American conservative movements typically look like the "pushmi-pullyu" creature in the Doctor Dolittle children's stories illustrated above, with anarcho-libertarians pulling against racial nationalists, and vice versa. Most white American are confused about where to draw the line in defense of both personal liberties and group ethnic-genetic interests. (Photo found here)

Reconciling
Libertarianism
and Nationalism

To include thorny issues involved in reconciling
anarcho-libertarianism with racial nationalism.

by William B. Fox
Publisher, America First Books

First published June 2010.
Last re-edited and updated 27 March 2011

Can we reconcile the anarcho-libertarian theory espoused by Lew Rockwell (left photo), Dr. Thomas D. Lorenzo, Dr. Thomas Woods, the late Dr. Murray Rothbard, and other intellectuals connected with the Mises Institute with the white racial nationalist philosophy espoused by the late Dr. William L. Pierce (right photo), late Dr. Revilo Oliver, or currently by Willis Carto, Dr. David Duke and Kevin Strom? ...To borrow an "Obama-ism" -- YES WE CAN!

The American Revolution was about libertarian decentralization not only on a political level against the British Empire, but also in many cases on a tactical military level. Col. Isaac Shelby exhorted militia before the Battle of Kings Mountain: "When we encounter the enemy, don't wait for a word of command. Let each of you be your own officer, and do the best you can..." This battle became a major patriot victory and turning point in the war. Shelby went on to become the first and fifth Governor of the U.S. state of Kentucky. Paradoxically, George Washington's Army went in the opposite philosophical direction. (Artist concept of Col. Isaac Shelby courtesy of Kings Mountain National Military Park plaque).

One of the biggest problems with "libertarianism" in America today is that many of its main advocates like Congressman Ron Paul refuse to openly confront the racial and ethnic dimensions behind Zionist power in America. The behavior of most leading Zionists typically shows contempt for the U.S. Constitution and genuine libertarian principles on an emotional as well as intellectual level. Please see my extended discussion of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology in my online "Mutualism vs. Parasitism" article. See also the Rev. Ted Pike archive regarding nonstop Jewish ADL efforts to destroy free speech.

A January 2009 scene from the "Pots and Pans Revolution" in Iceland, a land with longstanding libertarian traditions. Over the long run, nationalist policies are necessary to protect Icelandic libertarian traditions as well as to help keep Iceland Icelandic.

AMERICAN
LIBERTARIAN THINKERS
AND MEDIA LEADERS

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: Often called "the Father of Reaganomics," he was once a former high level insider (see bio) during the Reagan administration. Dr. Roberts has since done excellent work in documenting economic policies that have eroded America's industrial base. He has also covered America's transition towards the police state. For "mainstream moderates" who read Fortune, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and other "mainstream media," Dr. Roberts' discussions of economic issues provide an excellent introduction point to prepare people for more radical thinkers like Dr. Murray Rothbard and Dr. Hans Hermann-Hoppe below --or even Dr. William Pierce. Dr. Robert's 24 March 2010 "sign off" article "Truth Has Fallen and Has Taken Liberty With It" got a lot of people feeling depressed, but I am more optimistic. Having been both a real estate and stock broker and repeatedly seen both individual businesses and overall markets go through extreme cycles -where often the coldest part of the night is an hour before dawn -- I am impressed with the cyclical nature of just about everything, to include "imperial cycles" on a macro-political and historical level. Eventually there will be a new dawn. Nation-states will some day form out of the U.S. rubble (just like they formed out of the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia) and sanity and healthy nationalism will some day return to North America. Many anarcho-libertarians probably should feel depressed, because their view of the world is so limited that they keep beating their heads against a wall, expecting people to be "reasonable" in areas where most of the time they are really ruled by emotion and instinct. They also act as if longstanding anti-Nordic genocide in America does not matter, when in fact it really does. One argument for the creation and maintenance of smaller countries (or the return of serious "State's Rights" in America) is the fact that in even in a "democracy" with a "free press," large segments of the population have problems intelligently and decisively responding to sophisticated threats like Zionist "Info War" (to include "false flag" operations) and they need their own territory, folk culture, and nation state as "training wheels" to help preserve their long term ethnic-genetic interests. Living in a pluralist, imperial society where nobody cares any more about protecting their ethnic-genetic interests and core indigenous values seems to create an even worse problem, namely everybody becomes too fractured, selfish, and amoral to prevent the most psychopathic mafias (like Zionists) and individuals (Bill Clinton and George W. Bush) from rising to the top. It happened in the ancient Roman and Babylonian empires, and it has happened here in America as well. Most people seem to prefer to go about their daily lives unconcerned about macro social and political issues even when faced with terrible dangers, although admittedly some racial and ethnic groups (like Icelanders) seem to be more effective at intelligent grass roots democratic action than others. Links: Articles archive at vdare.com; archive at lewrockwell.com. More recent articles than the "sign off" article archived at Globalresearch.ca, include June 2, 2010 article: "A Plague Upon The World: The USA is a `Failed State Interview with Dr. Paul Craig Roberts." Dr. Robert's articles archive at Vdare.com now has the 31 July 2010 article "Let Them Eat Cake," and his 26 July 2010 article "The Year America Dissolved." Welcome back, Dr. Roberts.

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

 

Dr. Murray Rothbard: A Jewish renegade who was rejected from Ayn Rand's atheistic Jewish inner circle in Manhattan because he married a Christian wife, Murray Rothbard once quipped "All stereotypes are true." Dr. Rothbard did considerable work resurrecting Old Right paleoconservatism, although he filtered much of it from a Jewish-friendly, anarcho-libertarian perspective. Dr. Rothbard produced iconoclastic histories such as The Great Depression, which showed how the Federal Reserve created the very economic malaise it was allegedly designed to avoid. His article "Generalissimo Washington: How He Crushed the Spirit of Liberty" dovetails nicely with my discussion of Dr. Thomas Woods and the relationship of George Washington vs. the anti-Federalists below. Rothbard's Conceived in Liberty underscores what he considered to be a defining aspect of the "American experience," namely that during the colonial era, settlers in places like Pennsylvania grew in population to the size of many small European states, yet they got along perfectly well managing their own affairs at a local level without hardly any central government by European standards. In fact, without the overhang of various classes of political and religious "rent-seekers," they discovered that they were much happier and more prosperous. What Murray Rothbard does not mention is that many of these colonists, to include English Puritans in New England, Dutch in New York, German Lutherans in Pennsylvania, and Scots-Irish on the frontier, retained a quaint European folk culture and other forms of social fabric that fostered moral order on the local level. In addition, many of them consisted of Nordic and closely related Celtic peoples who had already manifested libertarian instinctive tendencies and self-sufficiency back in the Old Country. See, for example, my discussion of Iceland as a model libertarian society during the medieval period. Rothbard provided many valuable libertarian analyses regarding labor markets. He argued that the major force for driving up wages over the long run in a society is the ability of entrepreneurial businesses to increase productivity and offer better products, which in turn gives them an incentive to raise wages to attract better people. This complements the view of Eumonn Fingleton in In Praise of Hard Industries: Why Manufacturing, Not the Information Economy, Is the key to Future Prosperity, namely that only the manufacturing sector has the ability to infinitely scale up productivity and wages over the long run, not the service sector. In contrast, unions that focus simply on increasing benefits for themselves regardless of productivity gains wind up killing the golden geese that lay the golden eggs. Rothbard also pointed out many interesting historical anomalies in his lectures. For example, he claims that many colleagues at Columbia University originally started out with an extremely socialistic, pro-union orientation. After extensive studies of union-related economic statistics, they concluded that unions tend to "throw sand in the gears of change." They can also foment a "war of the working class against the working class" by driving up wages for those fortunate enough to belong to unions, while at the same time increasing unemployment among those outside the union structure. Higher wage scales may force certain employers to hire fewer workers overall. Rothbard also observed that the main forces behind the creation of the South African apartheid system were not "right wing" racist Afrikaners, but white socialist or communist unionists --many of whom were British-- who wanted to prevent blacks from taking their jobs. (Interestingly enough, the article "Denis Kearney and the Struggle for a White America" on page 192 of Best of Attack! --also mentioned with a PDF link in the Kevin Strom section below -- claims that the main force that ejected Asians from California in the late 19th century to keep California mostly white were labor unions and not racist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan). Last, but not least, Rothbard maintained that the "dirty little secret" of organized labor success in Northern states compared to the South was the tendency of northern policemen to look the other way when unions used violence to enforce strikes, whereas Southern policemen tended to be much more sympathetic towards enforcing the so-called "right to work" of strike breakers. (An article in Forbes magazine also noted another irony along this line; namely that because unions have been exempted from anti-trust and other anti-monopoly laws, certain corrupt unions abuse their control of the supply of labor with all the monopolistic arrogance of the "robber baron" corporate interests that they oppose). It is worth noting that politics makes strange bedfellows in other ways. While it is true that Communists and Nationalists are usually at each other's throats, there have been unusual historical situations where they have been closer on certain issues than so-called "moderates." For example, in the 1990's Russian communists and nationalists were closer in openly opposing Zionist oligarchs than many so-called Russian "moderates." There is also an interesting photo in Adolf Hitler by John Toland showing Communist and Nazi flags mixed together hanging out of apartment windows during a 1920's renter's strike in Germany. Lastly, in the 1960's, American old Right libertarian nationalists (paleoconservatives) were just as opposed to America's interventionism in Vietnam as the far Left, albeit for different rhetorical and ideological reasons, using code words like disdain for "foreign entanglements," "large standing armies," and "self-aggrandizing government as a threat to personal liberty" rather than "imperialism," "oppression of the masses," and "racism" Having had some personal experience working with unions, I do not want to knock them too hard here. In fact, on a broad theoretical level they are consistent with many of my pro-nationalist views, namely the right of people to organize themselves to protect their own vital interests. (The right of peaceable assembly is a First Amendment right, incidentally, along with freedom of speech and freedom of the press). Unions can be extremely effective in handling abusive employers --of whom there are many -- and in defending vital political and economic interests. Unions can also function like "craft guilds" that help improve quality standards and professionalism. Often it is hard to measure union success in these areas, since they deter employer abuse and can help improve intangible quality standards. Many of the AFL-CIO-affiliated union local leaders I had personal contact with in the State of Washington were conscious of the need to keep benefit increases in line with productivity gains. There are also many unions involving teachers, policemen, and other public servants who uphold high professional standards. In my view, America needs even more grass roots organizing to defend both political and economic interests, not less, so long as these things are done in an intelligent manner. I view the ability to go on worker's strike as a "weapon," analogous on an abstract sociological level to carrying a firearm with a concealed carry permit on a physical level. While I believe that Americans should be as "armed" as possible on the grass roots level to protect individual liberty against centralized tyranny, they should also be very careful about how they "brandish" their "weapons" in public. Even members of the most hard-core pro-gun ownership groups will agree with me that under certain circumstances, brandishing a concealed weapon in public can constitute a form of terroristic threatening and hence constitute a criminal offense, and the same applies for brandishing the more abstract threat of a worker's strike. Strikes can generate a lot of bitterness between workers and management, and scare away the very entrepreneurial environment that is required to create the innovative businesses and capital investment required to drive up real wage growth over the long run. Dr. Murray Rothbard is one of the very few relatively honest Jews I can respect and admire. If more Jews were like him, we probably would not have so many problems. Links: Rothbard File at LewRockwell.com, articles archive at Mises.org. Online literature at Mises.org includes classics such as Conceived in Liberty (PDF), On Liberty, What Has Government Done to Our Money?, and The Great Depression. Mises Institute MP3 Archive include discussion of union economics, Austrian theory of business cycle.

Dr. Murray Rothbard (1926-1995)

 

Lew Rockwell, President of the Mises Institute, has been a very effective popularizer of the libertarian insights of the founders of the Austrian School of economics created by Karl Menger (a gentile) and later redacted by Ludwig von Mises (a Jew) and Murray Rothbard (a Jew). Rockwell's works are pithy and to the point for American readers who may lack the time and inclination for Dr. Rothbard's more academic approach. Considering how American conservatism was completely knocked down for the count by decades of brainwashing from leftist, pro-big government and pro-central bank Jewish controlled national media by the early 1990's, and how the Internet Revolution still lay beyond the horizon, Lew Rockwell's decision during this period to simply focus on the libertarian side and pay enough lip service to Jewish redactors to get major Jewish funding was probably a shrewd, practical, and disciplined decision given the realities at the time. It was hard enough to reach a mass audience with either a coherent libertarian or a racial nationalist message, and probably even more difficult to do both simultaneously. It seems like only Zionist neocons and Jewish pressure organizations like the ADL and SPLC had lots of money. Most everybody else was starving. Without question there are quite a few areas where Rockwell and his libertarian colleagues hit home runs. One clear area involves explaining how Frederic Bastiat's "Fallacy of the Broken Window" applies on a general macroeconomic level, to include the overall impact of war, natural disasters, and other catastrophes. See also Professor Mark Thornton's lecture "What Thrives and Dies During War." Harry Hazlitt observed in his classic Economics in One Lesson that despite all efforts to explode this fallacy, it always continually resurfaces in national media and the pronouncements of leading politicians. Another "home run" area involves showing how increasingly levels of central planning and other forms authoritarianism tends to produce increasingly levels of inefficiency, economic mismanagement, and corruption over time. Rockwell, Rothbard, Hoppe and other colleagues demonstrate how both central government and central bank interventionism tend to do more to distort the economy, promote mal-investment, discourage productive savings and investment, undermine the growth of real productivity, and otherwise do more damage than good to the economy over the long run. This is also contrary to what one typically reads in mainstream media and hears from leading politicians, but it is true. A major reason why central bankers and Big Government politicos have pushed Keynesianism and other snake oil economic creeds on the public is because at root most of them are shameless "rent-seekers" (if not outright criminals) who shameless exploit the police power of the state and milk its prestige to get something for nothing for themselves. (See the free online book Keynes at Harvard: Economic Deception as a Political Credo by Zygmund Dobbs of the Veritas Foundation which explains how a leading university got infiltrated and corrupted by false dogmas perpetrated by leading central bankers and big government bureaucrats who provide major donations). Although I generally admire Lew Rockwell's work, my main reservation with both himself and his colleague Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo is the way they keep pushing free trade ideology long after conservatives like Dr. Paul Craig Roberts have woken up to its fallacies. "Free trade" has become a libertarian religious icon. Theoretically, if true libertarianism returns to America, then grass roots racial nationalism will reemerge as "spontaneous order" (to use a Hayekian phrase) because people are naturally tribalistic. However, it will be a cold day in hell when Zionists ever voluntarily permit their white gentile vassals in America to reorganize themselves by ethnicity, since historically ethnic groups comprise the most potent resistance forces against tyranny --to include the Jewish-flavored varieties. See my commentary for quiz question 13 "Does ethnic solidarity matter in defense of liberty?" for my "Have You Been Brainwashed? Quiz. In reality, American anarcho-libertarianism is a very strange animal that helps create the very monsters it subsequently offers itself as the only solution to get under control. By encouraging extreme individualism, people become so selfish and atomized they are incapable of serving as adequate "counter-predators" against unrestrained growth of government, out of control Third World immigration, and Zionist criminal mafias. Then after out-of-control government starts stepping on everyone, anarcho-libertarians act as if they are the only ones who fully comprehend these abuses of power, while generally ignoring outrages committed by Jews and other aliens because they remain ideologically willfully blind to racial and ethnic differences. Lew Rockwell links: Lew Rockwell's articles archive at lewrockwell.com Mises Institute MP3 Archve

Lew Rockwell, 8 May 2009 on Infowars, "We Are Now Nazi Germany"

The Obama Deception by Alex Jones. In March 2009, three months after our Lone Star Iconoclast Alert listed in Chapter 35 of the Mission of Conscience Trilogy, Alex Jones released his landmark documentary: The Obama Deception which has a very similar viewpoint. 1:51:21 Here is one web site overview: "The Obama Deception is a hard-hitting film that completely destroys the myth that Barack Obama is working for the best interests of the American people. The Obama phenomenon is a hoax carefully crafted by the captains of the New World Order. He is being pushed as savior in an attempt to con the American people into accepting global slavery. We have reached a critical juncture in the New World Order's plans. and only by exposing the con can we help to save freedom in America. The Obama Deception is not about Left or Right: it's about a One World Government. The international banks plan to loot the people of the United States and turn them into slaves on a Global Plantation. Covered in this film: who Obama works for, what lies he has told, and his real agenda, and how his initial appointments and actions prove he serves the corporate oligarchs, not the American people." See also: Review: The Obama Deception by Alex Jones March 15, 2009

 

