19.
|
Have different geographic evolutionary environments influenced the capacity of different races to develop civilizations? |
|
|
(- 5) A strong environmental
. . . .viewpoint: |
|
|
.(+5) A strong genetic
. . . . .viewpoint: |
* |
Different climates may influence life- |
|
* |
Harsh winters sculpture races towards |
|
styles and cultures, but not genetics |
|
|
innate technological adaptiveness |
* |
Urban environments congregate ex- |
|
* |
Man vs. man competition in urbanized |
|
pertise and mostly build civilizations |
|
|
environments can help evolve criminality |
* |
Civilization is about strenuously over- |
|
* |
Migrations to easier climates freed sur- |
| |
coming differences in urban areas |
|
|
plus capacities to help create civilization |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
.
| 20. |
Why should a society have the right to determine it's own destiny? |
|
|
(- 5)One perspective on an
. . . .ethical issue: |
|
|
.(+5) An opposing perspective on
. . . .. the same ethical issue: |
* |
Only certain "protected groups" have |
|
* |
The right of group survival is analogous |
|
such a right, others may not deserve it |
|
|
to the right of individual self-determination |
* |
It is a right for your own group if you |
|
* |
Sovereignty rights of other groups should |
|
can get it, but not for competitors |
|
|
be respected just like individual rights |
* |
Certain groups must perpetually sup- |
|
* |
It is moral for all to practice "charity be- |
| |
port others at their own expense |
|
|
gins at home" for basic survival needs |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
21.
|
Should we incentivize public servants with the perquisites of expanded government, or be more concerned that they will abuse these things? |
|
|
(- 5) A strong centralization
. . . .viewpoint: |
|
|
.(+5) A strong decentralization
. . . . .viewpoint: |
* |
Government accomplishes great good |
|
* |
We must never ignore fact that there are |
|
with size, negatives are unimportant |
|
|
very few things government can do well |
* |
It can listen to public complaints and |
|
* |
It is more dangerous than private sector |
|
correct as easily as small government |
|
|
as the territorial monopolist on violence |
* |
Size means more staff experts who |
|
* |
It also creates special privileges which |
| |
self-police and advise wise policies. |
|
|
foments crony capitalism and corruption |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
.
22.
|
Why must Americans insist on completely honest public disclosure of everything that is counterproductive in their society? |
|
|
(- 5) One perspective on an
. . . . ethical issue: |
|
|
.(+5) An opposing perspective on
. . . .. the same ethical issue: |
* |
Without honest communication and |
|
* |
In a world of moral relativism and global- |
|
criticism society becomes distorted |
|
|
ism, it is presumptuous to identify "evil" |
* |
There exist practical moral tests that |
|
* |
Moral judgments too risky because they |
|
leaders can reasonably cite to public |
|
|
may discriminate against certain minorities |
* |
You cannot keep criminals in check |
|
* |
Moral leaders often too tainted with rac- |
| |
unless you openly condemn them |
|
|
ism, xenophobia, bigotry, and reaction. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
Mutualism vs. Parasitism (Pro-Mut -5, Pro Para +5)
.
| 23. |
What is the preferable function of religion in a society? |
|
|
(- 5) A strong genetic
. . . .viewpoint: |
|
|
.(+5) A strong environmental
. . . . .viewpoint: |
* |
Religion is largely an expression of |
|
* |
Real religion depends on divine revelation |
|
certain types of altruistic genes |
|
|
applicable to all men, cultures and times |
* |
The character of religion depends on |
|
* |
We require revelation to overcome hu- |
|
the innate character of the population |
|
|
man nature, which is often bad |
* |
Religions that encourage detribaliza- |
|
* |
Tribal religions are obsolescent before |
| |
tion increase parasitic vulnerability |
|
|
new revelations that can remake man |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
.
| 24. |
Can we justify secessionism? |
|
|
(- 5) A strong decentralization
. . . .viewpoint: |
|
|
.(+5) A strong centralization
. . . . .viewpoint: |
* |
Only a viable threat of secession can |
|
* |
Secessionism leads to destructive divi- |
|
really restrain tyrannical centralization |
|
|
siveness rather than good decentralization |
* |
Secessionism is the political analog of |
|
* |
It is fundamentally different than spin-offs |
|
corporate spin-offs and downsizing |
|
|
because of governmental, patriotic issues |
* |
Results can be peaceful and may im- |
|
* |
It can create war danger and may threat- |
| |
prove productive friendly competition |
|
|
en groups that deserve special protection |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|