Chapter 5


Profiling the
Opposing Forces Commander
and His Kosher Handlers

  In the military intelligence world, it is extremely important to create a realistic behavioral model of ones adversary as a necessary first step towards making successful predictions.
The most basic version of profiling is called “the intelligence preparation of the battle field.”  Here, the intelligence officer maintains a detailed overview of the enemy situation, friendly situation, terrain, and other essential tactical factors. 
But this is only the tip of the proverbial ice berg.  Invariably, one also requires extensive “deep background” on an enemy, to include such “soft topics” as history, culture, personality profiles, and tactical and strategic doctrines.  All these things, whether directly or indirectly, influence an enemy’s behavior. 
In the Info War during the Bush administration we faced two primary enemies. To use cattle ranch parlance: “Circle B” and “Circle Z.” We also faced a much deeper organizational enemy, such as the "Rings within Rings" strategy described by G. Edward Griffin (described later in this chapter) and more nebuluous enemies with deep ethnic, religious, cultural, and other sociological roots that have been "position-building" for centuries.  
First, at the center of “Circle Bush” is a demented, alcoholic, sadistic, draft-dodging clown masquerading as President of the United States named George W. Bush. Continually leaning over his shoulder and whispering in his ear what to think and say are two gentile confederates: Bush’s totally unscrupulous “boy genius” political advisor Karl Rove and his arguably even more diabolical Vice President Dick Cheney.   Many different news reports claim that Rove and Cheney actually ran the White House, not Bush.

 

Secondly, heavily overlapping “Circle Bush” like a Venn Diagram is the vastly more powerful and dangerous “Circle Zionist,” comprising the utterly treasonous and deceitful Zionist neo-con power elite in control of major national media, key branches of the Federal government, and fiercely loyal to Greater Israel at the expense of whatever was left of the U.S. Constitution and legitimate American national interests.  An excellent book that provides deep background on these characters is The High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper. Later in this series I cite The New Jerusalem, The New Babylon and other workds by Michael Collins Piper, that explain important deep sociological, cultural, religious, and historical background.
The moment I say this, I can almost hear a whining, sarcastic, impatient voice in the background “Here we go again, blame it all on the Jews!”
Well, no, we don’t blame everything on the Jews.  The Jewish influence is both a cause and effect.  While it is true that the Zionist power elite creates enormous mischief in its own right, an alien group like this never would have risen to the top of American society were it not for so many things that had already gone wrong on so many different social, political, cultural and religious levels involving non-Jews.  We will try to address those issues as well.
One of my biggest problems in writing this book is that both Captain May and I make many assertions that are a few leaps ahead of what most Americans are exposed to either in their federally-funded schools or controlled national media.  This creates what Psychological Operations (PSYOPS) specialists call the “incredible truth” problem (or conversely what psychologists also call “cognitive dissonance”), where people often find it hard to believe ideas that have been clouded with disinformation or lie too far beyond what they are routinely told –even when these ideas are completely true.
For example, Americans are routinely told that they have the best, mostly highly evolved political system on the planet. 
Presenting evidence that George W. Bush is a man of bad character raises all kinds of deeper questions about what has gone so terribly wrong with the American political system –and who really controls it from behind the scenes-- that a latter day Caligula or Nero can rise to the top.  In fact, in his interviews, Captain May asserts that the political situation in America has deteriorated to the point that bad character has almost become a prerequisite for high office.
I agree with him that “must be blackmailable” has almost become a de facto job description for high office, particularly when the public remains lulled into complacency by controlled national media.  However, making this point requires not one, but an entire sequence of “dissonance reduction” or “deprogramming” steps before the public will fully subscribe to our viewpoint.
To provide full explanations, not only must we provide convincing evidence regarding Bush’s bad character, but we must also explain (a) why it suits the political objectives of the power elite behind the scenes to support someone like Bush (b) how the power elite is able to corrupt an honest democratic process through such tools as vote-buying, physical threats, control of national media, and vote fraud (c) how all of this reflects well-documented historical trends and confirmed sociological patterns (d) why “counter predators” in American society are so weak that they permit all of this to happen in the first place and (e) why Bush and the shadow power elite are so evil that they consciously try to “manage” the American public with false flag events, displaying a level of callousness reminiscent of the Morlocks who control Eloi flower children in H.G. Well’s The Time Machine.
I cannot cover (a) to (e) in this chapter alone, although I will touch upon these areas through the remainder of this book.  For now we need to focus on George W. Bush.  He serves as a useful intellectual “rabbit hole” (as in what led Alice to a strange whole new world in Alice in Wonderland) that in turn leads to the other areas.
As we deal with “rabbit hole” George Bush and follow on topics, I may need to request that the reader patiently show a “willing suspension of disbelief” until we connect enough dots to prove our case in a thoroughly coherent way.
Obviously the Bush/Zionist power elite problem did not emerge over night.  In fact, this power elite has been furiously at work furthering its agenda in America ever since the beginning of the 20^th century, if not earlier.  While its power base has grown, the effective influence of the old WASP power elite has been in corresponding decline. Through their growing infiltration of national media, finance, academia, and government, the Zionists have even created disinformational roadblocks to jam out truthful interpretations of the aforementioned areas (a) to (e). 
The fact that direct talk about Zionist power may seem so incredible to most Americans actually helps to prove rather than disprove their influence, especially once one understands the real nature of this power, as we will discuss towards the end of this chapter.
Back to Bush.  We can start by analyzing the character of George W. Bush himself, and then address members of his immediate family and their ancestors. Capt May provided the following analysis in this 4 August 2003 letter to an individual named Dr. Pesikoff: 

August 4, letter to Dr. Pesikoff

Certified letter of authority

Dear Dr. Pesikoff,

Thanks for suggesting the practical business of the notes and recollections you have regarding my case.  In the event of my death, kindly release my entire file to anyone who is interested.

To give credit where it’s due, your skepticism about the president helped me take a good, long look at his personality.  I think the following observations about George W. Bush deserve note:

1.      The Bush Dynasty rests on his shoulders.

2.      He has a grudge against Saddam Hussein, who tried to assassinate his father.

3.      He thinks he’s Shakespeare’s Henry V, making up for an ill-spent youth with a bellicose reign; but he’s acting like Richard III, who ruthlessly disposed of anyone impeding his power.

4.      He thinks he’s George Washington, saving his country; but he’s acting like George III by tyrannizing it.

5.      He thought he’d be called another George Patton for charging into Iraq ; but now fears that he’ll be called another George Custer.

6.      He is, like me, a dry alcoholic who has found something to keep him focused.  With me it’s tae kwon do and writing.  With him it’s power plays and politics.

7.      He is a born-again Christian who received his power in the Millennium through his brother’s intervention.  It’s a story worthy of the Old Testament, and a powerful affirmation of his belief that he is destined to lead us against Islam, which he may identify as the religion of the Antichrist.

8.      What he calls the Global War on Terror is an attempt to enforce global security through global domination.  It is World War Three in his mind, and he’ll make us mind him in fighting it.

9.      If he causes a world war he may view it as a fulfillment of the Revelation of John in the battle of Armageddon.

Starting with these personal reflections, I have investigated his character further through his acquaintances and intimates.  I have until now kept their names private, but believe that, given the frequency of my calls and meetings with them, they are safer revealed than concealed:

Chase Untermeyer, who was the best man at my marriage to Mrs. May.  Chase worked for the Reagan and Bush White Houses and is an intimate of the Bush family.

Paul Burka, who edits Texas Monthly Magazine and believes the Bush Team is capable of murder.  In a conversation in early April, I confided to him that I believed the “collateral damage” deaths of Arab journalists covering the Battle of Baghdad were assassination.  “That sounds like Bush” was his reply.

Frank Michel and David Langworthy, both editors for the Houston Chronicle and associates for over ten years.  Both men have confided to me that then-governor Bush was a bully when it came to the media, and that his team had bullied them on occasion.

From my conversations with these men I have learned the following specific character traits about the president:

1.      He is the shortest man in his family and is self-conscious about it.

2.      He affects a Texas accent (the only man in his family to do so), and cowboy manners.

3.      He is immature and reaches decisions without much prior consideration.

4.      Once he has made up his mind he is headlong and unswerving.

5.      He takes opposition to his decisions personally, and retaliates.

I’ll continue to develop these ideas here and there.  I hope you’ll agree with me that the commander in chief has some interesting issues.  Is this the stuff of an interesting paper?

The manuscript I’ve sent you is intact, minus my road trip letters, which contain little relevant information.

Eric

Captain May’s observations in August 2003 proved prescient.  Two years later, Doug Thompson would begin his 15 Aug 2005 article “Is Bush Out of Control?” with the following:

Buy beleaguered, overworked White House aides enough drinks and they tell a sordid tale of an administration under siege, beset by bitter staff infighting and led by a man whose mood swings suggest paranoia bordering on schizophrenia.
They describe a President whose public persona masks an angry, obscenity-spouting man who berates staff, unleashes tirades against those who disagree with him and ends meetings in the Oval Office with “get out of here!”
In fact, George W. Bush’s mood swings have become so drastic that White House emails often contain “weather reports” to warn of the President’s demeanor. “Calm seas” means Bush is calm while “tornado alert” is a warning that he is pissed at the world.
Decreasing job approval ratings and increased criticism within his own party drives the President’s paranoia even higher. Bush, in a meeting with senior advisors, called Senator Majority Leader Bill Frist a “god-damned traitor” for opposing him on stem-cell research.
“There’s real concern in the West Wing that the President is losing it,” a high-level aide told me recently.
A year ago, this web site discovered the White House physician prescribed anti-depressants for Bush. The news came after revelations that the President’s wide mood swings led some administration staffers to doubt his sanity.
Although GOP loyalists dismissed the reports an anti-Bush propaganda, the reports were later confirmed by prominent George Washington University psychiatrist Dr. Justin Frank in his book Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President. Dr. Frank diagnosed the President as a “paranoid megalomaniac” and “untreated alcoholic” whose “lifelong streak of sadism, ranging from childhood pranks (using firecrackers to explode frogs) to insulting journalists, gloating over state executions and pumping his hand gleefully before the bombing of Baghdad ” showcase Bush’s instabilities.
“I was really very unsettled by him and I started watching everything he did and reading what he wrote and watching him on videotape. I felt he was disturbed,” Dr. Frank said. “He fits the profile of a former drinker whose alcoholism has been arrested but not treated.”

 

 

On the 9 Dec 2007 Jeff and Mike Show, May provided some more evidence that Bush is a text book sadist who gets titillated by evil:

Capt May: Bush when he was Governor of Texas put to death the first woman in 120 years, Karla Faye Tucker.
Jeff Lynch: I remember that, and she found Christ in prison, and she did not ask to be released. She just said "Let me live," because now she found a purpose in her life, even behind bars, and he would not grant her any mercy.
Capt May: That is the deal, not that he had to give reprieve. Not that he had to believe her. But what came out was even more damning, which was that Bush was together with his buddies chuckling and making jokes, actually mocking Tammy Faye. He was saying, "Oh, oh, oh, please don't kill me." This is what he was doing with his buddies when she was being put to death. [As reported by Paul Begala, CNN]. So, you know, if you want to call Karla Faye a mad dog, and if you look at her crimes, it is not hard to make that argument. Man, I am not saying you cannot shoot a mad dog, and I am not saying that I could not shoot a mad dog, but if you sit there and laugh and have a good time shooting a mad dog, then you are a mad dog.
Mike Howard: Well, you are no better than the person who got --to a certain extent you are no better than the person you are condemning to death.
Capt May: That is the point. It is very interesting you would say that, because what Karla Faye said --she was a crack 'ho [whore]. And she evidently had a grudge against ex-boyfriends, drugs were involved --she and one of her homies went and murdered these people brutally.
Jeff. Yes.
Capt May: Using a pick axe.
Jeff: Using a pick axe, right in the head.
Capt May: And what she said was "Every time I hit him with a pick axe, I had an orgasm."
Jeff: Yes, that is pretty sick.
Capt May: However, when I say Bush gets off on evil, that is what I mean. I mean I think it is woven into his level all the way to the sexual level. In fact, if you know anything about the Skull and Bones --
Mike: You know that somewhere in the Oval Office he has whips and chains, leather hiding somewhere. I would not be surprised if some homo-erotic--
Capt May: Skull and Bones has homo-erotic initiation rituals.
Jeff: Yes!
Mike: Whipping him, maybe?
Capt May: One of the things that doesn't get talked up is that they all talk about their most erotic, youthful memories while the others sit around and self-stimulate.
Jeff: Yes, pretty sick.
Capt May: …Until the conclusion of that act. Now that is reprogramming your wires pretty deep down, buddy.
Mike: (laughter). In fact, I don't think I am going to sleep well tonight after that.