Alex Jones is a major leader of Austin, Texas-based so-called "Patriot Resistance" against "The New World Order" along with John Stadtmiller of Republic Broadcasting Network (depicted further down this page in the nationalist section). He has played an important role in reaching millions of Americans about such threats as repeat 9/11-type false flag attacks, loss of American sovereignty before New World Order cabals, carbon tax and global warming frauds, food and water additive poisoning, economic melt-down in America, creation of the police state control grid, and genocidal global depopulation plans by a totally corrupt power elite. He admits that he finds it hard to watch mainstream media without feeling like he is being bombarded with poisonous embedded messages that try to intimidate Americans out of waking up to the New World Order. Jones has been ably assisted by the research and articles of Paul Joseph Watson, Kurt Nimmo, and other associates. His documentaries have had a powerful effect in reaching a mass audience of millions of people. They include Food: The Ultimate Secret Exposed (July 2010), Don't Tread on Me: Rise of the Republic (May 2010), Police State 4: The Rise of FEMA (April 2010), Invisible Empire A New World Order Defined (produced with Jason Bermas, April 2010), Terror Storm II (Feb 2010, Terror Storm I first released July 2006), Endgame (Nov 2009), Fall of the Republic (Oct 2009), and The Obama Deception (March 2009), 9/11 -The Road to Tyranny (Feb 2007). Jones was executive producer for 9/11 Truth classic Loose Change Final Cut (Feb 2007). The good news about all these documentaries is that they provide valuable information that has been filtered out by mainstream media. The bad news is that these documentaries are themselves filtered. They are firmly anarcho-libertarian in their ideological slant and ignore a honest portrayal of the paleoconservative and genetic top-down perspectives. One example of filtering involves Jones' take on issues such as tribalism and eugenics. While Jones admits that humans are tribal by nature, he thinks they should try to extend their tribal instincts across different racial and ethnic groups. (Who says? Why not use the K.I.S.S. principle and let them start with the group ethnically and genetically closest to themselves first and then build outward from there?) He also uses the term "eugenics" with a very negative connotation and lambastes "Nazi conspiracies," which sometimes appear to be hiding behind every bush. One can argue that the issue of "eugenics" is not that simple, since it is practiced one way or another by virtually everyone, either through omission or commission, either consciously or subconsciously. (Many sociobiologists would argue that eugenics is always practiced by virtually everyone to some degree or another at least a subconscious level; for example mate selection is inherently a eugenic decision). The United States Government has spent untold trillions on the greatest negative eugenics program in world history by supporting the accelerated reproduction of people of poor character and low IQ on its welfare programs and also by opening its borders to tidal waves of Third World illegal alien immigrants. (The correct term for "negative eugenics" is "dysgenics." The Jewish power elite generally promotes dysgenics for gentiles while supporting "eugenics" for their own kind, similar to the very ancient PSYOP formula "openly promote leftism among those outside your own tribal group to induce them to drop their guard and become weaker, and quietly encourage rightism among those within your own group to build their cohesion and other forms of tribal strength"). In regard to Jones' talk about alleged "Nazi conspiracies," many historians such as David Irving and even Pat Buchanan do not believe that Hitler had a plan to take over the world. He could not even cross the English Channel to take Britain, much less cross the Atlantic to conquer America. When Alex Jones' talks about a deliberate "globalist conspiracy" to outsource America's strategic industries, collapse the economy, genocide Americans with "soft kill" toxins (chemtrails, toxic drinking water additives, etc), and liquidate Americans in FEMA camps, I view this as an inaccurate analysis, although I fully agree with Jones that the situation is indeed very real, very serious, and very dangerous. I prefer Dr. William Pierce's assessment in his article "The Scorpion and the Frog" that much of the behavior of the Jewish power elite reflects a semi-conscious biological "tropism" that has resulted from the Jews' unique evolutionary history that has become stamped into their DNA. I do not think that elite Jews necessarily start with a conscious master plan for global enslavement and 90% global depopulation (as reflected, for example, in the "Georgia Guidestones" or "U.N. Agenda 21"), although certainly these kinds of murderous things are sanctioned in the hateful Talmud. I think that Jewish "elitists" usually start out when they initially infiltrate a relatively un-infested, pristine, productive, and homogeneous gentile society by being naturally extremely greedy and addicted to intrigue and speculation. Within one portion of their naturally fractured personalities, they cannot shake these addictions, which also include a long term historical sociological addiction towards introducing other aliens into formerly homogeneous gentile societies and mixing them up racially and ethnically, as if engaging in a form of "macro ethno-social pedophilia." Within other portions of their fractured psyches, Jews envy and admire WASPs and engage in adaptive mimicry so long as WASPs remain in the "up" position. The fact that Jews naturally have very fractured psyches is a major reason why Israel has more psychiatrists per capita than any other country, and is also rated as more corrupt than any European country. In this area I can speak from some personal experience. I lived in New York City for ten years and was surrounded by Jews. Many of my gentile friends who had similar experiences frequently talked about how much they wanted to leave NYC to "detox." One one side of their fractured personalities, Jews can come across as unusually personable, humorous, charming, articulate, learned, intelligent, and sophisticated. On another side of the "fractures," they can also come across as one of the ugliest, sickest, nastiest, meanest, and most "messed up," "neurotic," deceitful, rude, vicious, sinister, greedy, coldly manipulative, underhanded, and pushy peoples on the planet. (All these descriptive terms heard live on the streets of New York City numerous times, I swear!) After Jews become so successful that their shady tactics start breaking down the overall system --particularly after their control of a privately owned central bank fiat money system like the Federal Reserve runs debt into the stratosphere and the currency into the ground -- and after WASPs slip into a "down" position, then elite Jewish psychopaths start devising ever more desperate and ruthless plans to keep their enemies from undoing their swindles rather than "come clean." At this point, the usual Jewish paranoia goes on steroids, and the Jewish power elite starts devising ways to mass murder tens of millions of gentiles, just like Jewish-Bolsheviks in the Soviet Union, rather than suffer any form of retribution. The Jewish power elite also tends to accelerate the rate in which it loots a country on the theory that when everything breaks down, it must be in the strongest material position possible relative to everyone else. Bernie Madoff's grand Wall Street swindle and Hank Paulson's multi-trillion dollar shakedown of Congress have been such obscenely obvious outrages that many Americans are beginning to conclude that many so-called "conspiracy theorists" have in fact been dealing with "conspiracy fact." (Check out Chapter 33 and Gov. Jesse Ventura's "Wall Street" episode in his "Conspiracy Theory" series, "Season 2"). From the Jewish point of view, everything they do is usually somehow "defensive." After all, the world owes them a living and a license to engage in unlimited speculative activity at gentile expense, because the Talmud says so, and also because they are the "Chosen." Anyone who disagrees with them is automatically an evil anti-Semite who fails to understand "nice Jewish boys" who simply "make a few mistakes" and "just need to make some money." Their Jewish mothers coddled them when they got caught fibbing, so what can't the rest of the world be just as compassionate? An important key to understanding Jewish behavior is the strong likelihood that Jews are the most psychopathic inbred group of people on the planet. As one of my abnormal psychology textbooks pointed out back in my college days, when psychopaths are in the "down" position, they will stop at nothing to curry favor. When they are in an "up" position, they have no internal self-restraint to prevent them from becoming the most cruel and vicious tyrants imaginable. I discuss this and other interesting Jewish behavior phenomena in the "parasitism" section of my online "mutualism vs. parasitism" article. Alex Jones is certainly a huge improvement over the overtly pro-Zionist neocon "right wing" talk radio show hosts like Michael Savage (born Jewish as Michael Alan Wiener) and Rush Limbaugh (who takes vacations in Israel) for his willingness to occasionally identify leading Jews such as the Rothschilds, Larry Silverstein, and Henry Kissinger at the top of New World Order cabals. Given the current realities of a thoroughly dumbed-down American public brainwashed by multi-racialism, multiculturalism, Holocaustianity, and Christian Zionist-style Israel worship in mass media, maybe Jones' brand of anarcho-libertarianism is about as far as someone can push the envelop and still reach an American audience in the millions. On top of all this, many people like his persona as a self-styled red-blooded, manly "fighting Texan" willing to stand above America's all too abundant masses of effeminized, conformist, wimpy, metro-sexual males, although some may wonder if Jones' stage personality gets a bit "schmaltzy," "showy" and overdone at times, showing a possible Jewish "chutzpah" influence on Jones' psyche. This is a tricky issue for me personally, since I have always admired the manliness, adventurousness, and special "fighting spirit" of Texas "cowboys" (reminiscent of Norsemen in the sagas) --so long as these things are handled in an appropriate manner -- but at the same time I bitterly resent people like Lyndon Baines Johnson (part Jewish, a Big Government centralizer, social reengineer, globalist, and a likely ringleader in the JFK assassination -- see Gov. Jesse Ventura's "Conspiracy Theory" episode on the JFK assassination), and George W. Bush (a demonic pervert, globalist, Zionist bootlick, and Judas Goat -- see Chapt. 5) who have tried to hijack the "Texas mystique" for their own nefarious political agendas. Alex Jones has his critics, to be sure, such as the September 9. 2009 article The Alex Jones Deception: False Flag Journalism Discrediting The Truth Movement, Victor Thorn's Hall of Shame at WingTV.net, the Gentile Alliance Jones web page, and Eric Hufschmid's expose page. See also Jeff Rense's summary expose page with numerous links titled "Who IS This Man...Really?" "Why Is The ADL Promoting Alex Jones?" by Brother Naphanael Kapner, who is a Jewish convert to Christianity, comments: "...Jones, his program, his sites (at least five of them), and through his documentaries are essentially the core of a mass desensitizing operation. When viewing his ‘films,’ most come away feeling as if they’ve been bludgeoned and beaten to near hopelessness. And that, of course, is the very idea. All the talk about ‘taking the country back’ basically runs most people into the ground…and many of them become moribund, disheartened…or just quit. When Jones keeps pounding home the theme about the ALL-powerful Global Elite - but not mentioning that Zionist Jews ARE the great majority of the elite - the message of who is really running the West and America is lost..." Elsewhere, Brother Kapner talks about how Jones is meant to serve as "fly-paper" for the political Right in America. I think that this a very profound insight, and I want to add on to it here with my own interpretation. Jones offers four hours of programming each week day (although the 4th hour is typically a rebroadcast) and two hours each Sunday, which probably soaks up all the time that most people who work normal jobs to support themselves have in order to obtain alternative news. By giving the appearance that he offers "all the news that is fit to print," (a longstanding motto of the Zionist-controlled New York Times) it does not matter how much truth Jones lets out to the public as long as he leads the pack and the public remains fairly passive while the power elite plays for time to perfect its control grid, censor the Internet, and go back to deeply brainwashing the public with controlled national media just like what they did throughout most of the 20th century in the pre-Internet era. In other words, a major function of Jones is to prevent opposition to the power elite from ever launching a truly effective counter movement to regain control of America while the power elite steadily lets out enough truth to play for time. A truly effective counter-movement would probably have strong racial nationalist overtones to differentiate most whites from the Jewish power elite on a religious, ethnic, and racial as well as ideological level, but Jones will always keep the debate generally framed within the anarcho-libertarian ideological box and avoid going near proven "tribal behavior" engines of effective political action. See also Is Alex Jones A Zionist Shill?..Controversy Swirls by Brother Kapner. Alternative medicine activist Dr. Leonard Horowitz is also unhappy with Alex Jones. In his 28 July 2010 article coauthored with Sherri Kane titled "WAR on The World: Rothschild League’s 30 Facts Evidencing Gulf Oil Disaster Was Planned," for item #30, Dr. Horowitz states: "Homeland Security medical officials are also now implicated in fraudulently promoting (through Alex Jones) a `decoy product' for infectious disease markets called Silver Sol for profit and probably depopulation as well. (CLICK HERE for the shocking story.)" The 13 Aug 2010 article Alex Jones promotes Zionist heretics Jeffrey and Missler at the Fitzpatrick Informer comments: "Evidence continues to mount against American radio show host and self-proclaimed patriot Alex Jones that he is a counter-intelligence operative working for the state of Israel..." Many observers feel that Alex Jones' "Hollywood Is Owned by the Arabs (video)" rhetoric, repeated as recently as August 2010, is a clear "smoking gun" about his ultimate loyalties. Rev Ted Pike weighed in with his 7 Sept 2010 article "An Open Letter to Alex Jones" and his 9 Sept 2010 article Jones to Pike: "Don't Criticize Jews." In the latter article, Pike summarizes: "What I learned, beyond any doubt, was that Alex Jones cannot be depended upon to provide the populist right with all the facts necessary to understand geopolitical reality. If he will censor the truth concerning a threat as dominant and well-documented as Jewish supremacism, what else will he manipulate?" On air, Jones admitted his wife has some Jewish ancestry. A number of people wonder where he gets all the money necessary to fund his productions and wide distribution, such as Michael Collins Piper. Listen to Mike Piper describe his perceptions of Jones as a "Judas Goat" in his 29 Dec podcast MP3 (download Here) and 31 Dec podcast MP3 (download Here), at: michaelcollinspiper.podbean.com. Piper believes that Jones is misdirecting people, omitting important facts, and confusing important issues, to include misrepresenting historical facts about Nazi Germany in an effort to create a contemporary Nazi boogeyman behind "The New World Order." In his book The New Babylon, Piper explains how Zionism and Jewish plutocracy comprise the main forces behind the New World Order rather than latter day "Nazis." Piper recommends the web site alexjonesexposed.wordpress.com. .Alex Jones has repeatedly interviewed Bilderberg sleuth Jim Tucker of the American Free Press as well as AFP journalist Mark Anderson. However, in Chapter 10 of my Trilogy, I mention Capt. Eric May's complaint that Alex Jones has ignored his alerts. According to Capt. May, Alex Jones accused him of being COINTELPRO to Stephen Webster who worked on the staff of the Lone Star Iconoclast. Capt. May makes no bones about his U.S. Army Intelligence Officer background, (see Chapter 1 of the Mission of Conscience Series), and admits that he has played a "double game" through his relationship with people like high level Jewish-born Bush Administration official Chase Untermeyer, but he also claims he has been firmly on the patriot side since the Battle of Baghdad cover-up -- and probably got "neurotoxined" with ALS for his efforts. In his 15 Dec 2010 article Urgent Infowar Discussion: Is Alex Jones a Judas?, Capt. May made it clear to the public where he stands regarding Alex Jones. In his 27 March 2011 article BREAKING: Pacifex 11 Linked to Asian Earthquake, he recommended readers link to: Alex Jones Ex Fan - Re: To Cursing Out Mike Delaney at Prothink.org (video). (See also Alex Jones Zionist behavior (video)). Despite negative things said by various detractors about Alex Jones, his ability to reach a mass audience, expose false flag operations, and directly denounce the criminality of the "power elite" and "globalists" (however vaguely defined) remains impressive. He has is a very intelligent man, with an excellent memory for details and ability to identify inane contradictions that surround us. His work has helped inspire other important alternative electronic media with a similar libertarian bent, such as The Corbett Report run by James Corbett, an ex-patriot Canadian currently living in Western Japan, and Media Monarchy run by James Pilato (who interviewed this author on 30 July 2009) based in Portland, Oregon. I draw heavily upon many works of Alex Jones, Paul Watson, Kurt Nimmo, and other InfoWar.com associates in my Mission of Conscience Trilogy because of their excellence in certain areas. I quote from his interviews with people like former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Alan Watt, David Icke, Sheriff Richard Mack, and Birgitta Jonsdottir, Member of Parliament in Iceland. But then again, I am openly and consciously eclectic. Admittedly my own personal political approach is geared to my own unique background involving sales experience, academia, and other influences. It is not necessarily appropriate for other American activists. It will probably take many different approaches by many different kinds of people on many different levels of our society to win our struggle. I like the famous dictum of Socrates "If I know anything, it is that I know nothing." I never know the whole truth, but arrive at truth by piecing together information from many different sources, to include Alex Jones. An important issue for me remains how to offer the public a positive vision that can rebuild a successful society without getting drowned in all the ugliness and criminality that the power elite keeps throwing at us. At the beginning of Chapter 37 I talk about how PSYOP approaches like fear mongering and predictive programming can be used as tools by the power elite to preoccupy the public and frighten it into appeasement and acquiescence. Even Alex Jones admits that educating the public about the terrible things that evil New World Order cabals are trying to do to us can become self-defeating at that point when people become paralyzed with fear or fatalistic, and lose the will to openly and aggressively defend their Constitutional rights. A huge part of the answer for me personally involves trying to rebuild the kind of social fabric and indigenous values that once worked for my own ancestors. Alex Jones' hard line anarcho-libertarianism, where he continually beats his breast about how he does not care at all about race or ethnicity and only judges people as individuals, goes against my own brand of paleoconservativism where I recognize that people act in society both as individuals and as part of groups. Their behavior is often every bit as much instinctive and tribal as it is rational and individualized. In the real world, most people require the support of a tribal group to stand up to tyranny. It may not make globalists feel particularly comfortable to see growing masses of Americans protest their