Starting
with first principles and the scientific method
America
First Books
Featuring
ebooks that find a truer path in uncertain times
The election of Barack
Hussein Obama II as President signals the death of America
as the baby boom generation once knew it unless whites heroically
unite to preserve their heritage and assert their right to determine
their own destiny. Otherwise America is doomed to either become
a permanent Marxist-Socialist Third World country with no future,
or else break apart in a manner that ranges somewhere between
peaceful means and a very bloody Civil
War Two scenario.
From Bad
to Worse
to DISASTER?
"The average White American hasn't an idea in his head that
didn't come from his television receiver." - Dr. William
L. Pierce
"Wherever you find the Negro everything is going down
around him, and wherever you find the White man you see everything
around him improving." -Robert E. Lee
"Silicon Valley may be keeping the economy zooming along
for now, but that is only a superficial sign of health, a misleading
sign. America is like a man whose body is riddled with cancer,
but who still manages to keep his shoes shined and his fingernails
clean." - Dr. William L. Pierce (in the late 1990's).
Not "Guess
Who Is Coming
for Dinner,"
but rather, "Who is Inviting
For Dinner" at the White House?
Editor's Note by William B. Fox
Publisher, America First Books
First published in Fall 2008
--Just about everything has been proven accurate ever since--
Ocassionally updated
The
header for this web page "From Bad to Worse to Disaster?"
was inspired by a comment made by Dr.
Ralph Raico at the Mises Institute. In one of his lectures,
while addressing the Bush administration, he voiced words to
the effect "I never thought I would see the day where I
would regret no longer having Bill Clinton." Now
we face a scenario where we might actually regret no longer
having George Bush, if such is actually possible. Please check
out my other web page on Obama, Chapter 35 "The
Election of `Bush in Blackface' and Another Mumbai False Flag"
of my Mission
of Conscience Trilogy that provides other insights
and links regarding America's mystery President, and in particular
strong evidence that Obama is a longstanding Mossad-CIA asset.. I
view the candidacy and election of Barack Hussein Obama II for
President of the United States as a major intellectual "rabbit
hole" regarding the decline and fall of America. It should
be obvious from the articles archived on this web page to any
thinking individual that this turn of events has to be symptomatic
of extremely serious problems on all levels of America society
today. This
should become especially obvious after one reads my Publisher's
Preface to Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup of America, or some of
my other articles such as "Thomas
Jefferson and the `Incredible Truth' about Bush Cabal Wise Guys
and False Flag Nukes" or my Foreword
to Henry Ford's
My Life and Work. Better yet, please read books like
Final
Judgment, The
Judas Goats, The
New Jerusalem, Viper's
Venom and Rattler's
Revenge for deep background on the alien, corrupt,
and malevolent forces at the highest levels that made the Obama
nightmare possible in the first place. At
a time when the white population is in rapid demographic decline
(we can also say "being genocided"), when America
so desperately needs to recover entrepreneurial infrastructure
along with its formerly very powerful and productive industrial
base, and when America so desperately needs to resist Zionist
hijacking of its foreign policy that is literally driving this
country towards total bankruptcy or even World War III/Armageddon
(see High
Priests of War), what could be a more cruel and degrading
joke than for the power elite to foist someone like Obama on
this country as President? He probably does not even qualify
as a "natural born citizen" as required by the Constitution
and further defined in case law in order to be President. He
is all smoke and mirrors --except when he staunchly supports
Zionism at the expense of American nationalism and promotes
nonwhite interests at the expense of beleaguered whites. We
can also reasonably expect him to promote a brand of globalism
that further reduces domestic industry and to support more spend-thrift
government interventionism that generates ever more inflation
and squeezes out ever more productive free enterprise. This
slap in the face reminds me of Mike Piper's article "Franklin
J. Moses, Reconstruction's Most Infamous Scalawag"
about how vindictive Yankees once foisted a totally corrupt
Reconstruction regime over economically prostrate whites in
South Carolina. In
the long run, all of this is terribly unwise. It will only create
more misery, hate, and discontent in America. It is not going
to be good for anyone --to include African Americans. Although
Obama obviously charms many Americans as a fellow human being,
there is strong evidence that he is captive to destructive special
interests (particularly the Jewish lobby), alien ethnic
genetic interests (fellow blacks and other nonwhites), and
dysfunctional Marxist-Socialist ideology. While
he may come across on TV to many people as an OK person, he
is still way in over his head as President of the United States.
However, if he can just figure out a way to turn the tables
on the Zionist criminals who created the 9/11 inside job, restore
the Constitution (just like Congressman Ron Paul's agenda),
reverse the unnecessary invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, and
(going back much further in time) eliminate the totally dysfunctional
Federal Reserve Banking System, and top of all this restore
a stable and sustainable relationship between whites and nonwhites
in America, I may actually change my whole attitude towards
Barack Obama and publicly celebrate him as a hero --but until
such a time I am very much on guard with this man, to say the
least. Paradoxically,
it may turn out that Obama has nothing to lose and everything
to gain by trying to be the kind of hero that I just described.
Remember, Zionists are famous for their treachery. No matter
what he does, they probably secretly want him dead after they
have used him so that their controlled media can turn him into
a liberal martyr like JFK while replacing him with arch-Zionist
sympathizer VP Joe Biden. They would probably prefer to frame
some white supremacists as patsies in a trumped-up assassination
plot in order to discredit their political enemies rather than
engineer a plane crash. The Zionists would probably also prefer
to give Obama just enough time to get built up as a liberal
hero while simultaneously taking some fall on failed military
policies and a collapsing economy before giving him a Jewish
mafia-Mossad-style "send-off." Sound
far-fetched? Michael Collins Piper explains in Final
Judgment how this kind of thing happened once before
when JFK got hit by the Mossad and their CIA allies and replaced
by arch-Zionist sympathizer VP Lyndon Baines Johnson. Not
familiar with Zionist perfidiousness? Here is a good example
from "Blacks
Run Out of New Orleans" at Judicial-inc.biz
What Happened To The Black's Best Friend?
For
300 years, Jewish Liberals said: We are always there for our
Black brothers. They brought most of them over in their slave
ships, they auctioned them off, they started the NAACP,
they tormented them with their B'nai B'rith Ku Klux Klan creation,
and they were behind the welfare system that disintegrated
the black family structure. Now, they gave the Blacks a bus
ticket, boxes of MREs, and tenement housing scattered far
across the rest of America. [Editor's Note: One might add
that after blowing
the levees just after Hurricane Katrina passed through
to flood out the blacks, they also ran
Blacks out using mercenaries, who included Israelis.
The real aid to New Orleans has gone to Jewish
real estate developers, casino
operators, and other
business owners. It has also gone to kosher co-tribalists
in other disaster areas, such
Florida hurricane victims].
Let
us hope that in regard to treason, treachery, extreme double-standards,
and assassination we really can see change in America. Yes we
can!
2009-01-26 Obama’s
Partisan, Profane Confidant Reins It In, Mark Leibovitch,
New York Times. "WASHINGTON — Early this month,
Barack Obama was meeting with the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, and
other lawmakers when Rahm Emanuel, his chief of staff, began nervously
cracking a knuckle. Mr. Obama then turned to complain to Mr. Emanuel
about his noisy habit. At which point, Mr. Emanuel held the offending
knuckle up to Mr. Obama’s left ear and, like an annoying little
brother, snapped off a few special cracks...."
2008-11-24 RAHM
EMANUEL: Ardent Zionist called Obama’s ‘Svengali’
by Victor Thorn, AFP
....Emanuel
is a rampant warmonger who takes his cues from the neo-cons. In
his book The Plan: Big Ideas for America, he wrote, “We
need to expand the U.S. Army by 100,000 more troops.” What
will America’s next target be under an Obama presidency?
Sources close to Emanuel say that he has a “Zionist obsession
with Iran.” To
get a final idea of what we’re dealing with, consider this
quote from U.S. war journalist Pat Dollard: Let
me tell you right now, no exaggeration. Rahm Emanuel is the devil.
He is . . . a Goebbels, a Mengele, a perfect Cromwell who would,
without the faintest evidence of hesitation washing across his
face for even a millisecond, order and even personally execute
each and every human being he or Obama perceived to be an enemy
of the regime. And if you ever personally offended him, and he
had the opportunity to kill you, he would probably do it by starting
with your children as you were made to watch. He is a bad guy.
Some
researchers have gone so far as to claim that Emanuel was the
notorious “Mega” spy deep inside the Clinton administration
who passed top-secret documents about Iran on to the Israeli government,
causing a great deal of chaos among the various intelligence agencies.
Be very wary of this man. Like the “Prince of Darkness”
Richard Perle and Michael Chertoff before him (both of whom hold
dual U.S.-Israeli citizenships), it may well be proven that his
loyalties rest more with a fabricated little state in the Middle
East than they do with us.
2008-11-15 Oh
Come, Oh Come, Emanuel by Eric Gliebe. "Rahm Emanuel
is a Jewish member of the House of Representatives who votes a documented
98% with the Democrats. His appointment marks a switch in tone for
Obama, who promised, if elected, to reach across the isle to Republicans.
Emanuel is not one of those guys who like to share power or reach
across the isle. Associated Press calls him a man with sharp elbows
and a `fiery partisan who doesn't mind breaking glass and hurting
feelings.' In fact, he once sent a dead fish to one of his political
rivals. After the Republicans blew out the Democrats in the 2002
off-year election, Emanuel publicly named those he considered "traitors"
to the party and slammed a steak knife into a table with each name.
Yeah -- just the kind of guy to heal wounds and bring us together!"
2008-10-10 An
Open Letter to President-Elect Obama by Ralph Nader.
"[We must note] your transformation from an articulate defender
of Palestinian rights in Chicago before your run for the U.S. Senate
to an acolyte, a dittoman for the hard-line AIPAC lobby, which bolsters
the militaristic oppression, occupation, blockage, colonization
and land-water seizures over the years of the Palestinian peoples
and their shrunken territories in the West Bank and Gaza..."
2008-11-09 Rahm
Emanuel Is Obama's Favorite Jew to Mock. Hey, lighten
up folks, it is only another Jewish conspiracy!
2008-11-09 Journalist
Reaches From Grave To Nail Rahm; Excerpts From Archived News Investigations
By The Late Sherman H. Skolnick. This article also
has a lot of good additional links to other articles about "Rahm-bo."
If you accept the premise that the Mossad has been central to such
attacks on America as 9/11, the Oklahoma City bombing, and the JFK
assassination, and that Rahm is in tight with them, Obama's
appointment of this man as White House Chief of Staff is practically
a declaration of war against the U.S. Constitution and the American
people. The barbarians
are truly inside the gates!
2008-11-06 Obama
Faced With Security Problem At Outset of Transition Process- Wayne
Madsen Report November 6, 2008 -
Another oh-so-clever smug and
smirking Jewish supremacist who thinks he is at the
top of his game, Israel Firster Rahm Emanuel wants
to force 18-25 year old Americans to labor for the
government
"WMR
has learned from informed U.S. intelligence sources that prospective
Barack Obama White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel has an active
FBI counter-intelligence file maintained on him. Emanuel's rise
to the Chief of Staff position may pose a significant security problem
for President-elect Obama if the FBI insists on conducting the full
background security investigation normally required for senior White
House officials. Questions
about Emanuel's links to the Israeli intelligence service, the Mossad,
were allegedly so great that President Bill Clinton was forced to
dismiss Emanuel from the White House staff in 1998. One of the FBI
agents who discovered Emanuel's dealings with Israeli intelligence
was, according to our sources, the late FBI counter-terrorism Assistant
Director John O'Neill. O'Neill retired after being set up in a smear
operation involving a temporarily stolen brief case in 2001. O'Neill
and another FBI agent who still works for the bureau and shall remain
nameless at this point to protect him and his career discovered
that Emanuel was heavily involved in the decision to place intern
Monica Lewinsky close to President Clinton. O'Neill accepted the
top security position for Kroll Associates at the World Trade Center.
O'Neill was killed in the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center.
WMR has also reported that O'Neill was a close friend of slain retired
Houston CIA station chief Roland V. `Tony' Carnaby, who was similarly
investigating Israeli intelligence operations in the Houston area
when Houston police shot and killed him last April. Emanuel
reportedly had knowledge of Israeli intelligence penetration of
White House communications systems and Lewinsky, in sworn testimony
before the Office of Independent Counsel, stated: `He [Clinton]
suspected that a foreign embassy [it is now known that embassy was
that of Israel] was tapping his telephones, and he proposed cover
stories.' Lewinsky continued, `If ever questioned, she should say
that the two of them were just friends. If anyone ever asked about
their phone sex, she should say that they knew their calls were
being monitored all along, and the phone sex was just a put on.'
WMR
has learned from U.S. intelligence sources that Emanuel was discovered
to be part of a political intelligence and blackmail operation directed
against Clinton by Israel's Likud Party and Binyamin Netanyahu to
sink Clinton's proposed Middle East peace deal. We have also learned
that the FBI investigation of Emanuel is part of a file code-named
the `Mega file.' `Mega' is a reference to a top-level Mossad agent
in the Reagan administration who was said to have run a number of
Israeli agents, including U.S. Navy spy Jonathan Pollard."
How well does America's "affirmative action/Manchurian
candidate" President function without his teleprompter?
Watch these gaffes! Also watch Gaffe
1, Gaffe
2, etc on YouTube.
Obama as fake-out leftist cover for dangerous oligarchical-imperialist
schemes and domestic fascist power consolidation
The
Amazon book description for Obama:
The Post Modern Coup
provides a good overview of Tarpley's views: "Obama
is a deeply troubled personality, the megalomaniac front man for
a postmodern coup by the intelligence agencies, using fake polls,
mobs of swarming adolescents, super-rich contributors, and orchestrated
media hysteria to short-circuit normal politics and seize power.
Obama comes from the orbit of the Ford Foundation, and has never
won public office in a contested election. His guru and controller
is Zbigniew Brzezinski, the deranged revanchist and Russia-hater
who dominated the catastrophic Carter presidency 30 years ago. All
indications are that Brzezinski recruited Obama at Columbia University
a quarter century ago. Trilateral Commission co-founder Brzezinski
wants a global showdown with Russia and China far more dangerous
for the United States than the Bush-Cheney Iraq adventure. Obama's
economics are pure Skull & Bones/Chicago school austerity and
sacrifice for American working families, all designed to bail out
the bankrupt Wall Street elitist financiers who own Obama. Obama's
lemming legions and Kool-Aid cult candidacy hearken back to Italy
in 1919-1922, and raise the question of postmodern fascism in the
United States today. Obama is a recipe for a world tragedy. No American
voter can afford to ignore the lessons contained in this book."
(About the Author Webster Griffin Tarpley (Massachusetts 1946) is
an intelligence expert and historian who has been studying and exposing
covert operations for over thirty years. He is the author of George
Bush: The Unauthorized Biography (1992) and 9/11 Synthetic
Terror (2005). He has appeared on C-SPAN, CNN, Fox News, and
many more. --This text refers to the Paperback edition.)
A former KGB agent reveals four steps to brainwash
a nation. A friend who supplied the link to this
video commented"Isn't
it interesting that this former KGB agent is Jewish, and his
father was a high-up party official. The Bolshevik Revolution
was inspired by the teachings of Karl Marx; the leaders of
the revolution were mainly Jewish; and, afterwards, about
85% of executive positions were held by Jews, overseeing the
military, finance, propaganda, concentration camps, etc. Only
later on did Stalin purge them (along with everyone else,
it seems). Obama is backed by and surrounded by Jews in his
administration; at least, his top advisors are Jews. Jewish
culture is antithetical to our Northern European one &
the founding principles of this country."
America First Books editor comment: Tarpley
is a brilliant man, does great research, and puts out a lot of good
information to the public. I think that all of his material is well
worth considering. (I have a similar attitude towards Alex Jones,
incidentally, and I think that Capt
Eric May shares my sentiments here). However, my own personal
reservation is that Tarpley tends to pull a lot of punches when
it comes to drawing Zionist connections. He is certainly no explicit
racial nationalist like Dr. William Pierce or Dr.
David Duke, or explicit critic of Zionists like Michael
Collins Piper and Col
Donn de Grand Pre (whose works are carried by America First
Books). Although he is willing to draw some connections to Zionists,
he tends to do so only very skittishly. For example, although9/11
Synthetic Terror: Made in USAhas a lot of excellent research
and insights, the book fails to identify what was probably the central
role of the Mossad and Israel. I
believe strongly that it takes a foreign power whose leaders feel
a 3,000+
year old racial hatred of gentiles to mastermind and orchestrate
something as utterly diabolical as the "9-11 inside job"
(actually "9-11 outside job"). While there were
undoubtedly senior members of the Bush administration, U.S. military,
CIA, and FBI who were co-opted (witting or unwittingly) by the conspirators,
and furthermore while there are always a certain percentage of psychopaths
of any race --Jewish or gentile-- at the head of any government
agency in any country around the world, I certainly do not think
the average American who goes to work for the FBI, CIA, or rises
through the ranks of the U.S. military is capable of pulling off
this level of treason. Without
question, Israel, the Jewish Lobby, and the Mossad exert tremendous
influence. Please recall the famous
quote by former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral
Thomas Moorer ""I've never seen a President -- I don't
care who he is -- stand up to them [the Israelis]. It just boggles
the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what
is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn't writing
anything down. If the American people understood what a grip those
people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our
citizens certainly don't have any idea what goes on." Consider
also Final
Judgment, where Michael Collins Piper provides evidence
that the mysterious death of former CIA Director William Colby was
a Mossad hit. The book itself focuses on why the Mossad was in all
likelihood central to the assassination of JFK. When the Mossad
demonstrates that it can murder the President of the United States
and former CIA Director on U.S. soil --and then quietly slither
away under the cover of Jewish supremacist-controlled national media
--that, my little Virginia, is real power. Tarpley
does mention that Obama is not only in tight with Zbigniew
Brzezinski but also George Soros, who is a major Jewish neo-con
trouble-maker. As an example of such trouble-making, please see
my co-authored Mid-Summer
Alert Update. Also, from a traditional American conservative
perspective, Brzezinski is a fellow
traveler with Dr. Henry Kissinger, who in turn is a mouthpiece
of the Rothschilds and other elite Jewish plutocratic families.
Lastly,
for those who doubt that certain parts of the the CIA (probably
in partnership with the Mossad) has penetrated various state government
or nonprofit entities in domestic America such as the Ford Foundation,
check out Jesse
Ventura's video interview about how he was monitored as Governor
of Minnesota by the CIA, to include surveillance by a CIA agent
permanently emplanted in a state government upper level management
position. As another sampler of CIA-Mossad penetration, please check
out Mike Piper's article "Guess
Who’s in Charge of Guarding U.S. Nuclear Power & Weapon
Sites?"
Does Obama have narcissistic personality disorder?
Yes! This analysis explains why
Obama as a narcissistic, unrestrained
leader
2009-09-03 Broun
warns of dictatorship
2009-02-04 Dr.
Samuel Vaknin on Obama, an update at blueeyeview.blogspot.com.
