Chapter 7


How September 11^th Became
the False Flag Rosetta Stone

The unfolding of the story of Captain May’s mission of conscience reminds me of the  plot structure of the classic 1950’s science fiction movie The Forbidden Planet. 
Early in the movie, we are introduced to a monster that threatens an interstellar earth expedition that has landed on a forbidden planet.  As the movie progresses, we learn how unbelievably powerful and dangerous this monster is.  Towards the end of the movie we also learn the secret to the monster.  We learn about its peculiar vulnerabilities, how very internal it is, and its capacity to not only destroy its own creator and but everything around it.
So far in this book we have been introduced to general outlines of a predatory monster that obviously consists of Zionism, unlimited Federal government, and controlled national media.  It does nasty things like wage unprovoked and unnecessary wars of aggression against Third World countries and continually covers up casualty figures for its own imperial troopers as well as innocent Third World civilians. 
Now we are going to learn about how this monster is vastly more dangerous and duplicitous than it has been described so far.  We will begin to learn about how it not only tells big lies to its own citizens, but also mass-murders them on its own soil. 
We will also learn about how this monster has dual characteristics much like the monster in the movie.  That is, it can simultaneously be both physically very real while at the same time functioning on the level of subconscious denial for most Americans.
Strangely, both the monster in the movie as well the one in America could never exist were it not for massive psychological repression and denial.  In the case of America , this denial is maintained through Info War, as waged by controlled national media and its sinister plutocratic handlers.
Lastly, we will begin to fathom this strange monster’s incredible capacity for self-destructive evil in the future that is far greater than most Americans can imagine.  It has the potential to bring something as bizarre as the group suicides at Jonestown or Masada to America on a national scale.   
Already we have experienced for decades a slow form of suicide (that is now accelerating) through the hollowing out of America ’s manufacturing base, the shrinking and biological replacement of its formerly strong white middle class, and the continual debauchment of Federal Reserve Notes.   We have already experienced over forty million Christian Zionists who pray for Armageddon.  We also suffer a Zionist cabal that has dragged America into futile Middle Eastern military adventures seasoned accompanied by the use of torture, a neutron nuke, and mass depleted uranium poisoning.
During most of 2003, Capt May confronted only a limited part of the monster.  For all his bravery, he was still in denial and repression regarding its claw tracks running through 9-11.
Ironically, it took a former U.S.M.C. Captain to shake him out of his denial, particularly given that the U.S. Marine Corps is hardly an organization that specializes in providing anti-Establishment psychotherapy.  
Captain May described the initial shake-up process during his 5 July 2006 Hal Turner interview: 

Capt May: Then after I had published a site on the Battle of Baghdad cover-up, as so much happens on the Internet now, an Internet operative named Capt Jeff Cross, a former Marine officer, got in touch with me. He had been in New York City on the day of 9-11. He had been transitioning out of the Marine Corps into civilian life. One of those boots to business suits type programs.
Hal Turner: Yes.
Capt May: He was a competent officer who was on the scene and he talked to me and he must have talked to me four or five different times before he finally convinced me, because he had been there, that the whole thing was what is called a false flag operation. Meaning, the people who did it pretend to be someone else, or if there is a story, pretending that someone did it different from the people who actually did it.
Turner: OK.
Capt May: And his explanation was that it was all CIA-Mossad. That it was a set-up operation all the way around.
Turner: Now this fits with facts that I have reported on this radio since the attacks of September 11th. The two aircraft that took off out of Boston's Logan Airport which ultimately crashed into the two towers at the World Trade Center in New York, the security company that was responsible for airport security at Boston's Logan Airport was an Israeli security firm and the men who staffed that security firm were all or mostly ex-Israeli military. The idea that these nineteen hijackers could have ever even gotten on those planes was ridiculous. But then plane number one takes off, a few minutes after take off it deviates from its flight plan and nobody can communicate with the plane. Well in this country, as you know, since the 1970's, the standard operating procedure is that the airport calls the FAA, the FAA calls NORAD, NORAD scrambles a fighter jet to find out what is wrong with the plane.
Capt May: Sure. Ricky ticky. Like real fast.
Turner: Right. This was not done for the first aircraft. The first aircraft is on its way now south from Boston toward New York , when the second aircraft takes off. Fifteen or twenty minutes into that flight, it too deviates from its flight plan and loses communication, and again no military fighter jet was scrambled anywhere around Boston or anywhere in Connecticut, or anywhere in New York State, or anywhere in New Jersey. Plane number one hits the North Tower of the World Trade Center at about 8:43 or 8:46 AM. Plane number two is still inbound. We have in New Jersey maybe sixty miles from my house McGuire Air Force Base at which fighter jets are stationed. We also have the Atlantic City Naval Air Station. Up north of us we have Ft Stewart, in New York state, which has fighter jets. Despite the fact that the first plane they lost contact with had struck the World Trade Center , and the second plane was also off course and out of communication, no fighter jets were scrambled to even intercept the second aircraft, which as we know, struck the second Tower. So right there, that told me that our government was complicit in these attacks. Maybe they didn't carry them out, but they knew it was going to happen, and they let it happen on purpose. And then I subsequently found out that they were actually in on it and probably made the plan themselves. Why don't you pick it up from there.
Capt May: Yes sir. Well you have gone through the same discovery process that I did. You go from believing the story, to seeing doubts, to thinking well, maybe they let it happen on purpose. That is the LIHOP argument: Let it happen on purpose.
Turner: Right.
Capt May: And eventually we all wind up with the MIHOP argument: Made It Happen On Purpose.
Turner. Ahhh.
Capt May: I just published an article in the Lone Star Iconoclast about that very argument which is starting to become dominant in the 911 research community. There are so many ways of figuring the evidence. You probably heard that there were ongoing Federal aviation drills simulating terrorist strikes on skyscrapers with airplanes that day?
Turner: Yes.
Capt May: That was going on in real time. Cheney was running it.
Turner: OK.
Capt May: When you hear that Cheney was in the bunker, they were doing --you know the bunker drills they did June 19th of this year?
Turner: Right.
Capt May: --a couple of weeks ago?
Turner: Right.
Capt May: That is the exact same drill that was going on. It is a once a year drill that was going on the day of 9-11. In other words, the Federal government was insulating itself against any possible coup de etat by loyal officers.
Turner: Right
Capt May: The Federal government was running exercises simulating exactly what they did, which allowed them to control everybody and tell them to stand down. And the Federal government was coordinating at every level what happened to New York . You know it is a funny thing. If I go out and burn down my own gas station, the first thing an insurance guy is going to do is question hard to see what happened to see if arson was the cause.
Turner: That is correct.
Capt May: But the biggest arson in U.S. history happened on 9-11, and the day after it happened they started hauling away the junk to get it out of the country. They destroyed the crime scene instantaneously, and then do a point of commission, the first person they tried to put in charge of the commission is Henry Kissinger, Beelzebub himself? A British-Yiddish hit all the way.