outrageous crimes and (neo-Jacobin) police state corruption from an anarcho-libertarian ideological perspective, but as a fall back position, it is safer for them to see Americans simply chant "Protect the Constitution!," "Protect the Constitution!" from the purely libertarian perspective advocated by Jones than to also see them circle the wagons on a biological level, with almost the same instinctive fury that honey bees display when they suddenly recognize a Death's-head Hawkmoth parasite within their colony and then converge on it to sting it. A big part of Alex Jones' alleged Trojan Horse function may be to mentally disconnect Americans from consciously recognizing "Jewish racial reality" and "Zionist criminality." The same goes with innate biological differences involving other groups of Americans, to include Mexicans. Here, Jones encourages white Americans to ignore racial and ethnic differences as well. I am certainly all for "Protecting the Constitution," it is just that I also believe that "Protecting the Constitution" is just a starting point -- a "necessary, but not sufficient" condition -- for sorting out Americans problems. In some situations, your skin color becomes your "uniform" whether you want it to be this way or not, such as the well-publicized Reginald Denny case during the 1992 Los Angeles riots where a white construction truck driver got dragged from his cab and nearly beaten to death by a gang of blacks for simply being white. On a more subtle level, just because a particular topic is totally taboo in current public discussion does not prevent it from remaining a very real factor in human affairs. For example, one taboo topic remains Protestant vs. Catholic conflict, supposedly rendered a "non-issue" by the "melting pot" and enlightened rationalist instruction in our public schools long ago. Yet in big cities like New York, Chicago, and Boston, Italian and Irish Catholics often ally themselves with Jews against WASPs. As Dr. Lothrop Stoddard explained in his landmark 1924 work Racial Realities in Europe, one reason why this conflict is unlikely to ever completely go away is that "Protestantism" has had a high historical correlation with "Nordics" and closely related Celts, whereas "Catholicism" has had a much higher correlation with other types of Celtic, Mediterranean, and Alpine branches of Caucasian peoples --and each group has distinctive cognitive, temperamental, and emotional characteristics embedded in their DNA that can make "getting along" tricky on certain social, political, and economic issues. Among other things, "Alpines" as a group tend to be much more authoritarian and dogmatic compared to "Nordics," who tend to be more adventurous, individualistic, rationalistic, emotionally distant (often interpreted or misinterpreted by others as "arrogance") and entrepreneurial. (See more discussion by Dr. Stoddard in Appendix I of Part 6 of my Iceland Gets "ENRONed" series, as well as in the "Handling Real Nazis" section of Chapter 34 of the Mission of Conscience series.) After reading Racial Realities in Europe, one might get the impression that the policy of forcefully entangling Nordics with other types of whites within the context of the "pluralistic" American empire has been a long term sociological disaster. It has actually reversed the process in which Nordics separated themselves on a social and political as well as theological level from other whites in Europe during the Protestant Reformation, or later separated themselves from the British Empire during the American War of Independence. Today "federalism" has become America's omnipresent secular state religion, and the U.S. Government -- disproportionately influenced by Jews at the top and non-Nordics everywhere else -- has taken on all the corrupt, totalitarian, dogmatic, and inefficient characteristics of the Catholic Church that Martin Luther protested against in the 16th century. The Catholic Church of the late Middle Ages had become a totally corrupt rent-seeking operation masquerading as a religion, and today the U.S. Government, intertwined with a nexus of military-industrial-central banking-big corporate interests, Mossad-CIA, and the Jewish Lobby, are all essentially just a governmental and special interest version of the same thing. Both systems were supported on the backs of large masses of gullible, petty people with a lowly peasant mentalities who were incapable of acting as the intelligent counter predators necessary to keep tyrannical predators in check. Reminiscent of the "witch-hunts and wars of religion and imperial conquest" once promoted by the 16th and 17th century Catholic Church, Mossad-CIA today creates false flag terror attacks, Guantanamo torture, the Al Qaeda boogeyman (see Chapter 12), and the destruction of civil liberties at home. Meanwhile, in the Gulf of Mexico, the Rothschild-controlled oil company British Petroleum has exercised its "Divine Right" to control the Obama Administration, violate virtually all safety standards, manipulate major media and local police, and shorten the lives of millions of Americans (let them eat cake!) by flaunting prohibitions against using the highly toxic dispersant Corexit. If old northern European heroes and heroines who fought for political decentralization and human liberty in the face of "New World Order" threats of their era could turn in their graves, then Arminius, Martin Luther, Queen Elizabeth I of England, and Gustavus Adolfus would probably be running high RPM right now. Don't forget Thomas Jefferson either, who once created an Anglo-Saxon grammar book to help Anglo-Americans regain a greater sense of their roots, and later in life stated that peoples from northern Europe were better suited for republican government than people from southern Europe. (See. Elena Kagan and the Decline of WASP America by Kevin MacDonald, Ph. D, The Nationalist Times, May 2010, for more on what happens when Jews and their minions displace WASPs). In spirit, if not in actual public statements, the current phony "War on Terror," and creation of the "Homeland Security" apparatus (currently run by a Catholic of probable Jewish descent named Janet Napolitano, and formerly by a Jew named Michael Chertoff who turned loose the 9/11 "dancing Israelis" and "art students" and has been a major profiteer on cancer-causing airport body scanners) and the Federally-controlled, militarized police state (see Chapter 31 of the Mission of Conscience series), might be interpreted as a devious Jewish-Catholic effort to further marginalize and even ultimately eliminate WASP influence in America, just as initial 16th and 17th century Protestant gains got wiped out in France and Austria in the animated map below. Wikipedia caption from article The Protestant Reformation: "Reformation and Counter Reformation in Europe. Protestant lands in blue (with gains and the losses due to the Counter Reformation), Catholic in olive."   There was nothing accidental about the Protestant roll-back depicted above. For example, as part of the Counter Reformation, the Pope created the Jesuits who took a personal loyalty oath to their temporal maximum leader, underscoring an authoritarian theme that would later be echoed in the 20th century. According to "Fascism, Sequel to Communism:" Hitler's feared SS troops and the Gestapo were also closely connected with the Jesuits. Hitler referred to Himmler, who headed the SS, as "our Ignatius of Loyola." The SS's black uniforms were based on the Jesuits' robes and many Jesuits participated in the SS - including Himmler's uncle who was a senior SS officer and a Jesuit priest. The SS skull and cross bones also appears at the ceremony of the Jesuit oath Jesuits also swore to infiltrate and subvert Protestantism and republican government. Part of the Jesuit oath, administered within the higher "inner circle," went as follows: ...Therefore to the utmost of my power I will defend this doctrine and His Holiness's right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Lutheran Church of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden and Norway, and the now pretended authority and Churches of England and Scotland, and the branches of same now established in Ireland and on the continent of America and elsewhere and all adherents in regard that they may be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome... ...will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the militia of the Pope... Chapter 5 of the Mission of Conscience series contains an important historical example of a particularly horrible Jewish-Catholic Alliance. An excerpt from the lecture "The Fall of Poland" by Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson describes how a partnership between a corrupted Polish Catholic nobility and Jewish middlemen reduced the Polish people into the worst form of slavery in Europe during the 16th-17th centuries. More often than not, Jews manipulated the nobility rather than the other way around. During this dark period, 80% of the world's Jewish population moved to the Polish empire, which became not only "The New Jerusalem," but also a prototype for the kind of "New World Order" tyranny that Jews would later try to fasten on to the United States and entire world. What Would It Take? by Edmund Connelly, Occidental Observer, 15 July 2010 makes the point that things could go from bad to worse when white Americans -- on track to become an absolute minority in a couple of decades-- could become extermination targets, just as millions of whites have already been driven into poverty and starvation in South Africa under black rule. Given the seriousness of this overall situation, Alex Jones is not doing his audiences a favor when he fails to inform them regarding the racial motivations behind anti-WASP marginalization in particular, and anti-White genocide in general, by an alien power elite. Nor is he helping European Americans when he fails to inform them about the richness of their own indigenous European roots that they could draw upon for strength and cohesion in the battle for survival ahead. At root, there is a very simple biological explanation behind America's trend towards unfettered globalism and the police state within American borders. It all started when WASP's once ran this country in the 19th century and created the highly prosperous infrastructure of universities and "home garage middle class tinkerers" that promoted scientific and technological advancement. They also created political institutions that protected individual liberty. Much of this was based upon the innate individualism of Nordic or closely related Celtic peoples like the Puritans, Anglo-Saxons, Scandinavians, Scottish, and Scots-Irish. These peoples are noted for their legendary "Faustian spirit" that glorifies scientific as well as geographic exploration. Then in poured Catholics and Jews from stagnant, corrupt societies in Southern and Eastern Europe. Initially, they all felt profound inferiority complexes in the face of impressive WASP achievements, where America once led the world in inventiveness and was on track to have a greater industrial base than France, Germany, and Britain combined. The Catholics and Jews engaged in "adaptive mimicry," assuming enough WASP values (superficially at least) to aid their rise to the top. Over time, they incrementally exploited their political (and even criminal mafia) organization to edge more individualized WASPs out of the strategic power bases of American society. Flash forward today, and Jews and Catholic are so firmly in the saddle that they think they have everything under control (we even have a Jewish-Catholic head of the Orwellian-sounding "Department of Homeland Security" named Janet Napolitano ), and WASPs are a dispensable commodity that can be sneered at, marginalized, and even disposed of. Catholics and Jews now take for granted the subtle "loose-tight" temperamental characteristics more commonly found among WASP's ("loose-tight" --a term frequently used in In Search of Excellence by Waterman and Peters -- involves a talent for sophisticated and meticulous long range technological and operational planning combined with a fine balance between decentralized individual initiative and self-restraint combined with an innate chivalrous sense of loyalty to the "common good") even though they themselves lack this fine balance of innate temperamental characteristics. "Adaptive mimicry" has now been replaced by "chip-on-the-shoulder" arrogance, and the innate crookedness of Jews and innate authoritarianism of Catholics has worked its way to the surface. We now see the same shameless "rent-seeking" and "feather-bedding" mentality in bloated federal bureaucracies (disproportionately filled with Jews and Catholics) that exploit the phony "War on Terror" that Americans once saw in spades in a much earlier era in American history with "Jewish lightning" in Brooklyn, "Kosher Nostra" racketeering in Las Vegas, and vulgar grubbing Irish Catholic "patronage" political machines in Chicago. Not surprisingly, as WASP's are being liquidated through their low reproductive rates, and inability to defend their ethnic as well as geographic "territory," America is assuming all the stagnant and corrupt characteristics of the societies that many Catholics and Jews originally came from in the 19th century. America increasingly looks more like southern Italy, back alley Dublin, and Israel (rated by many sources as more corrupt than most European countries) and less and less like Scandinavia and Merry Olde England. In the long run, social analysis is really fairly simple. As the Jewish British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli once observed in the 19th century, "In the long run, it is all racial." (Check out the "Bioresponse" chart elsewhere on this web page created by Harvard professor Edward Wilson where he conceptualizes "group genetic response" as a "Log 10 [seconds]" mathematical evolutionary function across time). Human tribalism and innate differences in productivity between human groups are fundamental facts of life that will never go away. In the long run, it is far wiser to deal with these things out in the open than to try to suppress them. In fact, by allowing Jews and Catholics to engage in "adaptive mimicry" to get the upper hand over them, one might say that WASP's "trained the dog to bite them." Worse yet, they have allowed Jewish-controlled media monopoly allied with forms of government coercion to forcefully integrate WASPs with Jews and Catholics so thoroughly throughout all areas of American society that Catholic and Jewish deficiencies are now WASP problems, whether WASPs deserve these problems or not on their own. When Jews and Catholics do insanely criminal, authoritarian, or stupid things and go down, they automatically pull WASPs down with them. In retrospect, it was incredibly foolish for WASPs to expose the fate of their children and all future generations to the shaky results of anarcho-libertarian "dog training" applied to alien peoples. All this having been said, as an individual who has tried his own hand at creating documentary films, and understanding how very hard it is to produce and distribute professional-quality works with so many Jewish gate-keepers manning the strategic choke-points of film distribution, I can respect Alex Jones' achievements in this area. In fact, I can go a step further. Despite all the anarcho-libertarian ideological blind spots, and other problems and limitations addressed in this piece, I like Alex Jones enough to listen to him a lot, subject to personal caveats and reservations filed away in the back of my mind that make him, like Ron Paul and other libertarians, "necessary but not sufficient" and a form of "limited hangout." In other words, listening to Alex Jones is like eating a delicious but boney fish. As long as you can separate the good meat out from the bones so that you do not get them stuck in your throat, it is good eating. One reason why I like Jones is that I believe that for Americans who have been raised in sheltered homes (to include Scandinavian-Americans like myself with their reputation for "Nordic naïveté"), Jones can be good at smelling intrigue and explaining how evil people think. He knows how to "think kinky," detect black ops, and smell double and triple agents. He is even good at discerning knuckle-brained, "power-tripping control freaks" at lower levels. As they say in New York City, one has to become "street smart" and read the "wise guys." And indeed, with the decline of the WASP, there are quite a few highly psychopathic, punk wise guys and other types of mafia-criminal-sleazy-greasy evil people in high places these days. For naive Americans, Jones is like a "half-way house" or a good initial toe in the water regarding many important suppressed realities. Interestingly enough, in his November 2010 broadcasts Alex Jones himself repeatedly commented that he is beginning to find new respect for Glenn Beck and Michael Savage because they are finally showing the courage to come out in the open and alert the public to possible false flag attacks that could be staged by the government. Alex Jones believes that he made an important contribution by moving mainstream media closer to himself. I find it hard to come down too hard on Alex Jones because I think he has a valid point here. In fact, given all the paradoxical and Kafkaesque twists and turns of the "Info War," it is possible that some Jews are blasting Jones as being heavily "Jewish connected" not because they feel that Jones is spreading too much disinformation, but rather because as a "Jewish connected" renegade, Jones may actually be waking too many gentiles up. One way to try to unfairly discredit Jones among the gentile Right is to emphasize his "Jewish connections." In the Kafkaesque, fractured world of Jewish intrigue, it is possible that "all of the above" is true, namely that Jones is simultaneously sprinkling bits of disinformation here and there while going too far (from the Jewish perspective) in waking people up in certain other areas at the same time. He is like hedge fund manager who is both long and short different sectors of the market at the same time, running a complex juggling act. He claims on air that he is trying to spread as much truth as possible while at the same time braving the risk of getting assassinated. Ultimately, he insists, "This is not a game." He is not doing this for his health. I fully agree with Jones fully on that point, namely that the "Info War" is deadly serious with huge stakes. I hasten to add that I also like to listen to Daryl Bradford Smith, Rev. Ted Pike, Jeff Rense, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Gov. Jesse Ventura, the late Dr. Murray Rothbard and other "anarcho-libertarians" listed in this section. I addition, I listen to John Stadtmiller, Michael Collins Piper, Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson, Kevin Strom, the late Dr. William Pierce, and other more paleoconservative folks listed in the "nationalist" section below. Taken all together, I think they are all helping to lead America back in the Right direction (pun intended). Links: Articles archives and video links at: Prisonplanet.com, prisonplanet.tv, infowars.com. Genesis Communications Network: Alex Jones home page and MP3 archive. Honorable mention at Genesis Communications Network also include: Webster Tarpley's World Crisis Radio. Tarpley is a foremost expert on false flag attacks, geopolitics, and macroeconomic crises. However, he has an infatuation with FDR and the New Deal and a dislike for the Mises Institute and libertarian perspectives on economics that is troubling for many individuals like myself who lean towards paleoconservatism and nationalism. Tarpley is also anti-racialist. Nevertheless, in other areas I respect Tarpley as a gold mine of valuable information and insights. Erskine Overnight. Erskine interviewed this author and Capt. May about the swine flu epidemic. Other Sources: If "Hollywood Is Owned by the Arabs" is too much for you to stomach, but you still want to stay on the libertarian side that avoids racial nationalist interpretations but still exposes Zionists and other corrupt power elites, consider Daryl Bradford Smith at the French Connection at iamthewitness.com. He has interviewed a lot of good people with a variety of valuable viewpoints -- such as Michael Collins Piper, Bill Murphy of GATA, John Kaminski, Jim Condit, and the late Eustace Mullins. Additional Update References: 2011-08-23 Alex Jones, Mike Adams and the 9/11 Litmus Test. [Rense.com] 2011-01-21 Alex Jones discussion by David Duke and Tom Sunic (video)