Please scroll a fourth way down web page to his comments framed
inside a page outline. "I must confess I was impressed by Sen.Barack
Obama from the first time I saw him. At first I was excited to see
a black candidate. He looked youthful, spoke well, appeared to be
confident - a wholesome presidential package. I was put off soon,
not just because of his shallowness but also because there was an
air of haughtiness in his demeanor that was unsettling. His posture
and his body language were louder than his empty words. Obama's
speeches are unlike any political speech we have heard in American
history. Never a politician in this land had such quasi `religious'
impact on so many people. The fact that Obama is a total incognito
with zero accomplishment, makes this inexplicable infatuation alarming...The
peace of the world depends on the strength of America, and its weakness
translates into the triumph of terrorism and victory of rogue nations.
It is no wonder that Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, the Castrists, the
Hezbollah, the Hamas, the lawyers of the Guantanamo terrorists and
virtually all sworn enemies of America are so thrilled by the prospect
of their man in the White House. America is on the verge of destruction.
There is no insanity greater than electing a pathological narcissist
as president."
2008-11-01 The following interview took place between James Edwards,
host of the Political
Cesspool, and Bob Griswold, owner of Ready
Made Resources, on November 1, 2008. (Archived
online with the Republic Broadcasting Network).
Bob Griswold: One thing that I don't know that
people take into consideration if we think about a Barack presidency,
what will he do to immigration? And what will that mean for any
future elections in this country if the floodgates to Mexico are
opened and around the world. We can see he has his own family
of illegal aliens living in this country. Can you imagine what
America is going to look in four years from now under a Barack
presidency? James Edwards: (Laughter) Hey, you know this
show is too late at night, Bob, to really think about that. We
have got to go to bed soon, and you know I do not want to have
nightmares. But it is going to be very scary. And that
is the point I was getting at. I think I mentioned in passing
with Jema, and that is if Barack Obama gets elected, God forbid.
He could quite possibly have a filibuster-proof majority in Congress.
Jema said that it is possible that you may have a couple of defectors,
but I just do not see that happening with Obama. Everyone is going
to want to please the New Savior. He is going to have a totally
complicit media that is going to go along and support his every
whim, and because of his race, he is going to be completely protected
from any criticism, because of course you know if you criticize
him you are a racist. So I tell you, there is nothing
to restrain Barack Obama. There is nothing to restrain anything
that man would want to do should he be elected, and that is very
scary. Griswold: You brought up an interesting point.
Being in the business that I am in, I talk to many people all
over the country. And so many of them have told me that they have
gone to their place of employment --and not that I am
going to endorse John McCain-- but they said "I am voting
for John McCain," and they are called a racist. The effort
to squelch the free speech and thought in this country, that you
cannot even disagree with this man without being labeled
a racist, which will under his presidency, I believe, be a crime,
so that possibly the very fact that you disagree with this man
will make you a racist, and racism will become a crime. Edwards: Well, you know to add on to the foundation
that you are building there, Bob, an excellent article, if you
want to imagine how bad it could be if Obama is in fact elected
and the power he might have, read Pat Buchanan's recent article
"Obama's
First 100 Days." Griswold: I have read it. Edwards: Those are all things he could do theoretically
and I just don't see anything to stop him unless he has self-restraint,
and he would be the first I have seen with that much power to
have it. Griswold: Well he has not shown self-restraint
in his life up until this point. He has been given a pass to everything
in his life. You know it is an interesting characteristic about
this man, as soon as he develops somebody in the news that is
not politically correct; Bill
Ayers or Rev
Wright or Tony
Rezko or the list goes on, he is one to throw these people
under the bus. He is willing to sacrifice anything to get power.
I mean his life long friend, Jeremiah Wright --threw him under
the bus. Edwards: Right, right. Griswold: The person who got him into politics
to begin with, Bill
Ayers --thrown under the bus. Tony
Rezko, the man who financed him --throw him under the bus.
And that is a concerning trait about this man that he will do
whatever it takes to get the power he craves. And with this Messiah
mentality and Messiah complex that surrounds him, I really do
worry if he is elected whether America can survive even
four years of this man. The Federal courts alone. Who will he
put in there for Federal judges? I mean, I think he will put in
people who will be far left of what Bill Clinton would have appointed.
Edwards: Well, Bob, with that being said, and
of course I cannot disagree with you...
Interestingly
enough, Rev Jesse Jackson accused Obama of selling out blacks by
"acting
white" over the "Jena 6" affair. In a separate
incident, Jackson apologized to Obama for "crude comments"
that got on the air. According to a
news report: "Jackson charged that Obama had been talking
down to black people and added: `I want to cut his n_ts out.'"
2008-08-13 "Barack
Obama - Narcissist or Merely Narcissistic?"
by Sam Vaknin, Phd. A good oveview of Narcissism 101 and Obama.
John Pilger: Obama Is a Corporate Marketing Creation
Australian journalist and documentary maker explains the king of "junk
politics"
Obama as a new messiah and corporate marketing creation, using hypnotic
technique and attracting fanatical cult followers
This
web page used to link to some YouTube videos that depict Louis Farrakhan
calling Obama "the Messiah." They have since been withdrawn
off the Internet by his Nation of Islam. Other interesting You Tube
videos: Ann
Coulter compares Obama to Hitler; also Is
Mr. Obama Using Hitler's Tactics on his Followers?
and Obama
= Hitler. If the comparison of Obama's rhetoric and
mannerisms with Hitler's seems very sketchy and far-fetched, consider
how the same very powerful and clever "Zionazis" who have
handled George W. Bush are now handling Obama. Furthermore, consider
how Bush has himself acted in a Hitlerian manner. 9/11 was his Reichstag
Fire. His May 2003 "Mission Accomplished" landing on the
U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln resembled scenes not only from the movie
Independence Day, but Leni Reifenstahl's Triumph of
the Will. For more in-depth analysis, see the transcript of
Frank Whalen's interview
of Capt Eric May, 3rd Hour, 23 February 2006, or GeorgeAnn Hughes
interview
of Capt May, Part II, 19 January 2006, on The Byte Show: Cracking
Satan's Code. See also Capt May's article "America
Uber Alles" -- Our Nazi Nation." The premise
is that America's utterly corrupt Zionist neo-con plutocratic elite
is seeking to create a dictatorship, and will use techniques borrowed
from any autocratic playbook. Whether it is Communist or
Nazi, they do not care as long as it is effective in subjugating
America. Captain Eric May has told William Fox, editor of American
First books, that he views Obama as essentially Bush in black face,
and we can expect all of the same kinds of authoritarian grabs for
power --to include repeated attempts at false flag operations. In
fact, Obama is more dangerous than Bush, because he is slicker,
smarter, and sexier to many people. Take for example "I
Got a Crush...On Obama" By Obama Girl that scored
11.8 million web hits by Nov 2008. Or listen to "Obama"
sung as a Negro spiritual at the beginning of this video How
Obama Got Elected... Interviews With Obama Voters.
The cadence "O-bah-mah! O-bah-mah! Oh-bah-mah!" reminds
me of "Soma!
Soma! Soma!" from Aldous Huxley's Brave
New World. In view of the current American social and political
context, the "O-Bah-Mah" chant has a primitive, eerie,
decadent, and chilling "beauty" to it, analogous (for
you photographers out there) to saturated golden-hued landscape
colors glowing as the sun sets (symbolizing "golden years"
satisfaction just before dying) or that warm wonderful feeling people
report in the last phase of hyperthermia (just prior to death --like
America today). It is the "jungle" that Dr. William Pierce
writes about in his review of The Bonfire of Vanities (see
excerpt below) taking over and enveloping us. Remember, "republicanism"
and "democracy" originally evolved as rational group decision-making
processes that apply to government, just as the "scientific
method" is a process for accumulating and interpeting knowledge
and finding truth. It is so "Third World" that increasing
percentages of Americans now approach these things mostly on "gut."
2009-03-31 Beware
the cult of Obama by Gene Healy, SFExaminer.
An
Examination of Obama’s Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in
His Speeches (pdf) A scholarly white paper of unknow
authorship that makes strong arguments. "Obama’s speeches
contain the hypnosis techniques of Dr. Milton Erickson, M.D. who
developed a form of “conversational” hypnosis that could
be hidden in seemingly normal speech and used on patients without
their knowledge for therapy purposes. Obama’s speeches intentionally
contain: Trance Inductions - Hypnotic Anchoring - Pacing and Leading
- Pacing, Distraction and Utilization - Critical Factor Bypass -
Stacking Language Patterns - Preprogrammed Response Adaptation -
Linking Statements/ Causality Bridges - Secondary Hidden Meanings/Imbedded
Suggestions - Emotion Transfer - Non-Dominant Hemisphere Programming.."
Obama as a serious threat to the First Amendment
right of freedom of speech and peaceable assembly
2009-12-24 America
Under Barack Obama, An Interview with Nat Hentoff by
John W. Whitehead, "I try to avoid hyperbole, but I think Obama
is possibly the most dangerous and destructive president we have
ever had."
2009-04-25 Emergency
Alert! Don't Give Pedophiles Hate Bill Protection by
Rev. Ted Pike
2009-04-24 Pedophiles,
But Not Veterans, video posted by Erick Erickson.The
Democrats show favoritism to groups outside the realm of common
sense. "Congressman Rooney offered an amendment to
include veterans as a protected class in hate crimes legislation,
but the Democrats voted down the amendment. Here’s Congresswoman
Wasserman-Schultz denying that veterans need any protection: The
Democrats were, however, more willing to consider extending hate
crimes protection to pedophiles. That’s not a punch line.
That’s just sick."
2009-04-24 Twisted
H.R. 1913 Passes House Committee – Worst Attackon
First Amendment Freedoms of Speech, Religion in American History
by Rev. Michael Bresciani
2009-04-23 Judiciary
Committee greenlights 'hate crimes' Membersrefuse
to protect Christian pastors from charges by Bob Unruh,
WorldNetDaily. "Members of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee
today rejected an opportunity to protect Christian pastors who preach
the biblical condemnation of homosexuality and approved on a 15-12
vote a `hate crimes' bill that supporters admit could be used to
bring charges against religious leaders. The bill, H.R. 1913, now
will be considered by the full House of Representatives. The committee
rejected a number of amendments offered by several members seeking
to protect religious liberty, to protect the unborn, to protect
against violence by illegal aliens, and to clarify the bill's meanings
of `gender identity' and `sexual orientation.' One of the rejected
proposals was offered by Rep. Louis Gohmert, R-Texas, who sought
to ensure ministers could not be prosecuted for abetting a `hate
crime' simply because they preach from the Bible or another religious
book."
2009-04-18 Emergency
Alert!!! Demand Hate Bill Hearings! by Rev Pike
2009-04-02 Conyers
Introducing New Hate Bill! by Rev Ted Pike. "Conyers’
bill will give government the right to enter law enforcement to
punish violent hate crimes, punishing `as a principal' those pastors,
writers, talk show hosts, etc. whose public speech incites violent
hate crimes. It will also empower government to intervene to investigate
and punish all non-violent bias crimes against persons or property.
The government can do the same for alleged felonies. Its power will
massively expand, with corresponding loss of states’ rights
in law enforcement. The federal government will be able to nullify
verdicts in state hate crime trials; it will force the remaining
five US states without hate laws to submit to its statutes; lastly,
it will create a federal hate crimes bureaucracy to "prevent"
hate crimes in America through education and other means."
2009-03-25 We're
All Terrorists Now by Edgar J. Steele
2009-03-18 Preparing
for Civil Unrest in America: Legislation to Establish Internment
Camps on US Military Bases By Michel Chossudovsky.
2009-02-26 Alert
to Congress Regarding Hate Bills and the False Flag Attack Threat
by William B. Fox. The hate bill threat is very serious. If we do
not stop bills like H.R. 256 and H.R. 262 NOW at the House Judiciary
Committee level, the consequences could be horrible. Of course the
false flag attack threat is also horrible. Citizens awake!
2009-02-23 Christian
Silence Before Hate Bill Threat by Rev Ted Pike. Wake
up Christians --this proposed legislation is very dangerous!
2009-02-17 Pro-Lifers
at Greater Risk From Hate Laws by Harmony Grant. By
the way, "Pro-lifers" are not the only ones in danger.
So is everyone else who does not buy into the blank check pro-Zionist,
multi-racial, mutli-cultural, neo-Marxist agenda.
2009-02-16 Emergency
Alert! Hate Bills Move Forward in House Judiciary. New Video
Explains How to Stop Them!by
Rev Ted Pike. Call your Congressman and stop H.R. 256 and
262 NOW! Ask him and his staff to watch the "How
to Kill the Hate Bills" online video!
2009-02-11 Hate
Laws: Rope Around Our Throats by Harmony Grant
2009-01-26 Hate
Bill, ENDA Top Obama's Wish List by Rev Ted Pike
2009-01-15 ADL's
New `Trojan Horse' Hate Bill by Rev Ted Pike
2009-01-09 Emergency
Alert!!! Hate Bill Introduced Into Congress! Rev Pike
2008-11-18 Obama:
High Priest of the Religious Left by Harmony Grant
2008-11-17 Obama
Declares War on Conservative Talk Radio
The
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rule in question is called
"localism." Radio and television stations are required
to serve the interests of their local community as a condition
of keeping their broadcast licenses. Obama
needs only three votes from the five-member
FCC to define localism in such a way that no radio station
would dare air any syndicated conservative programming. Localism
is one of the rare issues on which Obama himself has been outspoken.
On September 20, 2007, Obama submitted a pro-localism written
statement to an FCC hearing
held at the Chicago headquarters of Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr.'s
Operation Push. Furthermore,
the Obama transition team knows all about the potential of localism
as a means of silencing conservative dissent. The head of the
Obama transition team is John Podesta, President and CEO of the
Center for American Progress. In
2007, the Center for American Progress issued a report, The
Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio. This report
complained that there was too much conservative talk on the radio
because of "the absence of localism in American radio markets"
and urged the FCC to "[e]nsure greater local accountability
over radio licensing.
How
could America, ostensibly protected by the First Amendment, also
lose free speech on the internet? For
starters, Congress could pass ADL's federal hate crimes bill,
the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act, this
winter. In 1971, Canada enacted ADL's very similar federal hate
law. Soon, it was extended to criminalize "hate speech"
originating on Canadian websites. Sec. 13.1 of Canada's human
rights statute outlaws even such internet speech as is "likely"
to cause embarrassment to federally protected groups. If
the Obama/ADL hate bill is passed, internet "homophobic hate
speech" in evangelical media, as well as in pulpits, will
become illegal. The hate bill is ostensibly directed only against
violent hate crimes in the States. However, a federal hate bill
will quickly overflow such limits, as prosecutors and judges broaden
it to protection of the "hurt feelings" of sodomites.
2008-11-05 Obama's
Hate Bill Steals God-Given Freedom by Rev Ted Pike.
If this goes through, one can kiss goodbye creating any realistic
checks on the "human tsunami" of illegal immigration that
is already swamping America.
Obama as a serious threat to
our Second Amendment right to bear arms
Obama as a creature of Orwellian, controlled national media
Obama
has very little political experience compared to most white governors,
senators, and congressmen. He has very little of substance to say.
(Please note section below that deals with
this issue). Imagine if a white candidate had tried to make it saying
exactly what Obama says? Such a candidate probably would have never
made it past Hillary Clinton or most other well-established white
liberal candidates. Without question, Obama is America's "affirmative
action" president. He has been packaged and sold by major national
media slicker than Pepsi, Marlboro, the State of Israel, and the
official government versions of the JFK assassination, Oklahoma
City, and the 9-11 controlled demolition inside job. All of this
raises the important "rabbit hole" question about who
really controls national media in America. The following are links
that I have also listed at my site map that help answer this question.
"Who
Rules America" by the National Alliance
"Harvest
of Shame II" How Bill Moyer's PBS documentary
Buying
the War exposes America's mainstream media as a Ministry
of Lies Operation
MockingbirdThis Wikipedia article discusses the history
of CIA operations to heavily influence domestic U.S. media. See
also the article "The
CIA's Family Jewels" about 25 years of other illicit domestic
activities. Final
Judgment explains how the CIA has been largely controlled
by Israel and the Mossad and was used in a conspiracy to murder
the President of the United States in downtown Dallas in broad daylight.
The
Judas Goats explains instances of FBI cooperation with
Jewish groups to harass
American patriots. In my guest
editorial for Sgt
Skull's Field Manual, I discuss the CIA-Mossad partnership
involving the Golden Triangle and Afghanistan drug trades. See also,
for example, Prof. Alfred McCoy’s The
Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade.
Hopefully
if we can maintain a free Internet most of these kinds of abuses
and usurpations will continue to be exposed and fade in the light
of truth. This is why it is so vitally important to stay
on your elected government officials and demand that they not
vote for so-called "hate crime" bills that serve as Trojan
horses to steal our free speech rights. Please see the Rev
Ted Pike and Harmony Grant archive for the latest information
about this threat. Political
Journalism Incest Chartfrom waynemadsenreport.com. "250+
9/11 'Smoking Guns' Found in the Mainstream Media." This
article explains how mainstream media fails miserably in its public
responsibility to address basic questions, and instead sweeps them
under the rug. Even when it reports important clues to conspiracy,
it shows breath-taking willful blindness by failing
to assemble the jigsaw puzzle when the resulting
picture resembles the Star of David.
"Who
Owns the Media?" by Takebackthemedia.com
"Who
Runs the US Media? What you don't know can hurt you." by
Alfons with Veterans for 9-11 Truth
"Who Runs
the Media" from Chapter 19 of My Awakening
by Dr. David Duke. Who Controls
the British Media?courtesy of natallnews.com. Who Controls
the Canadian Media?courtesy
of natallnews.com.
2008-11-16 HowObamaGotElected.com
Takes A Look At Media Malpractice (video) Exit poll
interviews of misinformed American voters show how little they knew,
from howobamagotelected.com.
60% did not know what party controls Congress.
According to: "No
hand over heart from Obama during national anthem"
"Weeks after coming under fire for his refusal
to wear an American flag pin, Democratic presidential
contender Sen. Barack Obama is again facing questions about
his patriotism from some conservative
blogs -- this time for apparently failing to put his
hand over his heart during a rendition of the national anthem
at an Iowa campaign event [on Sept 16, 2008]...Meanwhile,
rival Democratic candidates Gov. Bill Richardson (D-AZ)
and Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) strike a traditional anthem
pose beside him, holding their right hands over their hearts."
"Barack
Obama Refuses to Salute Flag, Anthem?" by David
Emery, About.com, October 30, 2007, claims that Obama is
being portrayed unfairly.
One emailer posted at About.com
called this a replay of the "crotch salute." About.com
claims this is unfair on the web page "Obama's
Veterans Day / Ft. Hood Non-Salute," stating at
the end of the web page "there's a very good reason
why President Obama wasn't saluting when the above photo
was taken, even though everyone else on the dais was. C-Span
video footage reveals that the moment in question occurred
just after Obama was introduced and the band began playing
"Hail to the Chief." The video also shows Obama
saluting during the playing of the National Anthem.
2008-11-11 Obama's
Foreign Policy: No Sharp Break From Bush by Jim Lobe.
Under Obama, America will very likely continue to practice global
"bigmanship" rather than repair productive infrastructure
on the home front first. "Bigmanship" is an anthropological
term describing the behavior of redistributor chiefs of primitive,
zero-sum societies who posture and shift wealth to cronies and engage
in various forms of conspicuous wealth consumption mainly for the
purpose of prestige-enhancement and paternalistic ego gratification.
2008-11-07 Worse
Than Bush? by Ted Galen Carpenter.
