-standing interest in weakening the influence
of its political rivals in the region. Before 9/11, Iraq was the most modern and sophisticated
among the Arab states, with a fine national health-care system, a
strong program of public education, and an excellent infrastructure.
who wants to appreciate one of the real reasons for 9/11 should think
about a clip of cheering
Palestinians that played as the towers were being destroyed.
asked myself, “Is there an enormous large-screen, outdoor television
in the West Bank that would enable Palestinians to view these events
as they are happening?”
turns out to be archival
footage from 1993 of rejoicing after some students had given an
olive branch to the Israeli soldiers and thought that peace was "just
around the corner", which just happened to be introduced at the
point of maximum revulsion about what we were seeing on the screen.
An influential group known as “Project for the New American
Century” has formulated a plan for creating an empire greater
than any the world has ever seen.
that the US is
the only superpower, they advocate moving aggressively into the Middle
East to seize control of its oil, support Israel , and exert influence outward from that geopolitically
who have signed
on to its principles include Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Eliott
Abrams, Paul Wolfowitz, “Scotter” Libby, Eliot Cohen,
and even Jeb Bush, many of whom assumed powerful positions in the
get a handle on the “mind set” that drives this conception,
which is now being justified as part of the “war on terror”,
try reading The
Shell Game. It is undemocratic, anti-American, and perverted.
it exerts a powerful grip upon this administration. It is a mind set
that must not just be changed but completely destroyed!
Basra is pacified and that oil is transported,
it will be through a series of pipelines that reach the Mediterranean
Sea by way of Israel .
“Follow the Money”
motives for mass murder must have been powerful. What happens when
we “follow the money”?
Silverstein took control of the WorldTradeCenter on 24 July 2001 and promptly insured it for $3.5 billion
against terrorist attacks. When there were two planes, he claimed
“double indemnity” and asked for $7 billion, settling
for $4.6. Not bad for a six week’s investment of $114 million.
and Exchange Commission records stored in WTC-7 were destroyed when
that building was brought down. They not only included documents from
the Enron case but many other major investigations of financial and
fines and penalties could have totaled hundreds of millions, even
billions. But information necessary to conduct those investigations
has now been destroyed.
the day before 9/11 that the Pentagon had lost track of $2.3 trillion.
He did that on a Monday, which was very odd for an experienced politician,
who would know that reporters would dog him all week and the story
would “grow legs”.
you would wait until Friday with a story like this, hoping that it
might be lost among weekend sports and other news. It is as if he
knew that something would occur to wipe this from consciousness so
he could waltz back into the halls of Congress and ask for hundreds
of billions more in defense spending—which is exactly what he
of course is profiting mightily from $100 billion, no bid, cost-plus
contracts, which mean that, no matter how much you spend on a project,
you can add your profit on top of it.
Cheney still has some 400,000 shares of stock in Halliburton in a
not so blind “trust”.
the gas and oil industry is benefiting immeasurably. Consider the
case of Afghanistan
as an illustration.
9/11, we negotiated on behalf of Unocal with the Taliban over a pipeline
to be built in northern Afghanistan, telling them that if they allowed
it, we would bathe them in gold, and if not, we would bathe them in
bombs. They didn’t and, after 9/11, we did.
that pipeline is under construction, there are two permanent bases
ideally positioned to support it, the President of Afghanistan is
a former Unocal oil official, and our Ambassador to Afghanistan is
another Unocal oil official. This is not rocket science.
Rice asked the Taliban to turn Osama over to the United States for prosecution. They
replied that they would do that on the condition that she produce
proof that he had been involved. She said she would but never got
around to it. She must have had more pressing engagements.
What about Israel ?
could Israel have been involved? There are disturbing indications.
The five “dancing Israels”
were observed on a roof across the Hudson
in New Jersey drinking and celebrating as they filmed the destruction
of the TwinTowers .
by neighbors led to their apprehension in a van. The driver told the
arresting officer, “We are not your problem. The Palestinians
are your problem!” They would be incarcerated for 71 days until
an assistant to then-Attorney General John Ashcroft directed their
returned to Israel
where three of them appeared on Israeli TV and explained they were
there to document the destruction
of the TwinTowers . Obviously, they could not have
done that without knowing the TwinTowers were
going to be destroyed.
man who directed their release was Michael Chertoff, now our Director
of Homeland Security, who is a joint US/Israeli citizen.
Controller of the Pentagon at the time $2.3 trillion went missing
was Dov Zakheim, another joint US/Israeli citizen.
in the administration with dual
citizenship include Paul Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams, Richard Pearle,
Douglas Feith, “Scooter” Libby, Eliot Cohen, and John
Bolton. Do any of these names sound familiar?
especially interesting case is Michael Mukasey, our new Attorney General,
who was also the judge on litigation between Larry Silverstein and
insurance companies over the events of 9/11.
runs this country? About two weeks after 9/11, Ariel Sharon said, “We
own America , and the Americans know it”.
Israel was involved in 9/11, the American people are entitled
will be accused of anti-Semitism for telling you facts in the public
domain. But it is not “anti-Semitic” to criticize the
state of Israel , the government of the state of Israel , or the policies and actions of the state
of Israel .
involves discounting or belittling persons on the basis of their religious
orientation or their ethnic origins.
is not anti-Semitic to object to the expansion of illegal settlements,
the starvation and killing of the Palestinian people, or the butchering
of a peace activist with a bulldozer! For these gross violations of
human rights, we have the government of Israel to thank.
need laws to keep dual citizens from decision-making and policy-shaping
position in the US government. Who knows whose loyalty they respect? I
call upon those with joint citizenship to resign their positions in
the interests of the nation—the United States of America !
you think that’s “in your face”, consider this.
Michael Hayden, our Director of the CIA, like General Petraeus, still
wears his uniform. That means he is still in the chain of command
and under the control of the President as Commander-in-Chief. We are
being played for suckers! I
call upon him to resign his commission or to resign his position!
An Attack on Iran ?
last time Cheney visited the Middle East, we attacked Iraq . This time may presage an attack
on Iran . A Saudi
newspaper has reported that the kingdom has been warned to prepare
to cope with “sudden nuclear and radioactive hazards”,
the source no doubt Cheney himself.
of casualties run as high as 1 million dead Iranians and as many as
35 million collateral casualties in Afghanistan
, Pakistan , and
, who will incur cancer as a result of exposure to radioactivity.
we—or “our ally”, Israel
—undertake such an action, it will be the greatest act of mass
murder in history, which will inevitably lead to attacks in kind on
the US and on Israel
, leading to its annihilation.
who would attack Iran are betraying this country. As a former Marine Corps
officer, I remind commissioned officers of the American military that
they not only have an obligation to refuse illegal orders but have
the duty to take into custody those who issue them. Iran is not in Iraq.
Our own National Intelligence Estimate concluded that Iran abandoned its development of
nuclear weapons in 2003. It has the right to develop nuclear energy.
if it had a bomb, Iran could not use it for offensive purposes without committing
national suicide. Israel
alone has more than 200 nuclear weapons. Did we learn nothing from
the Cold War? I
call upon the officers of our armed forces to take into custody those
who would direct the commission of further war crimes.
in Washington , we have a crime syndicate masquerading as an administration.
Bush is talking about another
9/11, even suggesting its source!
should sit down and ask him how he could possibly know.
Commander-in-Chief is marching our troops off a cliff!
