Jewish criminality

Jewish-dominated Hollywood falsely portrays Italian-Americans as criminal ringleaders in America, when in fact the real brains have always been Jewish. The same is true in Europe, where for centuries most of the underworld slang has come from Yiddish.

Michael Collin's Piper's Final Judgment gives an excellent overview of the Meyer Lansky operation in America, which dominated American organized crime for decades and played a key role in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Lansky's crime syndicate was closely tied to the Mossad, which dominates the global drug trade along with its partner the CIA. The book Supermob: How Sidney Korshak and His Criminal Associates Became America's Hidden Powerbrokers by Gus Russo, also describes Jewish domination of major organized crime tentacles that reach throughout America.

Jews have always dominated the vice industries in America, to include liquor, gambling, and pornography. See The International Jew by Henry Ford and My Awakening and Jewish Supremacism by Dr. David Duke for more details.

Since ancient times, Jews have had a long history as slave dealers. In early America, Jews dominated the Negro slave trade.

Today, Jews dominate the global white slave trade. Israel has been a central hub for the exploitation and resale of Slavic women since the fall of the Soviet Empire. In July 2001 "a US State Department report placed Israel in the third section of its `black list' on countries whose laws don't meet US criteria for dealing with this crime and threatened economic sanctions." In Israel, white sex slaves are only allowed to keep three percent of their earnings.

Jews are also leaders in major white collar crime in America. As an example, see "Enron, Fastow, and the Looting of America" by Dr. William Pierce. Major Wall Street swindles have been be led by Jews such as Ivan Boesky and Mike Milken, whose involvement in the S&L debacle cost the U.S. taxpayer hundreds of billions of dollars.

Jews have produced a disproportionate number of spies and subversives in America, such as Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, nine of the Hollywood Ten (six of the ten were dues-paying members of the Communist Party), Jonathan Pollard, and the neo-con instigators behind the Larry Franklin-AIPAC spy scandal. Even the Jewish ADL, a self-styled human rights and Jewish defense organization, got its fingers caught in the espionage cookie jar with the Roy Bullock bust in San Francisco. Please note the Israeli spy chronology listed at whatreallyhappen.com.

In American and Europe throughout the 1930's, Jews typically made up over 50% of the membership of communist party organizations, although they typically made up miniscule portions of the overall population well below ten times this percentage. Jews played a key role in financing the Bolshevik revolution, and a key role in conducting the slaughter of tens of millions of non-communists. These alleged Jewish atheists systematically looted and destroyed Christian churches and slaughtered Russian priests while leaving all synagogues unscathed.

Jews have been major perpetrators of war crimes and terror atrocities in the Middle East. As some examples, they were involved in the bombing of the King David Hotel that killed 92 people in 1946, the assassination of the Swedish U.N. mediator Count Folke Bernadotte, the massacre at Deir Yassein, the Lavon Affair, the machine-gunning of disarmed Egyptian POWs in Sinai, the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty (21 Americans dead, 92 maimed), passive-aggressive allowance of the bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut in Oct 1983 (according to Victor Ostrovsky the Mossad knew all about the suicide mission, but deliberately failed to warn the Marines, who lost 245 men), the Sabra-Shatilla massacre in Lebanon, the Jewish neo-con led wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq that have dumped hundreds of tons of aerosolized depleted uranium in the Middle East (cf. High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper), and the July-August 2006 war of naked aggression against the civilian population of Lebanon.

In August 2005, the World Bank reported that Israel is one of the most corrupt countries in the West. Business Data Israel (BDI) commented: ""Israel is considered one of the riskiest places in the Western world, with an unstable, inefficient regime, low accountability, a relatively high rate of state corruption and poor law enforcement." In addition, according to a 2006 BBC survey, 43% of the Israeli public feels that some form of torture should be permissible, the highest percentage of twenty five leading countries polled across the world. Last but not least, Uri Avery observes in his article "Lovable Man?" that the gap between rich and poor in Israel is one of the widest in the industrialized world (contrary to northern European societies that have traditionally had the largest middle classes relative to their overall populations).

Let us pause for a moment and ask if this is what we would expect from a nation supposedly serving a divine mission from God to be a light unto the world?

In spirit, if not technical violation of existing laws, Jews have run roughshod over every 19th century classical liberal principle upon which America was founded. Let us start with the pro-white racial nationalism plank. In the immigration act of 1790 America was explicitly defined as a white country. Its leaders believed firmly that whites had a right to their own racial, economic, and political self-determination. In contrast, Jews spearheaded the 1965 immigration reform act that opened the floodgates of Third World immigration. Jewish-dominated national media have consistently orchestrated white guilt and white self-hatred campaigns.

Let us take the Jeffersonian and Jacksonian plank that vehemently opposed the creation of a central bank. Rothschild interests, along with their Rockefeller and Morgan confederates, orchestrated the creation of the Federal Reserve Banking System in 1913. The Jewish predisposition towards financial speculation and manipulation has helped lead America towards massive indebtedness and loss of core manufacturing industries, as opposed to the classical liberal focus on internal manufacturing infrastructural development.

Let us take the classical liberal focus on avoiding aggressive war and foreign entanglements. Woodrow Wilson was surrounded by Jewish advisors, who encouraged him to flip flop 180 degrees after he won re-election in 1916 election on a peace plank. Suddenly he stated to bang the war drums for World War I intervention. So did America's Jewish-controlled major newspapers. The Balfour Declaration, in which the British government promised Palestine to Zionists (which Britain had not yet conquered from the Ottoman Empire), was the gift Britain made to American Jews in return for bringing America into the war on Britain's side.

America's entry into World War I dragged out the war for two years, cost many millions of additional lives, and so exhausted Europe that it contributed heavily towards the rise of Bolshevism, Fascism, Nazism, and World War II. The Jewish recasting of America into a global empire has resulted in an incredible drain on American lives and treasures.

Finally, let us consider the classical liberal focus on decentralization. Through their monopolization of national media and control of Congress, Jews mock early American values that promote local sovereignty, chivalrous free enterprise competition, and freedom of speech. Through their resurrection of an archaic Jewish state, Jews also mock Enlightenment principles that replaced religious dogma with the individual search for truth and rationalism. Meanwhile, Jews have the nerve to beat their chests as leftist champions of all of the aforementioned classical liberal principles, even though they have torn up every social contract and implied mutual understanding that once emancipated them from the ghettos of Eastern Europe.

The Old Testament, Talmud, and Kabala have numerous sections that absolutely drip with hatred towards gentiles. Sections of the Talmud refer to gentiles as lowly cattle. Not all Jews take this seriously, but among the ones that do, this predisposes them towards being in a state of perpetual war towards gentile society in much the same manner that hardened criminals are permanent subversives.

There appear to be some significant sociological differences in child-rearing practices between Jews and gentiles. An interesting anecdote was reported by F. Scott Fitzgerald, author of The Great Gatsby, based on an experience when he was a scriptwriter in Hollywood in the 1930's. A Jewish kid is caught lying and cheating in school, and is sent home by the principle. He wrote in the script that the mother shows disapproval. His Jewish producers had him rewrite the scene where the mother coddles the poor dear. Fitzgerald remarked that if the scene had involved himself and his Irish mother, she would have whipped the hell out of him.

An important perspective on Jewish criminality was outlined in the PBS documentary "World War II: The Propaganda Battle" on PBS, part of the "A Walk Through the 20th Century With Bill Moyers" series. This documentary featured interviews with Fritz Hippler, creator of the Nazi documentary The Eternal Jew, as well as Frank Capra, who created the Why We Fight series.