2007-08 "Renewing
American Leadership" by Barack Obama, July/August
2007 Foreign Affairs, published by the Council on Foreign
Relations, a subsidiary of the Zionist globalist elite. Obama calls
for ever more global bigmanship and foreign entanglements. According
to the Wikipedia article about the Chicago
Council on Foreign Relations: "Michelle Obama was listed
as a director on the Chicago Council website until her husband started
gaining more attention during the 2008 Democratic nomination race."
Obama as a potential false flag operator
Israel needs a pretext to expand war
in the Middle East. Obama has a strong incentive to accomodate his
Zionist handlers and start running false flag terror operations
within the first 6-9 months of his presidency. Such operations would
not only milk his popularity ratings while they are still relatively
high, but also keep potential challengers off balance or under lock
down.
Was this cartoon a coded warning to Obama? See 2009-04-09
interview comments below
2009-09-05 Alert!
Say NO to Mass Swine Flu Vaccinations Until Vaccines Are PROVEN
SAFE and NECESSARY! by Maj. William Fox, also archived
in the Lone Star Iconoclast.
2009-04-09 The
Real Deal. Interview by Dr. Fetzer with Capt. May,
Maj. Fox, and SFC Buswell. Capt May thinks it was very strange that
Obama and Biden flew
separately to Denver on Feb 17th to sign the stimulus bill.
Normally this kind of signing is done in the Rose Garden or somewhere
else at the White House. Did Obama want to be close to the USNORTHCOM
HQ in case it was time for him and Biden to pull another “Cheney
in the bunker?” Also, very peculiar, the next day the Zionist-controlled
New York Post ran
the “Dead Monkey” cartoon. Did Obama draw ire for
failing to give the go ahead to administer a false flag stimulus
as expected? Capt. May, Maj. Fox, SFC Buswell, and Dr. Fetzer still
think that the Chicago Willis Tower (formerly the Sears Tower) remains
in the cross hairs, as reflected in their 10
April alert.
2 hrs 5 min, 44.1 MB Download Here
20090410 Chicago's
Nuclear Obama — False Flag Unfurled coauthored
by Capt Eric May, Maj. William Fox, Dr. James Fetzer, and SFC Donald
Buswell. Also archived
at the Lone Star Iconoclast. 2009-02-12 The
Real Deal. Jim Fetzer interviews Maj. William Fox,
who along with Capt May are strenuously trying to second-guess possible
future false flag operations, since the most dangerous period of
the Obama administration, like the Bush administration, is likely
to be within its first nine months through Sept 2009. The interview
starts with outline of a possible false flag scenario involving
three explosions (two in Israel, a nuke in a U.S. city) addressed
in the 14 Feb 2009 Alert Chicago
False Flag? — Analysis and Hypothesis — coauthored
with Capt. Eric May. Maj Fox and Dr. Fetzer also address dysfunctional
macro economic, political, and social policies in America and how
they might get fixed. Unfortunately a Revere Radio blurb cuts out
where Maj Fox explains the motive for blowing up the Dome of the
Rock. The idea is that it would be deliberately designed by the
Mossad to appear to be a Muslim
false flag operation. This convoluted intrigue would be designed
to clear the way towards rebuilding the Temple of Solomon --a major
Zionist objective, while blaming the attack on Muslim intriguers
out to discredit Zionists. Incidentally, if this were such a far-fetched
scenario, why would the Muslim false flag scenario be advocated
in an Israeli publication by a Middle East analyst? Also, the 16
Feb 2009 American Free Press article which Maj Fox
cites by Mark Glenn originally had the confusing title where it
called the burial site of Jesus at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher
the birthplace. Maj Fox has since cleared up this confusion by correcting
the title in his online
posting of this article. This article is significant because
Benjamin Netanyahu threatened an attack on this site. This show
is also on YouTube in five parts, part one beginning here.
Unfortunately Capt. May, who suffers from the late stages of ALS,
started suffering from breathing problems and had to bow out of
this show before he could speak.
2 hours, 28.2 MB Download Here.
20081223 Chicago
Cops Dodge Blagojevich/Sears Tower Investigation by
William Fox with Capt Eric May. Also archived at LSI.
Jeff and Mike interview Capt May and Maj William Fox 12 Dec
'08 about false flag attack potential under Obama (3 min excerpt;
see the Capt
May or Maj
Fox archive for full MP3 download)
20081211 `Black
Bush' Barack? False Flag Frankenstein? coauthored by
Capt. Eric May, Maj. William Fox and Dr. James Fetzer. Also archived
at The
Lone Star Iconoclast.
2008-11-14 Obama
Warned of ‘Spectacular’ al-Qaeda Attack During Transition.
Please see the archived
articles by Capt Eric May and Maj
William Fox to understand why we believe most of the "terror
warnings" relayed by global media from "Al Qaeda"
are really politically motivated contrivances of "Al CIA-Mossad-duh."
Among other things, Benazir Bhutto (in
a statement shortly before her death) and an alleged
Saudi Intelligence spokesman are probably correct that Osama
Bin Laden died within a few years following the U.S. invasion of
Afghanistan. Experts have exposed virtually all the "Bin Laden"
tapes in recent years as fakes. A number of sources such as "Afghan
article says US Bin-Ladin hunt phoney" by Juan Cole
suggest there never was a serious attempt to catch Bin Laden. Staging
a second 9-11-type false flag terror strike would provide a perfect
excuse for Obama and his New World Order handlers to censor all
criticism of the burgeoning neo-Jacobin dictatorship they have in
mind for us through Internet lockdown and other draconian measures.
2008-11-09 Bush's
False Flag Finale?(A Vigilant Shield Update) coauthored
by Major William B. Fox and Captain Eric H. May. "The election
of Barack Hussein Obama II would appear to present no obstacle to
any planned false flag attack. He has just selected Zionist Rahm
Emanuel as his White House Chief of Staff. This is most alarming
foreshadowing..."
Obama as an anti-white leader of a European-founded nation
2009-01-26 The
Obamas' Problem With America: Radical black
theology pervades thinking of those close to Democratic chief executive
by Victor Thorn, American Free Press
2008-06-27 Baracknophobia
by Edgar J. Steele:
Obama's
mother was White, but you never hear anything about her side of
his family. Obama talks only of the African man who conceived
Obama while wed to another and then abandoned him. From Obama's
first little book, Dreams of My Father: "I found a solace
in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against
my mother's race." Also from Dreams of My Father:
"I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12
or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating
myself to whites." Google
up some recent pictures of Detroit. Google up the FBI web site
and track down the statistics on Black on White crime today (50
times as much violent crime from individual Blacks as from individual
Whites). Obama
was a member of virulent racist, anti-White Rev. Wright's church
for 20 years. Wright performed the Obamas' marriage. Only after
a public outcry did Obama condemn Rev. Wright's "God damn
America" sermon.
America's first affirmative action President of the
United States! If Obama had been white and continued to say
the same kinds of far left things as "Queen Hillary,"
do you really think the public and New World Order kingmakers
would have swung the election his way?
Obama threatens to open floodgates of illegal
immigration wider
Please be aware that things can get much worse than granting citizenship
to an extra 12 million illegal aliens, on top of the over 30 million
Mexicans who have biologically replaced the same number
of whites in the last two decades (filling in for white abortions
and less than ZPG-level birthrates). If Obama's neo-Marxist buddies
have their way, they might try importing a huge share of the in-excess
of a billion poor Chinese and poverty-strick people from India.
The Chinese have already gained footholds strategically close to
America with their control of the Panama Canal and creation of the
world's
largest port in the Bahamas. People from India have already
gained major footholds in American in positions ranging from running
hotels and 7-11's to executive positons in Silicon Valley firms.
As the graph below shows, from simply considering differential birth
rates alone, we still have a huge crisis even if nonwhite immigration
is signficantly curtailed. Imagine if Obama's proposed "hate
crime" laws get passed, and it becomes illegal to criticize
the "human tsunami" bearing down on us, how hopelessly
America will get totally swamped. See the articles by Frosty Wooldridge
such as the "The
Next Added 100 Million Americans."
Obama increases white miscegenation and dispossession
2008-10-29 Obama’s
Family in Pictures by James Buchanan: "Do we really
want Barack Obama to ascend to the presidency, knowing that this
will send a message to millions of White American girls, that race-mixing
is `OK'? Do millions of White parents want to effectively give their
White daughters permission to marry a Black man? 80 percent of Obama’s
African relatives are Muslims. Obama’s Indonesian step-father
was a Muslim, and Barack himself attended a Muslim school in Indonesia
for several years. Obama’s home country of Kenya is a desperately
poor, backward Third World nation, and there’s a great chance
a President Obama would spend billions of dollars in foreign aid
on Kenya and throw open the immigration door to millions of his
African cousins."
Obama Deception HQ: An Alex Jones documentary (Makes many important points, but is light on the Zionist
dimension of the "oligarchy;"
however, beginning at 18:28 note the Rahm Emanuel and Henry Kissinger
clips )
Obama: somewhere between "business
as usual" and bad change
2009-03-31 Another
War Lost? by William S. Lind "Here we see how
little `change' the Obama administration really represents. The
differences between the neo-liberals and the neocons are few. Both
are militant believers in Brave New World, a globalist future in
which everyone on earth becomes modern."
2009-03-30 Obama
Looks More and More Like Bush by Timothy V. Gatto
2009-03-01 Change
for the Worse by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts 2009-01-01 2009
Top-Ten List for Boys Crying Wolf by Edgar J. Steele
2008-11-19 What
the Clinton Appointment Means And why we won't see any change in
American foreign policy by Justin Raimondo
2008-11@15 The
Obama Team: Harbinber of No Change by Joel Skousen
2008-11-14 Torture
– Yes We Can? Obama and the national security question: the
sellout accelerates by Justin Raimondo. "A recent
Wall Street Journalpiece
describing the transition process as it relates to intelligence-gathering
reveals we aren't going to see much change in this vitally important
realm, the one in which the Bush administration truly made its blackest
mark. This will `create tension within the Democratic party,'
we are told, apparently because even the worst party hacks will
have a hard time going along with the revised Obama Doctrine on
the issue of torture. According to the Journal, Obama's
advisors on intelligence matters are `centrists' in the Clinton
mold and outright Republicans, who favor torture `with oversight.'
These, we are told, are the `pragmatists,' likely candidates for
positions in Obama's national security bureaucracy. `He's going
to take a very centrist approach to these issues,' avers Roger
Cressey, who served as a counter-terrorism official under Clinton
as well as Bush II. It's a grotesque commentary on the moral health
of the nation when advocacy of torture is considered `centrist.'
One shudders to imagine what it means to be right-of-center."
2008-11-17 Does
Barack Obama Offer Hope for New Mideast Dynamic?
by Jeff Gates, AFP "When he convened his foreign advisory team,
he placed pro-Israeli Madeleine Albright at the head of the table.
She was secretary of state for President Bill Clinton. When he convened
his economic policy team, Lawrence Summers took the lead. Recently
forced out as president of Harvard University, former Treasury Secretary
Summers handpicked the pro-Israeli advisory team that oversaw the
oligarchization of Russia. The largest fraud in history, Mikhail
Gorbachev estimated that the financial pillage exceeded $1 trillion.
Eight of the top nine oligarchs qualify for Israeli citizenship."
2008-11-10 Conned
Again? Obama, Rahm-bo and the End of the New American Century by
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
2008-11-09 Who
are the Architects of Economic Collapse? Will an Obama Administration
Reverse the Tide? by Dr. Michel Chossudovsky:
The
October 2008 financial meltdown is not the result of a cyclical
economic phenomenon. It is the deliberate result of US government
policy instrumented through the Treasury and the US Federal Reserve
Board. This
is the most serious economic crisis in World history. The
"bailout" proposed by the US Treasury does not constitute
a "solution" to the crisis. In fact quite the opposite:
it is the cause of further collapse. It triggers an unprecedented
concentration of wealth, which in turn contributes to widening
economic and social inequalities both within and between nations... ...What
we are witnessing is continuity. Obama
provides a " human face" to the status quo. This human
face serves to mislead Americans on the nature of the economic
and political process. The
neoliberal economic reforms remain intact. The
substance of these reforms including the "bailout" of
America's largest financial institutions ultimately destroys the
real economy, while spearheading entire areas of manufacturing
and the services economy into bankruptcy.
Editor's
note by William B. Fox: I think Dr. Chossudovsky's
analysis is brilliant and right on target. To really put things
into perspective on the deeper level of economic theory, please
see my commentary regarding question 16: "How
is real wealth created in American society?" and question
28 "Where
should we locate `system risk' in the creation of money and credit?"
in my "Have
You Been Brainwashed?" series. Please also see my discussion
of the vital role of grass roots entrepreneurial calculation and
technology-driven manufacturing infrastructure in chapter 4 "Where
and How Do We Make Money?" and Chapter 5 "Robo-Political
Economy" in my work I
Robot Entrepreneur. Also see my historical discussion about
how the financial sector has usurped and strangled the once productive
American manufacturing sector in the last century in my centralized
vs. decentralized discussion in my "Resolving
Opposing Political and Economic Ideologies" series. In
particular, please note the discussion of Special
Privilege: How the Monetary Elite Benefit at Your Expense,
by Vincent LoCasio. Also, please peruse the archived
works of Dr. Murray Rothbard (for example the classic: "What
Has Government Done To Our Money?") as well archived
works by other great conservative, pro-free market writers such
as Congressman
Ron Paul, Dr.
Paul Craig Roberts, Lew
Rockwell, Dr.
Thomas DiLorenzo, Dr.
Ralph Raico,and Dr.
Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Last, but not least, an excellent book called
Keynes At Harvard:
Economic Deception As A Political Credo published
by Zygmund Dobbs and the Veritas Foundation in the early 1960's,
explains how mainstream economic theory suffered a conspiratorial,
central banker-financed coup de etat in American universities
in the 1930's. Please also consider our audio
archive and check out links in the "High Fraud/High Greed
Economy/Financial System" section, such as the YouTube Video
The
Money Masters. Check out G. Edward Griffin's classic
work The
Creature From Jekyll Island: A Second Look At the Federal Reserve,
which is extremely well-written, just like a great detective novel.
After
all this reading, you should come to appreciate why early American
presidents such as Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson --or for
that matter most 19th century populist political movements in America--
were staunch foes of a fiat-money-driven central bank and alternatively
strong advocates of a forcefully decentralized monetary system typically
based on hard assets such as gold and silver. Just
like they preferred an "inefficient" trial by jury system
compared to more efficient single judge or tribunal system as a
guard against political tyranny, early American leaders also required
a heavily regulated, forcefully decentralized financial system to
avoid the possibility of the kind of highly consolidated financial
power that we suffer under today. Remember, when you empower the
financial sector, the financial tail starts to wag the general economic
dog. Most economic power should reside within the manufacturing
sector in the heartland, and the financial sector (globally headquartered
today in places like New York City and the City of London) should
be kept deliberately chained down, fragmented, and "inefficient"
as a check against economic tyranny. To
give the reader an idea about how extremely distorted our economy
has become, in his book In
Praise of Hard Industries: Why Manufacturing, Not the Information
Economy, Is the Key to Future Prosperity, Eamonn
Fingleton observes that in a healthy economy, manufacturing should
stand at about 33 % of GDP. Today it is below 12% in America. In
contrast, the financial sector, which is normally at around 5% of
S&P sectors, increased during the 2000 bubble to about 25% of
GDP. Thomas
Jefferson once
said:
The central bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility
existing against the Principles and form of our Constitution.
I am an Enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything
but Coin. If the American People allow private banks to control
the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by
deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around
them will deprive the People of all their Property until their
Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers
conquered.
In
contrast to all this, Obama is basically just a "house boy"
for the kinds of utterly selfish and greedy financial operators
identified by Dr. Chossudovsky. President Thomas Jefferson probably
would have considered them full-scale domestic enemies of our republic
and tried to figure out Constitutional ways to motivate local sheriffs,
militia, Army or Marines to put them all in jail or on bond awaiting
trial for well-founded criminal charges by now. In
fact, speaking of the U.S. military, we may ultimately be faced
with a very unpleasant "kill or be killed" dilemma. In
our 9 Oct 2008 "Vigilant
Shield and Jokers Gone Wild" alert, we described how
the banksters had the bloody nerve to threaten U.S. Congressman
with martial law if they did not bail them out of the consequences
of their own corrupt and reckless handling of the financial system.
...U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman of California discussed
the threat of martial law made to Congressmen during the recent
bailout bill debate: “Many of us were told in private conversations
that if we voted against this bill on Monday that the sky would
fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points the first
day and another couple of thousand on the second day, and a few
members were even told that there would be martial law in America
if we voted no. That is what I call fearmongering…"
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
under Reagan, told talk show host Alex Jones on 3 Oct that the
bailout bill gives economic
martial law power to the Treasury.
In
his article "A
Dawning Dictatorship? (911-2B & NSPD-51)" Captain
Eric May quotes Oregon Congressman Peter DeFazio: "I just can’t
believe they’re going to deny a member of Congress the right
of reviewing how they plan to conduct the government of the United
States after a significant terrorist attack … Maybe the people
who think there’s a conspiracy out there are right."
Of course under NSPD-51, a financial emergency can also serve as
a trigger, just like a terrorist attack. In
other words, if the American people and their elected government
representatives do not get law enforcement personnel and the military
on their side to face off the banksters, the banksters and pro-Zionist
national media tycoons will continue their sneaky, deceitful campaign
to set up soldiers and police to violently suppress the people to
serve their own special interests at the expense of this country.
Get it? Barack
Hussein Obama II is likely to do nothing except take orders from
these financial parasites and help lead America into even greater
ruin. 2008-11-07 Obama:
Meet the new boss, same as the old bossblog
entry by "Devrim".
To Austrian/classical economists,
white nationalists, and paleo-
conservatives alike this is a grotesque surrealistic nightmare
Obama as a tragic repeater of FDR's mistakes that
prolonged and deepened the Great Depression
The
first important fact to know about the Great Depression is that
the Federal Reserve Banking System largely created the conditions
for the Depression to begin with. (The Fed itself was created by
a very unsavory group of Jewish supremacist financiers and their
Morgan and Rockefeller cronies, as documented in G. Edward Griffin's
book The Creature from Jekyll Island, Eustace Mullins'
The Federal Reserve Conspiracy, and Henry Ford's The
International Jew) It doubled the money supply in World War
I, and roughly doubled it again during the Roaring 20's, creating
massive distortions in the economy. The criminal Fed also increased
fractional
reserve ratios and approved extremely speculative methods on
Wall Street so that fellow Members of the Tribe (MOT) could better
profit from insider borrowing privileges and inside information.
Then, after massively super-goosing the economy, the Fed took the
punch bowl away from the party, and was then able to eliminate weaker
independent banks to consolidate its power base while various Members
of the Tribe were able to scoop up major American media and industrial
assets for pennies on the dollar. Meanwhile, frontmen like Herbert
Hoover and FDR cast the blame everywhere except upon the real culprits.
(In contrast, Germany found a leader less skitish about naming names).