Alex Jones     From "Why Is The ADL Promoting Alex Jones?" by Brother Naphanael Kapner

 

Pat Buchanan, along with Joseph Sobran, Col Donn de Grand Pre, Dr. Thomas Woods (see below), and John Dalberg-Acton happens to be one of many conservative Catholic intellectuals I can respect and admire --subject to certain disclaimers, caveats, and reservations which I state below. Interestingly enough, Buchanan has been popularizing insights that were well known among American rightist circles for decades, but suppressed by controlled media, such as the The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization (suicidal demographic decline rates of whites) and Churchill, Hitler, and "The Unnecessary War": How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World (or how Allies were at least as much at fault in causing WWII as Adolf Hitler). Consistent with my discussions about WASP dispossession, Buchanan came out with his 14 May 2010 article "Are Liberals Anti-WASP?" about how both WASPs and certain Catholics groups are now getting short-changed by the Democratic establishment -- in fact certain Catholics who were "anti-WASP" in an earlier era are now suffering blow-back from rising former "liberal-minority coalition" allies: ...If Kagan is confirmed, Jews, who represent less than 2 percent of the U.S. population, will have 33 percent of the Supreme Court seats. Is this the Democrats' idea of diversity? But while leaders in the black community may be upset, the folks who look more like the real targets of liberal bias are white Protestants and Catholics, who still constitute well over half of the U.S. population. Not in living memory has a Democratic president nominated an Irish, Italian or Polish Catholic, though these ethnic communities once gave the party its greatest victories in the cities and states of the North. What happened to the party of the Daleys, Rizzos and Rostenkowskis? And not in nearly half a century has a Democratic president nominated a white Protestant or white Catholic man or woman. Catholics once provided the political backbone for Jews on their rise to power in the big cities like New York, Chicago, Boston, and Los Angeles. They also provided the "interface" between the WASP world and Jewish world by shilling for Jews in Jewish-controlled major media to help keep WASPs in the heartland bamboozled. A few Catholics like Rev. Charles Coughlin were willing to speak out in the 1930's, but he eventually shut up on orders from his Detroit Archbishop in the early 1940's, just as WASPs feared. After all, the Vatican has a long history of being infiltrated by the Rothschilds and other Zionists. (See my discussion of the chapter "Zionist Spy Inside the Vatican" from The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within and related topics in Chapt. 29 of the Mission of Conscience series). Just as Randolph Bourne once famously observed that "War is the health of the state," that is, war provides a perfect environment for a central government to become ever more centralized, similarly the rise of neo-Jacobin federal government and the welfare-warfare state in the 20th century (or what historians Harry Elmer Barnes and Gore Vidal have called "Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace" in book titles) ended up being very good for the upward social mobility of both Jews and Catholics and America --often at WASP expense. It is probably fair to say that both Jews and Catholics acquired vastly more prestige through their "liberal minority coalition" partnership -- culminating in JFK's "Camelot" -- than if either group had continued to be viewed by WASPs according to Old World norms. Many Catholics continue to serve the Jewish agenda to milk the old "liberal-minority coalition" political formula to death, even though by now they have pretty much killed the WASP golden goose that once laid golden eggs. The old "welfare-warfare" political formula includes supporting the perpetual phony "War on Terror" (see Chapt. 7 and Chapt 12 of my Mission of Conscience series), despite the fact that leading Jewish psychopaths (a redundancy) have largely discarded Catholics as "useful idiots," just as they have now completely discarded Muslim and Christian Palestinian communities that once supported Jews as they were building up their beachhead in Palestine in the early to mid-20th century. I learned as a former stock broker that in the very long run high flying stocks and industries always return to historical norms regarding what they are really worth based upon real cash flow generating power and real assets, and the same is true in a kind of "ethnic market" that is the psychological analog to the "stock market." The phony "War on Terror" may help postpone the day of reckoning for both Jews and Catholics, but eventually public perceptions will cycle back towards Old World norms. The psychological "ethnic market" will some day "price into their stock" the fact that the liberal-minority coalition took a 90% white and mostly WASP country with the largest and most prosperous industrial base and some of the greatest individual freedom in the world in the mid to late 19th century, and converted it into a soon-to-be majority nonwhite Third World economic basket case and authoritarian police state in a little over a century. Some day WASPs in America (what few are left) will probably go back to viewing most Irish Catholics in America in a manner that is a lot closer to the way the English middle class and Northern Ireland Protestants viewed Irish Catholics in Ireland in the mid-19th century than the way most Irish Catholics are viewed by most Americans in America today. Without question Buchanan is brilliant and well-researched. The bad news is that he is only willing to push the envelop so far against conventional wisdom offered by mainstream media. His works still edit out considerable direct criticism of Jews and identification of their central role in many historical events. His policy of incrementalism and cautious and carefully measured approaches towards dispensing "truth" to the public is a trade off. On the one hand, by diluting his message, he can get important messages past Jewish gatekeepers to broad audiences. By acting as a "kosher conservative," he hopes to sustain some form of "conservatism" through thick and thin in hopes of never making Jewish media moguls and other plutocrats mad enough to want to destroy everything. On the other hand, by not telling the full story, people may wake up too late to be able to effectively face various grave dangers. In addition, Buchanan only tends to go on "limited offensives" once he is convinced the public mood has changed to the point that it is relatively safe. The big problem with the appeasement and incremental approach is that once Jews get completely out of control, as they did with Russians following the Bolshevik Revolution, or with Palestinians upon creation of the Jewish State of Israel, they themselves practice daring (as in "chutzpah") and forms of "total war" (as in "cultural Marxism," "affirmative action" forms of slow anti-white marginalization and genocide, and other approaches). In the "Info War," it takes at least a "maneuver warfare" tactician to decisively defeat Jewish "Mongols of covert 4th generation warfare." (Please go to Chapter 38 where I discuss "Principles of Info War," and search the web page for the key word "Mongols.") Using William S. Lind's four generations of warfare paradigm as an analogy, Buchanan's mentality is heavily "Second Generation." Using a World War II analogy, he reminds me of British Gen. Bernard Montgomery who only tended to advance in limited offensives once he had a clear 2:1 or 3:1 superiority in man power and fire power (combat power) in set-piece battles compared to someone like a Gen. Douglas MacArthur, Gen George S. Patton, Gen Field Marshall Erwin Rommel, or Generaloberst Heinz Guderian who were much more mentally geared towards audaciously and opportunistically striking their enemies on the flanks or making deep pincer envelopments to collapse the enemy from the rear forward (the basic blitzkrieg concept). So far Buchanan has given no inkling that Jews are a significantly in-bred gene pool with a high percentage of psychopathic and Neanderthal-type people for whom there is absolutely no limit to how much evil they can commit or the depths of ugliness they will sink to until someone finally brings them in check. Nor has Buchanan made much effort to lay out clear differences in ethnic spirit and innate mentality between contending groups in America. In the 19th century, when WASP's set the tone for America with the Protestant work ethic, the spirit of America promoted innovation, craftsmanship, savings, prudent investment, and the production of real and useful things, consistent with the ancestral patterns of northern European peoples. In the 20th century, after Jews used their mafia networking talents to shove all other groups aside at the top and increasingly set the tone for the country, America increasingly became a corrupt nation of rent-seekers from top to bottom and from sea to shining sea, not a whole lot different from the "anything for a buck" transactional mentality of Jews addicted to "schlepping (peddling) schmatta (things)." Other "pillars" of this "New America" have included Jewish hucksters like Bernie Madoff, Alan Dershowitz, Elie Wiesel, Larry Silverstein, Mike Milken, Jonathan Pollard, Andy Fastow... (the list is endless!) for whom posturing or "chutzpah" is everything. Let us not forget another great contribution of the self-Chosen bearers of "fossil" civilization, namely the attitude of Jewish mafia in ancient Babylon that it was always better to figure angles than ever engage in physical labor. (Physical labor is prohibited for Jews in the Talmud. For more on these and other exotic traits, please see my discussion of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology in the "parasitism" section of my mutualism vs. parasitism article. This should help readers who have never had personal contact with Jews better understand how "rent-seeking" comprises the center of gravity of the Jewish way of life. Furthermore, it should become easier to understand how high level Jews have always operated as a kind of "CIA in search of a country," and how Jews tend to infect countries with values that serve themselves at the expense of their hosts as they rise in power and influence.) I suppose for certain descendants of Irish Catholics, particularly the more primitive "shanty Irish" types with some possible admixture of Neanderthalism (quite a few Shanty Irish actually have a simian appearance as reflected in the cartoon to the right, which includes the small forehead and receding chin. See also the "balanced from the bottom up" 19th century cartoon depicted in Chapter 34. Lastly, the study guide The Irish Famine, 1.3 MB PDF download, has a section with numerous 19th century quotes and cartoons that compare Shanty Irish to apes and other primitive relatives of homo sapiens) it was not worth making much of a distinction between either "Anglos" or "Jews." Quite a few of these "primitives" hate all "Anglos" with a passion because of the very unfortunate Irish experience for centuries under British occupation. While they perpetually wallow in self-pity and a sense of victimhood (although for Irish Catholics it is still nothing compared to the high art practiced by Jews with their "Holocaustianity" and other religions of professional "victimhood" and "self-pity"), how many Irish Catholics are willing to admit that they themselves share some blame for their own predicament, and in the long run they could be acting self-destructively by fanatically allying themselves with the "underdog," that is, Jews, Blacks, Mexicans, and other "minorities," against "Anglos." An example of one self-inflicted geopolitical initiative that embittered Irish-British relations for centuries took place when Irish leaders invited Spain to use their island as a staging area for another go at conquering England after Sir Francis Drake's naval forces defeated the first Spanish Armada (See Spanish Armadas and Ireland [pdf] by Hiram Morgan, National University of Cork). The British became totally infuriated. They not only systematically hunted down and killed or captured all the Spanish soldiers in Ireland, but their determination hardened to fasten a plantation-occupation system on the Irish to "fix" them for good. We learn in Final Judgment that Irish American leader Joe Kennedy decided to join up with the Jews after World War II so that one of his sons could become the first Roman Catholic President of the United States. Kennedy Sr. claimed that he had fought the Jews in the 1930's an effort to prevent WWII, and certainly there was no Irish-American who was more aware of the Jewish role in Bolshevism and other sinister Jewish modus operandi. Nevertheless, Kennedy Sr. was clearly willing to make a pact with the Devil to serve Irish-American interests following WWII at the possible long term expense of the American national interest. (See "A Conversation in Hell," mocking Joe Kennedy, by Jewish writer John Podhoretz, New York Post, 21 July 1999, reproduced in Final Judgment). In the 1960's, political expediency prevailed once again when Senator Ted Kennedy, another one of Joe Kennedy's sons, supported the Jewish ADL initiative to push through the Immigration Act of 1965 which eventually opened up the floodgates of Third World immigration into America, which has in turn led to America's continuing social, political, and economic slide in the direction of becoming a permanent Third World hell hole. The April 2003 American Renaissance article "The Fade to Brown: Immigration and the End of White America" by Stephen Webster comments: ...If there is one man who can take the most credit for the 1965 act, it is John F. Kennedy. Kennedy seems to have inherited the resentment his father Joseph felt as an outsider in Boston’s WASP aristocracy. He voted against the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, and supported various refugee acts throughout the 1950s. In 1958 he wrote a book, A Nation of Immigrants, which attacked the quota system as illogical and without purpose, and the book served as Kennedy’s blueprint for immigration reform after he became president in 1960. A number of traditional American conservatives are also very upset with Ronald Reagan, who looked "Irish Catholic" and also acted that way with his slick, glad-handing political style (earning the nickname "The Teflon President") even though he was only Irish Catholic on his father's side and Scots-English on his mother's side. As noted in the Wikipedia article on Reagan, he supported an amnesty bill that caused everything to go from bad to worse in stemming the tidal waves of illegal immigration: Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act in 1986. The act made it illegal to knowingly hire or recruit illegal immigrants, required employers to attest to their employees' immigration status, and granted amnesty to approximately 3 million illegal immigrants who entered the United States prior to January 1, 1982, and had lived in the country continuously. Critics argue that the employer sanctions were without teeth and failed to stem illegal immigration. Upon signing the act at a ceremony held beside the newly refurbished Statue of Liberty, Reagan said, "The legalization provisions in this act will go far to improve the lives of a class of individuals who now must hide in the shadows, without access to many of the benefits of a free and open society. Very soon many of these men and women will be able to step into the sunlight and, ultimately, if they choose, they may become Americans." Despite his "All-American" image from his acting roles involved with football heroes, "Death Valley Days" cowboys, and other "Americana" icons, Ronald Reagan was heavily in bed with Jews all his professional life, to include Jules Stein and Lew Wasserman of MCA/Universal, as documented in Dark Victory: Ronald Reagan, MCA, and the Mob by Dan Moldea. He also put up a false front in many other ways, such as failing to act on Grace Commission Report recommendations to stop runaway national debt, and instead helping to set new records in the growth of national debt and government while pretending to be a pro-limited government conservative Republican. Clearly, Irish-American envy and resentment of Anglos, combined with a certain "petty greediness" and peculiar sympathy for the "underdog" -- no matter how alien -- has been an important reason for why there has been such a failure among "counter predators" in America to prevent psychopathic Jewish "predators" from getting so completely out of control, particularly in view of insane Jewish plans to merge all of North America into one country (the "North American Union" or "NAU") as part of their global push for one-world government headquartered in Jerusalem, as I discuss at the beginning of Chapter 23 of my Mission of Conscience series, or as documented by Alex Jones in Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement. In the Reference section of Chapter 8 of my Mission of Conscience series, I describe an important "race war" dimension behind 9-11 and other false flag attacks orchestrated by Mossad and their Irish and Italian Catholic minions (such as Rudy Giuliani of NYC and Richard Daley of Chicago) that ultimately expresses anti-WASP hatred and Jewish-Catholic takeover of America: Getting back to "Catholics," unlike the early 19th century period of majority WASP control that repealed three privately owned and corrupt central banks up through the administration of President Andrew Jackson (see Chapter 33), the period of substantial "Catholic" political influence in the 20th century never made any serious effort to stop the ultimate Jewish power machine -- the privately controlled and highly corrupt Federal Reserve Banking System -- since its inception in 1913. If one studies the tragic history of Ireland, one discovers a considerable amount of festering racial and ethnic hatred by certain Irish Catholics towards "Anglos," particular among the more degenerate and Alpinid and Neanderthal "Shanty Irish" types as opposed to the more Nordic and Celtic "Lace Curtain" Irish Catholics. Many southern Italian Catholics -- many of whom show traces of Negro blood from slave importation during the Roman Empire or invaders from swarthy areas -- hate "Nordic" and "Celtic" northern Italian Catholics, and vice versa. Hollywood dramatized a hidden "race war" dimension between different groups of white people in America that involves many Sicilians as well as Jews and Shanty Irish Catholics in the movie True Romance (1993). On a metaphorical level, it describes out of control organized crime in America by depicting a Sicilian mafia don who has the nerve to not only invade the home of a former cop who wears a police jacket, but also torture him and ultimately shoot him in the head. Journalist and political activist John de Nugent wrote in his Dec 2010 blog about "Flying Squirrels in Norway and Sore Point in Sicily:" This is a key clip from the movie “True Romance” with Christopher Walken playing (in a ludicrous physical miscasting, using black hair color on top of Germanic features!), yes, a Sicilian mafia don. (Walken, to whom in his movie hayday I used to often be compared physically, is actually pure German; his parents were both from Hamburg, the great German port city on the North Sea.) Dennis Hopper plays a retired cop living alone in a trailer. The mafiosi burst in and demand to know where his ne’er-do-well, double-crossing, drug-dealer son is who has betrayed them. Hopper’s character decides that, as disappointing as his son has been, still he loves him enough to not want to betray his location to these Sicilians out to get him. And so he provokes Don Vicenzo deliberately with the most cutting remarks he can possibly utter to him, so as to avoid further torture for himself and the betrayal of his son’s whereabouts. This is a fascinating psychological scene of mental warfare between two masters of mindwar. Guess who wins?   [John de Nugent's commentary continued...] Actually, there is both black and also neanderthal blood throughout Europe. I have seen it in Germans, Irishmen and Poles too, way up north. The Roman Empire brought slaves all over. And this is why it collapsed before the onslaught in the 300s and 400s A.D. of the tall, blond, milk-and-meat-drinking, protein-powered, blue-eyed Germanic tribes. Rome was racially and morally corrupt, just like the Jewnited Snakes today. And history will repeat itself. The statement by the former policeman character played by Dennis Hopper that the "Moors were niggers" is not accurate. A "white history" web site reacts to this scene by observing: a) Contrary to the opinion of Tarantino's Afrocentric friend [a black friend of the filmmaker of True Romance who gave him the idea that "Negroidal" Moors altered the Sicilian gene pool for good], the Saracens [referred to as "Moors" in the film] were not (predominantly) Negroid. (b) It is unlikely that most Sicilians ever "were like the wops in northern Italy. Blond hair, blue eyes." Sicily had genetic ties to the eastern Mediterranean and North Africa long before Moors invaded. It is worth noting that the racial composition of not only Sicily, but also North Africa and the Middle East is also more complicated than the film implies --or current forces of "political correctness" would have us believe. Since ancient times, there have been waves of Nordic-Germanic peoples who have trickled down to North Africa as either individuals or have swept down as entire tribes and mixed in with peoples of North Africa. For example, archeologists have found quite a few light-skinned, blond-haired mummies from early Egyptian dynasties (contrary to "politically correct" histories which give the false impression that blacks founded and ran Egyptian civilization). Statues of Hannibal of ancient Carthage, or Cleopatra of ancient Egypt, depict Caucasian people, not Negroes (contrary, once again, to certain fabricated "political correctness" histories taught in American schools). The Berbers of North Africa, who have controlled much of the caravan trade across the Sahara, have been noted by certain anthropologists as having many "Indo-European" (or "Nordic" or "Germanic" or "Aryan," take your pick) characteristics, to include "chivalrous" treatment of women, compared to the more "Neanderthal" approach of various neighboring Arab tribes who are more inclined to treat women like chattel. The Wikipedia article on "Moors" includes "Berbers" within its definition. Also, many Visigothic (Germanic) tribes swept into North Africa after the fall of the Roman Empire. A number of racial historians believe they provided the racial basis for the existence of blond-haired, blue-eyed Sultans and Caliphs who played a key role behind the "Islamic Golden Age" or the "Islamic Renaissance" from the mid-7th century to the mid-13th century A.D., which involved the spread of "Algebra" and the creation of universities from Spain to the Middle East. There was also another interesting "Nordic" migration that directly impacted on Sicily in the 11th and 12th centuries, in which both Sicily and Southern Italy were conquered by Normans. The Normans were descended from Norwegian and Danish Vikings, as well as admixtures of northern French Celts. However, the Normans set up a fairly thin ruling class, and I doubt they were able to have enough sex with enough Sicilian women to shift the island's entire population towards blond hair and blue eyes any more than Hopper's alleged "Moors" were able to shift everyone towards black hair and swarthy skin. Speaking of the Middle East, in places like Syria and Turkey today one can find pockets of Nordic or Celtic-looking people whose ancestors came from ancient migrations, or perhaps even later with the Crusades. "Galatia" of New Testament fame is one example of such migrations. It was named after a tribe of Celtic Gauls who migrated from Thrace in Greece to what is today Turkey during the during the Third Century B.C., following an earlier Gallic invasion of the Balkans. Many of these "Gauls" traced their ancestors from southern France, and who knows where they came from before that. The name of the country "Iran" comes from the word "Aryan" from an ancient era when a much larger percentage of the population had Nordic and Celtic features than today based upon numerous migrations from the north. To this day, many Iranians refer to themselves as "Persians" and take offense at being confused with "Arabs." According to The Dispossessed Majority by Wilmot Robertson, while there are some Negro genetic strains found in various pockets in Southern Italy and Sicily, these genes probably comprise less then 5-10% of the total genetic makeup of certain individuals.(That is, regarding individuals within stabilized populations that existed before WWII. In the post war era, Italy has been flooded like most other European countries with fresh waves of Arabs, blacks, and other nonwhites). Negro genes that entered European gene pools centuries ago seem to account for curly hair and somewhat darker skin among whites today. The blockbuster racial case made about the ill effects of Negro gene absorption into a white European country apparently has more to do with Portugal than Sicily, as presented in the online article "The Black Man's Gift to Portugal" by Ray Smith (which also appeared on pages 8-9 of Best of Attack!, cited again elsewhere on this web page). Smith stated: "What you can see in Portugal today is the product of uniform, non-selective mixing of the 10 percent Negroes and 90 percent Whites into one homogeneous whole. In effect, it is a new race - a race that has stagnated in apathy and produced virtually nothing in the last 400 years." Obviously Hopper's retired cop character was not motivated to make all these academic distinctions, since the prime purpose of his foray into racial history was to provoke Walken's mafia don character into quickly terminating the torture session "with extreme prejudice," as intelligence operatives used to say during the Vietnam era. Regardless of determining exact genetic percentages in ancestry, we can still discern enormous stores of anti-"Anglo" racial hatred in the behavior of certain "Catholics" like Richard Daley of Chicago and Rudy Giuliani of New York City, and also in their amazing willingness to form tight alliances with Jews and continually shill for them. The closest "Catholics" ever came towards interdicting the Federal Reserve came under the leadership of Rev. Charles Coughlin in the 1930's, that is, until the Catholic hierarchy stopped his political momentum cold by telling him to shut up. And Rev. Coughlin did in fact shut up for the rest of his life, with the exception of writing anti-communist pamphlets. Oh well, so much for loyalty to American national interests as opposed to Vatican politics... A huge part of this entire tragedy is that so many WASPs have become so naive, ignorant, and disoriented that they have allowed other racial and ethnic groups to eat their lunch. This is also dangerous for Nordic and Celtic Italian Catholics and Lace Curtain Irish Catholics who would like to ally themselves with honest WASPs to rebuild an honest, productive America, but find that so many WASPs have become weak people that there is little to side with relative to highly organized Mossad-CIA and other mafia enemies on the other side of the fence. I have had plenty of frustration on this score in my own personal life. For example, during my ten years as a real estate salesman and broker in New York City (1985-1994), I discovered that the social reality in America is often very different than what appears on the surface. As two examples, my real estate first client was a "kindly Italian American gentleman" who came into my office and said that he needed loft space in Queens. Not long after I found him the space he needed and negotiated and completed the lease deal, my client's face appeared in the local newspapers as local mafia chieftain who was arrested for dumping toxic chemicals in the East River. Welcome to New York City. Then little bit later I attended a Real Estate Board of New York lecture series to hear a "kindly Jewish American gentleman" describe how he became so stunningly successful in real estate. After his talk was over, I went up to the podium, and even spent about ten minutes chatting with him to his face. He was actually very nice and approachable with me, and I learned a lot of good stuff. Then flash forward a number of years, and I hear this very same "kindly Jewish gentleman" telling a documentary video makers about how he made a decision to "pull" Building 7 at the World Trade Center on 9/11. There is very strong evidence that this very same "kindly Jewish gentleman" also stuck it to insurance companies for billions, helped lead America into phony wars that are sucking dry whatever is left of America's economy, and orchestrated controlled demolition explosions that not only killed hundreds of firemen and police but also spread aerosolized asbestos and other toxins to cause the early deaths of tens of thousands of fellow New Yorkers. In any event, I watch the videos and think "small world." But what really drove me crazy back in the early 1990's took place when I visited places like Minnesota and Iowa and tried to discuss the "score" with certain fellow Scandinavian Americans -- particularly in the pre-9/11 and pre-Internet era. I would typically encounter social and political attitudes commonly characterized as "modern liberal La La Land. " That only made me feel even more frustrated. The "thought crime" episode listed in my author archive is one example of a situation where I tried discussing indigenous Nordic religion to help wake up certain fellow Scandinavian Americans who I view as tragically naive and misinformed, but it ended up backfiring, thanks in part to the efforts to convene an unnecessary Board of Inquiry by a female fellow Norwegian American Marine officer who was later denounced by my commanding officer as a "stupid b---- who has been brainwashed." Perhaps Pat Buchanan's nibblings on the edges have helped stem the rising tide of corruption and alien takeover in America a little bit. Maybe. Or then again, perhaps they have been more "limited hangout" in nature, and have helped shill for our enemies, and the more correct answer is "maybe not." Please read Buchanan and decide for yourself. For more insights, please see "Pat Buchanan's Double Mind," by Kevin Alfred Strom, 28 Aug 2009. Links: columns archived at townhall.com, and also at his home site The American Cause.

Contrary to the image created by this Time cover, Buchanan has been mostly a "kosher conservative" for the establishment From Irish Simian to Homer Simpson caption: "An Irish Simian, drawn by Fredrick Opper for Puck, February 15, 1882."

 

Dr. Ralph Raico is a professor of European history who has specialized in "the history of liberty, the liberal tradition in Europe, and the relationship between war and the rise of the state." He does an excellent job of making an analogy between the benefits of political decentralization following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire, and the virtues of business decentralization that result in smaller and more entrepreneurial companies. In other words, breaking apart empires has analogous advantages on a political level to breaking apart conglomerates on a business level, as explained by Thomas J. Peters and Robert H. Waterman in their classic work In Search of Excellence : Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies. With more states competing against each other in the Middle Ages, rulers were under more pressure to avoid overtaxing their most productive subjects for fear of losing them to competition. This encouraged lower taxation and more personal liberty compared to an imperial system. This is certainly a potent argument for secessionism and the creation and maintenance of small states as opposed to empires. As an interesting aside that comments on this issue, I recollect a guest from Gun Owners of America on the Alex Jones show who conducted a study which demonstrated an amazing direct correlation between repressive gun ownership laws and high taxation in America. The states and cities that do the most to ban private gun ownership -- a reflection of the most basic right of personal self defense-- also have the highest taxes, and vice versa. In the final analysis, personal liberty involves the result of a tug of war between predators and counter predators, that is, between individuals vs. the state, between states vs. the central government, and between states and competing states. An important reason for the steadily growing police state control grid in America today is raw Federal monopoly power over all the states, as well as too much apathy among the general public in standing up for its rights. Raico also does a great job of explaining the full nature of 19th century classical liberalism, and how the Industrial Revolution created greater relative material progress compared to most other periods of history, despite distorted and often politically-motivated charges about "Dark Satanic Mills" and "worker exploitation" made by slave-owning, land-rich Tories (later reinforced by Marxists) against entrepreneurial Whigs in England, their political competition. Although he does not explicitly discuss race and ethnicity, he does not explicitly contradict the role of these things either. For starters, he has observed that an important social basis of the American Revolution was the fact that there was relatively little immigration between 1700 and 1775, and America's tripled population came mostly from natural increase. Americans had a sense of rootedness within each colony. They also had extended kindred ties and retained Old World cultural values. All of this gave them the social organization, cohesion, discipline, and sense of purpose necessary on a grass roots level to successfully combat tyranny. Nor does Raico explicitly discuss the Jewish phenomenon as a possible "sociobiological disease" of 19th century classical liberalism and "empires." In other words, this was the century in which dynamic European societies became so liberal for entrepreneurs that they suffered reduced resistance to dynamic alien intruders. Worse yet, once nations turn into multi-ethnic or multi-racial empires, ruling elites become much more reliant on intrigue and intimidation to hold their power bases together, which in turn makes it much easier for Jews to parlay their own peculiar strengths in these areas to rise to the top. In addition, empires tend to form vast multi-ethnic urban power centers in places like Rome, London, Paris, Moscow, or New York, which also throws the Jewish "Briar Rabbit" into the urban "briar patch," because Jews have always been the most urban of all peoples and hence power competition in big cities is always "home turf." In his historical lectures, Raico explains how Germany and France were divided up into scores of semi-autonomous provinces throughout most of the 18th century, and how all of this rapidly changed into the 19th century. Jews exploited classical liberalism utilized by de facto imperial social orders to not only infiltrate the highest levels of power in the 19th century, but also to quietly build up spectacular financial power bases and networks, as Michael Collins Piper documents in The New Babylon. The 20th century became the era when Jews called in their chips accumulated in the prior century, stopping at nothing to ruthlessly exploit their financial power bases, and where their worst Forbidden Planet-type "Id Monster" fantasies such as the Soviet state floating in an orgy of gentile bloodshed became reality for much of humanity. (See "Parting Thoughts: The Eternal Conflict" by George Kadar, where he notes: "...The 20th century in the Western world can be rightfully called the "Century of the Neanderthal..."). Unfortunately, as America heads deeper into the police state control grid, this savage plot is still thickening, with an all too familiar cast of characters still remaining in the background. Mises Institute articles archive Mises Institute MP3 archive: Lewrockwell.com articles archive