Bush ignored a plea to spare the life of Karla Faye Tucker by both the Pope and World Council of Churches.  Wayne Madsen provided further insight into the vicious side of Bush’s personality in “Bush’s `Christian’ Blood Cult: Concerns Raised by Vatican : ”

Bush's blood lust has been extended across the globe. He has given the CIA authority to assassinate those deemed a threat to U.S. national interests. Bush has virtually suspended Executive Orders 11905 (Gerald Ford), 12306 (Jimmy Carter), and 12333 (Ronald Reagan) which prohibit the assassination of foreign leaders. Bush's determination to kill Saddam Hussein, his family, and his top leaders with precision-guided missiles and tactical nuclear weapon-like Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) bombs is yet another indication of Bush's disregard for his Republican and Democratic predecessors. It now appears that in his zeal to kill Hussein, innocent civilian patrons of a Baghdad restaurant were killed by one of Bush's precision Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs). Like it or not, Saddam Hussein was recognized by over 100 nations as the leader of Iraq -- a member state of the United Nations. Hussein, like North Korea' Kim Jong Il, Syria's Bashir Assad, and Iran's Mohammed Khatami, are covered by Executive Order 12333, which the Bush mouthpieces claim is still in effect. Bush's "Christian" blood cult sees no other option than death for those who become his enemies. This doctrine is found no place in Christian theology.

 

 

Regarding evidence that Bush is a sexual pervert, James Guckert, aka Jeff Gannon, a $200/hour gay male prostitute, was able to get near George W. Bush nearly every day for 2 years.
Something perverse seems to also involve other members of his family. Consider for example the allegations connected to the  Franklin Cover-up Scandal where call-boys were taken on a midnight tour of the White House during the administration of George W. Bush’s father, George H. W. Bush
Speaking of the Bush family, in “American Caligula” May 28, 2004 thepeoplesvoice.org, author Raymond Ponzini observed:   

Lt. Cmdr. Al Martin, US Navy, (Ret) said, "You have to look at the entire Bush Family in this context - as if the family ran a corporation called “Frauds-R-Us,” George Jr.’s specialty was insurance and security fraud, Jeb’s specialty was oil and gas fraud, Neil’s specialty was real estate fraud, Prescott’s specialty was banking fraud, and George Sr.’s specialty? All of the above." Christopher Hitchens, Washington Editor for Harpers and columnist for The Nation said, “George Bush, he’s bad on drugs, he’s sick mentally and physically, if he was a dog he’d be shot. He’s a scumbag. That’s why he won’t be re-elected. He’s not morally, physically or mentally fit to be President.”

According to the online article "The Order of the Skull and Bones: Everything you always wanted to know, but were afraid to ask," the father George H. W. Bush, once ran a fake "War on Drugs:"

Before the Vietnam "War", the Golden Triangle was run by French Intelligence and Corsican mobsters. After the French bailed out and America moved in, the triangle was run by U.S. intelligence, with aid from Sicilian mobsters. This narcotics network is well documented in The Politics of Heroin in S. E. Asia by Alfred McCoy, The Great Heroin Coup by Henrik Kruger and Double-Cross by Sam and Chuck Giancana.
Vice-President George Bush, as Chairman of President Reagan's cabinet-level working group and as Director of the National Narcotics Interdiction System, was the highest U. S. governmental official involved in the "war on drugs".
Frances Mullen, Jr., former head of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), called Bush's efforts "an intellectual fraud" and "a liability rather than an asset". Soon after these statements, Mullen resigned and the resultant General Accounting Office (GAO) report was buried.
In July, 1985, the suppressed GAO paper reported that there were "no benefits from the National Narcotics Border Interdiction System, directed by George Bush. In fact, the overall effect was to encourage supply...."
Monika Jensen-Stevenson, a 60 Minutes producer, quit her job after the CBS news program refused to air the story she had uncovered relating to the covert drug trade. Her book, Kiss The Boys Goodbye, details how our intelligence community used the apparatus of the POW/MIA governmental agencies as a cover for the trafficking of opiates from the Golden Triangle.

This is an important precedent, given that this work shows how the son ran a fake war on terror, in which federal agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security and FBI do more to set up "Al Qaeda" terror acts than defend America against them. The drug theme also persists, given that Afghanistan went from having very little opium production under the Taliban to becoming a major world producer after George Bush's invasion in 2001. Last, but not least, the aforementioned quote that talks about only "French Intelligence and Corsican mobsters" being in control of the Golden Triangle is inaccurate. Many sources, such as Final Judgment, explain how both French Intelligence and the Corsican mafia were heavily infiltrated and influenced by the Mossad. Other sources identify Mossad as being the key player alongside the CIA, which it largely controls, in both the Golden Triangle and more recently during the George W. Bush administration in Afghanistan.
Having now established that George W. Bush has both serious personal problems and sordid family roots,  the next big question is how all of this impacted on his performance as President of the United States .
For starters, America is supposed to have a republican government that is specifically designed to prevent dictatorship –something that Bush has openly courted in both word and deed.  
This point is worth emphasizing.  For example, the book The End of Kings: A History of Republicans and Republicans by William Everdell explains the historical pattern where republican governments have usually always been instituted first and foremost as an attempt to solve the problem of tyranny, rather than as a tool to achieve any universal suffrage or wealth redistribution goals of “social democracy.”  These leftist things usually come later in the historical life cycles of republics. 
A tyrant can become a terrible parasite on a society, literally destroying it from within through such means as fomenting ill-advised wars, raising ruinous levels of taxation, and conducting murderous purges of honest and productive people. 
A republican government, which I interpret as nothing more than an effort to institute rational elements of the scientific method to government, is supposed to achieve enough transparency, accountability, and group input to prevent irrational and irresponsible excesses by any single individual.
As the famous libertarian historian Lord Acton observed, “Power corrupts, and power corrupts absolutely.”  Any one entrusted with sole power, by whatever name he is called,  be it “dictator,” “king,” “unitary executive,” “emperor,” “monarch,” “commissar,” or whatever, is at high risk of abusing it and ultimately turning into a tyrant. 
People with a dictatorial mentality become particularly dangerous when they feel that their power base is threatened and feel justified to try to preserve it at all costs, to include though the use of murderous covert operations.  In Russian history alone, Ivan the Terrible, Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin are good examples.
This is all pretty basic stuff that most Americans –the “counter predators” in our society-- should have been taught in High School civics classes if they have not been able to figure it out for themselves.  
Unfortunately, most Americans do not seem to be either adequately taught or self-informed in this area.  According to “Americans Test Low in Civic Literacy” by Michael Caprio.  1,700 out of 2,500 randomly selected Americans flunked the ISI civics test. According to other news reports about this same test, even seniors at elite universities such as Harvard did poorly.
Now back to “predator” George W. Bush.  He openly flirted with dictatorship in his rhetoric on many occasions with surprisingly little reaction from a dumbed-down public –or controlled national media.  Worse yet, this menacing language was backed by highly constrictive legislation, the use of torture, a greatly enhanced the surveillance state, and war criminal aggression abroad. 
Bush frequently flipped off subordinates and once screamed "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it’s just a goddamned piece of paper!” He also stated, “I’m the President and I’ll do whatever I goddamned please..."
At wikiquote for Bush online one can find the following:  

1998

·         “You don't get everything you want. A dictatorship would be a lot easier. “

o        Responding to the difficulties of governing Texas , "The Taming of Texas," Governing Magazine (July 1998); also cited in Is our Children Learning?: The Case Against George W. Bush (2000) by Paul Begala.)

2000

·         “I told all four [congressional leaders] that I felt like this election happened for a reason; that it pointed out — the delay in the outcome should make it clear to all of us — that we can come together to heal whatever wounds may exist, whatever residuals there may be. And I really look forward to the opportunity. I hope they've got my sense of optimism about the possible, and enthusiasm about the job. I told all four that there are going to be some times where we don't agree with each other, but that's okay. If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier... [Bush laughs out loud, audience laughs out loud] ...just so long as I'm the dictator [more laughter].”

o        Online NewsHour interview, Washington , DC , (December 18, 2000)' during his first trip to Washington as President-elect. The last sentence is also included in Fahrenheit 9/11

2001

·         “Dealing with Congress is a matter of give and take. The president doesn't get everything he wants, the Congress doesn't get everything they want. But we're finding good common ground. A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it.”

o        Statement, Washington , DC , (July 26, 2001); as quoted in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer (July 27, 2001).

2004

·         “It's not a dictatorship in Washington , but I tried to make it one in that instance.”

o        Describing his executive order making faith-based groups eligible for federal subsidies, New Orleans , Louisiana , January 15, 2004

In his 9 Dec 2007 Jeff and Mike show interview, Capt. May commented:

Capt May: ….King George Bush, who calls himself, by the way, the "unitary executive." Which is --you have heard of the theory of the unitary executive --the neo-con theory.
Jeff: Yes.
Capt May: Unitary executive is just in Latin what in Greek would be "monarch."
Mike: Uh-huh.
Capt May: Unitary is just "sole ruler." Sole commander. So the Bush --let's say the post-911 theory of U.S. government has become dictatorial.
Mike: Exactly.
Capt May: By its own definition. By its own terms.
Jeff: As he says, [feigning a mock Texas accent] "I'm the decider [guy]." (laughter)
Capt May: That is probably as close to dictatorship as it could come in speech. Actually, that is false. Because we all remember the expression from December 2000 one month before assuming office when Bush once told Congress during his visit there, "Dictatorship would be a hell of a lot easier as long as I could be the dictator."
Jeff: Yes, that is not a joking matter for a President to say.
Capt May: Well you know there are these categories of information, and as an Internet writer. You know I write for the Lone Star Iconoclast. I live off of them, they are my stock and trade. They are the little repeated, but often important phrases like the decider comment. Or when Bush said dictatorship would be better. Bush said that in 1999 when he was still Texas governor. So these kinds of statements give a great amount of information to the public, but the public never hears them.
Jeff: No.
Capt May: Because they are sanitized out by the media.
Mike: Of course.
Capt May: The mainstream media is not there to inform--
Jeff: No
Capt May: --But to misinform and disinform.
Jeff: Yes
Mike: It is the language version of money laundering.

 

In his Cracking Satan’s Code interview, Capt. May explained the relationship of Bush to Zionist neo-cons, and how their behavior reflects longstanding war plans for Greater Israel:

Capt May: Well, remember this war [in Iraq ] started with "Shock and Awe." "Shock and Awe" was the propaganda phrase we used to describe how we were going to scare the Moslems into peeing their pants and giving up, remember?
Hughes: Yes.
Capt May: There is nothing more shocking and awful than nukes. And I am not saying anything about what they want to do that they didn't say in a document they issued in 2000: The Project for a New American Century, which you know was made up of the neo-cons. And the neo-cons are nothing but a cute phrase used to describe the Jewish hardliners who are part of daddy Bush's, George Herbert Walker Bush's cabinet in the Iraq war. The ones who want to go all the way through and fight everybody.
Karen AnnHughes: And I want to point out something right here. Those particular people, that you just mentioned, during Hitler's regime, were very instrumental in killing Jews throughout Europe . And they are without mercy. They will do it again. [Editor’s Note: Ms. Hughes is probably referring to the Transfer Agreement negotiated in 1933 between Zionists and Nazis.  These Zionist leaders—similar to neo-cons today—cold-bloodedly selected Zionist zealots to emigrate from Germany to Israel , whereas less enthusiastic Jews were left behind to a highly uncertain fate].
Capt May: Yes, this particular group when we talk about the Jews, we need to understand that there are three basic categories that I think of. One is what I call the self-hating Jews. And that means the Jews who really are going to say everything that I am about to say, but the other Jews say that they hate themselves. That they are lying about the Jews. They represent about 10% of the Jews. Then there is probably, oh, 60-70% of the Jews who are kind of the way towards Zionists that the Irish people are towards the IRA. They are not in on it, but they are not going to mess with it, and in their heart of hearts they are kind of for it. And then there is the hard edge, the 25% that is Zionist. And those are the criminal conspiracy.
Hughes: Right.
Capt May: And they are cabalistic. They use the Jewish technique of the Cabala. Something that they learned when they were in the Babylonian Exile, by the way, from the Babylonians which involved encrypting, encoding, numerology. It is a mystic and occult science or art. Very much parallel to Illuminatism, Free Masonry, and whatnot.
Hughes: Exactly.
Capt May: We are talking about all these codes and numbers, and everything we are talking about comes straight out of these two gangs. The Cabalistic Zionists, and the Illuminatist power elite, which calls itself Christian, but is really anti-Christian. So the Zionist Jews who are part of George Herbert Walker Bush's cabinet, and who wanted to go into a big war in the Middle East in 1991 and 1992, were the ones who gathered around Bush, gathered up all the media, finance, political influence of worldwide Zionism and brought George W. Bush to the Presidency. In 2000, they had published a document. This being one year before 9-11. In September 2000 they had published a document called The Project for a New American Century: Restructuring America's Defenses. By the way, "Restructuring America's Defenses" was also a code. "Restructuring America 's Defenses" or "R.A.D." It was intended to be a RADical restructuring of America 's defenses. Just a little joke they put on the front page of it. In that book they said the correct move in the world today was to take over the Middle East to get the oil and take care of Israel's territorial enemies and that it would be a great thing to do but in order to do it we would have to have a new Pearl Harbor. That is where you have heard the phrase "A New Pearl Harbor."
Hughes: Yes.
Capt May: The new Pearl Harbor was called for by the people who brought Bush to power one year before 9-11 and six months before Bush took the oath of office. When Bush came to office, the war plan was already agreed upon, and it was A Project for a New American Century: Restructuring America's Defenses. It was only about an eighty page long document. That document calls for everything within the power of modern weaponry and science to be brought to bear to fight this Third World War, which was predicated upon having what is called in Latin a causus belli, a reason for war. A new Pearl Harbor . They executed the new Pearl Harbor on 9-11 and everything they promised to do in a Project for a New American Century: Restructuring America's Defenses document, they are going to do. The same way that people after World War II said, "My God, how could we have been so stupid, Hitler said everything he was going to do in Mein Kampf." Well, the neo-cons, the people who brought in the Bush boys, said everything they were going to do in a Project for a New American Century. It is just that the media hasn't covered it. In that document they say, "We're going to go nuclear." They say, "We're going to have cyber warfare." They say --now this is how chilling and cold-hearted these rascals are-- "That we should fully explore the options of biological warfare, especially since biological warfare can target genotypes."
Hughes: Oh yes, they have got that down pat now.
Capt May: They are going to exterminate the Arabs.
Hughes: Yes.
Capt May: Look, everything they say was done to them in World War II is what they are going to do. That is the oldest hustle of all hustles. You know, if you tell somebody, "You are a murderer" and somebody tried to kill you, that is the best way to get them to drop their guard so that you can stab them in the back, isn't it?
Hughes: Oh gee. Oh my gosh.