See America's Great
Depression by Dr. Murray Rothbard which explains much of
this in detail from his anarch-libertarian perspective. Also, in
my centralized
vs. decentralized discussion, I provide excerpts from Special
Privilege: How the Monetary Elite Benefit at Your Expense,
by Vincent LoCasio that describe how the Fed did the exact opposite
behind the scenes compared to what it was supposed to do when originally
sold to Congress in 1913. Lastly, please see my commentary regarding
the question: "What
is the proper role of the Federal Government (Feds) and central
bank (the Federal Reserve or "the Fed") in managing the
economy?" as part of my "Have
You Been Brainwashed?" quiz. Similarly,
major Jewish-controlled Wall Street firms today such as Goldman
Sachs and the now defunct Lehman Brothers were major contributors
to the Obama campaign. Don't hold your breath that Obama will ever
go after the banksters responsible for the reckless lending that
led to the aforementioned $700 billion taxpayer bailout. Nor will
he likely go after the Wall Street criminals who have created over
500 trillion in derivatives, of which about 80 trillion (about 7
times the size of the U.S. economy) are considered particularly
toxic. Billionaire Warren Buffet once referred to these derivatives
as "Weapons of Mass Financial Destruction." But don't
hold your breath that Obama will ever name names. Instead, like
FDR, he will blame everyone except the real culprits. The
next important fact to know is that one does not promote real economic
recovery by destroying the basis for successful "entrepreneurial
calculation," (the latter being a key phrase in "Austrian
economics.") And
what is this calculation made of? Simple. Just go to any publicly
listed company on the Internet and download its Form 10K. This is
essentially an outline of its business plan. Most business plans
try to explain how a company can offer a product with a superior
ratio of perceived value to price to the consumer relative to the
competition, and do so with worthwhile profit expectations. In a
nutshell, most of FDR's New Deal policies provided disincentives
for the normal process of entrepreneurial calculation. The flawed
policies vastly increased regulation that increased costs to businesses.
They raised taxes and provided enormous disincentives to save and
invest in businesses. They set wage and price controls that hampered
the ability of the free market to sort out major asset price and
labor price distortions. Ultimately,
most of FDR's policies were designed to serve as a smoke screen
for the exploitive and unAmerican agenda of the Jewish supremacist
power elite behind the Fed, Wall Street, Hollywood, and major national
media. These policies had very little to do with sound economic
realities for the American public at large. It was not accidental
either that FDR's administration was lousy with Jewish supremacists
and Reds (see for example The
Red Network by Elizabeth Dilling, Grand Dame of
the 1930's American Right). Given that government workers and politicians
are usually horrible at anything to do with real economics compared
to the private sector (see for example Why Government Doesn't
Work by Harry Browne), why should we surprised that FDR's efforts
to greatly expand government at the expense of the private sector
had such dismal results? For
more in-depth discussion of this viewpoint, please search articles
with titles related to "FDR", "Depression,"
and "Fed" for libertarian economists archived a lewrockwell.com
and mises.org such as Lew
Rockwell, Dr.
Murray Rothbard, Dr.
Hans-Herman Hoppe, Dr.
Robert Higgs, and Dr.
Ralph Raico. In
particular, please check out the series "Fascism
Comes to America" by Dr. Ralph Raico. Also, I think
that Lew Rockwell is particularly talented at writing articles that
are brief, clear, and to the point for the layman to understand,
such as "Don't
Trust the Depression Brain Trust," "Grand
Theft Society", "War
and Inflation" (Our Enemy the Fed), and "The
Frightful Face of Stimulus." Incidentally,
Dr. Robert Higgs and other libertarians believe that it is a myth
that World War II pulled America out of the Great Depression, or
at least in the way that Keynesian economists normally explain it.
According to the libertarians, America came out of the Depression
in a rear-end backwards way, almost despite itself and its New Deal
policies. Wartime inflation, combined with artificially suppressed
wages (for example low army pay for millions of G.I.s) finally brought
down real wages to a level so that it was now economical to start
hiring at full employment. In addition, America's industrial base
survived unscathed, whereas much of its foriegn competition got
bombed out. Regarding
the real economic impact of war vs. peace, please see the lecture
"What
Thrives and What Dies During War" also archived as
an MP3 file
by Dr.
Mark Thornton to help debunk the Orwellian notion that war is
inherently good for the economy. There
is one last question that I will address, namely that if government
intervention is so horrible, how was it that Hitler's National Socialist
policies seemed to be so successful in lifting Germany out of its
Depression? According to Dr. Hans Herman-Hoppe in his lecture "The
Economic Doctrine of the Nazis" during the Mises Institute
Economics
of Fascism conference, it is very ironic that in certain key
areas Adolf Hitler's program was actually more libertarian
than that of FDR! Another part of my answer is that sometimes it
is more the men who make the system than the system that makes the
men. When a group of patriotic Germans are giving their 100% best
efforts to self-finance and help fellow Germans out of poverty and
misery, even if a "socialist-bureaucratic" paradigm is
generally less efficient than a free enterprise system, it may still
work much better than an American New Deal bureaucracy heavily staffed
with Members of the Tribe, and furthermore where the government
is heavily indebted to international Jewish banksters. A third part
of my answer is that much of the German recovery was "artificial"
to the extent that it reflected a distorted economy stimulated by
government spending geared towards building a war machine, and was
not sustainable for peace. However, other government-sponsored programs
such as the creation of the Autobahn and the Volkswagen (model
VW30 test-driven by the S.S.!) reflected intelligent domestic
investment that paid ample economic dividends. A fourth part of
my answer is that when certain people (such as Germans, Japanese,
and Scandinavian "Labor Party socialists") possess a high
level of innate intelligence, discipline, and vigor, they often
able to produce satisfactory results from government-driven investment
as well as private investment, although the latter is usually always
more efficient. A fifth part of my answer is that in extreme circumstances,
where the normal social and economic fabric has been badly dislocated
and torn, sometimes a helping government presence is certainly better
than no presence at all.
2009-04-02 Should
We Kill the Fed? by Pat Buchanan. "Obama is repeating
the failed policies of Hoover and FDR, by refusing to let prices
fall. Obama, with his intervention to prop up housing prices and
Bernanke with his gushers of money to bail out bankrupt banks and
businesses are creating a new bubble that will burst even more spectacularly."
2009-02-23 How
the Economy Was Lost by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
2009-02-12 How
Will Obama's Deficits Be Financed? by Dr. Paul Craig
Roberts
2009-02-08 Ship
of Fools by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Barack Obama as a reflection of white guilt and self-hatred
In
an interview, Obama called his mother, "the dominant figure
in my formative years …The values she taught me continue
to be my touchstone when it comes to how I go about the world
of politics." Though Obama sometimes tries to evoke an image
of his mother being just a conservative Kansan schoolgirl, the
truth is that she was a radical cultural Marxist and dedicated
leftist of the first order, one with a predilection for Black
men so profound as to belie her own self-hating, anti-White beliefs.
Obama's
mother's outlook was formed in Mercer Island High School, Bellevue,
Washington, which has been described as being "a hotbed of
pro-Marxist radical teachers" at the time she attended, one
that had a Communist on its Board and several unapologetically-Marxist
teachers on staff who advocated rejection of societal norms, rejection
of Christianity and the family and assigned readings by Karl Marx.
This is the fount from which Obama claims his "touchstone
values" flow. There
is liberal and then there is Communist, the singular invention
of Russian Jew Karl Marx. One is American as apple pie. The other
is anti-American in the extreme. Yes, all these years of a so-called
"conservative" like George W. Bush makes anybody look
attractive. Problem is, Bush was the idiot-child President. Obama,
if his "touchstone values" truly are rooted in Communism,
could be far worse.
Obama as a highly flawed individual on many different levels; expect
goofy things from his administration:
Tracy…I am so sorry that you had to go through that again.
For the FIRST time I am REALLY ANGRY. I make no apologies about
this one. I AM MORE THAN UPSET. I am shaking as I type this. This
administrations incompetence and arrogance and narcisissism knows
NO BOUNDS! Obama does not have one ounce of repect for AMERICANS
that have gone through one of the worst attacks on American soil
of our time. Where was the RESPECT and HONOR for that City and
its citizens? That skyline should be respected in memorial…NOT
USED FOR A STUPID PHOTO OP. No, I believe it goes much further….
NO WORD FROM THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF????????????????? WHAT AN UNMITIGATED
ASS AND UN AMERICAN PRETENDER TO OUR PRESIDENCY. HE OWED YOU AN
APOLOGY!!!! No, he can APOLOGIZE TO OTHER Nations BUT NOT TO HIS
CITIZENS? Freakin unreal. ANYONE…ANYONE…ANYONE FREAKIN
ONE, THAT IT NOT OUTRAGED BY THIS SHOULD SERIOUSLY QUESTION THEIR
SANITY. By Kelly In Texas on 04/28/2009 11:07 am
"This
appraisal of Mr. Obama’s character is based on his two books,
Dreams From My Father (DMF) and The Audacity of Hope
(AOH). The advantage of relying on these sources is that they
are not only Mr. Obama’s own words but his considered words.
He cannot claim that were written hastily and without reflection... If
we assume that genes play a strong role in determining character,
what can we learn from Mr. Obama’s ancestry? Apart
from the fact that he got himself an education, Mr. Obama’s
father’s behavior matches the modern stereotype of the black
man. He goes from one woman to another breeding incontinently,
and this explains why Mr. Obama has so many half-brothers and
half-sisters. He leaves Mr. Obama’s mother when Barack is
still a toddler and then reappears rarely in the boy’s life.
From Mr. Obama’s account, he provided his mother with no
money whatsoever, and back in Africa he variously abandoned and
neglected his other women and children. He became a drunk and
ruined his job prospects by recklessly insulting influential people.
Here is Mr. Obama’s account of his half-sister Auma describing
his father’s behavior towards members of the Kenyan elite:
“When he was passed up for a promotion, he complained
loudly. ‘How can you be my senior,’ he would say
to one of the ministers, ‘and yet I am teaching you how
to do your job properly?’” (DMF p. 215.)
Mr.
Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, a white woman from middle
America, marries first an African then an Indonesian, but neither
marriage lasts. For someone of her background to marry one person
of a different race and culture might be put down to love; marrying
two looks like a political statement. She takes Mr. Obama to Indonesia
then sends him back to the USA—Hawaii—after several
years to live with his mother’s parents. Eventually she
returns to the USA and takes an anthropology degree, during which
time Mr. Obama lives with her. After she finishes her degree,
she leaves Mr. Obama once more with her parents while she goes
abroad for anthropological fieldwork. Mr.
Obama’s description of his mother makes her sound like a
Margaret Mead anthropological naïf, forever searching for
the right approach to non-white, non-American people while ironically
insisting most of the time that Mr. Obama be brought up as an
American. Mr. Obama describes her attitude towards blacks:
Every black man was Thurgood Marshall or Sidney Poitier; every
black woman Fannie Lou Hamer or Lena Horne. To be black was
to be the beneficiary of a great inheritance, a special destiny,
glorious burdens that only we were strong enough to bear. Burdens
we were to carry with style. More than once, my mother would
point out, “Harry Belafonte is the best-looking man on
the planet.” (DMF p. 51.)
It
is clear that Mr. Obama’s parents were unusually selfish
and egotistical, far more concerned with satisfying their own
wants than caring for others, even their children. Mr. Obama’s
description of their personalities, both through his own presumed
recollection and that of others, paints a picture of reckless
self-absorption. As
for his grandparents, if Mr. Obama is to be believed, his grandfather
was a restless, undisciplined man who never made a success of
anything, flitting from place to place and job to job until he
finally settled in Hawaii. His grandmother, despite Mr. Obama’s
attempt to paint her as a feminist trailblazer as the first female
vice-president of a local Hawaiian bank, comes across as curiously
colorless for someone Mr. Obama claims loomed very large in his
emotional life...:
Let
me sort of describe my overall policy. What
I've said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place
that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else's
out there. I
was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade
system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases
emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market
in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented,
whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have
to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps
that are being placed, imposed every year. So
if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's
just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged
a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted. That
will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar,
wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches. The
only thing I've said with respect to coal, I haven't been some
coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off
the table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed to saying if
technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue
it. So
if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It's
just that it will bankrupt them.
What
does the triumvirate of Obama-Pelosi-Reid offer? Rep.
Barney Frank is calling for new tax hikes on the most successful
and a 25 percent across-the-board slash in national defense. Sen.
John Kerry is talking up new and massive federal spending, a la
FDR's New Deal. Specifically, we can almost surely expect: --
Swift amnesty for 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens and
a drive to make them citizens and register them, as in the Bill
Clinton years. This will mean that Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico
and Arizona will soon move out of reach for GOP presidential candidates,
as has California. --
Border security will go on the backburner, and America will have
a virtual open border with a Mexico of 110 million. --
Taxes will be raised on the top 5 percent of wage-earners, who
now carry 60 percent of the U.S. income tax burden, and tens of
millions of checks will be sent out to the 40 percent of wage-earners
who pay no federal income tax. Like the man said, redistribute
the wealth, spread it around. --
Social Security taxes will be raised on the most successful among
us, and capital gains taxes will be raised from 15 percent to
20 percent. The Bush tax cuts will be repealed, and death taxes
reimposed. --
Two or three more liberal activists of the Ruth Bader Ginsberg-John
Paul Stevens stripe will be named to the Supreme Court. U.S. district
and appellate courts will be stacked with "progressives." --
Special protections for homosexuals will be written into all civil
rights laws, and gays and lesbians in the military will be invited
to come out of the closet. "Don't ask, don't tell" will
be dead. --
The homosexual marriages that state judges have forced California,
Massachusetts and Connecticut to recognize, an Obama Congress
or Obama court will require all 50 states to recognize. --
A "Freedom of Choice Act" nullifying all state restrictions
on abortions will be enacted. America will become the most pro-abortion
nation on earth. --
Affirmative action --
hiring and promotions based on race, sex and sexual orientation
until specified quotas are reached will be rigorously enforced
throughout the U.S. government and private sector. --
Universal health insurance will be enacted, covering legal and
illegal immigrants, providing another powerful magnet for the
world to come to America, if necessary by breaching her borders.
--
A federal bailout of states and municipalities to keep state and
local governments spending up could come in December or early
next year. --
The first trillion-dollar deficit will be run in the first year
of an Obama presidency. It will be the first of many. Welcome
to Obamaland!
According to the following Sept 8, 2008 blog
entry:
Quote: National Journal is out with
its ratings of the votes of the members of the Senate, and it
has found that the most liberal senator in 2007 was Barack Obama.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/01/31/politics/horserace/entry377545
1.shtml [Vice Presidential Candidate] Joe Biden ranked the
third most liberal Senator. http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/
This is not a moderate ticket, not a dig in and get some bipartisan
work done. It's a fringe ticket from the left, and will only further
polarize the nation...Obama Record May Be Gold Mine For
Critics; Eight Years As State Senator Were Full Of Controversial
Votes, Including Abortion And Gun Control.
Obama voted against requiring medical care for aborted fetuses
who survive. (Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, Obama
votes No. LINK
Obama argued the legislation threatened a woman's right to abortion
by defining the fetus as a child. (The child had to have been
already born, and alive) "It would essentially bar
abortions because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody
to kill a child, and if this was a child then this would be an
anti-abortion statute," Obama said in the Senate's
debate in March 2001. Obama may also find himself fielding questions
about his actions outside public office, from his acknowledgment
of cocaine use in his youth to a more recent land purchase from
a political supporter who is facing charges in an unrelated kickback
scheme involving investment firms seeking state business. Obama's
Connection With an Accused Political Fixer Tony Rezco Raises Questions
Obama was known in the Illinois Capitol as a consistently
liberal senator. He had a 100 percent rating from the
Illinois Planned Parenthood. Obama regularly supported
gun-control measures, including a ban on semiautomatic
"assault weapons" and a limit on handgun purchases...
He also opposed letting people use a self-defense argument if
charged with violating local handgun bans by using weapons in
their homes. The bill was a reaction to a Chicago-area man who,
after shooting an intruder, was charged with a handgun violation.
Obama occasionally supported higher taxes, joining other
Democrats in pushing to raise more than 300 taxes. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/17/politics/main2369157.shtmlQuote: Obama voiced support for the DC
Gun Ban on handguns, which is scheduled to be heard by
the Supreme Court next month. (The Supreme Court struck down this
gun ban as an Unconstitutional infringement on the individuals
right to bear arms, however Obama saw it differently.) “The
city of Chicago has gun laws, so does Washington, DC, The notion
that somehow local jurisdictions can’t initiate gun safety
laws to deal with gang bangers and random shootings on the street
isn’t born out by our Constitution” Obama
said.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/02/15/obama-says-us-must-end-gun-vio
lence-after-campus-shooting-in-home-state/comment-page-2/
The DC gun ban Obama supported, banned all guns including handguns,
forbid their sale, and required previously owned firearms to be
unloaded and disassembled inside homes. Proving once more this
is not a moderate ticket.
Many
political observers are concerned that the Obama regime will make
another run --just like the Clintonistas in the early 1990s-- at
infiltrating the U.S. military with open homosexuals. William S.
Lind commented:
"President Obama's first national security test will in fact
be a test of his honesty. Will he govern as the centrist he presented
himself as being during the campaign? If so, he will allow present
policies on women and gays in the military to remain in place. Or,
will he reveal himself as a cultural Marxist who deceived the American
public in order to get elected and will govern from the left, not
the center? If so, we will witness many experiments against reality,
with the U.S. armed forces early victims."
Obama
Speaks Arabic, posted August 12, 2008.
Dr. Jerome Corsi discusses his book Obama Nation
with Sean Hannity, and his views on Obama's highly questionable
background.
NEED
FOR CHANGE AREAS
CENSORED
"Censored" satire of baby Obama
in native African environment
Perhaps even more significant than the Kenyan birth certificate
is his documented Indonesian citizenship while in elementary school.
Barack Obama's highly questionable
background
See discussion
about why Obama flunks the Constitutional requirement as a "natural
born citizenship" at theobamafile.com. "For each presidential
candidate, they can put the factual history of their birth in the
equation and see if they fit the bill to be president of the U.S.
(POTUS) under the Constitution of the United States of America,
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, and the 14th Amendment, Section
1, and the relevant federal law under U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169
U.S. 649 (1898), and Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939). As you
can clearly see, Obama is a citizen of the United States, but he's
not a `natural born citizen' of the United States, and, as such,
is not eligible for POTUS, because his father, a Kenyan, was not
a U. S. citizen."
For the most complete, up-to-date discussion of Barry Soetero (AKA
Obama, or whatever), please see obamacrimes.com
run by Attorney Phil J. Berg. Based on his research to date (this
update made 24 Aug 2010) Berg maintains the following:
* The United States Constitution mandates the President
of the United States must be a United States “natural born”
Citizen – Article II, Section I;
* Obama was born in Mombasa, in what is now Kenya, Africa;
* Obama’s legal name is Barry Soetoro;
* Obama is an Indonesian Citizen as he was adopted/acknowledged
by his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian Citizen; and
* The Healthcare bill (ObamaCare) signed into Law by Obama on
March 23, 2010 is unconstitutional and voidable
since he is ineligible to serve as President of the United States.
Obama is literally America's first illegal alien president,
a complete imposter, and should be impeached immediately.
He is a living testament to how most Americans are being cruelly
deceived by their controlled national media most of the time.