James H. Fetzer is McKnight Professor Emeritus, University
of Minnesota , Duluth ; Founder, Scholars for 9/11 Truth;
Editor, Assassination Research. www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/
have been quite a few high level political figurers and intelligence
sources who claim that 9-11 had to have been an inside job. They include
Gen. Hameed Gul, former head of the Pakistani intelligence
service who once worked with the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden.
He contended in an interview
with Arnaud de Borchgrave that 9-11 was conducted by the Mossad
in conjunction with a renegade element of the U.S. Air Force:
U.S. spends $40 billion a year on its 11 intelligence agencies.
That's $400 billion in 10 years. Yet the Bush Administration says
it was taken by surprise. I don't believe it. Within 10 minutes
of the second twin tower being hit in the World Trade Center CNN
said Osama bin Laden had done it. That was a planned piece of disinformation
by the real perpetrators. It created an instant mindset and put
public opinion into a trance, which prevented even intelligent people
from thinking for themselves...
and its American associates are the obvious culprits. Who benefits
from the crime? The attacks against the twin towers started at 8:45
a.m. and four flights are diverted from their assigned air space
and no air traffic controller sounds the alarm. And no Air Force
jets scramble until 10 a.m. That also smacks of a small scale Air
Force rebellion, a coup against the Pentagon perhaps? Radars are
jammed, transponders fail. No IFF -- friend or foe identification
-- challenge. In Pakistan, if there is no response to IFF, jets
are instantly scrambled and the aircraft is shot down with no further
questions asked. This was clearly an inside job. Bush was afraid
and rushed to the shelter of a nuclear bunker. He clearly feared
a nuclear situation. Who could that have been? Will that also be
hushed up in the investigation, like the Warren report after the
von Bülow served on the parliamentary commission which oversees
the three branches of the German secret service while a member of
the Bundestag (German parliament) from 1969 to 1994, and wrote a
book Im Namendes Staates ("In the Name of the State")
on the criminal activities of secret services, including the CIA.
Bülow told AFP that he believes that the Israeli intelligence
service, Mossad, is behind the Sept. 11 terror attacks. These attacks,
he said, were carried out to turn public opinion against the Arabs
and boost military and security spending.
don't get the higher echelons," von Bülow said, referring
to the "architectural structure" which masterminds such
terror attacks. At this level, he said, the organization doing the
planning, such as Mossad, is primarily interested in affecting public
architectural level planners use corrupt "guns for hire"
such as Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist who von Bülow
called "an instrument of Mossad," high-ranking Stasi (former
East German secret service) operatives, or Libyan agents who organize
terror attacks using dedicated people, for example Palestinian and
Arab "freedom fighters."
terrorists who actually commit the crimes are what von Bülow
calls "the working level," such as the 19 Arabs who allegedly
hijacked the planes on Sept. 11. "The working level is part
of the deception," he said. [Added note: This tactic is called
a "false flag operation" or a "false flag recruitment",
used by both the CIA and Mossad for purposes of propaganda.]
percent of the work of the intelligence agencies around the world
is deception and disinformation," von Bülow said, which
is widely propagated in the mainstream media creating an accepted
version of events.
don't even raise the simplest questions," he said, adding,
"those who differ are labeled as crazy."
level disbelievers in the official government story also include Stanley
Hilton, former Bob Dole Chief of Staff, Morgan Reynolds, former
chief economist for the Dept of Labor under George Bush, and Dr. Paul
Craig Roberts, former assistant Secretary of the Treasury under Reagan.
article “Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job,” by Paul Watson,December 2007, observed:
Former Italian President and the man
who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio Francesco Cossiga has
gone public on 9/11, telling Italy's most respected newspaper that
the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common
knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.
According to journalists close to the Vatican , the Pope and his closest advisers are
also concerned that the ultimate acts of evil - the September 11 terrorist
attacks on the WorldTradeCenter and Pentagon - were known in advance by senior Bush administration
officials. By permitting the attacks to take their course, there is
a perception within the Roman Catholic Church hierarchy that a coup
d'etat was implemented, one that gave Bush and his leadership near-dictatorial
powers to carry out their agenda.
May has remarked that 9/11 is like a two stage IQ test: On the first level are people who are bright
enough to figure out that the official government story is a lie,
and that the whole thing had to be an inside job.
is encouraging that an online
March 2006 CNN poll showed 83% of respondents agreed that 9/11
was an inside job.However,
this was not a random, scientific poll, but one that was confined
to voluntary Internet users who happen to visit the poll web site.
kinds of people are probably a lot brighter and more inquisitive than
the general population, given the dismal results of the aforementioned
ISI civics test when applied to the general population.
second stage IQ test qualifies those who can figure out that the same
insiders who pulled off 9/11 are likely to repeat it.After all, if they needed the first inside job to provoke outrage
at enemies of Zionism, certainly they would need to keep administering
false flag “terror doses” to keep the population intimidated,
propagandized, and off balance, particularly before enough dissidents
can successfully rise up against them. Hence, we must remain vigilant
for a “9/11 to be,” or as Captain May likes to code it,
a “9/11 2B.”
national media has repeatedly warned us about the dangers of a repeat
9/11, as we will discuss repeatedly in the rest of this book.However, whereas the national media claims “Al Qaeda”
will likely be the future boogeyman, those who pass this second “9/11
2B” IQ test know that the real culprit is more likely to be
Reality and the Beliefs of the Military and Clandestine
First of all, to the idiots who monitor all our communications,
internet, telephone, who knows how far they have gone or are going,
do not think there aren’t lists of those who oppose this illegal
effort and will see to it you are indicted. If you believe the current
form of government is going to be superseded by a corporate plutocracy
as in the Canadian TV shown “Continuum,” (find it) you
The old power bases are gone, too many have been burned. Playing
spy as though you think the courts still support FISA will get you
some GITMO time, don’t take my word for it, “times are
Homeland Security (DHS) is strangling the efforts of several older
institutions. This is beyond just “turf war” and is becoming
The machinery put together during Bush II is entirely dysfunctional,
control of the Justice Department is gone, in fact, under Holder,
we aren’t sure it exists anymore. Only Homeland Security is
still around and will be held accountable, not for passenger searches
but for childish plots. Go ahead, bug the Pentagon, you won’
t like it.
Here is where things stand on 9/11 today:
The official accepted belief on the towers is that the
two were destroyed by 4 small nuclear devices, two in the basement,
two on upper floors, that produced over a million degrees of heat
that dissolved the building, put out minor radiation for a short
distance and kept fires burning for months. It vaporized enough
steel to build 3 huge aircraft carriers and huge beams hundreds
of yards away show more damage than anything in Hiroshima. This
is the official opinion of DARPA and the US Army. This is highly
classified but I am printing it anyway.
Building 7 is said to have been destroyed with conventional
No official secret finding has been reached on the Pentagon
attack other than that wreckage from a Columbia crash in 1995 was
dumped on the lawn and the site was altered during the day to simulate
an air crash. I have not been given access to anything beyond this
and choose not to make something up.
The official finding as to rationale for the 9/11 attacks
was to cheat insurance companies out of billions. Those who have
examined US policy said that there were other simpler possibilities
for bringing the US to war other than the 9/11 action against the
US. (for those who don’t catch the connection, it has been
accepted that 9/11 was an “inside job”)
Many Israeli teams were involved in 9/11 and the twin
tower attack was entirely an Israeli action with our military and
intelligence services denying involvement. This is not my opinion,
this is official.
Several Israeli teams were arrested on 9/11, one after
the George Washington Bridge explosion. There were other attacks
on 9/11 thwarted by police, one on the Lincoln Tunnel. There is
no evidence of an attack on the Verrazano Bridge or Brooklyn Bridge.