Significantly, just as George W. Bush has openly talked about dictatorship, his Zionist neo-con handlers have openly espoused a totalitarian philosophy known as “Straussianism.”   Capt May addressed this in his interview with Dr. Kevin Barrett:

Capt May: You know Dr. Barrett, this whole discipline that we are talking about, this whole cryptanalysis is the actual word, from the Greek "crypto" meaning "secret" and "analysis" meaning "to discover" and "to investigate." This discovery or investigation into hidden things, hidden numbers, this "cryptanalysis," in Ghost Troop we commonly refer to it as the embedded code. Because the code is embedded all over the place. It is particularly in newspaper articles, in day groups, you will find it all over. And that is, by the way, one of the Straussian, neo-con idiosyncrasies is that they love to be like a bunch of bullies. They love to know that there is a joke at your expense but you don't know it.
Dr. Barrett: Well that is right. That actually is a very important part of the Straussian philosophy about a secret elite that knows what the general public doesn't know.
Capt May: They get it.
Dr. Barrett. That is right. That is very basic --they go back to Plato and the stories of Socrates, and they claim that actually there was this hidden wisdom that Plato and Socrates taught to their most gifted, or shall we say their most psychopathic students, and those students were taught that in fact that the ordinary teaching that all of us get from reading Plato and Socrates is false.
Capt May: The hoi polloi. The many.
Dr. Barrett: Right, that is just for the masses. And the true teachings is that there is no such thing as good in the world, there is no God, there is no transcendent, and only the really hard, hard core people like themselves, the arch-Machiavellian neo-con types are strong enough to face the unpleasant reality. And thus those people have not only the right, but the duty to assume complete power over everybody else, and to rule through lies, murder, -- whatever it takes. Because there is no rule [of law].
Capt May: Well if you have known Straussians, you will know that they will even talk about Machiavelli's twenty four books. And the first twelve books --they will break them down into numeric codes themselves. Part of the reason for that is that Leo Strauss himself, the father of the Straussian movement, was a Hungarian Jew and a Kabbalistic student. Strauss brought those principles of Kabbalah to political philosophy.
Dr. Barrett: That seems like a bad parody of mysticism. Numerology and mysticism, there is a long and fairly honorable tradition among this sort of thing among people who are trying to get close to God, but here it seems like they are trying to go in the other direction.
Capt May: Well, he writes his classic philosophy and the, what --"Philosophy and Political Persecution," no --Persecution and the Art of Writing, in which he says basically you have to lay it between the lines or the many will gang up and kill you. You can't really tell them the truth. So the whole secrecy motif is inherent even in the proto-neo-cons. The Straussians are all behind it. And let us talk about some of the numerics that --when I said that this would be embedded code, the reason I told you it was kind of a Straussian joke, it was the same way that, remember I said earlier that they had been telling us it is a global war since day one. So that one day we will not be able to bitch when they say, "By the way, global war meant World War, dummy, didn't you know that?"
Dr. Barrett: Well a lot of them are actually calling it World War III, and some are calling it World War IV.
Capt May: Yes, and in the same way this is the embedded code that we are talking about, but with the advent of the Iraq War, what did they tell you the media was going to be? Embedded media.
Dr. Barrett: Right.
Capt May: In other words the media was not only going to be embedded in the military, it was also going to be compromised. You know, there is a lot of eroticism and cruelty --you are going to embed media, that means media is in bed with government, so there was that part of it, and there is the idea that media is embedded with code…

The Straussian mindset has been an important factor in the ruthless way America has conducted its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan .  This includes the use of “Shock and Awe.”  The Arab Mind by Raphael Patai, is another example of a work by a neo-con that tries to provide justification for this ruthlessness.  Patai, incidentally, is a Hungarian-Israeli-American academic.
According to Pankay Mishra in his review “In search of monsters to destroy” (Guardian.co.uk 4 Oct 2008);

…The Arab Mind, originally published in 1973, was the bible of neocon commentators in Washington and New York cheerleading the Bush administration's audacious venture: what Condoleezza Rice in the new book by Bob Woodward, The War Within: A Secret White House History 2006-2008 (Simon & Schuster), describes as shifting the "epicentre of American power" from Europe, where it had rested since the second world war, to the Middle East. Widely read in the US military, The Arab Mind later inspired the modus operandi of the jailers of Abu Ghraib.
More surprisingly, respectable intellectuals, journalists and academics echoed its generalisations. Among these people was the historian Bernard Lewis, who assured Dick Cheney, one of his most devoted readers, that "in that part of the world, nothing matters more than resolute will and force". The New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman …exhorted the US to act "just a little bit crazy", since "the more frightened our enemies are today, the fewer we will have to fight tomorrow". Accordingly, Richard Armitage, assistant secretary of state and a relative moderate among the Bush administration's hawks, told Pakistani diplomats that the US would bomb their country "back to the stone age" if it did not withdraw its support for the Taliban.
…Could smashing up Iran or invading Pakistan become the face-saving formula for the exponents of "shock and awe"? Certainly, they see US force impressing the Persian and the Pakistani mind as it apparently has the Arab mind. And such is the crazy logic of a wounded militarism that, notwithstanding its battered economy, the US may soon be embattled on many more fronts in what is already its most damaging war.

So far in this chapter we have talked about George W. Bush as a demented psychopath, and how his Zionist neo-con handlers seem to have similar mental characteristics.  They are also bent towards secret society maneuverings and totalitarianism.  Notice also how the word “criminal” keeps popping up in these interviews as well.
Let’s pause for a moment and review some key words such as “psychopathic,” “secret societies,” “totalitarianism,” “criminality,” and “Zionist neo-cons.”
Certainly a next logical question is whether or not all these things relate to each other?    Furthermore, how do these horrible things rise to the top in our society?
At my web site www.americafirstbooks.com I wrestle with the issues in some detail by exploring scientific dualities in my article series “Reconciling Opposing Economic and Political Ideologies.” This can be accessed from “Resolving Ideologies” option on the home page tool bar.
As one example, we can try to approach this question by looking at the “centralized vs. decentralized” debate in management science.  This is essentially a libertarian mode of analysis.
Without question, the major trend in American history has been from a relatively decentralized society to one reflecting a high degree of imperial centralization.  As an example, Dr. Murray Rothbard observes in Conceived in Liberty that in the late colonial period, most Americans had almost no government by European standards.  Everything was handled on a local level.  Up until the War Between the States, total government remained below about 5% -10% of GDP. 
Once local power is shattered, power tends to gravitate towards the center.  This is certainly what began to happen after states’ rights were shattered by the Federal victory.  Today, total government in American consumes about 50% of GDP and reaches into all areas of Americans’ lives.  
If one accepts the premise by libertarian authors such as Harry Browne, author of the classic Why Government Doesn’t Work, that government is inherently bureaucratic, and is usually inferior when it comes to producing useful things compared to the private sector, it becomes easy to see how once government grows beyond a certain size, it tends to become more of a parasite than a producer.  Beyond a certain point, increasing centralization tends to create a fertile environment where intriguers tend to thrive at the expense of honest producers.  
We can also try to approach this question utilizing the environmental vs. genetics debate in psychology.  
On the genetic side of the equation, we can look at how the white population was overwhelmingly White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) in the early 1800’s. WASPs are mostly a Nordic or Nordic-Celtic people from Northern Europe with strong traditions of rugged individualism, a relatively large middle class of armed and self-sufficient free farmers (and fishermen and craftsmen), and various forms of parliamentary government going back to pre-historic times.  They take pride in their craftsmanship and ability to produce real and useful things.   They traditionally have a strong year-round work ethic and tend to be more far-sighted and self-disciplined in their operations than other groups.   Their innate temperamental traits have been sculptured by a long evolutionary history in a frost zone environment, with strong themes of technological adaptation and man vs. nature conflict.  They also put considerable emphasis on open, honorable, and chivalrous behavior.
Flash forward to mid 20^th century America, and we see WASP’s largely displaced in high finance and national media by Jews, who have very different cultural, social, and innate temperamental characteristics.  Among other things, Jews are much more adapted to the Asiatic-despotic social model, where the leaders typically utilize covert gangster tactics and trickery to rise to the top of a pyramidal social structure.  Jews are predisposed towards achieving quick gain through intrigue, financial speculation, and transactional businesses as opposed to going through the more laborious route of engineering and manufacturing real and useful things.  They tend to be more collectivistic than individualistic, as witnessed by their historic enthusiasm for “Kibbutz”-style communes and other communist experiments. 
I call this the "gorilla-gangster" social model. It is a common practice in nature for the strongest gorilla to grab everything for himself, to include monopolizing female gorillas into harems, while driving less advantaged males to the periphery. Although less likely to pass on their genes, the weaker males still serve a collective tribal purpose of acting as sentries against predators and adding numbers or "throw weight" to the herd.
The human analog of the "gorilla-gangster" social model is called "Oligarchical Collectivism." Having evolved in pyramidal, Asiatic societies such as ancient Babylon, or as professional minorities who run authoritarian organized crime systems, Jews have imprinted in their DNA a tropism towards creating pyramidal power structures, there they stand at the top as the ruthless overlords, with race-mixed masses at their feet. They tried to reform Russian society in this fashion during the Bolshevik Revolution, and this is the trend promoted by the Zionist oligarchy on America today:

The Jewish Oligarchical Collectivist-Asiatic Despotic Social Model taken from George Orwell's 1984