Attorney Phil Berg explains the case against Obama
Notes from the video above, posted to YouTube
12 Oct 2008: Introductory Titles: "On 21 Aug 2008 Phil
Berg filed a lawsuit against Barack Obama claiming he was not qualified
to become President of the United States because he is not a natural
born citizen. The case requires Obama to present birth documents
proving otherwise. Senator Obama has not complied." Phil Berg: "...Obama cannot produce a birth
certificate, because the birth certificate he would produce [from
actually having been born in Kenya] would indicate that he is not
a natural born citizen of the United States...It does not matter
if he was born in Hawaii or not [according to Obama's story], because
if he was born here, he lost his natural-born citizenship. How do
you lose your United States citizenship? Well what happened is Obama's
mother divorced the father. After that she remarried. She remarried
Lolo Soetoro from Indonesia. They got married here in the United
States. In his book, Obama states "My stepfather went back
to Indonesia before I did, and when I got there, I went immediately
to school there." And he spent four years in school. Significant
at that time was Indonesia was at war. The only people who could
go to school in Indonesia were people that were citizens of Indonesia.
So therefore his stepfather had to do one of two things to get him
to school. He had to adopt him, or he had to acknowledge him. If
he did either one, that is how he went to school. Now we have records
--it is on my web site-- we have the school record, indicating his
name is Barry Soetoro, his nationality is Indonesia, and his religion
is Islam. That is how he went to school there. Indonesia at that
time did not provide for dual citizenships. So he was now a citizen
of Indonesia. The only thing he could have done at that time when
he came back, he could have gone through immigration to come back
to the United States. We don't believe he did that. If he did do
that, then he would be a naturalized citizen at that point, not
natural born any more, even if he was natural born in the first
instance, therefore a naturalized citizen is not natural born, and
cannot be President of the United States... Not only is Obama trying
to dismiss this case under legal technicalities, which are proper,
but also it is an outrage that the Democratic National Committee
has joined in with Obama in these motions. Why is it an outrage?
Because the Democrat National Committee has a different role. I
believe they have a role to all Democracts in this country, and
all citizens in this country, to make sure that they put forth qualified
candidates. And when this law suit was filed, if they did not know
about it before, they knew about it when they were served, and I
feel they had an obligation to go to Obama and say "produce
credentials to us, and if you cannot produce them to us --"
they should have taken the next step and removed them from the ballot
and they can substitute a candidate for president. So to join together
with Obama, to hide from the public facts which should be presented
is a disgrace..[on the flip side, contending Republican candidate
John McCain, who was born in the Canal Zone, immediately released
his birth certificate]..on the other hand you have Obama, who has
refused to release any records. And in my Federal court case, he
is hiding behind legalisms, which although proper, it is a disgrace
because I think the people in the United States deserve to know
where you were born, where you are a citizen from, and what is going
on, why are you hiding your background... I think he is a fraud
and he doesn't have these documents to produce. Obama has also refused
to release his medical records, his records from college, Occidental
College, Columbia University, and Harvard Law School. This is significant
because these documents might say where he is really a citizen from.
Many of us would release this information to future employers, and
we as citizens are going to employ Obama or McCain as President
of the United States...My question to Barack Obama is this, if you
are a natural born citizen, what are you hiding?
Here
is the evidence, the terrifying truth, behind my radio ad called
"BARACK'S DANGEROUS BLACKMAILABILITY" First,
this: The Jewish psychopaths want ONLY blackmailable puppet candidates
for president. A "Mister Clean," especially one with
charisma, leadership and organizational ability, would have to
be eliminated. Information
coming out suggests that the actual father of Barack (it is hard
to call him "Obama" after you read the below) was the
black communist Franklin Marshall Davis, whom Barack physically
strongly resembles. However, a deal was perhaps cut where another
black, the African Barack Obama (now called "Obama, Senior"),
claimed paternity of Barack, perhaps so he could stay in America.
(He married the pregnant Ann Dunham in 1961 and left her in 1963.)
Worse,
Stanley Ann Dunham apparently engaged in many ménages à
trois with Davis and his white socialite wife. Someone at least
took the nude photos seen further below. I
have no desire to dash the soaring hopes of blacks about finally
getting a "black president," but due to his extreme
blackmailability Barack will have to be a total slave to the Jewish
masters of the media, finance and politics. Unlike
the truly great Marcus Garvey of the 1920s, who wanted blacks
to go "back to Africa," and found millions of black
and white supporters until J. Edgar Hoover, doing the Jews' bidding,
railroaded him into prison, Barack will HAVE to pursue black-white
"integration" to the harm of both races. How
else can one explain that Barack has spoken to the National Council
of La Raza, the Mexican immigrant organization, promising them
he will legalize 40 MILION ILLEGAL HISPANICS. These Mexicans are
taking unskilled jobs -- gardening, maids, babysitters, janitors,
etc. -- that blacks have had for 400 years! If
the Jewish psychopaths order Barack to attack Iran and start WWIII,
either he obeys or they pull the plug not only on his presidency
but even on his US citizenship! Technically, the man may actually
be an illegal alien himself!
Franklin Marshall Davis. Believed
to have been a porn writer, poet, communist, and possible
FBI informant. Many also believe that Davis is the real
biological father of Obama.
The Communist Manifesto
calls for "free love." Very permissive attitudes towards
ménages
à trois and porn writing would seem to
fit the orientation of "Bohemian Reds" (as opposed to
ferocious Stalinists, Trotskyites, or some other very authoritarian
or militant variety). Part of Karl Marx's logic was as follows:
since all humans (all featherless bi-peds found anywhere on the
planet) are theoretically literally equal, preserving family,
tribal, national, and racial lines through carefully thought-out
marriages does not matter. Eugenic mating allegedly does not matter
either. Furthermore, one can depend on a "collective"
like a village to raise the illegitimate offspring of wild liaisons
rather than a traditional family unit. Please note that the Rothschild
dynasty, which helped finance the mostly Jewish-led Bolshevik
movement, has practiced the extreme opposite of "free love"
for itself with well-planned marriages that preserve Jewish ethnic-genetic
interests and private estate wealth. Apparently they hope that
through "free love" the goyim (gentiles) will
recklessly invest or dissipate their DNA while conversely the
self-chosen can continue to use greater selectivity to make their
own gene pool more competitive over time.
Uncensored photo of a thoroughly
race-mixed family. Ann Dunham’s second husband was
Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian, with whom she bore a half-breed
daughter, Maya Kassandra Soetoro. Why would Barack Obama
have any reservations about making the entire U.S. just
as mixed?
Cruisin' with Larry Sinclair? In a speech before
the National Press Club, in a YouTube
clip, and in his Jeff
Rense interview, Larry Sinclair charged that he took
cocaine and had oral sex with Illinois state representative
Barack Obama in a limo between 3-8 Nov 1999. He has also
linked
Obama to the murder of alleged gay lover Donald Young, former
choir master at Obama's church. Barack Obama admitted
to teenage drug use in his 1995 autobiography called,
Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance
(David Dees satiric art, not an actual photograph).
Obama surrounded by other radical
leftists
Michael Savage rips into Janet Napolitano
Arch-neoconservative Michael
Savage (born Michael
Alan Wiener, in a Jewish family ) attacks Janet Napolitano,
Director of the Department of Homeland Security (strong
evidence of Jewish ties, if not ancestry, also her real sexual
orientation is a widespread topic of speculation) because of the
DHS list of suspected "terrorists" which includes what
Savage views as loyal, patriotic Americans. He also thinks Obama
& Co. may try to pull off another "Richstag Fire."
(See also Capt. May and Maj. Fox discussion of the serious danger
of a potential false flag operation above). Savage states: "I
have studied revolutions before. We have a revolution in this country.
Obama is a revolutionary. He has appointed one radical left winger
after another, in one department after another, and in one legal
position after another..." 2009-04-16 "Republicans
criticize report on right-wing groups" by Eileen
Sullivan, AP "WASHINGTON — Republicans on Wednesday said
a Homeland Security Department intelligence assessment unfairly
characterizes military veterans as right-wing extremists. House
Republican leader John Boehner described the report as offensive
and called on the agency to apologize to veterans. The agency's
intelligence assessment, sent to law enforcement officials last
week, warns that right-wing extremists could use the bad state of
the U.S. economy and the election of the country's first black president
to recruit members. The assessment also said that returning military
veterans who have difficulties assimilating back into their home
communities could be susceptible to extremist recruiters or might
engage in lone acts of violence. `To characterize men and women
returning home after defending our country as potential terrorists
is offensive and unacceptable,' said Boehner, R-Ohio."
2009-04-15 "Napolitano
Stands Behind Extremism Report"(Washington
Times) "...She stands by the report sent to law enforcement
that lists veterans as a terrorist risk to the U.S. and defines
`rightwing extremism” as including groups opposed to abortion
and immigration.'
Obama as the triumph of style over substance
2008-11-06 No
He Can't A black libertarian lady explains why the
Obama phenomenon is all about modern liberal "feel good"
politics and little else. 2008 Obamanable
Showmanby H. Millard
Obama as a product of the corrupt Chicago
political machine
2009001-26 Chicago
Shakedown: How Close Is Obama? by Victor Thorn, American
Free Press
2008-10-07 The
Real Obama by black Stanford fellow Dr. Thomas Sowell.
" The story of Obama's political career is not a pretty story.
He won his first political victory by being the only candidate on
the ballot-- after hiring someone skilled at disqualifying the signers
of opposing candidates' petitions, on whatever technicality he could
come up with. Despite his words today about `change' and `cleaning
up the mess in Washington,' Obama was not on the side of reformers
who were trying to change the status quo of corrupt, machine politics
in Chicago and clean up the mess there. Obama came out in favor
of the Daley machine and against reform candidates. Senator Obama
is running on an image that is directly the opposite of what he
has been doing for two decades. His escapes from his past have been
as remarkable as the great escapes of Houdini."
Obama's Marxist-socialist tendencies
2009-08-21 Voight:
Is Obama creating a civil war in America? "Be
outraged, [Academy Award-winning Actor Jon] Voight advises. `Do
not let the Obama administration fool you with all their cunning
Alinsky methods. And if you don’t know what that method is,
I implore you to get the book Rules for Radicals, by Saul
Alinsky . Mr. Obama is very well trained in these methods,' he continues,
citing a television campaign critical of the Republican Party and
contentious town-hall meetings about health care reform. `The real
truth is that the Obama administration is professional at bullying,
as we have witnessed with ACORN at work during the presidential
campaign. It seems to me they are sending down their bullies to
create fist fights among average American citizens who don’t
want a government-run health care plan forced upon them,' Mr. Voight
says. `So I ask again. Is President Obama creating a civil war in
our own country?'”
2009-04-27 American
Capitalism Gone with a Whimper by Stanislav Mishkin.
"...Then came Barack Obama's command that GM's (General Motor)
president step down from leadership of his company. That is correct,
dear reader, in the land of "pure" free markets, the American
president now has the power, the self given power, to fire CEOs
and we can assume other employees of private companies, at will..."
2009-04-05 How
Freedom Was Lost by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts. "[The]
first step in the enserfment of the American people was taken in
envy. The rich were the targets of the income tax. Once in place,
the income tax was extended by law and by inflation until ordinary
people were being taxed at rates several times as high as the original
top rate for the rich."
2009-03-19 House
adopts plan for 'volunteer' corps Also requires new evaluation of
'mandatory' service for all by Bob Unruh. Also known
as the "Obama Brigade," or the "Generations Invigorating
Volunteerism and Education Act" or just H.R. 1388. "Many,
however, are raising concerns that the program, which is intended
to include 250,000 `volunteers,' is the beginning of what President
Obama called his `National Civilian Security Force' in a a speech
last year in which he urged creating an organization as big and
well-funded as the U.S. military. He has declined since then to
elaborate." Communism is all about central planning, and the
creation of government-directed industrial armies is specifically
mentioned in the Communist Manifesto. Regimented social service
operations are similar in concept.
2008-11-11 Are
We There Yet, Are We There Yet? Let's Check Marx and Engels's List
by Robert Higgs. Unfortunately many Americans have already been
heavily conditioned to accept the philosophical underpinnings of
Marxism. They are inclined to blindly follow the Obama Pied Piper.
2008
The Great Slave Revolt of 2008 by H. Millard
2008-20-21
Obama’s Wealth Redistribution “Tragedy”
By James Edwards
2008-10-28 Obama
Would Raise Taxes Starting at $6,100 by James Buchanan
Obama & handlers steal white sovereignty
rights
The
term "sovereignty," in the abstract, means the capacity
of a people to determine their own destiny. People who enjoy full
sovereignty rights are able to maximize their ability to live in
their own nation, with their own values, run by their own people
(the ones most likely to promote their long term welfare and prosperity),
with an indigenous culture that helps them to rise to their highest
level of achievement. People who lack sovereignty rights are typically
subjugated and oppressed by an alien, dominant power. They stand
a much greater chance of living lives of frustration and degradation,
and even getting marginalized into extinction (or to put it more
bluntly, getting "genocided.") . See for example, "Are
We The Kurds of the Future?" by Kevin Strom. See also
my commentary for question 20 "Why
should a society have the right to determine it's own destiny?"
in my "Have
You Been Brainwashed?" quiz. Please note how I discuss
the McKinsey 7-S model (conceptually applicable to the survival
and success of nations as well as small companies), and how the
elements that promote sovereignty are both intangible (for example
shared culture, history, race and ethnicity, and superordinate goals)
and tangible (for example right to tax, make treaty alliances with
other powers, control financial system, maintain armed forces and
make war, control borders, form ones own government, and select
own people to control strategic bases of the society such as media,
banking, military, and industry). Barack
Hussein Obama II has voiced support for black nationalist goals
while a twenty plus year member of Rev Wright's "God damn America"
black church. While as an "international
nationalist" I think it is perfectly healthy for blacks
to support black nationalism, I have serious problems with someone
promoting such goals as President of the United States at the expense
of whites. It would be much more appropriate for Obama to run for
president of Kenya, Nigeria, or the Congo where his ethnic
genetic interests would be much more closely aligned with those
of the host population. Worse,
just as affirmative action is in actuality a theft of the white
right to meritocracy and the basic right to enjoy opportunities
proportional to talent and hard work, Obama's occupancy of the White
House steals from whites many of their most important sovereignty
tools required to control their own destiny. One
of the most basic axioms of Right Wing 101 is that the closer people
tend to be towards each other in race and ethnicity, the greater
the odds that they will have a mutualist/altruistic relationship,
and conversely, the greater the ethnic-genetic distance, the greater
the risk that a parasitic or predatory relationship will eventually
develop. This is one reason why it is much safer for people to have
individuals of their own racial and ethnic group manning the strategic
bases of power over them. Obama robs white Americans of their right
to a white leader that defends white priorities and white values.
In fact, he openly and actively supports Jewish control of national
media, banking, and American foreign policy at the expense of white
American interests. He certainly does not promote or even defend
indigenous European culture and indigenous Indo-European religion.
Instead, he has been closely associated with both the Muslim and
Christian religions at different times in his life, both of which
are universalistic, left wing religions developed by alien Semitic
peoples. Please see my further discussion of this issue in my mutualism
vs. parasitism section, to include my analysis of Jewish
criminal totalitarian psychopathology --which Obama is in bed
with. We
can expect the Obama regime to push America even further in the
direction of "parasite government" as depicted below,
as opposed to "productive government." Please also see
some of my other diagrams contrasting productive vs. parasite modes
for citizenship and morality. They are also included in my mutualism
vs. parasitism discussion.
Productive Government ..................................................
.....
Parasite Government ..................................................
Protects lives, property, and human rights
Maliciously destroys lives and property, undermines civil
liberties
Renders socially useful services in proportion to the taxes
it collects. Eliminates waste.
Grows bureaucracy and waste while raising taxes regardless
of services rendered to taxpayers
Increases government accountability and transparency, protects
whistle-blowers. Demystifies its processes and makes itself
open to grass roots input.
Ruthlessly suppresses any criticism or any challenges to power.
Creates a sense of religious awe about itself to stifle objective
criticism. Launches ideological crusades without concrete justifications.
This is typically done as a smokescreen to hide corruption and
special privileges for crony groups.
Demonstrates consistent principles and inspires admiration
both at home and abroad
Practices extreme double standards and inspires hatred and
loathing at home and around the world
Serves the interests of honest, competent, hard-working, loyal
people in society, to include their vital cultural and genetic
interests
Serves a few narrow corrupt and disloyal interests at expense
of everyone else. Undermines the cultural and racial coherence
of core population.
Policies favor strong domestic economic development and job
creation, to include the steady strengthening of the technological
and manufacturing base.
Runs down domestic manufacturing base while empowering potential
enemies
Foments international distrust through unnecessary aggressive
wars, deception, barbaric practices such as torture, use of
DU Weapons of Mass Destruction on helpless civilians, etc.
Maintains the value of currency, honors commitments to retirees,
eliminates unnecessary cash drains on taxpayer
Debauches the currency, cripples or bankrupts country with
debt
Protects productive capabilities of the private sector or
at least leaves it alone
Genetic viewpoint: . . In
my environmental
vs genetics article, I discuss the landmark Mankind Quarterly
article "Zoological
Subspecies of Man" by Dr. Norman Hall which argues that
tribalism and "racism" occur naturally in virtually
all other mammalian species besides man, to include monkeys, rats,
and moose. In his book A New Theory of Evolution, the
famous British Anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith argued that tribalism
and racism persist as genetic traits because they have served
a positive evolutionary function in primitive environments to
help Evolutionary Breeding Units (EBU's), or tribes, preserve
their superior genetic characteristics compared to less successful
EBU's. . . Given that racism has a genetic
basis, we should not be surprised then when we see repeated failures
by leftist states and modern liberal media to eradicate it. Communism
not only failed to erase ethnicity in the former Yugoslavia and
former Soviet Union, but paradoxically helped create tremendous
ethnic and racial "blow-back." . . .Even interracial marriage can
create dangerous complications rather than blended racial solutions.
According to Dr. Lothrop Stoddard in The Rising Tide of Color,
the mixture of whites and Indians in South America created Mestizo
classes that often acted more like a third race rather than a
resultant race. Instead of solving the two-way white vs. Indian
racial conflict, race mixing often created new three-way conflicts
and an even bigger mess. Mestizos have often swung back and forth
between whites and Indians in their political loyalties, adding
to the political instability that has generally plagued latin
American regimes.
. . . Also, in his work The French Revolution in Santo Domingo,
Dr. Stoddard explained how the mixture of French colonial whites
and blacks in Haiti created a mulatto class that eventually sided
with blacks to exterminate all the whites on the island. Later
the pure blacks waged a campaign to purify the island of mulattoes.
All of this took place before in the early 1800's long before
the advent of the Ku Klux Klan, Nazi Party, another white supremacist
groups that Jewish organizations such as the ADL would have us
believe are at the root of all our racial problems. . . .The Jewish British Prime Minister
Benjamin Disraeli once summed it up when he said, ""The
racial question is the key to world history…all is race,
there is no other truth." Ironically, his Jewish brethren
who run America's controlled
national media simultaneously promote extreme anti-racism
in their programming directed at gentiles, while privately among
themselves they practice virulently pro-Jewish racist support
for Israel and other Members of the Tribe everywhere around the
world. (If these double standards confuse you, please skip down
to the last paragraph in this discussion for an informative link).