Dr. Ralph Raico

 

Thomas DiLorenzo is the author of The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War (also two follow-on books about Lincoln, such as: Lincoln Unmasked and Abraham Lincoln: Friend of Foe of Freedom), Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson's Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution--and What It Means for Americans Today, and How Capitalism Saved America: The Untold History of Our Country, from the Pilgrims to the Present. I view Thomas DiLorenzo's major contribution as his ability to popularize longstanding criticisms of modern liberal icons in a way that is still palatable to today's teeming masses of P.C.-brainwashed Yuppies. Needless to say, DiLorenzo goes nowhere near direct criticism of Jews or explicit discussion of racial and ethnic issues. However, he helps demolish historical icons that neo-Jacobin "Big Brother" uses to "control the past in order to control the future." Abe Lincoln and Alexander Hamilton are two major historical icons that provide ghostly support for unlimited federal government and an unlimited private central bank. Dr. DiLorenzo is a major contributor to the King Lincoln archive at lewrockwell.com which serves as an important Ghost-buster on Lincoln-related issues. It is not that DiLorenzo is saying anything that is particularly new, it is just that his sources have been gathering dust on library shelves and ignored by controlled media for too long. For example, his thesis about Lincoln is consistent with Shattering the Icon of Abraham Lincoln by Sam Dickson or The American Lenin by L. Neil Smith published decades earlier. One of best explanations of the Confederate cause I have ever seen, echoed by Dr. DiLorenzo in his lectures, are contained in the first chapters of Memoirs of Service Afloat, During the War Between the States originally published in 1868 by Admiral Raphael Semmes, a lawyer who later became commander of the C.S.S. Alabama, one of the greatest raiders in naval history. In my "centralization vs. decentralization" article, I draw heavily upon Dr. DiLorenzo's analysis to describe how limited republics can morph into "ponzi government" by initially following the "Whig agenda" and Henry Clay's "American System" that DiLorenzo describes for Abraham Lincoln's policies which favored public works, a central bank, high tariffs, and other forms of "special privilege." From here, things can go from bad to worse to where we finally wind up with "evil government." This stops at absolutely nothing to keep itself in power, to include false flag attacks, distractive foreign wars, confiscatory taxation, fascistic banking-government cartels, the police state, and even genocide of the very core population it was originally designed to protect. Does any of this sound disturbingly familiar? Unfortunately DiLorenzo typically uses the word "nationalism" with a negative spin in his lectures. He usually conflates "nationalism" with high tariffs and other features of Henry Clay's "American System" which enhanced the power of the federal government and awarded disproportionate pork and special privilege to Northerners. In actuality, there exist alternative forms of American nationalism, such as "States Rights nationalism" that seeks to enhance state sovereignty in the face of federal power, "ethnic grass roots nationalism," which seeks to enhance the self-sufficiency and self-determination of ethnic groups at the grass roots as an alternative to government control, "racial libertarian nationalism," which uses protectionist measures to maintain racial and ethnic balance and control within a country without supporting empire, and generalized "libertarian nationalism," which imposes only low to moderate tariffs as a least bad form of taxation, while enjoying national unity provided by some form of minimum national government. Libertarian nationalism was the core political philosophy advocated by many leading Southerners such as Thomas Jefferson and John C. Calhoun. The Lincoln brand of highly centralized federal nationalism sought to jump tariffs from 15% (average in 1857) to over 47%. Given the nature of trade retaliation, exporters usually wound up paying the same tariff levels as importers. This wound up hitting Southern cotton exporters especially hard. With only one third of the national population, Southerners wound up paying over three quarters of all federal tax revenues, most of which was spent in the North. Meanwhile, northern manufacturers fattened up, since the high tariffs shut out much of their European competition. DiLorenzo notes "Southerners clearly understood that they were being made into tax slaves by the North, and by Lincoln, who announced in a February 15 1861 speech in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, that `The tariff is to the government what a meal is to the family.'" DiLorenzo is such a hardcore anarcho-libertarian that he has pushed free trade ideology to the maximum in his lectures beyond even moderate tariffs, as if he is oblivious to the way pure free trade policies can open up a society to infiltration by Jewish mafias at the highest levels and proletarian displacement at the lower levels by complete aliens. Pure free trade policies can also seriously undermine the ability of the native population to continually reinvest in strategic industries while retaining firm control of the strategic bases of society, to include major media and major money center banks. Besides, in the real world almost nobody ever practices what they preach about free trade for a variety of other reasons, to include the "sociobiological virtue" that charity must begin at home for any people to survive and prosper in a competitive world. There are many forms of tangible as well as intangible "social reinvestment" that has to be continually maintained, to including rewarding people involved in "idealistic service professions" such as police, school teachers, and military reserves, in order for a society to successfully perpetuate itself. Even on a racial level, whites have to continually reinvest in fellow whites on all levels in order for them to survive as a people. The business that does not continually reinvest in itself as a first priority eventually goes bankrupt, pure and simple. The same principle applies on a "sociobiological" and "ethnic-genetic" level among competing "Evolutionary Breeding Units" (or "tribes"), as explained in greater detail by the late British anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith in his landmark work A New Theory of Evolution. He even explains the paradox that EBU's have to be selfish about inbreeding altruistic (or "selfless") genes in order for such selfless traits to survive. All of this leads to what I call the "libertarian paradox." Anarcho-libertarianism is all about a firm belief in the ability of human reason to triumph in all matters. This in turn implies faith that rational, scientific procedures can be consistently applied throughout society. Therefore, if one is scientific and truthful, one should be able to find sympathetic friends everywhere. People should respect honest differences of opinion on pressing social issues so long as one can demonstrate that one is honest and well-intentioned. People should bend over backwards to not discriminate even when one comes up with ideas that may startle or even shock them --so long as one is playing by ethical libertarian rules. And now for the real world. The paradox is that if one offers scientific evidence regarding innate racial and ethnic differences (see for example my discussion of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology in my "mutualism vs. parasitism" article, or my discussion of innate racial differences in my "environmental vs. genetics" article), it is amazing how many leading anarcho-libertarians who publicly pride themselves on their "truthfulness" will suddenly run off and hide somewhere. They may even avoid transacting on a business level. They are only willing to go so far in standing up to the forces of "political correctness." Well, dear reader, isn't this the equivalent on a personal level to what nations practice on a broader geopolitical level when they engage in boycotts, blockades, and protectionism? Nationalism is essentially a form of "organizing" to protect group political, economic, and other interests. Any anarcho-libertarian lecturers at the Mises Institute who might refuse to join me in an open public discussion of Jewish Neanderthalism, Holocaustianity, or Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology are in effect practicing a negative and perverse form of "nationalism" on the personal level by boycotting a truthful and open intellectual discussion. How dare any of them criticize me for taking a nationalist position on macro-economic trade issues when they are in effect practicing a form of "nationalism" -- albeit an ideological and very negative "political correctness" form of nationalism that I personally find very distasteful -- on the street level? The reality is that people practice both positive and negative forms of "nationalism" every day in their personal business and social affairs, so why should we be surprised if these things are also practiced routinely on a national economic level? "Nationalism" is too deeply rooted in human nature to ever be successfully altered on a sustainable basis by anarcho-libertarian free trade ideology. Man is by nature a tribal animal and nothing will ever change this underlying reality. All this having been said, despite hitting a few foul balls here and there on free trade and other "anarcho-libertarian religious icon"-related issues, Dr. DiLorenzo keeps hitting doubles, triples, and home runs on other topic areas. The following are some examples: 2010-11-06 The Real Jefferson 2010-10-30 The Most Cynical and Hypocritical Speech Ever Delivered 2010-09-22 The Culture of Violence in the American West: Myth versus Reality 2006-09-30 The Fatherland Protection Racket For more DiLorenzo please see: Mises Institute articles archive Mises Institute MP3 archive Lewrockwell.com articles archive: The following is an interesting article written by another author about Dr. DiLorenzo's work. 2011-02-08 Hamilton's Curse: Root cause of U.S. demise: Bankers sabotaged Constitution by John Kaminski.

Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo

 

Dr. Hans Hermann Hoppe has offered some fresh perspectives that challenge us to examine actual functions performed by government agencies, and then ask hard questions about how the private sector can possibly perform them better. Among other things, Hoppe examines the role of private incentives and a sense of long term stakeholdership to motivate optimal stewardship of operations and resources. In The Myth of National Defense Hoppe asks why insurance companies and private contractor groups cannot perform various "security" functions better than government agencies. In his lectures, Hoppe explains how monarchy can serve as a form of "privately owned government" where rulers have a long term incentive to reinvest in their fiefdoms, whereas "social democracy," in which politicians have no ownership, but instead often focus heavily on manipulating public appearances to get re-elected, often engage in wasteful pork spending to make a name for themselves without concern for the way running up public debt creates a bigger burden on others. The good news about Hoppe is that is always beneficial to try to look under the hood and perform a functional analysis. After all, government agencies that are left unchecked tend to grow like cancers --or even worse yet may even co-opt or take over national media (please recollect how "The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." --William Colby, former CIA Director, quoted by Dave Mcgowan, Derailing Democracy, and also consider the quote "You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple hundred dollars a month." --CIA operative, discussing the availability and prices of journalists willing to peddle CIA propaganda and cover stories. Katherine the Great, by Deborah Davis). As Harry Browne observed in Why Government Doesn't Work, over the long run government agencies have a strange way of morphing into self-serving monsters that perform the exact opposite functions for which they were originally intended. For example, a government that is supposed to protect the rights and interests of the overwhelming majority of its electorate who are white citizens may morph into a monster that serves Israeli/Jewish interests first and makes war on whites through forced-race mixing programs, false flag attacks, onerous taxation, and the installation of the police state control grid. A military establishment that is supposed to protect a country may instead create "fake Bin Ladens" to help justify its bloated existence and find new excuses to feed the military industrial complex. The bad news is that Hoppe is so "anarcho" that he, like Dr. DiLorenzo and most other Mises Institute scholars, are generally unwilling to explicitly incorporate the facts of life about innate Jewish criminal Neanderthalism, innate authoritarian passivity of various white ethnic groups, or greater organic levels of psychological dysfunctionality (neuroses) of different racial and ethnic groups in America into their analysis. We can see this discrepancy on a rhetorical level. As one example, the phrase "private contractor" is usually highly revered by libertarians, since libertarians tend to idolize the private sector and a contractual approach to life. However, following the Katrina disaster, many residents of New Orleans began to view the term "private contractor" negatively after they saw Israeli "private contractors" confiscate firearms from private citizens. Many American servicemen have similarly become disgusted with observing how "private contractors" are used abroad to skirt laws that ordinarily apply to servicemen, to include the torture of Iraqi children. Often it is more the men who make the system than the system that makes the men. Also, there are important reasons why many citizen armies have often historically been more effective than mercenary armies. One of the best forms of long term caretakership involves a sense of ownership of ones own ethnicity, race, or culture --which Hoppe does not openly address. Sometimes government organizations are the least bad alternative to maintain citizen control and fend off predatory Jewish mafias than "private" entities gone bad, somewhat analogous to the "poison pill defense" that many boards of directors of public corporations prepare to deter hostile hostile mergers and acquisitions. This is one reason why many countries insist on retaining 50% government ownership of mining and other natural resources-related enterprises whenever outsiders are involved. Sometimes "privatization" is used as a smokescreen for covert Zionist aggression; see for example my series about how Iceland got "ENRONed" about the nefarious operations of George Soros, the City of London, the Russian Jewish mafia, and other aliens. Their brand of "privatization" severely damaged what was previously a prosperous country. Therefore, while I think Hoppe has important insights and asks important questions, I would not take him as the "last word" on national defense or other government-related issues, but rather as just a "starting point" regarding "hypotheses" we need to entertain once we engage in deeper analytical thinking. Mises Institute articles archive. Mises Institute Hoppe MP3 archive Lewrockwell.com author archive.

Dr. Hans Hermann-Hoppe

 