In their ruthless scrambles to become top gorillas, Jews tend to be very opportunistic, manipulative, and chameleon-like.  They will opportunistically support any –I repeat ANY-- political, economic, or religious ideology --be it capitalism, communism, pro-gun ownership, anti-gun ownership, anarcho-libertarianism, fascism, neo-conservatism, New Age Hippie Counterculture, Christian Zionism, Straussianism, environmentalism, or Trotskyitism –if it serves their immediate tactical advantage.   In fact, Jewish organizations typically help fund and infiltrate both sides of political controversies so that no matter who wins, they can establish some control and influence.  Jews tend to deal in ideologies no differently from the way Jewish rag peddlers and pawn shop owners like to swap around rags and junk.
It is an interesting paradox that the most effective Zionists leaders like David Ben Gurion and Golda Meier have tended to be atheists.  For these Jews, political ideologies and religious theologies are simply mental play toys to be used on other peoples to accomplish tactical objectives rather than something to really believe in oneself.
This reminds me of the joke I once heard when I lived in New York City for ten years and was surrounded by Jews.  Here it is: Whenever you get two Jews together, you get three opinions. 
Having been through business school and received military intelligence operations training, I am amazed at how the average Jew on the street, with no formal education at all in any of these areas, nevertheless tends to have amazing intuitive feel for all these things.  More than any other ethnic culture, Jewish society is heavily geared towards business and intrigue.  They are almost like a CIA in search of a country, which helps to explain why the Mossad is the most admired organization in Israel .
Another thing really struck me about the Jews is that they are the ultimate “city slickers” of mankind.  Throughout all recorded history, they have always been a more highly urbanized people than most other groups.  They have always particularly thrived in decadent multi-racial, multi-cultural cosmopolitan settings.  Contrary to the pastoral image created in the Bible, the real center of gravity of ancient Jews was Babylonia for over 1,500 years. In fact, this has been such a major part of their past that one suspects that it has become reverse imprinted in their DNA through a Darwinian process.  Whenever Jews rise in power, they tend to instinctively recreate the social environment around them in ways that fit their unique characteristics, which means recreating “Babylonia,” multiculturalism, and multiracialism whether it is good for the host population or not.
In fact, speaking of DNA, in Jewish Supremacism by Dr. David Duke, he cites genetic studies that claim that Jews as a group are twice as genetically distant from the average white person as any white ethnic group is from any other white group (for example twice the ethnic-genetic distance compared to the distance between Irish and Russians or between Scots and Greeks).
In order to better fasten themselves on to the American host population, Jews have had as collaborators in big cities many millions of Catholics and peoples from authoritarian, peasant societies of southern and eastern Europe who came in waves of immigration following the mid-18^th century.  These collaborators often envy and resent many of the aloof personality characteristics and attitudes of superiority of WASPs.  (WASPs tend to be emotionally distant and highly judgmental with each other, so nothing personal). 
Jews have also had as collaborators tens of millions of intellectually-challenged Christian Zionist Protestants suffering from the delusion that Jews are some kind of specially favored people of God exempt from criticism --rather than a race of utterly manipulative, psychopathic, deceitful, and shameless predators who resort to anything –to include telling lies about God – if it creates for them a tactical advantage.
All of these things have had a huge impact on the character of America ’s political and economic institutions –mostly for the worse.
Lastly, we can apply the mutualism vs. parasitism paradigm one finds in the field of sociobiology, where “parasitism” is roughly comparable to the term “criminal.”
Parasitism can be a very successful evolutionary strategy in certain tropical biomes, where as many as 50% of the animals species are parasites on the other species. 
Regarding humans, parasitism became an increasingly rewarding way of life in 20^th century America as the country became a more urbanized, multi-racial, and multi-cultural.  Whereas Americans in the early 1800’s typically retained strong Old World ethnic and cultural ties (for example the descendants of Puritans often retained ties to eastern England and the descendants of Scots-Irish could remember their clan origins in Scotland), the “melting pot” produced increasingly fragmented and disoriented whites who became increasingly inept, disunited, and powerless in regard to keeping a highly tribalistic, goal-oriented, and crafty people like the Jews in check.
Furthermore, whereas in most states of early America only literate land-owning white males could vote, following the War Against Southern Independence, the average ability of voters to comprehend the unique danger posed by the Zionist cabal began to deteriorate with the new mania for universal suffrage. For example, both women and former Negro slaves became enfranchised in the late 19^th century.  According to political science studies, women as a group vote about one standard deviation to the ideological left of men.  In accordance with the Right Wing 101 principle that groups tend to reorient the environment around them to suit their unique characteristics, when women as a group grow in political power, government tends to become “wetter,” more nanny-like, and more expensive (higher taxes are required to fund bleeding heart socialistic programs).   In regard to full-blooded blacks, most “culture fair” IQ tests show them about one standard deviation below whites.  This is not a particularly auspicious start in dealing with a very clever, subtle, and duplicitous people like the Zionists.
As usual, as “counter predators” within the electorate weaken, predators at the top multiply and grow more dangerous.
In my discussion of parasitism in my “mutualism vs. parasitism” article at my web site, I tie together the aforementioned terms such as “psychopaths,” “secret societies,” “totalitarianism,” “criminality,” and “Zionist neo-cons.”  Please see my extended discussion of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology on my web site. Among other things, I provide  evidence that Jews have a much higher rate of genetically-based psychopathy and homosexuality within their gene pool compared to whites, and explain why this might offer a survival advantage given their peculiar evolutionary strategy.
The following is an extract where I focus on the topic of Jewish criminality:

Jewish-dominated Hollywood falsely portrays Italian-Americans as criminal ringleaders in America , when in fact the real brains have always been Jewish. The same is true in Europe , where for centuries most of the underworld slang has come from Yiddish.
Michael Collin's Piper's Final Judgment gives an excellent overview of the Meyer Lansky operation in America , which dominated American organized crime for decades and played a key role in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Lansky's crime syndicate was closely tied to the Mossad, which dominates the global drug trade along with its partner the CIA. The book Supermob: How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America's Hidden Powerbrokers by Gus Russo, also describes Jewish domination of major organized crime tentacles that reach throughout America. An excellent companion work is The Money and the Power: The Making of Las Vegas and Its Hold on America by Sally Denton and Roger Morris. This book explains how the Jewish gangsters who founded Vegas were linked to Jewish mobsters in other American cities, and how they were able to spread their power tentacles across America at the highest levels. Denton and Morris also note how Jewish gangsters have played a key role in the history of Israel .
Jews have always dominated the vice industries in America , to include liquor, gambling, and pornography. See the Jewish Crime, Jewish Mob page at Jewwatch.com, the judicial-inc.biz web pages on Jewish ultra high level crime, espionage, and targeted executions, and also Jewish Supremacism by Dr. David Duke and The International Jew by Henry Ford for more details.
Interestingly enough, according to Dr. Kevin McDonald in his review of the book Henry Ford and the Jews, "As TIJ [The International Jew] notes, the Kehillah [central Jewish community leadership] was organized in response to the comment by General Bingham, the chief of police of New York City, that Jews were responsible for 50% of the crime in the city."
Jews also have a long track record of dominating high level organized crime around the world. It is no accident that most of the underworld slang in major European countries in the 19th century came from Yiddish. In that same century, the Jewish Sassoon family ran the opium trade in China, founded Hong Kong , and used the British army to subjugate the entire country under the heel of their mega-criminal enterprise. The Sassoons became one of the richest crime families in the world, and scion Edward Albert Sassoon intermarried with the British branch of the Rothschild family and was knighted.
Since ancient times, Jews have had a long history as slave dealers. In early America , Jews dominated the Negro slave trade. Today, Jews dominate the global white slave trade. Israel has been a central hub for the exploitation and resale of Slavic women since the fall of the Soviet Empire. In July 2001 "a US State Department report placed Israel in the third section of its `black list' on countries whose laws don't meet US criteria for dealing with this crime and threatened economic sanctions." In Israel , white sex slaves are only allowed to keep three percent of their earnings.
Jews are also leaders in major white collar crime in America . As an example, see "Enron, Fastow, and the Looting of America" by Dr. William Pierce. Major Wall Street swindles have been led by Jews such as Ivan Boesky and Mike Milken, whose involvement in the S&L debacle cost the U.S. taxpayer hundreds of billions of dollars.
Jews have produced a disproportionate number of spies and subversives in America , such as Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, nine of the Hollywood Ten (six of the ten were dues-paying members of the Communist Party), Jonathan Pollard, and the neo-con instigators behind the Larry Franklin-AIPAC spy scandal. Even the Jewish ADL, a self-styled human rights and Jewish defense organization, got its fingers caught in the espionage cookie jar with the Roy Bullock bust in San Francisco . Please note the Israeli spy chronology listed at whatreallyhappen.com.
In American and Europe throughout the 1930's, Jews typically made up over 50% of the membership of communist party organizations, although they typically made up miniscule portions of the overall population well below ten times this percentage. Jews played a key role in financing the Bolshevik revolution, and a key role in conducting the slaughter of tens of millions of non-communists. These alleged Jewish atheists systematically looted and destroyed Christian churches and slaughtered Russian priests while leaving all synagogues unscathed.
Jews have been major perpetrators of war crimes and terror atrocities in the Middle East . As some examples, they were involved in the bombing of the King David Hotel that killed 92 people in 1946, the assassination of the Swedish U.N. mediator Count Folke Bernadotte, the massacre at Deir Yassein, the Lavon Affair, the machine-gunning of disarmed Egyptian POWs in Sinai, the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty (21 Americans dead, 92 maimed), passive-aggressive allowance of the bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut in Oct 1983 (according to Victor Ostrovsky the Mossad knew all about the suicide mission, but deliberately failed to warn the Marines, who lost 245 men), the Sabra-Shatilla massacre in Lebanon, the Jewish neo-con led wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq that have dumped hundreds of tons of aerosolized depleted uranium in the Middle East (cf. High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper), and the July-August 2006 war of naked aggression against the civilian population of Lebanon.
In August 2005, the World Bank reported that Israel is one of the most corrupt countries in the West. Business Data Israel (BDI) commented: "" Israel is considered one of the riskiest places in the Western world, with an unstable, inefficient regime, low accountability, a relatively high rate of state corruption and poor law enforcement." In addition, according to a 2006 BBC survey, 43% of the Israeli public feels that some form of torture should be permissible, the highest percentage of twenty five leading countries polled across the world. Last but not least, Uri Avery observes in his article "Lovable Man?" that the gap between rich and poor in Israel is one of the widest in the industrialized world (contrary to northern European societies that have traditionally had the largest middle classes relative to their overall populations).
Let us pause for a moment and ask if this is what we would expect from a nation supposedly serving a divine mission from God to be a light unto the world?

Let me close by at least covering some Jewish strengths: 
First, as a group, they tend to be instinctively better at schmoozing and “handling” people than starchy Nordic types.  Schmoozing, after all, is a Yiddish word. 
Ralph Townsend in his 1933 book Ways that Are Dark makes a fascinating sociological point when he implies that Jews are to Nordics as the Chinese are to the Japanese.  It really resonates with my personal experiences dealing with both Nordics and Jews in New York City .
According to Townsend, when Americans initially come in contact with both Chinese and Japanese communities, they invariably like the Chinese much more because the Chinese come across as much more affable, whereas the Japanese tend to be much more reserved.  However, after getting to know both groups for several years, Townsend observed an amazing reversal where Americans invariably prefer the Japanese.  This is because while the Chinese are famous for being friendly on a very superficial level, and for telling people what they want to hear, they also have a bad track record for later betraying them.  In contrast, the Japanese, while harder to get to know, are more likely once they become friends to remain faithful friends for life.
Not surprisingly, the Chinese are often referred to as “The Jews of the East.” Also, Townsend observed that there is such a huge distance between Chinese and Japanese that back in the 1930’s the conventional wisdom in the San Francisco prison system was that if a Chinese person and Japanese individual were put in the same prison cell in the evening, one of them would likely be dead the following morning.
Another thing I grant the Jews.  They make truly funny stand up comics.  Some, like Rodney Dangerfield, don’t get no respect for their considerable talents in this area.  Others, like Jerry Lewis, go a long ways towards disarming suspicions that we are dealing with bona fide members of some kind of Chosen Master Race of God.

Jerry Lewis as the Nutty Professor

That having been said, I would also note that the mischief these wise guys pull off in this world would be absolutely hilarious if there weren’t so many people getting ruined and killed.   Some times I almost wonder if characters like Bizarro in the Superman comics or the Joker in Batman comics are a case of art imitating Jews, or whether in fact it works the other way around.
Once I became convinced that 9/11 was very likely a Mossad-CIA inside job, and that the Israelis are prepared to drag America into World War III and get us all killed if it might serve them an immediate tactical advantage, I stopped laughing with these people, and instead started laughing at them –if that.

A final word regarding the complete analysis

There is some important historical explanation that I wish to share with the reader. First, I think it is important to explain how Jews developed their hegemony in Britain and elsewhere in Europe beginning in the 17th century before they started commencing international banker versions of "false flag" attacks against the United States in the 19th century, which I describe in some detail in Chapter 33 of Book III when I review the important video The Money Masters.

A landmark work

Of course there is no substitute for studying the whole gamut of Jewish history, to include the ancient history of Jews in Babylon and Rome as well as Palestine, or the even the history of Jews in the Middle Ages, to include their expulsion from England, hegemony in Spain, and eventual establishment in Poland and elsewhere in Eastern Europe. It is an amazing history, but unfortunately it is beyond the scope of this chapter to go into it all here. However, I would like to provide the following extract from pages 111 to 115 of Micheal Collins Piper's outstanding book The New Babylon to help the reader understand how Jews conquered England as an important springboard for their eventual takeover of the United States. It is also important to note how Jews showed an affinity towards absolutist or totalitarian regimes, similar to what they are now trying to impose on America through the 9/11 inside job (Chapter 7), Patriot Act and NSPD-51 (Chapter 23), and martial law training exercises (Chapter 31). Jews typically worked as the "financial KGB" of despotic European rulers, helping them squeeze their subjects through ferocious tax-collecting and other forms of monopolistic rent-seeking. Last, but not least, Jews showed a special talent for covert infiltration techniques of European power centers. I discuss their special aptitude as the "Mongols of covert 4th generation warfare" methods in more detail in Chapter 38.