. . .In regard to the bullet point:
"When a group falls below 75% of the total population, instability
and fission climb," this 75% figure is not carved in stone,
but rather is an intuitive number that I derived from reading
Chapter 15 "Bloody Lessons of Tribal Europe" of Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup of America by Tom Chittum
(carried by America First Books). The following extract from Civil
War Two helps to explain this point:
. . . . . .The
lesson is clear: The more monoethnic a European nation is, the
more likely it is to be peaceful and stable. The more multiethnic
a European nation is, the more likely it is to experience tribal
civil wars. There is simply no real arguing with this brutal
fact . . .[p. 131]
. . .[Chittum provides a list of European countries that depicts
their percentages of ethnic minorities. The most multi-ethnic
country of Bosnia experienced the most civil war dead. The least
multi-ethnic were the most stable and generally devoid of civil
war. The quotation ahead commences on page 133]. . . . The most multiethnic European nation produced the most
multiethnic dead. If there had been only Moslems
residing in Bosnia, there would have been no civil war in Bosnia. . . . Is America a multi-tribal
country and therefore unstable? With each and every passing
day, more and more Americans of all ethnic groups are perceiving
their tribal affiliation as more self-definitive and more important
than their common American nationality. By this measure we are
increasingly unstable. . . .More bad news: Of the European
countries, the median size of the most numerous ethnic group
is 89%. In America, the most numerous ethnic group (the English-speaking
whites) is only 75% of the total population and falling. By
this measure, America is again not as internally stable as most
European nations. Twelve European nations have primary ethnic
groups that are 75% or less of their total population. Seven
of these twelve nations are fighting wars, are occupied, or
have internal secessionist terrorists. . . .More bad news: Of the European
countries, the median size of the second largest ethnic group
is 5%. In America, our second largest ethnic group (the blacks)
is 12%. By this measure, America is again not as stable as most
European nations. Twelve European nations have secondary ethnic
groups that are 12% or more of the total population. Four are
fighting wars, two are occupied by foreign troops, one is fighting
internal terrorists. . . . More bad news: Of the European
countries, the median size of the third largest ethnic group
is 1%. In America, our third largest ethnic group (the Hispanics)
is 9%. By this measure, America is again not as stable as most
European nations. Two European nations have third ranking ethnic
groups that are 9% or more of the population. One is fighting
a civil war, the other occupied. . . .More bad news: In America,
88% of the people speak the most widely-used language (English)
as their primary language. Of the European countries, the median
size of this [p. 134] percentage is 94%. By this measure, America
is again not as stable as most European nations. . . .More bad news: There are now
about six million Moslems in America, and they are expected
to outnumber Jews by the end of this decade. America has been
described as a Judeo- Christian nation. Are we now to be a Judeo-Christian-Moslem
nation and all that it implies? The concept of freedom of religion
can absorb only so much cultural diversity. As the Moslem percentage
of the population grows, it is predictable that they will demand
and eventually get laws allowing polygamy, chopping off the
hands of criminals, death by stoning for adulterers, and the
host of other antique horrors Moslems embrace. In Miami, Dade
County has a special maintenance squad that cleans up dead chickens,
goats, lizards, voodoo powder, and other "hex" items
found each morning on the grounds of the county courthouse.
These items are ritually deposited there by adherents of the
Voodoo, Santeria, and similar religions whose members are appearing
before the court on various charges. Almost all are immigrants
from the Caribbean islands. Eventually, our diversity will increase
to the point that there will be no common basis for our laws.
That's why America is becoming an undemocratic imperial system,
and that's why we'll break up in a civil war.
. . .In regard to the
statement "Jewish national media masters
who promote white decline are hypocritical since they typically
favor the exact opposite for their own group in Israel compared
to Palestinians" [this statement is provided in another part of the "Have
You Been Brainwashed?" Quiz] please see the Aug 2000 Free
Speech online article "The
Nature of the Beast" by the late Dr. William Pierce.
This hypocrisy is part of an ancient PSYOPS (psychological operations)
formula that works as follows: "Be privately right wing among
members of your own tribe to maintain unity and cohesion, and
be publicly left wing towards people outside your tribe to make
them drop their guard and not oppose your own tribe." In
other words, preach steadfast and courageous in-group loyalty
for your own kinsmen (patriotism), and conversely preach peaceful
brotherly love and egalitarianism towards strangers (modern liberalism
and "liberal minority coalition politics"). Among Jews,
the formula in the early 20th century was "Zionism for us,
Communism for the gentiles." In my environmental
vs. genetic duality article, I discuss liberal minority coalition
politics in greater detail (please go to the site and enter the
search words "liberal minority" to pick up the thread).
Now that pure communism has become extremely shop worn in the
West, many formerly Trotskyite Jews have switched over to a new
schmiel called "neo-conservativism"
which has absolutely nothing to do with authentic American conservatism.
Please see The
High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper (carried
by America First Books) for more details on this amazing story.
...Who chooses what government we live under?
Those who cast the votes, or as Stalin observed, those who count
them? Do We The People pick those who govern us, or does a private
company, owned by the CIA controlled media, and operating without
any public oversight? Have We The People consented by vote to
bear the $65 trillion burden of a government's reckless fiscal
policy, or was that consent and that vote fraudulently obtained?
Just think about all it really means if the elections are being
rigged on a massive scale.
It means that the contract between ruler and ruled is broken.
The government does not govern with the consent of the governed,
it rules by treachery and deception. The crown it wears is a
stolen one, usurped from the people by three voting machine
companies and one media owned results-announcer totally beyond
review and reproach.
Obama as the reductio ad absurdum of the
flawed premises behind the Orwellian, Zionist-dominated, neo-Jacobin,
Multi-racial, Multi-Cultural, Welfare-Warfare, Global-Imperialist
Super State that Wages Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace
I
picked up the term "neo-Jacobin"
from Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, which describes perfectly the authoritarian
leftist establishment that has characterized the Federal government
ever since the King
Lincoln era. When power is diminished on a local level, it tends
to gravitate towards the center, and ever since the Federal government
crushed State's rights, we have suffered a trend towards ever more
unlimited central government. In addition, by 1861 the U.S. Government
became a full blown empire, since an empire by definition means
a government that insists upon holding together its provinces by
force rather than by voluntary consent. Ever since the inception
of the War Against Southern Independence, the U.S. Government has
steadily moved ever further towards the ideological left as it has
tried to rhetorically hold together the increasingly disparate peoples
cobbled together within its empire under the guise of righteously
defending "equality." A
prime foreign example of neo-Jacobin government in the "modern"
era was the government of Napoleon Bonaparte, which preached "Liberty,
Fraternity, and Equality" while controlling all the newspapers
in France and keeping a secret police spy on every block of Paris.
My 1957 Encyclopedia Britannica also identifies Napoleon's
government as a prime example of modern (leftist) fascism, especially
after it tried to create some kind of "United States of Europe"
through conquest. Neo-Jacobin
governments typically promise greater freedom on a rhetorical level
while taking it away in substance. The title of the book Emancipating
Slaves, Enslaving Free Men: A History of the American Civil War
by Dr. Jeffrey Hummel about the true legacy of the War of Northern
Aggression Against Southern Independence hints at this Orwellian
aspect of the neo-Jacobin state. Since the term "liberty"
originally meant simply "absence of the state," the use
of coercive state power and interventionism to promote "liberty
and freedom" or the absence of itself has got to have Orwellian
overtones. The
term "welfare-warfare
state" was coined by the libertarian writer Dr. Murray
Rothbard. It describes double-barrelled pork barrell government
in which politicians try to buy off their constituents with various
benefit programs, while enhancing loyalty to the state by waging
periodic wars ("War
is the health of the state" as Randolph Bourne observed,
since war gives the state tremendous opportunities to suppress dissent,
consolidate its power, and whip up patriotic emotion to aggrandize
itself). One example involves Otto von Bismarck, the German leader
who created a social welfare system to buy loyalty on the part of
German workers in order to make them more willing to serve as soldiers
for Greater Germany. Please
see my centralized
vs. decentralized discussion of "ponzi government"
where pork politicians stay in power by soaking taxpayers to pay
off special interests, who in turn give them campaign contribution
kick-backs to use for re-election campaigns. Pork politicians also
soak the financial system with deficit spending to buy votes through
social programs, creating a growing debt burden that will usually
eventually result in a financial crisis --hence the "ponzi"
lack of sustainability-- but they usually hope to be out of office
and retired by the time someone else has to worry about it.
"Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace" comes from the title
of a book by historian Harry Elmer Barnes and a more
recent work by Gore Vidal. In my centralized
vs. decentralized discussion, I discuss how a ponzi government
can morph into an evil government that periodically runs false flag
operations to start wars that help perpetuate its own existence.
Again "war is the health of the state," as George Orwell
also observed in 1984. I have been very active with Capt
Eric May trying to prevent a repeat 9/11 false flag operation
designed to further the cruelly exploitive power base of Obama's
good buddies, the Zionist neo-con "War
Party that never sleeps." America
has come a long way from the time of the American War of Independence.
This was essentially a libertarian revolution fought by people with
strong white racial and ethnic roots. Please see my commentary to
question 13 "Does
ethnic solidarity matter in the defense of liberty?"
in my "Have You Been Brainwashed?" quiz about the tremendous
rootedness of Americans descended from such groups as English Puritans,
Scots-Irish,
and German Rhine West Bank Protestants (misnamed "Pennsylvania
Dutch"). The
New Englanders provide one of the most striking examples of shared
ethnicity, culture, religion, and history. They were descended from
Puritans, who themselves mostly from eastern England, the most "Nordic"
part of the British isles, no doubt influenced by many waves of
immigration from Angles, Saxons, and Jutes (from Denmark and northern
Germany) and later influxes of Danish and Norwegian Vikings. New
England was effectively a "Nordic ethnostate." (See The
Cousin's Wars by Kevin Philips). Both the Puritans and their
New England descendants were a solidly middle class social phenomenon
with strong traditions of local self-government, similar to Scandinavian
societies. A large number of their ancestors fought for or supported
the "New
Model Army" of Oliver Cromwell and Parliament in the English
Civil War and echoed its unique blend of political and religious
radicalism combined with Spartan soldierly virtues. (As one interesting
anecdote provided by Philips, in one particular year during the
English Civil War, half of the graduating class at Harvard went
back to England to fight for Cromwell/Parliament). At the outset
of the American Revolution, Cromwell remained a big hero for most
New Englanders, and the patriot militias that fought at Lexington
and Concord and subsequently drove the British back into Boston
were to a large extent the resurrected Cromwellian "New Model
Army" fighting against Royalist absolutism. Ethnic
identity, roots, and solidarity began to quickly blur as America
moved westward. In order to rapidly conquer a continent and fend
off the countering imperial pretensions of the British, Spanish,
Mexicans, Russians, and French, American leaders adopted a fast
growth strategy that meant flooding America with disparate European
peoples to obtain quick cheap labor and achieve fast settlement
of Western land. This was basically the old Roman imperial social
model in disguise, and as a consequence American history has loosely
resembled that of the Roman Republic later morphing into the Roman
Empire and then even later becoming terminally corrupt. America
is now so far neo-Jacobin-leftist that it has become saddled with
a black president who is totally decoupled from the ethnic
genetic interests of its White Anglo-Saxon Protestant founders.
Obama promotes global interventionist policies that are totally
decoupled from the early American libertarian distrust of standing
armies, foreign entanglements, imperial bureaucracies, and other
structural threats to individual liberty. In
my "Resolving Opposing Political and Economic Ideologies"
introduction
I explain how America has moved diagonally away from "genetic
bottom up" to "environmental top down" category.
Today both "modern liberals" and "neo-cons"
are almost diametrically opposed on such issues as racial preferences,
global interventionism, and government spending compared to ideological
positions once held by classical liberals (early
Whigs) and Tory conservatives. I do not think any
of the Founding Fathers (whether Federalist, anti-Federalist,
or something else) would have been caught dead elevating a left
wing Negro to the top political position of their country or fighting
ruinous foreign wars on behalf of Jewish supremacist criminals at
the expense of their own society. Obama
is the slick poster boy culmination of a perverse historical transformation,
the tip of the ice berg of a thoroughly sick, deracinated, and fractured
society that cannot adequately defend itself from the continuing
massive illegal alien Mexican invasion across its southwest border
while at the same time devoting vast resources towards policing
Iraq's borders with Iran and Syria and Afghanistan's border with
Pakistan. But
it gets worse. Historically, leftist authoritarian governments have
been vastly more murderous than right wing fascist governments.
Simply count up the tens of millions of innocents slaughtered by
the Bolsheviks, Maoists, and Kymer Rouge and see what can come even
close. Things get even worse still when leftist authoritarian governments
are run very paranoid, racially alien leaders, such as when the
majority of Bolshevik leaders were comprised of Jews. Then the leftist
authoritarianism has a way of turning into a race war in disguise.
With the U.S. government today, we not only have the neo-Jacobin
ideology and NSPD-51-type martial law provisions in place (thanks
Bush!), but we are now ruled by an unholy alliance of both Negros
and Jews, with all the subconscious racial hatred, paranoia, and
envy towards whites that comes with both groups combined. . Not
good, my little Virginia. Not good at all.
Obama as a logical outgrowth of America's interracial "pet
adoption" craze
The
late "Birdman" Bryant
came up with an interesting analogy to describe America's current
racial situation. Back in the 1960's, when America was still 90%
white, the country was like a big white dog that decided to adopt
a lot of cute little black (Negro), brown (Hispanic), olive (Jewish),
and yellow (Asian) puppies. Now the big white dog has grown old
and tired, and all around him all his former "pets" are
now like full grown adults at least his size. Some of them have
become ornery and vicious and repeatedly shove aside or even snap
at the aged white dog step-father. I
have met quite a few white couples who have adopted cute little
non-white children with the same mentality held by many folks who
patroize pet stores and buy cute little kittens or puppies. Prodding
them along are many very left wing, super-universalistic Christian
churches who preach that interracial adoption is somehow highly
moral and desirable. (Please see my Religious
Crisis page for more discussion of various forms of liberal
Christian insanity). The idea that one's cute little nonwhite "pet"
can someday grow up to become President of the United States must
be a real thrill for many nonwhite pet owners across America who
secretly fear that they are acting like race traitors by allowing
their innate altruism to be parasitically invested in the support
of competing ethnic-genetic interests. A
variation on this theme has occurred when Federal bureaucrats have
"adopted" alien peoples and forcefully integrated them
into white society. For example, after the fall of South Vietnam,
Hmong tribesmen from Laos were resettled in lilly white Scandinavian
and German American communities in the northern Midwest. In the
aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, poor black folks from the greater
New Orleans area were redistributed by the Feds around America,
or to include deliberate efforts to infiltrate Mormon communities
in Utah considered "too white." Obama
himself has been "adopted." While living in Hawaii, he
was raised by his two white maternal grandparents. Some articles
appearing in The American Free Press and elsewhere claim
that that Obama has been adopted by New World Order plutocrats who
have recognized his potential as a "rising star" going
back at least a couple of decades. There
are some important fallacies behind the "interracial pet adoption"
concept. First, nonwhites are not "pets." They are people.
Treating them like "pets" is simply a more subtle form
of white supremacism. Secondly,
throughout history interracial adoption has been relatively "unnatural."
Most people in most eras have lived and reproduced within the context
of racially and ethnically homogeneous tribal units (or what the
late British anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith called "Evolutionary
Breeding Units --or EBU's). As I have already discussed elsewhere
on this web page, Keith argued that interracialism goes instinctively
against the grain because it erodes the genetic advantages held
by successful EBU's, analogous to the way small businesses must
internally reinvest cash flow and protect their property rights
relative to competitors to continue to grow and prosper. I have
also discussed "Zoological
Subspecies of Man" by Dr. Norman Hall which also
argues for an evolutionarily adaptive and instinctive basis for
human racism and other forms of tribalism. As
an interesting ironic side note regarding this issue, sometimes
the radical right and radical left are in greater agreement than
the so-called "center." As an example, back when I was
in college in the mid-1970's I once attended a discussion panel
that included the leader of a Communist organization. This Red condemned
"Operation Baby Lift," which was a scheme by the Ford
Administration to airlift Vietnamese orphans to America during the
collapse of South Vietnam. Presumably the Asian children would be
adopted by white parents. The Communist spokesman decried this as
an example of "imperialist kidnapping." Even more interesting,
Vietnam's Communist leaders subsequently showed their own racism
by expelling half-breed Vietnamese children created by liasons with
white and negro American servicemen. However, I must add that this
was probably a peculiar situation. Generally speaking, leftists
tend to be much more amenable to race-mixing than right wingers.
Obama as an accelerator of dysgenic decay
In
my environmental
vs. genetics discussion, I describe the importance of genetics
in human affairs. In his book The
Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions
Imperil Our Country and Civilization, Patrick
J. Buchanan describes how demographic trends threaten the very biological
existence of Western Civilization and all of its accomplishments
over the last 3,000 years --its music, culture, science, religion
--everything!. Obama's
influence can only reinforce the permanent dumbing down process
in America on an innate biological level, accelerating further the
extensive damage already done to the white gene pool as a consequence
of feminism (encourages more gifted women to have relatively fewer
children than stupid women), welfare programs (a negative eugenics
program where the U.S. government pays lazy and stupid women to
have proportionately more children than the general population),
and forced integration (encourages white women to miscegenate with
alien peoples, thereby increasing the ethnic-genetic fracturing
of a once productive, fairly homogeneous white society). The following
is an extract from my environmental
vs. genetics discussion.
Scientific support for genetic
differences
Thanks to the Internet, and the fact
that more Americans tend to become open to new ideas as the
country falls apart, accumulated scientific research on the
role of genetics is making a bigger impact. In fact, even
some national media are now following along kicking and screaming.
As one example Dan Seligman’s May 12, 2003 Forbes article:
“Professor
Rothman Strikes Again,” states, “In The IQ
Controversy: The Media and Public Policy (1988), Rothman and
Mark Snyderman collected data showing that the press overwhelmingly
attributed IQ differences in the population to various cultural
artifacts. The authors also surveyed 661 experts —
academic psychologists, cognitive scientists, test specialists
—
who decisively rejected these cultural explanations and collectively
stated that some 60% of IQ variance reflected the different
genes of the high and low scorers.”
Other experts weigh in higher. Dr. Arthur Jensen in Bias
In Mental Testing reports, "Estimates of
h² (ie., "broad heritability," which includes
all of the genetic variance) for various standardized tests
of intelligence vary from about .50 to .90 in different samples
and populations, with a central tendency close to .75."
(p. 244). In Intelligence and National Achievement,
Dr. Raymond Cattell reported, "The accumulating evidence
that 60-80% of intelligence should end... [a reluctance by
most people to believe that intelligence is substantially
inherited]. It is about as heritable as stature. By shifting
from a generation with poor nutrition to one very well fed
we can get a shift of average stature from about 5 ft. 7 ins.
to 5 ft. 9 ins., but you cannot go on doing this."