Capt Jeff Cross told May that he felt numerous explosions reverberating through his building both before and during the collapse of the World Trade Center towers. The power and pattern of the explosions suggested a military-style operation, far beyond any stories about aircraft collisions, jet fuel fires, and alleged floor-by-floor “pancaking.”  The official government story had to be a lie. 
Capt Cross tried to tell government officials about the anomalies. Rather than encourage him, they warned him to remain silent. Capt. May explained in a Zeph Daniel interview how this created an analogy with his experience dealing with the Battle of Baghdad cover-up.

Capt May:  [When Capt Cross contacted me] I had no conflicts whatsoever about 9-11. I thought about it like I thought of anything else but I did not have an ability to confirm or deny. It was interesting to me, but I had no opinion. But then something happened. Jeff started me out thinking maybe it could be true, because he was so emphatic. It wasn't that the forensic evidence, even the personal evidence of his experience when he was there moved me. What moved me was his tone and his conviction and his experience in all the various ways they tried to shut him down. Because the way the tried to shut him down was the exact way they tried to shut me down.
Zeph: Which was?
Capt May: Oh, you have death threats, intimidation. Death threats against my spouse. Ridicule. Insinuations that I was insane.
Zeph: Oh, yes.
Capt May: Disinformation people on the Internet who would spread slander. Calls from officers. Emails from officers threatening me with prison or retaliatory action. Outright promises of assassination if I didn't stop. Intimidation is the cheapest form of Info War. You scare somebody to death. It is impossible -at this point, you become rather --in this form of warfare, like any other, eventually your nerves --it is not that you get good nerves-- it is just that your ability to live in a state of fear of violent death goes. You lose your ability to be as scared as you were. It has nothing to do, I am convinced, with bravery. It is just that you can't keep being scared. You can't. You physically lose the process.

In his article “False Flag Prospects 2008” written in February 23, 2008,  Captain May presented what he felt was the strongest evidence that 9/11 was an inside job:

The US 9/11 Commission stumbled across strong evidence of treason by Dick Cheney when it interviewed Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, who was present in Cheney's famous command bunker as Flight 77 sped toward Washington , DC . Cheney was at the center of national military exercises simulating terrorist hijackings of US aircraft—at the very time that those hijackings were occurring in real life. On May 23, 2003, Secretary Mineta testified:
"During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, "The plane is 50 miles out." "The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to "the plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the Vice President, "Do the orders still stand?" And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
9/11 Commission co-chairman Lee Hamilton failed to follow up on the bombshell revelation, and quickly switched the topic. Thanks to YouTube, Mineta's astounding revelation and Hamilton 's amazing reaction are both viewable on a three minute clip at:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y
…Three World Trade Center buildings collapsed in New York City on September 11, 2001: WTC 1 and WTC 2 (the Twin Towers) in the morning, and WTC 7 (the Salomon Building) at 5:20 p.m. EST. Given that all three buildings were said to be unexpected collapses by all official sources, there is no good reason—except for complicity—to explain how it is that the BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 twenty minutes before it happened:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc&feature=related
…Fox news damned itself by announcing that WTC 7 had collapsed—even as it showed a live shot of downtown New York with WTC 7 still standing. A few seconds later the building collapsed, understandably confusing the newscasters: (Video removed by user)
…The owner of all three buildings was Larry Silverstein, who had recently doubled the insurance value of the Twin Towers . Amazingly, "Lucky Larry," later stated in a PBS interview that he and the New York Fire Department agreed to a controlled demolition of WTC 7. Since skyscrapers are not wired for demolition—unless someone intends to demolish them—Silverstein's statement is an admission that 9/11 was an inside job: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100

"The Noble Lie"

I believe that on the strength of the five YouTube links above an objective investigation would have more than enough evidence to warrant impeachment of Bush and Cheney on a charge of high treason, and to summon a grand jury that would indict many others on charges of high treason against Larry Silverstein and other apparent 9/11 collaborators. I believe that the American people, if presented with a single news story containing the five YouTube links above, would demand that the case of high treason be carried to its logical conclusion.
Congress, though, won't impeach the president. The mainstream media, for which I used to write, will not investigate and report the story. The military that was used as a tool to mass murder American citizens will not take action against traitors in uniform who knew exactly what they were doing on 9/11, or the many more uniformed dupes who thought they were conducting military exercises until the events of 9/11 occurred. To this day there have been no adverse actions—which would require investigation and evaluation—against any military person involved in what even official apologists call the greatest defense failure in American history. All of this shows that the fix is in, and that we are in a fix.

One could write volumes about 9/11 anomalies alone.  However, the purpose of this book is not to provide a comprehensive description of every false flag event, but rather to provide the reader with enough of an overview to accept their reality and become attuned to strategies to thwart their reoccurrence.   

 

No introduction would be complete without including the articles “21 Reasons to Question the Official Story about 9/11” by Dr. David Ray Griffin and “9/11 and the Neo-Con Agenda” by Dr. James Fetzer.
Dr. David Ray Griffin,  author of  The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé, once sent May an email stating admiration for his work. 

21 Reasons to Question the Official Story about 9/11

By Dr. David Ray Griffin

Note: Although the points are stated briefly, I give in each case the pages in my most recent book---"The New Pearl Harbor Revisited"---where the issue is documented and discussed more extensively.

(1) Although the official account of 9/11 claims that Osama bin Laden ordered the attacks, the FBI does not list 9/11 as one of the terrorist acts for which he is wanted and has admitted that it "has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11" (NPHR 206-11).

(2) Although the official story holds that the four airliners were hijacked by devout Muslims ready to die as martyrs to earn a heavenly reward, Mohamed Atta and the other alleged hijackers regularly drank heavily, went to strip clubs, and paid for sex (NPHR 153-55).

(3) Many people reported having received cell phone calls from loved ones or flight attendants on the airliners, during which they were told that Middle Eastern hijackers had taken over the planes. One recipient, Deena Burnett, was certain that her husband had called her several times on his cell phone because she had recognized his number on her Caller ID. But the calls to Burnett and most of the other reported calls were made when the planes were above 30,000 feet, and evidence presented by the 9/11 truth movement showed that, given the technology of the time, cell phone calls from high-altitude airliners had been impossible. By the time the FBI presented a report on phone calls from the planes at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui in 2006, it had changed its story, saying that there were only two cell phone calls from the flights, both from United 93 after it had descended to 5,000 feet (NPHR 111-17).

(4) US Solicitor General Ted Olson's claim that his wife, Barbara Olson, phoned him twice from AA 77, reporting that hijackers had taken it over, was also contradicted by this FBI report, which says that the only call attempted by her was "unconnected" and hence lasted "0 seconds" (NPRH 60-62).