This PBS documentary showed a famous extract of The Eternal Jew. It started with an animated map of the world. It depicted a rat population in central asia. It noted that rats are a cunning mammalian species that has evolved to covertly feed off human sloth. The animated map showed the global rat population spreading out in little colonies all over the world. First they infested the ancient world, and then later medieval Europe. Following the advent of the age of Exploration following the discoveries of Columbus, little rat colonies followed Europeans to the far corners of the globe. The animated map then depicted Jewish origins in western Asia. The documentary noted that Jews live off the running sores of human civilization. It then showed them spreading around the world in little colonies following Europeans in a manner analogous to rats.

This caused Bill Moyers to look up at the camera with a very painful expression. He asked (with words to the effect), "If one compares ones fellow man to rats, it does not take a great genius to figure out what to do with them."

Moyers is absolutely right. These are extremely unpleasant thoughts. I do not advocate violating the Constitutional rights of Jews or any other group. I advocate purely legal, peaceful means.

However, it is true that criminals of all races can have similarities to rats. Criminals generally operate in a stealthy manner. They can also be ornery, malicious, and destructive. According to the book More Cunning Than Man: A Social History of Rats and Man by Robert Hendrickson, while it is true that as individuals rats typically cringe and hide, once they operate in groups and can find a weak target, they have been known to attack. As an example, rat packs have been known to attack and kill unprotected human infants. When given free rein of an apple warehouse, rats have been known to maliciously take a small bite out of each apple to ruin as much as possible. Criminals often operate in an analogous manner, becoming more dangerous and vicious as they become more organized and powerful and gain free reign.

One possible explanation of this phenomenon is that criminals tend to be highly selfish without any strongly held sense of coherent principles or internal restraint. Therefore, when they are subjected to close scrutiny or oppressive rule, there is no limit to how far they will cringe, dissimilate, and debase themselves in order to please their masters and gratify simple survival needs. Conversely, when they are in positions of tremendous power with little external restraint, there is no limit to the cruel abuses that they are willing to inflict on others to satisfy their power lusts.

This helps to explain the observation by Tacitus that "When the state is most corrupt, the rules are most multiplied." Honest people, conversely, require fewer laws because they operate under greater internal restraint. In addition, given that blacks have a higher percentage of sociopaths in their populations than whites, and that the French Foreign legion has traditionally had a much higher percentage of desperados escaping justice than most Western military organizations, this helps to explain why most black rulers in Africa have tended to be far more capricious and oppressive on their own people than the white colonialist governments that they replaced in the 20th century, and why the Foreign Legion has been notorious for its brutal discipline.

Getting back to Jews, it is not that all Jews are like rats, but rather it is those particular Jews who are criminals — like criminals of all other races — who remind people of rodent behavior.

After living in New York City for ten years and dealing with New York Jews on a daily basis, I am convinced that the Jewish population has a significantly higher percentage of sociopaths than the white middle class population. However, I do not know what that percentage is and can only make a wild guess. At least 20-30%? I do not know for sure, although it is probably close to whatever the maximum saturation point a population can sustain without becoming dysfunctional. Furthermore, the sustainable saturation level probably varies with such factors as economic conditions and the character of the host population. Jewish sociopathology rates can probably be analyzed with ecological balance and dynamic game theory interactive models.

However, the more significant issue than determining an accurate percentage (if such is possible), is the fact that this percentage seems to be high enough to give the Jewish community very serious problems in preventing its worst sociopaths from rising to the top and keeping them in check once they get there. In the articles that I have archived for the Reverend Ted Pike, he is not joking around when he talks about "evil Jewish leaders" who are out to use every devious means possible to destroy all of our First Amendment rights, if not what is left of the Constitution. This is a very real and very serious threat. Michael Collins Piper is not joking either when he describes their behavior in books such as Final Judgment, Judas Goats, and High Priests of War. Ditto for Col Donn de Grand Pre in Viper's Venom.

Jewish totalitarianism

Anti-Nazi propaganda has left many Americans with the subliminal impression that because the Nazis were brutal authoritarians, and because they persecuted the Jews, that this somehow means that Jews are the exact opposite, namely humane, libertarian, and innocent. This is is very fallacious. Often brutal authoritarian intriguers hate each other more than they are hated by libertarians. As come examples, authoritarian Nazis fought authoritarian Communists on the Eastern Front. Communist Chinese waged border skirmishes with Communist Russians in the 1960's. Communist Vietnamese vanquished Communist Khymer Rouge mass murderers in Cambodia in the 1970's. Lastly, Stalinist Communists purged international Trotskyite Jewish Communists in the 1930's.

The kinds of people who become enemies of the Jews does not necessarily define who the Jews are as a people. This is particularly true since the Jews have at one time or another made enemies of just about every racial and ethnic group, nationality, and ideological persuasion on the planet. Jews have severely alienated ideologues ranging from authoritarians to anarcho-libertarians, and from extreme leftists to extreme rightists. Perhaps the only thing that enemies of Jews have had in common throughout history is their common hatred of Jews who remind them of criminals and subversives. (See my criminality section above).

Wilmot Robertson points out in the Dispossessed Majority (p. 193) that everywhere that Jews have gained the supreme ruling hand, their rule has been cruel and vicious:

In ancient times, Jews were also brutal. Israeli dissident Israel Shamir writes in his excellent article "Friends, True and False":

Fascism to perfection

The state of Israel today is hardly a model democracy. In fact, it seems to fit all the criteria outlined in the Mises Institute seminar on the Economics of Fascism for the perfect fascist state, which I will discuss in detail later when I address its economic policies.

Many of Israel's leaders have openly admired Zeev (Vladimir) Jabotinsky, a leader of "Revisionist" Zionism, who in turn openly admired Mussolini's fascism. Its leaders typically have a Mossad background, which Victor Ostrowsky (author of By Way of Deception) claims is the most admired organization in Israel. Not surprisingly, Israeli leaders prefer to operate in secrecy. They routinely carry out assassinations. They also routinely engage in back door international arm-twisting and warmongering through neo-cons in America (see High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper).

Israel also appears to perfectly fit a different definition of fascism contained in professor Robert Paxton's 2004 book The Anatomy of Fascism. In his article about the highly misleading term "Islamo-Fascism," Eric Margolis summarizes Dr. Paxton's ingredients for fascism as follows:

Fascism exults the state. The Jewish state is supremely exulted not only in Israel, but also before the U.S. Congress by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). The loss of crewman on the U.S.S. Liberty and the cancerous shortening of the lives of hundreds of thousands of American military personnel from aerosolized depleted uranium are all treated like insignificant human sacrifices on the alter of the ineffably magnificent Zionist cause.

Fascism promotes massive economic central planning and government cooption of industry. The Israeli government engages in massive economic interventionism, including major direct subsidy, joint ownership of industry, massive welfare payments, and myriad restrictions on general economic activity. During the Cold War, socialist Israel employed about 30% of the population, the highest percentage outside of Communist countries. Much of the top-down subsidy comes from American aid. Prior to the Iraqi War, conservative estimates of American subsidy to Israel was in the hundreds of billions of dollars. According to an estimate that appeared in the American Free Press, the total direct and indirect costs of the Jewish state to America, to include the full economic impact to America of the 1970's oil shocks and current Iraq war, are somewhere over $4 trillion.

Fascism frequently glorifies war and promotes militarism. Since war-making is typically a monopoly of the state, this is an ideal way for fascist regimes to flatter themselves while using militarist authority to suppress civil liberties and dissent.

The Israeli state is highly militarized and promotes a state of perpetual siege-like paranoia among its citizens. It routinely applies horrendous economic sanctions, if not outright regulatory strangulation, against West Bank and Gaza-bound enclaves of Palestinians. Many areas have become de facto Warsaw Ghettos. The Israeli government also visits aerial bombardment upon innocent Lebanese civilians and vital infrastructure completely disconnected from any guerilla activity. The Orwellian "perpetual war for perpetual peace" environment includes endless expansionist visions offered by various political and religious extremists, hardly denounced vehemently by the Israeli majority.