Dr. Thomas Woods has done terrific work shattering many modern liberal historical icons just like Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo, particularly in regard to examining the history of colonial America, the role of the anti-Federalists, and the degradation of the U.S. Constitution over time. He is the author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History. Woods assisted Dr. Kevin R. C. Gutzman in The Politically Incorrect Guide(tm) to the Constitution, and co-authored with Gutzman Who Killed the Constitution?: The Federal Government vs. American Liberty from World War I to Barack Obama. I think these books are real home runs. According to Woods, twice during the colonial era, the colonies resisted creating a central government for North America. Up until the French and Indian War, the British government was typically "out of sight, out of mind," and each colony often conducted its own affairs like a fully sovereign country, to include issuing its own money, regulating its own economy, selecting its own government leaders, raising its own armed forces, protecting its own borders, and deciding against whom to make war. Significantly, in the Paris Peace Treaty of 1783 which officially ended the American War of Independence, the King of England recognized each former colony as a separate sovereign state. This is a very profound insight. Americans need to stand back and really let it sink in. For starters, it shatters the "Founding Fathers" cult and the "Federal Government as God" religion, where Americans somehow feel like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson came down from the clouds and gave Americans their rights under the Constitution like Moses coming down from Mt. Sinai with the Ten Commandments tablets. If anything, the "Founding Fathers" were really the "Following Fathers." The states had already proven themselves completely competent at running themselves before even the Articles of Confederation were created, not to mention the U.S. Constitution. They had already developed their own viable constitutions and parliamentary procedures. In fact, in the End of Kings William Everdell observes that America had some of its most honest, effective, and efficient government during the colonial era. In addition, America had eight Presidents of the United States in Congress Assembled under the Articles of Confederation beginning with John Hanson, so why is it that in our federalized school system usually gives children the impression that America was cursed with weak, dithering, or nonexistent federal leadership prior to the Washington presidency? Lastly, neither the Constitution nor Bill of Rights gave Americans any rights, but rather described the limited powers the people's representatives gave to government to help protect the rights that they already had. On top of this, America's overwhelmingly WASP (highly Nordic-Celtic) population had very strong libertarian instinctive feelings --embodied in the naturally-evolved English Common Law-- to back up what George W. Bush would later call "Just a G-D piece of paper" -- the kinds of feelings that have been steadily lost in the population at large as America has steadily diluted its former WASP majority with descendants of Neanderthals, Aztec cannibals, and other featherless bipeds from around the world. One can make a very strong argument that if anything, the states had already given up too many sovereignty rights under the Articles of Confederation in order to give the appearance of a "united front" to attract aid from France during the American Revolution. Then things went from bad to worse when many of them agreed to even greater federal centralization created by the U.S. Constitution. As Gary North observes in "Conspiracy in Philadelphia," the motives of the framers of the Constitution --who actually usurped the Articles of Confederation-- were not totally pure. The Philadelphia convention was held in secret under the guise of recommending amendments to the Articles of Confederation rather than replacing the entire document. The Constitution also bailed out bankers who had lent money to individual states during the Revolution by making the Federal government responsible for repayment. American citizens had no moral duty to bail out these lenders who had understood the risks involved when they originated their loans with individual states. I do not have the space here to go into all the main points made by Gary North or Dr. Thomas Woods here --which are all well worth your time -- but instead would like to illustrate how they they have stimulated me to do my own historical research to uncover the real motivations behind many leading Federalists. George Washington is a prime example. I discovered that he was a major western land speculator who wanted to rapidly develop his properties with a Federal army. He claimed thousands of acres near the Battle of the Great Kanawha in 1774 (also called the Battle of Point Pleasant) on the West Virginia-Ohio border that Teddy Roosevelt claims in The Winning of the West helped start the American War of Independence. The militia who fought this battle brazenly defied the the British government's prohibition against expansion across the Appalachian continental divide. They showed other colonists how they could go man to man against Indians deep inside the frontier and defeat the main Indian force defending the Ohio Valley --without any help from British soldiers. Roosevelt claims this victory really pumped up colonists psychologically for Lexington and Concord. An important selling point in Common Sense by Tom Paine was the idea that if Americans could win their independence, they would have the wealth of an entire continent at their disposal and no longer be hemmed in by the Appalachians. The U. S. Government was born as a speculative real estate venture partner as well as a limited republic ostensibly designed to protect rights. Washington also owned thousands more acres along the main overland transportation corridor into the Ohio Valley than ran next to where he was defeated at Ft. Necessity at the inception of the French and Indian War. One of his first orders of business as President was to send federal armies into the Ohio valley to complete the conquest from the Indians. George Washington also saw some nice personal property appreciation when he played a key role in relocating the Federal capitol near his Mount Vernon estate. Alexander Hamilton (probably a Rothschild agent), who was Washington's right hand man, wanted to install an American version of the British mercantilist system that favored big bankers over the people. He also wanted to create a central bank that could be a valuable tool for funding federal military operations. Quite a few contemporaries of Washington had a totally different view of the man than what is commonly promoted today by our federalized education system, a prime example being Benjamin Franklin Bache, editor of the populist paper The Philadelphia Aurora and grandson of Benjamin Franklin, who bitterly compared George Washington to Oliver Cromwell. I lean in Bache's direction and now view George Washington as a kind of "Cromwell lite." The analogy is not perfect by any means, because among other things Cromwell was a Puritan, whereas Washington was a Deist heavily influenced by the Enlightenment. In addition, many historians agree that Washington had many noble character traits that do not necessarily coincide with Cromwell's personality. However, there are still some interesting historical "rhymes" and "echoes." Washington figured out a way to score eight years as a "U.S. President" rather than serve as as Cromwell's version of a "Lord Protector." Still, this beat the term of roughly one year each served by Presidents of the United States in Congress Assembled under the Articles of Confederation. Like Cromwell, Washington loved to lead armies. In fact, he raised raised a bigger army than the one he had used to win at Yorktown in an effort to pacify western Pennsylvania whiskey farmers, and became the only acting U.S. President to lead an army himself. Washington also worked with apparent Jewish agents. Cromwell let the Jews back into England after they had been banned for centuries, and not only borrowed money from them, but joined with them in foreign plantation ventures. Washington was cozy not only with the likely Rothschild agent Alexander Hamilton, but was also a Mason. The Masons in America probably functioned as a front organization for Jewish plutocrats in Britain much like the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission, Rhodes Scholars, Bilderberg Group, and other elite groups that came later. See Chapter 5 for more on these subversive groups, to include the "ring within a ring" strategy for covert conquest explained by G. Edward Griffin and Professor Carol Quigley. The installation of the U.S. Constitution over the Articles of Confederation primed America for a fast-growth strategy to rapidly develop western lands under federal direction and a federal army. Previously, each colony or state was responsible for expansion to its immediate west. It also set up America to get its first privately owned central bank, a very bad precedent that was finally ended in the 19th century by President Andrew Jackson. For more background on America's tragic historical experience with privately owned central banks, please visit Chapter 33: Wall Street Coup de Etat and Banker False Flags Against America and watch The Money Masters video. America grew so fast that the country became overwhelmed by alien peoples, totally destroying the common social fabric described in Albion's Seed by David Hackett Fisher that had helped give rise to the American Revolution in the first place. As an aside, it is worth emphasizing that this "social fabric" not only included extensive kinship ties from several generations of large families within each colony, but also important elements of "ethnic historical memory." For example, in The Cousins' Wars by Kevin Philips, we learn that nearly all the inhabitants of New England were descended from Puritans, who over a hundred years earlier had overwhelmingly supported the Parliamentary cause against Royalist absolutism in the English Civil War. Nearly every New Englander could trace an ancestor who fought on the side of Cromwell and Parliament against the King and his Royalists. In many ways the American war against King George III was simply a "continuation war" that started with the Parliamentary war against King Charles I. Similarly, in The Winning of the West by Theodore Roosevelt, we learn that before Americans began to serious move westward across the Appalachians, they first evolved a "pioneer culture" along the frontier that was disproportionately Scottish or Scots-Irish in composition. These frontiersmen also played a disproportionate role in fighting the Revolution, just like the descendants of English Puritans. The Scots-Irish were descended from Scottish clans (with some admixture of Anglo-Saxon and Viking ancestors). They also had bitter historical memories fighting agents of the British crown back in the "Old Country," as dramatized in movies like Braveheart or Rob Roy. In the latter case, Wikipedia notes: In Rob Roy, the Scottish Highlanders and English aristocrats are portrayed in opposite manners. The Guardian wrote, "The baddies are English and queer, the goodies are Scottish and ruggedly hetero." It asserted the Scottish portrayal as American-driven and referenced a subplot where one of Rob Roy's men wants to emigrate to America. In addition, while the film spanned the years between 1712 and 1722, the Jacobite Risings (which took place in 1715 and 1719) go unmentioned. It is also worth noting that a Scotsman named John Paul Jones became "the Father of the U.S. Navy," and that fierce Scots and Germans were the only peoples the Romans could never conquer, resulting in Hadrian's Wall and the Roman version of the "watch on the Rhine." After whites rapidly conquered Indians, Zionists came in from behind and rapidly conquered fragmented whites. Using the liberal minority coalition political tactics described by Wilmot Robertson in The Dispossessed Majority, many Jewish leaders along with certain Catholic allies like Senator Teddy Kennedy proceeded to open up the floodgates of nonwhite immigration in the 1960's, thereby reducing whites from 90% of the population down to less than 70% today. Admirers of George Washington point out that to put rapid westward expansion policies in perspective, one needs to keep in mind that Thomas Jefferson, one of America's leading anti-Federalists, played loose with the Constitution to take advantage of the Louisiana Purchase. That was every bit as aggressive as Washington's fixation on conquering the Ohio and Indiana Territories with a federal army, funded by a central bank. To a large extent, these leaders were following public sentiment as much as leading it. Many Americans believed that rapid growth was necessary to preempt territorial claims on the West by the empires of Spain, Britain, Mexico, France, and Russia. Tragically, this rapid growth strategy came at a terrible price. It gave the Federal government an excuse to maintain a large standing army that it would later use to ruthlessly crush Southern states during the War of Northern Aggression Against Southern Independence (1861-1865). It also conditioned new immigrants to look to the federal government as their ultimate benefactor to acquire land rather than a state government, creating another nail in the coffin of States' Rights and opening another door towards unlimited federal growth. One might say that rapid western growth through federal government direction comprised its flanking maneuver against the "true federalism" doctrine intended by most states for the original U.S. Constitution, where the federal government was supposed to always be kept weaker than the state governments. Like so many anarcho-libertarians, Woods does not directly address racial and ethnic issues, so let me connect some dots here with my own views while I am on this topic: America went from a provincial social model during the colonial period to a fast growth Roman imperial model masquerading as a "limited republic" beginning with the George Washington presidency. This "limited-republic-at risk" finally let the mask of the Big Government cunning predator completely slip away during Abe Lincoln's War of Northern Aggression Against Southern Independence, which totally destroyed all viable remnants of the "limited republic" of the so-called "Founding Fathers," and installed in its place a Neo-Jacobin version of Napoleonic France in North America. Then along came the Rothschilds and millions of other Jews, and under their "wise and noble tutelage" in the 20th century, America morphed into New Babylon and a nonfiction version of the Galactic Empire of the Sith. . (See High Priests of War, The New Jerusalem, The New Babylon by Michael Collins Piper and the "snake book series" by Col Donn de Grand Pre). Once one understands the general trend of America's sociological changes, Dr. Wood's books in cooperation with Dr. Kevin Gutzman about the U.S. Constitution become much more comprehensible. In a radio interview, Dr. Gutzman observed that in the 20th century, the federal government simply ignored the Constitution most of the time. Dr. Gutzman's books with Dr. Woods show us the steady process of erosion in the fundamental support structures of the Constitution that began soon after the document was created, and only accelerated into the 19th and then 20th centuries. Things really hit a new low in the 20th century when the Jewish Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis justified decisions based on "sociological theories" that he simply pulled out of his hip pocket, which had absolutely nothing to do with the original Constitution. There is also an interesting paradox at play here where both modern liberals (environmental top-down "Neo-Jacobins" in my chart above) and old fashioned paleoconservatives ("genetic bottom up") can become disdainful of too much emphasis on "Constitutionalism" --but for opposite ideological reasons. Neo-Jacobins view the Constitution as a creature of ideology, which is reinvented to change with the times and new ruling elites. They also believe that one needs a strong state to enforce ideology and hold America together. Therefore, we saw President George W. Bush calling the Constitution just a "G-D piece of paper" when it got in the way of his latest Zionist neocon ideological revelations and Big Government power needs. In contrast, paleoconservatives point out that a number of European countries like Iceland, England, and Switzerland have operated stable, successful parliamentary governments respectful of individual rights for extended periods in their history without any written Constitution at all. An important reason is that they have maintained a stable, homogeneous white ethnic population in which parliamentary traditions and human rights are firmly embedded in their folk traditions. From this viewpoint, a sudden emphasis on "constitutionalism" can be a negative indicator that greedy businessmen now want to import alien peoples as cheap labor, and claim that they can indoctrinate aliens in enough "constitutional law" to make them "just as good" as longstanding citizens (This did not seem to work too well with America's first suspected "illegal alien president" Barack Hussein Obama II, aka Barry Soetero, who is a former "professor" of constitutional law). In actuality, when one starts filling up the country with too many different peoples with innately different value systems, it loses the critical mass of deeply felt core sentiment required to preserve the true spirit of any original constitution. Instead, everything becomes all form and no substance, where people focus on legalities rather than real justice. As the Roman writer Tacitus once observed, "When the state is most corrupt, then the laws are most multiplied." He said this long after the once fairly homogeneous Roman Republic had dissolved into a highly corrupt and centralized multi-racial empire. An excessive dependency on "Constitutionalism" can become symptomatic of "multiplying law, " and hence a negative when it causes people to lose sight of the fact that in the long run, blood is thicker than anything else. Speaking of blood and liberty, I have some very serious disagreements with Dr. Wood's book How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization. Not surprisingly, Dr. Woods is a convert to Roman Catholicism. I provide links to many sources that directly contradict underlying premises of this work in my Religious Archive web page. A good starting point is the The Age of Reason by Tom Paine and the work Which Way Western Man? by William Gayley Simpson (see archive page), which debunk Christianity itself. Regarding the Catholic Church, consider A Lamp in the Dark: The Untold History of the Bible, or the works of Sir Edward Gibbon, author of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, who believed that the Catholic Church was more of an expression of Roman decadence than its solution. William Simpson explained how Christianity has many leftist-universalistic philosophical characteristics in common with communism. He also explained how Christianity was invented by Jews and has many very unattractive Jewish characteristics embedded within it. Even Dr. Murray Rothbard admitted that the Protestant Reformation was about political and religious decentralization, to include the right for each individual to read the Bible and interpret it on his own, as well as politically break away from Vatican dictatorship, all of which is the opposite direction from where the Catholic Church was headed. Not surprisingly, the Protestant Reformation predominated in majority Nordic countries, where a certain streak of libertarianism seems to be embedded in the DNA. Perhaps the increased intellectual and economic output in Protestant countries that coincided with throwing off the Catholic yoke provides a better perspective for evaluating the Catholic contribution to "Western Civilization." I am sure that one can find considerable good done by the Catholic Church in certain places, but then again, once a parasite takes over its host, it has to stop hurting it and actually start helping it at some point in order for both to survive. At some point, the Catholic Church focused less energy on rooting out and torturing heretics, and brainwashing people with Jewish-created dogmas. The Catholic Church actually started to do some good things for people. Similarly, Soviet Russia at one point started to focus less time on mass murder and running the GULAG, and instead started to do things which would help to rebuild Russia. Maybe this is an area where I can find some common ground with Dr. Woods on the Catholic Church issue. This leads to another important point, namely that Jews have used their alliance with Catholics in America to outflank and dispossess WASP's in a similar manner to the way the Federal government was able to use its large professional standing army used to conquer the West to outflank States' rights. I discuss all this in greater detail in my "Handling Real Nazis' section in Chapter 34 of my Trilogy titled "Saving Dr. Toben, Handling Real Nazis, and Countering the Holocaustianity Intellectual Blackjack." Hardly willing to benefit from constructive criticism by Protestants, there have been certain Popes who have unleashed covert private armies of Jesuits and other professional subversives under oath to reverse both republican government and the Protestant Reformation in Protestant countries. Today, Catholics are as numerous as Protestants in America --and should we be surprised that this Jewish-Catholic takeover seems to be leading America towards the perfect police state? (Janet Napolitano, the Catholic-Jewish head of the Department of Homeland Security -- America's answer to Soviet KGB and Nazi Gestapo -- serves as a poster girl in this regard). As previously mentioned on this web page, Catholics typically swing back and forth politically between WASPs and Jews like the way mestizos swing between whites and Indians in Latin American politics, and as I document in Chapter 29 of my Trilogy from research by Michael Collins Piper's and Brother Nathanael Kapner, there is strong evidence that there have been times when the Vatican has been run outright by Jewish infiltrators. Among other things, the Vatican has a long history of relying on the Rothschilds to manage its finances. The fact that Catholic scholars on the Mises Institute staff almost never directly criticize Jews or Zionists, yet accept funding contributions from them, while advocating libertarian ideals originated by WASP's, helps to support these assertions. Of course I do not mean imply that Dr. Woods himself is necessarily some kind of "useful idiot" in a Jesuit conspiracy. (Capt Eric May, who I cover in my Trilogy, thinks many Catholics have mellowed out over time, which is why he humored his Catholic wife by letting himself get baptized by them in Chapter 13). In fact, there is at least one area of common philosophical ground that Dr. Woods appears to share with both myself and a paleoconservative nationalist like Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson who is a priest in the Ukrainian Orthodox church (profiled in the nationalist section further down this web page). According to Wikipedia: "As a traditional Catholic, [Dr. Woods] advocates the Extraordinary Form of the Mass and cultural conservatism." The idea is that in order to be a really hardcore conservative (or even "nationalist"), one needs to find "indigenous" forms of religion that have passed the test of time over many centuries within a stabilized population that reflect the evolution of "natural" values. In fact, in this area I am not only on the same page as Dr. Woods and Dr. Johnson, but am even further to the right. I support the modern revitalization of the Old Norse religion, as discussed in Part I of my Iceland series, or my interview with the late Icelandic religious leader Sveinbjorn Beinteinsson. However, I cannot push this area of common ground too far either, after all, there were some definite areas of "friction" in the "values department" between Norsemen and Catholics in places like the shorelines of France, England, and Ireland during the Viking Age, or between Eastern Orthodox Christians and Roman Catholics when the great Russian hero Alexander Nevsky won his victory against the Catholic Teutonic Knights in the Battle of the Ice on 5 April 1242. Nevsky apparently considered even Mongols a lessor evil compared to Catholics. Wikipedia notes: "Historians seem to be unsure about Alexander’s behavior when it came to his relations with Mongols. He may have thought that Catholicism presented a more tangible threat to Russian national identity than paying a tribute to the Khan, who had little interest in Russian religion and culture." Despite my many reservations regarding Dr. Wood's interpretations of certain religious issues, I believe that his articles about American history and the Constitution are a "must read." Mises Institute articles archive Mises Institute MP3 archive Lew Rockwell articles archive.

Dr. Thomas Woods

 

Rev. Ted Pike is an important defender of free speech on the Religious Right. Our First Amendment rights are a prerequisite before any other rights become meaningful. As in the case of Dr. Thomas Woods, while I express disagreement with many of Rev. Pike's views on a theological level (as reflected on my Religious Crisis web page), this does not negate our pressing need to make common cause with all patriotic Americans regardless of their religious background against evil forces like the ADL that seek to destroy our free speech rights and turn America into a complete police state. This could result in what Alex Jones refers to as "global population reduction" genocide of major portions of this country. Don't laugh --it already happened in Bolshevik Russia. I agree with Alex Jones that most Americans have no concept regarding the level of evil we are up against. I list the articles of Rev Ted and his niece Harmony Grant Daws on a special Rev Ted Pike web page, which serves as a backup to the articles that Rev. Pike lists at his own web site truthtellers.org.

Rev. Ted Pike and his wife Alynn

 

Other libertarians: There are many dozens of other libertarian thinkers and media leaders who are worthy of mention. Please check out "The French Connection" at iamthewitness.com that gives Zionism a black eye while claiming "We are not racist, xenophobic, homophobic, or prejudiced against any race, creed, or national origin. We are prejudiced only against criminals." For those of you Yuppies out there who are too politically correct squeamish to squarely address racial and ethnic issues, maybe this is the only way I can inspire you to get your feet wet and wake up just a little bit. Please got to my Site Map section to find many of other important web sites listed under "Some important libertarian sites."

AMERICAN
NATIONALIST THINKERS
AND MEDIA LEADERS

Theodore Roosevelt: The rise of jingoistic, pro-globalist, imperialistic, anti-European ethnic, Zionist-friendly, "Eastern Establishment," pseudo-nationalism personified.   In the early 19th century, a distinctly "American" form of "nationalism" had developed which meant replacing supposedly effete, fossilized, and decrepit European forms of land, class, religious, and ethnic-based "nationalism" with what one might call "frontier Darwinism." Three of the most famous American political leaders to openly exploit the theme of "frontier Darwinism" were Andrew Jackson, Davy Crockett, and Theodore Roosevelt (pictured above). "Frontier Darwinism" is the idea that the hard conditions of the North American wilderness and Indian wars encouraged the selection of a more innately fit people, as well as provided territory to support the enhanced genetic expansion of their superior characteristics. All of this in turn supported Manifest Destiny, American Exceptionalism, and even famous art works like "American Progress" and "Westward the Course of Empire Takes its Way." (In Why Civilizations Self-Destruct, Dr. Elmer Pendell explains how this concept has validity. For example, a disproportionate number of successful inventors of the 19th century were directly descended from the first waves of immigrants in the 17th century who were culled by unusually harsh winters and other "survival of the fittest" selective factors that favored intelligent, hardy, innovative, far-sighted and intrepid settlers over the cowardly and weak). "Old Hickory" Jackson from "West of the Appalachians" was the first U.S. President born in a log cabin. Davy Crockett charmed audiences on his lecture tours in Eastern cities by bragging "I'm that same David Crockett, fresh from the backwoods, half-horse, half-alligator, a little touched with the snapping turtle; can wade the Mississippi, leap the Ohio, ride upon a streak of lightning, and slip without a scratch down a honey locust [tree];" and Theodore Roosevelt cultivated a "Rough Rider" image. Both Jackson and Crockett seasoned their bravado with genuine populist politics, whereas Roosevelt remains the most suspect and potentially counterfeit regarding his background and ultimate loyalties. Roosevelt used inherited "Eastern Establishment" wealth to go play cowboy in the Dakota territory in the 1880's, and turned a blind eye to the worst Robber Barons, to include Rothschild agents who created the privately owned Federal Reserve Banking System in 1913 -- in stark contrast to Andrew Jackson who almost got assassinated by a likely Rothschild agent, and who also claimed that killing the central bank was one of his greatest achievements. Please see my Chapt. 33 discussion of President Andrew Jackson and the Federal Reserve. Also, Dr. Murray Rothbard wrote in "Wall Street, Banks, and American Foreign Policy" that "Theodore Roosevelt had been a Morgan man from the beginning of his career." (Chapt. 33 explains how J.P. Morgan, like John D. Rockefeller, was closely allied with the Rothschilds and City of London). Roosevelt revealed another very suspicious side to his character when he waged verbal war against all forms of "hyphenated Americans" --except Jewish Americans, of course. This compounded a problem of lack of ancestral identity that has contributed towards the steady decline of WASPs and other whites in the face of tidal waves of Third World immigration. The Wikipedia article on "Hyphenated Americans" states that "Former President Theodore Roosevelt in speaking to the largely Irish Catholic Knights of Columbus at Carnegie Hall on Columbus Day 1915, asserted that: There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all... The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic... There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American. The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else. A hardcore paleoconservative like myself would counter that Roosevelt had things upside down and backwards. The best way to avoid a Civil War Two form of social instability (see discussion of Tom Chittum's work further down the page) is to keep the immigration of "hyphenated-Americans" restricted to those of shared WASP/Nordic/Celtic ancestry, rather than suppress the "hyphenated issue" altogether and then keep adding ever more exotic "hyphenated" Americans to the population mix. In addition, in all my readings about first generation German, Norwegian, Swedish, English, Dutch, Scottish and other northern European communities in America in the 19th century, I am left with the impression that they offered the best of two worlds. On the one hand, America's boundless resources gave them strong incentives to put their strong work ethic and entrepreneurial talents to productive use. On the other hand, they retained Old World memories and social fabric and hence were much more likely to have both feet on the ground on a moral, ethical, and political level than most Americans today. I believe this was a major reason for why American settlers in real life generally experienced "spontaneous order" on a grass roots level (see my further explanation of this Hayakian term in my Chapt. 38 discussion of Dr. Murray Rothbard's description of colonial Pennsylvania as a model libertarian society). These northern European ethnic communities were far less violent and chaotic than portrayed by Hollywood, as also noted in Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo's 22 Sept 2010 article The Culture of Violence in the American West: Myth versus Reality. First generation WASPs in 19th century America generally "knew the score" on Jews, Catholics and other alien groups based upon longstanding Old World experience, and were much less likely to be taken in by "Neo-Jacobin" mass media propaganda which commenced on steroids with the War Against Southern Independence (1861-1865) than their second and third generation offspring. (An extreme example of Protestant vs. Catholic competition in America in the 1860's was dramatized in the fictional film Gangs of New York, although told with a pro-Catholic bias. Also, one typically found very little need to lecture first generation gentile Russian and Polish immigrants to the United States about "the Jews," whose views were typically every bit as impassioned as those of Christian and Muslim Palestinian refugees today). A strong sense of ethnic roots also provided a strong incentive for individuals to be successful and act as model citizens to become a "credit" to their group. This sense of ethnic group pride has now been totally lost by most members of the post WWII "me" generations, and films produced by Jewish Hollywood today typically ridicule gentile characters who talk about someone being a "credit to their race." As one particularly quaint example of an earlier "Victorian" period of ethnic pride, in The Promise of America: A History of the Norwegian American People, Dr. Odd S. Lovell describes how the 19th century Norwegian American communities in Minnesota and Wisconsin bent over backwards to find jobs and provide free housing for young immigrant girls from Norway, because (among other motives) it would be too embarrassing if any of these girls turned to prostitution. Jews have retained a sense of ethnically-based group self-help better than most northern European-descended white groups, which helps explain the Jewish rise to power in the 20th century as their gentile competitors became increasingly self-centered and atomized, and hence more easily divided and conquered or else just plain dysfunctional and apathetic in the face of the Jewish envelopment of America through control of the privately owned Federal Reserve system, mass media, and other strategic bases of society. On top of all this, with the decline of WASPs to one more minority, coequal with Catholics, and the decline of Nordics from over 60% to less than 20% of the white population, the actual "demographic DNA" of the total population has shifted away from people with a high innate capacity for grass roots "spontaneous order" towards innately authoritarian people who emotionally crave various forms of paternalism, to include "fascism" or a "redistributor chief" Big Brother. Worse yet, the Federal bureaucracy has swollen enormously with vast armies of "rent-seekers" and "busy bodies" by innate temperament who are being given ever-expanding authority to meddle in all parts of the lives of private citizens, and literally suffocate all forms of individual initiative with over-regulation. The real driving force behind the extreme "pluralism" that emerged in the late 19th century was greed and envy, not any kind of social "wisdom." That is, greed for low cost labor by Robber Baron industrialists, and the political expediency of building up the "envy vote" by anti-WASP Catholics and Jews who ran the Democratic Party. They could add to their voting base by enfranchising ever larger numbers of non-WASPs. All of this was bad enough for America -- not to mention the extreme psychological fracturing inflicted on America during the War Between the States and the so-called Reconstruction Era -- but all of this escalated into a global tragedy in the 20th century, when Jews and their minions used America as their super power riding horse to wage war against genuine nationalists around the world in the name of their "globalist agenda." This included funding support by Jacob Schiff and related Rothschild confederates in New York City for Bolshevism in Russia that started towards the end of WWI. It also included the "economic hit men" activities conducted on behalf of Mossad-CIA and big money center banks described by John Perkins which accelerated after World War II. (See John Perkins interview below). Other highlights include the gratuitous bombing of Serbian nationalists in the 1990's, and America's unprovoked invasions of Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003), without any clear national interest or for that matter any evidence of WMD's or proof of involvement in 9/11, which was in all likelihood a Mossad-CIA false flag operation. In the midst of all these "fun and games, one can in fact demonstrate clear interests on the part of Israel and the Jewish Lobby, certain international oil companies, the "military industrial complex," and mercenary enterprises like the old Blackwater/new Xe. (See Chapter 7 of the Mission of Conscience series about the 9/11 inside job, and Chapter 12 about Bin Laden and Sadam Hussein fakery). My big bugaboo is that I simply fail how to see how any of this pertains to genuine American national interests consistent with any traditional American conservative nationalist principles. Probably the closest the United States has ever come to having leaders who could intelligently articulate a coherent nationalist policy and then come reasonably close to practicing what they preached took place during the administration of President Thomas Jefferson, who favored a sound money system, even-handed diplomacy, representative government, popular sovereignty, and an emphasis on growth through the internal development of scientific and technological institutions as well as conquest of the frontier. His 19th century brand of "classical liberalism" was reasonably close to the "paleoconservative" agenda that I describe in greater detail in my Resolving Opposing Ideologies series. Interestingly enough, as he got older, Jefferson became increasingly more of a racial nationalist, stating that northern Europeans were more fit for republican government than southern Europeans. Jefferson developed an Anglo-Saxon grammar book to help Anglo-descended Americans get closer to their indigenous cultural and linguistic roots. He also favored a "naturalistic" approach to religion (such as in his reference to "Nature's God" in the Declaration of Independence or through his close friendship with fellow "Deist" Tom Paine that included inviting him to the White House after he published The Age of Reason which debunked the Bible). Dr. Hans Gunther claims towards the end of The Religious Attitudes of the Indo-Europeans that Jefferson was much closer to indigenous forms of Indo-European religiosity than Christians. Throughout most of the 20th century, just about everything that Jefferson promoted got inverted. A strange irony emerged where most Americans felt themselves to be a free people and comprising the most powerful nation in the world, and yet at the same time they had effectively lost control of most forms of popular sovereignty in the face of top political, financial, and business leaders who habitually supported alien interests at the expense of their own legitimate national interests. This will probably go down as one of the greatest, most longstanding, and most destructive delusions in world history.