(5) Although decisive evidence that al-Qaeda was responsible for the attacks was reportedly found in Mohamed Atta's luggage---which allegedly failed to get loaded onto Flight 11 from a commuter flight that Atta took to Boston from Portland, Maine, that morning---this story was made up after the FBI's previous story had collapsed. According to that story, the evidence had been found in a Mitsubishi that Atta had left in the Logan Airport parking lot and the trip to Portland was taken by Adnan and Ameer Bukhari. After the FBI learned that neither of the Bukharis had died on September 11, it simply declared that the trip to Portland was made by Atta and another al-Qaeda operative (NPHR 155-62).

(6) The other types of reputed evidence for Muslim hijackers---such as videos of al-Qaeda operatives at airports, passports discovered at the crash sites, and a headband discovered at the crash site of United 93---also show clear signs of having been fabricated (NPHR 170-73).

(7) In addition to the absence of evidence for hijackers on the planes, there is also evidence of their absence: If hijackers had broken into the cockpits, the pilots would have "squawked" the universal hijack code, an act that takes only a couple of seconds. But not one of the eight pilots on the four airliners did this (NPHR 175-79).

(8) Given standard operating procedures between the FAA and the military, according to which planes showing signs of an in-flight emergency are normally intercepted within about 10 minutes, the military's failure to intercept any of the flights implies that something, such as a stand-down order, prevented standard procedures from being carried out (NPHR 1-10, 81-84).

(9) Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta reported an episode in which Vice President Cheney, while in the bunker under the White House, apparently confirmed a stand-down order at about 9:25 AM, which was prior to the strike on the Pentagon. Another man has reported hearing members of LAX Security learn that a stand-down order had come from the "highest level of the White House" (NPHR 94-96).

(10) The 9/11 Commission did not mention Mineta's report, removed it from the Commission's video record of its hearings, and claimed that Cheney did not enter the shelter conference room until almost 10:00, which was at least 40 minutes later than he was really there, according to Mineta and several other witnesses, including Cheney's photographer (NPHR 91-94).

(11) The 9/11 Commission's timeline for Cheney that morning even contradicted what Cheney himself had told Tim Russert on "Meet the Press" September 16, just five days after 9/11 (NPHR 93).

(12) Hani Hanjour, known as a terrible pilot who could not safely fly even a single-engine airplane, could not possibly have executed the amazing trajectory reportedly taken by American Flight 77 in order to hit Wedge 1 of the Pentagon (NPHR 78-80).

(13) Wedge 1 would have been the least likely part of the Pentagon to be targeted by foreign terrorists, for several reasons: It was as far as possible from the offices of Rumsfeld and the top brass, whom Muslim terrorists presumably would have wanted to kill; it was the only part of the Pentagon that had been reinforced; the reconstruction was not finished, so there were relatively few people there; and it was the only part of the Pentagon that would have presented obstacles to a plane's flight path (NPHR 76-78).

(14) Contrary to the claim of Pentagon officials that they did not have the Pentagon evacuated because they had no way of knowing that an aircraft was approaching, a military E-4B---the Air Force's most advanced communications, command, and control airplane---was flying over the White House at the time. Also, although there can be no doubt about the identity of the plane, which was captured on video by CNN and others, the military has denied that it belonged to them (NPHR 96-98).

(15) The Secret Service, after learning that a second World Trade Center building had been attacked---which would have meant that terrorists were going after high-value targets---and that still other planes had apparently been hijacked, allowed President Bush to remain at the school in Sarasota, Florida, for another 30 minutes. It thereby revealed its foreknowledge that Bush would not be a target: If these had really been surprise attacks, the agents, fearing that a hijacked airliner was bearing down on the school, would have hustled Bush away. On the first anniversary of 9/11, the White House started telling a new story, according to which Bush, rather than remaining in the classroom several minutes after Andrew Card whispered in his ear that a second WTC building had been hit, immediately got up and left the room. This lie was told in major newspapers and on MSNBC and ABC television (NPHR 129-31).

(16) Given the fact that the Twin Towers and WTC 7 had steel columns running from their basements to their roofs, they simply could not have come down as they did---straight down at virtually free-fall speed---unless these columns had been sliced by means of explosives. Therefore, the official theory, according to which the buildings came down because of fire plus (in the case of the Twin Towers ) the impact of the planes, is scientifically impossible (NPHR 12-25).

(17) The destruction of the Twin Towers had many other features---such as the horizontal ejections of steel beams, the melting of steel, and the sulfidation and thinning of steel---that can be explained only in terms of powerful explosives. For example, the fires could not have come within 1000 degrees Fahrenheit of the temperature needed to melt steel (30-36).

(18) Members of the FDNY (Fire Department of New York) provided oral histories shortly after 9/11 in which one fourth of them testified to having witnessed explosions in the Twin Towers . Explosions in the WTC 7 as well as the towers were also reported by city officials, WTC employees, and journalists (NPHR 27-30, 45-48, 51).

(19) Mayor Rudy Giuliani told Peter Jennings of ABC News that day: "we set up headquarters at 75 Barclay Street . . . , and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna collapse. And it [the South Tower ] did collapse before we could actually get out of the building." However, there was no objective basis for expecting the towers to collapse; even the 9/11 Commission admitted that none of the fire chiefs expected them to come down. The FDNY oral histories show that the information that they were going to collapse came from the Office of Emergency Management---Giuliani's own office. How could Giuliani's people have known that the towers were going to come down, unless they knew that the buildings had been laced with explosives? (NPH 40)

(20) NIST, which produced the official reports on the Twin Towers and (recently) WTC 7, has been "fully hijacked from the scientific to the political realm," so that its scientists are little more than "hired guns," a former employee has reported, and the 9/11 Commission was no more independent, being run by Philip Zelikow, who was essentially a member of the Bush White House (NPHR 11, 238-51).

(21) The official story about 9/11 is now rejected by constantly growing numbers of physicists, chemists, architects, engineers, pilots, former military officers, and former intelligence officials (NPHR xi).