Prior to the modern Jewish bnaks in the Rothschild sphere, there was also a considerable Jewish presence in the world of money. The Economic History of the Jews noted:

Medieval princes used the commercial and financial services of individual Jews. However, as an institution, the Court Jew is a feature of the Absolutist State, especially in Central Europe, from the end of the 16th century onward.
Trying as far as possible to extend his power over the whole of his territory, the ruler set up a centralized administration as part of his court, which at the same time became the power center, presenting a lavish display of luxery. Economically, a Jew could be of great service to such a ruler.
In Poland many landed estates were administered by Jews and a large part of the trade in agricultural products was in their hands.
This, combined with the emergence of early Jewish capitalist commercial activity by Sephardim in the Netherlands, with their connections with Levantine trade through Jews in the Ottoman Empire, amade the Jew in central Europe particularly sutied to ban agent for provisioning armies with grain, timber and cattle, as well as a supplier of diamonds and other goods for conspicuous consumption.
As tax collecting and enlargement of the scope of taxation often lagged considerably behind the growing expenditure of court, army and bureaucracy, this type of regime developed an almost chronic financial deficit.
Here the Jews with their organizational skill and their far-reaching connections could help, through the frequent supply of commercial credit or ready cash, as also through the supply of food stuffs, cloth, and weapons for the army, the most important instrument of the prince's power.

All of this laid the groundwork for the rise of banking families such as, most notably, the Rothschilds:

In all their varied activities, the Court Jews played a remarkable part in the development of international credit facilities, especially in the central European states, and to some degree in northern Europe also, from the mid-17th to the late 18th Centuries.
Generally, they were agents who arranged transfers of credit rather than possessors of vast capital in their own right; through their far-reaching commercial relationships and their organizing skill, they were able to provide funds more swiftly than most Christian bankers.
Because of their specialization in the money business, they were able to furnish the silver for the mints more easily, and could more easily act as army purveyors, once more because of their ability to organize and their network of family relationships. With their entrepreneurial spirit, they contributed in part to the process of industrialization within the frame of mercantilist policies.
There is no doubt that they were instrumental in the growth of the modern absolute state, and at the end of the era there emerged a group of several important Jewish private bankers who exemplify the transition to modern methods of economy and government, primarily the Rothschilds, the Goldsmids, the Oppenheimers, and the Seligmans.

The authors added, almost as an afterthought, "However, it should not be forgotten that the courts had their Christian bankers, entrepreneurs and army agents, too, who also played a part in this development." How kind of these Judeo-centric authors, writing for a Judeo-centric publishing house, to give credit to the Christians!
Great Britain's emergence--as the preeminent center of Jewish fmance-is vital for us to consider. During the" early years of World War II, Germany's news agency, World-Service, assessed this little-known history.

Jewry's rise to power in England took place in three sharply defined stages, which are separated by intervals of about 100 years.
Under Cromwell's rule and during the first half of the Revolution period, under Charles II, the Jews, after having been banned from England for a period of more than 350 years, again swarmed into England.
Cromwell's rule is characterized by an outspoken British imperial policy. With regard to his financial as well as his political policy Cromwell depended upon the Jews to be the backbone of his colonial expansion. Jewish agents carried on economic and political espionage for Cromwell, availing themselves of the Jewish business houses in foreign countries.
In Cromwell's time, exactly as 100 and 200 years later, a small ruling Jewish clique was formed, at whose head one Jew appeared as the backbone of the new colonial economic policy. In Cromwell's time it was the enormously rich Sephardic Jew Antony Fernandez Carvajal who occupied this position.
A hundred years later the second stage of the Jew's rise to power in England commences. The Jewish clique in England was then led by the exceedingly rich Sephardic Jew, Sampson Gideon, who also greatly influenced the English cabinet ministers. At that time the influence of the Jews on finance-capital in England was already so great, that without exaggeration one may say, that English Jews were controlling the English money market.
Under the leading of Sampson Gideon the Jews sought to break down the barrier-erected by the time-approved laws against the influx of foreign Jews. The English nation, aroused to anger, strenuously opposed this Jewish effort. The Jews therefore could accomplish nothing by constitutional means, but already their power was so great, and by working from behind the scenes the influential English Jews saw to it, that these time-approved laws were evaded and set at nought.
Again, a hundred years later, in the 19th Century, we encountered the last and most decisive period, during which the Jews attempted their emancipation. Jewish personalities such as Rothschild, Montefiore, Bernal, Montagu, Ricardo and Disraeli at the beginning of the Victorian age, fought for and gained equal rights for Jewry within English law.
Once the Jews .had been received at court and had been granted citizenship, the English nobility no longer felt degraded by intermarriage with Jews. Uninterrupted, the penetration and disintegration of the English nobility by Jewry now continued. Uninterrupted, the Jewish invasion of the ruling class, whose national opposition was broken down, was now continued on a broad basis.After Jewry had in this way succeeded in worming its way into the nobility, it could from this strong position carry on its campaign against the English nation.
It now began the third stage of its conquest of England. In a period of about 100 years it had accomplished this. In the reign of Queen Victoria the last resistance of the English nation was broken down. Judah had conquered England. Jewish-English Plutocracy was stabilized by the Jews and by sections of the ruling class, which was connected with it by ties of blood, and which was to be still further extended in the 20th Century. Jewish interest and the interest of the Jewish-English aristocracy were now identical.
Through this plutocratic system of government Jewish and British Imperialism were firmly welded together. The strong hands by which the Jews had bound the English nobility to themselves were those of blood relationship and finance-capital. Jewish gold now became the undeniable ruler of England. Jewish unscrupulousness and aggressiveness, shady Jewish avarice and greed from now on become the characteristics and the stamp of the ruling classes, now to be counted in with the Jews.
These were the cornerstones that were used in building up the British Empire in its present form. These are the foundations upon which it rests.

While the Rothschild family held sway through their banks in London, Paris, Frankfurt,Vienna and Naples, there were also such big names in Jewish finance as Bleichroder in Berlin, Warburg in Hamburg, Oppenheim in Cologne and Speyer in Frankfurt who were also emerging as powerful lords of money who worked in conjunction with one another and with the Rothschilds, competing often to be sure, but all tied together by their Jewish heritage and traditions. There were also the Hambros of London, the Sassoons of Bombay and the Guinzberg house in St. Petersburg.
Although these banking empires were equivalent to what are called "merchant banks" or "investment banks" today, there was also a significant Jewish role in setting up so-called "commercial" banks (more akin to the "average" bank with which the average commoner would deal for fmancial services) such as the Deutsche Bank and the Dresdner Bank--two of Germany's "Big Three," Credit Mobilier and the Banque de Paris et des Pays-Bas in France, along with Banca Commerciale Italiana and Credito Italiano in Italy, and Creditanstalt-Bankverein and Banque de Bruxelles, among others.
In the United States, there were Jewish bankers rising: Haim Solomon of Revolutionary War fame (although there are those who dispute the claim that Solomon was "The Jewish Patriot Who Financed the American Revolution") and Isaac Moses who--along with Alexander Hamilton--founded the Bank of New York in 1784.
Krefetz cited such Jewish banking houses that rose in America from the period of 1840 onward: Bache, Goldman, Sachs, J. W Seligman, Kuhn Loeb, Ladenburg, Thalmann, Lazard Freres, Lehman Brothers, Speyer, and Wertheim. And Krefetz notes that these American-based Jewish banking houses had a tendency to intermarry and often acted in concert and thus projected "an image of concentrated power."
And needless to say, in the midst of this, the Rothschilds were indeed already operating on American soil through their American agent, August Belmont, who worked with many of these other Jewish capitalist forces.
What is interesting is that Krefetz suggested that these Jewish banks were unable to compete with what he calls "Protestant" banks among which Morgan, Drexel, Gould, Fiske, Harriman and Hill were the most prominent. But, as we shall see later in these pages, many of these elements were, in fact, under the sway of Rothschild and other Jewish influence.
For the record, Krefetz added, that, in his opinion, there is no real evidence of an international conspiracy of Jewish bankers, but that "some Jews in banking have conspired."
The money game, he said, "holds a fascination for Jews that some might say is equivalent to sex to the French, food to the Chinese, and power to the politician. And since the Diaspora [the scattering of Jewish communities], their financial concerns have always had an international flavor."
As early as 1879, the anti-Jewish German of partial Jewish descent, Wilhelm Marr, said candidly that Jewish Money Power had assembled a pre-dominant influence, in Germany in particular, but he recognized that this money power was international in scope. Marr described his own writings as "less a polemic against Jewry than confirmation of a cultural and historical fact." He said that any intemperate language he may have used "must be understood as no more than a cry of pain from one of the oppressed."
By the "oppressed," Marr was referring to the rest of the many Europeans and peoples worldwide who were, as one English writer put it, some years later, "under the heel of the Jew," --referring, indeed, to the Jewish Money Power.
Pointing out that many people had written unpleasant things about Jews and the organized Jewish community, Marr noted that, nonetheless, "our self conceit still keeps us from the open and honest admission that Israel has become a world power of the very first rank."
He emphasized that there was no religious prejudice in his writings. He was, he noted, simply enabling his readers to peer into what he called "the mirror" of cultural and historical facts. He advised readers of his pessimistic works to not blame him if that mirror showed those readers to be slaves.

At this point the reader may find it of particular interest to visit my discussion of America's totally dysfunctional financial system in Chapter 33 to learn about strong evidence that Jews tried to permanently fasten three highly corrupt central banks on the United States in the18th century and 19th centuries before they finally became successful with the establishment of the Federal Reserve Banking System in 1913. There is strong evidence that the Rothschilds tried to assassinate President Andrew Jackson for his opposition the third American central bank. There is also interesting circumstantial evidence that the Rothschilds and other Jews played a significant role in the assassinations of Presidents Abraham Lincoln and James Garfield. Last, but not least, there is overwhelming evidence provided by Michael Collins Piper in Final Judgment that the Mossad was central to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, who indirectly signaled an interest in curtailing the Federal Reserve.
Again, there is quite a lot of history I wish I could cover in this chapter to help the reader connect all the dots, but I do not have the space. Certainly I cannot encourage the reader enough to watch the full length video The Money Masters provided in Chapter 33 to get a good start. Three areas I would like to touch upon before closing out this chapter involve the continued consolidation of Jewish power in America and around the globe following World War II. This includes their push towards global New World Order dictatorship, as documented by Alex Jones in his documentary ENDGAME. I also want to address the highjacking of American foriegn policy documented by Michael Collins Piper in The High Priests of War, and the Mossad role in 9/11 covered by Victor Thorn in 9-11 Evil.

 

Oct 2007: ENDGAME- ALEX JONES - Blueprint for Global Enslavement 2:19:29

The Alex Jones documentary ENDGAME has a lot of good introductory material, particularly in the first half. (It seems to be a pattern in Alex Jones documentaries that his best material is in the first half, whereas the last half often goes off on tangents about various alleged high level Nazi networks and eugenics conspiracies, etc. I tend to agree with the first half and not the second half of much of many of his works, unless one substitutes the word "Zionist" for Nazi.").
The following segment of ENDGAME is not as far-fetched as it might appear to certain individuals who are newcomers to the strange world of high level "Circle Z" intrigue, especially when one considers that every country Jews have ever inhabited over the last twenty five hundred years has ultimately turned on them. Not surprisingly, most Jews suffer from unlimited paranoia, which goes hand-in-hand with the unlimited psychopathy that afflicts a significant percentage of the Jewish population. Books like Two Hundred Years Together by Alexandr Solzhenitsyn document the blood-chilling ruthlessness of Jewish Bolsheviks who played a key role in mass-murdering 60 million Slavic people. Therefore, we should be comfortable with the idea that if a paranoid and power-mad, criminal-psychopathic Jewish elite were ever permitted to achieve their goal of world domination, there would be absolutely no limit to the cruel and ruthless methods they would be willing to utilize to keep control at all costs. No limit whatsoever. We could expect them to treat all of humanity lower than cattle --lower even than the Palestinians that Israelis continue to genocide in Gaza and the West Bank.
At 3:51 into the his documentary, Alex Jones has the following comments about the "Blueprint for Global Enslavement."

In the near future Earth is dominated by a powerful world government. Once-free nations are slaves to the will of a tiny elite. The dawn of a new Dark Age is upon mankind. Countries are a thing of the past. Every form of independence is under attack. …with the family, and even the individual itself nearing extinction.
Close to 80% of the Earth’s population has been eliminated. Remanants of humanity are forced to live within highly-controlled compact prison-like cities. Travel is highly restricted. Superhighways connect the mega-cities and keep the population from entering into unauthorized zones.
No human activity is private.AI supercomputers chronicle and catagorize every action. A prison-planet dominated by a ruthless gang of control-freaks. Whose power can never be challenged.
This is the vision of the global elite. Their goal - a program of total dehumanization. The science of tyrrany is law.
A world-wide control grid. Designed to ensure the overlords’ monopoly of power forever. Our species will be condemned to this nightmare future unless masses are awakened to the New World Order master plan and mobilized to defeat it.
Erected by a secretive group the Georgia Guidestones are a testiment to the elites’ plan for a world religion, Global laws, with a global court and army to enforce it. And set in stone, it is written that the population never rise above 500 million.
In this film you will learn how our world is truly governed. You will see how highly secretive roundtable groups interlock to form a global intelligence network. This group has steered planetary affairs for hundreds of years. Now in the final stages, they prepare for open world government. A goal tyrants throughout history have lusted after.