Arrests were made of the Israeli’s at the GWB, hard proof
exists but the arrests at the Lincoln Tunnel, two Israeli citizens,
van of explosives and weapons is only backed by limited police testimony
and they are scared to death. An authoritative source on the scene
says the terrorists, Israelis, were turned over to Bernie Kerik,
Police Commissioner and never heard from again.
Thousands of cancer victims, hundreds, maybe thousands dead of “radiation
poisoning” already are attributed to use of fire hoses directly
on the moulton nuclear “ground zero” which put radiated
water vapor into the air which was unintended. These nuclear heat
chambers below the twin towers put out massive heat for 64 days under
a flood of continual cold water although there is no official attribution
to their heat source. Perhaps it was burning asbestos and insurance
An outrageously false cover story about a “toxic stew”
involving “dry wall” was part of the “official record.”
By that standard, every firefighter, drywaller or person who has lived
in a building with drywall is actually dead but not yet informed.
Thousands of New Yorkers are dying of radiation poisoning from 9/11
and being “monitored” or being offered payments from a
several billion dollar fund that mysterious appeared to buy their
Other groups have evidence regarding the aircraft, crews, passengers,
“theoretical phone calls and text messages” with much
of it in FBI files. Some of that information is evidence worthy and
some is not but there is much that can be introduced in court.
Many people who are potential witnesses have disappeared, thousands
have been threatened. The numbers are so large that they in themselves
have been used by some as proof there was a massive coverup conspiracy.
“Why or how could so many people be controlled or killed and
what kind of person would do this?”
Do you really want that question answered? You think the million
plus dead on Rwanda was an accident? You never heard of the uncounted
dead in Guatemala, Mexico and where you have heard, you have been
lulled into immunity.
There technically was no “9/11? and thus, any defense of American
interests through military occupation, stimulation of insurrection,
emplacement of puppet governments and theft of resources, no matter
how profitable for the gang inside the Beltway, is not sustainable.
America has no vital interests in Central Asia nor is there any potential
threat to oil supplies in a nation that has the choice of becoming
oil independent in less than 3 years. (Can prove this is court).
Even Iran would sell us all their oil at deep discount and take payment
in new Jeeps and Fords if we wanted, were we not run by crazy people.
Want me to prove it to you? [more Here]
Government Is Raping You: Sibel Edmonds(Alex
Jones Infowars.com Video)(1:01:55) YouTube caption:
"In this startling new memoir, Sibel Edmonds—the most classified
woman in U.S. history—takes us on a surreal journey that begins
with the secretive FBI and down the dark halls of a feckless Congress
to a stonewalling judiciary and finally, to the national security
whistleblowers movement she spearheaded. Having lived under Middle
East dictatorships, Edmonds knows firsthand what can happen when government
is allowed to operate in secret. Hers is a sobering perspective that
combines painful experience with a rallying cry for the public's right
to know and to hold the lawbreakers accountable. With U.S. citizens
increasingly stripped of their rights in a calibrated media blackout,
Edmonds' story is a wake-up call for all Americans who, willingly
or unwillingly, traded liberty for illusive security in the wake of
9/11."[Editor's Note: Please see Sibel Edmond's
web site at boilingfrogspost.com].
Edmonds: US government needs to keep the fear factor alive
(RT Video), YouTube caption. "The Obama administration has
the worst track record when it comes to prosecuting whistleblowers.
Obama once claimed he'd work hard to have a transparent government,
but many have faced retaliation for revealing controversial government
information. Sibel Edmonds, who is a whistleblower, waited 340 days
for FBI clearance of her memoir but finally released it on her own.
Edmonds, founder of the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition,
joins us for more."
The New American Century - Full Version, beforeitsnews.com.
Editor's Note: This web page has embedded in it a 1:43:23 video with
the following caption:
by Massimo Mazzucco, THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY explores the historical,
philosophical and economic background that suggests a matrix for such
events that is much closer to home than the so-called "Islamic
film provides solid evidence for the true reasons behind the Afghanistan
and Iraq wars, whose unfolding is described in chilling detail in
a document called "Project for the New American Century",
published in the year 2,000, that seems to have served as the actual
blueprint for such dramatic events.
a follow-up to Inganno Globale, The New American Century presents
the historical, philosophical, economical and political background
-- some of which is totally unknown to the public -- that lend support
to the accusation that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were in fact an
film is astonishing, it goes in detail through the untold history
of The Project for the New American Century with tons of archival
footage and connects it right into the present. This film exposes
how every major war in US history was based on a complete fraud with
video of insiders themselves admitting it. This film shows how the
first film theaters in the US were used over a hundred years ago to
broadcast propaganda to rile the American people into the Spanish-American
War. This film shows the white papers of the oil company Unocal which
called for the creation of a pipeline through Afghanistan and how
their exact needs were fulfilled through the US invasion of Afghanistan.
This film shows how Halliburton under their "cost plus"
exclusive contract with the US Government went on a mad dash spending
spree akin to something out of the movie Brewster's Millions, yet
instead of blowing $30 million they blew through BILLIONS by literally
burning millions of dollars worth of hundred thousand dollar cars
and trucks if they had so much as a flat tire. I have seen a ton of
films, this film contains a massive amount of incredible footage I
have never seen before anywhere, it is an historical documentary which
exposes all the lies of the past so that you can understand the present.
This film is a must see."
TRUTH : ISRAEL DID 911 ~ ROTHSCHILD ISRAELI ZIONIST CONTROL AMERICA
Silverstein no response to WTC 7 lies (video)
9/11:Deep Parallels Surface – Norway,
9/11, 7/7 and Bali by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor, veteranstoday.com.
Berwick and the Protocols of the Elders of Islam, Norway: Murdoch and the Aliens Did It by Gordon
Duff, Senior Editor, Veterans Today ...Remember
the list of top military officers who opposed the wars, Afghanistan,
Iraq, who had been forced into retirement for speaking up? You have
forgotten? Don’t worry, you aren’t the only one. They
forgot too. They spoke once and then, for some reason, went “quiet.”
ago, when the Army’s top intel officer, General Stubblebein,
said no plane hit the Pentagon….
you can read his story here
in legal documents and the video below:
was the top guy, the top intel officer in the army who came out and
said it, 9/11 was a scam, a government operation.
it, he was ground up and spit out. One of my friends, as a Colonel
in Army Intelligence (don’t laugh) knew him well. Try looking
up Stubblebein. You will be told he is a freak, a UFO nut, a ghost
hunter. He was the Army’s Chief of Intelligence, the best of
the best until he spoke up on 9/11.
actually went as far as to make a movie to take a whack at him. Did
you see “Men Who Stare at Goats?”
an aside, secrecy, in fact our biggest secrets, are leaked, often
under ‘comic’ circumstances, when they can discredit someone
who has become a danger...
Harari, Mossad, and 9/11, mrfriendsblog.blogspot.com.
[Ed. Note: see listing for Dmitri Khalezov book for 2008 listing].
It has long been clear that 9/11 was carried out operationally
by the Israeli Mossad. This devastating false flag terrorist attack
was facilitated, assisted and covered-up by a powerful international
network of individuals in and out of government that are dedicated
to Zionism and the state of Israel. The attack was successful largely
as a result of the false narrative and disinformation (i.e., Osama
bin Laden and al-Qaeda) immediately put forth by the Zionist-owned
Western media. Facts and information that fail to validate, or attempt
to even remotely challenge, the foreign policy objectives of the
Zionist-occupied U.S. government rarely see the light of day. Mainstream
American journalists' primary role and duty is to protect and uncritically
pass along the viewpoints of American policy makers, in effect giving
cover to their criminal behavior, all the while attacking and criticizing
others who dare to challenge those in power. It's not a stretch
to characterize mainstream journalism as, in essence, the public
relations arm of the criminal elements controlling the government
and those that carried out 9/11.