David Ray Griffin. The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé. Olive Branch Press, September, 2008, ISBN-10: 1566567297
David Ray Griffin is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by David Ray Griffin

 

There is now very strong evidence that the official government explanation about the buildings coming down because of “pancaking” is not only completely implausible, but furthermore hydrogen mini-nukes would have been required for the towers to come down at nearly free-fall speed and at the same time experience pulverization of most of their mass.
The 6 April 2009 American Free Press article “More Than 600 Architects Say 9/11 an Inside Job” by Mark Anderson describes in greater detail why the official government “pancaking” story is completely implausible.  For starters, the buildings came down at nearly free-fall speed, which was over six times faster than any even remotely plausible “pancaking” scenario.  On top of this, retired physics instructor Chuck Boldwyn has debunked this government story even further through his structural analysis.  Dr. James Fetzer has brilliantly summarized his findings in his article "Is 9/11 Research `Anti-Semitic'?":

About Boldwynn's paper, his thesis is very clear: that it would have taken the equivalent of 48,000 tons of explosives to equal the kinetic energy (energy of motion) that the top 16 floors of the North Tower (taking the plane to have hit at the 94 floor and subtracting 94 from 110 = 16) would have had to exert upon the bottom 94 floors for their "collapse" to have initiated the collapse of those 94 floors. John Skilling, one of the senior engineers of the firm that built the towers, had observed that they could carry 20 times the expected "live load" (that is, physical steel and concrete structure plus office furniture and human beings) that they would ever be expected to carry. Charles believes it was actually much greater than that, but even using Skilling's more conservative figures, he has calculated that the force required to collapse the lower 94 floors (using vector addition and subtraction of forces) which would have required the combined weight of some 588 16-floor equivalents (taking into account that those uppermost 16 floors were not as heavy as lower 16 floor units because the steel was not as thick) before collapse would ensue; or, using the thought of those 16 floors falling through space downward onto the lower 94, that that 16-floor unit would have to be elevated to a height of 120 miles above the remaining 94 for it to possess enough energy of motion to collapse the remaining 94; or, alternatively, that the energy required would be equivalent to that of 2.4 (Hiroshima sized) atomic bombs, which clearly was not available from the miniscule potential energy that was allegedly released by the fires weakening the steel and causing the top 16 floors to collapse on the bottom 94.

It is helpful for us to familiarize ourselves with the behavior of mini-nukes.  In chapter 17, I quote Joe Vialls’ description of the effects of a mini-nuke likely used in the Bali bombing.  “…Less than six inches in diameter and burning at a staggering 300,000 degrees centigrade, the fireball was a perfect shimmering sphere, made possible by 99.78% Plutonium 239 manufactured at the Dimona nuclear facility in the Negev Desert .  Five microseconds passed while this fission monster from hell expanded, then the already-cooling fireball tore its angry way out into the street above, vaporizing all victims standing within thirty feet while simultaneously spreading two tons of deadly microscopic roadbed shrapnel in a lethal arc across Kuta Beach …”

 

From web site titled “WTC Demolished By Hydrogen Bomb”

Indeed, photos of the World Trade Center tower destruction resemble hydrogen bomb tests. In fact, many videos and photos of the World Trade Center towers coming down show repeated orange flashes emanating from inside the building as pulverized building material is simultaneously being blown out in all directions.  As one example, one can see some orange flash effects in the photo below:
 

 

"Destruction of the towers by explosions is clear according to the photographs and reports of the eye witnesses. In the picture [above], a range of cutting charges have just exploded in the down left sector and a typical white cloud is formed outwards from the wall." (caption and picture from expose911.com:-could an aviation strike make the buildings collapse?)

In the photograph above, one can also see the top third of World Trade Center Tower One leaning over about 30 degrees as the building is coming down.  In Chapter 20 I mention how Sgt First Class Donald Buswell, a member of Ghost Troop with a background in Explosive Ordnance Disposal and Intelligence, immediately recognized that if  only TNT explosives had been used, the upper section would have left a large shell of wreckage off to the side of the building.
An excellent article which summarizes the case for the use of nukes is “The US Government's Usage of Atomic Bombs - Domestic - WTC" by Ed Ward, MD:  

 

Declassified August 1958: "Mere fact that the U. S. has developed atomic munitions suitable for use in demolition work." Declassified January 1967, "The fact that we are interested in and are continuing studies on a weapon for minimizing the emerging flux of neutrons and internal induced activity." Declassified March 1976, "The fact of weapon laboratory interest in Minimum Residual Radiation (MRR) devices. The fact of successful development of MRR devices."
The factual evidence indicates that our government is using and has used 3^rd or possibly 4^th generation hydrogen bombs domestically and internationally. The evidence for international usage is not quite as strong as the domestic usage, but when domestic usage is considered, the international usage seems inescapable. The process of exclusion based on the known facts leaves only one viable option for the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings - a relatively pure hydrogen bomb.

Just some of the facts are: widespread cancer in the responders, molten steel, melted cars, steel beams hurled hundreds of feet, aerosolized metals, vaporized steel witnessed and video, aerosolized and pulverized concrete, elevated tritium levels, vanishing (vaporized) victims, only sliver fragments of victims on roof tops, EMP - Electro Magnetic Pulse effects on communications, hundreds of eyewitness testimony of ancillary explosions by heroic rescuers and victims, massive dispersal of debris, demolition expert states hydrogen bomb needed for this type of demolition, audio of a massive explosion prior to collapse, video of ancillary explosions, audio of ancillary explosions, significant reduction in debris pile, ancillary thermate found in wreckage, shockwave of a mini yield nuclear blast knocked people off their feet, vaporization of 200,000 gallons of water, removal of wreckage without investigation, only remnants of fire in one tower minutes after the plane collision, unprecedented history of 3 skyscrapers collapsing secondary to fire, early miscalculation stating WTC building 7 'pulled', towers fall at demolition or free fall speed, foreknowledge of WTC 7 immediate collapse, slow-motion video evidence of plane appendage with smoke and explosion immediately prior to impact of both planes, unprecedented NORAD non response to variant flights, FEMA drill scheduled for same day, military 'exercise' of exactly what was taking place to prevent NORAD response, most of NORAD protection planes sent far away in another 'exercise' to prevent response, prevention of examination of wreckage by those assigned to investigate, seismic evidence of a mini yield nuclear explosion, Cheney takes over NORAD response command, Cheney prevents NORAD response, WTC towers designed for 757 collision and fire, 911 used falsely for previously planned war, government fabrication of 'evidence' correlation for starting war, hundreds of people found themselves trapped by locked doors and missing escape routes above and below the impact zone, and not all inclusively, but finally, Bush brands anyone noting any of these facts a terrorist.
The spectrum and percentages of cancer are massive. There are at least 4 classifications of blood-cell cancers: leukemia, lymphoma, Hodgkin's and myeloma. There are many more classifications of soft tissue cancers. There is brain cancer. There is breast cancer. For most of these there are subclassifications of many different types of specific cancer in each, so far not publicly disclosed. There are huge percentages of respiratory distress and loss of function. Multiple reports of 'irregular cycles' (miscarriages?). Most likely there will be several more types of cancer to follow. In particular, responders should be checked for thyroid cancer and function. There has been no noting of birth defects which also needs to be done. There is one thing and only one thing that can cause all these cancers and problems - RADIATION.