At 7:20 into the documentary, we see an interview with Congressman Ron Paul, who comments:

President Bush said the New World Order was in tune. That’s what they were working for. The UN is part of that government. They’re working right now very significantly for a North American Union. There’s a lot of people in Washington right now who don’t care too much about our borders. They have a philosophic belief that national sovereignty is not important. That’s sort of the reason I have made a very strong suggestion we need not be in the United Nations for our national security.

At 11:07 into the documentary, we get some important background history:

... Archduke Franz Ferdinand, was assassinated while traveling in a motorcade. The “Black Hand” - a Serbian secret society with connections to French and British intellegence took credit. World War I had begun.
Armaments companies financed by Rothschild-controlled banks in Germany, France, England, and Austria bankrolled all factions. At least 20 million were killed in the war. It was a conflict so terrible, the people vowed to never fight again. They dubbed it the “War to End All Wars”.
The question is “Why did they want war?” Well, first of all, there’s money and power- But secondly, they wanted to create the League of Nations. They had this in their plans all along, and as a consequence, once the war was over, or about to be over, they began to formulate this idea of a League of Nations so this would never ever happen again.
Hundreds of years of practice made the British experts at hiding their empire behind puppet governments and councils. In the name of stopping all future conflicts, they proposed that countries would join a “League of Nations.” Their true intention was for the League to serve as a framework for world government.
President Woodrow Wilson, who had spearheaded the establishment of the private Federal Reserve System in the United States in 1913, strongly supported the establishment of the League of Nations. Woodrow Wilson was a very naïve President.

At 16:29 into the documentary, we get an introduction to secretive elite groups who have included senior U.S. Government officials. They have met in secret to handle U.S. policy with high level foreign leaders in criminal violation of the U.S. Logan Act.

In the build-up to World War II, and during the conflict, the bankers financed both sides just as they had done with Napolean. After the rise and fall of the Third Reich, Europe lay in ruins.
Once again, the elite claimed, that only global governance could save humanity from certain destruction. And this time the elite would succeed in setting up their world body. In April of 1945, at the Presideo naval base in San Francisco The United Nations was founded by the victors of World War II.
The United Nations complex was then built in New York City on land donated by John D. Rockefeller. Shortly after, the Elite established the United Nations as their base in the United States the newly-formed World Council quickly began work.
On the next phase in their plan the incremental formation of continental “super states”. The first step in their tri-lateral plan was the creation of the European Union.
Unifying Europe had been tried many times, and was extremely unpopular. Where Napolean and Hitler had failed to accomplish their goals using force, the Globalists would succeed, using stealth.
The British spearheaded the formation of the Council of Europe on May 5, 1949. The Treaty of London claimed to only establish trade ties between European nations like NAFTA or GATT in North America. Its true intention was the formation of a European super-state.
WE SHALL HAVE WORLD GOVERNMENT WHETHER OR NOT YOU LIKE IT. BY CONQUEST OR CONSENT. -James Warburg, in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, February 17, 1950
In 1954, the Elite of the planet met in secret at the Bilderburg Hotel, in Oesterbek, Holland. The Builderburg Group would later admit that their mission was the formation of the EU (European Union). Once the EU was established under the guise of trade deals, North American Union, and Asian Union would be formed.
The three interlocking superstates form the core of the global government. While the United Nations would serve as a world regulatory and enforcement body. Over the third-world sub regions.
The Bilderburg Group consists of the heads of all of the managing rountable groups that steer individual countries. Picture the elite power structure of the world as a giant pyramid. With only the elite of the Elite at the tip-top of the capstone.
The group has been so secretive, that until the mid-1980’s, the controlled corporate media denied its existence. Into the late 1990’s coverage only consisted of rare, one-line mentions.
[Skip to: 47:02] ...Builderburg was founded by David Rockefeller and the Rothschilds in Europe. They’re still the main powers.
Baron Evelyn de Rothschild, male, attended for many years. Rothschild is still represented. You’ll see them on the list of participants…
Somebody will represent the Rothschild Group. They are the main powers behind Builderburg. Dutch Royal Shell is part of the Queen’s fortune… Of course, the Rockefellers have always had heavy oil interests…that is the original source of their old money…

 

 

It is important to grasp that these elite groups did not suddenly appear overnight, but gradually grew in power through a long term covert "position-building" process. One good source consists of excerpts of G. Edward Griffin in "Episode #058 - Meet Carroll Quigley" on the Corbett Report or the Nov. 2007 online transcript of a speech made by Griffin which makes similar points, beginning with discussing secret societies set up by Cecil Rhodes.
Once one begins to understand that Rhodes was a Rothschild agent, and that high level Jews like the Rothshilds possess a behavioral tropism towards "oligarchical collectivism," "gorilla-gangster" monopoly, and criminal intrigue, everything that Griffin says makes perfect sense. It also becomes totally clear how the main levers of power and influence in both American and British society could become infiltrated and hijacked to serve evil purposes while most Americans and UK citizens naively go about their daily lives.

At the end of the 19th Century, a secret society was formed by Cecil Rhodes. Cecil Rhodes as all of you know, I’m sure, was one of the wealthiest men in the world. He was the political head man in South Africa, the chancellor I believe they called him, and while he was there he was able to acquire control over all of the diamond deposits and the gold deposits of South Africa — all of the mineral reserves, and in that period of time he amassed one of the greatest, if not, the greatest fortune in the world. What people don’t realize is that when he died, none of that money went to his heirs. Where did it go?
It went through a series of seven wills to create a secret society. The purpose of the secret society was to create a structure that would literally control the world — from behind the scenes, in a fashion that the average man or woman would never see it or never suspect it even existed.
The Rhodes Scholarship which most people know about was just the tip of the iceberg that created in one in one of the wills of Cecil Rhodes. The purpose of the Rhodes Scholarship was to provide a funnel or a recruiting mechanism to find the most appropriate, the most likely individuals — young men and women who could be recruited into this secret society. It should come as no surprise that William Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. It fits perfectly into this scenario.
This secret organization is not just of historical interest. It exists today and, according to Quigley and other observers who are close to it, it is the most important single historical force in the world since World War I. Now just think about that for a moment. Is it true? Well, we’ll cover a few facts and you judge it for yourself.
The goal of the secret organization originally was to expand the British Empire and the men who were behind it — not necessarily the royalty, but the real political figures behind it, and I’ll mention some of their names in a moment — to extend the British Empire to control the world. Rhodes and his associates believed that the British had acquired the highest culture, the highest level of morality according at least to his definitions of morality, and the highest standard of living, the most perfect language. He felt that the race was superior and that for the benefit of the rest of the world, for their good, it was their responsibility — this group, using the British Empire — it was their responsibility to rule the world for the benefit of the world, of course. That was very carefully spelled out in their writings and their goals
Now this evolved not too long after the organization was put into motion it changed. The goal changed. World domination didn’t change. Control from behind the scenes by a very small elect group didn’t change. But what did change is that the focal point for this was no longer the British or England, but it was to be a New World Order, international in scope and to be housed through an international organization of some kind. Initially they had hoped that it would be the League of Nations and all of their members worked very hard to create the League of Nations for that purpose. When that failed, then they set their sites on the United Nations, which finally was put into action and now is on a fast track to becoming the very structure which they had projected as their goal. And now, of course, the central of all of this instead of being in England is focused primarily in New York.
Now the method by which this secret organization was to accomplish this incredible goal was not to be visible and not to go forth and influence the people directly. The people weren’t even supposed to suspect that such a thing was going on. The people were not even supposed to know the names primarily of the big players. They weren’t to be in the news at all. The way this was to be done was indirectly through the power centers of society, as they’re called. The strategists behind this are brilliant and they realized that human beings have a herd instinct. We clump together, most of us, a few hermits get off in the wilderness and do okay, but most of us get nervous out in the wilderness and we congregate into villages and cities and, beyond that, we come together in organizations like this. We have leaders. We join labor unions. We affiliate with political parties. We come together in church organizations and we send our kids to schools that are organized, and we have girl scouts and boy scouts. The way we operate is that we work through groups and organizations and we follow leaders. They had this all figured out. They said, “Therefore, the way for us to lead the masses is not directly one on one, but what we must do is control the leadership of the organizations to which people belong. We don’t need that many people to do that.” So with just one percent or one-tenth of one percent of the population, we can control the entire population by controlling the power centers of society. That was their strategy from the beginning, and it is their strategy today, and I might add, it is an extremely effective strategy.
The structure of this secret organization was outwardly modeled after the Jesuit Order. Yes, incredible isn’t it. But Rhodes was an admirer of the organizational genius, in his mind, of the Society of Jesus, the Jesuit Order, and he said we should use that as our model. He didn’t take it straight across but he took many elements from it and, at the deeper level, though, it is interesting I think and very instructive to note that he borrowed the structure of classic conspiracy control directly from Adam Weishaupt. Now, those of you who have studied this thing, you recognize that name. Adam Weishaupt was the founder of the Illuminati and we all know a little bit about the Illuminati because it was disbanded in Bavaria shortly after it was formed, and their secret records and notebooks and so forth were seized and placed into the public records, so you can go to a library today and read verbatim the organizational structure of the original Illuminati. There is a debate as to whether or not the Illuminati really were destroyed or whether it just went underground and still exists today. I think that debate is interesting and I have my opinions about it, but they’re just opinions. In the final analysis, it’s not too important because we know that there are shoots coming up from the ground with identical structures all over the place. Now whether those shoots are coming up from seeds or roots, I don’t think makes too much difference. The fact is that we have had many organizational imitations of the Illuminati and this secret one that we’re talking about here created by Cecil Rhodes is a perfect example.
Now what is that structure I’m talking about? It’s what they call rings within rings within rings. That’s the way they usually refer to it, and what that means is this: Weishaupt said that in the center of his Illuminati organization, there would be a controlling group of maybe three or four people — just a small number. These in turn would create a membership ring around them of a larger number of perhaps 20 or 30 or something like, and the members of that ring would not be aware that they were being dominated and controlled by the inner circle. Now that outer ring, in turn , thinking that they were the whole enchilada, would then create a larger ring around it comprising of hundreds or perhaps thousands of people, and those people would not suspect that they were being dominated and directed by an inner ring. And then finally that last ring would create still another one that would reach out to mass organizations — reach out to the masses. And in that fashion Weishaup said that a few of us in the center through this carefully controlled structure or rings within rings can control the world, and the people being controlled would never know that that’s how it worked. Now that’s the structure that Weishaupt created and described at some length and it’s interesting to me that Rhodes selected that very structure for his secret society.
Now, let’s take a look –{something dropped} I’m glad there’s not lead attached to that.{laughter} But the result of all this, ladies and gentlemen, is that this structure — this secret society – remains invisible to the average person. It remains invisible not only because of its structure and because of its secrecy, but also because it has had the foresight of not having a name. Now just think about that for a minute. If you say that you have an organization or you create an organization and somebody says, well what are we going to call ourselves, and the answer is we’re not going to call ourselves anything. We’re not going to have a name. That way, nobody can talk about us. Brilliant! And that’s what they decided to do. Quigley himself doesn’t know how to describe it. At some places in his books he calls it the network. In other places he calls it the Rhodes group. In other places he just calls it the group. It has no name. Therefore, it’s another reason that it’s invisible to the average person today.
At the inner-circle of this organization that I am describing, that was called the “Society of the Elect.” It originally consisted of Cecil Rhodes and a small brain trust of his very wealthy and influential political cronies from British politics and British banking. The center of gravity, as I said earlier, shortly thereafter — after Rhodes death — didn’t take long before the center of gravity shifted away to the Rockefeller group which was very quick to move into that circle and now we see that there are centers or secondary centers of influence within the Rockefeller group and centers within such organizations as The Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission, to name just a few. The goal shifted away from creating and world empire based in England to a world empire based in New York called the New World Order but based on the model of collectivism.
The secondary rings around this Society of the Elect that Cecil Rhodes created were called “roundtables.” That’s the name they gave them — roundtables, and these existed in the Untied States, Britain and all of the former British dependencies. Finally there was a tertiary group or ring around that which was created. Each of those roundtables in each of the countries, created another ring larger around it, and they called those in most of the British dependencies “The Royal Institute for International Affairs.” You’ll find that in England, you’ll find it in Canada, and so forth. That’s what it’s called. It’s still there. Very powerful, prominent institutions in British politics and all of these countries. In the United States, for some reason which I’ve never been able to find out, they didn’t choose that name I suppose because royal wouldn’t be an acceptable word in the United States, so in the U S. they call it the Council on Foreign Relations. And ladies and gentlemen, after 100 years of penetration into the power centers of society, the Rhodesian Network, I call it — I have given it a name and I hope you’ll pick it up and use it because we have to identify this group — I call it the Rhodesian Network, or the Rhodesians — after 100 years the Rhodesians are very close to the final achievement of their goal in the western world.
Now I add the phrase “in the western world” because we must not lose sight of the fact when we’re looking at this group, that there is another group out there which is just as dangerous, just as secret and just as cunning as the Rhodesians. And they, by the way, took a clue from the Rhodesians and they got rid of their name a few years ago. We used to call them Communists and then they got rid of the name. They pretended to go away; they pretended that they crumbled overnight — a great miracle. They’re still there! I call them the Leninists. They have never renounced the theories or the goals of Lenin, they just renounced Communism. Well, they never really had Communism in any of those countries any way, they always refer to themselves as Socialists or Leninists or what have you. But all the old former Communist commissars simply took their hat off that said Communist on the front of it and turned it around and now it says Social Democrat, but you notice it’s the same heads underneath the hats. The heads didn’t change, nor did their real policies.
I want to emphasize that there is another very large and powerful and dangerous group out there which I call the Leninists. And the Leninists and the Rhodesians are often seen warring against each other. Let’s take a look at Mr. Bush in Washington, D.C. and in Venezuela we’ve got Chavez. Now there’s a perfect example of the Rhodesians versus the Leninists, and they fight each other, they’re opposed to each other, they criticize each other, they hate each other, but the world that they want is the same. The only thing they disagree with is not ideology; it’s who is going to run this New World Order — the so called left or will it be the so-called right, and when you peel off all of those labels and you look underneath, you’ll find that in all of these camps, what they really stand for is collectivism. That’s the word we should be using. They’re all collectivists in nature but then they wrap themselves in flags and different rhetoric and they appear to oppose each other, but I want to emphasize just because we are focusing tonight on one group goes not mean that that is the only place we need to keep our guard up, because we have another equally potential group very much alive in the world today.