I've been interested in just how 9/11 was pulled off for some time
now. Many 9/11 Truth advocates I talk to argue-- not at all incorrectly--
that since we know the official story is a complete farce, it is
vital to open up a new investigation, and hold those responsible
for the cover-up accountable. Also, many 9/11 Truth activists conduct
their outreach efforts by pointing out the obvious flaws, inconsistencies,
and outright fabrications put forth and uncritically disseminated
by the government and mainstream media (and thus, much of society).
I'm not opposed to either of those arguments or efforts. However,
any officially sanctioned investigation-- assuming there will be
another official investigation, which doesn't seem likely-- will
most assuredly be compromised. After all, the entire political establishment
is complicit in the false flag attack on 9/11, so it will take independent,
honest researchers and insiders to get to the bottom of what happened
that day. Basing 9/11 Truth outreach efforts on the many demonstrably
false assertions advanced by those in the U.S. government and media
is indeed a sound, coherent strategy. On this blog, I'm more interested
in exploring the forces behind 9/11-- the "who," and "why"--
and how the operation was successfully executed. I'd argue that
we will never know all the facts, but we can do our research and
make an educated guess by connecting dots, clues, and bits of information
together to reach a coherent conclusion.
And that's what we'll try to do today. Dmitri Khalezov, who I featured
in a post a while back, may be a big part in helping us understand
exactly what happened on 9/11.
Before we jump into Khalezov's claims, I think it's important to
go through the copious amount of information that ties the state
of Israel and an international network of Zionists directly to the
prosecution and subsequent cover-up of the false flag attack on
First off, it's important to understand a bit about how intelligence
agencies work, specifically the Israeli Mossad, and how their operations
are conducted. I would highly recommend Victor Ostrovsky's book,
By Way of Deception (see here for a good review), that details the
inner workings of the Mossad by a former katsa, or an intelligence
officer of the Mossad. The role of sayanim, or Jewish volunteer
helpers, is vital in most, if not all, Mossad operations, especially
in regards to 9/11. Sayanim are Jews living in the diaspora (i.e.,
not Israel) who are called upon to offer their assistance in order
to facilitate a covert operation. These volunteers will not know
the nature and details of the covert operation, and may only play
a minor role in it's prosecution. For instance, a Jew living in
New York who owns an apartment block may be asked to house a Mossad
operative for a period of time necessary to successfully complete
Jeff Gates, who writes at Criminal State, explains the role of
sayanim quite well. He writes (bold and underlines mine):
Sayanim play a role akin to military reservists who can be activated
on short notice to support Israeli operations. These helpers are
shielded from criminal culpability by being told only enough to
perform their narrow role. Because recruiters ensure these volunteers
are kept ignorant of the broader goals of an operation, they could
easily pass a polygraph test. Their narrow intent: to respond promptly
to requests to assist Israel.
That assistance could be logistics, medical care or intelligence
Gates also describes the role of agents and assets of the Mossad
in the previously linked article. Describing agents, he writes:
Agents are fully conscious of the intended goal of an operation.
Intent is what distinguishes premeditated murder from involuntary
manslaughter. Culpability is gauged by the state of mind. Agents
operate with what the law calls extreme malice and an "evil
mind." Thus the severity of the sanctions for premeditated
He continues by describing assets of this crime network:
Assets are people profiled such that-- within an acceptable range
of probabilities-- they can be relied upon to behave consistent
with their personality profile. Assets lack the state of mind required
for traditional culpability due to their lack of intent. Assets
contribute to an operation simply by pursuing their subconscious
personal needs. Typically those needs are for recognition, influence,
money, sex, drugs or the greatest drug of all: ideology.
These concepts are crucial to comprehend in understanding how an
operation like 9/11 could be carried out in plain sight, yet covered
up and spun in a way to give average people the impression that
Osama bin Laden and his cohort of Arab terrorists conducted the
attack. And if you take a close look at the individuals in key positions--
both in the U.S. government and private sector-- that facilitated
and covered up this false flag attack, you can easily identify sayanim,
agents and assets of this criminal gang. See here for more.
We also know that the state of Israel has a long history of conducting
espionage against the U.S., including stealing nuclear weapons technology,
military secrets and engaging in blackmail operations against high-profile
politicians, including U.S. presidents, and others in positions
Leading up to 9/11, federal agencies, including the Drug Enforcement
Agency, unravelled a sophisticated Israeli espionage ring gathering
intelligence on important federal facilities and officials. We've
seen reports alleging that Mossad was "running" or handling
the supposed hijackers on 9/11. A brief excerpt:
British intelligence reported in February 2002 that the Israeli
Mossad ran the Arab hijacker cells that were later blamed by the
U.S. government's 9/11 Commission for carrying out the aerial attacks
on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. [...]
A Mossad unit consisting of six Egyptian- and Yemeni-born Jews
infiltrated "Al Qaeda" cells in Hamburg (the Atta-Mamoun
Darkanzali cell), south Florida, and Sharjah in the United Arab
Emirates in the months before 9/11. The Mossad not only infiltrated
cells but began to run them and give them specific orders that would
eventually culminate in their being on board four regularly-scheduled
flights originating in Boston, Washington Dulles, and Newark, New
Jersey on 9/11.
The Mossad infiltration team comprised six Israelis, compromising
two cells of three agents, who all received special training at
a Mossad base in the Negev Desert in their future control and handling
of the "Al Qaeda" cells.
5 Israelis were also arrested on 9/11, and later went on a television
show in Israel and stated that their purpose that day was to "document
And that brings us to Dmitri Khalezov's allegations surrounding
the events of 9/11.
First off, here is a brief bio of Khalezov that was posted on Kevin
Barrett's blog in his first interview with Khalezov:
Mr. Dimitri A. Khalezov, a former Soviet citizen, a former commissioned
officer of the so-called "military unit 46179," otherwise
known as "the Special Control Service" of the 12th Chief
Directorate of the Defense Ministry of the USSR. The Special Control
Service, also known as the Soviet atomic (later "nuclear")
intelligence was a secret military unit responsible for detecting
of nuclear explosions (including underground nuclear tests) of various
adversaries of the former USSR as well as responsible for controlling
of observance of various international treaties related to nuclear
testing and to peaceful nuclear explosions. After September the
11th Khalezov undertook some extensive 9/11 research and proved
that the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center as well as its building
7 were demolished by three underground thermo-nuclear explosions--
which earned the very name "ground zero" to the demolition
site. Moreover, he testifies that he knew about the in-built so-called
"emergency nuclear demolitions scheme" of the Twin Towers
as long ago as back in the '80s-- while being a serviceman in the
Soviet Special Control Service.
As you can tell, English is not this man's first language. Here
is the second, longer interview Dmitri did with Kevin Barrett and
Gordon Duff, chief editor of Veterans Today.