Fascism frequently involves police state surveillance and intimidation of the citizenry. Reuven Schossen is a former Israeli Army Captain who was interviewed on Aug 3, 2006 by Daryl Bradford Smith. He had this to say about the current police state climate in Israel (at about 34 minutes into the interview):

Reuven Schossen has sought political asylum in the United States. He is trying to publish a book about Israeli police state repression titled Holygarchy. At his web site schossen.com, he writes:

Mr. Schossen has demonstrated tremendous courage and honesty. More telling yet will be the number of fellow Jews in American who can respect his courage and help him, because he does need support from both Jews and gentiles alike.

For more insights into the repressive world of Israel from an American liberal perspective, one should read online The Life of An American Jew in Racist, Marxist Israel, written in 1985 by Jack Bernstein. This is a classic that helps to reinforce many points made elsewhere in this article.

Religious centralization

Judaism itself is a fundamentally totalitarian religion, as explicitly noted by Israel Shahak in Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years. In his chapter "Orthodoxy and Interpretation" professor Shahak notes:

In his classic book Stranger Than Fiction: The History of the Jewish People, Rabbi Lewis Browne points out that rabbis often built up a wall of all-encompassing laws to maintain Jewish identity and continuity at all costs. In various places in medieval Europe where Jews were initially openly welcomed by gentiles, the Jews typically segregated themselves first. Then when they ran into conflict with gentiles through their sharp practices, they secretly welcomed anti-Semitism because it gave them an excuse to maintain the wall of ethnic separation, while at the same time giving them a victimization role that could be blamed on gentiles rather than upon themselves. In fact, the Jews have a long history of magnifying their own persecution and pumping up casualty figures, going back to ancient times. There are numerous cases where Jews have claimed that more of them were killed in anti-Semitic programs than the total number of humans living in the entire host country where they lived.

All of this stands in sharp opposition to Northern European traditions of honesty, openness, honor, modesty, and stoicism. The rub comes when Jews want to enter our society and enjoy the stability, productivity, and human rights created by the indigenous innate traits and culture of white people, and then the next thing we know, elite Jews (who reform Jews cannot seem to control) want to turn around and receive special privileges, mix us up racially and ethnically, and call us dumb schmucks under their breath. They cannot live with us, and they cannot live without us.

Totalitarianism frequently manifests itself through abusiveness to dependent people. I vividly remember once watching a PBS documentary about the necessity of shelters for battered wives in Israel. Such things are a rarity in northern European societies, where women's rights are more often taken for granted. Dr. Duke notes in Jewish Supremacism (p. 111)

Dr. Duke also observes on page 112 of Jewish Supremacism:

Jewish totalitarian complexities

Most Americans seem to have a visceral sense that "totalitarianism" means long rows of fanatical soldiers goose-stepping in jackboots to orders being barked over loudspeakers, as secret police spies closely watch the reactions of individuals in crowds. But this is very simplistic.

At the beginning of my "top down vs. bottom up" article, I have already mentioned William S. Lind's discussion regarding an interesting anomaly. Hitler's army actually encouraged forms of insubordination while engaged in maneuver warfare.

In his book The Roman Republic, Isaac Asimov talked about how Roman imperialists practiced the policy, "The looser the hold, the tighter the grip." The imperialists provided aqueducts, roads, Roman law, and some quasi-autonomy in return for tribute to Caesar. Many conquered regions acquiesced to this program.

Similarly, we can see some "loose-tight" characteristics in at least two areas of Jewish totalitarianism, namely adaptive mimicry and contractual deal negotiation.

In regard to adaptive mimicry, I have met quite a few Jews who seem to have photographic memories. As a group, Jews seem to be very good at quickly learning foreign languages and superficially adopting foreign customs and culture to blend in. As an extreme example, I think that former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak probably earned prestige in Israeli society for his cleverness when he disguised himself as an Arab woman to conduct a successful commando assassination mission in Lebanon. I am also reminded of the cleverness of the Jewish straight actor Dustin Hoffman when he successfully plays a woman to get an acting part in the film Tootsie. In addition, it is common to find Jews getting involved with political groups on both sides of every issue, such as both the pro-gun ownership and anti-gun factions, or pro-immigration and anti-immigration groups. This, despite the fact that the majority of American Jews tend to be about one standard deviation to the political left of white males on most important issues in America. (This is according to a 1980's article once published in the American Enterprise magazine). I think that Jews often take pride in their ability to infiltrate alien groups and affect views that are very different from their own real views.

Therefore, the fact that there have been some famous Jewish libertarians such as Ayn Rand, Dr. Ludwig von Mises, and Dr. Murray Rothbard does not necessarily negate an overall pattern of Jewish totalitarianism. These libertarians may simply reflect a small minority of renegades. Indeed, if one looks hard enough one can find that renegades have existed in all societies, to include the old Soviet Union and Third Reich. The existence of certain libertarians may also reflect a combination of intrigue and adaptive mimicry.

In the cases of Ayn Rand, Ludwig von Mises, and Dr. Murray Rothbard, I think that they were probably sincere in their libertarian views. However, one might argue that they were the renegade exceptions that help prove the rule. In addition, in their own subtle ways they too showed their Jewishness. They never staunchly defended white genetic interests or an American nationalist industrial policy. Instead they generally favored multi-racialism and multiculturalism and an internationalist brand of libertarianism that encouraged open borders and unrestricted free trade.

Dr. Murray Rothbard, who I admire most of the three, and who came the closest to defending American Old Right principles, had a Christian wife of non-Jewish ancestry. He really was a renegade.

In regard to contractual deal negotiation, obviously people who are smart enough to understand how to trade off concessions have the analytical ability to understand encroachments by authorities. However, intellectually understanding contractual negotiation and having the emotional drive to demand liberty are two different things. There are many cases of people who are intellectually libertarian, but fall into line with a totalitarian agenda at the drop of a hat because of strong emotional ties.

A good example of intellectual freedom seekers who remained emotional slaves are stories about certain Soviet spies who defected to America during the Cold War. After a few months in America, many former Soviet agents started experiencing an extremely powerful urge to go to the Soviet embassy and turn themselves in. Intellectually, they understood perfectly well that the Soviet system was evil, barbarous, and totalitarian. Intellectually, they admired American libertarian institutions (or what was left of them by the Cold War era). They understood that upon returning to the Soviet Union, they could be tortured, shot, or sent to the Gulag for life. However, they also felt this incredibly powerful emotional attachment to "Mother Russia." I recollect reading that emotional withdrawal symptoms became such a problem that the FBI went out of its way to help create Russian social support groups in America to reduce the probability of suicides and re-defections.

As a person who leans towards libertarian racial nationalism, I think it is perfectly healthy for Jews or people of any race or ethnicity to feel loyalty to their tribal roots. The issue here is not a strongly felt Jewish loyalty to Jewish heritage, but rather situations where a strong emotional commitment causes certain Jews to do nasty things that threaten America and our Constitutional rights. It is not Jewish racial nationalism per se that bothers me, but rather the aggressive Zionist imperialist brand of racial nationalism that is killing people and destroying American civil liberties.

Regrettably, there are well-funded Jewish totalitarian institutions firmly implanted here on U.S. soil. One of the most notorious is called the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). MIT professor Noam Chomsky, who the ADL labels a Jewish renegade, has noted its "Stalinist-style mentality." The ADL claims to be one of America's leading "human rights" and "Jewish defense" organizations. In actuality, the American Free Press has long maintained that this sinister organization serves as an unregistered agent of Israel and the Mossad.

The ADL keeps massive files and dossiers on American dissidents on all ends of he political spectrum. It got caught in illegal domestic spying in the notorious Roy Bullock case. It has been a leader in promoting "hate crime" legislation, which many American conservatives view as a back door ruse to condition the public to link political ideas to "crime." In contrast to all this, the Anglo Saxon common law punishes only acts, and not speech (with some extremely narrow exceptions, such as libel or for falsely yelling "fire!" in a crowded movie theater). The ultimate objective is to criminalize any public criticism of Jews in America much as it has already been criminalized in Canada and throughout Europe.