Melvin Sickler has provided an online condensation of a paper "Why A Bankrupt America" by Jack Newell and Devvy Kidd that provides important additional insights into the Council on Foreign Affairs and the Trilateral Commission::

Edward Mandell House 

The Council on Foreign Relations was founded in 1921 by Edward Mandell House, who had been the chief advisor of President Woodrow Wilson. Actually, he was more than just a prominent aide of the President; he dominated the President. He was referred to as Wilson’s "alter ego" (other self), and was credited for being the most powerful individual in the United States during the Wilson Administration from 1913 until 1921. 
House was a Marxist whose goal was to socialize the United States. In 1912, House wrote the book "Philip Dru: Administrator" in which he stated that he was working for "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx." In this book, House laid out a plan for the conquest of America, telling how both the Democratic and Republican Parties would be controlled, and be used as instruments in the creation of a socialistic government. And he asked for the establishment of a state-controlled central bank, which were both proposed in "The Communist Manifesto". And it was in 1913, during the very first year of the House-dominated Wilson Administration, that both of these proposals became law. The Federal Reserve Act was passed, which brought into power a private central bank to create the money of the United States, taking this power away from the united States Congress. And the 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution, the graduated income tax as proposed by Karl Marx, was also ratified. 

The Council on Foreign Relations 

In 1921, House and his friends formed the Council on Foreign Relations whose purpose right from its conception was to destroy the freedom and independence of the United States, and to lead the country into a one-world government. 
Right from its beginning, in 1921, the CFR began to attract men of power and influence. In the late 1920’s, important financing for the CFR came from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Foundation. In 1940, at the invitation of President Roosevelt, members of the CFR gained domination over the State Department, and they have maintained this domination ever since. 

Its intentions

 The late Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton’s mentor), Professor of History at Georgetown University, member of the CFR, stated in his book, "Tragedy & Hope": "The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established." 
Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the Cfr for 16 years, warned the American people of the organization’s intentions: "The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereingty of the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government." 
And Dan Smoot, a former member of the FBI Headquarters staff in Washington, D.C., summarized the organization’s purpose as follows: "The ultimate aim of the CFR is to create a one-world socialist system, and to make the U.S. an official part of it." 
In other words, the CFR’s activities are treasonous to the U.S. Constitution. Their goal is to put an end to the United States of America, and to make the country a part of their global government scheme. 

Its influence 

In 1944 and in 1948, the Republican candidate for President, Thomas Dewey, was a CFR member. In later years, Republicans Eisenhower and Nixon were members of the CFR, as were Democrats Stevenson, Kennedy, Humphrey, and McGovern. (Note: We believe Kennedy became disloyal to the CFR prior to his assassination.") The American people think that they have a choice when they vote for a President, but the truth of the matter is , with few exceptions: Presidential candidates for decades have been CFR members. 
In one of the CFR’s annual reports, published in 1978, it listed a membership of 1878 members. Eleven of its members at this time were United States Senators, with even more Congressmen belonging to the organization. 284 of its members listed in this report were United States Government officials. And the Chairman of the Board of this immensely powerful pyramid was stated as being none other than David Rockefeller himself. 
The CFR not only has its members in the United States Government, but its influence has also spead to other vital areas of American life. According to Newell: "Its members have run, or are running, NBC and CBS, ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Washington Post’, ‘The Des Moines Register’, and many other important newspapers. The leaders of ‘Time’, ‘Newsweek’, ‘Fortune’, ‘Business Week’, and numerous other publications are CFR members. The organization’s members also dominate the academic world, top corporations, the huge tax-exempt foundations, labor unions, the military, and just about every segment of American life." 
Barry Goldwater states in his book, "With No Apologies", on page 231: 
"Does it not seem strange to you that these men just happened to be CFR and just happened to be on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, that absolutely controls the money and interest rates of this great country without benefit of Congress? A privately owned organization, the Federal Reserve, which has absolutely nothing to do with the United States of America!" and Newell continues to write: "Not every member of the CFR is fully committed to carrying out Edward Mandell House’s conspiratorial plan. Many have been flattered by an invitation to join a study group, which is what the CFR calls itself. Others go along because of personal benefits, such as a nice job and a new importance. But all are used to promote the destruction of U.S. sovereignty." 

All aspects of American life are dominated

 The members of the CFR dominate almost every aspect of American life, yet most Americans have never even heard of the Council on Foreign Relations. One reason for this is probably because there are over 170 journalists, correspondents, and communications executives who are members of the CFR, and who do not write about the organization. Also, it is an express condition of membership that no one is to disclose what goes on at CFR meetings. 
Congressmen John R. Rarick had warned: 
"The CFR, dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education, and mass communication-media, should be familiar to every American concerned with good government, and with preserving and defending the U.S. Constitution and our free-enterprise system. Yet, the nation’s right-to-know machinery, the news media, usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities. 
"The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitution Republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship." 
The CFR now has its main headquarters at the corner of park Avenue and 68th Street in New York City, in a building given to the organization by the Rockefeller family in 1929. Its main goal is still to create a one-world government by destroying the freedom and independence of all nations, especially the United States. And David Rockefeller continues to be its Chairman of the Board.

The Trilateral Commission

Unfortunately, the Council on Foreign Relations is not the only group proposing an end to the sovereignty of the United States. In 1973, The Trilateral Commission was founded to work for the same goal: a one-world government.
The Trilateral Commission's roots stem from the book, "Between Two Ages", written by Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1970. In this book, Brzezinski praised Marxism, thought of the United States as obsolete, and praised the formation of a one-world government. His thinking closely parallels that of CFR founder Edward Mandell house.

Marxism

On page 72, Brzezinski writes: "Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief."
On page 83, he states: "Marxism disseminated on the popular level in the form of Communism, represented a major advance in man's ability to conceptualize his relationship to his world."
On page 123, we find: "Marxism supplied the best available insight into contemporary reality."
What Mr. Brzezinski fails to tell his readers is that approximately 100 million human beings have been murdered under Marxism "in the form of Communism" just in this Twentieth Century. It has enslaved a billion more, and has been responsible for those who live in Communist-dominated countries. There is nothing like being brainwashed!

For world government

Zbigniew Brzezinski's "Between Two Ages" was published in 1970 while he was a professor in New York City. David Rockefeller read the book and, in 1973, launched the new Trilateral Commission, whose purposes include linking North America, Western Europe, and Japan "in their economic relations, their political and defense relations, their relations with developing countries, and their relations with Communist countries."
As Newell writes: "The original literature of The Trilateral Commission also states, exactly as Brzezinski's book had proposed, that the more advanced Communist States could become partners in the alliance leading to world government. In short, David Rockefeller implemented Brzezinski's proposal."
Rockefeller appointed Zbigniew Brzezinski to be the Director of The Trilateral Commission.

It is also worth mentioning that some secret societies are very peculiar in other ways, to say the least. They include the exotic rituals behind Yale's Skull and Bones, which has been a prime source of CIA leaders, and bizarre sexual behavior practiced at Bohemian Grove, which is attended once a year by 1,500 of America's most influential leaders.
Once when commenting upon the topics of San Francisco, homosexuals, and Bohemian Grove, former President Richard Nixon commented: "But it's not just the ratty part of town. The upper class in San Francisco is that way. The Bohemian Grove, which I attend from time to time . . . It is the most faggy goddamned thing you could ever imagine with that San Francisco crowd. I can't shake hands with anybody from San Francisco."
The Corbett Reports "Episode #042 - The Bohemian Grove" provides evidence that Bohemian Grove has been the site where little boys imported for homosexual prostitution have also been subjects of in-house hard-core gay porno flicks. At at least on of these kids was murdered after being forced to participate.

To perform a really complete analysis, it would help to start by creating lists of personalities connected with both “Circle B” and “Circle Z,” such as the one provided by blogger "Barney Rubble" in the comments section of the Infowars.com article "9/11: The Case for Controlled Demolition."
Books like 9-11 Evil by Victor Thorn and High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper are gold mines of insight that help to take us to a next higher level of identifying motivations and ultimate objectives of current circles of malefactors.

 

On pages 88 and 89 of 9-11 Evil, Victor Thorn comments on Zionist neocon kingpin Richard Perle, nicknamed by many colleagues "The Prince of Darkness":

...Our nation's War Machine takes it marching orders from an entity called the Defense Policy Board, which most certainly wields more power than the current Defense Secretary on 9-11, Donald Rumsfeld.
...the Defense Policy Board was under the direct tutelage of Richard Perle on the morning of 9-11; and no more psychotic, rabid Zionist infected with pure evil could be found anywhere in Washington, D.C. Perle wielded so much power that in 1986 The Washington Post quoted a high-ranking State Department official who called him "the most powerful man in the Pentagon." [As a side-note, many of the references in this section are culled from Michael Collins Piper's The High Priests of War, which is an invaluable source for this subject. Many thanks for his years of top-notch work.]
Perle was also once referred to as "The person in charge of World War III" by Britain's Labor Party Leader Denis Healey in the 1980's; plus, "In 1970, after the National Security Council ordered a wiretap of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, Perle was revealed to be passing classified information to an officer of the Israeli Embassy" [The High Priests of War]. Last but not least, Perle - who was appointed as head of the Defense Policy Board by George W. Bush himself -- became very wealthy selling weapons to the Israeli Defense Force [the most bloodthirsty killers on earth].
In a December, 2002 interview, author John Pilger provides a clearer understanding of Richard Perle's paranoid, Dr. Strangelove mentality where he advocates multiple wars in simultaneous theaters of engagement:

This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq ... this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war ... our children will sing great songs about us years from now.

The Prince of Darkness's lunatic vision of an imperialistic Israeli war machine is just plain scary. But Perle wasn' t the only mastermind manning the Pentagon guns. On April 9. 2003 in the Magazine Forward, Ari Shavit revealed, "The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neo-conservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish."