You can also find an interview that George Mapp, Jr. did with Khalezov
here for even more information, and Mapp was recently on Kevin Barrett's
Truth Jihad Radio program to discuss these matters as well. For
the purposes of this post, I am mainly using the testimony put forth
by Khalezov in his 2 interviews with Kevin Barrett, in which he
goes over an enormous amount of information, which I will try to
Khalezov retired from the Soviet, and later Russian, army in 1992,
and eventually moved to Thailand. There he met Mike Harari, Mossad
agent extraordinaire, who later confessed to Khalezov that he organized
the 9/11 attacks. Apparently, Harari had recently fled the Philippines,
and relocated to Thailand. At first, Harari needed Khalezov's assistance
translating Russian weapons-related documents to English. According
to Khalezov, the underlying reason why Harari wanted to meet Khalezov
was to inquire about the knowledge he gained in the Soviet army,
in particular whether or not he knew (and thus, the Russians knew)
about the thermo-nuclear devices placed at the base of the World
Trade Center towers in New York City that were to be used in case
of an emergency demolition. Khalezov could in fact verify this information,
as he had learned first hand in his time with the Soviet army that
the World Trade Center buildings did indeed have thermo-nuclear
weapons built in the base of the buildings. Khalezov claims that
the he and the Soviet (later Russian) government knew of this because
of the 1976 Treaty Between the USA and USSR on Underground Nuclear
Explosions for Peaceable Purposes, which states clearly (bold and
underline mine) in Article IV, section (b):
provide to the other Party information and access to sites of
explosions and furnish assistance in accordance with the provisions
set forth in the Protocol to this Treaty
So, Khalezov is essentially claiming that his special army unit
specializing in nuclear weapons knew of the thermo-nuclear devices
placed at the base of the World Trade Center towers due to this
treaty, i.e., the U.S. had to provide the information (probably
covertly) about the nuclear devices built into the World Trade Center
After Khalezov met Harari in early 2001, they soon developed a
close personal friendship. Khalezov even claims that Harari treated
him like a son, as Harari was much older than Khalezov and had very
few friends in Thailand. Prior to the attacks on 9/11, Harari offered
Khalezov a TV (since Khalezov didn't own one), informing him something
"very interesting" was about to unfold in the coming days,
and he needed to see it on TV. Also, Harari advised Khalezov to
ditch his U.S. dollars, telling Khalezov the value of the U.S. dollar
was sure to go down in the coming days and weeks. Furthermore, on
the morning of September 12th, 2001, Harari invited Khalezov over
to his house for a celebration breakfast-- a celebration breakfast
to commemorate Harari's successful false flag operation on 9/11.
Khalezov has explicitly said that Harari admitted to organizing
the attacks, hated Americans and was overjoyed the morning following
the attacks, as were the other Mossad-connected people Khalezov
knew in Bangkok. Harari further informed Khalezov that the Granit
missiles on board the Russian Kursk submarine that sunk in August
2000 were stolen (or at least acquired after they were stolen) by
the Israeli Mossad, and one of them was launched into the Pentagon
Khalezov goes on to explain his knowledge from working in the Soviet
army of various false flag-type mini-nuclear explosions that have
been conducted in numerous countries over the past 3 decades. He
claims, based on his professional experience and first-hand knowledge
through his contacts in the Soviet army, that the following bombings
were indeed false-flag attacks that used mini-nuclear devices:
1983- The bombing in Beirut, Lebanon that targeted both U.S. Marine
barracks and French military forces was carried out using a mini-nuclear
device, killing 299 American and French servicemen
1986- The Chernobyl nuclear "accident" was caused by a
mini-nuclear device placed underneath one of the nuclear reactors
at Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine.
1995- The bomb used in the false-flag attack on Oklahoma City's
Alfred P. Murrah Federal Buidling, which killed 168 people, was
a mini-nuclear device.
1996- The Khobar Towers bombing in Khobar, Saudi Arabia, targeting
foreign military personnel, including U.S. servicemen, which killed
19 people, was the result of a false flag-type attack using a mini-nuclear
1999- The bombing of an apartment block in Volgodonsk, Russia on
September 16, 1999, which resulted in the deaths of many innocent
civilians, was the result of a mini-nuclear device.
2001- The destruction of World Trade Center towers 1, 2 and 7 in
New York City was the result of nuclear devices placed at the base
of the buildings when they were constructed. Khalezov claims that
150 kilo-ton nuclear devices were placed 77 meters below the surface
of the WTC building's foundation. These nuclear devices were to
be used in an emergency situation in order to demolish the buildings.
Khalezov claims his Soviet army unit that specialized in nuclear
weapons and explosions learned of these devices as a result of U.S.
compliance with the 1976 Treaty Between the USA and USSR on Underground
Nuclear Explosions for Peaceable Purposes. Apparently, this information
was not widely publicized or know, outside of those with specialized
knowledge of these devices and their functions.
2002- The Bali bombings in 2002 which targeted popular tourist nightclubs
were carried out using mini-nuclear devices. Khalezov later learned
that Harari was responsible for organizing and controlling "al-Qaeda"
and other Islamic groups for the Mossad in Thailand and Indonesia.
Harari is basing these claims off the knowledge he learned in the
Soviet army and his contacts there, specifically how they tracked
and investigated nuclear explosions around the world. That being
said, there should be documents proving these allegations, as the
army unit he worked for had to have collected seismic tests proving
these bombings were indeed nuclear-based. Obviously, this information
has been suppressed for political reasons, and he seems to be the
first insider to offer his specialized knowledge on the subject.
Is Khalezov making this up? Possibly, but he sounds pretty legitimate
and convincing in the interviews he did with Kevin Barrett, so I'm
not ready to dismiss what he says as others were so quick to.
In a nutshell, this is what Khalezov claims happened on 9/11: the
(typically) nuclear tipped Granit missile, stolen from the Russian
Kursk submarine, was launched into the Pentagon, which NORAD did
in fact detect, but was helpless to stop, as the U.S. government
and military simply do not have the technology to intercept and
take down a missile as sophisticated as the Granit. The nuclear
device on the Granit that hit the Pentagon either was not functioning,
or was taken off prior to its launch, avoiding a nuclear catastrophe.
In all likelihood, the Granit struck sometime around 9:30a.m., this
based on Barbara Honegger's research in her Pentagon Attack Papers,
and other explosives, which were pre-planted in the Pentagon, went
off following the missile strike.
Imagine, for a moment, being a NORAD commander and having to tell
your superiors that a nuclear armed missile was advancing on the
Pentagon, and there was nothing you or the U.S. military could do
about it. According to Khalezov, this is exactly what happened on
9/11. And of course this information is going to be hidden! As we
know, it was an extremely chaotic morning, and the officials responsible
for responding to the attack on the U.S. had little time to think
through their decisions and actions. NORAD, the U.S. military and
executive branch were informed of the (typically) nuclear tipped
Granit missile that struck the Pentagon, and were further informed
that the (supposed) planes that struck the World Trade Center buildings
may be equipped with nuclear devices as well. In their haste, it
was quickly decided to demolish the World Trade Center towers that
were struck, using the underground thermo-nuclear devices in place
underneath the buildings, so as to avoid a possible nuclear explosion
above ground in New York City. Khalezov contends that airplanes
(especially the supposed 757s) did not in fact strike the World
Trade Center towers that morning, and that what passes today as
footage of the 9/11 attacks is simply doctored, fabricated footage.
Here is a documentary advancing this theory.
I'm pretty convinced that something did in fact strike the World
Trade Centers on 9/11, but they weren't Boeing 757s.
Certainly some controversial statements, even in (or perhaps especially
in) the 9/11 Truth Movement. This scenario laid out by Khalezov
is plausible, however fantastic it may sound.