 

An Introduction to American "Nationalism"

by William B. Fox

 

One of the great tragedies of American "nationalism" is that it has always been something of a joke by traditional European standards. This is one reason why William Everdell remarked in The End of Kings: A History of Republics and Republicans that the entire right hand side of the British political spectrum was completely missing in the colonies at the time of the American Revolution. In assessing early American forms of "right wing" nationalism, I am reminded of the quip by Dr. Murray Rothbard that "Artists often get it right, they just don't know why." Similarly, early Americans often found themselves intuitively doing "the right things for the wrong reasons" or often doing the "right" things despite rather than because of their official religious or political ideology. This naïveté and lack of a conscious understanding of "key success factors" would later cost Americans dearly. From my own life experience, I have observed that in the long run, we tend to pay a price for our delusions and ignorance (both in terms of real costs and opportunity costs) that is greater than what we gain. As one example of gross misdirection, the Puritans who settled most of New England in the 17th and 18th centuries originally promoted hard-line interpretations and enforcement of Biblical dogma, particularly in regard to the Old Testament. In the short run, this gave the Puritans a sense of commitment to a higher cause (see, for example, the famous "A Shining City Upon A Hill" speech by John Winthrop, first governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony). Certainly such things as social cohesion, self-discipline, and a sense of higher purpose helped Puritans survive cruel winters, Indian attacks and other extreme stresses of the frontier. On a superficial level, many of these things are consistent with "nationalism," to the extent that "nationalism" implies the way in which people organize themselves and address issues to support their own group survival and practice "charity begins at home." However, despite the short term advantages Old Testament-style "nationalism," it became long term a disaster for Americans on at least two counts (a) The Puritans were actually "free-riding" on the nationalism of an alien people, that is, ancient Jews, whose more recent analogs would exploit this as an ideological wedge to infiltrate and take over American society at its highest levels, to include creating its privately owned central bank in 1913, followed by gobbling up control of major media; and (b) the Puritan brand of nationalism was based upon highly flawed Jewish mythology rather than grounded upon scientific principles, as reflected in the conflicts one sees between Puritan theology and modern psychiatry in the Salem witch trials of 1692-1693, between fundamentalist Christianity and the modern theory of evolution in the Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925, or between Christian theology in general, and the biological world view advocated in works such as Which Way Western Man? by William Gayley Simpson, A New Theory of Evolution by Sir Arthur Keith, Beyondism: Religion From Science by Dr. Raymond Cattell, or Sociobiology: The New Synthesis by Dr. Edward Wilson. In my Religious Crisis web page, I argue that truly authentic forms of nationalism draw upon the tribal history and indigenous culture of ones own people, rather than that of an alien people (to include Jews). After all, if one does not care enough about ones own ancestors to show reverence for their indigenous culture, why would want care enough about their descendants to support their economic and military strength and the quality of their culture and social cohesion? Another important area of American nationalist naïveté involved an inability of early Anglo-Saxon and Celtic-descended Americans to thoroughly understand their own anthropological background or explicitly grasp the broader social and political implications of "frontier Darwinism." "Darwinism" itself was more of a subconscious, intuitive phenomenon rather than something stated on an explicitly intellectual level in the early 19th century, especially given that Charles Darwin's landmark work On the Origin of Species that explained the mechanics of natural selection was not published until 1859. Nevertheless, I find it difficult to find a better term to describe the savagery of frontier conditions that shaped the "American character," to include militias that played a key role in winning the War of Independence. Quite a few early American writings that call attention to overly arrogant, inbred, effete Brits during the War of Independence. They drip with "frontier Darwinism" themes even if the sentiments expressed were not explicitly identified as such. As one example, Thomas Jefferson excoriated certain incompetent, lazy, and overly inbred European aristocrats and lionized hard-working yeoman American farmers and rough-hewn Spartan frontiersmen. As another example, Americans made fun of British expeditions into the Wilderness where soldiers behaved like toy soldiers and their commanders required an entourage complete with mistresses and fancy china dinnerware. Last, but not least, de facto "Darwinist" themes also had a way of surfacing whenever Europeans sought a "Manifest Destiny" justification for killing Indians and taking their land. The Puritans who originally settled most of New England in the 17th and 18th centuries came from eastern England, formerly the "Danelaw" areas conquered by Danish and Norwegian Vikings and settled by the first Anglo-Saxon invasions, an area which remains the most Nordic part of the British Isles. Most Puritans had no idea what "Nordic" meant in any kind of anthropological, cultural, or historical sense, particularly in relation to other groups such as Celts, Alpines -- or complete aliens such as Jews. They had little idea about the innate behavioral and cultural characteristics of Nordic peoples -- to include their weaknesses as well as strengths. Nor did they understand how the Nordic concept of "egalitarianism" implied a relatively large middle class of economically self-sufficient, armed free men who lived under relatively dispersed conditions within homogeneous northern European societies, all of which contrasted sharply with authoritarian peasant societies in southern and eastern Europe and elsewhere, or the highly urban environments favored by Jews. Nor would the New England Puritans' descendants in the 19th and 20th centuries adequately grasp in advance the threat posed by Jewish Marxist concepts of "equality," which completely ignore race and ethnicity -- for gentiles (but not fellow Jews). Regarding problems in grasping "frontier Darwinism," Dr. Elmer Pendell explained in his classic work Why Civilizations Self-Destruct how an amazingly disproportionate number of successful inventors and patent holders of the 19th century came from the first 17th century waves New England Puritans and other immigrants to America who gave rise to the phrase "Yankee ingenuity." These first waves often suffered savage attrition from cruel winters that tended to weed out lazy and stupid people incapable of future planning. American frontier conditions also rewarded men of courage, enterprise, and ingenuity who could not only develop new land as owners and entrepreneurs, but also multiply their genetic characteristics as a proportion of the overall population by having large families. All of this in turn had in an important eugenic impact on the viability and quality of Americans social and political institutions. In later periods, American demagogues would totally ignore the importance of frontier Darwinism and Nordic and Celtic anthropology, and attribute American successes simply to abstract leftist interpretations of "personal freedom" and "equality" that they claimed could also "elevate" (or at least gain votes from) "wretched refuse" types of people. They would use these leftist interpretations as ideological battering rams to open America up to endless waves of low cost alien labor or various types of rent-seeking alien mafia bent on infiltrating and looting America -- like Jews and Sicilian mafia. Worse yet, various Robber Barons would invent a perverse brand of "social Darwinism" that could be used as an excuse for monopolistic plutocrats (like the Rockefellers and Rothschilds) to violate Nordic and Celtic concepts of fair play and equal rights among common people in order to shamelessly deceive, loot, or even poison them. Alex Jones blames "eugenicists" for various types of sinister plots against Americans, but I think that this is simplistic. Everyone is more or less a "eugenicist" and a "social Darwinist," if only on a subconscious level, just like deep down inside everyone is also a "racist." It is normal and healthy to be a "eugenicist," "social Darwinist," and even a "racist" to the extent that genetics is a very real part of life, and there should be a place to deal with these "facts of life" in an open and honest manner. The real issue to me is the extent to which one understands "eugenics" and "social Darwinism" (and "race") well enough on a conscious, scientific level so that one handle issues in a reasonably intelligent and humane manner without getting hijacked by alien propagandists and hostile interests. (See Dr. Kevin MacDonald discuss eugenics from a very different perspective than Alex Jones in the video "The End of White People 2: Jewish Intelligence and Goals"). One can reasonably suspect that the Rockefellers and their Rothschild allies have always held hostile and alien interpretations of "social Darwinian" and "eugenics" to justify evil policies. Early in the 20th century, their excesses included the infamous "Ludlow Massacre" of 1914, the Federal Reserve private monopoly created in 1913, and abuses described by Jack London in his famous work The Iron Heel. Later on we got UN Agenda 21 population reduction agenda, GMO food and vaccination-induced sterilization schemes, and Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Incidentally, Alex Jones claims that Huxley confessed to creating Brave New World as a form of "predictive programming" (see Chapt. 37 for more on this "Infowar" phenomenon) to prepare the public for the long term globalist agenda. A fundamental difference between more decentralized Nordic and Celtic forms of "social Darwinism" that characterized early Americans compared to the Zionist versions which came later is the strong tenancy towards "Asiatic despotism" that characterizes Jews, as explained in Chapter 5 of my Mission of Conscience series. No doubt there are a quite few American Indians who believe that either version of "social Darwinism" has to be bad, because either approach can kill them just as dead. However, I still hold to the notion that Nordics and Celts retain more genuinely humanitarian instincts and scientific talent than both Zionists and Indians, and therefore, all things being held equal, they compare favorably with everyone else. In addition, not all American Indian tribes acted like "noble savages" or "innocent and unspoiled children of nature" upon initial contact with the white man. To the contrary, a significant number of North American Indian tribes were heavily bent towards cannibalism, despotism, women-beating, child molestation, blood-curdling human sacrifice, slavery, torture, and superstition. (Recall in the Declaration of Independence how Thomas Jefferson talked about "the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.") In fact, there is evidence that their ancestors ruthlessly exterminated Caucasians like "Kennewick Man" who were on the North American continent first. (More on "KM" and "Solutreanism" in Chapt. 34). Ever since the commencement of "King Lincoln's" War of Northern Aggression Against Southern Independence in 1861, the nicest thing one can say about traditional American "conservatism" (which started out as a polite euphemism for "pro-WASP ethnic nationalism") is that it has been able to fight some kind of delaying action against the never-ending, cancerous growths of out-of-control neo-Jacobin federal government and the myriad manifestations of Jewish Marxism and Zionism. Since "demographics is destiny," it should be no big surprise that the Nordic percentage of the U.S. population has been in steady decline since this period (see, for example the online book The Passing of the Great Race by Madison Grant, first published in 1916, subsequently amended in the 1920's and 1930's) and the proportion of increasingly economically empowered and politically enfranchised alien groups has steadily been on the rise. There has been a longstanding joke on the American Right that what is "conservative" today is merely what was introduced as "radical left wing" only a few decades before. The late Harvard economist John Kenneth Galbraith noted in The Age of Uncertainty that many of his students were shocked when they first read the Communist Manifesto and saw how many items on the plank had become a reality in America. Reinforcing this same point, Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman commented in a late 1970's Forbes interview that virtually every item on the 1928 Socialist plank eventually became a reality in America. Meanwhile, white American society only seems to become ever more fragmented over time. Not surprisingly, the overall society has became ever more multi-racial, multi-cultural, imperial, and plantation-like in its de facto social structure. There is no "indigenous identity" for whites, often the bedrock of other nationalist movements around the world. In the prevailing business culture, "success" for whites means the ability to make a quick buck while suppressing all feelings of natural tribal loyalty for fellow whites -- to in essence be as undiscriminating as a whore in a Nevada bordello --unless one happens to be Jewish, in which case it is totally acceptable to totally dominate the management of the Federal Reserve, Hollywood firms, small Brooklyn sweatshops -- whatever Jews want, Jews get -- as one of the most ferociously tribalistic peoples in world history. Today, America comprises a truly amazing sociological and ideological train wreck with unspeakably evil cabals redoubling their efforts to feed on its carcass by installing police state and martial law control grids. In my introduction to the Kevin Strom author archive, I explain how America today is ideologically redder than a lobster by traditional European standards. For example, most Americans would view Kevin Strom as "radical right wing." Politically correct Federal agents who tried to frame Strom while he was undergoing divorce proceedings with his second wife, Elisha Strom, probably wanted to leave the subliminal impression with the American public: "Bad luck on Strom for being so right wing, and bad luck on you if you read his stuff and take him seriously." Yet ironically, by many traditional European standards Strom actually did three very left wing things: a) He married outside his European country of ancestral origin b) he married outside his class (upper middle class professional) and c) he married outside his ethnicity. Speaking of European attitudes, in my section "Handling Real Nazis" of Chapter 34 of my Trilogy, I describe my encounter with a scholar while riding on a train in Britain, who said: "Well, I say [old chap], you Americans come from an interesting land where everything is new. You Americans have no history, you have no class, and you have no culture." I also referenced John de Nugent, a white civil rights activist, who claimed that while he lived in France, many French expressed the attitude that America is simply a land of overgrown adolescents. He quoted former French leader Clemenceau, who allegedly said "The US is the only society to have gone from barbarism to decadence without passing through civilization along the way." White Anglo Saxon Protestants (WASP's), who were once America's overwhelming majority, have been reduced to another minority about co-equal in size with Catholics, and both groups are dominated by Jews, and neither WASP's nor Catholics seem to care very much about the possibility of getting completely obliterated by the Death of the West trend identified in Pat Buchanan's book by this same name. On an ideological level, things only went from bad to worse in America when the floodgates of immigration were opened up to all European nationalities in the late 19th century in order to rapidly populate the remaining frontier, which also meant rapidly driving up real estate values and driving down real wages for the benefit of greedy land speculators and industrialists. Instead of "folk, faith, and the sacred motherland of ones ancestors," it became "money, money, money." It also became a land of "tinsel, neon, and honky tonks" instead of "high culture." In Appendix IV of my Iceland series which addresses American history from a nationalist perspective, I explain the highly dualistic nature of the original U.S. Constitution. On the one hand, it supported State's Rights where State Legislatures originally selected representatives to the U.S. Senate. On the other hand, it promoted federal centrism through direct election by the public to the U.S. House of Representatives. This is one example where Americans created a "have your cake and eat it too" society. In the 19th century, Americans wanted to have the libertarian ethos that typically accompanies a relatively small homogeneous Nordic or Nordic-Celtic society like Iceland, Scotland, England, Norway, and Sweden, yet at the same time America operated as a de facto multi-layered and multi-ethnic and even multi-racial plantation society more reminiscent of ancient Babylon. Americans imported black slaves in the South and Irish and Italian Catholics as low cost industrial workers in the North. In the 20th century, the federal government maintained a de facto open borders policy with tidal waves of low cost, illegal alien immigrants from Mexico. In the 19th century America wanted to retain the "democratic feel" of New England town hall meetings, yet at the same time run a de facto imperial war machine that conquered the "inland empire" of the North American continent, only to later use it to smash the Old South and along with it any credible doctrine of States' Rights --which Thomas Jefferson stated in the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 was the only credible deterrent to unlimited federal growth and federal tyranny. In the 20th century this same imperial war machine morphed into a Zionist-friendly global cop that looks the other way whenever Israelis kill Americans (as noted again at the end of this piece) while Americans kill over a million Iraqis and Afghans for Israel and Rothschild-controlled big oil interests. This country has always been doing one thing on a sociological and business level, and then doing something totally the opposite on a superficial ideological or rhetorical level. This disparity became especially wide after 1861, as captured in Dr. Revilo Oliver's excellent article "The Beginning of the End," Liberty Bell, Aug 1988. Unfortunately the land of the "Wild West" went from having problems that were "fixable" to problems that have become completely out of control. Even today one can find many well-crafted "Victorian" and "American Gothic" old houses around the country, not to mention beautiful mansions in the South, that give the sense that Americans were trying to evolve their own "high culture" in the mid to late 1800's before something very dark started creeping into their land, only to drag down Americans and stab them in the heart, just like what happened to the Russian people. (See the last sentence of the article "Russia's Christian Martyrs" by Marina Marynova. Also, nostalgia for the late 19th century period is probably one reason why the works of artists like Thomas Kinkade, the "Painter of Light," are so popular in America today. Norman Rockwell is another noteworthy "nostalgia artist" of "Americana," although he later allowed his approach to get hijacked as propaganda for the modern liberal agenda. See also why William S. Lind thinks Americans may historically cycle back towards becoming "New Victorians" in his satirical piece ""Militant Musings: From Nightmare 1995 to My Utopian 2050") . After the Federal government became a foaming-at-the-mouth neo-Jacobin state following Abe Lincoln's War and the so-called "Reconstruction" era in the South, the Robber Barons who controlled the government from behind the scenes took the attitude that by pumping anarcho-libertarian ideology into the brains of "wretched refuse" imported as cheap labor from all over Europe, this could erase centuries old racial and ethnic conflicts while cobbling together an empire of "useful idiot" proletarians. All this included millions of Jews like the Marxist-Zionist named Emma Lazarus, who explicitly called for importing "wretched refuse" in her poem "The New Colossus," a very much beloved sonnet by her kinfolk that is now inscribed on a crummy little iron plaque stuck on the base of a grand statue donated to America by the people of France. This statue was originally dedicated to the "Liberty" earned by hardy, intelligent, free, brave and self-sufficient people heavily sculptured by "frontier Darwinism," and not by "wretched refuse." Again, America's schizoid rhetorical and ideological disparities in "The Land of Contrasts" manifested itself once again. The quality and character of America's political institutions deteriorated a quantum level in the decades following the War Against Southern Independence, where the "politics of envy," "patronage payoffs," and "wealth redistribution" soon replaced the original republican politics of "wise policy formulation" and "rational process," all of which was in turn accompanied by the rise of extremely selfish and vulgar Marxist-socialist labor unions, Jewish mafia, ornate Robber Baron mansions, and big city Catholic political machines. The principles of limited government so beautifully expressed in the famous Davy Crockett "Sockdolager!" story became "Gone With the Wind." In time, the majority WASP population that felt these values on an instinctive level also became history. To paraphrase 18th century French libertarian analysts (as noted by Dr. Ralph Raico cited below), the "political means" replaced "the productive means" and the "tax-eating classes" gained the upper hand over the "tax-producing classes." America became a giant "neo-Jacobin bloat bag" where the real objective of America's power elite was to "preserve the union" (code-speak for "stay in power at all costs," to include any tyrannical methods that can be smoothed over by "democratic" rhetoric) by figuring out ever more ingenious methods to deceive people while shifting their money about in whatever way was necessary to "preserve the system." The American state became, as Frederic Bastiat so famously put it, "the great fiction by which everybody tries to live at the expense of everybody else." The ultimate masters at this game on a global scale smelled blood like the way "hungry fleas" might sense a bloodied, battered "dog" left by The American Lenin and quickly flooded into America. As mentioned, millions of Jews vectored in from Eastern Europe and elsewhere to pile into America's largest cities in the late 19th century. Having already become a major power in America behind the scenes in railroads and oil in the mid to late 1800's, Rothschild confederates set up America's privately owned central bank in 1913 and grabbed control of major media. The Washington "District of Criminals" essentially became a glorified baby-sitting service where politicians espoused Jeffersonian rhetoric for public consumption on the one hand, while on the other hand behind the scenes aided and abetted ultra high-level deception and looting. This included shanghaiing America into unnecessary intervention into a European fratricidal war (see my discussion of the Balfour Declaration in my article "Thomas Jefferson and the `Incredible Truth' about Bush Cabal Wise Guys and False Flag Nukes") and financing the Bolshevik takeover of Russia (Please see in Chapter 33 the commentary related to the embedded video "The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of America"). Tragically, America's emergent New Jerusalem and New Babylon leadership in the early 20th century could never control quite control it's insane greed and Neanderthal hatred towards America's once highly productive white majority. By the mid-1960's, this evil elite made no serious effort to arrest what became the beginning of a long decline in America's industrial base. At this same time, they also opened up the floodgates of Third World immigration and fast-forwarded the continued depletion of America's Nordic genetic stock on a sociobiological level. The failure to arrest the industrial decline and the race war against WASP's fit hand in glove with each other, because only WASP's and perhaps a few other frost-zone sculptured gene pools have demonstrated a long term capacity to innovate, delay gratification, follow rational processes, and implement other measures necessary to build a productive industrial base at a faster rate than resources are consumed by overall population. The poisonous attitudes of the alien power elite are manifested in myriad other ways, not only through the "mainstreaming" of hard-core pornography beginning in the 1970's to destroy family values, but also through the introduction of toxic additives in "GMO'ed" foods, vaccines, and public drinking water --not to mention the atmosphere itself. (Listen to Alex Jones on GCN and John Stadtmiller at RBN and their expert guests for more details). Eventually, states like Minnesota would report childhood autism rates at 1 in 80 --which only decades earlier was extremely rare. In this and myriad other ways, the general American population was showing signs of getting ever sicker and sicker. Libertarian theory cannot explain any of this. In fact, it is so weird and evil that it usually blows libertarian minds. In contrast, most chapters on "parasitology" in sociobiology textbooks handle this topic quite nicely, and you can too once you accept the premise that man remains a part of nature instead of removed from nature. Please see my "mutualism vs. parasitism" online article for more background. As the beginning of the final "end game" approached by the 1990s, America's malevolent "New World Order" power elite resorted to the most vile subterfuges imaginable as distracters, such as false flag attacks at Oklahoma City in 1995, New York and Washington, D.C. on 9-11-2001, and London 7-7-2005. By 2005 they were going pedal to the metal to install the police state and martial law control grids. In 2008 they came perilously close to starting a global nuclear war in South Ossetia as a gambit to cover their tracks, and in 2009 they made a abortive run at global depopulation mass murder through a swine flu false flag pandemic. Nationalism is about maintaining control of ones own destiny and protecting vital cultural and ethnic-genetic interests. The Jewish people, who have been despised everywhere they have gone in the last three thousand years for being the most deceitful, criminal, hypocritical, and money-grubbing of all races, were able to not only find a "happy home" in America, but also hijack the country's government and media and impose their values everywhere. This does not say a whole lot about American core cultural values --or the quality and strength of "American nationalism." Instead of proving that "this time it is different," the "American experience" has really only proven that "the nature of the beast" remains the same on both sides of the Atlantic. In his 4 June 2010 article "This Says It All," Justin Raimondo describes how the U.S. Government was unwilling to issue even a peep of protest after Israelis boarded a "Peace flotilla" in international waters and murdered a U.S. citizen in cold blood, just like it refused to protest when Israel tried to wipe out the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967 on the high seas and blame it on Egypt. Indeed, Justin Raimondo is right --"this says it all." Despite all this, there have been quite a few very astute American observers who have tried to educate the public regarding nationalist principles. While they have been unable so far to turn the tide in favor of genuine nationalism, it is fair to say that things would be immeasurably worse in America if there was no one providing alternative viewpoints or putting up any resistance at all. As Tom Chittum observes in Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America, just wait until the neo-Jacobin America empire finally comes apart at the seams. Genuine nationalism will some day return. It has to. After all the sugar candy dreams promoted by Zionists, leftists, and big government fanatics have finally evaporated, white nationalism will be the only proven thing left that people can hang on to that actually works. Just ask folks in the former Soviet Union and former Communist Yugoslavia how they finally had to circle the wagons to save themselves from total obliteration and ruin.