In addition, the ADL is a leader in promoting legislation to censure the Internet under the guise of fighting "child pornography" and "terrorism." Rev. Ted Pike has been one of many patriotic leaders who has stood up to fight this deception.

We have also seen organized Jewish groups come down hard on the Mearsheimer-Walt Harvard study for daring to expose the influence of the Jewish lobby in America today. Jews have also pounced on Holocaustianity free thinkers such as David Irving, Ernst Zundel, Gumar Rudolf, and other men of conscience and free inquiry. I cover this in the Critical Issues section, also see Best Witness (offered by America First Books) about an early skirmish in this longstanding First Amendment Battle.

Last, but not least, we frequently see Jews beat up on fellow Jews who are dissidents, smearing them as "self-hating Jews" and "non-Jewish Jews." They include individuals such as Victor Ostrovsky, Mordechai Venuunu, Noam Chomsky, professor Stanley Lichter, and professor Israel Shahak.

Offering the Jewish community a deal it can't refuse

While attending a business club meeting in New York City, I will never forget once hearing a very successful Jewish leader with impeccable Ivy League and "assimilated" credentials talk about being privileged to one day be able to meet a very special man. He talked about it in such a hushed, reverent, and cryptic way that I felt it could only mean a godfather. As a published example of this, the preface of Indecent Exposure: A True Story of Hollywood and Wall Street by David McClintick has a quote by the famous director John Huston, to the effect that people who lived in Hollywood in the 1930's were wrong to think that Louis B. Meyer of MGM was King of the Jungle. Every day Meyer was on the phone long distance with Nicholas Schenck of Loews back in New York City, who kept his name out of the papers, but was the real King of the Jungle. We also know from Final Judgment about how America's crime boss Meyer Lansky worked in partnership with the Israeli government and its Mossad along with part of the CIA. Their nefarious activities received cover-up services from America's Jewish dominated national media. In other words, behind the scenes, Jews operate under a monarchical, oligarchical godfather system that makes small potatoes out of the version played by Marlon Brando in Francis Ford Coppolla's Godfather film.

Fanatical Zionists have been known to not only arm twist fellow Jews, but to also kill them. For example, in 1940 the Jewish Haganah bombed the S.S. Patria in Haifa harbor, killing 247 Jewish refugees. Naeim Giladi, an Arab Jew who has become a U.S. citizen, has written Ben Gurion's Scandals: How the Hagannah & Mossad Eliminated Jews. It talks about how Zionists posing as Arab terrorists killed Jews in Arab lands to drive them to Israel.

All of this supports my point that the Jewish community is often caught in a web of intrigue and conflicting loyalties that makes it difficult to prevent vicious, depraved, and tyrannical people from rising to the top.

White social reaction to Jewish totalitarianism can create additional complications

Jewish totalitarianism often creates enormous complications for patriotic American gentiles. When first confronted with nasty, heavy-handed Jewish methods, the immediate patriotic emotional reaction is often to try to fight fire with fire and create a focused, authoritarian counter movement. This is almost reflexive, like trying to swat away a mosquito that is buzzing in ones ear. Put another way, at first glance, it seems unlikely that one will break the Jewish choke hold on America's privately owned central bank, its national media, and its government by merely passing out lollipops and tootsie rolls.

One of the most famous examples of authoritarian reaction was George Lincoln Rockwell, a former U.S Navy flier who founded the American Nazi Party in 1959. He claimed in his book White Power that he was really trying to promote an "authoritarian republic" rather than blind "Fuhrerism." He felt that one needed to use very bold confrontation tactics to deal with Jewish power. If nothing else, the Nazis might shake things up, expand the political frame of reference, and maybe gain some elbow room for traditional American conservatives who Rockwell felt had become too squeamish. Rockwell was angered that many conservatives rarely dared to explicitly identify Jews as their enemies in public, often using cutesy terms such as "the eskimos" and "the you know who" even in their private political meetings. According to some sources, before he was assassinated in 1967, Rockwell had started to shift away from the storm troop confrontation approach.

As another famous example, the late Dr. William Pierce claimed in his article "The Radicalizing of an American" in Best of Attack: Revolutionary Voice of the National Alliance (p. 124-125) that he started out as a libertarian while growing up as a teenager and later as a physics professor at Oregon State University. Then after he got disgusted with the social changes fomented by Jews in America during the early 1960's, he got involved with George Lincoln Rockwell and became publisher of National Socialist World. By the early 1970's he started to distance himself from Nazi tactics, although in editorials such as "The Measure of Greatness" that appeared in the March-April 1989 National Vanguard magazine he did not exactly engage in Hitler-bashing either. He instructed members of his National Alliance in a 1980's membership manual that they could honestly tell the public that they were not a "Nazi" movement. Later in an American Dissident Voices broadcast he referred to the use of Nazi props as a "cheap right wing trick" that tried to use authoritarianism as a method to build cohesion among whites to match Jewish cohesion, circumventing the more tedious process of building shared values and educating fellow citizens on a grass roots level. While the use of Nazi props might fetch instant publicity in the controlled media, Pierce said that such tactics typically attracted unreliable right wing "hobbyists" and "thrill-seekers" rather than people with a deep long term commitment and sorely needed skills.

Last, but not least, in My Awakening, on pages 488-489, Dr. David Duke claims that as a teenager he was influenced by George Lincoln Rockwell's radical approach. The story of young David is a classic example of an immature reaction to the complex sociological threat created by Jews, specifically as it regarded Duke's desire to protest a Jewish revolutionary named William Kunstler who proselytized near his home in the New Orleans area. According to Dr. Duke:

A big problem with any authoritarian approach is that it immediately alienates Nordic America. I have already described in my environmental vs. genetic discussion how Nordics have longstanding libertarian traditions, more so than any other people on the planet.

Unfortunately Nordics have been in steady decline as a percentage of America's population since the Civil War. Most of them still do not have their act together or know anything about their indigenous Indo-European culture or identity. They are easily manipulated. It still works like a charm for Jews to trot out blond-haired, blue-eyed Nordics-for-hire and have them bewail those supposedly nasty, authoritarian, bigoted, racist American nationalists who don't say nice things about all those totally wonderful poor, persecuted, innocent, downtrodden Jews. In their own way, particularly among Christian Zionist Nordics, Nordic Americans can become bigger enemies of white right wingers than the Jews themselves.

Dr. Duke often talks about how national media frequently tag him with the label "former Klansman," as if he was born with "KKK" on his birth certificate. The national media is much less likely to mention that he has been out of the Klan nearly three decades, and has served as elected public official in the Louisiana legislature. An important point Dr. Duke likes to make for would-be pro-white activists is that Jewish-controlled Hollywood has created many toxic and distorted images of right wingers, and that this can create self-defeating, self-fulfilling prophecies. For example, Hollywood often shows racially conscious whites cowering around as if they have done something illegal when in fact it is perfectly legal, normal, and healthy to be concerned about white survival. Meanwhile, Hollywood makes aggressive pro-Zionist activists such as Mel Mermelstein in Mike Piper's Best Witness (carried by America First Books) appear very noble. White Americans need to turn off their TV sets when it comes to all the "Hollywood Nazi," "Hollywood Klansmen," and other toxic "Hollywood Right Winger" stereotypes being fed them and simply be themselves and act like the normal, decent citizens that they are. The real sickies are the Jewish moguls who run Hollywood who continually pump out misleading images.