Khalezov goes on to explain that Mike Harari was the main operative
for the Mossad running and organizing "al-Qaeda" and other
Islamic "terrorist" groups in Bangkok and the Far East,
selling them weapons and planning false flag terrorist attacks.
Harari was later arrested on October 12, 2003 using a false name,
Hadji Mohamed Husseini, as the operational leader of the Islamic
"terrorist" cell being blamed for the violence, including
the Bali bombing in 2002, taking place in the region. Harari signed
confession statements to the Thai authorities taking credit for
these attacks, and was then released because of his Mossad and CIA
connections, according to Khalezov. However, Harari confessed to
these attacks and being the organizing force behind the "terrorist"
cell using his fake spy name, Hadji Mohamed Husseini. Since Khalezov
was so close with Harari, and had been under surveillance by the
FBI and Thai authorities who were on to Harari, he was arrested
as well, first on August 13, 2003 and again on November 6, 2003.
After his first arrest, Khalezov simply paid a cash bribe to the
Thai authorities and he was released. Following his second arrest
in November, he realized that American officials were trying to
get him extradited to the U.S. to stand trial, and that Harari was
trying to set him up as the fall guy for his criminal activities
on the behalf of the Mossad. This led Khalezov to go public with
the information he had learned through Harari, including his organizing
the 9/11 false flag attacks and the nuclear devices used to demolish
the World Trade Center towers, which would make it impossible for
the U.S. to try him in a court of law, as his damning testimony
would see the light of day and cause a major problem for U.S. authorities
(as well as many others).
Khalezov eventually began researching the events of 9/11 in more
detail in 2006, and published a book in 2007 titled, The Third Truth
About 9/11. He sent this information to U.S. authorities (he doesn't
really say who in the interviews), and released it to the public.
Khalezov says this is when the nanothermite theory of the destruction
of the World Trade Center buildings was first put forth, as a way
to downplay and distract attention away from his nuclear demolition
theory. In essence, according to Khalezov, U.S. authorities, engaged
in a sophisticated disinformation campaign, planted the nanothermite
theory and allowed it to be exposed and promoted as a way to counteract
Khalezov's valid interpretation of the events of 9/11 that he laid
out in his book. This isn't to say those promoting the nanothermite
theory of the destruction of the towers are necessarily government
operatives involved in a disinformation campaign. Most, if not all,
may genuinely belief in the nanothermite theory for the demolition,
and, indeed, nanothermite may have been a factor (but certainly
not the only factor) in the destruction of the World Trade Center
towers on 9/11.
Barbara Honegger, mentioned above, who wrote The Pentagon Attack
Papers, was on Kevin Barrett's Truth Jihad Radio Monday, February
28th, mainly to critique and offer her doubts on Khalezov's testimony
and allegations. I find both Honegger and Khalezov's information
credible, and even compatible in many ways. So it's important to
listen carefully to what each of these individuals have to offer.
Towards the end of the interview with Kevin Barrett, Honegger makes
a few claims about Khalezov that I don't think reconcile with his
testimony and allegations. The first comment that caught by attention
dealt with Khalezov's allegations against Mike Harari, discussed
above. She claims:
Yes, his testimony about Harari is first hand. And as far as I
see it, it's very strange, because he's being very coy in leaving
out who it was that Harari and the Mossad, meaning Israel, allegedly,
presumably sold this Granit missile to that then hit the Pentagon.
Khalezov only says that Harari told him that the Granit missiles
were stolen (or at least acquired) from the Kursk by the Mossad.
Khalezov is simply testifying what he learned from his service in
the Russian army, what Mike Harari told him and what he learned
in assisting with the defense of Victor Bout: that many (if not
all) of the nuclear Granit missiles onboard the Russian Kursk submarine
that sank in August 2000 were stolen, and one of them hit the Pentagon
on 9/11. And 9/11 was organized primarily by Mike Harari of the
Here is a short AP report mentioning the Kursk submarine sinking:
This report details (page 4) the typical armaments on board a Russian
The Kursk submarine has an armament capacity for 24 ship-to-ship
cruise missiles (SN-19-GRANIT- NATO Shipwreck) armed with 760kg
main charge conventional explosive but nuclear capable for low yield
warheads. The missiles were housed in individual pressure sealed
silos, pitched forward at 40 [degrees] arranged in two rows of twelve,
each covered by six hatches on each side of the sail.
Here is another source regarding Russian Kursk submarines and Granit
missiles. A brief excerpt (bold and underline mine):
...22 Granit guided missiles located beyond the major hull in
special containers in the middle part of the submarine. The Granits
have not been affected by the explosion [of the Kursk]. It is easy
to get to them even without the necessity of entering the submarine.
The Granit is the latest, the most classified anti-ship guided
missile devised for American aircraft-carriers. Even its appearance
is a deep dark secret, to say nothing of technical parameters.
According to the Russian military, the range of the Granit is
large (over 300 kilometers), the missile is autonomous, and its
guidance system includes elements of artificial intelligence.
Foreign sources say that a Granit en route to its target receives
additional information from navigation satellites-- perhaps from
spy satellites, and from AWACS-type aircraft. [...]
The naval aviation command says, "some underwater objects
including submarines were detected trying to penetrate the area."
Between last autumn and now Russian ships guarding the Kursk deployed
more than 50 depth charges to scare the foreigners away. All these
explosions were registered by the Norwegians.
There is a legal problem here. The Kursk sank in international
waters, and scaring foreign ships away is expensive and not precisely
legitimate. Moreover, the Western military suspects that some Granits
on the Kursk carry nuclear warheads. Moscow denies it. A Norwegian
naval officer told this correspondent last April that Norwegian
divers who had worked on the Kursk carried indicators which signified
the presence of nuclear warheads on the submarine.
Actually, the Granit was designed for a nuclear warhead.
Were the nuclear Granit missiles stolen from the Russian Kursk
submarine that sunk in August 2000? And was one later used to attack
the Pentagon? Khalezov is simply saying that yes, according to Mike
Harari, a personal friend and long-time Mossad operative, they were,
based on his first-hand knowledge. His story is at least plausible,
so it must be considered as a possibility.
Honegger goes on to say:
So it's a very strange thing for him to be saying when he claims
to be so close to Mike Harari, a long-time personal friend from
the same village in Russia, and all of this. It seems a very strange
thing to do to basically hang his good friend out to dry in this
First off, Khalezov never claims that he and Harari are from the
same village in Russia. He clearly states that he met Harari in
Bangkok well after his service in the Soviet military. He does state
that he and Victor Bout are from the same village in Russia though.
Khalezov also says that he and Harari developed a good friendship,
which is how Khalezov learned of Harari's involvement in 9/11 after
Harari confided in him and told him. Khalezov is "hanging his
good friend out to dry" because he later learned that Harari
tried setting him up to take the fall for his criminal conduct in
Honegger then makes this statement:
Well, you know he's slitting his own throat doing this in a way
because he's admitted on your program, or claimed on your program,
that he, Khalezov, worked directly and helped Harari sell arms in
Thailand to al-Qaeda, so why should we believe Mr. Khalezov wasn't
involved in getting this Granit missile on behave of Mr. Harari
to whoever received it and then slammed it into the Pentagon. I
mean he's really opening himself up to be part of this conspiracy
that he's allegedly revealing.
I'd like to know when Khalezov ever made this claim that he "worked
directly and helped Harari sell arms in Thailand to al-Qaeda."