Some of the best evidence to remove "environmental noise"
comes from studies of identical twins who have been separated
at birth and raised in different environments. The April 13,
1987 U.S. News & World Report
article "The Gene Factor" provided the following
examples where the Minnesota Center for Twin and Adoption
Research compared hundreds of identical twins against the
general population and analyzed statistical variation. The
percentages below show how much the traits are determined
by heredity:
Extroverts
are born, not made
Extroversion
Mixes easily, affable, likes to be the center
of attention
61%
Conformity
Respect tradition and authority, follows the rules
60%
Worry
Easily distressed and frustrated, feels vulnerable and
sensitive
55%
Creativity
Tendency to become lost in thought and abstraction
55%
Paranoia
Keeps to oneself, feels exploited, thinks "world
is out to get me"
55%
Optimism
Confident, cheerful, upbeat
54%
Cautiousness
Avoids risks and dangers, takes safe route even if more
difficult
51%
Aggressiveness
Tends to be physically violent, has a taste for revenge
48%
Ambitiousness
Works hard at setting and achieving goals, a perfectionist
46%
Orderliness
Plans carefully, tries to make rational decisions
43%
Intimacy
Prefers emotional closeness
33%
Another interesting percentage worth considering is contained
in the 1991
study, by J.M. Bailey and R.C. Pillard, which found a
.52 genetic contribution to male homosexuality.
Dr. William M. Fox reports in his book American
Values Decline (offered by America First
Books) evidence for strong heritability among criminals as
well:
...[A] Swedish study involved 1,775 adopted
men and women who were born between 1930 and 1949. Of the men
who had been born to law-abiding parents and reared in good
adoptive homes, only 3 percent had been convicted of a crime.
Of those born to law-abiding parents and reared in unfavorable
adoptive homes, 7 percent had been convicted. However, of those
who had been born to a convicted parent and reared in good adoptive
homes, 12 percent had been convicted, and of those born to a
convicted parent and reared, in unfavorable adoptive homes,
the rate soared to 40 percent!" [from Jerry E. Bishop,
"Probing the Cell: Researchers Close in On Some Genetic
Bases of Antisocial behavior," The Wall Street
Journal, February 12, 1986, page 19.]
What makes discussion of racial issues tricky for many people
is the fact that genetic traits in populations tend to manifest
themselves as bell-shaped statistical curves. This makes sense,
since genetic traits originate with DNA molecules, which in
turn are continually replicating. Most DNA will perfectly replicate
most of the time, but we can inevitably expect slight errors
from mutation and other causes on each side of the norm. These
errors decline in frequency the more they deviate from the norm,
creating a bell-shaped distribution.
Hence, when we compare groups on a genetic level, we have to
compare statistical bell-shaped curves for one group against
averages for another. People who try to confuse a genetic issue
often use the technique of favorably comparing someone on the
right hand side of a bell-shaped curve that characterizes one
population group with people in the left hand side of a different
bell-shaped population. This can disguise the fact that the
first population taken as a whole may be decidedly inferior
to the second population group.
The 22 Jan 2006 National Vanguard article "Multiracialists
Are Crazy Part 3 carried overlapping IQ graphs that illustrate
the differences between blacks and whites. These data are taken
from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth, Version 1. According
to The
Bell Curve, by Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray,
these kinds of overall population differences have persisted
despite massive resources expended by environmentalists to eradicate
them.
The differences between white and black
populations involve far more than skin color and IQ test
results. There are also significant differences in brain
structure. For example, frontal lobe development is correlated
with abstract intelligence, and whites have a higher ratio
of frontal lobe to anterior lobe area compared to blacks.
They also have a larger average brain
size, a higher density of cerebral folding, and other
anatomical features that correlate with greater intelligence,
as noted
by such researchers as Dr. Carleton S. Coon, Dr. F. W. Vint,
and Dr. C. J. Connoly.
In his book The External Morphology of the Primate
Brain, that involved a study of 60 brains
of whites and negroes, Dr. Connoly observed:
"Comparing the two large groups of Whites
and Negroes, while the variability is large and there is much
overlapping, the mean values reveal significant differences.
The dimensions correlate well with what we might expect from
a knowledge of the cranium in the two races. The Negro brain
is on the average relatively longer, narrower, and flatter than
the brain of the Whites. The frontal region, as measured by
the projectional distance to midpoint of central sulcus, is,
relative to the total length of the brain, larger in male Whites
than in Negroes, while the parietal is larger in Negroes than
in Whites . . . . It can be said that the pattern of the frontal
lobes in the White brains of our series is more regular, more
uniform than in the Negro brain . . . . The White series is
perhaps slightly more fissurated and there is more anastomosing
of the sulci . . . . It is a matter of frequencies."
Obviously one can find examples of blacks
on the extreme right end of the bell curve who are smarter
than most whites. But one needs to compare both curves together
to really grasp the significant population differences.
The graph shows a vastly greater number of people with IQ's
over 120 who are whites who are able to provide intelligent
leadership to society. In contrast, the black population
is weighed down with a vastly larger number of border-line
mentally retarded people.
The graph also explains why intermarrying black and white
populations of equal size results in a disaster for any
society that wants to remain a technologically advanced
First World country. If total population size is kept constant,
the number of people with IQ's over 120 drops by 90%.
We can use the bell curve concept to not only compare two
different populations, but also get a sense regarding how
a particular characteristic might be graduated along a spectrum
within a population group. As an example, in his diffusion
of innovations theory, Everett M. Rogers suggested that
the bell curve (presumably for white people) might be divided
as follows: innovators (2.5%), early adopters (13.5%), early
majority (34%), late majority (34%) and laggards (16%).
Obviously an advanced technological society capable of sustainable
innovation, scientific analysis, and rational political
institutions needs to maintain relatively higher percentages
of the first few categories on an innate genetic level than
various stagnant Third World countries.
Barack
Obama also personifies the advanced stage of dysgenic decay described
in Dr. Elmer Pendell's book Why Civilizations Self-Destruct,
where charlatans and sociopaths are more likely to rise to
the top of a population that has become too degraded to keep them
in check. As I also observe in my environmental
vs. genetic duality discussion:
A basic model
for understanding the evolution of genetic differences
For starters it is critical to understand
how different geographic environments (or "environmental
stresses") sculpture the distributions of traits in
human gene pools in different ways, and how these gene pools
can degrade over time. Here I am using "environment"
to mean a physical environment such as an Ice Age glacier
or a sub-saharan jungle. These physical environments tend
to select people in different ways. This use of the word
"environment" to mean a geological environment
that selects for human genes in a certain way is different
from the use of the word "environmental" used
at the beginning of this article to mean "learned"
or "nurtured" behavior.
In his landmark work Why
Civilizations Self-Destruct, Dr. Elmer Pendell
explained that human gene pools are subject to the Second
Law of Thermodynamics, just like other animals. This law
states that chemical reactions in the universe tend towards
greater randomness. This applies to chemical reactions that
sustain life processes inside the human cell and replicate
DNA. In other words, in the absence of natural selection,
animals that reproduce at a zero population growth rate
accumulate dysfunctional mutations and other forms of genetic
load over time and suffer gradual and continual degradation
in their abilities. Because of this deteriorative pressure,
Dr. Pendell believed that animal species only achieve bare
survival equilibrium with their geological environment.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics prevents populations from
developing capabilities in excess of the selective pressures
of their physical environment.
Dr. Pendell believed that Ice Age environments imposed vastly
more severe demands on human problem solving skills than
tropical environments. Humans who lacked the ability to
create winter survival technology and who also lacked the
ability to delay gratification to prepare in the summer
for the winters tended to get killed off at a faster rate.
This skewed the innate traits of frost zone gene pools towards
technological adapativeness.
In contrast, human groups that remained in temperate zones
failed to develop this greater technological adapativeness.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics kept them in bare equilibrium
survival with the lower requirements of their physical environment.
One might see an analogy with the case of the dodo bird.
A group of dodos once flew into a particular tropical-zone
island where there no ground predators. As dodos established
their home on this island, the ones which remained capable
of flight had no particular survival advantage over birds
incapable of flight. Over time, mutations which inhibited
flight spread through the dodo bird population. By the time
European sailors discovered the island, no dodos could fly
anymore. Non-flight "genetic load" had saturated
the dodo population. Sailors could grab dodos off the ground
at will, and they quickly became extinct.
In his landmark book My
Awakening, Dr. David Duke provides an
excellent summary of the selective differences between frost
zone and sub-Saharan African conditions (p. 93):
Prehistoric
European-Asian Conditions
Prehistoric
Sub-Saharan Africa
complex-sturdy shelter-critical
minimal shelter needed for survival
winter —
extremely harsh climate
no winter —
comfortable climate
warm, well-made clothing —
critical
no clothing required for survival
ability to make/control fire —
critical
fire not required for survival
long periods of resource deprivation
resources more abundant
periods of little vegetation, few small animals
or birds —
hunting necessary
food gathering less problematic in tropical
climes —
gathering favored
foresight, planning and delayed gratification
necessary for survival
little seasonal change, immediate gratification
favored
in resource scarce, male-provisioned, hunting
society, monogamy favored
in female provisioned gathering society, polygamy
favored
male provisioned society, less sexual and physical
aggression favored
female provisioned society favors male aggression
and sexual drive
promiscuous behavior resulting in fights often
leads to death of mate and children
death in fights from sexual competition not
critical for survival of mates and children
Evolutionary sculpturing
of territorial needs and chivalrous instincts:
Dr. Duke provides some extended discussion
to explain the evolutionary impact of frost zones that is
well worth reading. He notes on page 92:
During most of the last 80,000 years, Europe
endured temperatures much colder than today. Modern Europeans
emerged about 35,000 years ago and met the crucible of the Wurm
glaciation (24,000-10,000 B.C.). Temperatures in Europe and
Asia probably averaged around 18 degrees (F) colder than the
present.
We see significant technological adaptiveness and comparatively
higher IQs among all races or racial subgroups that have had
a significant frost zone sculpturing tenure, including eskimos,
Japanese, and Mongols. Conversely, we see a relative lack of
technological adapativeness among tropical peoples. Another
example besides Negroes are the Piraha Tribe of the Amazon,
which has proven completely incapable
of learning how to add 1 + 1 despite months of instruction by
anthropologists.
Professor J.
Philippe Rushton has put together the IQ map provided below
that illustrate his article: "Winters
Are Good For Your Genes: Lynn Book Finds World Average IQ
90, Declining From North To South."
I would like to interject my personal view that the frost zone
evolutionary environment likely sculptured temperamental traits
in many other areas besides an aptitude for technological problem
solving.
It appears that whites in general, and the Nordic branch of
Caucasoids in particular, have lived for a longer evolutionary
period than other races under extremely dispersed conditions
near Ice Age glaciers in relatively small family or tribal units.
The key selective factors involved man vs. nature technological
innovation themes. Man vs. man guile or artful sociability was
probably not a particularly significant factor. In fact, in
some ways it probably helped to err on the side of having a
high sense of individual territoriality to prevent competitors
from stealing ones food in cold winters.
A vivid anecdotal example of this behavior is described at the
beginning of a book called Sissu about
the Finnish Winter War against the Soviets. According to a folk
tale, which was perhaps apocryphal, a Finn heard that someone
wanted to build a cabin several miles away. He pulled out his
puukku knife to go kill him because he felt the stranger was
invading his territory.
In his essay "The
History of Freedom in Antiquity," the eminent British
19th century historian Lord Acton commented on how a strong
need for personal freedom is very ancient among white people:
According to a famous saying of the most famous authoress
of the continent, Liberty is ancient; and it is Despotism
that is new. It has been the pride of recent historians to
vindicate the truth of that maxim. The heroic age of Greece
confirms it, and it is still more conspicuously true of Teutonic
Europe. Wherever we can trace the earlier life of the Aryan
nations we discover germs which favouring circumstances and
assiduous culture might have developed into free societies.
They exhibit some sense of common interest in common concerns,
little reverence for external authority, and an imperfect
sense of the function and supremacy of the state. Where the
division of property and of labour is incomplete, there is
little division of classes and of power...
In his book Body Language, Julius
Fast talks about how people from Northern Europe stand much
further apart from each other in their conversations. Interpersonal
interactions among Nordic peoples often strike others as being
a bit stuffy and distant. As a rule of thumb, as one heads further
south in Europe, people stand increasingly closer to each other
in conversation, and have more informal protocols. It is not
uncommon for Mediterranean fathers to hug and kiss their own
sons and kiss other men, which is unheard of in northern countries.
Going further south, Julius Fast points out how Arabs stand
very close to each other. To deny an Arab your breath is to
insult him.
This very different sense of personal territoriality among population
groups has political implications. "Human rights"
is probably related to an instinctive requirement to preserve
significant personal territory before government.
The origin of the cultural and behavioral trait of chivalry
is also an important issue. In "The Passing
of the Great Race" Madison Grant wrote (page
168).
The Nordics are, all over the world, a race
of soldiers, sailors, adventurers and explorers, but above all,
of rulers, organizers, and aristocrats in sharp contrast to
the essentially peasant and democratic character of the Alpines.
The Nordic race is domineering, individualistic, self reliant,
and jealous of their personal freedom both in political and
religious systems and as a result they are usually Protestants.
Chivalry and knighthood and their still surviving but greatly
impaired counterparts are peculiarly Nordic traits and feudalism,
class distinctions and race pride among Europeans are mainly
traceable for the most part to the north." (p. 228).
The social status of woman varies largely with race, but here
religion plays a part. In the Roman Republic and in Ancient
Germany women were held in high esteem. In the Nordic Countries
of today, women's rights have received much more recognition
than among the southern nations with their tradition of Latin
culture." (p. 228).
Chivalrous competition is very common among
frost zone mammals such as wolves, reindeer, foxes, bears, and
bears. One of the greatest threats to chivalry is parasitism.
While parasitism is very common in tropical environments, where
animals are close enough for parasites to easily hop from host
to host, the high degree of animal dispersion in Arctic environments
works in the opposite direction.
In chivalrous competition, males will spar to compete for females.
They compete just enough to show dominance, but refrain from destroying
the loser by drawing blood. This enables the more fit males to
disproportionately reproduce, thereby maintaining the strength
of the herd. However, by not killing off the weaker males, the
herd retains the greater safety of numbers to ward off packs of
predators.
Chivalrous government is an anomaly among most human societies.
Most human societies around the planet become very pyramidal is
they become very large. The people at the top typically become
increasingly vicious to fend off any real or perceived competitors.
We can see how chivalrous instincts must be spread among the general
population in order for Western Civilization to become viable.
Parliamentary debate depends on the ability of individuals to
voice their dissent without getting assassinated. The right to
face ones accusers in a trial by jury depends upon not being up
against vicious mafia groups who ruthlessly kill off all witnesses.
Scientific debate requires the ability to advance a new theory
that contradicts leading scientists without losing ones job.
In order for competitive free markets and for free enterprise
capitalism to remain viable, both the government and the largest
corporations must refrain from using their power to viciously
squeeze out competitors and rig the markets.
One reason why America is breaking down, incidentally, is the
increase in vicious, anti-chivalrous behavior throughout society.
We see this in the case of people who lose their jobs for voicing
not politically correct opinions. In contrast, back in the early
19th century chivalrous values once made America once of the most
admired countries on earth.
Today America has become despised around the world. The
High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper
documents how America's foreign policy has been high-jacked by
Jewish neo-cons who viciously
smear all domestic critics of their influence. Torture, which
is very commonly used by Israelis against Palestinians, is now
widely used overseas by Americans.
An interesting indicator of America's depravity involves the sad
case of Jewish spokesman and national media darling Dr. Alan Dershowitz.
He hardly ennobles either the Harvard University faculty or America's
Jewish community. He has artfully tried to reduce public repugnance
towards the use of torture
and has viciously attacked
his colleague Dr. Stephen Walt, former Dean of Harvard's Kennedy
School of Government, for the report
co-authored with Dr. John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago
that criticizes the Jewish Lobby's role in American foreign policy.
Critics of Jews have historically viewed them as an an alien racial
group instinctively incapable of acting like chivalrous gentlemen.
For over two thousand years their evolutionary history has been
focused on man vs. man competition where they have been outsiders
in highly urbanized environments forced to live by their wits.
Critics such as Henry Ford in his International Jew
series claim that Jews as a group are more likely to produce a
disproportionate number of people who are prone to engage in covert,
deceitful, vicious, criminal, Mafia-like behavior. In business
they have a greater tendency to act as vicious monopolists. In
their view, Jews tend to be incompatible with chivalrous republican
government and principled free enterprise competition.
This has some similarities to Ralph Townsend's analysis in Ways
That Are Dark about the Chinese (offered by
America First Books). To him, it is no accident that
the Chinese are often referred to as "The Jews of the East."
For well over two thousand years the Chinese have endured conditions
of extreme deprivation and overcrowding, in which Darwinian survival
depended heavily on artful man vs. man diplomacy, to put it politely.
In addition to their considerable business acumen, Townsend claims
that the Chinese have an amazing capacity to ingratiate themselves
with Americans. They can quote high-minded platitudes of Confucius
one moment and then just as easily break their word with Westerners
the next. According to Townsend, writing in 1933, the Chinese
language has no real equivalent of the word "lie" that
carries with it any sense of the moral repugnance that accompanies
its usage in the West.
Townsend noted that the Japanese, who have absorbed some Caucasoid
genes from the Ainu, have a very different cultural personality
that is much closer to Western concepts of personal honor. Townsend
observed an interesting paradox that begins with the fact that
initially Americans tend to like the Chinese more than the Japanese.
The Chinese seem much more affable and gregarious, whereas the
Japanese appear more reserved. However, Townsend claimed that
after Americans have had enough dealings with both the Chinese
and Japanese to begin to understand each group, most Americans
start to prefer the Japanese. They discover that they have more
in common with the Japanese on the honor issue, and that is more
important to them in the long run.
In regard to the comparing the Chinese with Jews, if one compares
Ways
That Are Dark with Jewish
Supremacism by Dr. David Duke, one can see that
the Chinese are qualitatively very different from Jewish supremacists
in many important ways. Among other things, the Chinese have had
their own land base and self-contained civilization for thousands
of years. Their religious institutions make it possible for them
to find contentment within their own borders without defining
themselves relative to other peoples or making it a divine mission
to perpetually infiltrate and exert control over other societies
under false pretenses.
The origins of advanced civilizations
According to Dr. Elmer Pendell in Why
Civilizations Self-Destruct, advanced civilizations
began when peoples of the north headed southwards to warmer lands
where survival was much easier. Dr. Pendell defined civilization
as the sum total of problem-solving improvements made by people
over time. Hence, the peoples of the north had excess genetic
capacity in terms of intelligence and robustness that could now
be invested towards the continuous problem solving processes required
to create advanced civilizations.
However, once in the warmer lands, the peoples of the north were
no longer subjected to savage sculpturing factors. Their offspring
tended to decline over time in average fitness much like the dodo
bird. In addition, the civilizations they created developed niches
that allowed people of low ability to reproduce at a faster rate
than people of higher ability.
Paradoxically, as the material improvements and monuments of civilizations
accumulated over time, giving the external appearance of an increasingly
advanced civilization, the underlying genetic quality was steadily
deteriorating. Eventually, the ratio of nonproducers to producers
increased to the point that bygone civilizations began to stagnate.
At this tipping point, they began to lose traction in their ability
to anticipate
and solve problems. Eventually they became so overwhelmed by their
accumulating problems that they went into decline.
At this point let me interject that while I agree with Pendell
that dysgenic decay is an important long term underlying factor,
I see evidence that many civilizations seem to fall apart well
before their underlying gene pools are totally depleted due to
the accumulation of genetic load.
I think that there are two extremely important addition reasons
to help explain the accelerated decline of various civilizations.
One reason is that over time civilizations tend to become more
centralized and tyrannical, which degrades their ability to engage
in rational innovation and problem-solving on a grass roots level.