An important purpose behind this discussion of Jewish totalitarianism is to clear up American right wing code-speak about an amorphous group of internationalists who work tirelessly through myriad front organizations to create a one world despotic government. What they usually mean, in plainer English, is an international network of extremely powerful Jewish plutocrats who possess a powerful instinctive tendency towards centrism, criminal deception, and monopolization. These paranoid Jewish criminals feel that they must ultimately create a global police state to prevent honest citizens from thinking for themselves, organizing, rebelling, and ultimately overthrowing Jewish supremacism. These low cunning supremacists routinely infiltrate legitimate nationalist groups with agents who pose as phony free speech liberals in order to find exploitable vulnerabilities and determine ways to play off one group against another. They also play the same game by infiltrating leftist groups.

E.D. Butler summed it up well in his article "Censored History" when he stated, "The frightful results to date of the policies of these international power fanatics are nothing compared with what now threatens mankind. It is no use suggesting that they can be appealed to, pointing out that their policies of centralizing power run so contrary to reality, that the end result must be the complete collapse of what remains of Civilization and their own destruction."

Jewish psychopathology

On the street level, we have all heard the term "neurotic New Yorker" which usually means "Jewish." Having lived in New York City for ten years, which has the largest Jewish population in the world outside of Israel, it was not uncommon for me to hear gentiles comment about their need to periodically leave New York City to mentally "detox." It is not uncommon to hear them refer to Jews as being a very "unnatural" people, overly adapted to the very "unnatural" multi-racial, multi-cultural environment of a densely populated urban environment. Lastly, it is interesting that Israel has more psychiatrists than any other nation in the world.

I could go on for pages trying to describe Jewish "unnaturalness" and "toxicity," but perhaps the following might serve as an adequate introductory overview.

Apocalyptic megalomania: This is a central topic of Israel Shahak's classic work and currently comprises the most dangerous Jewish delusional disorder. Israel has over four hundred atomic bombs and missiles, if anything should go wrong, many Israeli leaders think they have some kind of divine right to exercise a "Samson Option" and pull the whole world down with them. Closely related to this insanity is Israel's "mad dog" policy advocated by Phineas Lavon and other Jewish leaders.

The Talmud, which Jews prize over the Old Testament, is a virtual megalomania manual. As some examples: "Only Jews are human. [Gentiles] are animals." (Baba Mezia 114a- 114b.). Also, "Even the best of the [Gentiles] should be killed. (Babylonian Talmud); and finally "If a heathen [Gentile] hits a Jew, the Gentile must be killed. Hitting a Jew is hitting God." (Sanhedrin 58b.)

An important component of Jewish delusional megalomania is Jewish messianism. In his book Stranger than Fiction: A History of the Jewish People, Rabbi Lewis Browne noted that a major recurrent theme of Jewish history has been the way in which over and over again some self-styled Rabbi has come up with a New Revelation, gained a large Jewish cult following, and then has ultimately come to a bad end for himself and his followers.

Unfortunately the bad end can also become bad news for gentiles who get sucked into the messiah game. Rev. Ted Pike has discussed on Daryl Bradford Smith's show the mentality of certain Zionist groups sects where the end justifies the means. Hence, it is OK to do evil, because when the Messiah finally comes, he will somehow rectify all the evil that has been done in preparation for his coming.

Obviously this approach flunks scientific reasoning 101, because there are no control measures or differentiations between independent and dependent variables. What if it turns out that Jews who do evil in perpetuity never see a messiah? How do we tell the difference between a true "Chosen of God" and some group that simply wants to do perpetual evil for its own sake?

Back in the late 1980's-early 1990's time frame, I recall seeing a documentary film about Israel that began with a rock concert in Israel. A lead guitarist started banging out a steady barrage of low base notes. Then in studied intervals between the notes, he started wailing into the microphone, "Messiah is not coming...messiah is not coming...messiah is not coming...messiah is not coming...(then the base notes stopped, with a pregnant pause)....he is not even going to telephone!!!" The crowd of young Israeli rock fans went wild with laughter and applause.

Part of the "joke" behind all this is the fact that well over half of all Jews are atheists (in Jewish Supremacism, Dr. Duke quotes an Israeli poll that puts the figure as high as 85%), and most of Israel's leading Zionist politicians have been secular, yet somehow they cannot shake their egotistical fanaticism. They realize that much of the Old Testament collapses before modern archeology and rational Biblical criticism, yet they threaten to nuke major capitols of the world for questioning their legitimacy.

Dr. Issa Khalaf's article "Rationality and Israeli violence" (17-23 Aug 2006 Al-Ahram) provides an excellent analysis of the extreme contradictions manifested by Jewish psychopathology. He notes:

This supremacism comes at a tremendous psychological price. Dr. Khalaf quotes Israeli commentator Haim Hanegbi from his Ari Shavit interview, in Haaretz, 28 August, 2003:

High rate of insanity: In the late 1800's, European psychotherapists noted that Jews have a higher incidence rate of insanity compared to gentiles, ranging from two to six times the local population. The Jewish Encyclopedia article "Nervous Diseases" notes that:

The comment in the Jewish Encyclopedia about being town dwellers is very significant. Significantly, throughout recorded history Jews have mostly functioned as an urban minority. In Isaac Asimov's Bible, Asimov claims that the real center of gravity in the ancient world for Jews was Babylonia and not Palestine. Jews have never really functioned as a balanced, self-sufficient ecosystem on a sociobiological level, but rather as dependent sub-component at odds with a host.

High rate of traumatic stress disorder: Another interesting indication of a different Jewish nervous system can be seen in military affairs. In all of America's wars, Jews have generally been dramatically under represented in proportion to their percentage within the overall American population (3%) in regard to both their level of U.S. military participation and combat casualties. (In contrast, Jews can be as much as ten times over represented in American professional occupations such as lawyers, doctors, professors, investment advisors). According to "Israelis: Neither Tough Nor Brave" (National Vanguard, Dec 1982), one reason why Israel is so trigger happy with massive American-supplied firepower from jets and artillery is because its soldiers have little toughness for close combat. In bloody American military campaigns, battle fatigue may account for as much as 10 percent of all casualties suffered. "For the Israeli soldiers who participated in the invasion of Lebanon [in 1982], a relatively brief and easy excursion in which the Jew were exposed to little direct fire, as indicated by the extraordinary low number of Jewish combat deaths, battle fatigue accounted for 23 per cent of all casualties."

This is not to mention how Israel shocked the world in the summer of 2006 with its massive destruction of Lebanese infrastructure and innocent civilian lives.

High level of homosexuality: With the usual Talmudic cleverness and duplicity, Jews simultaneously condemn homosexuality, rationalize it, sanction it, and promote it. Behind closed doors, Jews appear to have a much higher rate of homosexuality than whites. In The Life of An American Jew in Racist, Marxist Israel (available online), Jack Bernstein talks about how Israeli society is over-supplied with homosexuals. I got the same feeling when I lived in New York City for ten years.

According to Reverend Ted Pike, Judaism, more than any other religion, has rejected moral judgments against homosexuality and supports the gay agenda. Pike reports that:

Reform Judaism, representing 39 percent of American religious Jews, is now in total endorsement of sodomy. It says:

We hold that homosexuality is no longer {an abomination}; it is not a mental illness or social deviancy; it is not a perversion of the natural order. Homosexuality is not a choice or a preference; it is not something that one decides to do or abstain from doing. It is, like, heterosexuality, the way one is. As such it makes no sense on religious or moral grounds to differentiate between people on the basis of sexual orientation.

Rabbi Eric Yoffie, president of the Union For Reformed Judaism, concurs:

For the first time in history, a major rabbinical body has affirmed the Jewish validity of committed, same-gender relationships. 1

Conservative rabbis, who lead 33 percent of religious Jews, announce they will soon ordain gay rabbis and encourage homosexuality for Jewish men and women who are so inclined. 2

Orthodox Judaism, 21 percent of American religious Jews, has not yet outwardly endorsed homosexuality. In fact, it officially forbids homosexual relations between adults.