 

 

 

James Fetzer 7-14-10 London part 1 from No Lies Radio on Vimeo. Dr. James Fetzer speaks before the 14 July 2010 international symposium, “Debunking the ‘War on Terror’” held in London, UK

 

The following article “9/11 and the Neo-Con Agenda” by Dr. James Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, does an excellent job of introducing people to the broader strategic motivations for the false flag attack.  Dr. Fetzer has frequently interviewed Captain May on his talk show and has cosigned numerous false flag alerts: 

 

 

9/11 and the
Neo-Con Agenda

By Dr. James Fetzer

 

 

We cannot support the troops by “staying the course” when the Commander-in-Chief is marching them over a cliff. —Jim Fetzer (15 April 2008)

There is a crucial link between the anti-war movement and the 9/11 truth movement, because exposing the truth about 9/11 destroys the justification for those wars.
We are told not to discuss conspiracy theories, but if 19 Islamic fundamentalists hijacked four planes, outfoxed the most sophisticated air defense system in the world, and perpetrated these atrocities under the control of a guy off in a cave in Afghanistan , then 9/11 involved a conspiracy.
If we can’t talk about conspiracies, we can’t talk about 9/11. Why would this administration want to suppress public discussion of 9/11? To conceal the truth about the war or to conceal the truth about 9/11?

Lies about the War

We were told big lies about the war, including, first, that Saddam was responsible for 9/11. But during a press conference, Bush himself had to admit that Saddam had “nothing” to do with 9/11.
We were told, second, that Saddam was in cahoots with al Qaeda. But several investigations have revealed that not only was Saddam not in cahoots with al Qaeda, but he was actively tracking down its leaders to incarcerate or even kill them.
Moreover, honest generals have told us al Qaeda is not responsible for more than 10% of the opposition to US presence in Iraq and that our presence there is the greatest recruiting tool al Qaeda possesses.
In fact, an admiral—who may face imminent demotion—was quoted in The New York Times (11 April 2008) observing that no more than 40-50 foreign fighters were entering the country each month. How great a threat can that represent?
Political hacks tell us differently. Compare what General William Odom, who is retired, has said, with the words of General David Petraeus, who is not.
Third, we were told that Osama bin Laden was responsible for 9/11. But our FBI—our own FBI!—has acknowledged that it has “no hard evidence” connecting Osama bin Laden to the events of 9/11.
You thought there was “a confession tape”? But in his first video, which is the only one that appears to be authentic, Osama said that he had nothing to do with 9/11 and that the killing of innocent women and children is contrary to the tenets of Islam.
He said that he opposed the presence of US forces in Saudi Arabia , the home of Mecca and Medina —the two most holy sites in Islam—and our one-sided stance regarding the Israeli-Palestinian issue.
The so-called “confession tape” involves a different “Osama” who does not look the same and has a different voice. It is the product of an intelligence agency.

Lies about 9/11

And we have been told lesser lies about 9/11. You don’t have to have read the books of David Ray Griffin to know these things, but it helps.
At the Twin Towers , the fires burned neither long enough nor hot enough to cause the steel to weaken, much less melt. Jet fuel is primarily kerosene, most of which burned up in those spectacular fireballs. If it could have such effects, our Coleman lanterns and camping stoves would melt when we use them.
The towers were pulverized from the top down. Each floor stands motionless awaiting its destruction. They were turned into very fine dust and the buildings were destroyed to below ground level. There were no “pancakes”.
WTC-7 was destroyed by a classic controlled demolition at 5:20 PM. All of its floors fell together in a complete, abrupt, and symmetrical collapse in about 6.5 seconds. When it was over, there was a stack of about 7 floors of “pancakes”. Their modes of demolition were quite different.
Earlier, at 4:57 PM, the BBC reported that WTC-7 had collapsed, 23 minutes before the event occurred. If anyone wonders whether there is any collusion between the intelligence agencies, the government, and the mass media, I cannot imagine a better example.
The Pentagon presents many oddities. Pilots for 9/11 Truth has taken the black box data that the National Transportation Safety Board says came from the plane that hit the building and discovered that the data corresponds to a flight with a different approach and altitude than the official account describes.
It was too high at 300 feet to have taken out any lampposts and, one second from the building, it was 100 feet too high to have impacted with it. Such a plane may have swooped over the Pentagon, but it could not have hit it.
Moreover, two lime-green civilian fire trucks were on the scene almost immediately and extinguished the fires in the first 15-20 minutes. The billowing black clouds that were later observed from the Capitol came from a series of enormous dumpsters in front of the building rather than from the building itself. They were a special effect. We are being played for saps.
Apologists for the government insist that there is so little debris at the crash site in Shanksville because the plane crashed into an abandoned mine shaft!
Well, we know what to do with miners trapped in mine shafts: We bring out the heavy equipment and work non-stop in the hope that someone may have miraculously An Air Force officer who is an expert on plane crashes, Colonel George Nelson (retired), has told me that it looked to him as though someone had taken a bulldozer, dug a trench, filled it with trash, and blown it up!
We are not alone in our concerns with what we have been told by our government about 9/11. Jesse Ventura and Ralph Nader are two of the latest to join us. If you want to know why hundreds of military officers, intelligence experts, pilots, scientists, and members of the families of survivors support 9/11 truth, visit Patriots Question 9/11.

Why All These Lies?

According to the Center for Public Integrity, prominent members of the administration made nearly 1,000 lies to induce Americans to support a war in Iraq . These were made by George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and others. Why were they lying to us?
One reason may be because real national security depends upon (a) a sound economy, (b) military strength, and (c) our moral standing in the world. Bush has vitiated all three. (a) The war alone is estimated to run $1-3 trillion and the nation is bankrupt.
These ongoing rotations are (b) weakening our military and are not sustainable, as general after general has observed. And if you doubt the morality of this practice, view the film “Stop-Loss”.
By launching wars of aggression in violation of international law, the UN Charter, and the US Constitution, combined with the practice of torture, (c) the US has lost its moral standing in the eyes of the world. Instead of being the most admired and respected of nations, we are now—together with our ally, Israel —the most despised and reviled.
Since our greatest source of security from attack has been our moral standing, for Bush to describe himself as “the security president” is no more than a sick joke.