In cover this process in some depth in my centralization
vs. decentralization discussion. Please note my libertarian
analysis regarding how centralized government tends to turn into
ponzi government, which in turn tends to turn into evil government.
In addition, as societies become more centralized and individuals
become less self-sufficient, people with increasingly criminal
traits, parasitic modus operandi, and other mental
health problems tend to rise to the top and set the tone of
society. This also severely degrades the ability of a society
to engage in rational grass roots problem solving and innovation.
I discuss the "criminal personality" and parasitism
in depth in my mutualism
vs. parasitism discussion.
There is definitely an unvirtuous circle involved here in which
all of these factors viciously feed on each other. Dysgenic decay
encourages increasing centralization, because a declining level
of overall competence in the overall population makes its more
likely that "the masses" will become increasingly less
self-sufficient as individual adults and instead assume an increasingly
child-like level of dependency on their rulers. They will simultaneously
become less capable of heading off various forms of tyranny. Similarly,
as a population becomes weaker in terms of its innate character
and intelligence, it becomes less capable of resisting criminal
exploitation.
Obama symbolizes America's descent to the
Third World
Really,
if there's any group of people in America who deserve to suffer,
it's the White middle-class. It's the people who have been warned
for decades about where this country is headed, but who were too
shortsighted, too timid, and above all too greedy, too selfish,
to do anything about it. During the 1960s, when Blacks were rioting
and burning our cities, middle-class Whites refused to take a
strong stand against them because that would disrupt the country
even more and would be bad for business; instead they tried to
appease the Blacks with all sorts of new civil rights laws and
other government programs. They tried to buy them off. The Whites
just wanted to continue indulging themselves; they didn't want
to do anything that might require a bit of austerity in return
for the long-term improvement of the country. In
the 1970s, when the real push was on to racially integrate the
country through forced busing and forced housing and forced employment
laws, and many White working-class people were demonstrating in
the streets against this forced racial integration, the comfortable
middle class, which was not being as adversely affected as the
blue-collar class, refused to become involved. The White lawyers
and doctors and accountants and professors and engineers and small
businessmen just looked the other way and kept on stuffing their
faces. Their kids weren't being bused to Black schools; their
employment wasn't being threatened by affirmative action. They
certainly weren't going to jeopardize their own comfort and security
and respectability, just because of what was happening to working-class
White kids and working-class White parents. Of
course, many middle-class Whites were concerned about the degenerative
trends which were all too obvious in America during the 1960s
and 1970s. They just weren't concerned enough to do anything.
Their solution was just to vote Republican and keep making as
much money as possible, so that they could insulate themselves
and their own immediate families from what was happening around
them, and to hell with everyone else. And so we had the Reagan
era, and the White middle class thought that their strategy of
compromise and appeasement and selfishness had worked. Well,
of course, it hadn't worked. Such strategies never work in the
long run. People who will not fight eventually will be eaten by
people who will fight. A community whose members are so self-centered
that they will work only for their own personal benefit and not
for the common good eventually will be destroyed by its enemies.
And
our enemies have been at work, day and night. They opened our
borders to the subhumanity of the Third World and began building
up their numbers. They encouraged feminism and began reducing
our numbers by persuading our women that careers were more important
than families. They infiltrated and took over our educational
establishment and taught our children that they should be ashamed
of their own race, that their own history and traditions weren't
worth learning about. And
the children of the White middle class learned instead that doing
drugs and putting safety pins through their noses and wearing
baseball caps backward and listening to Black rappers is cool.
And the daughters of the White middle class began bedding down
with Blacks and becoming pregnant with mongrel babies, and their
parents didn't like it, but they tolerated it, as long as they
could hang onto their money and their comfort and their lifestyle.
And eventually the enemies of our people were strong enough to
launch the Clinton era. But the members of the White middle class
were still comfortable, and so they tolerated the Clinton era
too, with all of its treason and degeneracy. They tolerated the
total Judaization of their government. They tolerated the Clinton
government's bombing of Belgrade to force Serbia into line with
the New World Order. They didn't like it, but they tolerated it.
And
so now the fruits of all that toleration are almost ready to be
harvested -- and it's about time. It's about time for the White
middle class to have to deal with the problem of 30 million Blacks
who believe they are entitled to reparations and who very shortly
will be clamoring for $100,000 from every White family. They believe
they're entitled to at least five trillion dollars in reparations
from us, because we tolerated the Jewish media pumping expectations
of that sort into them during the past 50 years. We tolerated
all of the Hollywood films and the television propaganda telling
them about how they were persecuted and mistreated by us for 400
years and that they really are equal to us, and the only thing
which has kept them from achieving what we have achieved is White
racism. We knew it wasn't true -- we knew it was Jewish lies --
but we tolerated that propaganda rather than risk being called
"racists" for contradicting it or "anti-Semites"
for pointing out who the liars were. And
we also proved to 30 million Blacks that we're a bunch of wimps
who won't fight for our people or for our own rights. They believe
that the White man owes them five trillion dollars and that he
doesn't have the guts or the gumption to stop them from taking
it...
1992-11-7 America
Since World War II: An Interview with Dr. William L. Pierce
1988-April-May National Vanguard Magazine review
of the Tom Wolfe novel Bonfire of the
Vanities by Dr. William L. Pierce. An extract of this
review is also provided in my "Environmental
vs. Genetic Duality" discussion. Preceding the Dr. Pierce
quote, I describe how white people often like to play "Man
Who Would Be King" by living as supposedly enlightened and
benevolent leaders surrounded by nonwhites rather than living among
equals in racially homogeneous white societies like their European
ancestors. This can lead to some very unpleasant surprises down
the road. In fact, Barack Obama may be viewed as the ultimate expression
of the encroaching "jungle" that Dr. Pierce warns about
in his review.
An important variation of the "Man Who Would Be King"
syndrome was illustrated in the superb novel Bonfire
of the Vanities by American author Tom Wolfe. It is
about a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) bond trader named
Sherman McCoy who lives in New York City. He and his Wall Street
colleagues make huge incomes, live in very upscale housing,
enjoy the most expensive luxuries, and call themselves "Masters
of the Universe."
Unlike the "Man Who Would Be King" characters [in
the Rudyard
Kipling novel or the 1975
action-adventure movie], McCoy does not actively go in search
of an alien people to work with. Instead, McCoy's hubris comes
from failing to recognize how an effective support base of fellow
whites has rotted out from under him. Meanwhile alien peoples
and the alien values that they represent have quietly enveloped
McCoy's world like an anaconda, leaving McCoy in an extremely
"leveraged" social situation without knowing it.
Roger Ebert created an excellent review
of the Hollywood version of this story, but perhaps the hardest
hitting commentary about the underlying novel was written by
the late Dr. William Pierce for the April-May 1988 issue of
National Vanguard magazine:
...McCoy lives in an artificial world, a world separated
by a wall of money from the encroaching jungle all around.
His parents are living reminders of an earlier day, when the
jungle existed only in patches here and there, and White people
did not have to have scads of money to keep the animals at
bay. But the jungle has grown mightily since then, and its
denizens have multiplied and become much bolder...
One night, however, McCoy gets a close up glimpse of the jungle.
While driving his mistress back from the airport he makes
a wrong turn and becomes lost in the Bronx. He evades a Black
mugging attempt, and the experience, though it shakes him
badly at the time, only strengthens his belief in his superiority:
he fought the jungle with his bare hands and he won! He is
truly a Master of the Universe in every way!
But the jungle is much more dangerous than McCoy realizes:
its really threatening denizens are not the Blacks and Puerto
Ricans who form the bulk of its population, but the Jews who
control them and are able to move back and forth from their
world to McCoy's at will...Even at the book's end, when the
Jews and their minions have ganged up on him and pulled him
into the jungle for good, there is no indication that McCoy
is any wiser about their ways...
The preceding sentence notwithstanding, Wolfe's tale is not
one of classic Jewish conspiracy. His Jews act in concert,
for the most part —
although there is one Jewish judge who refuses to go along
—
because it serves their immediate personal interests to do
so. They do enjoy pulling a WASP down, but there are no formal
meetings of the Learned Elders in the synagogue to plot strategy.
Nor is it primarily a cautionary tale about the dangers of
the jungle. It is really a morality play about the White man
and what he has done to himself: about his dangerous delusions,
his dangerous lack of contact with the real world, his dangerous
loss of virtue and manhood. Sherman McCoy stands for the leadership
stratum of his race in the closing years of the 20th century.
He is all the eager White business executives and entrepreneurs,
the ambitious White educators and publicists, who have cast
all other considerations aside in their single-minded scramble
for status and wealth; who, having suppressed every vestige
of racial consciousness, have allied themselves with Jews
as readily as with men of their own blood whenever there was
an advantage to it; who have ignored the encroachments of
the jungle so long as they perceived no personal threat from
it, and even abetted them when there was a personal gain involved;
who have become so well adapted to plutocracy that they have
forgotten the virtues becoming an aristocrat —
virtues such as self-discipline, toughness, bravery, a sense
of personal honor; and who nevertheless maintain the dangerous
vanity that they are aristocrats —
Masters of the Universe —
and still are in control of their world.
Obama repeats the tragedies
of Rhodesia and South Africa
Nelson Mandela (center)
giving communist salute alongside Joe
Slovo (rt.), Jewish leader of the South African Communist Party
Ever since World War II,
the American Liberal-Zionist Establishment has promoted the usurpation
of white self-rule by blacks everywhere in Africa, and has generally
created mostly disaster as a consequence. The Spotlight (predecessor
of the American Free Press) ran articles in the early 1990's
claiming that the CIA and Mossad funded Marxist African groups against
white rule, and even ran disruption campaigns against white nationalists
utilizing personnel and equipment stationed in the U.S. embassy
in South Africa. Now these evil chickens are coming home to roost
inside America
2009-03-26 Exposing
the Hidden Hand of Jewish Extremism and Its Effect on South Africa.
A review of four books, three by Jewish authors, which describe
the Jewish-black alliance that wrecked a once great white country.
2008-08-20
A White South Africa - What Went Wrong? by Arthur
Kemp
2008-06-24
Mandela: The Legend and the Legacy: Part I,
see also Part
II by Sarah Maid of Albion. How the once most prosperous
country in Africa was turned into another Third World hell hole
with over a million whites having already fled the country, two
million reduced to grinding poverty, rampant theft and murder everywhere,
and worse things yet to come. Generally the historical pattern has
been once nonwhites become the voting majority, nonwhite leaders
become the permanent norm. They tend to naturally revert to Marxist-socialist
policies (remember that anthropological "bigmanship" phenomenon
described earlier on this web page?) that ultimately suck whites
completely dry in favor of nonwhites.
2007-11-23 Ian
Smith the last White leader of Rhodesia disappears into a crack
in the sky at 88. "After years of political contortions
and external pressure from the British and US governments, free
elections were held in early 1980 in which Mugabe’s Zanu-PF
swept to victory, winning most of the seats in the new parliament.
Nkomo’s Zapu held on to its Ndebele strongholds and formed
the opposition. Smith’s Rhodesia Front claimed all 20 reserved
seats in a reflex vote by the white electorate. At first it seemed
that Smith’s dire predictions about the future might prove
to be ill-founded. Despite Mugabe’s inflammatory rhetoric,
whites kept their land and foreign investment was encouraged. Smith
continued to excoriate Mugabe as a Marxist dictator, but was seen
as an increasingly irrelevant figure. In 1987, he was expelled from
parliament for 12 months after criticising sanctions imposed on
neighbouring South Africa. By the time his suspension was lifted,
the whites had lost their seats in parliament. During the 1990s,
as Mugabe’s regime became increasingly corrupt and violent,
Smith took a grim delight in seeing his predictions come true. `It
helps lift my depression that the majority of black people are saying
it is time to get rid of this bunch of corrupt gangsters,' he said.
In his memoirs, The Great Betrayal (1997), he put the blame
for Rhodesia’s collapse on almost everybody except himself.
`During UDI we had the greatest national spirit in the world, a
fantastic country, great race relations, the happiest black faces
in the world … if our friends hadn’t betrayed us, we’d
have won,' he wrote."
2006-12-01 The
Negro-Jewish Alliance that Destroyed Rhodesia. Instead
of Obama-Rahmbo, it was Mugabe-Hoogstraten, and the results were
bone-chilling. A poster-board summary from judicial-inc.biz.
2003-06-14 First
Things First by Kevin Strom. The subversion of the
Dutch Reform Church was an important factor in the destruction of
white-ruled South Africa.
Other web sites
Chicagoans
Against Obama This web site has some good home town
insights into the real Obama during his campaign months leading
up to the presidential election. The web master signed off stating:
"This site spent much time focused on the failures of Chicago’s
political machine and Barack Obama’s inaction as a state senator,
and US Senator…..the reality is, the results of these failures
(highest murder rate in the country, highest sales taxes in the
country, public schools under-funded and mismanaged, public hospitals
being mismanaged, infrastructure falling apart, high unemployment)
are still seen, and felt, today….and will continue to be
problems that we will face every day moving forward…. Also,
I spent a great deal of time examining Barack Obama’s many
questionable relationships and ties…I do not regret doing
so…..In all honesty, I hope that these ties prove to be innocuous…and
not a predicator of future decision making….."
Obamacrimes.com Home of attorney Phil Berg who filed
a law suit to determine Obama's real country of birth Theobamadisaster.com Theobamafile.com
"A privileged African-American, who has not shared the black
American experience By birth, blood and training, a Muslim, who
was a member of a Marxist, Black-African church for 20 years. A
socialist whose politics are rooted in Marx and whose tactics were
conceived by the communist, Alinsky A master at shaping his own
mythology and completely unqualified to be Commander in Chief And,
he is not now, nor ever has been, a `natural
born citizen' -- his father was a foreigner."
Trying very hard to find a way to close on an upbeat note
At
the preface of this web page, I commented: "While he may come
across as an OK person, he is still way in over his head as President-elect
of the United States. However, if he can just figure out a way to
turn the tables on the evil Zionist criminals who created the 9/11
inside job, the unnecessary invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, and
(going back much further in time) the totally dysfunctional Federal
Reserve Banking System, and top of all this restores a stable and
sustainable relationship between whites and nonwhites in America,
I may actually change my whole attitude towards Barack Obama and
publicly celebrate him as a hero --but until such a time I am very
much on guard with this man, to say the least." I
would add that sometimes the best free thinkers (or agnostics or
atheists) are individuals who once deeply immersed themselves into
fundamentalist Christianity enough to see how all the moving parts
are supposed to come together. (I am an example of this from my
own personal experience). Often the radical left and radical right
are more like the ends of a horse shoe than two polar opposites,
to the extent that radical people often have in common a desire
to understand how things really work underneath the surface rather
than just accept pat answers and status quo. (I am also a personal
example of this, having dabbled with aspects of the radical left
before moving more towards the libetarian right). Sometimes the
radical left sees things in a similar way to the radical right,
particularly when class struggle and racial struggle overlap each
other. It
is possible that Obama has gone so far to the left, and has been
so heavily exposed to the full stench of corrupt politics and criminal
Zionism, that he is disgusted with it all deep down inside while
thoroughly understanding what it is all about from personal experience.
He could be well-positioned to help move this country back to the
right and do some serious cleaning up of systemic corruption. Just
as it took anti-commie "gut fighter" Richard Nixon to
defuse right wing concerns when he reopened talks and trade with
Red China, maybe it takes a liberal black to turn the tables on
criminal Zionists and neo-Marxist race-mixers and open borders liberals.
I
am caught in a dilemma. On the one hand, I would be foolish to blindly
trust Obama to turn out to be a "good guy" without solid
evidence. Dr. William Pierce was correct when he described in his
article "Lordy, Lordy!" how too much
Pollyannaish thinking has been a major factor that has gotten us
into this horrible mess to begin with. On
the other hand, I might also be foolish if I declare myself Obama's
sworn enemy and do not leave him maneuvering room to prove himself.
Sometimes positive miracles happen. But
then again, what makes me very apprehensive is that it is also possible
that we could experience a gigantic "negative miracle."
Obama and his Jewish Supremacist buddies might utilize their considerable
political cleverness in order to engineer a martial law clamp down
on America that eventually devolves into a latter-day, neo-Jacobin
terror. Who knows what America is in for once we get hit with full
blown financial system collapse and hyperinflation that renders
the dollars worthless. We might see rivers of blood flow beneath
dictatorial savage ferocity that rivals Robespierre, Trotsky, and
Pol Pot. So
far the indicators lean heavily in the negative direction. For starters,
many conservatives agree with me that designated White House Chief
of Staff Rahm Emanuel (described earlier on this web page) is a
pretty scary guy, in many ways more so that Michael
Chertoff, if such is possible. So far the Democratic Party continues
to deliver more than its fair share of neo-Commies. Remember,
if they had even a shred of honesty and patriotism, they would be
at least hinting at opening up an honest investigation regarding
the 9/11 inside job, not to mention the outrageous war profiteering
on no-bid contracts conducted by Bush cabal cronies in its Middle
Eastern military adventures. Instead, in style and deed, they feel
more like Zio-Marxist revolutionaries --like real Reds--
out to grab all the chips. In
John Toland's book Adolf Hitler, he describes a news correspondent's
wire dispatch sent within the first few years after the World War
I Armistice: "Germany is having a nervous breakdown. There
is nothing sane to report!" It was during this period that
Germany experienced a revolutionary takeover attempt by communists
that came very close to being successful as well as massive hyperinflation.
I
wonder if we are going there over the next four years. It
is very sad that we have to go through such guess work and intrigue
with our political leaders. How much more straightforward and safer
it would be to simply elect as President an honest, stable white
leader who openly espouses and defends white values and heritage,
while at the same time taking seriously his oath to protect
and defend the Constitution (a novel new idea!) and showing humanity
towards other races. As
a final note --don't "coocoon" and let fear paralyze you.
Get in the habit of being active beginning right now. Start
preparing to survive the hard times ahead. Create a support base
for activism. Passivity only encourages highly opportunistic or
possibly even sociopathic people like Obama and Emanuel to become
that much more tyrannical. If we can develop enough protest counter
force and political organization, we may actually succeed in bottling
up the evil that they may have in store for us. Start opposing them
now. (To use a military analogy, hit the enemy amphibious
invaders out in the surf before they can take the beach, and as
a fall-back, keep hitting them on the beach before they can establish
a beach-head futher inland. Fight them all the way, and never let
up, and never give up an inch for free). Start fighting Obama right
now by telling electors across America to not elect him by
virtue of his lack of documentation proving that he is a naturalized
citizen qualified to be President. Also, start mobilizing and expressing
protest against all proposed "hate crime" laws.
Our First Amendment rights are the most precious of all, and we
can never afford to give an inch here either. Even if your protests
may fail over any particular short-term issues, you may still succeed
at waking up and educating a lot of people, and that in itself can
have tremendous value in achieving victory regarding the biggest
long term issues.
The
header for this web page "From Bad to Worse to Disaster?"
was inspired by a comment made by 
Now
we face a scenario where we might actually regret no longer
having George Bush, if such is actually possible. Please check
out my other web page on Obama, Chapter 35 "
Hopefully
if we can maintain a free Internet most of these kinds of abuses
and usurpations will continue to be exposed and fade in the light
of truth. This is why it is so vitally important to stay
on your elected government officials and demand that they not
vote for so-called "hate crime" bills that serve as Trojan
horses to steal our free speech rights. Please see the 
at
the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781