But in the Talmud, the highest religious, ethical and legal authority for Orthodox Jews, we find a very different, shocking reality: little boys under the age of nine (delectable objects of homosexual lust) are repeatedly described as incapable of “throwing guilt” on the adult who rapes them!

Orthodox gay Jewish groups thrive, American gay porno stars such as Michael Lucas entertain Israeli troops with live sex shows in Israel, and famous Jews such as the late Allen Ginsberg have been disproportionately represented in radical gay organizations such as the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) and other gay groups. This helps to explain why Jewish-dominated national media have pushed for acceptance of homosexuality across America so hard in recent decades.

Two examples of national media promotion include the notorious lesbian Ellen Degeneres, whose openly pro-gay influence has been magnified by such Jewish controlled media outlets such as CBS, HBO, and Time. Please also note the movie Brokeback Mountain, created by Jewish producers, that tries to bend the American cowboy masculinity icon towards homosexuality. Idaho attorney Edgar Steele has had some choice words about the damage this has done. It is the fact that this is part of a continual, systematic national media propaganda pattern that makes many American conservatives so livid.

I am reminded of the following passage from Tom Wolfe's The Bonfire of the Vanities (p. 106):

. . ."Jimmy," Andriutti said to Caughey, "did you know that Jewish guys — Larry, I don't want you to take this personally — did you know that Jewish guys, even if they're real stand-up guys, all have one faggot gene? That's a well-known fact. They can't stand going out in the rain without an umbrella or they have all this modern sh** in their apartment or they don't like to go hunting or they're for the f**king nuclear freeze and affirmative action or they wear jogging shoes to work or some god***n thing. You know?"
. . ."Gee," said [Larry] Kramer, "I don't know why you thought I'd take it personally."
. . . "Come on, Larry," said Andriutti, "tell the truth. Deep down, don't you wish you were Italian or Irish?"
. . ."Yeah," said Kramer, "that way I wouldn't know what the f**k was going on in this f**king place."

I do not mean to suggest that all male Jews are homosexuals or un-masculine, but rather that the Jewish community appears to have a significantly higher percentage of homosexuals than white gentile communities. The problem is significant enough that it must be addressed in any honest discussion about Jews and about how American values have become so messed up.

To be sure, there are certainly masculine Jewish people around, such as various screen personas played by Jews such as William Shatner, Kirk Douglas, James Caan, Paul Newman, and Sir Lawrence Olivier. From first hand experience, I have observed some Jewish leaders with masculine personalities in both the military and civilian worlds.

However, even here there can be some interesting little twists which make one wonder about what the real underlying feelings are. As an example, in a PBS interview, the Jewish actor Sir Lawrence Oliver talked about how he once shocked a British audience with his "vulgarity" and his emphasis on "technique" when one moment he played a very hard-edged Hamlet in live theater, and then in a play that immediately followed, he convincingly played an effeminate puff-head aristocrat.

When one reads real histories about the Jews, one is often struck about how Jews repeatedly get off with a mere slap on the wrist or mere expulsion after committing extremely damaging high-level crimes that would ordinarily get most gentiles hung in a heartbeat from the lamp posts. I think that a high level of homosexuality and adaptive mimicry acting traits within Jewry are important factors to help explain this anomaly. Most gentiles tend to think of their enemies as being openly bold, defiant, and aggressive personalities. German Nazis and American Indian savages are good historical examples. From my own experience as a real estate broker in New York City, I have known many Jews who are brilliant people, but who nevertheless like to play effeminate games such as pretend that they are poor in math or are not "mechanical" when in fact they are like human computers. When one is acting as a mediator in an urban setting between different peoples from varied ethnic backgrounds and all walks of life, one can begin to appreciate how it might help to be a bit oily and effeminate to patiently keep cool and pragmatically make deals rather than risk blowing deals by affecting a harder masculine edge that is more likely to alienate people.

Oiliness also helps people slither out of tight spots. Jews can be extremely deceitful and vicious, yet they are so good at appearing mild-mannered and meek that one almost feels like one is trying to hit girl by taking reprisals against them. For starters, there is no ethnic group in America that celebrates and whines about a long history of persecution like the Jews. Mike Piper calls this "The Cult of Death." Repeatedly mulling and kvetching over their long history of persecution while making big profits off what Norman Finkelstein calls the "Holocaust Industry" reflects both a cynical and an effeminate approach to life.

Jewish effeminacy reminds me of the self-protective pheromone that the Death's Head moth squirts on itself when it invades bee hives. I discuss this later in the parasite animal models section.

Perhaps Dr. David Duke sums it all up best on page 221 of Jewish Supremacism:

A high level of "miscellaneous other" perversion: The article "The Essence of Judaism" in Best of Attack! and National Vanguard Tabloid explains that:

Ironically, while America's controlled media currently encourages Americans to hate Muslims, nowhere in Islam do you find anything as hateful towards Jesus as the Talmud, which states: "Balaam [Jesus] is raised from the dead and being punished in boiling hot semen. Those who mock the words of the Jewish sages and sin against Israel are boiled in hot excrement." (57a Gittin).

Earlier I have mentioned "The Shower Rangers," by Dr. William Pierce, who described how top Jews at Viacom thought it was funny to squirt young gentile girls with diarrhea as a surprise comedy act. I also mentioned his article "Fetuses, Feces, etc." that describes a seemingly pathological Jewish preoccupation with scatological material.

As an interesting aside, I once discussed with Michael Collins Piper the letters he receives from readers of his books. While most of the letters are overwhelmingly positive, as a highly controversial author he also gets his share of hate mail. He said that what really sticks out about hate mail he gets from recognizable Jewish sources is that about 90% of it is scatological in nature.

Fractured personalities: Jewish Freudian psychotherapy puts enormous emphasis on integrating fractured levels of personality, which helps to confirm my observation that Jews as a group tend to have vastly more fractured personalities than the general white population.

An important element of Jewish fracturing is the fact that "normal," "honest," "mainstream," "righteous," and "assimilated" Jews will typically front for and support corrupt Jews out of a sense Jewish tribal loyalty. For example, in By Way of Deception, Victor Ostrovsky talks about how under the sayonim program the Mossad can recruit the assistance of Jews virtually anywhere in the world. As another example, after Ivan Boesky was convicted as a stock swindler, he was welcomed with open arms back into synagogues.

It is common to see fracturing on an ideological level. As some examples, the monopoly capitalist Jacob Schiff supported Bolshevist Leon Trotsky not only when he came to live in New York City in 1916, but also when Trotsky returned to Russia to form the Red Army and butcher millions of Christians. Dr. Armand Hammer, former head of Occidental Petroleum, shifted back and forth between having been an active "friend of Lenin" to calling himself a "friend" of various U.S. presidents. Also, Michael Collins Piper observes in High Priests of War how many current "neo-conservatives" reinvented themselves who formerly had Trotskyite backgrounds. Jews are famous for opportunistically shifting back and forth between whatever ideologies happen to serve their purposes at the moment.

Now that the ruinous effects of open borders and massive Third World immigration are beginning to become much more obvious to most white Americans, we are beginning to see increasing numbers of Jews jump ship and start to posture as if they have been "pro-white" all along, when in fact Jews led the immigration law changes in the mid-1960's that created the demographic disaster. They have also funded and directed most of the extreme leftist organizations that have suppressed the white immune response system against alien invasion, while simultaneously funding fanatical Zionists in Palestine that insist on maintaining Jewish racial purity (for some specifics, see Dr. William L. Pierce's article "The Nature of the Beast.")

Chutzpah is a very prized trait in Jewish culture. It is also an excellent example of hypocritical fracturing. Dr. Alan Dershowitz has written a book titled Chutzpah that encourages his fellow tribalists to be proud of it and just let it all hang out. Even Larry Wilde's Official Jewish Jokebook has plenty of chutzpah jokes.