The Real Reasons for War

Do they want to conceal the real reasons for going to war? There appear to be three: oil, Israel , and ideology.
OIL: It’s easier to steal their oil than it is to find it ourselves. For a war that was supposed to pay for itself, we are shelling out $1 billion a week for gasoline to move our equipment around in Iraq .
I haven’t heard that ExxonMobile is offering to provide that gas for free to support our troops! Where do you suppose those profits are going?
After Dick Cheney’s latest visit to the Middle East, al Maliki rushed to Basra to oversee an attack on the militia forces of al Sadr. Basra is not just the second largest city in Iraq but sits astride the large oil fields in south and eastern Iraq .
Without pacifying the conflict there, ExxonMobile, Shell, BP and other companies will not be comfortable taking oil from that region. I have no doubt that the Bush-Cheney “benchmark” for success in Iraq is that the country has been pacified sufficiently for that purpose. That’s their bottom line.
ISRAEL . Israel has had a long-standing interest in weakening the influence of its political rivals in the region. Before 9/11, Iraq was the most modern and sophisticated among the Arab states, with a fine national health-care system, a strong program of public education, and an excellent infrastructure.
Anyone who wants to appreciate one of the real reasons for 9/11 should think about a clip of cheering Palestinians that played as the towers were being destroyed.
I asked myself, “Is there an enormous large-screen, outdoor television in the West Bank that would enable Palestinians to view these events as they are happening?”
It turns out to be archival footage from 1993 of rejoicing after some students had given an olive branch to the Israeli soldiers and thought that peace was "just around the corner", which just happened to be introduced at the point of maximum revulsion about what we were seeing on the screen.
IDEOLOGY. An influential group known as “Project for the New American Century” has formulated a plan for creating an empire greater than any the world has ever seen.
Now that the US is the only superpower, they advocate moving aggressively into the Middle East to seize control of its oil, support Israel , and exert influence outward from that geopolitically strategic area.
Those who have signed on to its principles include Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Eliott Abrams, Paul Wolfowitz, “Scotter” Libby, Eliot Cohen, and even Jeb Bush, many of whom assumed powerful positions in the Bush administration.
To get a handle on the “mind set” that drives this conception, which is now being justified as part of the “war on terror”, try reading The Shell Game. It is undemocratic, anti-American, and perverted.
Yet it exerts a powerful grip upon this administration. It is a mind set that must not just be changed but completely destroyed!
When Basra is pacified and that oil is transported, it will be through a series of pipelines that reach the Mediterranean Sea by way of Israel .

“Follow the Money”

The motives for mass murder must have been powerful. What happens when we “follow the money”?
Larry Silverstein took control of the World Trade Center on 24 July 2001 and promptly insured it for $3.5 billion against terrorist attacks. When there were two planes, he claimed “double indemnity” and asked for $7 billion, settling for $4.6. Not bad for a six week’s investment of $114 million.
Security and Exchange Commission records stored in WTC-7 were destroyed when that building was brought down. They not only included documents from the Enron case but many other major investigations of financial and banking interests.
The fines and penalties could have totaled hundreds of millions, even billions. But information necessary to conduct those investigations has now been destroyed.
Donald Rumsfeld acknowledged the day before 9/11 that the Pentagon had lost track of $2.3 trillion. He did that on a Monday, which was very odd for an experienced politician, who would know that reporters would dog him all week and the story would “grow legs”.
Ordinarily, you would wait until Friday with a story like this, hoping that it might be lost among weekend sports and other news. It is as if he knew that something would occur to wipe this from consciousness so he could waltz back into the halls of Congress and ask for hundreds of billions more in defense spending—which is exactly what he did!
Halliburton of course is profiting mightily from $100 billion, no bid, cost-plus contracts, which mean that, no matter how much you spend on a project, you can add your profit on top of it.
Dick Cheney still has some 400,000 shares of stock in Halliburton in a not so blind “trust”.
And the gas and oil industry is benefiting immeasurably. Consider the case of Afghanistan as an illustration.
Before 9/11, we negotiated on behalf of Unocal with the Taliban over a pipeline to be built in northern Afghanistan, telling them that if they allowed it, we would bathe them in gold, and if not, we would bathe them in bombs. They didn’t and, after 9/11, we did.
Today that pipeline is under construction, there are two permanent bases ideally positioned to support it, the President of Afghanistan is a former Unocal oil official, and our Ambassador to Afghanistan is another Unocal oil official. This is not rocket science.
Condoleezza Rice asked the Taliban to turn Osama over to the United States for prosecution. They replied that they would do that on the condition that she produce proof that he had been involved. She said she would but never got around to it. She must have had more pressing engagements.

What about Israel ?

But could Israel have been involved? There are disturbing indications. The five “dancing Israels” were observed on a roof across the Hudson in New Jersey drinking and celebrating as they filmed the destruction of the Twin Towers .
Complaints by neighbors led to their apprehension in a van. The driver told the arresting officer, “We are not your problem. The Palestinians are your problem!” They would be incarcerated for 71 days until an assistant to then-Attorney General John Ashcroft directed their released.
They returned to Israel where three of them appeared on Israeli TV and explained they were there to document the destruction of the Twin Towers . Obviously, they could not have done that without knowing the Twin Towers were going to be destroyed.
The man who directed their release was Michael Chertoff, now our Director of Homeland Security, who is a joint US/Israeli citizen.
The Controller of the Pentagon at the time $2.3 trillion went missing was Dov Zakheim, another joint US/Israeli citizen.
Others in the administration with dual citizenship include Paul Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams, Richard Pearle, Douglas Feith, “Scooter” Libby, Eliot Cohen, and John Bolton. Do any of these names sound familiar?
An especially interesting case is Michael Mukasey, our new Attorney General, who was also the judge on litigation between Larry Silverstein and insurance companies over the events of 9/11.
Who runs this country? About two weeks after 9/11, Ariel Sharon said, “We own America , and the Americans know it”.
If Israel was involved in 9/11, the American people are entitled to know.

Conflicting Loyalties

I will be accused of anti-Semitism for telling you facts in the public domain. But it is not “anti-Semitic” to criticize the state of Israel , the government of the state of Israel , or the policies and actions of the state of Israel .
Anti-Semitism involves discounting or belittling persons on the basis of their religious orientation or their ethnic origins.
It is not anti-Semitic to object to the expansion of illegal settlements, the starvation and killing of the Palestinian people, or the butchering of a peace activist with a bulldozer! For these gross violations of human rights, we have the government of Israel to thank.
We need laws to keep dual citizens from decision-making and policy-shaping position in the US government. Who knows whose loyalty they respect?
I call upon those with joint citizenship to resign their positions in the interests of the nation—the United States of America !
If you think that’s “in your face”, consider this. Michael Hayden, our Director of the CIA, like General Petraeus, still wears his uniform. That means he is still in the chain of command and under the control of the President as Commander-in-Chief. We are being played for suckers!
I call upon him to resign his commission or to resign his position!

An Attack on Iran ?

The last time Cheney visited the Middle East, we attacked Iraq . This time may presage an attack on Iran . A Saudi newspaper has reported that the kingdom has been warned to prepare to cope with “sudden nuclear and radioactive hazards”, the source no doubt Cheney himself.
Estimates of casualties run as high as 1 million dead Iranians and as many as 35 million collateral casualties in Afghanistan , Pakistan , and India , who will incur cancer as a result of exposure to radioactivity.
If we—or “our ally”, Israel —undertake such an action, it will be the greatest act of mass murder in history, which will inevitably lead to attacks in kind on the US and on Israel , leading to its annihilation.
Those who would attack Iran are betraying this country. As a former Marine Corps officer, I remind commissioned officers of the American military that they not only have an obligation to refuse illegal orders but have the duty to take into custody those who issue them.
Iran is not in Iraq. Our own National Intelligence Estimate concluded that Iran abandoned its development of nuclear weapons in 2003. It has the right to develop nuclear energy.
Even if it had a bomb, Iran could not use it for offensive purposes without committing national suicide. Israel alone has more than 200 nuclear weapons. Did we learn nothing from the Cold War?
I call upon the officers of our armed forces to take into custody those who would direct the commission of further war crimes.