He never did. He developed a friendship with Harari through Mossad-linked
people he knew in Bangkok. Harari was the one who organized and
sold arms to al-Qaeda in Thailand at the behest of the Israeli Mossad,
not Khalezov. Harari was originally interested in the information
Khalezov had acquired through his work in the Soviet army, in particular,
whether Khalezov knew of the nuclear demolitions placed underneath
the World Trade Center buildings in New York City. Khalezov never
claimed to help Harari sell weapons to anyone in any of his interviews
with Kevin Barrett. So Honegger simply has her facts wrong here,
and needs to apologize, on air, for her ignorant statements.
Honegger's snide, arrogant dismissal of Khalezov is rather baffling,
considering her background in this movement and professional credentials.
At the very least, she owes Khalezov, a brave man for coming forth
with this information, an apology for inaccurately accusing him
of things he did not say. It was simply inexcusable for Barrett
to allow these extremely ignorant and arrogant statements put forth
by Honegger to go unchallenged.
None of this is to say that Honegger does not have valid criticisms
of Khalezov's testimony, or that her work shouldn't be taken seriously.
But she is wrong in her depiction of Khalezov, and is wrong in her
quick dismissal of his information. I see very little of what Khalezov
is claiming that could be considered inconsistent with Honegger's
allegations of pre-planted bombs inside the Pentagon and her refutation
of the official government conspiracy theory that the 757 hit the
Pentagon at 9:37a.m. Honegger argues the Pentagon was attacked much
earlier than the official story says, beginning at roughly 9:30a.m.
Maybe it was the Granit missile Khalezov says hit the Pentagon that
first struck at 9:30a.m., or even earlier? Honegger argues that
pre-planted internal explosions went off around 9:30a.m., but leaves
the possibility open to a missile or plane attack in her Pentagon
It is important here to note that internal explosion(s) between
9:30 and 9:32a.m. on the first and/or second floors of the west
section of the Pentagon are not inconsistent with there possibly
having also been a later impact by some airborne object much smaller
than a 757/Flight 77-- a piloted plane, unmanned drone, or missile--
into the same or a nearby section of the building. Indeed, if a
heat-seeking missile hit the building following the explosions,
the heat from the earlier explosion(s) would have become the target
for the missile. (See below for reports that A-3 Sky Warrior planes
were retrofitted shortly before 9/11 to enable them to be remotely
controlled, and fitted with missiles.)
Question for Khalezov or anyone with advanced weapons technology
knowledge: is the Granit missile a heat-seeking missile, or is the
weapon so advanced it does not require heat-seeking technology to
perform it's function that day?
Honegger further states:
It is worth noting that the Pentagon's top financial officer leading
up to and at the time of the attacks, Dov Zakheim, who also acknowledged
the "missing" Trillions, had a company specializing in
aircraft remote-control technology. As some analyses claim a part
found in the Pentagon wreckage is the front-hub assembly of the
front compressor of a JT8D turbojet engine used in the A-3 Sky Warrior
jet fighter, and as Air Force A-3 Sky Warriors-- normally piloted
planes-- were reportedly secretly retrofitted into remote-controlled
drones and fitted with missiles in a highly-compartmented operation
at an airport near Ft. Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport in Colorado
in the months before 9/11, the question further arises as to whether
Pentagon auditors trying to "follow the money" and their
computerized databases were intentionally targeted by inside-the-building
explosives on 9/11, with the plane-impacting claim as the preplanned
Sounds totally compatible with Khalezov's allegations, right?
Another question for Khalezov and those with knowledge of advanced
weapons systems like the one were discussing here:
Can Granit missiles be launched from A-3 Sky Warrior fighter jets?
If not, how else could the Granit missile that supposedly struck
the Pentagon be launched?
Khalezov mentions in his interview with Barrett that a submarine
could have possibly launched the missile from somewhere in the Atlantic.
Do the Israelis have subs in the Atlantic?
Could a rogue commander in NATO or the U.S. Navy have allowed this
Granit missile to be fired into the Pentagon on 9/11?
Do we have any evidence of where the supposed missile was launched
Theory Jesse Ventura - 9/11 - Part 1, see
3, and Part
4. "9/11 Premiered
Wed, December 9 at 10P Jesse Ventura steps into America's most
controversial conspiracy by challenging the 9/11 Commission
Report and searching for evidence that the September 11th attacks
may have been an inside job. At the urging of victims' families,
he finds witnesses who claim the towers were brought down by
explosives, the missing black box flight recorders were actually
recovered and ground control knew the hijackers were in the
cockpits before the jets took off."
Solving 9-11: The Deception
that Changed the World
By Christopher Bollyn
Table of Contents
Updated June 2011
(The bold blue titles of the chapters and articles by year are clickable
(through 2005) and take the reader to the specific chapter or article.
Each article has a Print icon in the top right corner for the print-friendly
format for printing.)
As a journalist and skeptic of the unproven official version, I have
examined the facts and evidence and concluded that the U.S. government
and controlled media have engaged in a conspiracy to deceive the world
about what really happened on 9-11.
Florida was the central networking base and staging area for the
"false flag" terror attacks of 9/11. Fifteen of the nineteen
Arabs allegedly involved in the hijackings, for example, lived and
had their base of operations in South Florida. A preponderance of
evidence indicates that Israeli military intelligence was the master
organization behind the "Arab" terrorist network based in
Who controls the "hidden hand" in the U.S. massmedia that censors and suppresses the crucial 9-11 evidence?
What is the nexus connecting the architects of 9-11 with the mass
media moguls who are covering up the truth?
Politicians in the United States and Britain are made to submit to
the Zionist masters who control our political parties. By forcing
our leaders to accept the Zionist yoke our nations have become subjugated
to a foreign agenda.
The day after Barack Obama was elected president, the Israeli press
reported he had chosen the "Israeli Rahm Emanuel" to manage
his administration. The "free" press in the United States,
however, failed to report that the chief of staff is a dual-national
with terrorist roots and a loyalty to a foreign state.
"P-Tech is the one thread, the one golden thread you pull on,
and all of this is unraveled. ... All of this stuff took money to
fund. And it was funded through major financial crimes, money laundering,
and looting, looting of the S&L’s, looting of the banking
system...it’s all being done systematically to keep the slush
funds up for the game at play." – Indira R. Singh
The discovery of active super-thermite in the dust of the WorldTradeCenter
is crucial to understanding what really happened on 9-11. This scientific
discovery reveals that tons of sophisticated explosives were packed
into the twin towers long before the planes struck them.
The officials who oversaw the investigation at the World Trade Center
certainly knew it was wrong to dispose of evidence from the crime
scene before it had been properly examined. The fact that the highest
officials at the Department of Justice and the FBI allowed the structural
steel to be destroyed without been examined indicates that a high-level
criminal conspiracy was at work to prevent it from becoming forensic
evidence. The conspiracy to destroy the steel is an intrinsic part
of the 9/11 crime because it was absolutely essential to prevent the
discovery of who and what had caused the murderous demolition of the
From the Israeli Michael Chertoff, the Assistant Attorney General
at the Department of Justice and the senior official responsible for
investigating and prosecuting the crimes of 9/11, to the Mossad-controlled
traders and owners of the New Jersey junkyards that managed its destruction,
the steel passed from one Zionist agent to another until it was completely
destroyed in the furnaces of Asian steel mills. What does this fundamental
part of the 9/11 cover up tell us about who is really behind the crime?
If Osama Bin Laden and 19 Arab hijackers truly brought down the World
Trade Center, why was a network of Israeli intelligence agents engaged
in a concerted effort to destroy the evidence?
did 9/11, ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD!! This web page
has a good overview of Israels' central role.
sanitizes 9/11 video archive to conceal perp?, page 1,
abovetopsecret.com. Was the "Harley Man" part of a pre-packaged
"eyewitness" PSYOP designed to falsely steer the public?