On page 12 of High Priests, Piper notes: "On December 13, 2002, Counterpunch magazine, published by maverick Irish-born American-based journalist Alexander Cockburn, featured an article raising the questions of “the Bush administration’s dual loyalties” and provided a fascinating overview of the neo-conservative network that ultimately led America to war. The authors were Bill and Kathleen Christison, a husband-and-wife team of former veteran U.S. Central Intelligence Agency analysts. They cited the Israeli sympathies of top neo-conservative policy makers inside the Bush administration, pointing out that—indeed—these neo-conservatives were closely aligned with the ideology of the Likud bloc in Israel. Their summary of the “cast of characters” among the neo-conservatives is precise and worth noting:"

Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz leads the pack. He was a protégé of Richard Perle, who heads the prominent Pentagon advisory body, the Defense Policy Board. Many of today’s neo-conservatives, including Perle, are the intellectual progeny of the late Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson, a strong defense hawk and one of Israel’s most strident congressional supporters in the 1970s.
Wolfowitz in turn is the mentor of Lewis “Scooter” Libby, now Vice
President Cheney’s chief of staff who was first a student of Wolfowitz and later a subordinate during the 1980s in both the State and the Defense Departments.
Another Perle protégé is Douglas Feith, who is currently undersecretary of defense for policy, the department’s number-three man, and has worked closely with Perle both as a lobbyist for Turkey and in co-authoring strategy papers for right-wing Israeli governments.
Assistant Secretaries Peter Rodman and Dov Zakheim, old hands from the Reagan administration when the neo-cons first flourished, fill out the subcabinet ranks at Defense. At lower levels, the Israel and the Syria/Lebanon desk officers at Defense are imports from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a think tank spun off from the pro-Israel lobby organization, AIPAC.
Neo-conservatives have not made many inroads at the State Department, except for John Bolton, an American Enterprise Institute hawk and Israeli proponent who is said to have been forced on a reluctant Colin Powell as undersecretary for arms control. Bolton’s special assistant is David Wurmser, who wrote and/or co-authored with Perle and Feith at least two strategy papers for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu in 1996.
Wurmser’s wife, Meyrav Wurmser, is a co-founder of the media-watch web-site MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute), which is run by retired Israeli military and intelligence officers and specializes in translating and widely circulating Arab media and statements by Arab leaders. A recent investigation by The Guardian of London found that MEMRI’s translations are skewed by being highly selective. Although it inevitably translates and circulates the most extreme of Arab statements, it ignores moderate Arab commentary and extremist Hebrew statements.
In the vice president’s office, Cheney has established his own personal
national security staff, run by aides known to be very pro-Israel. The deputy director of the staff, John Hannah, is a former fellow of the Israeli-oriented Washington Institute.
On the National Security Council staff, the newly appointed director of
Middle East affairs is Elliott Abrams, who came to prominence after pleading guilty to withholding information from Congress during the Iran-contra scandal (and was pardoned by President Bush the elder) and who has long been a vocal proponent of right-wing Israeli positions. Putting him in a key policymaking position on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is like entrusting the henhouse to a fox.
Probably the most important organization, in terms of its influence on Bush administration policy formulation, is the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). Formed after the 1973 Arab-Israeli war specifically to bring Israel’s security concerns to the attention of U.S. policymakers and concentrating also on broad defense issues, the extremely hawkish, right-wing JINSA has always had a high-powered board able to place its members inside conservative U.S. administrations. Cheney, Bolton, and Feith were members until they entered the Bush administration. Several lower level JINSA functionaries are now working in the Defense Department.
Wolfowitz himself has been circumspect in public, writing primarily about broader strategic issues rather than about Israel specifically or even the Middle East, but it is clear that at bottom Israel is a major interest and may be the principal reason for his near obsession with the effort, of which he is the primary spearhead, to dump Saddam Hussein, remake the Iraqi government in an American image, and then further redraw the Middle East map by accomplishing the same goals in Syria, Iran, and perhaps other countries.
But his interest in Israel always crops up. Even profiles that downplay his attachment to Israel nonetheless always mention the influence the Holocaust, in which several of his family perished, has had on his thinking. One source inside the administration has described him frankly as “over-the-top crazy when it comes to Israel.” Although this probably accurately describes most of the rest of the neo-con coterie, and Wolfowitz is guilty at least by association, he is actually more complex and nuanced than this.

Piper goes on to spell out how the Zionist octopus has spread its tentacles throughout Washington, D.C. and national media. Most alarming of all, he identifies how the ultimate agenda of the Zionists is to "use up" America as their riding horse and then callously throw America in the trash heap. In other words, their agenda is fundamentally hostile to America and and traditional conservative values. They may be rightfully considered traitors and domestic enemies of the U.S. Constitution and the legitimate national interests of the United States of America.

 

 

A FINAL WORD . . .

Who will be ruling America . . .
when America is ruling the New World Order?

An examination of “the secret agenda behind the agenda”
of the High Priests of War.

The United Nations—as we have known it—can effectively be considered a ghost of the past. The UN has been shelved, sidelined, consigned to the trash heap—at least temporarily—by the one world dreamers who once saw the global body as the means of establishing a world hegemon. Today’s imperialists now envision Uncle Sam as their officially- designated world policeman or, in their more academic terms “the center of a new international system.” The goal is “a world that looks like America, and is therefore safe for all.”
However, despite the rhetoric—which might please the ears of many
grass-roots American patriots (or those who fancy themselves that)—it’s
not quite so simple. There’s more to this agenda than meets the eye.
What might be described as The Grand Scheme for a New World
Order—in the wake of America’s new “imperial” role—was imparted in
quite candid fashion in a major two-part policy paper in the Summer 2003
and Winter 2004 issues of The Journal of International Security Affairs,
house organ of the definitively influential Jewish Institute for National
Security Policy (JINSA), which has been referenced repeatedly in the
pages of The High Priests of War.
Once a previously little-known Washington think tank, JINSA is now
often publicly acknowledged as perhaps the most specific guiding force
behind Bush administration foreign policy today. So when something
appears in a JINSA publication, there’s a lot of weight behind it.
The author, Alexander H. Joffe, a pro-Israel academic, has been a featured writer in the pages of this JINSA publication, and that he was given so much space to tout his theories certainly reflects the high regard in
which his views are held.
Joffe’s two-part series was entitled “The Empire That Dared Not
Speak Its Name.” In his essay, Joffee frankly admitted that “America is
an empire” and asserts that, yes, this is a very good thing.
Joffe says that when the UN dared to take on Zionism, that marked
the demise of the UN in the minds of the internationalists. Joffe writes:
“The end of the General Assembly as a credible body may plausibly be
ascribed to the infamous ‘Zionism is Racism’ resolution in 1975.” The
JINSA author contends that the world should be “grateful” that the UN
has been “discredited, reduced to farce and ultimately ground to a halt,”
referring, of course, to UN positions that the Zionists and their allies in
the world empire movement find offensive.
As a result of the UN being shelved as a world government vehicle,
writes Joffe, “We now have the opportunity, and obligation, to begin
again.” However, he warns that the emerging European Union (EU) is a
threat to the dream of a global empire.
The JINSA writer asserts that the EU is an “alternative vision for the
international community,” one that, as he puts it, frankly is “the authentic
countervision to an American Empire.” According to the Zionist writer,
the biggest problem with Europe and the EU is that “culture remains at
the core of Europe’s problems. Nationalism was a doctrine born in
Europe, as were its vicious mutant offspring: fascism and communism.”.
(Note: A fervent advocate of Israeli super-nationalism, the writer,
Joffe, doesn’t seem to see the lack of logic in his attack on other peoples’
nationalism—but then, again, honesty has never been integral to the hardline
Zionist point of view.)
Joffe complains that although “the new European Empire is multicultural
in theory . . . in reality it is dominated politically and culturally by France and economically by Germany.” Today, in the EU, he says, “driven by a sense of postcolonial guilt and postwar ennui the door have been thrown open to all ideas. At the most sinister levels it has permitted and even legitimized a vast explosion of unhinged thought and action, namely anti-Americanism, anti-Semitism, and a wide variety of conspiracy theories.”
(The so-called “conspiracy theories” that so alarm this Zionist theoretician are those that dare to challenge the “official” views of what really happened on September 11, 2001. He is inflamed that millions of people in Europe and the Muslim world—not to mention the United States— have raised questions about Israeli foreknowledge and/or involvement in those events.)
In any case, what Joffe describes as “the other kind of liberal internationalism” is what the Zionist movement favors and Joffe defines it:

The American Empire has no real or theoretical competitors. The goal of the American Empire in the 21st century is not territorial control or the exploitation of resources but political and economic leadership which defends and advances American interests, and which promotes the development and well being of all nations. Given our history and our values, that future lies in leveraging the American Empire in such a way that it becomes the basis of a new democratic international system.
Ultimately the only answer for a stable and prosperous planet will be a global system that is structurally and morally similar to the American union—semiautonomous states with secular, liberal democratic systems; where states have both prescribed rights and agreed upon responsibilities in a larger secular, liberal democratic framework; one equipped with checks and balances and meaningful institutions; with governance based on rule of law and tolerant and pluralist values.

In the second-part of his extended essay, published in the Winter 2004
issue of JINSA’s journal, Joffe pursued this line of thought further,
expanding on his call for what he described as “an empire that looks like
America.”
Amazingly, Joffe frankly talks about the United States engaging in
massive imperial conquests in the trouble-torn regions of frica—presumably
after the United States has already made havoc in the Arab countries
of the Middle East:

The conditions under which America and its allies would simply take over and restore African countries are far from clear. What are the thresholds for intervention? What are the procedures and outcomes? Who will fight and who will pay? The restoration of Africa would involve long-term commitments and immense costs, of the sort that could only be paid for by Africa itself. That is to say, it would probably require American economic control, to go along with political and cultural control. Colonialism is always pay as you go, and it is not pretty. The question is both whether Africa can pay the price (or afford not to) and whether America has the stomach.

Of course, Africa is not the only target of Joffe and his like-minded
schemers (and that is precisely what they are, however, “extreme” that
term may be perceived). In fact, Joffe talks of a wide-ranging global agenda— well beyond the African continent.
In the end, however, Joffe lets the cat out of the bag, about the real
intentions of those who are using United States military power as the
mechanism for a bigger agenda. “New arrangements,” he says, “must
come into being under American leadership to provide an alternative for
states that are willing to accept rights and responsibilities.” Joffe dreams
of a United Nations that has been re-made under the imperial force of the
United States. And ultimately, he predicts the possibility of a world government, writing:

Possibly, after a period of chaos and anger, which in any event would simply intensify existing states of being, the institution [the United Nations] might be bludgeoned into changing. [Note his use of the term “bludgeoned.”—MCP]
Rather than a club that admits all, the 21st century United Nations might— someday, somehow—be remade into an exclusive, by invitation, members-only group, of free, democratic states, sharing similar values. Or in the end, replaced by one. That day, however, may be decades off.

Should there be any doubt that he is talking about world government,
note Joffe’s concluding words:

The best way to preserve the American empire is to eventually give it up. Setting the stage for global governance can only be done with American leadership and American-led institutions of the sort schematically outlined here.

So it is. Despite all the high-sounding rhetoric about “democracy,”
what it all comes down to—in the words of this pro-Israel ideologue—is
the use of America’s military power to advance another (secret) agenda
altogether. Even many of those grass-roots American flag-wavers (who
may be genuine patriots) who relish the concept of an American empire
may find Joffe’s concepts somewhat different from what they otherwise
might perceive.
But here, in the pages of a devotedly pro-Zionist journal, we learn
precisely what the “story behind the story” actually happens to be. It has
nothing to do, really, even with a “strong America” or, for that matter,
even with America itself.
The United States of America is simply a pawn—albeit a powerful
one—in the game, being ruthlessly shifted about in a scheme for world
dominance by an elite few operating behind the scenes.
And, in the end, this does tell us very much about who The High
Priests of War really are and what their agenda is really all about. There’s
no mystery at all.
What remains to be determined is what the American people—and all
other real patriots in nations around the globe—intend to do about it.
The question is this: will the world finally decide it is time to declare
war on The High Priests of War?

—MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER

 

Additional Update References

2010-02-13 Israel is accused of waging covert war across the Middle East by Sheera Frenkel, The Times. Also archived at RBN.
2009-12-20 Bended Knees: Zionist Power in American Politics by James Petras, Dissident Voice
The History and Timeline of the House of Rothschild at jewwatch.com

Brother Nathanael Kapner on "Circle Z"
2009-07-30 Bernanke - The Rothschild Puppet # 131
2008-12-21 Greek Riots & The Rothschild Bankers # 17
2008-09-25 Is The Bailout A Rothschild Trick? # 57
2008-06-17 Is Sarkozy A Rothschild Puppet? # 9
2008-04-29 How The Rothschild Dynasty Operates # 86
2008-03-26 Judeo Masonry & The Ruin Of Europe # 9
2008-01-27 The Rothschild-Israel Occult Connection # 9

2007-12-02 Rothschilds & Rockefellers, TRILLIONAIRES of the World by NEW WORLD ORDER

Videos

2010-01-28. Jim Cramer states: “You know what, the Bavarian Illuminati, the Trilateral Commission, Goldman Sachs, & The Queen of England are not all bad!”

CNBC Jim Cramer: Illuminati Exist And Is Not All Bad!

Secret Societies Bilderberg Group Jesse Ventura Tru TV, 2010
Part-2 Part-3 Part-4 Part-5 Part-6

Premiered: Wed, December 30 at 10P Show notes state: "They're thought to be a group of the world's elite who meet once a year at a luxury hotel and decide how they will run the world. It's believed they plan to thin out the population through disease-and vaccines. Jesse Ventura infiltrates the Bilderberg Group."

Books

The New Babylon by Michael Collins Piper
9-11 Evil by Victor Thorn.

Flag carried by the 3rd Maryland Regiment at the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781

© America First Books
America First Books offers many viewpoints that are not necessarily its own in order to provide additional perspectives.