"Amerika" by the German band Rammstein. Editor's Note: The video I originally had posted here was a very different visual interpretation than the more MTV-compatible "standard" version on YouTube. It was removed in Sept 2010 for alleged "terms of use violation." It featured a steady procession of Neanderthal-looking Jewish billionaires. My caption: "Is this the real tune of "American" nationalism today or is it more accurate to view this as some kind of "Neanderthal Internationale"? (Please see the table of contents excerpt for the special "Revenge of the Neanderthal" Barnes Review issue below, as well as links in the Dr. William Pierce section to the article "Who Rules America? and the classic video "America is a Changing Country." Why do you think most anarcho-libertarians are too scared to touch these issues?)." As a last note, there are other videos on the Internet that try to use the "Amerika"soundtrack to satirize other themes, often from a leftist perspective, such as the "Obama Nation homeland security police state," "imperial militarist interventionism," "9/11 inside job," "moon hoax and multiculturalist globalism."

 

Table of Contents The following are some sample articles that explain the Neanderthal background of Jews, and how these hominids have been involved in a de facto race war with Cro Magnon Man (most whites) for tens of thousands of years preceding the official creation of "Judaism" as religious camouflage for skullduggery. For a complete list of articles, please visit the Table of Contents of the May/June 2010 special issue of The Barnes Review. REVENGE OF THE NEANDERTHAL by Willis A. Carto, "The truth about the Neanderthal is a historical web that is finally being untangled. . . ." ISRAELI SAYS: “WE WERE INVENTED” by Willis Carto, "An eminent Israeli historian says the perceived origin of the Jewish people is anything but true. . . ." ‘MY ANCESTORS WERE NEANDERTHALS’ by Willis Carto, " Jewish scholar Stan Gooch has written extensively on the Neanderthal origins of today’s people known as `the Jews.'” Russian Royal Family Murdered by Neanderthals: RUSSIA’S CHRISTIAN MARTYRS by Marina Marynova, "The royal family of Russia were perhaps the first most prominent victims of Jewish Bolshevism. Here’s the sad story of their brutal murders. . . " The Postwar Neanderthal Triumph: WHO REIGNS SUPREME? by Michael Collins Piper, "Have the heirs to the Neanderthal finally achieved global supremacy? . . ." PARTING THOUGHTS: THE ETERNAL CONFLICT by George Kadar, "...The 20th century in the Western world can be rightfully called the `Century of the Neanderthal' and it is up to us to stop this process."   The section above is taken from an online Table of Contents for the May/June 2010 special issue of The Barnes Review. Please also see the section "The Revenge of the Neanderthal, Ethnic-Genetic Distance, and the Neanderthal-Troll Connection" from Appendix VI of my Iceland series for some important additional perspectives. When was the last time you ever saw an anarcho-libertarian address these anthropological issues point-blank?

 

It is probably fair to state that in terms of scope of audience, and volume of publishing, Willis Carto has done more "heavy lifting" for paleoconservatism than most other activists on the Right. He founded The Spotlight (1975-2001), which once achieved mass circulation in the hundreds of thousands during the Carter administration, an impressive achievement in the pre-Internet era at a time when anything to the right of Winnie the Pooh was typically in the cross-hairs of "mainstream" controlled media, FBI COINTELPRO, or well-funded Jewish smear groups like the SPLC and ADL (see Rev. Ted Pike archive for more on this unregistered agent of Israel and Zionist plutocracy). Find a brief bio here. Carto founded The Barnes Review in 1994, which covers "history brought in accordance with the facts" and began publication of the weekly newspaper American Free Press to replace the Spotlight in 2001. Carto still hits home runs. For example, I include an online table of contents for the "Revenge of the Neanderthal" May/June 2010 Barnes Review in Appendix VI of my Iceland series. Michael Collins Piper has assembled An Appeal To Reason that contains a wealth of Willis Carto's writings. I have always viewed the circulation numbers for Carto's publications (Spotlight, American Free Press, and The Barnes Review) as litmus tests for the general competency level of the American public and its business elite to rule themselves. These publications were always early to report such outrages as the deliberate Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967, Mossad-CIA global drug dealing, and utterly criminal pork spending on Capitol Hill. At their peak, Carto's publications have only numbered tens or hundreds of thousands rather than millions in circulation. This indicates how "dumbed-down," "apathetic," "childish," "brainwashed," and generally lacking in "republican virtue" a large segment of the general public had become by the late 20th century. Despite all this, Carto has continued to fight the good fight, because as depressing as the lack of an effective public response has been, if people like Carto failed to man the barricades, things could always become immeasurably worse in America. In the Gulag Archipelago and Two Hundred Years Together, Alexandr Solzhenitsyn recollects how Jewish Bolsheviks mass-murdered 60 million Russians. American Free Press is home base to many outstanding journalists, such as Michael Collins Piper, John Tiffany, Pat Shannon, Jim Tucker, Mark Anderson, and Victor Thorn who do outstanding work in documenting the the New World Order, false flag attacks, the police state control grid, and other threats to American sovereignty. I think that history will remember Carto very well. Links: Americanfreepress.net and barnesreview.org.

Willis Carto at the American Free Press Town Hall Event 13 Feb 2010 for James Traficant

John Stadtmiller runs the Republic Broadcasting Network out of Austin, Texas whose slogan is "Because You Can Handle the Truth." RBN serves as slightly more paleoconservative electronic media counterpart to Alex Jones and GCN. Stadtmiller's network hosts include Mark Anderson (a star journalist for American Free Press), Dr. Rebecca Carley (who interviewed this author about the swine flu epidemic on 5 Dec 2010), Wayne Madsen of waynemadsen-report.com (a former Naval intelligence officer whose work I refer to frequently in my Mission of Conscience series), Rick Adams, and other patriotic hosts. It also has the archives of Michael Collins Piper, who broadcast from 9 Feb 2006 to 15 Dec 2010. RBN currently charges only $1.33 to access its MP3 archives, which I think is well worth it. In fact, I will go a step further. Even Alex Jones admits that he cannot sit through a single mainstream media program these days and not feel like he is being subliminally programmed with a some kind of poisonous message that supports the New World Order. How many other networks out there have the "truth quotient" of RBN? How many other networks besides RBN are willing to see if you can "handle the truth?" Links: republicbroadcasting.org. This home page also provides an excellent source of breaking news article links.

John Stadtmiller

John Stadtmiller interviews John Perkins, author of Confession of an Economic Hit Man, June 17 2010

Jack London's Iron Heel is alive and well

Michael Collins Piper has been a leading journalist in pro-American nationalist, populist alternative media for decades. That alone is an amazing achievement. His first edition of Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy came out in 1994, in the pre-Internet Dark Ages when such exposes could be especially dangerous for a journalist's health. Considering all the material witnesses to the JFK assassination who have met untimely deaths, not to mention American sailors who got murdered in broad daylight on the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967 without hardly a peep of protest by the U.S. Government, it took guts to openly accuse the Mossad and its CIA-U.S. Government collaborators of orchestrating the murder of President John F. Kennedy. Piper's books do more than update us from where Henry Ford, Myron Fagan, Benjamin H. Freedman, and other whistle-blowers regarding out-of-control Zionist power left off. Zionism, a highly aggressive and criminal form of Jewish nationalism, exists in a predator vs. counter-predator relationship with any form of gentile nationalism. When Zionism gets stronger, gentile nationalism is always correspondingly weaker, and vice versa, just like rat and cat populations in ecology models. In this back-handed manner, Piper's books about Zionism instruct us more honestly than most other sources on the sorry state of any form of genuine American nationalism. America First Books is honored to carry many Piper books as ebooks. They include not only Final Judgment, but also The Judas Goats, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Best Witness, and Dirty Secrets. Piper's other books currently available in soft-cover include The GOLEM, My First One Hundred Days in the White House, Target Traficant, and The New Babylon. Links: Author archive page at americafirstbooks.com and mikepiperreport.com (also Michaelcollinspiper.com). Mike Piper used to broadcast on Republic Broadcasting Network from 9 Feb 2006 until his last show on 15 Dec 2010. The old shows are available in the RBN archive via subscription. Mike Piper now has a free MP3 download broadcast site at: michaelcollinspiper.podbean.com.

Mike Piper pictured with Greek nationalist and writer Peter Papaheraklis at the Traficant conference on 13 Feb 2010

AFP Columnist Mike Piper Discusses Zionist Media and Role Alternative Media Can Play in Fighting Bias (6:39)

Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson's work is a perfect example of what I mean by the "international nationalist" concept on the home page. One must necessarily be exposed to numerous "case studies" of different societies, cultures, and historical experiences in order to understand how all the different variables that affect successful social functioning come together, as well as acquire a fresh perspective on ones own society and how it fits it into a broader context. Dr. Johnson earned his Ph.D. in political science and is an expert on Eastern European history. Although of Irish and other northern European-related descent, he is a priest in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and the author of The Third Rome: Holy Russia, Tsarism and Orthodoxy. His articles at rusjournal.com and lectures on his Orthodox Nationalist radio show address the necessity for "spiritual" and "organic integrity" as well as "ideological integrity" for a society to function adequately. Significantly, Dr. Johnson claims that his political and religious views have evolved to the point that they are very similar to those expressed by the late Nobel Laureate Alexandr Solzhenitsyn. Please visit Chapter 32: "Neo-Con Bloodying of the Russian Bear, and Putin vs. the New World Order" of my Trilogy where I extensively quote from the work of Dr. Johnson. I explain ways in which Russia appears to provide some kind of bulwark of anti-New World Order and pro-nationalist sanity as the rest of the world patiently waits for America to transition out of its current phase of imperial lunatic decadence. If nothing else, Russia has punished certain criminal Zionist oligarchs, resisted Israeli demands, and has also refused to surrender its territory to invading Third World hordes. By American standards (or rather the lack of them) this is way off the New World Order path. I have found Dr. Johnson's lectures on medieval Slavic history and culture to be very valuable for many reasons. First, for paleoconservatives who believe that human societies reflect innate as well as learned traits, it is very helpful to observe their behavior over many hundreds of years to get a sense of "baseline functioning." For example, in Part I of my Iceland series I devote some space to discussing libertarian tendencies among Nordic peoples that go back to the Viking era and before. The small village leadership structures, religious tendencies, and land ownership practices in places like Ukraine and Russia are relevant towards understanding their descendants today. From a paleoconservative viewpoint, as one departs from historical or natural norms, one adds "stress factors" to a society that may ultimately result in its breakup or degradation in social efficiency. (See the discussion of Tom Chittum's Civil War Two below). This is consistent with the "constraint analysis" approach that I address in Chapter 38 where one starts with proven models of functioning systems. One then tries to understand how they change as one alters variables that impact on "critical nodes" and "process flows." In contrast, utopian maximalists, who are over-represented by modern liberals and anarcho-libertarians, seek to maximize particular variables like "personal freedom" without any real concern for how these changes impact on the overall system. "Libertarianism" becomes "libertinism." For an example of "maximalism," see "The Folly of Maximalist Objectives" by William S. Lind. Another reason why I find Dr. Johnson's lecture series valuable is that Eastern European history challenges many "comic book" historical cliches that are fed to Americans by their federalized education system and Jewish-controlled national media. There have been many times when I have listened to Dr. Johnson's descriptions of unfolding of historical events, which invariably involve conflicts between the monarchy, nobility, church, fledgling middle class, peasantry, and serfs, and somehow my American "programming" causes me to subconsciously expect Russian history to "zig" in many places where it instead "zags." This challenges me to think more deeply about all the different variables that make a society work and influence its national destiny. Last, but not least, one can see similar patterns behind the continued development of the police state and martial law control grid in America and what happened in Soviet Russia. Furthermore, Zionist neocons with a similar mentality to former Vice President Dick Cheney still control American foreign policy. They can still start a disastrous nuclear war. They have already instigated a "dirty nuke" war by spreading depleted uranium all over Iraq and Afghanistan. New Yorker journalist Seymour Hersh claims that Dick Cheney planned an operation where U.S. Navy SEALs dressed as Iranians would attack a U.S. ship to justify war on Iran in spring 2008. In addition, the article "New Books Suggests Dick Cheney Wanted to Go To War With Russia," by Andrew Moran, 20 Feb 2010, notes that "As the South Ossetia War was being fought between the Russian Federation and Georgia in August 2008, then-Vice President Dick Cheney pushed for the United States to engage in a military conflict with Russia over its disputed invasion of the Georgian Republic, suggests a new book by Ronald Asmus titled A Little War That Shook The World, according to the Raw Story." Without question, Dr. Johnson does an excellent job of addressing many very serious current issues. He goes well beyond merely developing an academic appreciation of Slavic history.