#045 - Ptech and the 9/11 software [MP3], The Corbett
Report, "Indira Singh explains about Ptech, the company with
numerous investors and managers with direct links to terrorist financing.
Ptech's clients included the CIA, FBI, the White House, the Department
of Energy, the Air Force, the Navy, the FAA, IBM and Enron...Yet Singh
learnt they were a CIA front company and their software could gain
control of the most sensitive computer systems in the country."
2008 9/11thology by Dimitri Khalezov, online book (11 chapters provided for
free out of a longer book, updated 2010). Pdf download here.
A fascinating explanation regarding how mini-nukes were likely used
during 9/11 -- as well as during other "false flag" operations.
Khalezov describes his background as follows: "Mr. Dimitri A.
Khalezov, a former Soviet citizen, a former commissioned officer of
the so-called “military unit 46179”, otherwise known as
“the Special Control Service” of the 12th Chief Directorate
of the Defense Ministry of the USSR. The Special Control Service,
also known as the Soviet atomic (later “nuclear”) intelligence
was a secret military unit responsible for detecting of nuclear explosions
(including underground nuclear tests) of various adversaries of the
former USSR as well as responsible for controlling of observance of
various international treaties related to nuclear testing and to peaceful
nuclear explosions. After September the 11th Khalezov undertook some
extensive 9/11 research and proved that the Twin Towers of World Trade
Center as well as its building 7 were demolished by three underground
thermo-nuclear explosions – which earned the very name “ground
zero” to the demolition site. Moreover, he testifies that he
knew about the in-built so-called “emergency nuclear demolitions
scheme” of the Twin Towers as long ago as back in the ‘80s
– while being a serviceman in the Soviet Special Control Service."
Predicted "Event" To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11
Hollywood director Russo recalls remarkable "forecast" of
coming attack by Paul Joseph Watson, PrisonPlanet.com
Leonid Ivashov (left) at the Axis for Peace Conference 2005
in Brussels, with Webster Tarpley
Voltaire Network Introduction: General Leonid
Ivashov was the Chief of Staff of the Russian armed forces when the
September 11, 2001, attacks took place. This military man, who lived
the events from the inside, offers an analysis which is very different
to that of his American colleagues. As he did during the Axis for
Peace 2005 conference, he now explains that international terrorism
does not exist and that the September 11 attacks were the result of
a set-up. What we are seeing is a manipulation by the big powers;
this terrorism would not exist without them. He affirms that, instead
of faking a “world war on terror”, the best way to reduce
that kind of attacks is through respect for international law and
peaceful cooperation among countries and their citizens.
As the current international situation shows, terrorism emerges where contradiction aggravate, where there is a change of social relations or a change of regime, where there is political, economic or social instability, where there is moral decadence, where cynicism and nihilism triumph, where vice is legalized and where crime spreads.
It is globalization what creates the conditions for the emergence of these extremely dangerous phenomena. It is in this context that the new world geo-strategic map is being designed, that the resources of the planet are being re-distributed, that borders are disappearing, that international law is being torn into pieces, that cultural identities are being erased, that spiritual life becomes impoverished...
The analysis of the essence of the globalization process, the military and political doctrines of the United States and other countries, shows that terrorism contributes to a world dominance and the submissiveness of states to a global oligarchy. This means that terrorism is not something independent of world politics but simply an instrument, a means to install a unipolar world with a sole world headquarters, a pretext to erase national borders and to establish the rule of a new world elite. It is precisely this elite that constitutes the key element of world terrorism, its ideologist and its “godfather”.
The main target of the world elite is the historical, cultural, traditional and natural reality; the existing system of relations among states; the world national and state order of human civilization and national identity.
Today’s international terrorism is a phenomenon that combines the use of terror by state and non-state political structures as a means to attain their political objectives through people’s intimidation, psychological and social destabilization, the elimination of resistance inside power organizations and the creation of appropriate conditions for the manipulation of the countries’ policies and the behavior of people.
Terrorism is the weapon used in a new type of war. At the same time, international terrorism, in complicity with the media, becomes the manager of global processes. It is precisely the symbiosis between media and terror, which allows modifying international politics and the exiting reality.
In this context, if we analyze what happened on September 11, 2001, in the United States, we can arrive at the following conclusions:
1. The organizers of those attacks were the political and business circles interested in destabilizing the world order and who had the means necessary to finance the operation. The political conception of this action matured there where tensions emerged in the administration of financial and other types of resources. We have to look for the reasons of the attacks in the coincidence of interests of the big capital at global and transnational levels, in the circles that were not satisfied with the rhythm of the globalization process or its direction.
Unlike traditional wars, whose conception is determined by generals and politicians, the oligarchs and politicians submitted to the former were the ones who did it this time.
2. Only secret services and their current chiefs – or those retired but still having influence inside the state organizations – have the ability to plan, organize and conduct an operation of such magnitude. Generally, secret services create, finance and control extremist organizations. Without the support of secret services, these organizations cannot exist – let alone carry out operations of such magnitude inside countries so well protected. Planning and carrying out an operation on this scale is extremely complex.
3. Osama bin Laden and “Al Qaeda” cannot be the organizers nor the
performers of the September 11 attacks. They do not have the necessary
organization, resources or leaders. Thus, a team of professionals
had to be created and the Arab kamikazes are just extras to mask the
The September 11 operation modified the course of events in the world
in the direction chosen by transnational mafias and international
oligarchs; that is, those who hope to control the planet’s natural
resources, the world information network and the financial flows.
This operation also favored the US economic and political elite that
also seeks world dominance.
Leonid Ivashov with journalist Christopher Bollyn from American
The use of the term “international terrorism” has the following goals:
* Hiding the real objectives of the forces deployed all over
the world in the struggle for dominance and control;
* Turning the people’s demands to a struggle of undefined goals
against an invisible enemy;
* Destroying basic international norms and changing concepts
such as: aggression, state terror, dictatorship or movement of national
* Depriving peoples of their legitimate right to fight against
aggressions and to reject the work of foreign intelligence services;
* Establishing the principle of renunciation to national interests,
transforming objectives in the military field by giving priority to
the war on terror, violating the logic of military alliances to the
detriment of a joint defense and to favor the anti-terrorist coalition;
* Solving economic problems through a tough military rule using
the war on terror as a pretext. In order to fight in an efficient
way against international terrorism it is necessary to take the following
* To confirm before the UN General Assembly the principles of
the UN Charter and international law as principles that all states
are obliged to respect;
* To create a geo-strategic organization (perhaps inspired in
the Cooperation Organization of Shanghai comprised of Russia, China,
Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan) with a set of values
different to that of the Atlantists; to design a strategy of development
of states, a system of international security, another financial and
economic model (which would mean that the world would again rest on
* To associate (under the United Nations) the scientific elites
in the design and promotion of the philosophical concepts of the Human
Being of the 21st Century.
* To organize the interaction of all religious denominations
in the world, on behalf of the stability of humanity’s development,
security and mutual support.
Leonid Ivashov is the vice-president of the Academy on geopolitical
affairs. He was the chief of the department for General affairs
in the Soviet Union’s ministry of Defense, secretary
of the Council of defense ministers of the Community of independant
states (CIS), chief of the Military cooperation department
at the Russian federation’s Ministry of defense and
Joint chief of staff of the Russian armies. He is member of
for Peace conference.