Parting Reflections

Here in Washington , we have a crime syndicate masquerading as an administration.
And Bush is talking about another 9/11, even suggesting its source!
Someone should sit down and ask him how he could possibly know.
The Commander-in-Chief is marching our troops off a cliff!

 

James H. Fetzer is McKnight Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota , Duluth ; Founder, Scholars for 9/11 Truth; Editor, Assassination Research. www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/

 

There have been quite a few high level political figurers and intelligence sources who claim that 9-11 had to have been an inside job. They include Gen. Hameed Gul, former head of the Pakistani intelligence service who once worked with the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. He contended in an interview with Arnaud de Borchgrave that 9-11 was conducted by the Mossad in conjunction with a renegade element of the U.S. Air Force:

The U.S. spends $40 billion a year on its 11 intelligence agencies. That's $400 billion in 10 years. Yet the Bush Administration says it was taken by surprise. I don't believe it. Within 10 minutes of the second twin tower being hit in the World Trade Center CNN said Osama bin Laden had done it. That was a planned piece of disinformation by the real perpetrators. It created an instant mindset and put public opinion into a trance, which prevented even intelligent people from thinking for themselves...
....Mossad and its American associates are the obvious culprits. Who benefits from the crime? The attacks against the twin towers started at 8:45 a.m. and four flights are diverted from their assigned air space and no air traffic controller sounds the alarm. And no Air Force jets scramble until 10 a.m. That also smacks of a small scale Air Force rebellion, a coup against the Pentagon perhaps? Radars are jammed, transponders fail. No IFF -- friend or foe identification -- challenge. In Pakistan, if there is no response to IFF, jets are instantly scrambled and the aircraft is shot down with no further questions asked. This was clearly an inside job. Bush was afraid and rushed to the shelter of a nuclear bunker. He clearly feared a nuclear situation. Who could that have been? Will that also be hushed up in the investigation, like the Warren report after the Kennedy assassination?

Foreign intelligence experts also include former British MI-5 agent David Shaylor, the authors of a German intelligence report linking the Mossad to 9-11, and Andreas Von Bulow,  former state-secretary in the German Federal Ministry of Defence. According to "9-11, Mossad, the CIA and `False Flag Operations'":

Andreas von Bülow served on the parliamentary commission which oversees the three branches of the German secret service while a member of the Bundestag (German parliament) from 1969 to 1994, and wrote a book Im Namendes Staates ("In the Name of the State") on the criminal activities of secret services, including the CIA.
Von Bülow told AFP that he believes that the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, is behind the Sept. 11 terror attacks. These attacks, he said, were carried out to turn public opinion against the Arabs and boost military and security spending.
"You don't get the higher echelons," von Bülow said, referring to the "architectural structure" which masterminds such terror attacks. At this level, he said, the organization doing the planning, such as Mossad, is primarily interested in affecting public opinion.
The architectural level planners use corrupt "guns for hire" such as Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist who von Bülow called "an instrument of Mossad," high-ranking Stasi (former East German secret service) operatives, or Libyan agents who organize terror attacks using dedicated people, for example Palestinian and Arab "freedom fighters."
The terrorists who actually commit the crimes are what von Bülow calls "the working level," such as the 19 Arabs who allegedly hijacked the planes on Sept. 11. "The working level is part of the deception," he said. [Added note: This tactic is called a "false flag operation" or a "false flag recruitment", used by both the CIA and Mossad for purposes of propaganda.]
"Ninety-five percent of the work of the intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation," von Bülow said, which is widely propagated in the mainstream media creating an accepted version of events.
"Journalists don't even raise the simplest questions," he said, adding, "those who differ are labeled as crazy."

High level disbelievers in the official government story also include Stanley Hilton, former Bob Dole Chief of Staff, Morgan Reynolds, former chief economist for the Dept of Labor under George Bush, and Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, former assistant Secretary of the Treasury under Reagan.  
The article “Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job,” by Paul Watson,  December 2007, observed:

Former Italian President and the man who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio Francesco Cossiga has gone public on 9/11, telling Italy's most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.

According to “Bush’s `Christian’ Blood Cult” by former Naval Intelligence officer Wayne Madsen, even the Pope has his doubts:

According to journalists close to the Vatican , the Pope and his closest advisers are also concerned that the ultimate acts of evil - the September 11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon - were known in advance by senior Bush administration officials. By permitting the attacks to take their course, there is a perception within the Roman Catholic Church hierarchy that a coup d'etat was implemented, one that gave Bush and his leadership near-dictatorial powers to carry out their agenda.

Captain May has remarked that 9/11 is like a two stage IQ test:   On the first level are people who are bright enough to figure out that the official government story is a lie, and that the whole thing had to be an inside job. 
It is encouraging that an online March 2006 CNN poll showed 83% of respondents agreed that 9/11 was an inside job.  However, this was not a random, scientific poll, but one that was confined to voluntary Internet users who happen to visit the poll web site. 
These kinds of people are probably a lot brighter and more inquisitive than the general population, given the dismal results of the aforementioned ISI civics test when applied to the general population.
The second stage IQ test qualifies those who can figure out that the same insiders who pulled off 9/11 are likely to repeat it.  After all, if they needed the first inside job to provoke outrage at enemies of Zionism, certainly they would need to keep administering false flag “terror doses” to keep the population intimidated, propagandized, and off balance, particularly before enough dissidents can successfully rise up against them. Hence, we must remain vigilant for a “9/11 to be,” or as Captain May likes to code it, a “9/11 2B.”

 

 

The national media has repeatedly warned us about the dangers of a repeat 9/11, as we will discuss repeatedly in the rest of this book.  However, whereas the national media claims “Al Qaeda” will likely be the future boogeyman, those who pass this second “9/11 2B” IQ test know that the real culprit is more likely to be “Al CIA-Mossad-duh.”