Here is an example of a cute chutzpah joke I found on the Internet:

This is the kind of chutzpah that makes many gentiles who like to hang out with Jews smile and laugh and view them as bunch of lovable old rogues. However, for the purposes of this article I want to cover the brand of chutzpah that ultimately creates major national security threats.

In the bad forms of chutzpah, a person tells a nervy lie, and then goes "one extra" in brazenness by righteously attacking the victim of the lie with another lie. I have known Jews who are so good at creating a fantasy world for themselves so that they virtually believe their own lies while "on stage." Great method acting, even to the point of self-delusion. In fact, it is so smooth, so slick, so spontaneous, and so natural for so many of them that I consider it a kind of a quasi-instinctive, semi-conscious, delusional disorder.

As two examples, watch these chilling videos, Exhibits 1 and 2, that show Israeli spokespersons withstand grilling about Israeli mass murder of innocent Lebanese civilians by British journalists. These Israelis have the same smooth relentless insectoid robotic efficiency as the human-killing supercomputer HAL in 2001 a Space Odyssey. Also, watch video where WTC landlord Larry Silverstein casually talks about the decision to "pull" World Trade Center 7, even though obviously it must have taken days to lay in controlled demolitions — what did he know in advance of 9-11?

Mystery buildings have a long history in New York City. Back in the late 1800's insurance companies in New York came up with the term "Jewish lightning" to characterize Jewish businessmen who secretly set fire to their failing businesses to collect the insurance money. Chutzpah involved going "one extra" with this "con" by righteously and indignantly threatening to sue the insurance company for dereliction and screaming "anti-Semitism" if it did not settle quickly and fully.

In regard to Larry Silverstein and WTC 7, an anonymous reader at prison planet reported that, "In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties' estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. This building's collapse alone resulted in a profit of about $500 million."

As another example, noted by Israeli peace activist Israel Shamir in his article "Friends True and False," during the July 2006 invasion of Lebanon, the Israelis deliberately targeted and killed four U.N. peacekeeper observers as part of their war of naked aggression against the people of Lebanon. Then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had the chutzpah to ask United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan to apologize!

Laird Wilcox's Crying Wolf: Hate Crime Hoaxes In America (also listed as link in my site map section) has documented innumerable hoaxes staged by Jews, such as fake attacks on Jewish cemeteries with spray-painted swastikas, combined with the chutzpah to make an indignant national media shows over alleged wrongs.

Incidentally, in the Tawana Brawley affair in 1987, some nationally prominent blacks tried to play the same game as many unscrupulous Jews but were just were not as smart and smooth. Everything blew up in their faces.

One needs to understand how chutzpah has helped certain Jews get rich since ancient times. As one example, in medieval Europe, Jewish goldsmiths would issue warehouse receipts for gold and silver coins and jewelry kept with them on deposit. Knowing that not everyone came to collect their valuables all at once, they created fake warehouse receipts and then loaned them out, in essence counterfeiting money. This sleazy practice, considered utterly crooked in all other industries (such as in the grain and personal effects storage industries) has become the basis of the fractional reserve banking system in America today, as explained in the excellent Mises Institute video about Money, Banking, and the Federal Reserve.

This can create a whole new interpretation of someone like the Jewish money lender Shylock in William Shakespeare's classic play The Merchant of Venice. In a climatic trial scene, Shylock unmercifully whips out his knife to cut a pound of flesh out of Antony, the Merchant of Venice, for defaulting on his loans after his ships sank in storms. Fortunately Portia, the heroine of Shakespeare's play, prevents Shylock from "collecting" through her impassioned speech before a judge.

Imagine if the loans that Shylock had made to Antony were based on nonexistent assets. Imagine that Shylock feels he must protect his counterfeiting racket at all costs, therefore he goes ahead and mock-righteously cuts out his pound of flesh, with blood gushing on the floor and Antony screaming out in pain. Now that would be chutzpah.

We can see how Shylock might feel incentivized to act cruelly righteous even if he is loaning out unsecured paper, for fear that to do otherwise would undermine confidence in his crooked loan system. Then his other borrowers might default and he would be left impoverished. Worse yet, leveraged fractional reserve systems can create major business recessions and even depressions once a wave of defaults causes them to rapidly implode. In fact, Dr. Murray Rothbard claims in his work The Great Depression that an imploding fractional reserve system was a major cause behind one of America's worst economic catastrophes. Nevertheless, regardless of any possible social justifications, to most white people the kind of fractured behavior that would be involved in cutting up Antony would be so unspeakably low that it would almost define "criminal evil."

Can't happen in real life? Take a look at Larry Silverstein, who was involved in the decision to "pull" World Trade Center Seven, and collected billions in insurance money while beating his chests about how America should go fight Israel's enemies in the Middle East. Meanwhile, he has not appeared before a grand jury to help explain the strong evidence of controlled demolitions that brought down his buildings. Nor has he explained the sightings of strange work crews that entered his buildings weeks before the collapse. Don't "we the people" have the right to demand further legal investigation of someone like Silverstein, or are we just merely cattle?

There are lots of pounds of flesh that have been lost among the few thousand Americans who died in 9-11, not to mention servicemen killed in Iraq, or hundreds of thousands of American military and Iraqi civilians destroyed by aerosolized depleted uranium. And don't forget those 500,000 Iraqi children who America's Jewish Secretary of State Madelyn Albright under President Clinton thought were an "acceptable loss" as a consequence of America's twelve year blockade of Iraq in her interview with Greta Van Susteren.

As another important real world example, there is strong evidence that the Rothschilds and other elite Jewish families used considerable chutzpah to make gigantic loans to embattled countries during the Napoleonic Wars based on nonexistent assets, and ultimately parlayed the unsecured loans into wealth for themselves while paying off politicians so that they would not caught and punished. They even gained control of central banks.

We know for fact that the Israel Lobby has shown the chutzpah to recycle U.S. aid money to Israel to further buy off and further corrupt U.S. Congressmen. See Stealth PACs by Richard H. Curtiss and They Dare to Speak Out by former Congressman Paul Findley. Jews such as Ben Bernanke who run the Federal Reserve show an incredible amount of chutzpah by telling us that he may be able to ease interest rates in the mid single digit area because inflation is subsiding, when everyone sees real commodity prices escalating at double digit rates, and the Fed had the nerve to stop reporting the money supply growth (M3) in March 2006. It also takes a lot of chutzpah for the highly artificial state of Israel to maneuver the U.S. into invading Middle Eastern countries (see High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper) when there is considerable evidence that the 9-11 "terrorism" was an inside job, and furthermore, that America is effectively bankrupt and without an adequate industrial base.

Extreme projection: This is the case where the person who lives in a glass house likes to throw stones at other glass houses, on the theory that the best defense is a good offense. As some examples, Jewish Bolsheviks murdered tens of millions of Russians, yet Jews incessantly whine about Jewish deaths in German internment camps that were more than ten times fewer. In fact, they have grossly inflated casualty numbers and have exaggerated circumstances and have even shamelessly created a whole Holocaust industry to thoroughly exploit white guilt. (See Best Witness by Michael Collins Piper carried by America First Books, and The Holocaust Industry by Jewish writer Norm Finklestein).

While the whole Holocaust thing has certainly provided untold billions in reparations money for Israel from Germany, and tremendous sympathy money from America and other Western countries, on another level it has backfired by giving many Jews a very militant "Jewish crap doesn't stink" attitude that alienates many gentiles. I certainly saw a lot of this while I lived in New York City.

As another example, consider that many Jews are the biggest racists on the planet. They insist on maintaining bloodlines documented by genealogies going back over a fifteen hundred years (such as the Cohen priestly class and the kohanim class). Nevertheless they condemn any form of racial consciousness among whites as bigotry. Jews condemn any criticism of themselves as "anti-Semitic" and "Nazi," yet do not hesitate to publicly defame and hurt the employment of white patriots who try to stand up to them.