Missing Links:The Definitive Truth About 9/11

Update References:

2011-11-06 Powerful: The New American Century - Full Version, beforeitsnews.com. Editor's Note: This web page has embedded in it a 1:43:23 video with the following caption:
"Produced by Massimo Mazzucco, THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY explores the historical, philosophical and economic background that suggests a matrix for such events that is much closer to home than the so-called "Islamic terrorism".
The film provides solid evidence for the true reasons behind the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, whose unfolding is described in chilling detail in a document called "Project for the New American Century", published in the year 2,000, that seems to have served as the actual blueprint for such dramatic events.
As a follow-up to Inganno Globale, The New American Century presents the historical, philosophical, economical and political background -- some of which is totally unknown to the public -- that lend support to the accusation that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were in fact an inside-job.
This film is astonishing, it goes in detail through the untold history of The Project for the New American Century with tons of archival footage and connects it right into the present. This film exposes how every major war in US history was based on a complete fraud with video of insiders themselves admitting it. This film shows how the first film theaters in the US were used over a hundred years ago to broadcast propaganda to rile the American people into the Spanish-American War. This film shows the white papers of the oil company Unocal which called for the creation of a pipeline through Afghanistan and how their exact needs were fulfilled through the US invasion of Afghanistan. This film shows how Halliburton under their "cost plus" exclusive contract with the US Government went on a mad dash spending spree akin to something out of the movie Brewster's Millions, yet instead of blowing $30 million they blew through BILLIONS by literally burning millions of dollars worth of hundred thousand dollar cars and trucks if they had so much as a flat tire. I have seen a ton of films, this film contains a massive amount of incredible footage I have never seen before anywhere, it is an historical documentary which exposes all the lies of the past so that you can understand the present. This film is a must see."
2011-08-30 Larry Silverstein no response to WTC 7 lies (video)
2011-07-25 Norway's 9/11: Deep Parallels Surface – Norway, 9/11, 7/7 and Bali by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor, veteranstoday.com.
2011-07-20 Andy Berwick and the Protocols of the Elders of Islam, Norway: Murdoch and the Aliens Did It by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor, Veterans Today
...Remember the list of top military officers who opposed the wars, Afghanistan, Iraq, who had been forced into retirement for speaking up? You have forgotten? Don’t worry, you aren’t the only one. They forgot too. They spoke once and then, for some reason, went “quiet.”
Years ago, when the Army’s top intel officer, General Stubblebein, said no plane hit the Pentagon….
Well, you can read his story here in legal documents and the video below:

General of All Intelligence, 9/11 was a Fraud!

 

This was the top guy, the top intel officer in the army who came out and said it, 9/11 was a scam, a government operation.
For it, he was ground up and spit out. One of my friends, as a Colonel in Army Intelligence (don’t laugh) knew him well. Try looking up Stubblebein. You will be told he is a freak, a UFO nut, a ghost hunter. He was the Army’s Chief of Intelligence, the best of the best until he spoke up on 9/11.
They actually went as far as to make a movie to take a whack at him. Did you see “Men Who Stare at Goats?”
As an aside, secrecy, in fact our biggest secrets, are leaked, often under ‘comic’ circumstances, when they can discredit someone who has become a danger...
2010-12-08 11 Reasons Why the Threat From Al Qaeda is Not Real by Saman Mohammadi, Infowars.com, also archived at The Excavator.
2010-10-05 Is America Under Attack ... Or Are the Barbarians Inside the Gates?, Washington's blog, "Ironically, the war on terror actually diminishes our national security. So the barbarians inside the gates are opening us up to the barbarians abroad as well."
2010-09-26 Department of Defense Turns Nazi – Buys And Burns Every Copy of Book Revealing Evidence Of 9/11 Cover Up, Alexander Higgins blog
2010-09-06 Kitat Kohenut and the Israeli Police State in Amerikka by Mark Dankof.
"For those of you who have trouble sleeping, I don’t recommend reading the alternative explanation of the events in New York on September 11, 2001 offered by Nashid Abdul-Khaaliq. Nor would I recommend ex-CIA station chief Philip Giraldi’s recent essay in Pat Buchanan’s “The American Conservative,” entitled “Mossad in America.”
"A perpetual state of insomnia may come your way by reading these articles in conjunction with Internet releases chronicling the development of a Jewish paramilitary force in the continental United States, called Kitat Kohenut (“rapid response units“). UNM Israel Alliance’s post on this New York-based organization informs the reader that a training camp is being constructed in northern Arizona..."
2010-09-09 9/11 ANALYSIS: From Ronald Reagan and the Soviet-Afghan War to George W Bush and September 11, 2001 by Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research
2010-09-06 Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement by Ed Ward, M.D., Rense.com
2010-05-03 How Ehud Barak Pulled Off 9-11 by Chris Bollyn
2010-04-03 "Israel Did 9-11" - U.S. Military Expert Supports Bollyn Thesis. Includes transcript of Dr. Alan Sabrosky interview.
2010-03-15 Why the Military Knows Israel Did 9/11 (video). Mark Glenn and Phil Tourney interview Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Studies at the U.S. Army War College. See also MP3 download pages here and here.
2010-02-10 New 9/11 photos released, by Dr. James Fetzer
2010-01-19 This Is What Happened On 9/11, blogpost by "Terral"
2009-12-09 Conspiracy Theory Jesse Ventura - 9/11, Episode 2

Conspiracy Theory Jesse Ventura - 9/11 - Part 1, see also Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4. "9/11 Premiered Wed, December 9 at 10P Jesse Ventura steps into America's most controversial conspiracy by challenging the 9/11 Commission Report and searching for evidence that the September 11th attacks may have been an inside job. At the urging of victims' families, he finds witnesses who claim the towers were brought down by explosives, the missing black box flight recorders were actually recovered and ground control knew the hijackers were in the cockpits before the jets took off."

 

2009-05-06 Israel did 9/11, ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD!! This web page has a good overview of Israels' central role.
2008-06-08 Episode #045 - Ptech and the 9/11 software [MP3], The Corbett Report, "Indira Singh explains about Ptech, the company with numerous investors and managers with direct links to terrorist financing. Ptech's clients included the CIA, FBI, the White House, the Department of Energy, the Air Force, the Navy, the FAA, IBM and Enron...Yet Singh learnt they were a CIA front company and their software could gain control of the most sensitive computer systems in the country."
2006-10-28 Rockefeller Predicted "Event" To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11 Hollywood director Russo recalls remarkable "forecast" of coming attack by Paul Joseph Watson, PrisonPlanet.com

 

Web sites

assassinationscience.com web site edited by Dr. James Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth and coauthor with this author and Capt. May on many alerts coverered in Books II and III of this series.
rediscover911.com
Israel did 9/11 - ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD, The Information Underground
9-11 Was an Inside Job Perpetrated by Elements of the U.S. Government and Israeli Mossad at: bushstole04.com/index.html
PRISON PLANET.com News Archive: 9/11 Prior Knowledge and Government Complicity
Missing Links:The Definitive Truth About 9/11; movie home page

Books:

9-11 Evil by Victor Thorn. See reviews by John Kaminski, John Tiffany, and others.
9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in the USA by Webster Griffin Tarpley

Videos

 

Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9/11

 

 

Flag carried by the 3rd Maryland Regiment at the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781

© America First Books
America First Books offers many viewpoints that are not necessarily its own in order to provide additional perspectives.