A healthy society does not need Big Brother surveillance, even when it comes under severe stress. The Bush administration and its Jewish supremacist handlers who are trying to put the rest of America under increasing surveillance and take away our civil liberties are simply projecting their own criminality on to others. They are not telling us how we deserve to be treated, but rather how they deserve to be treated.

Mike Rivero, webmaster of Whatreallyhappened.com, posted on 23 Nov 2006 an excellent summary of ultra high-stakes Jewish projection regarding the Israeli campaign to drag America into striking Iran. (Watch former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu try to whip up anti-Iranian hate in his TV interview with Glenn Beck archived on YouTube). Rivero responded to a neo-con piece "Bomb Iran" that appeared in the 19 Nov 2006 Los Angeles Times. Written by Joshua Muravchik, a resident scholar at the Zionist-highjacked American Enterprise Institute, this LA Times OpEd piece exhorts America to make a pre-emptive strike to avoid a possible future Iranian nuclear threat. Rivero responded:

What nuclear threat?

Is Iran a threat to the United States? No, it isn't. Our parents paid trillions of dollars to create the ultimate nuclear deterrent force, consisting of land-based nuclear missiles, submarine-launched nuclear missiles, and nuclear-armed bombers, all able to strike anywhere on the Earth.

In contrast, Iran has no nuclear weapons. Nobody has found any proof Iran is making nuclear weapons (although one could hardly blame them for doing so after seeing the US invade the non-nuclear armed Iraq).

What is Iran doing that Mr. Muravchik finds so upsetting?

Iran is building a power station. Yep, that's it. Iran is building a power station. You know, to make electricity with?

Nobody in the US cares about Iran's power station. After all, the United States and Iran have both signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which allows signers to build and fuel nuclear power plants. And that is what Iran is doing, along with allowing all the inspections the treaty requires, and complying with relevant UN resolutions.

Israel, on the other hand, has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, does not allow inspections, has at least 400 nuclear weapons, and when it cannot have UN resolutions vetoed by the US, will ignore them.

The problem here isn't Iran. The problem is that Israel, having routinely ignored the UN, conducted a secret weapons program, avoided signing nuclear control treaties, lied at every turn, cannot admit to itself that other nations can behave with honor. So, Israel has to deal with its own sense of guilt by convincing itself that every other nation behaves exactly the way that Israel behaves. It is okay for Israel to have a secret weapons plant under the Dimona reactor because (in Israel's imagination) Iraq had nuclear weapons plants under their reactor (it didn't as it turns out), Iran has nuclear weapons plants under their reactor (it doesn't, according to inspectors), etc. etc. etc. Another manifestation of this avoidance of guilt by transference is the idea that it is okay for Israel to treat the Palestinians the way it does because the rest of the world treats Jews that same exact way. It is okay for Israel's spies to blackmail the US Government into attacking Israel's enemies because otherwise those other governments would blackmail the US into attacking Israel.

On and on it goes with Israel's crimes justified by a paranoid delusion operating on a national scale. Israel; acts as it does because it is terrified of other nations acting exactly the same way, not realizing that Israel alone is behaving like a spoiled child in the region, and that everyone else would be happy to get on with their lives and their business if it weren't for the fear Israel itself creates.

Imagine you live in a neighborhood where everyone is working and living together, but in this shack in the middle of town of a raving paranoid, armed to the teeth, pointing his guns out the window at every passer by, even taking pot-shots at some of them, daring them to shoot back so that he can screech, "See? See? They DP hate me!" before opening up on a schoolyard with an AK-47.

Is an intervention needed?

You betcha!

Racial instability, genetic distance, unique inbred temperamental traits: Many scientists believe that race mixing can add to mental instability. One reason is that for periods of hundreds of thousands of years, different races have evolved a particular mix of temperamental traits that achieve evolutionary balance for a particular physical environment. Race-mixing can produce unpredictable combinations of discordant mental traits. As one example, I once heard a Mexican intellectual on talk radio describe how most Mexicans are genetically some mixture of white and Indian, and a lot of them feel like they are two different kinds of people mixed together. One interpretation of Middle Eastern monotheism, incidentally, is a need for race-mixed people to have a single deity focus upon to help pull themselves together psychologically.

Jews have absorbed genes from many different peoples, while at the same time preserving a core genetic type that can typically be traced through the maternal line. As some examples of outside absorption, in The Dispossessed Majority, (p. 31), Wilmot Robertson cites A. E. Mourant, author of The Genetics of the Jews, who found that Jews as a whole show an admixture of 5-10 percent Negro genes. Conversely, one can find some Jews in America who have blond hair and blue eyes similar to Jewish film stars Kirk Douglas and Goldie Hawn.

In Chapter 25 "Jewish Evolutionary Strategy and Claims of Jewish Superiority" of his book My Awakening, Dr. David Duke observes that:

As part of the wide genetic distance argument, Jews have many genetically-transmitted diseases such as Tay-Sachs and Picts that are uniquely Jewish.

On page 455 of My Awakening, Dr. Duke resolves the mystery regarding how Jews can externally appear similar to their gentile hosts, yet internally maintain a high level of genetic distance:

People tend to recreate the environment around them to reflect their own characteristics (please refer to my environmental vs. genetic discussion). As a partially race-mixed people, with a high level of genetic distance towards their hosts, perhaps we should not be surprised that everywhere Jews have gone in history they have tried to racially mix up their host populations. They tend to do this regardless of whether or not the hosts want to get mixed up or not. In the long run, this behavior is irrational, because no host population likes to undergo an attack on its genetic interests and risk being reduced to a minority.

Ironically, I believe that most white Americans only really care about very basic things like holding down a decent job and supporting a family. As a "melting pot" society, the overwhelming majority of Americans could care less if Jews dominate Hollywood, national media, Wall Street or whatever. In fact, quite a few Americans admire Jewish business acumen and are happy to partner up with them.

The formula to maintain American society on perpetual prosperity autopilot was really simple. Just keep America the way it was up until the mid-1960's at about 90% white. Keep government somewhere below 30% or even 20% of GDP (actually the lower the better — 5% would not be low enough for me) so it does not squeeze out the productive private sector too much. Avoid disastrous foreign entanglements. Basically follow the 19th century classical liberal agenda. It is really simple!

Within such an environment, America could prosper and pretty much run itself indefinitely. Jews would always be fairly free to do their own thing. To be sure, there will always be plenty of people around who do not like Jews, and say bad things about them, but no neo-Nazi or anti-Semitic movement would have likely become influential enough to directly threaten Jewish interests. As long as most American families can make a decent living, live in nice neighborhoods, and look forward to a prosperous future, the American Nazi Party could march through every American neighborhood six million times and most whites would probably remain apathetic.

But apparently operating by this very simple formula was just too easy for Jewish leaders. They just could not leave well enough alone, or quit while they were ahead. Nor could they ever adopt a really protective or appreciative attitude towards white working class Americans. They had to attack vital white genetic interests by opening the floodgates of Third World immigration in the mid-1960's. They had to keep pushing multi-racialism, multi-culturalism, radical feminism, homosexuality, collective white guilt over the "Holocaust," the JFK assassination and assault on the U.S.S. Liberty cover-ups, and on and on and on. They also had to keep growing the spendthrift, warmongering, neo-Jacobin welfare warfare super state in support of Israel and get Americans killed overseas. So now everything has been pushed way too far and is unraveling.

Some crazy elite Jews had it in the bag, and they blew it. Almost on par with the self-destructive nuttiness of the Reverend Jim Jones and his suicide cult in Guyana.

A functional analysis of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology

There are some important keys to understanding the evolution of Jewish social behavior:

One can mentally "reverse engineer" what the Jews are all about. Simply take a) to e) above as your constraints, and then try to mentally conceptualize what the resultant racial-ethnic group would have to look like to evolve under such constraints.